modcat_1.miz
begin
reserve x,y for
set;
reserve D for non
empty
set;
reserve UN for
Universe;
reserve R for
Ring;
reserve G,H for
LeftMod of R;
definition
let R;
::
MODCAT_1:def1
mode
LeftMod_DOMAIN of R -> non
empty
set means
:
Def1: for x be
Element of it holds x is
strict
LeftMod of R;
existence
proof
set D =
{(
TrivialLMod R)};
take D;
thus thesis by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
end
reserve V for
LeftMod_DOMAIN of R;
definition
let R, V;
:: original:
Element
redefine
mode
Element of V ->
LeftMod of R ;
coherence by
Def1;
end
registration
let R, V;
cluster
strict for
Element of V;
existence
proof
set e = the
Element of V;
take e;
thus thesis by
Def1;
end;
end
definition
let R;
::
MODCAT_1:def2
mode
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of R -> non
empty
set means
:
Def2: for x be
Element of it holds x is
strict
LModMorphism of R;
existence
proof
set G = the
LeftMod of R;
take
{(
ID G)};
let x be
Element of
{(
ID G)};
thus thesis by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
end
definition
let R;
let M be
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of R;
:: original:
Element
redefine
mode
Element of M ->
LModMorphism of R ;
coherence by
Def2;
end
registration
let R;
let M be
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of R;
cluster
strict for
Element of M;
existence
proof
set e = the
Element of M;
take e;
thus thesis by
Def2;
end;
end
theorem ::
MODCAT_1:1
Th1: for f be
strict
LModMorphism of R holds
{f} is
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of R
proof
let f be
strict
LModMorphism of R;
for x be
Element of
{f} holds x is
strict
LModMorphism of R by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis by
Def2;
end;
definition
let R, G, H;
::
MODCAT_1:def3
mode
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of G,H ->
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of R means
:
Def3: for x be
Element of it holds x is
strict
Morphism of G, H;
existence
proof
reconsider D =
{(
ZERO (G,H))} as
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of R by
Th1;
take D;
thus thesis by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
end
theorem ::
MODCAT_1:2
Th2: D is
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of G, H iff for x be
Element of D holds x is
strict
Morphism of G, H
proof
thus D is
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of G, H implies for x be
Element of D holds x is
strict
Morphism of G, H by
Def3;
thus (for x be
Element of D holds x is
strict
Morphism of G, H) implies D is
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of G, H
proof
assume
A1: for x be
Element of D holds x is
strict
Morphism of G, H;
then for x be
Element of D holds x is
strict
LModMorphism of R;
then
reconsider D9 = D as
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of R by
Def2;
for x be
Element of D9 holds x is
strict
Morphism of G, H by
A1;
hence thesis by
Def3;
end;
end;
theorem ::
MODCAT_1:3
for f be
strict
Morphism of G, H holds
{f} is
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of G, H
proof
let f be
strict
Morphism of G, H;
for x be
Element of
{f} holds x is
strict
Morphism of G, H by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis by
Th2;
end;
definition
let R, G, H;
::
MODCAT_1:def4
func
Morphs (G,H) ->
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of G, H means
:
Def4: for x be
object holds x
in it iff x is
strict
Morphism of G, H;
existence
proof
(
ZeroMap (G,H)) is
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of G,the
carrier of H)) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
then
reconsider f0 = (
ZeroMap (G,H)) as
Element of (
Maps (G,H)) by
GRCAT_1:def 21;
set D = {
LModMorphismStr (# G, H, f #) where f be
Element of (
Maps (G,H)) : f is
additive
homogeneous };
LModMorphismStr (# G, H, f0 #)
in D;
then
reconsider D as non
empty
set;
A1: for x be
object holds x is
strict
Morphism of G, H implies x
in D
proof
let x be
object;
assume x is
strict
Morphism of G, H;
then
reconsider x as
strict
Morphism of G, H;
(
dom x)
= G by
MOD_2:def 8;
then
A2: the
Dom of x
= G;
A3: (
cod x)
= H by
MOD_2:def 8;
then the
Cod of x
= H;
then
reconsider f = the
Fun of x as
Function of G, H by
A2;
f is
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of G,the
carrier of H)) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
then
reconsider g = f as
Element of (
Maps (G,H)) by
GRCAT_1:def 21;
the
Fun of x is
additive
homogeneous & x
=
LModMorphismStr (# G, H, g #) by
A3,
A2,
MOD_2: 4;
hence thesis;
end;
A4: for x be
object holds x
in D implies x is
strict
Morphism of G, H
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in D;
then ex f be
Element of (
Maps (G,H)) st x
=
LModMorphismStr (# G, H, f #) & f is
additive
homogeneous;
hence thesis by
MOD_2: 6;
end;
then for x be
Element of D holds x is
strict
Morphism of G, H;
then
reconsider D as
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of G, H by
Th2;
take D;
thus thesis by
A4,
A1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let D1,D2 be
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of G, H such that
A5: for x be
object holds x
in D1 iff x is
strict
Morphism of G, H and
A6: for x be
object holds x
in D2 iff x is
strict
Morphism of G, H;
for x be
object holds x
in D1 iff x
in D2
proof
let x be
object;
hereby
assume x
in D1;
then x is
strict
Morphism of G, H by
A5;
hence x
in D2 by
A6;
end;
assume x
in D2;
then x is
strict
Morphism of G, H by
A6;
hence thesis by
A5;
end;
hence thesis by
TARSKI: 2;
end;
end
definition
let R, G, H;
let M be
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of G, H;
:: original:
Element
redefine
mode
Element of M ->
Morphism of G, H ;
coherence by
Def3;
end
definition
let x,y be
object;
let R;
::
MODCAT_1:def5
pred
GO x,y,R means ex x1,x2 be
object st x
=
[x1, x2] & ex G be
strict
LeftMod of R st y
= G & x1
= the addLoopStr of G & x2
= the
lmult of G;
end
theorem ::
MODCAT_1:4
Th4: for x,y1,y2 be
object st
GO (x,y1,R) &
GO (x,y2,R) holds y1
= y2
proof
let x,y1,y2 be
object such that
A1:
GO (x,y1,R) and
A2:
GO (x,y2,R);
consider a1,a2 be
object such that
A3: x
=
[a1, a2] and
A4: ex G be
strict
LeftMod of R st y1
= G & a1
= the addLoopStr of G & a2
= the
lmult of G by
A1;
consider G1 be
strict
LeftMod of R such that
A5: y1
= G1 and
A6: a1
= the addLoopStr of G1 and
A7: a2
= the
lmult of G1 by
A4;
consider b1,b2 be
object such that
A8: x
=
[b1, b2] and
A9: ex G be
strict
LeftMod of R st y2
= G & b1
= the addLoopStr of G & b2
= the
lmult of G by
A2;
consider G2 be
strict
LeftMod of R such that
A10: y2
= G2 and
A11: b1
= the addLoopStr of G2 and
A12: b2
= the
lmult of G2 by
A9;
the addLoopStr of G1
= the addLoopStr of G2 by
A3,
A8,
A6,
A11,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence thesis by
A3,
A8,
A5,
A7,
A10,
A12,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
theorem ::
MODCAT_1:5
for UN holds ex x be
object st x
in the set of all
[G, f] where G be
Element of (
GroupObjects UN), f be
Element of (
Funcs (
[:the
carrier of R,
{
{} }:],
{
{} })) &
GO (x,(
TrivialLMod R),R)
proof
let UN;
set T = (
TrivialLMod R);
reconsider x1 = the addLoopStr of T as
Element of (
GroupObjects UN) by
GRCAT_1: 29;
reconsider f1 = the
lmult of T as
Function of
[:the
carrier of R,
{
{} }:],
{
{} };
reconsider x2 = f1 as
Element of (
Funcs (
[:the
carrier of R,
{
{} }:],
{
{} })) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
take x =
[x1, x2];
thus x
in the set of all
[G, f] where G be
Element of (
GroupObjects UN), f be
Element of (
Funcs (
[:the
carrier of R,
{
{} }:],
{
{} }));
thus thesis;
end;
definition
let UN, R;
::
MODCAT_1:def6
func
LModObjects (UN,R) ->
set means
:
Def6: for y be
object holds y
in it iff ex x st x
in the set of all
[G, f] where G be
Element of (
GroupObjects UN), f be
Element of (
Funcs (
[:the
carrier of R, the
carrier of G:],the
carrier of G)) &
GO (x,y,R);
existence
proof
defpred
P[
object,
object] means
GO ($1,$2,R);
set N = the set of all
[G, f] where G be
Element of (
GroupObjects UN), f be
Element of (
Funcs (
[:the
carrier of R, the
carrier of G:],the
carrier of G));
A1: for x,y1,y2 be
object st
P[x, y1] &
P[x, y2] holds y1
= y2 by
Th4;
consider Y be
set such that
A2: for y be
object holds y
in Y iff ex x be
object st x
in N &
P[x, y] from
TARSKI:sch 1(
A1);
take Y;
let y be
object;
thus y
in Y implies ex x st x
in the set of all
[G, f] where G be
Element of (
GroupObjects UN), f be
Element of (
Funcs (
[:the
carrier of R, the
carrier of G:],the
carrier of G)) &
GO (x,y,R)
proof
assume y
in Y;
then ex x be
object st x
in N &
P[x, y] by
A2;
hence thesis;
end;
thus thesis by
A2;
end;
uniqueness
proof
set N = the set of all
[G, f] where G be
Element of (
GroupObjects UN), f be
Element of (
Funcs (
[:the
carrier of R, the
carrier of G:],the
carrier of G));
let Y1,Y2 be
set such that
A3: for y be
object holds y
in Y1 iff ex x st x
in N &
GO (x,y,R) and
A4: for y be
object holds y
in Y2 iff ex x st x
in N &
GO (x,y,R);
now
let y be
object;
y
in Y1 iff ex x st x
in N &
GO (x,y,R) by
A3;
hence y
in Y1 iff y
in Y2 by
A4;
end;
hence thesis by
TARSKI: 2;
end;
end
theorem ::
MODCAT_1:6
Th6: (
TrivialLMod R)
in (
LModObjects (UN,R))
proof
set G0 =
Trivial-addLoopStr , f0 = (
pr2 (the
carrier of R,
{
0 }));
reconsider G0 as
Element of (
GroupObjects UN) by
GRCAT_1: 29;
reconsider f0 as
Element of (
Funcs (
[:the
carrier of R, the
carrier of G0:],the
carrier of G0)) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
set x =
[G0, f0];
A1: x
in the set of all
[G, f] where G be
Element of (
GroupObjects UN), f be
Element of (
Funcs (
[:the
carrier of R, the
carrier of G:],the
carrier of G));
GO (x,(
TrivialLMod R),R);
hence thesis by
A1,
Def6;
end;
registration
let UN, R;
cluster (
LModObjects (UN,R)) -> non
empty;
coherence by
Th6;
end
theorem ::
MODCAT_1:7
Th7: for x be
Element of (
LModObjects (UN,R)) holds x is
strict
LeftMod of R
proof
let x be
Element of (
LModObjects (UN,R));
set N = the set of all
[G, f] where G be
Element of (
GroupObjects UN), f be
Element of (
Funcs (
[:the
carrier of R, the
carrier of G:],the
carrier of G));
consider u be
set such that u
in N and
A1:
GO (u,x,R) by
Def6;
ex a1,a2 be
object st u
=
[a1, a2] & ex G be
strict
LeftMod of R st x
= G & a1
= the addLoopStr of G & a2
= the
lmult of G by
A1;
hence thesis;
end;
definition
let UN, R;
:: original:
LModObjects
redefine
func
LModObjects (UN,R) ->
LeftMod_DOMAIN of R ;
coherence
proof
for x be
Element of (
LModObjects (UN,R)) holds x is
strict
LeftMod of R by
Th7;
hence thesis by
Def1;
end;
end
definition
let R, V;
::
MODCAT_1:def7
func
Morphs (V) ->
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of R means
:
Def7: for x be
object holds x
in it iff ex G,H be
strict
Element of V st x is
strict
Morphism of G, H;
existence
proof
set G0 = the
strict
Element of V;
set M = (
Morphs (G0,G0)), S = the set of all (
Morphs (G,H)) where G be
strict
Element of V, H be
strict
Element of V;
(
ZERO (G0,G0)) is
Element of M & M
in S by
Def4;
then
reconsider T = (
union S) as non
empty
set by
TARSKI:def 4;
A1: for x be
object holds x
in T iff ex G,H be
strict
Element of V st x is
strict
Morphism of G, H
proof
let x be
object;
thus x
in T implies ex G,H be
strict
Element of V st x is
strict
Morphism of G, H
proof
assume x
in T;
then
consider Y be
set such that
A2: x
in Y and
A3: Y
in S by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider G,H be
strict
Element of V such that
A4: Y
= (
Morphs (G,H)) by
A3;
take G, H;
thus thesis by
A2,
A4,
Def4;
end;
thus (ex G,H be
strict
Element of V st x is
strict
Morphism of G, H) implies x
in T
proof
given G,H be
strict
Element of V such that
A5: x is
strict
Morphism of G, H;
set M = (
Morphs (G,H));
A6: M
in S;
x
in M by
A5,
Def4;
hence thesis by
A6,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
end;
now
let x be
Element of T;
ex G,H be
strict
Element of V st x is
strict
Morphism of G, H by
A1;
hence x is
strict
LModMorphism of R;
end;
then
reconsider T9 = T as
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of R by
Def2;
take T9;
thus thesis by
A1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let D1,D2 be
LModMorphism_DOMAIN of R such that
A7: for x be
object holds x
in D1 iff ex G,H be
strict
Element of V st x is
strict
Morphism of G, H and
A8: for x be
object holds x
in D2 iff ex G,H be
strict
Element of V st x is
strict
Morphism of G, H;
now
let x be
object;
x
in D1 iff ex G,H be
strict
Element of V st x is
strict
Morphism of G, H by
A7;
hence x
in D1 iff x
in D2 by
A8;
end;
hence thesis by
TARSKI: 2;
end;
end
definition
let R, V;
let F be
Element of (
Morphs V);
::
MODCAT_1:def8
func
dom' (F) ->
Element of V equals (
dom F);
coherence
proof
consider G,H be
strict
Element of V such that
A1: F is
strict
Morphism of G, H by
Def7;
reconsider F9 = F as
Morphism of G, H by
A1;
(
dom F9)
= G by
MOD_2:def 8;
hence thesis;
end;
::
MODCAT_1:def9
func
cod' (F) ->
Element of V equals (
cod F);
coherence
proof
consider G,H be
strict
Element of V such that
A2: F is
strict
Morphism of G, H by
Def7;
reconsider F9 = F as
Morphism of G, H by
A2;
(
cod F9)
= H by
MOD_2:def 8;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let R, V;
let G be
Element of V;
::
MODCAT_1:def10
func
ID (G) ->
strict
Element of (
Morphs V) equals (
ID G);
coherence
proof
reconsider G as
strict
Element of V by
Def1;
(
ID G) is
strict
Element of (
Morphs V) by
Def7;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let R, V;
::
MODCAT_1:def11
func
dom (V) ->
Function of (
Morphs V), V means
:
Def11: for f be
Element of (
Morphs V) holds (it
. f)
= (
dom' f);
existence
proof
deffunc
G(
Element of (
Morphs V)) = (
dom' $1);
consider F be
Function of (
Morphs V), V such that
A1: for f be
Element of (
Morphs V) holds (F
. f)
=
G(f) from
FUNCT_2:sch 4;
take F;
thus thesis by
A1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let F1,F2 be
Function of (
Morphs V), V such that
A2: for f be
Element of (
Morphs V) holds (F1
. f)
= (
dom' f) and
A3: for f be
Element of (
Morphs V) holds (F2
. f)
= (
dom' f);
now
let f be
Element of (
Morphs V);
(F1
. f)
= (
dom' f) by
A2;
hence (F1
. f)
= (F2
. f) by
A3;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
::
MODCAT_1:def12
func
cod (V) ->
Function of (
Morphs V), V means
:
Def12: for f be
Element of (
Morphs V) holds (it
. f)
= (
cod' f);
existence
proof
deffunc
G(
Element of (
Morphs V)) = (
cod' $1);
consider F be
Function of (
Morphs V), V such that
A4: for f be
Element of (
Morphs V) holds (F
. f)
=
G(f) from
FUNCT_2:sch 4;
take F;
thus thesis by
A4;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let F1,F2 be
Function of (
Morphs V), V such that
A5: for f be
Element of (
Morphs V) holds (F1
. f)
= (
cod' f) and
A6: for f be
Element of (
Morphs V) holds (F2
. f)
= (
cod' f);
now
let f be
Element of (
Morphs V);
(F1
. f)
= (
cod' f) by
A5;
hence (F1
. f)
= (F2
. f) by
A6;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
::$Canceled
end
theorem ::
MODCAT_1:8
Th8: for g,f be
Element of (
Morphs V) st (
dom' g)
= (
cod' f) holds ex G1,G2,G3 be
strict
Element of V st g is
Morphism of G2, G3 & f is
Morphism of G1, G2
proof
set X = (
Morphs V);
defpred
P[
Element of X,
Element of X] means (
dom' $1)
= (
cod' $2);
let g,f be
Element of X such that
A1:
P[g, f];
consider G2,G3 be
strict
Element of V such that
A2: g is
strict
Morphism of G2, G3 by
Def7;
consider G1,G29 be
strict
Element of V such that
A3: f is
strict
Morphism of G1, G29 by
Def7;
A4: G29
= (
cod' f) by
A3,
MOD_2:def 8;
G2
= (
dom' g) by
A2,
MOD_2:def 8;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A3,
A4;
end;
theorem ::
MODCAT_1:9
Th9: for g,f be
Element of (
Morphs V) st (
dom' g)
= (
cod' f) holds (g
* f)
in (
Morphs V)
proof
set X = (
Morphs V);
defpred
P[
Element of X,
Element of X] means (
dom' $1)
= (
cod' $2);
let g,f be
Element of X;
assume
P[g, f];
then
consider G1,G2,G3 be
strict
Element of V such that
A1: g is
Morphism of G2, G3 and
A2: f is
Morphism of G1, G2 by
Th8;
reconsider f9 = f as
Morphism of G1, G2 by
A2;
reconsider g9 = g as
Morphism of G2, G3 by
A1;
(g9
* f9)
= (g9
*' f9);
hence thesis by
Def7;
end;
theorem ::
MODCAT_1:10
Th10: for g,f be
Element of (
Morphs V) st (
dom g)
= (
cod f) holds (g
* f)
in (
Morphs V)
proof
let g,f be
Element of (
Morphs V);
assume (
dom g)
= (
cod f);
then (
dom' g)
= (
cod' f);
hence thesis by
Th9;
end;
definition
let R, V;
::
MODCAT_1:def14
func
comp (V) ->
PartFunc of
[:(
Morphs V), (
Morphs V):], (
Morphs V) means
:
Def13: (for g,f be
Element of (
Morphs V) holds
[g, f]
in (
dom it ) iff (
dom' g)
= (
cod' f)) & for g,f be
Element of (
Morphs V) st
[g, f]
in (
dom it ) holds (it
. (g,f))
= (g
* f);
existence
proof
set X = (
Morphs V);
defpred
P[
Element of X,
Element of X] means (
dom' $1)
= (
cod' $2);
deffunc
F(
Element of X,
Element of X) = ($1
* $2);
A1: for g,f be
Element of X st
P[g, f] holds
F(g,f)
in X by
Th9;
consider c be
PartFunc of
[:X, X:], X such that
A2: (for g,f be
Element of X holds
[g, f]
in (
dom c) iff
P[g, f]) & for g,f be
Element of X st
[g, f]
in (
dom c) holds (c
. (g,f))
=
F(g,f) from
BINOP_1:sch 8(
A1);
take c;
thus thesis by
A2;
end;
uniqueness
proof
set X = (
Morphs V);
defpred
P[
Element of X,
Element of X] means (
dom' $1)
= (
cod' $2);
let c1,c2 be
PartFunc of
[:X, X:], X such that
A3: for g,f be
Element of X holds
[g, f]
in (
dom c1) iff
P[g, f] and
A4: for g,f be
Element of X st
[g, f]
in (
dom c1) holds (c1
. (g,f))
= (g
* f) and
A5: for g,f be
Element of X holds
[g, f]
in (
dom c2) iff
P[g, f] and
A6: for g,f be
Element of X st
[g, f]
in (
dom c2) holds (c2
. (g,f))
= (g
* f);
set V0 = (
dom c1);
now
let x be
object;
assume
A7: x
in (
dom c1);
then
consider g,f be
Element of X such that
A8: x
=
[g, f] by
SUBSET_1: 43;
P[g, f] by
A3,
A7,
A8;
hence x
in (
dom c2) by
A5,
A8;
end;
then
A9: (
dom c1)
c= (
dom c2) by
TARSKI:def 3;
A10: for x,y be
object st
[x, y]
in V0 holds (c1
. (x,y))
= (c2
. (x,y))
proof
let x,y be
object;
assume
A11:
[x, y]
in V0;
then
reconsider x, y as
Element of X by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
(c1
. (x,y))
= (x
* y) by
A4,
A11;
hence thesis by
A6,
A9,
A11;
end;
now
let x be
object;
assume
A12: x
in (
dom c2);
then
consider g,f be
Element of X such that
A13: x
=
[g, f] by
SUBSET_1: 43;
P[g, f] by
A5,
A12,
A13;
hence x
in (
dom c1) by
A3,
A13;
end;
then (
dom c2)
c= (
dom c1) by
TARSKI:def 3;
then (
dom c1)
= (
dom c2) by
A9,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
hence thesis by
A10,
BINOP_1: 20;
end;
end
theorem ::
MODCAT_1:11
Th11: for g,f be
Element of (
Morphs V) holds
[g, f]
in (
dom (
comp V)) iff (
dom g)
= (
cod f)
proof
let g,f be
Element of (
Morphs V);
(
dom g)
= (
dom' g) & (
cod f)
= (
cod' f);
hence thesis by
Def13;
end;
definition
let UN, R;
::
MODCAT_1:def15
func
LModCat (UN,R) ->
strict
CatStr equals
CatStr (# (
LModObjects (UN,R)), (
Morphs (
LModObjects (UN,R))), (
dom (
LModObjects (UN,R))), (
cod (
LModObjects (UN,R))), (
comp (
LModObjects (UN,R))) #);
coherence ;
end
registration
let UN, R;
cluster (
LModCat (UN,R)) -> non
void non
empty;
coherence ;
end
theorem ::
MODCAT_1:12
Th12: for f,g be
Morphism of (
LModCat (UN,R)) holds
[g, f]
in (
dom the
Comp of (
LModCat (UN,R))) iff (
dom g)
= (
cod f)
proof
set C = (
LModCat (UN,R)), V = (
LModObjects (UN,R));
let f,g be
Morphism of C;
reconsider f9 = f as
Element of (
Morphs V);
reconsider g9 = g as
Element of (
Morphs V);
A1: (
cod f)
= (
cod' f9) by
Def12
.= (
cod f9);
A2: (
dom g)
= (
dom' g9) by
Def11
.= (
dom g9);
A3:
now
assume (
dom g)
= (
cod f);
then (
dom' g9)
= (
cod' f9) by
A2,
A1;
hence
[g, f]
in (
dom the
Comp of C) by
Def13;
end;
now
assume
[g, f]
in (
dom the
Comp of C);
then (
dom' g9)
= (
cod' f9) by
Def13
.= (
cod f9);
hence (
dom g)
= (
cod f) by
A2,
A1;
end;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
registration
let UN, R;
cluster ->
strict for
Element of (
Morphs (
LModObjects (UN,R)));
coherence
proof
set V = (
LModObjects (UN,R));
let f be
Element of (
Morphs V);
ex G,H be
strict
Element of V st f is
strict
Morphism of G, H by
Def7;
hence f is
strict;
end;
end
::$Canceled
theorem ::
MODCAT_1:15
Th13: for f be
Morphism of (
LModCat (UN,R)) holds for f9 be
Element of (
Morphs (
LModObjects (UN,R))) st f
= f9 holds (
dom f)
= (
dom f9) & (
cod f)
= (
cod f9)
proof
set C = (
LModCat (UN,R)), V = (
LModObjects (UN,R));
set X = (
Morphs V);
let f be
Morphism of C, f9 be
Element of X;
assume
A1: f
= f9;
hence (
dom f)
= (
dom' f9) by
Def11
.= (
dom f9);
thus (
cod f)
= (
cod' f9) by
A1,
Def12
.= (
cod f9);
end;
theorem ::
MODCAT_1:16
Th14: for f,g be
Morphism of (
LModCat (UN,R)), f9,g9 be
Element of (
Morphs (
LModObjects (UN,R))) st f
= f9 & g
= g9 holds ((
dom g)
= (
cod f) iff (
dom g9)
= (
cod f9)) & ((
dom g)
= (
cod f) iff
[g9, f9]
in (
dom (
comp (
LModObjects (UN,R))))) & ((
dom g)
= (
cod f) implies (g
(*) f)
= (g9
* f9)) & ((
dom f)
= (
dom g) iff (
dom f9)
= (
dom g9)) & ((
cod f)
= (
cod g) iff (
cod f9)
= (
cod g9))
proof
set C = (
LModCat (UN,R)), V = (
LModObjects (UN,R));
set X = (
Morphs V);
let f,g be
Morphism of C;
let f9,g9 be
Element of X;
assume that
A1: f
= f9 and
A2: g
= g9;
A3: (
cod f)
= (
cod f9) by
A1,
Th13;
hence (
dom g)
= (
cod f) iff (
dom g9)
= (
cod f9) by
A2,
Th13;
(
dom g)
= (
dom g9) by
A2,
Th13;
hence
A4: (
dom g)
= (
cod f) iff
[g9, f9]
in (
dom (
comp V)) by
A3,
Th11;
thus (
dom g)
= (
cod f) implies (g
(*) f)
= (g9
* f9)
proof
assume
A5: (
dom g)
= (
cod f);
then
[g, f]
in (
dom the
Comp of C) by
Th12;
hence (g
(*) f)
= ((
comp V)
. (g9,f9)) by
A1,
A2,
CAT_1:def 1
.= (g9
* f9) by
A4,
A5,
Def13;
end;
(
dom f)
= (
dom f9) by
A1,
Th13;
hence (
dom f)
= (
dom g) iff (
dom f9)
= (
dom g9) by
A2,
Th13;
(
cod g)
= (
cod g9) by
A2,
Th13;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th13;
end;
Lm1: for f,g be
Morphism of (
LModCat (UN,R)) st (
dom g)
= (
cod f) holds (
dom (g
(*) f))
= (
dom f) & (
cod (g
(*) f))
= (
cod g)
proof
set X = (
Morphs (
LModObjects (UN,R)));
let f,g be
Morphism of (
LModCat (UN,R)) such that
A1: (
dom g)
= (
cod f);
reconsider g9 = g as
strict
Element of X;
reconsider f9 = f as
strict
Element of X;
A2: (
dom g9)
= (
cod f9) by
A1,
Th14;
then
A3: (
dom (g9
* f9))
= (
dom f9) & (
cod (g9
* f9))
= (
cod g9) by
MOD_2: 15;
reconsider gf = (g9
* f9) as
Element of X by
A2,
Th10;
gf
= (g
(*) f) by
A1,
Th14;
hence thesis by
A3,
Th14;
end;
Lm2: for f,g,h be
Morphism of (
LModCat (UN,R)) st (
dom h)
= (
cod g) & (
dom g)
= (
cod f) holds (h
(*) (g
(*) f))
= ((h
(*) g)
(*) f)
proof
set X = (
Morphs (
LModObjects (UN,R)));
let f,g,h be
Morphism of (
LModCat (UN,R)) such that
A1: (
dom h)
= (
cod g) & (
dom g)
= (
cod f);
reconsider f9 = f, g9 = g, h9 = h as
strict
Element of X;
A2: (h9
* g9)
= (h
(*) g) & (
dom (h
(*) g))
= (
cod f) by
A1,
Lm1,
Th14;
A3: (
dom h9)
= (
cod g9) & (
dom g9)
= (
cod f9) by
A1,
Th14;
then
reconsider gf = (g9
* f9), hg = (h9
* g9) as
strict
Element of X by
Th10;
(g9
* f9)
= (g
(*) f) & (
dom h)
= (
cod (g
(*) f)) by
A1,
Lm1,
Th14;
then (h
(*) (g
(*) f))
= (h9
* gf) by
Th14
.= (hg
* f9) by
A3,
MOD_2: 17
.= ((h
(*) g)
(*) f) by
A2,
Th14;
hence thesis;
end;
registration
let UN, R;
cluster (
LModCat (UN,R)) ->
Category-like
transitive
associative
reflexive;
coherence
proof
set C = (
LModCat (UN,R));
thus C is
Category-like by
Th14;
thus C is
transitive by
Lm1;
thus C is
associative by
Lm2;
thus C is
reflexive
proof
let a be
Element of C;
reconsider G = a as
Element of (
LModObjects (UN,R));
consider x such that x
in the set of all
[H, f] where H be
Element of (
GroupObjects UN), f be
Element of (
Funcs (
[:the
carrier of R, the
carrier of H:],the
carrier of H)) and
A1:
GO (x,G,R) by
Def6;
set ii = (
ID G);
consider x1,x2 be
object such that x
=
[x1, x2] and
A2: ex H be
strict
LeftMod of R st G
= H & x1
= the addLoopStr of H & x2
= the
lmult of H by
A1;
reconsider G as
strict
Element of (
LModObjects (UN,R)) by
A2;
reconsider ii as
Morphism of C;
reconsider ia = ii as
LModMorphismStr over R;
A3: (
dom ii)
= (
dom ia) by
Th13
.= a;
(
cod ii)
= (
cod ia) by
Th13
.= a;
then ii
in (
Hom (a,a)) by
A3;
hence (
Hom (a,a))
<>
{} ;
end;
end;
end