bspace.miz
begin
definition
let S be
1-sorted;
::
BSPACE:def1
func
<*> S ->
FinSequence of S equals (
<*> (
[#] S));
coherence ;
end
reserve S for
1-sorted,
i for
Element of
NAT ,
p for
FinSequence,
X for
set;
theorem ::
BSPACE:1
for p be
FinSequence of S st i
in (
dom p) holds (p
. i)
in S
proof
let p be
FinSequence of S;
assume i
in (
dom p);
hence (p
. i)
in the
carrier of S by
FINSEQ_2: 11;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:2
(for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom p) holds (p
. i)
in S) implies p is
FinSequence of S
proof
assume
A1: for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom p) holds (p
. i)
in S;
for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom p) holds (p
. i)
in the
carrier of S by
A1,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
hence thesis by
FINSEQ_2: 12;
end;
scheme ::
BSPACE:sch1
IndSeqS { S() ->
1-sorted , P[
set] } :
for p be
FinSequence of S() holds P[p]
provided
A1: P[(
<*> S())]
and
A2: for p be
FinSequence of S() holds for x be
Element of S() st P[p] holds P[(p
^
<*x*>)];
A3: P[(
<*> the
carrier of S())] by
A1;
thus for p be
FinSequence of the
carrier of S() holds P[p] from
FINSEQ_2:sch 2(
A3,
A2);
end;
begin
definition
::
BSPACE:def2
func
Z_2 ->
Field equals (
INT.Ring 2);
coherence by
INT_2: 28,
INT_3: 12;
end
theorem ::
BSPACE:3
(
[#]
Z_2 )
=
{
0 , 1} by
CARD_1: 50;
theorem ::
BSPACE:4
for a be
Element of
Z_2 holds a
=
0 or a
= 1 by
CARD_1: 50,
TARSKI:def 2;
theorem ::
BSPACE:5
Th5: (
0.
Z_2 )
=
0 by
NAT_1: 44,
SUBSET_1:def 8;
theorem ::
BSPACE:6
Th6: (
1.
Z_2 )
= 1 by
INT_3: 14;
theorem ::
BSPACE:7
Th7: ((
1.
Z_2 )
+ (
1.
Z_2 ))
= (
0.
Z_2 )
proof
((
1.
Z_2 )
+ (
1.
Z_2 ))
= ((1
+ 1)
mod 2) by
Th6,
GR_CY_1:def 4
.=
0 by
NAT_D: 25;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:8
for x be
Element of
Z_2 holds x
= (
0.
Z_2 ) iff x
<> (
1.
Z_2 ) by
Th5,
Th6,
CARD_1: 50,
TARSKI:def 2;
begin
definition
let X be
set, x be
object;
::
BSPACE:def3
func X
@ x ->
Element of
Z_2 equals
:
Def3: (
1.
Z_2 ) if x
in X
otherwise (
0.
Z_2 );
coherence ;
consistency ;
end
theorem ::
BSPACE:9
for X,x be
set holds (X
@ x)
= (
1.
Z_2 ) iff x
in X by
Def3;
theorem ::
BSPACE:10
for X,x be
set holds (X
@ x)
= (
0.
Z_2 ) iff not x
in X by
Def3;
theorem ::
BSPACE:11
for X,x be
set holds (X
@ x)
<> (
0.
Z_2 ) iff (X
@ x)
= (
1.
Z_2 ) by
Th5,
Th6,
CARD_1: 50,
TARSKI:def 2;
theorem ::
BSPACE:12
for X,x,y be
set holds (X
@ x)
= (X
@ y) iff (x
in X iff y
in X)
proof
let X,x,y be
set;
thus (X
@ x)
= (X
@ y) implies (x
in X iff y
in X)
proof
assume
A1: (X
@ x)
= (X
@ y);
thus x
in X implies y
in X
proof
assume x
in X;
then (X
@ x)
= (
1.
Z_2 ) by
Def3;
hence thesis by
A1,
Def3;
end;
assume y
in X;
then (X
@ y)
= (
1.
Z_2 ) by
Def3;
hence thesis by
A1,
Def3;
end;
assume
A2: x
in X iff y
in X;
per cases by
Th5,
Th6,
CARD_1: 50,
TARSKI:def 2;
suppose (X
@ x)
= (
0.
Z_2 );
hence thesis by
A2,
Def3;
end;
suppose (X
@ x)
= (
1.
Z_2 );
hence thesis by
A2,
Def3;
end;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:13
for X,Y,x be
set holds (X
@ x)
= (Y
@ x) iff (x
in X iff x
in Y)
proof
let X,Y,x be
set;
thus (X
@ x)
= (Y
@ x) implies (x
in X iff x
in Y)
proof
assume
A1: (X
@ x)
= (Y
@ x);
thus x
in X implies x
in Y
proof
assume x
in X;
then (X
@ x)
= (
1.
Z_2 ) by
Def3;
hence thesis by
A1,
Def3;
end;
assume x
in Y;
then (Y
@ x)
= (
1.
Z_2 ) by
Def3;
hence thesis by
A1,
Def3;
end;
thus (x
in X iff x
in Y) implies (X
@ x)
= (Y
@ x)
proof
assume
A2: x
in X iff x
in Y;
per cases by
Th5,
Th6,
CARD_1: 50,
TARSKI:def 2;
suppose (X
@ x)
= (
0.
Z_2 );
hence thesis by
A2,
Def3;
end;
suppose (X
@ x)
= (
1.
Z_2 );
hence thesis by
A2,
Def3;
end;
end;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:14
for x be
set holds (
{}
@ x)
= (
0.
Z_2 ) by
Def3;
theorem ::
BSPACE:15
Th15: for X be
set, u,v be
Subset of X, x be
Element of X holds ((u
\+\ v)
@ x)
= ((u
@ x)
+ (v
@ x))
proof
let X be
set, u,v be
Subset of X, x be
Element of X;
per cases ;
suppose
A1: x
in (u
\+\ v);
then
A2: ((u
\+\ v)
@ x)
= (
1.
Z_2 ) by
Def3;
per cases ;
suppose
A3: x
in u;
then not x
in v by
A1,
XBOOLE_0: 1;
then
A4: (v
@ x)
= (
0.
Z_2 ) by
Def3;
(u
@ x)
= (
1.
Z_2 ) by
A3,
Def3;
hence thesis by
A2,
A4,
RLVECT_1: 4;
end;
suppose
A5: not x
in u;
then x
in v by
A1,
XBOOLE_0: 1;
then
A6: (v
@ x)
= (
1.
Z_2 ) by
Def3;
(u
@ x)
= (
0.
Z_2 ) by
A5,
Def3;
hence thesis by
A2,
A6,
RLVECT_1: 4;
end;
end;
suppose
A7: not x
in (u
\+\ v);
then
A8: ((u
\+\ v)
@ x)
= (
0.
Z_2 ) by
Def3;
per cases ;
suppose x
in u;
then x
in v & (u
@ x)
= (
1.
Z_2 ) by
A7,
Def3,
XBOOLE_0: 1;
hence thesis by
A8,
Def3,
Th7;
end;
suppose
A9: not x
in u;
then not x
in v by
A7,
XBOOLE_0: 1;
then
A10: (v
@ x)
= (
0.
Z_2 ) by
Def3;
(u
@ x)
= (
0.
Z_2 ) by
A9,
Def3;
hence thesis by
A8,
A10,
RLVECT_1: 4;
end;
end;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:16
for X,Y be
set holds X
= Y iff for x be
object holds (X
@ x)
= (Y
@ x)
proof
let X,Y be
set;
thus X
= Y implies for x be
object holds (X
@ x)
= (Y
@ x);
thus (for x be
object holds (X
@ x)
= (Y
@ x)) implies X
= Y
proof
assume
A1: for x be
object holds (X
@ x)
= (Y
@ x);
thus X
c= Y
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in X;
then (X
@ y)
= (
1.
Z_2 ) by
Def3;
then (Y
@ y)
= (
1.
Z_2 ) by
A1;
hence thesis by
Def3;
end;
let y be
object;
assume y
in Y;
then (Y
@ y)
= (
1.
Z_2 ) by
Def3;
then (X
@ y)
= (
1.
Z_2 ) by
A1;
hence thesis by
Def3;
end;
end;
begin
definition
let X be
set, a be
Element of
Z_2 , c be
Subset of X;
::
BSPACE:def4
func a
\*\ c ->
Subset of X equals
:
Def4: c if a
= (
1.
Z_2 ),
(
{} X) if a
= (
0.
Z_2 );
consistency ;
coherence ;
end
definition
let X be
set;
::
BSPACE:def5
func
bspace-sum (X) ->
BinOp of (
bool X) means
:
Def5: for c,d be
Subset of X holds (it
. (c,d))
= (c
\+\ d);
existence
proof
defpred
P[
set,
set,
set] means ex a,b be
Subset of X st $1
= a & $2
= b & $3
= (a
\+\ b);
A1: for x,y be
set st x
in (
bool X) & y
in (
bool X) holds ex z be
set st z
in (
bool X) &
P[x, y, z]
proof
let x,y be
set;
assume x
in (
bool X) & y
in (
bool X);
then
reconsider x, y as
Subset of X;
set z = (x
\+\ y);
take z;
thus thesis;
end;
consider f be
Function of
[:(
bool X), (
bool X):], (
bool X) such that
A2: for x,y be
set st x
in (
bool X) & y
in (
bool X) holds
P[x, y, (f
. (x,y))] from
BINOP_1:sch 9(
A1);
reconsider f as
BinOp of (
bool X);
take f;
for c,d be
Subset of X holds (f
. (c,d))
= (c
\+\ d)
proof
let c,d be
Subset of X;
ex a,b be
Subset of X st c
= a & d
= b & (f
. (c,d))
= (a
\+\ b) by
A2;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let f,g be
BinOp of (
bool X) such that
A3: (for c,d be
Subset of X holds (f
. (c,d))
= (c
\+\ d)) & for c,d be
Subset of X holds (g
. (c,d))
= (c
\+\ d);
A4: for x be
object st x
in (
dom f) holds (f
. x)
= (g
. x)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
dom f);
then
consider y,z be
object such that
A5: y
in (
bool X) and
A6: z
in (
bool X) and
A7: x
=
[y, z] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider z as
Subset of X by
A6;
reconsider y as
Subset of X by
A5;
(f
. (y,z))
= (y
\+\ z) & (g
. (y,z))
= (y
\+\ z) by
A3;
hence thesis by
A7;
end;
(
dom f)
=
[:(
bool X), (
bool X):] by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (
dom f)
= (
dom g) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
end
theorem ::
BSPACE:17
Th17: for a be
Element of
Z_2 , c,d be
Subset of X holds (a
\*\ (c
\+\ d))
= ((a
\*\ c)
\+\ (a
\*\ d))
proof
let a be
Element of
Z_2 , c,d be
Subset of X;
per cases by
Th5,
Th6,
CARD_1: 50,
TARSKI:def 2;
suppose
A1: a
= (
0.
Z_2 );
then (a
\*\ (c
\+\ d))
= (
{} X) & (a
\*\ c)
= (
{} X) by
Def4;
hence thesis by
A1,
Def4;
end;
suppose
A2: a
= (
1.
Z_2 );
then (a
\*\ (c
\+\ d))
= (c
\+\ d) & (a
\*\ c)
= c by
Def4;
hence thesis by
A2,
Def4;
end;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:18
Th18: for a,b be
Element of
Z_2 , c be
Subset of X holds ((a
+ b)
\*\ c)
= ((a
\*\ c)
\+\ (b
\*\ c))
proof
let a,b be
Element of
Z_2 , c be
Subset of X;
per cases by
Th5,
Th6,
CARD_1: 50,
TARSKI:def 2;
suppose
A1: a
= (
0.
Z_2 );
then (a
\*\ c)
= (
{} X) by
Def4;
hence thesis by
A1,
RLVECT_1: 4;
end;
suppose
A2: a
= (
1.
Z_2 );
per cases by
Th5,
Th6,
CARD_1: 50,
TARSKI:def 2;
suppose
A3: b
= (
0.
Z_2 );
then (b
\*\ c)
= (
{} X) by
Def4;
hence thesis by
A3,
RLVECT_1: 4;
end;
suppose
A4: b
= (
1.
Z_2 );
A5: (c
\+\ c)
= (
{} X) by
XBOOLE_1: 92;
(b
\*\ c)
= c by
A4,
Def4;
hence thesis by
A2,
A4,
A5,
Def4,
Th7;
end;
end;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:19
for c be
Subset of X holds ((
1.
Z_2 )
\*\ c)
= c by
Def4;
theorem ::
BSPACE:20
Th20: for a,b be
Element of
Z_2 , c be
Subset of X holds (a
\*\ (b
\*\ c))
= ((a
* b)
\*\ c)
proof
let a,b be
Element of
Z_2 , c be
Subset of X;
per cases by
Th5,
Th6,
CARD_1: 50,
TARSKI:def 2;
suppose
A1: a
= (
0.
Z_2 );
then (a
\*\ (b
\*\ c))
= (
{} X) by
Def4;
hence thesis by
A1,
Def4;
end;
suppose
A2: a
= (
1.
Z_2 );
then (a
\*\ (b
\*\ c))
= (b
\*\ c) by
Def4;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
end;
definition
let X be
set;
::
BSPACE:def6
func
bspace-scalar-mult (X) ->
Function of
[:the
carrier of
Z_2 , (
bool X):], (
bool X) means
:
Def6: for a be
Element of
Z_2 , c be
Subset of X holds (it
. (a,c))
= (a
\*\ c);
existence
proof
defpred
P[
set,
set,
set] means ex a be
Element of
Z_2 , c be
Subset of X st $1
= a & $2
= c & $3
= (a
\*\ c);
A1: for x,y be
set st x
in the
carrier of
Z_2 & y
in (
bool X) holds ex z be
set st z
in (
bool X) &
P[x, y, z]
proof
let x,y be
set such that
A2: x
in the
carrier of
Z_2 and
A3: y
in (
bool X);
reconsider y as
Subset of X by
A3;
reconsider x as
Element of
Z_2 by
A2;
set z = (x
\*\ y);
take z;
thus thesis;
end;
consider f be
Function of
[:the
carrier of
Z_2 , (
bool X):], (
bool X) such that
A4: for x,y be
set st x
in the
carrier of
Z_2 & y
in (
bool X) holds
P[x, y, (f
. (x,y))] from
BINOP_1:sch 9(
A1);
take f;
for a be
Element of
Z_2 , c be
Subset of X holds (f
. (a,c))
= (a
\*\ c)
proof
let a be
Element of
Z_2 , c be
Subset of X;
ex a9 be
Element of
Z_2 , c9 be
Subset of X st a
= a9 & c
= c9 & (f
. (a,c))
= (a9
\*\ c9) by
A4;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let f,g be
Function of
[:the
carrier of
Z_2 , (
bool X):], (
bool X) such that
A5: (for a be
Element of
Z_2 , c be
Subset of X holds (f
. (a,c))
= (a
\*\ c)) & for a be
Element of
Z_2 , c be
Subset of X holds (g
. (a,c))
= (a
\*\ c);
A6: for x be
object st x
in (
dom f) holds (f
. x)
= (g
. x)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
dom f);
then
consider y,z be
object such that
A7: y
in the
carrier of
Z_2 and
A8: z
in (
bool X) and
A9: x
=
[y, z] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider z as
Subset of X by
A8;
reconsider y as
Element of
Z_2 by
A7;
(f
. (y,z))
= (y
\*\ z) & (g
. (y,z))
= (y
\*\ z) by
A5;
hence thesis by
A9;
end;
(
dom f)
=
[:the
carrier of
Z_2 , (
bool X):] by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (
dom f)
= (
dom g) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
hence thesis by
A6;
end;
end
definition
let X be
set;
::
BSPACE:def7
func
bspace (X) -> non
empty
ModuleStr over
Z_2 equals
ModuleStr (# (
bool X), (
bspace-sum X), (
{} X), (
bspace-scalar-mult X) #);
coherence ;
end
Lm1: for a,b,c be
Element of (
bspace X), A,B,C be
Subset of X st a
= A & b
= B & c
= C holds (a
+ (b
+ c))
= (A
\+\ (B
\+\ C)) & ((a
+ b)
+ c)
= ((A
\+\ B)
\+\ C)
proof
let a,b,c be
Element of (
bspace X);
let A,B,C be
Subset of X;
assume that
A1: a
= A and
A2: b
= B and
A3: c
= C;
(b
+ c)
= (B
\+\ C) by
A2,
A3,
Def5;
hence (a
+ (b
+ c))
= (A
\+\ (B
\+\ C)) by
A1,
Def5;
(a
+ b)
= (A
\+\ B) by
A1,
A2,
Def5;
hence ((a
+ b)
+ c)
= ((A
\+\ B)
\+\ C) by
A3,
Def5;
end;
Lm2: for a,b be
Element of
Z_2 , x,y be
Element of (
bspace X), c,d be
Subset of X st x
= c & y
= d holds ((a
* x)
+ (b
* y))
= ((a
\*\ c)
\+\ (b
\*\ d)) & (a
* (x
+ y))
= (a
\*\ (c
\+\ d)) & ((a
+ b)
* x)
= ((a
+ b)
\*\ c) & ((a
* b)
* x)
= ((a
* b)
\*\ c) & (a
* (b
* x))
= (a
\*\ (b
\*\ c))
proof
let a,b be
Element of
Z_2 , x,y be
Element of (
bspace X), c,d be
Subset of X such that
A1: x
= c and
A2: y
= d;
(a
* x)
= (a
\*\ c) & (b
* y)
= (b
\*\ d) by
A1,
A2,
Def6;
hence ((a
* x)
+ (b
* y))
= ((a
\*\ c)
\+\ (b
\*\ d)) by
Def5;
(x
+ y)
= (c
\+\ d) by
A1,
A2,
Def5;
hence (a
* (x
+ y))
= (a
\*\ (c
\+\ d)) by
Def6;
thus ((a
+ b)
* x)
= ((a
+ b)
\*\ c) by
A1,
Def6;
thus ((a
* b)
* x)
= ((a
* b)
\*\ c) by
A1,
Def6;
(b
* x)
= (b
\*\ c) by
A1,
Def6;
hence (a
* (b
* x))
= (a
\*\ (b
\*\ c)) by
Def6;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:21
Th21: (
bspace X) is
Abelian
proof
let x,y be
Element of (
bspace X);
reconsider A = x, B = y as
Subset of X;
(x
+ y)
= (B
\+\ A) by
Def5
.= (y
+ x) by
Def5;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:22
Th22: (
bspace X) is
add-associative
proof
let x,y,z be
Element of (
bspace X);
reconsider A = x, B = y, C = z as
Subset of X;
(x
+ (y
+ z))
= (A
\+\ (B
\+\ C)) by
Lm1
.= ((A
\+\ B)
\+\ C) by
XBOOLE_1: 91
.= ((x
+ y)
+ z) by
Lm1;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:23
Th23: (
bspace X) is
right_zeroed
proof
let x be
Element of (
bspace X);
reconsider A = x as
Subset of X;
reconsider Z = (
0. (
bspace X)) as
Subset of X;
(x
+ (
0. (
bspace X)))
= (A
\+\ Z) by
Def5
.= x;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:24
Th24: (
bspace X) is
right_complementable
proof
let x be
Element of (
bspace X);
reconsider A = x as
Subset of X;
take x;
(A
\+\ A)
= (
{} X) by
XBOOLE_1: 92;
hence thesis by
Def5;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:25
Th25: for a be
Element of
Z_2 , x,y be
Element of (
bspace X) holds (a
* (x
+ y))
= ((a
* x)
+ (a
* y))
proof
let a be
Element of
Z_2 , x,y be
Element of (
bspace X);
reconsider c = x, d = y as
Subset of X;
(a
* (x
+ y))
= (a
\*\ (c
\+\ d)) by
Lm2
.= ((a
\*\ c)
\+\ (a
\*\ d)) by
Th17
.= ((a
* x)
+ (a
* y)) by
Lm2;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:26
Th26: for a,b be
Element of
Z_2 , x be
Element of (
bspace X) holds ((a
+ b)
* x)
= ((a
* x)
+ (b
* x))
proof
let a,b be
Element of
Z_2 , x be
Element of (
bspace X);
reconsider c = x as
Subset of X;
((a
+ b)
* x)
= ((a
+ b)
\*\ c) by
Lm2
.= ((a
\*\ c)
\+\ (b
\*\ c)) by
Th18
.= ((a
* x)
+ (b
* x)) by
Lm2;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:27
Th27: for a,b be
Element of
Z_2 , x be
Element of (
bspace X) holds ((a
* b)
* x)
= (a
* (b
* x))
proof
let a,b be
Element of
Z_2 , x be
Element of (
bspace X);
reconsider c = x as
Subset of X;
((a
* b)
* x)
= ((a
* b)
\*\ c) by
Lm2
.= (a
\*\ (b
\*\ c)) by
Th20
.= (a
* (b
* x)) by
Lm2;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:28
Th28: for x be
Element of (
bspace X) holds ((
1_
Z_2 )
* x)
= x
proof
let x be
Element of (
bspace X);
reconsider c = x as
Subset of X;
((
1_
Z_2 )
* x)
= ((
1_
Z_2 )
\*\ c) by
Def6
.= c by
Def4;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:29
Th29: (
bspace X) is
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital by
Th25,
Th26,
Th27,
Th28;
registration
let X be
set;
cluster (
bspace X) ->
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital
Abelian
right_complementable
add-associative
right_zeroed;
coherence by
Th21,
Th22,
Th23,
Th24,
Th29;
end
begin
definition
let X be
set;
::
BSPACE:def8
func
singletons (X) ->
set equals { f where f be
Subset of X : f is 1
-element };
coherence ;
end
definition
let X be
set;
:: original:
singletons
redefine
func
singletons (X) ->
Subset of (
bspace X) ;
coherence
proof
set S = (
singletons X);
S
c= (
bool X)
proof
let f be
object;
assume f
in S;
then ex g be
Subset of X st f
= g & g is 1
-element;
then
reconsider f as
Subset of X;
f is
Element of (
bool X);
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let X be non
empty
set;
cluster (
singletons X) -> non
empty;
coherence
proof
set x = the
Element of X;
{x}
in (
singletons X);
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
BSPACE:30
Th30: for X be non
empty
set, f be
Subset of X st f is
Element of (
singletons X) holds f is 1
-element
proof
let X be non
empty
set, f be
Subset of X;
assume f is
Element of (
singletons X);
then f
in (
singletons X);
then ex g be
Subset of X st g
= f & g is 1
-element;
hence thesis;
end;
definition
let F be
Field, V be
VectSp of F, l be
Linear_Combination of V, x be
Element of V;
:: original:
.
redefine
func l
. x ->
Element of F ;
coherence
proof
(l
. x)
in (
[#] F);
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let X be non
empty
set, s be
FinSequence of (
bspace X), x be
Element of X;
::
BSPACE:def9
func s
@ x ->
FinSequence of
Z_2 means
:
Def9: (
len it )
= (
len s) & for j be
Nat st 1
<= j & j
<= (
len s) holds (it
. j)
= ((s
. j)
@ x);
existence
proof
deffunc
F(
set) = ((s
. $1)
@ x);
consider p be
FinSequence such that
A1: (
len p)
= (
len s) and
A2: for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom p) holds (p
. k)
=
F(k) from
FINSEQ_1:sch 2;
A3: for j be
Nat st 1
<= j & j
<= (
len s) holds (p
. j)
= ((s
. j)
@ x) by
A1,
FINSEQ_3: 25,
A2;
(
rng p)
c= the
carrier of
Z_2
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in (
rng p);
then
consider a be
object such that
A4: a
in (
dom p) and
A5: (p
. a)
= y by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
(p
. a)
= ((s
. a)
@ x) by
A2,
A4;
hence thesis by
A5;
end;
then
reconsider p as
FinSequence of
Z_2 by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
take p;
thus thesis by
A1,
A3;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let f,g be
FinSequence of
Z_2 such that
A6: (
len f)
= (
len s) and
A7: for j be
Nat st 1
<= j & j
<= (
len s) holds (f
. j)
= ((s
. j)
@ x) and
A8: (
len g)
= (
len s) and
A9: for j be
Nat st 1
<= j & j
<= (
len s) holds (g
. j)
= ((s
. j)
@ x);
for k be
Nat st 1
<= k & k
<= (
len f) holds (f
. k)
= (g
. k)
proof
let k be
Nat such that
A10: 1
<= k & k
<= (
len f);
(f
. k)
= ((s
. k)
@ x) by
A6,
A7,
A10;
hence thesis by
A6,
A9,
A10;
end;
hence thesis by
A6,
A8;
end;
end
theorem ::
BSPACE:31
Th31: for X be non
empty
set, x be
Element of X holds ((
<*> (
bspace X))
@ x)
= (
<*>
Z_2 )
proof
let X be non
empty
set, x be
Element of X;
set V = (
bspace X);
set L = ((
<*> V)
@ x);
(
len L)
= (
len (
<*> V)) by
Def9
.=
0 ;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:32
Th32: for X be
set, u,v be
Element of (
bspace X), x be
Element of X holds ((u
+ v)
@ x)
= ((u
@ x)
+ (v
@ x))
proof
let X be
set, u,v be
Element of (
bspace X), x be
Element of X;
reconsider u9 = u, v9 = v as
Subset of X;
((u
+ v)
@ x)
= ((u9
\+\ v9)
@ x) by
Def5
.= ((u9
@ x)
+ (v9
@ x)) by
Th15;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:33
Th33: for X be non
empty
set, s be
FinSequence of (
bspace X), f be
Element of (
bspace X), x be
Element of X holds ((s
^
<*f*>)
@ x)
= ((s
@ x)
^
<*(f
@ x)*>)
proof
let X be non
empty
set, s be
FinSequence of (
bspace X), f be
Element of (
bspace X), x be
Element of X;
set L = ((s
^
<*f*>)
@ x);
set R = ((s
@ x)
^
<*(f
@ x)*>);
A1: (
len L)
= (
len (s
^
<*f*>)) by
Def9
.= ((
len s)
+ (
len
<*f*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= ((
len s)
+ 1) by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
A2: for k be
Nat st 1
<= k & k
<= (
len L) holds (L
. k)
= (R
. k)
proof
let k be
Nat such that
A3: 1
<= k and
A4: k
<= (
len L);
per cases by
A1,
A4,
NAT_1: 8;
suppose
A5: k
<= (
len s);
(
dom (s
@ x))
= (
Seg (
len (s
@ x))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
Seg (
len s)) by
Def9;
then k
in (
dom (s
@ x)) by
A3,
A5;
then
A6: (R
. k)
= ((s
@ x)
. k) by
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= ((s
. k)
@ x) by
A3,
A5,
Def9;
(
dom s)
= (
Seg (
len s)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A7: k
in (
dom s) by
A3,
A5;
k
<= (
len (s
^
<*f*>)) by
A4,
Def9;
then (L
. k)
= (((s
^
<*f*>)
. k)
@ x) by
A3,
Def9;
hence thesis by
A6,
A7,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
end;
suppose
A8: k
= (
len L);
(
dom
<*(f
@ x)*>)
=
{1} by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
FINSEQ_1:def 8;
then
A9: 1
in (
dom
<*(f
@ x)*>) by
TARSKI:def 1;
(
len (s
@ x))
= (
len s) by
Def9;
then
A10: (R
. k)
= (
<*(f
@ x)*>
. 1) by
A1,
A8,
A9,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= (f
@ x) by
FINSEQ_1:def 8;
(
dom
<*f*>)
=
{1} by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
FINSEQ_1:def 8;
then 1
in (
dom
<*f*>) by
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A11: ((s
^
<*f*>)
. k)
= (
<*f*>
. 1) by
A1,
A8,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= f by
FINSEQ_1:def 8;
k
<= (
len (s
^
<*f*>)) by
A4,
Def9;
hence thesis by
A3,
A10,
A11,
Def9;
end;
end;
(
len ((s
@ x)
^
<*(f
@ x)*>))
= ((
len (s
@ x))
+ (
len
<*(f
@ x)*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= ((
len s)
+ (
len
<*(f
@ x)*>)) by
Def9
.= ((
len s)
+ 1) by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:34
Th34: for X be non
empty
set, s be
FinSequence of (
bspace X), x be
Element of X holds ((
Sum s)
@ x)
= (
Sum (s
@ x))
proof
let X be non
empty
set, s be
FinSequence of (
bspace X), x be
Element of X;
set V = (
bspace X);
defpred
Q[
FinSequence of V] means ((
Sum $1)
@ x)
= (
Sum ($1
@ x));
A1:
Q[(
<*> V)]
proof
reconsider z = (
0. V) as
Subset of X;
set e = (
<*> V);
A2: (z
@ x)
= (
0.
Z_2 ) by
Def3;
(
Sum e)
= (
0. V) & (e
@ x)
= (
<*>
Z_2 ) by
Th31,
RLVECT_1: 43;
hence thesis by
A2,
RLVECT_1: 43;
end;
A3: for p be
FinSequence of V, f be
Element of V st
Q[p] holds
Q[(p
^
<*f*>)]
proof
let p be
FinSequence of V, f be
Element of V such that
A4:
Q[p];
((
Sum (p
^
<*f*>))
@ x)
= (((
Sum p)
+ (
Sum
<*f*>))
@ x) by
RLVECT_1: 41
.= (((
Sum p)
+ f)
@ x) by
RLVECT_1: 44
.= (((
Sum p)
@ x)
+ (f
@ x)) by
Th32
.= ((
Sum (p
@ x))
+ (
Sum
<*(f
@ x)*>)) by
A4,
RLVECT_1: 44
.= (
Sum ((p
@ x)
^
<*(f
@ x)*>)) by
RLVECT_1: 41
.= (
Sum ((p
^
<*f*>)
@ x)) by
Th33;
hence thesis;
end;
for p be
FinSequence of V holds
Q[p] from
IndSeqS(
A1,
A3);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:35
Th35: for X be non
empty
set, l be
Linear_Combination of (
bspace X), x be
Element of (
bspace X) st x
in (
Carrier l) holds (l
. x)
= (
1_
Z_2 )
proof
let X be non
empty
set, l be
Linear_Combination of (
bspace X), x be
Element of (
bspace X);
assume x
in (
Carrier l);
then (l
. x)
<> (
0.
Z_2 ) by
VECTSP_6: 2;
hence thesis by
Th5,
Th6,
CARD_1: 50,
TARSKI:def 2;
end;
registration
let X be
empty
set;
cluster (
singletons X) ->
empty;
coherence
proof
assume (
singletons X) is non
empty;
then
consider f be
object such that
A1: f
in (
singletons X);
ex g be
Subset of X st g
= f & g is 1
-element by
A1;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
BSPACE:36
Th36: (
singletons X) is
linearly-independent
proof
per cases ;
suppose X is
empty;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose X is non
empty;
then
reconsider X as non
empty
set;
set V = (
bspace X);
set S = (
singletons X);
for l be
Linear_Combination of S st (
Sum l)
= (
0. V) holds (
Carrier l)
=
{}
proof
let l be
Linear_Combination of S such that
A1: (
Sum l)
= (
0. V);
reconsider s = (
Sum l) as
Subset of X;
set C = (
Carrier l);
A2: (l
! (
Carrier l))
= l by
RANKNULL: 24;
assume C
<>
{} ;
then
consider f be
Element of V such that
A3: f
in C by
SUBSET_1: 4;
reconsider f as
Subset of X;
reconsider g = f as
Element of V;
A4:
{g}
c= (
Carrier l) by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
reconsider n = (l
!
{g}) as
Linear_Combination of
{g};
reconsider m = (l
! (C
\
{g})) as
Linear_Combination of (C
\
{g});
reconsider l as
Linear_Combination of C by
A2;
reconsider t = (
Sum m), u = (
Sum n) as
Subset of X;
g
in
{g} by
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A5: (
Sum n)
= ((n
. g)
* g) & (n
. g)
= (l
. g) by
RANKNULL: 25,
VECTSP_6: 17;
(l
. g)
<> (
0.
Z_2 ) by
A3,
VECTSP_6: 2;
then (l
. g)
= (
1_
Z_2 ) by
Th5,
Th6,
CARD_1: 50,
TARSKI:def 2;
then
A6: u
= f by
A5,
VECTSP_1:def 17;
C
c= S by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
then f is 1
-element by
A3,
Th30;
then
consider x be
Element of X such that
A7: f
=
{x} by
CARD_1: 65;
x
in f by
A7,
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A8: (f
@ x)
= (
1.
Z_2 ) by
Def3;
A9: for g be
Subset of X st g
<> f & g
in C holds (g
@ x)
= (
0.
Z_2 )
proof
let g be
Subset of X such that
A10: g
<> f and
A11: g
in C;
C
c= S by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
then g is 1
-element by
A11,
Th30;
then
consider y be
Element of X such that
A12: g
=
{y} by
CARD_1: 65;
now
assume (g
@ x)
<> (
0.
Z_2 );
then x
in
{y} by
A12,
Def3;
hence contradiction by
A7,
A10,
A12,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
A13: (t
@ x)
=
0
proof
consider F be
FinSequence of V such that
A14: F is
one-to-one & (
rng F)
= (
Carrier m) and
A15: t
= (
Sum (m
(#) F)) by
VECTSP_6:def 6;
A16: ((
Sum (m
(#) F))
@ x)
= (
Sum ((m
(#) F)
@ x)) by
Th34;
for F be
FinSequence of V st F is
one-to-one & (
rng F)
= (
Carrier m) holds ((m
(#) F)
@ x)
= ((
len F)
|-> (
0.
Z_2 ))
proof
let F be
FinSequence of V such that F is
one-to-one and
A17: (
rng F)
= (
Carrier m);
set R = ((
len F)
|-> (
0.
Z_2 ));
set L = ((m
(#) F)
@ x);
A18: (
len (m
(#) F))
= (
len F) by
VECTSP_6:def 5;
then
A19: (
len L)
= (
len F) by
Def9;
A20: for k be
Nat st 1
<= k & k
<= (
len L) holds (L
. k)
= (R
. k)
proof
let k be
Nat such that
A21: 1
<= k & k
<= (
len L);
A22: k
in (
Seg (
len F)) by
A19,
A21;
(
len (m
(#) F))
= (
len F) by
VECTSP_6:def 5;
then (
dom (m
(#) F))
= (
Seg (
len F)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then k
in (
dom (m
(#) F)) by
A19,
A21;
then
A23: ((m
(#) F)
. k)
= ((m
. (F
/. k))
* (F
/. k)) by
VECTSP_6:def 5;
reconsider Fk = (F
/. k) as
Subset of X;
A24: (
Carrier m)
c= (C
\
{f}) by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
(
dom F)
= (
Seg (
len F)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A25: k
in (
dom F) by
A19,
A21;
then
A26: (F
/. k)
= (F
. k) by
PARTFUN1:def 6;
then (m
. (F
/. k))
= (
1_
Z_2 ) by
A17,
A25,
Th35,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
A27: ((m
(#) F)
. k)
= Fk by
A23,
VECTSP_1:def 17;
A28: (F
/. k)
in (
Carrier m) by
A17,
A25,
A26,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
A29: Fk
in C by
A24,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
A30: Fk
<> f
proof
assume Fk
= f;
then not f
in
{f} by
A28,
A24,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence contradiction by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
(L
. k)
= (((m
(#) F)
. k)
@ x) by
A18,
A19,
A21,
Def9
.= (
0.
Z_2 ) by
A9,
A27,
A30,
A29;
hence thesis by
A22,
FUNCOP_1: 7;
end;
(
dom R)
= (
Seg (
len F)) by
FUNCOP_1: 13;
then (
len L)
= (
len R) by
A19,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
hence thesis by
A20;
end;
then ((m
(#) F)
@ x)
= ((
len F)
|-> (
0.
Z_2 )) by
A14;
hence thesis by
A15,
A16,
Th5,
MATRIX_3: 11;
end;
l
= (n
+ m) by
A4,
RANKNULL: 27;
then (
Sum l)
= ((
Sum m)
+ (
Sum n)) by
VECTSP_6: 44;
then s
= (t
\+\ u) by
Def5;
then
A31: (s
@ x)
= ((t
@ x)
+ (u
@ x)) by
Th15;
(s
@ x)
= (
0.
Z_2 ) by
A1,
Def3;
hence thesis by
A8,
A31,
A13,
A6,
RLVECT_1: 4;
end;
hence thesis by
VECTSP_7:def 1;
end;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:37
for f be
Element of (
bspace X) st (ex x be
set st x
in X & f
=
{x}) holds f
in (
singletons X);
theorem ::
BSPACE:38
Th38: for X be
finite
set, A be
Subset of X holds ex l be
Linear_Combination of (
singletons X) st (
Sum l)
= A
proof
let X be
finite
set, A be
Subset of X;
set V = (
bspace X);
set S = (
singletons X);
defpred
P[
set] means $1 is
Subset of X implies ex l be
Linear_Combination of S st (
Sum l)
= $1;
A1:
P[
{} ]
proof
reconsider l = (
ZeroLC V) as
Linear_Combination of S by
VECTSP_6: 5;
assume
{} is
Subset of X;
take l;
(
Sum l)
= (
0. V) by
VECTSP_6: 15;
hence thesis;
end;
A2: for x,B be
set st x
in A & B
c= A &
P[B] holds
P[(B
\/
{x})]
proof
let x,B be
set such that x
in A and B
c= A and
A3:
P[B];
assume
A4: (B
\/
{x}) is
Subset of X;
then
reconsider B as
Subset of X by
XBOOLE_1: 11;
consider l be
Linear_Combination of S such that
A5: (
Sum l)
= B by
A3;
per cases ;
suppose
A6: x
in B;
take l;
thus thesis by
A5,
A6,
ZFMISC_1: 40;
end;
suppose not x
in B;
then
A7: B
misses
{x} by
ZFMISC_1: 50;
reconsider z = (
ZeroLC V) as
Linear_Combination of (
{} V) by
VECTSP_6: 5;
reconsider f =
{x} as
Element of V by
A4,
XBOOLE_1: 11;
reconsider g = f as
Subset of X;
set m = (z
+* (f,(
1_
Z_2 )));
m is
Linear_Combination of ((
{} V)
\/
{f}) by
RANKNULL: 23;
then
reconsider m = (z
+* (f,(
1_
Z_2 ))) as
Linear_Combination of
{f};
(
dom z)
= (
[#] V) by
FUNCT_2: 92;
then
A8: (m
. f)
= (
1_
Z_2 ) by
FUNCT_7: 31;
f
in S;
then
{f}
c= S by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then m is
Linear_Combination of S by
VECTSP_6: 4;
then
reconsider n = (l
+ m) as
Linear_Combination of S by
VECTSP_6: 24;
take n;
(
Sum n)
= ((
Sum l)
+ (
Sum m)) by
VECTSP_6: 44
.= ((
Sum l)
+ ((m
. f)
* f)) by
VECTSP_6: 17
.= ((
Sum l)
+ f) by
A8,
VECTSP_1:def 17
.= (B
\+\ g) by
A5,
Def5
.= ((B
\/
{x})
\ (B
/\
{x})) by
XBOOLE_1: 101
.= ((B
\/
{x})
\
{} ) by
A7
.= (B
\/
{x});
hence thesis;
end;
end;
A9: A is
finite;
P[A] from
FINSET_1:sch 2(
A9,
A1,
A2);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:39
Th39: for X be
finite
set holds (
Lin (
singletons X))
= (
bspace X)
proof
let X be
finite
set;
set V = (
bspace X);
set S = (
singletons X);
for v be
Element of V holds v
in (
Lin S)
proof
let v be
Element of V;
reconsider f = v as
Subset of X;
consider A be
set such that
A1: A
c= X and
A2: f
= A;
reconsider A as
Subset of X by
A1;
ex l be
Linear_Combination of S st (
Sum l)
= A by
Th38;
hence thesis by
A2,
VECTSP_7: 7;
end;
hence thesis by
VECTSP_4: 32;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:40
Th40: for X be
finite
set holds (
singletons X) is
Basis of (
bspace X)
proof
let X be
finite
set;
(
singletons X) is
linearly-independent & (
Lin (
singletons X))
= (
bspace X) by
Th36,
Th39;
hence thesis by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
end;
registration
let X be
finite
set;
cluster (
singletons X) ->
finite;
coherence ;
end
registration
let X be
finite
set;
cluster (
bspace X) ->
finite-dimensional;
coherence
proof
set S = (
singletons X);
S is
Basis of (
bspace X) by
Th40;
hence thesis by
MATRLIN:def 1;
end;
end
theorem ::
BSPACE:41
(
card (
singletons X))
= (
card X)
proof
defpred
P[
object,
object] means $1
in X & $2
=
{$1};
A1: for x be
object st x
in X holds ex y be
object st
P[x, y];
consider f be
Function such that
A2: (
dom f)
= X and
A3: for x be
object st x
in X holds
P[x, (f
. x)] from
CLASSES1:sch 1(
A1);
A4: (
rng f)
= (
singletons X)
proof
thus (
rng f)
c= (
singletons X)
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in (
rng f);
then
consider x be
object such that
A5: x
in (
dom f) and
A6: y
= (f
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
A7: (f
. x)
=
{x} by
A2,
A3,
A5;
then
reconsider fx = (f
. x) as
Subset of X by
A2,
A5,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
fx is 1
-element by
A7;
hence thesis by
A6;
end;
let y be
object such that
A8: y
in (
singletons X);
reconsider X as non
empty
set by
A8;
ex z be
Subset of X st y
= z & z is 1
-element by
A8;
then
reconsider y as 1
-element
Subset of X;
consider x be
Element of X such that
A9: y
=
{x} by
CARD_1: 65;
y
= (f
. x) by
A3,
A9;
hence thesis by
A2,
FUNCT_1: 3;
end;
f is
one-to-one
proof
let x1,x2 be
object such that
A10: x1
in (
dom f) & x2
in (
dom f) and
A11: (f
. x1)
= (f
. x2);
P[x1, (f
. x1)] &
P[x2, (f
. x2)] by
A2,
A3,
A10;
hence thesis by
A11,
ZFMISC_1: 3;
end;
then (X,(
singletons X))
are_equipotent by
A2,
A4,
WELLORD2:def 4;
hence thesis by
CARD_1: 5;
end;
theorem ::
BSPACE:42
(
card (
[#] (
bspace X)))
= (
exp (2,(
card X))) by
CARD_2: 31;
theorem ::
BSPACE:43
(
dim (
bspace
{} ))
=
0
proof
(
card (
[#] (
bspace
{} )))
= 1 by
CARD_2: 42,
ZFMISC_1: 1;
hence thesis by
RANKNULL: 5;
end;