compts_1.miz
begin
reserve x,y,z for
set,
T for
TopStruct,
A for
SubSpace of T,
P,Q for
Subset of T;
definition
let T be
TopStruct;
::
COMPTS_1:def1
attr T is
compact means for F be
Subset-Family of T st F is
Cover of T & F is
open holds ex G be
Subset-Family of T st G
c= F & G is
Cover of T & G is
finite;
end
definition
let T be non
empty
TopSpace;
:: original:
regular
redefine
::
COMPTS_1:def2
attr T is
regular means for p be
Point of T, P be
Subset of T st P
<>
{} & P is
closed & p
in (P
` ) holds ex W,V be
Subset of T st W is
open & V is
open & p
in W & P
c= V & W
misses V;
compatibility
proof
thus T is
regular implies for p be
Point of T, P be
Subset of T st P
<>
{} & P is
closed & p
in (P
` ) holds ex W,V be
Subset of T st W is
open & V is
open & p
in W & P
c= V & W
misses V;
assume
A1: for p be
Point of T, P be
Subset of T st P
<>
{} & P is
closed & p
in (P
` ) holds ex W,V be
Subset of T st W is
open & V is
open & p
in W & P
c= V & W
misses V;
let p be
Point of T, P be
Subset of T;
assume that
A2: P is
closed and
A3: p
in (P
` );
per cases ;
suppose
A4: P
=
{} ;
take G1 = (
[#] T), G2 = (
{} T);
thus G1 is
open & G2 is
open;
thus p
in G1;
thus thesis by
A4;
end;
suppose P
<>
{} ;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A3;
end;
end;
:: original:
normal
redefine
::
COMPTS_1:def3
attr T is
normal means for W,V be
Subset of T st W
<>
{} & V
<>
{} & W is
closed & V is
closed & W
misses V holds ex P,Q be
Subset of T st P is
open & Q is
open & W
c= P & V
c= Q & P
misses Q;
compatibility
proof
thus T is
normal implies for W,V be
Subset of T st W
<>
{} & V
<>
{} & W is
closed & V is
closed & W
misses V holds ex P,Q be
Subset of T st P is
open & Q is
open & W
c= P & V
c= Q & P
misses Q;
assume
A5: for W,V be
Subset of T st W
<>
{} & V
<>
{} & W is
closed & V is
closed & W
misses V holds ex P,Q be
Subset of T st P is
open & Q is
open & W
c= P & V
c= Q & P
misses Q;
let F1,F2 be
Subset of T such that
A6: F1 is
closed and
A7: F2 is
closed and
A8: F1
misses F2;
per cases ;
suppose
A9: F1
=
{} ;
take G1 = (
{} T), G2 = (
[#] T);
thus G1 is
open & G2 is
open;
thus F1
c= G1 by
A9;
thus F2
c= G2;
thus thesis;
end;
suppose
A10: F2
=
{} ;
take G1 = (
[#] T), G2 = (
{} T);
thus G1 is
open & G2 is
open;
thus F1
c= G1;
thus F2
c= G2 by
A10;
thus thesis;
end;
suppose F1
<>
{} & F2
<>
{} ;
hence thesis by
A5,
A6,
A7,
A8;
end;
end;
end
notation
let T be
TopStruct;
synonym T is
Hausdorff for T is
T_2;
end
definition
let T be
TopStruct, P be
Subset of T;
::
COMPTS_1:def4
attr P is
compact means
:
Def4: for F be
Subset-Family of T st F is
Cover of P & F is
open holds ex G be
Subset-Family of T st G
c= F & G is
Cover of P & G is
finite;
end
registration
let T;
cluster
empty ->
compact for
Subset of T;
coherence
proof
reconsider C =
{} as
Subset-Family of T by
XBOOLE_1: 2;
let S be
Subset of T;
assume S is
empty;
then
A1: S
c= (
union C);
let F be
Subset-Family of T such that F is
Cover of S and F is
open;
take C;
thus thesis by
A1,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
end;
end
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:1
T is
compact iff (
[#] T) is
compact;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:2
Th2: Q
c= (
[#] A) implies (Q is
compact iff for P be
Subset of A st P
= Q holds P is
compact)
proof
(
[#] A)
c= (
[#] T) by
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
then
reconsider AA = (
[#] A) as
Subset of T;
assume
A1: Q
c= (
[#] A);
then
A2: (Q
/\ AA)
= Q by
XBOOLE_1: 28;
thus Q is
compact implies for P be
Subset of A st P
= Q holds P is
compact
proof
assume
A3: Q is
compact;
let P be
Subset of A such that
A4: P
= Q;
thus P is
compact
proof
let G be
Subset-Family of A;
set GG = G;
assume that
A5: G is
Cover of P and
A6: G is
open;
consider F be
Subset-Family of T such that
A7: F is
open and
A8: for AA be
Subset of T st AA
= (
[#] A) holds GG
= (F
| AA) by
A6,
TOPS_2: 39;
A9: Q
c= (
union G) by
A4,
A5,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
(
union (F
| AA))
c= (
union F) by
TOPS_2: 34;
then (
union G)
c= (
union F) by
A8;
then Q
c= (
union F) by
A9;
then F is
Cover of Q by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then
consider F9 be
Subset-Family of T such that
A10: F9
c= F and
A11: F9 is
Cover of Q and
A12: F9 is
finite by
A3,
A7;
(F9
| AA)
c= (
bool (
[#] (T
| AA)));
then
reconsider G9 = (F9
| AA) as
Subset-Family of A by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
take G9;
(F9
| AA)
c= (F
| AA) by
A10,
TOPS_2: 30;
hence G9
c= G by
A8;
Q
c= (
union F9) by
A11,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then P
c= (
union G9) by
A2,
A4,
TOPS_2: 32;
hence G9 is
Cover of P by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
thus thesis by
A12,
TOPS_2: 36;
end;
end;
thus (for P be
Subset of A st P
= Q holds P is
compact) implies Q is
compact
proof
reconsider QQ = Q as
Subset of A by
A1;
assume for P be
Subset of A st P
= Q holds P is
compact;
then
A13: QQ is
compact;
thus Q is
compact
proof
let F be
Subset-Family of T;
set F9 = F;
assume that
A14: F is
Cover of Q and
A15: F is
open;
consider f be
Function such that
A16: (
dom f)
= F9 and
A17: (
rng f)
= (F9
| AA) and
A18: for x st x
in F holds for Q be
Subset of T st Q
= x holds (f
. x)
= (Q
/\ AA) by
TOPS_2: 40;
(F9
| AA)
c= (
bool (
[#] (T
| AA)));
then
reconsider F9 = (
rng f) as
Subset-Family of A by
A17,
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
A19: F9 is
open
proof
let X be
Subset of A;
assume
A20: X
in F9;
then
reconsider Y = X as
Subset of (T
| AA) by
A17;
consider R be
Subset of T such that
A21: R
in F and
A22: (R
/\ AA)
= Y by
A17,
A20,
TOPS_2:def 3;
R is
open by
A15,
A21;
then R
in the
topology of T;
then X
in the
topology of A by
A22,
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
hence thesis;
end;
Q
c= (
union F) by
A14,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then QQ
c= (
union F9) by
A2,
A17,
TOPS_2: 32;
then F9 is
Cover of QQ by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then
consider G be
Subset-Family of A such that
A23: G
c= F9 and
A24: G is
Cover of QQ and
A25: G is
finite by
A13,
A19;
consider X be
set such that
A26: X
c= (
dom f) and
A27: X is
finite and
A28: (f
.: X)
= G by
A23,
A25,
ORDERS_1: 85;
reconsider G9 = X as
Subset-Family of T by
A16,
A26,
TOPS_2: 2;
take G9;
Q
c= (
union G9)
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A29: x
in Q;
QQ
c= (
union G) by
A24,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then
consider Y be
set such that
A30: x
in Y and
A31: Y
in G by
A29,
TARSKI:def 4;
consider z be
object such that
A32: z
in (
dom f) and
A33: z
in X and
A34: (f
. z)
= Y by
A28,
A31,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
reconsider Z = z as
Subset of T by
A16,
A32;
Y
= (Z
/\ AA) by
A16,
A18,
A32,
A34;
then x
in Z by
A30,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence thesis by
A33,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
hence thesis by
A16,
A26,
A27,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
end;
end;
end;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:3
Th3: (P
=
{} implies (P is
compact iff (T
| P) is
compact)) & (T is
TopSpace-like & P
<>
{} implies (P is
compact iff (T
| P) is
compact))
proof
A1: (
[#] (T
| P))
= P by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
thus P
=
{} implies (P is
compact iff (T
| P) is
compact);
assume that
A2: T is
TopSpace-like and
A3: P
<>
{} ;
reconsider T9 = T as non
empty
TopSpace by
A2,
A3;
reconsider P9 = P as non
empty
Subset of T9 by
A3;
A4: (
[#] (T9
| P9)) is
compact iff (T9
| P9) is
compact;
hence P is
compact implies (T
| P) is
compact by
A1,
Th2;
assume (T
| P) is
compact;
then for Q be
Subset of (T
| P) st Q
= P holds Q is
compact by
A4,
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th2;
end;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:4
Th4: for T be non
empty
TopSpace holds T is
compact iff for F be
Subset-Family of T st F is
centered & F is
closed holds (
meet F)
<>
{}
proof
let T be non
empty
TopSpace;
thus T is
compact implies for F be
Subset-Family of T st F is
centered & F is
closed holds (
meet F)
<>
{}
proof
assume
A1: T is
compact;
let F be
Subset-Family of T such that
A2: F is
centered and
A3: F is
closed;
reconsider C = (
COMPLEMENT F) as
Subset-Family of T;
assume
A4: (
meet F)
=
{} ;
F
<>
{} by
A2,
FINSET_1:def 3;
then (
union (
COMPLEMENT F))
= ((
meet F)
` ) by
TOPS_2: 7
.= (
[#] T) by
A4;
then
A5: (
COMPLEMENT F) is
Cover of T by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
(
COMPLEMENT F) is
open by
A3,
TOPS_2: 9;
then
consider G9 be
Subset-Family of T such that
A6: G9
c= C and
A7: G9 is
Cover of T and
A8: G9 is
finite by
A1,
A5;
set F9 = (
COMPLEMENT G9);
A9: F9 is
finite by
A8,
TOPS_2: 8;
A10: F9
c= F
proof
let X be
object;
assume
A11: X
in F9;
then
reconsider X1 = X as
Subset of T;
(X1
` )
in G9 by
A11,
SETFAM_1:def 7;
then ((X1
` )
` )
in F by
A6,
SETFAM_1:def 7;
hence thesis;
end;
G9
<>
{} by
A7,
TOPS_2: 3;
then
A12: F9
<>
{} by
TOPS_2: 5;
(
meet F9)
= ((
union G9)
` ) by
A7,
TOPS_2: 3,
TOPS_2: 6
.= ((
[#] T)
\ (
[#] T)) by
A7,
SETFAM_1: 45
.=
{} by
XBOOLE_1: 37;
hence contradiction by
A2,
A10,
A9,
A12,
FINSET_1:def 3;
end;
assume
A13: for F be
Subset-Family of T st F is
centered & F is
closed holds (
meet F)
<>
{} ;
thus T is
compact
proof
let F be
Subset-Family of T such that
A14: F is
Cover of T and
A15: F is
open;
reconsider G = (
COMPLEMENT F) as
Subset-Family of T;
A16: G is
closed by
A15,
TOPS_2: 10;
F
<>
{} by
A14,
TOPS_2: 3;
then
A17: G
<>
{} by
TOPS_2: 5;
(
meet G)
= ((
union F)
` ) by
A14,
TOPS_2: 3,
TOPS_2: 6
.= ((
[#] T)
\ (
[#] T)) by
A14,
SETFAM_1: 45
.=
{} by
XBOOLE_1: 37;
then not G is
centered by
A13,
A16;
then
consider G9 be
set such that
A18: G9
<>
{} and
A19: G9
c= G and
A20: G9 is
finite and
A21: (
meet G9)
=
{} by
A17,
FINSET_1:def 3;
reconsider G9 as
Subset-Family of T by
A19,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
take F9 = (
COMPLEMENT G9);
thus F9
c= F
proof
let A be
object;
assume
A22: A
in F9;
then
reconsider A1 = A as
Subset of T;
(A1
` )
in G9 by
A22,
SETFAM_1:def 7;
then ((A1
` )
` )
in F by
A19,
SETFAM_1:def 7;
hence thesis;
end;
(
union F9)
= ((
meet G9)
` ) by
A18,
TOPS_2: 7
.= (
[#] T) by
A21;
hence F9 is
Cover of T by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
thus thesis by
A20,
TOPS_2: 8;
end;
end;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:5
for T be non
empty
TopSpace holds T is
compact iff for F be
Subset-Family of T st F
<>
{} & F is
closed & (
meet F)
=
{} holds ex G be
Subset-Family of T st G
<>
{} & G
c= F & G is
finite & (
meet G)
=
{}
proof
let T be non
empty
TopSpace;
thus T is
compact implies for F be
Subset-Family of T st F
<>
{} & F is
closed & (
meet F)
=
{} holds ex G be
Subset-Family of T st G
<>
{} & G
c= F & G is
finite & (
meet G)
=
{}
proof
assume
A1: T is
compact;
let F be
Subset-Family of T such that
A2: F
<>
{} and
A3: F is
closed and
A4: (
meet F)
=
{} ;
not F is
centered by
A1,
A3,
A4,
Th4;
then
consider G be
set such that
A5: G
<>
{} and
A6: G
c= F and
A7: G is
finite and
A8: (
meet G)
=
{} by
A2,
FINSET_1:def 3;
reconsider G as
Subset-Family of T by
A6,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
take G;
thus thesis by
A5,
A6,
A7,
A8;
end;
assume
A9: for F be
Subset-Family of T st F
<>
{} & F is
closed & (
meet F)
=
{} holds ex G be
Subset-Family of T st G
<>
{} & G
c= F & G is
finite & (
meet G)
=
{} ;
for F be
Subset-Family of T st F is
centered & F is
closed holds (
meet F)
<>
{}
proof
let F be
Subset-Family of T;
assume that
A10: F is
centered and
A11: F is
closed;
assume
A12: (
meet F)
=
{} ;
F
<>
{} by
A10,
FINSET_1:def 3;
then ex G be
Subset-Family of T st G
<>
{} & G
c= F & G is
finite & (
meet G)
=
{} by
A9,
A11,
A12;
hence contradiction by
A10,
FINSET_1:def 3;
end;
hence thesis by
Th4;
end;
reserve TS for
TopSpace;
reserve PS,QS for
Subset of TS;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:6
Th6: TS is
T_2 implies for A be
Subset of TS st A
<>
{} & A is
compact holds for p be
Point of TS st p
in (A
` ) holds ex PS, QS st PS is
open & QS is
open & p
in PS & A
c= QS & PS
misses QS
proof
assume
A1: TS is
T_2;
let F be
Subset of TS such that
A2: F
<>
{} and
A3: F is
compact;
set z = the
Element of F;
let a be
Point of TS;
assume a
in (F
` );
then
A4: not a
in F by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
defpred
P[
object,
object,
object] means ex PS, QS st $2
= PS & $3
= QS & PS is
open & QS is
open & a
in PS & $1
in QS & (PS
/\ QS)
=
{} ;
A5: for x be
object holds x
in F implies ex y,z be
object st y
in the
topology of TS & z
in the
topology of TS &
P[x, y, z]
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A6: x
in F;
then
reconsider p = x as
Point of TS;
consider W,V be
Subset of TS such that
A7: W is
open and
A8: V is
open and
A9: a
in W and
A10: p
in V and
A11: W
misses V by
A1,
A4,
A6;
reconsider PS = W, QS = V as
set;
take PS, QS;
thus PS
in the
topology of TS & QS
in the
topology of TS by
A7,
A8;
take W, V;
thus thesis by
A7,
A8,
A9,
A10,
A11;
end;
consider f,g be
Function such that
A12: (
dom f)
= F & (
dom g)
= F and
A13: for x be
object st x
in F holds
P[x, (f
. x), (g
. x)] from
MCART_1:sch 1(
A5);
(g
.: F)
c= (
bool the
carrier of TS)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (g
.: F);
then
consider y be
object such that y
in (
dom g) and
A14: y
in F and
A15: (g
. y)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
ex PS, QS st (f
. y)
= PS & (g
. y)
= QS & PS is
open & QS is
open & a
in PS & y
in QS & (PS
/\ QS)
=
{} by
A13,
A14;
hence thesis by
A15;
end;
then
reconsider C = (g
.: F) as
Subset-Family of TS;
A16: C is
open
proof
let G be
Subset of TS;
assume G
in C;
then
consider x be
object such that x
in (
dom g) and
A17: x
in F and
A18: G
= (g
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
ex PS, QS st (f
. x)
= PS & (g
. x)
= QS & PS is
open & QS is
open & a
in PS & x
in QS & (PS
/\ QS)
=
{} by
A13,
A17;
hence thesis by
A18;
end;
F
c= (
union C)
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A19: x
in F;
then
consider PS, QS such that (f
. x)
= PS and
A20: (g
. x)
= QS and PS is
open and QS is
open and a
in PS and
A21: x
in QS and (PS
/\ QS)
=
{} by
A13;
QS
in C by
A12,
A19,
A20,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
hence thesis by
A21,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
then C is
Cover of F by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then
consider C9 be
Subset-Family of TS such that
A22: C9
c= C and
A23: C9 is
Cover of F and
A24: C9 is
finite by
A3,
A16;
C9
c= (
rng g) by
A12,
A22,
RELAT_1: 113;
then
consider H9 be
set such that
A25: H9
c= (
dom g) and
A26: H9 is
finite and
A27: (g
.: H9)
= C9 by
A24,
ORDERS_1: 85;
(f
.: H9)
c= (
bool the
carrier of TS)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (f
.: H9);
then
consider y be
object such that y
in (
dom f) and
A28: y
in H9 and
A29: (f
. y)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
ex PS, QS st (f
. y)
= PS & (g
. y)
= QS & PS is
open & QS is
open & a
in PS & y
in QS & (PS
/\ QS)
=
{} by
A12,
A13,
A25,
A28;
hence thesis by
A29;
end;
then
reconsider B = (f
.: H9) as
Subset-Family of TS;
take G0 = (
meet B), G1 = (
union C9);
B is
open
proof
let G be
Subset of TS;
assume G
in B;
then
consider x be
object such that
A30: x
in (
dom f) and x
in H9 and
A31: G
= (f
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
ex PS, QS st (f
. x)
= PS & (g
. x)
= QS & PS is
open & QS is
open & a
in PS & x
in QS & (PS
/\ QS)
=
{} by
A12,
A13,
A30;
hence thesis by
A31;
end;
hence G0 is
open by
A26,
TOPS_2: 20;
thus G1 is
open by
A16,
A22,
TOPS_2: 11,
TOPS_2: 19;
A32: for G be
set st G
in B holds a
in G
proof
let G be
set;
assume
A33: G
in B;
then
reconsider G9 = G as
Subset of TS;
consider x be
object such that
A34: x
in (
dom f) and x
in H9 and
A35: G9
= (f
. x) by
A33,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
ex PS, QS st (f
. x)
= PS & (g
. x)
= QS & PS is
open & QS is
open & a
in PS & x
in QS & (PS
/\ QS)
=
{} by
A12,
A13,
A34;
hence thesis by
A35;
end;
F
c= (
union C9) by
A23,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then z
in (
union C9) by
A2;
then
consider D be
set such that z
in D and
A36: D
in C9 by
TARSKI:def 4;
reconsider D9 = D as
Subset of TS by
A36;
consider y be
object such that
A37: y
in (
dom g) and
A38: y
in H9 and D9
= (g
. y) by
A27,
A36,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
ex PS, QS st (f
. y)
= PS & (g
. y)
= QS & PS is
open & QS is
open & a
in PS & y
in QS & (PS
/\ QS)
=
{} by
A12,
A13,
A37;
then B
<>
{} by
A12,
A37,
A38,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
hence a
in G0 by
A32,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
thus F
c= G1 by
A23,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
thus (G0
/\ G1)
=
{}
proof
set x = the
Element of ((
meet B)
/\ (
union C9));
assume
A39: (G0
/\ G1)
<>
{} ;
then
A40: x
in (
meet B) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
x
in (
union C9) by
A39,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider A be
set such that
A41: x
in A and
A42: A
in C9 by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider z be
object such that
A43: z
in (
dom g) and
A44: z
in H9 and
A45: A
= (g
. z) by
A27,
A42,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
consider PS, QS such that
A46: (f
. z)
= PS and
A47: (g
. z)
= QS and PS is
open and QS is
open and a
in PS and z
in QS and
A48: (PS
/\ QS)
=
{} by
A12,
A13,
A43;
PS
in B by
A12,
A43,
A44,
A46,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
then x
in PS by
A40,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
hence contradiction by
A41,
A45,
A47,
A48,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
end;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:7
Th7: TS is
T_2 & PS is
compact implies PS is
closed
proof
assume that
A1: TS is
T_2 and
A2: PS is
compact;
per cases ;
suppose PS
=
{} ;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
A3: PS
<>
{} ;
now
let a be
set;
thus a
in (PS
` ) implies ex Q be
Subset of TS st Q is
open & Q
c= (PS
` ) & a
in Q
proof
assume
A4: a
in (PS
` );
then
reconsider p = a as
Point of TS;
consider W,V be
Subset of TS such that
A5: W is
open and V is
open and
A6: p
in W and
A7: PS
c= V and
A8: W
misses V by
A1,
A2,
A3,
A4,
Th6;
take Q = W;
W
misses ((V
` )
` ) by
A8;
then
A9: W
c= (V
` ) by
SUBSET_1: 24;
(V
` )
c= (PS
` ) by
A7,
SUBSET_1: 12;
hence thesis by
A5,
A6,
A9;
end;
thus (ex Q be
Subset of TS st Q is
open & Q
c= (PS
` ) & a
in Q) implies a
in (PS
` );
end;
then (PS
` ) is
open by
TOPS_1: 25;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:8
Th8: T is
compact & P is
closed implies P is
compact
proof
assume that
A1: T is
compact and
A2: P is
closed;
reconsider pp =
{(P
` )} as
Subset-Family of T;
let F be
Subset-Family of T such that
A3: F is
Cover of P and
A4: F is
open;
set FP = (F
\/ pp);
A5: (P
` ) is
open by
A2;
A6: FP is
open
proof
let H be
Subset of T;
assume H
in FP;
then H
in F or H
in
{(P
` )} by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence thesis by
A4,
A5,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
reconsider M =
{(P
` )} as
Subset-Family of T;
((F
\/
{(P
` )})
\
{(P
` )})
= (F
\
{(P
` )}) by
XBOOLE_1: 40;
then
A7: ((F
\/
{(P
` )})
\
{(P
` )})
c= F by
XBOOLE_1: 36;
P
c= (
union F) by
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then (P
\/ (P
` ))
c= ((
union F)
\/ (P
` )) by
XBOOLE_1: 9;
then (
[#] T)
c= ((
union F)
\/ (P
` )) by
PRE_TOPC: 2;
then (
[#] T)
= ((
union F)
\/ (P
` ))
.= ((
union F)
\/ (
union
{(P
` )})) by
ZFMISC_1: 25
.= (
union (F
\/
{(P
` )})) by
ZFMISC_1: 78;
then FP is
Cover of T by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then
consider G be
Subset-Family of T such that
A8: G
c= FP and
A9: G is
Cover of T and
A10: G is
finite by
A1,
A6;
reconsider G9 = (G
\ pp) as
Subset-Family of T;
take G9;
G9
c= ((F
\/
{(P
` )})
\
{(P
` )}) by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 33;
hence G9
c= F by
A7;
((
union G)
\ (
union M))
= ((
[#] T)
\ (
union
{(P
` )})) by
A9,
SETFAM_1: 45
.= ((P
` )
` ) by
ZFMISC_1: 25
.= P;
then P
c= (
union G9) by
TOPS_2: 4;
hence G9 is
Cover of P by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
thus thesis by
A10;
end;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:9
Th9: PS is
compact & QS
c= PS & QS is
closed implies QS is
compact
proof
assume that
A1: PS is
compact and
A2: QS
c= PS and
A3: QS is
closed;
per cases ;
suppose PS
=
{} ;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
suppose PS
<>
{} ;
then (TS
| PS) is
compact by
A1,
Th3;
then
A4: for QQ be
Subset of (TS
| PS) st QQ
= QS holds QQ is
compact by
A3,
Th8,
TOPS_2: 26;
PS
= (
[#] (TS
| PS)) by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
hence thesis by
A2,
A4,
Th2;
end;
end;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:10
P is
compact & Q is
compact implies (P
\/ Q) is
compact
proof
assume that
A1: P is
compact and
A2: Q is
compact;
let F be
Subset-Family of T such that
A3: F is
Cover of (P
\/ Q) and
A4: F is
open;
A5: (P
\/ Q)
c= (
union F) by
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
Q
c= (P
\/ Q) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then Q
c= (
union F) by
A5;
then F is
Cover of Q by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then
consider G2 be
Subset-Family of T such that
A6: G2
c= F and
A7: G2 is
Cover of Q and
A8: G2 is
finite by
A2,
A4;
A9: Q
c= (
union G2) by
A7,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
P
c= (P
\/ Q) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then P
c= (
union F) by
A5;
then F is
Cover of P by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then
consider G1 be
Subset-Family of T such that
A10: G1
c= F and
A11: G1 is
Cover of P and
A12: G1 is
finite by
A1,
A4;
reconsider G = (G1
\/ G2) as
Subset-Family of T;
take G;
thus G
c= F by
A10,
A6,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
P
c= (
union G1) by
A11,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then (P
\/ Q)
c= ((
union G1)
\/ (
union G2)) by
A9,
XBOOLE_1: 13;
then (P
\/ Q)
c= (
union (G1
\/ G2)) by
ZFMISC_1: 78;
hence G is
Cover of (P
\/ Q) by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
thus thesis by
A12,
A8;
end;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:11
TS is
T_2 & PS is
compact & QS is
compact implies (PS
/\ QS) is
compact
proof
assume that
A1: TS is
T_2 and
A2: PS is
compact and
A3: QS is
compact;
A4: QS is
closed by
A1,
A3,
Th7;
PS is
closed by
A1,
A2,
Th7;
hence thesis by
A2,
A4,
Th9,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
end;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:12
for TS be non
empty
TopSpace holds TS is
T_2 & TS is
compact implies TS is
regular by
Th6,
Th8;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:13
for TS be non
empty
TopSpace holds TS is
T_2 & TS is
compact implies TS is
normal
proof
let TS be non
empty
TopSpace;
assume that
A1: TS is
T_2 and
A2: TS is
compact;
let A,B be
Subset of TS such that
A3: A
<>
{} and
A4: B
<>
{} and
A5: A is
closed and
A6: B is
closed and
A7: (A
/\ B)
=
{} ;
defpred
P[
object,
object,
object] means ex P,Q be
Subset of TS st $2
= P & $3
= Q & P is
open & Q is
open & $1
in P & B
c= Q & (P
/\ Q)
=
{} ;
A8: for x be
object holds x
in A implies ex y,z be
object st y
in the
topology of TS & z
in the
topology of TS &
P[x, y, z]
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A9: x
in A;
then
reconsider p = x as
Point of TS;
not p
in B by
A7,
A9,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then p
in (B
` ) by
SUBSET_1: 29;
then
consider W,V be
Subset of TS such that
A10: W is
open and
A11: V is
open and
A12: p
in W and
A13: B
c= V and
A14: W
misses V by
A1,
A2,
A4,
A6,
Th6,
Th8;
reconsider X = W, Y = V as
set;
take X, Y;
thus X
in the
topology of TS & Y
in the
topology of TS by
A10,
A11;
(W
/\ V)
=
{} by
A14;
hence thesis by
A10,
A11,
A12,
A13;
end;
consider f,g be
Function such that
A15: (
dom f)
= A & (
dom g)
= A and
A16: for x be
object st x
in A holds
P[x, (f
. x), (g
. x)] from
MCART_1:sch 1(
A8);
(f
.: A)
c= (
bool the
carrier of TS)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (f
.: A);
then
consider y be
object such that y
in (
dom f) and
A17: y
in A and
A18: (f
. y)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
ex P,Q be
Subset of TS st (f
. y)
= P & (g
. y)
= Q & P is
open & Q is
open & y
in P & B
c= Q & (P
/\ Q)
=
{} by
A16,
A17;
hence thesis by
A18;
end;
then
reconsider Cf = (f
.: A) as
Subset-Family of TS;
A
c= (
union Cf)
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A19: x
in A;
then
consider P,Q be
Subset of TS such that
A20: (f
. x)
= P and (g
. x)
= Q and P is
open and Q is
open and
A21: x
in P and B
c= Q and (P
/\ Q)
=
{} by
A16;
P
in Cf by
A15,
A19,
A20,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
hence thesis by
A21,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
then
A22: Cf is
Cover of A by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
A23: Cf is
open
proof
let G be
Subset of TS;
assume G
in Cf;
then
consider x be
object such that x
in (
dom f) and
A24: x
in A and
A25: G
= (f
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
ex P,Q be
Subset of TS st (f
. x)
= P & (g
. x)
= Q & P is
open & Q is
open & x
in P & B
c= Q & (P
/\ Q)
=
{} by
A16,
A24;
hence thesis by
A25;
end;
A is
compact by
A2,
A5,
Th8;
then
consider C be
Subset-Family of TS such that
A26: C
c= Cf and
A27: C is
Cover of A and
A28: C is
finite by
A22,
A23;
set z = the
Element of A;
A
c= (
union C) by
A27,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then z
in (
union C) by
A3;
then
consider D be
set such that z
in D and
A29: D
in C by
TARSKI:def 4;
C
c= (
rng f) by
A15,
A26,
RELAT_1: 113;
then
consider H9 be
set such that
A30: H9
c= (
dom f) and
A31: H9 is
finite and
A32: (f
.: H9)
= C by
A28,
ORDERS_1: 85;
(g
.: H9)
c= (
bool the
carrier of TS)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (g
.: H9);
then
consider y be
object such that y
in (
dom g) and
A33: y
in H9 and
A34: (g
. y)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
ex P,Q be
Subset of TS st (f
. y)
= P & (g
. y)
= Q & P is
open & Q is
open & y
in P & B
c= Q & (P
/\ Q)
=
{} by
A15,
A16,
A30,
A33;
hence thesis by
A34;
end;
then
reconsider Bk = (g
.: H9) as
Subset-Family of TS;
consider y be
object such that
A35: y
in (
dom f) and
A36: y
in H9 and D
= (f
. y) by
A32,
A29,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
A37: for X be
set st X
in Bk holds B
c= X
proof
let X be
set;
assume
A38: X
in Bk;
then
reconsider X9 = X as
Subset of TS;
consider x be
object such that
A39: x
in (
dom g) and x
in H9 and
A40: X9
= (g
. x) by
A38,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
ex P,Q be
Subset of TS st (f
. x)
= P & (g
. x)
= Q & P is
open & Q is
open & x
in P & B
c= Q & (P
/\ Q)
=
{} by
A15,
A16,
A39;
hence thesis by
A40;
end;
take W = (
union C), V = (
meet Bk);
thus W is
open by
A23,
A26,
TOPS_2: 11,
TOPS_2: 19;
Bk is
open
proof
let G be
Subset of TS;
assume G
in Bk;
then
consider x be
object such that
A41: x
in (
dom g) and x
in H9 and
A42: G
= (g
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
ex P,Q be
Subset of TS st (f
. x)
= P & (g
. x)
= Q & P is
open & Q is
open & x
in P & B
c= Q & (P
/\ Q)
=
{} by
A15,
A16,
A41;
hence thesis by
A42;
end;
hence V is
open by
A31,
TOPS_2: 20;
thus A
c= W by
A27,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
ex P,Q be
Subset of TS st (f
. y)
= P & (g
. y)
= Q & P is
open & Q is
open & y
in P & B
c= Q & (P
/\ Q)
=
{} by
A15,
A16,
A35;
then Bk
<>
{} by
A15,
A35,
A36,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
hence B
c= V by
A37,
SETFAM_1: 5;
thus (W
/\ V)
=
{}
proof
set x = the
Element of ((
union C)
/\ (
meet Bk));
assume
A43: (W
/\ V)
<>
{} ;
then
A44: x
in (
meet Bk) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
x
in (
union C) by
A43,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider D be
set such that
A45: x
in D and
A46: D
in C by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider z be
object such that
A47: z
in (
dom f) and
A48: z
in H9 and
A49: D
= (f
. z) by
A32,
A46,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
consider P,Q be
Subset of TS such that
A50: (f
. z)
= P and
A51: (g
. z)
= Q and P is
open and Q is
open and z
in P and B
c= Q and
A52: (P
/\ Q)
=
{} by
A15,
A16,
A47;
Q
in Bk by
A15,
A47,
A48,
A51,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
then x
in Q by
A44,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
hence contradiction by
A45,
A49,
A50,
A52,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
end;
reserve S for non
empty
TopStruct;
reserve f for
Function of T, S;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:14
T is
compact & f is
continuous & (
rng f)
= (
[#] S) implies S is
compact
proof
assume
A1: T is
compact;
(
[#] T)
c= (
dom f) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A2: (
[#] T)
c= (f
" (f
.: (
[#] T))) by
FUNCT_1: 76;
assume that
A3: f is
continuous and
A4: (
rng f)
= (
[#] S);
let F be
Subset-Family of S such that
A5: F is
Cover of S and
A6: F is
open;
set F1 = F;
reconsider G = ((
" f)
.: F1) as
Subset-Family of T by
TOPS_2: 42;
(
union G)
= (f
" (
union F)) by
A4,
FUNCT_3: 26
.= (f
" (
rng f)) by
A4,
A5,
SETFAM_1: 45
.= (f
" (f
.: (
dom f))) by
RELAT_1: 113
.= (f
" (f
.: (
[#] T))) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A7: G is
Cover of T by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
A8: ((
.: f)
.: ((
.: f)
" F))
c= F by
FUNCT_1: 75;
((
.: f)
.: ((
" f)
.: F))
c= ((
.: f)
.: ((
.: f)
" F)) by
FUNCT_3: 29,
RELAT_1: 123;
then
A9: ((
.: f)
.: G)
c= F by
A8;
G is
open by
A3,
A6,
TOPS_2: 47;
then
consider G9 be
Subset-Family of T such that
A10: G9
c= G and
A11: G9 is
Cover of T and
A12: G9 is
finite by
A1,
A7;
reconsider F9 = ((
.: f)
.: G9) as
Subset-Family of S;
take F9;
((
.: f)
.: G9)
c= ((
.: f)
.: G) by
A10,
RELAT_1: 123;
hence F9
c= F by
A9;
(
dom f)
= (
[#] T) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (
union F9)
= (f
.: (
union G9)) by
FUNCT_3: 14
.= (f
.: (
[#] T)) by
A11,
SETFAM_1: 45
.= (f
.: (
dom f)) by
FUNCT_2:def 1
.= (
[#] S) by
A4,
RELAT_1: 113;
hence F9 is
Cover of S by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
thus thesis by
A12;
end;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:15
Th15: f is
continuous & (
rng f)
= (
[#] S) & P is
compact implies (f
.: P) is
compact
proof
assume that
A1: f is
continuous and
A2: (
rng f)
= (
[#] S) and
A3: P is
compact;
let F be
Subset-Family of S such that
A4: F is
Cover of (f
.: P) and
A5: F is
open;
reconsider G = ((
" f)
.: F) as
Subset-Family of T by
TOPS_2: 42;
(f
.: P)
c= (
union F) by
A4,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then
A6: (f
" (f
.: P))
c= (f
" (
union F)) by
RELAT_1: 143;
P
c= (
[#] T);
then P
c= (
dom f) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A7: P
c= (f
" (f
.: P)) by
FUNCT_1: 76;
(
union G)
= (f
" (
union F)) by
A2,
FUNCT_3: 26;
then P
c= (
union G) by
A6,
A7;
then
A8: G is
Cover of P by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
G is
open by
A1,
A5,
TOPS_2: 47;
then
consider G9 be
Subset-Family of T such that
A9: G9
c= G and
A10: G9 is
Cover of P and
A11: G9 is
finite by
A3,
A8;
reconsider F9 = ((
.: f)
.: G9) as
Subset-Family of S;
take F9;
A12: ((
.: f)
.: ((
.: f)
" F))
c= F by
FUNCT_1: 75;
((
.: f)
.: ((
" f)
.: F))
c= ((
.: f)
.: ((
.: f)
" F)) by
FUNCT_3: 29,
RELAT_1: 123;
then
A13: ((
.: f)
.: G)
c= F by
A12;
((
.: f)
.: G9)
c= ((
.: f)
.: G) by
A9,
RELAT_1: 123;
hence F9
c= F by
A13;
A14: P
c= (
union G9) by
A10,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
(
dom f)
= (
[#] T) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (
union F9)
= (f
.: (
union G9)) by
FUNCT_3: 14;
then (f
.: P)
c= (
union F9) by
A14,
RELAT_1: 123;
hence F9 is
Cover of (f
.: P) by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
thus thesis by
A11;
end;
reserve SS for non
empty
TopSpace;
reserve f for
Function of TS, SS;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:16
Th16: TS is
compact & SS is
T_2 & (
rng f)
= (
[#] SS) & f is
continuous implies for PS st PS is
closed holds (f
.: PS) is
closed
proof
assume that
A1: TS is
compact and
A2: SS is
T_2 and
A3: (
rng f)
= (
[#] SS) and
A4: f is
continuous;
let PS;
assume PS is
closed;
then PS is
compact by
A1,
Th8;
hence thesis by
A2,
A3,
A4,
Th7,
Th15;
end;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:17
TS is
compact & SS is
T_2 & (
rng f)
= (
[#] SS) & f is
one-to-one & f is
continuous implies f is
being_homeomorphism
proof
assume that
A1: TS is
compact and
A2: SS is
T_2 and
A3: (
rng f)
= (
[#] SS) and
A4: f is
one-to-one and
A5: f is
continuous;
A6: (
dom f)
= (
[#] TS) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
for P be
Subset of TS holds P is
closed iff (f
.: P) is
closed
proof
let P be
Subset of TS;
A7: P
c= (f
" (f
.: P)) by
A6,
FUNCT_1: 76;
thus P is
closed implies (f
.: P) is
closed by
A1,
A2,
A3,
A5,
Th16;
assume (f
.: P) is
closed;
then
A8: (f
" (f
.: P)) is
closed by
A5;
(f
" (f
.: P))
c= P by
A4,
FUNCT_1: 82;
hence thesis by
A8,
A7,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
end;
hence thesis by
A6,
A3,
A4,
TOPS_2: 58;
end;
definition
let D be
set;
::
COMPTS_1:def5
func
1TopSp D ->
TopStruct equals
TopStruct (# D, (
[#] (
bool D)) #);
coherence ;
end
registration
let D be
set;
cluster (
1TopSp D) ->
strict
TopSpace-like;
coherence by
ZFMISC_1:def 1;
end
registration
let D be non
empty
set;
cluster (
1TopSp D) -> non
empty;
coherence ;
end
registration
let x be
set;
cluster (
1TopSp
{x}) ->
T_2;
coherence
proof
let p,q be
Point of (
1TopSp
{x});
assume
A1: p
<> q;
p
= x by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis by
A1,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
end
registration
cluster
T_2 non
empty for
TopSpace;
existence
proof
take (
1TopSp
{
{} });
thus thesis;
end;
end
registration
let T be
T_2 non
empty
TopSpace;
cluster
compact ->
closed for
Subset of T;
coherence by
Th7;
end
registration
let A be
finite
set;
cluster (
1TopSp A) ->
finite;
coherence ;
end
registration
cluster non
empty
finite
strict for
TopSpace;
existence
proof
take (
1TopSp
{
{} });
thus thesis;
end;
end
registration
cluster
finite ->
compact for
TopSpace;
coherence ;
end
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:18
for T be
TopSpace st the
carrier of T is
finite holds T is
compact;
registration
let T be
TopSpace;
cluster
finite ->
compact for
Subset of T;
coherence
proof
let A be
Subset of T;
assume A is
finite;
then
reconsider B = A as
finite
Subset of T;
(
[#] (T
| B))
= B by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
then
A1: (T
| B) is
compact;
B
=
{} or B
<>
{} ;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th3;
end;
end
registration
let T be non
empty
TopSpace;
cluster non
empty
compact for
Subset of T;
existence
proof
set A = the
finite non
empty
Subset of T;
take A;
thus thesis;
end;
end
registration
cluster
empty ->
T_2 for
TopStruct;
coherence by
STRUCT_0:def 10;
end
registration
let T be
T_2
TopStruct;
cluster ->
T_2 for
SubSpace of T;
coherence
proof
let A be
SubSpace of T;
per cases ;
suppose A is
empty;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
A1: A is non
empty;
let p,q be
Point of A such that
A2: not p
= q;
(
[#] A)
c= (
[#] T) by
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
then T is non
empty by
A1;
then
reconsider p9 = p, q9 = q as
Point of T by
A1,
PRE_TOPC: 25;
consider W,V be
Subset of T such that
A3: W is
open and
A4: V is
open and
A5: p9
in W and
A6: q9
in V and
A7: W
misses V by
A2,
PRE_TOPC:def 10;
reconsider W9 = (W
/\ (
[#] A)), V9 = (V
/\ (
[#] A)) as
Subset of A;
V
in the
topology of T by
A4;
then
A8: V9
in the
topology of A by
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
take W9, V9;
W
in the
topology of T by
A3;
then W9
in the
topology of A by
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
hence W9 is
open & V9 is
open by
A8;
thus p
in W9 & q
in V9 by
A1,
A5,
A6,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A9: (W
/\ V)
=
{} by
A7;
(W9
/\ V9)
= ((W
/\ (V
/\ (
[#] A)))
/\ (
[#] A)) by
XBOOLE_1: 16
.= (
{}
/\ (
[#] A)) by
A9,
XBOOLE_1: 16
.=
{} ;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
end
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:19
Th19: for X be
TopStruct holds for Y be
SubSpace of X, A be
Subset of X, B be
Subset of Y st A
= B holds A is
compact iff B is
compact
proof
let X be
TopStruct;
let Y be
SubSpace of X, A be
Subset of X, B be
Subset of Y such that
A1: A
= B;
A2: B
c= (
[#] Y);
hence A is
compact implies B is
compact by
A1,
Th2;
assume B is
compact;
then for P be
Subset of Y st P
= A holds P is
compact by
A1;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
Th2;
end;
reserve T,S for non
empty
TopSpace,
p for
Point of T;
Lm1: for X be
set holds for T1,T2 be
SubSpace of T, f be
Function of T1, S, g be
Function of T2, S st ((
[#] T1)
\/ (
[#] T2))
= (
[#] T) & ((
[#] T1)
/\ (
[#] T2))
= X & T1 is
compact & T2 is
compact & T is
T_2 & f is
continuous & g is
continuous & (f
| X)
tolerates (g
| X) holds (f
+* g) is
continuous
Function of T, S
proof
let X be
set;
let T1,T2 be
SubSpace of T, f be
Function of T1, S, g be
Function of T2, S;
assume that
A1: ((
[#] T1)
\/ (
[#] T2))
= (
[#] T) and
A2: ((
[#] T1)
/\ (
[#] T2))
= X and
A3: T1 is
compact and
A4: T2 is
compact and
A5: T is
T_2 and
A6: f is
continuous and
A7: g is
continuous and
A8: (f
| X)
tolerates (g
| X);
set h = (f
+* g);
A9: (
dom g)
= (
[#] T2) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
(
rng h)
c= ((
rng f)
\/ (
rng g)) by
FUNCT_4: 17;
then
A10: (
rng h)
c= the
carrier of S by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
A11: (
dom f)
= (
[#] T1) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (
dom h)
= the
carrier of T by
A1,
A9,
FUNCT_4:def 1;
then
reconsider h as
Function of T, S by
A10,
FUNCT_2:def 1,
RELSET_1: 4;
for P be
Subset of S st P is
closed holds (h
" P) is
closed
proof
let P be
Subset of S;
(
[#] T1)
c= (
[#] T) by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then
reconsider P1 = (f
" P) as
Subset of T by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
(
[#] T2)
c= (
[#] T) by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then
reconsider P2 = (g
" P) as
Subset of T by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
A12: (
dom h)
= ((
dom f)
\/ (
dom g)) by
FUNCT_4:def 1;
A13:
now
let x be
object;
thus x
in ((h
" P)
/\ (
[#] T2)) implies x
in (g
" P)
proof
assume
A14: x
in ((h
" P)
/\ (
[#] T2));
then x
in (h
" P) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A15: (h
. x)
in P by
FUNCT_1:def 7;
(g
. x)
= (h
. x) by
A9,
A14,
FUNCT_4: 13;
hence thesis by
A9,
A14,
A15,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
end;
assume
A16: x
in (g
" P);
then
A17: x
in (
dom g) by
FUNCT_1:def 7;
(g
. x)
in P by
A16,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then
A18: (h
. x)
in P by
A17,
FUNCT_4: 13;
x
in (
dom h) by
A12,
A17,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then x
in (h
" P) by
A18,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
hence x
in ((h
" P)
/\ (
[#] T2)) by
A16,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
A19: for x be
set st x
in (
[#] T1) holds (h
. x)
= (f
. x)
proof
let x be
set such that
A20: x
in (
[#] T1);
A21: (
dom g)
= the
carrier of T2 by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
per cases ;
suppose
A22: x
in (
[#] T2);
then x
in ((
[#] T1)
/\ (
[#] T2)) by
A20,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A23: x
in X by
A2;
then
A24: ((f
| X)
. x)
= (f
. x) & ((g
| X)
. x)
= (g
. x) by
FUNCT_1: 49;
x
in (
dom (f
| X)) & x
in (
dom (g
| X)) by
A11,
A20,
A21,
A22,
A23,
RELAT_1: 57;
then x
in ((
dom (f
| X))
/\ (
dom (g
| X))) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then ((f
| X)
. x)
= ((g
| X)
. x) by
A8,
PARTFUN1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A9,
A22,
A24,
FUNCT_4: 13;
end;
suppose not x
in (
[#] T2);
hence thesis by
A9,
FUNCT_4: 11;
end;
end;
now
let x be
object;
thus x
in ((h
" P)
/\ (
[#] T1)) implies x
in (f
" P)
proof
assume
A25: x
in ((h
" P)
/\ (
[#] T1));
then x
in (h
" P) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A26: (h
. x)
in P by
FUNCT_1:def 7;
(f
. x)
= (h
. x) by
A19,
A25;
hence thesis by
A11,
A25,
A26,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
end;
assume
A27: x
in (f
" P);
then x
in (
dom f) by
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then
A28: x
in (
dom h) by
A12,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
(f
. x)
in P by
A27,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then (h
. x)
in P by
A19,
A27;
then x
in (h
" P) by
A28,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
hence x
in ((h
" P)
/\ (
[#] T1)) by
A27,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
then
A29: ((h
" P)
/\ (
[#] T1))
= (f
" P) by
TARSKI: 2;
assume
A30: P is
closed;
then (f
" P) is
closed by
A6;
then (f
" P) is
compact by
A3,
Th8;
then
A31: P1 is
compact by
Th19;
(g
" P) is
closed by
A7,
A30;
then (g
" P) is
compact by
A4,
Th8;
then
A32: P2 is
compact by
Th19;
(h
" P)
= ((h
" P)
/\ ((
[#] T1)
\/ (
[#] T2))) by
A11,
A9,
A12,
RELAT_1: 132,
XBOOLE_1: 28
.= (((h
" P)
/\ (
[#] T1))
\/ ((h
" P)
/\ (
[#] T2))) by
XBOOLE_1: 23;
then (h
" P)
= ((f
" P)
\/ (g
" P)) by
A29,
A13,
TARSKI: 2;
hence thesis by
A5,
A31,
A32;
end;
hence thesis by
PRE_TOPC:def 6;
end;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:20
for T1,T2 be
SubSpace of T, f be
Function of T1, S, g be
Function of T2, S st ((
[#] T1)
\/ (
[#] T2))
= (
[#] T) & ((
[#] T1)
/\ (
[#] T2))
=
{p} & T1 is
compact & T2 is
compact & T is
T_2 & f is
continuous & g is
continuous & (f
. p)
= (g
. p) holds (f
+* g) is
continuous
Function of T, S
proof
let T1,T2 be
SubSpace of T, f be
Function of T1, S, g be
Function of T2, S;
assume
A1: ((
[#] T1)
\/ (
[#] T2))
= (
[#] T) & ((
[#] T1)
/\ (
[#] T2))
=
{p} & T1 is
compact & T2 is
compact & T is
T_2 & f is
continuous & g is
continuous;
assume (f
. p)
= (g
. p);
then (f
|
{p})
tolerates (g
|
{p}) by
PARTFUN1: 81;
hence thesis by
A1,
Lm1;
end;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:21
for T be non
empty
TopSpace, T1,T2 be
SubSpace of T, p1,p2 be
Point of T holds for f be
Function of T1, S, g be
Function of T2, S st ((
[#] T1)
\/ (
[#] T2))
= (
[#] T) & ((
[#] T1)
/\ (
[#] T2))
=
{p1, p2} & T1 is
compact & T2 is
compact & T is
T_2 & f is
continuous & g is
continuous & (f
. p1)
= (g
. p1) & (f
. p2)
= (g
. p2) holds (f
+* g) is
continuous
Function of T, S
proof
let T be non
empty
TopSpace, T1,T2 be
SubSpace of T, p1,p2 be
Point of T;
let f be
Function of T1, S, g be
Function of T2, S;
assume
A1: ((
[#] T1)
\/ (
[#] T2))
= (
[#] T) & ((
[#] T1)
/\ (
[#] T2))
=
{p1, p2} & T1 is
compact & T2 is
compact & T is
T_2 & f is
continuous & g is
continuous;
assume (f
. p1)
= (g
. p1) & (f
. p2)
= (g
. p2);
then (f
|
{p1, p2})
tolerates (g
|
{p1, p2}) by
PARTFUN1: 82;
hence thesis by
A1,
Lm1;
end;
begin
registration
let S be
TopStruct;
cluster the
topology of S ->
open;
coherence
proof
let P be
Subset of S;
thus thesis;
end;
end
registration
let T be
TopSpace;
cluster
open non
empty for
Subset-Family of T;
existence
proof
take the
topology of T;
thus thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:22
Th22: for T be non
empty
TopSpace, F be
set holds F is
open
Subset-Family of T iff F is
open
Subset-Family of the TopStruct of T
proof
let T be non
empty
TopSpace, F be
set;
thus F is
open
Subset-Family of T implies F is
open
Subset-Family of the TopStruct of T
proof
assume
A1: F is
open
Subset-Family of T;
then
reconsider F as
Subset-Family of the TopStruct of T;
F is
open by
A1,
TOPS_2:def 1,
PRE_TOPC: 30;
hence thesis;
end;
assume
A2: F is
open
Subset-Family of the TopStruct of T;
then
reconsider F as
Subset-Family of T;
F is
open by
A2,
TOPS_2:def 1,
PRE_TOPC: 30;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:23
for T be non
empty
TopSpace, X be
set holds X is
compact
Subset of T iff X is
compact
Subset of the TopStruct of T
proof
let T be non
empty
TopSpace, X be
set;
thus X is
compact
Subset of T implies X is
compact
Subset of the TopStruct of T
proof
assume
A1: X is
compact
Subset of T;
then
reconsider Z = X as
Subset of the TopStruct of T;
Z is
compact by
Th22,
A1,
Def4;
hence thesis;
end;
assume
A2: X is
compact
Subset of the TopStruct of T;
then
reconsider Z = X as
Subset of T;
Z is
compact by
Th22,
A2,
Def4;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
COMPTS_1:24
for X be
set holds for T1,T2 be
SubSpace of T, f be
Function of T1, S, g be
Function of T2, S st ((
[#] T1)
\/ (
[#] T2))
= (
[#] T) & ((
[#] T1)
/\ (
[#] T2))
= X & T1 is
compact & T2 is
compact & T is
T_2 & f is
continuous & g is
continuous & (f
| X)
tolerates (g
| X) holds (f
+* g) is
continuous
Function of T, S by
Lm1;