group_20.miz
begin
definition
let I be
set, G be
Group;
::
GROUP_20:def1
mode
Subgroup-Family of I,G ->
Group-Family of I means
:
Def1: for i be
object st i
in I holds (it
. i) is
Subgroup of G;
existence
proof
deffunc
f(
object) = (
(1). G);
consider F be
Function such that
A1: (
dom F)
= I and
A2: for i be
object st i
in I holds (F
. i)
=
f(i) from
FUNCT_1:sch 3;
for i be
object st i
in I holds (F
. i) is
Group by
A2;
then
reconsider F as
Group-Family of I by
A1,
GROUP_19: 2;
take F;
thus thesis by
A2;
end;
end
definition
let I be
set, G be
Group, F be
Subgroup-Family of I, G;
::
GROUP_20:def2
attr F is
component-commutative means for i,j be
object, gi,gj be
Element of G st i
in I & j
in I & i
<> j holds ex Fi,Fj be
Subgroup of G st Fi
= (F
. i) & Fj
= (F
. j) & (gi
in Fi & gj
in Fj implies (gi
* gj)
= (gj
* gi));
end
definition
let I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
Subgroup-Family of I, G;
:: original:
component-commutative
redefine
::
GROUP_20:def3
attr F is
component-commutative means
:
Def2: for i,j be
Element of I, gi,gj be
Element of G st i
<> j & gi
in (F
. i) & gj
in (F
. j) holds (gi
* gj)
= (gj
* gi);
compatibility
proof
thus F is
component-commutative implies for i,j be
Element of I, gi,gj be
Element of G st i
<> j & gi
in (F
. i) & gj
in (F
. j) holds (gi
* gj)
= (gj
* gi)
proof
assume
A1: F is
component-commutative;
let i,j be
Element of I, gi,gj be
Element of G;
assume i
<> j;
then ex Fi,Fj be
Subgroup of G st Fi
= (F
. i) & Fj
= (F
. j) & (gi
in Fi & gj
in Fj implies (gi
* gj)
= (gj
* gi)) by
A1;
hence thesis;
end;
assume
A2: for i,j be
Element of I, gi,gj be
Element of G st i
<> j & gi
in (F
. i) & gj
in (F
. j) holds (gi
* gj)
= (gj
* gi);
let i,j be
object, gi,gj be
Element of G;
assume that
A3: i
in I & j
in I and
A4: i
<> j;
reconsider Fi = (F
. i), Fj = (F
. j) as
Subgroup of G by
A3,
Def1;
take Fi, Fj;
thus thesis by
A2,
A3,
A4;
end;
end
registration
let I be non
empty
set, G be
Group;
cluster
component-commutative for
Subgroup-Family of I, G;
existence
proof
deffunc
f(
object) = (
(1). G);
consider F be
Function such that
A1: (
dom F)
= I and
A2: for i be
object st i
in I holds (F
. i)
=
f(i) from
FUNCT_1:sch 3;
for i be
object st i
in I holds (F
. i) is
Group by
A2;
then
reconsider F as
Group-Family of I by
A1,
GROUP_19: 2;
for i be
object st i
in I holds (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
A2;
then
reconsider F as
Subgroup-Family of I, G by
Def1;
take F;
for i,j be
Element of I, gi,gj be
Element of G st i
<> j & gi
in (F
. i) & gj
in (F
. j) holds (gi
* gj)
= (gj
* gi)
proof
let i,j be
Element of I;
let gi,gj be
Element of G;
assume i
<> j & gi
in (F
. i) & gj
in (F
. j);
then gi
in (
(1). G) & gj
in (
(1). G) by
A2;
then gi
in
{(
1_ G)} & gj
in
{(
1_ G)} by
GROUP_2:def 7;
then gi
= (
1_ G) & gj
= (
1_ G) by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
GROUP_20:1
Th1: for G be
Group, H be
normal
Subgroup of G, x,y be
Element of G st y
in H holds ((x
* y)
* (x
" ))
in H & (x
* (y
* (x
" )))
in H
proof
let G be
Group, H be
normal
Subgroup of G, x,y be
Element of G;
assume
A1: y
in H;
(x
* H)
= (H
* x) by
GROUP_3: 117;
then
consider g be
Element of G such that
A2: (x
* y)
= (g
* x) & g
in H by
A1,
GROUP_2: 103,
GROUP_2: 104;
((x
* y)
* (x
" ))
= g by
A2,
GROUP_3: 1;
hence thesis by
A2,
GROUP_1:def 3;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_20:2
Th2: for I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
Group-Family of I, x be
Function of I, G st x
in (
product F) holds x is
Function of I, (
Union (
Carrier F))
proof
let I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
Group-Family of I, x be
Function of I, G;
assume
A1: x
in (
product F);
A2: (
dom (
Carrier F))
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
for z be
object st z
in (
rng x) holds z
in (
Union (
Carrier F))
proof
let z be
object;
assume z
in (
rng x);
then
consider i be
object such that
A3: i
in I & z
= (x
. i) by
FUNCT_2: 11;
reconsider i as
Element of I by
A3;
(x
. i)
in (F
. i) by
A1,
GROUP_19: 5;
then z
in (
[#] (F
. i)) by
A3;
then
A4: z
in ((
Carrier F)
. i) by
PENCIL_3: 7;
((
Carrier F)
. i)
in (
rng (
Carrier F)) by
A2,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then z
in (
union (
rng (
Carrier F))) by
A4,
TARSKI:def 4;
hence z
in (
Union (
Carrier F)) by
CARD_3:def 4;
end;
then (
rng x)
c= (
Union (
Carrier F));
hence x is
Function of I, (
Union (
Carrier F)) by
FUNCT_2: 6;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_20:3
Th3: for I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, H be
Subgroup of G, x be
Function of I, G, y be
Function of I, H st x
= y holds (
support x)
= (
support y)
proof
let I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, H be
Subgroup of G, x be
Function of I, G, y be
Function of I, H;
assume
A1: x
= y;
for i be
object holds i
in (
support x) iff i
in (
support y)
proof
let i be
object;
A2: i
in (
support x) iff (x
. i)
<> (
1_ G) & i
in I by
GROUP_19:def 2;
i
in (
support y) iff (y
. i)
<> (
1_ H) & i
in I by
GROUP_19:def 2;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
GROUP_2: 44;
end;
hence thesis by
TARSKI: 2;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_20:4
Th4: for I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, H be
Subgroup of G, y be
finite-support
Function of I, H holds y is
finite-support
Function of I, G
proof
let I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, H be
Subgroup of G, y be
finite-support
Function of I, H;
(
[#] H)
c= (
[#] G) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then
reconsider x = y as
Function of I, G by
FUNCT_2: 7;
(
support x)
= (
support y) by
Th3;
hence thesis by
GROUP_19:def 3;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_20:5
Th5: for I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, H be
Subgroup of G, x be
finite-support
Function of I, G st (
rng x)
c= (
[#] H) holds x is
finite-support
Function of I, H
proof
let I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, H be
Subgroup of G, x be
finite-support
Function of I, G;
assume (
rng x)
c= (
[#] H);
then
reconsider y = x as
Function of I, H by
FUNCT_2: 6;
(
support x)
= (
support y) by
Th3;
hence thesis by
GROUP_19:def 3;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_20:6
Th6: for I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, H be
Subgroup of G, x be
finite-support
Function of I, G, y be
finite-support
Function of I, H st x
= y holds (
Product x)
= (
Product y)
proof
let I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, H be
Subgroup of G, x be
finite-support
Function of I, G, y be
finite-support
Function of I, H;
assume
A1: x
= y;
then
A2: (
support x)
= (
support y) by
Th3;
reconsider fx = ((x
| (
support x))
* (
canFS (
support x))) as
FinSequence of G by
FINSEQ_2: 32;
reconsider fy = ((y
| (
support y))
* (
canFS (
support y))) as
FinSequence of H by
FINSEQ_2: 32;
thus (
Product x)
= (
Product fx) by
GROUP_17:def 1
.= (
Product fy) by
A1,
A2,
GROUP_19: 45
.= (
Product y) by
GROUP_17:def 1;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_20:7
Th7: for f be
Function, i,x be
set holds f
= ((f
+* (i,x))
+* (i,(f
. i)))
proof
let f be
Function, i,x be
set;
thus f
= (f
+* (i,(f
. i))) by
FUNCT_7: 35
.= ((f
+* (i,x))
+* (i,(f
. i))) by
FUNCT_7: 34;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_20:8
Th8: for I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
component-commutative
Subgroup-Family of I, G, x,y be
finite-support
Function of I, G, i be
Element of I st y
= (x
+* (i,(
1_ (F
. i)))) & x
in (
product F) holds (
Product x)
= ((
Product y)
* (x
. i))
= ((x
. i)
* (
Product y))
proof
let I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
component-commutative
Subgroup-Family of I, G, x,y be
finite-support
Function of I, G, i be
Element of I;
A1: for i be
object st i
in I holds (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
Def1;
A2: for i,j be
Element of I, gi,gj be
Element of G st i
<> j & gi
in (F
. i) & gj
in (F
. j) holds (gi
* gj)
= (gj
* gi) by
Def2;
assume that
A3: y
= (x
+* (i,(
1_ (F
. i)))) and
A4: x
in (
product F);
A5: for i be
Element of I holds (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
Def1;
reconsider px = x as
Element of (
product F) by
A4;
A6: (x
. i)
in (F
. i) by
A4,
GROUP_19: 5;
y
in (
product F) by
A3,
A4,
GROUP_19: 24;
then
reconsider py = y as
Element of (
product F);
(
support y)
= (
support (py,F)) by
A1,
GROUP_19: 9;
then py
in (
sum F) by
GROUP_19: 8;
then
reconsider sy = py as
Element of (
sum F);
set z = ((
1_ (
product F))
+* (i,(x
. i)));
A7: z
in (
sum F) by
A6,
GROUP_19: 25,
GROUP_2: 46;
then
A8: z
in (
product F) by
GROUP_2: 40;
reconsider sz = z as
Element of (
sum F) by
A7;
reconsider pz = z as
Element of (
product F) by
A8;
reconsider z as
finite-support
Function of I, G by
A1,
A7,
GROUP_19: 10;
A9: (
dom x)
= I by
A4,
GROUP_19: 3;
(sy
* sz) is
Element of (
product F) by
GROUP_2: 42;
then
A10: (
dom (sy
* sz))
= I by
GROUP_19: 3;
A11: (
dom (
1_ (
product F)))
= I by
GROUP_19: 3;
A12: x
= (sy
* sz)
proof
for j be
object st j
in I holds (x
. j)
= ((sy
* sz)
. j)
proof
let j be
object;
assume j
in I;
then
reconsider j as
Element of I;
(y
. j)
in (F
. j) by
A3,
A4,
GROUP_19: 5,
GROUP_19: 24;
then
reconsider yj = (y
. j) as
Element of (F
. j);
(z
. j)
in (F
. j) by
A7,
GROUP_19: 5,
GROUP_2: 40;
then
reconsider zj = (z
. j) as
Element of (F
. j);
per cases ;
suppose
A13: j
= i;
then
A14: (y
. j)
= (
1_ (F
. j)) by
A3,
A9,
FUNCT_7: 31;
(z
. j)
= (x
. j) by
A11,
A13,
FUNCT_7: 31;
then (yj
* zj)
= (x
. j) by
A14,
GROUP_1:def 4;
then (px
. j)
= ((py
* pz)
. j) by
GROUP_7: 1;
hence thesis by
GROUP_2: 43;
end;
suppose
A15: j
<> i;
then
A16: (y
. j)
= (x
. j) by
A3,
FUNCT_7: 32;
((
1_ (
product F))
. j)
= (
1_ (F
. j)) by
GROUP_7: 6;
then (z
. j)
= (
1_ (F
. j)) by
A15,
FUNCT_7: 32;
then (yj
* zj)
= (x
. j) by
A16,
GROUP_1:def 4;
then (px
. j)
= ((py
* pz)
. j) by
GROUP_7: 1;
hence thesis by
GROUP_2: 43;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A9,
A10,
FUNCT_1: 2;
end;
A17: (sy
* sz)
= (sz
* sy)
proof
A18: (
support (py,F))
= ((
support (px,F))
\
{i}) by
A3,
A9,
GROUP_19: 27;
A19: (
support (py,F))
misses (
support (pz,F)) by
A6,
A18,
GROUP_19: 17,
XBOOLE_1: 85;
thus (sy
* sz)
= (py
* pz) by
GROUP_2: 43
.= (pz
* py) by
A19,
GROUP_19: 32
.= (sz
* sy) by
GROUP_2: 43;
end;
A20: (
Product x)
= ((
Product y)
* (
Product z)) by
A2,
A5,
A12,
GROUP_19: 53;
(
1_ (
product F))
= (I
--> (
1_ G)) by
A5,
GROUP_19: 13;
then (
Product z)
= (x
. i) by
GROUP_19: 21;
hence thesis by
A2,
A5,
A12,
A17,
A20,
GROUP_19: 53;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_20:9
Th9: for I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
component-commutative
Subgroup-Family of I, G, UF be
Subset of G holds for i be
Element of I, x,y be
finite-support
Function of I, (
gr UF) st y
= (x
+* (i,(
1_ (F
. i)))) & x
in (
product F) holds (
Product x)
= ((
Product y)
* (x
. i))
= ((x
. i)
* (
Product y))
proof
let I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
component-commutative
Subgroup-Family of I, G, UF be
Subset of G;
let i be
Element of I, x,y be
finite-support
Function of I, (
gr UF);
assume that
A1: y
= (x
+* (i,(
1_ (F
. i)))) and
A2: x
in (
product F);
reconsider x0 = x, y0 = y as
finite-support
Function of I, G by
Th4;
A3: (
Product x)
= (
Product x0) by
Th6;
A4: (
Product y)
= (
Product y0) by
Th6;
A5: (
Product x0)
= ((
Product y0)
* (x0
. i))
= ((x0
. i)
* (
Product y0)) by
A1,
A2,
Th8;
then (
Product x)
= ((
Product y)
* (x
. i)) by
A3,
A4,
GROUP_2: 43;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4,
A5,
GROUP_2: 43;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_20:10
Th10: for I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
component-commutative
Subgroup-Family of I, G, UF be
Subset of G holds for y be
finite-support
Function of I, (
gr UF), i be
Element of I, g be
Element of (
gr UF) st y
in (
product F) & (y
. i)
= (
1_ (F
. i)) & g
in (F
. i) holds ((
Product y)
* g)
= (g
* (
Product y))
proof
let I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
component-commutative
Subgroup-Family of I, G, UF be
Subset of G;
let y be
finite-support
Function of I, (
gr UF), i be
Element of I, g be
Element of (
gr UF);
assume that
A1: y
in (
product F) and
A2: (y
. i)
= (
1_ (F
. i)) and
A3: g
in (F
. i);
reconsider x = (y
+* (i,g)) as
finite-support
Function of I, (
gr UF) by
GROUP_19: 26;
A4: y
= (x
+* (i,(
1_ (F
. i)))) by
A2,
Th7;
A5: x
in (
product F) by
A1,
A3,
GROUP_19: 24;
(
dom y)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then (x
. i)
= g by
FUNCT_7: 31;
hence thesis by
A4,
A5,
Th9;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_20:11
Th11: for I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
component-commutative
Subgroup-Family of I, G, UF be
Subset of G st UF
= (
Union (
Carrier F)) holds for g be
Element of G, H be
FinSequence of G, K be
FinSequence of
INT st (
len H)
= (
len K) & (
rng H)
c= UF & (
Product (H
|^ K))
= g holds ex f be
finite-support
Function of I, G st f
in (
product F) & g
= (
Product f)
proof
let I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
component-commutative
Subgroup-Family of I, G, UF be
Subset of G;
assume
A1: UF
= (
Union (
Carrier F));
defpred
P[
Nat] means for g be
Element of G, H be
FinSequence of G, K be
FinSequence of
INT st (
len H)
= $1 & (
len H)
= (
len K) & (
rng H)
c= UF & (
Product (H
|^ K))
= g holds ex f be
finite-support
Function of I, G st f
in (
product F) & g
= (
Product f);
A2:
P[
0 ]
proof
let g be
Element of G, H be
FinSequence of G, K be
FinSequence of
INT such that
A3: (
len H)
=
0 & (
len H)
= (
len K) & (
rng H)
c= UF & (
Product (H
|^ K))
= g;
H
= (
<*> (
[#] G)) & K
= (
<*>
INT ) by
A3;
then
A4: (H
|^ K)
= (
<*> (
[#] G)) by
GROUP_4: 21;
reconsider f = (I
--> (
1_ G)) as
Function of I, G;
(
support f) is
finite by
GROUP_19: 12;
then
reconsider f as
finite-support
Function of I, G by
GROUP_19:def 3;
take f;
for i be
Element of I holds (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
Def1;
then f
= (
1_ (
product F)) by
GROUP_19: 13;
hence f
in (
product F);
(
Product f)
= (
1_ G) by
GROUP_19: 16;
hence g
= (
Product f) by
A3,
A4,
GROUP_4: 8;
end;
A5: for n be
Nat st
P[n] holds
P[(n
+ 1)]
proof
let n be
Nat;
assume
A6:
P[n];
let g be
Element of G, H be
FinSequence of G, K be
FinSequence of
INT such that
A7: (
len H)
= (n
+ 1) & (
len H)
= (
len K) & (
rng H)
c= UF & (
Product (H
|^ K))
= g;
reconsider h = (H
/. (n
+ 1)) as
Element of G;
reconsider k = (K
/. (n
+ 1)) as
Element of
INT ;
reconsider H0 = (H
| n) as
FinSequence of G;
reconsider K0 = (K
| n) as
FinSequence of
INT ;
reconsider H1 =
<*h*> as
FinSequence of G;
reconsider K1 =
<*k*> as
FinSequence of
INT ;
(
rng H0)
c= (
rng H) by
RELAT_1: 70;
then
A8: (
rng H0)
c= UF by
A7;
A9:
<*(
@ k)*>
= K1 by
GROUP_4:def 1;
(n
+ 1)
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 4;
then
A10: (n
+ 1)
in (
dom H) & (n
+ 1)
in (
dom K) by
A7,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (H
/. (n
+ 1))
= (H
. (n
+ 1)) & (K
/. (n
+ 1))
= (K
. (n
+ 1)) by
PARTFUN1:def 6;
then
A11: H
= (H0
^ H1) & K
= (K0
^ K1) by
A7,
FINSEQ_3: 55;
h
= (H
. (n
+ 1)) by
A10,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
then
A12: h
in UF by
A7,
A10,
FUNCT_1: 3;
n
<= (
len H) & n
<= (
len K) by
A7,
XREAL_1: 31;
then
A13: (
len H0)
= n & (
len K0)
= n by
FINSEQ_1: 17;
A14: (
len H1)
= 1 & (
len K1)
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
A15: (H
|^ K)
= ((H0
|^ K0)
^ (H1
|^ K1)) by
A11,
A13,
A14,
GROUP_4: 19
.= ((H0
|^ K0)
^
<*(h
|^ k)*>) by
A9,
GROUP_4: 22;
consider f0 be
finite-support
Function of I, G such that
A16: f0
in (
product F) & (
Product (H0
|^ K0))
= (
Product f0) by
A6,
A8,
A13;
h
in (
union (
rng (
Carrier F))) by
A1,
A12,
CARD_3:def 4;
then
consider Fi be
set such that
A17: h
in Fi & Fi
in (
rng (
Carrier F)) by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider i be
object such that
A18: i
in (
dom (
Carrier F)) & Fi
= ((
Carrier F)
. i) by
A17,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider i as
Element of I by
A18;
A19: (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
Def1;
((
Carrier F)
. i)
= (
[#] (F
. i)) by
PENCIL_3: 7;
then h
in (F
. i) by
A17,
A18;
then
A22: (h
|^ k)
in (F
. i) by
A19,
GROUP_4: 4;
A23: (f0
. i)
in (F
. i) by
A16,
GROUP_19: 5;
(
1_ (F
. i)) is
Element of G by
A19,
GROUP_2: 42;
then
reconsider f1 = (f0
+* (i,(
1_ (F
. i)))) as
finite-support
Function of I, G by
GROUP_19: 26;
reconsider f = (f1
+* (i,((f0
. i)
* (h
|^ k)))) as
finite-support
Function of I, G by
GROUP_19: 26;
A27: (
dom f0)
= I by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A28: (
dom f1)
= I by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A29: f1
in (
product F) by
A16,
GROUP_19: 24;
A30: (f
. i)
= ((f0
. i)
* (h
|^ k)) by
A28,
FUNCT_7: 31;
take f;
((f0
. i)
* (h
|^ k))
in (F
. i) by
A19,
A22,
A23,
GROUP_2: 50;
hence
A31: f
in (
product F) by
A29,
GROUP_19: 24;
(f1
. i)
= (
1_ (F
. i)) by
A27,
FUNCT_7: 31;
then f1
= (f
+* (i,(
1_ (F
. i)))) by
Th7;
then (
Product f)
= ((
Product f1)
* ((f0
. i)
* (h
|^ k))) by
A30,
A31,
Th8
.= (((
Product f1)
* (f0
. i))
* (h
|^ k)) by
GROUP_1:def 3
.= ((
Product f0)
* (h
|^ k)) by
A16,
Th8
.= g by
A7,
A15,
A16,
GROUP_4: 6;
hence thesis;
end;
for n be
Nat holds
P[n] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A2,
A5);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_20:12
Th12: for I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
Subgroup-Family of I, G, h,h0 be
finite-support
Function of I, G, i be
Element of I, UFi be
Subset of G st UFi
= (
Union ((
Carrier F)
| (I
\
{i}))) & h0
= (h
+* (i,(
1_ (F
. i)))) & h
in (
product F) holds (
Product h0)
in (
gr UFi)
proof
let I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
Subgroup-Family of I, G, h,h0 be
finite-support
Function of I, G, i be
Element of I, UFi be
Subset of G;
assume that
A1: UFi
= (
Union ((
Carrier F)
| (I
\
{i}))) and
A2: h0
= (h
+* (i,(
1_ (F
. i)))) and
A3: h
in (
product F);
set CFi = ((
Carrier F)
| (I
\
{i}));
(
dom (
Carrier F))
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A4: (
dom CFi)
= (I
\
{i}) by
RELAT_1: 62;
for y be
object st y
in (
rng h0) holds y
in (
[#] (
gr UFi))
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in (
rng h0);
then
consider j be
Element of I such that
A5: y
= (h0
. j) by
FUNCT_2: 113;
per cases ;
suppose
A6: j
<> i;
then not j
in
{i} by
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A7: j
in (
dom CFi) by
A4,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
A8: (h0
. j)
= (h
. j) by
A2,
A6,
FUNCT_7: 32;
(h
. j)
in (F
. j) by
A3,
GROUP_19: 5;
then (h
. j)
in (
[#] (F
. j));
then (h
. j)
in ((
Carrier F)
. j) by
PENCIL_3: 7;
then
A9: (h0
. j)
in (CFi
. j) by
A7,
A8,
FUNCT_1: 47;
(CFi
. j)
c= (
union (
rng CFi)) by
A7,
FUNCT_1: 3,
ZFMISC_1: 74;
then
A10: (CFi
. j)
c= UFi by
A1,
CARD_3:def 4;
UFi
c= (
[#] (
gr UFi)) by
GROUP_4:def 4;
hence thesis by
A5,
A9,
A10;
end;
suppose
A11: j
= i;
(
dom h)
= I by
A3,
GROUP_19: 3;
then
A12: (h0
. j)
= (
1_ (F
. j)) by
A2,
A11,
FUNCT_7: 31;
(F
. j) is
Subgroup of G by
Def1;
then (
1_ (F
. j))
= (
1_ (
gr UFi)) by
GROUP_2: 45;
hence thesis by
A5,
A12;
end;
end;
then (
rng h0)
c= (
[#] (
gr UFi));
then
reconsider x0 = h0 as
finite-support
Function of I, (
gr UFi) by
Th5;
(
Product x0)
= (
Product h0) by
Th6;
hence (
Product h0)
in (
gr UFi);
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_20:13
Th13: for I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
component-commutative
Subgroup-Family of I, G, UF be
Subset of G st UF
= (
Union (
Carrier F)) holds for g be
Element of G st g
in (
gr UF) holds ex f be
finite-support
Function of I, (
gr UF) st f
in (
sum F) & g
= (
Product f)
proof
let I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
component-commutative
Subgroup-Family of I, G, UF be
Subset of G;
assume
A1: UF
= (
Union (
Carrier F));
A2: for i be
object st i
in I holds (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
Def1;
let g be
Element of G;
assume g
in (
gr UF);
then
consider H be
FinSequence of G, K be
FinSequence of
INT such that
A3: (
len H)
= (
len K) & (
rng H)
c= UF & (
Product (H
|^ K))
= g by
GROUP_4: 28;
consider f be
finite-support
Function of I, G such that
A4: f
in (
product F) & g
= (
Product f) by
A1,
A3,
Th11;
f is
Function of I, (
Union (
Carrier F)) by
A4,
Th2;
then
A5: (
rng f)
c= UF by
A1,
RELAT_1:def 19;
UF
c= (
[#] (
gr UF)) by
GROUP_4:def 4;
then (
rng f)
c= (
[#] (
gr UF)) by
A5;
then
reconsider f0 = f as
finite-support
Function of I, (
gr UF) by
Th5;
take f0;
(
support (f,F))
= (
support f) by
A2,
A4,
GROUP_19: 9;
hence thesis by
A4,
GROUP_19: 8,
Th6;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_20:14
Th14: for I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
component-commutative
Subgroup-Family of I, G, UF be
Subset of G st UF
= (
Union (
Carrier F)) holds for i be
Element of I holds (F
. i) is
normal
Subgroup of (
gr UF)
proof
let I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
component-commutative
Subgroup-Family of I, G, UF be
Subset of G;
assume
A1: UF
= (
Union (
Carrier F));
let i be
Element of I;
A2: (
dom (
Carrier F))
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
A3: (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
Def1;
((
Carrier F)
. i)
in (
rng (
Carrier F)) by
A2,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then (
[#] (F
. i))
in (
rng (
Carrier F)) by
PENCIL_3: 7;
then (
[#] (F
. i))
c= (
union (
rng (
Carrier F))) by
ZFMISC_1: 74;
then
A4: (
[#] (F
. i))
c= UF by
A1,
CARD_3:def 4;
UF
c= (
[#] (
gr UF)) by
GROUP_4:def 4;
then (
[#] (F
. i))
c= (
[#] (
gr UF)) by
A4;
then
reconsider Fi = (F
. i) as
Subgroup of (
gr UF) by
A3,
GROUP_2: 57;
for a be
Element of (
gr UF) holds (a
* Fi)
c= (Fi
* a)
proof
let a be
Element of (
gr UF);
for x be
object st x
in (a
* Fi) holds x
in (Fi
* a)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (a
* Fi);
then
consider g be
Element of (
gr UF) such that
A5: x
= (a
* g) & g
in Fi by
GROUP_2: 103;
reconsider a1 = a as
Element of G by
GROUP_2: 42;
a1
in (
gr UF);
then
consider h be
finite-support
Function of I, (
gr UF) such that
A6: h
in (
sum F) & a
= (
Product h) by
A1,
Th13;
reconsider m = (h
. i) as
Element of (
gr UF);
A7: h
in (
product F) by
A6,
GROUP_2: 40;
A8: (h
. i)
in (F
. i) by
A6,
GROUP_19: 5,
GROUP_2: 40;
reconsider I0 = (I
\
{i}) as
Subset of I;
(
1_ (F
. i))
in (
gr UF) by
A3,
GROUP_2: 47;
then
reconsider h0 = (h
+* (i,(
1_ (F
. i)))) as
finite-support
Function of I, (
gr UF) by
GROUP_19: 26;
A9: h0
in (
product F) by
A6,
GROUP_19: 24,
GROUP_2: 40;
(
dom h)
= I by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A10: (h0
. i)
= (
1_ (F
. i)) by
FUNCT_7: 31;
A11: (a
* g)
= (((
Product h0)
* m)
* g) by
A6,
A7,
Th9
.= ((
Product h0)
* (m
* g)) by
GROUP_1:def 3;
A12: (a
* g)
= ((m
* g)
* (
Product h0)) by
A5,
A8,
A9,
A10,
A11,
GROUP_2: 50,
Th10
.= (((m
* g)
* (
1_ (
gr UF)))
* (
Product h0)) by
GROUP_1:def 4
.= (((m
* g)
* ((m
" )
* m))
* (
Product h0)) by
GROUP_1:def 5
.= ((((m
* g)
* (m
" ))
* m)
* (
Product h0)) by
GROUP_1:def 3
.= (((m
* g)
* (m
" ))
* (m
* (
Product h0))) by
GROUP_1:def 3
.= (((m
* g)
* (m
" ))
* ((
Product h0)
* m)) by
A7,
Th9
.= (((m
* g)
* (m
" ))
* a) by
A6,
A7,
Th9;
(m
" )
in Fi by
A8,
GROUP_2: 51;
then (g
* (m
" ))
in Fi by
A5,
GROUP_2: 50;
then (m
* (g
* (m
" )))
in Fi by
A8,
GROUP_2: 50;
then ((m
* g)
* (m
" ))
in Fi by
GROUP_1:def 3;
hence thesis by
A5,
A12,
GROUP_2: 104;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis by
GROUP_3: 118;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_20:15
Th15: for I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
component-commutative
Subgroup-Family of I, G st for i be
Element of I holds ex UFi be
Subset of G st UFi
= (
Union ((
Carrier F)
| (I
\
{i}))) & ((
[#] (
gr UFi))
/\ (
[#] (F
. i)))
=
{(
1_ G)} holds for x1,x2 be
finite-support
Function of I, G st x1
in (
sum F) & x2
in (
sum F) & (
Product x1)
= (
Product x2) holds x1
= x2
proof
let I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
component-commutative
Subgroup-Family of I, G;
A1: for i be
object st i
in I holds (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
Def1;
assume
A2: for i be
Element of I holds ex UFi be
Subset of G st UFi
= (
Union ((
Carrier F)
| (I
\
{i}))) & ((
[#] (
gr UFi))
/\ (
[#] (F
. i)))
=
{(
1_ G)};
let x1,x2 be
finite-support
Function of I, G;
assume that
A3: x1
in (
sum F) & x2
in (
sum F) and
A4: (
Product x1)
= (
Product x2);
defpred
P[
Nat] means for x1,x2 be
finite-support
Function of I, G st (
card (
support x1))
= $1 & x1
in (
sum F) & x2
in (
sum F) & (
Product x1)
= (
Product x2) holds x1
= x2;
A5:
P[
0 ]
proof
let x1,x2 be
finite-support
Function of I, G;
assume that
A6: (
card (
support x1))
=
0 and
A7: x1
in (
sum F) & x2
in (
sum F) and
A8: (
Product x1)
= (
Product x2);
A9: (
support x1)
=
{} by
A6;
A10: (
Product x2)
= (
1_ G) by
A8,
A9,
GROUP_19: 15;
x2
= (
1_ (
product F))
proof
assume x2
<> (
1_ (
product F));
then not (
support x2) is
empty by
A1,
GROUP_19: 14;
then
consider i be
object such that
A11: i
in (
support x2) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
A12: (x2
. i)
<> (
1_ G) & i
in I by
A11,
GROUP_19:def 2;
reconsider i as
Element of I by
A11;
A13: (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
Def1;
then (
1_ (F
. i)) is
Element of G by
GROUP_2: 42;
then
reconsider y = (x2
+* (i,(
1_ (F
. i)))) as
finite-support
Function of I, G by
GROUP_19: 26;
x2
in (
product F) by
A7,
GROUP_2: 41;
then
A14: (
Product x2)
= ((
Product y)
* (x2
. i)) by
Th8;
consider UFi be
Subset of G such that
A15: UFi
= (
Union ((
Carrier F)
| (I
\
{i}))) and
A16: ((
[#] (
gr UFi))
/\ (
[#] (F
. i)))
=
{(
1_ G)} by
A2;
A17: (
Product y)
in (
gr UFi) by
A7,
A15,
GROUP_2: 41,
Th12;
(x2
. i)
in (F
. i) by
A7,
GROUP_19: 5,
GROUP_2: 41;
then
A18: ((x2
. i)
" )
in (F
. i) by
A13,
GROUP_2: 51;
A19: (
Product y)
= ((x2
. i)
" ) by
A10,
A14,
GROUP_1: 12;
then (
Product y)
in
{(
1_ G)} by
A16,
A17,
A18,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (
Product y)
= (
1_ G) by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence contradiction by
A12,
A19,
GROUP_1: 10;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
A9,
GROUP_19: 14;
end;
A20: for k be
Nat st
P[k] holds
P[(k
+ 1)]
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A21:
P[k];
let x1,x2 be
finite-support
Function of I, G;
assume that
A22: (
card (
support x1))
= (k
+ 1) and
A23: x1
in (
sum F) & x2
in (
sum F) and
A24: (
Product x1)
= (
Product x2);
not (
support x1) is
empty by
A22;
then
consider i be
object such that
A25: i
in (
support x1) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
reconsider i as
Element of I by
A25;
A26: (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
Def1;
then
A27: (
1_ (F
. i)) is
Element of G by
GROUP_2: 42;
reconsider y1 = (x1
+* (i,(
1_ (F
. i)))) as
finite-support
Function of I, G by
A27,
GROUP_19: 26;
reconsider y2 = (x2
+* (i,(
1_ (F
. i)))) as
finite-support
Function of I, G by
A27,
GROUP_19: 26;
consider UFi be
Subset of G such that
A28: UFi
= (
Union ((
Carrier F)
| (I
\
{i}))) and
A29: ((
[#] (
gr UFi))
/\ (
[#] (F
. i)))
=
{(
1_ G)} by
A2;
(
1_ (F
. i))
= (
1_ G) by
A26,
GROUP_2: 44;
then
A30: (
card (
support y1))
= ((
card (
support x1))
- 1) by
A25,
GROUP_19: 30
.= k by
A22;
A31: y1
in (
sum F) & y2
in (
sum F) by
A23,
GROUP_19: 25;
A32: x1
in (
product F) & x2
in (
product F) by
A23,
GROUP_2: 41;
A33: (
Product x1)
= ((
Product y1)
* (x1
. i)) by
A32,
Th8;
A34: (
Product y1)
in (
gr UFi) & (
Product y2)
in (
gr UFi) by
A23,
A28,
GROUP_2: 41,
Th12;
A35: (x1
. i)
in (F
. i) & (x2
. i)
in (F
. i) by
A23,
GROUP_19: 5,
GROUP_2: 41;
(
Product y1)
= (((
Product y2)
* (x2
. i))
* ((x1
. i)
" )) by
A24,
A32,
A33,
GROUP_1: 14,
Th8;
then (
Product y1)
= ((
Product y2)
* ((x2
. i)
* ((x1
. i)
" ))) by
GROUP_1:def 3;
then
A36: (((
Product y2)
" )
* (
Product y1))
= ((x2
. i)
* ((x1
. i)
" )) by
GROUP_1: 13;
((
Product y2)
" )
in (
gr UFi) by
A34,
GROUP_2: 51;
then
A37: (((
Product y2)
" )
* (
Product y1))
in (
gr UFi) by
A34,
GROUP_2: 50;
((x1
. i)
" )
in (F
. i) by
A26,
A35,
GROUP_2: 51;
then
A38: ((x2
. i)
* ((x1
. i)
" ))
in (F
. i) by
A26,
A35,
GROUP_2: 50;
(((
Product y2)
" )
* (
Product y1))
in
{(
1_ G)} by
A29,
A36,
A37,
A38,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (((
Product y2)
" )
* (
Product y1))
= (
1_ G) by
TARSKI:def 1;
then ((
Product y1)
" )
= ((
Product y2)
" ) by
GROUP_1: 12;
then
A39: y1
= y2 by
A21,
A30,
A31,
GROUP_1: 9;
((x2
. i)
* ((x1
. i)
" ))
in
{(
1_ G)} by
A29,
A36,
A37,
A38,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then ((x2
. i)
* ((x1
. i)
" ))
= (
1_ G) by
TARSKI:def 1;
then ((x1
. i)
" )
= ((x2
. i)
" ) by
GROUP_1: 12;
then
A40: (x1
. i)
= (x2
. i) by
GROUP_1: 9;
x1
= (y1
+* (i,(x1
. i))) by
Th7;
hence thesis by
A39,
A40,
Th7;
end;
A42: for k be
Nat holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A5,
A20);
(
card (
support x1)) is
Nat;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4,
A42;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_20:16
for I be non
empty
set, G be
strict
Group, F be
Group-Family of I holds F is
internal
DirectSumComponents of G, I iff (for i be
Element of I holds (F
. i) is
normal
Subgroup of G) & (ex UF be
Subset of G st UF
= (
Union (
Carrier F)) & (
gr UF)
= G) & for i be
Element of I holds ex UFi be
Subset of G st UFi
= (
Union ((
Carrier F)
| (I
\
{i}))) & ((
[#] (
gr UFi))
/\ (
[#] (F
. i)))
=
{(
1_ G)}
proof
let I be non
empty
set, G be
strict
Group, F be
Group-Family of I;
A1: (
dom F)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
A2: (
dom (
Carrier F))
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hereby
assume
A3: F is
internal
DirectSumComponents of G, I;
then
A4: (for i be
object st i
in I holds (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G) & (for i,j be
Element of I, gi,gj be
Element of G st i
<> j & gi
in (F
. i) & gj
in (F
. j) holds (gi
* gj)
= (gj
* gi)) & (for y be
Element of G holds ex x be
finite-support
Function of I, G st x
in (
sum F) & y
= (
Product x)) & (for x1,x2 be
finite-support
Function of I, G st x1
in (
sum F) & x2
in (
sum F) & (
Product x1)
= (
Product x2) holds x1
= x2) by
GROUP_19: 54;
then
A5: F is
component-commutative
Subgroup-Family of I, G by
Def1,
Def2;
for x be
object st x
in (
Union (
Carrier F)) holds x
in (
[#] G)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
Union (
Carrier F));
then x
in (
union (
rng (
Carrier F))) by
CARD_3:def 4;
then
consider Fi be
set such that
A6: x
in Fi & Fi
in (
rng (
Carrier F)) by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider i be
object such that
A7: i
in I & Fi
= ((
Carrier F)
. i) by
A2,
A6,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider i as
Element of I by
A7;
A8: ((
Carrier F)
. i)
= (
[#] (F
. i)) by
PENCIL_3: 7;
(F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
A3,
GROUP_19: 54;
then (
[#] (F
. i))
c= (
[#] G) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
hence thesis by
A6,
A7,
A8;
end;
then (
Union (
Carrier F))
c= (
[#] G);
then
reconsider UF = (
Union (
Carrier F)) as
Subset of G;
A9: for g be
Element of G holds g
in (
gr UF)
proof
let g be
Element of G;
consider x be
finite-support
Function of I, G such that
A10: x
in (
sum F) & g
= (
Product x) by
A3,
GROUP_19: 54;
x is
Function of I, (
Union (
Carrier F)) by
A10,
GROUP_2: 41,
Th2;
then
A11: (
rng x)
c= UF by
RELAT_1:def 19;
UF
c= (
[#] (
gr UF)) by
GROUP_4:def 4;
then (
rng x)
c= (
[#] (
gr UF)) by
A11;
then
reconsider x0 = x as
finite-support
Function of I, (
gr UF) by
Th5;
reconsider fx = ((x0
| (
support x0))
* (
canFS (
support x0))) as
FinSequence of (
gr UF) by
FINSEQ_2: 32;
(
Product fx)
= (
Product x0) by
GROUP_17:def 1
.= g by
A10,
Th6;
hence thesis;
end;
then
A12: (
gr UF)
= G by
GROUP_2: 62;
thus for i be
Element of I holds (F
. i) is
normal
Subgroup of G by
A5,
A12,
Th14;
thus ex UF be
Subset of G st UF
= (
Union (
Carrier F)) & (
gr UF)
= G by
A9,
GROUP_2: 62;
thus for i be
Element of I holds ex UFi be
Subset of G st UFi
= (
Union ((
Carrier F)
| (I
\
{i}))) & ((
[#] (
gr UFi))
/\ (
[#] (F
. i)))
=
{(
1_ G)}
proof
let i be
Element of I;
A13: for i be
Element of I holds (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
A3,
GROUP_19: 54;
per cases ;
suppose (I
\
{i})
=
{} ;
then
A14: (
Union ((
Carrier F)
| (I
\
{i})))
= (
Union ((
Carrier F)
|
{} ))
.= (
union (
rng
{} )) by
CARD_3:def 4
.=
{} by
ZFMISC_1: 2;
reconsider UFi = (
{} the
carrier of G) as
Subset of G;
reconsider Fi = (F
. i) as
Subgroup of G by
A3,
GROUP_19: 54;
(
gr UFi)
= (
(1). G) by
GROUP_4: 30;
then
A15: ((
gr UFi)
/\ Fi)
= (
(1). G) by
GROUP_2: 85;
((
[#] (
gr UFi))
/\ (
[#] Fi))
= ((
carr (
gr UFi))
/\ (
carr Fi))
.= (
carr (
(1). G)) by
A15,
GROUP_2: 81
.=
{(
1_ G)} by
GROUP_2:def 7;
hence thesis by
A14;
end;
suppose
A16: (I
\
{i})
<>
{} ;
set CFi = ((
Carrier F)
| (I
\
{i}));
set UFi = (
Union CFi);
for x be
object st x
in UFi holds x
in (
[#] G)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in UFi;
then x
in (
union (
rng CFi)) by
CARD_3:def 4;
then
consider Fi be
set such that
A17: x
in Fi & Fi
in (
rng CFi) by
TARSKI:def 4;
A18: (
dom CFi)
= (I
\
{i}) by
A2,
RELAT_1: 62;
consider j be
object such that
A19: j
in (I
\
{i}) & Fi
= (CFi
. j) by
A17,
A18,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider j as
Element of I by
A19;
A20: (CFi
. j)
= ((
Carrier F)
. j) by
A19,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (
[#] (F
. j)) by
PENCIL_3: 7;
(F
. j) is
Subgroup of G by
A3,
GROUP_19: 54;
then (
[#] (F
. j))
c= (
[#] G) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
hence thesis by
A17,
A19,
A20;
end;
then
reconsider UFi as
Subset of G by
TARSKI:def 3;
take UFi;
thus UFi
= (
Union CFi);
A21: (
1_ G)
in (
gr UFi) by
GROUP_2: 46;
(F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
A3,
GROUP_19: 54;
then (
1_ G)
in (F
. i) by
GROUP_2: 46;
then (
1_ G)
in ((
[#] (
gr UFi))
/\ (
[#] (F
. i))) by
A21,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A22:
{(
1_ G)}
c= ((
[#] (
gr UFi))
/\ (
[#] (F
. i))) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
for x be
object st x
in ((
[#] (
gr UFi))
/\ (
[#] (F
. i))) holds x
in
{(
1_ G)}
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A23: x
in ((
[#] (
gr UFi))
/\ (
[#] (F
. i)));
then x
in (
[#] (
gr UFi)) & x
in (
[#] (F
. i)) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
reconsider g = x as
Element of G by
GROUP_2:def 5,
TARSKI:def 3;
set I0 = (I
\
{i});
set F0 = (F
| I0);
A24: (
dom F0)
= I0 by
A1,
RELAT_1: 62;
A25: for j be
object st j
in I0 holds (F0
. j) is
Subgroup of G
proof
let j be
object;
assume
A26: j
in I0;
then
A27: (F
. j)
= (F0
. j) by
FUNCT_1: 49;
reconsider j as
Element of I by
A26;
(F0
. j) is
Subgroup of G by
A3,
A27,
GROUP_19: 54;
hence thesis;
end;
then for j be
object st j
in I0 holds (F0
. j) is
Group;
then
reconsider F0 as
Group-Family of I0 by
A24,
GROUP_19: 2;
reconsider F0 as
Subgroup-Family of I0, G by
A25,
Def1;
A29: F0 is
component-commutative
proof
let j,k be
object, gj,gk be
Element of G;
assume
A28: j
in I0 & k
in I0 & j
<> k;
then
reconsider Fj = (F0
. j), Fk = (F0
. k) as
Subgroup of G by
Def1;
take Fj, Fk;
thus Fj
= (F0
. j) & Fk
= (F0
. k);
assume
A29: gj
in Fj & gk
in Fk;
reconsider j, k as
Element of I by
A28;
(F0
. j)
= (F
. j) & (F0
. k)
= (F
. k) by
A28,
FUNCT_1: 49;
hence (gj
* gk)
= (gk
* gj) by
A3,
A28,
A29,
GROUP_19: 54;
end;
A30: (
dom (
Carrier F0))
= I0 by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
for j be
object st j
in (
dom CFi) holds (CFi
. j)
= ((
Carrier F0)
. j)
proof
let j be
object;
assume
A31: j
in (
dom CFi);
then
A32: j
in I0;
then
reconsider I0 as non
empty
set;
reconsider F0 as
Group-Family of I0;
reconsider j0 = j as
Element of I0 by
A31;
reconsider j as
Element of I by
A32;
(CFi
. j)
= ((
Carrier F)
. j) by
A31,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (
[#] (F
. j)) by
PENCIL_3: 7
.= (
[#] (F0
. j0)) by
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((
Carrier F0)
. j) by
PENCIL_3: 7;
hence thesis;
end;
then
A33: UFi
= (
Union (
Carrier F0)) by
A2,
A30,
FUNCT_1: 2,
RELAT_1: 62;
g
in (
gr UFi) by
A23,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider hi be
finite-support
Function of I0, (
gr UFi) such that
A34: hi
in (
sum F0) & g
= (
Product hi) by
A16,
A29,
A33,
Th13;
set h = (hi
+* (
{i}
--> (
1_ G)));
A35: (
rng h)
c= ((
rng hi)
\/ (
rng (
{i}
--> (
1_ G)))) by
FUNCT_4: 17;
(
rng hi)
c= (
[#] G) by
GROUP_2:def 5,
TARSKI:def 3;
then ((
rng hi)
\/ (
rng (
{i}
--> (
1_ G))))
c= (
[#] G) by
XBOOLE_1: 8;
then
A36: (
rng h)
c= (
[#] G) by
A35;
A37: (
dom (
{i}
--> (
1_ G)))
=
{i};
(
dom hi)
= I0 by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A38: (
dom h)
= (I0
\/
{i}) by
A37,
FUNCT_4:def 1
.= I by
XBOOLE_1: 45;
then
reconsider h as
Function of I, G by
A36,
FUNCT_2: 2;
A39: for j be
object holds j
in (
support h) iff j
in (
support hi)
proof
let j be
object;
hereby
assume
A40: j
in (
support h);
then
A41: j
in I & (h
. j)
<> (
1_ G) by
GROUP_19:def 2;
A42: i
<> j
proof
assume
A43: j
= i;
then
A44: j
in
{i} by
TARSKI:def 1;
i
in
{i} by
TARSKI:def 1;
then i
in (
dom (
{i}
--> (
1_ G)));
then (h
. j)
= ((
{i}
--> (
1_ G))
. j) by
A43,
FUNCT_4: 13
.= (
1_ G) by
A44,
FUNCOP_1: 7;
hence contradiction by
A40,
GROUP_19:def 2;
end;
then not j
in
{i} by
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A45: j
in I0 by
A40,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
not j
in (
dom (
{i}
--> (
1_ G))) by
A42,
TARSKI:def 1;
then (hi
. j)
<> (
1_ G) by
A41,
FUNCT_4: 11;
then (hi
. j)
<> (
1_ (
gr UFi)) by
GROUP_2: 44;
hence j
in (
support hi) by
A45,
GROUP_19:def 2;
end;
assume
A46: j
in (
support hi);
then
A47: j
in I0 & (hi
. j)
<> (
1_ (
gr UFi)) by
GROUP_19:def 2;
A48: j
in I & not j
in
{i} by
A46,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
not j
in (
dom (
{i}
--> (
1_ G))) by
A46,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then (h
. j)
= (hi
. j) by
FUNCT_4: 11;
then (h
. j)
<> (
1_ G) by
A47,
GROUP_2: 44;
hence j
in (
support h) by
A48,
GROUP_19:def 2;
end;
then
A49: (
support h)
= (
support hi) by
TARSKI: 2;
then
reconsider h as
finite-support
Function of I, G by
GROUP_19:def 3;
A50: (
support h)
= (
dom (h
| (
support h))) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
A51: (
support hi)
= (
dom (hi
| (
support hi))) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
for x be
object st x
in (
dom (h
| (
support h))) holds ((h
| (
support h))
. x)
= ((hi
| (
support hi))
. x)
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A52: x
in (
dom (h
| (
support h)));
x
in (
dom (hi
| (
support hi))) by
A39,
A51,
A52;
then
A53: x
in ((
dom hi)
/\ (
support hi)) by
RELAT_1: 61;
A54: (
dom hi)
= I0 & (
dom (
{i}
--> (
1_ G)))
=
{i} by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
thus ((h
| (
support h))
. x)
= (h
. x) by
A52,
FUNCT_1: 47
.= (hi
. x) by
A53,
A54,
FUNCT_4: 16,
XBOOLE_1: 79
.= ((hi
| (
support hi))
. x) by
A39,
A51,
A52,
FUNCT_1: 47;
end;
then
A55: (h
| (
support h))
= (hi
| (
support hi)) by
A39,
A50,
A51,
FUNCT_1: 2,
TARSKI: 2;
reconsider fh = ((h
| (
support h))
* (
canFS (
support h))) as
FinSequence of G by
FINSEQ_2: 32;
reconsider fhi = ((hi
| (
support hi))
* (
canFS (
support hi))) as
FinSequence of (
gr UFi) by
FINSEQ_2: 32;
A56: g
= (
Product fhi) by
A34,
GROUP_17:def 1
.= (
Product fh) by
A49,
A55,
GROUP_19: 45
.= (
Product h) by
GROUP_17:def 1;
A57: i
in
{i} by
TARSKI:def 1;
A58: (
dom (
{i}
--> (
1_ G)))
=
{i};
A59: h
in (
product F)
proof
for j be
object st j
in I holds (h
. j)
in ((
Carrier F)
. j)
proof
let j be
object;
assume j
in I;
then
reconsider j as
Element of I;
(h
. j)
in (
[#] (F
. j))
proof
per cases ;
suppose i
= j;
then
A60: (h
. j)
= ((
{i}
--> (
1_ G))
. i) by
A57,
A58,
FUNCT_4: 13
.= (
1_ G) by
A57,
FUNCOP_1: 7;
(F
. j) is
Subgroup of G by
A3,
GROUP_19: 54;
then (
1_ G)
in (F
. j) by
GROUP_2: 46;
hence thesis by
A60;
end;
suppose
A61: i
<> j;
then not j
in
{i} by
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A62: j
in I0 by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
A63: not j
in (
dom (
{i}
--> (
1_ G))) by
A61,
TARSKI:def 1;
A64: (h
. j)
= (hi
. j) by
A63,
FUNCT_4: 11;
reconsider I0 as non
empty
set by
A62;
reconsider F0 as
Group-Family of I0;
reconsider j0 = j as
Element of I0 by
A62;
(hi
. j0)
in (F0
. j0) by
A34,
GROUP_19: 5,
GROUP_2: 40;
hence thesis by
A64,
FUNCT_1: 49;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
PENCIL_3: 7;
end;
then h
in (
product (
Carrier F)) by
A2,
A38,
CARD_3:def 5;
hence thesis by
GROUP_7:def 2;
end;
A65: h
in (
sum F)
proof
reconsider h0 = h as
Element of (
product F) by
A59;
(
support h)
= (
support (h0,F)) by
A4,
GROUP_19: 9;
hence thesis by
GROUP_19: 8;
end;
reconsider id1g = (I
--> (
1_ G)) as
Function of I, G;
(
support id1g) is
empty by
GROUP_19: 12;
then
reconsider id1g as
finite-support
Function of I, G by
GROUP_19:def 3;
A66: (
1_ (
product F))
= id1g by
A13,
GROUP_19: 13;
then
reconsider k = ((
1_ (
product F))
+* (i,g)) as
finite-support
Function of I, G by
GROUP_19: 26;
A67: (
Product k)
= g by
A66,
GROUP_19: 21;
k
in (
ProjSet (F,i)) by
A23,
GROUP_12:def 1;
then k
in (
ProjGroup (F,i)) by
GROUP_12:def 2;
then
A68: k
in (
sum F) by
GROUP_2: 40;
(
dom (
1_ (
product F)))
= I by
GROUP_19: 3;
then g
= (k
. i) by
FUNCT_7: 31
.= (h
. i) by
A3,
A56,
A65,
A67,
A68,
GROUP_19: 54
.= ((
{i}
--> (
1_ G))
. i) by
A57,
A58,
FUNCT_4: 13
.= (
1_ G) by
A57,
FUNCOP_1: 7;
hence x
in
{(
1_ G)} by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
then ((
[#] (
gr UFi))
/\ (
[#] (F
. i)))
c=
{(
1_ G)};
hence thesis by
A22,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
end;
end;
end;
assume that
A69: for i be
Element of I holds (F
. i) is
normal
Subgroup of G and
A70: ex UF be
Subset of G st UF
= (
Union (
Carrier F)) & (
gr UF)
= G and
A71: for i be
Element of I holds ex UFi be
Subset of G st UFi
= (
Union ((
Carrier F)
| (I
\
{i}))) & ((
[#] (
gr UFi))
/\ (
[#] (F
. i)))
=
{(
1_ G)};
consider UF be
Subset of G such that
A72: UF
= (
Union (
Carrier F)) & (
gr UF)
= G by
A70;
A73: for i be
Element of I holds (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
A69;
A74: for i be
object st i
in I holds (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
A69;
A75: for i,j be
Element of I st i
<> j holds ((
[#] (F
. i))
/\ (
[#] (F
. j)))
=
{(
1_ G)}
proof
let i,j be
Element of I;
assume
A76: i
<> j;
(F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
A69;
then (
1_ G)
in (F
. i) by
GROUP_2: 46;
then
A77:
{(
1_ G)}
c= (
[#] (F
. i)) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
(F
. j) is
Subgroup of G by
A69;
then (
1_ G)
in (F
. j) by
GROUP_2: 46;
then
{(
1_ G)}
c= (
[#] (F
. j)) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
A78:
{(
1_ G)}
c= ((
[#] (F
. i))
/\ (
[#] (F
. j))) by
A77,
XBOOLE_1: 19;
for x be
object st x
in ((
[#] (F
. i))
/\ (
[#] (F
. j))) holds x
in
{(
1_ G)}
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A79: x
in ((
[#] (F
. i))
/\ (
[#] (F
. j)));
then
A80: x
in (
[#] (F
. i)) & x
in (
[#] (F
. j)) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
consider UFj be
Subset of G such that
A81: UFj
= (
Union ((
Carrier F)
| (I
\
{j}))) & ((
[#] (
gr UFj))
/\ (
[#] (F
. j)))
=
{(
1_ G)} by
A71;
i
in I & not i
in
{j} by
A76,
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A82: i
in (I
\
{j}) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
A83: i
in (
dom ((
Carrier F)
| (I
\
{j}))) by
A2,
A82,
RELAT_1: 62;
(((
Carrier F)
| (I
\
{j}))
. i)
= ((
Carrier F)
. i) by
A82,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (
[#] (F
. i)) by
PENCIL_3: 7;
then (
[#] (F
. i))
c= (
union (
rng ((
Carrier F)
| (I
\
{j})))) by
A83,
FUNCT_1: 3,
ZFMISC_1: 74;
then
A84: (
[#] (F
. i))
c= UFj by
A81,
CARD_3:def 4;
UFj
c= (
[#] (
gr UFj)) by
GROUP_4:def 4;
then x
in (
[#] (
gr UFj)) by
A80,
A84;
hence thesis by
A79,
A81,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
then ((
[#] (F
. i))
/\ (
[#] (F
. j)))
c=
{(
1_ G)};
hence thesis by
A78,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
end;
A85: for i,j be
Element of I, gi,gj be
Element of G st i
<> j & gi
in (F
. i) & gj
in (F
. j) holds (gi
* gj)
= (gj
* gi)
proof
let i,j be
Element of I, gi,gj be
Element of G;
assume
A86: i
<> j & gi
in (F
. i) & gj
in (F
. j);
A87: (F
. i) is
normal
Subgroup of G by
A69;
A88: (F
. j) is
normal
Subgroup of G by
A69;
A89: ((
[#] (F
. i))
/\ (
[#] (F
. j)))
=
{(
1_ G)} by
A75,
A86;
set x = ((gi
* gj)
* ((gj
* gi)
" ));
A90: (gi
" )
in (F
. i) by
A86,
A87,
GROUP_2: 51;
A91: (gj
" )
in (F
. j) by
A86,
A88,
GROUP_2: 51;
A92: ((gi
* gj)
* (gi
" ))
in (F
. j) by
A86,
A88,
Th1;
A93: (gj
* ((gi
" )
* (gj
" )))
in (F
. i) by
A87,
A90,
Th1;
x
= ((gi
* gj)
* ((gi
" )
* (gj
" ))) by
GROUP_1: 17
.= (((gi
* gj)
* (gi
" ))
* (gj
" )) by
GROUP_1:def 3;
then
A94: x
in (F
. j) by
A88,
A91,
A92,
GROUP_2: 50;
x
= ((gi
* gj)
* ((gi
" )
* (gj
" ))) by
GROUP_1: 17
.= (gi
* (gj
* ((gi
" )
* (gj
" )))) by
GROUP_1:def 3;
then x
in (F
. i) by
A86,
A87,
A93,
GROUP_2: 50;
then x
in ((
[#] (F
. i))
/\ (
[#] (F
. j))) by
A94,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then x
= (
1_ G) by
A89,
TARSKI:def 1;
then ((gi
* gj)
" )
= ((gj
* gi)
" ) by
GROUP_1: 12;
hence thesis by
GROUP_1: 9;
end;
A95: F is
component-commutative
Subgroup-Family of I, G by
A74,
A85,
Def1,
Def2;
A96: for y be
Element of G holds ex x be
finite-support
Function of I, G st x
in (
sum F) & y
= (
Product x)
proof
let y be
Element of G;
y
in (
gr UF) by
A72;
then
consider x be
finite-support
Function of I, (
gr UF) such that
A97: x
in (
sum F) & y
= (
Product x) by
A72,
A95,
Th13;
reconsider x as
finite-support
Function of I, G by
A72;
take x;
thus thesis by
A72,
A97;
end;
for x1,x2 be
finite-support
Function of I, G st x1
in (
sum F) & x2
in (
sum F) & (
Product x1)
= (
Product x2) holds x1
= x2 by
A71,
A95,
Th15;
hence F is
internal
DirectSumComponents of G, I by
A73,
A85,
A96,
GROUP_19: 54;
end;
begin
theorem ::
GROUP_20:17
for I be non
empty
set, G be
commutative
Group, F be
Group-Family of I holds F is
internal
DirectSumComponents of G, I iff (for i be
Element of I holds (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G) & (for i,j be
Element of I st i
<> j holds ((
[#] (F
. i))
/\ (
[#] (F
. j)))
=
{(
1_ G)}) & (for y be
Element of G holds ex x be
finite-support
Function of I, G st x
in (
sum F) & y
= (
Product x)) & (for x1,x2 be
finite-support
Function of I, G st x1
in (
sum F) & x2
in (
sum F) & (
Product x1)
= (
Product x2) holds x1
= x2)
proof
let I be non
empty
set, G be
commutative
Group, F be
Group-Family of I;
hereby
assume
A1: F is
internal
DirectSumComponents of G, I;
then
A2: (for i be
Element of I holds (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G) & (for i,j be
Element of I, gi,gj be
Element of G st i
<> j & gi
in (F
. i) & gj
in (F
. j) holds (gi
* gj)
= (gj
* gi)) & (for y be
Element of G holds ex x be
finite-support
Function of I, G st x
in (
sum F) & y
= (
Product x)) & (for x1,x2 be
finite-support
Function of I, G st x1
in (
sum F) & x2
in (
sum F) & (
Product x1)
= (
Product x2) holds x1
= x2) by
GROUP_19: 54;
A3: for i be
object st i
in I holds (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
A1,
GROUP_19: 54;
A4: for i,j be
Element of I st i
<> j holds ((
[#] (F
. i))
/\ (
[#] (F
. j)))
=
{(
1_ G)}
proof
let i,j be
Element of I;
assume
A5: i
<> j;
A6: (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
A1,
GROUP_19: 54;
then
A7: (
1_ G)
in (F
. i) by
GROUP_2: 46;
A8: (F
. j) is
Subgroup of G by
A1,
GROUP_19: 54;
then (
1_ G)
in (F
. j) by
GROUP_2: 46;
then (
1_ G)
in ((
[#] (F
. j))
/\ (
[#] (F
. i))) by
A7,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A9:
{(
1_ G)}
c= ((
[#] (F
. i))
/\ (
[#] (F
. j))) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
for x be
object st x
in ((
[#] (F
. i))
/\ (
[#] (F
. j))) holds x
in
{(
1_ G)}
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A10: x
in ((
[#] (F
. i))
/\ (
[#] (F
. j)));
reconsider gi = x as
Element of (F
. i) by
A10,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
reconsider gj = x as
Element of (F
. j) by
A10;
gi
in G by
A6,
GROUP_2: 41;
then
reconsider ggi = gi as
Element of G;
gj
in G by
A8,
GROUP_2: 41;
then
reconsider ggj = gj as
Element of G;
x
= (
1_ G)
proof
assume
A11: x
<> (
1_ G);
set xi = ((
1_ (
product F))
+* (i,gi));
set xj = ((
1_ (
product F))
+* (j,gj));
A12: xi
in (
sum F) by
GROUP_19: 25,
GROUP_2: 46;
then
reconsider xi as
finite-support
Function of I, G by
A3,
GROUP_19: 10;
A13: xj
in (
sum F) by
GROUP_19: 25,
GROUP_2: 46;
then
reconsider xj as
finite-support
Function of I, G by
A3,
GROUP_19: 10;
A14: (
1_ (
product F))
= (I
--> (
1_ G)) by
A2,
GROUP_19: 13;
then (
Product xi)
= ggj by
GROUP_19: 21
.= (
Product xj) by
A14,
GROUP_19: 21;
then
A15: xi
= xj by
A1,
A12,
A13,
GROUP_19: 54;
A16: (
dom (
1_ (
product F)))
= I by
GROUP_19: 3;
(xj
. i)
= ((
1_ (
product F))
. i) by
A5,
FUNCT_7: 32
.= (
1_ (F
. i)) by
GROUP_7: 6
.= (
1_ G) by
A6,
GROUP_2: 44;
hence contradiction by
A11,
A15,
A16,
FUNCT_7: 31;
end;
hence x
in
{(
1_ G)} by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
then ((
[#] (F
. i))
/\ (
[#] (F
. j)))
c=
{(
1_ G)};
hence thesis by
A9,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
end;
thus (for i be
Element of I holds (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G) & (for i,j be
Element of I st i
<> j holds ((
[#] (F
. i))
/\ (
[#] (F
. j)))
=
{(
1_ G)}) & (for y be
Element of G holds ex x be
finite-support
Function of I, G st x
in (
sum F) & y
= (
Product x)) & (for x1,x2 be
finite-support
Function of I, G st x1
in (
sum F) & x2
in (
sum F) & (
Product x1)
= (
Product x2) holds x1
= x2) by
A1,
A4,
GROUP_19: 54;
end;
assume
A17: (for i be
Element of I holds (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G) & (for i,j be
Element of I st i
<> j holds ((
[#] (F
. i))
/\ (
[#] (F
. j)))
=
{(
1_ G)}) & (for y be
Element of G holds ex x be
finite-support
Function of I, G st x
in (
sum F) & y
= (
Product x)) & (for x1,x2 be
finite-support
Function of I, G st x1
in (
sum F) & x2
in (
sum F) & (
Product x1)
= (
Product x2) holds x1
= x2);
for i,j be
Element of I, gi,gj be
Element of G st i
<> j & gi
in (F
. i) & gj
in (F
. j) holds (gi
* gj)
= (gj
* gi);
hence F is
internal
DirectSumComponents of G, I by
A17,
GROUP_19: 54;
end;
begin
theorem ::
GROUP_20:18
Th19: for I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
Subgroup-Family of I, G, h be
Homomorphism of (
sum F), G, a be
finite-support
Function of I, G st a
in (
sum F) & for i be
Element of I, x be
Element of (F
. i) holds (h
. ((
1ProdHom (F,i))
. x))
= x holds (h
. a)
= (
Product a)
proof
let I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, F be
Subgroup-Family of I, G, h be
Homomorphism of (
sum F), G, a be
finite-support
Function of I, G;
assume that
A1: a
in (
sum F) and
A2: for i be
Element of I, x be
Element of (F
. i) holds (h
. ((
1ProdHom (F,i))
. x))
= x;
A3: for i be
object st i
in I holds (F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
Def1;
defpred
P[
Nat] means for b be
finite-support
Function of I, G st b
in (
sum F) holds (
card (
support b))
= $1 implies (h
. b)
= (
Product b);
A4:
P[
0 ]
proof
let b be
finite-support
Function of I, G;
assume b
in (
sum F);
assume (
card (
support b))
=
0 ;
then
A5: (
support b)
=
{} ;
then b
= (
1_ (
product F)) by
A3,
GROUP_19: 14
.= (
1_ (
sum F)) by
GROUP_2: 44;
then (h
. b)
= (
1_ G) by
GROUP_6: 31;
hence thesis by
A5,
GROUP_19: 15;
end;
A6: for k be
Nat st
P[k] holds
P[(k
+ 1)]
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A7:
P[k];
let b be
finite-support
Function of I, G;
assume
A8: b
in (
sum F);
assume
A9: (
card (
support b))
= (k
+ 1);
then not (
support b) is
empty;
then
consider i be
object such that
A10: i
in (
support b) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
A11: (b
. i)
<> (
1_ G) & i
in I by
A10,
GROUP_19:def 2;
reconsider i as
Element of I by
A10;
set c = (b
+* (i,(
1_ (F
. i))));
c
in (
sum F) by
A8,
GROUP_19: 25;
then
reconsider c as
Element of (
sum F);
(F
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
Def1;
then
A12: (
1_ (F
. i))
= (
1_ G) by
GROUP_2: 44;
then
reconsider c0 = c as
finite-support
Function of I, G by
GROUP_19: 26;
A13: b
in (
product F) by
A8,
GROUP_2: 40;
A14: (b
. i)
in (F
. i) by
A8,
GROUP_19: 5,
GROUP_2: 40;
then ((
1ProdHom (F,i))
. (b
. i))
in (
ProjGroup (F,i)) by
FUNCT_2: 5;
then ((
1ProdHom (F,i))
. (b
. i))
in (
sum F) by
GROUP_2: 40;
then
reconsider d = ((
1ProdHom (F,i))
. (b
. i)) as
Element of (
sum F);
A15: d
= ((
1_ (
product F))
+* (i,(b
. i))) by
A14,
GROUP_12:def 3;
A16: d is
Element of (
product F) by
GROUP_2: 42;
A17: (
support (d,F))
=
{i} by
A11,
A12,
A14,
A15,
A16,
GROUP_19: 18;
A18: i
in (
dom b) by
A11,
A13,
GROUP_19: 3;
A19: b
= (c
* d)
proof
reconsider c1 = c, d1 = d as
Element of (
product F) by
GROUP_2: 42;
A20: (
support (c1,F))
misses (
support (d1,F))
proof
(c
. i)
= (
1_ (F
. i)) by
A18,
FUNCT_7: 31;
then not ex G be
Group st G
= (F
. i) & (c
. i)
<> (
1_ G) & i
in I;
then not i
in (
support (c,F)) by
GROUP_19:def 1;
hence thesis by
A17,
ZFMISC_1: 50;
end;
A21: (
dom (i
.--> (b
. i)))
=
{i};
A22: (
dom (
1_ (
product F)))
= I by
GROUP_19: 3;
A23: (d1
| (
support (d1,F)))
= (((
1_ (
product F))
+* (i,(b
. i)))
|
{i}) by
A11,
A12,
A14,
A15,
GROUP_19: 18
.= (((
1_ (
product F))
+* (i
.--> (b
. i)))
|
{i}) by
A22,
FUNCT_7:def 3
.= (i
.--> (b
. i)) by
A21,
FUNCT_4: 23;
A24: i
in (
dom c) by
A18,
FUNCT_7: 30;
thus b
= (c1
+* (i,(b
. i))) by
Th7
.= (c1
+* (d1
| (
support (d1,F)))) by
A23,
A24,
FUNCT_7:def 3
.= (c1
* d1) by
A20,
GROUP_19: 31
.= (c
* d) by
GROUP_2: 43;
end;
A25: (h
. c0)
= (
Product c0)
proof
A26: c0
in (
sum F);
(
card (
support c0))
= ((
card (
support b))
- 1) by
A10,
A12,
GROUP_19: 30
.= k by
A9;
hence thesis by
A7,
A26;
end;
for i,j be
Element of I, gi,gj be
Element of G st i
<> j & gi
in (F
. i) & gj
in (F
. j) holds (gi
* gj)
= (gj
* gi)
proof
let i,j be
Element of I;
let gi,gj be
Element of G;
assume that
A27: i
<> j and
A28: gi
in (F
. i) and
A29: gj
in (F
. j);
set ai = ((
1ProdHom (F,i))
. gi);
A30: ai
in (
ProjGroup (F,i)) by
A28,
FUNCT_2: 5;
then ai
in (
sum F) by
GROUP_2: 40;
then
reconsider ai as
Element of (
sum F);
reconsider bi = ai as
Element of (
product F) by
GROUP_2: 42;
set aj = ((
1ProdHom (F,j))
. gj);
A31: aj
in (
ProjGroup (F,j)) by
A29,
FUNCT_2: 5;
then aj
in (
sum F) by
GROUP_2: 40;
then
reconsider aj as
Element of (
sum F);
reconsider bj = aj as
Element of (
product F) by
GROUP_2: 42;
A32: gi
= (h
. ai) by
A2,
A28;
(gi
* gj)
= ((h
. ai)
* (h
. aj)) by
A2,
A29,
A32
.= (h
. (ai
* aj)) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= (h
. (bi
* bj)) by
GROUP_2: 43
.= (h
. (bj
* bi)) by
A27,
A30,
A31,
GROUP_12: 7
.= (h
. (aj
* ai)) by
GROUP_2: 43
.= ((h
. aj)
* (h
. ai)) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= (gj
* gi) by
A2,
A29,
A32;
hence thesis;
end;
then
A33: F is
component-commutative;
A34: b
in (
product F) by
A8,
GROUP_2: 40;
(h
. b)
= ((h
. c)
* (h
. d)) by
A19,
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((
Product c0)
* (b
. i)) by
A2,
A14,
A25
.= (
Product b) by
A33,
A34,
Th8;
hence thesis;
end;
A35: for k be
Nat holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A4,
A6);
consider k be
Nat such that
A36: (
card (
support a))
= k;
thus thesis by
A1,
A35,
A36;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_20:19
for I be non
empty
set, G be
Group, M be
DirectSumComponents of G, I holds ex f be
Homomorphism of (
sum M), G, N be
internal
DirectSumComponents of G, I st f is
bijective & for i be
Element of I holds ex qi be
Homomorphism of (M
. i), (N
. i) st qi
= (f
* (
1ProdHom (M,i))) & qi is
bijective
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let G be
Group;
let M be
DirectSumComponents of G, I;
consider f be
Homomorphism of (
sum M), G such that
A1: f is
bijective by
GROUP_19:def 8;
deffunc
FN(
Element of I) = (f
.: (
ProjGroup (M,$1)));
consider N be
Function such that
A2: (
dom N)
= I and
A3: for i be
Element of I st i
in I holds (N
. i)
=
FN(i) from
CLASSES1:sch 2;
A4: for i be
object st i
in I holds (N
. i) is
strict
Subgroup of G
proof
let i be
object;
assume i
in I;
then
reconsider i as
Element of I;
(N
. i)
= (f
.: (
ProjGroup (M,i))) by
A3;
hence thesis;
end;
then for i be
object st i
in I holds (N
. i) is
Group;
then
reconsider N as
Group-Family of I by
A2,
GROUP_19: 2;
for i be
object st i
in I holds (N
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
A4;
then
reconsider N as
Subgroup-Family of I, G by
Def1;
A5: for i be
Element of I holds (N
. i) is
Subgroup of G by
A4;
deffunc
FQ(
Element of I) = (f
* (
1ProdHom (M,$1)));
consider q be
Function such that
A6: (
dom q)
= I and
A7: for i be
Element of I st i
in I holds (q
. i)
=
FQ(i) from
CLASSES1:sch 2;
reconsider q as non
empty
Function by
A6;
A8:
now
let i be
Element of I;
A9: (
rng (
1ProdHom (M,i)))
= (
[#] (
ProjGroup (M,i))) by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
reconsider fi = (f
| (
ProjGroup (M,i))) as
Homomorphism of (
ProjGroup (M,i)), G;
(
dom fi)
= (
[#] (
ProjGroup (M,i))) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A10: (f
* (
1ProdHom (M,i)))
= (fi
* (
1ProdHom (M,i))) by
A9,
RELAT_1: 165;
A11: (
rng fi)
= (f
.: (
[#] (
ProjGroup (M,i)))) by
RELAT_1: 115
.= (
[#] (f
.: (
ProjGroup (M,i)))) by
GRSOLV_1: 8
.= (
[#] (N
. i)) by
A3;
(
Image fi)
= (f
.: (
ProjGroup (M,i)))
.= (N
. i) by
A3;
then
reconsider fi as
Homomorphism of (
ProjGroup (M,i)), (N
. i) by
GROUP_6: 49;
A12: fi is
one-to-one by
A1,
FUNCT_1: 52;
A13: fi is
onto by
A11,
FUNCT_2:def 3;
reconsider qi = (fi
* (
1ProdHom (M,i))) as
Homomorphism of (M
. i), (N
. i);
take qi;
thus qi
= (q
. i) by
A7,
A10;
thus qi is
bijective by
A12,
A13,
GROUP_6: 64;
end;
then
A14: for i be
Element of I holds ex qi be
Homomorphism of (M
. i), (N
. i) st qi
= (q
. i) & qi is
bijective;
reconsider r = (
SumMap (M,N,q)) as
Homomorphism of (
sum M), (
sum N);
A15: r is
bijective by
A6,
A14,
GROUP_19: 41;
reconsider s = (r
" ) as
Homomorphism of (
sum N), (
sum M) by
A6,
A14,
GROUP_19: 41,
GROUP_6: 62;
A16: s is
bijective by
A15,
GROUP_6: 63;
reconsider g = (f
* s) as
Function;
reconsider g as
Homomorphism of (
sum N), G;
A17: g is
bijective by
A1,
A16,
GROUP_6: 64;
then
reconsider N as
DirectSumComponents of G, I by
GROUP_19:def 8;
for i be
Element of I, n be
Element of (N
. i) holds (g
. ((
1ProdHom (N,i))
. n))
= n
proof
let i be
Element of I;
let n be
Element of (N
. i);
consider qi be
Homomorphism of (M
. i), (N
. i) such that
A18: qi
= (q
. i) and
A19: qi is
bijective by
A8;
A20: (
dom qi)
= (
[#] (M
. i)) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
(
rng qi)
= (
[#] (N
. i)) by
A19,
FUNCT_2:def 3;
then
consider m be
object such that
A21: m
in (
[#] (M
. i)) and
A22: (qi
. m)
= n by
A20,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider m as
Element of (M
. i) by
A21;
for i be
Element of I holds (q
. i) is
Homomorphism of (M
. i), (N
. i)
proof
let i be
Element of I;
ex qi be
Homomorphism of (M
. i), (N
. i) st qi
= (q
. i) & qi is
bijective by
A8;
hence thesis;
end;
then
A24: (r
. ((
1ProdHom (M,i))
. m))
= ((
1ProdHom (N,i))
. n) by
A6,
A18,
A22,
GROUP_19: 42;
A25: (
dom r)
= (
[#] (
sum M)) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
((
1ProdHom (M,i))
. m)
in (
ProjGroup (M,i));
then
A26: ((
1ProdHom (M,i))
. m)
in (
sum M) by
GROUP_2: 40;
A27: (
dom s)
= (
[#] (
sum N)) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
((
1ProdHom (N,i))
. n)
in (
ProjGroup (N,i));
then
A28: ((
1ProdHom (N,i))
. n)
in (
sum N) by
GROUP_2: 40;
A29: qi
= (f
* (
1ProdHom (M,i))) by
A7,
A18;
A30: m
in (
dom (
1ProdHom (M,i))) by
A21,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
(g
. ((
1ProdHom (N,i))
. n))
= (f
. (s
. ((
1ProdHom (N,i))
. n))) by
A27,
A28,
FUNCT_1: 13
.= (f
. ((
1ProdHom (M,i))
. m)) by
A15,
A24,
A25,
A26,
FUNCT_1: 34
.= n by
A22,
A29,
A30,
FUNCT_1: 13;
hence thesis;
end;
then for a be
finite-support
Function of I, G st a
in (
sum N) holds (g
. a)
= (
Product a) by
Th19;
then
reconsider N as
internal
DirectSumComponents of G, I by
A5,
A17,
GROUP_19:def 9;
take f, N;
for i be
Element of I holds ex qi be
Homomorphism of (M
. i), (N
. i) st qi
= (f
* (
1ProdHom (M,i))) & qi is
bijective
proof
let i be
Element of I;
consider qi be
Homomorphism of (M
. i), (N
. i) such that
A31: qi
= (q
. i) and
A32: qi is
bijective by
A8;
take qi;
thus thesis by
A7,
A31,
A32;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;