interva1.miz
begin
definition
let U be
set;
let X,Y be
Subset of U;
::
INTERVA1:def1
func
Inter (X,Y) ->
Subset-Family of U equals { A where A be
Subset of U : X
c= A & A
c= Y };
coherence
proof
set IT = { A where A be
Subset of U : X
c= A & A
c= Y };
IT
c= (
bool U)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in IT;
then x
in { A where A be
Subset of U : X
c= A & A
c= Y };
then
consider B be
Subset of U such that
A1: x
= B & X
c= B & B
c= Y;
thus thesis by
A1;
end;
then IT is
Subset-Family of U;
hence thesis;
end;
end
reserve U for
set,
X,Y for
Subset of U;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:1
Th1: for x be
set holds x
in (
Inter (X,Y)) iff X
c= x & x
c= Y
proof
let x be
set;
hereby
assume x
in (
Inter (X,Y));
then
consider A9 be
Element of (
bool U) such that
A1: x
= A9 & X
c= A9 & A9
c= Y;
thus X
c= x & x
c= Y by
A1;
end;
assume
A2: X
c= x & x
c= Y;
then x is
Subset of U by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:2
Th2: (
Inter (X,Y))
<>
{} implies X
in (
Inter (X,Y)) & Y
in (
Inter (X,Y))
proof
assume (
Inter (X,Y))
<>
{} ;
then
consider x be
object such that
A1: x
in (
Inter (X,Y)) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
reconsider x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
X
c= x & x
c= Y by
A1,
Th1;
then X
c= Y;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:3
Th3: for U be
set, A,B be
Subset of U st not A
c= B holds (
Inter (A,B))
=
{}
proof
let U be
set, A,B be
Subset of U;
assume
A1: not A
c= B;
assume (
Inter (A,B))
<>
{} ;
then
consider x be
object such that
A2: x
in (
Inter (A,B)) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
reconsider x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
A
c= x & x
c= B by
A2,
Th1;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:4
for U be
set, A,B be
Subset of U st (
Inter (A,B))
=
{} holds not A
c= B by
Th1;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:5
Th5: for A,B be
Subset of U st (
Inter (A,B))
<>
{} holds A
c= B
proof
let A,B be
Subset of U;
assume (
Inter (A,B))
<>
{} ;
then
consider x be
object such that
A1: x
in (
Inter (A,B)) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
reconsider x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
A
c= x & x
c= B by
A1,
Th1;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:6
Th6: for A,B,C,D be
Subset of U st (
Inter (A,B))
<>
{} & (
Inter (A,B))
= (
Inter (C,D)) holds A
= C & B
= D
proof
let A,B,C,D be
Subset of U;
assume
A1: (
Inter (A,B))
<>
{} & (
Inter (A,B))
= (
Inter (C,D));
then A
in (
Inter (A,B)) by
Th2;
then
A2: C
c= A & A
c= D by
Th1,
A1;
C
in (
Inter (C,D)) by
A1,
Th2;
then
A3: A
c= C & C
c= B by
A1,
Th1;
B
in (
Inter (A,B)) by
A1,
Th2;
then
A4: B
c= D by
Th1,
A1;
D
in (
Inter (C,D)) by
A1,
Th2;
then D
c= B by
A1,
Th1;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4,
A2;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:7
Th7: for U be non
empty
set, A be non
empty
Subset of U holds (
Inter (A,(
{} U)))
=
{}
proof
let U be non
empty
set, A be non
empty
Subset of U;
thus (
Inter (A,(
{} U)))
c=
{}
proof
let x be
object;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume x
in (
Inter (A,(
{} U)));
then A
c= xx & xx
c= (
{} U) by
Th1;
hence thesis;
end;
thus thesis;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:8
Th8: for A be
Subset of U holds (
Inter (A,A))
=
{A}
proof
let A be
Subset of U;
thus (
Inter (A,A))
c=
{A}
proof
let x be
object;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume x
in (
Inter (A,A));
then A
c= xx & xx
c= A by
Th1;
then A
= x by
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
hence thesis by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
let x be
object;
assume x
in
{A};
then x
= A by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis;
end;
definition
let U;
::
INTERVA1:def2
mode
IntervalSet of U ->
Subset-Family of U means
:
Def2: ex A,B be
Subset of U st it
= (
Inter (A,B));
existence
proof
set A = the
Subset of U;
set IT =
{A};
IT
= (
Inter (A,A)) by
Th8;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
INTERVA1:9
for U be non
empty
set holds
{} is
IntervalSet of U
proof
let U be non
empty
set;
set A = the non
empty
Subset of U;
(
Inter (A,(
{} U)))
=
{} by
Th7;
hence thesis by
Def2;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:10
Th10: for U be non
empty
set, A be
Subset of U holds
{A} is
IntervalSet of U
proof
let U be non
empty
set, A be
Subset of U;
(
Inter (A,A))
=
{A} by
Th8;
hence thesis by
Def2;
end;
definition
let U;
let A,B be
Subset of U;
:: original:
Inter
redefine
func
Inter (A,B) ->
IntervalSet of U ;
correctness by
Def2;
end
registration
let U be non
empty
set;
cluster non
empty for
IntervalSet of U;
existence
proof
set A = the
Subset of U;
{A} is
IntervalSet of U by
Th10;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
INTERVA1:11
Th11: for U be non
empty
set, A be
set holds A is non
empty
IntervalSet of U iff ex A1,A2 be
Subset of U st A1
c= A2 & A
= (
Inter (A1,A2))
proof
let U be non
empty
set, A be
set;
hereby
assume
A1: A is non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
then
consider A1,A2 be
Subset of U such that
A2: A
= (
Inter (A1,A2)) by
Def2;
take A1, A2;
thus A1
c= A2 by
A1,
A2,
Th3;
thus A
= (
Inter (A1,A2)) by
A2;
end;
given A1,A2 be
Subset of U such that
A3: A1
c= A2 & A
= (
Inter (A1,A2));
A1
in (
Inter (A1,A2)) by
A3;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:12
Th12: for U be non
empty
set, A1,A2,B1,B2 be
Subset of U st A1
c= A2 & B1
c= B2 holds (
INTERSECTION ((
Inter (A1,A2)),(
Inter (B1,B2))))
= { C where C be
Subset of U : (A1
/\ B1)
c= C & C
c= (A2
/\ B2) }
proof
let U be non
empty
set, A1,A2,B1,B2 be
Subset of U;
assume that
A1: A1
c= A2 and
A2: B1
c= B2;
set A = (
Inter (A1,A2)), B = (
Inter (B1,B2));
set LAB = (A1
/\ B1);
set UAB = (A2
/\ B2);
set IT = (
INTERSECTION ((
Inter (A1,A2)),(
Inter (B1,B2))));
thus IT
c= { C where C be
Subset of U : LAB
c= C & C
c= UAB }
proof
let x be
object;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume x
in IT;
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A3: X
in A & Y
in B & x
= (X
/\ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 5;
xx
c= X by
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then
A4: x is
Subset of U by
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
A5: A1
c= X by
Th1,
A3;
B1
c= Y by
Th1,
A3;
then
A6: LAB
c= xx by
A5,
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 27;
A7: X
c= A2 by
Th1,
A3;
Y
c= B2 by
Th1,
A3;
then xx
c= UAB by
A7,
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 27;
hence thesis by
A6,
A4;
end;
let x be
object;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume x
in { C where C be
Subset of U : LAB
c= C & C
c= UAB };
then
consider C9 be
Subset of U such that
A8: C9
= x & LAB
c= C9 & C9
c= UAB;
set x1 = ((xx
\/ A1)
/\ A2);
set x2 = ((xx
\/ B1)
/\ B2);
A9: (LAB
\/ xx)
= x by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 12;
A10: (UAB
/\ xx)
= x by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
A11: (x1
/\ x2)
= ((xx
\/ A1)
/\ (A2
/\ ((xx
\/ B1)
/\ B2))) by
XBOOLE_1: 16
.= ((xx
\/ A1)
/\ ((xx
\/ B1)
/\ (B2
/\ A2))) by
XBOOLE_1: 16
.= (((xx
\/ A1)
/\ (xx
\/ B1))
/\ UAB) by
XBOOLE_1: 16
.= x by
A9,
A10,
XBOOLE_1: 24;
(A1
/\ A2)
= A1 by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
then x1
= ((xx
/\ A2)
\/ A1) by
XBOOLE_1: 23;
then
A12: A1
c= x1 by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
x1
c= A2 by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then
A13: x1
in A by
A12;
(B1
/\ B2)
= B1 by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
then x2
= ((xx
/\ B2)
\/ B1) by
XBOOLE_1: 23;
then
A14: B1
c= x2 by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
x2
c= B2 by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then x2
in B by
A14;
hence thesis by
A11,
A13,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:13
Th13: for U be non
empty
set, A1,A2,B1,B2 be
Subset of U st A1
c= A2 & B1
c= B2 holds (
UNION ((
Inter (A1,A2)),(
Inter (B1,B2))))
= { C where C be
Subset of U : (A1
\/ B1)
c= C & C
c= (A2
\/ B2) }
proof
let U be non
empty
set, A1,A2,B1,B2 be
Subset of U;
assume that
A1: A1
c= A2 and
A2: B1
c= B2;
set A = (
Inter (A1,A2)), B = (
Inter (B1,B2));
set LAB = (A1
\/ B1);
set UAB = (A2
\/ B2);
set IT = (
UNION (A,B));
thus IT
c= { C where C be
Subset of U : LAB
c= C & C
c= UAB }
proof
let x be
object;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume x
in IT;
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A3: X
in A & Y
in B & x
= (X
\/ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 4;
A4: x is
Subset of U by
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
A5: A1
c= X by
Th1,
A3;
B1
c= Y by
Th1,
A3;
then
A6: LAB
c= xx by
A5,
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 13;
A7: X
c= A2 by
Th1,
A3;
Y
c= B2 by
Th1,
A3;
then xx
c= UAB by
A7,
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 13;
hence thesis by
A4,
A6;
end;
let x be
object;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume x
in { C where C be
Subset of U : LAB
c= C & C
c= UAB };
then
consider C9 be
Subset of U such that
A8: C9
= x & LAB
c= C9 & C9
c= UAB;
set x1 = ((xx
\/ A1)
/\ A2);
set x2 = ((xx
\/ B1)
/\ B2);
A9: (LAB
\/ xx)
= x by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 12;
A10: (UAB
/\ xx)
= x by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
A11: (A1
/\ A2)
= A1 by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
A12: (B1
/\ B2)
= B1 by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
A13: (x1
\/ x2)
= (((xx
/\ A2)
\/ (A1
/\ A2))
\/ ((xx
\/ B1)
/\ B2)) by
XBOOLE_1: 23
.= (((xx
/\ A2)
\/ A1)
\/ ((xx
/\ B2)
\/ (B1
/\ B2))) by
A11,
XBOOLE_1: 23
.= ((xx
/\ A2)
\/ (A1
\/ ((xx
/\ B2)
\/ B1))) by
A12,
XBOOLE_1: 4
.= ((xx
/\ A2)
\/ ((xx
/\ B2)
\/ LAB)) by
XBOOLE_1: 4
.= (((xx
/\ A2)
\/ (xx
/\ B2))
\/ LAB) by
XBOOLE_1: 4
.= x by
A9,
A10,
XBOOLE_1: 23;
(A1
/\ A2)
= A1 by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
then x1
= ((xx
/\ A2)
\/ A1) by
XBOOLE_1: 23;
then
A14: A1
c= x1 by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
x1
c= A2 by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then
A15: x1
in A by
A14;
(B1
/\ B2)
= B1 by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
then x2
= ((xx
/\ B2)
\/ B1) by
XBOOLE_1: 23;
then
A16: B1
c= x2 by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
x2
c= B2 by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then x2
in B by
A16;
hence thesis by
A13,
A15,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
end;
definition
let U be non
empty
set, A,B be non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
::
INTERVA1:def3
func A
_/\_ B ->
IntervalSet of U equals (
INTERSECTION (A,B));
coherence
proof
set IT = (
INTERSECTION (A,B));
consider A1,A2 be
Subset of U such that
A1: A1
c= A2 & A
= (
Inter (A1,A2)) by
Th11;
consider B1,B2 be
Subset of U such that
A2: B1
c= B2 & B
= (
Inter (B1,B2)) by
Th11;
set LAB = (A1
/\ B1);
set UAB = (A2
/\ B2);
IT
= (
Inter (LAB,UAB)) by
Th12,
A1,
A2;
hence thesis;
end;
::
INTERVA1:def4
func A
_\/_ B ->
IntervalSet of U equals (
UNION (A,B));
coherence
proof
set IT = (
UNION (A,B));
consider A1,A2 be
Subset of U such that
A3: A1
c= A2 & A
= (
Inter (A1,A2)) by
Th11;
consider B1,B2 be
Subset of U such that
A4: B1
c= B2 & B
= (
Inter (B1,B2)) by
Th11;
set LAB = (A1
\/ B1);
set UAB = (A2
\/ B2);
IT
= (
Inter (LAB,UAB)) by
Th13,
A3,
A4;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let U be non
empty
set, A,B be non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
cluster (A
_/\_ B) -> non
empty;
coherence by
TOPGEN_4: 31;
cluster (A
_\/_ B) -> non
empty;
coherence by
TOPGEN_4: 30;
end
reserve U for non
empty
set,
A,B,C for non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
definition
let U, A;
::
INTERVA1:def5
func A
``1 ->
Subset of U means
:
Def5: ex B be
Subset of U st A
= (
Inter (it ,B));
existence
proof
consider A1,A2 be
Subset of U such that
A1: A1
c= A2 & A
= (
Inter (A1,A2)) by
Th11;
thus thesis by
A1;
end;
uniqueness by
Th6;
::
INTERVA1:def6
func A
``2 ->
Subset of U means
:
Def6: ex B be
Subset of U st A
= (
Inter (B,it ));
existence
proof
consider A1,A2 be
Subset of U such that
A2: A1
c= A2 & A
= (
Inter (A1,A2)) by
Th11;
thus thesis by
A2;
end;
uniqueness by
Th6;
end
theorem ::
INTERVA1:14
Th14: for X be
set holds X
in A iff (A
``1 )
c= X & X
c= (A
``2 )
proof
let X be
set;
A1: X
in A implies (A
``1 )
c= X & X
c= (A
``2 )
proof
assume
A2: X
in A;
A3: (A
``1 )
c= X
proof
consider B be
Subset of U such that
A4: A
= (
Inter ((A
``1 ),B)) by
Def5;
thus thesis by
Th1,
A2,
A4;
end;
X
c= (A
``2 )
proof
consider B be
Subset of U such that
A5: A
= (
Inter (B,(A
``2 ))) by
Def6;
thus thesis by
Th1,
A2,
A5;
end;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
(A
``1 )
c= X & X
c= (A
``2 ) implies X
in A
proof
assume (A
``1 )
c= X & X
c= (A
``2 );
then
A6: X
in (
Inter ((A
``1 ),(A
``2 ))) by
Th1;
consider B be
Subset of U such that
A7: A
= (
Inter ((A
``1 ),B)) by
Def5;
consider C be
Subset of U such that
A8: A
= (
Inter (C,(A
``2 ))) by
Def6;
thus thesis by
A7,
A6,
Th6,
A8;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:15
Th15: A
= (
Inter ((A
``1 ),(A
``2 )))
proof
A1: (
Inter ((A
``1 ),(A
``2 )))
c= A
proof
let x be
object;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume x
in (
Inter ((A
``1 ),(A
``2 )));
then (A
``1 )
c= xx & xx
c= (A
``2 ) by
Th1;
hence thesis by
Th14;
end;
A
c= (
Inter ((A
``1 ),(A
``2 )))
proof
let x be
object;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume x
in A;
then (A
``1 )
c= xx & xx
c= (A
``2 ) by
Th14;
hence thesis by
Th1;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:16
Th16: (A
``1 )
c= (A
``2 )
proof
consider B be
Subset of U such that
A1: A
= (
Inter ((A
``1 ),B)) by
Def5;
consider C be
Subset of U such that
A2: A
= (
Inter (C,(A
``2 ))) by
Def6;
(A
``1 )
= C by
Th6,
A2,
A1;
hence thesis by
Th5,
A2;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:17
Th17: (A
_\/_ B)
= (
Inter (((A
``1 )
\/ (B
``1 )),((A
``2 )
\/ (B
``2 ))))
proof
thus (A
_\/_ B)
c= (
Inter (((A
``1 )
\/ (B
``1 )),((A
``2 )
\/ (B
``2 ))))
proof
let x be
object;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume
A1: x
in (A
_\/_ B);
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A2: X
in A & Y
in B & x
= (X
\/ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 4;
A3: (A
``1 )
c= X & X
c= (A
``2 ) by
A2,
Th14;
A4: (B
``1 )
c= Y & Y
c= (B
``2 ) by
A2,
Th14;
then
A5: xx
c= ((A
``2 )
\/ (B
``2 )) by
A3,
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 13;
((A
``1 )
\/ (B
``1 ))
c= xx by
A3,
A2,
A4,
XBOOLE_1: 13;
hence thesis by
A1,
A5;
end;
thus (
Inter (((A
``1 )
\/ (B
``1 )),((A
``2 )
\/ (B
``2 ))))
c= (A
_\/_ B)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
Inter (((A
``1 )
\/ (B
``1 )),((A
``2 )
\/ (B
``2 ))));
then
consider Z be
Element of (
bool U) such that
A6: x
= Z & ((A
``1 )
\/ (B
``1 ))
c= Z & Z
c= ((A
``2 )
\/ (B
``2 ));
(A
``1 )
c= ((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ))
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A7: x
in (A
``1 );
assume
A8: not x
in ((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ));
per cases by
A8,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
suppose not x
in (Z
\/ (A
``1 ));
hence thesis by
A7,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
suppose
A9: not x
in (A
``2 );
(A
``1 )
c= (A
``2 ) & x
in (A
``1 ) by
A7,
Th16;
hence thesis by
A9;
end;
end;
then (A
``1 )
c= ((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 )) & ((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ))
c= (A
``2 ) by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then
A10: ((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ))
in A by
Th14;
(B
``1 )
c= ((Z
\/ (B
``1 ))
/\ (B
``2 ))
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A11: x
in (B
``1 );
then
A12: x
in (Z
\/ (B
``1 )) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
(B
``1 )
c= (B
``2 ) by
Th16;
hence thesis by
A11,
A12,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
then (B
``1 )
c= ((Z
\/ (B
``1 ))
/\ (B
``2 )) & ((Z
\/ (B
``1 ))
/\ (B
``2 ))
c= (B
``2 ) by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then
A13: ((Z
\/ (B
``1 ))
/\ (B
``2 ))
in B by
Th14;
(((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ))
\/ ((Z
\/ (B
``1 ))
/\ (B
``2 )))
= ((((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ))
\/ (Z
\/ (B
``1 )))
/\ (((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ))
\/ (B
``2 ))) by
XBOOLE_1: 24
.= ((((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
\/ (Z
\/ (B
``1 )))
/\ ((A
``2 )
\/ (Z
\/ (B
``1 ))))
/\ (((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ))
\/ (B
``2 ))) by
XBOOLE_1: 24
.= (((Z
\/ ((A
``1 )
\/ (B
``1 )))
/\ ((A
``2 )
\/ (Z
\/ (B
``1 ))))
/\ (((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ))
\/ (B
``2 ))) by
XBOOLE_1: 5
.= ((Z
/\ ((A
``2 )
\/ (Z
\/ (B
``1 ))))
/\ (((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ))
\/ (B
``2 ))) by
A6,
XBOOLE_1: 12
.= (((Z
/\ (A
``2 ))
\/ (Z
/\ (Z
\/ (B
``1 ))))
/\ (((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ))
\/ (B
``2 ))) by
XBOOLE_1: 23
.= (((Z
/\ (A
``2 ))
\/ Z)
/\ (((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ))
\/ (B
``2 ))) by
XBOOLE_1: 7,
XBOOLE_1: 28
.= (Z
/\ ((B
``2 )
\/ ((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 )))) by
XBOOLE_1: 12,
XBOOLE_1: 17
.= (Z
/\ (((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
\/ (B
``2 ))
/\ ((A
``2 )
\/ (B
``2 )))) by
XBOOLE_1: 24
.= (Z
/\ ((Z
\/ ((A
``1 )
\/ (B
``2 )))
/\ ((A
``2 )
\/ (B
``2 )))) by
XBOOLE_1: 4
.= (Z
/\ ((Z
/\ ((A
``2 )
\/ (B
``2 )))
\/ (((A
``1 )
\/ (B
``2 ))
/\ ((A
``2 )
\/ (B
``2 ))))) by
XBOOLE_1: 23
.= (Z
/\ (Z
\/ (((A
``1 )
\/ (B
``2 ))
/\ ((A
``2 )
\/ (B
``2 ))))) by
A6,
XBOOLE_1: 28
.= (Z
/\ ((Z
\/ ((A
``1 )
\/ (B
``2 )))
/\ (Z
\/ ((A
``2 )
\/ (B
``2 ))))) by
XBOOLE_1: 24
.= ((Z
/\ (Z
\/ ((A
``1 )
\/ (B
``2 ))))
/\ (Z
\/ ((A
``2 )
\/ (B
``2 )))) by
XBOOLE_1: 16
.= (Z
/\ (Z
\/ ((A
``2 )
\/ (B
``2 )))) by
XBOOLE_1: 7,
XBOOLE_1: 28
.= Z by
XBOOLE_1: 7,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
then
consider X,Y be
Subset of U such that
A14: X
in A & Y
in B & Z
= (X
\/ Y) by
A10,
A13;
thus thesis by
A14,
A6,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
end;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:18
Th18: (A
_/\_ B)
= (
Inter (((A
``1 )
/\ (B
``1 )),((A
``2 )
/\ (B
``2 ))))
proof
A1: (A
_/\_ B)
c= (
Inter (((A
``1 )
/\ (B
``1 )),((A
``2 )
/\ (B
``2 ))))
proof
let x be
object;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume x
in (A
_/\_ B);
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A2: X
in A & Y
in B & x
= (X
/\ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 5;
(A
``1 )
c= X & (B
``1 )
c= Y & X
c= (A
``2 ) & Y
c= (B
``2 ) by
A2,
Th14;
then ((A
``1 )
/\ (B
``1 ))
c= xx & xx
c= ((A
``2 )
/\ (B
``2 )) by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 27;
hence thesis by
Th1;
end;
(
Inter (((A
``1 )
/\ (B
``1 )),((A
``2 )
/\ (B
``2 ))))
c= (A
_/\_ B)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
Inter (((A
``1 )
/\ (B
``1 )),((A
``2 )
/\ (B
``2 ))));
then
consider Z be
Element of (
bool U) such that
A3: x
= Z & ((A
``1 )
/\ (B
``1 ))
c= Z & Z
c= ((A
``2 )
/\ (B
``2 ));
(A
``1 )
c= ((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ))
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A4: x
in (A
``1 );
assume
A5: not x
in ((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ));
per cases by
A5,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
suppose not x
in (Z
\/ (A
``1 ));
hence thesis by
A4,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
suppose
A6: not x
in (A
``2 );
(A
``1 )
c= (A
``2 ) & x
in (A
``1 ) by
A4,
Th16;
hence thesis by
A6;
end;
end;
then (A
``1 )
c= ((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 )) & ((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ))
c= (A
``2 ) by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then
A7: ((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ))
in A by
Th14;
(B
``1 )
c= ((Z
\/ (B
``1 ))
/\ (B
``2 ))
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A8: x
in (B
``1 );
then
A9: x
in (Z
\/ (B
``1 )) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
(B
``1 )
c= (B
``2 ) by
Th16;
hence thesis by
A8,
A9,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
then (B
``1 )
c= ((Z
\/ (B
``1 ))
/\ (B
``2 )) & ((Z
\/ (B
``1 ))
/\ (B
``2 ))
c= (B
``2 ) by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then
A10: ((Z
\/ (B
``1 ))
/\ (B
``2 ))
in B by
Th14;
(((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (A
``2 ))
/\ ((Z
\/ (B
``1 ))
/\ (B
``2 )))
= ((((A
``2 )
/\ (Z
\/ (A
``1 )))
/\ (Z
\/ (B
``1 )))
/\ (B
``2 )) by
XBOOLE_1: 16
.= (((A
``2 )
/\ ((Z
\/ (A
``1 ))
/\ (Z
\/ (B
``1 ))))
/\ (B
``2 )) by
XBOOLE_1: 16
.= (((A
``2 )
/\ (Z
\/ ((A
``1 )
/\ (B
``1 ))))
/\ (B
``2 )) by
XBOOLE_1: 24
.= (((A
``2 )
/\ Z)
/\ (B
``2 )) by
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 12
.= (Z
/\ ((A
``2 )
/\ (B
``2 ))) by
XBOOLE_1: 16
.= Z by
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
hence thesis by
A3,
A7,
A10,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
definition
let U;
let A, B;
:: original:
=
redefine
::
INTERVA1:def7
pred A
= B means (A
``1 )
= (B
``1 ) & (A
``2 )
= (B
``2 );
compatibility
proof
thus A
= B implies (A
``1 )
= (B
``1 ) & (A
``2 )
= (B
``2 );
assume that
A1: (A
``1 )
= (B
``1 ) and
A2: (A
``2 )
= (B
``2 );
A3: A
c= B
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A4: x
in A;
consider A1,B1 be
Subset of U such that
A5: A
= (
Inter (A1,B1)) by
Def2;
consider C1 be
Subset of U such that
A6: A
= (
Inter ((A
``1 ),C1)) by
Def5;
A7: A1
= (B
``1 ) by
A1,
A5,
Th6,
A6;
consider C2 be
Subset of U such that
A8: B
= (
Inter ((B
``1 ),C2)) by
Def5;
consider D1 be
Subset of U such that
A9: A
= (
Inter (D1,(A
``2 ))) by
Def6;
A10: (B
``2 )
= B1 by
A2,
A9,
A5,
Th6;
consider D2 be
Subset of U such that
A11: B
= (
Inter (D2,(B
``2 ))) by
Def6;
thus thesis by
A4,
A5,
A7,
A8,
A10,
A11,
Th6;
end;
B
c= A
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A12: x
in B;
consider A1,B1 be
Subset of U such that
A13: B
= (
Inter (A1,B1)) by
Def2;
consider C1 be
Subset of U such that
A14: B
= (
Inter ((B
``1 ),C1)) by
Def5;
A15: (A
``1 )
= A1 by
A1,
A14,
Th6,
A13;
consider C2 be
Subset of U such that
A16: A
= (
Inter ((A
``1 ),C2)) by
Def5;
consider D1 be
Subset of U such that
A17: B
= (
Inter (D1,(B
``2 ))) by
Def6;
A18: (A
``2 )
= B1 by
A2,
A17,
A13,
Th6;
consider D2 be
Subset of U such that
A19: A
= (
Inter (D2,(A
``2 ))) by
Def6;
thus thesis by
A12,
A13,
A15,
A16,
A18,
A19,
Th6;
end;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
end
theorem ::
INTERVA1:19
(A
_\/_ A)
= A
proof
A1: (A
_\/_ A)
c= A
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (A
_\/_ A);
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A2: X
in A & Y
in A & x
= (X
\/ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 4;
A3: (A
``1 )
c= X & X
c= (A
``2 ) by
A2,
Th14;
(A
``1 )
c= Y & Y
c= (A
``2 ) by
A2,
Th14;
then
A4: (X
\/ Y)
c= (A
``2 ) by
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
X
c= (X
\/ Y) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then (A
``1 )
c= (X
\/ Y) by
A3;
hence thesis by
Th14,
A4,
A2;
end;
A
c= (A
_\/_ A)
proof
let x be
object;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume
A5: x
in A;
x
= (xx
\/ xx);
hence thesis by
A5,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:20
(A
_/\_ A)
= A
proof
A1: (A
_/\_ A)
c= A
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (A
_/\_ A);
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A2: X
in A & Y
in A & x
= (X
/\ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 5;
A3: (A
``1 )
c= X & X
c= (A
``2 ) by
A2,
Th14;
(A
``1 )
c= Y & Y
c= (A
``2 ) by
A2,
Th14;
then
A4: (A
``1 )
c= (X
/\ Y) by
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 19;
(X
/\ Y)
c= X by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then (X
/\ Y)
c= (A
``2 ) by
A3;
hence thesis by
A4,
A2,
Th14;
end;
A
c= (A
_/\_ A)
proof
let x be
object;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume
A5: x
in A;
x
= (xx
/\ xx);
hence thesis by
A5,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:21
(A
_\/_ B)
= (B
_\/_ A);
theorem ::
INTERVA1:22
(A
_/\_ B)
= (B
_/\_ A);
theorem ::
INTERVA1:23
Th23: ((A
_\/_ B)
_\/_ C)
= (A
_\/_ (B
_\/_ C))
proof
A1: ((A
_\/_ B)
_\/_ C)
c= (A
_\/_ (B
_\/_ C))
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in ((A
_\/_ B)
_\/_ C);
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A2: X
in (
UNION (A,B)) & Y
in C & x
= (X
\/ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 4;
consider Z,W be
set such that
A3: Z
in A & W
in B & X
= (Z
\/ W) by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
(W
\/ Y)
in (
UNION (B,C)) by
A2,
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
then (Z
\/ (W
\/ Y))
in (
UNION (A,(
UNION (B,C)))) by
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A2,
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 4;
end;
(A
_\/_ (B
_\/_ C))
c= ((A
_\/_ B)
_\/_ C)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (A
_\/_ (B
_\/_ C));
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A4: X
in A & Y
in (
UNION (B,C)) & x
= (X
\/ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 4;
consider Z,W be
set such that
A5: Z
in B & W
in C & Y
= (Z
\/ W) by
A4,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
(X
\/ Z)
in (
UNION (A,B)) by
A4,
A5,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
then ((X
\/ Z)
\/ W)
in (
UNION ((
UNION (A,B)),C)) by
A5,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A4,
A5,
XBOOLE_1: 4;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:24
Th24: ((A
_/\_ B)
_/\_ C)
= (A
_/\_ (B
_/\_ C))
proof
A1: ((A
_/\_ B)
_/\_ C)
c= (A
_/\_ (B
_/\_ C))
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in ((A
_/\_ B)
_/\_ C);
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A2: X
in (
INTERSECTION (A,B)) & Y
in C & x
= (X
/\ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 5;
consider Z,W be
set such that
A3: Z
in A & W
in B & X
= (Z
/\ W) by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
(W
/\ Y)
in (
INTERSECTION (B,C)) by
A2,
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
then (Z
/\ (W
/\ Y))
in (
INTERSECTION (A,(
INTERSECTION (B,C)))) by
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
hence thesis by
A2,
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 16;
end;
(A
_/\_ (B
_/\_ C))
c= ((A
_/\_ B)
_/\_ C)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (A
_/\_ (B
_/\_ C));
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A4: X
in A & Y
in (
INTERSECTION (B,C)) & x
= (X
/\ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 5;
consider Z,W be
set such that
A5: Z
in B & W
in C & Y
= (Z
/\ W) by
A4,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
(X
/\ Z)
in (
INTERSECTION (A,B)) by
A4,
A5,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
then ((X
/\ Z)
/\ W)
in (
INTERSECTION ((
INTERSECTION (A,B)),C)) by
A5,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
hence thesis by
A4,
A5,
XBOOLE_1: 16;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
Lm1: for X be
set, A,B,C be
Subset-Family of X holds (
UNION (A,(
INTERSECTION (B,C))))
c= (
INTERSECTION ((
UNION (A,B)),(
UNION (A,C))))
proof
let X be
set, A,B,C be
Subset-Family of X;
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
UNION (A,(
INTERSECTION (B,C))));
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A1: X
in A & Y
in (
INTERSECTION (B,C)) & x
= (X
\/ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 4;
consider W,Z be
set such that
A2: W
in B & Z
in C & Y
= (W
/\ Z) by
A1,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
A3: x
= ((X
\/ W)
/\ (X
\/ Z)) by
A1,
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 24;
A4: (X
\/ W)
in (
UNION (A,B)) by
A1,
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
(X
\/ Z)
in (
UNION (A,C)) by
A1,
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
end;
definition
let X be
set;
let F be
Subset-Family of X;
::
INTERVA1:def8
attr F is
ordered means
:
Def8: ex A,B be
set st A
in F & B
in F & for Y be
set holds Y
in F iff A
c= Y & Y
c= B;
end
registration
let X be
set;
cluster non
empty
ordered for
Subset-Family of X;
existence
proof
reconsider F =
{X} as
Subset-Family of X by
ZFMISC_1: 68;
take F;
ex A,B be
set st A
in F & B
in F & for Y be
set holds Y
in F iff A
c= Y & Y
c= B
proof
take X, X;
thus X
in F & X
in F by
TARSKI:def 1;
let Y be
set;
thus Y
in F implies X
c= Y & Y
c= X by
TARSKI:def 1;
assume X
c= Y & Y
c= X;
then X
= Y;
hence thesis by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
INTERVA1:25
Th25: for A,B be
Subset of U st A
c= B holds (
Inter (A,B)) is non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U
proof
let A,B be
Subset of U;
assume
A1: A
c= B;
consider C,D be
set such that
A2: C
= A & D
= B;
C
in (
Inter (A,B)) & D
in (
Inter (A,B)) & for Y be
set holds Y
in (
Inter (A,B)) iff C
c= Y & Y
c= D by
A2,
Th1,
A1;
hence thesis by
Def8;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:26
Th26: for A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U holds A is non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U
proof
let A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
A
= (
Inter ((A
``1 ),(A
``2 ))) & (A
``1 )
c= (A
``2 ) by
Th15,
Th16;
hence thesis by
Th25;
end;
notation
let X be
set;
synonym
min X for
meet X;
synonym
max X for
union X;
end
definition
let X be
set;
let F be non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of X;
:: original:
min
redefine
func
min F ->
Element of F ;
correctness
proof
consider A,B be
set such that
A1: A
in F & B
in F & for Y be
set holds Y
in F iff A
c= Y & Y
c= B by
Def8;
for Z1 be
set st Z1
in F holds A
c= Z1 by
A1;
then
A2: A
c= (
meet F) by
SETFAM_1: 5;
(
meet F)
c= B by
A1,
SETFAM_1: 3;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2;
end;
:: original:
max
redefine
func
max F ->
Element of F ;
correctness
proof
consider A,B be
set such that
A3: A
in F & B
in F & for Y be
set holds Y
in F iff A
c= Y & Y
c= B by
Def8;
A4: for Z1 be
set st Z1
in F holds Z1
c= B by
A3;
A5: A
c= (
union F) by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 74;
(
union F)
c= B by
A4,
ZFMISC_1: 76;
hence thesis by
A3,
A5;
end;
end
Lm2: for X be
set, F be non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of X, G be
set st G
in F holds G
= (
min F) iff for Y be
set st Y
in F holds G
c= Y by
SETFAM_1: 3;
Lm3: for X be
set, F be non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of X, G be
set st G
in F holds G
= (
max F) iff for Y be
set st Y
in F holds Y
c= G by
ZFMISC_1: 74;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:27
Th27: for A,B be
Subset of U, F be
ordered non
empty
Subset-Family of U st F
= (
Inter (A,B)) holds (
min F)
= A & (
max F)
= B
proof
let A,B be
Subset of U;
let F be
ordered non
empty
Subset-Family of U;
assume
A1: F
= (
Inter (A,B));
then A is
Element of F & for Y be
set st Y
in F holds A
c= Y by
Th2,
Th1;
then
A2: A
= (
min F) by
Lm2;
B is
Element of F & for Y be
set st Y
in F holds Y
c= B by
Th2,
A1,
Th1;
hence thesis by
A2,
Lm3;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:28
Th28: for X,Y be
set, A be non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of X holds Y
in A iff (
min A)
c= Y & Y
c= (
max A)
proof
let X,Y be
set;
let A be non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of X;
(
min A)
c= Y & Y
c= (
max A) implies Y
in A
proof
assume
A1: (
min A)
c= Y & Y
c= (
max A);
consider C,D be
set such that
A2: C
in A & D
in A & for X be
set holds X
in A iff C
c= X & X
c= D by
Def8;
A3: (
min A)
c= C & D
c= (
max A) by
Lm2,
Lm3,
A2;
C
c= (
min A) & (
max A)
c= D by
A2;
then (
min A)
= C & (
max A)
= D by
A3;
hence thesis by
A2,
A1;
end;
hence thesis by
Lm2,
Lm3;
end;
Lm4: for A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U holds A is non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U by
Th26;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:29
Th29: for X be
set, A,B,C be non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of X holds (
UNION (A,(
INTERSECTION (B,C))))
= (
INTERSECTION ((
UNION (A,B)),(
UNION (A,C))))
proof
let X be
set, A,B,C be non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of X;
A1: (
UNION (A,(
INTERSECTION (B,C))))
c= (
INTERSECTION ((
UNION (A,B)),(
UNION (A,C)))) by
Lm1;
(
INTERSECTION ((
UNION (A,B)),(
UNION (A,C))))
c= (
UNION (A,(
INTERSECTION (B,C))))
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
INTERSECTION ((
UNION (A,B)),(
UNION (A,C))));
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A2: X
in (
UNION (A,B)) & Y
in (
UNION (A,C)) & x
= (X
/\ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 5;
consider X1,X2 be
set such that
A3: X1
in A & X2
in B & X
= (X1
\/ X2) by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
consider Y1,Y2 be
set such that
A4: Y1
in A & Y2
in C & Y
= (Y1
\/ Y2) by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
A5: x
= ((X1
/\ (Y1
\/ Y2))
\/ (X2
/\ (Y1
\/ Y2))) by
A2,
A3,
A4,
XBOOLE_1: 23
.= (((X1
/\ Y1)
\/ (X1
/\ Y2))
\/ (X2
/\ (Y1
\/ Y2))) by
XBOOLE_1: 23
.= (((X1
/\ Y1)
\/ (X1
/\ Y2))
\/ ((X2
/\ Y1)
\/ (X2
/\ Y2))) by
XBOOLE_1: 23
.= ((((X1
/\ Y1)
\/ (X1
/\ Y2))
\/ (X2
/\ Y1))
\/ (X2
/\ Y2)) by
XBOOLE_1: 4;
set A1 = (
min A), A2 = (
max A);
A1
c= X1 & X1
c= A2 & A1
c= Y1 & Y1
c= A2 by
A3,
A4,
Th28;
then
A6: (A1
/\ A1)
c= (X1
/\ Y1) & (X1
/\ Y1)
c= (A2
/\ A2) by
XBOOLE_1: 27;
Y1
c= A2 & (X2
/\ Y1)
c= Y1 by
A4,
Th28,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then (X2
/\ Y1)
c= A2;
then
A7: A1
c= ((X1
/\ Y1)
\/ (X2
/\ Y1)) & ((X1
/\ Y1)
\/ (X2
/\ Y1))
c= A2 by
A6,
XBOOLE_1: 8,
XBOOLE_1: 10;
X1
c= A2 & (X1
/\ Y2)
c= X1 by
A3,
Th28,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then (X1
/\ Y2)
c= A2;
then (((X1
/\ Y1)
\/ (X2
/\ Y1))
\/ (X1
/\ Y2))
c= A2 by
A7,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
then A1
c= (((X1
/\ Y1)
\/ (X2
/\ Y1))
\/ (X1
/\ Y2)) & (((X1
/\ Y1)
\/ (X1
/\ Y2))
\/ (X2
/\ Y1))
c= A2 by
A7,
XBOOLE_1: 4,
XBOOLE_1: 10;
then A1
c= (((X1
/\ Y1)
\/ (X1
/\ Y2))
\/ (X2
/\ Y1)) & (((X1
/\ Y1)
\/ (X1
/\ Y2))
\/ (X2
/\ Y1))
c= A2 by
XBOOLE_1: 4;
then
A8: (((X1
/\ Y1)
\/ (X1
/\ Y2))
\/ (X2
/\ Y1))
in A by
Th28;
(X2
/\ Y2)
in (
INTERSECTION (B,C)) by
A3,
A4,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
hence thesis by
A8,
A5,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
Lm5: for X be
set, A,B,C be
Subset-Family of X holds (
INTERSECTION (A,(
UNION (B,C))))
c= (
UNION ((
INTERSECTION (A,B)),(
INTERSECTION (A,C))))
proof
let X be
set, A,B,C be
Subset-Family of X;
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
INTERSECTION (A,(
UNION (B,C))));
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A1: X
in A & Y
in (
UNION (B,C)) & x
= (X
/\ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 5;
consider Z,W be
set such that
A2: Z
in B & W
in C & Y
= (Z
\/ W) by
A1,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
A3: x
= ((X
/\ Z)
\/ (X
/\ W)) by
A1,
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 23;
A4: (X
/\ Z)
in (
INTERSECTION (A,B)) by
A1,
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
(X
/\ W)
in (
INTERSECTION (A,C)) by
A1,
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:30
Th30: for X be
set, A,B,C be non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of X holds (
INTERSECTION (A,(
UNION (B,C))))
= (
UNION ((
INTERSECTION (A,B)),(
INTERSECTION (A,C))))
proof
let X be
set, A,B,C be non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of X;
A1: (
INTERSECTION (A,(
UNION (B,C))))
c= (
UNION ((
INTERSECTION (A,B)),(
INTERSECTION (A,C)))) by
Lm5;
(
UNION ((
INTERSECTION (A,B)),(
INTERSECTION (A,C))))
c= (
INTERSECTION (A,(
UNION (B,C))))
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
UNION ((
INTERSECTION (A,B)),(
INTERSECTION (A,C))));
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A2: X
in (
INTERSECTION (A,B)) & Y
in (
INTERSECTION (A,C)) & x
= (X
\/ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 4;
consider X1,X2 be
set such that
A3: X1
in A & X2
in B & X
= (X1
/\ X2) by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
consider Y1,Y2 be
set such that
A4: Y1
in A & Y2
in C & Y
= (Y1
/\ Y2) by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
A5: x
= (((X1
/\ X2)
\/ Y1)
/\ ((X1
/\ X2)
\/ Y2)) by
A2,
A3,
A4,
XBOOLE_1: 24
.= ((Y1
\/ (X1
/\ X2))
/\ ((Y2
\/ X1)
/\ (Y2
\/ X2))) by
XBOOLE_1: 24
.= (((Y1
\/ X1)
/\ (Y1
\/ X2))
/\ ((Y2
\/ X1)
/\ (Y2
\/ X2))) by
XBOOLE_1: 24
.= ((((Y1
\/ X1)
/\ (Y1
\/ X2))
/\ (Y2
\/ X1))
/\ (Y2
\/ X2)) by
XBOOLE_1: 16;
set A1 = (
min A), A2 = (
max A);
A6: A1
c= Y1 & A1
c= X1 by
A3,
A4,
Th28;
then
A7: (A1
\/ A1)
c= (Y1
\/ X1) by
XBOOLE_1: 13;
Y1
c= (Y1
\/ X2) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then A1
c= (Y1
\/ X2) by
A6;
then
A8: (A1
/\ A1)
c= ((Y1
\/ X1)
/\ (Y1
\/ X2)) by
A7,
XBOOLE_1: 27;
A1
c= X1 & X1
c= (Y2
\/ X1) by
Th28,
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then A1
c= (Y2
\/ X1);
then
A9: A1
c= (((Y1
\/ X1)
/\ (Y1
\/ X2))
/\ (Y2
\/ X1)) by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 19;
Y1
c= A2 & X1
c= A2 by
A3,
A4,
Th28;
then ((Y1
\/ X1)
/\ ((Y1
\/ X2)
/\ (Y2
\/ X1)))
c= (Y1
\/ X1) & (Y1
\/ X1)
c= A2 by
XBOOLE_1: 8,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then A1
c= (((Y1
\/ X1)
/\ (Y1
\/ X2))
/\ (Y2
\/ X1)) & ((Y1
\/ X1)
/\ ((Y1
\/ X2)
/\ (Y2
\/ X1)))
c= A2 by
A9;
then A1
c= (((Y1
\/ X1)
/\ (Y1
\/ X2))
/\ (Y2
\/ X1)) & (((Y1
\/ X1)
/\ (Y1
\/ X2))
/\ (Y2
\/ X1))
c= A2 by
XBOOLE_1: 16;
then
A10: (((Y1
\/ X1)
/\ (Y1
\/ X2))
/\ (Y2
\/ X1))
in A by
Th28;
(Y2
\/ X2)
in (
UNION (B,C)) by
A3,
A4,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A5,
A10,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:31
(A
_\/_ (B
_/\_ C))
= ((A
_\/_ B)
_/\_ (A
_\/_ C))
proof
A1: (A
_\/_ (B
_/\_ C))
c= ((A
_\/_ B)
_/\_ (A
_\/_ C)) by
Lm1;
((A
_\/_ B)
_/\_ (A
_\/_ C))
c= (A
_\/_ (B
_/\_ C))
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in ((A
_\/_ B)
_/\_ (A
_\/_ C));
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A2: X
in (
UNION (A,B)) & Y
in (
UNION (A,C)) & x
= (X
/\ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 5;
A3: A is non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U & B is non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U & C is non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U by
Lm4;
x
in (
INTERSECTION ((
UNION (A,B)),(
UNION (A,C)))) by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
hence thesis by
Th29,
A3;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:32
(A
_/\_ (B
_\/_ C))
= ((A
_/\_ B)
_\/_ (A
_/\_ C))
proof
A1: (A
_/\_ (B
_\/_ C))
c= ((A
_/\_ B)
_\/_ (A
_/\_ C))
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (A
_/\_ (B
_\/_ C));
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A2: X
in A & Y
in (
UNION (B,C)) & x
= (X
/\ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 5;
consider Z,W be
set such that
A3: Z
in B & W
in C & Y
= (Z
\/ W) by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
A4: A is non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U & B is non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U & C is non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U by
Lm4;
(X
/\ (Z
\/ W))
in (
INTERSECTION (A,(
UNION (B,C)))) by
A2,
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
hence thesis by
A2,
A3,
Th30,
A4;
end;
((A
_/\_ B)
_\/_ (A
_/\_ C))
c= (A
_/\_ (B
_\/_ C))
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in ((A
_/\_ B)
_\/_ (A
_/\_ C));
then
consider X,Y be
set such that
A5: X
in (
INTERSECTION (A,B)) & Y
in (
INTERSECTION (A,C)) & x
= (X
\/ Y) by
SETFAM_1:def 4;
A6: A is non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U & B is non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U & C is non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U by
Lm4;
x
in (
UNION ((
INTERSECTION (A,B)),(
INTERSECTION (A,C)))) by
A5,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
Th30,
A6;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:33
Th33: for X be
set, A,B be non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of X holds (
INTERSECTION (A,(
UNION (A,B))))
= A
proof
let X be
set;
let A,B be non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of X;
set A1 = (
min A), A2 = (
max A);
A1: (
INTERSECTION (A,(
UNION (A,B))))
c= A
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
INTERSECTION (A,(
UNION (A,B))));
then
consider Y,Z be
set such that
A2: Y
in A & Z
in (
UNION (A,B)) & x
= (Y
/\ Z) by
SETFAM_1:def 5;
consider Z1,Z2 be
set such that
A3: Z1
in A & Z2
in B & Z
= (Z1
\/ Z2) by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
A4: x
= ((Y
/\ Z1)
\/ (Y
/\ Z2)) by
A2,
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 23;
A5: (A1
c= Y & Y
c= A2) & (A1
c= Z1 & Z1
c= A2) by
Th28,
A2,
A3;
then A1
c= (Y
/\ Z1) & (Y
/\ Z1)
c= (A2
/\ A2) by
XBOOLE_1: 19,
XBOOLE_1: 27;
then
A6: A1
c= (Y
/\ Z1) & (Y
/\ Z1)
c= A2 & (Y
/\ Z1)
c= ((Y
/\ Z1)
\/ (Y
/\ Z2)) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then
A7: A1
c= ((Y
/\ Z1)
\/ (Y
/\ Z2));
(Y
/\ Z2)
c= Y by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then (Y
/\ Z2)
c= A2 by
A5;
then ((Y
/\ Z1)
\/ (Y
/\ Z2))
c= A2 by
A6,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
hence thesis by
Th28,
A4,
A7;
end;
A
c= (
INTERSECTION (A,(
UNION (A,B))))
proof
let x be
object;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume
A8: x
in A;
set b = the
Element of B;
A9: x
= (xx
/\ (xx
\/ b)) by
XBOOLE_1: 21;
(xx
\/ b)
in (
UNION (A,B)) by
A8,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A8,
A9,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:34
Th34: for X be
set, A,B be non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of X holds (
UNION ((
INTERSECTION (A,B)),B))
= B
proof
let X be
set;
let A,B be non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of X;
A1: (
UNION ((
INTERSECTION (A,B)),B))
c= B
proof
let x be
object;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
set B1 = (
min B), B2 = (
max B);
assume x
in (
UNION ((
INTERSECTION (A,B)),B));
then
consider Y,Z be
set such that
A2: Y
in (
INTERSECTION (A,B)) & Z
in B & x
= (Y
\/ Z) by
SETFAM_1:def 4;
consider Y1,Y2 be
set such that
A3: Y1
in A & Y2
in B & Y
= (Y1
/\ Y2) by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
B1
c= Y2 & Y2
c= B2 & (Y1
/\ Y2)
c= Y2 by
A3,
Th28,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then
A4: (Y1
/\ Y2)
c= B2;
Z
c= B2 by
A2,
Th28;
then
A5: xx
c= B2 by
A2,
A3,
A4,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
B1
c= Z & Z
c= xx by
A2,
Th28,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then B1
c= xx & xx
c= B2 by
A5;
hence thesis by
Th28;
end;
B
c= (
UNION ((
INTERSECTION (A,B)),B))
proof
let x be
object;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume
A6: x
in B;
set b = the
Element of A;
A7: x
= (xx
\/ (xx
/\ b)) by
XBOOLE_1: 22;
(b
/\ xx)
in (
INTERSECTION (A,B)) by
A6,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
hence thesis by
A7,
A6,
SETFAM_1:def 4;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:35
Th35: (A
_/\_ (A
_\/_ B))
= A
proof
A is non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U & B is non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U by
Lm4;
hence thesis by
Th33;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:36
Th36: ((A
_/\_ B)
_\/_ B)
= B
proof
A is non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U & B is non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U by
Lm4;
hence thesis by
Th34;
end;
begin
theorem ::
INTERVA1:37
Th37: for U be non
empty
set, A,B be
Subset-Family of U holds (
DIFFERENCE (A,B)) is
Subset-Family of U
proof
let U be non
empty
set, A,B be
Subset-Family of U;
(
DIFFERENCE (A,B))
c= (
bool U)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
DIFFERENCE (A,B));
then
consider Y,Z be
set such that
A1: Y
in A & Z
in B & x
= (Y
\ Z) by
SETFAM_1:def 6;
(Y
\ Z)
c= U by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 109;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:38
Th38: for U be non
empty
set, A,B be non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U holds (
DIFFERENCE (A,B))
= { C where C be
Subset of U : ((
min A)
\ (
max B))
c= C & C
c= ((
max A)
\ (
min B)) }
proof
let U be non
empty
set;
let A,B be non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U;
set A1 = (
min A), B1 = (
min B), A2 = (
max A), B2 = (
max B);
A1: (
DIFFERENCE (A,B))
c= { C where C be
Subset of U : ((
min A)
\ (
max B))
c= C & C
c= ((
max A)
\ (
min B)) }
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A2: x
in (
DIFFERENCE (A,B));
then
consider Y,Z be
set such that
A3: Y
in A & Z
in B & x
= (Y
\ Z) by
SETFAM_1:def 6;
(
DIFFERENCE (A,B)) is
Subset-Family of U by
Th37;
then
reconsider x as
Subset of U by
A2;
A1
c= Y & Y
c= A2 & B1
c= Z & Z
c= B2 by
A3,
Th28;
then (A1
\ B2)
c= x & x
c= (A2
\ B1) by
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 35;
hence thesis;
end;
{ C where C be
Subset of U : ((
min A)
\ (
max B))
c= C & C
c= ((
max A)
\ (
min B)) }
c= (
DIFFERENCE (A,B))
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in { C where C be
Subset of U : ((
min A)
\ (
max B))
c= C & C
c= ((
max A)
\ (
min B)) };
then
consider x9 be
Subset of U such that
A4: x9
= x & ((
min A)
\ (
max B))
c= x9 & x9
c= ((
max A)
\ (
min B));
set A1 = (
min A), A2 = (
max A), B1 = (
min B), B2 = (
max B);
set z1 = ((x9
\/ A1)
/\ A2);
set z2 = (((x9
\/ (B2
` ))
/\ (B1
` ))
` );
B1
c= B2 by
Lm2;
then
A5: (B2
` )
c= (B1
` ) by
SUBSET_1: 12;
((x9
\/ (B2
` ))
/\ (B1
` ))
= ((x9
/\ (B1
` ))
\/ ((B2
` )
/\ (B1
` ))) by
XBOOLE_1: 23
.= ((x9
/\ (B1
` ))
\/ (B2
` )) by
A5,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
then
A6: (B2
` )
c= ((x9
\/ (B2
` ))
/\ (B1
` )) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
((x9
\/ (B2
` ))
/\ (B1
` ))
c= (B1
` ) by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then
A7: (((x9
\/ (B2
` ))
/\ (B1
` ))
` )
c= ((B2
` )
` ) & ((B1
` )
` )
c= (((x9
\/ (B2
` ))
/\ (B1
` ))
` ) by
A6,
SUBSET_1: 12;
z1
= ((x9
/\ A2)
\/ (A1
/\ A2)) by
XBOOLE_1: 23
.= ((x9
/\ A2)
\/ A1) by
SETFAM_1: 2,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
then A1
c= z1 & z1
c= A2 by
XBOOLE_1: 7,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then
A8: z1
in A & z2
in B by
Th28,
A7;
A9: ((x9
\/ (A1
\ B2))
/\ (A2
\ B1))
= (x9
/\ (A2
\ B1)) by
A4,
XBOOLE_1: 12
.= x9 by
A4,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
(z1
\ z2)
= (z1
/\ (z2
` )) by
SUBSET_1: 13
.= ((x9
\/ A1)
/\ (A2
/\ ((x9
\/ (B2
` ))
/\ (B1
` )))) by
XBOOLE_1: 16
.= ((x9
\/ A1)
/\ ((x9
\/ (B2
` ))
/\ ((B1
` )
/\ A2))) by
XBOOLE_1: 16
.= ((x9
\/ A1)
/\ ((x9
\/ (B2
` ))
/\ (A2
\ B1))) by
SUBSET_1: 13
.= (((x9
\/ A1)
/\ (x9
\/ (B2
` )))
/\ (A2
\ B1)) by
XBOOLE_1: 16
.= ((x9
\/ (A1
/\ (B2
` )))
/\ (A2
\ B1)) by
XBOOLE_1: 24
.= x9 by
A9,
SUBSET_1: 13;
hence thesis by
A4,
A8,
SETFAM_1:def 6;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:39
Th39: for U be non
empty
set, A1,A2,B1,B2 be
Subset of U st A1
c= A2 & B1
c= B2 holds (
DIFFERENCE ((
Inter (A1,A2)),(
Inter (B1,B2))))
= { C where C be
Subset of U : (A1
\ B2)
c= C & C
c= (A2
\ B1) }
proof
let U be non
empty
set;
let A1,A2,B1,B2 be
Subset of U;
assume A1
c= A2 & B1
c= B2;
then
reconsider A12 = (
Inter (A1,A2)), B12 = (
Inter (B1,B2)) as non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U by
Th25;
A1: (
min A12)
= A1 & (
max A12)
= A2 by
Th27;
(
min B12)
= B1 & (
max B12)
= B2 by
Th27;
hence thesis by
Th38,
A1;
end;
definition
let U be non
empty
set, A,B be non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
::
INTERVA1:def9
func A
_\_ B ->
IntervalSet of U equals (
DIFFERENCE (A,B));
coherence
proof
set IT = (
DIFFERENCE (A,B));
consider A1,A2 be
Subset of U such that
A1: A1
c= A2 & A
= (
Inter (A1,A2)) by
Th11;
consider B1,B2 be
Subset of U such that
A2: B1
c= B2 & B
= (
Inter (B1,B2)) by
Th11;
set LAB = (A1
\ B2);
set UAB = (A2
\ B1);
IT
= (
Inter (LAB,UAB)) by
Th39,
A1,
A2;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let U be non
empty
set, A,B be non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
cluster (A
_\_ B) -> non
empty;
coherence
proof
(A
_\_ B)
<>
{}
proof
assume
A1: (A
_\_ B)
=
{} ;
consider A1,A2 be
Subset of U such that
A2: A1
c= A2 & A
= (
Inter (A1,A2)) by
Th11;
consider B1,B2 be
Subset of U such that
A3: B1
c= B2 & B
= (
Inter (B1,B2)) by
Th11;
consider y be
set such that
A4: y
= (A1
\ B1);
not (A1
in A & B1
in B & y
= (A1
\ B1)) by
A1,
SETFAM_1:def 6;
hence thesis by
A4,
A2,
A3;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
INTERVA1:40
Th40: (A
_\_ B)
= (
Inter (((A
``1 )
\ (B
``2 )),((A
``2 )
\ (B
``1 ))))
proof
reconsider AA = A, BB = B as non
empty
ordered
Subset-Family of U by
Th26;
AA
= (
Inter ((A
``1 ),(A
``2 ))) & BB
= (
Inter ((B
``1 ),(B
``2 ))) by
Th15;
then (
min AA)
= (A
``1 ) & (
min BB)
= (B
``1 ) & (
max AA)
= (A
``2 ) & (
max BB)
= (B
``2 ) by
Th27;
hence thesis by
Th38;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:41
Th41: for X,Y be
Subset of U st A
= (
Inter (X,Y)) holds (A
_\_ C)
= (
Inter ((X
\ (C
``2 )),(Y
\ (C
``1 ))))
proof
let X,Y be
Subset of U;
assume
A1: A
= (
Inter (X,Y));
A
= (
Inter ((A
``1 ),(A
``2 ))) by
Th15;
then X
= (A
``1 ) & Y
= (A
``2 ) by
A1,
Th6;
hence thesis by
Th40;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:42
Th42: for X,Y,W,Z be
Subset of U st A
= (
Inter (X,Y)) & C
= (
Inter (W,Z)) holds (A
_\_ C)
= (
Inter ((X
\ Z),(Y
\ W)))
proof
let X,Y,W,Z be
Subset of U;
assume
A1: A
= (
Inter (X,Y)) & C
= (
Inter (W,Z));
A
= (
Inter ((A
``1 ),(A
``2 ))) & C
= (
Inter ((C
``1 ),(C
``2 ))) by
Th15;
then (A
``1 )
= X & (A
``2 )
= Y & (C
``1 )
= W & (C
``2 )
= Z by
A1,
Th6;
hence thesis by
Th40;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:43
Th43: for U be non
empty
set holds (
Inter ((
[#] U),(
[#] U))) is non
empty
IntervalSet of U
proof
let U be non
empty
set;
(
Inter ((
[#] U),(
[#] U)))
=
{(
[#] U)} by
Th8;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:44
Th44: for U be non
empty
set holds (
Inter ((
{} U),(
{} U))) is non
empty
IntervalSet of U
proof
let U be non
empty
set;
(
Inter ((
{} U),(
{} U)))
=
{
{} } by
Th8;
hence thesis;
end;
registration
let U be non
empty
set;
cluster (
Inter ((
[#] U),(
[#] U))) -> non
empty;
coherence by
Th43;
cluster (
Inter ((
{} U),(
{} U))) -> non
empty;
coherence by
Th44;
end
definition
let U be non
empty
set, A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
::
INTERVA1:def10
func A
^ -> non
empty
IntervalSet of U equals ((
Inter ((
[#] U),(
[#] U)))
_\_ A);
coherence ;
end
theorem ::
INTERVA1:45
Th45: for U be non
empty
set, A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U holds (A
^ )
= (
Inter (((A
``2 )
` ),((A
``1 )
` ))) by
Th41;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:46
Th46: for X,Y be
Subset of U st A
= (
Inter (X,Y)) & X
c= Y holds (A
^ )
= (
Inter ((Y
` ),(X
` )))
proof
let X,Y be
Subset of U;
assume
A1: A
= (
Inter (X,Y)) & X
c= Y;
then (
Inter (X,Y))
= (
Inter ((A
``1 ),(A
``2 ))) by
Th15;
then X
= (A
``1 ) & Y
= (A
``2 ) by
Th6,
A1;
hence thesis by
Th41;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:47
((
Inter ((
{} U),(
{} U)))
^ )
= (
Inter ((
[#] U),(
[#] U)))
proof
((
Inter ((
{} U),(
{} U)))
^ )
= (
Inter ((
[#] U),((
{} U)
` ))) by
Th46;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:48
((
Inter ((
[#] U),(
[#] U)))
^ )
= (
Inter ((
{} U),(
{} U)))
proof
((
Inter ((
[#] U),(
[#] U)))
^ )
= (
Inter (((
[#] U)
` ),((
[#] U)
` ))) by
Th46
.= (
Inter ((
{} U),((
[#] U)
` ))) by
XBOOLE_1: 37;
hence thesis by
XBOOLE_1: 37;
end;
begin
theorem ::
INTERVA1:49
ex A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U st ((A
_/\_ A)
^ )
<> (
Inter ((
{} U),(
{} U)))
proof
A1: (
[#] U)
in (
Inter ((
{} U),(
[#] U)));
then
consider A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U such that
A2: A
= (
Inter ((
{} U),(
[#] U)));
A3: (A
^ )
= (
Inter (((
[#] U)
` ),((
{} U)
` ))) by
A2,
Th46
.= (
Inter ((
{} U),(
[#] U)));
(A
^ )
= (
Inter (((A
^ )
``1 ),((A
^ )
``2 ))) by
Th15;
then ((A
^ )
``1 )
= (
{} U) & ((A
^ )
``2 )
= (
[#] U) by
Th6,
A3;
then
A4: ((A
_/\_ A)
^ )
= (
Inter (((
{} U)
/\ (
{} U)),((
[#] U)
/\ (
[#] U)))) by
A2,
Th18,
A3
.= (
Inter ((
{} U),(
[#] U)));
not (
[#] U)
c= (
{} U);
then not (
[#] U)
in (
Inter ((
{} U),(
{} U))) by
Th1;
hence thesis by
A4,
A1;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:50
ex A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U st ((A
_\/_ A)
^ )
<> (
Inter ((
[#] U),(
[#] U)))
proof
not (
[#] U)
c= (
{} U);
then
A1: not (
{} U)
in (
Inter ((
[#] U),(
[#] U))) by
Th1;
A2: (
{} U)
in (
Inter ((
{} U),(
[#] U)));
then
consider A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U such that
A3: A
= (
Inter ((
{} U),(
[#] U)));
A4: (A
^ )
= (
Inter (((
[#] U)
` ),((
{} U)
` ))) by
Th46,
A3
.= (
Inter ((
{} U),(
[#] U)));
(A
^ )
= (
Inter (((A
^ )
``1 ),((A
^ )
``2 ))) by
Th15;
then ((A
^ )
``1 )
= (
{} U) & ((A
^ )
``2 )
= (
[#] U) by
Th6,
A4;
then ((A
_\/_ A)
^ )
= (
Inter (((
{} U)
\/ (
{} U)),((
[#] U)
\/ (
[#] U)))) by
Th17,
A3,
A4
.= (
Inter ((
{} U),(
[#] U)));
hence thesis by
A2,
A1;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:51
ex A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U st (A
_\_ A)
<> (
Inter ((
{} U),(
{} U)))
proof
(
Inter ((
{} U),(
[#] U)))
<>
{} by
Th1;
then
consider A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U such that
A1: A
= (
Inter ((
{} U),(
[#] U)));
A2: (A
_\_ A)
= (
Inter (((
{} U)
\ (
[#] U)),((
[#] U)
\ (
{} U)))) by
Th42,
A1
.= (
Inter ((
{} U),(
[#] U)));
not U
c=
{} ;
then (
[#] U)
in (
Inter ((
{} U),(
[#] U))) & not (
[#] U)
in (
Inter ((
{} U),(
{} U))) by
Th1;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:52
for A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U holds U
in (A
_\/_ (A
^ ))
proof
let A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
A1: U
c= ((A
``2 )
\/ ((A
``1 )
` ))
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A2: x
in U;
(A
``1 )
c= (A
``2 ) by
Th16;
then
A3: ((A
``2 )
` )
c= ((A
``1 )
` ) by
SUBSET_1: 12;
x
in (A
``2 ) or x
in ((A
``2 )
` ) by
A2,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence thesis by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
A4: (A
^ )
= (
Inter (((A
``2 )
` ),((A
``1 )
` ))) by
Th45;
(A
^ )
= (
Inter (((A
^ )
``1 ),((A
^ )
``2 ))) by
Th15;
then ((A
^ )
``1 )
= ((A
``2 )
` ) & ((A
^ )
``2 )
= ((A
``1 )
` ) by
Th6,
A4;
then (A
_\/_ (A
^ ))
= (
Inter (((A
``1 )
\/ ((A
``2 )
` )),((A
``2 )
\/ ((A
``1 )
` )))) by
Th17;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:53
for A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U holds
{}
in (A
_/\_ (A
^ ))
proof
let A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
A1: ((A
``1 )
/\ ((A
``2 )
` ))
c=
{}
proof
let x be
object;
A2: (A
``1 )
c= (A
``2 ) by
Th16;
assume x
in ((A
``1 )
/\ ((A
``2 )
` ));
then x
in (A
``1 ) & x
in ((A
``2 )
` ) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence thesis by
A2,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
A3: (A
^ )
= (
Inter (((A
``2 )
` ),((A
``1 )
` ))) by
Th45;
(A
^ )
= (
Inter (((A
^ )
``1 ),((A
^ )
``2 ))) by
Th15;
then ((A
^ )
``1 )
= ((A
``2 )
` ) & ((A
^ )
``2 )
= ((A
``1 )
` ) by
Th6,
A3;
then
A4: (A
_/\_ (A
^ ))
= (
Inter (((A
``1 )
/\ ((A
``2 )
` )),((A
``2 )
/\ ((A
``1 )
` )))) by
Th18;
((A
``1 )
/\ ((A
``2 )
` ))
c=
{} &
{}
c= ((A
``2 )
/\ ((A
``1 )
` )) by
A1;
hence thesis by
A4,
Th1;
end;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:54
for A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U holds
{}
in (A
_\_ A)
proof
let A be non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
A1: (A
_\_ A)
= (
Inter (((A
``1 )
\ (A
``2 )),((A
``2 )
\ (A
``1 )))) by
Th40;
A2: ((A
``1 )
\ (A
``2 ))
c=
{}
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in ((A
``1 )
\ (A
``2 ));
then x
in (A
``1 ) & not x
in (A
``2 ) & (A
``1 )
c= (A
``2 ) by
Th16,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence thesis;
end;
{}
c= ((A
``2 )
\ (A
``1 ));
hence thesis by
Th1,
A2,
A1;
end;
begin
definition
let U be non
empty
set;
::
INTERVA1:def11
func
IntervalSets U -> non
empty
set means
:
Def11: for x be
set holds x
in it iff x is non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
existence
proof
defpred
P[
set] means $1 is non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
ex X be
set st for x be
set holds x
in X iff x
in (
bool (
bool U)) &
P[x] from
XFAMILY:sch 1;
then
consider X be
set such that
A1: for x be
set holds x
in X iff x
in (
bool (
bool U)) &
P[x];
set x = the
Element of U;
reconsider E =
{x} as
Subset of U by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
{E} is non
empty
IntervalSet of U by
Th10;
then
reconsider X as non
empty
set by
A1;
take X;
thus thesis by
A1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let S1,S2 be non
empty
set such that
A2: for x be
set holds x
in S1 iff x is non
empty
IntervalSet of U and
A3: for x be
set holds x
in S2 iff x is non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
for x be
object holds x
in S1 iff x
in S2 by
A3,
A2;
hence thesis by
TARSKI: 2;
end;
end
definition
let U be non
empty
set;
::
INTERVA1:def12
func
InterLatt U ->
strict non
empty
LattStr means
:
Def12: the
carrier of it
= (
IntervalSets U) & for a,b be
Element of the
carrier of it , a9,b9 be non
empty
IntervalSet of U st a9
= a & b9
= b holds (the
L_join of it
. (a,b))
= (a9
_\/_ b9) & (the
L_meet of it
. (a,b))
= (a9
_/\_ b9);
existence
proof
set B = (
IntervalSets U);
defpred
P[
Element of B,
Element of B,
Element of B] means ex a9,b9 be non
empty
IntervalSet of U st a9
= $1 & b9
= $2 & $3
= (a9
_\/_ b9);
A1: for x,y be
Element of B holds ex z be
Element of B st
P[x, y, z]
proof
let x,y be
Element of B;
reconsider x9 = x, y9 = y as non
empty
IntervalSet of U by
Def11;
reconsider z = (x9
_\/_ y9) as
Element of B by
Def11;
take z;
thus thesis;
end;
consider B1 be
BinOp of B such that
A2: for x,y be
Element of B holds
P[x, y, (B1
. (x,y))] from
BINOP_1:sch 3(
A1);
defpred
R[
Element of B,
Element of B,
Element of B] means ex a9,b9 be non
empty
IntervalSet of U st a9
= $1 & b9
= $2 & $3
= (a9
_/\_ b9);
A3: for x,y be
Element of B holds ex z be
Element of B st
R[x, y, z]
proof
let x,y be
Element of B;
reconsider x9 = x, y9 = y as non
empty
IntervalSet of U by
Def11;
reconsider z = (x9
_/\_ y9) as
Element of B by
Def11;
take z;
thus thesis;
end;
consider B2 be
BinOp of B such that
A4: for x,y be
Element of B holds
R[x, y, (B2
. (x,y))] from
BINOP_1:sch 3(
A3);
take IT =
LattStr (# B, B1, B2 #);
thus the
carrier of IT
= (
IntervalSets U);
let a,b be
Element of the
carrier of IT, a9,b9 be non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
assume
A5: a9
= a & b9
= b;
reconsider x = a, y = b as
Element of B;
consider a9,b9 be non
empty
IntervalSet of U such that
A6: a9
= x & b9
= y & (B1
. (x,y))
= (a9
_\/_ b9) by
A2;
consider a1,b1 be non
empty
IntervalSet of U such that
A7: a1
= x & b1
= y & (B2
. (x,y))
= (a1
_/\_ b1) by
A4;
thus thesis by
A6,
A7,
A5;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let L1,L2 be
strict non
empty
LattStr such that
A8: the
carrier of L1
= (
IntervalSets U) & for a,b be
Element of the
carrier of L1, a9,b9 be non
empty
IntervalSet of U st a9
= a & b9
= b holds (the
L_join of L1
. (a,b))
= (a9
_\/_ b9) & (the
L_meet of L1
. (a,b))
= (a9
_/\_ b9) and
A9: the
carrier of L2
= (
IntervalSets U) & for a,b be
Element of the
carrier of L2, a9,b9 be non
empty
IntervalSet of U st a9
= a & b9
= b holds (the
L_join of L2
. (a,b))
= (a9
_\/_ b9) & (the
L_meet of L2
. (a,b))
= (a9
_/\_ b9);
for a,b be
Element of L1 holds (the
L_join of L1
. (a,b))
= (the
L_join of L2
. (a,b))
proof
let a,b be
Element of L1;
reconsider a9 = a, b9 = b as non
empty
IntervalSet of U by
A8,
Def11;
(the
L_join of L1
. (a,b))
= (a9
_\/_ b9) by
A8
.= (the
L_join of L2
. (a,b)) by
A9,
A8;
hence thesis;
end;
then
A10: the
L_join of L1
= the
L_join of L2 by
A8,
A9,
BINOP_1: 2;
for a,b be
Element of L1 holds (the
L_meet of L1
. (a,b))
= (the
L_meet of L2
. (a,b))
proof
let a,b be
Element of L1;
reconsider a9 = a, b9 = b as non
empty
IntervalSet of U by
A8,
Def11;
(the
L_meet of L1
. (a,b))
= (a9
_/\_ b9) by
A8
.= (the
L_meet of L2
. (a,b)) by
A8,
A9;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis by
A8,
A9,
A10,
BINOP_1: 2;
end;
end
registration
let U be non
empty
set;
cluster (
InterLatt U) ->
Lattice-like;
correctness
proof
A1: (
InterLatt U) is
join-commutative
proof
for a,b be
Element of (
InterLatt U) holds (a
"\/" b)
= (b
"\/" a)
proof
let a,b be
Element of (
InterLatt U);
a
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U) & b
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U);
then a
in (
IntervalSets U) & b
in (
IntervalSets U) by
Def12;
then
reconsider a9 = a, b9 = b as non
empty
IntervalSet of U by
Def11;
(a
"\/" b)
= (a9
_\/_ b9) by
Def12
.= (b9
_\/_ a9)
.= (b
"\/" a) by
Def12;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
A2: (
InterLatt U) is
join-associative
proof
for a,b,c be
Element of (
InterLatt U) holds (a
"\/" (b
"\/" c))
= ((a
"\/" b)
"\/" c)
proof
let a,b,c be
Element of (
InterLatt U);
a
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U) & b
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U) & c
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U);
then a
in (
IntervalSets U) & b
in (
IntervalSets U) & c
in (
IntervalSets U) by
Def12;
then
reconsider a9 = a, b9 = b, c9 = c as non
empty
IntervalSet of U by
Def11;
reconsider bc = (b9
_\/_ c9) as non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
reconsider ab = (a9
_\/_ b9) as non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
bc
in (
IntervalSets U) & ab
in (
IntervalSets U) by
Def11;
then
A3: bc
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U) & ab
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U) by
Def12;
(a
"\/" (b
"\/" c))
= (the
L_join of (
InterLatt U)
. (a,bc)) by
Def12
.= (a9
_\/_ bc) by
Def12,
A3
.= ((a9
_\/_ b9)
_\/_ c9) by
Th23
.= (the
L_join of (
InterLatt U)
. (ab,c9)) by
Def12,
A3
.= ((a
"\/" b)
"\/" c) by
Def12;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
A4: (
InterLatt U) is
meet-absorbing
proof
for a,b be
Element of (
InterLatt U) holds ((a
"/\" b)
"\/" b)
= b
proof
let a,b be
Element of (
InterLatt U);
a
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U) & b
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U);
then a
in (
IntervalSets U) & b
in (
IntervalSets U) by
Def12;
then
reconsider a9 = a, b9 = b as non
empty
IntervalSet of U by
Def11;
reconsider ab = (a9
_/\_ b9) as non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
ab
in (
IntervalSets U) by
Def11;
then
A5: ab
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U) by
Def12;
((a
"/\" b)
"\/" b)
= (the
L_join of (
InterLatt U)
. (ab,b)) by
Def12
.= (ab
_\/_ b9) by
Def12,
A5
.= b by
Th36;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
A6: (
InterLatt U) is
meet-associative
proof
for a,b,c be
Element of (
InterLatt U) holds (a
"/\" (b
"/\" c))
= ((a
"/\" b)
"/\" c)
proof
let a,b,c be
Element of (
InterLatt U);
a
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U) & b
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U) & c
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U);
then a
in (
IntervalSets U) & b
in (
IntervalSets U) & c
in (
IntervalSets U) by
Def12;
then
reconsider a9 = a, b9 = b, c9 = c as non
empty
IntervalSet of U by
Def11;
reconsider bc = (b9
_/\_ c9), ab = (a9
_/\_ b9) as non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
bc
in (
IntervalSets U) & ab
in (
IntervalSets U) by
Def11;
then
A7: bc
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U) & ab
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U) by
Def12;
(a
"/\" (b
"/\" c))
= (the
L_meet of (
InterLatt U)
. (a,bc)) by
Def12
.= (a9
_/\_ bc) by
Def12,
A7
.= ((a9
_/\_ b9)
_/\_ c9) by
Th24
.= (the
L_meet of (
InterLatt U)
. (ab,c9)) by
Def12,
A7
.= ((a
"/\" b)
"/\" c) by
Def12;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
A8: (
InterLatt U) is
join-absorbing
proof
for a,b be
Element of the
carrier of (
InterLatt U) holds (a
"/\" (a
"\/" b))
= a
proof
let a,b be
Element of the
carrier of (
InterLatt U);
a
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U) & b
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U);
then a
in (
IntervalSets U) & b
in (
IntervalSets U) by
Def12;
then
reconsider a9 = a, b9 = b as non
empty
IntervalSet of U by
Def11;
reconsider ab = (a9
_\/_ b9) as non
empty
IntervalSet of U;
ab
in (
IntervalSets U) by
Def11;
then
A9: ab
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U) by
Def12;
(a
"/\" (a
"\/" b))
= (the
L_meet of (
InterLatt U)
. (a9,(a9
_\/_ b9))) by
Def12
.= (a9
_/\_ ab) by
Def12,
A9
.= a by
Th35;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
(
InterLatt U) is
meet-commutative
proof
for a,b be
Element of the
carrier of (
InterLatt U) holds (a
"/\" b)
= (b
"/\" a)
proof
let a,b be
Element of the
carrier of (
InterLatt U);
a
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U) & b
in the
carrier of (
InterLatt U);
then a
in (
IntervalSets U) & b
in (
IntervalSets U) by
Def12;
then
reconsider a9 = a, b9 = b as non
empty
IntervalSet of U by
Def11;
(a9
_/\_ b9)
= (b9
_/\_ a9);
then (the
L_meet of (
InterLatt U)
. (a,b))
= (b9
_/\_ a9) by
Def12
.= (the
L_meet of (
InterLatt U)
. (b,a)) by
Def12;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A4,
A6,
A8;
end;
end
definition
let X be
Tolerance_Space;
::
INTERVA1:def13
mode
RoughSet of X ->
Element of
[:(
bool the
carrier of X), (
bool the
carrier of X):] means
:
Def13: not contradiction;
existence ;
end
theorem ::
INTERVA1:55
Th55: for X be
Tolerance_Space, A be
RoughSet of X holds ex B,C be
Subset of X st A
=
[B, C]
proof
let X be
Tolerance_Space, A be
RoughSet of X;
consider A1,A2 be
object such that
A1: A1
in (
bool the
carrier of X) & A2
in (
bool the
carrier of X) & A
=
[A1, A2] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider A1, A2 as
Subset of X by
A1;
take A1, A2;
thus thesis by
A1;
end;
definition
let X be
Tolerance_Space, A be
Subset of X;
::
INTERVA1:def14
func
RS A ->
RoughSet of X equals
[(
LAp A), (
UAp A)];
coherence
proof
[(
LAp A), (
UAp A)]
in
[:(
bool the
carrier of X), (
bool the
carrier of X):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
hence thesis by
Def13;
end;
end
definition
let X be
Tolerance_Space, A be
RoughSet of X;
::
INTERVA1:def15
func
LAp A ->
Subset of X equals (A
`1 );
coherence
proof
consider A9,B9 be
Subset of X such that
A1: A
=
[A9, B9] by
Th55;
thus thesis by
A1;
end;
::
INTERVA1:def16
func
UAp A ->
Subset of X equals (A
`2 );
coherence
proof
consider A9,B9 be
Subset of X such that
A2: A
=
[A9, B9] by
Th55;
thus thesis by
A2;
end;
end
definition
let X be
Tolerance_Space;
let A,B be
RoughSet of X;
:: original:
=
redefine
::
INTERVA1:def17
pred A
= B means (
LAp A)
= (
LAp B) & (
UAp A)
= (
UAp B);
compatibility
proof
thus A
= B implies (
LAp A)
= (
LAp B) & (
UAp A)
= (
UAp B);
assume
A1: (
LAp A)
= (
LAp B) & (
UAp A)
= (
UAp B);
consider A1,B1 be
Subset of X such that
A2: A
=
[A1, B1] by
Th55;
consider A2,B2 be
Subset of X such that
A3: B
=
[A2, B2] by
Th55;
(
LAp A)
= A1 by
A2;
then
A4: A1
= A2 by
A1,
A3;
(
UAp A)
= B1 by
A2;
then B1
= B2 by
A1,
A3;
hence A
= B by
A2,
A4,
A3;
end;
end
definition
let X be
Tolerance_Space;
let A,B be
RoughSet of X;
::
INTERVA1:def18
func A
_\/_ B ->
RoughSet of X equals
[((
LAp A)
\/ (
LAp B)), ((
UAp A)
\/ (
UAp B))];
coherence
proof
[((
LAp A)
\/ (
LAp B)), ((
UAp A)
\/ (
UAp B))]
in
[:(
bool the
carrier of X), (
bool the
carrier of X):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
hence thesis by
Def13;
end;
::
INTERVA1:def19
func A
_/\_ B ->
RoughSet of X equals
[((
LAp A)
/\ (
LAp B)), ((
UAp A)
/\ (
UAp B))];
coherence
proof
[((
LAp A)
/\ (
LAp B)), ((
UAp A)
/\ (
UAp B))]
in
[:(
bool the
carrier of X), (
bool the
carrier of X):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
hence thesis by
Def13;
end;
end
reserve X for
Tolerance_Space,
A,B,C for
RoughSet of X;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:56
(
LAp (A
_\/_ B))
= ((
LAp A)
\/ (
LAp B));
theorem ::
INTERVA1:57
(
UAp (A
_\/_ B))
= ((
UAp A)
\/ (
UAp B));
theorem ::
INTERVA1:58
(
LAp (A
_/\_ B))
= ((
LAp A)
/\ (
LAp B));
theorem ::
INTERVA1:59
(
UAp (A
_/\_ B))
= ((
UAp A)
/\ (
UAp B));
theorem ::
INTERVA1:60
(A
_\/_ A)
= A;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:61
Th61: (A
_/\_ A)
= A;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:62
(A
_\/_ B)
= (B
_\/_ A);
theorem ::
INTERVA1:63
(A
_/\_ B)
= (B
_/\_ A);
theorem ::
INTERVA1:64
Th64: ((A
_\/_ B)
_\/_ C)
= (A
_\/_ (B
_\/_ C)) by
XBOOLE_1: 4;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:65
Th65: ((A
_/\_ B)
_/\_ C)
= (A
_/\_ (B
_/\_ C)) by
XBOOLE_1: 16;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:66
Th66: (A
_/\_ (B
_\/_ C))
= ((A
_/\_ B)
_\/_ (A
_/\_ C)) by
XBOOLE_1: 23;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:67
Th67: (A
_\/_ (A
_/\_ B))
= A by
XBOOLE_1: 22;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:68
(A
_/\_ (A
_\/_ B))
= A by
XBOOLE_1: 21;
begin
definition
let X;
::
INTERVA1:def20
func
RoughSets X ->
set means
:
Def20: for x be
set holds x
in it iff x is
RoughSet of X;
existence
proof
defpred
P[
object] means $1 is
RoughSet of X;
consider F be
set such that
A1: for x be
object holds x
in F iff x
in
[:(
bool the
carrier of X), (
bool the
carrier of X):] &
P[x] from
XBOOLE_0:sch 1;
take F;
let x be
set;
thus x
in F implies x is
RoughSet of X by
A1;
assume x is
RoughSet of X;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let F1,F2 be
set such that
A2: (for x be
set holds x
in F1 iff x is
RoughSet of X) & (for x be
set holds x
in F2 iff x is
RoughSet of X);
for x be
object holds x
in F1 iff x
in F2 by
A2;
hence thesis by
TARSKI: 2;
end;
end
registration
let X;
cluster (
RoughSets X) -> non
empty;
coherence
proof
set A = the
RoughSet of X;
A
in (
RoughSets X) by
Def20;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let X;
let R be
Element of (
RoughSets X);
::
INTERVA1:def21
func
@ R ->
RoughSet of X equals R;
coherence by
Def20;
end
definition
let X;
let R be
RoughSet of X;
::
INTERVA1:def22
func R
@ ->
Element of (
RoughSets X) equals R;
coherence by
Def20;
end
definition
let X;
::
INTERVA1:def23
func
RSLattice X ->
strict
LattStr means
:
Def23: the
carrier of it
= (
RoughSets X) & for A,B be
Element of (
RoughSets X), A9,B9 be
RoughSet of X st A
= A9 & B
= B9 holds (the
L_join of it
. (A,B))
= (A9
_\/_ B9) & (the
L_meet of it
. (A,B))
= (A9
_/\_ B9);
existence
proof
deffunc
U(
Element of (
RoughSets X),
Element of (
RoughSets X)) = (((
@ $1)
_\/_ (
@ $2))
@ );
consider j be
BinOp of (
RoughSets X) such that
A1: for x,y be
Element of (
RoughSets X) holds (j
. (x,y))
=
U(x,y) from
BINOP_1:sch 4;
deffunc
W(
Element of (
RoughSets X),
Element of (
RoughSets X)) = (((
@ $1)
_/\_ (
@ $2))
@ );
consider m be
BinOp of (
RoughSets X) such that
A2: for x,y be
Element of (
RoughSets X) holds (m
. (x,y))
=
W(x,y) from
BINOP_1:sch 4;
take IT =
LattStr (# (
RoughSets X), j, m #);
thus the
carrier of IT
= (
RoughSets X);
let A,B be
Element of (
RoughSets X), A9,B9 be
RoughSet of X;
assume
A3: A
= A9 & B
= B9;
thus (the
L_join of IT
. (A,B))
=
U(A,B) by
A1
.= (A9
_\/_ B9) by
A3;
thus (the
L_meet of IT
. (A,B))
=
W(A,B) by
A2
.= (A9
_/\_ B9) by
A3;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let A1,A2 be
strict
LattStr such that
A4: the
carrier of A1
= (
RoughSets X) & for A,B be
Element of (
RoughSets X), A9,B9 be
RoughSet of X st A
= A9 & B
= B9 holds (the
L_join of A1
. (A,B))
= (A9
_\/_ B9) & (the
L_meet of A1
. (A,B))
= (A9
_/\_ B9) and
A5: the
carrier of A2
= (
RoughSets X) & for A,B be
Element of (
RoughSets X), A9,B9 be
RoughSet of X st A
= A9 & B
= B9 holds (the
L_join of A2
. (A,B))
= (A9
_\/_ B9) & (the
L_meet of A2
. (A,B))
= (A9
_/\_ B9);
reconsider a3 = the
L_meet of A1, a4 = the
L_meet of A2, a1 = the
L_join of A1, a2 = the
L_join of A2 as
BinOp of (
RoughSets X) by
A4,
A5;
now
let x,y be
Element of (
RoughSets X);
thus (a1
. (x,y))
= ((
@ x)
_\/_ (
@ y)) by
A4
.= (a2
. (x,y)) by
A5;
end;
then
A6: a1
= a2 by
BINOP_1: 2;
now
let x,y be
Element of (
RoughSets X);
thus (a3
. (x,y))
= ((
@ x)
_/\_ (
@ y)) by
A4
.= (a4
. (x,y)) by
A5;
end;
hence thesis by
A4,
A5,
A6,
BINOP_1: 2;
end;
end
registration
let X;
cluster (
RSLattice X) -> non
empty;
coherence
proof
the
carrier of (
RSLattice X)
= (
RoughSets X) by
Def23;
hence thesis;
end;
end
Lm6: for a,b be
Element of (
RSLattice X) holds (a
"\/" b)
= (b
"\/" a)
proof
set G = (
RSLattice X);
let a,b be
Element of G;
reconsider a1 = a, b1 = b as
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def23;
reconsider a9 = a1, b9 = b1 as
RoughSet of X by
Def20;
(a
"\/" b)
= (a9
_\/_ b9) by
Def23
.= (b9
_\/_ a9)
.= (b
"\/" a) by
Def23;
hence thesis;
end;
Lm7: for a,b,c be
Element of (
RSLattice X) holds (a
"\/" (b
"\/" c))
= ((a
"\/" b)
"\/" c)
proof
let a,b,c be
Element of (
RSLattice X);
reconsider a1 = a, b1 = b, c1 = c as
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def23;
reconsider a9 = a1, b9 = b1, c9 = c1 as
RoughSet of X by
Def20;
set G = (
RSLattice X);
A1: (b9
_\/_ c9) is
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def20;
A2: (a9
_\/_ b9) is
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def20;
(a
"\/" (b
"\/" c))
= (the
L_join of G
. (a,(b9
_\/_ c9))) by
Def23
.= (a9
_\/_ (b9
_\/_ c9)) by
Def23,
A1
.= ((a9
_\/_ b9)
_\/_ c9) by
Th64
.= (the
L_join of G
. ((a9
_\/_ b9),c1)) by
Def23,
A2
.= ((a
"\/" b)
"\/" c) by
Def23;
hence thesis;
end;
reserve K,L,M for
Element of (
RoughSets X);
Lm8: (the
L_join of (
RSLattice X)
. ((the
L_meet of (
RSLattice X)
. (K,L)),L))
= L
proof
reconsider K9 = K, L9 = L as
RoughSet of X by
Def20;
A1: (K9
_/\_ L9) is
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def20;
thus (the
L_join of (
RSLattice X)
. ((the
L_meet of (
RSLattice X)
. (K,L)),L))
= (the
L_join of (
RSLattice X)
. ((K9
_/\_ L9),L)) by
Def23
.= ((K9
_/\_ L9)
_\/_ L9) by
Def23,
A1
.= (L9
_\/_ (L9
_/\_ K9))
.= L by
Th67;
end;
Lm9: for a,b be
Element of (
RSLattice X) holds ((a
"/\" b)
"\/" b)
= b
proof
let a,b be
Element of (
RSLattice X);
set G = (
RSLattice X);
reconsider a1 = a, b1 = b as
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def23;
thus ((a
"/\" b)
"\/" b)
= (the
L_join of G
. ((the
L_meet of G
. (a1,b1)),b1))
.= b by
Lm8;
end;
Lm10: for a,b be
Element of (
RSLattice X) holds (a
"/\" b)
= (b
"/\" a)
proof
let a,b be
Element of (
RSLattice X);
reconsider a1 = a, b1 = b as
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def23;
reconsider a9 = a1, b9 = b1 as
RoughSet of X by
Def20;
(a
"/\" b)
= (a9
_/\_ b9) by
Def23
.= (b9
_/\_ a9)
.= (b
"/\" a) by
Def23;
hence thesis;
end;
Lm11: for a,b,c be
Element of (
RSLattice X) holds (a
"/\" (b
"/\" c))
= ((a
"/\" b)
"/\" c)
proof
let a,b,c be
Element of (
RSLattice X);
reconsider a1 = a, b1 = b, c1 = c as
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def23;
reconsider a9 = a1, b9 = b1, c9 = c1 as
RoughSet of X by
Def20;
set G = (
RSLattice X);
A1: (b9
_/\_ c9) is
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def20;
A2: (a9
_/\_ b9) is
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def20;
(a
"/\" (b
"/\" c))
= (the
L_meet of G
. (a1,(b9
_/\_ c9))) by
Def23
.= (a9
_/\_ (b9
_/\_ c9)) by
Def23,
A1
.= ((a9
_/\_ b9)
_/\_ c9) by
Th65
.= (the
L_meet of G
. ((a9
_/\_ b9),c1)) by
Def23,
A2
.= ((a
"/\" b)
"/\" c) by
Def23;
hence thesis;
end;
Lm12: (the
L_meet of (
RSLattice X)
. (K,(the
L_join of (
RSLattice X)
. (L,M))))
= (the
L_join of (
RSLattice X)
. ((the
L_meet of (
RSLattice X)
. (K,L)),(the
L_meet of (
RSLattice X)
. (K,M))))
proof
set G = (
RSLattice X);
reconsider K9 = K, L9 = L, M9 = M as
RoughSet of X by
Def20;
A1: (L9
_\/_ M9) is
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def20;
A2: (K9
_/\_ L9) is
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def20;
A3: (K9
_/\_ M9) is
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def20;
(the
L_meet of G
. (K,(the
L_join of G
. (L,M))))
= (the
L_meet of G
. (K,(L9
_\/_ M9))) by
Def23
.= (K9
_/\_ (L9
_\/_ M9)) by
Def23,
A1
.= ((K9
_/\_ L9)
_\/_ (K9
_/\_ M9)) by
Th66
.= (the
L_join of G
. ((K9
_/\_ L9),(K9
_/\_ M9))) by
Def23,
A2,
A3
.= (the
L_join of G
. ((the
L_meet of G
. (K,L)),(K9
_/\_ M9))) by
Def23
.= (the
L_join of G
. ((the
L_meet of G
. (K,L)),(the
L_meet of G
. (K,M)))) by
Def23;
hence thesis;
end;
Lm13: for a,b be
Element of (
RSLattice X) holds (a
"/\" (a
"\/" b))
= a
proof
let a,b be
Element of (
RSLattice X);
set G = (
RSLattice X);
reconsider a1 = a, b1 = b as
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def23;
reconsider a9 = a1 as
RoughSet of X by
Def20;
thus (a
"/\" (a
"\/" b))
= (the
L_join of G
. ((the
L_meet of G
. (a1,a1)),(the
L_meet of G
. (a1,b1)))) by
Lm12
.= (the
L_join of G
. ((a9
_/\_ a9),(the
L_meet of G
. (a1,b1)))) by
Def23
.= (a
"\/" (a
"/\" b)) by
Th61
.= ((a
"/\" b)
"\/" a) by
Lm6
.= ((b
"/\" a)
"\/" a) by
Lm10
.= a by
Lm9;
end;
registration
let X;
cluster (
RSLattice X) ->
Lattice-like;
coherence
proof
set G = (
RSLattice X);
thus for u,v be
Element of G holds (u
"\/" v)
= (v
"\/" u) by
Lm6;
thus for u,v,w be
Element of G holds (u
"\/" (v
"\/" w))
= ((u
"\/" v)
"\/" w) by
Lm7;
thus for u,v be
Element of G holds ((u
"/\" v)
"\/" v)
= v by
Lm9;
thus for u,v be
Element of G holds (u
"/\" v)
= (v
"/\" u) by
Lm10;
thus for u,v,w be
Element of G holds (u
"/\" (v
"/\" w))
= ((u
"/\" v)
"/\" w) by
Lm11;
let u,v be
Element of G;
thus (u
"/\" (u
"\/" v))
= u by
Lm13;
end;
end
registration
let X;
cluster (
RSLattice X) ->
distributive;
coherence
proof
let u,v,w be
Element of (
RSLattice X);
reconsider K = u, L = v, M = w as
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def23;
thus (u
"/\" (v
"\/" w))
= (the
L_join of (
RSLattice X)
. ((the
L_meet of (
RSLattice X)
. (K,L)),(the
L_meet of (
RSLattice X)
. (K,M)))) by
Lm12
.= ((u
"/\" v)
"\/" (u
"/\" w));
end;
end
definition
let X;
::
INTERVA1:def24
func
ERS X ->
RoughSet of X equals
[
{} ,
{} ];
coherence
proof
reconsider A =
{} as
Subset of X by
XBOOLE_1: 2;
A
= (
{} X);
then
A1: (
LAp A)
=
{} & (
UAp A)
=
{} by
ROUGHS_1: 18,
ROUGHS_1: 19;
[(
LAp A), (
UAp A)]
in
[:(
bool the
carrier of X), (
bool the
carrier of X):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
hence thesis by
Def13,
A1;
end;
end
Lm14: (
ERS X)
in (
RoughSets X) by
Def20;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:69
Th69: for A be
RoughSet of X holds ((
ERS X)
_\/_ A)
= A;
definition
let X;
::
INTERVA1:def25
func
TRS X ->
RoughSet of X equals
[(
[#] X), (
[#] X)];
coherence
proof
reconsider A = (
[#] X) as
Subset of X;
A1: (
LAp A)
= (
[#] X) & (
UAp A)
= (
[#] X) by
ROUGHS_1: 20,
ROUGHS_1: 21;
[(
LAp A), (
UAp A)]
in
[:(
bool the
carrier of X), (
bool the
carrier of X):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
hence thesis by
Def13,
A1;
end;
end
Lm15: (
TRS X)
in (
RoughSets X) by
Def20;
theorem ::
INTERVA1:70
Th70: for A be
RoughSet of X holds ((
TRS X)
_/\_ A)
= A by
XBOOLE_1: 28;
registration
let X;
cluster (
RSLattice X) ->
bounded;
coherence
proof
thus (
RSLattice X) is
lower-bounded
proof
reconsider E = (
ERS X) as
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Lm14;
reconsider e = E as
Element of (
RSLattice X) by
Def23;
take e;
let u be
Element of (
RSLattice X);
reconsider K = u as
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def23;
reconsider E9 = E, K9 = K as
RoughSet of X by
Def20;
(e
"\/" u)
= (E9
_\/_ K9) by
Def23
.= u by
Th69;
then (e
"/\" u)
= e & (u
"/\" e)
= e by
LATTICES:def 9;
hence thesis;
end;
thus (
RSLattice X) is
upper-bounded
proof
reconsider E = (
TRS X) as
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Lm15;
reconsider e = E as
Element of (
RSLattice X) by
Def23;
take e;
let u be
Element of (
RSLattice X);
reconsider K = u as
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def23;
reconsider E9 = E, K9 = K as
RoughSet of X by
Def20;
(e
"/\" u)
= (E9
_/\_ K9) by
Def23
.= u by
Th70;
then (e
"\/" u)
= e & (u
"\/" e)
= e by
LATTICES:def 8;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
end
theorem ::
INTERVA1:71
Th71: for X be
Tolerance_Space, A,B be
Element of (
RSLattice X), A9,B9 be
RoughSet of X st A
= A9 & B
= B9 holds A
[= B iff (
LAp A9)
c= (
LAp B9) & (
UAp A9)
c= (
UAp B9)
proof
let X be
Tolerance_Space, A,B be
Element of (
RSLattice X), A9,B9 be
RoughSet of X;
assume
A1: A
= A9 & B
= B9;
A2: A is
Element of (
RoughSets X) & B is
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def23;
thus A
[= B implies (
LAp A9)
c= (
LAp B9) & (
UAp A9)
c= (
UAp B9)
proof
assume A
[= B;
then (A
"\/" B)
= B;
then (A9
_\/_ B9)
= B9 by
A1,
Def23,
A2;
then ((
LAp A9)
\/ (
LAp B9))
= (
LAp B9) & ((
UAp A9)
\/ (
UAp B9))
= (
UAp B9);
hence thesis by
XBOOLE_1: 11;
end;
assume (
LAp A9)
c= (
LAp B9) & (
UAp A9)
c= (
UAp B9);
then ((
LAp A9)
\/ (
LAp B9))
= (
LAp B9) & ((
UAp A9)
\/ (
UAp B9))
= (
UAp B9) by
XBOOLE_1: 12;
then (
LAp (A9
_\/_ B9))
= (
LAp B9) & (
UAp (A9
_\/_ B9))
= (
UAp B9);
then
A3: (A9
_\/_ B9)
= B9;
reconsider A1 = A, B1 = B as
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def23;
reconsider A9 = A1, B9 = B1 as
RoughSet of X by
Def20;
(A9
_\/_ B9)
= (A
"\/" B) by
Def23;
hence thesis by
A3,
A1;
end;
Lm16: (
RSLattice X) is
complete
proof
let Y be
Subset of (
RSLattice X);
ex a be
Element of (
RSLattice X) st a
is_less_than Y & for b be
Element of (
RSLattice X) st b
is_less_than Y holds b
[= a
proof
per cases ;
suppose
A1: Y is
empty;
take a = (
Top (
RSLattice X));
for q be
Element of (
RSLattice X) st q
in Y holds a
[= q by
A1;
hence a
is_less_than Y;
let b be
Element of (
RSLattice X);
assume b
is_less_than Y;
thus b
[= a by
LATTICES: 19;
end;
suppose
A2: Y is non
empty;
set A1 = { (
LAp a1) where a1 be
RoughSet of X : a1
in Y };
set A2 = { (
UAp a1) where a1 be
RoughSet of X : a1
in Y };
set a9 =
[(
meet A1), (
meet A2)];
consider f be
object such that
A3: f
in Y by
A2;
Y is
Subset of (
RoughSets X) by
Def23;
then
reconsider f as
RoughSet of X by
A3,
Def20;
A4: (
LAp f)
in A1 by
A3;
then
A5: A1
<>
{} ;
consider g be
object such that
A6: g
in Y by
A2;
Y is
Subset of (
RoughSets X) by
Def23;
then
reconsider g as
RoughSet of X by
A6,
Def20;
(
UAp g)
in A2 by
A6;
then
A7: A2
<>
{} ;
A8: (
meet A1)
c= the
carrier of X
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
meet A1);
then
A9: for Z be
set holds Z
in A1 implies x
in Z by
SETFAM_1:def 1;
consider c be
set such that
A10: c
in A1 by
A4;
consider c9 be
RoughSet of X such that
A11: c
= (
LAp c9) & c9
in Y by
A10;
A12: c
in (
bool the
carrier of X) by
A11;
x
in c by
A10,
A9;
hence thesis by
A12;
end;
a9 is
RoughSet of X
proof
(
meet A2)
c= the
carrier of X
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
meet A2);
then
A13: for Z be
set holds Z
in A2 implies x
in Z by
SETFAM_1:def 1;
consider c be
object such that
A14: c
in A2 by
A7,
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
consider c9 be
RoughSet of X such that
A15: c
= (
UAp c9) & c9
in Y by
A14;
reconsider c as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
A16: c
c= the
carrier of X by
A15;
x
in c by
A14,
A13;
hence thesis by
A16;
end;
then
[(
meet A1), (
meet A2)]
in
[:(
bool the
carrier of X), (
bool the
carrier of X):] by
A8,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
hence thesis by
Def13;
end;
then
reconsider a9 as
RoughSet of X;
a9
in (
RoughSets X) by
Def20;
then
reconsider a = a9 as
Element of (
RSLattice X) by
Def23;
take a;
thus a
is_less_than Y
proof
let q be
Element of (
RSLattice X);
assume
A17: q
in Y;
q
in the
carrier of (
RSLattice X);
then q
in (
RoughSets X) by
Def23;
then
reconsider q9 = q as
RoughSet of X by
Def20;
consider q1,q2 be
Subset of X such that
A18: q9
=
[q1, q2] by
Th55;
A19: q1
= (
LAp q9) by
A18;
then
A20: q1
in A1 by
A17;
(
meet A1)
c= (
LAp q9) by
A19,
A20,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
then
A21: (
LAp a9)
c= (
LAp q9);
A22: (
UAp a9)
= (
meet A2);
A23: q2
= (
UAp q9) by
A18;
then
A24: q2
in A2 by
A17;
(
meet A2)
c= (
UAp q9) by
A23,
A24,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
hence a
[= q by
A21,
Th71,
A22;
end;
thus for b be
Element of (
RSLattice X) st b
is_less_than Y holds b
[= a
proof
let b be
Element of (
RSLattice X);
assume
A25: b
is_less_than Y;
b is
Element of (
RoughSets X) by
Def23;
then
reconsider b9 = b as
RoughSet of X by
Def20;
reconsider a9 = a as
RoughSet of X;
A26: for q be
Element of (
RSLattice X) st q
in Y holds b
[= q by
A25;
for Z1 be
set st Z1
in A1 holds (
LAp b9)
c= Z1
proof
let Z1 be
set;
assume Z1
in A1;
then
consider c1 be
RoughSet of X such that
A27: Z1
= (
LAp c1) & c1
in Y;
reconsider c19 = c1 as
Element of (
RSLattice X) by
A27;
b
[= c19 by
A25,
A27;
hence thesis by
A27,
Th71;
end;
then
A28: (
LAp b9)
c= (
meet A1) by
A5,
SETFAM_1: 5;
A29: (
LAp b9)
c= (
LAp a9) by
A28;
for Z1 be
set st Z1
in A2 holds (
UAp b9)
c= Z1
proof
let Z1 be
set;
assume Z1
in A2;
then
consider c2 be
RoughSet of X such that
A30: Z1
= (
UAp c2) & c2
in Y;
reconsider c29 = c2 as
Element of (
RSLattice X) by
A30;
b
[= c29 by
A26,
A30;
hence thesis by
A30,
Th71;
end;
then
A31: (
UAp b9)
c= (
meet A2) by
A7,
SETFAM_1: 5;
(
UAp b9)
c= (
UAp a9) by
A31;
hence thesis by
A29,
Th71;
end;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
registration
let X;
cluster (
RSLattice X) ->
complete;
coherence by
Lm16;
end