measure5.miz
begin
reserve a,b for
R_eal;
scheme ::
MEASURE5:sch1
RSetEq { P[
set] } :
for X1,X2 be
Subset of
REAL st (for x be
R_eal holds x
in X1 iff P[x]) & (for x be
R_eal holds x
in X2 iff P[x]) holds X1
= X2;
let A1,A2 be
Subset of
REAL such that
A1: for x be
R_eal holds x
in A1 iff P[x] and
A2: for x be
R_eal holds x
in A2 iff P[x];
thus A1
c= A2
proof
let x be
Real;
assume
A3: x
in A1;
then x
in
REAL ;
then
reconsider x as
R_eal by
NUMBERS: 31;
P[x] by
A1,
A3;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
let x be
Real;
assume
A4: x
in A2;
then x
in
REAL ;
then
reconsider x as
R_eal by
NUMBERS: 31;
P[x] by
A2,
A4;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
definition
let a,b be
R_eal;
:: original:
].
redefine
::
MEASURE5:def1
func
].a,b.[ ->
Subset of
REAL means for x be
R_eal holds x
in it iff a
< x & x
< b;
coherence
proof
for x be
set st x
in
].a, b.[ holds x
in
REAL ;
hence thesis;
end;
compatibility
proof
let X be
Subset of
REAL ;
thus X
=
].a, b.[ implies for x be
R_eal holds x
in X iff a
< x & x
< b by
XXREAL_1: 4;
assume
A1: for x be
R_eal holds x
in X iff a
< x & x
< b;
thus X
c=
].a, b.[
proof
let x be
Real;
assume
A2: x
in X;
then x
in
REAL ;
then
reconsider t = x as
R_eal by
NUMBERS: 31;
a
< t & t
< b by
A1,
A2;
hence thesis;
end;
let x be
Real;
reconsider t = x as
R_eal by
XXREAL_0:def 1;
assume x
in
].a, b.[;
then a
< t & t
< b by
XXREAL_1: 4;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
end
definition
let IT be
Subset of
REAL ;
::
MEASURE5:def2
attr IT is
open_interval means ex a,b be
R_eal st IT
=
].a, b.[;
::
MEASURE5:def3
attr IT is
closed_interval means ex a,b be
Real st IT
=
[.a, b.];
end
registration
cluster non
empty
open_interval for
Subset of
REAL ;
existence
proof
take
].
-infty ,
+infty .[;
(
In (
0 ,
REAL ))
in
].
-infty ,
+infty .[ by
XXREAL_1: 224;
hence
].
-infty ,
+infty .[ is non
empty;
take
-infty ,
+infty ;
thus thesis;
end;
cluster non
empty
closed_interval for
Subset of
REAL ;
existence
proof
take
[.
0 , 1.];
thus
[.
0 , 1.] is non
empty by
XXREAL_1: 30;
take
0 , 1;
thus thesis;
end;
end
definition
let IT be
Subset of
REAL ;
::
MEASURE5:def4
attr IT is
right_open_interval means ex a be
Real, b be
R_eal st IT
=
[.a, b.[;
end
notation
let IT be
Subset of
REAL ;
synonym IT is
left_closed_interval for IT is
right_open_interval;
end
definition
let IT be
Subset of
REAL ;
::
MEASURE5:def5
attr IT is
left_open_interval means ex a be
R_eal, b be
Real st IT
=
].a, b.];
end
notation
let IT be
Subset of
REAL ;
synonym IT is
right_closed_interval for IT is
left_open_interval;
end
registration
cluster non
empty
right_open_interval for
Subset of
REAL ;
existence
proof
take
[.
0 ,
+infty .[;
0
in
[.
0 ,
+infty .[ by
XXREAL_1: 236;
hence
[.
0 ,
+infty .[ is non
empty;
take
0 ,
+infty ;
thus thesis;
end;
cluster non
empty
left_open_interval for
Subset of
REAL ;
existence
proof
take
].
-infty , 1.];
1
in
].
-infty , 1.] by
XXREAL_1: 234;
hence
].
-infty , 1.] is non
empty;
take
-infty , 1;
thus thesis;
end;
end
definition
mode
Interval is
interval
Subset of
REAL ;
end
reserve A,B for
Interval;
registration
cluster
open_interval ->
interval for
Subset of
REAL ;
coherence ;
cluster
closed_interval ->
interval for
Subset of
REAL ;
coherence ;
cluster
right_open_interval ->
interval for
Subset of
REAL ;
coherence ;
cluster
left_open_interval ->
interval for
Subset of
REAL ;
coherence ;
end
theorem ::
MEASURE5:1
for I be
interval
Subset of
REAL holds I is
open_interval or I is
closed_interval or I is
right_open_interval or I is
left_open_interval
proof
let I be
interval
Subset of
REAL ;
per cases ;
suppose
A1: I is
left_end
right_end;
reconsider a = (
inf I), b = (
sup I) as
R_eal;
A2: a
in I & I
=
[.a, b.] by
A1,
XXREAL_2: 75,
XXREAL_2:def 5;
thus thesis by
A1,
A2;
end;
suppose
A3: I is non
left_end
right_end;
set a = (
inf I), b = (
sup I);
A4: I
=
].a, b.] by
A3,
XXREAL_2: 76;
A5: b
in I by
A3,
XXREAL_2:def 6;
thus thesis by
A5,
A4;
end;
suppose
A6: I is
left_end non
right_end;
set a = (
inf I), b = (
sup I);
A7: I
=
[.a, b.[ by
A6,
XXREAL_2: 77;
A8: a
in I by
A6,
XXREAL_2:def 5;
thus thesis by
A8,
A7;
end;
suppose I is non
left_end non
right_end;
then
consider a,b be
ExtReal such that
A9: a
<= b and
A10: I
=
].a, b.[ by
XXREAL_2: 79;
reconsider a, b as
R_eal by
XXREAL_0:def 1;
a
<= b by
A9;
hence thesis by
A10;
end;
end;
theorem ::
MEASURE5:2
Th2: for a,b be
R_eal st a
< b holds ex x be
R_eal st a
< x & x
< b & x
in
REAL
proof
let a,b be
R_eal;
A1: a
in
REAL or a
in
{
-infty ,
+infty } by
XBOOLE_0:def 3,
XXREAL_0:def 4;
A2: b
in
REAL or b
in
{
-infty ,
+infty } by
XBOOLE_0:def 3,
XXREAL_0:def 4;
assume
A3: a
< b;
then
A4: ( not a
=
+infty ) & not b
=
-infty by
XXREAL_0: 4,
XXREAL_0: 6;
per cases by
A1,
A2,
A4,
TARSKI:def 2;
suppose a
in
REAL & b
in
REAL ;
then
consider x,y be
Real such that
A5: x
= a & y
= b and x
<= y by
A3;
consider z be
Real such that
A6: x
< z & z
< y by
A3,
A5,
XREAL_1: 5;
reconsider z as
Element of
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
reconsider o = z as
R_eal by
XXREAL_0:def 1;
take o;
thus thesis by
A5,
A6;
end;
suppose
A7: a
in
REAL & b
=
+infty ;
then
reconsider x = a as
Real;
consider z be
Real such that
A8: x
< z by
XREAL_1: 1;
reconsider z as
Element of
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
reconsider o = z as
R_eal by
XXREAL_0:def 1;
take o;
thus thesis by
A7,
A8,
XXREAL_0: 9;
end;
suppose
A9: a
=
-infty & b
in
REAL ;
then
reconsider y = b as
Real;
consider z be
Real such that
A10: z
< y by
XREAL_1: 2;
reconsider z as
Element of
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
reconsider o = z as
R_eal by
XXREAL_0:def 1;
take o;
thus thesis by
A9,
A10,
XXREAL_0: 12;
end;
suppose
A11: a
=
-infty & b
=
+infty ;
take
0. ;
0.
= (
In (
0 ,
REAL ));
hence thesis by
A11;
end;
end;
theorem ::
MEASURE5:3
for a,b,c be
R_eal st a
< b & a
< c holds ex x be
R_eal st a
< x & x
< b & x
< c & x
in
REAL
proof
let a,b,c be
R_eal;
A1: (
min (b,c))
= (
min
{b, c}) by
XXREAL_2: 14;
ex o be
R_eal st o
in
{b, c} & o
<= c
proof
take c;
thus thesis by
TARSKI:def 2;
end;
then
A2: (
min (b,c))
<= c by
A1,
XXREAL_2: 62;
reconsider m = (
min (b,c)) as
R_eal by
XXREAL_0:def 1;
assume a
< b & a
< c;
then a
< (
min (b,c)) by
XXREAL_0:def 9;
then
consider x be
R_eal such that
A3: a
< x & x
< m & x
in
REAL by
Th2;
take x;
ex o be
R_eal st o
in
{b, c} & o
<= b
proof
take b;
thus thesis by
TARSKI:def 2;
end;
then (
min (b,c))
<= b by
A1,
XXREAL_2: 62;
hence thesis by
A3,
A2,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
theorem ::
MEASURE5:4
for a,b,c be
R_eal st a
< c & b
< c holds ex x be
R_eal st a
< x & b
< x & x
< c & x
in
REAL
proof
let a,b,c be
R_eal;
reconsider m = (
max (a,b)) as
R_eal by
XXREAL_0:def 1;
A1: b
in
{a, b} by
TARSKI:def 2;
assume a
< c & b
< c;
then (
max (a,b))
< c by
XXREAL_0:def 10;
then
consider x be
R_eal such that
A2: m
< x & x
< c & x
in
REAL by
Th2;
take x;
(
max (a,b))
= (
max
{a, b}) & a
in
{a, b} by
TARSKI:def 2,
XXREAL_2: 12;
hence thesis by
A2,
A1,
XXREAL_2: 61;
end;
definition
let A be
ext-real-membered
set;
::
MEASURE5:def6
func
diameter A ->
R_eal equals
:
Def6: ((
sup A)
- (
inf A)) if A
<>
{}
otherwise
0. ;
coherence ;
consistency ;
end
theorem ::
MEASURE5:5
for a,b be
R_eal holds (a
< b implies (
diameter
].a, b.[)
= (b
- a)) & (b
<= a implies (
diameter
].a, b.[)
=
0. )
proof
let a,b be
R_eal;
hereby
assume
A1: a
< b;
then
A2: (
sup
].a, b.[)
= b by
XXREAL_2: 32;
].a, b.[
<>
{} & (
inf
].a, b.[)
= a by
A1,
XXREAL_1: 33,
XXREAL_2: 28;
hence (
diameter
].a, b.[)
= (b
- a) by
A2,
Def6;
end;
assume b
<= a;
then
].a, b.[
=
{} by
XXREAL_1: 28;
hence thesis by
Def6;
end;
theorem ::
MEASURE5:6
for a,b be
R_eal holds (a
<= b implies (
diameter
[.a, b.])
= (b
- a)) & (b
< a implies (
diameter
[.a, b.])
=
0. )
proof
let a,b be
R_eal;
hereby
assume
A1: a
<= b;
then
A2: (
sup
[.a, b.])
= b by
XXREAL_2: 29;
[.a, b.]
<>
{} & (
inf
[.a, b.])
= a by
A1,
XXREAL_1: 30,
XXREAL_2: 25;
hence (
diameter
[.a, b.])
= (b
- a) by
A2,
Def6;
end;
assume b
< a;
then
[.a, b.]
=
{} by
XXREAL_1: 29;
hence thesis by
Def6;
end;
theorem ::
MEASURE5:7
for a,b be
R_eal holds (a
< b implies (
diameter
[.a, b.[)
= (b
- a)) & (b
<= a implies (
diameter
[.a, b.[)
=
0. )
proof
let a,b be
R_eal;
hereby
assume
A1: a
< b;
then
A2: (
sup
[.a, b.[)
= b by
XXREAL_2: 31;
[.a, b.[
<>
{} & (
inf
[.a, b.[)
= a by
A1,
XXREAL_1: 31,
XXREAL_2: 26;
hence (
diameter
[.a, b.[)
= (b
- a) by
A2,
Def6;
end;
assume b
<= a;
then
[.a, b.[
=
{} by
XXREAL_1: 27;
hence thesis by
Def6;
end;
theorem ::
MEASURE5:8
for a,b be
R_eal holds (a
< b implies (
diameter
].a, b.])
= (b
- a)) & (b
<= a implies (
diameter
].a, b.])
=
0. )
proof
let a,b be
R_eal;
hereby
assume
A1: a
< b;
then
A2: (
sup
].a, b.])
= b by
XXREAL_2: 30;
].a, b.]
<>
{} & (
inf
].a, b.])
= a by
A1,
XXREAL_1: 32,
XXREAL_2: 27;
hence (
diameter
].a, b.])
= (b
- a) by
A2,
Def6;
end;
assume b
<= a;
then
].a, b.]
=
{} by
XXREAL_1: 26;
hence thesis by
Def6;
end;
theorem ::
MEASURE5:9
for a,b be
R_eal holds a
=
-infty & b
=
+infty & (A
=
].a, b.[ or A
=
[.a, b.] or A
=
[.a, b.[ or A
=
].a, b.]) implies (
diameter A)
=
+infty
proof
let a,b be
R_eal;
assume that
A1: a
=
-infty & b
=
+infty and
A2: A
=
].a, b.[ or A
=
[.a, b.] or A
=
[.a, b.[ or A
=
].a, b.];
A3: (
sup A)
=
+infty & (
inf A)
=
-infty by
A1,
A2,
XXREAL_2: 25,
XXREAL_2: 26,
XXREAL_2: 27,
XXREAL_2: 28,
XXREAL_2: 29,
XXREAL_2: 30,
XXREAL_2: 31,
XXREAL_2: 32;
then A is non
empty by
XXREAL_2: 40;
then (
diameter A)
= (b
- a) by
A1,
A3,
Def6
.=
+infty by
A1,
XXREAL_3: 13;
hence thesis;
end;
registration
cluster
empty ->
open_interval for
Subset of
REAL ;
coherence
proof
let S be
Subset of
REAL ;
assume S is
empty;
then S
=
].
0. ,
0. .[;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
MEASURE5:10
(
diameter
{} )
=
0. by
Def6;
Lm1: (
diameter A)
>=
0
proof
per cases ;
suppose A is
empty;
hence thesis by
Def6;
end;
suppose A is non
empty;
then (
inf A)
<= (
sup A) by
XXREAL_2: 40;
then ((
sup A)
- (
inf A))
>=
0 by
XXREAL_3: 40;
hence thesis by
Def6;
end;
end;
Lm2: A
c= B implies (
diameter A)
<= (
diameter B)
proof
assume
A1: A
c= B;
per cases ;
suppose A
=
{} ;
then (
diameter A)
=
0 by
Def6;
hence thesis by
Lm1;
end;
suppose
A2: A
<>
{} ;
then B
<>
{} by
A1;
then
A3: (
diameter B)
= ((
sup B)
- (
inf B)) by
Def6;
A4: (
sup A)
<= (
sup B) & (
inf B)
<= (
inf A) by
A1,
XXREAL_2: 59,
XXREAL_2: 60;
(
diameter A)
= ((
sup A)
- (
inf A)) by
A2,
Def6;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4,
XXREAL_3: 37;
end;
end;
theorem ::
MEASURE5:11
A
c= B & B
=
[.a, b.] & b
<= a implies (
diameter A)
=
0. & (
diameter B)
=
0.
proof
assume that
A1: A
c= B and
A2: B
=
[.a, b.] and
A3: b
<= a;
per cases by
A3,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A4: a
= b;
then B
=
{a} by
A2,
XXREAL_1: 17;
then (
inf B)
= a & (
sup B)
= a by
XXREAL_2: 11,
XXREAL_2: 13;
then
A5: (
diameter B)
= (a
- a) by
A2,
A4,
Def6
.=
0 by
XXREAL_3: 7;
then (
diameter A)
<=
0 by
A1,
Lm2;
hence thesis by
A5,
Lm1;
end;
suppose b
< a;
then
A6: B
=
{} by
A2,
XXREAL_1: 29;
then A
=
{} by
A1;
hence thesis by
A6,
Def6;
end;
end;
theorem ::
MEASURE5:12
A
c= B implies (
diameter A)
<= (
diameter B) by
Lm2;
theorem ::
MEASURE5:13
0.
<= (
diameter A) by
Lm1;
theorem ::
MEASURE5:14
for X be
Subset of
REAL holds X is non
empty
closed_interval iff ex a,b be
Real st a
<= b & X
=
[.a, b.] by
XXREAL_1: 29,
XXREAL_1: 30;