tex_4.miz
begin
registration
let X be non
empty
TopSpace, A be non
empty
Subset of X;
cluster (
Cl A) -> non
empty;
coherence by
PCOMPS_1: 2;
end
registration
let X be
TopSpace, A be
empty
Subset of X;
cluster (
Cl A) ->
empty;
coherence by
PRE_TOPC: 22;
end
registration
let X be non
empty
TopSpace, A be non
proper
Subset of X;
cluster (
Cl A) -> non
proper;
coherence
proof
A
= (
[#] X) by
SUBSET_1:def 6;
hence thesis by
TOPS_1: 2;
end;
end
registration
let X be non
trivial
TopSpace, A be non
trivial
Subset of X;
cluster (
Cl A) -> non
trivial;
coherence
proof
A
c= (
Cl A) by
PRE_TOPC: 18;
hence thesis;
end;
end
reserve X for non
empty
TopSpace;
theorem ::
TEX_4:1
Th1: for A be
Subset of X holds (
Cl A)
= (
meet { F where F be
Subset of X : F is
closed & A
c= F })
proof
let A be
Subset of X;
set G = { F where F be
Subset of X : F is
closed & A
c= F };
A1: G
c= (
bool the
carrier of X)
proof
let C be
object;
assume C
in G;
then ex P be
Subset of X st C
= P & P is
closed & A
c= P;
hence thesis;
end;
(
[#] X)
in G;
then
reconsider G as non
empty
Subset-Family of X by
A1;
now
let P be
set;
assume P
in G;
then ex F be
Subset of X st F
= P & F is
closed & A
c= F;
hence A
c= P;
end;
then
A2: A
c= (
meet G) by
SETFAM_1: 5;
A
c= (
Cl A) by
PRE_TOPC: 18;
then (
Cl A)
in G;
then
A3: (
meet G)
c= (
Cl A) by
SETFAM_1: 3;
now
let S be
Subset of X;
assume S
in G;
then ex F be
Subset of X st F
= S & F is
closed & A
c= F;
hence S is
closed;
end;
then G is
closed by
TOPS_2:def 2;
then (
Cl A)
c= (
meet G) by
A2,
TOPS_1: 5,
TOPS_2: 22;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:2
Th2: for x be
Point of X holds (
Cl
{x})
= (
meet { F where F be
Subset of X : F is
closed & x
in F })
proof
let x be
Point of X;
set G = { F where F be
Subset of X : F is
closed & x
in F };
set H = { F where F be
Subset of X : F is
closed &
{x}
c= F };
now
let P be
object;
assume P
in G;
then
consider F be
Subset of X such that
A1: F
= P and
A2: F is
closed and
A3: x
in F;
{x}
c= F by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
hence P
in H by
A1,
A2;
end;
then
A4: G
c= H;
now
let P be
object;
assume P
in H;
then
consider F be
Subset of X such that
A5: F
= P and
A6: F is
closed and
A7:
{x}
c= F;
x
in F by
A7,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
hence P
in G by
A5,
A6;
end;
then
A8: H
c= G;
(
Cl
{x})
= (
meet H) by
Th1;
hence thesis by
A4,
A8,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
end;
registration
let X be non
empty
TopSpace, A be non
proper
Subset of X;
cluster (
Int A) -> non
proper;
coherence
proof
A
= (
[#] X) by
SUBSET_1:def 6;
hence thesis by
TOPS_1: 15;
end;
end
registration
let X be non
empty
TopSpace, A be
proper
Subset of X;
cluster (
Int A) ->
proper;
coherence
proof
now
assume (
Int A) is non
proper;
then
A1: (
Int A)
= (
[#] X);
(
Int A)
c= A by
TOPS_1: 16;
hence contradiction by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let X be non
empty
TopSpace, A be
empty
Subset of X;
cluster (
Int A) ->
empty;
coherence ;
end
theorem ::
TEX_4:3
for A be
Subset of X holds (
Int A)
= (
union { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & G
c= A })
proof
let A be
Subset of X;
set F = { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & G
c= A };
A1: F
c= (
bool the
carrier of X)
proof
let C be
object;
assume C
in F;
then ex P be
Subset of X st C
= P & P is
open & P
c= A;
hence thesis;
end;
{}
c= A;
then (
{} X)
in F;
then
reconsider F as non
empty
Subset-Family of X by
A1;
now
let P be
set;
assume P
in F;
then ex G be
Subset of X st G
= P & G is
open & G
c= A;
hence P
c= A;
end;
then
A2: (
union F)
c= A by
ZFMISC_1: 76;
(
Int A)
c= A by
TOPS_1: 16;
then (
Int A)
in F;
then
A3: (
Int A)
c= (
union F) by
ZFMISC_1: 74;
now
let S be
Subset of X;
assume S
in F;
then ex G be
Subset of X st G
= S & G is
open & G
c= A;
hence S is
open;
end;
then F is
open by
TOPS_2:def 1;
then (
union F)
c= (
Int A) by
A2,
TOPS_1: 24,
TOPS_2: 19;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
begin
definition
let Y be
TopStruct;
let IT be
Subset of Y;
::
TEX_4:def1
attr IT is
anti-discrete means for x be
Point of Y, G be
Subset of Y st G is
open & x
in G holds x
in IT implies IT
c= G;
end
definition
let Y be non
empty
TopStruct;
let A be
Subset of Y;
:: original:
anti-discrete
redefine
::
TEX_4:def2
attr A is
anti-discrete means for x be
Point of Y, F be
Subset of Y st F is
closed & x
in F holds x
in A implies A
c= F;
compatibility
proof
hereby
assume
A1: A is
anti-discrete;
let x be
Point of Y, F be
Subset of Y;
set G = ((
[#] Y)
\ F);
A2: (A
\ F)
c= G by
XBOOLE_1: 33;
assume F is
closed;
then
A3: G is
open by
PRE_TOPC:def 3;
assume
A4: x
in F;
assume
A5: x
in A;
assume not A
c= F;
then (A
\ F)
<>
{} by
XBOOLE_1: 37;
then
consider a be
object such that
A6: a
in (A
\ F) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
a
in A by
A6,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then A
c= G by
A1,
A6,
A2,
A3;
then
A7: A
misses (G
` ) by
SUBSET_1: 24;
A8: (G
` )
= ((F
` )
` )
.= F;
(A
/\ F) is non
empty by
A4,
A5,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence contradiction by
A8,
A7;
end;
hereby
assume
A9: for x be
Point of Y, F be
Subset of Y st F is
closed & x
in F holds x
in A implies A
c= F;
now
let x be
Point of Y, G be
Subset of Y;
set F = ((
[#] Y)
\ G);
A10: (A
\ G)
c= F by
XBOOLE_1: 33;
A11: G
= ((
[#] Y)
\ F) by
PRE_TOPC: 3;
assume G is
open;
then
A12: F is
closed by
A11,
PRE_TOPC:def 3;
assume
A13: x
in G;
assume
A14: x
in A;
assume not A
c= G;
then (A
\ G)
<>
{} by
XBOOLE_1: 37;
then
consider a be
object such that
A15: a
in (A
\ G) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
A16: F
= (G
` );
a
in A by
A15,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then A
c= F by
A9,
A15,
A10,
A12;
then A
misses (F
` ) by
SUBSET_1: 24;
hence contradiction by
A13,
A14,
A16,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
end;
hence A is
anti-discrete;
end;
end;
end
definition
let Y be
TopStruct;
let A be
Subset of Y;
:: original:
anti-discrete
redefine
::
TEX_4:def3
attr A is
anti-discrete means for G be
Subset of Y st G is
open holds A
misses G or A
c= G;
compatibility
proof
hereby
assume
A1: A is
anti-discrete;
let G be
Subset of Y;
assume
A2: G is
open;
assume A
meets G;
then
consider a be
object such that
A3: a
in (A
/\ G) by
XBOOLE_0: 4;
reconsider a as
Point of Y by
A3;
A4: a
in G by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
a
in A by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence A
c= G by
A1,
A2,
A4;
end;
assume
A5: for G be
Subset of Y st G is
open holds A
misses G or A
c= G;
for x be
Point of Y, G be
Subset of Y st G is
open & x
in G & x
in A holds A
c= G by
A5,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let Y be
TopStruct;
let A be
Subset of Y;
:: original:
anti-discrete
redefine
::
TEX_4:def4
attr A is
anti-discrete means for F be
Subset of Y st F is
closed holds A
misses F or A
c= F;
compatibility
proof
hereby
assume
A1: A is
anti-discrete;
let G be
Subset of Y;
assume G is
closed;
then ((
[#] Y)
\ G) is
open by
PRE_TOPC:def 3;
then
A2: A
misses (G
` ) or A
c= (G
` ) by
A1;
assume A
meets G;
then A
c= ((G
` )
` ) by
A2,
SUBSET_1: 23;
hence A
c= G;
end;
hereby
assume
A3: for G be
Subset of Y st G is
closed holds A
misses G or A
c= G;
now
let G be
Subset of Y;
A4: G
= ((
[#] Y)
\ ((
[#] Y)
\ G)) by
PRE_TOPC: 3;
assume G is
open;
then ((
[#] Y)
\ G) is
closed by
A4,
PRE_TOPC:def 3;
then
A5: A
misses (G
` ) or A
c= (G
` ) by
A3;
assume A
meets G;
then A
c= ((G
` )
` ) by
A5,
SUBSET_1: 23;
hence A
c= G;
end;
hence A is
anti-discrete;
end;
end;
end
theorem ::
TEX_4:4
Th4: for Y0,Y1 be
TopStruct, D0 be
Subset of Y0, D1 be
Subset of Y1 st the TopStruct of Y0
= the TopStruct of Y1 & D0
= D1 holds D0 is
anti-discrete implies D1 is
anti-discrete
proof
let Y0,Y1 be
TopStruct, D0 be
Subset of Y0, D1 be
Subset of Y1;
assume
A1: the TopStruct of Y0
= the TopStruct of Y1;
assume
A2: D0
= D1;
assume
A3: D0 is
anti-discrete;
now
let D be
Subset of Y1;
reconsider E = D as
Subset of Y0 by
A1;
assume D is
open;
then E
in the
topology of Y0 by
A1,
PRE_TOPC:def 2;
then E is
open by
PRE_TOPC:def 2;
hence D1
misses D or D1
c= D by
A2,
A3;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
reserve Y for non
empty
TopStruct;
theorem ::
TEX_4:5
Th5: for A,B be
Subset of Y st B
c= A holds A is
anti-discrete implies B is
anti-discrete
proof
let A,B be
Subset of Y;
assume
A1: B
c= A;
assume
A2: A is
anti-discrete;
now
let G be
Subset of Y;
assume
A3: G is
open;
assume B
meets G;
then (B
/\ G)
<>
{} ;
then (A
/\ G)
<>
{} by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 3,
XBOOLE_1: 26;
then A
meets G;
then A
c= G by
A2,
A3;
hence B
c= G by
A1;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:6
Th6: for x be
Point of Y holds
{x} is
anti-discrete
proof
let x be
Point of Y;
now
let G be
Subset of Y such that G is
open;
assume
{x}
meets G;
then
consider a be
object such that
A1: a
in (
{x}
/\ G) by
XBOOLE_0: 4;
a
in
{x} by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A2: a
= x by
TARSKI:def 1;
a
in G by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence
{x}
c= G by
A2,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:7
for A be
empty
Subset of Y holds A is
anti-discrete;
definition
let Y be
TopStruct;
let IT be
Subset-Family of Y;
::
TEX_4:def5
attr IT is
anti-discrete-set-family means for A be
Subset of Y st A
in IT holds A is
anti-discrete;
end
theorem ::
TEX_4:8
Th8: for F be
Subset-Family of Y st F is
anti-discrete-set-family holds (
meet F)
<>
{} implies (
union F) is
anti-discrete
proof
let F be
Subset-Family of Y;
assume
A1: F is
anti-discrete-set-family;
assume
A2: (
meet F)
<>
{} ;
for G be
Subset of Y st G is
open holds (
union F)
misses G or (
union F)
c= G
proof
let G be
Subset of Y;
assume
A3: G is
open;
assume (
union F)
meets G;
then
consider A0 be
set such that
A4: A0
in F and
A5: A0
meets G by
ZFMISC_1: 80;
reconsider A0 as
Subset of Y by
A4;
A0 is
anti-discrete by
A1,
A4;
then
A6: A0
c= G by
A3,
A5;
(
meet F)
c= A0 by
A4,
SETFAM_1: 3;
then
A7: (
meet F)
c= G by
A6;
for B be
set st B
in F holds B
c= G
proof
let B be
set;
assume
A8: B
in F;
then
reconsider B0 = B as
Subset of Y;
(
meet F)
c= B0 by
A8,
SETFAM_1: 3;
then (B0
/\ G)
<>
{} by
A2,
A7,
XBOOLE_1: 3,
XBOOLE_1: 19;
then
A9: B0
meets G;
B0 is
anti-discrete by
A1,
A8;
hence thesis by
A3,
A9;
end;
hence thesis by
ZFMISC_1: 76;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:9
for F be
Subset-Family of Y st F is
anti-discrete-set-family holds (
meet F) is
anti-discrete
proof
let F be
Subset-Family of Y;
assume
A1: F is
anti-discrete-set-family;
hereby
per cases ;
suppose (
meet F)
=
{} ;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose (
meet F)
<>
{} ;
(
meet F)
c= (
union F) by
SETFAM_1: 2;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th5,
Th8;
end;
end;
end;
definition
let Y be
TopStruct, x be
Point of Y;
::
TEX_4:def6
func
MaxADSF (x) ->
Subset-Family of Y equals { A where A be
Subset of Y : A is
anti-discrete & x
in A };
coherence
proof
set F = { A where A be
Subset of Y : A is
anti-discrete & x
in A };
F
c= (
bool the
carrier of Y)
proof
let C be
object;
assume C
in F;
then ex A be
Subset of Y st C
= A & A is
anti-discrete & x
in A;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let Y be non
empty
TopStruct, x be
Point of Y;
cluster (
MaxADSF x) -> non
empty;
coherence
proof
set F = { A where A be
Subset of Y : A is
anti-discrete & x
in A };
A1: x
in
{x} by
TARSKI:def 1;
{x} is
anti-discrete by
Th6;
then
{x}
in F by
A1;
hence thesis;
end;
end
reserve x for
Point of Y;
theorem ::
TEX_4:10
Th10: (
MaxADSF x) is
anti-discrete-set-family
proof
now
let A be
Subset of Y;
assume A
in (
MaxADSF x);
then ex C be
Subset of Y st C
= A & C is
anti-discrete & x
in C;
hence A is
anti-discrete;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:11
Th11:
{x}
= (
meet (
MaxADSF x))
proof
A1: x
in
{x} by
TARSKI:def 1;
now
let A be
set;
assume A
in (
MaxADSF x);
then ex C be
Subset of Y st C
= A & C is
anti-discrete & x
in C;
hence
{x}
c= A by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
end;
then
A2:
{x}
c= (
meet (
MaxADSF x)) by
SETFAM_1: 5;
{x} is
anti-discrete by
Th6;
then
{x}
in (
MaxADSF x) by
A1;
then (
meet (
MaxADSF x))
c=
{x} by
SETFAM_1: 3;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:12
Th12:
{x}
c= (
union (
MaxADSF x))
proof
{x}
= (
meet (
MaxADSF x)) by
Th11;
hence thesis by
SETFAM_1: 2;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:13
Th13: (
union (
MaxADSF x)) is
anti-discrete
proof
{x}
= (
meet (
MaxADSF x)) by
Th11;
hence thesis by
Th8,
Th10;
end;
begin
definition
let Y be
TopStruct;
let IT be
Subset of Y;
::
TEX_4:def7
attr IT is
maximal_anti-discrete means IT is
anti-discrete & for D be
Subset of Y st D is
anti-discrete & IT
c= D holds IT
= D;
end
theorem ::
TEX_4:14
for Y0,Y1 be
TopStruct, D0 be
Subset of Y0, D1 be
Subset of Y1 st the TopStruct of Y0
= the TopStruct of Y1 & D0
= D1 holds D0 is
maximal_anti-discrete implies D1 is
maximal_anti-discrete
proof
let Y0,Y1 be
TopStruct, D0 be
Subset of Y0, D1 be
Subset of Y1;
assume
A1: the TopStruct of Y0
= the TopStruct of Y1;
assume
A2: D0
= D1;
assume
A3: D0 is
maximal_anti-discrete;
A4:
now
let D be
Subset of Y1;
reconsider E = D as
Subset of Y0 by
A1;
assume D is
anti-discrete;
then
A5: E is
anti-discrete by
A1,
Th4;
assume D1
c= D;
hence D1
= D by
A2,
A3,
A5;
end;
D0 is
anti-discrete by
A3;
then D1 is
anti-discrete by
A1,
A2,
Th4;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
reserve Y for non
empty
TopStruct;
theorem ::
TEX_4:15
Th15: for A be
empty
Subset of Y holds not A is
maximal_anti-discrete
proof
consider a be
object such that
A1: a
in the
carrier of Y by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
reconsider a as
Point of Y by
A1;
let A be
empty
Subset of Y;
now
take C =
{a};
thus C is
anti-discrete & A
c= C & A
<> C by
Th6;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:16
Th16: for A be non
empty
Subset of Y holds A is
anti-discrete & A is
open implies A is
maximal_anti-discrete
proof
let A be non
empty
Subset of Y;
assume
A1: A is
anti-discrete;
assume
A2: A is
open;
for D be
Subset of Y st D is
anti-discrete & A
c= D holds A
= D
proof
let D be
Subset of Y;
assume D is
anti-discrete;
then D
misses A or D
c= A by
A2;
then
A3: (D
/\ A)
=
{} or D
c= A;
assume A
c= D;
hence thesis by
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:17
Th17: for A be non
empty
Subset of Y holds A is
anti-discrete & A is
closed implies A is
maximal_anti-discrete
proof
let A be non
empty
Subset of Y;
assume
A1: A is
anti-discrete;
assume
A2: A is
closed;
for D be
Subset of Y st D is
anti-discrete & A
c= D holds A
= D
proof
let D be
Subset of Y;
assume D is
anti-discrete;
then D
misses A or D
c= A by
A2;
then
A3: (D
/\ A)
=
{} or D
c= A;
assume A
c= D;
hence thesis by
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
definition
let Y be
TopStruct, x be
Point of Y;
::
TEX_4:def8
func
MaxADSet (x) ->
Subset of Y equals (
union (
MaxADSF x));
coherence ;
end
registration
let Y be non
empty
TopStruct, x be
Point of Y;
cluster (
MaxADSet x) -> non
empty;
coherence
proof
{x}
c= (
union (
MaxADSF x)) by
Th12;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
TEX_4:18
for x be
Point of Y holds
{x}
c= (
MaxADSet x) by
Th12;
theorem ::
TEX_4:19
Th19: for D be
Subset of Y, x be
Point of Y st D is
anti-discrete & x
in D holds D
c= (
MaxADSet x)
proof
let D be
Subset of Y, x be
Point of Y;
assume
A1: D is
anti-discrete;
assume x
in D;
then D
in { A where A be
Subset of Y : A is
anti-discrete & x
in A } by
A1;
hence thesis by
ZFMISC_1: 74;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:20
Th20: for x be
Point of Y holds (
MaxADSet x) is
maximal_anti-discrete
proof
let x be
Point of Y;
A1: for D be
Subset of Y st D is
anti-discrete & (
MaxADSet x)
c= D holds (
MaxADSet x)
= D
proof
let D be
Subset of Y;
assume
A2: D is
anti-discrete;
assume
A3: (
MaxADSet x)
c= D;
{x}
c= (
MaxADSet x) by
Th12;
then
{x}
c= D by
A3;
then x
in D by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then D
c= (
MaxADSet x) by
A2,
Th19;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
(
MaxADSet x) is
anti-discrete by
Th13;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:21
Th21: for x,y be
Point of Y holds y
in (
MaxADSet x) iff (
MaxADSet y)
= (
MaxADSet x)
proof
let x,y be
Point of Y;
(
MaxADSet y) is
maximal_anti-discrete by
Th20;
then
A1: (
MaxADSet y) is
anti-discrete;
A2: (
MaxADSet x) is
maximal_anti-discrete by
Th20;
then
A3: (
MaxADSet x) is
anti-discrete;
thus y
in (
MaxADSet x) implies (
MaxADSet y)
= (
MaxADSet x)
proof
assume y
in (
MaxADSet x);
then (
MaxADSet x)
in { A where A be
Subset of Y : A is
anti-discrete & y
in A } by
A3;
then (
MaxADSet x)
c= (
MaxADSet y) by
ZFMISC_1: 74;
hence thesis by
A2,
A1;
end;
assume
A4: (
MaxADSet y)
= (
MaxADSet x);
{y}
c= (
MaxADSet y) by
Th12;
hence thesis by
A4,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:22
Th22: for x,y be
Point of Y holds (
MaxADSet x)
misses (
MaxADSet y) or (
MaxADSet x)
= (
MaxADSet y)
proof
let x,y be
Point of Y;
assume ((
MaxADSet x)
/\ (
MaxADSet y))
<>
{} ;
then
consider a be
object such that
A1: a
in ((
MaxADSet x)
/\ (
MaxADSet y)) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
reconsider a as
Point of Y by
A1;
a
in (
MaxADSet x) by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A2: (
MaxADSet a)
= (
MaxADSet x) by
Th21;
a
in (
MaxADSet y) by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence thesis by
A2,
Th21;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:23
Th23: for F be
Subset of Y, x be
Point of Y st F is
closed & x
in F holds (
MaxADSet x)
c= F
proof
let F be
Subset of Y, x be
Point of Y;
assume that
A1: F is
closed and
A2: x
in F;
{x}
c= (
MaxADSet x) by
Th12;
then
A3: x
in (
MaxADSet x) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
(
MaxADSet x) is
maximal_anti-discrete by
Th20;
then (
MaxADSet x) is
anti-discrete;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A3;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:24
Th24: for G be
Subset of Y, x be
Point of Y st G is
open & x
in G holds (
MaxADSet x)
c= G
proof
let G be
Subset of Y, x be
Point of Y;
assume that
A1: G is
open and
A2: x
in G;
{x}
c= (
MaxADSet x) by
Th12;
then
A3: x
in (
MaxADSet x) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
(
MaxADSet x) is
maximal_anti-discrete by
Th20;
then (
MaxADSet x) is
anti-discrete;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A3;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:25
for Y be non
empty
TopSpace, x be
Point of Y holds (
MaxADSet x)
c= (
meet { F where F be
Subset of Y : F is
closed & x
in F })
proof
let Y be non
empty
TopSpace;
let x be
Point of Y;
set G = { F where F be
Subset of Y : F is
closed & x
in F };
(
[#] Y)
in G;
then
A1: G
<>
{} ;
G
c= (
bool the
carrier of Y)
proof
let C be
object;
assume C
in G;
then ex P be
Subset of Y st C
= P & P is
closed & x
in P;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider G as
Subset-Family of Y;
now
let C be
set;
assume C
in G;
then ex F be
Subset of Y st F
= C & F is
closed & x
in F;
hence (
MaxADSet x)
c= C by
Th23;
end;
hence thesis by
SETFAM_1: 5,
A1;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:26
for Y be non
empty
TopSpace, x be
Point of Y holds (
MaxADSet x)
c= (
meet { G where G be
Subset of Y : G is
open & x
in G })
proof
let Y be non
empty
TopSpace;
let x be
Point of Y;
set F = { G where G be
Subset of Y : G is
open & x
in G };
(
[#] Y)
in F;
then
A1: F
<>
{} ;
F
c= (
bool the
carrier of Y)
proof
let C be
object;
assume C
in F;
then ex P be
Subset of Y st C
= P & P is
open & x
in P;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider F as
Subset-Family of Y;
now
let C be
set;
assume C
in F;
then ex G be
Subset of Y st G
= C & G is
open & x
in G;
hence (
MaxADSet x)
c= C by
Th24;
end;
hence thesis by
SETFAM_1: 5,
A1;
end;
definition
let Y be non
empty
TopStruct;
let A be
Subset of Y;
:: original:
maximal_anti-discrete
redefine
::
TEX_4:def9
attr A is
maximal_anti-discrete means ex x be
Point of Y st x
in A & A
= (
MaxADSet x);
compatibility
proof
thus A is
maximal_anti-discrete implies ex x be
Point of Y st x
in A & A
= (
MaxADSet x)
proof
assume
A1: A is
maximal_anti-discrete;
then A
<>
{} by
Th15;
then
consider x be
object such that
A2: x
in A by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
reconsider x as
Point of Y by
A2;
take x;
thus x
in A by
A2;
(
MaxADSet x) is
maximal_anti-discrete by
Th20;
then
A3: (
MaxADSet x) is
anti-discrete;
A is
anti-discrete by
A1;
then A
c= (
MaxADSet x) by
A2,
Th19;
hence thesis by
A1,
A3;
end;
assume ex x be
Point of Y st x
in A & A
= (
MaxADSet x);
hence thesis by
Th20;
end;
end
theorem ::
TEX_4:27
Th27: for A be
Subset of Y, x be
Point of Y st x
in A holds A is
maximal_anti-discrete implies A
= (
MaxADSet x) by
Th21;
definition
let Y be non
empty
TopStruct;
let A be non
empty
Subset of Y;
:: original:
maximal_anti-discrete
redefine
::
TEX_4:def10
attr A is
maximal_anti-discrete means for x be
Point of Y st x
in A holds A
= (
MaxADSet x);
compatibility
proof
thus A is
maximal_anti-discrete implies for x be
Point of Y st x
in A holds A
= (
MaxADSet x) by
Th27;
consider a be
object such that
A1: a
in A by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
reconsider a as
Point of Y by
A1;
assume
A2: for x be
Point of Y st x
in A holds A
= (
MaxADSet x);
now
take a;
thus a
in A by
A1;
thus A
= (
MaxADSet a) by
A2,
A1;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let Y be non
empty
TopStruct, A be
Subset of Y;
::
TEX_4:def11
func
MaxADSet (A) ->
Subset of Y equals (
union { (
MaxADSet a) where a be
Point of Y : a
in A });
coherence
proof
set M = { (
MaxADSet a) where a be
Point of Y : a
in A };
M
c= (
bool the
carrier of Y)
proof
let C be
object;
assume C
in M;
then ex a be
Point of Y st C
= (
MaxADSet a) & a
in A;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider M as
Subset-Family of Y;
(
union M) is
Subset of Y;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
TEX_4:28
Th28: for x be
Point of Y holds (
MaxADSet x)
= (
MaxADSet
{x})
proof
let x be
Point of Y;
set M = { (
MaxADSet a) where a be
Point of Y : a
in
{x} };
now
let P be
set;
assume P
in M;
then ex a be
Point of Y st P
= (
MaxADSet a) & a
in
{x};
hence P
c= (
MaxADSet x) by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
then
A1: (
MaxADSet
{x})
c= (
MaxADSet x) by
ZFMISC_1: 76;
x
in
{x} by
TARSKI:def 1;
then (
MaxADSet x)
in M;
then (
MaxADSet x)
c= (
MaxADSet
{x}) by
ZFMISC_1: 74;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:29
Th29: for A be
Subset of Y, x be
Point of Y holds (
MaxADSet x)
meets (
MaxADSet A) implies (
MaxADSet x)
meets A
proof
let A be
Subset of Y, x be
Point of Y;
set E = { (
MaxADSet a) where a be
Point of Y : a
in A };
assume ((
MaxADSet x)
/\ (
MaxADSet A))
<>
{} ;
then
consider z be
object such that
A1: z
in ((
MaxADSet x)
/\ (
MaxADSet A)) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
reconsider z as
Point of Y by
A1;
z
in (
MaxADSet A) by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider C be
set such that
A2: z
in C and
A3: C
in E by
TARSKI:def 4;
z
in (
MaxADSet x) by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A4: (
MaxADSet z)
= (
MaxADSet x) by
Th21;
consider b be
Point of Y such that
A5: C
= (
MaxADSet b) and
A6: b
in A by
A3;
(
MaxADSet b)
= (
MaxADSet z) by
A2,
A5,
Th21;
then
{b}
c= (
MaxADSet x) by
A4,
Th12;
then b
in (
MaxADSet x) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
hence thesis by
A6,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:30
Th30: for A be
Subset of Y, x be
Point of Y holds (
MaxADSet x)
meets (
MaxADSet A) implies (
MaxADSet x)
c= (
MaxADSet A)
proof
let A be
Subset of Y, x be
Point of Y;
set F = { (
MaxADSet b) where b be
Point of Y : b
in A };
assume (
MaxADSet x)
meets (
MaxADSet A);
then (
MaxADSet x)
meets A by
Th29;
then
consider z be
object such that
A1: z
in ((
MaxADSet x)
/\ A) by
XBOOLE_0: 4;
reconsider z as
Point of Y by
A1;
set E = { (
MaxADSet a) where a be
Point of Y : a
in
{z} };
z
in A by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A2:
{z}
c= A by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
E
c= F
proof
let C be
object;
assume C
in E;
then ex a be
Point of Y st C
= (
MaxADSet a) & a
in
{z};
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
then (
MaxADSet
{z})
c= (
MaxADSet A) by
ZFMISC_1: 77;
then
A3: (
MaxADSet z)
c= (
MaxADSet A) by
Th28;
z
in (
MaxADSet x) by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence thesis by
A3,
Th21;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:31
Th31: for A,B be
Subset of Y holds A
c= B implies (
MaxADSet A)
c= (
MaxADSet B)
proof
let A,B be
Subset of Y;
set E = { (
MaxADSet a) where a be
Point of Y : a
in A };
set F = { (
MaxADSet b) where b be
Point of Y : b
in B };
assume
A1: A
c= B;
E
c= F
proof
let C be
object;
assume C
in E;
then ex a be
Point of Y st C
= (
MaxADSet a) & a
in A;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
hence thesis by
ZFMISC_1: 77;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:32
Th32: for A be
Subset of Y holds A
c= (
MaxADSet A)
proof
let A be
Subset of Y;
let x be
object;
assume
A1: x
in A;
then
reconsider a = x as
Point of Y;
{a}
c= A by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then (
MaxADSet
{a})
c= (
MaxADSet A) by
Th31;
then
A2: (
MaxADSet a)
c= (
MaxADSet A) by
Th28;
A3: a
in
{a} by
TARSKI:def 1;
{a}
c= (
MaxADSet a) by
Th12;
then
{a}
c= (
MaxADSet A) by
A2;
hence x
in (
MaxADSet A) by
A3;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:33
Th33: for A be
Subset of Y holds (
MaxADSet A)
= (
MaxADSet (
MaxADSet A))
proof
let A be
Subset of Y;
A1: (
MaxADSet (
MaxADSet A))
c= (
MaxADSet A)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
MaxADSet (
MaxADSet A));
then
consider C be
set such that
A2: x
in C and
A3: C
in { (
MaxADSet a) where a be
Point of Y : a
in (
MaxADSet A) } by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider a be
Point of Y such that
A4: C
= (
MaxADSet a) and
A5: a
in (
MaxADSet A) by
A3;
consider D be
set such that
A6: a
in D and
A7: D
in { (
MaxADSet b) where b be
Point of Y : b
in A } by
A5,
TARSKI:def 4;
consider b be
Point of Y such that
A8: D
= (
MaxADSet b) and b
in A by
A7;
(
MaxADSet a)
= (
MaxADSet b) by
A6,
A8,
Th21;
hence thesis by
A2,
A4,
A7,
A8,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
(
MaxADSet A)
c= (
MaxADSet (
MaxADSet A)) by
Th32;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:34
Th34: for A,B be
Subset of Y holds A
c= (
MaxADSet B) implies (
MaxADSet A)
c= (
MaxADSet B)
proof
let A,B be
Subset of Y;
assume A
c= (
MaxADSet B);
then (
MaxADSet A)
c= (
MaxADSet (
MaxADSet B)) by
Th31;
hence thesis by
Th33;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:35
Th35: for A,B be
Subset of Y st B
c= (
MaxADSet A) & A
c= (
MaxADSet B) holds (
MaxADSet A)
= (
MaxADSet B) by
Th34;
theorem ::
TEX_4:36
for A,B be
Subset of Y holds (
MaxADSet (A
\/ B))
= ((
MaxADSet A)
\/ (
MaxADSet B))
proof
let A,B be
Subset of Y;
A1: (
MaxADSet (A
\/ B))
c= ((
MaxADSet A)
\/ (
MaxADSet B))
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
MaxADSet (A
\/ B));
then
consider C be
set such that
A2: x
in C and
A3: C
in { (
MaxADSet a) where a be
Point of Y : a
in (A
\/ B) } by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider a be
Point of Y such that
A4: C
= (
MaxADSet a) and
A5: a
in (A
\/ B) by
A3;
now
per cases by
A5,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
A6: a
in A;
now
take C;
thus x
in C by
A2;
thus C
in { (
MaxADSet c) where c be
Point of Y : c
in A } by
A4,
A6;
end;
then
A7: x
in (
MaxADSet A) by
TARSKI:def 4;
(
MaxADSet A)
c= ((
MaxADSet A)
\/ (
MaxADSet B)) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
hence thesis by
A7;
end;
suppose
A8: a
in B;
now
take C;
thus x
in C by
A2;
thus C
in { (
MaxADSet c) where c be
Point of Y : c
in B } by
A4,
A8;
end;
then
A9: x
in (
MaxADSet B) by
TARSKI:def 4;
(
MaxADSet B)
c= ((
MaxADSet A)
\/ (
MaxADSet B)) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
hence thesis by
A9;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
A10: (
MaxADSet B)
c= (
MaxADSet (A
\/ B)) by
Th31,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
(
MaxADSet A)
c= (
MaxADSet (A
\/ B)) by
Th31,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then ((
MaxADSet A)
\/ (
MaxADSet B))
c= (
MaxADSet (A
\/ B)) by
A10,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:37
Th37: for A,B be
Subset of Y holds (
MaxADSet (A
/\ B))
c= ((
MaxADSet A)
/\ (
MaxADSet B))
proof
let A,B be
Subset of Y;
A1: (
MaxADSet (A
/\ B))
c= (
MaxADSet B) by
Th31,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
(
MaxADSet (A
/\ B))
c= (
MaxADSet A) by
Th31,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
hence thesis by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 19;
end;
registration
let Y be non
empty
TopStruct, A be non
empty
Subset of Y;
cluster (
MaxADSet A) -> non
empty;
coherence by
Th32,
XBOOLE_1: 3;
end
registration
let Y be non
empty
TopStruct, A be
empty
Subset of Y;
cluster (
MaxADSet A) ->
empty;
coherence
proof
now
assume (
MaxADSet A) is non
empty;
then
consider x be
object such that
A1: x
in (
MaxADSet A);
reconsider a = x as
Point of Y by
A1;
consider D be
set such that a
in D and
A2: D
in { (
MaxADSet b) where b be
Point of Y : b
in A } by
A1,
TARSKI:def 4;
ex b be
Point of Y st D
= (
MaxADSet b) & b
in A by
A2;
hence contradiction;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let Y be non
empty
TopStruct, A be non
proper
Subset of Y;
cluster (
MaxADSet A) -> non
proper;
coherence
proof
A
= the
carrier of Y by
SUBSET_1:def 6;
then the
carrier of Y
c= (
MaxADSet A) by
Th32;
then (
MaxADSet A)
= the
carrier of Y;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let Y be non
trivial
TopStruct, A be non
trivial
Subset of Y;
cluster (
MaxADSet A) -> non
trivial;
coherence
proof
A
c= (
MaxADSet A) by
Th32;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
TEX_4:38
Th38: for G be
Subset of Y, A be
Subset of Y st G is
open & A
c= G holds (
MaxADSet A)
c= G
proof
let G be
Subset of Y, A be
Subset of Y;
assume
A1: G is
open;
assume
A2: A
c= G;
(
MaxADSet A)
c= G
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A3: x
in (
MaxADSet A);
then
reconsider a = x as
Point of Y;
consider D be
set such that
A4: a
in D and
A5: D
in { (
MaxADSet b) where b be
Point of Y : b
in A } by
A3,
TARSKI:def 4;
consider b be
Point of Y such that
A6: D
= (
MaxADSet b) and
A7: b
in A by
A5;
A8: (
MaxADSet a)
= (
MaxADSet b) by
A4,
A6,
Th21;
A9:
{a}
c= (
MaxADSet a) by
Th12;
(
MaxADSet b)
c= G by
A1,
A2,
A7,
Th24;
then
{a}
c= G by
A8,
A9;
hence thesis by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:39
Th39: for Y be non
empty
TopSpace, A be
Subset of Y holds (
MaxADSet A)
c= (
meet { G where G be
Subset of Y : G is
open & A
c= G })
proof
let Y be non
empty
TopSpace;
let A be
Subset of Y;
set F = { G where G be
Subset of Y : G is
open & A
c= G };
(
[#] Y)
in F;
then
A1: F
<>
{} ;
F
c= (
bool the
carrier of Y)
proof
let C be
object;
assume C
in F;
then ex P be
Subset of Y st C
= P & P is
open & A
c= P;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider F as
Subset-Family of Y;
now
let C be
set;
assume C
in F;
then ex G be
Subset of Y st G
= C & G is
open & A
c= G;
hence (
MaxADSet A)
c= C by
Th38;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
SETFAM_1: 5;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:40
Th40: for F be
Subset of Y, A be
Subset of Y st F is
closed & A
c= F holds (
MaxADSet A)
c= F
proof
let F be
Subset of Y, A be
Subset of Y;
assume
A1: F is
closed;
assume
A2: A
c= F;
(
MaxADSet A)
c= F
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A3: x
in (
MaxADSet A);
then
reconsider a = x as
Point of Y;
consider D be
set such that
A4: a
in D and
A5: D
in { (
MaxADSet b) where b be
Point of Y : b
in A } by
A3,
TARSKI:def 4;
consider b be
Point of Y such that
A6: D
= (
MaxADSet b) and
A7: b
in A by
A5;
A8: (
MaxADSet a)
= (
MaxADSet b) by
A4,
A6,
Th21;
A9:
{a}
c= (
MaxADSet a) by
Th12;
(
MaxADSet b)
c= F by
A1,
A2,
A7,
Th23;
then
{a}
c= F by
A8,
A9;
hence thesis by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:41
Th41: for Y be non
empty
TopSpace, A be
Subset of Y holds (
MaxADSet A)
c= (
meet { F where F be
Subset of Y : F is
closed & A
c= F })
proof
let Y be non
empty
TopSpace;
let A be
Subset of Y;
set G = { F where F be
Subset of Y : F is
closed & A
c= F };
G
c= (
bool the
carrier of Y)
proof
let C be
object;
assume C
in G;
then ex P be
Subset of Y st C
= P & P is
closed & A
c= P;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider G as
Subset-Family of Y;
A1:
now
let C be
set;
assume C
in G;
then ex F be
Subset of Y st F
= C & F is
closed & A
c= F;
hence (
MaxADSet A)
c= C by
Th40;
end;
(
[#] Y)
in G;
then G
<>
{} ;
hence thesis by
A1,
SETFAM_1: 5;
end;
begin
definition
let X be non
empty
TopSpace;
let A be
Subset of X;
:: original:
anti-discrete
redefine
::
TEX_4:def12
attr A is
anti-discrete means for x be
Point of X st x
in A holds A
c= (
Cl
{x});
compatibility
proof
thus A is
anti-discrete implies for x be
Point of X st x
in A holds A
c= (
Cl
{x})
proof
assume
A1: A is
anti-discrete;
let x be
Point of X;
assume
A2: x
in A;
{x}
c= (
Cl
{x}) by
PRE_TOPC: 18;
then
A3: x
in (
Cl
{x}) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
A
misses (
Cl
{x}) or A
c= (
Cl
{x}) by
A1;
hence A
c= (
Cl
{x}) by
A2,
A3,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
end;
thus (for x be
Point of X st x
in A holds A
c= (
Cl
{x})) implies A is
anti-discrete
proof
assume
A4: for x be
Point of X st x
in A holds A
c= (
Cl
{x});
now
let F be
Subset of X;
assume
A5: F is
closed;
assume A
meets F;
then
consider a be
object such that
A6: a
in (A
/\ F) by
XBOOLE_0: 4;
reconsider a as
Point of X by
A6;
a
in F by
A6,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
{a}
c= F by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
A7: (
Cl
{a})
c= F by
A5,
TOPS_1: 5;
a
in A by
A6,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then A
c= (
Cl
{a}) by
A4;
hence A
c= F by
A7;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
end
definition
let X be non
empty
TopSpace;
let A be
Subset of X;
:: original:
anti-discrete
redefine
::
TEX_4:def13
attr A is
anti-discrete means for x be
Point of X st x
in A holds (
Cl A)
= (
Cl
{x});
compatibility
proof
thus A is
anti-discrete implies for x be
Point of X st x
in A holds (
Cl A)
= (
Cl
{x}) by
ZFMISC_1: 31,
PRE_TOPC: 19,
TOPS_1: 5;
assume
A1: for x be
Point of X st x
in A holds (
Cl A)
= (
Cl
{x});
now
let x be
Point of X;
assume x
in A;
then (
Cl A)
= (
Cl
{x}) by
A1;
hence A
c= (
Cl
{x}) by
PRE_TOPC: 18;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let X be non
empty
TopSpace;
let A be
Subset of X;
:: original:
anti-discrete
redefine
::
TEX_4:def14
attr A is
anti-discrete means for x,y be
Point of X st x
in A & y
in A holds (
Cl
{x})
= (
Cl
{y});
compatibility
proof
thus A is
anti-discrete implies for x,y be
Point of X st x
in A & y
in A holds (
Cl
{x})
= (
Cl
{y})
proof
assume
A1: A is
anti-discrete;
let x,y be
Point of X;
assume that
A2: x
in A and
A3: y
in A;
A
c= (
Cl
{y}) by
A1,
A3;
then
{x}
c= (
Cl
{y}) by
A2,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
A4: (
Cl
{x})
c= (
Cl
{y}) by
TOPS_1: 5;
A
c= (
Cl
{x}) by
A1,
A2;
then
{y}
c= (
Cl
{x}) by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then (
Cl
{y})
c= (
Cl
{x}) by
TOPS_1: 5;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
thus (for x,y be
Point of X st x
in A & y
in A holds (
Cl
{x})
= (
Cl
{y})) implies A is
anti-discrete
proof
assume
A5: for x,y be
Point of X st x
in A & y
in A holds (
Cl
{x})
= (
Cl
{y});
now
let x be
Point of X;
assume
A6: x
in A;
now
let a be
object;
assume
A7: a
in A;
then
reconsider y = a as
Point of X;
{y}
c= (
Cl
{y}) by
PRE_TOPC: 18;
then y
in (
Cl
{y}) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
hence a
in (
Cl
{x}) by
A5,
A6,
A7;
end;
hence A
c= (
Cl
{x});
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
end
reserve X for non
empty
TopSpace;
theorem ::
TEX_4:42
for x be
Point of X, D be
Subset of X st D is
anti-discrete & (
Cl
{x})
c= D holds D
= (
Cl
{x})
proof
let x be
Point of X, D be
Subset of X;
assume D is
anti-discrete;
then D
misses (
Cl
{x}) or D
c= (
Cl
{x});
then
A1: (D
/\ (
Cl
{x}))
=
{} or D
c= (
Cl
{x});
assume (
Cl
{x})
c= D;
hence thesis by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:43
for A be
Subset of X holds A is
anti-discrete & A is
closed iff for x be
Point of X st x
in A holds A
= (
Cl
{x})
proof
let A be
Subset of X;
thus A is
anti-discrete & A is
closed implies for x be
Point of X st x
in A holds A
= (
Cl
{x}) by
ZFMISC_1: 31,
TOPS_1: 5;
thus (for x be
Point of X st x
in A holds A
= (
Cl
{x})) implies A is
anti-discrete & A is
closed
proof
assume
A1: for x be
Point of X st x
in A holds A
= (
Cl
{x});
then for x be
Point of X st x
in A holds A
c= (
Cl
{x});
hence A is
anti-discrete;
hereby
per cases ;
suppose A is
empty;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose A is non
empty;
then
consider a be
object such that
A2: a
in A;
reconsider a as
Point of X by
A2;
A
= (
Cl
{a}) by
A1,
A2;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
end;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:44
for A be
Subset of X holds A is
anti-discrete & not A is
open implies A is
boundary
proof
let A be
Subset of X;
A1: (
Int A)
c= A by
TOPS_1: 16;
assume A is
anti-discrete;
then A
misses (
Int A) or A
c= (
Int A);
then
A2: (A
/\ (
Int A))
=
{} or A
c= (
Int A);
assume
A3: not A is
open;
assume not A is
boundary;
then (
Int A)
<>
{} by
TOPS_1: 48;
hence contradiction by
A3,
A2,
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 10,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:45
Th45: for x be
Point of X st (
Cl
{x})
=
{x} holds
{x} is
maximal_anti-discrete
proof
let x be
Point of X;
assume
A1: (
Cl
{x})
=
{x};
{x} is
anti-discrete by
Th6;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th17;
end;
reserve x,y for
Point of X;
theorem ::
TEX_4:46
Th46: (
MaxADSet x)
c= (
meet { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & x
in G })
proof
set F = { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & x
in G };
(
[#] X)
in F;
then
A1: F
<>
{} ;
F
c= (
bool the
carrier of X)
proof
let C be
object;
assume C
in F;
then ex P be
Subset of X st C
= P & P is
open & x
in P;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider F as
Subset-Family of X;
now
let C be
set;
assume C
in F;
then ex G be
Subset of X st G
= C & G is
open & x
in G;
hence (
MaxADSet x)
c= C by
Th24;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
SETFAM_1: 5;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:47
Th47: (
MaxADSet x)
c= (
meet { F where F be
Subset of X : F is
closed & x
in F })
proof
set G = { F where F be
Subset of X : F is
closed & x
in F };
(
[#] X)
in G;
then
A1: G
<>
{} ;
G
c= (
bool the
carrier of X)
proof
let C be
object;
assume C
in G;
then ex P be
Subset of X st C
= P & P is
closed & x
in P;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider G as
Subset-Family of X;
now
let C be
set;
assume C
in G;
then ex F be
Subset of X st F
= C & F is
closed & x
in F;
hence (
MaxADSet x)
c= C by
Th23;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
SETFAM_1: 5;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:48
Th48: (
MaxADSet x)
c= (
Cl
{x})
proof
(
Cl
{x})
= (
meet { F where F be
Subset of X : F is
closed & x
in F }) by
Th2;
hence thesis by
Th47;
end;
Lm1: (
MaxADSet x)
= (
MaxADSet y) implies (
Cl
{x})
= (
Cl
{y})
proof
assume
A1: (
MaxADSet x)
= (
MaxADSet y);
then
A2: y
in (
MaxADSet x) by
Th21;
(
MaxADSet y) is
maximal_anti-discrete by
Th20;
then
A3: (
MaxADSet y) is
anti-discrete;
x
in (
MaxADSet y) by
A1,
Th21;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A3;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:49
Th49: (
MaxADSet x)
= (
MaxADSet y) iff (
Cl
{x})
= (
Cl
{y})
proof
A1: (
MaxADSet x)
c= ((
MaxADSet x)
\/ (
MaxADSet y)) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
thus (
MaxADSet x)
= (
MaxADSet y) implies (
Cl
{x})
= (
Cl
{y}) by
Lm1;
A2: (
MaxADSet y)
c= ((
MaxADSet x)
\/ (
MaxADSet y)) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
assume
A3: (
Cl
{x})
= (
Cl
{y});
now
let a be
Point of X;
assume
A4: a
in ((
MaxADSet x)
\/ (
MaxADSet y));
now
per cases by
A4,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose a
in (
MaxADSet x);
then
A5: (
MaxADSet a)
= (
MaxADSet x) by
Th21;
then (
Cl
{a})
= (
Cl
{x}) by
Lm1;
then
A6: (
MaxADSet y)
c= (
Cl
{a}) by
A3,
Th48;
(
MaxADSet x)
c= (
Cl
{a}) by
A5,
Th48;
hence ((
MaxADSet x)
\/ (
MaxADSet y))
c= (
Cl
{a}) by
A6,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
end;
suppose a
in (
MaxADSet y);
then
A7: (
MaxADSet a)
= (
MaxADSet y) by
Th21;
then (
Cl
{a})
= (
Cl
{y}) by
Lm1;
then
A8: (
MaxADSet x)
c= (
Cl
{a}) by
A3,
Th48;
(
MaxADSet y)
c= (
Cl
{a}) by
A7,
Th48;
hence ((
MaxADSet x)
\/ (
MaxADSet y))
c= (
Cl
{a}) by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
end;
end;
hence ((
MaxADSet x)
\/ (
MaxADSet y))
c= (
Cl
{a});
end;
then
A9: ((
MaxADSet x)
\/ (
MaxADSet y)) is
anti-discrete;
A10: (
MaxADSet y) is
maximal_anti-discrete by
Th20;
(
MaxADSet x) is
maximal_anti-discrete by
Th20;
then (
MaxADSet x)
= ((
MaxADSet x)
\/ (
MaxADSet y)) by
A9,
A1;
hence thesis by
A9,
A10,
A2;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:50
(
MaxADSet x)
misses (
MaxADSet y) iff (
Cl
{x})
<> (
Cl
{y}) by
Th49,
Th22;
definition
let X be non
empty
TopSpace, x be
Point of X;
:: original:
MaxADSet
redefine
::
TEX_4:def15
func
MaxADSet (x) -> non
empty
Subset of X equals ((
Cl
{x})
/\ (
meet { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & x
in G }));
compatibility
proof
set F = { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & x
in G };
F
c= (
bool the
carrier of X)
proof
let C be
object;
assume C
in F;
then ex P be
Subset of X st C
= P & P is
open & x
in P;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider F as
Subset-Family of X;
A1: (
MaxADSet x)
c= (
Cl
{x}) by
Th48;
A2: ((
Cl
{x})
/\ (
meet F))
c= (
MaxADSet x)
proof
assume not ((
Cl
{x})
/\ (
meet F))
c= (
MaxADSet x);
then (((
Cl
{x})
/\ (
meet F))
\ (
MaxADSet x))
<>
{} by
XBOOLE_1: 37;
then
consider a be
object such that
A3: a
in (((
Cl
{x})
/\ (
meet F))
\ (
MaxADSet x)) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
A4: a
in ((
Cl
{x})
/\ (
meet F)) by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
reconsider a as
Point of X by
A3;
not a
in (
MaxADSet x) by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
A5: (
MaxADSet a)
<> (
MaxADSet x) by
Th21;
now
set G = ((
Cl
{a})
` );
{a}
c= (
Cl
{a}) by
PRE_TOPC: 18;
then
A6: a
in (
Cl
{a}) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
assume not x
in (
Cl
{a});
then x
in G by
SUBSET_1: 29;
then G
in F;
then
A7: (
meet F)
c= G by
SETFAM_1: 3;
a
in (
meet F) by
A4,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence contradiction by
A7,
A6,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
then
{x}
c= (
Cl
{a}) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
A8: (
Cl
{x})
c= (
Cl
{a}) by
TOPS_1: 5;
a
in (
Cl
{x}) by
A4,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
{a}
c= (
Cl
{x}) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then (
Cl
{a})
c= (
Cl
{x}) by
TOPS_1: 5;
then (
Cl
{x})
= (
Cl
{a}) by
A8;
hence contradiction by
A5,
Th49;
end;
(
MaxADSet x)
c= (
meet F) by
Th46;
then (
MaxADSet x)
c= ((
Cl
{x})
/\ (
meet F)) by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 19;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
coherence ;
end
theorem ::
TEX_4:51
Th51: for x,y be
Point of X holds (
Cl
{x})
c= (
Cl
{y}) iff (
meet { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & y
in G })
c= (
meet { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & x
in G })
proof
let x,y be
Point of X;
set FX = { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & x
in G };
set FY = { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & y
in G };
A1: (
[#] X)
in FX;
thus (
Cl
{x})
c= (
Cl
{y}) implies (
meet { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & y
in G })
c= (
meet { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & x
in G })
proof
assume
A2: (
Cl
{x})
c= (
Cl
{y});
now
let P be
object;
assume P
in FX;
then
consider G be
Subset of X such that
A3: G
= P and
A4: G is
open and
A5: x
in G;
now
assume not y
in G;
then
{y}
misses G by
ZFMISC_1: 50;
then
A6: (
Cl
{y})
misses G by
A4,
TSEP_1: 36;
{x}
c= (
Cl
{x}) by
PRE_TOPC: 18;
then x
in (
Cl
{x}) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
hence contradiction by
A2,
A5,
A6,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
end;
hence P
in FY by
A3,
A4;
end;
then FX
c= FY;
hence thesis by
A1,
SETFAM_1: 6;
end;
assume
A7: (
meet { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & y
in G })
c= (
meet { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & x
in G });
set G = ((
Cl
{y})
` );
assume
A8: not (
Cl
{x})
c= (
Cl
{y});
not x
in (
Cl
{y}) by
A8,
TOPS_1: 5,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then x
in G by
SUBSET_1: 29;
then G
in FX;
then (
meet FX)
c= G by
SETFAM_1: 3;
then
A9: (
meet FY)
c= G by
A7;
{y}
c= (
Cl
{y}) by
PRE_TOPC: 18;
then
A10: y
in (
Cl
{y}) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
{y}
c= (
MaxADSet y) by
Th12;
then
A11: y
in (
MaxADSet y) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
(
MaxADSet y)
c= (
meet FY) by
Th46;
then y
in (
meet FY) by
A11;
hence contradiction by
A9,
A10,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:52
for x,y be
Point of X holds (
Cl
{x})
c= (
Cl
{y}) iff (
MaxADSet y)
c= (
meet { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & x
in G })
proof
let x,y be
Point of X;
set FY = { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & y
in G };
FY
c= (
bool the
carrier of X)
proof
let C be
object;
assume C
in FY;
then ex P be
Subset of X st C
= P & P is
open & y
in P;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider FY as
Subset-Family of X;
set FX = { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & x
in G };
FX
c= (
bool the
carrier of X)
proof
let C be
object;
assume C
in FX;
then ex P be
Subset of X st C
= P & P is
open & x
in P;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider FX as
Subset-Family of X;
thus (
Cl
{x})
c= (
Cl
{y}) implies (
MaxADSet y)
c= (
meet { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & x
in G })
proof
assume (
Cl
{x})
c= (
Cl
{y});
then
A1: (
meet FY)
c= (
meet FX) by
Th51;
((
Cl
{y})
/\ (
meet FY))
c= (
meet FY) by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
{y}
c= (
MaxADSet y) by
Th12;
then
A2: y
in (
MaxADSet y) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
assume (
MaxADSet y)
c= (
meet { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & x
in G });
then
A3: y
in (
meet FX) by
A2;
set G = ((
Cl
{y})
` );
assume
A4: not (
Cl
{x})
c= (
Cl
{y});
not x
in (
Cl
{y}) by
A4,
TOPS_1: 5,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then x
in G by
SUBSET_1: 29;
then G
in FX;
then
A5: (
meet FX)
c= G by
SETFAM_1: 3;
{y}
c= (
Cl
{y}) by
PRE_TOPC: 18;
then y
in (
Cl
{y}) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
hence contradiction by
A5,
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:53
Th53: for x,y be
Point of X holds (
MaxADSet x)
misses (
MaxADSet y) iff (ex V be
Subset of X st V is
open & (
MaxADSet x)
c= V & V
misses (
MaxADSet y)) or ex W be
Subset of X st W is
open & W
misses (
MaxADSet x) & (
MaxADSet y)
c= W
proof
let x,y be
Point of X;
thus (
MaxADSet x)
misses (
MaxADSet y) implies (ex V be
Subset of X st V is
open & (
MaxADSet x)
c= V & V
misses (
MaxADSet y)) or ex W be
Subset of X st W is
open & W
misses (
MaxADSet x) & (
MaxADSet y)
c= W
proof
set V = ((
Cl
{y})
` );
set W = ((
Cl
{x})
` );
assume
A1: ((
MaxADSet x)
/\ (
MaxADSet y))
=
{} ;
assume
A2: for V be
Subset of X holds V is
open & (
MaxADSet x)
c= V implies V
meets (
MaxADSet y);
now
take W;
thus W is
open;
(
MaxADSet x)
c= (
Cl
{x}) by
Th48;
hence W
misses (
MaxADSet x) by
SUBSET_1: 24;
now
(
MaxADSet y)
c= (
Cl
{y}) by
Th48;
then V
misses (
MaxADSet y) by
SUBSET_1: 24;
then not (
MaxADSet x)
c= V by
A2;
then ((
MaxADSet x)
\ V)
<>
{} by
XBOOLE_1: 37;
then
consider b be
object such that
A3: b
in ((
MaxADSet x)
\ V) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
A4: b
in (
MaxADSet x) by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
reconsider b as
Point of X by
A3;
not b
in V by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then b
in (
Cl
{y}) by
SUBSET_1: 29;
then
A5:
{b}
c= (
Cl
{y}) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
(
MaxADSet b)
= (
MaxADSet x) by
A4,
Th21;
then (
Cl
{b})
= (
Cl
{x}) by
Th49;
then
A6: (
Cl
{x})
c= (
Cl
{y}) by
A5,
TOPS_1: 5;
assume not (
MaxADSet y)
c= W;
then ((
MaxADSet y)
\ W)
<>
{} by
XBOOLE_1: 37;
then
consider a be
object such that
A7: a
in ((
MaxADSet y)
\ W) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
A8: a
in (
MaxADSet y) by
A7,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
reconsider a as
Point of X by
A7;
not a
in W by
A7,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then a
in (
Cl
{x}) by
SUBSET_1: 29;
then
A9:
{a}
c= (
Cl
{x}) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
(
MaxADSet a)
= (
MaxADSet y) by
A8,
Th21;
then (
Cl
{a})
= (
Cl
{y}) by
Th49;
then (
Cl
{y})
c= (
Cl
{x}) by
A9,
TOPS_1: 5;
then (
Cl
{x})
= (
Cl
{y}) by
A6;
then (
MaxADSet x)
= (
MaxADSet y) by
Th49;
hence contradiction by
A1;
end;
hence (
MaxADSet y)
c= W;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
assume
A10: (ex V be
Subset of X st V is
open & (
MaxADSet x)
c= V & V
misses (
MaxADSet y)) or ex W be
Subset of X st W is
open & W
misses (
MaxADSet x) & (
MaxADSet y)
c= W;
assume (
MaxADSet x)
meets (
MaxADSet y);
then
A11: (
MaxADSet x)
= (
MaxADSet y) by
Th22;
now
per cases by
A10;
suppose ex V be
Subset of X st V is
open & (
MaxADSet x)
c= V & V
misses (
MaxADSet y);
then
consider V be
Subset of X such that V is
open and
A12: (
MaxADSet x)
c= V and
A13: V
misses (
MaxADSet y);
(V
/\ (
MaxADSet y))
=
{} by
A13;
hence contradiction by
A11,
A12,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
end;
suppose ex W be
Subset of X st W is
open & W
misses (
MaxADSet x) & (
MaxADSet y)
c= W;
then
consider W be
Subset of X such that W is
open and
A14: W
misses (
MaxADSet x) and
A15: (
MaxADSet y)
c= W;
(W
/\ (
MaxADSet x))
=
{} by
A14;
hence contradiction by
A11,
A15,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
end;
end;
hence contradiction;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:54
for x,y be
Point of X holds (
MaxADSet x)
misses (
MaxADSet y) iff (ex E be
Subset of X st E is
closed & (
MaxADSet x)
c= E & E
misses (
MaxADSet y)) or ex F be
Subset of X st F is
closed & F
misses (
MaxADSet x) & (
MaxADSet y)
c= F
proof
let x,y be
Point of X;
thus (
MaxADSet x)
misses (
MaxADSet y) implies (ex E be
Subset of X st E is
closed & (
MaxADSet x)
c= E & E
misses (
MaxADSet y)) or ex F be
Subset of X st F is
closed & F
misses (
MaxADSet x) & (
MaxADSet y)
c= F
proof
assume
A1: (
MaxADSet x)
misses (
MaxADSet y);
hereby
per cases by
A1,
Th53;
suppose ex V be
Subset of X st V is
open & (
MaxADSet x)
c= V & V
misses (
MaxADSet y);
then
consider V be
Subset of X such that
A2: V is
open and
A3: (
MaxADSet x)
c= V and
A4: V
misses (
MaxADSet y);
now
take F = (V
` );
thus F is
closed by
A2;
thus F
misses (
MaxADSet x) by
A3,
SUBSET_1: 24;
thus (
MaxADSet y)
c= F by
A4,
SUBSET_1: 23;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose ex W be
Subset of X st W is
open & W
misses (
MaxADSet x) & (
MaxADSet y)
c= W;
then
consider W be
Subset of X such that
A5: W is
open and
A6: W
misses (
MaxADSet x) and
A7: (
MaxADSet y)
c= W;
now
take E = (W
` );
thus E is
closed by
A5;
thus (
MaxADSet x)
c= E by
A6,
SUBSET_1: 23;
thus E
misses (
MaxADSet y) by
A7,
SUBSET_1: 24;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
end;
assume
A8: (ex E be
Subset of X st E is
closed & (
MaxADSet x)
c= E & E
misses (
MaxADSet y)) or ex F be
Subset of X st F is
closed & F
misses (
MaxADSet x) & (
MaxADSet y)
c= F;
assume (
MaxADSet x)
meets (
MaxADSet y);
then
A9: (
MaxADSet x)
= (
MaxADSet y) by
Th22;
now
per cases by
A8;
suppose ex E be
Subset of X st E is
closed & (
MaxADSet x)
c= E & E
misses (
MaxADSet y);
then
consider E be
Subset of X such that E is
closed and
A10: (
MaxADSet x)
c= E and
A11: E
misses (
MaxADSet y);
(E
/\ (
MaxADSet y))
=
{} by
A11;
hence contradiction by
A9,
A10,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
end;
suppose ex F be
Subset of X st F is
closed & F
misses (
MaxADSet x) & (
MaxADSet y)
c= F;
then
consider F be
Subset of X such that F is
closed and
A12: F
misses (
MaxADSet x) and
A13: (
MaxADSet y)
c= F;
(F
/\ (
MaxADSet x))
=
{} by
A12;
hence contradiction by
A9,
A13,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
end;
end;
hence contradiction;
end;
reserve A,B for
Subset of X;
reserve P,Q for
Subset of X;
theorem ::
TEX_4:55
Th55: (
MaxADSet A)
c= (
meet { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & A
c= G }) by
Th39;
theorem ::
TEX_4:56
Th56: P is
open implies (
MaxADSet P)
= P
proof
set F = { G where G be
Subset of X : G is
open & P
c= G };
A1: P
c= (
MaxADSet P) by
Th32;
assume P is
open;
then P
in F;
then
A2: (
meet F)
c= P by
SETFAM_1: 3;
(
MaxADSet P)
c= (
meet F) by
Th55;
then (
MaxADSet P)
c= P by
A2;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:57
(
MaxADSet (
Int A))
= (
Int A) by
Th56;
theorem ::
TEX_4:58
Th58: (
MaxADSet A)
c= (
meet { F where F be
Subset of X : F is
closed & A
c= F }) by
Th41;
theorem ::
TEX_4:59
Th59: (
MaxADSet A)
c= (
Cl A)
proof
(
Cl A)
= (
meet { F where F be
Subset of X : F is
closed & A
c= F }) by
Th1;
hence thesis by
Th58;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:60
Th60: P is
closed implies (
MaxADSet P)
= P
proof
assume P is
closed;
then
A1: (
Cl P)
= P by
PRE_TOPC: 22;
A2: P
c= (
MaxADSet P) by
Th32;
(
MaxADSet P)
c= (
Cl P) by
Th59;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:61
(
MaxADSet (
Cl A))
= (
Cl A) by
Th60;
theorem ::
TEX_4:62
(
Cl (
MaxADSet A))
= (
Cl A) by
Th59,
TOPS_1: 5,
Th32,
PRE_TOPC: 19;
theorem ::
TEX_4:63
(
MaxADSet A)
= (
MaxADSet B) implies (
Cl A)
= (
Cl B)
proof
A1: (
MaxADSet A)
c= (
Cl A) by
Th59;
A2: (
MaxADSet B)
c= (
Cl B) by
Th59;
assume
A3: (
MaxADSet A)
= (
MaxADSet B);
then A
c= (
MaxADSet B) by
Th32;
then A
c= (
Cl B) by
A2;
then
A4: (
Cl A)
c= (
Cl B) by
TOPS_1: 5;
B
c= (
MaxADSet A) by
A3,
Th32;
then B
c= (
Cl A) by
A1;
then (
Cl B)
c= (
Cl A) by
TOPS_1: 5;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:64
P is
closed or Q is
closed implies (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q))
= ((
MaxADSet P)
/\ (
MaxADSet Q))
proof
assume
A1: P is
closed or Q is
closed;
A2: ((
MaxADSet P)
/\ (
MaxADSet Q))
c= (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q))
proof
assume not ((
MaxADSet P)
/\ (
MaxADSet Q))
c= (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q));
then
consider x be
object such that
A3: x
in ((
MaxADSet P)
/\ (
MaxADSet Q)) and
A4: not x
in (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q));
reconsider x as
Point of X by
A3;
now
per cases by
A1;
suppose
A5: P is
closed;
then P
= (
MaxADSet P) by
Th60;
then x
in P by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A6: (
MaxADSet x)
c= P by
A5,
Th23;
A7: (P
/\ Q)
c= (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q)) by
Th32;
x
in (
MaxADSet Q) by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider D be
set such that
A8: x
in D and
A9: D
in { (
MaxADSet b) where b be
Point of X : b
in Q } by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider b be
Point of X such that
A10: D
= (
MaxADSet b) and
A11: b
in Q by
A9;
{b}
c= (
MaxADSet b) by
Th12;
then
A12: b
in (
MaxADSet b) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
(
MaxADSet x)
= (
MaxADSet b) by
A8,
A10,
Th21;
then b
in (P
/\ Q) by
A6,
A11,
A12,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (
MaxADSet b)
meets (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q)) by
A12,
A7,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
then (
MaxADSet b)
c= (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q)) by
Th30;
hence contradiction by
A4,
A8,
A10;
end;
suppose
A13: Q is
closed;
then Q
= (
MaxADSet Q) by
Th60;
then x
in Q by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A14: (
MaxADSet x)
c= Q by
A13,
Th23;
A15: (P
/\ Q)
c= (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q)) by
Th32;
x
in (
MaxADSet P) by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider D be
set such that
A16: x
in D and
A17: D
in { (
MaxADSet b) where b be
Point of X : b
in P } by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider b be
Point of X such that
A18: D
= (
MaxADSet b) and
A19: b
in P by
A17;
{b}
c= (
MaxADSet b) by
Th12;
then
A20: b
in (
MaxADSet b) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
(
MaxADSet x)
= (
MaxADSet b) by
A16,
A18,
Th21;
then b
in (P
/\ Q) by
A14,
A19,
A20,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (
MaxADSet b)
meets (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q)) by
A20,
A15,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
then (
MaxADSet b)
c= (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q)) by
Th30;
hence contradiction by
A4,
A16,
A18;
end;
end;
hence contradiction;
end;
(
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q))
c= ((
MaxADSet P)
/\ (
MaxADSet Q)) by
Th37;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:65
P is
open or Q is
open implies (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q))
= ((
MaxADSet P)
/\ (
MaxADSet Q))
proof
assume
A1: P is
open or Q is
open;
A2: ((
MaxADSet P)
/\ (
MaxADSet Q))
c= (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q))
proof
assume not ((
MaxADSet P)
/\ (
MaxADSet Q))
c= (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q));
then
consider x be
object such that
A3: x
in ((
MaxADSet P)
/\ (
MaxADSet Q)) and
A4: not x
in (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q));
reconsider x as
Point of X by
A3;
now
per cases by
A1;
suppose
A5: P is
open;
then P
= (
MaxADSet P) by
Th56;
then x
in P by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A6: (
MaxADSet x)
c= P by
A5,
Th24;
A7: (P
/\ Q)
c= (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q)) by
Th32;
x
in (
MaxADSet Q) by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider D be
set such that
A8: x
in D and
A9: D
in { (
MaxADSet b) where b be
Point of X : b
in Q } by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider b be
Point of X such that
A10: D
= (
MaxADSet b) and
A11: b
in Q by
A9;
{b}
c= (
MaxADSet b) by
Th12;
then
A12: b
in (
MaxADSet b) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
(
MaxADSet x)
= (
MaxADSet b) by
A8,
A10,
Th21;
then b
in (P
/\ Q) by
A6,
A11,
A12,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (
MaxADSet b)
meets (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q)) by
A12,
A7,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
then (
MaxADSet b)
c= (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q)) by
Th30;
hence contradiction by
A4,
A8,
A10;
end;
suppose
A13: Q is
open;
then Q
= (
MaxADSet Q) by
Th56;
then x
in Q by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A14: (
MaxADSet x)
c= Q by
A13,
Th24;
A15: (P
/\ Q)
c= (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q)) by
Th32;
x
in (
MaxADSet P) by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider D be
set such that
A16: x
in D and
A17: D
in { (
MaxADSet b) where b be
Point of X : b
in P } by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider b be
Point of X such that
A18: D
= (
MaxADSet b) and
A19: b
in P by
A17;
{b}
c= (
MaxADSet b) by
Th12;
then
A20: b
in (
MaxADSet b) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
(
MaxADSet x)
= (
MaxADSet b) by
A16,
A18,
Th21;
then b
in (P
/\ Q) by
A14,
A19,
A20,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (
MaxADSet b)
meets (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q)) by
A20,
A15,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
then (
MaxADSet b)
c= (
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q)) by
Th30;
hence contradiction by
A4,
A16,
A18;
end;
end;
hence contradiction;
end;
(
MaxADSet (P
/\ Q))
c= ((
MaxADSet P)
/\ (
MaxADSet Q)) by
Th37;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
begin
reserve Y for non
empty
TopStruct;
theorem ::
TEX_4:66
Th66: for Y0 be
SubSpace of Y, A be
Subset of Y st A
= the
carrier of Y0 holds Y0 is
anti-discrete implies A is
anti-discrete
proof
let Y0 be
SubSpace of Y, A be
Subset of Y;
assume
A1: A
= the
carrier of Y0;
assume Y0 is
anti-discrete;
then
A2: the
topology of Y0
=
{
{} , the
carrier of Y0} by
TDLAT_3:def 2;
now
let G be
Subset of Y;
reconsider H = (A
/\ G) as
Subset of Y0 by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
assume
A3: G is
open;
G
in the
topology of Y & H
= (G
/\ (
[#] Y0)) by
A1,
A3,
PRE_TOPC:def 2;
then H
in the
topology of Y0 by
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
then (A
/\ G)
=
{} or (A
/\ G)
= the
carrier of Y0 by
A2,
TARSKI:def 2;
hence A
misses G or A
c= G by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:67
Th67: for Y0 be
SubSpace of Y st Y0 is
TopSpace-like holds for A be
Subset of Y st A
= the
carrier of Y0 holds A is
anti-discrete implies Y0 is
anti-discrete
proof
let Y0 be
SubSpace of Y;
assume
A1: Y0 is
TopSpace-like;
then
A2: the
carrier of Y0
in the
topology of Y0 by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
let A be
Subset of Y;
assume
A3: A
= the
carrier of Y0;
assume
A4: A is
anti-discrete;
now
let D be
object;
assume
A5: D
in the
topology of Y0;
then
reconsider C = D as
Subset of Y0;
consider E be
Subset of Y such that
A6: E
in the
topology of Y and
A7: C
= (E
/\ (
[#] Y0)) by
A5,
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
reconsider E as
Subset of Y;
A8: E is
open by
A6,
PRE_TOPC:def 2;
now
per cases by
A4,
A8;
suppose A
misses E;
hence C
=
{} or C
= A by
A3,
A7;
end;
suppose A
c= E;
hence C
=
{} or C
= A by
A3,
A7,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
end;
end;
hence D
in
{
{} , the
carrier of Y0} by
A3,
TARSKI:def 2;
end;
then
A9: the
topology of Y0
c=
{
{} , the
carrier of Y0};
{}
in the
topology of Y0 by
A1,
PRE_TOPC: 1;
then
{
{} , the
carrier of Y0}
c= the
topology of Y0 by
A2,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
then the
topology of Y0
=
{
{} , the
carrier of Y0} by
A9;
hence thesis by
TDLAT_3:def 2;
end;
reserve X for non
empty
TopSpace,
Y0 for non
empty
SubSpace of X;
theorem ::
TEX_4:68
(for X0 be
open
SubSpace of X holds Y0
misses X0 or Y0 is
SubSpace of X0) implies Y0 is
anti-discrete
proof
reconsider A = the
carrier of Y0 as
Subset of X by
TSEP_1: 1;
assume
A1: for X0 be
open
SubSpace of X holds Y0
misses X0 or Y0 is
SubSpace of X0;
now
let G be
Subset of X;
assume
A2: G is
open;
now
per cases ;
suppose G is
empty;
hence A
misses G or A
c= G;
end;
suppose G is non
empty;
then
consider X0 be
strict
open non
empty
SubSpace of X such that
A3: G
= the
carrier of X0 by
A2,
TSEP_1: 20;
Y0
misses X0 or Y0 is
SubSpace of X0 by
A1;
hence A
misses G or A
c= G by
A3,
TSEP_1: 4,
TSEP_1:def 3;
end;
end;
hence A
misses G or A
c= G;
end;
then A is
anti-discrete;
hence thesis by
Th67;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:69
(for X0 be
closed
SubSpace of X holds Y0
misses X0 or Y0 is
SubSpace of X0) implies Y0 is
anti-discrete
proof
reconsider A = the
carrier of Y0 as
Subset of X by
TSEP_1: 1;
assume
A1: for X0 be
closed
SubSpace of X holds Y0
misses X0 or Y0 is
SubSpace of X0;
now
let G be
Subset of X;
assume
A2: G is
closed;
now
per cases ;
suppose G is
empty;
hence A
misses G or A
c= G;
end;
suppose G is non
empty;
then
consider X0 be
strict
closed non
empty
SubSpace of X such that
A3: G
= the
carrier of X0 by
A2,
TSEP_1: 15;
Y0
misses X0 or Y0 is
SubSpace of X0 by
A1;
hence A
misses G or A
c= G by
A3,
TSEP_1: 4,
TSEP_1:def 3;
end;
end;
hence A
misses G or A
c= G;
end;
then A is
anti-discrete;
hence thesis by
Th67;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:70
for Y0 be
anti-discrete
SubSpace of X holds for X0 be
open
SubSpace of X holds Y0
misses X0 or Y0 is
SubSpace of X0
proof
let Y0 be
anti-discrete
SubSpace of X;
reconsider A = the
carrier of Y0 as
Subset of X by
TSEP_1: 1;
let X0 be
open
SubSpace of X;
reconsider G = the
carrier of X0 as
Subset of X by
TSEP_1: 1;
A1: G is
open by
TSEP_1: 16;
A is
anti-discrete by
Th66;
then A
misses G or A
c= G by
A1;
hence thesis by
TSEP_1: 4,
TSEP_1:def 3;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:71
for Y0 be
anti-discrete
SubSpace of X holds for X0 be
closed
SubSpace of X holds Y0
misses X0 or Y0 is
SubSpace of X0
proof
let Y0 be
anti-discrete
SubSpace of X;
reconsider A = the
carrier of Y0 as
Subset of X by
TSEP_1: 1;
let X0 be
closed
SubSpace of X;
reconsider G = the
carrier of X0 as
Subset of X by
TSEP_1: 1;
A1: G is
closed by
TSEP_1: 11;
A is
anti-discrete by
Th66;
then A
misses G or A
c= G by
A1;
hence thesis by
TSEP_1: 4,
TSEP_1:def 3;
end;
definition
let Y be non
empty
TopStruct;
let IT be
SubSpace of Y;
::
TEX_4:def16
attr IT is
maximal_anti-discrete means IT is
anti-discrete & for Y0 be
SubSpace of Y st Y0 is
anti-discrete holds the
carrier of IT
c= the
carrier of Y0 implies the
carrier of IT
= the
carrier of Y0;
end
registration
let Y be non
empty
TopStruct;
cluster
maximal_anti-discrete ->
anti-discrete for
SubSpace of Y;
coherence ;
cluster non
anti-discrete -> non
maximal_anti-discrete for
SubSpace of Y;
coherence ;
end
theorem ::
TEX_4:72
Th72: for Y0 be non
empty
SubSpace of X, A be
Subset of X st A
= the
carrier of Y0 holds Y0 is
maximal_anti-discrete iff A is
maximal_anti-discrete
proof
let Y0 be non
empty
SubSpace of X, A be
Subset of X;
assume
A1: A
= the
carrier of Y0;
thus Y0 is
maximal_anti-discrete implies A is
maximal_anti-discrete
proof
assume
A2: Y0 is
maximal_anti-discrete;
A3:
now
let D be
Subset of X;
assume
A4: D is
anti-discrete;
assume
A5: A
c= D;
then D
<>
{} by
A1;
then
consider X0 be
strict non
empty
SubSpace of X such that
A6: D
= the
carrier of X0 by
TSEP_1: 10;
X0 is
anti-discrete by
A4,
A6,
Th67;
hence A
= D by
A1,
A2,
A5,
A6;
end;
A is
anti-discrete by
A1,
A2,
Th66;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
assume
A7: A is
maximal_anti-discrete;
A8:
now
let X0 be
SubSpace of X;
reconsider D = the
carrier of X0 as
Subset of X by
TSEP_1: 1;
assume X0 is
anti-discrete;
then
A9: D is
anti-discrete by
Th66;
assume the
carrier of Y0
c= the
carrier of X0;
hence the
carrier of Y0
= the
carrier of X0 by
A1,
A7,
A9;
end;
A is
anti-discrete by
A7;
then Y0 is
anti-discrete by
A1,
Th67;
hence thesis by
A8;
end;
registration
let X be non
empty
TopSpace;
cluster
open
anti-discrete ->
maximal_anti-discrete for non
empty
SubSpace of X;
coherence
proof
let X0 be non
empty
SubSpace of X;
reconsider A = the
carrier of X0 as
Subset of X by
TSEP_1: 1;
assume X0 is
open;
then
A1: A is
open by
TSEP_1: 16;
assume X0 is
anti-discrete;
then A is
anti-discrete by
Th66;
then A is
maximal_anti-discrete by
A1,
Th16;
hence thesis by
Th72;
end;
cluster
open non
maximal_anti-discrete -> non
anti-discrete for non
empty
SubSpace of X;
coherence ;
cluster
anti-discrete non
maximal_anti-discrete -> non
open for non
empty
SubSpace of X;
coherence ;
cluster
closed
anti-discrete ->
maximal_anti-discrete for non
empty
SubSpace of X;
coherence
proof
let X0 be non
empty
SubSpace of X;
reconsider A = the
carrier of X0 as
Subset of X by
TSEP_1: 1;
assume X0 is
closed;
then
A2: A is
closed by
TSEP_1: 11;
assume X0 is
anti-discrete;
then A is
anti-discrete by
Th66;
then A is
maximal_anti-discrete by
A2,
Th17;
hence thesis by
Th72;
end;
cluster
closed non
maximal_anti-discrete -> non
anti-discrete for non
empty
SubSpace of X;
coherence ;
cluster
anti-discrete non
maximal_anti-discrete -> non
closed for non
empty
SubSpace of X;
coherence ;
end
definition
let Y be
TopStruct, x be
Point of Y;
::
TEX_4:def17
func
MaxADSspace (x) ->
strict
SubSpace of Y means
:
Def17: the
carrier of it
= (
MaxADSet x);
existence
proof
set D = (
MaxADSet x);
set Y0 = (Y
| D);
take Y0;
D
= (
[#] Y0) by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let Y1,Y2 be
strict
SubSpace of Y;
assume that
A1: the
carrier of Y1
= (
MaxADSet x) and
A2: the
carrier of Y2
= (
MaxADSet x);
set A1 = the
carrier of Y1, A2 = the
carrier of Y2;
A3: A2
= (
[#] Y2);
A4: A1
= (
[#] Y1);
then A1
c= (
[#] Y) by
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
then
reconsider A1 as
Subset of Y;
Y1
= (Y
| A1) by
A4,
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A3,
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
end;
end
registration
let Y be non
empty
TopStruct, x be
Point of Y;
cluster (
MaxADSspace x) -> non
empty;
coherence
proof
the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace x)
= (
MaxADSet x) by
Def17;
hence the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace x) is non
empty;
end;
end
Lm2: for X1,X2 be
SubSpace of Y holds the
carrier of X1
c= the
carrier of X2 implies X1 is
SubSpace of X2
proof
let X1,X2 be
SubSpace of Y;
set A1 = the
carrier of X1, A2 = the
carrier of X2;
A1: A1
= (
[#] X1);
assume
A2: A1
c= A2;
A3: A2
= (
[#] X2);
for P be
Subset of X1 holds P
in the
topology of X1 iff ex Q be
Subset of X2 st Q
in the
topology of X2 & P
= (Q
/\ A1)
proof
let P be
Subset of X1;
thus P
in the
topology of X1 implies ex Q be
Subset of X2 st Q
in the
topology of X2 & P
= (Q
/\ A1)
proof
assume P
in the
topology of X1;
then
consider R be
Subset of Y such that
A4: R
in the
topology of Y and
A5: P
= (R
/\ A1) by
A1,
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
reconsider Q = (R
/\ A2) as
Subset of X2 by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
take Q;
thus Q
in the
topology of X2 by
A3,
A4,
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
(Q
/\ A1)
= (R
/\ (A2
/\ A1)) by
XBOOLE_1: 16
.= (R
/\ A1) by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
hence thesis by
A5;
end;
given Q be
Subset of X2 such that
A6: Q
in the
topology of X2 and
A7: P
= (Q
/\ A1);
consider R be
Subset of Y such that
A8: R
in the
topology of Y and
A9: Q
= (R
/\ (
[#] X2)) by
A6,
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
P
= (R
/\ (A2
/\ A1)) by
A7,
A9,
XBOOLE_1: 16
.= (R
/\ A1) by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
hence thesis by
A1,
A8,
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
A3,
A2,
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:73
for x be
Point of Y holds (
Sspace x) is
SubSpace of (
MaxADSspace x)
proof
let x be
Point of Y;
A1: the
carrier of (
Sspace x)
=
{x} by
TEX_2:def 2;
the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace x)
= (
MaxADSet x) by
Def17;
hence thesis by
A1,
Lm2,
Th12;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:74
for x,y be
Point of Y holds y is
Point of (
MaxADSspace x) iff the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace y)
= the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace x)
proof
let x,y be
Point of Y;
A1: the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace x)
= (
MaxADSet x) by
Def17;
thus y is
Point of (
MaxADSspace x) implies the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace y)
= the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace x)
proof
assume y is
Point of (
MaxADSspace x);
then (
MaxADSet y)
= (
MaxADSet x) by
A1,
Th21;
hence thesis by
A1,
Def17;
end;
assume
A2: the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace y)
= the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace x);
the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace y)
= (
MaxADSet y) by
Def17;
hence thesis by
A2,
Th21;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:75
for x,y be
Point of Y holds the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace x)
misses the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace y) or the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace x)
= the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace y)
proof
let x,y be
Point of Y;
assume
A1: the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace x)
meets the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace y);
A2: the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace y)
= (
MaxADSet y) by
Def17;
the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace x)
= (
MaxADSet x) by
Def17;
hence thesis by
A2,
A1,
Th22,
TSEP_1: 5;
end;
registration
let X be non
empty
TopSpace;
cluster
maximal_anti-discrete
strict for
SubSpace of X;
existence
proof
consider a be
object such that
A1: a
in the
carrier of X by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
reconsider a as
Point of X by
A1;
consider X0 be
strict non
empty
SubSpace of X such that
A2: (
MaxADSet a)
= the
carrier of X0 by
TSEP_1: 10;
take X0;
(
MaxADSet a) is
maximal_anti-discrete by
Th20;
hence thesis by
A2,
Th72;
end;
end
registration
let X be non
empty
TopSpace, x be
Point of X;
cluster (
MaxADSspace x) ->
maximal_anti-discrete;
coherence
proof
A1: (
MaxADSet x) is
maximal_anti-discrete by
Th20;
(
MaxADSet x)
= the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace x) by
Def17;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th72;
end;
end
theorem ::
TEX_4:76
for X0 be
closed non
empty
SubSpace of X, x be
Point of X holds x is
Point of X0 implies (
MaxADSspace x) is
SubSpace of X0
proof
let X0 be
closed non
empty
SubSpace of X, x be
Point of X;
reconsider A = the
carrier of X0 as
Subset of X by
TSEP_1: 1;
A1: A is
closed by
TSEP_1: 11;
assume x is
Point of X0;
then (
MaxADSet x)
c= A by
A1,
Th23;
then the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace x)
c= the
carrier of X0 by
Def17;
hence thesis by
Lm2;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:77
for X0 be
open non
empty
SubSpace of X, x be
Point of X holds x is
Point of X0 implies (
MaxADSspace x) is
SubSpace of X0
proof
let X0 be
open non
empty
SubSpace of X, x be
Point of X;
reconsider A = the
carrier of X0 as
Subset of X by
TSEP_1: 1;
A1: A is
open by
TSEP_1: 16;
assume x is
Point of X0;
then (
MaxADSet x)
c= A by
A1,
Th24;
then the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace x)
c= the
carrier of X0 by
Def17;
hence thesis by
Lm2;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:78
for x be
Point of X st (
Cl
{x})
=
{x} holds (
Sspace x) is
maximal_anti-discrete
proof
let x be
Point of X;
assume (
Cl
{x})
=
{x};
then
A1:
{x} is
maximal_anti-discrete by
Th45;
the
carrier of (
Sspace x)
=
{x} by
TEX_2:def 2;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th72;
end;
notation
let Y be
TopStruct, A be
Subset of Y;
synonym
Sspace (A) for Y
| A;
end
Lm3: for Y be
TopStruct, A be
Subset of Y holds the
carrier of (Y
| A)
= A
proof
let Y be
TopStruct, A be
Subset of Y;
(
[#] (Y
| A))
= A by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:79
for A be non
empty
Subset of Y holds A is
Subset of (
Sspace A)
proof
let A be non
empty
Subset of Y;
the
carrier of (
Sspace A)
c= the
carrier of (
Sspace A);
hence thesis by
Lm3;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:80
for Y0 be
SubSpace of Y, A be non
empty
Subset of Y holds A is
Subset of Y0 implies (
Sspace A) is
SubSpace of Y0
proof
let Y0 be
SubSpace of Y, A be non
empty
Subset of Y;
assume A is
Subset of Y0;
then A
c= the
carrier of Y0;
then the
carrier of (
Sspace A)
c= the
carrier of Y0 by
Lm3;
hence thesis by
Lm2;
end;
registration
let Y be non
trivial
TopStruct;
cluster non
proper
strict for
SubSpace of Y;
existence
proof
(
[#] Y)
= the
carrier of Y;
then
reconsider A0 = the
carrier of Y as non
empty
Subset of Y;
set Y0 = (Y
| A0);
take Y0;
A0
= (
[#] Y0) by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
hence thesis by
TEX_2: 10;
end;
end
registration
let Y be non
trivial
TopStruct, A be non
trivial
Subset of Y;
cluster (
Sspace A) -> non
trivial;
coherence by
Lm3;
end
registration
let Y be non
empty
TopStruct, A be non
proper
Subset of Y;
cluster (
Sspace A) -> non
proper;
coherence
proof
now
assume
A1: (
Sspace A) is
proper;
the
carrier of (
Sspace A)
= A by
Lm3;
hence contradiction by
A1,
TEX_2: 8;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let Y be non
empty
TopStruct, A be
Subset of Y;
::
TEX_4:def18
func
MaxADSspace (A) ->
strict
SubSpace of Y means
:
Def18: the
carrier of it
= (
MaxADSet A);
existence
proof
set D = (
MaxADSet A);
set Y0 = (Y
| D);
take Y0;
D
= (
[#] Y0) by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let Y1,Y2 be
strict
SubSpace of Y;
assume that
A1: the
carrier of Y1
= (
MaxADSet A) and
A2: the
carrier of Y2
= (
MaxADSet A);
set A1 = the
carrier of Y1, A2 = the
carrier of Y2;
A3: A2
= (
[#] Y2);
A4: A1
= (
[#] Y1);
then A1
c= (
[#] Y) by
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
then
reconsider A1 as
Subset of Y;
Y1
= (Y
| A1) by
A4,
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A3,
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
end;
end
registration
let Y be non
empty
TopStruct, A be non
empty
Subset of Y;
cluster (
MaxADSspace A) -> non
empty;
coherence
proof
the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace A)
= (
MaxADSet A) by
Def18;
hence the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace A) is non
empty;
end;
end
theorem ::
TEX_4:81
for A be non
empty
Subset of Y holds A is
Subset of (
MaxADSspace A)
proof
let A be non
empty
Subset of Y;
the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace A)
= (
MaxADSet A) by
Def18;
hence thesis by
Th32;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:82
for A be non
empty
Subset of Y holds (
Sspace A) is
SubSpace of (
MaxADSspace A)
proof
let A be non
empty
Subset of Y;
A1: the
carrier of (
Sspace A)
= A by
Lm3;
the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace A)
= (
MaxADSet A) by
Def18;
hence thesis by
A1,
Lm2,
Th32;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:83
for x be
Point of Y holds the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace x)
= the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace
{x})
proof
let x be
Point of Y;
A1: the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace
{x})
= (
MaxADSet
{x}) by
Def18;
the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace x)
= (
MaxADSet x) by
Def17;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th28,
TSEP_1: 5;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:84
for A,B be non
empty
Subset of Y holds A
c= B implies (
MaxADSspace A) is
SubSpace of (
MaxADSspace B)
proof
let A,B be non
empty
Subset of Y;
assume
A1: A
c= B;
A2: the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace B)
= (
MaxADSet B) by
Def18;
the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace A)
= (
MaxADSet A) by
Def18;
hence thesis by
A2,
A1,
Lm2,
Th31;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:85
for A be non
empty
Subset of Y holds the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace A)
= the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace (
MaxADSet A))
proof
let A be non
empty
Subset of Y;
A1: the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace (
MaxADSet A))
= (
MaxADSet (
MaxADSet A)) by
Def18;
the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace A)
= (
MaxADSet A) by
Def18;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th33,
TSEP_1: 5;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:86
for A,B be non
empty
Subset of Y holds A is
Subset of (
MaxADSspace B) implies (
MaxADSspace A) is
SubSpace of (
MaxADSspace B)
proof
let A,B be non
empty
Subset of Y;
assume
A1: A is
Subset of (
MaxADSspace B);
A2: the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace B)
= (
MaxADSet B) by
Def18;
the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace A)
= (
MaxADSet A) by
Def18;
hence thesis by
A2,
A1,
Lm2,
Th34;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:87
for A,B be non
empty
Subset of Y holds B is
Subset of (
MaxADSspace A) & A is
Subset of (
MaxADSspace B) iff the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace A)
= the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace B)
proof
let A,B be non
empty
Subset of Y;
A1: the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace B)
= (
MaxADSet B) by
Def18;
A2: the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace A)
= (
MaxADSet A) by
Def18;
hence B is
Subset of (
MaxADSspace A) & A is
Subset of (
MaxADSspace B) implies the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace A)
= the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace B) by
A1,
Th35,
TSEP_1: 5;
assume the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace A)
= the TopStruct of (
MaxADSspace B);
hence thesis by
A2,
A1,
Th32;
end;
registration
let Y be non
trivial
TopStruct, A be non
trivial
Subset of Y;
cluster (
MaxADSspace A) -> non
trivial;
coherence
proof
not (
MaxADSet A) is
trivial;
hence thesis by
Def18;
end;
end
registration
let Y be non
empty
TopStruct, A be non
proper
Subset of Y;
cluster (
MaxADSspace A) -> non
proper;
coherence
proof
now
assume
A1: (
MaxADSspace A) is
proper;
the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace A)
= (
MaxADSet A) by
Def18;
hence contradiction by
A1,
TEX_2: 8;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
TEX_4:88
for X0 be
open
SubSpace of X, A be non
empty
Subset of X holds A is
Subset of X0 implies (
MaxADSspace A) is
SubSpace of X0
proof
let X0 be
open
SubSpace of X, A be non
empty
Subset of X;
reconsider D = the
carrier of X0 as
Subset of X by
TSEP_1: 1;
A1: D is
open by
TSEP_1: 16;
assume A is
Subset of X0;
then (
MaxADSet A)
c= D by
A1,
Th38;
then the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace A)
c= the
carrier of X0 by
Def18;
hence thesis by
Lm2;
end;
theorem ::
TEX_4:89
for X0 be
closed
SubSpace of X, A be non
empty
Subset of X holds A is
Subset of X0 implies (
MaxADSspace A) is
SubSpace of X0
proof
let X0 be
closed
SubSpace of X, A be non
empty
Subset of X;
reconsider D = the
carrier of X0 as
Subset of X by
TSEP_1: 1;
A1: D is
closed by
TSEP_1: 11;
assume A is
Subset of X0;
then (
MaxADSet A)
c= D by
A1,
Th40;
then the
carrier of (
MaxADSspace A)
c= the
carrier of X0 by
Def18;
hence thesis by
Lm2;
end;