borsuk_1.miz
begin
reserve e,u for
set;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:1
Th1: for X be
TopStruct, Y be
SubSpace of X holds the
carrier of Y
c= the
carrier of X
proof
let X be
TopStruct, Y be
SubSpace of X;
the
carrier of Y
= (
[#] Y) & the
carrier of X
= (
[#] X);
hence thesis by
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
end;
definition
let X,Y be non
empty
TopSpace, F be
Function of X, Y;
:: original:
continuous
redefine
::
BORSUK_1:def1
attr F is
continuous means for W be
Point of X, G be
a_neighborhood of (F
. W) holds ex H be
a_neighborhood of W st (F
.: H)
c= G;
compatibility
proof
A1: (
[#] Y)
<>
{} ;
thus F is
continuous implies for W be
Point of X, G be
a_neighborhood of (F
. W) holds ex H be
a_neighborhood of W st (F
.: H)
c= G
proof
assume
A2: F is
continuous;
let W be
Point of X, G be
a_neighborhood of (F
. W);
(F
. W)
in (
Int G) by
CONNSP_2:def 1;
then
A3: W
in (F
" (
Int G)) by
FUNCT_2: 38;
(F
" (
Int G)) is
open by
A1,
A2,
TOPS_2: 43;
then W
in (
Int (F
" (
Int G))) by
A3,
TOPS_1: 23;
then
reconsider H = (F
" (
Int G)) as
a_neighborhood of W by
CONNSP_2:def 1;
take H;
H
c= (F
" G) by
RELAT_1: 143,
TOPS_1: 16;
hence thesis by
EQREL_1: 46;
end;
assume
A4: for W be
Point of X, G be
a_neighborhood of (F
. W) holds ex H be
a_neighborhood of W st (F
.: H)
c= G;
now
let P1 be
Subset of Y such that
A5: P1 is
open;
now
let x be
set;
thus x
in (F
" P1) implies ex P be
Subset of X st P is
open & P
c= (F
" P1) & x
in P
proof
assume
A6: x
in (F
" P1);
then
reconsider W = x as
Point of X;
A7: (
Int P1)
= P1 by
A5,
TOPS_1: 23;
(F
. W)
in P1 by
A6,
FUNCT_2: 38;
then P1 is
a_neighborhood of (F
. W) by
A7,
CONNSP_2:def 1;
then
consider H be
a_neighborhood of W such that
A8: (F
.: H)
c= P1 by
A4;
take (
Int H);
thus (
Int H) is
open;
A9: (
Int H)
c= H by
TOPS_1: 16;
(
dom F)
= the
carrier of X by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A10: H
c= (F
" (F
.: H)) by
FUNCT_1: 76;
(F
" (F
.: H))
c= (F
" P1) by
A8,
RELAT_1: 143;
then H
c= (F
" P1) by
A10;
hence (
Int H)
c= (F
" P1) by
A9;
thus thesis by
CONNSP_2:def 1;
end;
thus (ex P be
Subset of X st P is
open & P
c= (F
" P1) & x
in P) implies x
in (F
" P1);
end;
hence (F
" P1) is
open by
TOPS_1: 25;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
TOPS_2: 43;
end;
end
reserve X,Y for non
empty
TopSpace;
registration
let X,Y,Z be non
empty
TopSpace, F be
continuous
Function of X, Y, G be
continuous
Function of Y, Z;
cluster (G
* F) ->
continuous;
coherence by
TOPS_2: 46;
end
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:2
Th2: for A be
continuous
Function of X, Y, G be
Subset of Y holds (A
" (
Int G))
c= (
Int (A
" G))
proof
let A be
continuous
Function of X, Y, G be
Subset of Y;
let e be
object;
A1: (A
" (
Int G))
c= (A
" G) by
RELAT_1: 143,
TOPS_1: 16;
(
[#] Y)
<>
{} ;
then
A2: (A
" (
Int G)) is
open by
TOPS_2: 43;
assume e
in (A
" (
Int G));
hence thesis by
A2,
A1,
TOPS_1: 22;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:3
Th3: for W be
Point of Y, A be
continuous
Function of X, Y, G be
a_neighborhood of W holds (A
" G) is
a_neighborhood of (A
"
{W})
proof
let W be
Point of Y, A be
continuous
Function of X, Y, G be
a_neighborhood of W;
W
in (
Int G) by
CONNSP_2:def 1;
then
{W}
c= (
Int G) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
A1: (A
"
{W})
c= (A
" (
Int G)) by
RELAT_1: 143;
(A
" (
Int G))
c= (
Int (A
" G)) by
Th2;
hence (A
"
{W})
c= (
Int (A
" G)) by
A1;
end;
definition
let X,Y be non
empty
TopSpace, W be
Point of Y, A be
continuous
Function of X, Y, G be
a_neighborhood of W;
:: original:
"
redefine
func A
" G ->
a_neighborhood of (A
"
{W}) ;
correctness by
Th3;
end
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:4
Th4: for X be non
empty
TopSpace, A,B be
Subset of X, U be
a_neighborhood of B st A
c= B holds U is
a_neighborhood of A
proof
let X be non
empty
TopSpace;
let A,B be
Subset of X, U be
a_neighborhood of B such that
A1: A
c= B;
B
c= (
Int U) by
CONNSP_2:def 2;
hence A
c= (
Int U) by
A1;
end;
registration
let X be non
empty
TopSpace, x be
Point of X;
cluster
{x} ->
compact;
coherence
proof
reconsider B =
{x} as
Subset of X;
now
let F be
Subset-Family of X such that
A1: F is
Cover of B and F is
open;
B
c= (
union F) by
A1,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then x
in (
union F) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
consider A be
set such that
A2: x
in A and
A3: A
in F by
TARSKI:def 4;
reconsider G =
{A} as
Subset-Family of X by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
take G;
thus G
c= F by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
x
in (
union G) by
A2;
then B
c= (
union G) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
hence G is
Cover of B by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
thus G is
finite;
end;
hence thesis by
COMPTS_1:def 4;
end;
end
begin
definition
let X,Y be
TopSpace;
::
BORSUK_1:def2
func
[:X,Y:] ->
strict
TopSpace means
:
Def2: the
carrier of it
=
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] & the
topology of it
= { (
union A) where A be
Subset-Family of it : A
c= {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y : X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y } };
existence
proof
set t = { (
union A) where A be
Subset-Family of
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] : A
c= {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y : X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y } };
t
c= (
bool
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:])
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in t;
then ex A be
Subset-Family of
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] st e
= (
union A) & A
c= {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y : X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y };
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider t as
Subset-Family of
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:];
set T =
TopStruct (#
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:], t #);
now
reconsider A =
{
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:]} as
Subset-Family of
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] by
ZFMISC_1: 68;
reconsider A as
Subset-Family of
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:];
A1: A
c= {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y : X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y }
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in A;
then
A2: e
=
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] by
TARSKI:def 1;
the
carrier of X
in the
topology of X & the
carrier of Y
in the
topology of Y by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
the
carrier of T
= (
union A);
hence the
carrier of T
in the
topology of T by
A1;
thus for a be
Subset-Family of T st a
c= the
topology of T holds (
union a)
in the
topology of T
proof
let a be
Subset-Family of T;
set A = {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y : X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y & ex x be
set st x
in a &
[:X1, Y1:]
c= x };
A
c= (
bool
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:])
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in A;
then ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st e
=
[:X1, Y1:] & X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y & ex x be
set st x
in a &
[:X1, Y1:]
c= x;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider A as
Subset-Family of
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:];
assume
A3: a
c= the
topology of T;
A4: (
union A)
= (
union a)
proof
thus (
union A)
c= (
union a)
proof
let e1,e2 be
object;
assume
[e1, e2]
in (
union A);
then
consider u such that
A5:
[e1, e2]
in u and
A6: u
in A by
TARSKI:def 4;
ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st u
=
[:X1, Y1:] & X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y & ex x be
set st x
in a &
[:X1, Y1:]
c= x by
A6;
hence thesis by
A5,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
let e be
object;
assume e
in (
union a);
then
consider u such that
A7: e
in u and
A8: u
in a by
TARSKI:def 4;
u
in the
topology of T by
A3,
A8;
then
consider B be
Subset-Family of
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] such that
A9: u
= (
union B) and
A10: B
c= {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y : X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y };
consider x be
set such that
A11: e
in x and
A12: x
in B by
A7,
A9,
TARSKI:def 4;
x
in {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y : X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y } by
A10,
A12;
then
consider X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y such that
A13: x
=
[:X1, Y1:] and
A14: X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y;
[:X1, Y1:]
c= u by
A9,
A12,
A13,
ZFMISC_1: 74;
then x
in A by
A8,
A13,
A14;
hence thesis by
A11,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
A
c= {
[:X2, Y2:] where X2 be
Subset of X, Y2 be
Subset of Y : X2
in the
topology of X & Y2
in the
topology of Y }
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in A;
then ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st e
=
[:X1, Y1:] & X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y & ex x be
set st x
in a &
[:X1, Y1:]
c= x;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
let a,b be
Subset of T;
set C = {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y : X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y &
[:X1, Y1:]
c= (a
/\ b) };
C
c= (
bool
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:])
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in C;
then ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st e
=
[:X1, Y1:] & X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y &
[:X1, Y1:]
c= (a
/\ b);
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider C as
Subset-Family of
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:];
assume that
A15: a
in the
topology of T and
A16: b
in the
topology of T;
consider A be
Subset-Family of
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] such that
A17: a
= (
union A) and
A18: A
c= {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y : X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y } by
A15;
consider B be
Subset-Family of
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] such that
A19: b
= (
union B) and
A20: B
c= {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y : X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y } by
A16;
A21: (a
/\ b)
= (
union C)
proof
thus (a
/\ b)
c= (
union C)
proof
let e be
object;
assume
A22: e
in (a
/\ b);
then e
in a by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider u1 be
set such that
A23: e
in u1 and
A24: u1
in A by
A17,
TARSKI:def 4;
A25: u1
in {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y : X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y } by
A18,
A24;
e
in b by
A22,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider u2 be
set such that
A26: e
in u2 and
A27: u2
in B by
A19,
TARSKI:def 4;
A28: u2
in {
[:X2, Y2:] where X2 be
Subset of X, Y2 be
Subset of Y : X2
in the
topology of X & Y2
in the
topology of Y } by
A20,
A27;
A29: u2
c= b by
A19,
A27,
ZFMISC_1: 74;
consider X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y such that
A30: u1
=
[:X1, Y1:] and
A31: X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y by
A25;
consider X2 be
Subset of X, Y2 be
Subset of Y such that
A32: u2
=
[:X2, Y2:] and
A33: X2
in the
topology of X & Y2
in the
topology of Y by
A28;
u1
c= a by
A17,
A24,
ZFMISC_1: 74;
then (
[:X1, Y1:]
/\
[:X2, Y2:])
c= (a
/\ b) by
A30,
A32,
A29,
XBOOLE_1: 27;
then
A34:
[:(X1
/\ X2), (Y1
/\ Y2):]
c= (a
/\ b) by
ZFMISC_1: 100;
(X1
/\ X2)
in the
topology of X & (Y1
/\ Y2)
in the
topology of Y by
A31,
A33,
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
then
A35:
[:(X1
/\ X2), (Y1
/\ Y2):]
in C by
A34;
e
in
[:(X1
/\ X2), (Y1
/\ Y2):] by
A23,
A26,
A30,
A32,
ZFMISC_1: 113;
hence thesis by
A35,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
let e1,e2 be
object;
assume
[e1, e2]
in (
union C);
then
consider u such that
A36:
[e1, e2]
in u and
A37: u
in C by
TARSKI:def 4;
ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st u
=
[:X1, Y1:] & X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y &
[:X1, Y1:]
c= (a
/\ b) by
A37;
hence thesis by
A36;
end;
C
c= {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y : X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y }
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in C;
then ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st e
=
[:X1, Y1:] & X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y &
[:X1, Y1:]
c= (a
/\ b);
hence thesis;
end;
hence (a
/\ b)
in the
topology of T by
A21;
end;
then
reconsider T as
strict
TopSpace by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
take T;
thus thesis;
end;
uniqueness ;
end
registration
let T1 be
TopSpace, T2 be
empty
TopSpace;
cluster
[:T1, T2:] ->
empty;
coherence
proof
the
carrier of
[:T1, T2:]
=
[:the
carrier of T1, the
carrier of T2:] by
Def2;
hence thesis;
end;
cluster
[:T2, T1:] ->
empty;
coherence
proof
the
carrier of
[:T2, T1:]
=
[:the
carrier of T2, the
carrier of T1:] by
Def2;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let X,Y be non
empty
TopSpace;
cluster
[:X, Y:] -> non
empty;
coherence
proof
the
carrier of
[:X, Y:]
=
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] by
Def2;
hence the
carrier of
[:X, Y:] is non
empty;
end;
end
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:5
Th5: for X,Y be
TopSpace holds for B be
Subset of
[:X, Y:] holds B is
open iff ex A be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] st B
= (
union A) & for e st e
in A holds ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st e
=
[:X1, Y1:] & X1 is
open & Y1 is
open
proof
let X,Y be
TopSpace;
let B be
Subset of
[:X, Y:];
A1: the
topology of
[:X, Y:]
= { (
union A) where A be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] : A
c= {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y : X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y } } by
Def2;
thus B is
open implies ex A be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] st B
= (
union A) & for e st e
in A holds ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st e
=
[:X1, Y1:] & X1 is
open & Y1 is
open
proof
assume B
in the
topology of
[:X, Y:];
then
consider A be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] such that
A2: B
= (
union A) and
A3: A
c= {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y : X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y } by
A1;
take A;
thus B
= (
union A) by
A2;
let e;
assume e
in A;
then e
in {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y : X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y } by
A3;
then
consider X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y such that
A4: e
=
[:X1, Y1:] & X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y;
reconsider Y1 as
Subset of Y;
reconsider X1 as
Subset of X;
take X1, Y1;
thus thesis by
A4;
end;
given A be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] such that
A5: B
= (
union A) and
A6: for e st e
in A holds ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st e
=
[:X1, Y1:] & X1 is
open & Y1 is
open;
A
c= {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y : X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y }
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in A;
then
consider X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y such that
A7: e
=
[:X1, Y1:] and
A8: X1 is
open & Y1 is
open by
A6;
X1
in the
topology of X & Y1
in the
topology of Y by
A8;
hence thesis by
A7;
end;
hence B
in the
topology of
[:X, Y:] by
A1,
A5;
end;
definition
let X,Y be
TopSpace, A be
Subset of X, B be
Subset of Y;
:: original:
[:
redefine
func
[:A,B:] ->
Subset of
[:X, Y:] ;
correctness
proof
thus
[:A, B:] is
Subset of
[:X, Y:] by
Def2;
end;
end
definition
let X,Y be non
empty
TopSpace, x be
Point of X, y be
Point of Y;
:: original:
[
redefine
func
[x,y] ->
Point of
[:X, Y:] ;
correctness
proof
thus
[x, y] is
Point of
[:X, Y:] by
Def2;
end;
end
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:6
Th6: for X,Y be
TopSpace holds for V be
Subset of X, W be
Subset of Y st V is
open & W is
open holds
[:V, W:] is
open
proof
let X,Y be
TopSpace, V be
Subset of X, W be
Subset of Y such that
A1: V is
open & W is
open;
reconsider PP =
{
[:V, W:]} as
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:];
reconsider PP as
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:];
A2:
now
let e;
assume
A3: e
in PP;
take V, W;
thus e
=
[:V, W:] & V is
open & W is
open by
A1,
A3,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
[:V, W:]
= (
union
{
[:V, W:]});
hence thesis by
A2,
Th5;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:7
Th7: for X,Y be
TopSpace holds for V be
Subset of X, W be
Subset of Y holds (
Int
[:V, W:])
=
[:(
Int V), (
Int W):]
proof
let X,Y be
TopSpace, V be
Subset of X, W be
Subset of Y;
thus (
Int
[:V, W:])
c=
[:(
Int V), (
Int W):]
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in (
Int
[:V, W:]);
then
consider Q be
Subset of
[:X, Y:] such that
A1: Q is
open and
A2: Q
c=
[:V, W:] and
A3: e
in Q by
TOPS_1: 22;
consider A be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] such that
A4: Q
= (
union A) and
A5: for e st e
in A holds ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st e
=
[:X1, Y1:] & X1 is
open & Y1 is
open by
A1,
Th5;
consider a be
set such that
A6: e
in a and
A7: a
in A by
A3,
A4,
TARSKI:def 4;
consider X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y such that
A8: a
=
[:X1, Y1:] and
A9: X1 is
open and
A10: Y1 is
open by
A5,
A7;
[:X1, Y1:]
c= Q by
A4,
A7,
A8,
ZFMISC_1: 74;
then
A11:
[:X1, Y1:]
c=
[:V, W:] by
A2;
then Y1
c= W by
A6,
A8,
ZFMISC_1: 114;
then
A12: Y1
c= (
Int W) by
A10,
TOPS_1: 24;
X1
c= V by
A6,
A8,
A11,
ZFMISC_1: 114;
then X1
c= (
Int V) by
A9,
TOPS_1: 24;
then
[:X1, Y1:]
c=
[:(
Int V), (
Int W):] by
A12,
ZFMISC_1: 96;
hence thesis by
A6,
A8;
end;
(
Int V)
c= V & (
Int W)
c= W by
TOPS_1: 16;
then
[:(
Int V), (
Int W):]
c=
[:V, W:] by
ZFMISC_1: 96;
hence thesis by
Th6,
TOPS_1: 24;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:8
Th8: for x be
Point of X, y be
Point of Y, V be
a_neighborhood of x, W be
a_neighborhood of y holds
[:V, W:] is
a_neighborhood of
[x, y]
proof
let x be
Point of X, y be
Point of Y, V be
a_neighborhood of x, W be
a_neighborhood of y;
x
in (
Int V) & y
in (
Int W) by
CONNSP_2:def 1;
then
[x, y]
in
[:(
Int V), (
Int W):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
hence
[x, y]
in (
Int
[:V, W:]) by
Th7;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:9
Th9: for A be
Subset of X, B be
Subset of Y, V be
a_neighborhood of A, W be
a_neighborhood of B holds
[:V, W:] is
a_neighborhood of
[:A, B:]
proof
let A be
Subset of X, B be
Subset of Y, V be
a_neighborhood of A, W be
a_neighborhood of B;
A
c= (
Int V) & B
c= (
Int W) by
CONNSP_2:def 2;
then
[:A, B:]
c=
[:(
Int V), (
Int W):] by
ZFMISC_1: 96;
hence
[:A, B:]
c= (
Int
[:V, W:]) by
Th7;
end;
definition
let X,Y be non
empty
TopSpace, x be
Point of X, y be
Point of Y, V be
a_neighborhood of x, W be
a_neighborhood of y;
:: original:
[:
redefine
func
[:V,W:] ->
a_neighborhood of
[x, y] ;
correctness by
Th8;
end
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:10
Th10: for XT be
Point of
[:X, Y:] holds ex W be
Point of X, T be
Point of Y st XT
=
[W, T]
proof
let XT be
Point of
[:X, Y:];
the
carrier of
[:X, Y:]
=
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] by
Def2;
hence thesis by
DOMAIN_1: 1;
end;
definition
let X,Y be non
empty
TopSpace, A be
Subset of X, t be
Point of Y, V be
a_neighborhood of A, W be
a_neighborhood of t;
:: original:
[:
redefine
func
[:V,W:] ->
a_neighborhood of
[:A,
{t}:] ;
correctness
proof
W is
a_neighborhood of
{t} by
CONNSP_2: 8;
hence
[:V, W:] is
a_neighborhood of
[:A,
{t}:] by
Th9;
end;
end
definition
let X,Y be
TopSpace;
let A be
Subset of
[:X, Y:];
::
BORSUK_1:def3
func
Base-Appr A ->
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] equals {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y :
[:X1, Y1:]
c= A & X1 is
open & Y1 is
open };
coherence
proof
set B = {
[:X1, Y1:] where X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y :
[:X1, Y1:]
c= A & X1 is
open & Y1 is
open };
B
c= (
bool the
carrier of
[:X, Y:])
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in B;
then ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st e
=
[:X1, Y1:] &
[:X1, Y1:]
c= A & X1 is
open & Y1 is
open;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let X,Y be
TopSpace, A be
Subset of
[:X, Y:];
cluster (
Base-Appr A) ->
open;
coherence
proof
let B be
Subset of
[:X, Y:];
assume B
in (
Base-Appr A);
then ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st B
=
[:X1, Y1:] &
[:X1, Y1:]
c= A & X1 is
open & Y1 is
open;
hence thesis by
Th6;
end;
end
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:11
Th11: for X,Y be
TopSpace holds for A,B be
Subset of
[:X, Y:] st A
c= B holds (
Base-Appr A)
c= (
Base-Appr B)
proof
let X,Y be
TopSpace, A,B be
Subset of
[:X, Y:] such that
A1: A
c= B;
let e be
object;
assume e
in (
Base-Appr A);
then
consider X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y such that
A2: e
=
[:X1, Y1:] and
A3:
[:X1, Y1:]
c= A and
A4: X1 is
open & Y1 is
open;
[:X1, Y1:]
c= B by
A1,
A3;
hence thesis by
A2,
A4;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:12
Th12: for X,Y be
TopSpace, A be
Subset of
[:X, Y:] holds (
union (
Base-Appr A))
c= A
proof
let X,Y be
TopSpace, A be
Subset of
[:X, Y:];
let e be
object;
assume e
in (
union (
Base-Appr A));
then
consider B be
set such that
A1: e
in B and
A2: B
in (
Base-Appr A) by
TARSKI:def 4;
ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st B
=
[:X1, Y1:] &
[:X1, Y1:]
c= A & X1 is
open & Y1 is
open by
A2;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:13
Th13: for X,Y be
TopSpace, A be
Subset of
[:X, Y:] st A is
open holds A
= (
union (
Base-Appr A))
proof
let X,Y be
TopSpace, A be
Subset of
[:X, Y:];
assume A is
open;
then
consider B be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] such that
A1: A
= (
union B) and
A2: for e st e
in B holds ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st e
=
[:X1, Y1:] & X1 is
open & Y1 is
open by
Th5;
thus A
c= (
union (
Base-Appr A))
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in A;
then
consider u such that
A3: e
in u and
A4: u
in B by
A1,
TARSKI:def 4;
(ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st u
=
[:X1, Y1:] & X1 is
open & Y1 is
open) & u
c= A by
A1,
A2,
A4,
ZFMISC_1: 74;
then u
in (
Base-Appr A);
hence thesis by
A3,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
thus thesis by
Th12;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:14
Th14: for X,Y be
TopSpace, A be
Subset of
[:X, Y:] holds (
Int A)
= (
union (
Base-Appr A))
proof
let X,Y be
TopSpace, A be
Subset of
[:X, Y:];
(
Int A)
= (
union (
Base-Appr (
Int A))) & (
Base-Appr (
Int A))
c= (
Base-Appr A) by
Th11,
Th13,
TOPS_1: 16;
hence (
Int A)
c= (
union (
Base-Appr A)) by
ZFMISC_1: 77;
(
union (
Base-Appr A)) is
open by
TOPS_2: 19;
hence thesis by
Th12,
TOPS_1: 24;
end;
definition
let X,Y be non
empty
TopSpace;
::
BORSUK_1:def4
func
Pr1 (X,Y) ->
Function of (
bool the
carrier of
[:X, Y:]), (
bool the
carrier of X) equals (
.: (
pr1 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y)));
coherence
proof
the
carrier of
[:X, Y:]
=
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] by
Def2;
hence thesis;
end;
correctness ;
::
BORSUK_1:def5
func
Pr2 (X,Y) ->
Function of (
bool the
carrier of
[:X, Y:]), (
bool the
carrier of Y) equals (
.: (
pr2 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y)));
coherence
proof
the
carrier of
[:X, Y:]
=
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] by
Def2;
hence thesis;
end;
correctness ;
end
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:15
Th15: for A be
Subset of
[:X, Y:], H be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] st for e st e
in H holds e
c= A & ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st e
=
[:X1, Y1:] holds
[:(
union ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: H)), (
meet ((
Pr2 (X,Y))
.: H)):]
c= A
proof
let A be
Subset of
[:X, Y:], H be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:];
assume
A1: for e st e
in H holds e
c= A & ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st e
=
[:X1, Y1:];
the
carrier of
[:X, Y:]
=
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] by
Def2;
hence thesis by
A1,
EQREL_1: 51;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:16
Th16: for H be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:], C be
set st C
in ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: H) holds ex D be
Subset of
[:X, Y:] st D
in H & C
= ((
pr1 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
.: D)
proof
let H be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:], C be
set;
assume C
in ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: H);
then
consider u be
object such that
A1: u
in (
dom (
Pr1 (X,Y))) and
A2: u
in H and
A3: C
= ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
. u) by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
reconsider u as
Subset of
[:X, Y:] by
A1;
take u;
thus u
in H by
A2;
the
carrier of
[:X, Y:]
=
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] by
Def2;
hence thesis by
A3,
EQREL_1: 47;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:17
Th17: for H be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:], C be
set st C
in ((
Pr2 (X,Y))
.: H) holds ex D be
Subset of
[:X, Y:] st D
in H & C
= ((
pr2 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
.: D)
proof
let H be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:], C be
set;
assume C
in ((
Pr2 (X,Y))
.: H);
then
consider u be
object such that
A1: u
in (
dom (
Pr2 (X,Y))) and
A2: u
in H and
A3: C
= ((
Pr2 (X,Y))
. u) by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
reconsider u as
Subset of
[:X, Y:] by
A1;
take u;
thus u
in H by
A2;
the
carrier of
[:X, Y:]
=
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] by
Def2;
hence thesis by
A3,
EQREL_1: 48;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:18
Th18: for D be
Subset of
[:X, Y:] st D is
open holds for X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y holds (X1
= ((
pr1 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
.: D) implies X1 is
open) & (Y1
= ((
pr2 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
.: D) implies Y1 is
open)
proof
let D be
Subset of
[:X, Y:];
set p = (
pr2 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y));
set P = (
.: p);
assume D is
open;
then
consider H be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] such that
A1: D
= (
union H) and
A2: for e st e
in H holds ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st e
=
[:X1, Y1:] & X1 is
open & Y1 is
open by
Th5;
reconsider K = H as
Subset-Family of
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] by
Def2;
let X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y;
thus X1
= ((
pr1 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
.: D) implies X1 is
open
proof
set p = (
pr1 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y));
set P = (
.: p);
reconsider PK = (P
.: K) as
Subset-Family of X;
reconsider PK as
Subset-Family of X;
A3: PK is
open
proof
let X1 be
Subset of X;
reconsider x1 = X1 as
Subset of X;
assume X1
in PK;
then
consider c be
Subset of
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] such that
A4: c
in K and
A5: x1
= (P
. c) by
FUNCT_2: 65;
(
dom P)
= (
bool
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:]) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A6: X1
= (p
.: c) by
A5,
FUNCT_3: 7;
A7: c
=
{} or c
<>
{} ;
ex X2 be
Subset of X, Y2 be
Subset of Y st c
=
[:X2, Y2:] & X2 is
open & Y2 is
open by
A2,
A4;
hence thesis by
A6,
A7,
EQREL_1: 49;
end;
assume X1
= (p
.: D);
then X1
= (
union (P
.: K)) by
A1,
EQREL_1: 53;
hence thesis by
A3,
TOPS_2: 19;
end;
reconsider PK = (P
.: K) as
Subset-Family of Y;
reconsider PK as
Subset-Family of Y;
A8: PK is
open
proof
let Y1 be
Subset of Y;
reconsider y1 = Y1 as
Subset of Y;
assume Y1
in PK;
then
consider c be
Subset of
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] such that
A9: c
in K and
A10: y1
= (P
. c) by
FUNCT_2: 65;
(
dom P)
= (
bool
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:]) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A11: Y1
= (p
.: c) by
A10,
FUNCT_3: 7;
A12: c
=
{} or c
<>
{} ;
ex X2 be
Subset of X, Y2 be
Subset of Y st c
=
[:X2, Y2:] & X2 is
open & Y2 is
open by
A2,
A9;
hence thesis by
A11,
A12,
EQREL_1: 49;
end;
assume Y1
= (p
.: D);
then Y1
= (
union (P
.: K)) by
A1,
EQREL_1: 53;
hence thesis by
A8,
TOPS_2: 19;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:19
Th19: for H be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] st H is
open holds ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: H) is
open & ((
Pr2 (X,Y))
.: H) is
open
proof
let H be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:];
reconsider P1 = ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: H) as
Subset-Family of X;
reconsider P2 = ((
Pr2 (X,Y))
.: H) as
Subset-Family of Y;
assume
A1: H is
open;
A2: P2 is
open
proof
let Y1 be
Subset of Y;
assume Y1
in P2;
then
consider D be
Subset of
[:X, Y:] such that
A3: D
in H and
A4: Y1
= ((
pr2 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
.: D) by
Th17;
D is
open by
A1,
A3;
hence thesis by
A4,
Th18;
end;
P1 is
open
proof
let X1 be
Subset of X;
assume X1
in P1;
then
consider D be
Subset of
[:X, Y:] such that
A5: D
in H and
A6: X1
= ((
pr1 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
.: D) by
Th16;
D is
open by
A1,
A5;
hence thesis by
A6,
Th18;
end;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:20
Th20: for H be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] st ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: H)
=
{} or ((
Pr2 (X,Y))
.: H)
=
{} holds H
=
{}
proof
let H be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:];
(
dom (
Pr1 (X,Y)))
= (
bool the
carrier of
[:X, Y:]) & (
dom (
Pr2 (X,Y)))
= (
bool the
carrier of
[:X, Y:]) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:21
Th21: for H be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:], X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st H is
Cover of
[:X1, Y1:] holds (Y1
<>
{} implies ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: H) is
Cover of X1) & (X1
<>
{} implies ((
Pr2 (X,Y))
.: H) is
Cover of Y1)
proof
let H be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:], X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y;
A1: (
dom (
.: (
pr2 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))))
= (
bool (
dom (
pr2 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y)))) by
FUNCT_3:def 1
.= (
bool
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:]) by
FUNCT_3:def 5;
A2: the
carrier of
[:X, Y:]
=
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] by
Def2;
assume
A3:
[:X1, Y1:]
c= (
union H);
thus Y1
<>
{} implies ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: H) is
Cover of X1
proof
assume Y1
<>
{} ;
then
consider y be
Point of Y such that
A4: y
in Y1 by
SUBSET_1: 4;
let e be
object;
assume
A5: e
in X1;
then
reconsider x = e as
Point of X;
[x, y]
in
[:X1, Y1:] by
A4,
A5,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
consider A be
set such that
A6:
[x, y]
in A and
A7: A
in H by
A3,
TARSKI:def 4;
[x, y]
in
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A8:
[x, y]
in (
dom (
pr1 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))) by
FUNCT_3:def 4;
A9: (
dom (
.: (
pr1 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))))
= (
bool (
dom (
pr1 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y)))) by
FUNCT_3:def 1
.= (
bool
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:]) by
FUNCT_3:def 4;
e
= ((
pr1 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
. (x,y)) by
FUNCT_3:def 4;
then
A10: e
in ((
pr1 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
.: A) by
A6,
A8,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
((
.: (
pr1 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y)))
. A)
= ((
pr1 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
.: A) by
A2,
A7,
EQREL_1: 47;
then ((
pr1 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
.: A)
in ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: H) by
A2,
A7,
A9,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
hence e
in (
union ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: H)) by
A10,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
assume X1
<>
{} ;
then
consider x be
Point of X such that
A11: x
in X1 by
SUBSET_1: 4;
let e be
object;
assume
A12: e
in Y1;
then
reconsider y = e as
Point of Y;
[x, y]
in
[:X1, Y1:] by
A11,
A12,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
consider A be
set such that
A13:
[x, y]
in A and
A14: A
in H by
A3,
TARSKI:def 4;
[x, y]
in
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A15:
[x, y]
in (
dom (
pr2 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))) by
FUNCT_3:def 5;
e
= ((
pr2 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
. (x,y)) by
FUNCT_3:def 5;
then
A16: e
in ((
pr2 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
.: A) by
A13,
A15,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
((
.: (
pr2 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y)))
. A)
= ((
pr2 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
.: A) by
A2,
A14,
EQREL_1: 48;
then ((
pr2 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
.: A)
in ((
Pr2 (X,Y))
.: H) by
A2,
A14,
A1,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
hence e
in (
union ((
Pr2 (X,Y))
.: H)) by
A16,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:22
Th22: for X,Y be
TopSpace, H be
Subset-Family of X, Y be
Subset of X st H is
Cover of Y holds ex F be
Subset-Family of X st F
c= H & F is
Cover of Y & for C be
set st C
in F holds C
meets Y
proof
let X,Y be
TopSpace, H be
Subset-Family of X;
let Y be
Subset of X;
assume
A1: H is
Cover of Y;
defpred
P[
set] means $1
in H & ($1
/\ Y)
<>
{} ;
{ Z where Z be
Subset of X :
P[Z] } is
Subset-Family of X from
DOMAIN_1:sch 7;
then
reconsider F = { Z where Z be
Subset of X : Z
in H & (Z
/\ Y)
<>
{} } as
Subset-Family of X;
reconsider F as
Subset-Family of X;
take F;
thus F
c= H
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in F;
then ex Z be
Subset of X st e
= Z & Z
in H & (Z
/\ Y)
<>
{} ;
hence thesis;
end;
A2: Y
c= (
union H) by
A1,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
thus F is
Cover of Y
proof
let e be
object;
assume
A3: e
in Y;
then
consider u such that
A4: e
in u and
A5: u
in H by
A2,
TARSKI:def 4;
reconsider u as
Subset of X by
A5;
(u
/\ Y)
<>
{} by
A3,
A4,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then u
in F by
A5;
hence e
in (
union F) by
A4,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
let C be
set;
assume C
in F;
then ex Z be
Subset of X st C
= Z & Z
in H & (Z
/\ Y)
<>
{} ;
hence (C
/\ Y)
<>
{} ;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:23
Th23: for F be
Subset-Family of X, H be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] st F is
finite & F
c= ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: H) holds ex G be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] st G
c= H & G is
finite & F
= ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: G)
proof
let F be
Subset-Family of X, H be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] such that
A1: F is
finite and
A2: F
c= ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: H);
defpred
P[
object,
object] means $2
in (
dom (
Pr1 (X,Y))) & $2
in H & $1
= ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
. $2);
A3: for e be
object st e
in F holds ex u be
object st
P[e, u] by
A2,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
consider f be
Function such that
A4: (
dom f)
= F and
A5: for e be
object st e
in F holds
P[e, (f
. e)] from
CLASSES1:sch 1(
A3);
A6: (f
.: F)
c= H
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in (f
.: F);
then ex u be
object st u
in (
dom f) & u
in F & e
= (f
. u) by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
hence thesis by
A5;
end;
then
reconsider G = (f
.: F) as
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
take G;
thus G
c= H by
A6;
thus G is
finite by
A1;
now
let e be
object;
thus e
in F iff ex u be
object st u
in (
dom (
Pr1 (X,Y))) & u
in G & e
= ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
. u)
proof
thus e
in F implies ex u be
object st u
in (
dom (
Pr1 (X,Y))) & u
in G & e
= ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
. u)
proof
assume
A7: e
in F;
take (f
. e);
thus (f
. e)
in (
dom (
Pr1 (X,Y))) by
A5,
A7;
thus (f
. e)
in G by
A4,
A7,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
thus thesis by
A5,
A7;
end;
given u be
object such that u
in (
dom (
Pr1 (X,Y))) and
A8: u
in G and
A9: e
= ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
. u);
ex v be
object st v
in (
dom f) & v
in F & u
= (f
. v) by
A8,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
hence thesis by
A5,
A9;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:24
for X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st
[:X1, Y1:]
<>
{} holds ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.
[:X1, Y1:])
= X1 & ((
Pr2 (X,Y))
.
[:X1, Y1:])
= Y1 by
EQREL_1: 50;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:25
Th25: for t be
Point of Y, A be
Subset of X st A is
compact holds for G be
a_neighborhood of
[:A,
{t}:] holds ex V be
a_neighborhood of A, W be
a_neighborhood of t st
[:V, W:]
c= G
proof
let t be
Point of Y, A be
Subset of X such that
A1: A is
compact;
let G be
a_neighborhood of
[:A,
{t}:];
A2: the
carrier of
[:X, Y:]
=
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] by
Def2;
now
per cases ;
suppose
A3: A
<> (
{} X);
[:A,
{t}:]
c= (
Int G) by
CONNSP_2:def 2;
then
[:A,
{t}:]
c= (
union (
Base-Appr G)) by
Th14;
then (
Base-Appr G) is
Cover of
[:A,
{t}:] by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then
consider K be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] such that
A4: K
c= (
Base-Appr G) and
A5: K is
Cover of
[:A,
{t}:] and
A6: for c be
set st c
in K holds c
meets
[:A,
{t}:] by
Th22;
reconsider PK = ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: K) as
Subset-Family of X;
K is
open by
A4,
TOPS_2: 11;
then
A7: ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: K) is
open by
Th19;
PK is
Cover of A by
A5,
Th21;
then
consider M be
Subset-Family of X such that
A8: M
c= ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: K) and
A9: M is
Cover of A and
A10: M is
finite by
A1,
A7,
COMPTS_1:def 4;
consider N be
Subset-Family of
[:X, Y:] such that
A11: N
c= K and
A12: N is
finite and
A13: ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: N)
= M by
A8,
A10,
Th23;
reconsider F = ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
.: N) as
Subset-Family of X;
A14: N is
Cover of
[:A,
{t}:]
proof
let e1,e2 be
object;
A15: A
c= (
union M) by
A9,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
assume
A16:
[e1, e2]
in
[:A,
{t}:];
then (
[e1, e2]
`2 )
in
{t} by
MCART_1: 10;
then (
[e1, e2]
`2 )
= t by
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A17:
[e1, e2]
=
[(
[e1, e2]
`1 ), t];
(
[e1, e2]
`1 )
in A by
A16,
MCART_1: 10;
then
consider X1 be
set such that
A18: (
[e1, e2]
`1 )
in X1 and
A19: X1
in M by
A15,
TARSKI:def 4;
consider XY be
Subset of
[:X, Y:] such that
A20: XY
in N and
A21: ((
Pr1 (X,Y))
. XY)
= X1 by
A13,
A19,
FUNCT_2: 65;
XY
in K by
A11,
A20;
then XY
in (
Base-Appr G) by
A4;
then
consider X2 be
Subset of X, Y2 be
Subset of Y such that
A22: XY
=
[:X2, Y2:] and
[:X2, Y2:]
c= G and X2 is
open and Y2 is
open;
XY
meets
[:A,
{t}:] by
A6,
A11,
A20;
then
consider xy be
object such that
A23: xy
in XY and
A24: xy
in
[:A,
{t}:] by
XBOOLE_0: 3;
(xy
`2 )
in
{t} by
A24,
MCART_1: 10;
then (xy
`2 )
= t by
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A25: t
in Y2 by
A22,
A23,
MCART_1: 10;
XY
<>
{} by
A18,
A21,
FUNCT_3: 8;
then (
[e1, e2]
`1 )
in X2 by
A18,
A21,
A22,
EQREL_1: 50;
then
[e1, e2]
in
[:X2, Y2:] by
A25,
A17,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
hence
[e1, e2]
in (
union N) by
A20,
A22,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
then F is
Cover of A by
Th21;
then
A26: A
c= (
union F) by
SETFAM_1:def 11;
reconsider H = ((
Pr2 (X,Y))
.: N) as
Subset-Family of Y;
A27:
now
let C be
set;
assume C
in H;
then
consider D be
Subset of
[:X, Y:] such that
A28: D
in N and
A29: C
= ((
pr2 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
.: D) by
Th17;
D
meets
[:A,
{t}:] by
A6,
A11,
A28;
then (D
/\
[:A,
{t}:])
<>
{} ;
then
consider x be
Point of
[:X, Y:] such that
A30: x
in (D
/\
[:A,
{t}:]);
A31: x
in
[:A,
{t}:] by
A30,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (x
`1 )
in A by
MCART_1: 10;
then
A32: ((
pr2 (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of Y))
. ((x
`1 ),t))
= t by
FUNCT_3:def 5;
(x
`2 )
in
{t} by
A31,
MCART_1: 10;
then (x
`2 )
= t by
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A33: x
=
[(x
`1 ), t] by
A2,
MCART_1: 21;
x
in D by
A30,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence t
in C by
A2,
A29,
A33,
A32,
FUNCT_2: 35;
end;
[:A,
{t}:]
c= (
union N) by
A14,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then N
<>
{} by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 2;
then H
<>
{} by
Th20;
then
A34: t
in (
meet H) by
A27,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
A35: N
c= (
Base-Appr G) by
A4,
A11;
then
A36: N is
open by
TOPS_2: 11;
then (
meet H) is
open by
A12,
Th19,
TOPS_2: 20;
then t
in (
Int (
meet H)) by
A34,
TOPS_1: 23;
then
reconsider W = (
meet H) as
a_neighborhood of t by
CONNSP_2:def 1;
(
union F) is
open by
A36,
Th19,
TOPS_2: 19;
then A
c= (
Int (
union F)) by
A26,
TOPS_1: 23;
then
reconsider V = (
union F) as
a_neighborhood of A by
CONNSP_2:def 2;
take V, W;
now
let e;
assume e
in N;
then e
in (
Base-Appr G) by
A35;
then ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st e
=
[:X1, Y1:] &
[:X1, Y1:]
c= G & X1 is
open & Y1 is
open;
hence e
c= G & ex X1 be
Subset of X, Y1 be
Subset of Y st e
=
[:X1, Y1:];
end;
hence
[:V, W:]
c= G by
Th15;
end;
suppose A
= (
{} X);
then A
c= (
Int (
{} X));
then
reconsider V = (
{} X) as
a_neighborhood of A by
CONNSP_2:def 2;
set W = the
a_neighborhood of t;
take V, W;
thus
[:V, W:]
c= G;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
begin
definition
let X be
1-sorted;
::
BORSUK_1:def6
func
TrivDecomp X ->
a_partition of the
carrier of X equals (
Class (
id the
carrier of X));
coherence ;
end
registration
let X be non
empty
1-sorted;
cluster (
TrivDecomp X) -> non
empty;
coherence ;
end
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:26
Th26: for A be
Subset of X st A
in (
TrivDecomp X) holds ex x be
Point of X st A
=
{x}
proof
let A be
Subset of X;
assume A
in (
TrivDecomp X);
then
consider x be
object such that
A1: x
in the
carrier of X and
A2: A
= (
Class ((
id the
carrier of X),x)) by
EQREL_1:def 3;
reconsider x as
Point of X by
A1;
take x;
thus thesis by
A2,
EQREL_1: 25;
end;
Lm1: for A be
Subset of X holds for V be
a_neighborhood of A holds ex W be
Subset of X st W is
open & A
c= W & W
c= V & for B be
Subset of X st B
in (
TrivDecomp X) & B
meets W holds B
c= W
proof
let A be
Subset of X;
let V be
a_neighborhood of A;
take (
Int V);
thus (
Int V) is
open;
thus A
c= (
Int V) by
CONNSP_2:def 2;
thus (
Int V)
c= V by
TOPS_1: 16;
let B be
Subset of X such that
A1: B
in (
TrivDecomp X) and
A2: B
meets (
Int V);
consider x be
Point of X such that
A3: B
=
{x} by
A1,
Th26;
x
in (
Int V) by
A2,
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 50;
hence thesis by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
end;
definition
let X be
TopSpace, D be
a_partition of the
carrier of X;
::
BORSUK_1:def7
func
space D ->
strict
TopSpace means
:
Def7: the
carrier of it
= D & the
topology of it
= { A where A be
Subset of D : (
union A)
in the
topology of X };
existence
proof
set t = { A where A be
Subset of D : (
union A)
in the
topology of X };
t
c= (
bool D)
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in t;
then ex A be
Subset of D st e
= A & (
union A)
in the
topology of X;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider t as
Subset-Family of D;
set T =
TopStruct (# D, t #);
T is
TopSpace-like
proof
(
union D)
= the
carrier of X by
EQREL_1:def 4;
then D
c= D & (
union D)
in the
topology of X by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
hence the
carrier of T
in the
topology of T;
thus for a be
Subset-Family of T st a
c= the
topology of T holds (
union a)
in the
topology of T
proof
let a be
Subset-Family of T;
A1: { (
union A) where A be
Subset of T : A
in a }
c= (
bool the
carrier of X)
proof
let e be
object;
reconsider ee = e as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume e
in { (
union A) where A be
Subset of T : A
in a };
then
consider A be
Subset of T such that
A2: e
= (
union A) and A
in a;
ee
c= the
carrier of X
proof
let u be
object;
assume u
in ee;
then
consider x be
set such that
A3: u
in x and
A4: x
in A by
A2,
TARSKI:def 4;
x
in the
carrier of T by
A4;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
assume
A5: a
c= the
topology of T;
{ (
union A) where A be
Subset of T : A
in a }
c= the
topology of X
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in { (
union A) where A be
Subset of T : A
in a };
then
consider A be
Subset of T such that
A6: e
= (
union A) and
A7: A
in a;
A
in the
topology of T by
A5,
A7;
then ex B be
Subset of D st A
= B & (
union B)
in the
topology of X;
hence thesis by
A6;
end;
then (
union { (
union A) where A be
Subset of T : A
in a })
in the
topology of X by
A1,
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
then (
union (
union a))
in the
topology of X by
EQREL_1: 54;
hence thesis;
end;
let a,b be
Subset of T;
assume that
A8: a
in the
topology of T and
A9: b
in the
topology of T;
consider B be
Subset of D such that
A10: b
= B and
A11: (
union B)
in the
topology of X by
A9;
consider A be
Subset of D such that
A12: a
= A and
A13: (
union A)
in the
topology of X by
A8;
(
union (A
/\ B))
= ((
union A)
/\ (
union B)) by
EQREL_1: 62;
then (
union (A
/\ B))
in the
topology of X by
A13,
A11,
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
hence thesis by
A12,
A10;
end;
then
reconsider T as
strict
TopSpace;
take T;
thus thesis;
end;
uniqueness ;
end
registration
let X be non
empty
TopSpace, D be
a_partition of the
carrier of X;
cluster (
space D) -> non
empty;
coherence by
Def7;
end
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:27
Th27: for D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X, A be
Subset of D holds (
union A)
in the
topology of X iff A
in the
topology of (
space D)
proof
let D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X, B be
Subset of D;
A1: the
topology of (
space D)
= { A where A be
Subset of D : (
union A)
in the
topology of X } by
Def7;
hence (
union B)
in the
topology of X implies B
in the
topology of (
space D);
assume B
in the
topology of (
space D);
then ex A be
Subset of D st B
= A & (
union A)
in the
topology of X by
A1;
hence thesis;
end;
definition
let X be non
empty
TopSpace, D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X;
::
BORSUK_1:def8
func
Proj D ->
continuous
Function of X, (
space D) equals (
proj D);
coherence
proof
reconsider F = (
proj D) as
Function of X, (
space D) by
Def7;
A1: the
carrier of (
space D)
= D by
Def7;
F is
continuous
proof
let W be
Point of X, G be
a_neighborhood of (F
. W);
reconsider H = (
union (
Int G)) as
Subset of X by
A1,
EQREL_1: 61;
(F
. W)
in (
Int G) by
CONNSP_2:def 1;
then W
in (F
" (
Int G)) by
FUNCT_2: 38;
then
A2: W
in (
union (
Int G)) by
A1,
EQREL_1: 67;
(
Int G)
in the
topology of (
space D) by
PRE_TOPC:def 2;
then (
union (
Int G))
in the
topology of X by
A1,
Th27;
then H is
open;
then W
in (
Int H) by
A2,
TOPS_1: 23;
then W
in (
Int (F
" (
Int G))) by
A1,
EQREL_1: 67;
then
reconsider N = (F
" (
Int G)) as
a_neighborhood of W by
CONNSP_2:def 1;
take N;
(F
.: N)
c= (
Int G) & (
Int G)
c= G by
FUNCT_1: 75,
TOPS_1: 16;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
correctness ;
end
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:28
for D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X, W be
Point of X holds W
in ((
Proj D)
. W) by
EQREL_1:def 9;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:29
Th29: for D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X, W be
Point of (
space D) holds ex W9 be
Point of X st ((
Proj D)
. W9)
= W
proof
let D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X, W be
Point of (
space D);
reconsider p = W as
Element of D by
Def7;
consider W9 be
Point of X such that
A1: ((
proj D)
. W9)
= p by
EQREL_1: 68;
take W9;
thus thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:30
Th30: for D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X holds (
rng (
Proj D))
= the
carrier of (
space D)
proof
let D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X;
thus (
rng (
Proj D))
c= the
carrier of (
space D);
let e be
object;
assume e
in the
carrier of (
space D);
then ex p be
Point of X st ((
Proj D)
. p)
= e by
Th29;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 4;
end;
definition
let XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X;
::
BORSUK_1:def9
func
TrivExt D -> non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of XX equals (D
\/ {
{p} where p be
Point of XX : not p
in the
carrier of X });
coherence
proof
set E = (D
\/ {
{p} where p be
Point of XX : not p
in the
carrier of X });
E
c= (
bool the
carrier of XX)
proof
let e be
object;
assume
A1: e
in E;
now
per cases by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
A2: e
in D;
(
bool the
carrier of X)
c= (
bool the
carrier of XX) by
Th1,
ZFMISC_1: 67;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
suppose e
in {
{p} where p be
Point of XX : not p
in the
carrier of X };
then ex p be
Point of XX st e
=
{p} & not p
in the
carrier of X;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider E as
Subset-Family of XX;
E is
a_partition of the
carrier of XX
proof
now
let e be
object;
thus e
in (the
carrier of XX
\ the
carrier of X) implies ex Z be
set st e
in Z & Z
in {
{p} where p be
Point of XX : not p
in the
carrier of X }
proof
assume
A3: e
in (the
carrier of XX
\ the
carrier of X);
take
{e};
thus e
in
{e} by
TARSKI:def 1;
not e
in the
carrier of X by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
given Z be
set such that
A4: e
in Z and
A5: Z
in {
{p} where p be
Point of XX : not p
in the
carrier of X };
consider p be
Point of XX such that
A6: Z
=
{p} and
A7: not p
in the
carrier of X by
A5;
e
= p by
A4,
A6,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence e
in (the
carrier of XX
\ the
carrier of X) by
A7,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
then
A8: (
union {
{p} where p be
Point of XX : not p
in the
carrier of X })
= (the
carrier of XX
\ the
carrier of X) by
TARSKI:def 4;
thus (
union E)
= ((
union D)
\/ (
union {
{p} where p be
Point of XX : not p
in the
carrier of X })) by
ZFMISC_1: 78
.= (the
carrier of X
\/ (the
carrier of XX
\ the
carrier of X)) by
A8,
EQREL_1:def 4
.= the
carrier of XX by
Th1,
XBOOLE_1: 45;
let A be
Subset of XX;
assume
A9: A
in E;
now
per cases by
A9,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose A
in D;
hence A
<>
{} by
EQREL_1:def 4;
end;
suppose A
in {
{p} where p be
Point of XX : not p
in the
carrier of X };
then ex p be
Point of XX st A
=
{p} & not p
in the
carrier of X;
hence A
<>
{} ;
end;
end;
hence A
<>
{} ;
let B be
Subset of XX;
assume
A10: B
in E;
now
per cases by
A9,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
A11: A
in D;
now
per cases by
A10,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose B
in D;
hence thesis by
A11,
EQREL_1:def 4;
end;
suppose B
in {
{p} where p be
Point of XX : not p
in the
carrier of X };
then ex p be
Point of XX st B
=
{p} & not p
in the
carrier of X;
then B
misses the
carrier of X by
ZFMISC_1: 50;
hence thesis by
A11,
XBOOLE_1: 63;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose A
in {
{p} where p be
Point of XX : not p
in the
carrier of X };
then
A12: ex p be
Point of XX st A
=
{p} & not p
in the
carrier of X;
then
A13: A
misses the
carrier of X by
ZFMISC_1: 50;
now
per cases by
A10,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose B
in D;
hence thesis by
A13,
XBOOLE_1: 63;
end;
suppose B
in {
{p} where p be
Point of XX : not p
in the
carrier of X };
then ex p be
Point of XX st B
=
{p} & not p
in the
carrier of X;
hence thesis by
A12,
ZFMISC_1: 11;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
correctness ;
end
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:31
Th31: for XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X, A be
Subset of XX st A
in (
TrivExt D) holds A
in D or ex x be
Point of XX st not x
in (
[#] X) & A
=
{x}
proof
let XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X, A be
Subset of XX;
assume
A1: A
in (
TrivExt D);
now
per cases by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
case A
in D;
hence A
in D;
end;
case A
in {
{p} where p be
Point of XX : not p
in the
carrier of X };
then
consider x be
Point of XX such that
A2: A
=
{x} and
A3: not x
in the
carrier of X;
take x;
thus not x
in (
[#] X) by
A3;
thus A
=
{x} by
A2;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:32
Th32: for XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X, x be
Point of XX st not x
in the
carrier of X holds
{x}
in (
TrivExt D)
proof
let XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X, x be
Point of XX;
(
union (
TrivExt D))
= the
carrier of XX by
EQREL_1:def 4;
then
consider A be
set such that
A1: x
in A and
A2: A
in (
TrivExt D) by
TARSKI:def 4;
assume not x
in the
carrier of X;
then not A
in D by
A1;
then A
in {
{p} where p be
Point of XX : not p
in the
carrier of X } by
A2,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then ex p be
Point of XX st A
=
{p} & not p
in the
carrier of X;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:33
Th33: for XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X, W be
Point of XX st W
in the
carrier of X holds ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. W)
= ((
Proj D)
. W)
proof
let XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X, W be
Point of XX;
assume
A1: W
in the
carrier of X;
then
reconsider p = W as
Point of X;
D
c= (
TrivExt D) & ((
proj D)
. p)
in D by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then
reconsider A = ((
Proj D)
. W) as
Element of (
TrivExt D);
W
in A by
A1,
EQREL_1:def 9;
hence thesis by
EQREL_1: 65;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:34
Th34: for XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X, W be
Point of XX st not W
in the
carrier of X holds ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. W)
=
{W}
proof
let XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X, W be
Point of XX;
assume not W
in the
carrier of X;
then W
in
{W} &
{W}
in (
TrivExt D) by
Th32,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis by
EQREL_1: 65;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:35
Th35: for XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X, W,W9 be
Point of XX st not W
in the
carrier of X & ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. W)
= ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. W9) holds W
= W9
proof
let XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X, W,W9 be
Point of XX;
assume not W
in the
carrier of X;
then
A1: ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. W)
=
{W} by
Th34;
W9
in ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. W9) by
EQREL_1:def 9;
hence thesis by
A1,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:36
Th36: for XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be non
empty
SubSpace of XX holds for D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X holds for e be
Point of XX st ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. e)
in the
carrier of (
space D) holds e
in the
carrier of X
proof
let XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be non
empty
SubSpace of XX;
let D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X;
let e be
Point of XX;
assume ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. e)
in the
carrier of (
space D);
then
A1: ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. e)
in D by
Def7;
e
in ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. e) by
EQREL_1:def 9;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:37
Th37: for XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be non
empty
SubSpace of XX holds for D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X holds for e st e
in the
carrier of X holds ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. e)
in the
carrier of (
space D)
proof
let XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be non
empty
SubSpace of XX;
let D be non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X;
let e;
assume
A1: e
in the
carrier of X;
then
reconsider x = e as
Point of X;
the
carrier of X
c= the
carrier of XX by
Th1;
then ((
Proj D)
. x)
= ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. x) by
A1,
Th33;
hence thesis;
end;
begin
definition
let X be non
empty
TopSpace;
::
BORSUK_1:def10
mode
u.s.c._decomposition of X -> non
empty
a_partition of the
carrier of X means
:
Def10: for A be
Subset of X st A
in it holds for V be
a_neighborhood of A holds ex W be
Subset of X st W is
open & A
c= W & W
c= V & for B be
Subset of X st B
in it & B
meets W holds B
c= W;
correctness
proof
take (
TrivDecomp X);
thus thesis by
Lm1;
end;
end
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:38
Th38: for D be
u.s.c._decomposition of X, t be
Point of (
space D), G be
a_neighborhood of ((
Proj D)
"
{t}) holds ((
Proj D)
.: G) is
a_neighborhood of t
proof
let D be
u.s.c._decomposition of X, t be
Point of (
space D), G be
a_neighborhood of ((
Proj D)
"
{t});
A1: the
carrier of (
space D)
= D by
Def7;
then ((
Proj D)
"
{t})
= t by
EQREL_1: 66;
then
consider W be
Subset of X such that
A2: W is
open and
A3: ((
Proj D)
"
{t})
c= W and
A4: W
c= G and
A5: for B be
Subset of X st B
in D & B
meets W holds B
c= W by
A1,
Def10;
set Q = ((
Proj D)
.: W);
A6: ((
Proj D)
.: ((
Proj D)
"
{t}))
c= Q by
A3,
RELAT_1: 123;
(
union Q)
= ((
proj D)
" Q) by
A1,
EQREL_1: 67
.= W by
A5,
EQREL_1: 69;
then (
union Q)
in the
topology of X by
A2;
then Q
in the
topology of (
space D) by
A1,
Th27;
then
A7: Q is
open;
(
rng (
Proj D))
= the
carrier of (
space D) by
Th30;
then
{t}
c= Q by
A6,
FUNCT_1: 77;
then
A8: t
in Q by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
Q
c= ((
Proj D)
.: G) by
A4,
RELAT_1: 123;
then t
in (
Int ((
Proj D)
.: G)) by
A7,
A8,
TOPS_1: 22;
hence thesis by
CONNSP_2:def 1;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:39
Th39: (
TrivDecomp X) is
u.s.c._decomposition of X
proof
thus for A be
Subset of X st A
in (
TrivDecomp X) holds for V be
a_neighborhood of A holds ex W be
Subset of X st W is
open & A
c= W & W
c= V & for B be
Subset of X st B
in (
TrivDecomp X) & B
meets W holds B
c= W by
Lm1;
end;
definition
let X be
TopSpace;
let IT be
SubSpace of X;
::
BORSUK_1:def11
attr IT is
closed means
:
Def11: for A be
Subset of X st A
= the
carrier of IT holds A is
closed;
end
Lm2: for T be
TopStruct holds the TopStruct of T is
SubSpace of T
proof
let T be
TopStruct;
set S = the TopStruct of T;
thus (
[#] S)
c= (
[#] T);
let P be
Subset of S;
hereby
reconsider Q = P as
Subset of T;
assume
A1: P
in the
topology of S;
take Q;
thus Q
in the
topology of T by
A1;
thus P
= (Q
/\ (
[#] S)) by
XBOOLE_1: 28;
end;
given Q be
Subset of T such that
A2: Q
in the
topology of T & P
= (Q
/\ (
[#] S));
thus thesis by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
end;
registration
let X be
TopSpace;
cluster
strict
closed for
SubSpace of X;
existence
proof
reconsider Y = the TopStruct of X as
strict
SubSpace of X by
Lm2;
take Y;
Y is
closed
proof
let A be
Subset of X;
assume A
= the
carrier of Y;
then A
= (
[#] X);
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let X;
cluster
strict
closed non
empty for
SubSpace of X;
existence
proof
(X
| (
[#] X)) is
closed
proof
let A be
Subset of X;
assume A
= the
carrier of (X
| (
[#] X));
then A
= (
[#] (X
| (
[#] X)))
.= (
[#] X) by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be
closed non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be
u.s.c._decomposition of X;
:: original:
TrivExt
redefine
func
TrivExt D ->
u.s.c._decomposition of XX ;
correctness
proof
let A be
Subset of XX such that
A1: A
in (
TrivExt D);
let V be
a_neighborhood of A;
A2: A
c= (
Int V) by
CONNSP_2:def 2;
A3: (
Int V)
c= V by
TOPS_1: 16;
now
per cases by
A1,
Th31;
suppose
A4: A
in D;
then
reconsider C = A as
Subset of X;
reconsider E = ((
Int V)
/\ (
[#] X)) as
Subset of X;
E is
open & C
c= E by
A2,
TOPS_2: 24,
XBOOLE_1: 19;
then C
c= (
Int E) by
TOPS_1: 23;
then E is
a_neighborhood of C by
CONNSP_2:def 2;
then
consider W be
Subset of X such that
A5: W is
open and
A6: C
c= W and
A7: W
c= E and
A8: for B be
Subset of X st B
in D & B
meets W holds B
c= W by
A4,
Def10;
consider G be
Subset of XX such that
A9: G is
open and
A10: W
= (G
/\ (
[#] X)) by
A5,
TOPS_2: 24;
take H = (G
/\ (
Int V));
thus H is
open by
A9;
A11: W
c= G by
A10,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then C
c= G by
A6;
hence A
c= H by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 19;
H
c= (
Int V) by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
hence H
c= V by
A3;
let B be
Subset of XX such that
A12: B
in (
TrivExt D) and
A13: B
meets H;
E
c= (
Int V) by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then W
c= (
Int V) by
A7;
then
A14: W
c= H by
A11,
XBOOLE_1: 19;
now
per cases by
A12,
Th31;
suppose
A15: B
in D;
B
meets G by
A13,
XBOOLE_1: 74;
then B
meets W by
A10,
A15,
XBOOLE_1: 77;
then B
c= W by
A8,
A15;
hence B
c= H by
A14;
end;
suppose ex y be
Point of XX st not y
in (
[#] X) & B
=
{y};
then
consider y be
Point of XX such that not y
in (
[#] X) and
A16: B
=
{y};
y
in H by
A13,
A16,
ZFMISC_1: 50;
hence B
c= H by
A16,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
end;
end;
hence B
c= H;
end;
suppose
A17: ex x be
Point of XX st not x
in (
[#] X) & A
=
{x};
(
[#] X)
c= (
[#] XX) by
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
then
reconsider C = (
[#] X) as
Subset of XX;
take W = ((
Int V)
\ C);
C is
closed by
Def11;
then ((
Int V)
/\ (C
` )) is
open;
hence W is
open by
SUBSET_1: 13;
consider x be
Point of XX such that
A18: not x
in (
[#] X) and
A19: A
=
{x} by
A17;
x
in A by
A19,
TARSKI:def 1;
then x
in W by
A2,
A18,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence A
c= W by
A19,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
W
c= (
Int V) by
XBOOLE_1: 36;
hence W
c= V by
A3;
let B be
Subset of XX such that
A20: B
in (
TrivExt D) and
A21: B
meets W;
now
A22: W
misses C by
XBOOLE_1: 79;
assume B
in D;
hence contradiction by
A21,
A22,
XBOOLE_1: 63;
end;
then
consider y be
Point of XX such that not y
in (
[#] X) and
A23: B
=
{y} by
A20,
Th31;
y
in W by
A21,
A23,
ZFMISC_1: 50;
hence B
c= W by
A23,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let X be non
empty
TopSpace;
let IT be
u.s.c._decomposition of X;
::
BORSUK_1:def12
attr IT is
DECOMPOSITION-like means
:
Def12: for A be
Subset of X st A
in IT holds A is
compact;
end
registration
let X be non
empty
TopSpace;
cluster
DECOMPOSITION-like for
u.s.c._decomposition of X;
existence
proof
reconsider D = (
TrivDecomp X) as
u.s.c._decomposition of X by
Th39;
take D;
let A be
Subset of X;
assume A
in D;
then ex x be
Point of X st A
=
{x} by
Th26;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let X be non
empty
TopSpace;
mode
DECOMPOSITION of X is
DECOMPOSITION-like
u.s.c._decomposition of X;
end
definition
let XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be
closed non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be
DECOMPOSITION of X;
:: original:
TrivExt
redefine
func
TrivExt D ->
DECOMPOSITION of XX ;
correctness
proof
(
TrivExt D) is
DECOMPOSITION-like
proof
let A be
Subset of XX;
assume A
in (
TrivExt D);
then
consider W be
Point of XX such that
A1: A
= ((
proj (
TrivExt D))
. W) by
EQREL_1: 68;
A2: A
= ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. W) by
A1;
A3: the
carrier of (
space D)
= D by
Def7;
now
per cases ;
suppose W
in the
carrier of X;
then
reconsider W9 = W as
Point of X;
A4: A
= ((
Proj D)
. W9) by
A2,
Th33;
then
reconsider B = A as
Subset of X by
A3,
TARSKI:def 3;
B is
compact by
A3,
A4,
Def12;
hence thesis by
COMPTS_1: 19;
end;
suppose not W
in the
carrier of X;
then A
=
{W} by
A2,
Th34;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let X be non
empty
TopSpace, Y be
closed non
empty
SubSpace of X, D be
DECOMPOSITION of Y;
:: original:
space
redefine
func
space D ->
strict
closed
SubSpace of (
space (
TrivExt D)) ;
correctness
proof
A1: the
topology of (
space (
TrivExt D))
= { A where A be
Subset of (
TrivExt D) : (
union A)
in the
topology of X } by
Def7;
A2: the
carrier of (
space (
TrivExt D))
= (
TrivExt D) by
Def7;
A3: the
topology of (
space D)
= { A where A be
Subset of D : (
union A)
in the
topology of Y } by
Def7;
A4: the
carrier of (
space D)
= D by
Def7;
A5: (
[#] (
space D))
= D & (
[#] (
space (
TrivExt D)))
= (
TrivExt D) by
Def7;
now
thus (
[#] (
space D))
c= (
[#] (
space (
TrivExt D))) by
A5,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
let P be
Subset of (
space D);
thus P
in the
topology of (
space D) implies ex Q be
Subset of (
space (
TrivExt D)) st Q
in the
topology of (
space (
TrivExt D)) & P
= (Q
/\ (
[#] (
space D)))
proof
D
c= (
TrivExt D) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then
A6: P
c= (
TrivExt D) by
A4;
assume P
in the
topology of (
space D);
then
consider A be
Subset of D such that
A7: P
= A and
A8: (
union A)
in the
topology of Y by
A3;
reconsider B = (
union A) as
Subset of Y by
A8;
consider C be
Subset of X such that
A9: C
in the
topology of X and
A10: B
= (C
/\ (
[#] Y)) by
A8,
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
{
{x} where x be
Point of X : x
in (C
\ (
[#] Y)) }
c= (
TrivExt D)
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in {
{x} where x be
Point of X : x
in (C
\ (
[#] Y)) };
then
consider x be
Point of X such that
A11: e
=
{x} and
A12: x
in (C
\ (
[#] Y));
not x
in the
carrier of Y by
A12,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence thesis by
A11,
Th32;
end;
then
reconsider Q = (P
\/ {
{x} where x be
Point of X : x
in (C
\ (
[#] Y)) }) as
Subset of (
space (
TrivExt D)) by
A2,
A6,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
take Q;
now
let e be
object;
thus e
in C implies ex u st e
in u & u
in Q
proof
assume
A13: e
in C;
then
reconsider x = e as
Point of X;
now
per cases ;
case e
in (
[#] Y);
then e
in B by
A10,
A13,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider u such that
A14: e
in u & u
in P by
A7,
TARSKI:def 4;
take u;
thus e
in u & u
in Q by
A14,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
case
A15: not e
in (
[#] Y);
take u =
{e};
thus e
in u by
TARSKI:def 1;
x
in (C
\ (
[#] Y)) by
A13,
A15,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then u
in {
{y} where y be
Point of X : y
in (C
\ (
[#] Y)) };
hence u
in Q by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
given u such that
A16: e
in u and
A17: u
in Q;
now
per cases by
A17,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose u
in P;
then e
in B by
A7,
A16,
TARSKI:def 4;
hence e
in C by
A10,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
suppose u
in {
{x} where x be
Point of X : x
in (C
\ (
[#] Y)) };
then
consider x be
Point of X such that
A18: u
=
{x} and
A19: x
in (C
\ (
[#] Y));
e
= x by
A16,
A18,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence e
in C by
A19,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
end;
hence e
in C;
end;
then C
= (
union Q) by
TARSKI:def 4;
hence Q
in the
topology of (
space (
TrivExt D)) by
A2,
A1,
A9;
P
c= Q by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
hence P
c= (Q
/\ (
[#] (
space D))) by
XBOOLE_1: 19;
let e be
object;
assume
A20: e
in (Q
/\ (
[#] (
space D)));
then
A21: e
in (
[#] (
space D));
A22:
now
assume e
in {
{x} where x be
Point of X : x
in (C
\ (
[#] Y)) };
then
consider x be
Point of X such that
A23: e
=
{x} and
A24: x
in (C
\ (
[#] Y));
A25: not x
in the
carrier of Y by
A24,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then not ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. x)
in the
carrier of (
space D) by
Th36;
hence contradiction by
A21,
A23,
A25,
Th34;
end;
e
in Q by
A20,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence thesis by
A22,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
given Q be
Subset of (
space (
TrivExt D)) such that
A26: Q
in the
topology of (
space (
TrivExt D)) and
A27: P
= (Q
/\ (
[#] (
space D)));
A28: (
union P) is
Subset of Y by
A4,
EQREL_1: 61;
now
let e be
object;
thus e
in ((
union Q)
/\ (
[#] Y)) implies ex u st e
in u & u
in P
proof
assume
A29: e
in ((
union Q)
/\ (
[#] Y));
then
A30: ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. e)
in the
carrier of (
space D) by
Th37;
e
in (
union Q) by
A29,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider u such that
A31: e
in u and
A32: u
in Q by
TARSKI:def 4;
take u;
thus e
in u by
A31;
u is
Element of (
TrivExt D) by
A32,
Def7;
then u
= ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. e) by
A31,
EQREL_1: 65;
hence thesis by
A27,
A32,
A30,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
given u such that
A33: e
in u and
A34: u
in P;
u
in Q by
A27,
A34,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A35: e
in (
union Q) by
A33,
TARSKI:def 4;
e
in (
union P) by
A33,
A34,
TARSKI:def 4;
hence e
in ((
union Q)
/\ (
[#] Y)) by
A28,
A35,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
then
A36: (
union P)
= ((
union Q)
/\ (
[#] Y)) by
TARSKI:def 4;
ex A be
Subset of (
TrivExt D) st Q
= A & (
union A)
in the
topology of X by
A1,
A26;
then (
union P)
in the
topology of Y by
A36,
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
hence P
in the
topology of (
space D) by
A4,
A3;
end;
then
reconsider T = (
space D) as
SubSpace of (
space (
TrivExt D)) by
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
T is
closed
proof
let A be
Subset of (
space (
TrivExt D)) such that
A37: A
= the
carrier of T;
reconsider C = (A
` ) as
Subset of (
TrivExt D) by
Def7;
reconsider B = (
union A) as
Subset of X by
A2,
EQREL_1: 61;
B
= the
carrier of Y by
A4,
A37,
EQREL_1:def 4;
then B is
closed by
Def11;
then
A38: (B
` )
in the
topology of X by
PRE_TOPC:def 2;
(
union C)
= (B
` ) by
A2,
EQREL_1: 63;
then (A
` )
in the
topology of (
space (
TrivExt D)) by
A38,
Th27;
then (A
` ) is
open;
hence thesis by
TOPS_1: 3;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
begin
Lm3: (
TopSpaceMetr
RealSpace )
=
TopStruct (# the
carrier of
RealSpace , (
Family_open_set
RealSpace ) #) by
PCOMPS_1:def 5;
definition
::
BORSUK_1:def13
func
I[01] ->
TopStruct means
:
Def13: for P be
Subset of (
TopSpaceMetr
RealSpace ) st P
=
[.
0 , 1.] holds it
= ((
TopSpaceMetr
RealSpace )
| P);
existence
proof
reconsider P =
[.
0 , 1.] as non
empty
Subset of (
TopSpaceMetr
RealSpace ) by
Lm3,
METRIC_1:def 13,
XXREAL_1: 1;
take ((
TopSpaceMetr
RealSpace )
| P);
thus thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
reconsider P =
[.
0 , 1.] as
Subset of (
TopSpaceMetr
RealSpace ) by
Lm3,
METRIC_1:def 13;
let I1,I2 be
TopStruct such that
A1: for P be
Subset of (
TopSpaceMetr
RealSpace ) st P
=
[.
0 , 1.] holds I1
= ((
TopSpaceMetr
RealSpace )
| P) and
A2: for P be
Subset of (
TopSpaceMetr
RealSpace ) st P
=
[.
0 , 1.] holds I2
= ((
TopSpaceMetr
RealSpace )
| P);
I1
= ((
TopSpaceMetr
RealSpace )
| P) by
A1;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
end
registration
cluster
I[01] ->
strict non
empty
TopSpace-like;
coherence
proof
reconsider P =
[.
0 , 1.] as non
empty
Subset of (
TopSpaceMetr
RealSpace ) by
Lm3,
METRIC_1:def 13,
XXREAL_1: 1;
I[01]
= ((
TopSpaceMetr
RealSpace )
| P) by
Def13;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:40
Th40: the
carrier of
I[01]
=
[.
0 , 1.]
proof
reconsider P =
[.
0 , 1.] as
Subset of (
TopSpaceMetr
RealSpace ) by
Lm3,
METRIC_1:def 13;
A1:
I[01]
= ((
TopSpaceMetr
RealSpace )
| P) by
Def13;
thus the
carrier of
I[01]
= (
[#]
I[01] )
.=
[.
0 , 1.] by
A1,
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
end;
definition
::
BORSUK_1:def14
func
0[01] ->
Point of
I[01] equals
0 ;
coherence by
Th40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
::
BORSUK_1:def15
func
1[01] ->
Point of
I[01] equals 1;
coherence by
Th40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
end
definition
let A be non
empty
TopSpace, B be non
empty
SubSpace of A, F be
Function of A, B;
::
BORSUK_1:def16
attr F is
being_a_retraction means for W be
Point of A st W
in the
carrier of B holds (F
. W)
= W;
end
definition
let X be non
empty
TopSpace, Y be non
empty
SubSpace of X;
::
BORSUK_1:def17
pred Y
is_a_retract_of X means ex F be
continuous
Function of X, Y st F is
being_a_retraction;
::
BORSUK_1:def18
pred Y
is_an_SDR_of X means ex H be
continuous
Function of
[:X,
I[01] :], X st for A be
Point of X holds (H
.
[A,
0[01] ])
= A & (H
.
[A,
1[01] ])
in the
carrier of Y & (A
in the
carrier of Y implies for T be
Point of
I[01] holds (H
.
[A, T])
= A);
end
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:41
for XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be
closed non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be
DECOMPOSITION of X st X
is_a_retract_of XX holds (
space D)
is_a_retract_of (
space (
TrivExt D))
proof
let XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be
closed non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be
DECOMPOSITION of X;
thus X
is_a_retract_of XX implies (
space D)
is_a_retract_of (
space (
TrivExt D))
proof
given R be
continuous
Function of XX, X such that
A1: R is
being_a_retraction;
now
given xx,xx9 be
Point of XX such that
A2: ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. xx)
= ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. xx9) & (((
Proj D)
* R)
. xx)
<> (((
Proj D)
* R)
. xx9);
xx
in the
carrier of X by
A2,
Th35;
then (R
. xx)
= xx by
A1;
then
A3: ((
Proj D)
. xx)
= (((
Proj D)
* R)
. xx) by
FUNCT_2: 15;
xx9
in the
carrier of X by
A2,
Th35;
then
A4: (R
. xx9)
= xx9 by
A1;
((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. xx)
= ((
Proj D)
. xx) & ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. xx9)
= ((
Proj D)
. xx9) by
A2,
Th33,
Th35;
hence contradiction by
A2,
A4,
A3,
FUNCT_2: 15;
end;
then
consider F be
Function of the
carrier of (
space (
TrivExt D)), the
carrier of (
space D) such that
A5: (F
* (
Proj (
TrivExt D)))
= ((
Proj D)
* R) by
EQREL_1: 56;
reconsider F as
Function of (
space (
TrivExt D)), (
space D);
F is
continuous
proof
let W be
Point of (
space (
TrivExt D));
let G be
a_neighborhood of (F
. W);
reconsider GG = (((
Proj D)
* R)
" G) as
a_neighborhood of ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
"
{W}) by
A5,
Th4,
EQREL_1: 57;
reconsider V9 = ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
.: GG) as
a_neighborhood of W by
Th38;
take V = V9;
(F
.: V)
= (((
Proj D)
* R)
.: GG) by
A5,
RELAT_1: 126;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_1: 75;
end;
then
reconsider F9 = F as
continuous
Function of (
space (
TrivExt D)), (
space D);
take F9;
let W be
Point of (
space (
TrivExt D));
consider W9 be
Point of XX such that
A6: ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. W9)
= W by
Th29;
assume
A7: W
in the
carrier of (
space D);
then W9
in the
carrier of X by
A6,
Th36;
then
A8: W9
= (R
. W9) by
A1;
A9: (F9
. W)
= ((F
* (
Proj (
TrivExt D)))
. W9) by
A6,
FUNCT_2: 15;
((
Proj D)
. W9)
= ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. W9) by
A6,
A7,
Th33,
Th36;
hence thesis by
A5,
A6,
A8,
A9,
FUNCT_2: 15;
end;
end;
::$Notion-Name
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:42
for XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be
closed non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be
DECOMPOSITION of X st X
is_an_SDR_of XX holds (
space D)
is_an_SDR_of (
space (
TrivExt D))
proof
let XX be non
empty
TopSpace, X be
closed non
empty
SubSpace of XX, D be
DECOMPOSITION of X;
given CH1 be
continuous
Function of
[:XX,
I[01] :], XX such that
A1: for A be
Point of XX holds (CH1
.
[A,
0[01] ])
= A & (CH1
.
[A,
1[01] ])
in the
carrier of X & (A
in the
carrier of X implies for T be
Point of
I[01] holds (CH1
.
[A, T])
= A);
the
carrier of
[:XX,
I[01] :]
=
[:the
carrier of XX, the
carrier of
I[01] :] by
Def2;
then
reconsider II =
[:(
Proj (
TrivExt D)), (
id the
carrier of
I[01] ):] as
Function of the
carrier of
[:XX,
I[01] :], the
carrier of
[:(
space (
TrivExt D)),
I[01] :] by
Def2;
now
given xx,xx9 be
Point of
[:XX,
I[01] :] such that
A2: (II
. xx)
= (II
. xx9) and
A3: (((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
* CH1)
. xx)
<> (((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
* CH1)
. xx9);
A4: (((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
* CH1)
. xx)
= ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. (CH1
. xx)) & (((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
* CH1)
. xx9)
= ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. (CH1
. xx9)) by
FUNCT_2: 15;
consider x be
Point of XX, t be
Point of
I[01] such that
A5: xx
=
[x, t] by
Th10;
consider x9 be
Point of XX, t9 be
Point of
I[01] such that
A6: xx9
=
[x9, t9] by
Th10;
A7: (II
. (x,t))
=
[((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. x), t] & (II
. (x9,t9))
=
[((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. x9), t9] by
EQREL_1: 58;
then t
= t9 & ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. x)
= ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. x9) by
A2,
A5,
A6,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then (CH1
. xx)
= x & (CH1
. xx9)
= x9 by
A1,
A3,
A5,
A6,
Th35;
hence contradiction by
A2,
A3,
A5,
A6,
A7,
A4,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
then
consider THETA be
Function of the
carrier of
[:(
space (
TrivExt D)),
I[01] :], the
carrier of (
space (
TrivExt D)) such that
A8: ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
* CH1)
= (THETA
* II) by
EQREL_1: 56;
reconsider THETA as
Function of
[:(
space (
TrivExt D)),
I[01] :], (
space (
TrivExt D));
THETA is
continuous
proof
let WT be
Point of
[:(
space (
TrivExt D)),
I[01] :];
reconsider xt9 = WT as
Element of
[:the
carrier of (
space (
TrivExt D)), the
carrier of
I[01] :] by
Def2;
let G be
a_neighborhood of (THETA
. WT);
reconsider FF = ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
* CH1) as
continuous
Function of
[:XX,
I[01] :], (
space (
TrivExt D));
consider W be
Point of (
space (
TrivExt D)), T be
Point of
I[01] such that
A9: WT
=
[W, T] by
Th10;
(II
"
{xt9})
=
[:((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
"
{W}),
{T}:] by
A9,
EQREL_1: 60;
then
reconsider GG = (FF
" G) as
a_neighborhood of
[:((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
"
{W}),
{T}:] by
A8,
Th4,
EQREL_1: 57;
W
in the
carrier of (
space (
TrivExt D));
then
A10: W
in (
TrivExt D) by
Def7;
then ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
"
{W})
= W by
EQREL_1: 66;
then ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
"
{W}) is
compact by
A10,
Def12;
then
consider U be
a_neighborhood of ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
"
{W}), V be
a_neighborhood of T such that
A11:
[:U, V:]
c= GG by
Th25;
reconsider H9 = ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
.: U) as
a_neighborhood of W by
Th38;
reconsider H99 =
[:H9, V:] as
a_neighborhood of WT by
A9;
take H = H99;
(II
.:
[:U, V:])
=
[:((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
.: U), V:] by
EQREL_1: 59;
then
A12: (((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
* CH1)
.: GG)
c= G & (THETA
.: H)
= (((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
* CH1)
.:
[:U, V:]) by
A8,
FUNCT_1: 75,
RELAT_1: 126;
(((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
* CH1)
.:
[:U, V:])
c= (((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
* CH1)
.: GG) by
A11,
RELAT_1: 123;
hence thesis by
A12;
end;
then
reconsider THETA9 = THETA as
continuous
Function of
[:(
space (
TrivExt D)),
I[01] :], (
space (
TrivExt D));
take THETA99 = THETA9;
let W be
Point of (
space (
TrivExt D));
consider W9 be
Point of XX such that
A13: ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. W9)
= W by
Th29;
(II
. (W9,
0[01] ))
=
[W,
0[01] ] by
A13,
EQREL_1: 58;
then
A14: ((THETA9
* II)
.
[W9,
0[01] ])
= (THETA9
.
[W,
0[01] ]) by
FUNCT_2: 15;
(CH1
. (W9,
0[01] ))
= W9 by
A1;
hence (THETA99
.
[W,
0[01] ])
= W by
A8,
A13,
A14,
FUNCT_2: 15;
A15: (CH1
.
[W9,
1[01] ])
in the
carrier of X by
A1;
(II
. (W9,
1[01] ))
=
[W,
1[01] ] by
A13,
EQREL_1: 58;
then
A16: ((THETA9
* II)
.
[W9,
1[01] ])
= (THETA9
.
[W,
1[01] ]) by
FUNCT_2: 15;
((THETA9
* II)
.
[W9,
1[01] ])
= ((
Proj (
TrivExt D))
. (CH1
.
[W9,
1[01] ])) by
A8,
FUNCT_2: 15;
hence (THETA99
.
[W,
1[01] ])
in the
carrier of (
space D) by
A16,
A15,
Th37;
assume
A17: W
in the
carrier of (
space D);
let T be
Point of
I[01] ;
(II
. (W9,T))
=
[W, T] by
A13,
EQREL_1: 58;
then
A18: ((THETA9
* II)
.
[W9, T])
= (THETA9
.
[W, T]) by
FUNCT_2: 15;
(CH1
. (W9,T))
= W9 by
A1,
A13,
A17,
Th36;
hence thesis by
A8,
A13,
A18,
FUNCT_2: 15;
end;
theorem ::
BORSUK_1:43
for r be
Real holds
0
<= r & r
<= 1 iff r
in the
carrier of
I[01]
proof
let r be
Real;
A1:
[.
0 , 1.]
= { r1 where r1 be
Real :
0
<= r1 & r1
<= 1 } by
RCOMP_1:def 1;
thus
0
<= r & r
<= 1 implies r
in the
carrier of
I[01] by
A1,
Th40;
assume r
in the
carrier of
I[01] ;
then ex r2 be
Real st r2
= r &
0
<= r2 & r2
<= 1 by
A1,
Th40;
hence thesis;
end;