zmodul04.miz
begin
reserve V for
Z_Module;
reserve W,W1,W2 for
Submodule of V;
Lem1: for i be
Integer holds i
in the
carrier of
INT.Ring by
INT_1:def 2;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:1
for R be
Ring holds for V be
LeftMod of R, W1,W2 be
Subspace of V, WW1,WW2 be
Subspace of (W1
+ W2) st WW1
= W1 & WW2
= W2 holds (W1
+ W2)
= (WW1
+ WW2)
proof
let R be
Ring;
let V be
LeftMod of R, W1,W2 be
Subspace of V, WW1,WW2 be
Subspace of (W1
+ W2) such that
A1: WW1
= W1 & WW2
= W2;
A2: (WW1
+ WW2) is
Subspace of V by
VECTSP_4: 26;
for x be
object holds x
in (W1
+ W2) iff x
in (WW1
+ WW2)
proof
let x be
object;
hereby
assume x
in (W1
+ W2);
then
consider v1,v2 be
Vector of V such that
B2: v1
in W1 & v2
in W2 & x
= (v1
+ v2) by
VECTSP_5: 1;
v1
in (W1
+ W2) & v2
in (W1
+ W2) by
B2,
VECTSP_5: 2;
then
reconsider vv1 = v1, vv2 = v2 as
Vector of (W1
+ W2);
v1
in WW1 & v2
in WW2 & x
= (vv1
+ vv2) by
A1,
B2,
VECTSP_4: 13;
hence x
in (WW1
+ WW2) by
VECTSP_5: 1;
end;
assume x
in (WW1
+ WW2);
then
consider vv1,vv2 be
Vector of (W1
+ W2) such that
B1: vv1
in WW1 & vv2
in WW2 & x
= (vv1
+ vv2) by
VECTSP_5: 1;
thus x
in (W1
+ W2) by
B1;
end;
then for x be
Vector of V holds x
in (W1
+ W2) iff x
in (WW1
+ WW2);
hence thesis by
A2,
VECTSP_4: 30;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:2
for R be
Ring holds for V be
LeftMod of R, W1,W2 be
Subspace of V, WW1,WW2 be
Subspace of (W1
+ W2) st WW1
= W1 & WW2
= W2 holds (W1
/\ W2)
= (WW1
/\ WW2)
proof
let R be
Ring;
let V be
LeftMod of R, W1,W2 be
Subspace of V, WW1,WW2 be
Subspace of (W1
+ W2) such that
A1: WW1
= W1 & WW2
= W2;
A2: (WW1
/\ WW2) is
Subspace of V by
VECTSP_4: 26;
for x be
object holds x
in (W1
/\ W2) iff x
in (WW1
/\ WW2)
proof
let x be
object;
hereby
assume x
in (W1
/\ W2);
then x
in WW1 & x
in WW2 by
A1,
VECTSP_5: 3;
hence x
in (WW1
/\ WW2) by
VECTSP_5: 3;
end;
assume x
in (WW1
/\ WW2);
then x
in W1 & x
in W2 by
A1,
VECTSP_5: 3;
hence x
in (W1
/\ W2) by
VECTSP_5: 3;
end;
then for x be
Vector of V holds x
in (W1
/\ W2) iff x
in (WW1
/\ WW2);
hence thesis by
A2,
VECTSP_4: 30;
end;
Lm19: for A,B be
set st (for z be
object st z
in A holds ex x,y be
object st z
=
[x, y]) & (for z be
object st z
in B holds ex x,y be
object st z
=
[x, y]) & (for x,y be
object holds (
[x, y]
in A iff
[x, y]
in B)) holds A
= B
proof
let A,B be
set;
assume that
A1: for z be
object st z
in A holds ex x,y be
object st z
=
[x, y] and
A2: for z be
object st z
in B holds ex x,y be
object st z
=
[x, y] and
A3: for x,y be
object holds
[x, y]
in A iff
[x, y]
in B;
now
let z be
object;
A4: z
in B implies ex x,y be
object st z
=
[x, y] by
A2;
z
in A implies ex x,y be
object st z
=
[x, y] by
A1;
hence z
in A iff z
in B by
A3,
A4;
end;
hence A
= B by
TARSKI: 2;
end;
registration
let V be
Z_Module;
cluster
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] -> non
empty;
coherence
proof
X1: 1
in
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
not 1
in
{
0 } by
TARSKI:def 1;
then (
INT
\
{
0 })
<>
{} by
X1,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let V be
Z_Module;
assume
AS: V is
Mult-cancelable;
::
ZMODUL04:def1
func
EQRZM (V) ->
Equivalence_Relation of
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] means
:
defEQRZM: for S,T be
object holds
[S, T]
in it iff (S
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] & T
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] & ex z1,z2 be
Element of V, i1,i2 be
Element of
INT.Ring st S
=
[z1, i1] & T
=
[z2, i2] & i1
<>
0 & i2
<>
0 & (i2
* z1)
= (i1
* z2));
existence
proof
defpred
P1[
object,
object] means ex z1,z2 be
Element of V, i1,i2 be
Element of
INT.Ring st $1
=
[z1, i1] & $2
=
[z2, i2] & i1
<>
0 & i2
<>
0 & (i2
* z1)
= (i1
* z2);
A1: for x be
object st x
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] holds
P1[x, x]
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):];
then
consider z1,i1 be
object such that
A11: z1
in the
carrier of V & i1
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) & x
=
[z1, i1] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider z1 as
Element of V by
A11;
A12: i1
in
INT & not i1
in
{
0 } by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
A11;
reconsider i1 as
Integer by
A11;
reconsider i1 as
Element of
INT.Ring by
A11;
i1
<>
0 & i1
<>
0 & (i1
* z1)
= (i1
* z1) by
A12,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence
P1[x, x] by
A11;
end;
A2: for x,y be
object st
P1[x, y] holds
P1[y, x];
A3: for x,y,z be
object st
P1[x, y] &
P1[y, z] holds
P1[x, z]
proof
let x,y,z be
object;
assume
A31:
P1[x, y] &
P1[y, z];
then
consider z1,z2 be
Element of V, i1,i2 be
Element of
INT.Ring such that
A32: x
=
[z1, i1] & y
=
[z2, i2] & i1
<>
0 & i2
<>
0 & (i2
* z1)
= (i1
* z2);
consider z3,z4 be
Element of V, i3,i4 be
Element of
INT.Ring such that
A33: y
=
[z3, i3] & z
=
[z4, i4] & i3
<>
0 & i4
<>
0 & (i4
* z3)
= (i3
* z4) by
A31;
A34: z2
= z3 & i2
= i3 by
A32,
A33,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
(i2
* (i4
* z1))
= ((i2
* i4)
* z1) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= ((i4
* i2)
* z1)
.= (i4
* (i2
* z1)) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= (i4
* (i1
* z2)) by
A32
.= ((i4
* i1)
* z2) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= ((i1
* i4)
* z2)
.= (i1
* (i4
* z2)) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= ((i1
* i2)
* z4) by
A33,
A34,
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= ((i2
* i1)
* z4)
.= (i2
* (i1
* z4)) by
VECTSP_1:def 16;
hence
P1[x, z] by
AS,
A32,
A33,
ZMODUL01: 10;
end;
consider EqR be
Equivalence_Relation of
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] such that
A4: for x,y be
object holds
[x, y]
in EqR iff (x
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] & y
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] &
P1[x, y]) from
EQREL_1:sch 1(
A1,
A2,
A3);
take EqR;
thus thesis by
A4;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let EqR1,EqR2 be
Equivalence_Relation of
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):];
assume
A1: for S,T be
object holds (
[S, T]
in EqR1 iff (S
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] & T
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] & ex z1,z2 be
Element of V, i1,i2 be
Element of
INT.Ring st S
=
[z1, i1] & T
=
[z2, i2] & i1
<>
0 & i2
<>
0 & (i2
* z1)
= (i1
* z2)));
assume
A2: for S,T be
object holds
[S, T]
in EqR2 iff (S
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] & T
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] & ex z1,z2 be
Element of V, i1,i2 be
Element of
INT.Ring st S
=
[z1, i1] & T
=
[z2, i2] & i1
<>
0 & i2
<>
0 & (i2
* z1)
= (i1
* z2));
A3: for z be
object st z
in EqR1 holds ex x,y be
object st z
=
[x, y] by
RELAT_1:def 1;
A4: for z be
object st z
in EqR2 holds ex x,y be
object st z
=
[x, y] by
RELAT_1:def 1;
for x,y be
object holds
[x, y]
in EqR1 iff
[x, y]
in EqR2
proof
let S,T be
object;
[S, T]
in EqR2 iff (S
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] & T
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] & ex z1,z2 be
Element of V, i1,i2 be
Element of
INT.Ring st S
=
[z1, i1] & T
=
[z2, i2] & i1
<>
0 & i2
<>
0 & (i2
* z1)
= (i1
* z2)) by
A2;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
hence EqR1
= EqR2 by
Lm19,
A3,
A4;
end;
end
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:3
LMEQR001: for V be
Z_Module, z1,z2 be
Element of V, i1,i2 be
Element of
INT.Ring st V is
Mult-cancelable holds
[
[z1, i1],
[z2, i2]]
in (
EQRZM V) iff i1
<>
0 & i2
<>
0 & (i2
* z1)
= (i1
* z2)
proof
let V be
Z_Module, z1,z2 be
Element of V, i1,i2 be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
assume
AS: V is
Mult-cancelable;
hereby
assume
[
[z1, i1],
[z2, i2]]
in (
EQRZM V);
then
consider zz1,zz2 be
Element of V, ii1,ii2 be
Element of
INT.Ring such that
P2:
[z1, i1]
=
[zz1, ii1] &
[z2, i2]
=
[zz2, ii2] & ii1
<>
0 & ii2
<>
0 & (ii2
* zz1)
= (ii1
* zz2) by
AS,
defEQRZM;
z1
= zz1 & i1
= ii1 & z2
= zz2 & i2
= ii2 by
P2,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence i1
<>
0 & i2
<>
0 & (i2
* z1)
= (i1
* z2) by
P2;
end;
assume
A2: i1
<>
0 & i2
<>
0 & (i2
* z1)
= (i1
* z2);
then
A21: not i1
in
{
0 } & not i2
in
{
0 } by
TARSKI:def 1;
i1
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) & i2
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
A21;
then
[z1, i1]
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] &
[z2, i2]
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
hence
[
[z1, i1],
[z2, i2]]
in (
EQRZM V) by
A2,
AS,
defEQRZM;
end;
definition
let V be
Z_Module;
assume
AS: V is
Mult-cancelable;
::
ZMODUL04:def2
func
addCoset (V) ->
BinOp of (
Class (
EQRZM V)) means
:
DefaddCoset: for A,B be
object st A
in (
Class (
EQRZM V)) & B
in (
Class (
EQRZM V)) holds for z1,z2 be
Element of V, i1,i2 be
Element of
INT.Ring st i1
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & i2
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & A
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z1, i1])) & B
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z2, i2])) holds (it
. (A,B))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[((i2
* z1)
+ (i1
* z2)), (i1
* i2)]));
existence
proof
defpred
P[
object,
object,
object] means for z1,z2 be
Element of V, i1,i2 be
Element of
INT.Ring st i1
<>
0 & i2
<>
0 & $1
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z1, i1])) & $2
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z2, i2])) holds $3
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[((i2
* z1)
+ (i1
* z2)), (i1
* i2)]));
set C = (
Class (
EQRZM V));
A1:
now
let A,B be
object;
assume
A10: A
in C & B
in C;
then
consider A1 be
object such that
A2: A1
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] & A
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),A1)) by
EQREL_1:def 3;
consider z1,i1 be
object such that
A3: z1
in the
carrier of V & i1
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) & A1
=
[z1, i1] by
A2,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider z1 as
Element of V by
A3;
i1
in
INT & not i1
in
{
0 } by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
A3;
then
A31: i1
in
INT & i1
<>
0 by
TARSKI:def 1;
reconsider i1 as
Integer by
A3;
reconsider i1 as
Element of
INT.Ring by
A3;
consider B1 be
object such that
A4: B1
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] & B
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),B1)) by
A10,
EQREL_1:def 3;
consider z2,i2 be
object such that
A5: z2
in the
carrier of V & i2
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) & B1
=
[z2, i2] by
A4,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider z2 as
Element of V by
A5;
i2
in
INT & not i2
in
{
0 } by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
A5;
then
A51: i2
in
INT & i2
<>
0 by
TARSKI:def 1;
reconsider i2 as
Integer by
A5;
reconsider i2 as
Element of
INT.Ring by
A5;
A61: not (i1
* i2)
in
{
0 } by
A31,
A51,
TARSKI:def 1;
(i1
* i2)
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
A61;
then
X1:
[((i2
* z1)
+ (i1
* z2)), (i1
* i2)]
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
set z = (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[((i2
* z1)
+ (i1
* z2)), (i1
* i2)]));
A7: z
in C by
X1,
EQREL_1:def 3;
P[A, B, z]
proof
let zz1,zz2 be
Element of V, ii1,ii2 be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
assume
A71: ii1
<>
0 & ii2
<>
0 & A
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[zz1, ii1])) & B
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[zz2, ii2]));
then
A72: not ii1
in
{
0 } by
TARSKI:def 1;
ii1
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
A72;
then
X2:
[zz1, ii1]
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
X21: not ii2
in
{
0 } by
TARSKI:def 1,
A71;
ii2
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
X21;
then
X3:
[zz2, ii2]
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
X5:
[
[zz1, ii1],
[z1, i1]]
in (
EQRZM V) by
X2,
A2,
A3,
A71,
EQREL_1: 35;
then
XX5: ii1
<>
0 & i1
<>
0 & (i1
* zz1)
= (ii1
* z1) by
LMEQR001,
AS;
X7:
[
[zz2, ii2],
[z2, i2]]
in (
EQRZM V) by
X3,
A4,
A5,
A71,
EQREL_1: 35;
then
XX7: ii2
<>
0 & i2
<>
0 & (i2
* zz2)
= (ii2
* z2) by
LMEQR001,
AS;
((ii1
* ii2)
* ((i2
* z1)
+ (i1
* z2)))
= (((ii1
* ii2)
* (i2
* z1))
+ ((ii1
* ii2)
* (i1
* z2))) by
VECTSP_1:def 14
.= ((((ii1
* ii2)
* i2)
* z1)
+ ((ii1
* ii2)
* (i1
* z2))) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= ((((ii2
* i2)
* ii1)
* z1)
+ (((ii1
* ii2)
* i1)
* z2)) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= (((ii2
* i2)
* (ii1
* z1))
+ (((ii1
* i1)
* ii2)
* z2)) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= (((ii2
* i2)
* (ii1
* z1))
+ ((ii1
* i1)
* (ii2
* z2))) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= (((ii2
* i2)
* (i1
* zz1))
+ ((ii1
* i1)
* (ii2
* z2))) by
AS,
X5,
LMEQR001
.= (((ii2
* i2)
* (i1
* zz1))
+ ((ii1
* i1)
* (i2
* zz2))) by
AS,
X7,
LMEQR001
.= ((((ii2
* i2)
* i1)
* zz1)
+ ((ii1
* i1)
* (i2
* zz2))) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= ((((i2
* i1)
* ii2)
* zz1)
+ (((ii1
* i1)
* i2)
* zz2)) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= (((i1
* i2)
* (ii2
* zz1))
+ (((i1
* i2)
* ii1)
* zz2)) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= (((i1
* i2)
* (ii2
* zz1))
+ ((i1
* i2)
* (ii1
* zz2))) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= ((i1
* i2)
* ((ii2
* zz1)
+ (ii1
* zz2))) by
VECTSP_1:def 14;
then
[
[((i2
* z1)
+ (i1
* z2)), (i1
* i2)],
[((ii2
* zz1)
+ (ii1
* zz2)), (ii1
* ii2)]]
in (
EQRZM V) by
XX5,
XX7,
LMEQR001,
AS;
hence thesis by
X1,
EQREL_1: 35;
end;
hence ex z be
object st z
in C &
P[A, B, z] by
A7;
end;
consider f be
Function of
[:C, C:], C such that
A14: for A,B be
object st A
in C & B
in C holds
P[A, B, (f
. (A,B))] from
BINOP_1:sch 1(
A1);
reconsider f as
BinOp of C;
take f;
thus thesis by
A14;
end;
uniqueness
proof
defpred
P[
object,
object,
object] means for z1,z2 be
Element of V, i1,i2 be
Element of
INT.Ring st i1
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & i2
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & $1
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z1, i1])) & $2
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z2, i2])) holds $3
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[((i2
* z1)
+ (i1
* z2)), (i1
* i2)]));
set C = (
Class (
EQRZM V));
let f1,f2 be
BinOp of C such that
A15: for A,B be
object st A
in C & B
in C holds
P[A, B, (f1
. (A,B))] and
A16: for A,B be
object st A
in C & B
in C holds
P[A, B, (f2
. (A,B))];
now
let A,B be
set;
assume
X0: A
in C & B
in C;
then
consider A1 be
object such that
A2: A1
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] & A
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),A1)) by
EQREL_1:def 3;
consider z1,i1 be
object such that
A3: z1
in the
carrier of V & i1
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) & A1
=
[z1, i1] by
A2,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider z1 as
Element of V by
A3;
i1
in
INT & not i1
in
{
0 } by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
A3;
then
A31: i1
in
INT & i1
<>
0 by
TARSKI:def 1;
reconsider i1 as
Integer by
A3;
consider B1 be
object such that
A4: B1
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] & B
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),B1)) by
X0,
EQREL_1:def 3;
consider z2,i2 be
object such that
A5: z2
in the
carrier of V & i2
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) & B1
=
[z2, i2] by
A4,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider z2 as
Element of V by
A5;
i2
in
INT & not i2
in
{
0 } by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
A5;
then
A51: i2
in
INT & i2
<>
0 by
TARSKI:def 1;
reconsider i2 as
Integer by
A5;
reconsider i1, i2 as
Element of
INT.Ring by
Lem1;
thus (f1
. (A,B))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[((i2
* z1)
+ (i1
* z2)), (i1
* i2)])) by
A2,
A3,
A4,
A5,
A15,
A31,
A51,
X0
.= (f2
. (A,B)) by
A2,
A3,
A4,
A5,
A16,
A31,
A51,
X0;
end;
hence thesis by
BINOP_1: 1;
end;
end
definition
let V be
Z_Module;
assume
AS: V is
Mult-cancelable;
::
ZMODUL04:def3
func
zeroCoset (V) ->
Element of (
Class (
EQRZM V)) means
:
defZero: for i be
Integer st i
<>
0 holds it
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(
0. V), i]));
existence
proof
X1: 1
in
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
not 1
in
{
0 } by
TARSKI:def 1;
then 1
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
X1;
then
[(
0. V), 1]
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
reconsider z = (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(
0. V), 1])) as
Element of (
Class (
EQRZM V)) by
EQREL_1:def 3;
take z;
for i be
Integer st i
<>
0 holds z
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(
0. V), i]))
proof
let i be
Integer;
assume
X2: i
<>
0 ;
then
X21: not i
in
{
0 } by
TARSKI:def 1;
Z1: i
in
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
then i
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
X21;
then
X3:
[(
0. V), i]
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
reconsider i as
Element of
INT.Ring by
Z1;
((
1.
INT.Ring )
* (
0. V))
= (
0. V) by
ZMODUL01: 1
.= (i
* (
0. V)) by
ZMODUL01: 1;
then
[
[(
0. V), i],
[(
0. V), 1]]
in (
EQRZM V) by
AS,
X2,
LMEQR001;
hence thesis by
X3,
EQREL_1: 35;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let z1,z2 be
Element of (
Class (
EQRZM V));
assume
AS1: for i be
Integer st i
<>
0 holds z1
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(
0. V), i]));
assume
AS2: for i be
Integer st i
<>
0 holds z2
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(
0. V), i]));
thus z1
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(
0. V), 1])) by
AS1
.= z2 by
AS2;
end;
end
definition
let V be
Z_Module;
assume
AS: V is
Mult-cancelable;
::
ZMODUL04:def4
func
lmultCoset (V) ->
Function of
[:the
carrier of
F_Rat , (
Class (
EQRZM V)):], (
Class (
EQRZM V)) means
:
DeflmultCoset: for q be
object, A be
object st q
in
RAT & A
in (
Class (
EQRZM V)) holds for m,n,i be
Integer, mm be
Element of
INT.Ring , z be
Element of V st m
= mm & n
<>
0 & q
= (m
/ n) & i
<>
0 & A
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, i])) holds (it
. (q,A))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(mm
* z), (n
* i)]));
existence
proof
defpred
P[
object,
object,
object] means for m,n,i be
Integer, mm be
Element of
INT.Ring , z be
Element of V st mm
= m & n
<>
0 & $1
= (m
/ n) & i
<>
0 & $2
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, i])) holds $3
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(mm
* z), (n
* i)]));
set cF =
RAT ;
set C = (
Class (
EQRZM V));
A1:
now
let q,A be
object;
assume
AS0: q
in
RAT & A
in C;
then
consider A1 be
object such that
A2: A1
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] & A
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),A1)) by
EQREL_1:def 3;
consider z,i be
object such that
A3: z
in the
carrier of V & i
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) & A1
=
[z, i] by
A2,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider z as
Element of V by
A3;
i
in
INT & not i
in
{
0 } by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
A3;
then
A31: i
in
INT & i
<>
0 by
TARSKI:def 1;
reconsider i as
Integer by
A3;
consider m,n be
Integer such that
A4: n
<>
0 & q
= (m
/ n) by
AS0,
RAT_1: 1;
reconsider I = i, mn = m, no = n as
Element of
INT.Ring by
Lem1;
A61: not (no
* i)
in
{
0 } by
A31,
A4,
TARSKI:def 1;
(no
* i)
in
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
then (no
* i)
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
A61;
then
X1:
[(mn
* z), (no
* i)]
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
set w = (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(mn
* z), (no
* i)]));
A7: w
in C by
X1,
EQREL_1:def 3;
P[q, A, w]
proof
let mm,nn,ii be
Integer, m1 be
Element of
INT.Ring , zz be
Element of V;
assume
A71: m1
= mm & nn
<>
0 & q
= (mm
/ nn) & ii
<>
0 & A
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[zz, ii]));
then
A72: not ii
in
{
0 } by
TARSKI:def 1;
ii
in
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
then ii
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
A72;
then
X2:
[zz, ii]
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
reconsider i2 = ii, n1 = nn as
Element of
INT.Ring by
INT_1:def 2;
X51:
[
[zz, i2],
[z, I]]
in (
EQRZM V) by
X2,
A2,
A3,
A71,
EQREL_1: 35;
((n1
* i2)
* (mn
* z))
= (((n1
* i2)
* mn)
* z) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= (((n1
* mn)
* i2)
* z)
.= ((n1
* mn)
* (i2
* z)) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= ((n1
* mn)
* (I
* zz)) by
AS,
X51,
LMEQR001
.= ((no
* m1)
* (I
* zz)) by
A4,
A71,
XCMPLX_1: 95
.= (((no
* m1)
* I)
* zz) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= (((no
* I)
* m1)
* zz)
.= ((no
* I)
* (m1
* zz)) by
VECTSP_1:def 16;
then
[
[(mn
* z), (no
* I)],
[(m1
* zz), (n1
* i2)]]
in (
EQRZM V) by
A31,
A4,
A71,
LMEQR001,
AS;
hence thesis by
X1,
EQREL_1: 35;
end;
hence ex w be
object st w
in C &
P[q, A, w] by
A7;
end;
consider f be
Function of
[:
RAT , C:], C such that
A14: for q,A be
object st q
in
RAT & A
in C holds
P[q, A, (f
. (q,A))] from
BINOP_1:sch 1(
A1);
reconsider f as
Function of
[:the
carrier of
F_Rat , C:], C;
take f;
thus thesis by
A14;
end;
uniqueness
proof
set cF = the
carrier of
F_Rat ;
set C = (
Class (
EQRZM V));
let f1,f2 be
Function of
[:cF, C:], C;
assume
A7: for q,A be
object st q
in
RAT & A
in (
Class (
EQRZM V)) holds for m,n,i be
Integer, mm be
Element of
INT.Ring , z be
Element of V st mm
= m & n
<>
0 & q
= (m
/ n) & i
<>
0 & A
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, i])) holds (f1
. (q,A))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(mm
* z), (n
* i)]));
assume
A8: for q be
object, A be
object st q
in
RAT & A
in (
Class (
EQRZM V)) holds for m,n,i be
Integer, mm be
Element of
INT.Ring , z be
Element of V st mm
= m & n
<>
0 & q
= (m
/ n) & i
<>
0 & A
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, i])) holds (f2
. (q,A))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(mm
* z), (n
* i)]));
now
let q,A be
object;
assume
AS0: q
in
RAT & A
in C;
then
consider A1 be
object such that
A2: A1
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] & A
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),A1)) by
EQREL_1:def 3;
consider z,i be
object such that
A3: z
in the
carrier of V & i
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) & A1
=
[z, i] by
A2,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider z as
Element of V by
A3;
i
in
INT & not i
in
{
0 } by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
A3;
then
A31: i
in
INT & i
<>
0 by
TARSKI:def 1;
reconsider i as
Integer by
A3;
consider m,n be
Integer such that
A4: n
<>
0 & q
= (m
/ n) by
AS0,
RAT_1: 1;
reconsider m, i, n as
Element of
INT.Ring by
Lem1;
i
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) by
A31;
hence (f1
. (q,A))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(m
* z), (n
* i)])) by
AS0,
A2,
A3,
A4,
A7
.= (f2
. (q,A)) by
AS0,
A2,
A3,
A4,
A8,
A31;
end;
then for q be
Element of
F_Rat , A be
Element of C holds (f1
. (q,A))
= (f2
. (q,A));
hence thesis by
BINOP_1: 2;
end;
end
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:4
LMEQR003: for V be
Z_Module, z be
Element of V, i,n be
Element of
INT.Ring st i
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & n
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & V is
Mult-cancelable holds (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, i]))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(n
* z), (n
* i)]))
proof
let V be
Z_Module, z be
Element of V, i,n be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
assume
AS: i
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & n
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & V is
Mult-cancelable;
then
B61: not i
in
{
0 } by
TARSKI:def 1;
i
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
B61;
then
X1:
[z, i]
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
((n
* i)
* z)
= ((i
* n)
* z)
.= (i
* (n
* z)) by
VECTSP_1:def 16;
then
[
[z, i],
[(n
* z), (n
* i)]]
in (
EQRZM V) by
AS,
LMEQR001;
hence (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, i]))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(n
* z), (n
* i)])) by
X1,
EQREL_1: 35;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:5
LMEQRZM1: for V be
Z_Module, v be
Element of
ModuleStr (# (
Class (
EQRZM V)), (
addCoset V), (
zeroCoset V), (
lmultCoset V) #) st V is
Mult-cancelable holds ex i be
Element of
INT.Ring , z be
Element of V st i
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & v
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, i]))
proof
let V be
Z_Module, v be
Element of
ModuleStr (# (
Class (
EQRZM V)), (
addCoset V), (
zeroCoset V), (
lmultCoset V) #);
assume V is
Mult-cancelable;
v
in (
Class (
EQRZM V));
then
consider A1 be
object such that
A1: A1
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] & v
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),A1)) by
EQREL_1:def 3;
consider z,i be
object such that
A2: z
in the
carrier of V & i
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) & A1
=
[z, i] by
A1,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider z as
Element of V by
A2;
A31: i
in
INT & not i
in
{
0 } by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
A2;
reconsider i as
Integer by
A2;
reconsider i as
Element of
INT.Ring by
A2;
take i, z;
thus i
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & v
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, i])) by
A1,
A2,
A31,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
ThEQRZMV1: for V be
Z_Module st V is
Mult-cancelable holds
ModuleStr (# (
Class (
EQRZM V)), (
addCoset V), (
zeroCoset V), (
lmultCoset V) #) is
VectSp of
F_Rat
proof
let V be
Z_Module;
assume
AS: V is
Mult-cancelable;
reconsider IT =
ModuleStr (# (
Class (
EQRZM V)), (
addCoset V), (
zeroCoset V), (
lmultCoset V) #) as non
empty
ModuleStr over
F_Rat ;
set F =
F_Rat ;
set AD = (
addCoset V);
set ML = (
lmultCoset V);
P1: for x be
Element of F holds for v,w be
Element of IT holds (x
* (v
+ w))
= ((x
* v)
+ (x
* w))
proof
let x be
Element of F, v,w be
Element of IT;
consider i be
Element of
INT.Ring , z be
Element of V such that
X1: i
<>
0 & v
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, i])) by
AS,
LMEQRZM1;
consider j be
Element of
INT.Ring , y be
Element of V such that
X2: j
<>
0 & w
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[y, j])) by
AS,
LMEQRZM1;
consider m,n be
Integer such that
X3: n
<>
0 & x
= (m
/ n) by
RAT_1: 1;
reconsider m, n as
Element of
INT.Ring by
Lem1;
X5: (v
+ w)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[((j
* z)
+ (i
* y)), (i
* j)])) by
X1,
X2,
DefaddCoset,
AS;
X7: (x
* v)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(m
* z), (n
* i)])) by
DeflmultCoset,
AS,
X1,
X3;
X8: (x
* w)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(m
* y), (n
* j)])) by
DeflmultCoset,
AS,
X2,
X3;
X11: (((n
* j)
* (m
* z))
+ ((n
* i)
* (m
* y)))
= ((((n
* j)
* m)
* z)
+ ((n
* i)
* (m
* y))) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= ((((n
* m)
* j)
* z)
+ (((n
* i)
* m)
* y)) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= (((n
* m)
* (j
* z))
+ (((n
* m)
* i)
* y)) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= (((n
* m)
* (j
* z))
+ ((n
* m)
* (i
* y))) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= ((n
* (m
* (j
* z)))
+ ((n
* m)
* (i
* y))) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= ((n
* (m
* (j
* z)))
+ (n
* (m
* (i
* y)))) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= (n
* ((m
* (j
* z))
+ (m
* (i
* y)))) by
VECTSP_1:def 14
.= (n
* (m
* ((j
* z)
+ (i
* y)))) by
VECTSP_1:def 14;
((x
* v)
+ (x
* w))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(((n
* j)
* (m
* z))
+ ((n
* i)
* (m
* y))), ((n
* i)
* (n
* j))])) by
X1,
X2,
X3,
X7,
X8,
DefaddCoset,
AS
.= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(n
* (m
* ((j
* z)
+ (i
* y)))), (n
* (n
* (i
* j)))])) by
X11
.= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(m
* ((j
* z)
+ (i
* y))), (n
* (i
* j))])) by
AS,
X1,
X2,
X3,
LMEQR003;
hence (x
* (v
+ w))
= ((x
* v)
+ (x
* w)) by
DeflmultCoset,
AS,
X1,
X2,
X3,
X5;
end;
P2: for x,y be
Element of F holds for v be
Element of IT holds ((x
+ y)
* v)
= ((x
* v)
+ (y
* v))
proof
let x,y be
Element of F, v be
Element of IT;
consider i be
Element of
INT.Ring , z be
Element of V such that
X1: i
<>
0 & v
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, i])) by
AS,
LMEQRZM1;
consider m,n be
Integer such that
X3: n
<>
0 & x
= (m
/ n) by
RAT_1: 1;
consider l,k be
Integer such that
Y3: k
<>
0 & y
= (l
/ k) by
RAT_1: 1;
Y4: (x
+ y)
= ((m
/ n)
+ (l
/ k)) by
X3,
Y3
.= (((k
* m)
+ (n
* l))
/ (n
* k)) by
XCMPLX_1: 116,
X3,
Y3;
reconsider l, k, m, n as
Element of
INT.Ring by
Lem1;
X7: (x
* v)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(m
* z), (n
* i)])) by
DeflmultCoset,
AS,
X1,
X3;
X8: (y
* v)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(l
* z), (k
* i)])) by
DeflmultCoset,
AS,
X1,
Y3;
X11: (((k
* i)
* (m
* z))
+ ((n
* i)
* (l
* z)))
= ((((k
* i)
* m)
* z)
+ ((n
* i)
* (l
* z))) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= (((i
* (k
* m))
* z)
+ (((i
* n)
* l)
* z)) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= ((i
* ((k
* m)
* z))
+ ((i
* (n
* l))
* z)) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= ((i
* ((k
* m)
* z))
+ (i
* ((n
* l)
* z))) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= (i
* (((k
* m)
* z)
+ ((n
* l)
* z))) by
VECTSP_1:def 14
.= (i
* (((k
* m)
+ (n
* l))
* z)) by
VECTSP_1:def 15;
((x
* v)
+ (y
* v))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(((k
* i)
* (m
* z))
+ ((n
* i)
* (l
* z))), ((n
* i)
* (k
* i))])) by
X1,
X3,
X7,
X8,
Y3,
DefaddCoset,
AS
.= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(i
* (((k
* m)
+ (n
* l))
* z)), (i
* ((n
* k)
* i))])) by
X11
.= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(((k
* m)
+ (n
* l))
* z), ((n
* k)
* i)])) by
AS,
X1,
X3,
Y3,
LMEQR003;
hence ((x
+ y)
* v)
= ((x
* v)
+ (y
* v)) by
DeflmultCoset,
AS,
X1,
X3,
Y3,
Y4;
end;
P3: for x,y be
Element of F holds for v be
Element of IT holds ((x
* y)
* v)
= (x
* (y
* v))
proof
let x,y be
Element of F, v be
Element of IT;
consider i be
Element of
INT.Ring , z be
Element of V such that
X1: i
<>
0 & v
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, i])) by
AS,
LMEQRZM1;
consider m,n be
Integer such that
X3: n
<>
0 & x
= (m
/ n) by
RAT_1: 1;
consider l,k be
Integer such that
Y3: k
<>
0 & y
= (l
/ k) by
RAT_1: 1;
reconsider mm = m, nn = n, ll = l, kk = k as
Element of
INT.Ring by
Lem1;
Y4: (x
* y)
= ((m
/ n)
* (l
/ k)) by
X3,
Y3
.= ((m
* l)
/ (n
* k)) by
XCMPLX_1: 76;
X8: (y
* v)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(ll
* z), (kk
* i)])) by
DeflmultCoset,
AS,
X1,
Y3;
(x
* (y
* v))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(mm
* (ll
* z)), (nn
* (kk
* i))])) by
DeflmultCoset,
AS,
X1,
X3,
X8,
Y3
.= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[((mm
* ll)
* z), ((nn
* kk)
* i)])) by
VECTSP_1:def 16;
hence ((x
* y)
* v)
= (x
* (y
* v)) by
DeflmultCoset,
AS,
X1,
X3,
Y3,
Y4;
end;
P4: for v be
Element of IT holds ((
1. F)
* v)
= v
proof
let v be
Element of IT;
set i1 = (
1.
INT.Ring );
reconsider ii1 = i1 as
Integer;
consider i be
Element of
INT.Ring , z be
Element of V such that
X1: i
<>
0 & v
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, i])) by
AS,
LMEQRZM1;
X2: (
1. F)
= 1
.= (ii1
/ ii1);
thus ((
1. F)
* v)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(i1
* z), (i1
* i)])) by
DeflmultCoset,
AS,
X1,
X2
.= v by
X1,
VECTSP_1:def 17;
end;
P5: for v be
Element of IT holds v is
right_complementable
proof
let v be
Element of IT;
consider i be
Element of
INT.Ring , z be
Element of V such that
X1: i
<>
0 & v
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, i])) by
AS,
LMEQRZM1;
X21: not (
- i)
in
{
0 } by
X1,
TARSKI:def 1;
(
- i)
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
X21;
then
[z, (
- i)]
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
reconsider w = (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, (
- i)])) as
Element of IT by
EQREL_1:def 3;
X3: (((
- i)
* z)
+ (i
* z))
= (((
- i)
+ i)
* z) by
VECTSP_1:def 15
.= (
0. V) by
ZMODUL01: 1;
(v
+ w)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(((
- i)
* z)
+ (i
* z)), (i
* (
- i))])) by
X1,
DefaddCoset,
AS
.= (
0. IT) by
AS,
X1,
X3,
defZero;
hence v is
right_complementable by
ALGSTR_0:def 11;
end;
P6: for v,w be
Element of IT holds (v
+ w)
= (w
+ v)
proof
let v,w be
Element of IT;
consider i be
Element of
INT.Ring , z be
Element of V such that
X1: i
<>
0 & v
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, i])) by
AS,
LMEQRZM1;
consider j be
Element of
INT.Ring , y be
Element of V such that
X2: j
<>
0 & w
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[y, j])) by
AS,
LMEQRZM1;
(v
+ w)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[((j
* z)
+ (i
* y)), (i
* j)])) by
X1,
X2,
DefaddCoset,
AS;
hence (v
+ w)
= (w
+ v) by
AS,
X1,
X2,
DefaddCoset;
end;
P7: for u,v,w be
Element of IT holds ((u
+ v)
+ w)
= (u
+ (v
+ w))
proof
let u,v,w be
Element of IT;
consider k be
Element of
INT.Ring , s be
Element of V such that
X0: k
<>
0 & u
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[s, k])) by
AS,
LMEQRZM1;
consider i be
Element of
INT.Ring , z be
Element of V such that
X1: i
<>
0 & v
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, i])) by
AS,
LMEQRZM1;
consider j be
Element of
INT.Ring , y be
Element of V such that
X2: j
<>
0 & w
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[y, j])) by
AS,
LMEQRZM1;
X3: (u
+ v)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[((i
* s)
+ (k
* z)), (k
* i)])) by
X0,
X1,
DefaddCoset,
AS;
X4: ((u
+ v)
+ w)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[((j
* ((i
* s)
+ (k
* z)))
+ ((k
* i)
* y)), ((k
* i)
* j)])) by
X0,
X1,
X2,
X3,
DefaddCoset,
AS;
X5: (v
+ w)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[((j
* z)
+ (i
* y)), (i
* j)])) by
X1,
X2,
DefaddCoset,
AS;
X6: (u
+ (v
+ w))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(((i
* j)
* s)
+ (k
* ((j
* z)
+ (i
* y)))), (k
* (i
* j))])) by
X0,
X1,
X2,
X5,
DefaddCoset,
AS;
((j
* ((i
* s)
+ (k
* z)))
+ ((k
* i)
* y))
= (((j
* (i
* s))
+ (j
* (k
* z)))
+ ((k
* i)
* y)) by
VECTSP_1:def 14
.= ((((j
* i)
* s)
+ (j
* (k
* z)))
+ ((k
* i)
* y)) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= ((((i
* j)
* s)
+ (j
* (k
* z)))
+ ((k
* i)
* y))
.= ((((i
* j)
* s)
+ (j
* (k
* z)))
+ (k
* (i
* y))) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= ((((i
* j)
* s)
+ ((j
* k)
* z))
+ (k
* (i
* y))) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= ((((i
* j)
* s)
+ ((k
* j)
* z))
+ (k
* (i
* y)))
.= ((((i
* j)
* s)
+ (k
* (j
* z)))
+ (k
* (i
* y))) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= (((i
* j)
* s)
+ ((k
* (j
* z))
+ (k
* (i
* y)))) by
RLVECT_1:def 3
.= (((i
* j)
* s)
+ (k
* ((j
* z)
+ (i
* y)))) by
VECTSP_1:def 14;
hence ((u
+ v)
+ w)
= (u
+ (v
+ w)) by
X4,
X6;
end;
for v be
Element of IT holds (v
+ (
0. IT))
= v
proof
let u be
Element of IT;
consider i be
Element of
INT.Ring , z be
Element of V such that
X1: i
<>
0 & u
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[z, i])) by
AS,
LMEQRZM1;
reconsider i1 = (
1.
INT.Ring ) as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
X3: (
0. IT)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(
0. V), i1])) by
AS,
defZero;
X5: (u
+ (
0. IT))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[((i1
* z)
+ (i
* (
0. V))), (i1
* i)])) by
AS,
X1,
X3,
DefaddCoset;
((i1
* z)
+ (i
* (
0. V)))
= (z
+ (i
* (
0. V))) by
VECTSP_1:def 17
.= (z
+ (
0. V)) by
ZMODUL01: 1
.= z;
hence (u
+ (
0. IT))
= u by
X5,
X1;
end;
hence thesis by
P1,
P2,
P3,
P4,
P5,
P6,
P7,
ALGSTR_0:def 16,
RLVECT_1:def 2,
RLVECT_1:def 3,
RLVECT_1:def 4,
VECTSP_1:def 14,
VECTSP_1:def 15,
VECTSP_1:def 16,
VECTSP_1:def 17;
end;
definition
let V be
Z_Module;
assume
AS: V is
Mult-cancelable;
::
ZMODUL04:def5
func
Z_MQ_VectSp (V) ->
VectSp of
F_Rat equals
:
defZMQVSp:
ModuleStr (# (
Class (
EQRZM V)), (
addCoset V), (
zeroCoset V), (
lmultCoset V) #);
correctness by
ThEQRZMV1,
AS;
end
ThEQRZMV2: for V be
Z_Module st V is
Mult-cancelable holds ex I be
Function of V, (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) st I is
one-to-one & (for v be
Element of V holds (I
. v)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[v, 1]))) & (for v,w be
Element of V holds (I
. (v
+ w))
= ((I
. v)
+ (I
. w))) & (for v be
Element of V, i be
Element of
INT.Ring , q be
Element of
F_Rat st i
= q holds (I
. (i
* v))
= (q
* (I
. v))) & (I
. (
0. V))
= (
0. (
Z_MQ_VectSp V))
proof
let V be
Z_Module;
assume
AS: V is
Mult-cancelable;
then
Z0: (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)
=
ModuleStr (# (
Class (
EQRZM V)), (
addCoset V), (
zeroCoset V), (
lmultCoset V) #) by
defZMQVSp;
X1: 1
in
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
not 1
in
{
0 } by
TARSKI:def 1;
then
X2: 1
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
X1;
set i1 = (
1.
INT.Ring );
defpred
F0[
Element of V,
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)] means $2
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[$1, 1]));
A2: for x be
Element of V holds ex v be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) st
F0[x, v]
proof
let x be
Element of V;
X1: 1
in
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
not 1
in
{
0 } by
TARSKI:def 1;
then 1
in (
INT
\
{
0 }) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
X1;
then
[x, 1]
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
reconsider z = (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[x, 1])) as
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) by
Z0,
EQREL_1:def 3;
z
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[x, 1]));
hence ex z be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) st
F0[x, z];
end;
consider F be
Function of V, (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) such that
X3: for x be
Element of V holds
F0[x, (F
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 3(
A2);
take F;
S2:
now
let x1,x2 be
object;
assume
A1: x1
in the
carrier of V & x2
in the
carrier of V & (F
. x1)
= (F
. x2);
then
reconsider x10 = x1, x20 = x2 as
Element of V;
P1: (F
. x1)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[x10, 1])) by
X3;
P2:
[x10, 1]
in
[:the
carrier of V, (
INT
\
{
0 }):] by
X2,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
(
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[x10, i1]))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[x20, i1])) by
A1,
P1,
X3;
then
P3:
[
[x10, i1],
[x20, i1]]
in (
EQRZM V) by
P2,
EQREL_1: 35;
thus x1
= (i1
* x10) by
VECTSP_1:def 17
.= (i1
* x20) by
AS,
P3,
LMEQR001
.= x2 by
VECTSP_1:def 17;
end;
S3: for v,w be
Element of V holds (F
. (v
+ w))
= ((F
. v)
+ (F
. w))
proof
let v,w be
Element of V;
P1: (F
. v)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[v, 1])) by
X3;
P2: (F
. w)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[w, 1])) by
X3;
P8: ((i1
* v)
+ (i1
* w))
= (i1
* (v
+ w)) by
VECTSP_1:def 14
.= (v
+ w) by
VECTSP_1:def 17;
((F
. v)
+ (F
. w))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[((i1
* v)
+ (i1
* w)), (i1
* i1)])) by
AS,
P1,
P2,
Z0,
DefaddCoset
.= (F
. (v
+ w)) by
P8,
X3;
hence thesis;
end;
S4: for v be
Element of V, i be
Element of
INT.Ring , q be
Element of
F_Rat st i
= q holds (F
. (i
* v))
= (q
* (F
. v))
proof
let v be
Element of V, i be
Element of
INT.Ring , x be
Element of
F_Rat ;
assume
AS0: i
= x;
P1: (F
. v)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[v, i1])) by
X3;
reconsider ii = i, ii1 = i1 as
Integer;
i1
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & x
= (ii
/ ii1) by
AS0;
then (x
* (F
. v))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(i
* v), (i1
* i1)])) by
AS,
P1,
Z0,
DeflmultCoset
.= (F
. (i
* v)) by
X3;
hence thesis;
end;
(F
. (
0. V))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(
0. V), 1])) by
X3
.= (
0. (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)) by
AS,
Z0,
defZero;
hence thesis by
S2,
S3,
S4,
X3,
FUNCT_2: 19;
end;
definition
let V be
Z_Module;
assume
AS: V is
Mult-cancelable;
::
ZMODUL04:def6
func
MorphsZQ (V) ->
Function of V, (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) means
:
defMorph: it is
one-to-one & (for v be
Element of V holds (it
. v)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[v, 1]))) & (for v,w be
Element of V holds (it
. (v
+ w))
= ((it
. v)
+ (it
. w))) & (for v be
Element of V, i be
Element of
INT.Ring , q be
Element of
F_Rat st i
= q holds (it
. (i
* v))
= (q
* (it
. v))) & (it
. (
0. V))
= (
0. (
Z_MQ_VectSp V));
existence by
ThEQRZMV2,
AS;
uniqueness
proof
let F1,F2 be
Function of V, (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
assume
A1: F1 is
one-to-one & (for v be
Element of V holds (F1
. v)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[v, 1]))) & (for v,w be
Element of V holds (F1
. (v
+ w))
= ((F1
. v)
+ (F1
. w))) & (for v be
Element of V, i be
Element of
INT.Ring , q be
Element of
F_Rat st i
= q holds (F1
. (i
* v))
= (q
* (F1
. v))) & (F1
. (
0. V))
= (
0. (
Z_MQ_VectSp V));
assume
A2: F2 is
one-to-one & (for v be
Element of V holds (F2
. v)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[v, 1]))) & (for v,w be
Element of V holds (F2
. (v
+ w))
= ((F2
. v)
+ (F2
. w))) & (for v be
Element of V, i be
Element of
INT.Ring , q be
Element of
F_Rat st i
= q holds (F2
. (i
* v))
= (q
* (F2
. v))) & (F2
. (
0. V))
= (
0. (
Z_MQ_VectSp V));
now
let v be
Element of V;
thus (F1
. v)
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[v, 1])) by
A1
.= (F2
. v) by
A2;
end;
hence F1
= F2 by
FUNCT_2:def 8;
end;
end
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:6
XThSum: for V be
Z_Module st V is
Mult-cancelable holds for s be
FinSequence of V, t be
FinSequence of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) st (
len s)
= (
len t) & for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom s) holds ex si be
Vector of V st si
= (s
. i) & (t
. i)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. si) holds (
Sum t)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. (
Sum s))
proof
let V be
Z_Module;
assume
AS: V is
Mult-cancelable;
defpred
P[
Nat] means for s be
FinSequence of V, t be
FinSequence of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) st (
len s)
= $1 & (
len s)
= (
len t) & for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom s) holds ex si be
Vector of V st si
= (s
. i) & (t
. i)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. si) holds (
Sum t)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. (
Sum s));
A1:
P[
0 ]
proof
let s be
FinSequence of V, t be
FinSequence of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
assume that
A2: (
len s)
=
0 & (
len s)
= (
len t) and for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom s) holds ex si be
Vector of V st si
= (s
. i) & (t
. i)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. si);
s
= (
<*> the
carrier of V) by
A2;
then (
Sum s)
= (
0. V) by
RLVECT_1: 43;
then
A3: ((
MorphsZQ V)
. (
Sum s))
= (
0. (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)) by
defMorph,
AS;
t
= (
<*> the
carrier of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)) by
A2;
hence thesis by
A3,
RLVECT_1: 43;
end;
A4: for k be
Nat st
P[k] holds
P[(k
+ 1)]
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A5:
P[k];
now
let s be
FinSequence of V, t be
FinSequence of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
assume that
A6: (
len s)
= (k
+ 1) & (
len s)
= (
len t) and
A7: for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom s) holds ex si be
Vector of V st si
= (s
. i) & (t
. i)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. si);
reconsider s1 = (s
| k) as
FinSequence of V;
A8: (
dom s)
= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A6,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A9: (
dom t)
= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A6,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A10: (
len s1)
= k by
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 59,
NAT_1: 11;
A11: (
dom s1)
= (
Seg (
len s1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
Seg k) by
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 59,
NAT_1: 11;
then
A12: s1
= (s
| (
dom s1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 15;
reconsider t1 = (t
| k) as
FinSequence of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
A13: (
dom t1)
= (
Seg (
len t1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
Seg k) by
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 59,
NAT_1: 11;
then
A14: t1
= (t
| (
dom t1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 15;
k
in
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
then
A15: (
len t1)
= k by
A13,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(s
. (
len s))
in (
rng s) by
A6,
A8,
FINSEQ_1: 4,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider vs = (s
. (
len s)) as
Element of V;
(t
. (
len t))
in (
rng t) by
A6,
A9,
FINSEQ_1: 4,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider vt = (t
. (
len t)) as
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
A16: (
len s1)
= k & (
len s1)
= (
len t1) by
A10,
A13,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A17: for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom s1) holds ex si be
Vector of V st si
= (s1
. i) & (t1
. i)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. si)
proof
let i be
Element of
NAT ;
assume
A18: i
in (
dom s1);
(
Seg k)
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 5,
NAT_1: 11;
then
consider si be
Vector of V such that
A19: si
= (s
. i) & (t
. i)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. si) by
A7,
A11,
A8,
A18;
take si;
thus si
= (s1
. i) by
A12,
A18,
A19,
FUNCT_1: 49;
thus (t1
. i)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. si) by
A14,
A11,
A13,
A18,
A19,
FUNCT_1: 49;
end;
A20: (
Sum t1)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. (
Sum s1)) by
A5,
A16,
A17;
A21: (
len s)
= ((
len s1)
+ 1) by
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 59,
NAT_1: 11;
consider ssi be
Vector of V such that
A22: ssi
= (s
. (
len s)) & (t
. (
len s))
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. ssi) by
A6,
A7,
A8,
FINSEQ_1: 4;
thus (
Sum t)
= ((
Sum t1)
+ vt) by
A6,
A14,
A15,
RLVECT_1: 38
.= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. ((
Sum s1)
+ vs)) by
AS,
A6,
A20,
A22,
defMorph
.= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. (
Sum s)) by
A12,
A21,
RLVECT_1: 38;
end;
hence
P[(k
+ 1)];
end;
for k be
Nat holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A1,
A4);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:7
XThSum1: for V be
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V), l be
Linear_Combination of I, lq be
Linear_Combination of IQ st V is
Mult-cancelable & IQ
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I) & l
= (lq
* (
MorphsZQ V)) holds (
Sum lq)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. (
Sum l))
proof
let V be
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V), l be
Linear_Combination of I, lq be
Linear_Combination of IQ;
assume
AS0: V is
Mult-cancelable & IQ
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I) & l
= (lq
* (
MorphsZQ V));
per cases ;
suppose
A3: I is
empty;
then IQ
= (
{} the
carrier of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)) by
AS0;
then lq
= (
ZeroLC (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)) by
VECTSP_6: 6;
then
A6: (
Sum lq)
= (
0. (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)) by
VECTSP_6: 15;
I
= (
{} the
carrier of V) by
A3;
then l
= (
ZeroLC V) by
ZMODUL02: 12;
then (
Sum l)
= (
0. V) by
ZMODUL02: 19;
hence (
Sum lq)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. (
Sum l)) by
A6,
defMorph,
AS0;
end;
suppose
E1: I is non
empty;
then
consider v0 be
object such that
A7: v0
in I;
reconsider v0 as
Vector of V by
A7;
((
MorphsZQ V)
. v0)
in IQ by
A7,
AS0,
FUNCT_2: 35;
then
reconsider X = IQ as non
empty
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
reconsider g = ((
MorphsZQ V)
| I) as
Function of I, IQ by
FUNCT_2: 101,
AS0;
(
MorphsZQ V) is
one-to-one by
defMorph,
AS0;
then
AX1: g is
one-to-one by
FUNCT_1: 52;
AX2: (
rng g)
= IQ by
RELAT_1: 115,
AS0;
then
reconsider F = (g
" ) as
Function of IQ, I by
FUNCT_2: 25,
AX1;
reconsider F as
Function of X, the
carrier of V by
E1,
FUNCT_2: 7;
X
= IQ;
then
AX2A: (
dom g)
= I by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
AX3: (
dom F)
= X & (
rng F)
= I by
AX1,
AX2,
FUNCT_1: 33;
A8: for u be
Vector of V st u
in I holds (F
. ((
MorphsZQ V)
. u))
= u
proof
let u be
Vector of V;
assume
AS8: u
in I;
hence (F
. ((
MorphsZQ V)
. u))
= (F
. (g
. u)) by
FUNCT_1: 49
.= u by
FUNCT_1: 34,
AS8,
AX2A,
AX1;
end;
consider Gq be
FinSequence of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) such that
A9: Gq is
one-to-one & (
rng Gq)
= (
Carrier lq) & (
Sum lq)
= (
Sum (lq
(#) Gq)) by
VECTSP_6:def 6;
set n = (
len Gq);
A10: (
dom Gq)
= (
Seg n) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A11: (
Carrier lq)
c= X by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
A12: (
dom (F
* Gq))
= (
Seg n) by
A10,
A9,
AX3,
RELAT_1: 27,
VECTSP_6:def 4;
A13: (
rng (F
* Gq))
c= the
carrier of V;
(F
* Gq) is
FinSequence by
AX3,
A9,
FINSEQ_1: 16,
VECTSP_6:def 4;
then
reconsider FGq = (F
* Gq) as
FinSequence of V by
A13,
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
for x be
object holds x
in (
rng FGq) iff x
in (
Carrier l)
proof
let x be
object;
hereby
assume x
in (
rng FGq);
then
consider z be
object such that
A14: z
in (
dom FGq) & x
= (FGq
. z) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
A15: x
= (F
. (Gq
. z)) by
A14,
FUNCT_1: 12;
A16: z
in (
dom Gq) & (Gq
. z)
in (
dom F) by
A14,
FUNCT_1: 11;
then
consider u be
Vector of V such that
A17: u
in I & (Gq
. z)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. u) by
AS0,
FUNCT_2: 65;
A18: (F
. (Gq
. z))
= u by
A8,
A17;
consider w be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) such that
A19: (Gq
. z)
= w & (lq
. w)
<> (
0.
F_Rat ) by
A9,
A16,
FUNCT_1: 3,
VECTSP_6: 1;
(l
. u)
<> (
0.
F_Rat ) by
AS0,
A17,
A19,
FUNCT_2: 15;
hence x
in (
Carrier l) by
A15,
A18;
end;
assume
A20: x
in (
Carrier l);
then
reconsider u = x as
Vector of V;
A21: (l
. u)
<>
0 by
A20,
ZMODUL02: 8;
A22: (
Carrier l)
c= I by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
(lq
. ((
MorphsZQ V)
. u))
<>
0 by
AS0,
A21,
FUNCT_2: 15;
then
A23: ((
MorphsZQ V)
. u)
in (
rng Gq) by
A9;
then
consider z be
object such that
A24: z
in (
dom Gq) & ((
MorphsZQ V)
. u)
= (Gq
. z) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
A25: (F
. (Gq
. z))
= u by
A20,
A22,
A24,
A8;
A26: z
in (
dom FGq) by
A11,
A9,
A24,
AX3,
A23,
FUNCT_1: 11;
then (FGq
. z)
= u by
A25,
FUNCT_1: 12;
hence x
in (
rng FGq) by
A26,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
then (
rng FGq)
= (
Carrier l) by
TARSKI: 2;
then
A27: (
Sum l)
= (
Sum (l
(#) FGq)) by
A9,
AX1,
VECTSP_6:def 6;
A28: (
len (l
(#) FGq))
= (
len FGq) by
VECTSP_6:def 5;
then
A29: (
len (l
(#) FGq))
= n by
A12,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A30: (
len (lq
(#) Gq))
= n by
VECTSP_6:def 5;
now
let i be
Element of
NAT ;
assume
A31: i
in (
dom (l
(#) FGq));
then i
in (
Seg (
len FGq)) by
A28,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A32: i
in (
dom FGq) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (FGq
. i)
in (
rng FGq) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider v = (FGq
. i) as
Element of V;
A33: ((l
(#) FGq)
. i)
= ((l
. v)
* v) by
A32,
ZMODUL02: 13;
i
in (
Seg n) by
A29,
A31,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A34: i
in (
dom Gq) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A35: (Gq
. i)
in (
rng Gq) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
reconsider w = (Gq
. i) as
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) by
A35;
consider u be
Vector of V such that
A37: u
in I & (Gq
. i)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. u) by
AS0,
A9,
A11,
A35,
FUNCT_2: 65;
A381: (F
. (Gq
. i))
= u by
A8,
A37;
then
A38: v
= u by
A32,
FUNCT_1: 12;
A39: w
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. v) by
A32,
A37,
A381,
FUNCT_1: 12;
A40: (lq
. w)
= (l
. v) by
AS0,
A37,
A38,
FUNCT_2: 15;
T1: ((lq
. w)
* w)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. ((l
. v)
* v)) by
defMorph,
A39,
A40,
AS0;
thus ex si be
VECTOR of V st si
= ((l
(#) FGq)
. i) & ((lq
(#) Gq)
. i)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. si)
proof
take si = ((l
(#) FGq)
. i);
thus thesis by
A33,
A34,
VECTSP_6: 8,
T1;
end;
end;
hence (
Sum lq)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. (
Sum l)) by
A9,
A27,
A29,
A30,
AS0,
XThSum;
end;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:8
ThEQRZMV3A: for V be
Z_Module, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) holds for lq be
Linear_Combination of IQ holds ex m be
Integer, a be
Element of
F_Rat st m
<>
0 & m
= a & (
rng (a
* lq))
c=
INT
proof
let V be
Z_Module, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
defpred
P[
Nat] means for lq be
Linear_Combination of IQ st (
card (
Carrier lq))
= $1 holds ex m be
Integer, a be
Element of
F_Rat st m
<>
0 & m
= a & (
rng (a
* lq))
c=
INT ;
P1:
P[
0 ]
proof
let lq be
Linear_Combination of IQ such that
P2: (
card (
Carrier lq))
=
0 ;
P3: (
Carrier lq)
=
{} by
P2;
reconsider m = 1 as
Integer;
reconsider a = m as
Element of
F_Rat ;
(
Carrier (a
* lq))
c= (
Carrier lq) by
VECTSP_6: 28;
then (
Carrier (a
* lq))
=
{} by
P3;
then
X1: (a
* lq)
= (
ZeroLC (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)) by
VECTSP_6:def 3;
now
let y be
object;
assume y
in (
rng (a
* lq));
then
consider x be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) such that
X2: y
= ((a
* lq)
. x) by
FUNCT_2: 113;
((a
* lq)
. x)
= (
0.
F_Rat ) by
X1,
VECTSP_6: 3
.=
0 ;
hence y
in
INT by
X2;
end;
hence thesis by
TARSKI:def 3;
end;
P2: for n be
Nat st
P[n] holds
P[(n
+ 1)]
proof
let n be
Nat;
assume
P21:
P[n];
now
let lq be
Linear_Combination of IQ;
assume
P22: (
card (
Carrier lq))
= (n
+ 1);
then (
Carrier lq)
<>
{} ;
then
consider x be
object such that
P24: x
in (
Carrier lq) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
reconsider x as
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) by
P24;
P25: (
card ((
Carrier lq)
\
{x}))
= ((
card (
Carrier lq))
- (
card
{x})) by
P24,
CARD_2: 44,
ZFMISC_1: 31
.= ((n
+ 1)
- 1) by
P22,
CARD_2: 42
.= n;
defpred
PN[
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V),
Element of
F_Rat ] means ($1
in
{x} implies $2
=
0 ) & ( not $1
in
{x} implies $2
= (lq
. $1));
A2: for v be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) holds ex y be
Element of
F_Rat st
PN[v, y]
proof
let v be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
v
in
{x} or not v
in
{x};
hence thesis;
end;
consider lq0 be
Function of the
carrier of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V), the
carrier of
F_Rat such that
A4: for v be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) holds
PN[v, (lq0
. v)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 3(
A2);
reconsider lq0 as
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V),the
carrier of
F_Rat )) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
set T = { v where v be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) : (lq0
. v)
<> (
0.
F_Rat ) };
A400: T
c= ((
Carrier lq)
\
{x})
proof
let v0 be
object;
assume v0
in T;
then
XX2: ex v1 be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) st v1
= v0 & (lq0
. v1)
<> (
0.
F_Rat );
then
reconsider v = v0 as
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
XX4: not v
in
{x} by
A4,
XX2;
(lq
. v)
<> (
0.
F_Rat ) by
A4,
XX2;
then v0
in (
Carrier lq);
hence v0
in ((
Carrier lq)
\
{x}) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5,
XX4;
end;
((
Carrier lq)
\
{x})
c= (
Carrier lq) by
XBOOLE_1: 36;
then
A40: T
c= (
Carrier lq) by
XBOOLE_1: 1,
A400;
reconsider T as
finite
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) by
A400,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
for v be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) st not v
in T holds (lq0
. v)
= (
0.
F_Rat );
then
reconsider lq0 as
Linear_Combination of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) by
VECTSP_6:def 1;
X5: T
= (
Carrier lq0);
(
Carrier lq)
c= IQ by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
then
reconsider lq0 as
Linear_Combination of IQ by
A40,
X5,
VECTSP_6:def 4,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
((
Carrier lq)
\
{x})
c= T
proof
let v0 be
object;
assume
YY11: v0
in ((
Carrier lq)
\
{x});
then
YY1: v0
in (
Carrier lq) & not v0
in
{x} by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
reconsider v = v0 as
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) by
YY11;
(lq
. v)
<> (
0.
F_Rat ) by
YY1,
VECTSP_6: 2;
then (lq0
. v)
<> (
0.
F_Rat ) by
A4,
YY1;
hence v0
in T;
end;
then (
card (
Carrier lq0))
= n by
A400,
P25,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then
consider m0 be
Integer, a0 be
Element of
F_Rat such that
X8: m0
<>
0 & m0
= a0 & (
rng (a0
* lq0))
c=
INT by
P21;
consider k0,n0 be
Integer such that
X9: n0
<>
0 & (lq
. x)
= (k0
/ n0) by
RAT_1: 1;
reconsider m = (n0
* m0) as
Integer;
reconsider a = m as
Element of
F_Rat by
RAT_1:def 2;
reconsider b = n0 as
Element of
F_Rat by
RAT_1:def 2;
for y be
object st y
in (
rng (a
* lq)) holds y
in
INT
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in (
rng (a
* lq));
then
consider z be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) such that
X2: y
= ((a
* lq)
. z) by
FUNCT_2: 113;
per cases ;
suppose
B2: z
in
{x};
BB2: y
= ((a
* lq)
. x) by
B2,
X2,
TARSKI:def 1
.= (a
* (lq
. x)) by
VECTSP_6:def 9;
(a
* (lq
. x))
= ((m0
* n0)
* (k0
/ n0)) by
X9
.= (m0
* (n0
* (k0
/ n0)))
.= (m0
* k0) by
XCMPLX_1: 87,
X9;
hence y
in
INT by
BB2,
INT_1:def 2;
end;
suppose not z
in
{x};
then
B31: (lq0
. z)
= (lq
. z) by
A4;
BBB: a
= (b
* a0) by
X8;
B32: ((a
* lq)
. z)
= (a
* (lq
. z)) by
VECTSP_6:def 9
.= (b
* (a0
* (lq0
. z))) by
B31,
BBB
.= (b
* ((a0
* lq0)
. z)) by
VECTSP_6:def 9;
((a0
* lq0)
. z)
in (
rng (a0
* lq0)) by
FUNCT_2: 4;
then
reconsider aqz = ((a0
* lq0)
. z) as
Integer by
X8;
(b
* ((a0
* lq0)
. z))
= (n0
* aqz);
hence y
in
INT by
B32,
X2,
INT_1:def 2;
end;
end;
hence ex m be
Integer, a be
Element of
F_Rat st m
<>
0 & m
= a & (
rng (a
* lq))
c=
INT by
X8,
X9,
TARSKI:def 3;
end;
hence
P[(n
+ 1)];
end;
P3: for n be
Nat holds
P[n] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
P1,
P2);
now
let lq be
Linear_Combination of IQ;
(
card (
Carrier lq)) is
Element of
NAT ;
hence ex m be
Integer, a be
Element of
F_Rat st m
<>
0 & m
= a & (
rng (a
* lq))
c=
INT by
P3;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:9
ThEQRZMV3: for V be
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V), lq be
Linear_Combination of IQ st V is
Mult-cancelable & IQ
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I) holds ex m be
Element of
INT.Ring , a be
Element of
F_Rat , l be
Linear_Combination of I st m
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & m
= a & l
= ((a
* lq)
* (
MorphsZQ V)) & ((
MorphsZQ V)
" (
Carrier lq))
= (
Carrier l)
proof
let V be
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V), lq be
Linear_Combination of IQ;
assume
AS: V is
Mult-cancelable & IQ
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I);
consider m be
Integer, a be
Element of
F_Rat such that
X3: m
<>
0 & m
= a & (
rng (a
* lq))
c=
INT by
ThEQRZMV3A;
reconsider mm = m as
Element of
INT.Ring by
INT_1:def 2;
P81: (
rng ((a
* lq)
* (
MorphsZQ V)))
c= (
rng (a
* lq)) by
RELAT_1: 26;
(
dom ((a
* lq)
* (
MorphsZQ V)))
= the
carrier of V by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then ((a
* lq)
* (
MorphsZQ V)) is
Function of the
carrier of V,
INT by
P81,
X3,
FUNCT_2: 2,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
then
reconsider l = ((a
* lq)
* (
MorphsZQ V)) as
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of V,
INT )) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
set T = { v where v be
Element of V : (l
. v)
<>
0 };
set F = (
MorphsZQ V);
B2:
now
let v be
object;
assume v
in T;
then ex v1 be
Element of V st v1
= v & (l
. v1)
<>
0 ;
hence v
in the
carrier of V;
end;
R1: T
c= (F
" (
Carrier lq))
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in T;
then
consider v be
Element of V such that
R11: x
= v & (l
. v)
<>
0 ;
RRR: (
dom F)
= the
carrier of V by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
V1: (l
. v)
= ((a
* lq)
. (F
. v)) by
FUNCT_1: 13,
RRR
.= (a
* (lq
. (F
. v))) by
VECTSP_6:def 9;
(lq
. (F
. v))
<> (
0.
F_Rat ) by
V1,
R11;
then (F
. v)
in (
Carrier lq);
hence x
in (F
" (
Carrier lq)) by
R11,
FUNCT_2: 38;
end;
F is
one-to-one by
AS,
defMorph;
then (F
" (
Carrier lq))
= ((F
" )
.: (
Carrier lq)) by
FUNCT_1: 85;
then
reconsider T as
finite
Subset of V by
B2,
R1,
TARSKI:def 3;
for v be
Element of V st not v
in T holds (l
. v)
= (
0.
INT.Ring );
then
reconsider l as
Linear_Combination of V by
VECTSP_6:def 1;
(F
" (
Carrier lq))
c= T
proof
let x be
object;
assume
S21: x
in (F
" (
Carrier lq));
then x
in the
carrier of V & (F
. x)
in (
Carrier lq) by
FUNCT_2: 38;
then
consider w be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) such that
R11: (F
. x)
= w & (lq
. w)
<> (
0.
F_Rat );
reconsider v = x as
Element of V by
S21;
RRR: (
dom F)
= the
carrier of V by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
RR1: (l
. v)
= ((a
* lq)
. (F
. v)) by
FUNCT_1: 13,
RRR
.= (a
* (lq
. w)) by
R11,
VECTSP_6:def 9;
reconsider a1 = a, d1 = (lq
. w) as
Rational;
(l
. v)
<>
0 by
RR1,
R11,
X3;
hence x
in T;
end;
then
A9: (F
" (
Carrier lq))
= T by
R1;
A7: T
= (
Carrier l);
AA1: (F
" (
Carrier lq))
c= (F
" (F
.: I)) by
AS,
RELAT_1: 143,
VECTSP_6:def 4;
(
dom F)
= the
carrier of V by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then F is
one-to-one & I
c= (
dom F) by
AS,
defMorph;
then T
c= I by
A9,
AA1,
FUNCT_1: 94;
then
reconsider l1 = l as
Linear_Combination of I by
A7,
VECTSP_6:def 4;
take mm;
take a;
take l1;
thus mm
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & mm
= a & l1
= ((a
* lq)
* (
MorphsZQ V)) & ((
MorphsZQ V)
" (
Carrier lq))
= (
Carrier l1) by
A9,
X3;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:10
ThEQRZMV3B: for V be
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V), lq be
Linear_Combination of IQ, m be
Integer, a be
Element of
F_Rat , l be
Linear_Combination of I st V is
Mult-cancelable & IQ
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I) & m
<>
0 & m
= a & l
= ((a
* lq)
* (
MorphsZQ V)) holds (a
* (
Sum lq))
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. (
Sum l))
proof
let V be
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V), lq be
Linear_Combination of IQ, m be
Integer, a be
Element of
F_Rat , l be
Linear_Combination of I;
assume
AS: V is
Mult-cancelable & IQ
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I) & m
<>
0 & m
= a & l
= ((a
* lq)
* (
MorphsZQ V));
reconsider lqa = (a
* lq) as
Linear_Combination of IQ by
VECTSP_6: 31;
thus (a
* (
Sum lq))
= (
Sum lqa) by
VECTSP_6: 45
.= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. (
Sum l)) by
AS,
XThSum1;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:11
ThEQRZMV3C: for V be
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) st V is
Mult-cancelable & IQ
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I) & I is
linearly-independent holds IQ is
linearly-independent
proof
let V be
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
assume
AS: V is
Mult-cancelable & IQ
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I) & I is
linearly-independent;
assume not IQ is
linearly-independent;
then
consider lq be
Linear_Combination of IQ such that
P1: (
Sum lq)
= (
0. (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)) & (
Carrier lq)
<>
{} by
VECTSP_7:def 1;
consider m be
Element of
INT.Ring , a be
Element of
F_Rat , l be
Linear_Combination of I such that
P2: m
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & m
= a & l
= ((a
* lq)
* (
MorphsZQ V)) & ((
MorphsZQ V)
" (
Carrier lq))
= (
Carrier l) by
ThEQRZMV3,
AS;
(a
* (
Sum lq))
= (
0. (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)) by
P1,
VECTSP_1: 15;
then
X2: ((
MorphsZQ V)
. (
Sum l))
= (
0. (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)) by
AS,
P2,
ThEQRZMV3B;
X3: ((
MorphsZQ V)
. (
0. V))
= (
0. (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)) by
AS,
defMorph;
(
MorphsZQ V) is
one-to-one by
AS,
defMorph;
then
P3: (
Sum l)
= (
0. V) by
X2,
X3,
FUNCT_2: 19;
H6: (
Carrier lq)
c= IQ by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
IQ
c= (
rng (
MorphsZQ V)) by
AS,
RELAT_1: 111;
then
H2: (
Carrier lq)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: (
Carrier l)) by
H6,
P2,
FUNCT_1: 77,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
(
Carrier l)
<>
{} by
H2,
P1;
hence contradiction by
AS,
P3,
VECTSP_7:def 1;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:12
ThEQRZMV4: for V be
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, l be
Linear_Combination of I, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) st V is
Mult-cancelable & IQ
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I) holds ex lq be
Linear_Combination of IQ st l
= (lq
* (
MorphsZQ V)) & (
Carrier lq)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: (
Carrier l))
proof
let V be
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, l be
Linear_Combination of I, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
assume
AS0: V is
Mult-cancelable & IQ
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I);
reconsider I0 = (
Carrier l) as
finite
Subset of V;
K2: ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I0)
c= IQ & ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I0) is
finite by
AS0,
RELAT_1: 123,
VECTSP_6:def 4;
reconsider IQ0 = ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I0) as
finite
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
defpred
P[
object,
object] means ($1
in IQ0 & ex v be
Element of V st v
in I0 & $1
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. v) & $2
= (l
. v)) or ( not $1
in IQ0 & $2
= (
0.
F_Rat ));
A2: for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) holds ex y be
object st y
in
RAT &
P[x, y]
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in the
carrier of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
then
reconsider x as
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
per cases ;
suppose
A3: x
in IQ0;
then
consider v be
object such that
A4: v
in the
carrier of V & v
in I0 & x
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. v) by
FUNCT_2: 64;
reconsider v as
Element of V by
A4;
(l
. v)
in
RAT by
NUMBERS: 14,
TARSKI:def 3;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4;
end;
suppose not x
in IQ0;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
consider lq be
Function of the
carrier of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V),
RAT such that
A5: for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) holds
P[x, (lq
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A2);
A6: for x be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) st not x
in IQ0 holds (lq
. x)
= (
0.
F_Rat ) by
A5;
lq is
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V),
RAT )) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
then
reconsider lq as
Linear_Combination of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) by
A6,
VECTSP_6:def 1;
A11: (
Carrier lq)
c= IQ0
proof
let x be
object;
assume that
A7: x
in (
Carrier lq) and
A8: not x
in IQ0;
consider z be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) such that
A9: x
= z and
A10: (lq
. z)
<> (
0.
F_Rat ) by
A7;
thus contradiction by
A5,
A8,
A9,
A10;
end;
then
reconsider lq as
Linear_Combination of IQ by
K2,
VECTSP_6:def 4,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
A12: (
dom l)
= the
carrier of V by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A13: (
dom (lq
* (
MorphsZQ V)))
= the
carrier of V by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
take lq;
F1: (
MorphsZQ V) is
one-to-one by
defMorph,
AS0;
for x be
object st x
in (
dom l) holds (l
. x)
= ((lq
* (
MorphsZQ V))
. x)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
dom l);
then
reconsider v = x as
Element of V;
reconsider w = ((
MorphsZQ V)
. v) as
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
per cases ;
suppose v
in I0;
then w
in IQ0 by
FUNCT_2: 35;
then
consider v0 be
Element of V such that
A16: v0
in I0 & w
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. v0) & (lq
. w)
= (l
. v0) by
A5;
v0
= v by
A16,
FUNCT_2: 19,
F1;
hence (l
. x)
= ((lq
* (
MorphsZQ V))
. x) by
A13,
A16,
FUNCT_1: 12;
end;
suppose
A18: not v
in I0;
then
A19: (l
. v)
= (
0.
F_Rat );
not w
in IQ0
proof
assume w
in IQ0;
then
consider v0 be
Element of V such that
A16: v0
in I0 & w
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. v0) & (lq
. w)
= (l
. v0) by
A5;
thus contradiction by
A16,
A18,
F1,
FUNCT_2: 19;
end;
then (lq
. w)
= (
0.
F_Rat ) by
A5;
hence (l
. x)
= ((lq
* (
MorphsZQ V))
. x) by
A13,
A19,
FUNCT_1: 12;
end;
end;
hence
U1: l
= (lq
* (
MorphsZQ V)) by
FUNCT_1: 2,
A12,
A13;
IQ0
c= (
Carrier lq)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in IQ0;
then
consider v be
object such that
A4: v
in the
carrier of V & v
in I0 & x
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. v) by
FUNCT_2: 64;
reconsider v as
Element of V by
A4;
x
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. v) by
A4;
then
reconsider y = x as
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
X1: (lq
. y)
= (l
. v) by
A4,
A13,
U1,
FUNCT_1: 12;
(l
. v)
<>
0 by
ZMODUL02: 8,
A4;
hence x
in (
Carrier lq) by
X1;
end;
hence (
Carrier lq)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: (
Carrier l)) by
A11;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:13
ThQuotAX: for V be
free
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V), l be
Linear_Combination of I, i be
Element of
INT.Ring st i
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & IQ
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I) holds (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(
Sum l), i]))
in (
Lin IQ)
proof
let V be
free
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V), l be
Linear_Combination of I, i be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
assume
AS: i
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & IQ
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I);
Z0: (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)
=
ModuleStr (# (
Class (
EQRZM V)), (
addCoset V), (
zeroCoset V), (
lmultCoset V) #) by
defZMQVSp;
consider lq be
Linear_Combination of IQ such that
P1: l
= (lq
* (
MorphsZQ V)) & (
Carrier lq)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: (
Carrier l)) by
ThEQRZMV4,
AS;
P2: (
Sum lq)
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
. (
Sum l)) by
AS,
P1,
XThSum1;
reconsider a = (1
/ i) as
Element of
F_Rat by
RAT_1:def 2;
P3: ((
MorphsZQ V)
. (
Sum l))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(
Sum l), (
1.
INT.Ring )])) by
defMorph;
(a
* ((
MorphsZQ V)
. (
Sum l)))
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[((
1.
INT.Ring )
* (
Sum l)), (i
* (
1.
INT.Ring ))])) by
AS,
P3,
Z0,
DeflmultCoset
.= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[(
Sum l), i])) by
VECTSP_1:def 17;
hence thesis by
P2,
VECTSP_4: 21,
VECTSP_7: 7;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:14
ThEQRZMV3E: for V be
free
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) st IQ
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I) holds (
card I)
= (
card IQ)
proof
let V be
free
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
assume
AS1: IQ
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I);
P1: (
MorphsZQ V) is
one-to-one by
defMorph;
the
carrier of V
= (
dom (
MorphsZQ V)) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
hence (
card I)
= (
card IQ) by
AS1,
P1,
CARD_1: 5,
CARD_1: 33;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:15
ThEQRZMV3D: for V be
free
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) st IQ
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I) & I is
Basis of V holds IQ is
Basis of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)
proof
let V be
free
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
assume
AS: IQ
= ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I) & I is
Basis of V;
then I is
base;
then
X0: I is
linearly-independent & (
Lin I)
= the ModuleStr of V by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
X1: IQ is
linearly-independent by
AS,
ThEQRZMV3C,
VECTSP_7:def 3;
AS0: (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)
=
ModuleStr (# (
Class (
EQRZM V)), (
addCoset V), (
zeroCoset V), (
lmultCoset V) #) by
defZMQVSp;
for vq be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) holds vq
in (
Lin IQ)
proof
let vq be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
consider i be
Element of
INT.Ring , v be
Element of V such that
P3: i
<>
0 & vq
= (
Class ((
EQRZM V),
[v, i])) by
AS0,
LMEQRZM1;
v
in (
Lin I) by
X0;
then
consider l be
Linear_Combination of I such that
P4: v
= (
Sum l) by
ZMODUL02: 64;
thus vq
in (
Lin IQ) by
AS,
P4,
P3,
ThQuotAX;
end;
hence thesis by
AS0,
X1,
VECTSP_4: 32,
VECTSP_7:def 3;
end;
registration
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module;
cluster (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) ->
finite-dimensional;
coherence
proof
consider I be
finite
Subset of V such that
P1: I is
Basis of V by
ZMODUL03:def 3;
reconsider IQ = ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I) as
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
IQ is
Basis of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) by
P1,
ThEQRZMV3D;
hence thesis by
MATRLIN:def 1;
end;
end
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:16
for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module holds (
rank V)
= (
dim (
Z_MQ_VectSp V))
proof
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module;
reconsider I = the
Basis of V as
Subset of V;
reconsider IQ = ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I) as
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
A1: IQ is
Basis of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) by
ThEQRZMV3D;
thus (
rank V)
= (
card I) by
ZMODUL03:def 5
.= (
card IQ) by
ThEQRZMV3E
.= (
dim (
Z_MQ_VectSp V)) by
A1,
VECTSP_9:def 1;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:17
XXTh1: for V be
free
Z_Module, I,A be
finite
Subset of V st I is
Basis of V & ((
card I)
+ 1)
= (
card A) holds A is
linearly-dependent
proof
let V be
free
Z_Module, I,A be
finite
Subset of V;
assume
AS: I is
Basis of V & ((
card I)
+ 1)
= (
card A);
reconsider IQ = ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: I) as
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
reconsider IQ as
finite
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
P2: IQ is
Basis of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) by
AS,
ThEQRZMV3D;
assume
P31: not A is
linearly-dependent;
reconsider B = ((
MorphsZQ V)
.: A) as
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
reconsider B as
finite
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V);
PP: IQ is
linearly-independent & (
Lin IQ)
= the ModuleStr of (
Z_MQ_VectSp V) by
VECTSP_7:def 3,
P2;
B is
linearly-independent by
P31,
ThEQRZMV3C;
then
P5: (
card B)
<= (
card IQ) by
VECTSP_9: 19,
PP;
(
card IQ)
= (
card I) by
ThEQRZMV3E;
then (
card A)
<= (
card I) by
P5,
ThEQRZMV3E;
hence contradiction by
AS,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:18
XXTh2: for V be
free
Z_Module, A,B be
Subset of V st A is
linearly-dependent & A
c= B holds B is
linearly-dependent by
VECTSP_7: 1;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:19
XXTh3: for V be
free
Z_Module, D,A be
Subset of V st D is
Basis of V & D is
finite & (
card D)
c< (
card A) holds A is
linearly-dependent
proof
let V be
free
Z_Module, D,A be
Subset of V;
assume
AS: D is
Basis of V & D is
finite & (
card D)
c< (
card A);
reconsider D0 = D as
finite
Subset of V by
AS;
(A
\ D0)
<>
{} by
AS,
CARD_1: 68,
ORDINAL1: 11;
then
consider x be
object such that
P3: x
in (A
\ D0) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
x
in A & not x
in D0 by
P3,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
P5: (
card (D0
\/
{x}))
= ((
card D0)
+ 1) by
CARD_2: 41;
(
succ (
card D0))
= ((
card D0)
+^ 1) by
ORDINAL2: 31
.= ((
card D0)
+ 1) by
CARD_2: 36;
then
P6: ((
card D0)
+ 1)
c= (
card A) by
AS,
ORDINAL1: 11,
ORDINAL1: 21;
consider f be
Function such that
P7: f is
one-to-one & (
dom f)
= (D0
\/
{x}) & (
rng f)
c= A by
CARD_1: 10,
P5,
P6;
set B = (
rng f);
P8: (
card B)
= ((
card D0)
+ 1) by
P5,
P7,
CARD_1: 5,
WELLORD2:def 4;
then
reconsider B as
finite
set;
reconsider B as
finite
Subset of V by
P7,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
B is
linearly-dependent by
XXTh1,
P8,
AS;
hence A is
linearly-dependent by
XXTh2,
P7;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:20
for V be
free
Z_Module, I,A be
Subset of V st I is
Basis of V & I is
finite & A is
linearly-independent holds (
card A)
c= (
card I) by
XXTh3,
XBOOLE_0:def 8;
begin
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:21
for V be
Z_Module st (
(Omega). V) is
free holds V is
free
proof
let V be
Z_Module such that
A1: (
(Omega). V) is
free;
consider I be
Subset of (
(Omega). V) such that
a2: I is
base by
VECTSP_7:def 4,
A1;
A2: I is
linearly-independent & (
(Omega). V)
= (
Lin I) by
a2,
VECTSP_7:def 3;
reconsider II = I as
linearly-independent
Subset of V by
A2,
ZMODUL03: 15;
(
(Omega). V)
= (
Lin II) by
A2,
ZMODUL03: 20;
then II is
base by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
hence thesis by
VECTSP_7:def 4;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:22
for R be
Ring holds for V be
LeftMod of R, W1,W2 be
Subspace of V, W1s,W2s be
strict
Subspace of V st W1s
= (
(Omega). W1) & W2s
= (
(Omega). W2) holds (W1s
+ W2s)
= (W1
+ W2)
proof
let R be
Ring;
let V be
LeftMod of R, W1,W2 be
Subspace of V, W1s,W2s be
strict
Subspace of V such that
A1: W1s
= (
(Omega). W1) & W2s
= (
(Omega). W2);
for x be
Vector of V holds x
in (W1
+ W2) iff x
in (W1s
+ W2s)
proof
let x be
Vector of V;
hereby
assume x
in (W1
+ W2);
then
consider x1,x2 be
Vector of V such that
B1: x1
in W1 & x2
in W2 & x
= (x1
+ x2) by
VECTSP_5: 1;
B2: x1
in W1s by
A1,
B1;
x2
in W2s by
A1,
B1;
hence x
in (W1s
+ W2s) by
B1,
B2,
VECTSP_5: 1;
end;
assume x
in (W1s
+ W2s);
then
consider x1,x2 be
Vector of V such that
B1: x1
in W1s & x2
in W2s & x
= (x1
+ x2) by
VECTSP_5: 1;
B2: x1
in W1 by
A1,
B1;
x2
in W2 by
A1,
B1;
hence x
in (W1
+ W2) by
B1,
B2,
VECTSP_5: 1;
end;
hence (W1
+ W2)
= (W1s
+ W2s) by
VECTSP_4: 30;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:23
for R be
Ring holds for V be
LeftMod of R, W1,W2 be
Subspace of V, W1s,W2s be
strict
Subspace of V st W1s
= (
(Omega). W1) & W2s
= (
(Omega). W2) holds (W1s
/\ W2s)
= (W1
/\ W2)
proof
let R be
Ring;
let V be
LeftMod of R, W1,W2 be
Subspace of V, W1s,W2s be
strict
Subspace of V such that
A1: W1s
= (
(Omega). W1) & W2s
= (
(Omega). W2);
for x be
Vector of V holds x
in (W1
/\ W2) iff x
in (W1s
/\ W2s)
proof
let x be
Vector of V;
hereby
assume x
in (W1
/\ W2);
then
B1: x
in W1 & x
in W2 by
VECTSP_5: 3;
B2: x
in W1s by
A1,
B1;
x
in W2s by
A1,
B1;
hence x
in (W1s
/\ W2s) by
B2,
VECTSP_5: 3;
end;
assume
B1: x
in (W1s
/\ W2s);
x
in the ModuleStr of W1 by
A1,
B1,
VECTSP_5: 3;
then
B2: x
in W1;
x
in the ModuleStr of W2 by
A1,
B1,
VECTSP_5: 3;
then x
in W2;
hence x
in (W1
/\ W2) by
B2,
VECTSP_5: 3;
end;
hence (W1
/\ W2)
= (W1s
/\ W2s) by
VECTSP_4: 30;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:24
Thn0V: for R be
Ring holds for V be
LeftMod of R, W be
strict
Subspace of V st W
<> (
(0). V) holds ex v be
Vector of V st v
in W & v
<> (
0. V)
proof
let R be
Ring;
let V be
LeftMod of R, W be
strict
Subspace of V such that
A1: W
<> (
(0). V);
A2: (
0. V)
in W by
VECTSP_4: 17;
the
carrier of W
<>
{(
0. V)} by
A1,
VECTSP_4:def 3;
then
{(
0. V)}
c< the
carrier of W by
A2,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
consider v be
object such that
A3: v
in the
carrier of W and
A4: not v
in
{(
0. V)} by
XBOOLE_0: 6;
reconsider v as
Vector of V by
A3,
VECTSP_4: 10;
take v;
thus thesis by
A3,
A4,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:25
ThCarrier1: for K be
Ring holds for V be
VectSp of K holds for A be
Subset of V, l1,l2 be
Linear_Combination of A st ((
Carrier l1)
/\ (
Carrier l2))
=
{} holds (
Carrier (l1
+ l2))
= ((
Carrier l1)
\/ (
Carrier l2))
proof
let K be
Ring;
let V be
VectSp of K;
let A be
Subset of V, l1,l2 be
Linear_Combination of A such that
A0: ((
Carrier l1)
/\ (
Carrier l2))
=
{} ;
A1: (
Carrier l1)
misses (
Carrier l2) by
A0;
((
Carrier l1)
\/ (
Carrier l2))
c= (
Carrier (l1
+ l2))
proof
let x be
object;
assume
B1: x
in ((
Carrier l1)
\/ (
Carrier l2));
then
reconsider x as
Vector of V;
per cases by
B1,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
C1: x
in (
Carrier l1);
then not x
in (
Carrier l2) by
A1,
B1,
XBOOLE_0: 5;
then
C2: (l2
. x)
= (
0. K);
((l1
+ l2)
. x)
= ((l1
. x)
+ (l2
. x)) by
VECTSP_6: 22
.= (l1
. x) by
C2;
then ((l1
+ l2)
. x)
<> (
0. K) by
C1,
VECTSP_6: 2;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
C1: x
in (
Carrier l2);
then not x
in (
Carrier l1) by
A1,
B1,
XBOOLE_0: 5;
then
C2: (l1
. x)
= (
0. K);
((l1
+ l2)
. x)
= ((l1
. x)
+ (l2
. x)) by
VECTSP_6: 22
.= (l2
. x) by
C2;
then ((l1
+ l2)
. x)
<> (
0. K) by
C1,
VECTSP_6: 2;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
VECTSP_6: 23;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:26
ThCarrier2: for R be
Ring holds for V be
VectSp of R holds for A1,A2 be
Subset of V, l be
Linear_Combination of (A1
\/ A2) st (A1
/\ A2)
=
{} holds ex l1 be
Linear_Combination of A1, l2 be
Linear_Combination of A2 st l
= (l1
+ l2)
proof
let K be
Ring;
let V be
VectSp of K;
let A1,A2 be
Subset of V, l be
Linear_Combination of (A1
\/ A2) such that
A1: (A1
/\ A2)
=
{} ;
A2: A1
misses A2 by
A1;
defpred
P[
object,
object] means $1 is
Vector of V implies ($1
in A1 & $2
= (l
. $1)) or ( not $1
in A1 & $2
= (
0. K));
A3: for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of V holds ex y be
object st y
in the
carrier of K &
P[x, y]
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in the
carrier of V;
then
reconsider x9 = x as
Vector of V;
per cases ;
suppose
B1: x
in A1;
(l
. x9)
in the
carrier of K;
hence thesis by
B1;
end;
suppose not x
in A1;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
ex l1 be
Function of the
carrier of V, the
carrier of K st for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of V holds
P[x, (l1
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A3);
then
consider l1 be
Function of the
carrier of V, the
carrier of K such that
A4: for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of V holds
P[x, (l1
. x)];
A5:
now
let v be
Vector of V;
assume
A6: not v
in (A1
/\ (
Carrier l));
per cases by
A6,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
suppose not v
in A1;
hence (l1
. v)
= (
0. K) by
A4;
end;
suppose not v
in (
Carrier l);
then (l
. v)
= (
0. K);
hence (l1
. v)
= (
0. K) by
A4;
end;
end;
reconsider l1 as
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of V,the
carrier of K)) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
reconsider l1 as
Linear_Combination of V by
A5,
VECTSP_6:def 1;
for x be
object holds x
in (
Carrier l1) implies x
in A1
proof
let x be
object;
assume
B1: x
in (
Carrier l1);
then
reconsider x as
Vector of V;
(l1
. x)
<> (
0. K) by
B1,
VECTSP_6: 2;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
then
AX1: l1 is
Linear_Combination of A1 by
TARSKI:def 3,
VECTSP_6:def 4;
defpred
Q[
object,
object] means $1 is
Vector of V implies ($1
in A2 & $2
= (l
. $1)) or ( not $1
in A2 & $2
= (
0. K));
A7: for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of V holds ex y be
object st y
in the
carrier of K &
Q[x, y]
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in the
carrier of V;
then
reconsider x9 = x as
Vector of V;
per cases ;
suppose
B1: x
in A2;
(l
. x9)
in the
carrier of K;
hence thesis by
B1;
end;
suppose not x
in A2;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
ex l2 be
Function of the
carrier of V, the
carrier of K st for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of V holds
Q[x, (l2
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A7);
then
consider l2 be
Function of the
carrier of V, the
carrier of K such that
A8: for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of V holds
Q[x, (l2
. x)];
A9:
now
let v be
Vector of V;
assume
A10: not v
in (A2
/\ (
Carrier l));
per cases by
A10,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
suppose not v
in A2;
hence (l2
. v)
= (
0. K) by
A8;
end;
suppose not v
in (
Carrier l);
then (l
. v)
= (
0. K);
hence (l2
. v)
= (
0. K) by
A8;
end;
end;
reconsider l2 as
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of V,the
carrier of K)) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
reconsider l2 as
Linear_Combination of V by
A9,
VECTSP_6:def 1;
for x be
object holds x
in (
Carrier l2) implies x
in A2
proof
let x be
object;
assume
B1: x
in (
Carrier l2);
then
reconsider x as
Vector of V;
(l2
. x)
<> (
0. K) by
B1,
VECTSP_6: 2;
hence thesis by
A8;
end;
then
AX2: l2 is
Linear_Combination of A2 by
TARSKI:def 3,
VECTSP_6:def 4;
for v be
Vector of V holds (l
. v)
= ((l1
+ l2)
. v)
proof
let v be
Vector of V;
per cases ;
suppose
B1: v
in A1;
then v
in (A1
\/ A2) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
B2: not v
in A2 by
A2,
B1,
XBOOLE_0: 5;
thus (l
. v)
= ((l1
. v)
+ (
0. K)) by
A4,
B1
.= ((l1
. v)
+ (l2
. v)) by
A8,
B2
.= ((l1
+ l2)
. v) by
VECTSP_6: 22;
end;
suppose
B1: v
in A2;
then v
in (A1
\/ A2) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
B2: not v
in A1 by
A2,
B1,
XBOOLE_0: 5;
thus (l
. v)
= ((
0. K)
+ (l2
. v)) by
A8,
B1
.= ((l1
. v)
+ (l2
. v)) by
A4,
B2
.= ((l1
+ l2)
. v) by
VECTSP_6: 22;
end;
suppose
B1: not v
in A1 & not v
in A2;
then not v
in (A1
\/ A2) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then not v
in (
Carrier l) by
TARSKI:def 3,
VECTSP_6:def 4;
hence (l
. v)
= (
0. K)
.= ((l1
. v)
+ (
0. K)) by
A4,
B1
.= ((l1
. v)
+ (l2
. v)) by
A8,
B1
.= ((l1
+ l2)
. v) by
VECTSP_6: 22;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
AX1,
AX2,
VECTSP_6:def 7;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:27
FRds1: for V be
Z_Module, W1,W2 be
free
Subspace of V, I1 be
Basis of W1, I2 be
Basis of W2 st V
is_the_direct_sum_of (W1,W2) holds (I1
/\ I2)
=
{}
proof
let V be
Z_Module, W1,W2 be
free
Subspace of V, I1 be
Basis of W1, I2 be
Basis of W2 such that
A1: V
is_the_direct_sum_of (W1,W2);
assume (I1
/\ I2)
<>
{} ;
then
consider v be
object such that
A2: v
in (I1
/\ I2) by
XBOOLE_0: 7;
A3: v
in I1 by
A2,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
not (
0. W1)
in I1 by
ZMODUL02: 57,
VECTSP_7:def 3;
then
A4: v
<> (
0. V) by
A3,
ZMODUL01: 26;
A5: v
in W1 by
A3;
v
in W2 by
A2;
then
W1: v
in (W1
/\ W2) by
A5,
VECTSP_5: 3;
(W1
/\ W2)
= (
(0). V) by
A1,
VECTSP_5:def 4;
then v
in (
(0). V) by
W1;
hence contradiction by
A4,
ZMODUL02: 66;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:28
FRds2: for V be
Z_Module, W1,W2 be
free
Subspace of V, I1 be
Basis of W1, I2 be
Basis of W2, I be
Subset of V st V
is_the_direct_sum_of (W1,W2) & I
= (I1
\/ I2) holds (
Lin I)
= the ModuleStr of V
proof
let V be
Z_Module, W1,W2 be
free
Subspace of V, I1 be
Basis of W1, I2 be
Basis of W2, I be
Subset of V such that
A1: V
is_the_direct_sum_of (W1,W2) and
A2: I
= (I1
\/ I2);
the
carrier of W1
c= the
carrier of V by
VECTSP_4:def 2;
then
reconsider II1 = I1 as
Subset of V by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
the
carrier of W2
c= the
carrier of V by
VECTSP_4:def 2;
then
reconsider II2 = I2 as
Subset of V by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
A5: the ModuleStr of W1
= (
Lin I1) by
VECTSP_7:def 3
.= (
Lin II1) by
ZMODUL03: 20;
A6: the ModuleStr of W2
= (
Lin I2) by
VECTSP_7:def 3
.= (
Lin II2) by
ZMODUL03: 20;
for x be
Vector of V holds x
in (W1
+ W2) iff x
in ((
Lin II1)
+ (
Lin II2))
proof
let x be
Vector of V;
hereby
assume x
in (W1
+ W2);
then
consider x1,x2 be
Vector of V such that
B1: x1
in W1 & x2
in W2 & x
= (x1
+ x2) by
VECTSP_5: 1;
B2: x1
in (
Lin II1) by
A5,
B1;
x2
in (
Lin II2) by
A6,
B1;
hence x
in ((
Lin II1)
+ (
Lin II2)) by
B1,
B2,
VECTSP_5: 1;
end;
assume x
in ((
Lin II1)
+ (
Lin II2));
then
consider x1,x2 be
Vector of V such that
B1: x1
in (
Lin II1) & x2
in (
Lin II2) & x
= (x1
+ x2) by
VECTSP_5: 1;
B2: x1
in W1 by
A5,
B1;
x2
in W2 by
A6,
B1;
hence x
in (W1
+ W2) by
B1,
B2,
VECTSP_5: 1;
end;
then
A7: (W1
+ W2)
= ((
Lin II1)
+ (
Lin II2)) by
VECTSP_4: 30;
thus the ModuleStr of V
= (W1
+ W2) by
A1,
VECTSP_5:def 4
.= (
Lin I) by
A2,
A7,
ZMODUL02: 72;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:29
FRds3: for V be
LeftMod of
INT.Ring , W1,W2 be
free
Subspace of V, I1 be
Basis of W1, I2 be
Basis of W2, I be
Subset of V st V
is_the_direct_sum_of (W1,W2) & I
= (I1
\/ I2) holds I is
linearly-independent
proof
let V be
LeftMod of
INT.Ring , W1,W2 be
free
Subspace of V, I1 be
Basis of W1, I2 be
Basis of W2, I be
Subset of V such that
A1: V
is_the_direct_sum_of (W1,W2) and
A2: I
= (I1
\/ I2);
assume I is
linearly-dependent;
then
consider l be
Linear_Combination of I such that
A3: (
Sum l)
= (
0. V) and
A4: (
Carrier l)
<>
{} by
VECTSP_7:def 1;
A5A: (I1
/\ I2)
=
{} by
A1,
FRds1;
then
A5B: I1
misses I2;
the
carrier of W1
c= the
carrier of V & the
carrier of W2
c= the
carrier of V by
VECTSP_4:def 2;
then
reconsider II1 = I1, II2 = I2 as
Subset of V by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
consider l1 be
Linear_Combination of II1, l2 be
Linear_Combination of II2 such that
A6: l
= (l1
+ l2) by
A2,
A5A,
ThCarrier2;
reconsider ll1 = l1 as
Linear_Combination of I by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 7,
ZMODUL02: 10;
reconsider ll2 = l2 as
Linear_Combination of I by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 7,
ZMODUL02: 10;
A7: (
Sum l)
= ((
Sum ll1)
+ (
Sum ll2)) by
A6,
ZMODUL02: 52;
set v1 = (
Sum ll1);
set v2 = (
Sum ll2);
(
Carrier ll1)
c= I1 & (
Carrier ll2)
c= I2 by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
then
A8: ((
Carrier ll1)
/\ (
Carrier ll2))
=
{} by
A5B,
XBOOLE_0:def 7,
XBOOLE_1: 64;
A10: v1
<> (
0. V)
proof
assume
B1: v1
= (
0. V);
II1 is
linearly-independent by
VECTSP_7:def 3,
ZMODUL03: 15;
then
B3: (
Carrier l1)
=
{} by
B1,
VECTSP_7:def 1;
II2 is
linearly-independent by
VECTSP_7:def 3,
ZMODUL03: 15;
then ((
Carrier ll1)
\/ (
Carrier ll2))
=
{} by
A3,
A7,
B1,
B3,
VECTSP_7:def 1;
hence contradiction by
A4,
A6,
A8,
ThCarrier1;
end;
A13: v1
= (
- v2) by
A3,
A7,
RLVECT_1: 6;
v1
in (
Lin II1) by
ZMODUL02: 64;
then v1
in (
Lin I1) by
ZMODUL03: 20;
then v1
in the ModuleStr of W1 by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
then
A14: v1
in W1;
v2
in (
Lin II2) by
ZMODUL02: 64;
then v2
in (
Lin I2) by
ZMODUL03: 20;
then v2
in the ModuleStr of W2 by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
then v2
in W2;
then
A15: v1
in W2 by
A13,
ZMODUL01: 38;
(W1
/\ W2)
= (
(0). V) by
A1,
VECTSP_5:def 4;
hence contradiction by
A10,
A14,
A15,
VECTSP_5: 3,
ZMODUL02: 66;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:30
FRdsX: for V be
Z_Module, W1,W2 be
free
Subspace of V st V
is_the_direct_sum_of (W1,W2) holds V is
free
proof
let V be
Z_Module, W1,W2 be
free
Subspace of V such that
A1: V
is_the_direct_sum_of (W1,W2);
set I1 = the
Basis of W1;
set I2 = the
Basis of W2;
set I = (I1
\/ I2);
the
carrier of W1
c= the
carrier of V by
VECTSP_4:def 2;
then
A3: I1 is
Subset of V by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
the
carrier of W2
c= the
carrier of V by
VECTSP_4:def 2;
then I2 is
Subset of V by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
then
reconsider I as
Subset of V by
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
the ModuleStr of V
= (
Lin I) by
A1,
FRds2;
then I is
base by
VECTSP_7:def 3,
FRds3,
A1;
hence thesis by
VECTSP_7:def 4;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:31
ThDirectSum: for V be
Z_Module, W1,W2 be
free
Subspace of V st (W1
/\ W2)
= (
(0). V) holds (W1
+ W2) is
free
proof
let V be
Z_Module, W1,W2 be
free
Subspace of V such that
P1: (W1
/\ W2)
= (
(0). V);
reconsider W = (W1
+ W2) as
strict
Subspace of V;
reconsider WW1 = W1 as
Subspace of W by
ZMODUL01: 97;
reconsider WW2 = W2 as
Subspace of W by
ZMODUL01: 97;
A2: (WW1
/\ WW2) is
Subspace of V by
ZMODUL01: 42;
A3: (WW1
+ WW2) is
Subspace of V by
ZMODUL01: 42;
for x be
object holds x
in (WW1
/\ WW2) iff x
in (
(0). V)
proof
let x be
object;
hereby
assume x
in (WW1
/\ WW2);
then x
in WW1 & x
in WW2 by
VECTSP_5: 3;
hence x
in (
(0). V) by
P1,
VECTSP_5: 3;
end;
assume x
in (
(0). V);
then x
in W1 & x
in W2 by
P1,
VECTSP_5: 3;
hence x
in (WW1
/\ WW2) by
VECTSP_5: 3;
end;
then for x be
Vector of V holds x
in (WW1
/\ WW2) iff x
in (
(0). V);
then
A4: (WW1
/\ WW2)
= (
(0). V) by
A2,
VECTSP_4: 30
.= (
(0). W) by
ZMODUL01: 51;
for x be
object holds x
in W iff x
in (WW1
+ WW2)
proof
let x be
object;
hereby
assume x
in W;
then
consider x1,x2 be
Vector of V such that
B2: x1
in W1 & x2
in W2 & x
= (x1
+ x2) by
VECTSP_5: 1;
x1
in (W1
+ W2) by
B2,
VECTSP_5: 2;
then
reconsider xx1 = x1 as
Vector of W;
x2
in (W1
+ W2) by
B2,
VECTSP_5: 2;
then
reconsider xx2 = x2 as
Vector of W;
x
= (xx1
+ xx2) by
B2,
ZMODUL01: 28;
hence x
in (WW1
+ WW2) by
B2,
VECTSP_5: 1;
end;
assume x
in (WW1
+ WW2);
then
consider x1,x2 be
Vector of W such that
B2: x1
in WW1 & x2
in WW2 & x
= (x1
+ x2) by
VECTSP_5: 1;
thus x
in W by
B2;
end;
then for x be
Vector of V holds x
in W iff x
in (WW1
+ WW2);
then W
= (WW1
+ WW2) by
A3,
VECTSP_4: 30;
hence (W1
+ W2) is
free by
A4,
FRdsX,
VECTSP_5:def 4;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:32
for V be
free
Z_Module, I be
Basis of V, v be
Vector of V st v
in I holds (
Lin (I
\
{v})) is
free & (
Lin
{v}) is
free
proof
let V be
free
Z_Module, I be
Basis of V, v be
Vector of V such that
A1: v
in I;
A2: I is
linearly-independent by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
then (I
\
{v}) is
linearly-independent by
XBOOLE_1: 36,
ZMODUL02: 56;
hence (
Lin (I
\
{v})) is
free;
{v} is
linearly-independent by
A1,
A2,
ZFMISC_1: 31,
ZMODUL02: 56;
hence (
Lin
{v}) is
free;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:33
FRdsY: for V be
free
Z_Module, I be
Basis of V, v be
Vector of V st v
in I holds V
is_the_direct_sum_of ((
Lin (I
\
{v})),(
Lin
{v}))
proof
let V be
free
Z_Module, I be
Basis of V, v be
Vector of V such that
A1: v
in I;
I
= ((I
\
{v})
\/
{v}) by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 45,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then (
Lin I)
= ((
Lin (I
\
{v}))
+ (
Lin
{v})) by
ZMODUL02: 72;
then
A3: the ModuleStr of V
= ((
Lin (I
\
{v}))
+ (
Lin
{v})) by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
(the
carrier of (
Lin (I
\
{v}))
/\ the
carrier of (
Lin
{v}))
=
{(
0. V)}
proof
assume
B1: (the
carrier of (
Lin (I
\
{v}))
/\ the
carrier of (
Lin
{v}))
<>
{(
0. V)};
(
0. V)
in ((
Lin (I
\
{v}))
/\ (
Lin
{v})) by
ZMODUL01: 33;
then (
0. V)
in (the
carrier of (
Lin (I
\
{v}))
/\ the
carrier of (
Lin
{v})) by
VECTSP_5:def 2;
then
{(
0. V)}
c< (the
carrier of (
Lin (I
\
{v}))
/\ the
carrier of (
Lin
{v})) by
B1,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
consider x be
object such that
B2: x
in (the
carrier of (
Lin (I
\
{v}))
/\ the
carrier of (
Lin
{v})) and
B3: not x
in
{(
0. V)} by
XBOOLE_0: 6;
B4: x
<> (
0. V) by
B3,
TARSKI:def 1;
B5: x
in ((
Lin (I
\
{v}))
/\ (
Lin
{v})) by
B2,
VECTSP_5:def 2;
then x
in V by
ZMODUL01: 24;
then
reconsider x as
Vector of V;
x
in (
Lin (I
\
{v})) by
B5,
VECTSP_5: 3;
then
consider lx1 be
Linear_Combination of (I
\
{v}) such that
B6: x
= (
Sum lx1) by
ZMODUL02: 64;
B7: (
Carrier lx1)
<>
{} by
B4,
B6,
ZMODUL02: 23;
B8: (
Carrier lx1)
c= (I
\
{v}) by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
x
in (
Lin
{v}) by
B5,
VECTSP_5: 3;
then
consider lx2 be
Linear_Combination of
{v} such that
B9: (
- x)
= (
Sum lx2) by
ZMODUL01: 38,
ZMODUL02: 64;
B11: (
Carrier lx2)
c=
{v} by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
reconsider llx1 = lx1 as
Linear_Combination of I by
XBOOLE_1: 36,
ZMODUL02: 10;
reconsider llx2 = lx2 as
Linear_Combination of I by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 31,
ZMODUL02: 10;
(
Carrier lx1)
misses (
Carrier lx2) by
B8,
B11,
XBOOLE_1: 64,
XBOOLE_1: 79;
then ((
Carrier lx1)
/\ (
Carrier lx2))
=
{} ;
then
B12: (
Carrier (llx1
+ llx2))
= ((
Carrier llx1)
\/ (
Carrier llx2)) by
ThCarrier1;
B13: ((
Sum llx1)
+ (
Sum llx2))
= (
0. V) by
B6,
B9,
RLVECT_1: 5;
reconsider llx = (llx1
+ llx2) as
Linear_Combination of I by
ZMODUL02: 27;
(
Sum llx)
= (
0. V) by
B13,
ZMODUL02: 52;
hence contradiction by
B7,
B12,
VECTSP_7:def 1,
VECTSP_7:def 3;
end;
then ((
Lin (I
\
{v}))
/\ (
Lin
{v}))
= (
(0). V) by
VECTSP_4:def 3,
VECTSP_5:def 2;
hence thesis by
A3,
VECTSP_5:def 4;
end;
FRX: for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, W be
Subspace of V holds W is
free
proof
defpred
P[
Nat] means for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, W be
Subspace of V st (
rank V)
= $1 holds W is
free;
A1:
P[
0 ]
proof
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, W be
Subspace of V such that
B1: (
rank V)
=
0 ;
set I = the
Basis of V;
set sW = the ModuleStr of W;
B2: sW
= (
(Omega). W);
B3: (
card I)
=
0 by
B1,
ZMODUL03:def 5;
then
B31: I
= (
{} the
carrier of V);
the ModuleStr of V
= (
Lin I) by
VECTSP_7:def 3
.= (
(0). V) by
B31,
ZMODUL02: 67;
then the
carrier of V
=
{(
0. V)} by
VECTSP_4:def 3;
then the
carrier of W
c=
{(
0. V)} by
VECTSP_4:def 2;
then
B5: the
carrier of W
c=
{(
0. W)} by
ZMODUL01: 26;
B6: I
= (
{} the
carrier of W) by
B3;
then
reconsider II = I as
Subset of W;
II
= (
{} the
carrier of W) by
B6;
then
AA: II is
linearly-independent;
sW
= (
(0). W) by
B2,
B5,
XBOOLE_0:def 10,
VECTSP_4:def 3
.= (
Lin II) by
B6,
ZMODUL02: 67;
then (
Lin II)
= the ModuleStr of W;
then II is
base by
VECTSP_7:def 3,
AA;
then W is
free by
VECTSP_7:def 4;
hence thesis;
end;
A2: for m be
Nat st
P[m] holds
P[(m
+ 1)]
proof
let n be
Nat such that
B1:
P[n];
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, W be
Subspace of V such that
B2: (
rank V)
= (n
+ 1);
set I = the
Basis of V;
B3: (
card I)
= (n
+ 1) by
B2,
ZMODUL03:def 5;
(
card I)
>
0 by
B2,
ZMODUL03:def 5;
then I
<>
{} ;
then
consider v be
object such that
B4: v
in I by
XBOOLE_0: 7;
reconsider v as
Vector of V by
B4;
set Iv = (I
\
{v});
B22:
{v} is
Subset of I by
B4,
SUBSET_1: 41;
then
B5: (
card Iv)
= ((n
+ 1)
- (
card
{v})) by
B3,
CARD_2: 44
.= ((n
+ 1)
- 1) by
CARD_1: 30
.= n;
I is
linearly-independent by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
then
B6: Iv is
linearly-independent by
XBOOLE_1: 36,
ZMODUL02: 56;
set Vv = (
Lin Iv);
reconsider VVv = Vv as
finite-rank
free
Z_Module by
B6;
for x be
object holds x
in Iv implies x
in the
carrier of VVv by
STRUCT_0:def 5,
ZMODUL02: 65;
then
reconsider IIv = Iv as
linearly-independent
Subset of VVv by
B6,
TARSKI:def 3,
ZMODUL03: 16;
(
Lin Iv)
= (
Lin IIv) by
ZMODUL03: 20;
then IIv is
Basis of VVv by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
then
B8: (
rank VVv)
= n by
B5,
ZMODUL03:def 5;
set Wv = (W
/\ Vv);
reconsider WWv = (W
/\ Vv) as
Subspace of Vv by
ZMODUL01: 105;
reconsider WWv as
free
Subspace of Vv by
B1,
B8;
set IIwv = the
Basis of WWv;
the
carrier of WWv
c= the
carrier of V by
VECTSP_4:def 2;
then
reconsider Iwv = IIwv as
Subset of V by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
B13: V
is_the_direct_sum_of (Vv,(
Lin
{v})) by
B4,
FRdsY;
set B = { (l
. v) where l be
Linear_Combination of I : (
Sum l)
in W };
B15: B
c=
INT
proof
let b be
object such that
CX1: b
in B;
consider l be
Linear_Combination of I such that
CX2: (l
. v)
= b & (
Sum l)
in W by
CX1;
thus b
in
INT by
CX2;
end;
B16: for b1,b2 be
Element of
INT st b1
in B & b2
in B holds (b1
+ b2)
in B
proof
let b1,b2 be
Element of
INT such that
C1: b1
in B & b2
in B;
set bb1 = b1, bb2 = b2;
consider l1 be
Linear_Combination of I such that
C3: (l1
. v)
= bb1 & (
Sum l1)
in W by
C1;
consider l2 be
Linear_Combination of I such that
C4: (l2
. v)
= bb2 & (
Sum l2)
in W by
C1;
((
Sum l1)
+ (
Sum l2))
= (
Sum (l1
+ l2)) by
ZMODUL02: 52;
then
C5: (
Sum (l1
+ l2))
in W by
C3,
C4,
ZMODUL01: 36;
(l1
+ l2) is
Linear_Combination of I by
ZMODUL02: 27;
then ((l1
+ l2)
. v)
in B by
C5;
then ((l1
. v)
+ (l2
. v))
in B by
VECTSP_6: 22;
then (b1
+ b2)
in B by
C3,
C4;
hence thesis;
end;
B17:
0
in B
proof
set wv = the
Element of Wv;
wv
in WWv;
then
consider lwv be
Linear_Combination of Iv such that
C2: wv
= (
Sum lwv) by
ZMODUL01: 23,
ZMODUL02: 64;
(
Carrier lwv)
c= Iv by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
then not v
in (
Carrier lwv) by
ZFMISC_1: 56;
then
C4: (lwv
. v)
=
0 ;
wv
in (Vv
/\ W);
then
C5: wv
in W by
VECTSP_5: 3;
lwv is
Linear_Combination of I by
XBOOLE_1: 36,
ZMODUL02: 10;
hence
0
in B by
C2,
C4,
C5;
end;
B18: for b be
Element of
INT st b
in B holds (
- b)
in B
proof
let b be
Element of
INT such that
C1: b
in B;
consider l be
Linear_Combination of I such that
C2: (l
. v)
= b & (
Sum l)
in W by
C1;
(
- (
Sum l))
in W by
C2,
ZMODUL01: 38;
then
C3: (
Sum (
- l))
in W by
ZMODUL02: 54;
consider bm be
Element of
INT.Ring such that
C4: bm
= ((
- l)
. v);
reconsider bb = b as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
bm
= (
- bb) by
C2,
C4,
VECTSP_6: 36;
then
C5: bm
= (
- b);
(
- l) is
Linear_Combination of I by
ZMODUL02: 38;
hence thesis by
C3,
C4,
C5;
end;
B19: for b be
Element of
INT st b
in B holds for i be
Element of
INT holds (i
* b)
in B
proof
let b be
Element of
INT such that
C1: b
in B;
defpred
Q[
Integer] means ($1
* b)
in B;
C2:
Q[
0 ] by
B17;
C3: for i be
Integer st
Q[i] holds
Q[(i
- 1)] &
Q[(i
+ 1)]
proof
let i be
Integer such that
D1:
Q[i];
D3: (
- b)
in B by
B18,
C1;
(i
* b) is
Element of
INT & (
- b) is
Element of
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
then ((i
* b)
+ (
- b))
in B by
B16,
D1,
D3;
hence
Q[(i
- 1)];
(i
* b) is
Element of
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
then ((i
* b)
+ b)
in B by
B16,
C1,
D1;
hence
Q[(i
+ 1)];
end;
for i be
Integer holds
Q[i] from
INT_1:sch 4(
C2,
C3);
hence thesis;
end;
set BP = (B
/\
NAT );
ex p be
Element of
INT st p
in B & for b be
Element of
INT st b
in B holds p
divides b
proof
C2: BP is non
empty by
B17,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
C5: BP
c=
NAT by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
set BPN = (BP
\
{
0 });
per cases ;
suppose BPN
=
{} ;
then
D1: BP
=
{
0 } by
C2,
ZFMISC_1: 58;
D2: for b be
object st b
in B holds b
=
0
proof
let b be
object such that
E1: b
in B;
reconsider bb = b as
Element of
INT by
B15,
E1;
assume
E2: b
<>
0 ;
per cases ;
suppose bb
>
0 ;
then bb
in
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
then bb
in BP by
E1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence contradiction by
D1,
E2,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
suppose bb
<
0 ;
then
F1: (
- bb)
in
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
(
- bb)
in B by
B18,
E1;
then (
- bb)
in BP by
F1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence contradiction by
D1,
E2,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
end;
set p =
0 ;
reconsider p as
Element of
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
take p;
thus thesis by
B17,
D2;
end;
suppose BPN
<>
{} ;
then
reconsider BPN as non
empty
Subset of
NAT by
C5,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
set p = (
min* BPN);
D1: p
in BPN by
NAT_1:def 1;
then
D2: p
in B by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
D4: p
<>
0 & p is
Element of
NAT by
D1,
ZFMISC_1: 56;
D5: for b be
Element of
INT st b
in BP holds p
divides b
proof
let b be
Element of
INT such that
E1: b
in BP;
assume
E2: not p
divides b;
set r = (b
mod p);
reconsider r as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3,
INT_1: 57;
E3: r
<>
0 by
D4,
E2,
INT_1: 62;
E4: r
in BPN
proof
set q = (b
div p);
reconsider q as
Element of
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
F1: b
= ((q
* p)
+ r) by
D4,
INT_1: 59;
F2: b
in B by
E1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
F3: (q
* p) is
Element of
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
p is
Element of
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
then
F5: (
- (q
* p))
in B by
B18,
B19,
D2,
F3;
(
- (q
* p)) is
Element of
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
then (b
+ (
- (q
* p)))
in B by
B16,
F2,
F5;
then r
in BP by
F1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence thesis by
E3,
ZFMISC_1: 56;
end;
r
< p by
D4,
INT_1: 58;
hence contradiction by
E4,
NAT_1:def 1;
end;
D6: for b be
Element of
INT st b
in B holds p
divides b
proof
let b be
Element of
INT such that
E1: b
in B;
assume
E2: not p
divides b;
per cases ;
suppose b
>=
0 ;
then b
in
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
then b
in BP by
E1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence contradiction by
D5,
E2;
end;
suppose b
<
0 ;
then
F1: (
- b)
in
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
(
- b)
in B by
B18,
E1;
then
F2: (
- b)
in BP by
F1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
(
- b) is
Element of
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
hence contradiction by
D5,
E2,
F2,
INT_2: 10;
end;
end;
reconsider p as
Element of
INT by
INT_1:def 1;
take p;
thus thesis by
D1,
D6,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
end;
then
consider p be
Element of
INT such that
B20: p
in B and
B21: for b be
Element of
INT st b
in B holds p
divides b;
reconsider pp = p as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
set Ws =
ModuleStr (# the
carrier of W, the
addF of W, the
ZeroF of W, the
lmult of W #);
Ws is
Subspace of V
proof
C2: the
carrier of Ws
c= the
carrier of V by
VECTSP_4:def 2;
C3: (
0. Ws)
= (
0. W)
.= (
0. V) by
ZMODUL01: 26;
C4: the
addF of Ws
= (the
addF of V
|| the
carrier of Ws) by
VECTSP_4:def 2;
the
lmult of Ws
= (the
lmult of V
|
[:
INT , the
carrier of Ws:]) by
VECTSP_4:def 2;
hence thesis by
C2,
C3,
C4,
ZMODUL01: 40;
end;
then
reconsider Ws as
strict
Subspace of V;
B24: for w be
Vector of V holds w
in Ws iff w
in W;
per cases ;
suppose p
= (
0.
INT.Ring );
then
C2: for b be
Element of
INT holds b
in B implies b
=
0 by
B21,
INT_2: 3;
for w be
Vector of V st w
in W holds w
in Vv
proof
let w be
Vector of V such that
D1: w
in W;
the ModuleStr of V
= (
Lin I) by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
then w
in (
Lin I);
then
consider lw be
Linear_Combination of I such that
D2: w
= (
Sum lw) by
ZMODUL02: 64;
(lw
. v)
in B by
D1,
D2;
then not v
in (
Carrier lw) by
C2,
ZMODUL02: 8;
then (
Carrier lw)
c= (I
\
{v}) by
ZFMISC_1: 34,
VECTSP_6:def 4;
then lw is
Linear_Combination of Iv by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
hence thesis by
D2,
ZMODUL02: 64;
end;
then for w be
Vector of V st w
in Ws holds w
in Vv by
B24;
then
C4: Ws is
Subspace of Vv by
ZMODUL01: 44;
Ws is
free by
B1,
B8,
C4;
then
consider Iws be
Subset of Ws such that
c5: Iws is
base by
VECTSP_7:def 4;
C5: Iws is
linearly-independent & (
Lin Iws)
= the ModuleStr of Ws by
c5,
VECTSP_7:def 3;
reconsider IwsV = Iws as
linearly-independent
Subset of V by
C5,
ZMODUL03: 15;
reconsider IwsW = IwsV as
linearly-independent
Subset of W by
ZMODUL03: 16;
(
Lin IwsW)
= (
Lin IwsV) by
ZMODUL03: 20
.= the ModuleStr of W by
C5,
ZMODUL03: 20;
then IwsW is
base by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
hence thesis by
VECTSP_7:def 4;
end;
suppose
C1: p
<> (
0.
INT.Ring );
consider lwpv be
Linear_Combination of I such that
C2: (lwpv
. v)
= p & (
Sum lwpv)
in W by
B20;
set wpv = (
Sum lwpv);
set vpv = (wpv
- (pp
* v));
consider lv be
Linear_Combination of V such that
C3: (lv
. v)
= (
1.
INT.Ring ) & for u be
Vector of V st v
<> u holds (lv
. u)
= (
0.
INT.Ring ) by
ZMODUL03: 1;
C4: (
Carrier lv)
=
{v}
proof
for u be
object holds u
in (
Carrier lv) implies u
in
{v}
proof
assume ex u be
object st u
in (
Carrier lv) & not u
in
{v};
then
consider u be
Vector of V such that
D1: u
in (
Carrier lv) & not u
in
{v};
u
<> v by
D1,
TARSKI:def 1;
then (lv
. u)
=
0 by
C3;
hence contradiction by
D1,
ZMODUL02: 8;
end;
then
D2: (
Carrier lv)
c=
{v} by
TARSKI:def 3;
v
in (
Carrier lv) by
C3;
then
{v}
c= (
Carrier lv) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
hence thesis by
D2;
end;
then
C18: (
Sum lv)
= ((lv
. v)
* v) by
ZMODUL02: 24;
then
C5: (
Sum (pp
* lv))
= (pp
* ((lv
. v)
* v)) by
ZMODUL02: 53
.= (pp
* v) by
C3,
VECTSP_1:def 17;
lv is
Linear_Combination of
{v} by
C4,
VECTSP_6:def 4;
then (pp
* lv) is
Linear_Combination of
{v} by
ZMODUL02: 31;
then
C6: (pp
* v)
in (
Lin
{v}) by
C5,
ZMODUL02: 64;
C17: v
<> (
0. V) by
B22,
ZMODUL02: 56,
VECTSP_7:def 3;
C8: not (pp
* v)
in Vv
proof
assume (pp
* v)
in Vv;
then (pp
* v)
in (Vv
/\ (
Lin
{v})) by
C6,
VECTSP_5: 3;
then (pp
* v)
in (
(0). V) by
B13,
VECTSP_5:def 4;
hence contradiction by
C1,
C17,
ZMODUL01:def 7,
ZMODUL02: 66;
end;
C9: vpv
in Vv
proof
the ModuleStr of V
= (
Lin I) by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
then vpv
in (
Lin I);
then
consider lvpv be
Linear_Combination of I such that
D2: vpv
= (
Sum lvpv) by
ZMODUL02: 64;
(
Carrier (pp
* lv))
=
{v} by
C1,
C4,
ZMODUL02: 29;
then
reconsider lpv = (pp
* lv) as
Linear_Combination of I by
B4,
ZFMISC_1: 31,
VECTSP_6:def 4;
D3: (
Sum lvpv)
= (
Sum (lwpv
- lpv)) by
C5,
D2,
ZMODUL02: 55;
(lwpv
- lpv) is
Linear_Combination of I by
ZMODUL02: 41;
then (
Carrier lvpv)
c= I & (
Carrier (lwpv
- lpv))
c= I by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
then lvpv
= (lwpv
- lpv) by
D3,
VECTSP_7:def 3,
ZMODUL03: 3;
then (lvpv
. v)
= ((lwpv
. v)
- (lpv
. v)) by
ZMODUL02: 39
.= ((lwpv
. v)
- (pp
* (lv
. v))) by
VECTSP_6:def 9
.=
0 by
C2,
C3;
then not v
in (
Carrier lvpv) by
ZMODUL02: 8;
then (
Carrier lvpv)
c= Iv by
ZFMISC_1: 34,
VECTSP_6:def 4;
then
reconsider lvvpv = lvpv as
Linear_Combination of Iv by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
vpv
= (
Sum lvvpv) by
D2;
hence thesis by
ZMODUL02: 64;
end;
reconsider wpv as
Vector of V;
set Iw = (Iwv
\/
{wpv});
C10: wpv
<> (
0. V)
proof
assume wpv
= (
0. V);
then (
- (
- (pp
* v)))
in Vv by
C9,
ZMODUL01: 38;
hence contradiction by
C8;
end;
set WX = (Wv
+ (
Lin
{wpv}));
reconsider WXv = WWv as
Subspace of WX by
ZMODUL01: 97;
reconsider Xwpv = (
Lin
{wpv}) as
Subspace of WX by
ZMODUL01: 97;
C11: not wpv
in Iwv
proof
assume wpv
in Iwv;
then wpv
in WWv;
then
D2: wpv
in Vv by
ZMODUL01: 23;
(wpv
- vpv)
= ((wpv
- wpv)
+ (pp
* v)) by
RLVECT_1: 29
.= ((
0. V)
+ (pp
* v)) by
RLVECT_1: 15
.= (pp
* v);
hence contradiction by
C8,
C9,
D2,
ZMODUL01: 39;
end;
C12: WX
= (WXv
+ Xwpv)
proof
D1: (Iwv
/\
{wpv})
=
{} by
C11,
XBOOLE_0:def 7,
ZFMISC_1: 50;
for x be
Vector of WX holds ex x1,x2 be
Vector of WX st x1
in WXv & x2
in Xwpv & x
= (x1
+ x2)
proof
let x be
Vector of WX;
E1: Wv
= (
Lin IIwv) by
VECTSP_7:def 3
.= (
Lin Iwv) by
ZMODUL03: 20;
WX
= (
Lin (Iwv
\/
{wpv})) by
E1,
ZMODUL02: 72;
then x
in (
Lin (Iwv
\/
{wpv}));
then
consider lx be
Linear_Combination of (Iwv
\/
{wpv}) such that
E3: x
= (
Sum lx) by
ZMODUL02: 64;
consider lx1 be
Linear_Combination of Iwv, lx2 be
Linear_Combination of
{wpv} such that
E4: lx
= (lx1
+ lx2) by
D1,
ThCarrier2;
set x1 = (
Sum lx1);
set x2 = (
Sum lx2);
x1
in WXv by
E1,
ZMODUL02: 64;
then x1
in WX by
ZMODUL01: 24;
then
reconsider xx1 = x1 as
Vector of WX;
x2
in Xwpv by
ZMODUL02: 64;
then x2
in WX by
ZMODUL01: 24;
then
reconsider xx2 = x2 as
Vector of WX;
E5: (x1
+ x2)
= x by
E3,
E4,
ZMODUL02: 52;
take xx1, xx2;
thus thesis by
E1,
E5,
ZMODUL01: 28,
ZMODUL02: 64;
end;
hence thesis by
ZMODUL01: 133;
end;
C15:
{wpv} is
linearly-independent by
C10,
ZMODUL02: 59;
(WXv
/\ Xwpv)
= (
(0). WX)
proof
assume (WXv
/\ Xwpv)
<> (
(0). WX);
then
consider x be
Vector of WX such that
D2: x
in (WXv
/\ Xwpv) & x
<> (
0. WX) by
Thn0V;
D3: x
in WXv by
D2,
VECTSP_5: 3;
x
in (
Lin
{wpv}) by
D2,
VECTSP_5: 3;
then
consider lx be
Linear_Combination of
{wpv} such that
D5: x
= (
Sum lx) by
ZMODUL02: 64;
x
in V by
D3,
ZMODUL01: 24;
then
reconsider xx = x as
Vector of V;
x
in WWv by
D2,
VECTSP_5: 3;
then
D9: x
in Vv by
ZMODUL01: 23;
D6: x
= ((lx
. wpv)
* wpv) by
D5,
ZMODUL02: 21;
D7: (lx
. wpv)
<>
0
proof
assume (lx
. wpv)
=
0 ;
then x
= (
0. V) by
D6,
ZMODUL01: 1
.= (
0. WX) by
ZMODUL01: 26;
hence contradiction by
D2;
end;
(vpv
+ (pp
* v))
= (wpv
- ((pp
* v)
- (pp
* v))) by
RLVECT_1: 29
.= (wpv
- (
0. V)) by
RLVECT_1: 15
.= wpv;
then x
= (((lx
. wpv)
* vpv)
+ ((lx
. wpv)
* (pp
* v))) by
D6,
VECTSP_1:def 14
.= (((lx
. wpv)
* vpv)
+ (((lx
. wpv)
* pp)
* v)) by
VECTSP_1:def 16;
then
D8: (xx
- ((lx
. wpv)
* vpv))
= ((((lx
. wpv)
* pp)
* v)
+ (((lx
. wpv)
* vpv)
- ((lx
. wpv)
* vpv))) by
RLVECT_1: 28
.= ((((lx
. wpv)
* pp)
* v)
+ (
0. V)) by
RLVECT_1: 15
.= (((lx
. wpv)
* pp)
* v);
((lx
. wpv)
* vpv)
in Vv by
C9,
ZMODUL01: 37;
then
D10: (((lx
. wpv)
* pp)
* v)
in Vv by
D8,
D9,
ZMODUL01: 39;
D11: (
Sum (((lx
. wpv)
* pp)
* lv))
= (((lx
. wpv)
* pp)
* ((lv
. v)
* v)) by
C18,
ZMODUL02: 53
.= (((lx
. wpv)
* pp)
* v) by
C3,
VECTSP_1:def 17;
lv is
Linear_Combination of
{v} by
C4,
VECTSP_6:def 4;
then (((lx
. wpv)
* pp)
* lv) is
Linear_Combination of
{v} by
ZMODUL02: 31;
then (((lx
. wpv)
* pp)
* v)
in (
Lin
{v}) by
D11,
ZMODUL02: 64;
then (((lx
. wpv)
* pp)
* v)
in (Vv
/\ (
Lin
{v})) by
D10,
VECTSP_5: 3;
then (((lx
. wpv)
* pp)
* v)
in (
(0). V) by
B13,
VECTSP_5:def 4;
hence contradiction by
C1,
C17,
D7,
ZMODUL01:def 7,
ZMODUL02: 66;
end;
then
C17: WX is
free by
C12,
C15,
FRdsX,
VECTSP_5:def 4;
for x be
Vector of V holds x
in W iff x
in WX
proof
let x be
Vector of V;
hereby
assume
D1: x
in W;
the ModuleStr of V
= (
Lin I) by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
then x
in (
Lin I);
then
consider lx be
Linear_Combination of I such that
D2: x
= (
Sum lx) by
ZMODUL02: 64;
(lx
. v)
in B by
D1,
D2;
then
consider y be
Integer such that
D4: (lx
. v)
= (p
* y) by
B21,
INT_1:def 3;
reconsider y as
Element of
INT.Ring by
Lem1;
(y
* wpv)
in W by
C2,
ZMODUL01: 37;
then
E3: (x
- (y
* wpv))
in W by
D1,
ZMODUL01: 39;
(x
- (y
* wpv))
in Vv
proof
F2: (y
* wpv)
= (
Sum (y
* lwpv)) by
ZMODUL02: 53;
((lx
- (y
* lwpv))
. v)
= ((lx
. v)
- ((y
* lwpv)
. v)) by
ZMODUL02: 39
.= ((pp
* y)
- (y
* (lwpv
. v))) by
D4,
VECTSP_6:def 9
.=
0 by
C2;
then
F3: not v
in (
Carrier (lx
- (y
* lwpv))) by
ZMODUL02: 8;
(y
* lwpv) is
Linear_Combination of I by
ZMODUL02: 31;
then (lx
- (y
* lwpv)) is
Linear_Combination of I by
ZMODUL02: 41;
then (
Carrier (lx
- (y
* lwpv)))
c= Iv by
F3,
ZFMISC_1: 34,
VECTSP_6:def 4;
then
reconsider lxy = (lx
- (y
* lwpv)) as
Linear_Combination of Iv by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
(x
- (y
* wpv))
= (
Sum lxy) by
D2,
F2,
ZMODUL02: 55;
hence thesis by
ZMODUL02: 64;
end;
then
E4: (x
- (y
* wpv))
in Wv by
E3,
VECTSP_5: 3;
wpv
in
{wpv} by
TARSKI:def 1;
then
E5: (y
* wpv)
in (
Lin
{wpv}) by
ZMODUL01: 37,
ZMODUL02: 65;
((x
- (y
* wpv))
+ (y
* wpv))
= (x
- ((y
* wpv)
- (y
* wpv))) by
RLVECT_1: 29
.= (x
- (
0. V)) by
RLVECT_1: 5
.= x;
hence x
in WX by
E4,
E5,
VECTSP_5: 1;
end;
assume
D1: x
in WX;
D2: Wv is
Subspace of W by
ZMODUL01: 105;
(
Lin
{wpv}) is
Subspace of W by
C2,
ZFMISC_1: 31,
ZMODUL03: 19;
then WX is
Subspace of W by
D2,
ZMODUL02: 76;
hence x
in W by
D1,
ZMODUL01: 23;
end;
then for x be
Vector of V holds x
in Ws iff x
in WX by
B24;
then Ws is
free by
C17,
VECTSP_4: 30;
then
consider Iws be
Subset of Ws such that
c18: Iws is
base by
VECTSP_7:def 4;
C18: Iws is
linearly-independent & (
Lin Iws)
= the ModuleStr of Ws by
VECTSP_7:def 3,
c18;
reconsider IwsV = Iws as
linearly-independent
Subset of V by
C18,
ZMODUL03: 15;
reconsider IwsW = IwsV as
linearly-independent
Subset of W by
ZMODUL03: 16;
(
Lin IwsW)
= (
Lin IwsV) by
ZMODUL03: 20
.= the ModuleStr of W by
C18,
ZMODUL03: 20;
then IwsW is
base by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
hence thesis by
VECTSP_7:def 4;
end;
end;
A3: for m be
Nat holds
P[m] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A1,
A2);
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, W be
Subspace of V;
set n = (
rank V);
P[n] by
A3;
hence thesis;
end;
registration
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module;
cluster ->
free for
Subspace of V;
correctness by
FRX;
end
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:34
for V be
Z_Module, W be
Subspace of V, W1,W2 be
free
Subspace of V st (W1
/\ W2)
= (
(0). V) & the ModuleStr of W
= (W1
+ W2) holds W is
free
proof
let V be
Z_Module, W be
Subspace of V, W1,W2 be
free
Subspace of V such that
A1: (W1
/\ W2)
= (
(0). V) & the ModuleStr of W
= (W1
+ W2);
reconsider Ws = (W1
+ W2) as
free
Subspace of V by
A1,
ThDirectSum;
consider I be
Subset of Ws such that
a3: I is
base by
VECTSP_7:def 4;
A3: I is
linearly-independent & Ws
= (
Lin I) by
VECTSP_7:def 3,
a3;
reconsider IV = I as
linearly-independent
Subset of V by
A3,
ZMODUL03: 15;
reconsider IW = IV as
linearly-independent
Subset of W by
A1,
ZMODUL03: 16;
the ModuleStr of W
= (
Lin IV) by
A1,
A3,
ZMODUL03: 20
.= (
Lin IW) by
ZMODUL03: 20;
then IW is
base by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
hence thesis by
VECTSP_7:def 4;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:35
for p be
prime
Element of
INT.Ring , V be
free
Z_Module st (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)) is
finite-dimensional holds V is
finite-rank
proof
let p be
prime
Element of
INT.Ring , V be
free
Z_Module such that
A1: (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)) is
finite-dimensional;
set I = the
Basis of V;
set IQ = { (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,u)) where u be
Vector of V : u
in I };
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in IQ;
then
consider v be
Vector of V such that
B1: x
= (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,v)) & v
in I;
thus x
in the
carrier of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)) by
B1;
end;
then
reconsider IQ as
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)) by
TARSKI:def 3;
A3: IQ is
Basis of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)) by
ZMODUL03: 35;
A2: (
card IQ)
= (
card I) by
ZMODUL03: 26;
IQ is
finite by
A1,
A3,
VECTSP_9: 20;
then I is
finite by
A2;
hence thesis by
ZMODUL03:def 3;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:36
for p be
prime
Element of
INT.Ring , V be
Z_Module, s be
Element of V, a be
Element of
INT.Ring , b be
Element of (
GF p) st b
= (a
mod p) holds (b
* (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,s)))
= (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,(a
* s)))
proof
let p be
prime
Element of
INT.Ring , V be
Z_Module, s be
Element of V, a be
Element of
INT.Ring , b be
Element of (
GF p) such that
A1: b
= (a
mod p);
A2: (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,s))
= (s
+ (p
(*) V));
set t = (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,s));
reconsider t1 = t as
Element of (
VectQuot (V,(p
(*) V)));
A3: (s
+ (p
(*) V)) is
Element of (
CosetSet (V,(p
(*) V))) by
A2,
VECTSP10:def 6;
reconsider i = b as
Nat;
thus (b
* t)
= ((a
mod p)
* t1) by
A1,
ZMODUL02:def 11
.= (a
* t1) by
ZMODUL02: 2
.= ((
lmultCoset (V,(p
(*) V)))
. (a,(s
+ (p
(*) V)))) by
VECTSP10:def 6
.= (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,(a
* s))) by
A3,
VECTSP10:def 5;
end;
LMX2: for p be
prime
Element of
INT.Ring , V be
free
Z_Module, i be
Element of
INT.Ring , v be
Element of V holds (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,((i
mod p)
* v)))
= (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,(i
* v)))
proof
let p be
prime
Element of
INT.Ring , V be
free
Z_Module, i be
Element of
INT.Ring , v be
Element of V;
reconsider a = (i
mod p) as
Element of (
GF p) by
EC_PF_1: 14;
reconsider t1 = (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,v)) as
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p));
reconsider t1 as
Element of (
VectQuot (V,(p
(*) V)));
(
ZMtoMQV (V,p,v))
= (v
+ (p
(*) V));
then
Q1: (v
+ (p
(*) V)) is
Element of (
CosetSet (V,(p
(*) V))) by
VECTSP10:def 6;
thus (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,((i
mod p)
* v)))
= (a
* (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,v))) by
ZMODUL03: 30
.= ((i
mod p)
* t1) by
ZMODUL02:def 11
.= (i
* t1) by
ZMODUL02: 2
.= ((
lmultCoset (V,(p
(*) V)))
. (i,t1)) by
VECTSP10:def 6
.= (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,(i
* v))) by
Q1,
VECTSP10:def 5;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:37
ThQuotBasis5A: for p be
prime
Element of
INT.Ring , V be
free
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)), l be
Linear_Combination of I st IQ
= { (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,u)) where u be
Vector of V : u
in I } holds (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,(
Sum l)))
in (
Lin IQ)
proof
let p be
prime
Element of
INT.Ring , V be
free
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)), l be
Linear_Combination of I;
assume
AS: IQ
= { (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,u)) where u be
Vector of V : u
in I };
consider G be
FinSequence of V such that
P1: G is
one-to-one & (
rng G)
= (
Carrier l) & (
Sum l)
= (
Sum (l
(#) G)) by
VECTSP_6:def 6;
now
let i be
Element of
NAT ;
assume i
in (
dom (l
(#) G));
then i
in (
Seg (
len (l
(#) G))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then i
in (
Seg (
len G)) by
VECTSP_6:def 5;
then
Y3: i
in (
dom G) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (G
. i)
in (
rng G) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider v = (G
. i) as
Element of V;
Y5: ((l
(#) G)
. i)
= ((l
. v)
* v) by
Y3,
ZMODUL02: 13;
reconsider b = ((l
. v)
mod p) as
Element of (
GF p) by
EC_PF_1: 14;
reconsider a = ((l
. v)
mod p) as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
reconsider k = (l
. v) as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
reconsider si = ((l
. v)
* v) as
Element of V;
reconsider t = (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,v)) as
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p));
Y7: (b
* t)
= (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,(a
* v))) by
ZMODUL03: 30
.= (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,(k
* v))) by
LMX2;
H1: v
in (
Carrier l) by
Y3,
P1,
FUNCT_1: 3;
(
Carrier l)
c= I by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
then t
in IQ by
AS,
H1;
then (b
* t)
in (
Lin IQ) by
VECTSP_4: 21,
VECTSP_7: 8;
hence ex si be
Vector of V st si
= ((l
(#) G)
. i) & (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,si))
in (
Lin IQ) by
Y7,
Y5;
end;
hence (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,(
Sum l)))
in (
Lin IQ) by
AS,
P1,
ZMODUL03: 33;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:38
ThQuotBasis5: for p be
prime
Element of
INT.Ring , V be
free
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)) st (
Lin I)
= the ModuleStr of V & IQ
= { (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,u)) where u be
Vector of V : u
in I } holds (
Lin IQ)
= the ModuleStr of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p))
proof
let p be
prime
Element of
INT.Ring , V be
free
Z_Module, I be
Subset of V, IQ be
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)) such that
P0: (
Lin I)
= the ModuleStr of V and
AS: IQ
= { (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,u)) where u be
Vector of V : u
in I };
for vq be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)) holds vq
in (
Lin IQ)
proof
let vq be
Element of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p));
consider v be
Vector of V such that
P3: vq
= (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,v)) by
ZMODUL03: 22;
consider l be
Linear_Combination of I such that
P4: v
= (
Sum l) by
P0,
STRUCT_0:def 5,
ZMODUL02: 64;
thus vq
in (
Lin IQ) by
AS,
P4,
P3,
ThQuotBasis5A;
end;
hence thesis by
VECTSP_4: 32;
end;
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:39
FG02: for V be
finitely-generated
free
Z_Module holds ex A be
finite
Subset of V st A is
Basis of V
proof
let V be
finitely-generated
free
Z_Module;
set p = the
prime
Element of
INT.Ring ;
set A = the
Basis of V;
set AQ = { (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,u)) where u be
Vector of V : u
in A };
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in AQ;
then
consider v be
Vector of V such that
B1: x
= (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,v)) & v
in A;
thus x
in the
carrier of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)) by
B1;
end;
then
reconsider AQ as
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)) by
TARSKI:def 3;
reconsider AQ as
Basis of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)) by
ZMODUL03: 35;
consider B be
finite
Subset of V such that
P1: (
Lin B)
= the ModuleStr of V by
ZMODUL03:def 4;
set BQ = { (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,u)) where u be
Vector of V : u
in B };
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in BQ;
then
consider v be
Vector of V such that
B1: x
= (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,v)) & v
in B;
thus x
in the
carrier of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)) by
B1;
end;
then
reconsider BQ as
Subset of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)) by
TARSKI:def 3;
deffunc
F(
Element of V) = (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,$1));
consider f be
Function of the
carrier of V, (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)) such that
P6: for x be
Element of V holds (f
. x)
=
F(x) from
FUNCT_2:sch 4;
B
c= the
carrier of V;
then
P8: B
c= (
dom f) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
for y be
object st y
in BQ holds ex x be
object st x
in (
dom (f
| B)) & y
= ((f
| B)
. x)
proof
let y be
object such that
Q1: y
in BQ;
consider x be
Vector of V such that
Q2: y
= (
ZMtoMQV (V,p,x)) & x
in B by
Q1;
Q3: x
in (
dom (f
| B)) by
P8,
Q2,
RELAT_1: 62;
Q4: y
= (f
. x) by
P6,
Q2
.= ((f
| B)
. x) by
Q3,
FUNCT_1: 47;
take x;
thus thesis by
P8,
Q2,
Q4,
RELAT_1: 62;
end;
then
P2: BQ
c= (
rng (f
| B)) by
FUNCT_1: 9;
(
Lin BQ)
= the ModuleStr of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)) by
P1,
ThQuotBasis5;
then
consider IQ be
Basis of (
Z_MQ_VectSp (V,p)) such that
P4: IQ
c= BQ by
VECTSP_7: 20;
P5: AQ is
finite by
P2,
P4,
MATRLIN:def 1,
VECTSP_9: 20;
(
card A)
= (
card AQ) by
ZMODUL03: 26;
then A is
finite by
P5;
hence thesis;
end;
registration
cluster ->
finite-rank for
finitely-generated
free
Z_Module;
coherence
proof
let V be
finitely-generated
free
Z_Module;
ex A be
finite
Subset of V st A is
Basis of V by
FG02;
hence thesis by
ZMODUL03:def 3;
end;
end
registration
cluster ->
finitely-generated for
finite-rank
free
Z_Module;
coherence
proof
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module;
consider A be
finite
Subset of V such that
A1: A is
Basis of V by
ZMODUL03:def 3;
take A;
thus thesis by
A1,
VECTSP_7:def 3;
end;
end
theorem ::
ZMODUL04:40
RL5Th25: for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module holds for A be
Subset of V st A is
linearly-independent holds A is
finite
proof
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module;
let A be
Subset of V;
consider I be
finite
Subset of V such that
A1: I is
Basis of V by
ZMODUL03:def 3;
assume A is
linearly-independent;
then (
card A)
c= (
card I) by
A1,
XXTh3,
XBOOLE_0:def 8;
hence thesis;
end;
RL5Th28: for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, W be
Subspace of V holds W is
finite-rank
proof
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, W be
Subspace of V;
set A = the
Basis of W;
reconsider A0 = A as
linearly-independent
Subset of V by
VECTSP_7:def 3,
ZMODUL03: 15;
A0 is
finite by
RL5Th25;
hence thesis by
ZMODUL03:def 3;
end;
registration
let V be
Z_Module, W1,W2 be
finite-rank
free
Subspace of V;
cluster (W1
/\ W2) ->
free;
correctness
proof
(W1
/\ W2) is
Subspace of W1 by
ZMODUL01: 105;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let V be
Z_Module, W1,W2 be
finite-rank
free
Subspace of V;
cluster (W1
/\ W2) ->
finite-rank;
correctness
proof
(W1
/\ W2) is
Subspace of W1 by
ZMODUL01: 105;
hence thesis by
RL5Th28;
end;
end
registration
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module;
cluster ->
finite-rank for
Subspace of V;
correctness by
RL5Th28;
end