group_14.miz
begin
registration
let G be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr;
cluster
<*G*> -> non
empty
AbGroup-yielding;
correctness
proof
now
let S be
set;
assume S
in (
rng
<*G*>);
then
consider i be
object such that
A1: i
in (
dom
<*G*>) & (
<*G*>
. i)
= S by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider i as
Element of
NAT by
A1;
(
dom
<*G*>)
=
{1} by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
FINSEQ_1:def 8;
then i
= 1 by
A1,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence S is
AbGroup by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
end;
hence thesis by
PRVECT_1:def 10;
end;
end
registration
let G,F be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr;
cluster
<*G, F*> -> non
empty
AbGroup-yielding;
correctness
proof
now
let S be
set;
assume S
in (
rng
<*G, F*>);
then
consider i be
object such that
A1: i
in (
dom
<*G, F*>) & (
<*G, F*>
. i)
= S by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
(
dom
<*G, F*>)
=
{1, 2} by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
FINSEQ_1: 89;
then i
= 1 or i
= 2 by
A1,
TARSKI:def 2;
hence S is
AbGroup by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 44;
end;
hence thesis by
PRVECT_1:def 10;
end;
end
theorem ::
GROUP_14:1
Th1: for X be
AbGroup holds ex I be
Homomorphism of X, (
product
<*X*>) st I is
bijective & (for x be
Element of X holds (I
. x)
=
<*x*>)
proof
let X be
AbGroup;
set CarrX = the
carrier of X;
consider I be
Function of CarrX, (
product
<*CarrX*>) such that
A1: I is
one-to-one & I is
onto & (for x be
object st x
in CarrX holds (I
. x)
=
<*x*>) by
PRVECT_3: 4;
(
len (
carr
<*X*>))
= (
len
<*X*>) by
PRVECT_1:def 11;
then
A2: (
len (
carr
<*X*>))
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
A3: (
dom
<*X*>)
=
{1} by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
FINSEQ_1:def 8;
A4: (
<*X*>
. 1)
= X by
FINSEQ_1:def 8;
1
in
{1} by
TARSKI:def 1;
then ((
carr
<*X*>)
. 1)
= the
carrier of X by
A3,
A4,
PRVECT_1:def 11;
then
A5: (
carr
<*X*>)
=
<*CarrX*> by
A2,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
then
reconsider I as
Function of X, (
product
<*X*>);
for v,w be
Element of X holds (I
. (v
+ w))
= ((I
. v)
+ (I
. w))
proof
let v,w be
Element of X;
A6: (I
. v)
=
<*v*> & (I
. w)
=
<*w*> & (I
. (v
+ w))
=
<*(v
+ w)*> by
A1;
A7: (
<*v*>
. 1)
= v & (
<*w*>
. 1)
= w by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
reconsider Iv = (I
. v), Iw = (I
. w) as
Element of (
product (
carr
<*X*>));
1
in
{1} by
TARSKI:def 1;
then
reconsider j1 = 1 as
Element of (
dom (
carr
<*X*>)) by
A2,
FINSEQ_1: 2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A8: ((
addop
<*X*>)
. j1)
= the
addF of (
<*X*>
. j1) by
PRVECT_1:def 12;
A9: ((
[:(
addop
<*X*>):]
. (Iv,Iw))
. j1)
= (((
addop
<*X*>)
. j1)
. ((Iv
. j1),(Iw
. j1))) by
PRVECT_1:def 8
.= (v
+ w) by
A8,
A6,
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
consider Ivw be
Function such that
A10: ((I
. v)
+ (I
. w))
= Ivw & (
dom Ivw)
= (
dom (
carr
<*X*>)) & (for i be
object st i
in (
dom (
carr
<*X*>)) holds (Ivw
. i)
in ((
carr
<*X*>)
. i)) by
CARD_3:def 5;
A11: (
dom Ivw)
= (
Seg 1) by
A2,
A10,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider Ivw as
FinSequence by
FINSEQ_1:def 2;
(
len Ivw)
= 1 by
A11,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
hence thesis by
A6,
A10,
A9,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
end;
then
reconsider I as
Homomorphism of X, (
product
<*X*>) by
VECTSP_1:def 20;
take I;
thus thesis by
A1,
A5;
end;
registration
let G,F be non
empty
AbGroup-yielding
FinSequence;
cluster (G
^ F) ->
AbGroup-yielding;
correctness
proof
let S be
set;
assume S
in (
rng (G
^ F));
then
consider i be
object such that
A1: i
in (
dom (G
^ F)) & ((G
^ F)
. i)
= S by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider i as
Element of
NAT by
A1;
per cases by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 25;
suppose
A2: i
in (
dom G);
then
A3: ((G
^ F)
. i)
= (G
. i) by
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
(G
. i)
in (
rng G) by
A2,
FUNCT_1: 3;
hence S is
AbGroup by
A3,
A1,
PRVECT_1:def 10;
end;
suppose ex n be
Nat st n
in (
dom F) & i
= ((
len G)
+ n);
then
consider n be
Nat such that
A4: n
in (
dom F) & i
= ((
len G)
+ n);
A5: ((G
^ F)
. i)
= (F
. n) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
(F
. n)
in (
rng F) by
A4,
FUNCT_1: 3;
hence S is
AbGroup by
A5,
A1,
PRVECT_1:def 10;
end;
end;
end
theorem ::
GROUP_14:2
Th2: for X,Y be
AbGroup holds ex I be
Homomorphism of
[:X, Y:], (
product
<*X, Y*>) st I is
bijective & (for x be
Element of X, y be
Element of Y holds (I
. (x,y))
=
<*x, y*>)
proof
let X,Y be
AbGroup;
set CarrX = the
carrier of X;
set CarrY = the
carrier of Y;
consider I be
Function of
[:CarrX, CarrY:], (
product
<*CarrX, CarrY*>) such that
A1: I is
one-to-one & I is
onto & for x,y be
object st x
in CarrX & y
in CarrY holds (I
. (x,y))
=
<*x, y*> by
PRVECT_3: 5;
(
len (
carr
<*X, Y*>))
= (
len
<*X, Y*>) by
PRVECT_1:def 11;
then
A2: (
len (
carr
<*X, Y*>))
= 2 by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
then
A3: (
dom (
carr
<*X, Y*>))
=
{1, 2} by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(
len
<*X, Y*>)
= 2 by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
then
A4: (
dom
<*X, Y*>)
=
{1, 2} by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A5: (
<*X, Y*>
. 1)
= X & (
<*X, Y*>
. 2)
= Y by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
1
in
{1, 2} & 2
in
{1, 2} by
TARSKI:def 2;
then ((
carr
<*X, Y*>)
. 1)
= CarrX & ((
carr
<*X, Y*>)
. 2)
= CarrY by
A4,
A5,
PRVECT_1:def 11;
then
A6: (
carr
<*X, Y*>)
=
<*CarrX, CarrY*> by
A2,
FINSEQ_1: 44;
then
reconsider I as
Function of
[:X, Y:], (
product
<*X, Y*>);
for v,w be
Element of
[:X, Y:] holds (I
. (v
+ w))
= ((I
. v)
+ (I
. w))
proof
let v,w be
Element of
[:X, Y:];
consider x1 be
Element of X, y1 be
Element of Y such that
A7: v
=
[x1, y1] by
SUBSET_1: 43;
consider x2 be
Element of X, y2 be
Element of Y such that
A8: w
=
[x2, y2] by
SUBSET_1: 43;
(I
. v)
= (I
. (x1,y1)) & (I
. w)
= (I
. (x2,y2)) by
A7,
A8;
then
A9: (I
. v)
=
<*x1, y1*> & (I
. w)
=
<*x2, y2*> by
A1;
A10: (I
. (v
+ w))
= (I
. ((x1
+ x2),(y1
+ y2))) by
A7,
A8,
PRVECT_3:def 1
.=
<*(x1
+ x2), (y1
+ y2)*> by
A1;
A11: (
<*x1, y1*>
. 1)
= x1 & (
<*x2, y2*>
. 1)
= x2 & (
<*x1, y1*>
. 2)
= y1 & (
<*x2, y2*>
. 2)
= y2 by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
reconsider Iv = (I
. v), Iw = (I
. w) as
Element of (
product (
carr
<*X, Y*>));
reconsider j1 = 1, j2 = 2 as
Element of (
dom (
carr
<*X, Y*>)) by
A3,
TARSKI:def 2;
A12: ((
addop
<*X, Y*>)
. j1)
= the
addF of (
<*X, Y*>
. j1) by
PRVECT_1:def 12;
A13: ((
[:(
addop
<*X, Y*>):]
. (Iv,Iw))
. j1)
= (((
addop
<*X, Y*>)
. j1)
. ((Iv
. j1),(Iw
. j1))) by
PRVECT_1:def 8
.= (x1
+ x2) by
A12,
A9,
A11,
FINSEQ_1: 44;
A14: ((
addop
<*X, Y*>)
. j2)
= the
addF of (
<*X, Y*>
. j2) by
PRVECT_1:def 12;
A15: ((
[:(
addop
<*X, Y*>):]
. (Iv,Iw))
. j2)
= (((
addop
<*X, Y*>)
. j2)
. ((Iv
. j2),(Iw
. j2))) by
PRVECT_1:def 8
.= (y1
+ y2) by
A14,
A9,
A11,
FINSEQ_1: 44;
consider Ivw be
Function such that
A16: ((I
. v)
+ (I
. w))
= Ivw & (
dom Ivw)
= (
dom (
carr
<*X, Y*>)) & (for i be
object st i
in (
dom (
carr
<*X, Y*>)) holds (Ivw
. i)
in ((
carr
<*X, Y*>)
. i)) by
CARD_3:def 5;
A17: (
dom Ivw)
= (
Seg 2) by
A2,
A16,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider Ivw as
FinSequence by
FINSEQ_1:def 2;
(
len Ivw)
= 2 by
A17,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
hence thesis by
A10,
A16,
A13,
A15,
FINSEQ_1: 44;
end;
then
reconsider I as
Homomorphism of
[:X, Y:], (
product
<*X, Y*>) by
VECTSP_1:def 20;
take I;
thus thesis by
A1,
A6;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:3
Th3: for X,Y be
Group-Sequence holds ex I be
Homomorphism of
[:(
product X), (
product Y):], (
product (X
^ Y)) st I is
bijective & (for x be
Element of (
product X), y be
Element of (
product Y) holds ex x1,y1 be
FinSequence st x
= x1 & y
= y1 & (I
. (x,y))
= (x1
^ y1))
proof
let X,Y be
Group-Sequence;
reconsider CX = (
carr X), CY = (
carr Y) as
non-empty
FinSequence;
A1: (
len CX)
= (
len X) & (
len CY)
= (
len Y) & (
len (
carr (X
^ Y)))
= (
len (X
^ Y)) by
PRVECT_1:def 11;
consider I be
Function of
[:(
product CX), (
product CY):], (
product (CX
^ CY)) such that
A2: I is
one-to-one & I is
onto & (for x,y be
FinSequence st x
in (
product CX) & y
in (
product CY) holds (I
. (x,y))
= (x
^ y)) by
PRVECT_3: 6;
set PX = (
product X);
set PY = (
product Y);
(
len (
carr (X
^ Y)))
= ((
len X)
+ (
len Y)) & (
len (CX
^ CY))
= ((
len X)
+ (
len Y)) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then
A3: (
dom (
carr (X
^ Y)))
= (
dom (CX
^ CY)) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
A4: for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom (
carr (X
^ Y))) holds ((
carr (X
^ Y))
. k)
= ((CX
^ CY)
. k)
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A5: k
in (
dom (
carr (X
^ Y)));
then
reconsider k1 = k as
Element of (
dom (X
^ Y)) by
A1,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
A6: ((
carr (X
^ Y))
. k)
= the
carrier of ((X
^ Y)
. k1) by
PRVECT_1:def 11;
A7: k
in (
dom (X
^ Y)) by
A1,
A5,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
per cases by
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 25;
suppose
A8: k
in (
dom X);
then
A9: k
in (
dom CX) by
A1,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
reconsider k2 = k1 as
Element of (
dom X) by
A8;
thus ((
carr (X
^ Y))
. k)
= the
carrier of (X
. k2) by
A6,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= (CX
. k) by
PRVECT_1:def 11
.= ((CX
^ CY)
. k) by
A9,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
end;
suppose ex n be
Nat st n
in (
dom Y) & k
= ((
len X)
+ n);
then
consider n be
Nat such that
A10: n
in (
dom Y) & k
= ((
len X)
+ n);
A11: n
in (
dom CY) by
A1,
A10,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
reconsider n1 = n as
Element of (
dom Y) by
A10;
thus ((
carr (X
^ Y))
. k)
= the
carrier of (Y
. n1) by
A6,
A10,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= (CY
. n) by
PRVECT_1:def 11
.= ((CX
^ CY)
. k) by
A11,
A10,
A1,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
end;
end;
then
A12: (
carr (X
^ Y))
= (CX
^ CY) by
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 13;
reconsider I as
Function of
[:PX, PY:], (
product (X
^ Y)) by
A3,
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 13;
A13: for x be
Element of (
product X), y be
Element of (
product Y) holds ex x1,y1 be
FinSequence st x
= x1 & y
= y1 & (I
. (x,y))
= (x1
^ y1)
proof
let x be
Element of PX, y be
Element of PY;
reconsider x1 = x, y1 = y as
FinSequence by
NDIFF_5: 9;
(I
. (x,y))
= (x1
^ y1) by
A2;
hence thesis;
end;
for v,w be
Element of
[:PX, PY:] holds (I
. (v
+ w))
= ((I
. v)
+ (I
. w))
proof
let v,w be
Element of
[:PX, PY:];
consider x1 be
Element of PX, y1 be
Element of PY such that
A14: v
=
[x1, y1] by
SUBSET_1: 43;
consider x2 be
Element of PX, y2 be
Element of PY such that
A15: w
=
[x2, y2] by
SUBSET_1: 43;
reconsider xx1 = x1, xx2 = x2 as
FinSequence by
NDIFF_5: 9;
reconsider yy1 = y1, yy2 = y2 as
FinSequence by
NDIFF_5: 9;
reconsider xx12 = (x1
+ x2), yy12 = (y1
+ y2) as
FinSequence by
NDIFF_5: 9;
A16: (
dom xx1)
= (
dom CX) & (
dom xx2)
= (
dom CX) & (
dom xx12)
= (
dom CX) & (
dom yy1)
= (
dom CY) & (
dom yy2)
= (
dom CY) & (
dom yy12)
= (
dom CY) by
CARD_3: 9;
(I
. v)
= (I
. (x1,y1)) & (I
. w)
= (I
. (x2,y2)) by
A14,
A15;
then
A17: (I
. v)
= (xx1
^ yy1) & (I
. w)
= (xx2
^ yy2) by
A2;
(I
. (v
+ w))
= (I
. ((x1
+ x2),(y1
+ y2))) by
A14,
A15,
PRVECT_3:def 1;
then
A18: (I
. (v
+ w))
= (xx12
^ yy12) by
A2;
then
A19: (
dom (xx12
^ yy12))
= (
dom (
carr (X
^ Y))) by
CARD_3: 9;
reconsider Iv = (I
. v), Iw = (I
. w) as
Element of (
product (
carr (X
^ Y)));
reconsider Ivw = ((I
. v)
+ (I
. w)) as
FinSequence by
NDIFF_5: 9;
for j0 be
Nat st j0
in (
dom Ivw) holds (Ivw
. j0)
= ((xx12
^ yy12)
. j0)
proof
let j0 be
Nat;
assume j0
in (
dom Ivw);
then
reconsider j = j0 as
Element of (
dom (
carr (X
^ Y))) by
CARD_3: 9;
A20: (Ivw
. j0)
= (((
addop (X
^ Y))
. j)
. ((Iv
. j),(Iw
. j))) by
PRVECT_1:def 8
.= (the
addF of ((X
^ Y)
. j)
. ((Iv
. j),(Iw
. j))) by
PRVECT_1:def 12;
per cases by
A20,
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 25;
suppose
A21: j0
in (
dom CX);
then j0
in (
dom X) by
A1,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A22: ((X
^ Y)
. j)
= (X
. j0) by
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
A23: (Iv
. j)
= (xx1
. j) & (Iw
. j)
= (xx2
. j) by
A21,
A16,
A17,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
A24: ((xx12
^ yy12)
. j0)
= (xx12
. j0) by
A21,
A16,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
reconsider j1 = j0 as
Element of (
dom (
carr X)) by
A21;
(the
addF of ((X
^ Y)
. j)
. ((Iv
. j),(Iw
. j)))
= (((
addop X)
. j1)
. ((xx1
. j1),(xx2
. j1))) by
A22,
A23,
PRVECT_1:def 12
.= ((xx12
^ yy12)
. j0) by
A24,
PRVECT_1:def 8;
hence (Ivw
. j0)
= ((xx12
^ yy12)
. j0) by
A20;
end;
suppose ex n be
Nat st n
in (
dom CY) & j0
= ((
len CX)
+ n);
then
consider n be
Nat such that
A25: n
in (
dom CY) & j0
= ((
len CX)
+ n);
A26: (
len CX)
= (
len xx1) & (
len CX)
= (
len xx2) & (
len CX)
= (
len xx12) by
A16,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
n
in (
dom Y) by
A1,
A25,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A27: ((X
^ Y)
. j)
= (Y
. n) by
A25,
A1,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
A28: (Iv
. j)
= (yy1
. n) & (Iw
. j)
= (yy2
. n) by
A16,
A17,
A25,
A26,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
A29: ((xx12
^ yy12)
. j0)
= (yy12
. n) by
A25,
A26,
A16,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
reconsider j1 = n as
Element of (
dom (
carr Y)) by
A25;
(the
addF of ((X
^ Y)
. j)
. ((Iv
. j),(Iw
. j)))
= (((
addop Y)
. j1)
. ((yy1
. j1),(yy2
. j1))) by
A27,
A28,
PRVECT_1:def 12
.= ((xx12
^ yy12)
. j0) by
A29,
PRVECT_1:def 8;
hence (Ivw
. j0)
= ((xx12
^ yy12)
. j0) by
A20;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A18,
A19,
CARD_3: 9,
FINSEQ_1: 13;
end;
then
reconsider I as
Homomorphism of
[:(
product X), (
product Y):], (
product (X
^ Y)) by
VECTSP_1:def 20;
take I;
thus thesis by
A13,
A2,
A12;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:4
Th4: for G,F be
AbGroup holds (for x be
set holds x is
Element of (
product
<*G, F*>) iff ex x1 be
Element of G, x2 be
Element of F st x
=
<*x1, x2*>) & (for x,y be
Element of (
product
<*G, F*>), x1,y1 be
Element of G, x2,y2 be
Element of F st x
=
<*x1, x2*> & y
=
<*y1, y2*> holds (x
+ y)
=
<*(x1
+ y1), (x2
+ y2)*>) & (
0. (
product
<*G, F*>))
=
<*(
0. G), (
0. F)*> & (for x be
Element of (
product
<*G, F*>), x1 be
Element of G, x2 be
Element of F st x
=
<*x1, x2*> holds (
- x)
=
<*(
- x1), (
- x2)*>)
proof
let G,F be
AbGroup;
consider I be
Homomorphism of
[:G, F:], (
product
<*G, F*>) such that
A1: I is
bijective & (for x be
Element of G, y be
Element of F holds (I
. (x,y))
=
<*x, y*>) by
Th2;
thus
A2: for x be
set holds (x is
Element of (
product
<*G, F*>) iff ex x1 be
Element of G, x2 be
Element of F st x
=
<*x1, x2*>)
proof
let y be
set;
hereby
assume y is
Element of (
product
<*G, F*>);
then y
in the
carrier of (
product
<*G, F*>);
then y
in (
rng I) by
A1,
FUNCT_2:def 3;
then
consider x be
Element of the
carrier of
[:G, F:] such that
A3: y
= (I
. x) by
FUNCT_2: 113;
consider x1 be
Element of G, x2 be
Element of F such that
A4: x
=
[x1, x2] by
SUBSET_1: 43;
take x1, x2;
(I
. (x1,x2))
=
<*x1, x2*> by
A1;
hence y
=
<*x1, x2*> by
A3,
A4;
end;
now
assume ex x1 be
Element of G, x2 be
Element of F st y
=
<*x1, x2*>;
then
consider x1 be
Element of G, x2 be
Element of F such that
A5: y
=
<*x1, x2*>;
A6: (I
.
[x1, x2])
in (
rng I) by
FUNCT_2: 112;
(I
. (x1,x2))
=
<*x1, x2*> by
A1;
hence y is
Element of (
product
<*G, F*>) by
A5,
A6;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
thus
A7: for x,y be
Element of (
product
<*G, F*>), x1,y1 be
Element of G, x2,y2 be
Element of F st x
=
<*x1, x2*> & y
=
<*y1, y2*> holds (x
+ y)
=
<*(x1
+ y1), (x2
+ y2)*>
proof
let x,y be
Element of (
product
<*G, F*>);
let x1,y1 be
Element of G, x2,y2 be
Element of F;
assume
A8: x
=
<*x1, x2*> & y
=
<*y1, y2*>;
reconsider z =
[x1, x2], w =
[y1, y2] as
Element of
[:G, F:];
A9: (z
+ w)
=
[(x1
+ y1), (x2
+ y2)] by
PRVECT_3:def 1;
(I
. ((x1
+ y1),(x2
+ y2)))
=
<*(x1
+ y1), (x2
+ y2)*> & (I
. (x1,x2))
=
<*x1, x2*> & (I
. (y1,y2))
=
<*y1, y2*> by
A1;
hence
<*(x1
+ y1), (x2
+ y2)*>
= (x
+ y) by
A9,
A8,
VECTSP_1:def 20;
end;
thus
A10: (
0. (
product
<*G, F*>))
=
<*(
0. G), (
0. F)*>
proof
thus (
0. (
product
<*G, F*>))
= (I
. (
0.
[:G, F:])) by
MOD_4: 40
.= (I
. ((
0. G),(
0. F)))
.=
<*(
0. G), (
0. F)*> by
A1;
end;
thus for x be
Element of (
product
<*G, F*>), x1 be
Element of G, x2 be
Element of F st x
=
<*x1, x2*> holds (
- x)
=
<*(
- x1), (
- x2)*>
proof
let x be
Element of (
product
<*G, F*>);
let x1 be
Element of G, x2 be
Element of F;
assume
A11: x
=
<*x1, x2*>;
reconsider y =
<*(
- x1), (
- x2)*> as
Element of (
product
<*G, F*>) by
A2;
(x
+ y)
=
<*(x1
+ (
- x1)), (x2
+ (
- x2))*> by
A7,
A11
.=
<*(
0. G), (x2
+ (
- x2))*> by
RLVECT_1:def 10
.= (
0. (
product
<*G, F*>)) by
A10,
RLVECT_1:def 10;
hence thesis by
RLVECT_1:def 10;
end;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:5
for G,F be
AbGroup holds (for x be
set holds x is
Element of
[:G, F:] iff ex x1 be
Element of G, x2 be
Element of F st x
=
[x1, x2]) & (for x,y be
Element of
[:G, F:], x1,y1 be
Element of G, x2,y2 be
Element of F st x
=
[x1, x2] & y
=
[y1, y2] holds (x
+ y)
=
[(x1
+ y1), (x2
+ y2)]) & (
0.
[:G, F:])
=
[(
0. G), (
0. F)] & (for x be
Element of
[:G, F:], x1 be
Element of G, x2 be
Element of F st x
=
[x1, x2] holds (
- x)
=
[(
- x1), (
- x2)])
proof
let G,F be
AbGroup;
thus for x be
set holds (x is
Element of
[:G, F:] iff ex x1 be
Element of G, x2 be
Element of F st x
=
[x1, x2]) by
SUBSET_1: 43;
thus for x,y be
Element of
[:G, F:], x1,y1 be
Element of G, x2,y2 be
Element of F st x
=
[x1, x2] & y
=
[y1, y2] holds (x
+ y)
=
[(x1
+ y1), (x2
+ y2)] by
PRVECT_3:def 1;
thus (
0.
[:G, F:])
=
[(
0. G), (
0. F)];
thus for x be
Element of
[:G, F:], x1 be
Element of G, x2 be
Element of F st x
=
[x1, x2] holds (
- x)
=
[(
- x1), (
- x2)]
proof
let x be
Element of
[:G, F:];
let x1 be
Element of G, x2 be
Element of F;
assume
A1: x
=
[x1, x2];
reconsider y =
[(
- x1), (
- x2)] as
Element of
[:G, F:];
(x
+ y)
=
[(x1
+ (
- x1)), (x2
+ (
- x2))] by
A1,
PRVECT_3:def 1
.=
[(
0. G), (x2
+ (
- x2))] by
RLVECT_1:def 10
.= (
0.
[:G, F:]) by
RLVECT_1:def 10;
hence thesis by
RLVECT_1:def 10;
end;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:6
Th6: for G,H,I be
AddGroup, h be
Homomorphism of G, H holds for h1 be
Homomorphism of H, I holds (h1
* h) is
Homomorphism of G, I
proof
let G,H,I be
AddGroup;
let h be
Homomorphism of G, H;
let h1 be
Homomorphism of H, I;
reconsider f = (h1
* h) as
Function of G, I;
now
let a,b be
Element of G;
thus (f
. (a
+ b))
= (h1
. (h
. (a
+ b))) by
FUNCT_2: 15
.= (h1
. ((h
. a)
+ (h
. b))) by
VECTSP_1:def 20
.= ((h1
. (h
. a))
+ (h1
. (h
. b))) by
VECTSP_1:def 20
.= ((f
. a)
+ (h1
. (h
. b))) by
FUNCT_2: 15
.= ((f
. a)
+ (f
. b)) by
FUNCT_2: 15;
end;
hence thesis by
VECTSP_1:def 20;
end;
definition
let G,H,I be
AddGroup;
let h be
Homomorphism of G, H;
let h1 be
Homomorphism of H, I;
:: original:
*
redefine
func h1
* h ->
Homomorphism of G, I ;
coherence by
Th6;
end
theorem ::
GROUP_14:7
Th7: for G,H be
AddGroup, h be
Homomorphism of G, H st h is
bijective holds (h
" ) is
Homomorphism of H, G
proof
let G,H be
AddGroup, h be
Homomorphism of G, H;
assume
A1: h is
bijective;
then
A2: h is
one-to-one & (
rng h)
= the
carrier of H by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
then
reconsider h1 = (h
" ) as
Function of H, G by
FUNCT_2: 25;
now
let a,b be
Element of H;
set a1 = (h1
. a), b1 = (h1
. b);
(h
. a1)
= a & (h
. b1)
= b by
A2,
FUNCT_1: 32;
hence (h1
. (a
+ b))
= (h1
. (h
. (a1
+ b1))) by
VECTSP_1:def 20
.= ((h1
. a)
+ (h1
. b)) by
A1,
FUNCT_2: 26;
end;
hence thesis by
VECTSP_1:def 20;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:8
for X,Y be
Group-Sequence holds ex I be
Homomorphism of (
product
<*(
product X), (
product Y)*>), (
product (X
^ Y)) st I is
bijective & (for x be
Element of (
product X), y be
Element of (
product Y) holds ex x1,y1 be
FinSequence st x
= x1 & y
= y1 & (I
.
<*x, y*>)
= (x1
^ y1))
proof
let X,Y be
Group-Sequence;
set PX = (
product X);
set PY = (
product Y);
set PXY = (
product (X
^ Y));
consider K be
Homomorphism of
[:PX, PY:], PXY such that
A1: K is
bijective & (for x be
Element of PX, y be
Element of PY holds ex x1,y1 be
FinSequence st x
= x1 & y
= y1 & (K
. (x,y))
= (x1
^ y1)) by
Th3;
consider J be
Homomorphism of
[:PX, PY:], (
product
<*PX, PY*>) such that
A2: J is
bijective & (for x be
Element of PX, y be
Element of PY holds (J
. (x,y))
=
<*x, y*>) by
Th2;
reconsider JB = (J
" ) as
Homomorphism of (
product
<*PX, PY*>),
[:PX, PY:] by
A2,
Th7;
(
dom J)
= the
carrier of
[:PX, PY:] by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (
rng JB)
= the
carrier of
[:PX, PY:] by
A2,
FUNCT_1: 33;
then
A3: JB is
onto by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
reconsider I = (K
* JB) as
Homomorphism of (
product
<*PX, PY*>), PXY;
take I;
I is
onto by
A1,
A3,
FUNCT_2: 27;
hence I is
bijective by
A1,
A2;
thus for x be
Element of PX, y be
Element of PY holds ex x1,y1 be
FinSequence st x
= x1 & y
= y1 & (I
.
<*x, y*>)
= (x1
^ y1)
proof
let x be
Element of PX, y be
Element of PY;
consider x1,y1 be
FinSequence such that
A4: x
= x1 & y
= y1 & (K
. (x,y))
= (x1
^ y1) by
A1;
A5: (J
. (x,y))
=
<*x, y*> by
A2;
[x, y]
in the
carrier of
[:PX, PY:];
then
A6:
[x, y]
in (
dom J) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
<*x, y*> is
Element of (
product
<*PX, PY*>) by
Th4;
then (I
.
<*x, y*>)
= (K
. (JB
. (J
.
[x, y]))) by
A5,
FUNCT_2: 15;
then (I
.
<*x, y*>)
= (x1
^ y1) by
A4,
A6,
A2,
FUNCT_1: 34;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:9
Th9: for X,Y be
AbGroup holds ex I be
Homomorphism of
[:X, Y:],
[:X, (
product
<*Y*>):] st I is
bijective & (for x be
Element of X, y be
Element of Y holds (I
. (x,y))
=
[x,
<*y*>])
proof
let X,Y be
AbGroup;
consider J be
Homomorphism of Y, (
product
<*Y*>) such that
A1: J is
bijective & (for y be
Element of Y holds (J
. y)
=
<*y*>) by
Th1;
defpred
P[
object,
object,
object] means $3
=
[$1,
<*$2*>];
A2: for x,y be
object st x
in the
carrier of X & y
in the
carrier of Y holds ex z be
object st z
in the
carrier of
[:X, (
product
<*Y*>):] &
P[x, y, z]
proof
let x,y be
object;
assume
A3: x
in the
carrier of X & y
in the
carrier of Y;
then
reconsider y0 = y as
Element of Y;
reconsider z =
[x,
<*y0*>] as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
take z;
(J
. y0)
=
<*y0*> by
A1;
hence thesis by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
end;
consider I be
Function of
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:], the
carrier of
[:X, (
product
<*Y*>):] such that
A4: for x,y be
object st x
in the
carrier of X & y
in the
carrier of Y holds
P[x, y, (I
. (x,y))] from
BINOP_1:sch 1(
A2);
reconsider I as
Function of
[:X, Y:],
[:X, (
product
<*Y*>):];
for v,w be
Element of
[:X, Y:] holds (I
. (v
+ w))
= ((I
. v)
+ (I
. w))
proof
let v,w be
Element of
[:X, Y:];
consider x1 be
Element of X, x2 be
Element of Y such that
A5: v
=
[x1, x2] by
SUBSET_1: 43;
consider y1 be
Element of X, y2 be
Element of Y such that
A6: w
=
[y1, y2] by
SUBSET_1: 43;
A7: (I
. (v
+ w))
= (I
. ((x1
+ y1),(x2
+ y2))) by
A5,
A6,
PRVECT_3:def 1
.=
[(x1
+ y1),
<*(x2
+ y2)*>] by
A4;
(I
. v)
= (I
. (x1,x2)) & (I
. w)
= (I
. (y1,y2)) by
A5,
A6;
then
A8: (I
. v)
=
[x1,
<*x2*>] & (I
. w)
=
[y1,
<*y2*>] by
A4;
A9: (J
. x2)
=
<*x2*> & (J
. y2)
=
<*y2*> by
A1;
then
reconsider xx2 =
<*x2*> as
Element of (
product
<*Y*>);
reconsider yy2 =
<*y2*> as
Element of (
product
<*Y*>) by
A9;
<*(x2
+ y2)*>
= (J
. (x2
+ y2)) by
A1
.= (xx2
+ yy2) by
A9,
VECTSP_1:def 20;
hence ((I
. v)
+ (I
. w))
= (I
. (v
+ w)) by
A7,
A8,
PRVECT_3:def 1;
end;
then
reconsider I as
Homomorphism of
[:X, Y:],
[:X, (
product
<*Y*>):] by
VECTSP_1:def 20;
take I;
now
let z1,z2 be
object;
assume
A10: z1
in the
carrier of
[:X, Y:] & z2
in the
carrier of
[:X, Y:] & (I
. z1)
= (I
. z2);
consider x1,y1 be
object such that
A11: x1
in the
carrier of X & y1
in the
carrier of Y & z1
=
[x1, y1] by
A10,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
consider x2,y2 be
object such that
A12: x2
in the
carrier of X & y2
in the
carrier of Y & z2
=
[x2, y2] by
A10,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
[x1,
<*y1*>]
= (I
. (x1,y1)) by
A4,
A11
.= (I
. (x2,y2)) by
A10,
A11,
A12
.=
[x2,
<*y2*>] by
A4,
A12;
then x1
= x2 &
<*y1*>
=
<*y2*> by
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence z1
= z2 by
A11,
A12,
FINSEQ_1: 76;
end;
then
A13: I is
one-to-one by
FUNCT_2: 19;
now
let w be
object;
assume w
in the
carrier of
[:X, (
product
<*Y*>):];
then
consider x,y1 be
object such that
A14: x
in the
carrier of X & y1
in the
carrier of (
product
<*Y*>) & w
=
[x, y1] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
y1
in (
rng J) by
A1,
A14,
FUNCT_2:def 3;
then
consider y be
object such that
A15: y
in the
carrier of Y & y1
= (J
. y) by
FUNCT_2: 11;
reconsider z =
[x, y] as
Element of
[:the
carrier of X, the
carrier of Y:] by
A14,
A15,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
(J
. y)
=
<*y*> by
A15,
A1;
then w
= (I
. (x,y)) by
A4,
A14,
A15;
then w
= (I
. z);
hence w
in (
rng I) by
FUNCT_2: 4;
end;
then the
carrier of
[:X, (
product
<*Y*>):]
c= (
rng I) by
TARSKI:def 3;
then I is
onto by
FUNCT_2:def 3,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
hence I is
bijective by
A13;
thus for x be
Element of X, y be
Element of Y holds (I
. (x,y))
=
[x,
<*y*>] by
A4;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:10
for X be
Group-Sequence, Y be
AbGroup holds ex I be
Homomorphism of
[:(
product X), Y:], (
product (X
^
<*Y*>)) st I is
bijective & (for x be
Element of (
product X), y be
Element of Y holds ex x1,y1 be
FinSequence st x
= x1 &
<*y*>
= y1 & (I
. (x,y))
= (x1
^ y1))
proof
let X be
Group-Sequence;
let Y be
AbGroup;
consider I be
Homomorphism of
[:(
product X), Y:],
[:(
product X), (
product
<*Y*>):] such that
A1: I is
bijective & (for x be
Element of (
product X), y be
Element of Y holds (I
. (x,y))
=
[x,
<*y*>]) by
Th9;
consider J be
Homomorphism of
[:(
product X), (
product
<*Y*>):], (
product (X
^
<*Y*>)) such that
A2: J is
bijective & (for x be
Element of (
product X), y be
Element of (
product
<*Y*>) holds ex x1,y1 be
FinSequence st x
= x1 & y
= y1 & (J
. (x,y))
= (x1
^ y1)) by
Th3;
set K = (J
* I);
reconsider K as
Homomorphism of
[:(
product X), Y:], (
product (X
^
<*Y*>));
take K;
A3: (
rng J)
= the
carrier of (
product (X
^
<*Y*>)) by
A2,
FUNCT_2:def 3;
(
rng I)
= the
carrier of
[:(
product X), (
product
<*Y*>):] by
A1,
FUNCT_2:def 3;
then (
rng (J
* I))
= (J
.: the
carrier of
[:(
product X), (
product
<*Y*>):]) by
RELAT_1: 127
.= the
carrier of (
product (X
^
<*Y*>)) by
A3,
RELSET_1: 22;
then K is
onto by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
hence K is
bijective by
A1,
A2;
thus for x be
Element of (
product X), y be
Element of Y holds ex x1,y1 be
FinSequence st x
= x1 &
<*y*>
= y1 & (K
. (x,y))
= (x1
^ y1)
proof
let x be
Element of (
product X), y be
Element of Y;
A4: (I
. (x,y))
=
[x,
<*y*>] by
A1;
[x, y]
in the
carrier of
[:(
product X), Y:];
then
[x,
<*y*>]
in the
carrier of
[:(
product X), (
product
<*Y*>):] by
A4,
FUNCT_2: 5;
then
reconsider yy =
<*y*> as
Element of (
product
<*Y*>) by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
consider x1,y1 be
FinSequence such that
A5: x
= x1 & yy
= y1 & (J
. (x,yy))
= (x1
^ y1) by
A2;
(J
. (x,yy))
= (J
. (I
.
[x, y])) by
A4
.= (K
. (x,y)) by
FUNCT_2: 15;
hence thesis by
A5;
end;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:11
Th11: for n be non
zero
Nat holds the addLoopStr of (
INT.Ring n) is non
empty
Abelian
right_complementable
add-associative
right_zeroed
proof
let n be non
zero
Nat;
A1: 1
<= n by
NAT_1: 14;
now
per cases ;
suppose n
= 1;
hence (
INT.Ring n) is
Ring by
INT_3: 10;
end;
suppose n
<> 1;
then 1
< n by
A1,
XXREAL_0: 1;
hence (
INT.Ring n) is
Ring by
INT_3: 11;
end;
end;
then
reconsider R = (
INT.Ring n) as
Ring;
set S = the addLoopStr of (
INT.Ring n);
A2: for v,w be
Element of S holds (v
+ w)
= (w
+ v)
proof
let v,w be
Element of S;
reconsider v1 = v, w1 = w as
Element of R;
thus (v
+ w)
= (v1
+ w1)
.= (w1
+ v1)
.= (w
+ v);
end;
A3: for x be
Element of S holds x is
right_complementable
proof
let v be
Element of S;
reconsider v1 = v as
Element of R;
consider w1 be
Element of R such that
A4: (v1
+ w1)
= (
0. R) by
ALGSTR_0:def 11;
reconsider w = w1 as
Element of S;
(v
+ w)
= (
0. S) by
A4;
hence thesis;
end;
A5: for u,v,w be
Element of S holds ((u
+ v)
+ w)
= (u
+ (v
+ w))
proof
let u,v,w be
Element of S;
reconsider u1 = u, v1 = v, w1 = w as
Element of R;
thus ((u
+ v)
+ w)
= ((u1
+ v1)
+ w1)
.= (u1
+ (v1
+ w1)) by
RLVECT_1:def 3
.= (u
+ (v
+ w));
end;
A6: for v be
Element of S holds (v
+ (
0. S))
= v
proof
let v be
Element of S;
reconsider v1 = v as
Element of R;
thus (v
+ (
0. S))
= (v1
+ (
0. R))
.= v;
end;
thus thesis by
A2,
A3,
A5,
A6,
RLVECT_1:def 2,
RLVECT_1:def 3,
RLVECT_1:def 4;
end;
definition
let n be
natural
Number;
::
GROUP_14:def1
func
Z/Z n ->
addLoopStr equals the addLoopStr of (
INT.Ring n);
coherence ;
end
registration
let n be non
zero
natural
Number;
cluster (
Z/Z n) -> non
empty
strict;
coherence ;
end
registration
let n be non
zero
natural
Number;
cluster (
Z/Z n) ->
Abelian
right_complementable
add-associative
right_zeroed;
coherence by
Th11;
end
theorem ::
GROUP_14:12
Th12: for X be
Group-Sequence, x,y,z be
Element of (
product X), x1,y1,z1 be
FinSequence st x
= x1 & y
= y1 & z
= z1 holds z
= (x
+ y) iff for j be
Element of (
dom (
carr X)) holds (z1
. j)
= (the
addF of (X
. j)
. ((x1
. j),(y1
. j)))
proof
let X be
Group-Sequence, x,y,z be
Element of (
product X), x1,y1,z1 be
FinSequence;
assume
A1: x
= x1 & y
= y1 & z
= z1;
hereby
assume
A2: z
= (x
+ y);
thus for j be
Element of (
dom (
carr X)) holds (z1
. j)
= (the
addF of (X
. j)
. ((x1
. j),(y1
. j)))
proof
let j be
Element of (
dom (
carr X));
thus (z1
. j)
= (((
addop X)
. j)
. ((x1
. j),(y1
. j))) by
A1,
A2,
PRVECT_1:def 8
.= (the
addF of (X
. j)
. ((x1
. j),(y1
. j))) by
PRVECT_1:def 12;
end;
end;
assume
A3: for j be
Element of (
dom (
carr X)) holds (z1
. j)
= (the
addF of (X
. j)
. ((x1
. j),(y1
. j)));
reconsider Ixy = (x
+ y) as
FinSequence by
NDIFF_5: 9;
A4: (
dom Ixy)
= (
dom (
carr X)) by
CARD_3: 9;
for j0 be
Nat st j0
in (
dom z1) holds (z1
. j0)
= (Ixy
. j0)
proof
let j0 be
Nat;
assume j0
in (
dom z1);
then
reconsider j = j0 as
Element of (
dom (
carr X)) by
CARD_3: 9,
A1;
(Ixy
. j0)
= (((
addop X)
. j)
. ((x1
. j),(y1
. j))) by
A1,
PRVECT_1:def 8
.= (the
addF of (X
. j)
. ((x1
. j),(y1
. j))) by
PRVECT_1:def 12
.= (z1
. j) by
A3;
hence thesis;
end;
hence z
= (x
+ y) by
A1,
CARD_3: 9,
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 13;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:13
Th13: for m be
CR_Sequence, j be
Nat, x be
Integer st j
in (
dom m) holds ((x
mod (
Product m))
mod (m
. j))
= (x
mod (m
. j))
proof
let m be
CR_Sequence, j be
Nat, x be
Integer;
assume
A1: j
in (
dom m);
consider z be
Integer such that
A2: (z
* (m
. j))
= (
Product m) by
A1,
INT_6: 10;
((x
mod (
Product m))
mod (m
. j))
= ((x
- ((x
div (z
* (m
. j)))
* (z
* (m
. j))))
mod (m
. j)) by
A2,
INT_1:def 10
.= (((x
mod (m
. j))
- ((
0
+ (((x
div (z
* (m
. j)))
* z)
* (m
. j)))
mod (m
. j)))
mod (m
. j)) by
INT_6: 7
.= (((x
mod (m
. j))
- (
0
mod (m
. j)))
mod (m
. j)) by
NAT_D: 61
.= ((x
-
0 )
mod (m
. j)) by
INT_6: 7
.= (x
mod (m
. j));
hence thesis;
end;
Lm1: for m be non
zero
Nat, x be
Integer holds (x
mod m)
in (
Segm m)
proof
let m be non
zero
Nat, x be
Integer;
(x
mod m)
>=
0 & (x
mod m)
< m by
NAT_D: 62;
then (x
mod m)
in
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
hence thesis by
NAT_1: 44,
NAT_D: 62;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:14
Th14: for m be
CR_Sequence, X be
Group-Sequence st (
len m)
= (
len X) & (for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom X) holds ex mi be non
zero
Nat st mi
= (m
. i) & (X
. i)
= (
Z/Z mi)) holds ex I be
Homomorphism of (
Z/Z (
Product m)), (
product X) st (for x be
Integer st x
in the
carrier of (
Z/Z (
Product m)) holds (I
. x)
= (
mod (x,m)))
proof
let m be
CR_Sequence, X be
Group-Sequence;
assume
A1: (
len m)
= (
len X) & (for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom X) holds ex mi be non
zero
Nat st mi
= (m
. i) & (X
. i)
= (
Z/Z mi));
set ZZ = (
Z/Z (
Product m));
reconsider CX = (
carr X) as
non-empty
FinSequence;
(
len (
carr X))
= (
len X) by
PRVECT_1:def 11;
then
A2: (
dom (
carr X))
= (
Seg (
len X)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
dom X) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
defpred
P[
object,
object] means ex x be
Integer st $1
= x & $2
= (
mod (x,m));
A3: for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of (
Z/Z (
Product m)) holds ex y be
object st y
in the
carrier of (
product X) &
P[x, y]
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in the
carrier of (
Z/Z (
Product m));
then
reconsider x1 = x as
Integer;
A4: (
dom (
mod (x1,m)))
= (
Seg (
len (
mod (x1,m)))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
Seg (
len m)) by
INT_6:def 3
.= (
Seg (
len (
carr X))) by
A1,
PRVECT_1:def 11
.= (
dom (
carr X)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
now
let i be
object;
assume
A5: i
in (
dom (
carr X));
then
reconsider i0 = i as
Element of (
dom (
carr X));
reconsider i1 = i as
Nat by
A5;
consider mi be non
zero
Nat such that
A6: mi
= (m
. i0) & (X
. i0)
= (
Z/Z mi) by
A1,
A2;
((
mod (x1,m))
. i)
= (x1
mod (m
. i1)) by
A4,
A5,
INT_6:def 3;
then ((
mod (x1,m))
. i)
in the
carrier of (X
. i0) by
A6,
Lm1;
hence ((
mod (x1,m))
. i)
in ((
carr X)
. i) by
A2,
PRVECT_1:def 11;
end;
hence thesis by
CARD_3: 9,
A4;
end;
consider I be
Function of the
carrier of (
Z/Z (
Product m)), the
carrier of (
product X) such that
A7: for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of (
Z/Z (
Product m)) holds
P[x, (I
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A3);
A8: for x be
Integer st x
in the
carrier of (
Z/Z (
Product m)) holds (I
. x)
= (
mod (x,m))
proof
let x be
Integer;
assume x
in the
carrier of (
Z/Z (
Product m));
then ex x0 be
Integer st x
= x0 & (I
. x)
= (
mod (x0,m)) by
A7;
hence (I
. x)
= (
mod (x,m));
end;
for v,w be
Point of ZZ holds (I
. (v
+ w))
= ((I
. v)
+ (I
. w))
proof
let v,w be
Point of ZZ;
reconsider v1 = v, w1 = w, vw1 = (v
+ w) as
Integer;
reconsider Iv = (I
. v), Iw = (I
. w), Ivw = (I
. (v
+ w)) as
FinSequence by
NDIFF_5: 9;
A9: (I
. v1)
= (
mod (v1,m)) by
A8;
A10: (I
. w1)
= (
mod (w1,m)) by
A8;
A11: (I
. vw1)
= (
mod (vw1,m)) by
A8;
(I
. v)
in the
carrier of (
product X);
then (
mod (v1,m))
in (
product (
carr X)) by
A8;
then
A12: (
dom (
mod (v1,m)))
= (
dom (
carr X)) by
CARD_3: 9;
(I
. w)
in the
carrier of (
product X);
then (
mod (w1,m))
in (
product (
carr X)) by
A8;
then
A13: (
dom (
mod (w1,m)))
= (
dom (
carr X)) by
CARD_3: 9;
(I
. (v
+ w))
in the
carrier of (
product X);
then (
mod (vw1,m))
in (
product (
carr X)) by
A8;
then
A14: (
dom (
mod (vw1,m)))
= (
dom (
carr X)) by
CARD_3: 9;
now
let j be
Element of (
dom (
carr X));
reconsider j0 = j as
Nat;
consider mj be non
zero
Nat such that
A15: mj
= (m
. j0) & (X
. j0)
= (
Z/Z mj) by
A2,
A1;
A16: (
dom m)
= (
Seg (
len X)) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
dom X) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A17: (v1
mod (m
. j0))
in (
Segm mj) & (w1
mod (m
. j0))
in (
Segm mj) by
Lm1,
A15;
A18: (Iw
. j0)
= (w1
mod (m
. j0)) by
A13,
A10,
INT_6:def 3;
A19: (Ivw
. j0)
= (vw1
mod (m
. j0)) by
A14,
A11,
INT_6:def 3;
thus (Ivw
. j)
= (((v1
+ w1)
mod (
Product m))
mod (m
. j0)) by
GR_CY_1:def 4,
A19
.= ((v1
+ w1)
mod (m
. j0)) by
A2,
A16,
Th13
.= (((v1
mod (m
. j0))
+ (w1
mod (m
. j0)))
mod (m
. j0)) by
NAT_D: 66
.= ((
addint mj)
. ((v1
mod (m
. j0)),(w1
mod (m
. j0)))) by
A17,
A15,
GR_CY_1:def 4
.= (the
addF of (X
. j)
. ((Iv
. j),(Iw
. j))) by
A12,
A9,
INT_6:def 3,
A18,
A15;
end;
hence (I
. (v
+ w))
= ((I
. v)
+ (I
. w)) by
Th12;
end;
then
reconsider I as
Homomorphism of (
Z/Z (
Product m)), (
product X) by
VECTSP_1:def 20;
take I;
thus thesis by
A8;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:15
Th15: for X,Y be non
empty
set holds ex I be
Function of
[:X, Y:],
[:X, (
product
<*Y*>):] st I is
one-to-one
onto & (for x,y be
set st x
in X & y
in Y holds (I
. (x,y))
=
[x,
<*y*>])
proof
let X,Y be non
empty
set;
A1: (
product
<*Y*>)
<>
{}
proof
assume (
product
<*Y*>)
=
{} ;
then
{}
in (
rng
<*Y*>) by
CARD_3: 26;
then
{}
in
{Y} by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
hence contradiction by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
consider J be
Function of Y, (
product
<*Y*>) such that
A2: J is
one-to-one & J is
onto & (for y be
object st y
in Y holds (J
. y)
=
<*y*>) by
PRVECT_3: 4;
defpred
P[
object,
object,
object] means $3
=
[$1,
<*$2*>];
A3: for x,y be
object st x
in X & y
in Y holds ex z be
object st z
in
[:X, (
product
<*Y*>):] &
P[x, y, z]
proof
let x,y be
object;
assume
A4: x
in X & y
in Y;
reconsider z =
[x,
<*y*>] as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
take z;
(J
. y)
=
<*y*> by
A2,
A4;
then
<*y*>
in (
product
<*Y*>) by
A4,
A1,
FUNCT_2: 5;
hence thesis by
A4,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
end;
consider I be
Function of
[:X, Y:],
[:X, (
product
<*Y*>):] such that
A5: for x,y be
object st x
in X & y
in Y holds
P[x, y, (I
. (x,y))] from
BINOP_1:sch 1(
A3);
reconsider I as
Function of
[:X, Y:],
[:X, (
product
<*Y*>):];
take I;
thus I is
one-to-one
proof
now
let z1,z2 be
object;
assume
A6: z1
in
[:X, Y:] & z2
in
[:X, Y:] & (I
. z1)
= (I
. z2);
then
consider x1,y1 be
object such that
A7: x1
in X & y1
in Y & z1
=
[x1, y1] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
consider x2,y2 be
object such that
A8: x2
in X & y2
in Y & z2
=
[x2, y2] by
A6,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
A9:
[x1,
<*y1*>]
= (I
. (x1,y1)) by
A5,
A7
.= (I
. (x2,y2)) by
A6,
A7,
A8
.=
[x2,
<*y2*>] by
A5,
A8;
then
<*y1*>
=
<*y2*> by
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then y1
= y2 by
FINSEQ_1: 76;
hence z1
= z2 by
A7,
A8,
A9,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 19,
A1;
end;
thus I is
onto
proof
now
let w be
object;
assume w
in
[:X, (
product
<*Y*>):];
then
consider x,y1 be
object such that
A10: x
in X & y1
in (
product
<*Y*>) & w
=
[x, y1] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
y1
in (
rng J) by
A2,
A10,
FUNCT_2:def 3;
then
consider y be
object such that
A11: y
in Y & y1
= (J
. y) by
FUNCT_2: 11;
A12: (J
. y)
=
<*y*> by
A11,
A2;
reconsider z =
[x, y] as
Element of
[:X, Y:] by
A10,
A11,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
w
= (I
. (x,y)) by
A5,
A10,
A11,
A12
.= (I
. z);
hence w
in (
rng I) by
FUNCT_2: 4,
A1;
end;
then
[:X, (
product
<*Y*>):]
c= (
rng I) by
TARSKI:def 3;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2:def 3,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
end;
thus for x,y be
set st x
in X & y
in Y holds (I
. (x,y))
=
[x,
<*y*>] by
A5;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:16
Th16: for X be non
empty
set holds (
card (
product
<*X*>))
= (
card X)
proof
let X be non
empty
set;
consider I be
Function of X, (
product
<*X*>) such that
A1: I is
one-to-one & I is
onto & for x be
object st x
in X holds (I
. x)
=
<*x*> by
PRVECT_3: 4;
not
{}
in (
rng
<*X*>)
proof
assume not not
{}
in (
rng
<*X*>);
then
{}
in
{X} by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
hence contradiction by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
then (
product
<*X*>)
<>
{} by
CARD_3: 26;
then
A2: (
dom I)
= X by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
(
rng I)
= (
product
<*X*>) by
A1,
FUNCT_2:def 3;
hence (
card X)
= (
card (
product
<*X*>)) by
CARD_1: 5,
A1,
A2,
WELLORD2:def 4;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:17
Th17: for X be
non-empty non
empty
FinSequence, Y be non
empty
set holds ex I be
Function of
[:(
product X), Y:], (
product (X
^
<*Y*>)) st I is
one-to-one
onto & (for x,y be
set st x
in (
product X) & y
in Y holds ex x1,y1 be
FinSequence st x
= x1 &
<*y*>
= y1 & (I
. (x,y))
= (x1
^ y1))
proof
let X be
non-empty non
empty
FinSequence, Y be non
empty
set;
A1: (
product
<*Y*>)
<>
{}
proof
assume (
product
<*Y*>)
=
{} ;
then
{}
in (
rng
<*Y*>) by
CARD_3: 26;
then
{}
in
{Y} by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
hence contradiction by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
consider I be
Function of
[:(
product X), Y:],
[:(
product X), (
product
<*Y*>):] such that
A2: I is
one-to-one & I is
onto & (for x,y be
set st x
in (
product X) & y
in Y holds (I
. (x,y))
=
[x,
<*y*>]) by
Th15;
<*Y*> is
non-empty
proof
assume not (
<*Y*> is
non-empty);
then
{}
in (
rng
<*Y*>) by
RELAT_1:def 9;
then
{}
in
{Y} by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
hence contradiction by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
then
reconsider YY =
<*Y*> as
non-empty non
empty
FinSequence;
consider J be
Function of
[:(
product X), (
product YY):], (
product (X
^ YY)) such that
A3: J is
one-to-one & J is
onto & (for x,y be
FinSequence st x
in (
product X) & y
in (
product YY) holds (J
. (x,y))
= (x
^ y)) by
PRVECT_3: 6;
set K = (J
* I);
reconsider K as
Function of
[:(
product X), Y:], (
product (X
^
<*Y*>));
take K;
thus K is
one-to-one by
A2,
A3;
A4: (
rng J)
= (
product (X
^
<*Y*>)) by
A3,
FUNCT_2:def 3;
(
rng I)
=
[:(
product X), (
product
<*Y*>):] by
A2,
FUNCT_2:def 3;
then (
rng (J
* I))
= (J
.:
[:(
product X), (
product
<*Y*>):]) by
RELAT_1: 127
.= (
product (X
^
<*Y*>)) by
A4,
RELSET_1: 22;
hence K is
onto by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
thus for x,y be
set st x
in (
product X) & y
in Y holds ex x1,y1 be
FinSequence st x
= x1 &
<*y*>
= y1 & (K
. (x,y))
= (x1
^ y1)
proof
let x,y be
set;
assume
A5: x
in (
product X) & y
in Y;
then
A6: (I
. (x,y))
=
[x,
<*y*>] by
A2;
A7:
[x, y]
in
[:(
product X), Y:] by
A5,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
[x,
<*y*>]
in
[:(
product X), (
product
<*Y*>):] by
A6,
A1,
FUNCT_2: 5;
then
A8:
<*y*>
in (
product
<*Y*>) by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
reconsider xx = x as
Function by
A5;
(
dom xx)
= (
dom X) by
CARD_3: 9,
A5
.= (
Seg (
len X)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider x1 = xx as
FinSequence by
FINSEQ_1:def 2;
set y1 =
<*y*>;
A9: (J
. (x,
<*y*>))
= (x1
^ y1) by
A3,
A5,
A8;
(J
. (x,
<*y*>))
= (K
. (x,y)) by
A6,
A7,
FUNCT_2: 15;
hence thesis by
A9;
end;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:18
Th18: for m be
FinSequence of
NAT , X be
non-empty non
empty
FinSequence st (
len m)
= (
len X) & (for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom X) holds (
card (X
. i))
= (m
. i)) holds (
card (
product X))
= (
Product m)
proof
defpred
P[
Nat] means for m be
FinSequence of
NAT , X be
non-empty non
empty
FinSequence st (
len m)
= $1 & (
len m)
= (
len X) & (for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom X) holds (
card (X
. i))
= (m
. i)) holds (
card (
product X))
= (
Product m);
A1:
P[
0 ];
A2: for n be
Nat st
P[n] holds
P[(n
+ 1)]
proof
let n be
Nat;
assume
A3:
P[n];
now
let m be
FinSequence of
NAT , X be
non-empty non
empty
FinSequence;
assume
A4: (
len m)
= (n
+ 1) & (
len m)
= (
len X) & (for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom X) holds (
card (X
. i))
= (m
. i));
now
per cases ;
suppose
A5: n
=
0 ;
A6: m
=
<*(m
. 1)*> by
A5,
FINSEQ_1: 40,
A4;
A7: X
=
<*(X
. 1)*> by
A5,
FINSEQ_1: 40,
A4;
(n
+ 1)
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 4;
then
A8: 1
in (
dom X) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1:def 3,
A4;
thus (
card (
product X))
= (
card (X
. 1)) by
Th16,
A7,
A8
.= (m
. 1) by
A8,
A4
.= (
Product m) by
A6,
RVSUM_1: 95;
end;
suppose
A9: n
<>
0 ;
set X1 = (X
| n);
reconsider m1 = (m
| n) as
FinSequence of
NAT ;
A10: (
len m1)
= n by
NAT_1: 11,
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 59;
A11: (
len X1)
= n by
NAT_1: 11,
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 59;
A12: (
dom X1)
= (
Seg (
len X1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
Seg n) by
NAT_1: 11,
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 59;
A13: (
dom m1)
= (
Seg (
len m1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
Seg n) by
NAT_1: 11,
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 59;
X1 is
non-empty
proof
assume not X1 is
non-empty;
then
A14:
{}
in (
rng X1) by
RELAT_1:def 9;
(
rng X1)
c= (
rng X) by
RELAT_1: 70;
hence contradiction by
A14;
end;
then
reconsider X1 as
non-empty non
empty
FinSequence by
A9;
now
let i be
Element of
NAT ;
assume
A15: i
in (
dom X1);
(
Seg n)
c= (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
NAT_1: 11,
FINSEQ_1: 5;
then i
in (
Seg (
len X)) by
A4,
A12,
A15;
then
A16: i
in (
dom X) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
thus (
card (X1
. i))
= (
card (X
. i)) by
FUNCT_1: 47,
A15
.= (m
. i) by
A4,
A16
.= (m1
. i) by
FUNCT_1: 47,
A15,
A13,
A12;
end;
then
A17: (
card (
product X1))
= (
Product m1) by
A3,
A10,
A11;
A18: n
< (
len X) by
NAT_1: 19,
A4;
A19: X is
FinSequence of (
rng X) by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
A20: X
= (X
| (n
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 58,
A4
.= (X1
^
<*(X
. (
len X))*>) by
A18,
FINSEQ_5: 83,
A4;
A21: n
< (
len m) by
NAT_1: 19,
A4;
A22: m
= (m
| (n
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 58,
A4
.= (m1
^
<*(m
. (
len m))*>) by
A21,
FINSEQ_5: 83,
A4;
(
len X)
in (
Seg (
len X)) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 4;
then
A23: (
len X)
in (
dom X) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A24: (
card (X
. (
len X)))
= (m
. (
len m)) by
A4;
consider I be
Function of
[:(
product X1), (X
. (
len X)):], (
product (X1
^
<*(X
. (
len X))*>)) such that
A25: I is
one-to-one & I is
onto & (for x,y be
set st x
in (
product X1) & y
in (X
. (
len X)) holds ex x1,y1 be
FinSequence st x
= x1 &
<*y*>
= y1 & (I
. (x,y))
= (x1
^ y1)) by
A23,
Th17;
not
{}
in (
rng (X1
^
<*(X
. (
len X))*>))
proof
assume not not
{}
in (
rng (X1
^
<*(X
. (
len X))*>));
then
{}
in ((
rng X1)
\/ (
rng
<*(X
. (
len X))*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 31;
then
{}
in (
rng X1) or
{}
in (
rng
<*(X
. (
len X))*>) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then not X1 is
non-empty or
{}
in
{(X
. (
len X))} by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
hence contradiction by
TARSKI:def 1,
A23;
end;
then (
product (X1
^
<*(X
. (
len X))*>))
<>
{} by
CARD_3: 26;
then
A26: (
dom I)
=
[:(
product X1), (X
. (
len X)):] by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
(
rng I)
= (
product (X1
^
<*(X
. (
len X))*>)) by
A25,
FUNCT_2:def 3;
then
A27: (
card
[:(
product X1), (X
. (
len X)):])
= (
card (
product (X1
^
<*(X
. (
len X))*>))) by
CARD_1: 5,
A25,
A26,
WELLORD2:def 4;
A28: (
card (
product X))
= (
card (
product
<*(
product X1), (X
. (
len X))*>)) by
CARD_1: 5,
A20,
A27,
TOPGEN_5: 8;
A29: (
product X1) is
finite
set & (X
. (
len X)) is
finite
set by
A24,
A17;
(
card (
product
<*(
product X1), (X
. (
len X))*>))
= (
card
[:(
product X1), (X
. (
len X)):]) by
CARD_1: 5,
TOPGEN_5: 8
.= ((
Product m1)
* (m
. (
len m))) by
A24,
A17,
A29,
CARD_2: 46;
hence (
card (
product X))
= (
Product m) by
RVSUM_1: 96,
A22,
A28;
end;
end;
hence (
card (
product X))
= (
Product m);
end;
hence
P[(n
+ 1)];
end;
for n be
Nat holds
P[n] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A1,
A2);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:19
Th19: for m be
CR_Sequence, X be
Group-Sequence st (
len m)
= (
len X) & (for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom X) holds ex mi be non
zero
Nat st mi
= (m
. i) & (X
. i)
= (
Z/Z mi)) holds (
card the
carrier of (
product X))
= (
Product m)
proof
let m be
CR_Sequence, X be
Group-Sequence;
assume
A1: (
len m)
= (
len X) & (for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom X) holds ex mi be non
zero
Nat st mi
= (m
. i) & (X
. i)
= (
Z/Z mi));
A2: (
dom (
carr X))
= (
Seg (
len (
carr X))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
Seg (
len X)) by
PRVECT_1:def 11
.= (
dom X) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A3: (
dom X)
= (
Seg (
len X)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
dom m) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3,
A1;
A4: for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom (
carr X)) holds (
card ((
carr X)
. i))
= (m
. i)
proof
let i be
Element of
NAT ;
assume
A5: i
in (
dom (
carr X));
reconsider i0 = i as
Element of (
dom X) by
A2,
A5;
consider mi be non
zero
Nat such that
A6: mi
= (m
. i) & (X
. i)
= (
Z/Z mi) by
A2,
A5,
A1;
thus (
card ((
carr X)
. i))
= (
card the
carrier of (X
. i0)) by
PRVECT_1:def 11
.= (m
. i) by
A6;
end;
A7: (
len (
carr X))
= (
len m) by
A1,
PRVECT_1:def 11;
now
let i be
Nat;
assume i
in (
dom m);
then ex mi be non
zero
Nat st mi
= (m
. i) & (X
. i)
= (
Z/Z mi) by
A3,
A1;
hence (m
. i)
in
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
end;
then m is
FinSequence of
NAT by
FINSEQ_2: 12;
hence thesis by
A4,
A7,
Th18;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:20
Th20: for m be
CR_Sequence, X be
Group-Sequence, I be
Function of (
Z/Z (
Product m)), (
product X) st (
len m)
= (
len X) & (for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom X) holds ex mi be non
zero
Nat st mi
= (m
. i) & (X
. i)
= (
Z/Z mi)) & (for x be
Integer st x
in the
carrier of (
Z/Z (
Product m)) holds (I
. x)
= (
mod (x,m))) holds I is
one-to-one
proof
let m be
CR_Sequence, X be
Group-Sequence, I be
Function of (
Z/Z (
Product m)), (
product X);
assume
A1: (
len m)
= (
len X) & (for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom X) holds ex mi be non
zero
Nat st mi
= (m
. i) & (X
. i)
= (
Z/Z mi)) & (for x be
Integer st x
in the
carrier of (
Z/Z (
Product m)) holds (I
. x)
= (
mod (x,m)));
for x1,x2 be
object st x1
in the
carrier of (
Z/Z (
Product m)) & x2
in the
carrier of (
Z/Z (
Product m)) & (I
. x1)
= (I
. x2) holds x1
= x2
proof
let x1,x2 be
object;
assume
A2: x1
in the
carrier of (
Z/Z (
Product m)) & x2
in the
carrier of (
Z/Z (
Product m)) & (I
. x1)
= (I
. x2);
then
reconsider xx1 = x1, xx2 = x2 as
Integer;
A3:
0
<= xx1 & xx1
< (
Product m) by
A2,
NAT_1: 44;
A4:
0
<= xx2 & xx2
< (
Product m) by
A2,
NAT_1: 44;
A5: (I
. x2)
= (
mod (xx2,m)) by
A1,
A2;
reconsider I0 =
0 as
Integer;
reconsider u =
{} as
INT
-valued
FinSequence;
A6: (
dom (
mod (xx1,m)))
= (
Seg (
len (
mod (xx1,m)))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
Seg (
len m)) by
INT_6:def 3
.= (
dom m) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A7:
now
let i be
Nat;
assume
A8: i
in (
dom m);
A9: i
in (
dom (
mod (xx2,m))) by
A5,
A6,
A1,
A2,
A8;
(m
. i)
in (
rng m) by
FUNCT_1: 3,
A8;
then
A10: (m
. i)
>
0 by
PARTFUN3:def 1;
A11: (xx1
mod (m
. i))
= ((
mod (xx1,m))
. i) by
A6,
A8,
INT_6:def 3
.= ((
mod (xx2,m))
. i) by
A1,
A2,
A5
.= (xx2
mod (m
. i)) by
A9,
INT_6:def 3;
then
A12: (m
. i)
divides ((xx1
- xx2)
- I0) by
INT_1:def 4,
NAT_D: 64,
A10;
A13: (m
. i)
divides ((xx2
- xx1)
- I0) by
INT_1:def 4,
NAT_D: 64,
A10,
A11;
(u
. i)
= I0;
hence ((xx1
- xx2),(u
. i))
are_congruent_mod (m
. i) & ((xx2
- xx1),(u
. i))
are_congruent_mod (m
. i) by
A12,
A13,
INT_1:def 4;
end;
A14: for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom m) holds (I0,(u
. i))
are_congruent_mod (m
. i)
proof
let i be
Nat;
assume i
in (
dom m);
A15: (u
. i)
= I0;
(I0
- I0)
= ((I0
- I0)
* (m
. i));
hence (I0,(u
. i))
are_congruent_mod (m
. i) by
A15,
INT_1:def 4,
INT_1:def 3;
end;
A16: (xx1
mod (
Product m))
>=
0 & (xx1
mod (
Product m))
< (
Product m) by
NAT_D: 62;
A17: (xx2
mod (
Product m))
>=
0 & (xx2
mod (
Product m))
< (
Product m) by
NAT_D: 62;
A18: (xx1
mod (
Product m))
= xx1 by
A3,
NAT_D: 63;
A19: (xx2
mod (
Product m))
= xx2 by
A4,
NAT_D: 63;
per cases ;
suppose xx2
<= xx1;
then
A20: (xx1
- xx2)
in
NAT by
INT_1: 5;
(xx1
- xx2)
<= (xx1
mod (
Product m)) by
A18,
XREAL_1: 43,
A2;
then ((xx1
- xx2)
- (
Product m))
< ((xx1
mod (
Product m))
- (xx1
mod (
Product m))) by
A16,
XREAL_1: 15;
then
A21: (xx1
- xx2)
< ((xx1
- xx2)
- ((xx1
- xx2)
- (
Product m))) by
XREAL_1: 46;
for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom m) holds ((xx1
- xx2),(u
. i))
are_congruent_mod (m
. i) by
A7;
then (xx1
- xx2)
= I0 by
INT_6: 42,
A14,
A20,
A21;
hence x1
= x2;
end;
suppose not xx2
<= xx1;
then
A22: (xx2
- xx1)
in
NAT by
INT_1: 5;
(xx2
- xx1)
<= (xx2
mod (
Product m)) by
A19,
XREAL_1: 43,
A2;
then ((xx2
- xx1)
- (
Product m))
< ((xx2
mod (
Product m))
- (xx2
mod (
Product m))) by
A17,
XREAL_1: 15;
then
A23: (xx2
- xx1)
< ((xx2
- xx1)
- ((xx2
- xx1)
- (
Product m))) by
XREAL_1: 46;
for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom m) holds ((xx2
- xx1),(u
. i))
are_congruent_mod (m
. i) by
A7;
then (xx2
- xx1)
= I0 by
INT_6: 42,
A14,
A22,
A23;
hence x1
= x2;
end;
end;
hence I is
one-to-one by
FUNCT_2: 19;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_14:21
for m be
CR_Sequence, X be
Group-Sequence st (
len m)
= (
len X) & (for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom X) holds ex mi be non
zero
Nat st mi
= (m
. i) & (X
. i)
= (
Z/Z mi)) holds ex I be
Homomorphism of (
Z/Z (
Product m)), (
product X) st I is
bijective & (for x be
Integer st x
in the
carrier of (
Z/Z (
Product m)) holds (I
. x)
= (
mod (x,m)))
proof
let m be
CR_Sequence, X be
Group-Sequence;
assume
A1: (
len m)
= (
len X) & (for i be
Element of
NAT st i
in (
dom X) holds ex mi be non
zero
Nat st mi
= (m
. i) & (X
. i)
= (
Z/Z mi));
then
consider I be
Homomorphism of (
Z/Z (
Product m)), (
product X) such that
A2: (for x be
Integer st x
in the
carrier of (
Z/Z (
Product m)) holds (I
. x)
= (
mod (x,m))) by
Th14;
A3: I is
one-to-one by
A1,
Th20,
A2;
(
Product m) is
Nat by
TARSKI: 1;
then
A4: (
card (
Segm (
Product m)))
= (
Product m);
A5: (
card the
carrier of (
product X))
= (
Product m) by
A1,
Th19;
then the
carrier of (
product X) is
finite;
then I is
onto by
A3,
A4,
A5,
FINSEQ_4: 63;
hence thesis by
A2,
A3;
end;