topgen_5.miz
begin
reserve x,y for
Real,
u,v,w for
set,
r for
positive
Real;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:1
Th1: for f,g be
Function st f
tolerates g holds for A be
set holds ((f
+* g)
" A)
= ((f
" A)
\/ (g
" A))
proof
let f,g be
Function;
assume
A1: f
tolerates g;
let A be
set;
f
c= (f
+* g) by
A1,
FUNCT_4: 28;
then
A2: (f
" A)
c= ((f
+* g)
" A) by
RELAT_1: 144;
thus ((f
+* g)
" A)
c= ((f
" A)
\/ (g
" A))
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A3: x
in ((f
+* g)
" A);
then x
in (
dom (f
+* g)) by
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then x
in ((
dom f)
\/ (
dom g)) by
FUNCT_4:def 1;
then x
in (
dom f) or x
in (
dom g) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
A4: x
in (
dom f) & ((f
+* g)
. x)
= (f
. x) or x
in (
dom g) & ((f
+* g)
. x)
= (g
. x) by
A1,
FUNCT_4: 13,
FUNCT_4: 15;
((f
+* g)
. x)
in A by
A3,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then x
in (f
" A) or x
in (g
" A) by
A4,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
hence thesis by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
(g
" A)
c= ((f
+* g)
" A) by
FUNCT_4: 25,
RELAT_1: 144;
hence thesis by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:2
for f,g be
Function st (
dom f)
misses (
dom g) holds for A be
set holds ((f
+* g)
" A)
= ((f
" A)
\/ (g
" A)) by
Th1,
PARTFUN1: 56;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:3
Th3: for x,a be
set, f be
Function st a
in (
dom f) holds ((
commute (x
.--> f))
. a)
= (x
.--> (f
. a))
proof
let x,a be
set;
let f be
Function;
set g = (x
.--> f);
A1: (
dom g)
=
{x};
A2: f
in (
Funcs ((
dom f),(
rng f))) by
FUNCT_2:def 2;
(
rng g)
=
{f} by
FUNCOP_1: 8;
then (
rng g)
c= (
Funcs ((
dom f),(
rng f))) by
A2,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
A3: g
in (
Funcs (
{x},(
Funcs ((
dom f),(
rng f))))) by
A1,
FUNCT_2:def 2;
A4: (g
. x)
= f by
FUNCOP_1: 72;
A5: x
in
{x} by
TARSKI:def 1;
assume
A6: a
in (
dom f);
then
A7: (((
commute g)
. a)
. x)
= (f
. a) by
A3,
A4,
A5,
FUNCT_6: 56;
(
dom ((
commute g)
. a))
=
{x} by
A3,
A6,
A4,
A5,
FUNCT_6: 56;
hence thesis by
A7,
DICKSON: 1;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:4
for b be
set, f be
Function holds b
in (
dom (
commute f)) iff ex a be
set, g be
Function st a
in (
dom f) & g
= (f
. a) & b
in (
dom g)
proof
let b be
set;
let f be
Function;
A1: (
dom (
commute f))
= (
proj2 (
dom (
uncurry f))) by
FUNCT_5: 23;
hereby
assume b
in (
dom (
commute f));
then
consider a be
object such that
A2:
[a, b]
in (
dom (
uncurry f)) by
A1,
XTUPLE_0:def 13;
consider a9 be
object, g be
Function, b9 be
object such that
A3:
[a, b]
=
[a9, b9] and
A4: a9
in (
dom f) and
A5: g
= (f
. a9) and
A6: b9
in (
dom g) by
A2,
FUNCT_5:def 2;
reconsider a as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
take a, g;
thus a
in (
dom f) & g
= (f
. a) & b
in (
dom g) by
A3,
A4,
A5,
A6,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
given a be
set, g be
Function such that
A7: a
in (
dom f) and
A8: g
= (f
. a) and
A9: b
in (
dom g);
[a, b]
in (
dom (
uncurry f)) by
A7,
A8,
A9,
FUNCT_5:def 2;
hence thesis by
A1,
XTUPLE_0:def 13;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:5
Th5: for a,b be
set, f be
Function holds a
in (
dom ((
commute f)
. b)) iff ex g be
Function st a
in (
dom f) & g
= (f
. a) & b
in (
dom g)
proof
let a,b be
set;
let f be
Function;
(
dom (
uncurry f))
c=
[:(
dom f), (
proj1 (
union (
rng f))):]
proof
let u be
object;
assume u
in (
dom (
uncurry f));
then
consider a be
object, g be
Function, b be
object such that
A1: u
=
[a, b] and
A2: a
in (
dom f) and
A3: g
= (f
. a) and
A4: b
in (
dom g) by
FUNCT_5:def 2;
g
in (
rng f) by
A2,
A3,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then g
c= (
union (
rng f)) by
ZFMISC_1: 74;
then (
proj1 g)
c= (
proj1 (
union (
rng f))) by
XTUPLE_0: 8;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A4,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
end;
then
A5: (
uncurry' (
commute f))
= (
uncurry f) by
FUNCT_5: 50;
hereby
assume
A6: a
in (
dom ((
commute f)
. b));
then b
in (
dom (
commute f)) by
FUNCT_1:def 2,
RELAT_1: 38;
then
[a, b]
in (
dom (
uncurry f)) by
A5,
A6,
FUNCT_5: 39;
then
consider a9 be
object, g be
Function, b9 be
object such that
A7:
[a, b]
=
[a9, b9] and
A8: a9
in (
dom f) and
A9: g
= (f
. a9) and
A10: b9
in (
dom g) by
FUNCT_5:def 2;
take g;
thus a
in (
dom f) & g
= (f
. a) & b
in (
dom g) by
A7,
A8,
A9,
A10,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
given g be
Function such that
A11: a
in (
dom f) and
A12: g
= (f
. a) and
A13: b
in (
dom g);
[a, b]
in (
dom (
uncurry f)) by
A11,
A12,
A13,
FUNCT_5:def 2;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_5: 22;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:6
Th6: for a,b be
set, f,g be
Function st a
in (
dom f) & g
= (f
. a) & b
in (
dom g) holds (((
commute f)
. b)
. a)
= (g
. b)
proof
let a,b be
set;
let f,g be
Function;
assume that
A1: a
in (
dom f) and
A2: g
= (f
. a) and
A3: b
in (
dom g);
A4:
[a, b]
in (
dom (
uncurry f)) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
FUNCT_5:def 2;
A5: (
[a, b]
`2 )
= b;
(
[a, b]
`1 )
= a;
then ((
uncurry f)
. (a,b))
= (g
. b) by
A5,
A4,
A2,
FUNCT_5:def 2;
hence thesis by
A4,
FUNCT_5: 22;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:7
Th7: for a be
set, f,g,h be
Function st h
= (f
\/ g) holds ((
commute h)
. a)
= (((
commute f)
. a)
\/ ((
commute g)
. a))
proof
let a be
set;
let f,g,h be
Function;
assume
A1: h
= (f
\/ g);
now
let u,v be
object;
hereby
assume
A2:
[u, v]
in ((
commute h)
. a);
then
A3: (((
commute h)
. a)
. u)
= v by
FUNCT_1: 1;
u
in (
dom ((
commute h)
. a)) by
A2,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
consider k be
Function such that
A4: u
in (
dom h) and
A5: k
= (h
. u) and
A6: a
in (
dom k) by
Th5;
[u, k]
in h by
A4,
A5,
FUNCT_1:def 2;
then
[u, k]
in f or
[u, k]
in g by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then u
in (
dom f) & k
= (f
. u) or u
in (
dom g) & k
= (g
. u) by
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
A7: u
in (
dom ((
commute f)
. a)) & (((
commute f)
. a)
. u)
= (k
. a) or u
in (
dom ((
commute g)
. a)) & (((
commute g)
. a)
. u)
= (k
. a) by
A6,
Th5,
Th6;
(((
commute h)
. a)
. u)
= (k
. a) by
A4,
A5,
A6,
Th6;
then
[u, v]
in ((
commute f)
. a) or
[u, v]
in ((
commute g)
. a) by
A7,
A3,
FUNCT_1: 1;
hence
[u, v]
in (((
commute f)
. a)
\/ ((
commute g)
. a)) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
assume
A8:
[u, v]
in (((
commute f)
. a)
\/ ((
commute g)
. a));
per cases by
A8,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
A9:
[u, v]
in ((
commute f)
. a);
then
A10: (((
commute f)
. a)
. u)
= v by
FUNCT_1: 1;
u
in (
dom ((
commute f)
. a)) by
A9,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
consider k be
Function such that
A11: u
in (
dom f) and
A12: k
= (f
. u) and
A13: a
in (
dom k) by
Th5;
A14: (((
commute f)
. a)
. u)
= (k
. a) by
A11,
A12,
A13,
Th6;
[u, k]
in f by
A11,
A12,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
A15:
[u, k]
in h by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
A16: u
in (
dom h) by
FUNCT_1: 1;
A17: k
= (h
. u) by
A15,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
A18: (((
commute h)
. a)
. u)
= (k
. a) by
A16,
A13,
Th6;
u
in (
dom ((
commute h)
. a)) by
A16,
A17,
A13,
Th5;
hence
[u, v]
in ((
commute h)
. a) by
A18,
A14,
A10,
FUNCT_1: 1;
end;
suppose
A19:
[u, v]
in ((
commute g)
. a);
then
A20: (((
commute g)
. a)
. u)
= v by
FUNCT_1: 1;
u
in (
dom ((
commute g)
. a)) by
A19,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
consider k be
Function such that
A21: u
in (
dom g) and
A22: k
= (g
. u) and
A23: a
in (
dom k) by
Th5;
A24: (((
commute g)
. a)
. u)
= (k
. a) by
A21,
A22,
A23,
Th6;
[u, k]
in g by
A21,
A22,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
A25:
[u, k]
in h by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
A26: u
in (
dom h) by
FUNCT_1: 1;
A27: k
= (h
. u) by
A25,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
A28: (((
commute h)
. a)
. u)
= (k
. a) by
A26,
A23,
Th6;
u
in (
dom ((
commute h)
. a)) by
A26,
A27,
A23,
Th5;
hence
[u, v]
in ((
commute h)
. a) by
A28,
A24,
A20,
FUNCT_1: 1;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:8
Th8: for X,Y be
set holds ((
product
<*X, Y*>),
[:X, Y:])
are_equipotent & (
card (
product
<*X, Y*>))
= ((
card X)
*` (
card Y))
proof
deffunc
F(
Function) =
[($1
. 1), ($1
. 2)];
let X,Y be
set;
consider f be
Function such that
A1: (
dom f)
= (
product
<*X, Y*>) & for g be
Function st g
in (
product
<*X, Y*>) holds (f
. g)
=
F(g) from
FUNCT_5:sch 1;
A2: (
<*X, Y*>
. 2)
= Y by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
A3: (
dom
<*X, Y*>)
=
{1, 2} by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
FINSEQ_1: 89;
A4: (
<*X, Y*>
. 1)
= X by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
thus ((
product
<*X, Y*>),
[:X, Y:])
are_equipotent
proof
take f;
thus f is
one-to-one
proof
let x1,x2 be
object;
assume that
A5: x1
in (
dom f) and
A6: x2
in (
dom f) and
A7: (f
. x1)
= (f
. x2);
consider g2 be
Function such that
A8: x2
= g2 and
A9: (
dom g2)
= (
dom
<*X, Y*>) and for y be
object st y
in (
dom
<*X, Y*>) holds (g2
. y)
in (
<*X, Y*>
. y) by
A1,
A6,
CARD_3:def 5;
consider g1 be
Function such that
A10: x1
= g1 and
A11: (
dom g1)
= (
dom
<*X, Y*>) and for y be
object st y
in (
dom
<*X, Y*>) holds (g1
. y)
in (
<*X, Y*>
. y) by
A5,
A1,
CARD_3:def 5;
A12:
[(g1
. 1), (g1
. 2)]
= (f
. x1) by
A1,
A5,
A10
.=
[(g2
. 1), (g2
. 2)] by
A1,
A6,
A7,
A8;
now
let z be
object;
assume z
in
{1, 2};
then z
= 1 or z
= 2 by
TARSKI:def 2;
hence (g1
. z)
= (g2
. z) by
A12,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
hence thesis by
A3,
A10,
A11,
A8,
A9,
FUNCT_1: 2;
end;
thus (
dom f)
= (
product
<*X, Y*>) by
A1;
thus (
rng f)
c=
[:X, Y:]
proof
let z be
object;
assume z
in (
rng f);
then
consider t be
object such that
A13: t
in (
dom f) and
A14: z
= (f
. t) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
consider g be
Function such that
A15: t
= g and (
dom g)
= (
dom
<*X, Y*>) and
A16: for y be
object st y
in (
dom
<*X, Y*>) holds (g
. y)
in (
<*X, Y*>
. y) by
A1,
A13,
CARD_3:def 5;
1
in
{1, 2} by
TARSKI:def 2;
then
A17: (g
. 1)
in X by
A3,
A4,
A16;
2
in
{1, 2} by
TARSKI:def 2;
then
A18: (g
. 2)
in Y by
A3,
A2,
A16;
z
=
[(g
. 1), (g
. 2)] by
A1,
A13,
A14,
A15;
hence thesis by
A17,
A18,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
end;
let z be
object;
set g =
<*(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )*>;
A19: (g
. 1)
= (z
`1 ) by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
A20: (g
. 2)
= (z
`2 ) by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
assume
A21: z
in
[:X, Y:];
then
A22: (z
`2 )
in Y by
MCART_1: 10;
(z
`1 )
in X by
A21,
MCART_1: 10;
then
A23: g
in (
product
<*X, Y*>) by
A22,
FINSEQ_3: 124;
z
=
[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )] by
A21,
MCART_1: 21;
then (f
. g)
= z by
A23,
A1,
A19,
A20;
hence thesis by
A1,
A23,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
hence (
card (
product
<*X, Y*>))
= (
card
[:X, Y:]) by
CARD_1: 5
.= (
card
[:(
card X), (
card Y):]) by
CARD_2: 7
.= ((
card X)
*` (
card Y)) by
CARD_2:def 2;
end;
scheme ::
TOPGEN_5:sch1
SCH1 { P[
object], A,B,C() -> non
empty
set , F1,F2(
object) ->
set } :
ex f be
Function of C(), B() st for a be
Element of A() st a
in C() holds (P[a] implies (f
. a)
= F1(a)) & ( not P[a] implies (f
. a)
= F2(a))
provided
A1: C()
c= A()
and
A2: for a be
Element of A() st a
in C() holds (P[a] implies F1(a)
in B()) & ( not P[a] implies F2(a)
in B());
A3: for a be
object st a
in C() holds (P[a] implies F1(a)
in B()) & ( not P[a] implies F2(a)
in B()) by
A1,
A2;
consider f be
Function of C(), B() such that
A4: for x be
object st x
in C() holds (P[x] implies (f
. x)
= F1(x)) & ( not P[x] implies (f
. x)
= F2(x)) from
FUNCT_2:sch 5(
A3);
take f;
thus thesis by
A4;
end;
scheme ::
TOPGEN_5:sch2
SCH2 { P,Q[
object], A,B,C() -> non
empty
set , F1,F2,F3(
object) ->
object } :
ex f be
Function of C(), B() st for a be
Element of A() st a
in C() holds (P[a] implies (f
. a)
= F1(a)) & ( not P[a] & Q[a] implies (f
. a)
= F2(a)) & ( not P[a] & not Q[a] implies (f
. a)
= F3(a))
provided
A1: C()
c= A()
and
A2: for a be
Element of A() st a
in C() holds (P[a] implies F1(a)
in B()) & ( not P[a] & Q[a] implies F2(a)
in B()) & ( not P[a] & not Q[a] implies F3(a)
in B());
set D = { a where a be
Element of C() : P[a] or Q[a] };
per cases ;
suppose
A3: D
=
{} ;
consider f be
Function such that
A4: (
dom f)
= C() & for u be
object st u
in C() holds (f
. u)
= F3(u) from
FUNCT_1:sch 3;
(
rng f)
c= B()
proof
let v be
object;
assume v
in (
rng f);
then
consider u be
object such that
A5: u
in (
dom f) and
A6: v
= (f
. u) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
A7: v
= F3(u) by
A4,
A5,
A6;
A8: not u
in D by
A3;
then
A9: not Q[u] by
A4,
A5;
not P[u] by
A8,
A4,
A5;
hence thesis by
A9,
A7,
A1,
A2,
A4,
A5;
end;
then
reconsider f as
Function of C(), B() by
A4,
FUNCT_2: 2;
take f;
let a be
Element of A();
assume
A10: a
in C();
not a
in D by
A3;
hence thesis by
A4,
A10;
end;
suppose D
<>
{} ;
then
reconsider D as non
empty
set;
defpred
PQ[
object] means P[$1] or Q[$1];
A11: for a be
object st a
in D holds (P[a] implies F1(a)
in B()) & ( not P[a] implies F2(a)
in B())
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in D;
then
A12: ex b be
Element of C() st a
= b & (P[b] or Q[b]);
then a
in C();
hence thesis by
A12,
A1,
A2;
end;
consider g be
Function of D, B() such that
A13: for x be
object st x
in D holds (P[x] implies (g
. x)
= F1(x)) & ( not P[x] implies (g
. x)
= F2(x)) from
FUNCT_2:sch 5(
A11);
deffunc
F12(
object) = (g
. $1);
A14: for a be
object st a
in C() holds (
PQ[a] implies
F12(a)
in B()) & ( not
PQ[a] implies F3(a)
in B())
proof
let a be
object;
assume
A15: a
in C();
hereby
assume
PQ[a];
then
A16: a
in D by
A15;
then
A17: not P[a] implies F2(a)
in B() by
A11;
P[a] implies F1(a)
in B() by
A16,
A11;
hence
F12(a)
in B() by
A17,
A16,
A13;
end;
thus thesis by
A1,
A2,
A15;
end;
consider f be
Function of C(), B() such that
A18: for x be
object st x
in C() holds (
PQ[x] implies (f
. x)
=
F12(x)) & ( not
PQ[x] implies (f
. x)
= F3(x)) from
FUNCT_2:sch 5(
A14);
take f;
let a be
Element of A();
assume
A19: a
in C();
then
PQ[a] implies (f
. a)
= (g
. a) & a
in D by
A18;
hence (P[a] implies (f
. a)
= F1(a)) & ( not P[a] & Q[a] implies (f
. a)
= F2(a)) by
A13;
thus thesis by
A18,
A19;
end;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:9
Th9: for a,b be
Real holds (
|.
|[a, b]|.|
^2 )
= ((a
^2 )
+ (b
^2 ))
proof
let a,b be
Real;
A1: (
|[a, b]|
`2 )
= b by
EUCLID: 52;
(
|[a, b]|
`1 )
= a by
EUCLID: 52;
hence thesis by
A1,
JGRAPH_1: 29;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:10
Th10: for X be
TopSpace, Y be non
empty
TopSpace holds for A,B be
closed
Subset of X holds for f be
continuous
Function of (X
| A), Y holds for g be
continuous
Function of (X
| B), Y st f
tolerates g holds (f
+* g) is
continuous
Function of (X
| (A
\/ B)), Y
proof
let X be
TopSpace, Y be non
empty
TopSpace;
let A,B be
closed
Subset of X;
let f be
continuous
Function of (X
| A), Y;
let g be
continuous
Function of (X
| B), Y such that
A1: f
tolerates g;
A2: the
carrier of (X
| (A
\/ B))
= (A
\/ B) by
PRE_TOPC: 8;
the
carrier of (X
| B)
= B by
PRE_TOPC: 8;
then
A3: (
dom g)
= B by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
the
carrier of (X
| A)
= A by
PRE_TOPC: 8;
then
A4: (
dom f)
= A by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A5: (
rng (f
+* g))
c= ((
rng f)
\/ (
rng g)) by
FUNCT_4: 17;
(
dom (f
+* g))
= ((
dom f)
\/ (
dom g)) by
FUNCT_4:def 1;
then
reconsider h = (f
+* g) as
Function of (X
| (A
\/ B)), Y by
A5,
A2,
A4,
A3,
FUNCT_2: 2,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
h is
continuous
proof
let C be
Subset of Y;
A6: (
[#] (X
| (A
\/ B)))
= (A
\/ B) by
PRE_TOPC: 8;
assume
A7: C is
closed;
then (f
" C) is
closed by
PRE_TOPC:def 6;
then
consider C1 be
Subset of X such that
A8: C1 is
closed and
A9: (C1
/\ (
[#] (X
| A)))
= (f
" C) by
PRE_TOPC: 13;
(g
" C) is
closed by
A7,
PRE_TOPC:def 6;
then
consider C2 be
Subset of X such that
A10: C2 is
closed and
A11: (C2
/\ (
[#] (X
| B)))
= (g
" C) by
PRE_TOPC: 13;
A12: ((C1
/\ A)
\/ (C2
/\ B)) is
closed by
A8,
A10;
A13: (
[#] (X
| A))
= A by
PRE_TOPC: 8;
A14: (
[#] (X
| B))
= B by
PRE_TOPC: 8;
(h
" C)
= ((f
" C)
\/ (g
" C)) by
A1,
Th1
.= (((f
" C)
\/ (g
" C))
/\ (A
\/ B)) by
A13,
A14,
XBOOLE_1: 13,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
hence thesis by
A12,
A9,
A11,
A6,
A13,
A14,
PRE_TOPC: 13;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:11
Th11: for X be
TopSpace, Y be non
empty
TopSpace holds for A,B be
closed
Subset of X st A
misses B holds for f be
continuous
Function of (X
| A), Y holds for g be
continuous
Function of (X
| B), Y holds (f
+* g) is
continuous
Function of (X
| (A
\/ B)), Y
proof
let X be
TopSpace, Y be non
empty
TopSpace;
let A,B be
closed
Subset of X such that
A1: A
misses B;
let f be
continuous
Function of (X
| A), Y;
let g be
continuous
Function of (X
| B), Y;
the
carrier of (X
| B)
= B by
PRE_TOPC: 8;
then
A2: (
dom g)
= B by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
the
carrier of (X
| A)
= A by
PRE_TOPC: 8;
then (
dom f)
= A by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
hence thesis by
A2,
A1,
Th10,
PARTFUN1: 56;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:12
Th12: for X be
TopSpace, Y be non
empty
TopSpace holds for A be
open
closed
Subset of X holds for f be
continuous
Function of (X
| A), Y holds for g be
continuous
Function of (X
| (A
` )), Y holds (f
+* g) is
continuous
Function of X, Y
proof
let X be
TopSpace;
let Y be non
empty
TopSpace;
let A be
open
closed
Subset of X;
let f be
continuous
Function of (X
| A), Y;
let g be
continuous
Function of (X
| (A
` )), Y;
(A
\/ (A
` ))
= (
[#] X) by
PRE_TOPC: 2;
then
A1: (X
| (A
\/ (A
` )))
= the TopStruct of X by
TSEP_1: 93;
A
misses (A
` ) by
XBOOLE_1: 79;
then
A2: (f
+* g) is
continuous
Function of (X
| (A
\/ (A
` ))), Y by
Th11;
the TopStruct of Y
= the TopStruct of Y;
hence thesis by
A2,
A1,
YELLOW12: 36;
end;
begin
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:13
Th13: for n be
Element of
NAT holds for a be
Point of (
TOP-REAL n) holds for r be
positive
Real holds a
in (
Ball (a,r))
proof
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
let a be
Point of (
TOP-REAL n);
let r be
positive
Real;
(a
- a)
= (
0. (
TOP-REAL n)) by
RLVECT_1: 5;
then
|.(a
- a).|
=
0 by
EUCLID_2: 39;
hence thesis by
TOPREAL9: 7;
end;
definition
::
TOPGEN_5:def1
func
y=0-line ->
Subset of (
TOP-REAL 2) equals the set of all
|[x,
0 ]|;
coherence
proof
set A = the set of all
|[x,
0 ]|;
A
c= the
carrier of (
TOP-REAL 2)
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in A;
then ex x st a
=
|[x,
0 ]|;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
::
TOPGEN_5:def2
func
y>=0-plane ->
Subset of (
TOP-REAL 2) equals {
|[x, y]| : y
>=
0 };
coherence
proof
set A = {
|[x, y]| : y
>=
0 };
A
c= the
carrier of (
TOP-REAL 2)
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in A;
then ex x, y st a
=
|[x, y]| & y
>=
0 ;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:14
for a,b be
set holds
<*a, b*>
in
y=0-line iff a
in
REAL & b
=
0
proof
let a,b be
set;
A1:
<*a, b*>
in
y=0-line iff ex x st
<*a, b*>
=
|[x,
0 ]|;
hereby
A2: (
<*a, b*>
. 1)
= a by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
assume
<*a, b*>
in
y=0-line ;
then
consider x, y such that
A3:
<*a, b*>
=
|[x,
0 ]| by
A1;
(
<*a, b*>
. 1)
= x by
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 44;
hence a
in
REAL by
A2,
XREAL_0:def 1;
(
<*a, b*>
. 2)
= b by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
hence b
=
0 by
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 44;
end;
assume a
in
REAL ;
then
reconsider x = a as
Real;
|[x,
0 ]|
=
<*a,
0 *>;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:15
Th15: for a,b be
Real holds
|[a, b]|
in
y=0-line iff b
=
0
proof
let a,b be
Real;
|[a, b]|
in
y=0-line iff ex x st
|[a, b]|
=
|[x,
0 ]|;
hence thesis by
SPPOL_2: 1;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:16
Th16: (
card
y=0-line )
=
continuum
proof
deffunc
F(
Real) =
|[$1,
0 ]|;
consider f be
Function such that
A1: (
dom f)
=
REAL and
A2: for r be
Element of
REAL holds (f
. r)
=
F(r) from
FUNCT_1:sch 4;
(
REAL ,
y=0-line )
are_equipotent
proof
take f;
thus f is
one-to-one
proof
let x,y be
object;
assume that
A3: x
in (
dom f) and
A4: y
in (
dom f);
reconsider x, y as
Element of
REAL by
A3,
A4,
A1;
A5: (f
. y)
=
|[y,
0 ]| by
A2;
(f
. x)
=
|[x,
0 ]| by
A2;
hence thesis by
A5,
SPPOL_2: 1;
end;
thus (
dom f)
=
REAL by
A1;
thus (
rng f)
c=
y=0-line
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in (
rng f);
then
consider b be
object such that
A6: b
in (
dom f) and
A7: a
= (f
. b) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider b as
Element of
REAL by
A1,
A6;
a
=
|[b,
0 ]| by
A2,
A7;
hence thesis;
end;
let a be
object;
assume
A8: a
in
y=0-line ;
then
reconsider a as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
reconsider a1 = (a
`1 ) as
Element of
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
A9: a
=
|[(a
`1 ), (a
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then (a
`2 )
=
0 by
A8,
Th15;
then a
= (f
. a1) by
A2,
A9;
hence thesis by
A1,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
hence thesis by
CARD_1: 5,
TOPGEN_3:def 4;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:17
for a,b be
set holds
<*a, b*>
in
y>=0-plane iff a
in
REAL & ex y st b
= y & y
>=
0
proof
let a,b be
set;
hereby
A1: (
<*a, b*>
. 1)
= a by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
assume
<*a, b*>
in
y>=0-plane ;
then
consider x, y such that
A2:
<*a, b*>
=
|[x, y]| and
A3: y
>=
0 ;
(
<*a, b*>
. 1)
= x by
A2,
FINSEQ_1: 44;
hence a
in
REAL by
A1,
XREAL_0:def 1;
take y;
(
<*a, b*>
. 2)
= b by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
hence b
= y & y
>=
0 by
A3,
A2,
FINSEQ_1: 44;
end;
assume a
in
REAL ;
then
reconsider x = a as
Real;
given y such that
A4: b
= y and
A5: y
>=
0 ;
|[x, y]|
=
<*a, b*> by
A4;
hence thesis by
A5;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:18
Th18: for a,b be
Real holds
|[a, b]|
in
y>=0-plane iff b
>=
0
proof
let a,b be
Real;
|[a, b]|
in
y>=0-plane iff ex x, y st
|[a, b]|
=
|[x, y]| & y
>=
0 ;
hence thesis by
SPPOL_2: 1;
end;
registration
cluster
y=0-line -> non
empty;
coherence by
Th15;
cluster
y>=0-plane -> non
empty;
coherence by
Th18;
end
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:19
Th19:
y=0-line
c=
y>=0-plane
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in
y=0-line ;
then
reconsider x as
Element of
y=0-line ;
A1: x
=
|[(x
`1 ), (x
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then (x
`2 )
=
0 by
Th15;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:20
Th20: for a,b,r be
Real st r
>
0 holds (
Ball (
|[a, b]|,r))
c=
y>=0-plane iff r
<= b
proof
let a,b,r be
Real such that
A1: r
>
0 ;
hereby
A2:
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[a, b]|,r)) by
A1,
Th13;
assume that
A3: (
Ball (
|[a, b]|,r))
c=
y>=0-plane and
A4: r
> b;
reconsider b as non
negative
Real by
A2,
A3,
Th18;
reconsider br = (b
- r) as
negative
Real by
A4,
XREAL_1: 49;
set y = (br
/ 2);
reconsider r as
positive
Real by
A1;
(
|[a, y]|
-
|[a, b]|)
=
|[(a
- a), (y
- b)]| by
EUCLID: 62;
then
A5:
|.(
|[a, y]|
-
|[a, b]|).|
=
|.(y
- b).| by
TOPREAL6: 23
.=
|.(b
- y).| by
COMPLEX1: 60
.= ((b
+ r)
/ 2) by
ABSVALUE:def 1;
(b
+ r)
< (r
+ r) by
A4,
XREAL_1: 6;
then ((b
+ r)
/ 2)
< ((r
+ r)
/ 2) by
XREAL_1: 74;
then
|[a, y]|
in (
Ball (
|[a, b]|,r)) by
A5,
TOPREAL9: 7;
hence contradiction by
A3,
Th18;
end;
assume
A6: r
<= b;
let x be
object;
assume
A7: x
in (
Ball (
|[a, b]|,r));
then
reconsider z = x as
Element of (
TOP-REAL 2);
A8:
|.(z
-
|[a, b]|).|
< r by
A7,
TOPREAL9: 7;
A9: (
|[((z
`1 )
- a), ((z
`2 )
- b)]|
`1 )
= ((z
`1 )
- a) by
EUCLID: 52;
A10: (
|[((z
`1 )
- a), ((z
`2 )
- b)]|
`2 )
= ((z
`2 )
- b) by
EUCLID: 52;
A11: z
=
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then (z
-
|[a, b]|)
=
|[((z
`1 )
- a), ((z
`2 )
- b)]| by
EUCLID: 62;
then
|.(z
-
|[a, b]|).|
= (
sqrt ((((z
`1 )
- a)
^2 )
+ (((z
`2 )
- b)
^2 ))) by
A9,
A10,
JGRAPH_1: 30;
then
|.((z
`2 )
- b).|
<=
|.(z
-
|[a, b]|).| by
COMPLEX1: 79;
then
|.((z
`2 )
- b).|
< r by
A8,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A12:
|.(b
- (z
`2 )).|
< r by
COMPLEX1: 60;
now
assume (z
`2 )
<
0 ;
then (b
- (z
`2 ))
> b by
XREAL_1: 46;
then (b
- (z
`2 ))
> r by
A6,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence contradiction by
A1,
A12,
ABSVALUE:def 1;
end;
hence thesis by
A11;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:21
Th21: for a,b,r be
Real st r
>
0 & b
>=
0 holds (
Ball (
|[a, b]|,r))
misses
y=0-line iff r
<= b
proof
let a,b,r be
Real;
assume that
A1: r
>
0 and
A2: b
>=
0 ;
hereby
A3:
|[a,
0 ]|
in
y=0-line ;
assume that
A4: (
Ball (
|[a, b]|,r))
misses
y=0-line and
A5: r
> b;
(
|[a,
0 ]|
-
|[a, b]|)
=
|[(a
- a), (
0
- b)]| by
EUCLID: 62;
then
|.(
|[a,
0 ]|
-
|[a, b]|).|
=
|.(
0
- b).| by
TOPREAL6: 23
.=
|.(b
-
0 ).| by
COMPLEX1: 60;
then
|.(
|[a,
0 ]|
-
|[a, b]|).|
< r by
A2,
A5,
ABSVALUE:def 1;
then
|[a,
0 ]|
in (
Ball (
|[a, b]|,r)) by
TOPREAL9: 7;
hence contradiction by
A3,
A4,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
end;
assume
A6: r
<= b;
assume (
Ball (
|[a, b]|,r))
meets
y=0-line ;
then
consider x be
object such that
A7: x
in (
Ball (
|[a, b]|,r)) and
A8: x
in
y=0-line by
XBOOLE_0: 3;
reconsider x as
Element of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
A7;
A9: x
=
|[(x
`1 ), (x
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then (x
`2 )
=
0 by
A8,
Th15;
then
A10: (x
-
|[a, b]|)
=
|[((x
`1 )
- a), (
0
- b)]| by
A9,
EUCLID: 62;
then
A11: ((x
-
|[a, b]|)
`2 )
= (
0
- b) by
EUCLID: 52;
((x
-
|[a, b]|)
`1 )
= ((x
`1 )
- a) by
A10,
EUCLID: 52;
then
|.(x
-
|[a, b]|).|
= (
sqrt ((((x
`1 )
- a)
^2 )
+ ((
0
- b)
^2 ))) by
A11,
JGRAPH_1: 30;
then
|.(x
-
|[a, b]|).|
>=
|.(
0
- b).| by
COMPLEX1: 79;
then
A12:
|.(x
-
|[a, b]|).|
>=
|.(b
-
0 ).| by
COMPLEX1: 60;
|.(x
-
|[a, b]|).|
< r by
A7,
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
|.b.|
< r by
A12,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence contradiction by
A1,
A6,
ABSVALUE:def 1;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:22
Th22: for n be
Element of
NAT , a,b be
Element of (
TOP-REAL n), r1,r2 be
positive
Real st
|.(a
- b).|
<= (r1
- r2) holds (
Ball (b,r2))
c= (
Ball (a,r1))
proof
let n be
Element of
NAT , a,b be
Element of (
TOP-REAL n), r1,r2 be
positive
Real;
assume
|.(a
- b).|
<= (r1
- r2);
then
A1:
|.(b
- a).|
<= (r1
- r2) by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
let x be
object;
assume
A2: x
in (
Ball (b,r2));
then
reconsider x as
Element of (
TOP-REAL n);
|.(x
- b).|
< r2 by
A2,
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
A3: (
|.(x
- b).|
+
|.(b
- a).|)
< (r2
+ (r1
- r2)) by
A1,
XREAL_1: 8;
|.(x
- a).|
<= (
|.(x
- b).|
+
|.(b
- a).|) by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
then
|.(x
- a).|
< (r2
+ (r1
- r2)) by
A3,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence thesis by
TOPREAL9: 7;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:23
Th23: for a be
Real, r1,r2 be
positive
Real st r1
<= r2 holds (
Ball (
|[a, r1]|,r1))
c= (
Ball (
|[a, r2]|,r2))
proof
let a be
Real;
let r1,r2 be
positive
Real;
assume r1
<= r2;
then
A1: (r2
- r1)
>=
0 by
XREAL_1: 48;
let x be
object;
assume
A2: x
in (
Ball (
|[a, r1]|,r1));
then
reconsider x as
Element of (
TOP-REAL 2);
A3:
|.(x
-
|[a, r1]|).|
< r1 by
A2,
TOPREAL9: 7;
(
|[a, r1]|
-
|[a, r2]|)
=
|[(a
- a), (r1
- r2)]| by
EUCLID: 62;
then
|.(
|[a, r1]|
-
|[a, r2]|).|
=
|.(r1
- r2).| by
TOPREAL6: 23;
then
|.(
|[a, r1]|
-
|[a, r2]|).|
=
|.(r2
- r1).| by
COMPLEX1: 60;
then
|.(
|[a, r1]|
-
|[a, r2]|).|
= (r2
- r1) by
A1,
ABSVALUE:def 1;
then
A4: (
|.(x
-
|[a, r1]|).|
+
|.(
|[a, r1]|
-
|[a, r2]|).|)
< (r1
+ (r2
- r1)) by
A3,
XREAL_1: 8;
|.(x
-
|[a, r2]|).|
<= (
|.(x
-
|[a, r1]|).|
+
|.(
|[a, r1]|
-
|[a, r2]|).|) by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
then
|.(x
-
|[a, r2]|).|
< r2 by
A4,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence thesis by
TOPREAL9: 7;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:24
Th24: for T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace holds for B1 be
Neighborhood_System of T1 holds for B2 be
Neighborhood_System of T2 st B1
= B2 holds the TopStruct of T1
= the TopStruct of T2
proof
let T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace;
let B1 be
Neighborhood_System of T1;
let B2 be
Neighborhood_System of T2;
A1: (
dom B1)
= the
carrier of T1 by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
A2: (
dom B2)
= the
carrier of T2 by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
A3: (
UniCl (
Union B2))
= the
topology of T2 by
YELLOW_9: 22;
A4: (
UniCl (
Union B1))
= the
topology of T1 by
YELLOW_9: 22;
assume B1
= B2;
hence thesis by
A4,
A3,
A1,
A2;
end;
definition
::$Notion-Name
::
TOPGEN_5:def3
func
Niemytzki-plane ->
strict non
empty
TopSpace means
:
Def3: the
carrier of it
=
y>=0-plane & ex B be
Neighborhood_System of it st (for x holds (B
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where r be
Real : r
>
0 }) & for x, y st y
>
0 holds (B
.
|[x, y]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where r be
Real : r
>
0 };
existence
proof
defpred
P[
object] means $1
in
y=0-line ;
deffunc
F1(
Element of (
TOP-REAL 2)) = { ((
Ball (
|[($1
`1 ), r]|,r))
\/
{$1}) where r be
Real : r
>
0 };
set X =
y>=0-plane ;
deffunc
F2(
Element of (
TOP-REAL 2)) = { ((
Ball ($1,r))
/\ X) where r be
Real : r
>
0 };
consider B be
ManySortedSet of X such that
A1: for a be
Element of X st a
in X holds (
P[a] implies (B
. a)
=
F1(a)) & ( not
P[a] implies (B
. a)
=
F2(a)) from
PRE_CIRC:sch 2;
B is
non-empty
proof
let z be
object;
assume z
in X;
then
reconsider s = z as
Element of X;
per cases ;
suppose
A2:
P[z];
set r = the
positive
Element of
REAL ;
set a =
|[(s
`1 ), r]|;
(B
. s)
=
F1(s) by
A2,
A1;
then ((
Ball (a,r))
\/
{s})
in (B
. s);
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
A3: not
P[z];
set r = the
positive
Element of
REAL ;
(B
. s)
=
F2(s) by
A3,
A1;
then ((
Ball (s,r))
/\ X)
in (B
. s);
hence thesis;
end;
end;
then
reconsider B as
non-empty
ManySortedSet of X;
A4: (
rng B)
c= (
bool (
bool X))
proof
let w be
object;
reconsider ww = w as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume w
in (
rng B);
then
consider a be
object such that
A5: a
in (
dom B) and
A6: w
= (B
. a) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider a as
Element of X by
A5;
ww
c= (
bool X)
proof
let z be
object;
reconsider zz = z as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume
A7: z
in ww;
per cases by
A1,
A6;
suppose w
=
F1(a);
then
consider r be
Real such that
A8: z
= ((
Ball (
|[(a
`1 ), r]|,r))
\/
{a}) and
A9: r
>
0 by
A7;
(
Ball (
|[(a
`1 ), r]|,r))
c= X by
A9,
Th20;
then zz
c= X by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose w
=
F2(a);
then ex r be
Real st z
= ((
Ball (a,r))
/\ X) & r
>
0 by
A7;
then zz
c= X by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
A10: for x,y,U be
set st x
in U & U
in (B
. y) & y
in X holds ex V be
set st V
in (B
. x) & V
c= U
proof
let x,y,U be
set;
assume
A11: x
in U;
assume
A12: U
in (B
. y);
assume y
in X;
then
reconsider y as
Element of X;
per cases ;
suppose
P[y];
then (B
. y)
=
F1(y) by
A1;
then
consider r be
Real such that
A13: U
= ((
Ball (
|[(y
`1 ), r]|,r))
\/
{y}) and
A14: r
>
0 by
A12;
A15: x
in (
Ball (
|[(y
`1 ), r]|,r)) or x
= y by
A11,
A13,
ZFMISC_1: 136;
then
reconsider z = x as
Element of (
TOP-REAL 2);
now
set r2 = (r
-
|.(z
-
|[(y
`1 ), r]|).|);
assume
A16: x
in (
Ball (
|[(y
`1 ), r]|,r));
take V = ((
Ball (z,r2))
/\ X);
|.(z
-
|[(y
`1 ), r]|).|
< r by
A16,
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
reconsider r1 = r, r2 as
positive
Real by
XREAL_1: 50;
A17: r2
>
0 ;
(
Ball (
|[(y
`1 ), r]|,r))
misses
y=0-line by
A14,
Th21;
then
A18: not
P[x] by
A16,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
(
Ball (
|[(y
`1 ), r]|,r))
c= X by
A14,
Th20;
then (B
. z)
=
F2(z) by
A16,
A18,
A1;
hence V
in (B
. x) by
A17;
A19: (
Ball (
|[(y
`1 ), r]|,r))
c= U by
A13,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
(r1
- r2)
=
|.(
|[(y
`1 ), r]|
- z).| by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
then
A20: (
Ball (z,r2))
c= (
Ball (
|[(y
`1 ), r]|,r1)) by
Th22;
V
c= (
Ball (z,r2)) by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then V
c= (
Ball (
|[(y
`1 ), r]|,r1)) by
A20;
hence V
c= U by
A19;
end;
hence thesis by
A12,
A15;
end;
suppose not
P[y];
then (B
. y)
=
F2(y) by
A1;
then
consider r be
Real such that
A21: U
= ((
Ball (y,r))
/\ X) and r
>
0 by
A12;
reconsider z = x as
Element of X by
A11,
A21,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
set r2 = (r
-
|.(z
- y).|);
z
in (
Ball (y,r)) by
A11,
A21,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
|.(z
- y).|
< r by
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
reconsider r1 = r, r2 as
positive
Real by
XREAL_1: 50;
A22: z
=
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
per cases ;
suppose
A23:
P[z];
then (z
`2 )
=
0 by
A22,
Th15;
then (
|[(z
`1 ), (r2
/ 2)]|
- z)
=
|[((z
`1 )
- (z
`1 )), ((r2
/ 2)
-
0 )]| by
A22,
EUCLID: 62;
then
|.(
|[(z
`1 ), (r2
/ 2)]|
- z).|
=
|.(r2
/ 2).| by
TOPREAL6: 23
.= (r2
/ 2) by
ABSVALUE:def 1;
then
|.(
|[(z
`1 ), (r2
/ 2)]|
- y).|
<= ((r2
/ 2)
+
|.(z
- y).|) by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
then
|.(y
-
|[(z
`1 ), (r2
/ 2)]|).|
<= (r
- (r2
/ 2)) by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
then
A24: (
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), (r2
/ 2)]|,(r2
/ 2)))
c= (
Ball (y,r1)) by
Th22;
set V = ((
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), (r2
/ 2)]|,(r2
/ 2)))
\/
{z});
take V;
(B
. z)
=
F1(z) by
A23,
A1;
hence V
in (B
. x);
A25:
{z}
c= U by
A11,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
(
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), (r2
/ 2)]|,(r2
/ 2)))
c= X by
Th20;
then (
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), (r2
/ 2)]|,(r2
/ 2)))
c= U by
A24,
A21,
XBOOLE_1: 19;
hence thesis by
A25,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
end;
suppose
A26: not
P[z];
take V = ((
Ball (z,r2))
/\ X);
(B
. z)
=
F2(z) by
A26,
A1;
hence V
in (B
. x);
|.(y
- z).|
= (r1
- r2) by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
hence thesis by
A21,
Th22,
XBOOLE_1: 26;
end;
end;
end;
A27: for x,U1,U2 be
set st x
in X & U1
in (B
. x) & U2
in (B
. x) holds ex U be
set st U
in (B
. x) & U
c= (U1
/\ U2)
proof
let x,U1,U2 be
set;
assume x
in X;
then
reconsider z = x as
Element of X;
assume that
A28: U1
in (B
. x) and
A29: U2
in (B
. x);
per cases ;
suppose
P[z];
then
A30: (B
. x)
=
F1(z) by
A1;
then
consider r1 be
Real such that
A31: U1
= ((
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), r1]|,r1))
\/
{z}) and
A32: r1
>
0 by
A28;
consider r2 be
Real such that
A33: U2
= ((
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), r2]|,r2))
\/
{z}) and
A34: r2
>
0 by
A29,
A30;
r1
<= r2 or r1
>= r2;
then
consider U be
set such that
A35: r1
<= r2 & U
= U1 or r1
>= r2 & U
= U2;
A36: U
c= U2 by
A31,
A32,
A33,
A35,
Th23,
XBOOLE_1: 9;
take U;
thus U
in (B
. x) by
A28,
A29,
A35;
U
c= U1 by
A31,
A33,
A34,
A35,
Th23,
XBOOLE_1: 9;
hence thesis by
A36,
XBOOLE_1: 19;
end;
suppose not
P[z];
then
A37: (B
. x)
=
F2(z) by
A1;
then
consider r1 be
Real such that
A38: U1
= ((
Ball (z,r1))
/\ X) and r1
>
0 by
A28;
consider r2 be
Real such that
A39: U2
= ((
Ball (z,r2))
/\ X) and r2
>
0 by
A29,
A37;
r1
<= r2 or r1
>= r2;
then
consider U be
set such that
A40: r1
<= r2 & U
= U1 or r1
>= r2 & U
= U2;
A41: U
c= U2 by
A38,
A39,
A40,
JORDAN: 18,
XBOOLE_1: 26;
take U;
thus U
in (B
. x) by
A28,
A29,
A40;
U
c= U1 by
A38,
A39,
A40,
JORDAN: 18,
XBOOLE_1: 26;
hence thesis by
A41,
XBOOLE_1: 19;
end;
end;
for x,U be
set st x
in X & U
in (B
. x) holds x
in U
proof
let x,U be
set;
assume x
in X;
then
reconsider a = x as
Element of X;
assume
A42: U
in (B
. x);
per cases by
A1;
suppose
A43: (B
. x)
=
F1(a);
A44: a
in
{a} by
TARSKI:def 1;
ex r be
Real st U
= ((
Ball (
|[(a
`1 ), r]|,r))
\/
{a}) & r
>
0 by
A43,
A42;
hence thesis by
A44,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
suppose (B
. x)
=
F2(a);
then
consider r be
Real such that
A45: U
= ((
Ball (a,r))
/\ X) and
A46: r
>
0 by
A42;
a
in (
Ball (a,r)) by
A46,
Th13;
hence thesis by
A45,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
end;
then
consider P be
Subset-Family of X such that P
= (
Union B) and
A47: for T be
TopStruct st the
carrier of T
= X & the
topology of T
= (
UniCl P) holds T is
TopSpace & for T9 be non
empty
TopSpace st T9
= T holds B is
Neighborhood_System of T9 by
A27,
A4,
A10,
TOPGEN_3: 3;
set T =
TopStruct (# X, (
UniCl P) #);
reconsider T as non
empty
strict
TopSpace by
A47;
reconsider B as
Neighborhood_System of T by
A47;
take T;
thus the
carrier of T
= X;
take B;
hereby
defpred
R[
Real] means $1
>
0 ;
let x;
deffunc
a1(
Real) = ((
Ball (
|[x, $1]|,$1))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|});
deffunc
a2(
Real) = ((
Ball (
|[(
|[x,
0 ]|
`1 ), $1]|,$1))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|});
A48:
|[x,
0 ]|
in X;
A49: for r be
Real holds
a1(r)
=
a2(r) by
EUCLID: 52;
A50: {
a2(r) where r be
Real :
R[r] }
c= {
a1(r1) where r1 be
Real :
R[r1] }
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in {
a2(r) where r be
Real :
R[r] };
then
consider r be
Real such that
A51: e
=
a2(r) &
R[r];
e
=
a1(r) &
R[r] by
A49,
A51;
hence e
in {
a1(r1) where r1 be
Real :
R[r1] };
end;
{
a1(r) where r be
Real :
R[r] }
c= {
a2(r1) where r1 be
Real :
R[r1] }
proof
let e be
object;
assume e
in {
a1(r) where r be
Real :
R[r] };
then
consider r be
Real such that
A52: e
=
a1(r) &
R[r];
e
=
a2(r) &
R[r] by
A49,
A52;
hence e
in {
a2(r1) where r1 be
Real :
R[r1] };
end;
then
A53: {
a1(r) where r be
Real :
R[r] }
= {
a2(r) where r be
Real :
R[r] } by
A50;
P[
|[x,
0 ]|];
then (B
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
=
F1(|[) by
A48,
A1;
hence (B
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } by
A53;
end;
let x, y;
assume
A54: y
>
0 ;
then
A55:
|[x, y]|
in X;
not
|[x, y]|
in
y=0-line by
A54,
Th15;
hence thesis by
A55,
A1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let T1,T2 be
strict non
empty
TopSpace such that
A56: the
carrier of T1
=
y>=0-plane and
A57: ex B be
Neighborhood_System of T1 st (for x holds (B
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where r be
Real : r
>
0 }) & for x, y st y
>
0 holds (B
.
|[x, y]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } and
A58: the
carrier of T2
=
y>=0-plane and
A59: ex B be
Neighborhood_System of T2 st (for x holds (B
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where r be
Real : r
>
0 }) & for x, y st y
>
0 holds (B
.
|[x, y]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where r be
Real : r
>
0 };
consider B2 be
Neighborhood_System of T2 such that
A60: for x holds (B2
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } and
A61: for x, y st y
>
0 holds (B2
.
|[x, y]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } by
A59;
consider B1 be
Neighborhood_System of T1 such that
A62: for x holds (B1
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } and
A63: for x, y st y
>
0 holds (B1
.
|[x, y]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } by
A57;
now
let a be
object;
assume a
in
y>=0-plane ;
then
reconsider z = a as
Element of
y>=0-plane ;
A64: z
=
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then (z
`2 )
=
0 or (z
`2 )
>
0 by
Th18;
then (z
`2 )
=
0 & (B1
. z)
= { ((
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), r]|,r))
\/
{
|[(z
`1 ),
0 ]|}) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } & (B2
. z)
= { ((
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), r]|,r))
\/
{
|[(z
`1 ),
0 ]|}) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } or (z
`2 )
>
0 & (B1
. z)
= { ((
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } & (B2
. z)
= { ((
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } by
A62,
A63,
A60,
A61,
A64;
hence (B1
. a)
= (B2
. a);
end;
hence thesis by
A56,
A58,
Th24,
PBOOLE: 3;
end;
end
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:25
Th25: (
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line ) is
open
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane
proof
consider BB be
Neighborhood_System of
Niemytzki-plane such that for x holds (BB
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } and
A1: for x, y st y
>
0 holds (BB
.
|[x, y]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } by
Def3;
A2: the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane
=
y>=0-plane by
Def3;
then
reconsider A = (
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line ) as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
XBOOLE_1: 36;
now
let a be
Point of
Niemytzki-plane ;
assume
A3: a
in A;
then a
in
y>=0-plane by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
consider x, y such that
A4: a
=
|[x, y]| and
A5: y
>=
0 ;
set B = ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,y))
/\
y>=0-plane );
reconsider B as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
not a
in
y=0-line by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
A6: y
<>
0 by
A4;
then B
in { ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } by
A5;
then
A7: B
in (BB
. a) by
A1,
A4,
A5,
A6;
take B;
(
dom BB)
= the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hence B
in (
Union BB) by
A7,
CARD_5: 2;
thus a
in B by
A7,
YELLOW_8: 12;
(
Ball (
|[x, y]|,y))
c=
y>=0-plane by
A5,
A6,
Th20;
then B
= (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,y)) by
XBOOLE_1: 28;
then B
misses
y=0-line by
A5,
A6,
Th21;
hence B
c= A by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 86;
end;
hence thesis by
YELLOW_9: 31;
end;
Lm1: the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane
=
y>=0-plane by
Def3;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:26
Th26:
y=0-line is
closed
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane
proof
reconsider B =
y=0-line as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
Def3,
Th19;
reconsider A = (
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line ) as
open
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
Th25;
(B
` )
= A by
Def3;
then (A
` )
=
y=0-line ;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:27
Th27: for x be
Real, r be
positive
Real holds ((
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) is
open
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane
proof
let x be
Real;
let r be
positive
Real;
the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane
=
y>=0-plane by
Def3;
then
reconsider a =
|[x,
0 ]| as
Point of
Niemytzki-plane by
Th18;
consider BB be
Neighborhood_System of
Niemytzki-plane such that
A1: for x holds (BB
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, q]|,q))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } and for x, y st y
>
0 holds (BB
.
|[x, y]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,q))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
Def3;
(BB
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, q]|,q))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
A1;
then ((
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|})
in (BB
. a);
hence thesis by
YELLOW_8: 12;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:28
Th28: for x be
Real holds for y,r be
positive
Real holds ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane ) is
open
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane
proof
let x be
Real;
let y,r be
positive
Real;
the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane
=
y>=0-plane by
Def3;
then
reconsider a =
|[x, y]| as
Point of
Niemytzki-plane by
Th18;
consider BB be
Neighborhood_System of
Niemytzki-plane such that for x holds (BB
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, q]|,q))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } and
A1: for x, y st y
>
0 holds (BB
.
|[x, y]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,q))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
Def3;
(BB
.
|[x, y]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,q))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
A1;
then ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane )
in (BB
. a);
hence thesis by
YELLOW_8: 12;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:29
Th29: for x,y be
Real holds for r be
positive
Real st r
<= y holds (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) is
open
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane
proof
let x,y be
Real;
let r be
positive
Real;
assume
A1: r
<= y;
A2: (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r))
c=
y>=0-plane
proof
let a be
object;
assume
A3: a
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r));
then
reconsider z = a as
Element of (
TOP-REAL 2);
A4: (z
`2 )
<
0 implies (y
- (z
`2 ))
> y &
|.(y
- (z
`2 )).|
= (y
- (z
`2 )) by
A1,
ABSVALUE:def 1,
XREAL_1: 46;
A5: z
=
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then
A6: (z
-
|[x, y]|)
=
|[((z
`1 )
- x), ((z
`2 )
- y)]| by
EUCLID: 62;
then
A7: ((z
-
|[x, y]|)
`2 )
= ((z
`2 )
- y) by
EUCLID: 52;
((z
-
|[x, y]|)
`1 )
= ((z
`1 )
- x) by
A6,
EUCLID: 52;
then
|.(z
-
|[x, y]|).|
= (
sqrt ((((z
`1 )
- x)
^2 )
+ (((z
`2 )
- y)
^2 ))) by
A7,
JGRAPH_1: 30;
then
|.(z
-
|[x, y]|).|
>=
|.((z
`2 )
- y).| by
COMPLEX1: 79;
then
A8:
|.(z
-
|[x, y]|).|
>=
|.(y
- (z
`2 )).| by
COMPLEX1: 60;
|.(z
-
|[x, y]|).|
< r by
A3,
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
|.(y
- (z
`2 )).|
< r by
A8,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence thesis by
A4,
A1,
A5,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane ) is
open
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
A1,
Th28;
hence thesis by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:30
Th30: for p be
Point of
Niemytzki-plane holds for r be
positive
Real holds ex a be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2), U be
open
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane st p
in U & a
in U & for b be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st b
in U holds
|.(b
- a).|
< r
proof
let p be
Point of
Niemytzki-plane ;
let r be
positive
Real;
consider BB be
Neighborhood_System of
Niemytzki-plane such that
A1: for x holds (BB
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, q]|,q))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } and
A2: for x, y st y
>
0 holds (BB
.
|[x, y]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,q))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
Def3;
A3: the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane
=
y>=0-plane by
Def3;
p
in the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane ;
then
reconsider p9 = p as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
A3;
A4: p
=
|[(p9
`1 ), (p9
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
per cases by
A3,
A4,
Th18;
suppose
A5: (p9
`2 )
=
0 ;
then (BB
. p)
= { ((
Ball (
|[(p9
`1 ), q]|,q))
\/
{
|[(p9
`1 ),
0 ]|}) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
A1,
A4;
then
A6: ((
Ball (
|[(p9
`1 ), (r
/ 2)]|,(r
/ 2)))
\/
{
|[(p9
`1 ),
0 ]|})
in (BB
. p);
(BB
. p)
c= the
topology of
Niemytzki-plane by
TOPS_2: 64;
then
reconsider U = ((
Ball (
|[(p9
`1 ), (r
/ 2)]|,(r
/ 2)))
\/
{p}) as
open
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
A6,
A4,
A5,
PRE_TOPC:def 2;
take a =
|[(p9
`1 ), (r
/ 2)]|, U;
thus p
in U by
ZFMISC_1: 136;
A7: (r
/ 2)
< ((r
/ 2)
+ (r
/ 2)) by
XREAL_1: 29;
a
in (
Ball (a,(r
/ 2))) by
Th13;
hence a
in U by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
let b be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
assume b
in U;
then
A8: b
in (
Ball (a,(r
/ 2))) or b
= p by
ZFMISC_1: 136;
(p9
- a)
=
|[((p9
`1 )
- (p9
`1 )), (
0
- (r
/ 2))]| by
A4,
A5,
EUCLID: 62;
then
|.(p9
- a).|
=
|.(
0
- (r
/ 2)).| by
TOPREAL6: 23
.=
|.((r
/ 2)
-
0 ).| by
COMPLEX1: 60
.= (r
/ 2) by
ABSVALUE:def 1;
then
|.(b
- a).|
<= (r
/ 2) by
A8,
TOPREAL9: 7;
hence thesis by
A7,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
suppose
A9: (p9
`2 )
>
0 ;
then (BB
. p)
= { ((
Ball (
|[(p9
`1 ), (p9
`2 )]|,q))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
A2,
A4;
then
A10: ((
Ball (p9,(r
/ 2)))
/\
y>=0-plane )
in (BB
. p) by
A4;
(BB
. p)
c= the
topology of
Niemytzki-plane by
TOPS_2: 64;
then
reconsider U = ((
Ball (p9,(r
/ 2)))
/\
y>=0-plane ) as
open
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
A10,
PRE_TOPC:def 2;
take a = p9, U;
A11: p
in (
Ball (a,(r
/ 2))) by
Th13;
p
in
y>=0-plane by
A4,
A9;
hence p
in U & a
in U by
A11,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
let b be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
assume b
in U;
then b
in (
Ball (a,(r
/ 2))) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A12:
|.(b
- a).|
<= (r
/ 2) by
TOPREAL9: 7;
(r
/ 2)
< ((r
/ 2)
+ (r
/ 2)) by
XREAL_1: 29;
hence thesis by
A12,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:31
Th31: for x,y be
Real holds for r be
positive
Real holds ex w,v be
Rational st
|[w, v]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) &
|[w, v]|
<>
|[x, y]|
proof
let x,y be
Real;
let r be
positive
Real;
x
< (x
+ (r
/ 2)) by
XREAL_1: 39;
then
consider w be
Rational such that
A1: x
< w and
A2: w
< (x
+ (r
/ 2)) by
RAT_1: 7;
A3: (w
- x)
>
0 by
A1,
XREAL_1: 50;
y
< (y
+ (r
/ 2)) by
XREAL_1: 39;
then
consider v be
Rational such that
A4: y
< v and
A5: v
< (y
+ (r
/ 2)) by
RAT_1: 7;
A6: (v
- y)
>
0 by
A4,
XREAL_1: 50;
(
|[w, v]|
-
|[x, v]|)
=
|[(w
- x), (v
- v)]| by
EUCLID: 62;
then
|.(
|[w, v]|
-
|[x, v]|).|
=
|.(w
- x).| by
TOPREAL6: 23;
then
|.(
|[w, v]|
-
|[x, v]|).|
= (w
- x) by
A3,
ABSVALUE:def 1;
then
A7:
|.(
|[w, v]|
-
|[x, v]|).|
< ((x
+ (r
/ 2))
- x) by
A2,
XREAL_1: 9;
take w, v;
A8: (
|[x, v]|
-
|[x, y]|)
=
|[(x
- x), (v
- y)]| by
EUCLID: 62;
A9:
|.(
|[w, v]|
-
|[x, y]|).|
<= (
|.(
|[w, v]|
-
|[x, v]|).|
+
|.(
|[x, v]|
-
|[x, y]|).|) by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
|.(
|[x, v]|
-
|[x, y]|).|
=
|.(v
- y).| by
A8,
TOPREAL6: 23;
then
|.(
|[x, v]|
-
|[x, y]|).|
= (v
- y) by
A6,
ABSVALUE:def 1;
then
|.(
|[x, v]|
-
|[x, y]|).|
<= ((y
+ (r
/ 2))
- y) by
A5,
XREAL_1: 9;
then (
|.(
|[w, v]|
-
|[x, v]|).|
+
|.(
|[x, v]|
-
|[x, y]|).|)
< (((x
+ (r
/ 2))
- x)
+ ((y
+ (r
/ 2))
- y)) by
A7,
XREAL_1: 8;
then
|.(
|[w, v]|
-
|[x, y]|).|
< r by
A9,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence
|[w, v]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) by
TOPREAL9: 7;
thus thesis by
A4,
SPPOL_2: 1;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:32
Th32: for A be
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane st A
= ((
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line )
/\ (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>)) holds for x be
set holds (
Cl (A
\
{x}))
= (
[#]
Niemytzki-plane )
proof
let A be
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane ;
assume
A1: A
= ((
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line )
/\ (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>));
let s be
set;
thus (
Cl (A
\
{s}))
c= (
[#]
Niemytzki-plane );
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
[#]
Niemytzki-plane );
then
reconsider a = x as
Element of
Niemytzki-plane ;
reconsider b = a as
Element of
y>=0-plane by
Def3;
consider BB be
Neighborhood_System of
Niemytzki-plane such that
A2: for x holds (BB
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, q]|,q))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } and
A3: for x, y st y
>
0 holds (BB
.
|[x, y]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,q))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
Def3;
A4: a
=
|[(b
`1 ), (b
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
for U be
set st U
in (BB
. a) holds U
meets (A
\
{s})
proof
let U be
set;
assume
A5: U
in (BB
. a);
per cases by
A4,
Th18;
suppose
A6: (b
`2 )
=
0 ;
then (BB
. a)
= { ((
Ball (
|[(b
`1 ), q]|,q))
\/
{
|[(b
`1 ),
0 ]|}) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
A2,
A4;
then
consider q be
Real such that
A7: U
= ((
Ball (
|[(b
`1 ), q]|,q))
\/
{a}) and
A8: q
>
0 by
A4,
A5,
A6;
reconsider q as
positive
Real by
A8;
consider w1,v1 be
Rational such that
A9:
|[w1, v1]|
in (
Ball (
|[(b
`1 ), q]|,q)) and
A10:
|[w1, v1]|
<>
|[(b
`1 ), q]| by
Th31;
A11:
|[w1, v1]|
in U by
A7,
A9,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
set q2 =
|.(
|[w1, v1]|
-
|[(b
`1 ), q]|).|;
(
|[w1, v1]|
-
|[(b
`1 ), q]|)
<> (
0. (
TOP-REAL 2)) by
A10,
RLVECT_1: 21;
then q2
<>
0 by
EUCLID_2: 42;
then
reconsider q2 as
positive
Real;
A12: q2
< q by
A9,
TOPREAL9: 7;
consider w2,v2 be
Rational such that
A13:
|[w2, v2]|
in (
Ball (
|[(b
`1 ), q]|,q2)) and
|[w2, v2]|
<>
|[(b
`1 ), q]| by
Th31;
|.(
|[w2, v2]|
-
|[(b
`1 ), q]|).|
< q2 by
A13,
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
|.(
|[w2, v2]|
-
|[(b
`1 ), q]|).|
< q by
A12,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A14:
|[w2, v2]|
in (
Ball (
|[(b
`1 ), q]|,q)) by
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
A15:
|[w2, v2]|
in U by
A7,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
A16: (
Ball (
|[(b
`1 ), q]|,q))
misses
y=0-line by
Th21;
(
Ball (
|[(b
`1 ), q]|,q))
c=
y>=0-plane by
Th20;
then
A17: (
Ball (
|[(b
`1 ), q]|,q))
c= (
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line ) by
A16,
XBOOLE_1: 86;
A18: v1
in
RAT by
RAT_1:def 2;
w1
in
RAT by
RAT_1:def 2;
then
|[w1, v1]|
in (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>) by
A18,
FINSEQ_3: 124;
then
A19:
|[w1, v1]|
in A by
A17,
A9,
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A20: s
=
|[w1, v1]| or s
<>
|[w1, v1]|;
A21: v2
in
RAT by
RAT_1:def 2;
w2
in
RAT by
RAT_1:def 2;
then
|[w2, v2]|
in (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>) by
A21,
FINSEQ_3: 124;
then
A22:
|[w2, v2]|
in A by
A17,
A14,
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
|[w2, v2]|
<>
|[w1, v1]| by
A13,
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
|[w1, v1]|
in (A
\
{s}) or
|[w2, v2]|
in (A
\
{s}) by
A20,
A19,
A22,
ZFMISC_1: 56;
hence thesis by
A11,
A15,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
end;
suppose
A23: (b
`2 )
>
0 ;
then (BB
. a)
= { ((
Ball (
|[(b
`1 ), (b
`2 )]|,q))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
A3,
A4;
then
consider q be
Real such that
A24: U
= ((
Ball (b,q))
/\
y>=0-plane ) and
A25: q
>
0 by
A4,
A5;
reconsider q, b2 = (b
`2 ) as
positive
Real by
A23,
A25;
reconsider q1 = (
min (q,b2)) as
positive
Real by
XXREAL_0:def 9;
consider w1,v1 be
Rational such that
A26:
|[w1, v1]|
in (
Ball (b,q1)) and
A27:
|[w1, v1]|
<> b by
A4,
Th31;
A28: v1
in
RAT by
RAT_1:def 2;
set q2 =
|.(
|[w1, v1]|
- b).|;
(
|[w1, v1]|
- b)
<> (
0. (
TOP-REAL 2)) by
A27,
RLVECT_1: 21;
then q2
<>
0 by
EUCLID_2: 42;
then
reconsider q2 as
positive
Real;
A29: q2
< q1 by
A26,
TOPREAL9: 7;
A30: q1
<= (b
`2 ) by
XXREAL_0: 17;
then
A31: (
Ball (b,q1))
c=
y>=0-plane by
A4,
Th20;
(
Ball (b,q1))
misses
y=0-line by
A30,
A4,
Th21;
then
A32: (
Ball (b,q1))
c= (
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line ) by
A31,
XBOOLE_1: 86;
w1
in
RAT by
RAT_1:def 2;
then
|[w1, v1]|
in (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>) by
A28,
FINSEQ_3: 124;
then
A33:
|[w1, v1]|
in A by
A32,
A26,
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A34: s
=
|[w1, v1]| or s
<>
|[w1, v1]|;
consider w2,v2 be
Rational such that
A35:
|[w2, v2]|
in (
Ball (b,q2)) and
|[w2, v2]|
<> b by
A4,
Th31;
A36:
|[w2, v2]|
<>
|[w1, v1]| by
A35,
TOPREAL9: 7;
|.(
|[w2, v2]|
- b).|
< q2 by
A35,
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
A37:
|.(
|[w2, v2]|
- b).|
< q1 by
A29,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A38:
|[w2, v2]|
in (
Ball (b,q1)) by
TOPREAL9: 7;
A39: q1
<= q by
XXREAL_0: 17;
then
|.(
|[w2, v2]|
- b).|
< q by
A37,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
|[w2, v2]|
in (
Ball (b,q)) by
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
A40:
|[w2, v2]|
in U by
A24,
A38,
A31,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A41: v2
in
RAT by
RAT_1:def 2;
w2
in
RAT by
RAT_1:def 2;
then
|[w2, v2]|
in (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>) by
A41,
FINSEQ_3: 124;
then
|[w2, v2]|
in A by
A32,
A38,
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A42:
|[w1, v1]|
in (A
\
{s}) or
|[w2, v2]|
in (A
\
{s}) by
A34,
A36,
A33,
ZFMISC_1: 56;
q2
< q by
A39,
A29,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
|[w1, v1]|
in (
Ball (b,q)) by
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
|[w1, v1]|
in U by
A24,
A26,
A31,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence thesis by
A42,
A40,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
TOPGEN_2: 10;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:33
Th33: for A be
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane st A
= (
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line ) holds for x be
set holds (
Cl (A
\
{x}))
= (
[#]
Niemytzki-plane )
proof
let A be
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane ;
assume
A1: A
= (
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line );
let s be
set;
reconsider B = (A
/\ (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>)) as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane ;
thus (
Cl (A
\
{s}))
c= (
[#]
Niemytzki-plane );
(B
\
{s})
c= (A
\
{s}) by
XBOOLE_1: 17,
XBOOLE_1: 33;
then (
Cl (B
\
{s}))
c= (
Cl (A
\
{s})) by
PRE_TOPC: 19;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th32;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:34
Th34: for A be
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane st A
= (
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line ) holds (
Cl A)
= (
[#]
Niemytzki-plane )
proof
let A be
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane ;
(A
\
{A})
= A
proof
thus (A
\
{A})
c= A by
XBOOLE_1: 36;
let x be
object;
not A
in A;
hence thesis by
ZFMISC_1: 56;
end;
hence thesis by
Th33;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:35
Th35: for A be
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane st A
=
y=0-line holds (
Cl A)
= A & (
Int A)
=
{}
proof
let A be
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane ;
assume
A1: A
=
y=0-line ;
then
A2: (A
` )
= (
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line ) by
Def3;
thus (
Cl A)
= A by
A1,
Th26,
PRE_TOPC: 22;
thus (
Int A)
= ((
Cl (A
` ))
` ) by
TOPS_1:def 1
.= ((
[#]
Niemytzki-plane )
` ) by
A2,
Th34
.=
{} by
XBOOLE_1: 37;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:36
Th36: ((
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line )
/\ (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>)) is
dense
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane
proof
((
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line )
/\ (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>))
c= (
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line ) by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then
reconsider A = ((
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line )
/\ (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>)) as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
Th25,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
(A
\
{A})
= A
proof
thus (A
\
{A})
c= A by
XBOOLE_1: 36;
let x be
object;
not A
in A;
hence thesis by
ZFMISC_1: 56;
end;
then (
Cl A)
= (
[#]
Niemytzki-plane ) by
Th32;
hence thesis by
TOPS_1:def 3;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:37
((
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line )
/\ (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>)) is
dense-in-itself
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane
proof
((
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line )
/\ (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>))
c= (
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line ) by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then
reconsider A = ((
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line )
/\ (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>)) as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
Th25,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
A is
dense-in-itself
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in A;
then
reconsider x = a as
Point of
Niemytzki-plane ;
(
Cl (A
\
{x}))
= the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane by
Th32;
then x
is_an_accumulation_point_of A;
hence thesis by
TOPGEN_1:def 3;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:38
(
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line ) is
dense
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane
proof
reconsider A = (
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line ) as
open
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
Th25;
(
Cl A)
= (
[#]
Niemytzki-plane ) by
Th34;
hence thesis by
TOPS_1:def 3;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:39
(
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line ) is
dense-in-itself
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane
proof
the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane
=
y>=0-plane by
Def3;
then
reconsider A = (
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line ) as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
XBOOLE_1: 36;
A is
dense-in-itself
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in A;
then
reconsider x = a as
Point of
Niemytzki-plane ;
(
Cl (A
\
{x}))
= the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane by
Th33;
then x
is_an_accumulation_point_of A;
hence thesis by
TOPGEN_1:def 3;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:40
y=0-line is
nowhere_dense
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane
proof
reconsider A =
y=0-line as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
Def3,
Th19;
(
Int (
Cl A))
= (
Int A) by
Th26,
PRE_TOPC: 22
.=
{} by
Th35;
hence thesis by
TOPS_3:def 3;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:41
Th41: for A be
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane st A
=
y=0-line holds (
Der A) is
empty
proof
consider BB be
Neighborhood_System of
Niemytzki-plane such that
A1: for x holds (BB
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } and for x, y st y
>
0 holds (BB
.
|[x, y]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } by
Def3;
let A be
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane ;
assume that
A2: A
=
y=0-line and
A3: not (
Der A) is
empty;
set a = the
Element of (
Der A);
a
in (
Der A) by
A3;
then
reconsider a as
Point of
Niemytzki-plane ;
A4: a
in (
Der A) by
A3;
a
is_an_accumulation_point_of A by
A3,
TOPGEN_1:def 3;
then
A5: a
in (
Cl (A
\
{a}));
the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane
=
y>=0-plane by
Def3;
then a
in
y>=0-plane ;
then
reconsider b = a as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
A6: a
=
|[(b
`1 ), (b
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
A7: (
Der A)
c= (
Cl A) by
TOPGEN_1: 28;
(
Cl A)
= A by
A2,
Th35;
then
A8: (b
`2 )
=
0 by
A4,
A7,
A2,
A6,
Th15;
then (BB
. a)
= { ((
Ball (
|[(b
`1 ), r]|,r))
\/
{
|[(b
`1 ),
0 ]|}) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } by
A1,
A6;
then ((
Ball (
|[(b
`1 ), 1]|,1))
\/
{b})
in (BB
. a) by
A6,
A8;
then ((
Ball (
|[(b
`1 ), 1]|,1))
\/
{b})
meets (A
\
{a}) by
A5,
TOPGEN_2: 9;
then
consider z be
object such that
A9: z
in ((
Ball (
|[(b
`1 ), 1]|,1))
\/
{b}) and
A10: z
in (A
\
{a}) by
XBOOLE_0: 3;
A11: z
in A by
A10,
ZFMISC_1: 56;
z
<> a by
A10,
ZFMISC_1: 56;
then
A12: z
in (
Ball (
|[(b
`1 ), 1]|,1)) by
A9,
ZFMISC_1: 136;
reconsider z as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
A9;
A13: z
=
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then (z
`2 )
=
0 by
A2,
A11,
Th15;
then
A14: (z
-
|[(b
`1 ), 1]|)
=
|[((z
`1 )
- (b
`1 )), (
0
- 1)]| by
A13,
EUCLID: 62;
A15: (
|[((z
`1 )
- (b
`1 )), (
0
- 1)]|
`2 )
= (
0
- 1) by
EUCLID: 52;
(
|[((z
`1 )
- (b
`1 )), (
0
- 1)]|
`1 )
= ((z
`1 )
- (b
`1 )) by
EUCLID: 52;
then
|.(z
-
|[(b
`1 ), 1]|).|
= (
sqrt ((((z
`1 )
- (b
`1 ))
^2 )
+ ((
- 1)
^2 ))) by
A14,
A15,
JGRAPH_1: 30
.= (
sqrt ((((z
`1 )
- (b
`1 ))
^2 )
+ (1
^2 )));
then
A16:
|.(z
-
|[(b
`1 ), 1]|).|
>=
|.1.| by
COMPLEX1: 79;
|.(z
-
|[(b
`1 ), 1]|).|
< 1 by
A12,
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
|.1.|
< 1 by
A16,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence contradiction by
ABSVALUE: 4;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:42
Th42: for A be
Subset of
y=0-line holds A is
closed
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane
proof
reconsider B =
y=0-line as
closed
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
Th26;
let A be
Subset of
y=0-line ;
A
c= B;
then
reconsider A as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
(
Der A)
c= (
Der B) by
TOPGEN_1: 30;
then (
Der A)
c=
{} by
Th41;
then (
Der A)
=
{} ;
then (
Cl A)
= (A
\/
{} ) by
TOPGEN_1: 29;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:43
Th43:
RAT is
dense
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line
proof
reconsider A =
RAT as
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line by
NUMBERS: 12,
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
consider B be
Subset-Family of
REAL such that
A1: the
topology of
Sorgenfrey-line
= (
UniCl B) and
A2: B
= {
[.x, q.[ where x,q be
Real : x
< q & q is
rational } by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line
=
REAL by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
then
A3: B is
Basis of
Sorgenfrey-line by
A1,
YELLOW_9: 22;
A is
dense
proof
thus (
Cl A)
c= the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line ;
let x be
object;
assume x
in the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line ;
then
reconsider x as
Point of
Sorgenfrey-line ;
now
let C be
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line ;
assume C
in B;
then
consider y,q be
Real such that
A4: C
=
[.y, q.[ and
A5: y
< q and q is
rational by
A2;
assume x
in C;
consider r be
Rational such that
A6: y
< r and
A7: r
< q by
A5,
RAT_1: 7;
A8: r
in A by
RAT_1:def 2;
r
in C by
A4,
A6,
A7,
XXREAL_1: 3;
hence A
meets C by
A8,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
end;
hence thesis by
A3,
YELLOW_9: 37;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:44
Sorgenfrey-line is
separable by
Th43,
TOPGEN_1:def 12,
TOPGEN_3: 17;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:45
Niemytzki-plane is
separable
proof
reconsider A = ((
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line )
/\ (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>)) as
dense
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
Th36;
A1: (
card A)
c= (
card (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>)) by
CARD_1: 11,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
(
density
Niemytzki-plane )
c= (
card A) by
TOPGEN_1:def 12;
then (
density
Niemytzki-plane )
c= (
card (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>)) by
A1;
hence (
density
Niemytzki-plane )
c=
omega by
Th8,
CARD_4: 6,
TOPGEN_3: 17;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:46
Niemytzki-plane is
T_1
proof
set T =
Niemytzki-plane ;
let p,q be
Point of T such that
A1: p
<> q;
A2: q
in the
carrier of T;
A3: the
carrier of T
=
y>=0-plane by
Def3;
p
in the
carrier of T;
then
reconsider p9 = p, q9 = q as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
A2,
A3;
(p9
- q9)
<> (
0. (
TOP-REAL 2)) by
A1,
RLVECT_1: 21;
then
|.(p9
- q9).|
<>
0 by
EUCLID_2: 42;
then
reconsider r =
|.(p9
- q9).| as
positive
Real;
consider ap be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2), Up be
open
Subset of T such that
A4: p
in Up and ap
in Up and
A5: for b be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st b
in Up holds
|.(b
- ap).|
< (r
/ 2) by
Th30;
consider aq be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2), Uq be
open
Subset of T such that
A6: q
in Uq and aq
in Uq and
A7: for b be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st b
in Uq holds
|.(b
- aq).|
< (r
/ 2) by
Th30;
take Up, Uq;
thus Up is
open & Uq is
open & p
in Up by
A4;
thus not q
in Up
proof
assume q
in Up;
then
A8:
|.(q9
- ap).|
< (r
/ 2) by
A5;
|.(q9
- ap).|
=
|.(ap
- q9).| by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
then (
|.(p9
- ap).|
+
|.(ap
- q9).|)
< ((r
/ 2)
+ (r
/ 2)) by
A8,
A4,
A5,
XREAL_1: 8;
hence contradiction by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
end;
thus q
in Uq by
A6;
assume
A9: p
in Uq;
A10:
|.(q9
- aq).|
=
|.(aq
- q9).| by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
|.(q9
- aq).|
< (r
/ 2) by
A6,
A7;
then (
|.(p9
- aq).|
+
|.(aq
- q9).|)
< ((r
/ 2)
+ (r
/ 2)) by
A10,
A9,
A7,
XREAL_1: 8;
hence contradiction by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:47
not
Niemytzki-plane is
normal
proof
reconsider C = ((
y>=0-plane
\
y=0-line )
/\ (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>)) as
dense
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
Th36;
set T =
Niemytzki-plane ;
defpred
P[
object,
object] means ex D1 be
set, U,V be
open
Subset of T st D1
= $1 & $2
= (U
/\ C) & D1
c= U & (
y=0-line
\ D1)
c= V & U
misses V;
A1: (
exp (2,
omega ))
in (
exp (2,(
exp (2,
omega )))) by
CARD_5: 14;
(
card C)
c= (
card (
product
<*
RAT ,
RAT *>)) by
CARD_1: 11,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then (
card C)
c=
omega by
Th8,
CARD_4: 6,
TOPGEN_3: 17;
then
A2: (
exp (2,(
card C)))
c= (
exp (2,
omega )) by
CARD_2: 93;
assume
A3: for W,V be
Subset of T st W
<>
{} & V
<>
{} & W is
closed & V is
closed & W
misses V holds ex P,Q be
Subset of T st P is
open & Q is
open & W
c= P & V
c= Q & P
misses Q;
A4: for a be
object st a
in (
bool
y=0-line ) holds ex b be
object st
P[a, b]
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in (
bool
y=0-line );
then
reconsider aa = a as
Subset of
y=0-line ;
reconsider a9 = (
y=0-line
\ aa) as
Subset of
y=0-line by
XBOOLE_1: 36;
reconsider A = aa, B = a9 as
closed
Subset of T by
Th42;
per cases ;
suppose
A5: a
=
{} ;
take
{} ;
take
{} , (
{} T), (
[#] T);
thus thesis by
A5,
Def3,
Th19;
end;
suppose
A6: a
=
y=0-line ;
take ((
[#] T)
/\ C);
take aa, (
[#] T), (
{} T);
thus aa
= a;
thus thesis by
A6,
Def3,
Th19,
XBOOLE_1: 37;
end;
suppose
A7: a
<>
{} & a
<>
y=0-line ;
((aa
` )
` )
= (a9
` );
then
A8: B
<> (
{}
y=0-line ) by
A7;
A
misses B by
XBOOLE_1: 79;
then
consider P,Q be
Subset of T such that
A9: P is
open and
A10: Q is
open and
A11: A
c= P and
A12: B
c= Q and
A13: P
misses Q by
A8,
A3,
A7;
take (P
/\ C);
thus thesis by
A9,
A10,
A11,
A12,
A13;
end;
end;
consider G be
Function such that
A14: (
dom G)
= (
bool
y=0-line ) and
A15: for a be
object st a
in (
bool
y=0-line ) holds
P[a, (G
. a)] from
CLASSES1:sch 1(
A4);
G is
one-to-one
proof
let x,y be
object;
assume that
A16: x
in (
dom G) and
A17: y
in (
dom G);
reconsider A = x, B = y as
Subset of
y=0-line by
A16,
A17,
A14;
assume that
A18: (G
. x)
= (G
. y) and
A19: x
<> y;
consider z be
object such that
A20: not (z
in A iff z
in B) by
A19,
TARSKI: 2;
A21: z
in (A
\ B) or z
in (B
\ A) by
A20,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
consider D1 be
set, UB,VB be
open
Subset of T such that
A22: D1
= B and
A23: (G
. B)
= (UB
/\ C) and
A24: D1
c= UB and
A25: (
y=0-line
\ D1)
c= VB and
A26: UB
misses VB by
A15;
consider D1 be
set, UA,VA be
open
Subset of T such that
A27: D1
= A and
A28: (G
. A)
= (UA
/\ C) and
A29: D1
c= UA and
A30: (
y=0-line
\ D1)
c= VA and
A31: UA
misses VA by
A15;
(B
\ A)
= (B
/\ (A
` )) by
SUBSET_1: 13;
then
A32: (B
\ A)
c= (UB
/\ VA) by
A30,
A24,
XBOOLE_1: 27,
A22,
A27;
(A
\ B)
= (A
/\ (B
` )) by
SUBSET_1: 13;
then (A
\ B)
c= (UA
/\ VB) by
A29,
A25,
XBOOLE_1: 27,
A22,
A27;
then C
meets (UA
/\ VB) or C
meets (UB
/\ VA) by
A32,
A21,
TOPS_1: 45;
then (ex z be
object st z
in C & z
in (UA
/\ VB)) or ex z be
object st z
in C & z
in (UB
/\ VA) by
XBOOLE_0: 3;
then
consider z be
set such that
A33: z
in C and
A34: z
in (UA
/\ VB) or z
in (UB
/\ VA);
z
in UA & z
in VB or z
in UB & z
in VA by
A34,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then z
in UA & not z
in UB or z
in UB & not z
in UA by
A31,
A26,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
then z
in (G
. A) & not z
in (G
. B) or z
in (G
. B) & not z
in (G
. A) by
A28,
A23,
A33,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence thesis by
A18;
end;
then
A35: (
card (
dom G))
c= (
card (
rng G)) by
CARD_1: 10;
(
rng G)
c= (
bool C)
proof
let a be
object;
reconsider aa = a as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume a
in (
rng G);
then
consider b be
object such that
A36: b
in (
dom G) and
A37: a
= (G
. b) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
P[b, aa] by
A14,
A15,
A36,
A37;
then aa
c= C by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
hence thesis;
end;
then (
card (
rng G))
c= (
card (
bool C)) by
CARD_1: 11;
then (
card (
bool
y=0-line ))
c= (
card (
bool C)) by
A35,
A14;
then
A38: (
exp (2,
continuum ))
c= (
card (
bool C)) by
Th16,
CARD_2: 31;
(
card (
bool C))
= (
exp (2,(
card C))) by
CARD_2: 31;
then (
exp (2,
continuum ))
c= (
exp (2,
omega )) by
A38,
A2;
then (
exp (2,
omega ))
in (
exp (2,
omega )) by
A1,
TOPGEN_3: 29;
hence contradiction;
end;
begin
definition
let T be
TopSpace;
::
TOPGEN_5:def4
attr T is
Tychonoff means for A be
closed
Subset of T, a be
Point of T st a
in (A
` ) holds ex f be
continuous
Function of T,
I[01] st (f
. a)
=
0 & (f
.: A)
c=
{1};
end
registration
cluster
Tychonoff ->
regular for
TopSpace;
coherence
proof
reconsider z =
0 , j = 1, half = (1
/ 2) as
Element of
I[01] by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
let T be
TopSpace;
assume that
A1: for A be
closed
Subset of T, a be
Point of T st a
in (A
` ) holds ex f be
continuous
Function of T,
I[01] st (f
. a)
=
0 & (f
.: A)
c=
{1};
reconsider A =
[.z, half.[, B =
].half, j.] as
Subset of
I[01] by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 35,
XXREAL_1: 36;
reconsider A, B as
open
Subset of
I[01] by
TOPALG_1: 4,
TOPALG_1: 5;
let p be
Point of T, P be
Subset of T;
assume that
A2: P is
closed and
A3: p
in (P
` );
consider f be
continuous
Function of T,
I[01] such that
A4: (f
. p)
=
0 and
A5: (f
.: P)
c=
{1} by
A2,
A3,
A1;
take W = (f
" A), V = (f
" B);
(
[#]
I[01] )
<>
{} ;
hence W is
open & V is
open by
TOPS_2: 43;
0
in A by
XXREAL_1: 3;
hence p
in W by
A3,
A4,
FUNCT_2: 38;
A6: (
dom f)
= the
carrier of T by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
1
in B by
XXREAL_1: 2;
then
{1}
c= B by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then (f
.: P)
c= B by
A5;
hence P
c= V by
A6,
FUNCT_1: 93;
assume W
meets V;
then
consider x be
object such that
A7: x
in W and
A8: x
in V by
XBOOLE_0: 3;
A9: (f
. x)
in A by
A7,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then
reconsider fx = (f
. x) as
Element of
I[01] ;
A10: fx
< half by
A9,
XXREAL_1: 3;
(f
. x)
in B by
A8,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
hence thesis by
A10,
XXREAL_1: 2;
end;
cluster
T_4 ->
Tychonoff for non
empty
TopSpace;
coherence
proof
the
carrier of (
Closed-Interval-TSpace ((
- 1),1))
=
[.(
- 1), 1.] by
TOPMETR: 18;
then
reconsider j = 1, k = (
- 1) as
Point of (
Closed-Interval-TSpace ((
- 1),1)) by
XXREAL_1: 1;
reconsider z =
0 , o = 1 as
Point of
I[01] by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
let T be non
empty
TopSpace;
assume
A11: T is
T_4;
let A be
closed
Subset of T, a be
Point of T;
per cases ;
suppose
A12: A is
empty;
set f = (T
--> z);
A13: (f
. a)
= z;
(f
.: A)
=
{} by
A12;
hence thesis by
A13,
XBOOLE_1: 2;
end;
suppose A is non
empty;
then
reconsider aa =
{a}, A9 = A as non
empty
closed
Subset of T by
A11,
URYSOHN1: 19;
reconsider B = (A9
\/ aa) as
closed
Subset of T;
set h = (((T
| A9)
--> j)
+* ((T
| aa)
--> k));
A14: ((T
| aa)
--> k)
= (aa
--> k) by
PRE_TOPC: 8;
A15: ((A9
--> 1)
.: A)
c=
{1} by
FUNCOP_1: 81;
A16: a
in aa by
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A17: a
in B by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
assume a
in (A
` );
then
A18: not a
in A by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then A9
misses aa by
ZFMISC_1: 50;
then
reconsider h as
continuous
Function of (T
| B), (
Closed-Interval-TSpace ((
- 1),1)) by
Th11;
consider g be
continuous
Function of T, (
Closed-Interval-TSpace ((
- 1),1)) such that
A19: (g
| B)
= h by
A11,
TIETZE: 23;
consider p be
Function of
I[01] , (
Closed-Interval-TSpace ((
- 1),1)) such that
A20: p is
being_homeomorphism and for r be
Real st r
in
[.
0 , 1.] holds (p
. r)
= ((2
* r)
- 1) and
A21: (p
.
0 )
= (
- 1) and
A22: (p
. 1)
= 1 by
JGRAPH_5: 39;
reconsider p9 = (p
/" ) as
continuous
Function of (
Closed-Interval-TSpace ((
- 1),1)),
I[01] by
A20,
TOPS_2:def 5;
A23: p9
= (p qua
Function
" ) by
A20,
TOPS_2:def 4;
then
A24: (p9
. k)
= z by
A20,
A21,
FUNCT_2: 26;
A25: the
carrier of (T
| aa)
= aa by
PRE_TOPC: 8;
then (
dom ((T
| aa)
--> k))
= aa;
then
A26: (h
. a)
= (((T
| aa)
--> k)
. a) by
A16,
FUNCT_4: 13
.= (
- 1) by
A25,
A16,
FUNCOP_1: 7;
reconsider f = (p9
* g) as
continuous
Function of T,
I[01] ;
A27: (f
.: A)
= (p9
.: (g
.: A)) by
RELAT_1: 126
.= (p9
.: (h
.: A)) by
A19,
RELAT_1: 129,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
((T
| A9)
--> j)
= (A9
--> 1) by
PRE_TOPC: 8;
then (h
.: A)
c=
{1} by
A14,
A15,
A18,
BOOLMARK: 3,
ZFMISC_1: 50;
then
A28: (f
.: A)
c= (
Im (p9,1)) by
A27,
RELAT_1: 123;
take f;
thus (f
. a)
= (p9
. (g
. a)) by
FUNCT_2: 15
.=
0 by
A26,
A17,
A19,
A24,
FUNCT_1: 49;
(p9
. j)
= o by
A20,
A22,
A23,
FUNCT_2: 26;
hence thesis by
A28,
SETWISEO: 8;
end;
end;
end
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:48
for X be
T_1
TopSpace st X is
Tychonoff holds for B be
prebasis of X holds for x be
Point of X holds for V be
Subset of X st x
in V & V
in B holds ex f be
continuous
Function of X,
I[01] st (f
. x)
=
0 & (f
.: (V
` ))
c=
{1}
proof
let X be
T_1
TopSpace;
assume
A1: X is
Tychonoff;
let B be
prebasis of X;
let x be
Point of X;
let V be
Subset of X;
assume that
A2: x
in V and
A3: V
in B;
A4: ((V
` )
` )
= V;
V is
open by
A3,
TOPS_2:def 1;
hence thesis by
A4,
A1,
A2;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:49
Th49: for X be
TopSpace, R be non
empty
SubSpace of
R^1 holds for f,g be
continuous
Function of X, R holds for A be
Subset of X st for x be
Point of X holds x
in A iff (f
. x)
<= (g
. x) holds A is
closed
proof
let X be
TopSpace;
let R be non
empty
SubSpace of
R^1 ;
let f,g be
continuous
Function of X, R;
let A be
Subset of X;
assume
A1: for x be
Point of X holds x
in A iff (f
. x)
<= (g
. x);
now
thus the
topology of X is
Basis of X by
CANTOR_1: 2;
let p be
Point of X;
set r = ((f
. p)
- (g
. p));
reconsider U1 =
].((f
. p)
- (r
/ 2)), ((f
. p)
+ (r
/ 2)).[, V1 =
].((g
. p)
- (r
/ 2)), ((g
. p)
+ (r
/ 2)).[ as
open
Subset of
R^1 by
JORDAN6: 35,
TOPMETR: 17;
reconsider U = (U1
/\ (
[#] R)), V = (V1
/\ (
[#] R)) as
open
Subset of R by
TOPS_2: 24;
A2: (g
" V) is
open by
TOPS_2: 43;
assume
A3: p
in (A
` );
then
A4: (f
. p)
in (
[#] R) by
FUNCT_2: 5;
not p
in A by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then (f
. p)
> (g
. p) by
A1;
then
reconsider r as
positive
Real by
XREAL_1: 50;
A5: (f
. p)
< ((f
. p)
+ (r
/ 2)) by
XREAL_1: 29;
take B = ((f
" U)
/\ (g
" V));
A6: (g
. p)
< ((g
. p)
+ (r
/ 2)) by
XREAL_1: 29;
A7: (g
. p)
in (
[#] R) by
A3,
FUNCT_2: 5;
((g
. p)
- (r
/ 2))
< (g
. p) by
XREAL_1: 44;
then (g
. p)
in V1 by
A6,
XXREAL_1: 4;
then (g
. p)
in V by
A7,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A8: p
in (g
" V) by
A3,
FUNCT_2: 38;
((f
. p)
- (r
/ 2))
< (f
. p) by
XREAL_1: 44;
then (f
. p)
in U1 by
A5,
XXREAL_1: 4;
then (f
. p)
in U by
A4,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A9: p
in (f
" U) by
A3,
FUNCT_2: 38;
(f
" U) is
open by
TOPS_2: 43;
hence B
in the
topology of X & p
in B by
A9,
A8,
A2,
PRE_TOPC:def 2,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
thus B
c= (A
` )
proof
let q be
object;
reconsider qq = q as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume
A10: q
in B;
then q
in (g
" V) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (g
. q)
in V by
FUNCT_2: 38;
then (g
. q)
in V1 by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A11: (g
. qq)
< ((g
. p)
+ (r
/ 2)) by
XXREAL_1: 4;
q
in (f
" U) by
A10,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (f
. q)
in U by
FUNCT_2: 38;
then (f
. q)
in U1 by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (f
. qq)
> ((f
. p)
- (r
/ 2)) by
XXREAL_1: 4;
then (g
. qq)
< (f
. qq) by
A11,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then not q
in A by
A1;
hence thesis by
A10,
SUBSET_1: 29;
end;
end;
then (A
` ) is
open by
YELLOW_9: 31;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:50
Th50: for X be
TopSpace, R be non
empty
SubSpace of
R^1 holds for f,g be
continuous
Function of X, R holds ex h be
continuous
Function of X, R st for x be
Point of X holds (h
. x)
= (
max ((f
. x),(g
. x)))
proof
let X be
TopSpace;
let R be non
empty
SubSpace of
R^1 ;
let f,g be
continuous
Function of X, R;
defpred
A[
set] means (f
. $1)
>= (g
. $1);
consider A be
Subset of X such that
A1: for a be
set holds a
in A iff a
in the
carrier of X &
A[a] from
SUBSET_1:sch 1;
defpred
B[
set] means (f
. $1)
<= (g
. $1);
consider B be
Subset of X such that
A2: for a be
set holds a
in B iff a
in the
carrier of X &
B[a] from
SUBSET_1:sch 1;
per cases ;
suppose
A3: X is
empty;
set h = the
continuous
Function of X, R;
take h;
let x be
Point of X;
A4: (f
. x)
=
0 by
A3;
A5: (g
. x)
=
0 by
A3;
thus thesis by
A3,
A4,
A5;
end;
suppose
A6: X is non
empty & A is
empty;
take g;
let x be
Point of X;
(f
. x)
< (g
. x) by
A6,
A1;
hence thesis by
XXREAL_0:def 10;
end;
suppose
A7: X is non
empty & B is
empty;
take f;
let x be
Point of X;
(g
. x)
< (f
. x) by
A7,
A2;
hence thesis by
XXREAL_0:def 10;
end;
suppose
A8: not X is
empty & not A is
empty & not B is
empty;
then
reconsider X9 = X as non
empty
TopSpace;
for x be
Point of X9 holds (x
in A iff (f
. x)
>= (g
. x)) & (x
in B iff (f
. x)
<= (g
. x)) by
A1,
A2;
then
reconsider A9 = A, B9 = B as non
empty
closed
Subset of X9 by
A8,
Th49;
reconsider ff = f, gg = g as
continuous
Function of X9, R;
A9: the
carrier of (X9
| A9)
= (
[#] (X9
| A9))
.= A9 by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
A10: (
dom ff)
= the
carrier of X9 by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (
dom (ff
| A9))
= A9 by
RELAT_1: 62;
then
reconsider f9 = (ff
| A9) as
continuous
Function of (X9
| A9), R by
A9,
FUNCT_2:def 1,
RELSET_1: 18,
TOPMETR: 7;
A11: the
carrier of (X9
| B9)
= (
[#] (X9
| B9))
.= B9 by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
A12: (
dom gg)
= the
carrier of X9 by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (
dom (gg
| B9))
= B9 by
RELAT_1: 62;
then
reconsider g9 = (gg
| B9) as
continuous
Function of (X9
| B9), R by
A11,
FUNCT_2:def 1,
RELSET_1: 18,
TOPMETR: 7;
A13: (
dom g9)
= B by
A12,
RELAT_1: 62;
A14: (A9
\/ B9)
= the
carrier of X9
proof
thus (A9
\/ B9)
c= the
carrier of X9;
let a be
object;
reconsider aa = a as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
(f
. aa)
>= (g
. aa) or (f
. aa)
<= (g
. aa);
then a
in the
carrier of X implies a
in A9 or a
in B9 by
A1,
A2;
hence thesis by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
then
A15: (X9
| (A9
\/ B9))
= (X9
| (
[#] X9))
.= the TopStruct of X by
TSEP_1: 93;
A16: the TopStruct of R
= the TopStruct of R;
A17: (
dom f9)
= A by
A10,
RELAT_1: 62;
A18: f9
tolerates g9
proof
let a be
object;
assume
A19: a
in ((
dom f9)
/\ (
dom g9));
then
A20: a
in A by
A17,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A21: (f
. a)
>= (g
. a) by
A1;
A22: a
in B by
A19,
A13,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (f
. a)
<= (g
. a) by
A2;
then (f
. a)
= (g
. a) by
A21,
XXREAL_0: 1;
hence (f9
. a)
= (g
. a) by
A20,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (g9
. a) by
A22,
FUNCT_1: 49;
end;
then (f9
+* g9) is
continuous
Function of (X9
| (A9
\/ B9)), R by
Th10;
then
reconsider h = (f9
+* g9) as
continuous
Function of X, R by
A16,
A15,
YELLOW12: 36;
take h;
let x be
Point of X;
x
in A9 or x
in B9 by
A14,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then x
in A9 & (f
. x)
>= (g
. x) & (h
. x)
= (f9
. x) & (f
. x)
= (f9
. x) or x
in B9 & (f
. x)
<= (g
. x) & (h
. x)
= (g9
. x) & (g
. x)
= (g9
. x) by
A1,
A17,
A13,
A18,
FUNCT_1: 49,
FUNCT_4: 13,
FUNCT_4: 15;
hence thesis by
XXREAL_0:def 10;
end;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:51
Th51: for X be non
empty
TopSpace, R be non
empty
SubSpace of
R^1 holds for A be
finite non
empty
set holds for F be
ManySortedFunction of A st for a be
set st a
in A holds (F
. a) is
continuous
Function of X, R holds ex f be
continuous
Function of X, R st for x be
Point of X, S be
finite non
empty
Subset of
REAL st S
= (
rng ((
commute F)
. x)) holds (f
. x)
= (
max S)
proof
let X be non
empty
TopSpace;
let R be non
empty
SubSpace of
R^1 ;
let A be
finite non
empty
set;
let F be
ManySortedFunction of A;
defpred
P[
set] means $1 is
empty or ex f be
continuous
Function of X, R st for x be
Point of X, S be
finite non
empty
Subset of
REAL st S
= (
rng ((
commute (F
| $1))
. x)) holds (f
. x)
= (
max S);
A1:
P[
{} ];
A2: (
dom F)
= A by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
assume
A3: for a be
set st a
in A holds (F
. a) is
continuous
Function of X, R;
(
rng F)
c= (
Funcs (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of R))
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in (
rng F);
then ex b be
object st b
in (
dom F) & a
= (F
. b) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then a is
Function of X, R by
A3;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 8;
end;
then
A4: F
in (
Funcs (A,(
Funcs (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of R)))) by
A2,
FUNCT_2:def 2;
A5:
now
let x,B be
set;
assume
A6: x
in A;
then
reconsider fx = (F
. x) as
continuous
Function of X, R by
A3;
assume
A7: B
c= A;
assume
A8:
P[B];
per cases ;
suppose
A9: B
=
{} ;
thus
P[(B
\/
{x})]
proof
assume not (B
\/
{x}) is
empty;
take fx;
let a be
Point of X, S be
finite non
empty
Subset of
REAL ;
A10: (
dom fx)
= the
carrier of X by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
(F
|
{x})
= (x
.--> (F
. x)) by
A2,
A6,
FUNCT_7: 6;
then ((
commute (F
|
{x}))
. a)
= (x
.--> (fx
. a)) by
A10,
Th3;
then
A11: (
rng ((
commute (F
|
{x}))
. a))
=
{(fx
. a)} by
FUNCOP_1: 8;
assume S
= (
rng ((
commute (F
| (B
\/
{x})))
. a));
hence thesis by
A11,
A9,
XXREAL_2: 11;
end;
end;
suppose
A12: B
<>
{} ;
then
reconsider B9 = B as non
empty
set;
consider f be
continuous
Function of X, R such that
A13: for x be
Point of X, S be
finite non
empty
Subset of
REAL st S
= (
rng ((
commute (F
| B9))
. x)) holds (f
. x)
= (
max S) by
A8;
consider h be
continuous
Function of X, R such that
A14: for x be
Point of X holds (h
. x)
= (
max ((f
. x),(fx
. x))) by
Th50;
thus
P[(B
\/
{x})]
proof
F is
Function of A, (
Funcs (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of R)) by
A4,
FUNCT_2: 66;
then (F
| B) is
Function of B, (
Funcs (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of R)) by
A7,
FUNCT_2: 32;
then (F
| B)
in (
Funcs (B,(
Funcs (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of R)))) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
then (
commute (F
| B))
in (
Funcs (the
carrier of X,(
Funcs (B,the
carrier of R)))) by
A12,
FUNCT_6: 55;
then
reconsider cFB = (
commute (F
| B)) as
Function of the
carrier of X, (
Funcs (B,the
carrier of R)) by
FUNCT_2: 66;
assume not (B
\/
{x}) is
empty;
take h;
let a be
Point of X, S be
finite non
empty
Subset of
REAL ;
reconsider cFBa = (cFB
. a) as
Function of B9, the
carrier of R;
A15: (
dom fx)
= the
carrier of X by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
(F
| (B
\/
{x}))
= ((F
| B)
\/ (F
|
{x})) by
RELAT_1: 78;
then
A16: ((
commute (F
| (B
\/
{x})))
. a)
= ((cFB
. a)
\/ ((
commute (F
|
{x}))
. a)) by
Th7;
assume S
= (
rng ((
commute (F
| (B
\/
{x})))
. a));
then
A17: S
= ((
rng cFBa)
\/ (
rng ((
commute (F
|
{x}))
. a))) by
A16,
RELAT_1: 12;
then (
rng cFBa)
c= S by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then
reconsider S1 = (
rng cFBa) as non
empty
finite
Subset of
REAL by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
(F
|
{x})
= (x
.--> (F
. x)) by
A2,
A6,
FUNCT_7: 6;
then ((
commute (F
|
{x}))
. a)
= (x
.--> (fx
. a)) by
A15,
Th3;
then
A18: S
= (S1
\/
{(fx
. a)}) by
A17,
FUNCOP_1: 8;
(f
. a)
= (
max S1) by
A13;
then (
max S)
= (
max ((f
. a),(
max
{(fx
. a)}))) by
A18,
XXREAL_2: 10
.= (
max ((f
. a),(fx
. a))) by
XXREAL_2: 11;
hence thesis by
A14;
end;
end;
end;
A19: A is
finite;
P[A] from
FINSET_1:sch 2(
A19,
A1,
A5);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:52
Th52: for X be
T_1 non
empty
TopSpace holds for B be
prebasis of X st for x be
Point of X holds for V be
Subset of X st x
in V & V
in B holds ex f be
continuous
Function of X,
I[01] st (f
. x)
=
0 & (f
.: (V
` ))
c=
{1} holds X is
Tychonoff
proof
reconsider z =
0 as
Point of
I[01] by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
let X be
T_1 non
empty
TopSpace;
let BB be
prebasis of X such that
A1: for x be
Point of X holds for V be
Subset of X st x
in V & V
in BB holds ex f be
continuous
Function of X,
I[01] st (f
. x)
=
0 & (f
.: (V
` ))
c=
{1};
let A be
closed
Subset of X;
let a be
Point of X;
A2: (
FinMeetCl BB) is
Basis of X by
YELLOW_9: 23;
assume a
in (A
` );
then
consider B be
Subset of X such that
A3: B
in (
FinMeetCl BB) and
A4: a
in B and
A5: B
c= (A
` ) by
A2,
YELLOW_9: 31;
consider F be
Subset-Family of X such that
A6: F
c= BB and
A7: F is
finite and
A8: B
= (
Intersect F) by
A3,
CANTOR_1:def 3;
per cases ;
suppose F is
empty;
then B
= the
carrier of X by
A8,
SETFAM_1:def 9;
then ((A
` )
` )
= (
{} X) by
A5,
XBOOLE_1: 37;
then
A9: ((X
--> z)
.: A)
=
{} ;
((X
--> z)
. a)
= z;
hence thesis by
A9,
XBOOLE_1: 2;
end;
suppose F is non
empty;
then
reconsider F as
finite non
empty
Subset-Family of X by
A7;
defpred
P[
object,
object] means ex S be
Subset of X, f be
continuous
Function of X,
I[01] st S
= $1 & f
= $2 & (f
. a)
=
0 & (f
.: (S
` ))
c=
{1};
reconsider Sa =
{(
In (
0 ,
REAL ))} as
finite non
empty
Subset of
REAL ;
set z = the
Element of F;
set R =
I[01] ;
A10: for x be
object st x
in F holds ex y be
object st
P[x, y]
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A11: x
in F;
then
reconsider S = x as
Subset of X;
a
in S by
A4,
A8,
A11,
SETFAM_1: 43;
then
consider f be
continuous
Function of X,
I[01] such that
A12: (f
. a)
=
0 and
A13: (f
.: (S
` ))
c=
{1} by
A6,
A11,
A1;
take f;
thus thesis by
A12,
A13;
end;
consider G be
Function such that
A14: (
dom G)
= F & for x be
object st x
in F holds
P[x, (G
. x)] from
CLASSES1:sch 1(
A10);
G is
Function-yielding
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
dom G);
then
P[x, (G
. x)] by
A14;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider G as
ManySortedFunction of F by
A14,
PARTFUN1:def 2,
RELAT_1:def 18;
(
rng G)
c= (
Funcs (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of R))
proof
let u be
object;
assume u
in (
rng G);
then
consider v be
object such that
A15: v
in (
dom G) and
A16: u
= (G
. v) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
P[v, u] by
A14,
A15,
A16;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 8;
end;
then G is
Function of F, (
Funcs (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of R)) by
A14,
FUNCT_2: 2;
then
A17: G
in (
Funcs (F,(
Funcs (the
carrier of X,the
carrier of R)))) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
then (
commute G)
in (
Funcs (the
carrier of X,(
Funcs (F,the
carrier of R)))) by
FUNCT_6: 55;
then
reconsider cG = (
commute G) as
Function of the
carrier of X, (
Funcs (F,the
carrier of R)) by
FUNCT_2: 66;
now
let a be
set;
assume a
in F;
then
P[a, (G
. a)] by
A14;
hence (G
. a) is
continuous
Function of X,
I[01] ;
end;
then
consider f be
continuous
Function of X,
I[01] such that
A18: for x be
Point of X, S be
finite non
empty
Subset of
REAL st S
= (
rng ((
commute G)
. x)) holds (f
. x)
= (
max S) by
Th51;
take f;
reconsider cGa = (cG
. a) as
Function of F, the
carrier of R;
A19: (
dom cGa)
= F by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
Sa
= (
rng ((
commute G)
. a))
proof
thus Sa
c= (
rng ((
commute G)
. a))
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in Sa;
then
A20: x
=
0 by
TARSKI:def 1;
P[z, (G
. z)] by
A14;
then x
= (((
commute G)
. a)
. z) by
A20,
A17,
FUNCT_6: 56;
hence thesis by
A19,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
rng ((
commute G)
. a));
then
consider z be
object such that
A21: z
in (
dom cGa) and
A22: x
= (cGa
. z) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
P[z, (G
. z)] by
A14,
A21;
then x
=
0 by
A17,
A21,
A22,
FUNCT_6: 56;
hence thesis by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
hence (f
. a)
= (
max Sa) by
A18
.=
0 by
XXREAL_2: 11;
let z be
object;
assume z
in (f
.: A);
then
consider x be
object such that
A23: x
in (
dom f) and
A24: x
in A and
A25: z
= (f
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
reconsider x as
Element of X by
A23;
not x
in B by
A5,
A24,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
consider w such that
A26: w
in F and
A27: not x
in w by
A8,
SETFAM_1: 43;
reconsider cGx = (cG
. x) as
Function of F, the
carrier of R;
reconsider S = (
rng cGx) as
finite non
empty
Subset of
REAL by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
A28: (f
. x)
= (
max S) by
A18;
consider T be
Subset of X, g be
continuous
Function of X, R such that
A29: T
= w and
A30: g
= (G
. w) and (g
. a)
=
0 and
A31: (g
.: (T
` ))
c=
{1} by
A14,
A26;
x
in (T
` ) by
A27,
A29,
SUBSET_1: 29;
then (g
. x)
in (g
.: (T
` )) by
FUNCT_2: 35;
then (g
. x)
= 1 by
A31,
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A32: (cGx
. w)
= 1 by
A17,
A26,
A30,
FUNCT_6: 56;
w
in (
dom cGx) by
A17,
A26,
A30,
FUNCT_6: 56;
then
A33: 1
in S by
A32,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
for r be
ExtReal st r
in S holds r
<= 1 by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
then (
max S)
= 1 by
A33,
XXREAL_2:def 8;
hence thesis by
A25,
A28,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:53
Th53:
Sorgenfrey-line is
T_1
proof
set T =
Sorgenfrey-line ;
consider B be
Subset-Family of
REAL such that
A1: the
topology of
Sorgenfrey-line
= (
UniCl B) and
A2: B
= {
[.x, q.[ where x,q be
Real : x
< q & q is
rational } by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
let x,y be
Point of T;
reconsider a = x, b = y as
Element of
REAL by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
A3: B
c= the
topology of T by
A1,
CANTOR_1: 1;
assume
A4: x
<> y;
per cases by
A4,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A5: a
< b;
b
< (b
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 29;
then
consider q be
Rational such that
A6: b
< q and q
< (b
+ 1) by
RAT_1: 7;
[.b, q.[
in B by
A2,
A6;
then
A7:
[.b, q.[
in the
topology of T by
A3;
consider w be
Rational such that
A8: a
< w and
A9: w
< b by
A5,
RAT_1: 7;
[.a, w.[
in B by
A2,
A8;
then
[.a, w.[
in the
topology of T by
A3;
then
reconsider U =
[.a, w.[, V =
[.b, q.[ as
open
Subset of T by
A7,
PRE_TOPC:def 2;
take U, V;
thus U is
open & V is
open;
thus thesis by
A5,
A8,
A9,
A6,
XXREAL_1: 3;
end;
suppose
A10: a
> b;
a
< (a
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 29;
then
consider q be
Rational such that
A11: a
< q and q
< (a
+ 1) by
RAT_1: 7;
[.a, q.[
in B by
A2,
A11;
then
A12:
[.a, q.[
in the
topology of T by
A3;
consider w be
Rational such that
A13: b
< w and
A14: w
< a by
A10,
RAT_1: 7;
[.b, w.[
in B by
A2,
A13;
then
[.b, w.[
in the
topology of T by
A3;
then
reconsider V =
[.b, w.[, U =
[.a, q.[ as
open
Subset of T by
A12,
PRE_TOPC:def 2;
take U, V;
thus U is
open & V is
open;
thus thesis by
A10,
A13,
A14,
A11,
XXREAL_1: 3;
end;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:54
Th54: for x be
Real holds (
left_open_halfline x) is
closed
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line
proof
let x be
Real;
set T =
Sorgenfrey-line ;
reconsider A = (
right_closed_halfline x) as
open
Subset of T by
TOPGEN_3: 15;
the
carrier of T
=
REAL by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
then (
left_open_halfline x)
= (A
` ) by
XXREAL_1: 224,
XXREAL_1: 294;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:55
for x be
Real holds (
left_closed_halfline x) is
closed
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line
proof
let x be
Real;
set T =
Sorgenfrey-line ;
reconsider A = (
right_open_halfline x) as
open
Subset of T by
TOPGEN_3: 14;
the
carrier of T
=
REAL by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
then (((
left_closed_halfline x)
` )
` )
= (A
` ) by
XXREAL_1: 224,
XXREAL_1: 288;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:56
Th56: for x be
Real holds (
right_closed_halfline x) is
closed
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line
proof
let x be
Real;
set T =
Sorgenfrey-line ;
reconsider A = (
left_open_halfline x) as
open
Subset of T by
TOPGEN_3: 13;
the
carrier of T
=
REAL by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
then (((
right_closed_halfline x)
` )
` )
= (A
` ) by
XXREAL_1: 224,
XXREAL_1: 294;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:57
Th57: for x,y be
Real holds
[.x, y.[ is
closed
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line
proof
let x,y be
Real;
set T =
Sorgenfrey-line ;
reconsider A = (
right_closed_halfline x), B = (
left_open_halfline y) as
closed
Subset of T by
Th54,
Th56;
A1: the
carrier of T
=
REAL by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
[.x, y.[
= ((
[.x, y.[
` )
` )
.= (((
left_open_halfline x)
\/ (
right_closed_halfline y))
` ) by
XXREAL_1: 382
.= (((
left_open_halfline x)
` )
/\ ((
right_closed_halfline y)
` )) by
XBOOLE_1: 53
.= (((A
` )
` )
/\ ((
right_closed_halfline y)
` )) by
A1,
XXREAL_1: 224,
XXREAL_1: 294
.= (A
/\ B) by
XXREAL_1: 224,
XXREAL_1: 294;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:58
Th58: for x be
Real, w be
Rational holds ex f be
continuous
Function of
Sorgenfrey-line ,
I[01] st for a be
Point of
Sorgenfrey-line holds (a
in
[.x, w.[ implies (f
. a)
=
0 ) & ( not a
in
[.x, w.[ implies (f
. a)
= 1)
proof
reconsider 00 =
0 , 01 = 1 as
Element of
I[01] by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
let x be
Real;
set X =
Sorgenfrey-line ;
let w be
Rational;
reconsider V =
[.x, w.[ as
open
closed
Subset of X by
Th57,
TOPGEN_3: 11;
defpred
P[
object] means $1
in
[.x, w.[;
deffunc
00(
object) =
0 ;
deffunc
01(
object) = 1;
reconsider f1 = ((X
| V)
--> 00) as
continuous
Function of (X
| V),
I[01] ;
reconsider f2 = ((X
| (V
` ))
--> 01) as
continuous
Function of (X
| (V
` )),
I[01] ;
A1: for a be
object st a
in the
carrier of X holds (
P[a] implies
00(a)
in the
carrier of
I[01] ) & ( not
P[a] implies
01(a)
in the
carrier of
I[01] ) by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
consider f be
Function of X,
I[01] such that
A2: for a be
object st a
in the
carrier of X holds (
P[a] implies (f
. a)
=
00(a)) & ( not
P[a] implies (f
. a)
=
01(a)) from
FUNCT_2:sch 5(
A1);
the
carrier of (X
| V)
= V by
PRE_TOPC: 8;
then
A4: (
dom f1)
= V;
A5: the
carrier of (X
| (V
` ))
= (V
` ) by
PRE_TOPC: 8;
then
A6: (
dom f2)
= (V
` );
A7: (
dom f)
= (
[#] X) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A8:
now
let u be
object;
assume u
in ((
dom f1)
\/ (
dom f2));
then
reconsider x = u as
Point of X by
A7,
A4,
A6,
PRE_TOPC: 2;
hereby
assume
A9: u
in (
dom f2);
then
A10: (((V
` )
--> 1)
. u)
= 1 by
A5,
FUNCOP_1: 7;
not x
in V by
A9,
A5,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence (f
. u)
= (f2
. u) by
A10,
A5,
A2;
end;
assume not u
in (
dom f2);
then x
in V by
A6,
SUBSET_1: 29;
hence (f
. u)
=
0 by
A2
.= (f1
. u);
end;
(V
\/ (V
` ))
= (
[#] X) by
PRE_TOPC: 2;
then f
= (f1
+* f2) by
A8,
A7,
A4,
A6,
FUNCT_4:def 1;
then
reconsider f as
continuous
Function of
Sorgenfrey-line ,
I[01] by
Th12;
take f;
let a be
Point of
Sorgenfrey-line ;
thus thesis by
A2;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:59
Sorgenfrey-line is
Tychonoff
proof
set X =
Sorgenfrey-line ;
A1: the
carrier of X
=
REAL by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
consider B be
Subset-Family of
REAL such that
A2: the
topology of X
= (
UniCl B) and
A3: B
= {
[.x, q.[ where x,q be
Real : x
< q & q is
rational } by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
B
c= (
UniCl B) by
CANTOR_1: 1;
then B is
Basis of X by
A1,
A2,
CANTOR_1:def 2,
TOPS_2: 64;
then
reconsider B as
prebasis of X by
YELLOW_9: 27;
now
let x be
Point of X;
let V be
Subset of X;
assume that
A4: x
in V and
A5: V
in B;
consider a,q be
Real such that
A6: V
=
[.a, q.[ and a
< q and
A7: q is
rational by
A5,
A3;
consider f be
continuous
Function of X,
I[01] such that
A8: for b be
Point of
Sorgenfrey-line holds (b
in
[.a, q.[ implies (f
. b)
=
0 ) & ( not b
in
[.a, q.[ implies (f
. b)
= 1) by
A7,
Th58;
take f;
thus (f
. x)
=
0 by
A4,
A6,
A8;
thus (f
.: (V
` ))
c=
{1}
proof
let u be
object;
assume u
in (f
.: (V
` ));
then
consider b be
Point of X such that
A9: b
in (V
` ) and
A10: u
= (f
. b) by
FUNCT_2: 65;
not b
in
[.a, q.[ by
A6,
A9,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then u
= 1 by
A8,
A10;
hence thesis by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
Th52,
Th53;
end;
begin
definition
let x be
Real, r be
positive
Real;
::
TOPGEN_5:def5
func
+ (x,r) ->
Function of
Niemytzki-plane ,
I[01] means
:
Def5: (it
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
=
0 & for a be
Real, b be non
negative
Real holds ((a
<> x or b
<>
0 ) & not
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) implies (it
.
|[a, b]|)
= 1) & (
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) implies (it
.
|[a, b]|)
= ((
|.(
|[x,
0 ]|
-
|[a, b]|).|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* b)));
existence
proof
deffunc
F3(
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2)) = ((
|.(
|[x,
0 ]|
- $1).|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* ($1
`2 )));
deffunc
F2(
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2)) = 1;
deffunc
F1(
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2)) =
0 ;
defpred
Q[
set] means not $1
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r));
defpred
P[
set] means $1
=
|[x,
0 ]|;
A1: for a be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st a
in the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane holds (
P[a] implies
F1(a)
in the
carrier of
I[01] ) & ( not
P[a] &
Q[a] implies
F2(a)
in the
carrier of
I[01] ) & ( not
P[a] & not
Q[a] implies
F3(a)
in the
carrier of
I[01] )
proof
let a be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
assume a
in the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane ;
thus
P[a] implies
F1(a)
in the
carrier of
I[01] by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
thus not
P[a] &
Q[a] implies
F2(a)
in the
carrier of
I[01] by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
assume not
P[a];
A2: a
=
|[(a
`1 ), (a
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
assume not
Q[a];
then
|.(a
-
|[x, r]|).|
< r by
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
|.
|[((a
`1 )
- x), ((a
`2 )
- r)]|.|
< r by
A2,
EUCLID: 62;
then
A3: (
|.
|[((a
`1 )
- x), ((a
`2 )
- r)]|.|
^2 )
< (r
^2 ) by
SQUARE_1: 16;
A4: (
|[((a
`1 )
- x), ((a
`2 )
- r)]|
`2 )
= ((a
`2 )
- r) by
EUCLID: 52;
(
|[((a
`1 )
- x), ((a
`2 )
- r)]|
`1 )
= ((a
`1 )
- x) by
EUCLID: 52;
then ((((a
`1 )
- x)
^2 )
+ (((a
`2 )
- r)
^2 ))
< (r
^2 ) by
A4,
A3,
JGRAPH_1: 29;
then (((((a
`1 )
- x)
^2 )
+ (((a
`2 )
^2 )
- ((2
* (a
`2 ))
* r)))
+ (r
^2 ))
< (
0
+ (r
^2 ));
then (((((a
`1 )
- x)
^2 )
+ ((a
`2 )
^2 ))
- ((2
* (a
`2 ))
* r))
<
0 by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A5: ((((a
`1 )
- x)
^2 )
+ (((a
`2 )
-
0 )
^2 ))
< ((2
* r)
* (a
`2 )) by
XREAL_1: 48;
A6: (
|[((a
`1 )
- x), (a
`2 )]|
`2 )
= (a
`2 ) by
EUCLID: 52;
(
|[((a
`1 )
- x), (a
`2 )]|
`1 )
= ((a
`1 )
- x) by
EUCLID: 52;
then
A7: (
|.
|[((a
`1 )
- x), ((a
`2 )
-
0 )]|.|
^2 )
< ((2
* r)
* (a
`2 )) by
A6,
A5,
JGRAPH_1: 29;
then (
|.(a
-
|[x,
0 ]|).|
^2 )
< ((2
* r)
* (a
`2 )) by
A2,
EUCLID: 62;
then (
|.(
|[x,
0 ]|
- a).|
^2 )
< ((2
* r)
* (a
`2 )) by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
then
F3(a)
<= 1 by
XREAL_1: 183;
hence thesis by
A7,
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
end;
the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane
=
y>=0-plane by
Def3;
then
A8: the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane
c= the
carrier of (
TOP-REAL 2);
consider f be
Function of
Niemytzki-plane ,
I[01] such that
A9: for a be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st a
in the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane holds (
P[a] implies (f
. a)
=
F1(a)) & ( not
P[a] &
Q[a] implies (f
. a)
=
F2(a)) & ( not
P[a] & not
Q[a] implies (f
. a)
=
F3(a)) from
SCH2(
A8,
A1);
take f;
A10: the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane
=
y>=0-plane by
Def3;
then
|[x,
0 ]|
in the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane ;
hence (f
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
=
0 by
A9;
let a be
Real, b be non
negative
Real;
A11:
|[a, b]|
in the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane by
A10;
hereby
assume a
<> x or b
<>
0 ;
then not
P[
|[a, b]|] by
SPPOL_2: 1;
hence not
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) implies (f
.
|[a, b]|)
= 1 by
A9,
A11;
end;
assume
A12:
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r));
A13:
|[x,
0 ]|
in
y=0-line ;
A14: (
|[a, b]|
`2 )
= b by
EUCLID: 52;
(
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
misses
y=0-line by
Th21;
then not
P[
|[a, b]|] by
A13,
A12,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
hence thesis by
A14,
A9,
A11,
A12;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let f,g be
Function of
Niemytzki-plane ,
I[01] such that
A15: (f
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
=
0 and
A16: for a be
Real, b be non
negative
Real holds ((a
<> x or b
<>
0 ) & not
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) implies (f
.
|[a, b]|)
= 1) & (
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) implies (f
.
|[a, b]|)
= ((
|.(
|[x,
0 ]|
-
|[a, b]|).|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* b))) and
A17: (g
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
=
0 and
A18: for a be
Real, b be non
negative
Real holds ((a
<> x or b
<>
0 ) & not
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) implies (g
.
|[a, b]|)
= 1) & (
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) implies (g
.
|[a, b]|)
= ((
|.(
|[x,
0 ]|
-
|[a, b]|).|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* b)));
A19: the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane
=
y>=0-plane by
Def3;
now
let p be
Point of
Niemytzki-plane ;
p
in
y>=0-plane by
A19;
then
reconsider q = p as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
A20: p
=
|[(q
`1 ), (q
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then
reconsider q2 = (q
`2 ) as non
negative
Real by
A19,
Th18;
per cases by
EUCLID: 53;
suppose (q
`1 )
= x & q2
=
0 ;
hence (f
. p)
= (g
. p) by
A15,
A17,
A20;
end;
suppose
A21: ((q
`1 )
<> x or q2
<>
0 ) & not
|[(q
`1 ), q2]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r));
then (f
. p)
= 1 by
A16,
A20;
hence (f
. p)
= (g
. p) by
A18,
A20,
A21;
end;
suppose
A22: p
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r));
then (f
. p)
= ((
|.(
|[x,
0 ]|
- q).|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* q2)) by
A16,
A20;
hence (f
. p)
= (g
. p) by
A18,
A20,
A22;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:60
Th60: for p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st (p
`2 )
>=
0 holds for x be
Real, r be
positive
Real st ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
=
0 holds p
=
|[x,
0 ]|
proof
let p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
assume
A1: (p
`2 )
>=
0 ;
set p1 = (p
`1 ), p2 = (p
`2 );
let x be
Real;
let r be
positive
Real;
assume
A2: ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
=
0 ;
A3: p
=
|[p1, p2]| by
EUCLID: 53;
assume
A4: p
<>
|[x,
0 ]|;
then p1
<> x or p2
<>
0 by
EUCLID: 53;
then
A5:
|[p1, p2]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
Def5;
(
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
misses
y=0-line by
Th21;
then not
|[p1, p2]|
in
y=0-line by
A5,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
then p2
<>
0 ;
then
reconsider p2 as
positive
Real by
A1;
(
0
/ ((2
* r)
* p2))
= ((
|.(
|[x,
0 ]|
-
|[p1, p2]|).|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)) by
A2,
A3,
A5,
Def5;
then
0
=
|.(
|[x,
0 ]|
- p).| by
A3;
hence contradiction by
A4,
TOPRNS_1: 28;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:61
Th61: for x,y be
Real, r be
positive
Real st x
<> y holds ((
+ (x,r))
.
|[y,
0 ]|)
= 1
proof
let x,y be
Real;
let r be
positive
Real;
A1:
|.(x
- y).|
= (x
- y) or
|.(x
- y).|
= (
- (x
- y)) by
ABSVALUE: 1;
A2: (
|[(x
- y), r]|
`2 )
= r by
EUCLID: 52;
(
|[(x
- y), r]|
`1 )
= (x
- y) by
EUCLID: 52;
then
A3: (
|.
|[(x
- y), r]|.|
^2 )
= ((r
^2 )
+ ((x
- y)
^2 )) by
A2,
JGRAPH_1: 29;
assume
A4: x
<> y;
then (x
- y)
<>
0 ;
then
A5:
|.(x
- y).|
>
0 by
COMPLEX1: 47;
then (
|.(x
- y).|
^2 )
<>
0 ;
then (
|.
|[(x
- y), r]|.|
^2 )
> (r
^2 ) by
A1,
A5,
A3,
XREAL_1: 29;
then
|.
|[(x
- y), (r
-
0 )]|.|
> r by
SQUARE_1: 15;
then
|.(
|[x, r]|
-
|[y,
0 ]|).|
> r by
EUCLID: 62;
then
|.(
|[y,
0 ]|
-
|[x, r]|).|
> r by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
then not
|[y,
0 ]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) by
TOPREAL9: 7;
hence thesis by
A4,
Def5;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:62
Th62: for p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) holds for x be
Real, a,r be
positive
Real st a
<= 1 &
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
= (r
* a) & (p
`2 )
<>
0 holds ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
= a
proof
let p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
set p1 = (p
`1 ), p2 = (p
`2 );
let x be
Real;
let a,r be
positive
Real;
assume
A1: a
<= 1;
A2: (
|[(p1
- x), (p2
- (r
* a))]|
`1 )
= (p1
- x) by
EUCLID: 52;
A3: (
|[(p1
- x), (p2
- (r
* a))]|
`2 )
= (p2
- (r
* a)) by
EUCLID: 52;
assume that
A4:
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
= (r
* a) and
A5: (p
`2 )
<>
0 ;
A6: p
=
|[(p
`1 ), (p
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then (
|.
|[(p1
- x), (p2
- (r
* a))]|.|
^2 )
= ((r
* a)
^2 ) by
A4,
EUCLID: 62;
then
A7: (((p1
- x)
^2 )
+ ((p2
- (r
* a))
^2 ))
= ((r
* a)
^2 ) by
A2,
A3,
JGRAPH_1: 29;
then
A8: (((p1
- x)
^2 )
+ (p2
^2 ))
= (((2
* p2)
* r)
* a);
((p1
- x)
^2 )
>=
0 by
XREAL_1: 63;
then
reconsider p2 as
positive
Real by
A5,
A8;
A9: (
|[(p1
- x), (p2
-
0 )]|
`1 )
= (p1
- x) by
EUCLID: 52;
A10: (
|[(p1
- x), p2]|
`2 )
= p2 by
EUCLID: 52;
per cases by
A1,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose a
< 1;
then (r
* a)
< r by
XREAL_1: 157;
then
reconsider s = (r
- (r
* a)) as
positive
Real by
XREAL_1: 50;
(
|.(p
-
|[x, r]|).|
^2 )
= (
|.
|[(p1
- x), (p2
- r)]|.|
^2 ) by
A6,
EUCLID: 62
.= (((p1
- x)
^2 )
+ ((p2
- r)
^2 )) by
Th9
.= ((((p1
- x)
^2 )
+ ((p2
- (a
* r))
^2 ))
+ (((r
- (a
* r))
^2 )
+ ((2
* (r
- (a
* r)))
* ((a
* r)
- p2))))
.= ((
|.
|[(p1
- x), (p2
- (a
* r))]|.|
^2 )
+ (((r
- (a
* r))
^2 )
+ ((2
* (r
- (a
* r)))
* ((a
* r)
- p2)))) by
Th9
.= (((a
* r)
^2 )
+ (((((r
* r)
- (r
* p2))
+ ((r
* a)
* r))
- (r
* p2))
- (((((a
* r)
* r)
- ((a
* r)
* p2))
+ ((a
* r)
^2 ))
- ((a
* r)
* p2)))) by
A6,
A4,
EUCLID: 62
.= ((r
^2 )
- (((1
+ 1)
* p2)
* s));
then (
|.(p
-
|[x, r]|).|
^2 )
< (r
^2 ) by
XREAL_1: 44;
then
|.(p
-
|[x, r]|).|
< r by
SQUARE_1: 15;
then p
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) by
TOPREAL9: 7;
then ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
= ((
|.(
|[x,
0 ]|
- p).|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)) by
A6,
Def5
.= ((
|.(p
-
|[x,
0 ]|).|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)) by
TOPRNS_1: 27
.= ((
|.
|[(p1
- x), (p2
-
0 )]|.|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)) by
A6,
EUCLID: 62
.= ((((p1
- x)
^2 )
+ (p2
^2 ))
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)) by
A9,
A10,
JGRAPH_1: 29;
then
A11: ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
= ((((2
* p2)
* r)
* a)
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)) by
A7;
(a
* (((2
* p2)
* r)
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)))
= (a
* 1) by
XCMPLX_1: 60;
hence thesis by
A11,
XCMPLX_1: 74;
end;
suppose
A12: a
= 1;
A13: p2 is non
negative;
not p
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) by
A12,
A4,
TOPREAL9: 7;
hence thesis by
A13,
A6,
A12,
Def5;
end;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:63
Th63: for p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) holds for x,a be
Real, r be
positive
Real st a
<= 1 &
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
< (r
* a) holds ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
< a
proof
let p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
set p1 = (p
`1 ), p2 = (p
`2 );
let x,a be
Real;
let r be
positive
Real;
assume that
A1: a
<= 1;
A2: (
|[(p1
- x), (p2
- (r
* a))]|
`2 )
= (p2
- (r
* a)) by
EUCLID: 52;
A3: p
=
|[(p
`1 ), (p
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then
A4: p2
=
0 implies p
in
y=0-line ;
set r1 = (r
* a), r2 = (r
* 1);
A5: (
|[(p1
- x), (p2
- (r
* a))]|
`1 )
= (p1
- x) by
EUCLID: 52;
assume
A6:
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
< (r
* a);
then
reconsider r1 as
positive
Real;
A7: p
in (
Ball (
|[x, r1]|,r1)) by
A6,
TOPREAL9: 7;
(
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
^2 )
< ((r
* a)
^2 ) by
A6,
SQUARE_1: 16;
then (
|.
|[(p1
- x), (p2
- (r
* a))]|.|
^2 )
< ((r
* a)
^2 ) by
A3,
EUCLID: 62;
then (((p1
- x)
^2 )
+ ((p2
- (r
* a))
^2 ))
< ((r
* a)
^2 ) by
A5,
A2,
JGRAPH_1: 29;
then (((((p1
- x)
^2 )
+ (p2
^2 ))
- ((2
* p2)
* (r
* a)))
+ ((r
* a)
^2 ))
< ((r
* a)
^2 );
then ((((p1
- x)
^2 )
+ (p2
^2 ))
- (((2
* p2)
* r)
* a))
<
0 by
XREAL_1: 31;
then
A8: (((p1
- x)
^2 )
+ (p2
^2 ))
< (((2
* p2)
* r)
* a) by
XREAL_1: 48;
A9: (
Ball (
|[x, r1]|,r1))
misses
y=0-line by
Th21;
(
Ball (
|[x, r1]|,r1))
c=
y>=0-plane by
Th20;
then
reconsider p2 as
positive
Real by
A3,
A7,
Th18,
A9,
A4,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
A10: (
|[(p1
- x), (p2
-
0 )]|
`1 )
= (p1
- x) by
EUCLID: 52;
A11: (
|[(p1
- x), p2]|
`2 )
= p2 by
EUCLID: 52;
(
Ball (
|[x, r1]|,r1))
c= (
Ball (
|[x, r2]|,r2)) by
A1,
Th23,
XREAL_1: 64;
then ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
= ((
|.(
|[x,
0 ]|
- p).|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)) by
A3,
A7,
Def5
.= ((
|.(p
-
|[x,
0 ]|).|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)) by
TOPRNS_1: 27
.= ((
|.
|[(p1
- x), (p2
-
0 )]|.|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)) by
A3,
EUCLID: 62
.= ((((p1
- x)
^2 )
+ (p2
^2 ))
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)) by
A10,
A11,
JGRAPH_1: 29;
then
A12: ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
< ((((2
* p2)
* r)
* a)
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)) by
A8,
XREAL_1: 74;
(a
* (((2
* p2)
* r)
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)))
= (a
* 1) by
XCMPLX_1: 60;
hence thesis by
A12,
XCMPLX_1: 74;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:64
Th64: for p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st (p
`2 )
>=
0 holds for x,a be
Real, r be
positive
Real st
0
<= a & a
< 1 &
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
> (r
* a) holds ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
> a
proof
let p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) such that
A1: (p
`2 )
>=
0 ;
set p1 = (p
`1 ), p2 = (p
`2 );
reconsider p2 as non
negative
Real by
A1;
let x,a be
Real;
let r be
positive
Real;
assume that
A2:
0
<= a and
A3: a
< 1;
reconsider a9 = a as non
negative
Real by
A2;
reconsider ra = (r
* a) as
Real;
assume
A4:
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
> (r
* a);
|.(
|[x,
0 ]|
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
=
|.(
|[x, (r
* a)]|
-
|[x,
0 ]|).| by
TOPRNS_1: 27
.=
|.
|[(x
- x), (ra
-
0 )]|.| by
EUCLID: 62
.=
|.ra.| by
TOPREAL6: 23
.= (r
* a9) by
ABSVALUE:def 1;
then
A5: p1
<> x or p2
<>
0 by
A4,
EUCLID: 53;
A6: p
=
|[(p
`1 ), (p
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then
reconsider z = p as
Element of
Niemytzki-plane by
A1,
Lm1,
Th18;
A7: ((
+ (x,r))
. z)
in the
carrier of
I[01] ;
per cases by
A2;
suppose
A8: a
=
0 ;
then p
<>
|[x, (r
*
0 )]| by
A4,
TOPRNS_1: 28;
then ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
<>
0 by
A1,
Th60;
hence thesis by
A7,
A8,
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
end;
suppose ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
= 1;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
suppose
A9: a
>
0 & ((
+ (x,r))
. z)
<> 1;
A10: (
|[(p1
- x), (p2
-
0 )]|
`1 )
= (p1
- x) by
EUCLID: 52;
A11: (
|[(p1
- x), p2]|
`2 )
= p2 by
EUCLID: 52;
p2 is non
negative;
then
A12: p
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) by
A6,
A5,
A9,
Def5;
then
A13: ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
= ((
|.(
|[x,
0 ]|
- p).|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)) by
A6,
Def5
.= ((
|.(p
-
|[x,
0 ]|).|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)) by
TOPRNS_1: 27
.= ((
|.
|[(p1
- x), (p2
-
0 )]|.|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)) by
A6,
EUCLID: 62
.= ((((p1
- x)
^2 )
+ (p2
^2 ))
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)) by
A10,
A11,
JGRAPH_1: 29;
(
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
^2 )
> ((r
* a)
^2 ) by
A2,
A4,
SQUARE_1: 16;
then
A14: (
|.
|[(p1
- x), (p2
- (r
* a))]|.|
^2 )
> ((r
* a)
^2 ) by
A6,
EUCLID: 62;
A15: (
|[(p1
- x), (p2
- (r
* a))]|
`2 )
= (p2
- (r
* a)) by
EUCLID: 52;
(
|[(p1
- x), (p2
- (r
* a))]|
`1 )
= (p1
- x) by
EUCLID: 52;
then (((p1
- x)
^2 )
+ ((p2
- (r
* a))
^2 ))
> ((r
* a)
^2 ) by
A14,
A15,
JGRAPH_1: 29;
then (((((p1
- x)
^2 )
+ (p2
^2 ))
- ((2
* p2)
* (r
* a)))
+ ((r
* a)
^2 ))
> ((r
* a)
^2 );
then ((((p1
- x)
^2 )
+ (p2
^2 ))
- (((2
* p2)
* r)
* a))
>
0 by
XREAL_1: 32;
then
A16: (((p1
- x)
^2 )
+ (p2
^2 ))
> (((2
* p2)
* r)
* a) by
XREAL_1: 47;
A17: p2
=
0 implies p
in
y=0-line by
A6;
(
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
misses
y=0-line by
Th21;
then
reconsider p2 as
positive
Real by
A12,
A17,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
A18: (a
* (((2
* p2)
* r)
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)))
= (a
* 1) by
XCMPLX_1: 60;
((
+ (x,r))
. p)
> ((((2
* p2)
* r)
* a)
/ ((2
* r)
* p2)) by
A13,
A16,
XREAL_1: 74;
hence thesis by
A18,
XCMPLX_1: 74;
end;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:65
Th65: for p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st (p
`2 )
>=
0 holds for x,a,b be
Real, r be
positive
Real st
0
<= a & b
<= 1 & ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
in
].a, b.[ holds ex r1 be
positive
Real st r1
<= (p
`2 ) & (
Ball (p,r1))
c= ((
+ (x,r))
"
].a, b.[)
proof
let p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) such that
A1: (p
`2 )
>=
0 ;
let x,a,b be
Real, r be
positive
Real;
A2: p
=
|[(p
`1 ), (p
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
A3: (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
misses
y=0-line by
Th21;
A4: (
|[((p
`1 )
- x), (p
`2 )]|
`1 )
= ((p
`1 )
- x) by
EUCLID: 52;
assume that
A5:
0
<= a and
A6: b
<= 1 and
A7: ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
in
].a, b.[;
A8: ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
> a by
A7,
XXREAL_1: 4;
A9: ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
< b by
A7,
XXREAL_1: 4;
then
A10: p
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) or (p
`1 )
= x & (p
`2 )
=
0 & p
<>
|[x,
0 ]| by
A8,
A1,
A2,
A5,
A6,
Def5;
then
A11: ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
= ((
|.(
|[x,
0 ]|
- p).|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* (p
`2 ))) by
A1,
A2,
Def5;
(p
`2 )
=
0 implies p
in
y=0-line by
A2;
then
reconsider p2 = (p
`2 ), b9 = b as
positive
Real by
A3,
A1,
A5,
A8,
A7,
A10,
EUCLID: 53,
XBOOLE_0: 3,
XXREAL_1: 4;
A12: (
|[((p
`1 )
- x), p2]|
`2 )
= p2 by
EUCLID: 52;
A13: ((2
* r)
* p2)
>
0 ;
then (
|.(
|[x,
0 ]|
- p).|
^2 )
> (((2
* r)
* (p
`2 ))
* a) by
A11,
A8,
XREAL_1: 79;
then (
|.(p
-
|[x,
0 ]|).|
^2 )
> (((2
* r)
* (p
`2 ))
* a) by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
then (
|.
|[((p
`1 )
- x), ((p
`2 )
-
0 )]|.|
^2 )
> (((2
* r)
* (p
`2 ))
* a) by
A2,
EUCLID: 62;
then ((((p
`1 )
- x)
^2 )
+ (p2
^2 ))
> (((2
* r)
* p2)
* a) by
A4,
A12,
JGRAPH_1: 29;
then (((((p
`1 )
- x)
^2 )
+ (p2
^2 ))
- (((2
* r)
* p2)
* a))
>
0 by
XREAL_1: 50;
then ((((((p
`1 )
- x)
^2 )
+ (p2
^2 ))
- (((2
* r)
* p2)
* a))
+ ((r
* a)
^2 ))
> ((r
* a)
^2 ) by
XREAL_1: 29;
then
A14: ((((p
`1 )
- x)
^2 )
+ ((p2
- (r
* a))
^2 ))
> ((r
* a)
^2 );
(
|.(
|[x,
0 ]|
- p).|
^2 )
< (((2
* r)
* (p
`2 ))
* b) by
A13,
A11,
A9,
XREAL_1: 77;
then (
|.(p
-
|[x,
0 ]|).|
^2 )
< (((2
* r)
* (p
`2 ))
* b) by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
then (
|.
|[((p
`1 )
- x), ((p
`2 )
-
0 )]|.|
^2 )
< (((2
* r)
* (p
`2 ))
* b) by
A2,
EUCLID: 62;
then ((((p
`1 )
- x)
^2 )
+ (p2
^2 ))
< (((2
* r)
* p2)
* b) by
A4,
A12,
JGRAPH_1: 29;
then (((((p
`1 )
- x)
^2 )
+ (p2
^2 ))
- (((2
* r)
* p2)
* b))
<
0 by
XREAL_1: 49;
then ((((((p
`1 )
- x)
^2 )
+ (p2
^2 ))
- (((2
* r)
* p2)
* b))
+ ((r
* b)
^2 ))
< ((r
* b)
^2 ) by
XREAL_1: 30;
then
A15: ((((p
`1 )
- x)
^2 )
+ ((p2
- (r
* b))
^2 ))
< ((r
* b)
^2 );
A16: (
|[((p
`1 )
- x), (p2
- (r
* b))]|
`2 )
= (p2
- (r
* b)) by
EUCLID: 52;
A17: (
|[((p
`1 )
- x), (p2
- (r
* a))]|
`2 )
= (p2
- (r
* a)) by
EUCLID: 52;
(
|[((p
`1 )
- x), (p2
- (r
* a))]|
`1 )
= ((p
`1 )
- x) by
EUCLID: 52;
then (
|.
|[((p
`1 )
- x), (p2
- (r
* a))]|.|
^2 )
> ((r
* a)
^2 ) by
A14,
A17,
JGRAPH_1: 29;
then (
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
^2 )
> ((r
* a)
^2 ) by
A2,
EUCLID: 62;
then
A18:
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
> (r
* a) by
SQUARE_1: 48;
A19: (((r
* b)
-
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* b)]|).|)
+
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* b)]|).|)
= (r
* b);
set r1 = (
min (((r
* b)
-
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* b)]|).|),(
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
- (r
* a))));
A20:
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* b)]|).|
=
|.(
|[x, (r
* b)]|
- p).| by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
(
|[((p
`1 )
- x), (p2
- (r
* b))]|
`1 )
= ((p
`1 )
- x) by
EUCLID: 52;
then (
|.
|[((p
`1 )
- x), (p2
- (r
* b))]|.|
^2 )
< ((r
* b)
^2 ) by
A15,
A16,
JGRAPH_1: 29;
then
A21: (
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* b)]|).|
^2 )
< ((r
* b)
^2 ) by
A2,
EUCLID: 62;
(r
* b9)
>=
0 ;
then
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* b)]|).|
< (r
* b) by
A21,
SQUARE_1: 48;
then ((r
* b)
-
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* b)]|).|)
>
0 & r1
= ((r
* b)
-
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* b)]|).|) or (
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
- (r
* a))
>
0 & r1
= (
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
- (r
* a)) by
A18,
XREAL_1: 50,
XXREAL_0: 15;
then
reconsider r1 as
positive
Real;
take r1;
r1
<= ((r
* b)
-
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* b)]|).|) by
XXREAL_0: 17;
then
A22: (
|.(
|[x, (r
* b)]|
- p).|
+ r1)
<= (r
* b) by
A20,
A19,
XREAL_1: 6;
|.(p
-
|[(p
`1 ),
0 ]|).|
=
|.
|[((p
`1 )
- (p
`1 )), (p2
-
0 )]|.| by
A2,
EUCLID: 62
.=
|.p2.| by
TOPREAL6: 23
.= p2 by
ABSVALUE:def 1;
then
A23:
|.(
|[x, (r
* b)]|
-
|[(p
`1 ),
0 ]|).|
<= (
|.(
|[x, (r
* b)]|
- p).|
+ p2) by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
now
assume r1
> (p
`2 );
then (
|.(
|[x, (r
* b)]|
- p).|
+ p2)
< (
|.(
|[x, (r
* b)]|
- p).|
+ r1) by
XREAL_1: 8;
then
|.(
|[x, (r
* b)]|
-
|[(p
`1 ),
0 ]|).|
< (
|.(
|[x, (r
* b)]|
- p).|
+ r1) by
A23,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
|.(
|[x, (r
* b)]|
-
|[(p
`1 ),
0 ]|).|
< (r
* b) by
A22,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
|.(
|[(p
`1 ),
0 ]|
-
|[x, (r
* b)]|).|
< (r
* b) by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
then
A24:
|[(p
`1 ),
0 ]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, (r
* b)]|,(r
* b))) by
TOPREAL9: 7;
|[(p
`1 ),
0 ]|
in
y=0-line ;
then (
Ball (
|[x, (r
* b)]|,(r
* b9)))
meets
y=0-line by
A24,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
hence contradiction by
Th21;
end;
then
A25: (
Ball (p,r1))
c=
y>=0-plane by
A2,
Th20;
let u be
object;
assume
A26: u
in (
Ball (p,r1));
then
reconsider q = u as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
A27:
|.(q
- p).|
< r1 by
A26,
TOPREAL9: 7;
then (
|.(q
- p).|
+
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* b)]|).|)
< (r1
+
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* b)]|).|) by
XREAL_1: 8;
then
A28: (
|.(q
- p).|
+
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* b)]|).|)
< (r
* b) by
A20,
A22,
XXREAL_0: 2;
|.(q
-
|[x, (r
* b)]|).|
<= (
|.(q
- p).|
+
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* b)]|).|) by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
then
|.(q
-
|[x, (r
* b)]|).|
< (r
* b) by
A28,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A29: ((
+ (x,r))
. q)
< b by
A6,
Th63;
A30:
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
<= (
|.(p
- q).|
+
|.(q
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|) by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
a
< b by
A8,
A9,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A31: a
< 1 by
A6,
XXREAL_0: 2;
(
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
- (r
* a))
>= r1 by
XXREAL_0: 17;
then (
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
- (r
* a))
>
|.(q
- p).| by
A27,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A32: (
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
-
|.(q
- p).|)
> (r
* a) by
XREAL_1: 12;
|.(p
- q).|
=
|.(q
- p).| by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
then
|.(q
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
>= (
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
-
|.(q
- p).|) by
A30,
XREAL_1: 20;
then
A33:
|.(q
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
> (r
* a) by
A32,
XXREAL_0: 2;
q
=
|[(q
`1 ), (q
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then (q
`2 )
>=
0 by
A25,
A26,
Th18;
then ((
+ (x,r))
. q)
> a by
A33,
A5,
A31,
Th64;
then ((
+ (x,r))
. q)
in
].a, b.[ by
A29,
XXREAL_1: 4;
hence thesis by
A25,
A26,
Lm1,
FUNCT_2: 38;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:66
Th66: for x be
Real, a,r be
positive
Real holds (
Ball (
|[x, (r
* a)]|,(r
* a)))
c= ((
+ (x,r))
"
].
0 , a.[)
proof
let x be
Real;
let a,r be
positive
Real, u be
object;
assume
A1: u
in (
Ball (
|[x, (r
* a)]|,(r
* a)));
then
reconsider p = u as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
(
Ball (
|[x, (r
* a)]|,(r
* a)))
c=
y>=0-plane by
Th20;
then
reconsider q = p as
Point of
Niemytzki-plane by
A1,
Def3;
q
=
|[(p
`1 ), (p
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then
A2: (p
`2 )
>=
0 by
Lm1,
Th18;
A3:
now
assume ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
=
0 ;
then p
=
|[x,
0 ]| by
A2,
Th60;
then
A4: p
in
y=0-line ;
(
Ball (
|[x, (r
* a)]|,(r
* a)))
misses
y=0-line by
Th21;
hence contradiction by
A4,
A1,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
end;
A5: ((
+ (x,r))
. q)
<= 1 by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
per cases ;
suppose
A6: a
> 1;
A7: ((
+ (x,r))
. q)
>
0 by
A3,
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
((
+ (x,r))
. q)
< a by
A6,
A5,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then ((
+ (x,r))
. q)
in
].
0 , a.[ by
A7,
XXREAL_1: 4;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 38;
end;
suppose
A8: a
<= 1;
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
< (r
* a) by
A1,
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
A9: ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
< a by
A8,
Th63;
((
+ (x,r))
. q)
>
0 by
A3,
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
then ((
+ (x,r))
. q)
in
].
0 , a.[ by
A9,
XXREAL_1: 4;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 38;
end;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:67
Th67: for x be
Real, a,r be
positive
Real holds ((
Ball (
|[x, (r
* a)]|,(r
* a)))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|})
c= ((
+ (x,r))
"
[.
0 , a.[)
proof
let x be
Real;
let a,r be
positive
Real, u be
object;
assume
A1: u
in ((
Ball (
|[x, (r
* a)]|,(r
* a)))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|});
then
A2: u
in (
Ball (
|[x, (r
* a)]|,(r
* a))) or u
in
{
|[x,
0 ]|} by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
reconsider p = u as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
A1;
A3:
|[x,
0 ]|
in
y>=0-plane ;
(
Ball (
|[x, (r
* a)]|,(r
* a)))
c=
y>=0-plane by
Th20;
then
reconsider q = p as
Point of
Niemytzki-plane by
A3,
A2,
Lm1,
TARSKI:def 1;
A4: ((
+ (x,r))
. q)
<= 1 by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
A5: ((
+ (x,r))
. q)
>=
0 by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
per cases by
A2,
TARSKI:def 1;
suppose a
> 1;
then ((
+ (x,r))
. q)
< a by
A4,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then ((
+ (x,r))
. q)
in
[.
0 , a.[ by
A5,
XXREAL_1: 3;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 38;
end;
suppose
A6: a
<= 1 & u
in (
Ball (
|[x, (r
* a)]|,(r
* a)));
then
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
< (r
* a) by
TOPREAL9: 7;
then ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
< a by
A6,
Th63;
then ((
+ (x,r))
. q)
in
[.
0 , a.[ by
A5,
XXREAL_1: 3;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 38;
end;
suppose u
=
|[x,
0 ]|;
then ((
+ (x,r))
. u)
=
0 by
Def5;
then ((
+ (x,r))
. q)
in
[.
0 , a.[ by
XXREAL_1: 3;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 38;
end;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:68
Th68: for p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st (p
`2 )
>=
0 holds for x,a be
Real, r be
positive
Real st
0
< ((
+ (x,r))
. p) & ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
< a & a
<= 1 holds p
in (
Ball (
|[x, (r
* a)]|,(r
* a)))
proof
let p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
assume
A1: (p
`2 )
>=
0 ;
let x,a be
Real;
A2: p
=
|[(p
`1 ), (p
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
let r be
positive
Real;
set r1 = (r
* a);
assume that
A3:
0
< ((
+ (x,r))
. p) and
A4: ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
< a and
A5: a
<= 1;
A6: x
<> (p
`1 ) implies p
<>
|[(p
`1 ),
0 ]| by
A4,
A5,
Th61;
A7: p
<>
|[x,
0 ]| by
A3,
Def5;
assume not p
in (
Ball (
|[x, r1]|,r1));
then
|.(p
-
|[x, r1]|).|
>= r1 by
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
|.(p
-
|[x, r1]|).|
= r1 or
|.(p
-
|[x, r1]|).|
> r1 & (a
< 1 or a
= 1) by
A5,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
= a or a
< 1 & ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
> a or a
= 1 & not p
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
A5,
A7,
A6,
Th62,
Th64,
TOPREAL9: 7;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A4,
A7,
A6,
Def5;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:69
Th69: for p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st (p
`2 )
>
0 holds for x,a be
Real, r be
positive
Real st
0
<= a & a
< ((
+ (x,r))
. p) holds ex r1 be
positive
Real st r1
<= (p
`2 ) & (
Ball (p,r1))
c= ((
+ (x,r))
"
].a, 1.])
proof
let p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
assume
A1: (p
`2 )
>
0 ;
let x,a be
Real;
let r be
positive
Real;
set f = (
+ (x,r));
assume that
A2:
0
<= a and
A3: a
< (f
. p);
A4: p
=
|[(p
`1 ), (p
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then p
in the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane by
A1,
Lm1;
then (f
. p)
in the
carrier of
I[01] by
FUNCT_2: 5;
then (f
. p)
<= 1 by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
then
A5: a
< 1 by
A3,
XXREAL_0: 2;
per cases by
A2;
suppose
A6: a
=
0 ;
reconsider r1 = (p
`2 ) as
positive
Real by
A1;
reconsider A = (
Ball (p,r1)) as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
A4,
Lm1,
Th20;
take r1;
thus r1
<= (p
`2 );
let u be
object;
assume
A7: u
in (
Ball (p,r1));
then
reconsider q = u as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
A8: q
=
|[(q
`1 ), (q
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
q
in A by
A7;
then
A9: (q
`2 )
>=
0 by
A8,
Lm1,
Th18;
q
in A by
A7;
then
reconsider z = q as
Element of
Niemytzki-plane ;
A10: (f
. z)
>=
0 by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
y=0-line
misses (
Ball (p,r1)) by
A4,
Th21;
then not q
in
y=0-line by
A7,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
then
A11: (q
`2 )
<>
0 by
A8;
A12: (f
. z)
<= 1 by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
(
|[x,
0 ]|
`2 )
=
0 by
EUCLID: 52;
then (f
. q)
<>
0 by
A11,
A9,
Th60;
then (f
. z)
in
].a, 1.] by
A10,
A12,
A6,
XXREAL_1: 2;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 38;
end;
suppose a
>
0 ;
then
reconsider b = a as
positive
Real;
set r1 = (
min ((
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
- (r
* a)),(p
`2 )));
A13: r1
= (
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
- (r
* a)) or r1
= (p
`2 ) by
XXREAL_0:def 9;
A14: b
<> (f
. p) by
A3;
not
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
< (r
* a) by
A3,
A5,
Th63;
then
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
> (r
* a) by
A14,
A1,
A5,
Th62,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
reconsider r1 as
positive
Real by
A13,
A1,
XREAL_1: 50;
take r1;
thus r1
<= (p
`2 ) by
XXREAL_0: 17;
then
reconsider A = (
Ball (p,r1)) as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
A4,
Lm1,
Th20;
let u be
object;
assume
A15: u
in (
Ball (p,r1));
then
reconsider q = u as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
u
in A by
A15;
then
reconsider z = q as
Point of
Niemytzki-plane ;
A16: q
=
|[(q
`1 ), (q
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
q
in A by
A15;
then
A17: (q
`2 )
>=
0 by
A16,
Lm1,
Th18;
A18:
now
(
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
- (r
* a))
>= r1 by
XXREAL_0: 17;
then
A19: ((r
* a)
+ r1)
<= ((
|.(p
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
- (r
* a))
+ (r
* a)) by
XREAL_1: 6;
assume not (f
. z)
> a;
then
|.(q
-
|[x, (r
* a)]|).|
<= (r
* a) by
A2,
A5,
A17,
Th64;
then
A20:
|.(
|[x, (r
* a)]|
- q).|
<= (r
* a) by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
A21: (
|.(
|[x, (r
* a)]|
- q).|
+
|.(q
- p).|)
>=
|.(
|[x, (r
* a)]|
- p).| by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
|.(q
- p).|
< r1 by
A15,
TOPREAL9: 7;
then (
|.(
|[x, (r
* a)]|
- q).|
+
|.(q
- p).|)
< ((r
* a)
+ r1) by
A20,
XREAL_1: 8;
then
|.(
|[x, (r
* a)]|
- p).|
< ((r
* a)
+ r1) by
A21,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence contradiction by
A19,
TOPRNS_1: 27;
end;
(f
. z)
<= 1 by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
then (f
. z)
in
].a, 1.] by
A18,
XXREAL_1: 2;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 38;
end;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:70
Th70: for p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st (p
`2 )
=
0 holds for x be
Real, r be
positive
Real st ((
+ (x,r))
. p)
= 1 holds ex r1 be
positive
Real st ((
Ball (
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|,r1))
\/
{p})
c= ((
+ (x,r))
"
{1})
proof
let p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
assume
A1: (p
`2 )
=
0 ;
let x be
Real;
let r be
positive
Real;
set r1 = ((
|.(p
-
|[x, r]|).|
- r)
/ 2);
set f = (
+ (x,r));
A2: p
=
|[(p
`1 ), (p
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
assume
A3: (f
. p)
= 1;
then ((p
`1 )
- x)
<>
0 by
A2,
A1,
Def5;
then (((p
`1 )
- x)
^2 )
>
0 by
SQUARE_1: 12;
then ((((p
`1 )
- x)
^2 )
+ ((
0
- r)
^2 ))
> (
0
+ ((
0
- r)
^2 )) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
|.
|[((p
`1 )
- x), ((p
`2 )
- r)]|.|
^2 )
> (r
^2 ) by
A1,
Th9;
then (
|.(p
-
|[x, r]|).|
^2 )
> (r
^2 ) by
A2,
EUCLID: 62;
then
|.(p
-
|[x, r]|).|
> r by
SQUARE_1: 15;
then (
|.(p
-
|[x, r]|).|
- r)
>
0 by
XREAL_1: 50;
then
reconsider r1 as
positive
Real;
take r1;
let u be
object;
assume
A4: u
in ((
Ball (
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|,r1))
\/
{p});
then
reconsider q = u as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
A5: (
Ball (
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|,r1))
c=
y>=0-plane by
Th20;
u
in (
Ball (
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|,r1)) or u
= p by
A4,
ZFMISC_1: 136;
then
reconsider z = q as
Point of
Niemytzki-plane by
A5,
A1,
A2,
Lm1,
Th18;
A6: q
=
|[(q
`1 ), (q
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
A7:
now
assume
A8: q
in (
Ball (
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|,r1));
then
|.(q
-
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|).|
< r1 by
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
A9: (
|.(q
-
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|).|
+
|.(
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|
- p).|)
< (r1
+
|.(
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|
- p).|) by
XREAL_1: 6;
A10:
|.r1.|
= r1 by
ABSVALUE:def 1;
A11: (
|.(q
-
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|).|
+
|.(
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|
- p).|)
>=
|.(q
- p).| by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
A12: (
|.(q
- p).|
+
|.(
|[x, r]|
- q).|)
>=
|.(
|[x, r]|
- p).| by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
A13:
|.
|[
0 , r1]|.|
=
|.r1.| by
TOPREAL6: 23;
(
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|
- p)
=
|[((p
`1 )
- (p
`1 )), (r1
-
0 )]| by
A1,
A2,
EUCLID: 62;
then (r1
+ r1)
>
|.(q
- p).| by
A9,
A11,
A10,
A13,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then ((
|.(p
-
|[x, r]|).|
- r)
+
|.(
|[x, r]|
- q).|)
> (
|.(q
- p).|
+
|.(
|[x, r]|
- q).|) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
|.(
|[x, r]|
- p).|
< ((
|.(p
-
|[x, r]|).|
- r)
+
|.(
|[x, r]|
- q).|) by
A12,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A14: (
|.(
|[x, r]|
- p).|
- (
|.(p
-
|[x, r]|).|
- r))
<
|.(
|[x, r]|
- q).| by
XREAL_1: 19;
|.(p
-
|[x, r]|).|
=
|.(
|[x, r]|
- p).| by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
then
|.(q
-
|[x, r]|).|
> r by
A14,
TOPRNS_1: 27;
hence not q
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) by
TOPREAL9: 7;
(q
`2 )
=
0 implies q
in
y=0-line & (
Ball (
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|,r1))
misses
y=0-line by
A6,
Th21;
hence (q
`2 )
<>
0 by
A8,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
end;
z
in
y>=0-plane by
Lm1;
then (q
`2 )
>=
0 by
A6,
Th18;
then (f
. z)
= 1 by
A7,
A3,
A4,
A6,
Def5,
ZFMISC_1: 136;
then (f
. z)
in
{1} by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 38;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:71
Th71: for T be non
empty
TopSpace, S be
SubSpace of T holds for B be
Basis of T holds { (A
/\ (
[#] S)) where A be
Subset of T : A
in B & A
meets (
[#] S) } is
Basis of S
proof
let T be non
empty
TopSpace;
let S be
SubSpace of T;
let B be
Basis of T;
set X = { (A
/\ (
[#] S)) where A be
Subset of T : A
in B & A
meets (
[#] S) };
X
c= (
bool the
carrier of S)
proof
let u be
object;
assume u
in X;
then ex A be
Subset of T st u
= (A
/\ (
[#] S)) & A
in B & A
meets (
[#] S);
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider X as
Subset-Family of S;
A1:
now
let U be
Subset of S;
assume U is
open;
then
consider U0 be
Subset of T such that
A2: U0 is
open and
A3: U
= (U0
/\ the
carrier of S) by
TSP_1:def 1;
let x be
Point of S;
assume
A4: x
in U;
then x
in U0 by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider V0 be
Subset of T such that
A5: V0
in B and
A6: x
in V0 and
A7: V0
c= U0 by
A2,
YELLOW_9: 31;
reconsider V = (V0
/\ (
[#] S)) as
Subset of S;
take V;
V0
meets (
[#] S) by
A4,
A6,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
hence V
in X by
A5;
thus x
in V by
A4,
A6,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
thus V
c= U by
A3,
A7,
XBOOLE_1: 26;
end;
X
c= the
topology of S
proof
let u be
object;
assume u
in X;
then
A8: ex A be
Subset of T st u
= (A
/\ (
[#] S)) & A
in B & A
meets (
[#] S);
B
c= the
topology of T by
TOPS_2: 64;
hence thesis by
A8,
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
YELLOW_9: 32;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:72
Th72: {
].a, b.[ where a,b be
Real : a
< b } is
Basis of
R^1
proof
set X = {
].a, b.[ where a,b be
Real : a
< b };
X
c= (
bool
REAL )
proof
let u be
object;
assume u
in X;
then ex a,b be
Real st u
=
].a, b.[ & a
< b;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider X as
Subset-Family of
R^1 by
TOPMETR: 17;
A1:
now
let U be
Subset of
R^1 such that
A2: U is
open;
let x be
Point of
R^1 such that
A3: x
in U;
reconsider a = x as
Real;
consider r be
Real such that
A4:
0
< r and
A5:
].(a
- r), (a
+ r).[
c= U by
A2,
A3,
FRECHET: 8;
reconsider V =
].(a
- r), (a
+ r).[ as
Subset of
R^1 by
TOPMETR: 17;
take V;
A6: a
< (a
+ r) by
A4,
XREAL_1: 29;
A7: (a
- r)
< a by
A4,
XREAL_1: 44;
then (a
- r)
< (a
+ r) by
A6,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence V
in X;
thus x
in V by
A7,
A6,
XXREAL_1: 4;
thus V
c= U by
A5;
end;
X
c= the
topology of
R^1
proof
let u be
object;
assume u
in X;
then ex a,b be
Real st u
=
].a, b.[ & a
< b;
then u is
open
Subset of
R^1 by
JORDAN6: 35,
TOPMETR: 17;
hence thesis by
PRE_TOPC:def 2;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
YELLOW_9: 32;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:73
Th73: for T be
TopSpace holds for U,V be
Subset of T holds for B be
set st U
in B & V
in B & (B
\/
{(U
\/ V)}) is
Basis of T holds B is
Basis of T
proof
let T be
TopSpace;
let U,V be
Subset of T;
let B be
set;
assume that
A1: U
in B and
A2: V
in B and
A3: (B
\/
{(U
\/ V)}) is
Basis of T;
A4: B
c= (B
\/
{(U
\/ V)}) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then
reconsider B9 = B as
Subset-Family of T by
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
A5:
now
A6: V
c= (U
\/ V) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
A7: U
c= (U
\/ V) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
let A be
Subset of T such that
A8: A is
open;
let p be
Point of T;
assume p
in A;
then
consider A9 be
Subset of T such that
A9: A9
in (B
\/
{(U
\/ V)}) and
A10: p
in A9 and
A11: A9
c= A by
A3,
A8,
YELLOW_9: 31;
assume
A12: not ex a be
Subset of T st a
in B9 & p
in a & a
c= A;
A9
in B or A9
= (U
\/ V) by
A9,
ZFMISC_1: 136;
then p
in U & U
c= A or p
in V & V
c= A by
A10,
A11,
A12,
A7,
A6,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence contradiction by
A1,
A2,
A12;
end;
(B
\/
{(U
\/ V)})
c= the
topology of T by
A3,
TOPS_2: 64;
hence thesis by
A5,
A4,
XBOOLE_1: 1,
YELLOW_9: 32;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:74
Th74: (({
[.
0 , a.[ where a be
Real :
0
< a & a
<= 1 }
\/ {
].a, 1.] where a be
Real :
0
<= a & a
< 1 })
\/ {
].a, b.[ where a,b be
Real :
0
<= a & a
< b & b
<= 1 }) is
Basis of
I[01]
proof
reconsider U =
[.
0 , (2
/ 3).[, V =
].(1
/ 3), 1.] as
Subset of
I[01] by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 35,
XXREAL_1: 36;
reconsider B = {
].a, b.[ where a,b be
Real : a
< b } as
Basis of
R^1 by
Th72;
set S =
I[01] , T =
R^1 ;
set A1 = {
[.
0 , a.[ where a be
Real :
0
< a & a
<= 1 };
set A2 = {
].a, 1.] where a be
Real :
0
<= a & a
< 1 };
set A3 = {
].a, b.[ where a,b be
Real :
0
<= a & a
< b & b
<= 1 };
set B9 = { (A
/\ (
[#] S)) where A be
Subset of T : A
in B & A
meets (
[#] S) };
A1: B9
= (((A1
\/ A2)
\/ A3)
\/
{(
[#] S)})
proof
reconsider aa =
].(
- 1), 2.[ as
Subset of T by
TOPMETR: 17;
thus B9
c= (((A1
\/ A2)
\/ A3)
\/
{(
[#] S)})
proof
let u be
object;
assume u
in B9;
then
consider A be
Subset of T such that
A2: u
= (A
/\ (
[#] S)) and
A3: A
in B and
A4: A
meets (
[#] S);
consider x be
object such that
A5: x
in A and
A6: x
in (
[#] S) by
A4,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
consider a,b be
Real such that
A7: A
=
].a, b.[ and
A8: a
< b by
A3;
reconsider x as
Real by
A5;
A9: a
< x by
A7,
A5,
XXREAL_1: 4;
A10: x
<= 1 by
A6,
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
A11:
0
<= x by
A6,
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
per cases ;
suppose
A12: a
<
0 & b
<= 1;
A13:
0
< b by
A11,
A7,
A5,
XXREAL_1: 4;
u
=
[.
0 , b.[ by
A12,
A2,
A7,
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 148;
then u
in A1 by
A13,
A12;
then u
in (A1
\/ A2) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then u
in ((A1
\/ A2)
\/ (A3
\/
{(
[#] S)})) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence thesis by
XBOOLE_1: 4;
end;
suppose a
<
0 & b
> 1;
then u
= (
[#] S) by
A2,
A7,
BORSUK_1: 40,
XBOOLE_1: 28,
XXREAL_1: 47;
hence thesis by
ZFMISC_1: 136;
end;
suppose
A14: a
>=
0 & b
<= 1;
then u
= A by
A2,
A7,
BORSUK_1: 40,
XBOOLE_1: 28,
XXREAL_1: 37;
then u
in A3 by
A7,
A8,
A14;
then u
in ((A1
\/ A2)
\/ A3) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence thesis by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
suppose
A15: a
>=
0 & b
> 1;
A16: a
< 1 by
A10,
A9,
XXREAL_0: 2;
u
=
].a, 1.] by
A15,
A2,
A7,
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 149;
then u
in A2 by
A16,
A15;
then u
in (A1
\/ A2) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then u
in ((A1
\/ A2)
\/ (A3
\/
{(
[#] S)})) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence thesis by
XBOOLE_1: 4;
end;
end;
let u be
object;
assume u
in (((A1
\/ A2)
\/ A3)
\/
{(
[#] S)});
then u
in ((A1
\/ A2)
\/ A3) or u
in
{(
[#] S)} by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
A17: u
in (A1
\/ A2) or u
in A3 or u
in
{(
[#] S)} by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
per cases by
A17,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose u
in
{(
[#] S)};
then u
= (
[#] S) by
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A18: u
= (aa
/\ (
[#] S)) by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XBOOLE_1: 28,
XXREAL_1: 47;
(
[#] S)
c= aa by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 47;
then
A19: aa
meets (
[#] S) by
XBOOLE_1: 68;
aa
in B;
hence thesis by
A18,
A19;
end;
suppose u
in A1;
then
consider a be
Real such that
A20: u
=
[.
0 , a.[ and
A21:
0
< a and
A22: a
<= 1;
reconsider A =
].(
- 1), a.[ as
Subset of T by
TOPMETR: 17;
A23: A
in B by
A21;
A24:
0
in
[.
0 , 1.] by
XXREAL_1: 1;
0
in A by
A21,
XXREAL_1: 4;
then
A25: A
meets (
[#] S) by
A24,
BORSUK_1: 40,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
u
= (A
/\
[.
0 , 1.]) by
A20,
A22,
XXREAL_1: 148;
hence thesis by
A23,
A25,
BORSUK_1: 40;
end;
suppose u
in A2;
then
consider a be
Real such that
A26: u
=
].a, 1.] and
A27:
0
<= a and
A28: a
< 1;
reconsider A =
].a, 2.[ as
Subset of T by
TOPMETR: 17;
2
> a by
A28,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A29: A
in B;
A30: 1
in
[.
0 , 1.] by
XXREAL_1: 1;
1
in A by
A28,
XXREAL_1: 4;
then
A31: A
meets (
[#] S) by
A30,
BORSUK_1: 40,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
u
= (A
/\
[.
0 , 1.]) by
A26,
A27,
XXREAL_1: 149;
hence thesis by
A29,
A31,
BORSUK_1: 40;
end;
suppose u
in A3;
then
consider a,b be
Real such that
A32: u
=
].a, b.[ and
A33:
0
<= a and
A34: a
< b and
A35: b
<= 1;
reconsider A =
].a, b.[ as
Subset of T by
TOPMETR: 17;
A36: A
c=
[.
0 , 1.] by
A33,
A35,
XXREAL_1: 37;
(a
+ b)
< (b
+ b) by
A34,
XREAL_1: 8;
then
A37: ((a
+ b)
/ 2)
< ((b
+ b)
/ 2) by
XREAL_1: 74;
(a
+ a)
< (a
+ b) by
A34,
XREAL_1: 8;
then ((a
+ a)
/ 2)
< ((a
+ b)
/ 2) by
XREAL_1: 74;
then ((a
+ b)
/ 2)
in A by
A37,
XXREAL_1: 4;
then
A38: A
meets (
[#] S) by
A36,
BORSUK_1: 40,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
A39: A
in B by
A34;
u
= (A
/\
[.
0 , 1.]) by
A33,
A35,
A32,
XBOOLE_1: 28,
XXREAL_1: 37;
hence thesis by
A39,
A38,
BORSUK_1: 40;
end;
end;
U
in A1;
then U
in (A1
\/ A2) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
A40: U
in ((A1
\/ A2)
\/ A3) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
V
in A2;
then V
in (A1
\/ A2) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
A41: V
in ((A1
\/ A2)
\/ A3) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
(U
\/ V)
= (
[#] S) by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 175;
hence thesis by
A1,
A40,
A41,
Th71,
Th73;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:75
Th75: for T be non
empty
TopSpace holds for f be
Function of T,
I[01] holds f is
continuous iff for a,b be
Real st
0
<= a & a
< 1 &
0
< b & b
<= 1 holds (f
"
[.
0 , b.[) is
open & (f
"
].a, 1.]) is
open
proof
set A3 = {
].a, b.[ where a,b be
Real :
0
<= a & a
< b & b
<= 1 };
set A2 = {
].a, 1.] where a be
Real :
0
<= a & a
< 1 };
set A1 = {
[.
0 , a.[ where a be
Real :
0
< a & a
<= 1 };
reconsider B = ((A1
\/ A2)
\/ A3) as
Basis of
I[01] by
Th74;
let T be non
empty
TopSpace;
let f be
Function of T,
I[01] ;
hereby
assume
A1: f is
continuous;
let a,b be
Real;
reconsider x = a, y = b as
Real;
assume that
A2:
0
<= a and
A3: a
< 1 and
A4:
0
< b and
A5: b
<= 1;
].x, 1.]
in A2 by
A2,
A3;
then
].x, 1.]
in (A1
\/ A2) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
A6:
].x, 1.]
in B by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
[.
0 , y.[
in A1 by
A4,
A5;
then
[.
0 , y.[
in (A1
\/ A2) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
[.
0 , y.[
in B by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence (f
"
[.
0 , b.[) is
open & (f
"
].a, 1.]) is
open by
A6,
A1,
YELLOW_9: 34;
end;
assume
A7: for a,b be
Real st
0
<= a & a
< 1 &
0
< b & b
<= 1 holds (f
"
[.
0 , b.[) is
open & (f
"
].a, 1.]) is
open;
now
let A be
Subset of
I[01] ;
assume A
in B;
then
A8: A
in (A1
\/ A2) or A
in A3 by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
per cases by
A8,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose A
in A1;
then ex a be
Real st A
=
[.
0 , a.[ &
0
< a & a
<= 1;
hence (f
" A) is
open by
A7;
end;
suppose A
in A2;
then ex a be
Real st A
=
].a, 1.] &
0
<= a & a
< 1;
hence (f
" A) is
open by
A7;
end;
suppose A
in A3;
then
consider a,b be
Real such that
A9: A
=
].a, b.[ and
A10:
0
<= a and
A11: a
< b and
A12: b
<= 1;
a
< 1 by
A11,
A12,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
reconsider U = (f
"
[.
0 , b.[), V = (f
"
].a, 1.]) as
open
Subset of T by
A10,
A11,
A7,
A12;
A
= (
[.
0 , b.[
/\
].a, 1.]) by
A9,
A10,
A12,
XXREAL_1: 153;
then (f
" A)
= (U
/\ V) by
FUNCT_1: 68;
hence (f
" A) is
open;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
YELLOW_9: 34;
end;
registration
let x be
Real, r be
positive
Real;
cluster (
+ (x,r)) ->
continuous;
coherence
proof
set f = (
+ (x,r));
consider BB be
Neighborhood_System of
Niemytzki-plane such that
A1: for x holds (BB
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, q]|,q))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } and
A2: for x, y st y
>
0 holds (BB
.
|[x, y]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,q))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
Def3;
A3: (
dom BB)
=
y>=0-plane by
Lm1,
PARTFUN1:def 2;
now
let a,b be
Real;
assume that
A4:
0
<= a and
A5: a
< 1 and
A6:
0
< b and
A7: b
<= 1;
now
let c be
Element of
Niemytzki-plane ;
assume c
in (f
"
[.
0 , b.[);
then
A8: (f
. c)
in
[.
0 , b.[ by
FUNCT_1:def 7;
c
in
y>=0-plane by
Lm1;
then
reconsider z = c as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
z
=
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then
A9: (z
`2 )
>=
0 by
Lm1,
Th18;
per cases by
A8,
XXREAL_1: 3;
suppose
A10: (f
. c)
=
0 ;
reconsider r1 = (r
* b) as
positive
Real by
A6;
reconsider U = ((
Ball (
|[x, r1]|,r1))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
Th27;
take U;
A11:
|[x,
0 ]|
in
y>=0-plane ;
U
in { ((
Ball (
|[x, q]|,q))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where q be
Real : q
>
0 };
then
A12: U
in (BB
.
|[x,
0 ]|) by
A1;
z
=
|[x,
0 ]| by
A10,
A9,
Th60;
hence U
in (
Union BB) & c
in U & U
c= (f
"
[.
0 , b.[) by
A12,
A11,
A3,
A6,
Th67,
CARD_5: 2,
ZFMISC_1: 136;
end;
suppose
A13:
0
< (f
. c) & (f
. c)
< b;
reconsider r1 = (r
* b) as
positive
Real by
A6;
reconsider U = (
Ball (
|[x, r1]|,r1)) as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
Th29;
take U;
A14:
|[x, r1]|
in
y>=0-plane ;
U
c=
y>=0-plane by
Th20;
then (U
/\
y>=0-plane )
= U by
XBOOLE_1: 28;
then U
in { ((
Ball (
|[x, r1]|,q))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where q be
Real : q
>
0 };
then U
in (BB
.
|[x, r1]|) by
A2;
hence U
in (
Union BB) by
A14,
A3,
CARD_5: 2;
A15: (f
"
].
0 , b.[)
c= (f
"
[.
0 , b.[) by
RELAT_1: 143,
XXREAL_1: 45;
(
Ball (
|[x, (r
* b)]|,(r
* b)))
c= ((
+ (x,r))
"
].
0 , b.[) by
A13,
Th66;
hence c
in U & U
c= (f
"
[.
0 , b.[) by
A15,
A13,
A7,
A9,
Th68;
end;
end;
hence (f
"
[.
0 , b.[) is
open by
YELLOW_9: 31;
now
let c be
Element of
Niemytzki-plane ;
c
in
y>=0-plane by
Lm1;
then
reconsider z = c as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
assume c
in (f
"
].a, 1.]);
then
A16: (f
. c)
in
].a, 1.] by
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then
A17: (f
. c)
> a by
XXREAL_1: 2;
A18: (f
. c)
<= 1 by
A16,
XXREAL_1: 2;
A19: z
=
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then
A20: (z
`2 )
>=
0 by
Lm1,
Th18;
per cases by
A19,
A16,
A18,
Lm1,
Th18,
XXREAL_0: 1,
XXREAL_1: 2;
suppose (z
`2 )
>
0 ;
then
consider r1 be
positive
Real such that
A21: r1
<= (z
`2 ) and
A22: (
Ball (z,r1))
c= ((
+ (x,r))
"
].a, 1.]) by
A4,
A17,
Th69;
reconsider U = (
Ball (z,r1)) as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
A19,
A21,
Th29;
U
c=
y>=0-plane by
A19,
A21,
Th20;
then
A23: (U
/\
y>=0-plane )
= U by
XBOOLE_1: 28;
U
in { ((
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]|,q))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
A23,
A19;
then
A24: U
in (BB
.
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]|) by
A21,
A2;
take U;
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]|
in
y>=0-plane by
A21;
hence U
in (
Union BB) by
A24,
A3,
CARD_5: 2;
thus c
in U & U
c= (f
"
].a, 1.]) by
A22,
Th13;
end;
suppose
A25: (f
. c)
= 1 & (z
`2 )
=
0 ;
then
consider r1 be
positive
Real such that
A26: ((
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), r1]|,r1))
\/
{z})
c= ((
+ (x,r))
"
{1}) by
Th70;
reconsider U = ((
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), r1]|,r1))
\/
{z}) as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
A19,
A25,
Th27;
U
in { ((
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), q]|,q))
\/
{
|[(z
`1 ),
0 ]|}) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
A19,
A25;
then
A27: U
in (BB
.
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]|) by
A1,
A25;
take U;
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]|
in
y>=0-plane by
A25;
hence U
in (
Union BB) by
A27,
A3,
CARD_5: 2;
thus c
in U by
ZFMISC_1: 136;
1
in
].a, 1.] by
A5,
XXREAL_1: 2;
then
{1}
c=
].a, 1.] by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then (f
"
{1})
c= (f
"
].a, 1.]) by
RELAT_1: 143;
hence U
c= (f
"
].a, 1.]) by
A26;
end;
suppose a
< (f
. c) & (f
. c)
< 1;
then (f
. c)
in
].a, 1.[ by
XXREAL_1: 4;
then
consider r1 be
positive
Real such that
A28: r1
<= (z
`2 ) and
A29: (
Ball (z,r1))
c= ((
+ (x,r))
"
].a, 1.[) by
A4,
A20,
Th65;
reconsider U = (
Ball (z,r1)) as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
A19,
A28,
Th29;
U
c=
y>=0-plane by
A19,
A28,
Th20;
then
A30: (U
/\
y>=0-plane )
= U by
XBOOLE_1: 28;
U
in { ((
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]|,q))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
A30,
A19;
then
A31: U
in (BB
.
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]|) by
A28,
A2;
take U;
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]|
in
y>=0-plane by
A28;
hence U
in (
Union BB) by
A31,
A3,
CARD_5: 2;
(f
"
].a, 1.[)
c= (f
"
].a, 1.]) by
RELAT_1: 143,
XXREAL_1: 41;
hence c
in U & U
c= (f
"
].a, 1.]) by
A29,
Th13;
end;
end;
hence (f
"
].a, 1.]) is
open by
YELLOW_9: 31;
end;
hence thesis by
Th75;
end;
end
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:76
Th76: for U be
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane holds for x, r st U
= ((
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) holds ex f be
continuous
Function of
Niemytzki-plane ,
I[01] st (f
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
=
0 & for a,b be
Real holds (
|[a, b]|
in (U
` ) implies (f
.
|[a, b]|)
= 1) & (
|[a, b]|
in (U
\
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) implies (f
.
|[a, b]|)
= ((
|.(
|[x,
0 ]|
-
|[a, b]|).|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* b)))
proof
let U be
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane ;
let x, r;
assume
A1: U
= ((
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|});
take f = (
+ (x,r));
thus (f
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
=
0 by
Def5;
let a,b be
Real;
thus
|[a, b]|
in (U
` ) implies (f
.
|[a, b]|)
= 1
proof
assume
A2:
|[a, b]|
in (U
` );
then
A3: not
|[a, b]|
in U by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
A4: not
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 136;
A5: a
<> x or b
<>
0 by
A3,
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 136;
b
>=
0 by
A2,
Lm1,
Th18;
hence thesis by
A4,
A5,
Def5;
end;
assume
A6:
|[a, b]|
in (U
\
{
|[x,
0 ]|});
then
A7: not
|[a, b]|
in
{
|[x,
0 ]|} by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
|[a, b]|
in U by
A6,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
A8:
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r)) by
A7,
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
b
>=
0 by
A6,
Lm1,
Th18;
hence thesis by
A8,
Def5;
end;
definition
let x,y be
Real, r be
positive
Real;
::
TOPGEN_5:def6
func
+ (x,y,r) ->
Function of
Niemytzki-plane ,
I[01] means
:
Def6: for a be
Real, b be non
negative
Real holds ( not
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) implies (it
.
|[a, b]|)
= 1) & (
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) implies (it
.
|[a, b]|)
= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
-
|[a, b]|).|
/ r));
existence
proof
deffunc
F1(
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2)) = 1;
deffunc
F2(
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2)) = (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- $1).|
/ r);
defpred
P[
set] means not $1
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r));
A1: for a be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st a
in the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane holds (
P[a] implies
F1(a)
in the
carrier of
I[01] ) & ( not
P[a] implies
F2(a)
in the
carrier of
I[01] )
proof
let a be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
assume a
in the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane ;
thus
P[a] implies
F1(a)
in the
carrier of
I[01] by
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
assume not
P[a];
then
|.(a
-
|[x, y]|).|
< r by
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
|.(
|[x, y]|
- a).|
< r by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
then
A2:
F2(a)
< (r
/ r) by
XREAL_1: 74;
(r
/ r)
= 1 by
XCMPLX_1: 60;
hence thesis by
A2,
BORSUK_1: 40,
XXREAL_1: 1;
end;
the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane
=
y>=0-plane by
Def3;
then
A3: the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane
c= the
carrier of (
TOP-REAL 2);
consider f be
Function of
Niemytzki-plane ,
I[01] such that
A4: for a be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st a
in the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane holds (
P[a] implies (f
. a)
=
F1(a)) & ( not
P[a] implies (f
. a)
=
F2(a)) from
SCH1(
A3,
A1);
take f;
let a be
Real, b be non
negative
Real;
|[a, b]|
in the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane by
Lm1;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let f,g be
Function of
Niemytzki-plane ,
I[01] such that
A5: for a be
Real, b be non
negative
Real holds ( not
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) implies (f
.
|[a, b]|)
= 1) & (
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) implies (f
.
|[a, b]|)
= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
-
|[a, b]|).|
/ r)) and
A6: for a be
Real, b be non
negative
Real holds ( not
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) implies (g
.
|[a, b]|)
= 1) & (
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) implies (g
.
|[a, b]|)
= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
-
|[a, b]|).|
/ r));
A7: the
carrier of
Niemytzki-plane
=
y>=0-plane by
Def3;
now
let p be
Point of
Niemytzki-plane ;
p
in
y>=0-plane by
A7;
then
reconsider q = p as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
A8: p
=
|[(q
`1 ), (q
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then
reconsider q2 = (q
`2 ) as non
negative
Real by
A7,
Th18;
per cases ;
suppose
A9: not
|[(q
`1 ), q2]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r));
then (f
. p)
= 1 by
A5,
A8;
hence (f
. p)
= (g
. p) by
A9,
A6,
A8;
end;
suppose
A10:
|[(q
`1 ), q2]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r));
then (f
. p)
= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
/ r) by
A5,
A8;
hence (f
. p)
= (g
. p) by
A10,
A6,
A8;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:77
Th77: for p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st (p
`2 )
>=
0 holds for x be
Real, y be non
negative
Real holds for r be
positive
Real holds ((
+ (x,y,r))
. p)
=
0 iff p
=
|[x, y]|
proof
let p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
assume
A1: (p
`2 )
>=
0 ;
let x be
Real;
let y be non
negative
Real;
let r be
positive
Real;
A2: p
=
|[(p
`1 ), (p
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
hereby
assume
A3: ((
+ (x,y,r))
. p)
=
0 ;
then p
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) by
A1,
A2,
Def6;
then
0
= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
/ r) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
Def6;
then (
0
* r)
=
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|;
hence p
=
|[x, y]| by
TOPRNS_1: 28;
end;
assume
A4: p
=
|[x, y]|;
then p
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) by
Th13;
hence ((
+ (x,y,r))
. p)
= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
/ r) by
A4,
Def6
.= (
0
/ r) by
A4,
TOPRNS_1: 28
.=
0 ;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:78
Th78: for x be
Real, y be non
negative
Real holds for r,a be
positive
Real st a
<= 1 holds ((
+ (x,y,r))
"
[.
0 , a.[)
= ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,(r
* a)))
/\
y>=0-plane )
proof
let x be
Real;
let y be non
negative
Real;
let r,a be
positive
Real;
set f = (
+ (x,y,r));
assume
A1: a
<= 1;
then (r
* a)
<= (r
* 1) by
XREAL_1: 64;
then
A2: (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,(r
* a)))
c= (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) by
JORDAN: 18;
thus ((
+ (x,y,r))
"
[.
0 , a.[)
c= ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,(r
* a)))
/\
y>=0-plane )
proof
let u be
object;
assume
A3: u
in (f
"
[.
0 , a.[);
then
reconsider p = u as
Point of
Niemytzki-plane ;
p
in
y>=0-plane by
Lm1;
then
reconsider q = p as
Element of (
TOP-REAL 2);
(f
. p)
in
[.
0 , a.[ by
A3,
FUNCT_2: 38;
then
A4: (f
. p)
< a by
XXREAL_1: 3;
A5: p
=
|[(q
`1 ), (q
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then
A6: (q
`2 )
>=
0 by
Lm1,
Th18;
then p
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) by
A4,
A1,
A5,
Def6;
then (f
. p)
= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
/ r) by
A5,
A6,
Def6;
then
A7:
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
< (r
* a) by
A4,
XREAL_1: 77;
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
=
|.(q
-
|[x, y]|).| by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
then p
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,(r
* a))) by
A7,
TOPREAL9: 7;
hence thesis by
Lm1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
let u be
object;
assume
A8: u
in ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,(r
* a)))
/\
y>=0-plane );
then
reconsider p = u as
Point of
Niemytzki-plane by
Lm1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
reconsider q = p as
Element of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
A8;
A9: u
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,(r
* a))) by
A8,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A10:
|.(q
-
|[x, y]|).|
< (r
* a) by
TOPREAL9: 7;
A11:
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
=
|.(q
-
|[x, y]|).| by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
A12: p
=
|[(q
`1 ), (q
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
u
in
y>=0-plane by
A8,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (q
`2 )
>=
0 by
A12,
Th18;
then
A13: (f
. p)
= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
/ r) by
A2,
A9,
A12,
Def6;
then (r
* (f
. p))
=
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).| by
XCMPLX_1: 87;
then (f
. p)
< a by
A10,
A11,
XREAL_1: 64;
then (f
. p)
in
[.
0 , a.[ by
A13,
XXREAL_1: 3;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 38;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:79
Th79: for p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st (p
`2 )
>
0 holds for x be
Real, a be non
negative
Real holds for y,r be
positive
Real st ((
+ (x,y,r))
. p)
> a holds
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
> (r
* a) & ((
Ball (p,(
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
- (r
* a))))
/\
y>=0-plane )
c= ((
+ (x,y,r))
"
].a, 1.])
proof
let p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
assume
A1: (p
`2 )
>
0 ;
let x be
Real;
let a be non
negative
Real;
let y,r be
positive
Real;
set f = (
+ (x,y,r));
A2: p
=
|[(p
`1 ), (p
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then p
in
y>=0-plane by
A1;
then (f
. p)
in
[.
0 , 1.] by
Lm1,
BORSUK_1: 40,
FUNCT_2: 5;
then
A3: (f
. p)
<= 1 by
XXREAL_1: 1;
assume
A4: (f
. p)
> a;
then
A5: a
< 1 by
A3,
XXREAL_0: 2;
A6:
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
=
|.(p
-
|[x, y]|).| by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
thus
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
> (r
* a)
proof
per cases by
A3,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose (f
. p)
< 1;
then p
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) by
A1,
A2,
Def6;
then (f
. p)
= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
/ r) by
A1,
A2,
Def6;
hence thesis by
A4,
XREAL_1: 79;
end;
suppose
A7: (f
. p)
= 1;
now
A8: (r
/ r)
= 1 by
XCMPLX_1: 60;
assume
A9: p
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r));
then
A10:
|.(p
-
|[x, y]|).|
< r by
TOPREAL9: 7;
1
= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
/ r) by
A9,
A1,
A2,
A7,
Def6;
hence contradiction by
A10,
A8,
A6,
XREAL_1: 74;
end;
then
A11:
|.(p
-
|[x, y]|).|
>= r by
TOPREAL9: 7;
(r
* 1)
> (r
* a) by
A5,
XREAL_1: 68;
hence thesis by
A11,
A6,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
end;
then
reconsider r1 = (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
- (r
* a)) as
positive
Real by
XREAL_1: 50;
let u be
object;
assume
A12: u
in ((
Ball (p,(
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
- (r
* a))))
/\
y>=0-plane );
then
reconsider z = u as
Point of
Niemytzki-plane by
Lm1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
reconsider q = z as
Element of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
A12;
u
in (
Ball (p,(
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
- (r
* a)))) by
A12,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
|.(q
- p).|
< r1 by
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
A13: (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
+
|.(q
- p).|)
< (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
+ r1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
A14: q
=
|[(q
`1 ), (q
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then
A15: (q
`2 )
>=
0 by
Lm1,
Th18;
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
<= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
+
|.(q
- p).|) by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
then
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
< (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
+ r1) by
A13,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A16: (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
- r1)
< ((
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
+ r1)
- r1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
A17:
now
assume q
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r));
then (f
. q)
= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
/ r) by
A14,
A15,
Def6;
hence (f
. z)
> a by
A16,
XREAL_1: 81;
end;
(f
. z)
in
[.
0 , 1.] by
BORSUK_1: 40;
then
A18: (f
. z)
<= 1 by
XXREAL_1: 1;
not q
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) implies (f
. q)
= 1 by
A15,
A14,
Def6;
then (f
. z)
in
].a, 1.] by
A18,
A5,
A17,
XXREAL_1: 2;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 38;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:80
Th80: for p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st (p
`2 )
=
0 holds for x be
Real, a be non
negative
Real holds for y,r be
positive
Real st ((
+ (x,y,r))
. p)
> a holds
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
> (r
* a) & ex r1 be
positive
Real st r1
= ((
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
- (r
* a))
/ 2) & ((
Ball (
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|,r1))
\/
{p})
c= ((
+ (x,y,r))
"
].a, 1.])
proof
let p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
A1: p
=
|[(p
`1 ), (p
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
assume
A2: (p
`2 )
=
0 ;
then
reconsider p9 = p as
Point of
Niemytzki-plane by
A1,
Lm1,
Th18;
let x be
Real;
let a be non
negative
Real;
let y,r be
positive
Real;
set f = (
+ (x,y,r));
p
in
y>=0-plane by
A2,
A1;
then (f
. p)
in
[.
0 , 1.] by
Lm1,
BORSUK_1: 40,
FUNCT_2: 5;
then
A3: (f
. p)
<= 1 by
XXREAL_1: 1;
assume
A4: (f
. p)
> a;
then
A5: a
< 1 by
A3,
XXREAL_0: 2;
A6:
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
=
|.(p
-
|[x, y]|).| by
TOPRNS_1: 27;
thus
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
> (r
* a)
proof
per cases by
A3,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose (f
. p)
< 1;
then p
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) by
A2,
A1,
Def6;
then (f
. p)
= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
/ r) by
A2,
A1,
Def6;
hence thesis by
A4,
XREAL_1: 79;
end;
suppose
A7: (f
. p)
= 1;
now
A8: (r
/ r)
= 1 by
XCMPLX_1: 60;
assume
A9: p
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r));
then
A10:
|.(p
-
|[x, y]|).|
< r by
TOPREAL9: 7;
1
= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
/ r) by
A9,
A2,
A1,
A7,
Def6;
hence contradiction by
A10,
A8,
A6,
XREAL_1: 74;
end;
then
A11:
|.(p
-
|[x, y]|).|
>= r by
TOPREAL9: 7;
(r
* 1)
> (r
* a) by
A5,
XREAL_1: 68;
hence thesis by
A11,
A6,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
end;
then
reconsider r9 = (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
- (r
* a)) as
positive
Real by
XREAL_1: 50;
take r1 = (r9
/ 2);
thus r1
= ((
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
- (r
* a))
/ 2);
let u be
object;
A12: (
Ball (
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|,r1))
c=
y>=0-plane by
Th20;
assume
A13: u
in ((
Ball (
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|,r1))
\/
{p});
then u
in (
Ball (
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|,r1)) or u
= p9 by
ZFMISC_1: 136;
then
reconsider z = u as
Point of
Niemytzki-plane by
A12,
Def3;
reconsider q = z as
Element of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
A13;
A14: q
=
|[(q
`1 ), (q
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then
A15: (q
`2 )
>=
0 by
Lm1,
Th18;
then
A16: not q
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) implies (f
. q)
= 1 by
A14,
Def6;
per cases by
A13,
ZFMISC_1: 136;
suppose u
= p9;
then (f
. z)
in
].a, 1.] by
A4,
A3,
XXREAL_1: 2;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 38;
end;
suppose u
in (
Ball (
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|,r1));
then
|.(q
-
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|).|
< r1 by
TOPREAL9: 7;
then
A17: (
|.(q
-
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|).|
+
|.(
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|
- p).|)
< (r1
+
|.(
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|
- p).|) by
XREAL_1: 6;
|.(q
- p).|
<= (
|.(q
-
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|).|
+
|.(
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|
- p).|) by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
then
A18:
|.(q
- p).|
< (r1
+
|.(
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|
- p).|) by
A17,
XXREAL_0: 2;
reconsider r1 as
Real;
A19:
|.
|[
0 , r1]|.|
=
|.r1.| by
TOPREAL6: 23;
A20:
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
<= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
+
|.(q
- p).|) by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
A21:
|.r1.|
= r1 by
ABSVALUE:def 1;
|.(
|[(p
`1 ), r1]|
- p).|
=
|.
|[((p
`1 )
- (p
`1 )), (r1
-
0 )]|.| by
A2,
A1,
EUCLID: 62;
then (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
+
|.(q
- p).|)
< (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
+ (r1
+ r1)) by
A18,
A19,
A21,
XREAL_1: 6;
then
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
< (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
+ (r1
+ r1)) by
A20,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A22: (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- p).|
- (r1
+ r1))
< ((
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
+ (r1
+ r1))
- (r1
+ r1)) by
XREAL_1: 9;
A23:
now
assume q
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r));
then (f
. q)
= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- q).|
/ r) by
A14,
A15,
Def6;
hence (f
. z)
> a by
A22,
XREAL_1: 81;
end;
(f
. z)
in
[.
0 , 1.] by
BORSUK_1: 40;
then (f
. z)
<= 1 by
XXREAL_1: 1;
then (f
. z)
in
].a, 1.] by
A5,
A16,
A23,
XXREAL_1: 2;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 38;
end;
end;
registration
let x be
Real;
let y,r be
positive
Real;
cluster (
+ (x,y,r)) ->
continuous;
coherence
proof
set f = (
+ (x,y,r));
consider BB be
Neighborhood_System of
Niemytzki-plane such that
A1: for x holds (BB
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, q]|,q))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } and
A2: for x, y st y
>
0 holds (BB
.
|[x, y]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,q))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
Def3;
A3: (
dom BB)
=
y>=0-plane by
Lm1,
PARTFUN1:def 2;
now
let a,b be
Real;
assume that
A4:
0
<= a and a
< 1 and
A5:
0
< b and
A6: b
<= 1;
(f
"
[.
0 , b.[)
= ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,(r
* b)))
/\
y>=0-plane ) by
A5,
A6,
Th78;
hence (f
"
[.
0 , b.[) is
open by
A5,
Th28;
now
let c be
Element of
Niemytzki-plane ;
c
in
y>=0-plane by
Lm1;
then
reconsider z = c as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
A7: z
=
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
assume c
in (f
"
].a, 1.]);
then (f
. c)
in
].a, 1.] by
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then
A8: (f
. c)
> a by
XXREAL_1: 2;
per cases by
A7,
Lm1,
Th18;
suppose
A9: (z
`2 )
>
0 ;
then
reconsider r1 = (
|.(
|[x, y]|
- z).|
- (r
* a)) as
positive
Real by
A4,
A8,
Th79,
XREAL_1: 50;
reconsider U = ((
Ball (z,r1))
/\
y>=0-plane ) as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
A7,
A9,
Th28;
U
in { ((
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]|,q))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
A7;
then
A10: U
in (BB
.
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]|) by
A2,
A9;
take U;
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]|
in
y>=0-plane by
A9;
hence U
in (
Union BB) by
A10,
A3,
CARD_5: 2;
c
in (
Ball (z,r1)) by
Th13;
hence c
in U & U
c= (f
"
].a, 1.]) by
A4,
A8,
A9,
Lm1,
Th79,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
suppose
A11: (z
`2 )
=
0 ;
then
consider r1 be
positive
Real such that r1
= ((
|.(
|[x, y]|
- z).|
- (r
* a))
/ 2) and
A12: ((
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), r1]|,r1))
\/
{z})
c= ((
+ (x,y,r))
"
].a, 1.]) by
A4,
A8,
Th80;
reconsider U = ((
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), r1]|,r1))
\/
{z}) as
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane by
A7,
A11,
Th27;
U
in { ((
Ball (
|[(z
`1 ), q]|,q))
\/
{
|[(z
`1 ),
0 ]|}) where q be
Real : q
>
0 } by
A7,
A11;
then
A13: U
in (BB
.
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]|) by
A1,
A11;
take U;
|[(z
`1 ), (z
`2 )]|
in
y>=0-plane by
A11;
hence U
in (
Union BB) by
A13,
A3,
CARD_5: 2;
thus c
in U by
ZFMISC_1: 136;
thus U
c= (f
"
].a, 1.]) by
A12;
end;
end;
hence (f
"
].a, 1.]) is
open by
YELLOW_9: 31;
end;
hence thesis by
Th75;
end;
end
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:81
Th81: for U be
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane holds for x, y, r st y
>
0 & U
= ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane ) holds ex f be
continuous
Function of
Niemytzki-plane ,
I[01] st (f
.
|[x, y]|)
=
0 & for a,b be
Real holds (
|[a, b]|
in (U
` ) implies (f
.
|[a, b]|)
= 1) & (
|[a, b]|
in U implies (f
.
|[a, b]|)
= (
|.(
|[x, y]|
-
|[a, b]|).|
/ r))
proof
let U be
Subset of
Niemytzki-plane ;
let x, y, r;
assume that
A1: y
>
0 and
A2: U
= ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane );
reconsider y9 = y as
positive
Real by
A1;
take f = (
+ (x,y9,r));
(
|[x, y9]|
`2 )
= y by
EUCLID: 52;
hence (f
.
|[x, y]|)
=
0 by
Th77;
let a,b be
Real;
thus
|[a, b]|
in (U
` ) implies (f
.
|[a, b]|)
= 1
proof
assume
A3:
|[a, b]|
in (U
` );
then not
|[a, b]|
in U by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
A4: not
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) by
A2,
A3,
Lm1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
b
>=
0 by
A3,
Lm1,
Th18;
hence thesis by
A4,
Def6;
end;
assume
A5:
|[a, b]|
in U;
then
A6:
|[a, b]|
in (
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r)) by
A2,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
b
>=
0 by
A5,
Lm1,
Th18;
hence thesis by
A6,
Def6;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:82
Th82:
Niemytzki-plane is
T_1
proof
set X =
Niemytzki-plane ;
let x,y be
Point of X;
A1: the
carrier of X
=
y>=0-plane by
Def3;
then
A2: y
in
y>=0-plane ;
x
in
y>=0-plane by
A1;
then
reconsider a = x, b = y as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
A2;
assume x
<> y;
then
|.(a
- b).|
<>
0 by
TOPRNS_1: 28;
then
reconsider r =
|.(a
- b).| as
positive
Real;
consider q be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2), U be
open
Subset of X such that
A3: x
in U and q
in U and
A4: for c be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st c
in U holds
|.(c
- q).|
< (r
/ 2) by
Th30;
consider p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2), V be
open
Subset of X such that
A5: y
in V and p
in V and
A6: for c be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) st c
in V holds
|.(c
- p).|
< (r
/ 2) by
Th30;
take U, V;
thus U is
open & V is
open & x
in U by
A3;
hereby
assume y
in U;
then
|.(b
- q).|
< (r
/ 2) by
A4;
then
A7: (
|.(a
- q).|
+
|.(b
- q).|)
< ((r
/ 2)
+ (r
/ 2)) by
A3,
A4,
XREAL_1: 8;
|.(a
- b).|
<= (
|.(a
- q).|
+
|.(q
- b).|) by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
hence contradiction by
A7,
TOPRNS_1: 27;
end;
thus y
in V by
A5;
assume
A8: x
in V;
A9:
|.(a
- b).|
<= (
|.(a
- p).|
+
|.(p
- b).|) by
TOPRNS_1: 34;
|.(b
- p).|
< (r
/ 2) by
A5,
A6;
then (
|.(a
- p).|
+
|.(b
- p).|)
< ((r
/ 2)
+ (r
/ 2)) by
A8,
A6,
XREAL_1: 8;
hence contradiction by
A9,
TOPRNS_1: 27;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_5:83
Niemytzki-plane is
Tychonoff
proof
set X =
Niemytzki-plane ;
consider B be
Neighborhood_System of X such that
A1: for x holds (B
.
|[x,
0 ]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, r]|,r))
\/
{
|[x,
0 ]|}) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } and
A2: for x, y st y
>
0 holds (B
.
|[x, y]|)
= { ((
Ball (
|[x, y]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } by
Def3;
reconsider uB = (
Union B) as
prebasis of X by
YELLOW_9: 27;
A3: the
carrier of X
=
y>=0-plane by
Def3;
now
let x be
Point of X;
let V be
Subset of X;
assume that
A4: x
in V and
A5: V
in uB;
V is
open by
A5,
TOPS_2:def 1;
then
consider V9 be
Subset of X such that
A6: V9
in (B
. x) and
A7: V9
c= V by
A4,
YELLOW_8:def 1;
x
in
y>=0-plane by
A3;
then
reconsider x9 = x as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
A8: x
=
|[(x9
`1 ), (x9
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
per cases by
A3,
A8,
Th18;
suppose
A9: (x9
`2 )
=
0 ;
then (B
. x)
= { ((
Ball (
|[(x9
`1 ), r]|,r))
\/
{
|[(x9
`1 ),
0 ]|}) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } by
A1,
A8;
then
consider r be
Real such that
A10: V9
= ((
Ball (
|[(x9
`1 ), r]|,r))
\/
{
|[(x9
`1 ),
0 ]|}) and
A11: r
>
0 by
A6;
consider f be
continuous
Function of
Niemytzki-plane ,
I[01] such that
A12: (f
.
|[(x9
`1 ),
0 ]|)
=
0 and
A13: for a,b be
Real holds (
|[a, b]|
in (V9
` ) implies (f
.
|[a, b]|)
= 1) & (
|[a, b]|
in (V9
\
{
|[(x9
`1 ),
0 ]|}) implies (f
.
|[a, b]|)
= ((
|.(
|[(x9
`1 ),
0 ]|
-
|[a, b]|).|
^2 )
/ ((2
* r)
* b))) by
A10,
A11,
Th76;
take f;
thus (f
. x)
=
0 by
A9,
A12,
EUCLID: 53;
thus (f
.: (V
` ))
c=
{1}
proof
let u be
object;
assume u
in (f
.: (V
` ));
then
consider b be
Point of X such that
A14: b
in (V
` ) and
A15: u
= (f
. b) by
FUNCT_2: 65;
b
in
y>=0-plane by
A3;
then
reconsider c = b as
Element of (
TOP-REAL 2);
A16: (V
` )
c= (V9
` ) by
A7,
SUBSET_1: 12;
b
=
|[(c
`1 ), (c
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then u
= 1 by
A16,
A14,
A13,
A15;
hence thesis by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
end;
suppose
A17: (x9
`2 )
>
0 ;
then (B
. x)
= { ((
Ball (
|[(x9
`1 ), (x9
`2 )]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane ) where r be
Real : r
>
0 } by
A2,
A8;
then
consider r be
Real such that
A18: V9
= ((
Ball (
|[(x9
`1 ), (x9
`2 )]|,r))
/\
y>=0-plane ) and
A19: r
>
0 by
A6;
consider f be
continuous
Function of
Niemytzki-plane ,
I[01] such that
A20: (f
.
|[(x9
`1 ), (x9
`2 )]|)
=
0 and
A21: for a,b be
Real holds (
|[a, b]|
in (V9
` ) implies (f
.
|[a, b]|)
= 1) & (
|[a, b]|
in V9 implies (f
.
|[a, b]|)
= (
|.(
|[(x9
`1 ), (x9
`2 )]|
-
|[a, b]|).|
/ r)) by
A17,
A18,
A19,
Th81;
take f;
thus (f
. x)
=
0 by
A20,
EUCLID: 53;
thus (f
.: (V
` ))
c=
{1}
proof
let u be
object;
assume u
in (f
.: (V
` ));
then
consider b be
Point of X such that
A22: b
in (V
` ) and
A23: u
= (f
. b) by
FUNCT_2: 65;
b
in
y>=0-plane by
A3;
then
reconsider c = b as
Element of (
TOP-REAL 2);
A24: (V
` )
c= (V9
` ) by
A7,
SUBSET_1: 12;
b
=
|[(c
`1 ), (c
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
then u
= 1 by
A24,
A22,
A21,
A23;
hence thesis by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
Th52,
Th82;
end;