laplace.miz
begin
reserve x,y for
object,
N for
Element of
NAT ,
c,i,j,k,m,n for
Nat,
D for non
empty
set,
s for
Element of (
2Set (
Seg (n
+ 2))),
p for
Element of (
Permutations n),
p1,q1 for
Element of (
Permutations (n
+ 1)),
p2 for
Element of (
Permutations (n
+ 2)),
K for
Field,
a for
Element of K,
f for
FinSequence of K,
A for
Matrix of K,
AD for
Matrix of n, m, D,
pD for
FinSequence of D,
M for
Matrix of n, K;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:1
Th1: for f be
FinSequence, i be
Nat st i
in (
dom f) holds (
len (
Del (f,i)))
= ((
len f)
-' 1)
proof
let f be
FinSequence, i be
Nat;
assume i
in (
dom f);
then ex m be
Nat st (
len f)
= (m
+ 1) & (
len (
Del (f,i)))
= m by
FINSEQ_3: 104;
hence thesis by
NAT_D: 34;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:2
Th2: for i,j,n be
Nat, M be
Matrix of n, K st i
in (
dom M) holds (
len (
Deleting (M,i,j)))
= (n
-' 1)
proof
let i,j,n be
Nat, M be
Matrix of n, K;
assume
A1: i
in (
dom M);
A2: (
len M)
= n by
MATRIX_0:def 2;
thus (
len (
Deleting (M,i,j)))
= (
len (
DelLine (M,i))) by
MATRIX_0:def 13
.= (n
-' 1) by
A1,
A2,
Th1;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:3
Th3: j
in (
Seg (
width A)) implies (
width (
DelCol (A,j)))
= ((
width A)
-' 1)
proof
set DC = (
DelCol (A,j));
A1: (
len DC)
= (
len A) by
MATRIX_0:def 13;
assume
A2: j
in (
Seg (
width A));
then (
Seg (
width A))
<>
{} ;
then (
width A)
<>
0 ;
then (
len A)
>
0 by
MATRIX_0:def 3;
then
consider t be
FinSequence such that
A3: t
in (
rng DC) and
A4: (
len t)
= (
width DC) by
A1,
MATRIX_0:def 3;
consider k9 be
object such that
A5: k9
in (
dom (
DelCol (A,j))) and
A6: (DC
. k9)
= t by
A3,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
k9
in (
Seg (
len DC)) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
consider k be
Nat such that
A7: k9
= k and 1
<= k and k
<= (
len DC);
k
in (
dom A) by
A1,
A5,
A7,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A8: t
= (
Del ((
Line (A,k)),j)) by
A6,
A7,
MATRIX_0:def 13;
A9: (
len (
Line (A,k)))
= (
width A) by
MATRIX_0:def 7;
then (
dom (
Line (A,k)))
= (
Seg (
width A)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
hence thesis by
A2,
A4,
A9,
A8,
Th1;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:4
Th4: for i be
Nat st (
len A)
> 1 holds (
width A)
= (
width (
DelLine (A,i)))
proof
let i be
Nat;
assume
A1: (
len A)
> 1;
per cases ;
suppose i
in (
dom A);
then
consider m be
Nat such that
A2: (
len A)
= (m
+ 1) and
A3: (
len (
Del (A,i)))
= m by
FINSEQ_3: 104;
A4: m
>= 1 by
A1,
A2,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A5: m
in (
dom (
Del (A,i))) by
A3,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then
A6: ((
DelLine (A,i))
. m)
in (
rng (
Del (A,i))) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
A7: (
rng (
Del (A,i)))
c= (
rng A) by
FINSEQ_3: 106;
A8: ((
DelLine (A,i))
. m)
= (
Line ((
DelLine (A,i)),m)) by
A5,
MATRIX_0: 60;
A is
Matrix of (
len A), (
width A), K by
A1,
MATRIX_0: 20;
then (
len (
Line ((
DelLine (A,i)),m)))
= (
width A) by
A6,
A8,
A7,
MATRIX_0:def 2;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4,
A6,
A8,
MATRIX_0:def 3;
end;
suppose not i
in (
dom A);
hence thesis by
FINSEQ_3: 104;
end;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:5
Th5: for i be
Nat st j
in (
Seg (
width M)) holds (
width (
Deleting (M,i,j)))
= (n
-' 1)
proof
let i be
Nat;
assume
A1: j
in (
Seg (
width M));
per cases ;
suppose
A2: (
len M)
<= 1 & i
in (
dom M);
(
Seg (
width M))
<>
{} by
A1;
then (
width M)
<>
{} ;
then (
len M)
>
0 by
MATRIX_0:def 3;
then
A3: (
len M)
= 1 by
A2,
NAT_1: 25;
A4: (
len (
Deleting (M,i,j)))
= (n
-' 1) by
A2,
Th2;
(
len M)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then (
len (
Deleting (M,i,j)))
=
0 by
A3,
A4,
XREAL_1: 232;
hence thesis by
A4,
MATRIX_0:def 3;
end;
suppose
A5: (
len M)
> 1;
A6: (
width M)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
(
width M)
= (
width (
DelLine (M,i))) by
A5,
Th4;
hence thesis by
A1,
A6,
Th3;
end;
suppose
A7: not i
in (
dom M);
A8: (
width M)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
(
DelLine (M,i))
= M by
A7,
FINSEQ_3: 104;
hence thesis by
A1,
A8,
Th3;
end;
end;
definition
let G be non
empty
multMagma;
let B be
Function of
[:the
carrier of G,
NAT :], the
carrier of G;
let g be
Element of G, i be
Nat;
:: original:
.
redefine
func B
. (g,i) ->
Element of G ;
coherence
proof
reconsider i as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
(B
. (g,i)) is
Element of G;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
LAPLACE:6
Th6: (
card (
Permutations n))
= (n
! )
proof
set P = (
Permutations n);
reconsider N = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
set X = (
finSeg N);
set PER = { F where F be
Function of X, X : F is
Permutation of X };
A1: P
c= PER
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in P;
then x is
Permutation of X by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
hence thesis;
end;
PER
c= P
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in PER;
then ex F be
Function of X, X st x
= F & F is
Permutation of X;
hence thesis by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
end;
then P
= PER by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
hence (
card P)
= ((
card X)
! ) by
CARD_FIN: 8
.= (n
! ) by
FINSEQ_1: 57;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:7
Th7: for i, j st i
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) & j
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) holds (
card { p1 : (p1
. i)
= j })
= (n
! )
proof
let i, j such that
A1: i
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) and
A2: j
in (
Seg (n
+ 1));
reconsider N = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
set n1 = (N
+ 1);
set X = (
finSeg n1);
set Y = (X
\
{j});
A3: (Y
\/
{j})
= X by
A2,
ZFMISC_1: 116;
set X9 = (X
\
{i});
set P1 = (
Permutations n1);
set F = { p where p be
Element of P1 : (p
. i)
= j };
set F9 = { f where f be
Function of (X9
\/
{i}), (Y
\/
{j}) : f is
one-to-one & (f
. i)
= j };
A4: (X9
\/
{i})
= X by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 116;
A5: F9
c= F
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in F9;
then
consider f be
Function of X, X such that
A6: f
= x and
A7: f is
one-to-one and
A8: (f
. i)
= j by
A4,
A3;
(
card X)
= (
card X);
then f is
onto by
A7,
FINSEQ_4: 63;
then f
in P1 by
A7,
MATRIX_1:def 12;
hence thesis by
A6,
A8;
end;
F
c= F9
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in F;
then
consider p be
Element of P1 such that
A9: x
= p and
A10: (p
. i)
= j;
reconsider p as
Permutation of X by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
(p
. i)
= j by
A10;
hence thesis by
A4,
A3,
A9;
end;
then
A11: F
= F9 by
A5,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
A12: (
card X)
= n1 by
FINSEQ_1: 57;
A13: not j
in Y by
ZFMISC_1: 56;
then
A14: (
card X)
= ((
card Y)
+ 1) by
A3,
CARD_2: 41;
A15: not i
in X9 by
ZFMISC_1: 56;
then
A16: (
card X)
= ((
card X9)
+ 1) by
A4,
CARD_2: 41;
then Y is
empty implies X9 is
empty by
A14;
hence (
card { p1 : (p1
. i)
= j })
= (
card { f where f be
Function of X9, Y : f is
one-to-one }) by
A15,
A13,
A11,
CARD_FIN: 5
.= (((
card Y)
! )
/ (((
card Y)
-' (
card X9))
! )) by
A16,
A14,
CARD_FIN: 7
.= (((
card Y)
! )
/ 1) by
A16,
A14,
NEWTON: 12,
XREAL_1: 232
.= (n
! ) by
A14,
A12;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:8
Th8: for K be
Fanoian
Field holds for p2 holds for X,Y be
Element of (
Fin (
2Set (
Seg (n
+ 2)))) st Y
= { s : s
in X & ((
Part_sgn (p2,K))
. s)
= (
- (
1_ K)) } holds (the
multF of K
$$ (X,(
Part_sgn (p2,K))))
= ((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(
card Y)))
proof
let K be
Fanoian
Field;
let p2;
set n2 = (n
+ 2);
let X,Y be
Element of (
Fin (
2Set (
Seg n2))) such that
A1: Y
= { s : s
in X & ((
Part_sgn (p2,K))
. s)
= (
- (
1_ K)) };
reconsider ID = (
id (
Seg n2)) as
Element of (
Permutations n2) by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
set Y9 = { s : s
in X & ((
Part_sgn (p2,K))
. s)
<> ((
Part_sgn (ID,K))
. s) };
A2: for x st x
in X holds ((
Part_sgn (ID,K))
. x)
= (
1_ K)
proof
A3: X
c= (
2Set (
Seg n2)) by
FINSUB_1:def 5;
let x;
assume x
in X;
then
consider i,j be
Nat such that
A4: i
in (
Seg n2) and
A5: j
in (
Seg n2) and
A6: i
< j and
A7: x
=
{i, j} by
A3,
MATRIX11: 1;
A8: (ID
. j)
= j by
A5,
FUNCT_1: 17;
(ID
. i)
= i by
A4,
FUNCT_1: 17;
hence thesis by
A4,
A5,
A6,
A7,
A8,
MATRIX11:def 1;
end;
A9: Y9
c= Y
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in Y9;
then
consider s such that
A10: y
= s and
A11: s
in X and
A12: ((
Part_sgn (p2,K))
. s)
<> ((
Part_sgn (ID,K))
. s);
((
Part_sgn (ID,K))
. s)
= (
1_ K) by
A2,
A11;
then ((
Part_sgn (p2,K))
. s)
= (
- (
1_ K)) by
A12,
MATRIX11: 5;
hence thesis by
A1,
A10,
A11;
end;
Y
c= Y9
proof
let y be
object;
A13: (
1_ K)
<> (
- (
1_ K)) by
MATRIX11: 22;
assume y
in Y;
then
consider s such that
A14: s
= y and
A15: s
in X and
A16: ((
Part_sgn (p2,K))
. s)
= (
- (
1_ K)) by
A1;
((
Part_sgn (ID,K))
. s)
= (
1_ K) by
A2,
A15;
hence thesis by
A14,
A15,
A16,
A13;
end;
then
A17: Y
= Y9 by
A9,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
per cases by
NAT_D: 12;
suppose
A18: ((
card Y)
mod 2)
=
0 ;
then
consider t be
Nat such that
A19: (
card Y)
= ((2
* t)
+
0 ) and
0
< 2 by
NAT_D:def 2;
t is
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
hence ((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(
card Y)))
= (
1_ K) by
A19,
HURWITZ: 4
.= (the
multF of K
$$ (X,(
Part_sgn (ID,K)))) by
A2,
MATRIX11: 4
.= (the
multF of K
$$ (X,(
Part_sgn (p2,K)))) by
A17,
A18,
MATRIX11: 7;
end;
suppose
A20: ((
card Y)
mod 2)
= 1;
then
consider t be
Nat such that
A21: (
card Y)
= ((2
* t)
+ 1) and 1
< 2 by
NAT_D:def 2;
t is
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
hence ((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(
card Y)))
= (
- (
1_ K)) by
A21,
HURWITZ: 4
.= (
- (the
multF of K
$$ (X,(
Part_sgn (ID,K))))) by
A2,
MATRIX11: 4
.= (the
multF of K
$$ (X,(
Part_sgn (p2,K)))) by
A17,
A20,
MATRIX11: 7;
end;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:9
Th9: for K be
Fanoian
Field holds for p2, i, j st i
in (
Seg (n
+ 2)) & (p2
. i)
= j holds ex X be
Element of (
Fin (
2Set (
Seg (n
+ 2)))) st X
= {
{N, i} where N be
Nat :
{N, i}
in (
2Set (
Seg (n
+ 2))) } & (the
multF of K
$$ (X,(
Part_sgn (p2,K))))
= ((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
proof
let K be
Fanoian
Field;
let p2, i, j such that
A1: i
in (
Seg (n
+ 2)) and
A2: (p2
. i)
= j;
reconsider N = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
set n2 = (N
+ 2);
reconsider p29 = p2 as
Permutation of (
finSeg n2) by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
A3: (
rng p29)
= (
Seg n2) by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
1
<= i by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
reconsider i1 = (i
- 1) as
Element of
NAT by
NAT_1: 21;
deffunc
F(
object) =
{$1, i};
set Ui = ((
finSeg n2)
\ (
Seg i));
set Li = (
finSeg i1);
set SS = (
2Set (
Seg (n
+ 2)));
set X = {
{k, i} where k be
Nat :
{k, i}
in (
2Set (
Seg (n
+ 2))) };
A4: X
c= SS
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in X;
then ex k be
Nat st x
=
{k, i} &
{k, i}
in (
2Set (
Seg n2));
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider X as
Element of (
Fin SS) by
FINSUB_1:def 5;
set Y = { s : s
in X & ((
Part_sgn (p2,K))
. s)
= (
- (
1_ K)) };
A5: Y
c= X
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in Y;
then ex s st s
= x & s
in X & ((
Part_sgn (p2,K))
. s)
= (
- (
1_ K));
hence thesis;
end;
then
A6: Y
c= SS by
A4;
(
dom p29)
= (
Seg n2) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
then
A7: (p2
. i)
in (
rng p2) by
A1,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then 1
<= j by
A2,
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
reconsider j1 = (j
- 1) as
Element of
NAT by
NAT_1: 21;
reconsider Y as
Element of (
Fin SS) by
A6,
FINSUB_1:def 5;
consider f be
Function such that
A8: (
dom f)
= (Li
\/ Ui) & for x be
object st x
in (Li
\/ Ui) holds (f
. x)
=
F(x) from
FUNCT_1:sch 3;
A9: (f
" Y)
c= (
dom f) by
RELAT_1: 132;
then
reconsider fY = (f
" Y) as
finite
set by
A8;
A10: (Li
\/ Ui)
c= ((
Seg n2)
\
{i})
proof
let x be
object such that
A11: x
in (Li
\/ Ui);
per cases by
A11,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
A12: x
in Li;
A13: i
<= n2 by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
consider k be
Nat such that
A14: x
= k and
A15: 1
<= k and
A16: k
<= i1 by
A12;
A17: i1
< (i1
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
then k
< i by
A16,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then k
<= n2 by
A13,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A18: k
in (
Seg n2) by
A15;
not k
in
{i} by
A16,
A17,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis by
A14,
A18,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
suppose
A19: x
in Ui;
A20: (i1
+ 1)
in (
Seg i) by
FINSEQ_1: 4;
not x
in (
Seg i) by
A19,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then not x
in
{i} by
A20,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis by
A19,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
end;
for x1,x2 be
object st x1
in (
dom f) & x2
in (
dom f) & (f
. x1)
= (f
. x2) holds x1
= x2
proof
let x1,x2 be
object such that
A21: x1
in (
dom f) and
A22: x2
in (
dom f) and
A23: (f
. x1)
= (f
. x2);
A24: (f
. x2)
=
F(x2) by
A8,
A22;
not x1
in
{i} by
A10,
A8,
A21,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
A25: x1
<> i by
TARSKI:def 1;
(f
. x1)
=
F(x1) by
A8,
A21;
then x1
in
{i, x2} by
A23,
A24,
TARSKI:def 2;
hence thesis by
A25,
TARSKI:def 2;
end;
then f is
one-to-one by
FUNCT_1:def 4;
then ((f
.: fY),fY)
are_equipotent by
A9,
CARD_1: 33;
then
A26: (
card (f
.: fY))
= (
card fY) by
CARD_1: 5;
((
finSeg n2)
\
{i})
c= (Li
\/ Ui)
proof
let x be
object such that
A27: x
in ((
finSeg n2)
\
{i});
x
in (
finSeg n2) by
A27;
then
consider k be
Nat such that
A28: x
= k and
A29: 1
<= k and
A30: k
<= n2;
not k
in
{i} by
A27,
A28,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
A31: k
<> i by
TARSKI:def 1;
per cases by
A31,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose k
< (i1
+ 1);
then k
<= i1 by
NAT_1: 13;
then x
in Li by
A28,
A29;
hence thesis by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
suppose k
> (i1
+ 1);
then
A32: not x
in (
Seg i) by
A28,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
x
in (
Seg n2) by
A28,
A29,
A30;
then x
in Ui by
A32,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence thesis by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
end;
then
A33: ((
finSeg n2)
\
{i})
= (Li
\/ Ui) by
A10,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
A34: (
rng f)
c= X
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
rng f);
then
consider y be
object such that
A35: y
in (
dom f) and
A36: (f
. y)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
y
in (
finSeg n2) by
A33,
A8,
A35;
then
consider k be
Nat such that
A37: k
= y and
A38: 1
<= k and
A39: k
<= n2;
A40: (f
. k)
=
{i, k} by
A8,
A35,
A37;
not y
in
{i} by
A10,
A8,
A35,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then i
<> k by
A37,
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A41: k
< i or i
< k by
XXREAL_0: 1;
k
in (
Seg n2) by
A38,
A39;
then
{i, k}
in SS by
A1,
A41,
MATRIX11: 1;
hence thesis by
A36,
A37,
A40;
end;
A42: (p29
.: ((Li
\ (f
" Y))
\/ (Ui
/\ (f
" Y))))
c= (
Seg j1)
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in (p29
.: ((Li
\ (f
" Y))
\/ (Ui
/\ (f
" Y))));
then
consider x be
object such that
A43: x
in (
dom p29) and
A44: x
in ((Li
\ (f
" Y))
\/ (Ui
/\ (f
" Y))) and
A45: (p29
. x)
= y by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
(
dom p29)
= (
Seg n2) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
then
consider k be
Nat such that
A46: x
= k and
A47: 1
<= k and
A48: k
<= n2 by
A43;
per cases by
A44,
A46,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
A49: k
in (Li
\ (f
" Y));
then k
<= i1 by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A50: k
< (i1
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
A51: Li
c= (
dom f) by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
A52: k
in Li by
A49;
then
A53: (f
. k)
in (
rng f) by
A51,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
not k
in (f
" Y) by
A49,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
A54: not (f
. k)
in Y by
A52,
A51,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
A55: k
in (
Seg n2) by
A47,
A48;
(
dom p29)
= (
Seg n2) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
then
A56: (p2
. i)
<> (p2
. k) by
A1,
A50,
A55,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
A57: (f
. k)
=
F(k) by
A8,
A52,
A51;
then
F(k)
in X by
A34,
A53;
then ex m be
Nat st
F(k)
=
{m, i} &
{m, i}
in SS;
then ((
Part_sgn (p2,K))
.
{k, i})
<> (
- (
1_ K)) by
A34,
A54,
A53,
A57;
then (p2
. k)
<= (p2
. i) by
A1,
A50,
A55,
MATRIX11:def 1;
then (p2
. k)
< (j1
+ 1) by
A2,
A56,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A58: (p2
. k)
<= j1 by
NAT_1: 13;
A59: (
rng p29)
= (
Seg n2) by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
(p2
. k)
in (
rng p29) by
A43,
A46,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then 1
<= (p2
. k) by
A59,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
hence thesis by
A45,
A46,
A58;
end;
suppose
A60: k
in (Ui
/\ (f
" Y));
then k
in Ui by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A61: not k
in (
Seg i) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
1
<= k by
A60,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A62: i
< k by
A61;
A63: k
in (f
" Y) by
A60,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (f
. k)
in Y by
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then
consider s such that
A64: s
= (f
. k) and s
in X and
A65: ((
Part_sgn (p2,K))
. s)
= (
- (
1_ K));
k
in (
dom f) by
A63,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then
A66: s
=
{i, k} by
A8,
A64;
(
dom p29)
= (
finSeg n2) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
then
A67: (p29
. i)
<> (p2
. k) by
A1,
A60,
A62,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
reconsider i, k as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
(
1_ K)
<> (
- (
1_ K)) by
MATRIX11: 22;
then (p2
. i)
>= (p2
. k) by
A1,
A60,
A65,
A66,
A62,
MATRIX11:def 1;
then (p2
. k)
< (j1
+ 1) by
A2,
A67,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A68: (p2
. k)
<= j1 by
NAT_1: 13;
A69: (
rng p29)
= (
Seg n2) by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
(p2
. k)
in (
rng p29) by
A43,
A46,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then 1
<= (p2
. k) by
A69,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
hence thesis by
A45,
A46,
A68;
end;
end;
take X;
reconsider I = i, J = j as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
set P = (
power K);
thus X
= {
{e, i} where e be
Nat :
{e, i}
in (
2Set (
Seg (n
+ 2))) };
A70: (Li
/\ (f
" Y))
c= Li by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
(
Seg j1)
c= (p29
.: ((Li
\ (f
" Y))
\/ (Ui
/\ (f
" Y))))
proof
let y be
object such that
A71: y
in (
Seg j1);
consider k be
Nat such that
A72: y
= k and 1
<= k and
A73: k
<= j1 by
A71;
A74: j1
< (j1
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A75: k
< j by
A73,
XXREAL_0: 2;
j
<= n2 by
A2,
A7,
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then j1
<= n2 by
A74,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (
Seg j1)
c= (
Seg n2) by
FINSEQ_1: 5;
then
consider x be
object such that
A76: x
in (
dom p29) and
A77: y
= (p29
. x) by
A3,
A71,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
A78: not x
in
{i} by
A2,
A72,
A73,
A74,
A77,
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A79: x
in (
dom f) by
A33,
A8,
A76,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
A80: (f
. x)
=
F(x) by
A8;
A81: (f
. x)
in (
rng f) by
A79,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
F(x)
in X by
A34,
A80;
then
consider m be
Nat such that
A82:
F(x)
=
{m, i} and
A83:
{m, i}
in (
2Set (
Seg n2));
A84: m
<> i by
A83,
SGRAPH1: 10;
A85: m
in (
Seg n2) by
A83,
SGRAPH1: 10;
m
in
{x, i} by
A82,
TARSKI:def 2;
then
A86: m
= x by
A84,
TARSKI:def 2;
reconsider m, i as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
per cases by
A83,
SGRAPH1: 10,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A87: m
< i;
A88: not m
in (f
" Y)
proof
assume m
in (f
" Y);
then
{m, i}
in Y by
A80,
A86,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then
A89: ex s st s
=
{m, i} & s
in X & ((
Part_sgn (p2,K))
. s)
= (
- (
1_ K));
((
Part_sgn (p2,K))
.
{m, i})
= (
1_ K) by
A1,
A2,
A72,
A75,
A76,
A77,
A86,
A87,
MATRIX11:def 1;
hence thesis by
A89,
MATRIX11: 22;
end;
m
< (i1
+ 1) by
A87;
then
A90: m
<= i1 by
NAT_1: 13;
1
<= m by
A85,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then m
in Li by
A90;
then x
in (Li
\ (f
" Y)) by
A86,
A88,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then x
in ((Li
\ (f
" Y))
\/ (Ui
/\ (f
" Y))) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence thesis by
A76,
A77,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
end;
suppose
A91: m
> i;
then not m
in (
Seg i) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A92: x
in Ui by
A86,
A85,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
((
Part_sgn (p2,K))
.
{m, i})
= (
- (
1_ K)) by
A1,
A2,
A72,
A75,
A76,
A77,
A86,
A91,
MATRIX11:def 1;
then
A93: (f
. x)
in Y by
A34,
A80,
A81,
A82,
A83;
x
in (
dom f) by
A33,
A8,
A76,
A78,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then x
in (f
" Y) by
A93,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then x
in (Ui
/\ (f
" Y)) by
A92,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then x
in ((Li
\ (f
" Y))
\/ (Ui
/\ (f
" Y))) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence thesis by
A76,
A77,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
end;
end;
then
A94: (
Seg j1)
= (p29
.: ((Li
\ (f
" Y))
\/ (Ui
/\ (f
" Y)))) by
A42,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
A95: (
Seg n2)
= (
dom p29) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
A96: (Li
\ (f
" Y))
= (Li
\ ((f
" Y)
/\ Li)) by
XBOOLE_1: 47;
i1
< (i1
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
then Li
c= (
Seg i) by
FINSEQ_1: 5;
then
A97: Li
misses Ui by
XBOOLE_1: 64,
XBOOLE_1: 79;
X
c= (
rng f)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in X;
then
consider k be
Nat such that
A98: x
=
{k, i} and
A99:
{k, i}
in SS;
k
<> i by
A99,
SGRAPH1: 10;
then
A100: not k
in
{i} by
TARSKI:def 1;
k
in (
Seg n2) by
A99,
SGRAPH1: 10;
then
A101: k
in (Li
\/ Ui) by
A33,
A100,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then (f
. k)
=
F(k) by
A8;
hence thesis by
A8,
A98,
A101,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
then X
= (
rng f) by
A34,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then
A102: (f
.: fY)
= Y by
A5,
FUNCT_1: 77;
((Li
/\ (f
" Y))
\/ (Ui
/\ (f
" Y)))
= ((
dom f)
/\ (f
" Y)) by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 23;
then
A103: ((Li
/\ (f
" Y))
\/ (Ui
/\ (f
" Y)))
= (f
" Y) by
RELAT_1: 132,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
A104: (Ui
/\ (f
" Y))
c= Ui by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then ((Li
\ (f
" Y))
\/ (Ui
/\ (f
" Y)))
c= ((
finSeg n2)
\
{i}) by
A33,
XBOOLE_1: 13;
then ((
finSeg j1),((Li
\ (f
" Y))
\/ (Ui
/\ (f
" Y))))
are_equipotent by
A95,
A94,
CARD_1: 33,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
then
A105: (
card (
finSeg j1))
= (
card ((Li
\ (f
" Y))
\/ (Ui
/\ (f
" Y)))) by
CARD_1: 5
.= ((
card (Li
\ ((f
" Y)
/\ Li)))
+ (
card (Ui
/\ (f
" Y)))) by
A97,
A104,
A96,
CARD_2: 40,
XBOOLE_1: 64
.= (((
card Li)
- (
card ((f
" Y)
/\ Li)))
+ (
card (Ui
/\ (f
" Y)))) by
CARD_2: 44,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
per cases ;
suppose j
> i;
then
reconsider ji = (j
- i) as
Element of
NAT by
NAT_1: 21;
(
card Y)
= ((((
card (Li
/\ fY))
+ (
card (
finSeg j1)))
- (
card Li))
+ (
card (fY
/\ Li))) by
A97,
A70,
A104,
A103,
A26,
A102,
A105,
CARD_2: 40,
XBOOLE_1: 64
.= (((2
* (
card (Li
/\ fY)))
+ (
card (
finSeg j1)))
- (
card Li))
.= (((2
* (
card (Li
/\ fY)))
+ j1)
- (
card Li)) by
FINSEQ_1: 57
.= (((2
* (
card (Li
/\ fY)))
+ j1)
- i1) by
FINSEQ_1: 57
.= ((2
* (
card (Li
/\ fY)))
+ ji);
hence (the
multF of K
$$ (X,(
Part_sgn (p2,K))))
= (P
. ((
- (
1_ K)),((2
* (
card (Li
/\ fY)))
+ ji))) by
Th8
.= ((P
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(2
* (
card (Li
/\ fY)))))
* (P
. ((
- (
1_ K)),ji))) by
HURWITZ: 3
.= ((
1_ K)
* (P
. ((
- (
1_ K)),ji))) by
HURWITZ: 4
.= ((P
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(2
* I)))
* (P
. ((
- (
1_ K)),ji))) by
HURWITZ: 4
.= (P
. ((
- (
1_ K)),((2
* i)
+ ji))) by
HURWITZ: 3
.= (P
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)));
end;
suppose j
<= i;
then
reconsider ij = (i
- j) as
Element of
NAT by
NAT_1: 21;
(
card Y)
= ((((
card Li)
+ (
card (Ui
/\ fY)))
- (
card (
finSeg j1)))
+ (
card (Ui
/\ fY))) by
A97,
A70,
A104,
A103,
A26,
A102,
A105,
CARD_2: 40,
XBOOLE_1: 64
.= (((2
* (
card (Ui
/\ fY)))
- (
card (
finSeg j1)))
+ (
card Li))
.= (((2
* (
card (Ui
/\ fY)))
- j1)
+ (
card Li)) by
FINSEQ_1: 57
.= (((2
* (
card (Ui
/\ fY)))
- j1)
+ i1) by
FINSEQ_1: 57
.= ((2
* (
card (Ui
/\ fY)))
+ ij);
hence (the
multF of K
$$ (X,(
Part_sgn (p2,K))))
= (P
. ((
- (
1_ K)),((2
* (
card (Ui
/\ fY)))
+ ij))) by
Th8
.= ((P
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(2
* (
card (Ui
/\ fY)))))
* (P
. ((
- (
1_ K)),ij))) by
HURWITZ: 3
.= ((
1_ K)
* (P
. ((
- (
1_ K)),ij))) by
HURWITZ: 4
.= ((P
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(2
* J)))
* (P
. ((
- (
1_ K)),ij))) by
HURWITZ: 4
.= (P
. ((
- (
1_ K)),((2
* j)
+ ij))) by
HURWITZ: 3
.= (P
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)));
end;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:10
Th10: for i, j st i
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) & n
>= 2 holds ex Proj be
Function of (
2Set (
Seg n)), (
2Set (
Seg (n
+ 1))) st (
rng Proj)
= ((
2Set (
Seg (n
+ 1)))
\ {
{N, i} where N be
Nat :
{N, i}
in (
2Set (
Seg (n
+ 1))) }) & Proj is
one-to-one & for k, m st k
< m &
{k, m}
in (
2Set (
Seg n)) holds (m
< i & k
< i implies (Proj
.
{k, m})
=
{k, m}) & (m
>= i & k
< i implies (Proj
.
{k, m})
=
{k, (m
+ 1)}) & (m
>= i & k
>= i implies (Proj
.
{k, m})
=
{(k
+ 1), (m
+ 1)})
proof
let i,j be
Nat such that
A1: i
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) and
A2: n
>= 2;
defpred
P[
object,
object] means for k,m be
Nat st
{k, m}
= $1 & k
< m holds (m
< i & k
< i implies $2
=
{k, m}) & (m
>= i & k
< i implies $2
=
{k, (m
+ 1)}) & (m
>= i & k
>= i implies $2
=
{(k
+ 1), (m
+ 1)});
set X = {
{N, i} where N be
Nat :
{N, i}
in (
2Set (
Seg (n
+ 1))) };
set SS = (
2Set (
Seg n));
set n1 = (n
+ 1);
set SS1 = (
2Set (
Seg n1));
A3: for k,m be
Nat st
{k, m}
in X holds k
= i or m
= i
proof
let k,m be
Nat;
assume
{k, m}
in X;
then
consider m1 be
Nat such that
A4:
{k, m}
=
{m1, i} and
{m1, i}
in SS1;
i
in
{i, m1} by
TARSKI:def 2;
hence thesis by
A4,
TARSKI:def 2;
end;
A5: for x be
object st x
in SS holds ex y be
object st y
in (SS1
\ X) &
P[x, y]
proof
n
<= (n
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 11;
then
A6: (
Seg n)
c= (
Seg n1) by
FINSEQ_1: 5;
reconsider N = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
let x be
object;
assume x
in SS;
then
consider k,m be
Nat such that
A7: k
in (
Seg n) and
A8: m
in (
Seg n) and
A9: k
< m and
A10: x
=
{k, m} by
MATRIX11: 1;
A11: (m
+ 1)
in (
Seg (N
+ 1)) by
A8,
FINSEQ_1: 60;
reconsider e = k as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
A12: (e
+ 1)
in (
Seg (N
+ 1)) by
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 60;
per cases ;
suppose
A13: m
< i & k
< i;
then
A14: not
{k, m}
in X by
A3;
{k, m}
in SS1 by
A7,
A8,
A9,
A6,
MATRIX11: 1;
then
A15:
{k, m}
in (SS1
\ X) by
A14,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
P[
{k, m},
{k, m}] by
A13,
ZFMISC_1: 6;
hence thesis by
A10,
A15;
end;
suppose
A16: m
>= i & k
< i;
A17:
P[
{k, m},
{k, (m
+ 1)}]
proof
let k9,m9 be
Nat such that
A18:
{k9, m9}
=
{k, m} and k9
< m9;
k9
= k or k9
= m by
A18,
ZFMISC_1: 6;
hence thesis by
A16,
A18,
ZFMISC_1: 6;
end;
(m
+ 1)
> i by
A16,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A19: not
{k, (m
+ 1)}
in X by
A3,
A16;
(m
+ 1)
> k by
A9,
NAT_1: 13;
then
{k, (m
+ 1)}
in SS1 by
A7,
A6,
A11,
MATRIX11: 1;
then
{k, (m
+ 1)}
in (SS1
\ X) by
A19,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence thesis by
A10,
A17;
end;
suppose m
< i & k
>= i;
hence thesis by
A9,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
suppose
A20: m
>= i & k
>= i;
A21:
P[
{k, m},
{(k
+ 1), (m
+ 1)}]
proof
let k9,m9 be
Nat such that
A22:
{k9, m9}
=
{k, m} and
A23: k9
< m9;
k9
= k or k9
= m by
A22,
ZFMISC_1: 6;
hence thesis by
A20,
A22,
A23,
ZFMISC_1: 6;
end;
A24: (k
+ 1)
> i by
A20,
NAT_1: 13;
(m
+ 1)
> (k
+ 1) by
A9,
XREAL_1: 8;
then
A25:
{(k
+ 1), (m
+ 1)}
in SS1 by
A11,
A12,
MATRIX11: 1;
(m
+ 1)
> i by
A20,
NAT_1: 13;
then not
{(k
+ 1), (m
+ 1)}
in X by
A3,
A24;
then
{(k
+ 1), (m
+ 1)}
in (SS1
\ X) by
A25,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence thesis by
A10,
A21;
end;
end;
consider f be
Function of SS, (SS1
\ X) such that
A26: for x be
object st x
in SS holds
P[x, (f
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A5);
ex y be
object st y
in (SS1
\ X) &
P[
{1, 2}, y] by
A2,
A5,
MATRIX11: 3;
then
reconsider SSX = (SS1
\ X) as non
empty
set;
reconsider f as
Function of SS, SSX;
A27: SSX
c= (
rng f)
proof
let x be
object such that
A28: x
in SSX;
consider k,m be
Nat such that
A29: k
in (
Seg n1) and
A30: m
in (
Seg n1) and
A31: k
< m and
A32: x
=
{k, m} by
A28,
MATRIX11: 1;
A33: k
<> i & m
<> i
proof
assume k
= i or m
= i;
then x
in X by
A28,
A32;
hence thesis by
A28,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
A34: 1
<= m by
A30,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
1
<= k by
A29,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
reconsider k1 = (k
- 1), m1 = (m
- 1) as
Element of
NAT by
A34,
NAT_1: 21;
reconsider m9 = m, k9 = k as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
per cases by
A33,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A35: k
< i & m
< i;
A36: i
<= (n
+ 1) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then k
< (n
+ 1) by
A35,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A37: k
<= n by
NAT_1: 13;
m
< (n
+ 1) by
A35,
A36,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A38: m
<= n by
NAT_1: 13;
1
<= m by
A30,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A39: m
in (
Seg n) by
A38;
A40: (
dom f)
= SS by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
1
<= k by
A29,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then k
in (
Seg n) by
A37;
then
A41:
{k9, m9}
in SS by
A31,
A39,
MATRIX11: 1;
then x
= (f
. x) by
A26,
A31,
A32,
A35;
hence thesis by
A32,
A41,
A40,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
suppose k
> i & m
< i;
hence thesis by
A31,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
suppose
A42: k
< i & m
> i;
1
<= i by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A43: 1
< (m1
+ 1) by
A42,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A44: i
<= m1 by
A42,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A45: k
< m1 by
A42,
XXREAL_0: 2;
i
<= (n
+ 1) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then k
< (n
+ 1) by
A42,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A46: k
<= n by
NAT_1: 13;
A47: (
dom f)
= SS by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
(m1
+ 1)
<= (n
+ 1) by
A30,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then m1
< (n
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A48: m1
<= n by
NAT_1: 13;
1
<= m1 by
A43,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A49: m1
in (
Seg n) by
A48;
1
<= k by
A29,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then k
in (
Seg n) by
A46;
then
A50:
{k9, m1}
in SS by
A49,
A45,
MATRIX11: 1;
then (f
.
{k9, m1})
=
{k9, (m1
+ 1)} by
A26,
A42,
A44,
A45;
hence thesis by
A32,
A50,
A47,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
suppose
A51: k
> i & m
> i;
(k1
+ 1)
<= (n
+ 1) by
A29,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then k1
< (n
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A52: k1
<= n by
NAT_1: 13;
A53: (
dom f)
= SS by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
(m1
+ 1)
<= (n
+ 1) by
A30,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then m1
< (n
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A54: m1
<= n by
NAT_1: 13;
A55: k1
< m1 by
A31,
XREAL_1: 9;
A56: 1
<= i by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A57: 1
< (m1
+ 1) by
A51,
XXREAL_0: 2;
A58: 1
< (k1
+ 1) by
A51,
A56,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A59: i
<= k1 by
A51,
NAT_1: 13;
1
<= k1 by
A58,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A60: k1
in (
Seg n) by
A52;
1
<= m1 by
A57,
NAT_1: 13;
then m1
in (
Seg n) by
A54;
then
A61:
{k1, m1}
in SS by
A60,
A55,
MATRIX11: 1;
i
<= m1 by
A51,
A57,
NAT_1: 13;
then (f
.
{k1, m1})
=
{(k1
+ 1), (m1
+ 1)} by
A26,
A59,
A55,
A61;
hence thesis by
A32,
A61,
A53,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
end;
A62: (
rng f)
c= SSX by
RELAT_1:def 19;
then
A63: SSX
= (
rng f) by
A27,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
(
dom f)
= SS by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
reconsider f as
Function of SS, SS1 by
A63,
FUNCT_2: 2;
take f;
for x1,x2 be
object st x1
in SS & x2
in SS & (f
. x1)
= (f
. x2) holds x1
= x2
proof
let x1,x2 be
object such that
A64: x1
in SS and
A65: x2
in SS and
A66: (f
. x1)
= (f
. x2);
consider k2,m2 be
Nat such that k2
in (
Seg n) and m2
in (
Seg n) and
A67: k2
< m2 and
A68: x2
=
{k2, m2} by
A65,
MATRIX11: 1;
consider k1,m1 be
Nat such that k1
in (
Seg n) and m1
in (
Seg n) and
A69: k1
< m1 and
A70: x1
=
{k1, m1} by
A64,
MATRIX11: 1;
reconsider m1, m2, k1, k2 as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
per cases ;
suppose
A71: k1
< i & m1
< i & k2
< i & m2
< i;
then (f
. x1)
= x1 by
A26,
A64,
A69,
A70;
hence thesis by
A26,
A65,
A66,
A67,
A68,
A71;
end;
suppose
A72: k1
< i & m1
< i & (k2
< i or k2
>= i) & m2
>= i;
then
A73: (f
. x2)
=
{k2, (m2
+ 1)} or (f
. x2)
=
{(k2
+ 1), (m2
+ 1)} by
A26,
A65,
A67,
A68;
(f
. x1)
=
{k1, m1} by
A26,
A64,
A69,
A70,
A72;
then (k1
= k2 or k1
= (m2
+ 1)) & (m1
= k2 or m1
= (m2
+ 1)) or (k1
= (k2
+ 1) or k1
= (m2
+ 1)) & (m1
= (k2
+ 1) or m1
= (m2
+ 1)) by
A66,
A73,
ZFMISC_1: 6;
hence thesis by
A69,
A72,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
suppose
A74: k1
< i & m1
>= i & k2
< i & m2
>= i;
then
A75: (f
. x2)
=
{k2, (m2
+ 1)} by
A26,
A65,
A67,
A68;
A76: (f
. x1)
=
{k1, (m1
+ 1)} by
A26,
A64,
A69,
A70,
A74;
then
A77: (m1
+ 1)
= k2 or (m1
+ 1)
= (m2
+ 1) by
A66,
A75,
ZFMISC_1: 6;
k1
= k2 or k1
= (m2
+ 1) by
A66,
A76,
A75,
ZFMISC_1: 6;
hence thesis by
A70,
A68,
A74,
A77,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
suppose
A78: k1
< i & m1
>= i & (k2
>= i & m2
>= i or k2
< i & m2
< i);
then
A79: (f
. x2)
=
{(k2
+ 1), (m2
+ 1)} or (f
. x2)
=
{k2, m2} by
A26,
A65,
A67,
A68;
(f
. x1)
=
{k1, (m1
+ 1)} by
A26,
A64,
A69,
A70,
A78;
then (k1
= (k2
+ 1) or k1
= (m2
+ 1)) & ((m1
+ 1)
= (k2
+ 1) or (m1
+ 1)
= (m2
+ 1)) or (k1
= k2 or k1
= m2) & ((m1
+ 1)
= k2 or (m1
+ 1)
= m2) by
A66,
A79,
ZFMISC_1: 6;
hence thesis by
A78,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
suppose k1
>= i & m1
< i or k2
>= i & m2
< i;
hence thesis by
A69,
A67,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
suppose
A80: k1
>= i & m1
>= i & k2
>= i & m2
>= i;
then
A81: (f
. x2)
=
{(k2
+ 1), (m2
+ 1)} by
A26,
A65,
A67,
A68;
A82: (f
. x1)
=
{(k1
+ 1), (m1
+ 1)} by
A26,
A64,
A69,
A70,
A80;
then
A83: (m1
+ 1)
= (k2
+ 1) or (m1
+ 1)
= (m2
+ 1) by
A66,
A81,
ZFMISC_1: 6;
(k1
+ 1)
= (k2
+ 1) or (k1
+ 1)
= (m2
+ 1) by
A66,
A82,
A81,
ZFMISC_1: 6;
hence thesis by
A69,
A70,
A68,
A83;
end;
suppose
A84: k1
>= i & m1
>= i & (k2
< i & m2
< i or k2
< i & m2
>= i);
then
A85: (f
. x2)
=
{k2, m2} or (f
. x2)
=
{k2, (m2
+ 1)} by
A26,
A65,
A67,
A68;
(f
. x1)
=
{(k1
+ 1), (m1
+ 1)} by
A26,
A64,
A69,
A70,
A84;
then ((k1
+ 1)
= k2 or (k1
+ 1)
= m2) & ((m1
+ 1)
= k2 or (m1
+ 1)
= m2) or ((k1
+ 1)
= k2 or (k1
+ 1)
= (m2
+ 1)) & ((m1
+ 1)
= k2 or (m1
+ 1)
= (m2
+ 1)) by
A66,
A85,
ZFMISC_1: 6;
hence thesis by
A69,
A84,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A26,
A27,
A62,
FUNCT_2: 19,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:11
Th11: n
< 2 implies for p be
Element of (
Permutations n) holds p is
even & p
= (
idseq n)
proof
assume
A1: n
< 2;
let p be
Element of (
Permutations n);
reconsider P = p as
Permutation of (
Seg n) by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
now
per cases by
A1,
NAT_1: 23;
suppose
A2: n
=
0 ;
then
A3: (
Seg n)
=
{} ;
A4: (
len (
Permutations n))
= n by
MATRIX_1: 9;
P
=
{} by
A2;
hence thesis by
A4,
A3,
MATRIX_1: 16,
RELAT_1: 55;
end;
suppose
A5: n
= 1;
A6: (
len (
Permutations n))
= n by
MATRIX_1: 9;
P
= (
id (
Seg n)) by
A5,
MATRIX_1: 10,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis by
A6,
MATRIX_1: 16;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:12
Th12: for X,Y,D be non
empty
set holds for f be
Function of X, (
Fin Y), g be
Function of (
Fin Y), D, F be
BinOp of D st (for A,B be
Element of (
Fin Y) st A
misses B holds (F
. ((g
. A),(g
. B)))
= (g
. (A
\/ B))) & F is
commutative
associative & F is
having_a_unity & (g
.
{} )
= (
the_unity_wrt F) holds for I be
Element of (
Fin X) st for x, y st x
in I & y
in I & (f
. x)
meets (f
. y) holds x
= y holds (F
$$ (I,(g
* f)))
= (F
$$ ((f
.: I),g)) & (F
$$ ((f
.: I),g))
= (g
. (
union (f
.: I))) & (
union (f
.: I)) is
Element of (
Fin Y)
proof
let X,Y,D be non
empty
set;
let f be
Function of X, (
Fin Y), g be
Function of (
Fin Y), D, F be
BinOp of D such that
A1: for A,B be
Element of (
Fin Y) st A
misses B holds (F
. ((g
. A),(g
. B)))
= (g
. (A
\/ B)) and
A2: F is
commutative
associative and
A3: F is
having_a_unity and
A4: (g
.
{} )
= (
the_unity_wrt F);
defpred
P[
set] means for I be
Element of (
Fin X) st I
= $1 & for x, y st x
in I & y
in I & (f
. x)
meets (f
. y) holds x
= y holds (F
$$ (I,(g
* f)))
= (F
$$ ((f
.: I),g)) & (F
$$ ((f
.: I),g))
= (g
. (
union (f
.: I))) & (
union (f
.: I)) is
Element of (
Fin Y);
A5: for I be
Element of (
Fin X), i be
Element of X holds
P[I] & not i
in I implies
P[(I
\/
{i})]
proof
let A be
Element of (
Fin X), a be
Element of X such that
A6:
P[A] and
A7: not a
in A;
let I be
Element of (
Fin X) such that
A8: (A
\/
{a})
= I and
A9: for x, y st x
in I & y
in I & (f
. x)
meets (f
. y) holds x
= y;
A10: for x, y st x
in A & y
in A & (f
. x)
meets (f
. y) holds x
= y
proof
let x, y such that
A11: x
in A and
A12: y
in A and
A13: (f
. x)
meets (f
. y);
A
c= I by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
hence thesis by
A9,
A11,
A12,
A13;
end;
then
A14: (F
$$ (A,(g
* f)))
= (F
$$ ((f
.: A),g)) by
A6;
A15: (
union (f
.: A)) is
Element of (
Fin Y) by
A6,
A10;
(
dom f)
= X by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (
Im (f,a))
=
{(f
. a)} by
FUNCT_1: 59;
then
A16: (f
.: I)
= ((f
.: A)
\/
{(f
. a)}) by
A8,
RELAT_1: 120;
A17: (F
$$ ((f
.: A),g))
= (g
. (
union (f
.: A))) by
A6,
A10;
(
dom (g
* f))
= X by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A18: (g
. (f
. a))
= ((g
* f)
. a) by
FUNCT_1: 12;
per cases ;
suppose
A19: (f
. a) is non
empty or not (f
. a)
in (f
.: A);
not (f
. a)
in (f
.: A)
proof
A20: A
c= I by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
A21:
{a}
c= I by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
A22: a
in
{a} by
TARSKI:def 1;
assume
A23: (f
. a)
in (f
.: A);
then
consider x be
object such that x
in (
dom f) and
A24: x
in A and
A25: (f
. x)
= (f
. a) by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
(f
. x)
meets (f
. a) by
A19,
A23,
A25,
XBOOLE_1: 66;
hence thesis by
A7,
A9,
A24,
A22,
A21,
A20;
end;
then
A26: (F
$$ ((f
.: I),g))
= (F
. ((F
$$ ((f
.: A),g)),((g
* f)
. a))) by
A2,
A3,
A16,
A18,
SETWOP_2: 2;
A27: (f
. a)
c= Y by
FINSUB_1:def 5;
(
union (f
.: A))
c= Y by
A15,
FINSUB_1:def 5;
then
A28: ((
union (f
.: A))
\/ (f
. a))
c= Y by
A27,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
now
let x be
set;
assume x
in (f
.: A);
then
A29: ex y be
object st y
in (
dom f) & y
in A & (f
. y)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
A30: a
in
{a} by
TARSKI:def 1;
A31: A
c= I by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
A32:
{a}
c= I by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
assume x
meets (f
. a);
hence contradiction by
A7,
A9,
A29,
A30,
A32,
A31;
end;
then
A33: (
union (f
.: A))
misses (f
. a) by
ZFMISC_1: 80;
(
union (f
.: I))
= ((
union (f
.: A))
\/ (
union
{(f
. a)})) by
A16,
ZFMISC_1: 78
.= ((
union (f
.: A))
\/ (f
. a)) by
ZFMISC_1: 25;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A3,
A7,
A8,
A14,
A17,
A15,
A18,
A26,
A28,
A33,
FINSUB_1:def 5,
SETWOP_2: 2;
end;
suppose
A34: (f
. a) is
empty & (f
. a)
in (f
.: A);
then
A35: ((f
.: A)
\/
{(f
. a)})
= (f
.: A) by
ZFMISC_1: 40;
(F
$$ (I,(g
* f)))
= (F
. ((F
$$ ((f
.: A),g)),(
the_unity_wrt F))) by
A2,
A3,
A4,
A7,
A8,
A14,
A18,
A34,
SETWOP_2: 2
.= (F
$$ ((f
.: I),g)) by
A3,
A16,
A35,
SETWISEO: 15;
hence thesis by
A6,
A10,
A16,
A35;
end;
end;
A36:
P[(
{}. X)]
proof
A37:
{}
c= Y;
let I be
Element of (
Fin X) such that
A38: (
{}. X)
= I and for x, y st x
in I & y
in I & (f
. x)
meets (f
. y) holds x
= y;
A39: (f
.: I)
= (
{}. (
Fin Y)) by
A38;
(F
$$ (I,(g
* f)))
= (g
.
{} ) by
A2,
A3,
A4,
A38,
SETWISEO: 31;
hence thesis by
A2,
A3,
A4,
A39,
A37,
FINSUB_1:def 5,
SETWISEO: 31,
ZFMISC_1: 2;
end;
for I be
Element of (
Fin X) holds
P[I] from
SETWISEO:sch 2(
A36,
A5);
hence thesis;
end;
begin
definition
let i,j,n be
Nat;
let K;
let M be
Matrix of n, K;
assume that
A1: i
in (
Seg n) and
A2: j
in (
Seg n);
::
LAPLACE:def1
func
Delete (M,i,j) ->
Matrix of (n
-' 1), K equals
:
Def1: (
Deleting (M,i,j));
coherence
proof
set D = (
Deleting (M,i,j));
A3: (
width M)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
(
len M)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then (
dom M)
= (
Seg n) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A4: (
len D)
= (n
-' 1) by
A1,
Th2;
per cases ;
suppose (n
-' 1)
=
0 ;
then (
dom D)
= (
Seg
0 ) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then for f st f
in (
rng D) holds (
len f)
= (n
-' 1) by
RELAT_1: 42;
hence thesis by
A4,
MATRIX_0:def 2;
end;
suppose
A5: (n
-' 1)
>
0 ;
(
width (
Deleting (M,i,j)))
= (n
-' 1) by
A2,
A3,
Th5;
hence thesis by
A4,
A5,
MATRIX_0: 20;
end;
end;
end
theorem ::
LAPLACE:13
Th13: for i, j st i
in (
Seg n) & j
in (
Seg n) holds for k, m st k
in (
Seg (n
-' 1)) & m
in (
Seg (n
-' 1)) holds (k
< i & m
< j implies ((
Delete (M,i,j))
* (k,m))
= (M
* (k,m))) & (k
< i & m
>= j implies ((
Delete (M,i,j))
* (k,m))
= (M
* (k,(m
+ 1)))) & (k
>= i & m
< j implies ((
Delete (M,i,j))
* (k,m))
= (M
* ((k
+ 1),m))) & (k
>= i & m
>= j implies ((
Delete (M,i,j))
* (k,m))
= (M
* ((k
+ 1),(m
+ 1))))
proof
let i, j such that
A1: i
in (
Seg n) and
A2: j
in (
Seg n);
set DM = (
Delete (M,i,j));
A3: (
Deleting (M,i,j))
= DM by
A1,
A2,
Def1;
n
>
0 by
A1;
then
reconsider n9 = (n
- 1) as
Element of
NAT by
NAT_1: 20;
set DL = (
DelLine (M,i));
let k, m such that
A4: k
in (
Seg (n
-' 1)) and
A5: m
in (
Seg (n
-' 1));
A6: (n
-' 1)
= n9 by
XREAL_0:def 2;
then
A7: (k
+ 1)
in (
Seg (n9
+ 1)) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 60;
reconsider I = i, J = j, K = k, U = m as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
n9
<= (n9
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 11;
then
A8: (
Seg n9)
c= (
Seg n) by
FINSEQ_1: 5;
A9: (
len M)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
A10: (
dom M)
= (
Seg n) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (
len DL)
= n9 by
A1,
A6,
A9,
Th1;
then
A11: (
dom DL)
= (
Seg n9) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A12: ((
Deleting (M,i,j))
. k)
= (
Del ((
Line (DL,k)),j)) by
A4,
A6,
MATRIX_0:def 13;
(
len DM)
= n9 by
A6,
MATRIX_0: 24;
then (
dom DM)
= (
Seg n9) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A13: (DM
. k)
= (
Line (DM,k)) by
A4,
A6,
MATRIX_0: 60;
(
width DM)
= n9 by
A6,
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
A14: ((
Line (DM,k))
. m)
= (DM
* (k,m)) by
A5,
A6,
MATRIX_0:def 7;
A15: (
Line (DL,k))
= (DL
. k) by
A4,
A6,
A11,
MATRIX_0: 60;
A16: (m
+ 1)
in (
Seg (n9
+ 1)) by
A5,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 60;
A17: K
>= I implies (U
< J implies (DM
* (K,U))
= (M
* ((K
+ 1),U))) & (U
>= J implies (DM
* (K,U))
= (M
* ((K
+ 1),(U
+ 1))))
proof
assume
A18: K
>= I;
K
<= n9 by
A4,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A19: (DL
. K)
= (M
. (K
+ 1)) by
A1,
A9,
A10,
A7,
A18,
FINSEQ_3: 111;
A20: (M
. (K
+ 1))
= (
Line (M,(K
+ 1))) by
A10,
A7,
MATRIX_0: 60;
thus U
< J implies (DM
* (K,U))
= (M
* ((K
+ 1),U))
proof
A21: (
width M)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
assume U
< J;
then (DM
* (K,U))
= ((
Line (M,(K
+ 1)))
. U) by
A12,
A3,
A13,
A14,
A15,
A19,
A20,
FINSEQ_3: 110;
hence thesis by
A5,
A6,
A8,
A21,
MATRIX_0:def 7;
end;
assume
A22: U
>= J;
A23: U
<= n9 by
A5,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A24: (
width M)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
A25: (
len (
Line (DL,K)))
= (
width M) by
A15,
A19,
A20,
MATRIX_0:def 7;
then J
in (
dom (
Line (DL,K))) by
A2,
A24,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (DM
* (K,U))
= ((
Line (M,(K
+ 1)))
. (U
+ 1)) by
A12,
A3,
A13,
A14,
A15,
A7,
A19,
A20,
A22,
A25,
A23,
FINSEQ_3: 111,
MATRIX_0: 24;
hence thesis by
A16,
A24,
MATRIX_0:def 7;
end;
K
< I implies (U
< J implies (DM
* (K,U))
= (M
* (K,U))) & (U
>= J implies (DM
* (K,U))
= (M
* (K,(U
+ 1))))
proof
assume K
< I;
then
A26: (DL
. K)
= (M
. K) by
FINSEQ_3: 110;
A27: (M
. K)
= (
Line (M,K)) by
A4,
A6,
A10,
A8,
MATRIX_0: 60;
thus U
< J implies (DM
* (K,U))
= (M
* (K,U))
proof
assume
A28: U
< J;
A29: (
width M)
= (n9
+ 1) by
MATRIX_0: 24;
(DM
* (K,U))
= ((
Line (M,K))
. U) by
A12,
A3,
A13,
A14,
A15,
A26,
A27,
A28,
FINSEQ_3: 110;
hence thesis by
A5,
A6,
A8,
A29,
MATRIX_0:def 7;
end;
assume
A30: U
>= J;
A31: U
<= n9 by
A5,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A32: (
width M)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
A33: (
len (
Line (DL,K)))
= (
width M) by
A15,
A26,
A27,
MATRIX_0:def 7;
then J
in (
dom (
Line (DL,K))) by
A2,
A32,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (DM
* (K,U))
= ((
Line (M,K))
. (U
+ 1)) by
A12,
A3,
A13,
A14,
A15,
A7,
A26,
A27,
A30,
A33,
A31,
FINSEQ_3: 111,
MATRIX_0: 24;
hence thesis by
A16,
A32,
MATRIX_0:def 7;
end;
hence thesis by
A17;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:14
Th14: for i, j st i
in (
Seg n) & j
in (
Seg n) holds ((
Delete (M,i,j))
@ )
= (
Delete ((M
@ ),j,i))
proof
let i, j such that
A1: i
in (
Seg n) and
A2: j
in (
Seg n);
n
>
0 by
A1;
then
reconsider n1 = (n
- 1) as
Element of
NAT by
NAT_1: 20;
set X1 = (
Seg n);
reconsider MT = (M
@ ) as
Matrix of n, K;
set D = (
Delete (M,i,j));
set n9 = (n
-' 1);
reconsider I = i as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
reconsider DT = (D
@ ) as
Matrix of n9, K;
set D9 = (
Delete (MT,j,i));
set X = (
Seg n9);
A3: ((n1
+ 1)
-' 1)
= n1 by
NAT_D: 34;
now
n9
<= n by
NAT_D: 35;
then
A4: X
c= X1 by
FINSEQ_1: 5;
let k,m be
Nat such that
A5:
[k, m]
in (
Indices DT);
[m, k]
in (
Indices D) by
A5,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
then
A6: (DT
* (k,m))
= (D
* (m,k)) by
MATRIX_0:def 6;
reconsider k9 = k, m9 = m as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
A7: (
Indices DT)
=
[:X, X:] by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
A8: k
in X by
A5,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A9: (k
+ 1)
in X1 by
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 60;
A10: (
Indices M)
=
[:X1, X1:] by
MATRIX_0: 24;
A11: m
in X by
A5,
A7,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A12: (m
+ 1)
in X1 by
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 60;
per cases ;
suppose
A13: m9
< I & k9
< j;
then
A14: (D9
* (k,m))
= (MT
* (k,m)) by
A1,
A2,
A8,
A11,
Th13;
A15:
[m, k]
in (
Indices M) by
A8,
A11,
A4,
A10,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
(D
* (m,k))
= (M
* (m,k)) by
A1,
A2,
A8,
A11,
A13,
Th13;
hence (DT
* (k,m))
= (D9
* (k,m)) by
A6,
A15,
A14,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
end;
suppose
A16: m9
< I & k9
>= j;
then
A17: (D9
* (k,m))
= (MT
* ((k
+ 1),m)) by
A1,
A2,
A8,
A11,
Th13;
A18:
[m, (k
+ 1)]
in (
Indices M) by
A11,
A4,
A9,
A10,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
(D
* (m,k))
= (M
* (m,(k
+ 1))) by
A1,
A2,
A8,
A11,
A16,
Th13;
hence (DT
* (k,m))
= (D9
* (k,m)) by
A6,
A18,
A17,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
end;
suppose
A19: m9
>= I & k9
< j;
then
A20: (D9
* (k,m))
= (MT
* (k,(m
+ 1))) by
A1,
A2,
A8,
A11,
Th13;
A21:
[(m
+ 1), k]
in (
Indices M) by
A8,
A4,
A12,
A10,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
(D
* (m,k))
= (M
* ((m
+ 1),k)) by
A1,
A2,
A8,
A11,
A19,
Th13;
hence (DT
* (k,m))
= (D9
* (k,m)) by
A6,
A21,
A20,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
end;
suppose
A22: m9
>= I & k9
>= j;
then
A23: (D9
* (k,m))
= (MT
* ((k
+ 1),(m
+ 1))) by
A1,
A2,
A8,
A11,
Th13;
A24:
[(m
+ 1), (k
+ 1)]
in (
Indices M) by
A9,
A12,
A10,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
(D
* (m,k))
= (M
* ((m
+ 1),(k
+ 1))) by
A1,
A2,
A8,
A11,
A22,
Th13;
hence (DT
* (k,m))
= (D9
* (k,m)) by
A6,
A24,
A23,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
MATRIX_0: 27;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:15
Th15: for f be
FinSequence of K, i, j st i
in (
Seg n) & j
in (
Seg n) holds (
Delete (M,i,j))
= (
Delete ((
RLine (M,i,f)),i,j))
proof
let f be
FinSequence of K, i, j such that
A1: i
in (
Seg n) and
A2: j
in (
Seg n);
A3: (
Delete (M,i,j))
= (
Deleting (M,i,j)) by
A1,
A2,
Def1;
A4: (
Delete ((
RLine (M,i,f)),i,j))
= (
Deleting ((
RLine (M,i,f)),i,j)) by
A1,
A2,
Def1;
reconsider f9 = f as
Element of (the
carrier of K
* ) by
FINSEQ_1:def 11;
reconsider I = i as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
per cases ;
suppose (
len f)
= (
width M);
then (
RLine (M,I,f))
= (
Replace (M,i,f9)) by
MATRIX11: 29;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4,
COMPUT_1: 3;
end;
suppose (
len f)
<> (
width M);
hence thesis by
MATRIX11:def 3;
end;
end;
definition
let c, n, m, D;
let M be
Matrix of n, m, D;
let pD be
FinSequence of D;
::
LAPLACE:def2
func
ReplaceCol (M,c,pD) ->
Matrix of n, m, D means
:
Def2: (
len it )
= (
len M) & (
width it )
= (
width M) & for i, j st
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) holds (j
<> c implies (it
* (i,j))
= (M
* (i,j))) & (j
= c implies (it
* (i,c))
= (pD
. i)) if (
len pD)
= (
len M)
otherwise it
= M;
consistency ;
existence
proof
thus (
len pD)
= (
len M) implies ex M1 be
Matrix of n, m, D st (
len M1)
= (
len M) & (
width M1)
= (
width M) & for i, j st
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) holds (j
<> c implies (M1
* (i,j))
= (M
* (i,j))) & (j
= c implies (M1
* (i,c))
= (pD
. i))
proof
reconsider M9 = M as
Matrix of (
len M), (
width M), D by
MATRIX_0: 51;
reconsider V = n, U = m as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
defpred
P[
set,
set,
set] means for i, j st i
= $1 & j
= $2 holds (j
<> c implies $3
= (M
* (i,j))) & (j
= c implies $3
= (pD
. i));
assume
A1: (
len pD)
= (
len M);
A2: for i,j be
Nat st
[i, j]
in
[:(
Seg V), (
Seg U):] holds ex x be
Element of D st
P[i, j, x]
proof
let i,j be
Nat such that
A3:
[i, j]
in
[:(
Seg V), (
Seg U):];
now
per cases ;
case
A4: j
= c;
A5: (
rng pD)
c= D by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
(
len M)
= n by
MATRIX_0:def 2;
then i
in (
Seg (
len pD)) by
A1,
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then i
in (
dom pD) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A6: (pD
. i)
in (
rng pD) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
P[i, j, (pD
. i)] by
A4;
hence thesis by
A6,
A5;
end;
case j
<> c;
then
P[i, j, (M
* (i,j))];
hence thesis;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
consider M1 be
Matrix of V, U, D such that
A7: for i,j be
Nat st
[i, j]
in (
Indices M1) holds
P[i, j, (M1
* (i,j))] from
MATRIX_0:sch 2(
A2);
reconsider M1 as
Matrix of n, m, D;
take M1;
A8:
now
per cases ;
suppose
A9: n
=
0 ;
then (
len M1)
=
0 by
MATRIX_0:def 2;
then
A10: (
width M1)
=
0 by
MATRIX_0:def 3;
(
len M)
=
0 by
A9,
MATRIX_0:def 2;
hence (
len M)
= (
len M1) & (
width M1)
= (
width M) by
A9,
A10,
MATRIX_0:def 2,
MATRIX_0:def 3;
end;
suppose
A11: n
>
0 ;
then
A12: (
width M)
= m by
MATRIX_0: 23;
(
len M)
= n by
A11,
MATRIX_0: 23;
hence (
len M)
= (
len M1) & (
width M)
= (
width M1) by
A11,
A12,
MATRIX_0: 23;
end;
end;
(
Indices M9)
= (
Indices M1) by
MATRIX_0: 26;
hence thesis by
A7,
A8;
end;
thus thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let M1,M2 be
Matrix of n, m, D;
thus (
len pD)
= (
len M) & ((
len M1)
= (
len M) & (
width M1)
= (
width M) & for i, j st
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) holds (j
<> c implies (M1
* (i,j))
= (M
* (i,j))) & (j
= c implies (M1
* (i,c))
= (pD
. i))) & ((
len M2)
= (
len M) & (
width M2)
= (
width M) & for i, j st
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) holds (j
<> c implies (M2
* (i,j))
= (M
* (i,j))) & (j
= c implies (M2
* (i,c))
= (pD
. i))) implies M1
= M2
proof
assume (
len pD)
= (
len M);
assume that
A13: (
len M1)
= (
len M) and
A14: (
width M1)
= (
width M) and
A15: for i, j st
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) holds (j
<> c implies (M1
* (i,j))
= (M
* (i,j))) & (j
= c implies (M1
* (i,c))
= (pD
. i));
assume that (
len M2)
= (
len M) and (
width M2)
= (
width M) and
A16: for i, j st
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) holds (j
<> c implies (M2
* (i,j))
= (M
* (i,j))) & (j
= c implies (M2
* (i,c))
= (pD
. i));
for i,j be
Nat st
[i, j]
in (
Indices M1) holds (M1
* (i,j))
= (M2
* (i,j))
proof
let i,j be
Nat;
assume
[i, j]
in (
Indices M1);
then
A17:
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) by
A13,
A14,
MATRIX_4: 55;
reconsider I = i, J = j as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
A18: J
= c implies (M1
* (I,c))
= (pD
. I) by
A15,
A17;
A19: J
<> c implies (M2
* (I,J))
= (M
* (I,J)) by
A16,
A17;
J
<> c implies (M1
* (I,J))
= (M
* (I,J)) by
A15,
A17;
hence thesis by
A16,
A17,
A18,
A19;
end;
hence thesis by
MATRIX_0: 27;
end;
thus thesis;
end;
end
notation
let c, n, m, D;
let M be
Matrix of n, m, D;
let pD be
FinSequence of D;
synonym
RCol (M,c,pD) for
ReplaceCol (M,c,pD);
end
theorem ::
LAPLACE:16
for i st i
in (
Seg (
width AD)) holds (i
= c & (
len pD)
= (
len AD) implies (
Col ((
RCol (AD,c,pD)),i))
= pD) & (i
<> c implies (
Col ((
RCol (AD,c,pD)),i))
= (
Col (AD,i)))
proof
let i such that
A1: i
in (
Seg (
width AD));
set R = (
RCol (AD,c,pD));
set CR = (
Col (R,i));
thus i
= c & (
len pD)
= (
len AD) implies CR
= pD
proof
assume that
A2: i
= c and
A3: (
len pD)
= (
len AD);
A4: (
len R)
= (
len pD) by
A3,
Def2;
A5:
now
let J be
Nat such that
A6: 1
<= J and
A7: J
<= (
len pD);
J
in (
Seg (
len pD)) by
A6,
A7;
then
A8: J
in (
dom R) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
i
in (
Seg (
width R)) by
A1,
A3,
Def2;
then
A9:
[J, c]
in (
Indices R) by
A2,
A8,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
A10: (
Indices R)
= (
Indices AD) by
MATRIX_0: 26;
(CR
. J)
= (R
* (J,c)) by
A2,
A8,
MATRIX_0:def 8;
hence (CR
. J)
= (pD
. J) by
A3,
A9,
A10,
Def2;
end;
(
len CR)
= (
len pD) by
A4,
MATRIX_0:def 8;
hence thesis by
A5;
end;
set CA = (
Col (AD,i));
A11: (
len AD)
= n by
MATRIX_0:def 2;
A12: (
len R)
= n by
MATRIX_0:def 2;
A13: (
len AD)
= (
len CA) by
MATRIX_0:def 8;
assume
A14: i
<> c;
A15:
now
let j be
Nat such that
A16: 1
<= j and
A17: j
<= (
len CA);
A18: j
in (
Seg (
len AD)) by
A13,
A16,
A17;
then
A19: j
in (
dom AD) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A20: (CA
. j)
= (AD
* (j,i)) by
MATRIX_0:def 8;
j
in (
dom R) by
A11,
A12,
A18,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A21: (CR
. j)
= (R
* (j,i)) by
MATRIX_0:def 8;
A22:
[j, i]
in (
Indices AD) by
A1,
A19,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
per cases ;
suppose (
len pD)
= (
len AD);
hence (CA
. j)
= (CR
. j) by
A14,
A20,
A21,
A22,
Def2;
end;
suppose (
len pD)
<> (
len AD);
hence (CA
. j)
= (CR
. j) by
Def2;
end;
end;
(
len CR)
= (
len R) by
MATRIX_0:def 8;
hence thesis by
A11,
A12,
A13,
A15;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:17
not c
in (
Seg (
width AD)) implies (
RCol (AD,c,pD))
= AD
proof
assume
A1: not c
in (
Seg (
width AD));
set R = (
RCol (AD,c,pD));
per cases ;
suppose
A2: (
len pD)
= (
len AD);
now
let i,j be
Nat such that
A3:
[i, j]
in (
Indices AD);
j
in (
Seg (
width AD)) by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
hence (R
* (i,j))
= (AD
* (i,j)) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
Def2;
end;
hence thesis by
MATRIX_0: 27;
end;
suppose (
len pD)
<> (
len AD);
hence thesis by
Def2;
end;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:18
(
RCol (AD,c,(
Col (AD,c))))
= AD
proof
set C = (
Col (AD,c));
set R = (
RCol (AD,c,C));
now
reconsider c as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
let i,j be
Nat such that
A1:
[i, j]
in (
Indices AD);
A2: (
len C)
= (
len AD) by
MATRIX_0:def 8;
reconsider I = i, J = j as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
A3: i
in (
dom AD) by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
now
per cases ;
suppose
A4: c
= j;
hence (R
* (i,j))
= (C
. I) by
A1,
A2,
Def2
.= (AD
* (i,j)) by
A3,
A4,
MATRIX_0:def 8;
end;
suppose c
<> J;
hence (R
* (i,j))
= (AD
* (i,j)) by
A1,
A2,
Def2;
end;
end;
hence (R
* (i,j))
= (AD
* (i,j));
end;
hence thesis by
MATRIX_0: 27;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:19
Th19: for A be
Matrix of n, m, D, A9 be
Matrix of m, n, D st A9
= (A
@ ) & (m
=
0 implies n
=
0 ) holds (
ReplaceCol (A,c,pD))
= ((
ReplaceLine (A9,c,pD))
@ )
proof
let A be
Matrix of n, m, D, A9 be
Matrix of m, n, D such that
A1: A9
= (A
@ ) and
A2: m
=
0 implies n
=
0 ;
set RC = (
ReplaceCol (A,c,pD));
set RL = (
ReplaceLine (A9,c,pD));
now
per cases ;
suppose
A3: n
=
0 ;
then
0
= (
len A) by
MATRIX_0:def 2;
then
0
= (
width A) by
MATRIX_0:def 3
.= (
len A9) by
A1,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
then m
=
0 by
MATRIX_0:def 2;
then (
len RL)
=
0 by
MATRIX_0:def 2;
then (
width RL)
=
0 by
MATRIX_0:def 3;
then (
len (RL
@ ))
=
0 by
MATRIX_0:def 6;
then
A4: (RL
@ )
=
{} ;
(
len RC)
=
0 by
A3,
MATRIX_0:def 2;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
suppose
A5: (
len pD)
<> (
len A) & n
>
0 ;
then
A6: (
width A)
= m by
MATRIX_0: 23;
then
A7: (
width A9)
= (
len A) by
A1,
A2,
A5,
MATRIX_0: 54;
A8: (
len A)
= n by
A5,
MATRIX_0: 23;
thus RC
= A by
A5,
Def2
.= ((A
@ )
@ ) by
A2,
A5,
A8,
A6,
MATRIX_0: 57
.= (RL
@ ) by
A1,
A5,
A7,
MATRIX11:def 3;
end;
suppose
A9: (
len pD)
= (
len A) & n
>
0 ;
then
A10: (
width RL)
= n by
A2,
MATRIX_0: 23;
then
A11: (
len (RL
@ ))
= n by
A9,
MATRIX_0: 54;
(
len RL)
= m by
A2,
A9,
MATRIX_0: 23;
then (
width (RL
@ ))
= m by
A9,
A10,
MATRIX_0: 54;
then
reconsider RL9 = (RL
@ ) as
Matrix of n, m, D by
A11,
MATRIX_0: 51;
A12: (
len A)
= n by
A9,
MATRIX_0: 23;
A13: (
width A9)
= n by
A2,
A9,
MATRIX_0: 23;
now
A14: (
Indices RC)
= (
Indices A) by
MATRIX_0: 26;
A15: (
Indices RL)
= (
Indices A9) by
MATRIX_0: 26;
let i,j be
Nat such that
A16:
[i, j]
in (
Indices RC);
reconsider I = i, J = j as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
(
Indices RC)
= (
Indices RL9) by
MATRIX_0: 26;
then
A17:
[j, i]
in (
Indices RL) by
A16,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
per cases ;
suppose
A18: J
= c;
hence (RC
* (i,j))
= (pD
. I) by
A9,
A16,
A14,
Def2
.= (RL
* (J,I)) by
A9,
A12,
A13,
A17,
A15,
A18,
MATRIX11:def 3
.= (RL9
* (i,j)) by
A17,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
end;
suppose
A19: J
<> c;
hence (RC
* (i,j))
= (A
* (I,J)) by
A9,
A16,
A14,
Def2
.= (A9
* (j,i)) by
A1,
A16,
A14,
MATRIX_0:def 6
.= (RL
* (J,I)) by
A9,
A12,
A13,
A17,
A15,
A19,
MATRIX11:def 3
.= (RL9
* (i,j)) by
A17,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
MATRIX_0: 27;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
begin
definition
let i, n;
let perm be
Element of (
Permutations (n
+ 1));
assume
A1: i
in (
Seg (n
+ 1));
::
LAPLACE:def3
func
Rem (perm,i) ->
Element of (
Permutations n) means
:
Def3: for k st k
in (
Seg n) holds (k
< i implies ((perm
. k)
< (perm
. i) implies (it
. k)
= (perm
. k)) & ((perm
. k)
>= (perm
. i) implies (it
. k)
= ((perm
. k)
- 1))) & (k
>= i implies ((perm
. (k
+ 1))
< (perm
. i) implies (it
. k)
= (perm
. (k
+ 1))) & ((perm
. (k
+ 1))
>= (perm
. i) implies (it
. k)
= ((perm
. (k
+ 1))
- 1)));
existence
proof
set j = (perm
. i);
set P = (
Permutations n);
set p = perm;
set n1 = (n
+ 1);
reconsider N = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
reconsider p9 = p as
Permutation of (
Seg n1) by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
A2: (
dom p9)
= (
Seg n1) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
defpred
Q[
object,
object] means for k st k
in (
Seg n) & $1
= k holds (k
< i implies ((p
. k)
< j implies $2
= (p
. k)) & ((p
. k)
>= j implies $2
= ((p
. k)
- 1))) & (k
>= i implies ((p
. (k
+ 1))
< j implies $2
= (p
. (k
+ 1))) & ((p
. (k
+ 1))
>= j implies $2
= ((p
. (k
+ 1))
- 1)));
A3: (
rng p9)
= (
Seg n1) by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
then
A4: j
in (
Seg n1) by
A1,
A2,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
A5: for k9 be
object st k9
in (
Seg n) holds ex y be
object st y
in (
Seg n) &
Q[k9, y]
proof
let k9 be
object;
assume k9
in (
Seg n);
then
consider k be
Nat such that
A6: k9
= k and
A7: 1
<= k and
A8: k
<= n;
A9: k
< n1 by
A8,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A10: k
in (
Seg n1) by
A7;
then
A11: (p
. k)
in (
Seg n1) by
A2,
A3,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
set k1 = (k
+ 1);
A12: (1
+
0 )
<= (k
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
(k
+ 1)
<= n1 by
A9,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A13: (k
+ 1)
in (
Seg n1) by
A12;
then
A14: (p
. (k
+ 1))
in (
Seg n1) by
A2,
A3,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
per cases ;
suppose
A15: k
< i & (p
. k)
< j;
j
<= n1 by
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (p
. k)
< n1 by
A15,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A16: (p
. k)
<= n by
NAT_1: 13;
A17:
Q[k9, (p
. k)] by
A6,
A15;
1
<= (p
. k) by
A11,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (p
. k)
in (
Seg n) by
A16;
hence thesis by
A17;
end;
suppose
A18: k
< i & (p
. k)
>= j;
then (p9
. k)
<> (p9
. i) by
A1,
A10,
FUNCT_2: 19;
then
A19: (p
. k)
> j by
A18,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
reconsider pk1 = ((p
. k)
- 1) as
Element of
NAT by
NAT_1: 20;
A20:
Q[k9, pk1] by
A6,
A18;
A21: pk1
< (pk1
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
(p
. k)
<= n1 by
A11,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then pk1
< n1 by
A21,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A22: pk1
<= n by
NAT_1: 13;
j
>= 1 by
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (pk1
+ 1)
> 1 by
A19,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then pk1
>= 1 by
NAT_1: 13;
then pk1
in (
Seg n) by
A22;
hence thesis by
A20;
end;
suppose
A23: k
>= i & (p
. k1)
< j;
j
<= n1 by
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (p
. k1)
< n1 by
A23,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A24: (p
. k1)
<= n by
NAT_1: 13;
A25:
Q[k9, (p
. k1)] by
A6,
A23;
1
<= (p
. k1) by
A14,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (p
. k1)
in (
Seg n) by
A24;
hence thesis by
A25;
end;
suppose
A26: k
>= i & (p
. k1)
>= j;
then i
< k1 by
NAT_1: 13;
then (p9
. k1)
<> (p9
. i) by
A1,
A13,
FUNCT_2: 19;
then
A27: (p
. k1)
> j by
A26,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
reconsider pk1 = ((p
. k1)
- 1) as
Element of
NAT by
NAT_1: 20;
A28:
Q[k9, pk1] by
A6,
A26;
A29: pk1
< (pk1
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
(p
. k1)
<= n1 by
A14,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then pk1
< n1 by
A29,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A30: pk1
<= n by
NAT_1: 13;
j
>= 1 by
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (pk1
+ 1)
> 1 by
A27,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then pk1
>= 1 by
NAT_1: 13;
then pk1
in (
Seg n) by
A30;
hence thesis by
A28;
end;
end;
consider q be
Function of (
Seg n), (
Seg n) such that
A31: for x be
object st x
in (
Seg n) holds
Q[x, (q
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A5);
for x1,x2 be
object st x1
in (
dom q) & x2
in (
dom q) & (q
. x1)
= (q
. x2) holds x1
= x2
proof
let x1,x2 be
object such that
A32: x1
in (
dom q) and
A33: x2
in (
dom q) and
A34: (q
. x1)
= (q
. x2);
A35: (
dom q)
= (
Seg n) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
then
consider k1 be
Nat such that
A36: x1
= k1 and
A37: 1
<= k1 and
A38: k1
<= n by
A32;
A39: (
0
+ 1)
<= (k1
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
A40: k1
< (n
+ 1) by
A38,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A41: k1
in (
Seg n1) by
A37;
(k1
+ 1)
<= (n
+ 1) by
A40,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A42: (k1
+ 1)
in (
Seg n1) by
A39;
consider k2 be
Nat such that
A43: x2
= k2 and
A44: 1
<= k2 and
A45: k2
<= n by
A33,
A35;
A46: k2
< (n
+ 1) by
A45,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A47: k2
in (
Seg n1) by
A44;
A48: (
0
+ 1)
<= (k2
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
(k2
+ 1)
<= (n
+ 1) by
A46,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A49: (k2
+ 1)
in (
Seg n1) by
A48;
per cases ;
suppose
A50: k1
< i & (p
. k1)
< j;
then
A51: (q
. k1)
= (p9
. k1) by
A31,
A32,
A36;
per cases ;
suppose k2
< i & (p
. k2)
< j;
then (p9
. k2)
= (p9
. k1) by
A31,
A33,
A34,
A36,
A43,
A51;
hence thesis by
A2,
A36,
A43,
A41,
A47,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
end;
suppose
A52: k2
< i & (p
. k2)
>= j;
then (q
. k2)
= ((p
. k2)
- 1) by
A31,
A33,
A43;
then ((p
. k1)
+ 1)
= (p
. k2) by
A34,
A36,
A43,
A51;
then (p
. k2)
<= j by
A50,
NAT_1: 13;
then (p9
. k2)
= (p9
. i) by
A52,
XXREAL_0: 1;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A47,
A52,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
end;
suppose
A53: k2
>= i & (p
. (k2
+ 1))
< j;
then (p9
. k1)
= (p9
. (k2
+ 1)) by
A31,
A33,
A34,
A36,
A43,
A51;
then k1
= (k2
+ 1) by
A2,
A41,
A49,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A50,
A53,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
suppose
A54: k2
>= i & (p
. (k2
+ 1))
>= j;
then (p
. k1)
= ((p
. (k2
+ 1))
- 1) by
A31,
A33,
A34,
A36,
A43,
A51;
then ((p
. k1)
+ 1)
= (p
. (k2
+ 1));
then (p
. (k2
+ 1))
<= j by
A50,
NAT_1: 13;
then (p9
. (k2
+ 1))
= (p
. i) by
A54,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then (k2
+ 1)
= i by
A1,
A2,
A49,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A54,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
end;
suppose
A55: k1
< i & (p
. k1)
>= j;
then
A56: (q
. k1)
= ((p
. k1)
- 1) by
A31,
A32,
A36;
per cases ;
suppose
A57: k2
< i & (p
. k2)
< j;
then (q
. k2)
= (p9
. k2) by
A31,
A33,
A43;
then (p
. k1)
= ((p
. k2)
+ 1) by
A34,
A36,
A43,
A56;
then (p
. k1)
<= j by
A57,
NAT_1: 13;
then (p
. k1)
= (p
. i) by
A55,
XXREAL_0: 1;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A41,
A55,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
end;
suppose k2
< i & (p
. k2)
>= j;
then ((p
. k1)
- 1)
= ((p
. k2)
- 1) by
A31,
A33,
A34,
A36,
A43,
A56;
hence thesis by
A2,
A36,
A43,
A41,
A47,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
end;
suppose
A58: k2
>= i & (p
. (k2
+ 1))
< j;
then ((p
. k1)
- 1)
= (p
. (k2
+ 1)) by
A31,
A33,
A34,
A36,
A43,
A56;
then ((p
. (k2
+ 1))
+ 1)
= (p
. k1);
then (p
. k1)
<= j by
A58,
NAT_1: 13;
then (p9
. k1)
= (p9
. i) by
A55,
XXREAL_0: 1;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A41,
A55,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
end;
suppose
A59: k2
>= i & (p
. (k2
+ 1))
>= j;
then ((p
. k1)
- 1)
= ((p
. (k2
+ 1))
- 1) by
A31,
A33,
A34,
A36,
A43,
A56;
then k1
= (k2
+ 1) by
A2,
A41,
A49,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A55,
A59,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
end;
suppose
A60: k1
>= i & (p
. (k1
+ 1))
< j;
then
A61: (q
. k1)
= (p
. (k1
+ 1)) by
A31,
A32,
A36;
per cases ;
suppose
A62: k2
< i & (p
. k2)
< j;
then (p9
. (k1
+ 1))
= (p9
. k2) by
A31,
A33,
A34,
A36,
A43,
A61;
then (k1
+ 1)
= k2 by
A2,
A47,
A42,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A60,
A62,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
suppose
A63: k2
< i & (p
. k2)
>= j;
then (p
. (k1
+ 1))
= ((p
. k2)
- 1) by
A31,
A33,
A34,
A36,
A43,
A61;
then (p
. k2)
= ((p
. (k1
+ 1))
+ 1);
then (p
. k2)
<= j by
A60,
NAT_1: 13;
then (p9
. k2)
= (p9
. i) by
A63,
XXREAL_0: 1;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A47,
A63,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
end;
suppose k2
>= i & (p
. (k2
+ 1))
< j;
then (q
. k2)
= (p
. (k2
+ 1)) by
A31,
A33,
A43;
then (k1
+ 1)
= (k2
+ 1) by
A2,
A34,
A36,
A43,
A42,
A49,
A61,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A36,
A43;
end;
suppose
A64: k2
>= i & (p
. (k2
+ 1))
>= j;
then (p
. (k1
+ 1))
= ((p
. (k2
+ 1))
- 1) by
A31,
A33,
A34,
A36,
A43,
A61;
then (p
. (k2
+ 1))
= ((p
. (k1
+ 1))
+ 1);
then (p
. (k2
+ 1))
<= j by
A60,
NAT_1: 13;
then (p9
. (k2
+ 1))
= (p9
. i) by
A64,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then (k2
+ 1)
= i by
A1,
A2,
A49,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A64,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
end;
suppose
A65: k1
>= i & (p
. (k1
+ 1))
>= j;
then
A66: (q
. k1)
= ((p
. (k1
+ 1))
- 1) by
A31,
A32,
A36;
per cases ;
suppose
A67: k2
< i & (p
. k2)
< j;
then ((p
. (k1
+ 1))
- 1)
= (p
. k2) by
A31,
A33,
A34,
A36,
A43,
A66;
then (p
. (k1
+ 1))
= ((p
. k2)
+ 1);
then (p
. (k1
+ 1))
<= j by
A67,
NAT_1: 13;
then (p9
. (k1
+ 1))
= (p9
. i) by
A65,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then (k1
+ 1)
= i by
A1,
A2,
A42,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A65,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
suppose
A68: k2
< i & (p
. k2)
>= j;
then ((p
. (k1
+ 1))
- 1)
= ((p
. k2)
- 1) by
A31,
A33,
A34,
A36,
A43,
A66;
then (k1
+ 1)
= k2 by
A2,
A47,
A42,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A65,
A68,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
suppose
A69: k2
>= i & (p
. (k2
+ 1))
< j;
then ((p
. (k1
+ 1))
- 1)
= (p
. (k2
+ 1)) by
A31,
A33,
A34,
A36,
A43,
A66;
then (p
. (k1
+ 1))
= ((p
. (k2
+ 1))
+ 1);
then (p
. (k1
+ 1))
<= j by
A69,
NAT_1: 13;
then (p9
. (k1
+ 1))
= (p9
. i) by
A65,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then (k1
+ 1)
= i by
A1,
A2,
A42,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A65,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
suppose k2
>= i & (p
. (k2
+ 1))
>= j;
then ((p
. (k1
+ 1))
- 1)
= ((p
. (k2
+ 1))
- 1) by
A31,
A33,
A34,
A36,
A43,
A66;
then (k1
+ 1)
= (k2
+ 1) by
A2,
A42,
A49,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A36,
A43;
end;
end;
end;
then
A70: q is
one-to-one by
FUNCT_1:def 4;
(
card (
finSeg N))
= (
card (
finSeg N));
then q is
one-to-one
onto by
A70,
FINSEQ_4: 63;
then
reconsider q as
Element of P by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
take q;
thus thesis by
A31;
end;
uniqueness
proof
set p = perm;
let q1,q2 be
Element of (
Permutations n) such that
A71: for k st k
in (
Seg n) holds (k
< i implies ((p
. k)
< (p
. i) implies (q1
. k)
= (p
. k)) & ((p
. k)
>= (p
. i) implies (q1
. k)
= ((p
. k)
- 1))) & (k
>= i implies ((p
. (k
+ 1))
< (p
. i) implies (q1
. k)
= (p
. (k
+ 1))) & ((p
. (k
+ 1))
>= (p
. i) implies (q1
. k)
= ((p
. (k
+ 1))
- 1))) and
A72: for k st k
in (
Seg n) holds (k
< i implies ((p
. k)
< (p
. i) implies (q2
. k)
= (p
. k)) & ((p
. k)
>= (p
. i) implies (q2
. k)
= ((p
. k)
- 1))) & (k
>= i implies ((p
. (k
+ 1))
< (p
. i) implies (q2
. k)
= (p
. (k
+ 1))) & ((p
. (k
+ 1))
>= (p
. i) implies (q2
. k)
= ((p
. (k
+ 1))
- 1)));
A73: q1 is
Permutation of (
Seg n) by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
then
A74: (
dom q1)
= (
Seg n) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
A75:
now
let x be
object such that
A76: x
in (
dom q1);
consider k be
Nat such that
A77: x
= k and 1
<= k and k
<= n by
A74,
A76;
set k1 = (k
+ 1);
A78: (p
. k)
< (p
. i) or (p
. k)
>= (p
. i);
A79: (p
. k1)
< (p
. i) or (p
. k1)
>= (p
. i);
k
< i or k
>= i;
then (p
. k)
< (p
. i) & (q1
. k)
= (p
. k) & (q2
. k)
= (p
. k) or (p
. k)
>= (p
. i) & (q1
. k)
= ((p
. k)
- 1) & (q2
. k)
= ((p
. k)
- 1) or (p
. k1)
< (p
. i) & (q1
. k)
= (p
. k1) & (q2
. k)
= (p
. k1) or (p
. k1)
>= (p
. i) & (q1
. k)
= ((p
. k1)
- 1) & (q2
. k)
= ((p
. k1)
- 1) by
A71,
A72,
A74,
A76,
A77,
A78,
A79;
hence (q1
. x)
= (q2
. x) by
A77;
end;
q2 is
Permutation of (
Seg n) by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
then (
dom q2)
= (
Seg n) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
hence thesis by
A73,
A75,
FUNCT_1: 2,
FUNCT_2: 52;
end;
end
theorem ::
LAPLACE:20
Th20: for i, j st i
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) & j
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) holds for P be
set st P
= { p1 : (p1
. i)
= j } holds ex Proj be
Function of P, (
Permutations n) st Proj is
bijective & for q1 st (q1
. i)
= j holds (Proj
. q1)
= (
Rem (q1,i))
proof
let i, j such that
A1: i
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) and
A2: j
in (
Seg (n
+ 1));
set n1 = (n
+ 1);
reconsider N = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
set P1 = (
Permutations (N
+ 1));
defpred
F[
object,
object] means for p be
Element of P1 st $1
= p & (p
. i)
= j holds $2
= (
Rem (p,i));
let X be
set such that
A3: X
= { p1 : (p1
. i)
= j };
A4: for x be
object st x
in X holds ex y be
object st y
in (
Permutations n) &
F[x, y]
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in X;
then
consider p be
Element of P1 such that
A5: p
= x and (p
. i)
= j by
A3;
take (
Rem (p,i));
thus thesis by
A5;
end;
consider f be
Function of X, (
Permutations n) such that
A6: for x be
object st x
in X holds
F[x, (f
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A4);
for x1,x2 be
object st x1
in X & x2
in X & (f
. x1)
= (f
. x2) holds x1
= x2
proof
let x1,x2 be
object such that
A7: x1
in X and
A8: x2
in X and
A9: (f
. x1)
= (f
. x2);
consider p1 be
Element of P1 such that
A10: p1
= x1 and
A11: (p1
. i)
= j by
A3,
A7;
set R1 = (
Rem (p1,i));
A12: (f
. x1)
= R1 by
A6,
A7,
A10,
A11;
consider p2 be
Element of P1 such that
A13: p2
= x2 and
A14: (p2
. i)
= j by
A3,
A8;
set R2 = (
Rem (p2,i));
A15: (f
. x2)
= R2 by
A6,
A8,
A13,
A14;
reconsider p19 = p1, p29 = p2 as
Permutation of (
Seg n1) by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
A16: (
dom p29)
= (
Seg n1) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
A17: (
dom p19)
= (
Seg n1) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
now
let x be
object such that
A18: x
in (
Seg n1);
consider k be
Nat such that
A19: x
= k and
A20: 1
<= k and
A21: k
<= n1 by
A18;
per cases by
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A22: k
< i;
i
<= n1 by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then k
< n1 by
A22,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then k
<= n by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A23: k
in (
Seg n) by
A20;
per cases ;
suppose (p1
. k)
< j & (p2
. k)
< j or (p1
. k)
>= j & (p2
. k)
>= j;
then (R1
. k)
= (p1
. k) & (R2
. k)
= (p2
. k) or (R1
. k)
= ((p1
. k)
- 1) & (R2
. k)
= ((p2
. k)
- 1) by
A1,
A11,
A14,
A22,
A23,
Def3;
hence (p1
. x)
= (p2
. x) by
A9,
A12,
A15,
A19;
end;
suppose (p1
. k)
< j & (p2
. k)
>= j or (p1
. k)
>= j & (p2
. k)
< j;
then (R1
. k)
= (p1
. k) & (R2
. k)
= ((p2
. k)
- 1) & (p1
. k)
< j & (p2
. k)
>= j or (R1
. k)
= ((p1
. k)
- 1) & (R2
. k)
= (p2
. k) & (p1
. k)
>= j & (p2
. k)
< j by
A1,
A11,
A14,
A22,
A23,
Def3;
then ((p1
. k)
+ 1)
= (p2
. k) & (p1
. k)
< j & (p2
. k)
>= j or (p1
. k)
= ((p2
. k)
+ 1) & (p1
. k)
>= j & (p2
. k)
< j by
A9,
A12,
A15;
then (p2
. k)
<= j & (p2
. k)
>= j or (p1
. k)
>= j & (p1
. k)
<= j by
NAT_1: 13;
then (p29
. k)
= (p29
. i) or (p19
. k)
= (p19
. i) by
A11,
A14,
XXREAL_0: 1;
hence (p1
. x)
= (p2
. x) by
A1,
A17,
A16,
A18,
A19,
A22,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
end;
end;
suppose k
= i;
hence (p1
. x)
= (p2
. x) by
A11,
A14,
A19;
end;
suppose
A24: k
> i;
then
reconsider k1 = (k
- 1) as
Element of
NAT by
NAT_1: 20;
(k1
+ 1)
> i by
A24;
then
A25: k1
>= i by
NAT_1: 13;
(k1
+ 1)
<= n1 by
A21;
then k1
< n1 by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A26: k1
<= n by
NAT_1: 13;
1
<= i by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then 1
< (k1
+ 1) by
A24,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then 1
<= k1 by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A27: k1
in (
Seg n) by
A26;
per cases ;
suppose (p1
. (k1
+ 1))
< j & (p2
. (k1
+ 1))
< j or (p1
. (k1
+ 1))
>= j & (p2
. (k1
+ 1))
>= j;
then (R1
. k1)
= (p1
. k) & (R2
. k1)
= (p2
. k) or (R1
. k1)
= ((p1
. k)
- 1) & (R2
. k1)
= ((p2
. k)
- 1) by
A1,
A11,
A14,
A27,
A25,
Def3;
hence (p1
. x)
= (p2
. x) by
A9,
A12,
A15,
A19;
end;
suppose (p1
. (k1
+ 1))
< j & (p2
. (k1
+ 1))
>= j or (p1
. (k1
+ 1))
>= j & (p2
. (k1
+ 1))
< j;
then (R1
. k1)
= (p1
. k) & (R2
. k1)
= ((p2
. k)
- 1) & (p1
. k)
< j & (p2
. k)
>= j or (R1
. k1)
= ((p1
. k)
- 1) & (R2
. k1)
= (p2
. k) & (p1
. k)
>= j & (p2
. k)
< j by
A1,
A11,
A14,
A27,
A25,
Def3;
then ((p1
. k)
+ 1)
= (p2
. k) & (p1
. k)
< j & (p2
. k)
>= j or (p1
. k)
= ((p2
. k)
+ 1) & (p1
. k)
>= j & (p2
. k)
< j by
A9,
A12,
A15;
then (p2
. k)
<= j & (p2
. k)
>= j or (p1
. k)
>= j & (p1
. k)
<= j by
NAT_1: 13;
then (p29
. k)
= (p29
. i) or (p19
. k)
= (p19
. i) by
A11,
A14,
XXREAL_0: 1;
hence (p1
. x)
= (p2
. x) by
A1,
A17,
A16,
A18,
A19,
A24,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
end;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A10,
A13,
A17,
A16,
FUNCT_1: 2;
end;
then
A28: f is
one-to-one by
FUNCT_2: 19;
set P = (
Permutations N);
(
card X)
= (N
! ) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
Th7;
then
reconsider P9 = P, X9 = X as
finite
set;
take f;
A30: (
card P9)
= (n
! ) by
Th6;
(
card X9)
= (n
! ) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
Th7;
then f is
onto
one-to-one by
A28,
A30,
FINSEQ_4: 63;
hence f is
bijective;
let p be
Element of (
Permutations (n
+ 1)) such that
A31: (p
. i)
= j;
p
in X by
A3,
A31;
hence thesis by
A6,
A31;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:21
Th21: for i, j st i
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) & (p1
. i)
= j holds (
- (a,p1))
= (((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* (
- (a,(
Rem (p1,i)))))
proof
set n1 = (n
+ 1);
let i, j such that
A1: i
in (
Seg n1) and
A2: (p1
. i)
= j;
A3: p1 is
Permutation of (
Seg n1) by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
then
A4: (
rng p1)
= (
Seg n1) by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
(
dom p1)
= (
Seg n1) by
A3,
FUNCT_2: 52;
then
A5: j
in (
Seg n1) by
A1,
A2,
A4,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
set R = (
Rem (p1,i));
per cases by
NAT_1: 23;
suppose
A6: n
=
0 ;
then R is
even by
Th11;
then
A7: (
- (a,R))
= a by
MATRIX_1:def 16;
A8: (1
+ 1)
= (2
* 1);
p1 is
even by
A6,
Th11;
then
A9: (
- (a,p1))
= a by
MATRIX_1:def 16;
A10: j
= 1 by
A5,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 2,
TARSKI:def 1;
i
= 1 by
A1,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 2,
TARSKI:def 1;
then ((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
= (
1_ K) by
A10,
A8,
HURWITZ: 4;
hence thesis by
A9,
A7;
end;
suppose
A11: n
= 1;
then
A12: p1 is
Permutation of (
Seg 2) by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
per cases by
A12,
MATRIX_7: 1;
suppose
A13: p1
=
<*1, 2*>;
i
= 1 or i
= 2 by
A1,
A11,
FINSEQ_1: 2,
TARSKI:def 2;
then i
= 1 & (p1
. i)
= 1 or i
= 2 & (p1
. i)
= 2 by
A13,
FINSEQ_1: 44;
then (i
+ j)
= (2
* 1) or (i
+ j)
= (2
* 2) by
A2;
then
A14: ((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
= (
1_ K) by
HURWITZ: 4;
A15: (
len (
Permutations 2))
= 2 by
MATRIX_1: 9;
R is
even by
A11,
Th11;
then
A16: (
- (a,R))
= a by
MATRIX_1:def 16;
(
id (
Seg 2)) is
even by
MATRIX_1: 16;
then (
- (a,p1))
= a by
A11,
A13,
A15,
FINSEQ_2: 52,
MATRIX_1:def 16;
hence thesis by
A14,
A16;
end;
suppose
A17: p1
=
<*2, 1*>;
(
len (
Permutations 2))
= 2 by
MATRIX_1: 9;
then (
- (a,p1))
= (
- a) by
A11,
A17,
MATRIX_1:def 16,
MATRIX_9: 12;
then
A18: (
- (a,p1))
= (
- ((
1_ K)
* a));
i
= 1 or i
= 2 by
A1,
A11,
FINSEQ_1: 2,
TARSKI:def 2;
then (i
+ j)
= ((2
* 1)
+ 1) by
A2,
A17,
FINSEQ_1: 44;
then
A19: ((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
= (
- (
1_ K)) by
HURWITZ: 4;
R is
even by
A11,
Th11;
then (
- (a,R))
= a by
MATRIX_1:def 16;
hence thesis by
A19,
A18,
VECTSP_1: 8;
end;
end;
suppose
A20: n
>= 2;
then
reconsider n2 = (n
- 2) as
Element of
NAT by
NAT_1: 21;
per cases ;
suppose
A21: not K is
Fanoian;
A22:
now
per cases by
NAT_D: 12;
suppose ((i
+ j)
mod 2)
=
0 ;
then
consider t be
Nat such that
A23: (i
+ j)
= ((2
* t)
+
0 ) and
0
< 2 by
NAT_D:def 2;
t is
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
hence ((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
= (
1_ K) by
A23,
HURWITZ: 4;
end;
suppose ((i
+ j)
mod 2)
= 1;
then
consider t be
Nat such that
A24: (i
+ j)
= ((2
* t)
+ 1) and 1
< 2 by
NAT_D:def 2;
A25: (
1_ K)
= (
- (
1_ K)) by
A21,
MATRIX11: 22;
t is
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
hence ((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
= (
1_ K) by
A24,
A25,
HURWITZ: 4;
end;
end;
A26: (
- (a,p1))
= a or (
- (a,p1))
= (
- a) by
MATRIX_1:def 16;
(
- (
1_ K))
= (
1_ K) by
A21,
MATRIX11: 22;
then
A27: (
- (a
* (
1_ K)))
= (a
* (
1_ K)) by
VECTSP_1: 9;
(
- (a,R))
= a or (
- (a,R))
= (
- a) by
MATRIX_1:def 16;
then (
- (a,R))
= a by
A27;
hence thesis by
A22,
A26,
A27;
end;
suppose
A29: K is
Fanoian;
set mm = the
multF of K;
reconsider n1 = (n2
+ 1) as
Element of
NAT ;
set P1 = (
Permutations (n1
+ 2));
reconsider Q1 = p1 as
Element of P1;
set SS1 = (
2Set (
Seg (n1
+ 2)));
consider X be
Element of (
Fin SS1) such that
A30: X
= {
{N, i} where N be
Nat :
{N, i}
in SS1 } and
A31: (mm
$$ (X,(
Part_sgn (Q1,K))))
= ((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j))) by
A1,
A2,
A29,
Th9;
set PQ1 = (
Part_sgn (Q1,K));
set SS2 = (
2Set (
Seg (n2
+ 2)));
reconsider Q19 = Q1 as
Permutation of (
Seg (n1
+ 2)) by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
set P2 = (
Permutations (n2
+ 2));
reconsider Q = R as
Element of P2;
reconsider Q9 = Q as
Permutation of (
Seg (n2
+ 2)) by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
set PQ = (
Part_sgn (Q,K));
SS1
in (
Fin SS1) by
FINSUB_1:def 5;
then
A32: (
In (SS1,(
Fin SS1)))
= SS1 by
SUBSET_1:def 8;
reconsider SSX = (SS1
\ X) as
Element of (
Fin SS1) by
FINSUB_1:def 5;
A33: (X
\/ SSX)
= (SS1
\/ X) by
XBOOLE_1: 39;
X
c= SS1 by
FINSUB_1:def 5;
then
A34: (X
\/ SSX)
= SS1 by
A33,
XBOOLE_1: 12;
consider f be
Function of SS2, SS1 such that
A35: (
rng f)
= (SS1
\ X) and
A36: f is
one-to-one and
A37: for k, m st k
< m &
{k, m}
in SS2 holds (m
< i & k
< i implies (f
.
{k, m})
=
{k, m}) & (m
>= i & k
< i implies (f
.
{k, m})
=
{k, (m
+ 1)}) & (m
>= i & k
>= i implies (f
.
{k, m})
=
{(k
+ 1), (m
+ 1)}) by
A1,
A20,
A30,
Th10;
set Pf = (PQ1
* f);
A38: (
dom Pf)
= SS2 by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A39: (
dom Q19)
= (
Seg (n1
+ 2)) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
A40:
now
n
<= (n
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 11;
then
A41: (
Seg (n2
+ 2))
c= (
Seg (n1
+ 2)) by
FINSEQ_1: 5;
let x be
object such that
A42: x
in SS2;
consider k,m be
Nat such that
A43: k
in (
Seg (n2
+ 2)) and
A44: m
in (
Seg (n2
+ 2)) and
A45: k
< m and
A46: x
=
{k, m} by
A42,
MATRIX11: 1;
reconsider k, m as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
(
dom Q9)
= (
Seg (n2
+ 2)) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
then (Q9
. k)
<> (Q
. m) by
A43,
A44,
A45,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
then
A47: (Q
. k)
> (Q
. m) or (Q
. k)
< (Q
. m) by
XXREAL_0: 1;
set m1 = (m
+ 1);
set k1 = (k
+ 1);
A48: ((n2
+ 2)
+ 1)
= (n1
+ 2);
then
A49: k1
in (
Seg (n1
+ 2)) by
A43,
FINSEQ_1: 60;
A50: m1
in (
Seg (n1
+ 2)) by
A44,
A48,
FINSEQ_1: 60;
per cases ;
suppose
A51: k
< i & m
< i;
A52: (Pf
. x)
= (PQ1
. (f
. x)) by
A38,
A42,
FUNCT_1: 12;
A53: (f
. x)
= x by
A37,
A42,
A45,
A46,
A51;
per cases ;
suppose (Q1
. k)
< j & (Q1
. m)
< j or (Q1
. k)
>= j & (Q1
. m)
>= j;
then (Q
. k)
= (Q1
. k) & (Q
. m)
= (Q1
. m) or (Q
. k)
= ((Q1
. k)
- 1) & (Q
. m)
= ((Q1
. m)
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
A43,
A44,
A51,
Def3;
then (Q
. k)
< (Q
. m) & (Q1
. k)
< (Q1
. m) or (Q
. k)
> (Q
. m) & (Q1
. k)
> (Q1
. m) by
A47,
XREAL_1: 9;
then (PQ1
. x)
= (
1_ K) & (PQ
. x)
= (
1_ K) or (PQ1
. x)
= (
- (
1_ K)) & (PQ
. x)
= (
- (
1_ K)) by
A43,
A44,
A45,
A46,
A41,
MATRIX11:def 1;
hence (Pf
. x)
= (PQ
. x) by
A38,
A42,
A53,
FUNCT_1: 12;
end;
suppose
A54: (Q1
. k)
< j & (Q1
. m)
>= j;
then (Q
. m)
= ((Q1
. m)
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
A44,
A51,
Def3;
then
A55: (Q1
. m)
= ((Q
. m)
+ 1);
(Q19
. m)
<> j by
A1,
A2,
A39,
A44,
A41,
A51,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
then (Q1
. m)
> j by
A54,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A56: (Q
. m)
>= j by
A55,
NAT_1: 13;
(Q1
. k)
< (Q1
. m) by
A54,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A57: (PQ1
. x)
= (
1_ K) by
A43,
A44,
A45,
A46,
A41,
MATRIX11:def 1;
(Q1
. k)
= (Q
. k) by
A1,
A2,
A43,
A51,
A54,
Def3;
then (Q
. k)
< (Q
. m) by
A54,
A56,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence (Pf
. x)
= (PQ
. x) by
A43,
A44,
A45,
A46,
A53,
A52,
A57,
MATRIX11:def 1;
end;
suppose
A58: (Q1
. k)
>= j & (Q1
. m)
< j;
then (Q
. k)
= ((Q1
. k)
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
A43,
A51,
Def3;
then
A59: (Q1
. k)
= ((Q
. k)
+ 1);
(Q19
. k)
<> j by
A1,
A2,
A39,
A43,
A41,
A51,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
then (Q1
. k)
> j by
A58,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A60: (Q
. k)
>= j by
A59,
NAT_1: 13;
(Q1
. k)
> (Q1
. m) by
A58,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A61: (PQ1
. x)
= (
- (
1_ K)) by
A43,
A44,
A45,
A46,
A41,
MATRIX11:def 1;
(Q1
. m)
= (Q
. m) by
A1,
A2,
A44,
A51,
A58,
Def3;
then (Q
. k)
> (Q
. m) by
A58,
A60,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence (Pf
. x)
= (PQ
. x) by
A43,
A44,
A45,
A46,
A53,
A52,
A61,
MATRIX11:def 1;
end;
end;
suppose k
>= i & m
< i;
hence (Pf
. x)
= (PQ
. x) by
A45,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
suppose
A62: k
< i & m
>= i;
A63: (Pf
. x)
= (PQ1
. (f
.
{k, m})) by
A38,
A42,
A46,
FUNCT_1: 12;
A64: (f
.
{k, m})
=
{k, m1} by
A37,
A42,
A45,
A46,
A62;
per cases ;
suppose (Q1
. k)
< j & (Q1
. m1)
< j or (Q1
. k)
>= j & (Q1
. m1)
>= j;
then (Q
. k)
= (Q1
. k) & (Q
. m)
= (Q1
. m1) or (Q
. k)
= ((Q1
. k)
- 1) & (Q
. m)
= ((Q1
. m1)
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
A43,
A44,
A62,
Def3;
then
A65: (Q
. k)
< (Q
. m) & (Q1
. k)
< (Q1
. m1) or (Q
. k)
> (Q
. m) & (Q1
. k)
> (Q1
. m1) by
A47,
XREAL_1: 9;
k
< m1 by
A45,
NAT_1: 13;
then (PQ1
.
{k, m1})
= (
1_ K) & (PQ
. x)
= (
1_ K) or (PQ1
.
{k, m1})
= (
- (
1_ K)) & (PQ
. x)
= (
- (
1_ K)) by
A43,
A44,
A45,
A46,
A41,
A50,
A65,
MATRIX11:def 1;
hence (Pf
. x)
= (PQ
. x) by
A38,
A42,
A46,
A64,
FUNCT_1: 12;
end;
suppose
A66: (Q1
. k)
< j & (Q1
. m1)
>= j;
m1
> i by
A62,
NAT_1: 13;
then (Q19
. m1)
<> j by
A1,
A2,
A39,
A50,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
then
A67: (Q1
. m1)
> j by
A66,
XXREAL_0: 1;
(Q
. m)
= ((Q1
. m1)
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
A44,
A62,
A66,
Def3;
then (Q1
. m1)
= ((Q
. m)
+ 1);
then
A68: (Q
. m)
>= j by
A67,
NAT_1: 13;
(Q1
. k)
= (Q
. k) by
A1,
A2,
A43,
A62,
A66,
Def3;
then
A69: (Q
. k)
< (Q
. m) by
A66,
A68,
XXREAL_0: 2;
A70: k
< m1 by
A45,
NAT_1: 13;
(Q1
. k)
< (Q1
. m1) by
A66,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (PQ1
.
{k, m1})
= (
1_ K) by
A43,
A41,
A50,
A70,
MATRIX11:def 1;
hence (Pf
. x)
= (PQ
. x) by
A43,
A44,
A45,
A46,
A64,
A63,
A69,
MATRIX11:def 1;
end;
suppose
A71: (Q1
. k)
>= j & (Q1
. m1)
< j;
then (Q
. k)
= ((Q1
. k)
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
A43,
A62,
Def3;
then
A72: (Q1
. k)
= ((Q
. k)
+ 1);
(Q19
. k)
<> j by
A1,
A2,
A39,
A43,
A41,
A62,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
then (Q1
. k)
> j by
A71,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A73: (Q
. k)
>= j by
A72,
NAT_1: 13;
(Q1
. m1)
= (Q
. m) by
A1,
A2,
A44,
A62,
A71,
Def3;
then
A74: (Q
. m)
< (Q
. k) by
A71,
A73,
XXREAL_0: 2;
A75: k
< m1 by
A45,
NAT_1: 13;
(Q1
. k)
> (Q1
. m1) by
A71,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (PQ1
.
{k, m1})
= (
- (
1_ K)) by
A43,
A41,
A50,
A75,
MATRIX11:def 1;
hence (Pf
. x)
= (PQ
. x) by
A43,
A44,
A45,
A46,
A64,
A63,
A74,
MATRIX11:def 1;
end;
end;
suppose
A76: k
>= i & m
>= i;
A77: (Pf
. x)
= (PQ1
. (f
.
{k, m})) by
A38,
A42,
A46,
FUNCT_1: 12;
A78: k1
< m1 by
A45,
XREAL_1: 6;
A79: (f
.
{k, m})
=
{(k
+ 1), (m
+ 1)} by
A37,
A42,
A45,
A46,
A76;
per cases ;
suppose (Q1
. k1)
< j & (Q1
. m1)
< j or (Q1
. k1)
>= j & (Q1
. m1)
>= j;
then (Q
. k)
= (Q1
. k1) & (Q
. m)
= (Q1
. m1) or (Q
. k)
= ((Q1
. k1)
- 1) & (Q
. m)
= ((Q1
. m1)
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
A43,
A44,
A76,
Def3;
then (Q
. k)
< (Q
. m) & (Q1
. k1)
< (Q1
. m1) or (Q
. k)
> (Q
. m) & (Q1
. k1)
> (Q1
. m1) by
A47,
XREAL_1: 9;
then (PQ1
.
{k1, m1})
= (
1_ K) & (PQ
. x)
= (
1_ K) or (PQ1
.
{m1, k1})
= (
- (
1_ K)) & (PQ
. x)
= (
- (
1_ K)) by
A43,
A44,
A45,
A46,
A49,
A50,
A78,
MATRIX11:def 1;
hence (Pf
. x)
= (PQ
. x) by
A38,
A42,
A46,
A79,
FUNCT_1: 12;
end;
suppose
A80: (Q1
. k1)
< j & (Q1
. m1)
>= j;
m1
> i by
A76,
NAT_1: 13;
then (Q19
. m1)
<> j by
A1,
A2,
A39,
A50,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
then
A81: (Q1
. m1)
> j by
A80,
XXREAL_0: 1;
(Q
. m)
= ((Q1
. m1)
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
A44,
A76,
A80,
Def3;
then (Q1
. m1)
= ((Q
. m)
+ 1);
then
A82: (Q
. m)
>= j by
A81,
NAT_1: 13;
(Q1
. k1)
< (Q1
. m1) by
A80,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A83: (PQ1
.
{k1, m1})
= (
1_ K) by
A49,
A50,
A78,
MATRIX11:def 1;
(Q1
. k1)
= (Q
. k) by
A1,
A2,
A43,
A76,
A80,
Def3;
then (Q
. k)
< (Q
. m) by
A80,
A82,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence (Pf
. x)
= (PQ
. x) by
A43,
A44,
A45,
A46,
A79,
A77,
A83,
MATRIX11:def 1;
end;
suppose
A84: (Q1
. k1)
>= j & (Q1
. m1)
< j;
k1
> i by
A76,
NAT_1: 13;
then (Q19
. k1)
<> j by
A1,
A2,
A39,
A49,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
then
A85: (Q1
. k1)
> j by
A84,
XXREAL_0: 1;
(Q
. k)
= ((Q1
. k1)
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
A43,
A76,
A84,
Def3;
then (Q1
. k1)
= ((Q
. k)
+ 1);
then
A86: (Q
. k)
>= j by
A85,
NAT_1: 13;
(Q1
. k1)
> (Q1
. m1) by
A84,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A87: (PQ1
.
{k1, m1})
= (
- (
1_ K)) by
A49,
A50,
A78,
MATRIX11:def 1;
(Q1
. m1)
= (Q
. m) by
A1,
A2,
A44,
A76,
A84,
Def3;
then (Q
. k)
> (Q
. m) by
A84,
A86,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence (Pf
. x)
= (PQ
. x) by
A43,
A44,
A45,
A46,
A79,
A77,
A87,
MATRIX11:def 1;
end;
end;
end;
reconsider domf = (
dom f) as
Element of (
Fin SS2) by
FINSUB_1:def 5;
A88: (f
.: domf)
= (
rng f) by
RELAT_1: 113;
(
dom f)
= SS2 by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A89: domf
= (
In (SS2,(
Fin SS2))) by
SUBSET_1:def 8;
(
dom PQ)
= SS2 by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then PQ
= Pf by
A38,
A40,
FUNCT_1: 2;
then
A90: (mm
$$ (SSX,PQ1))
= (
sgn (Q,K)) by
A35,
A36,
A89,
A88,
SETWOP_2: 6;
X
misses SSX by
XBOOLE_1: 79;
then (
sgn (Q1,K))
= (((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* (
sgn (Q,K))) by
A31,
A90,
A34,
A32,
SETWOP_2: 4;
hence (
- (a,p1))
= ((((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* (
sgn (Q,K)))
* a) by
MATRIX11: 26
.= (((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* ((
sgn (Q,K))
* a)) by
GROUP_1:def 3
.= (((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* (
- (a,R))) by
MATRIX11: 26;
end;
end;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:22
Th22: for i, j st i
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) & (p1
. i)
= j holds for M be
Matrix of (n
+ 1), K holds for DM be
Matrix of n, K st DM
= (
Delete (M,i,j)) holds ((
Path_product M)
. p1)
= ((((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* (M
* (i,j)))
* ((
Path_product DM)
. (
Rem (p1,i))))
proof
reconsider N = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
set n1 = (N
+ 1);
let i,j be
Nat such that
A1: i
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) and
A2: (p1
. i)
= j;
set mm = the
multF of K;
set R = (
Rem (p1,i));
let M be
Matrix of (n
+ 1), K, DM be
Matrix of n, K such that
A3: DM
= (
Delete (M,i,j));
set PR = (
Path_matrix (R,DM));
set Pp1 = (
Path_matrix (p1,M));
(
len Pp1)
= n1 by
MATRIX_3:def 7;
then (
dom Pp1)
= (
Seg n1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A4: (Pp1
. i)
= (M
* (i,j)) by
A1,
A2,
MATRIX_3:def 7;
A5:
now
per cases ;
suppose
A6: N
=
0 ;
then
A7: (
len Pp1)
= 1 by
MATRIX_3:def 7;
(Pp1
. 1)
= (M
* (i,j)) by
A1,
A4,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 2,
TARSKI:def 1;
then Pp1
=
<*(M
* (i,j))*> by
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
then
A8: (mm
$$ Pp1)
= (M
* (i,j)) by
FINSOP_1: 11;
(
len PR)
=
0 by
A6,
MATRIX_3:def 7;
then PR
= (
<*> the
carrier of K);
then
A9: (mm
$$ PR)
= (
the_unity_wrt mm) by
FINSOP_1: 10;
(
the_unity_wrt mm)
= (
1_ K) by
FVSUM_1: 5;
hence (mm
$$ Pp1)
= ((M
* (i,j))
* (mm
$$ PR)) by
A8,
A9;
end;
suppose
A10: N
>
0 ;
(
len PR)
= n by
MATRIX_3:def 7;
then
consider f be
sequence of the
carrier of K such that
A11: (f
. 1)
= (PR
. 1) and
A12: for k be
Nat st
0
<> k & k
< n holds (f
. (k
+ 1))
= (mm
. ((f
. k),(PR
. (k
+ 1)))) and
A13: (mm
$$ PR)
= (f
. n) by
A10,
FINSOP_1:def 1;
(
len Pp1)
= n1 by
MATRIX_3:def 7;
then
consider F be
sequence of the
carrier of K such that
A14: (F
. 1)
= (Pp1
. 1) and
A15: for k be
Nat st
0
<> k & k
< n1 holds (F
. (k
+ 1))
= (mm
. ((F
. k),(Pp1
. (k
+ 1)))) and
A16: (mm
$$ Pp1)
= (F
. n1) by
FINSOP_1:def 1;
defpred
P[
Nat] means 1
<= $1 & $1
< i implies (f
. $1)
= (F
. $1);
A17: for k st k
in (
Seg n) holds (k
< i implies (PR
. k)
= (Pp1
. k)) & (k
>= i implies (PR
. k)
= (Pp1
. (k
+ 1)))
proof
(
len Pp1)
= n1 by
MATRIX_3:def 7;
then
A18: (
dom Pp1)
= (
Seg n1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(
len PR)
= n by
MATRIX_3:def 7;
then
A19: (
dom PR)
= (
Seg n) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
reconsider p19 = p1 as
Permutation of (
Seg n1) by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
reconsider R9 = R as
Permutation of (
Seg n) by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
let k such that
A20: k
in (
Seg n);
reconsider k1 = (k
+ 1) as
Element of
NAT ;
A21: k1
in (
Seg n1) by
A20,
FINSEQ_1: 60;
A22: (
rng p19)
= (
Seg n1) by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
(
dom p19)
= (
Seg n1) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
then
A23: j
in (
Seg n1) by
A1,
A2,
A22,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
A24: (
rng R9)
= (
Seg n) by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
(
dom R9)
= (
Seg n) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
then
A25: (R
. k)
in (
Seg n) by
A20,
A24,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
consider Rk be
Nat such that
A26: Rk
= (R
. k) and 1
<= Rk and Rk
<= n;
A27: (n1
-' 1)
= (n1
- 1) by
XREAL_0:def 2;
n
<= n1 by
NAT_1: 11;
then
A28: (
Seg n)
c= (
Seg n1) by
FINSEQ_1: 5;
thus k
< i implies (PR
. k)
= (Pp1
. k)
proof
assume
A29: k
< i;
(
dom p19)
= (
Seg n1) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
then (p19
. k)
<> (p19
. i) by
A1,
A20,
A28,
A29,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
then (p1
. k)
< j or (p1
. k)
> j by
A2,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then Rk
= (p1
. k) & (p1
. k)
< j or (p1
. k)
> j & Rk
= ((p1
. k)
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
A20,
A26,
A29,
Def3;
then Rk
= (p1
. k) & (p1
. k)
< j or (p1
. k)
> j & (p1
. k)
= (Rk
+ 1);
then Rk
= (p1
. k) & (p1
. k)
< j or (p1
. k)
> j & Rk
>= j & (p1
. k)
= (Rk
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
then (DM
* (k,Rk))
= (M
* (k,Rk)) & (PR
. k)
= (DM
* (k,Rk)) & (Pp1
. k)
= (M
* (k,Rk)) or (PR
. k)
= (DM
* (k,Rk)) & (DM
* (k,Rk))
= (M
* (k,(Rk
+ 1))) & (Pp1
. k)
= (M
* (k,(Rk
+ 1))) by
A1,
A3,
A20,
A25,
A23,
A26,
A28,
A27,
A19,
A18,
A29,
Th13,
MATRIX_3:def 7;
hence thesis;
end;
A30: (
dom p19)
= (
Seg n1) by
FUNCT_2: 52;
assume
A31: k
>= i;
then k1
> i by
NAT_1: 13;
then (p19
. k1)
<> (p19
. i) by
A1,
A21,
A30,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
then (p1
. k1)
< j or (p1
. k1)
> j by
A2,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then Rk
= (p1
. k1) & (p1
. k1)
< j or (p1
. k1)
> j & Rk
= ((p1
. k1)
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
A20,
A26,
A31,
Def3;
then Rk
= (p1
. k1) & (p1
. k1)
< j or (p1
. k1)
> j & (p1
. k1)
= (Rk
+ 1);
then Rk
= (p1
. k1) & (p1
. k1)
< j or (p1
. k1)
> j & Rk
>= j & (p1
. k1)
= (Rk
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
then (DM
* (k,Rk))
= (M
* ((k
+ 1),Rk)) & (PR
. k)
= (DM
* (k,Rk)) & (Pp1
. k1)
= (M
* ((k
+ 1),Rk)) or (PR
. k)
= (DM
* (k,Rk)) & (DM
* (k,Rk))
= (M
* ((k
+ 1),(Rk
+ 1))) & (Pp1
. k1)
= (M
* (k1,(Rk
+ 1))) by
A1,
A3,
A20,
A25,
A23,
A26,
A27,
A21,
A19,
A18,
A31,
Th13,
MATRIX_3:def 7;
hence thesis;
end;
A32: for k st
P[k] holds
P[(k
+ 1)]
proof
let k such that
A33:
P[k];
reconsider e = k as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
assume that
A34: 1
<= (k
+ 1) and
A35: (k
+ 1)
< i;
set k1 = (e
+ 1);
i
<= n1 by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then k1
< n1 by
A35,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then k1
<= n by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A36: k1
in (
Seg N) by
A34;
per cases by
NAT_1: 14;
suppose k
=
0 ;
hence thesis by
A14,
A11,
A17,
A35,
A36;
end;
suppose
A37: k
>= 1;
i
<= n1 by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A38: k1
< n1 by
A35,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then k
< n1 by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A39: (F
. k1)
= (mm
. ((F
. k),(Pp1
. k1))) by
A15,
A37;
k1
<= n by
A38,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A40: k1
in (
Seg N) by
A34;
k
< n by
A38,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (f
. k1)
= (mm
. ((f
. k),(PR
. k1))) by
A12,
A37;
hence thesis by
A17,
A33,
A35,
A37,
A39,
A40,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
end;
defpred
Q[
Nat] means i
<= $1 & $1
<= n1 implies ($1
= 1 implies (F
. $1)
= (M
* (i,j))) & ($1
> 1 implies for a st a
= (f
. ($1
- 1)) holds (F
. $1)
= ((M
* (i,j))
* a));
A41:
P[
0 ];
A42: for k holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A41,
A32);
A43: for k st
Q[k] holds
Q[(k
+ 1)]
proof
let k such that
A44:
Q[k];
set k1 = (k
+ 1);
assume that
A45: i
<= k1 and
A46: k1
<= n1;
per cases ;
suppose
A47: k
=
0 ;
1
<= i by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
hence thesis by
A4,
A14,
A45,
A47,
XXREAL_0: 1;
end;
suppose
A48: k
>
0 ;
hence k1
= 1 implies (F
. k1)
= (M
* (i,j));
assume k1
> 1;
let a such that
A49: a
= (f
. (k1
- 1));
A50: k
<= n by
A46,
XREAL_1: 6;
k
>= 1 by
A48,
NAT_1: 14;
then
A51: k
in (
Seg n) by
A50;
(
len PR)
= n by
MATRIX_3:def 7;
then
A52: (
dom PR)
= (
Seg n) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A53: (PR
. k)
= (DM
* (k,(R
. k))) by
A51,
MATRIX_3:def 7;
k
< n1 by
A46,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A54: (F
. k1)
= (mm
. ((F
. k),(Pp1
. k1))) by
A15,
A48;
per cases by
A45,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A55: k1
= i;
then k
< i by
NAT_1: 13;
then (F
. k1)
= (a
* (M
* (i,j))) by
A4,
A42,
A48,
A49,
A54,
A55,
NAT_1: 14;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
A56: k1
> i;
A57: k
< n1 by
A46,
NAT_1: 13;
A58: k
>= i by
A56,
NAT_1: 13;
i
>= 1 by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A59: k
>= 1 by
A58,
XXREAL_0: 2;
per cases by
A59,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose k
= 1;
hence thesis by
A11,
A17,
A44,
A46,
A49,
A51,
A54,
A58,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
suppose
A60: k
> 1;
reconsider k9 = (k
- 1) as
Element of
NAT by
A48,
NAT_1: 20;
reconsider fk9 = (f
. k9) as
Element of K;
(k9
+ 1)
<= n by
A57,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A61: k9
< n by
NAT_1: 13;
(k9
+ 1)
> (
0
+ 1) by
A60;
then
A62: a
= (mm
. (fk9,(PR
. (k9
+ 1)))) by
A12,
A49,
A61;
(F
. k)
= ((M
* (i,j))
* fk9) by
A44,
A46,
A56,
A60,
NAT_1: 13;
hence (F
. k1)
= (((M
* (i,j))
* fk9)
* (DM
* (k,(R
. k)))) by
A17,
A51,
A54,
A53,
A58
.= ((M
* (i,j))
* (fk9
* (DM
* (k,(R
. k))))) by
GROUP_1:def 3
.= ((M
* (i,j))
* a) by
A51,
A52,
A62,
MATRIX_3:def 7;
end;
end;
end;
end;
A63:
Q[
0 ];
A64: for k holds
Q[k] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A63,
A43);
A65: i
<= n1 by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A66: (n1
- 1)
= n;
n1
> (
0
+ 1) by
A10,
XREAL_1: 6;
hence (mm
$$ Pp1)
= ((M
* (i,j))
* (mm
$$ PR)) by
A16,
A13,
A64,
A65,
A66;
end;
end;
per cases ;
suppose
A67: R is
even;
thus ((
Path_product M)
. p1)
= (
- ((mm
$$ Pp1),p1)) by
MATRIX_3:def 8
.= (((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* (
- ((mm
$$ Pp1),R))) by
A1,
A2,
Th21
.= (((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* ((M
* (i,j))
* (mm
$$ PR))) by
A5,
A67,
MATRIX_1:def 16
.= ((((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* (M
* (i,j)))
* (mm
$$ PR)) by
GROUP_1:def 3
.= ((((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* (M
* (i,j)))
* (
- ((mm
$$ PR),R))) by
A67,
MATRIX_1:def 16
.= ((((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* (M
* (i,j)))
* ((
Path_product DM)
. R)) by
MATRIX_3:def 8;
end;
suppose
A68: R is
odd;
thus ((
Path_product M)
. p1)
= (
- ((mm
$$ Pp1),p1)) by
MATRIX_3:def 8
.= (((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* (
- ((mm
$$ Pp1),R))) by
A1,
A2,
Th21
.= (((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* (
- ((M
* (i,j))
* (mm
$$ PR)))) by
A5,
A68,
MATRIX_1:def 16
.= (((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* ((M
* (i,j))
* (
- (mm
$$ PR)))) by
VECTSP_1: 8
.= ((((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* (M
* (i,j)))
* (
- (mm
$$ PR))) by
GROUP_1:def 3
.= ((((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* (M
* (i,j)))
* (
- ((mm
$$ PR),R))) by
A68,
MATRIX_1:def 16
.= ((((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* (M
* (i,j)))
* ((
Path_product DM)
. R)) by
MATRIX_3:def 8;
end;
end;
begin
definition
let i,j,n be
Nat;
let K;
let M be
Matrix of n, K;
::
LAPLACE:def4
func
Minor (M,i,j) ->
Element of K equals (
Det (
Delete (M,i,j)));
coherence ;
end
definition
let i,j,n be
Nat;
let K;
let M be
Matrix of n, K;
::
LAPLACE:def5
func
Cofactor (M,i,j) ->
Element of K equals (((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* (
Minor (M,i,j)));
coherence ;
end
theorem ::
LAPLACE:23
Th23: for i, j st i
in (
Seg n) & j
in (
Seg n) holds for P be
Element of (
Fin (
Permutations n)) st P
= { p : (p
. i)
= j } holds for M be
Matrix of n, K holds (the
addF of K
$$ (P,(
Path_product M)))
= ((M
* (i,j))
* (
Cofactor (M,i,j)))
proof
let i,j be
Nat such that
A1: i
in (
Seg n) and
A2: j
in (
Seg n);
n
>
0 by
A1;
then
reconsider n9 = (n
- 1) as
Element of
NAT by
NAT_1: 20;
set P = (
Permutations (n
-' 1));
set n91 = (n9
+ 1);
set P1 = (
Permutations n);
A3: (n91
-' 1)
= ((n9
+ 1)
- 1) by
XREAL_0:def 2;
set aa = the
addF of K;
P
in (
Fin P) by
FINSUB_1:def 5;
then
A4: (
In (P,(
Fin P)))
= P by
SUBSET_1:def 8;
let PP be
Element of (
Fin P1) such that
A5: PP
= { p : (p
. i)
= j };
consider Proj be
Function of PP, P such that
A6: Proj is
bijective and
A7: for q be
Element of (
Permutations n91) st (q
. i)
= j holds (Proj
. q)
= (
Rem (q,i)) by
A1,
A2,
A5,
A3,
Th20;
let M be
Matrix of n, K;
set DM = (
Delete (M,i,j));
set PathM = (
Path_product M);
set PathDM = (
Path_product DM);
set pm = (((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j)))
* (M
* (i,j)));
defpred
P[
set] means for D be
Element of (
Fin P1), ProjD be
Element of (
Fin P) st D
= $1 & ProjD
= (Proj
.: D) & D
c= PP holds (aa
$$ (D,PathM))
= (pm
* (aa
$$ (ProjD,PathDM)));
A8: for B9 be
Element of (
Fin P1), b be
Element of P1 holds
P[B9] & not b
in B9 implies
P[(B9
\/
{b})]
proof
let B9 be
Element of (
Fin P1), b be
Element of P1 such that
A9:
P[B9] and
A10: not b
in B9;
A11: b
in
{b} by
TARSKI:def 1;
A12: (
rng Proj)
= P by
A6,
FUNCT_2:def 3;
then (Proj
.: B9)
c= P by
RELAT_1: 111;
then
reconsider ProjB9 = (Proj
.: B9) as
Element of (
Fin P) by
FINSUB_1:def 5;
let D be
Element of (
Fin P1), ProjD be
Element of (
Fin P) such that
A13: D
= (B9
\/
{b}) and
A14: ProjD
= (Proj
.: D) and
A15: D
c= PP;
A16: B9
c= D by
A13,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
B9
c= D by
A13,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then
A17: B9
c= PP by
A15;
{b}
c= D by
A13,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then
A18: b
in PP by
A15,
A11;
then
consider Q1 be
Element of P1 such that
A19: Q1
= b and
A20: (Q1
. i)
= j by
A5;
A21: (
dom Proj)
= PP by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A22: (
Im (Proj,b))
=
{(Proj
. b)} by
A18,
FUNCT_1: 59;
reconsider Q = (Proj
. b) as
Element of P by
A18,
A21,
A12,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
A23: (Proj
. b)
in (
rng Proj) by
A18,
A21,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider Q19 = Q1 as
Element of (
Permutations (n9
+ 1));
A24: (
Rem (Q19,i))
= Q by
A7,
A19,
A20;
then
A25: (PathM
. Q1)
= (pm
* (PathDM
. Q)) by
A1,
A3,
A20,
Th22;
A26: not Q
in ProjB9
proof
assume Q
in ProjB9;
then ex x be
object st x
in (
dom Proj) & x
in B9 & (Proj
. x)
= Q by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
hence thesis by
A6,
A10,
A18,
A21,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
end;
per cases ;
suppose
A27: B9
=
{} ;
then
A28: (aa
$$ (D,PathM))
= (PathM
. b) by
A13,
SETWISEO: 17;
(aa
$$ (ProjD,PathDM))
= (PathDM
. (Proj
. b)) by
A13,
A14,
A22,
A23,
A12,
A27,
SETWISEO: 17;
hence thesis by
A1,
A3,
A19,
A20,
A24,
A28,
Th22;
end;
suppose
A29: B9
<>
{} ;
ProjD
= (ProjB9
\/
{Q}) by
A13,
A14,
A22,
RELAT_1: 120;
hence (pm
* (aa
$$ (ProjD,PathDM)))
= (pm
* ((aa
$$ (ProjB9,PathDM))
+ (PathDM
. Q))) by
A18,
A17,
A21,
A26,
A29,
SETWOP_2: 2
.= ((pm
* (aa
$$ (ProjB9,PathDM)))
+ (pm
* (PathDM
. Q))) by
VECTSP_1:def 2
.= (aa
. ((aa
$$ (B9,PathM)),(PathM
. b))) by
A9,
A15,
A19,
A16,
A25,
XBOOLE_1: 1
.= (aa
$$ (D,PathM)) by
A10,
A13,
A29,
SETWOP_2: 2;
end;
end;
A30:
P[(
{}. P1)]
proof
let B be
Element of (
Fin P1), ProjB be
Element of (
Fin P) such that
A31: B
= (
{}. P1) and
A32: ProjB
= (Proj
.: B) and B
c= PP;
ProjB
= (
{}. P) by
A31,
A32;
then
A33: (aa
$$ (ProjB,PathDM))
= (
the_unity_wrt aa) by
FVSUM_1: 8,
SETWISEO: 31;
A34: (
the_unity_wrt aa)
= (
0. K) by
FVSUM_1: 7;
(aa
$$ (B,PathM))
= (
the_unity_wrt aa) by
A31,
FVSUM_1: 8,
SETWISEO: 31;
hence thesis by
A33,
A34;
end;
A35: for B be
Element of (
Fin P1) holds
P[B] from
SETWISEO:sch 2(
A30,
A8);
A36: (
dom Proj)
= PP by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
(
rng Proj)
= P by
A6,
FUNCT_2:def 3;
then (Proj
.: PP)
= (
In (P,(
Fin P))) by
A4,
A36,
RELAT_1: 113;
hence (aa
$$ (PP,PathM))
= (((M
* (i,j))
* ((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j))))
* (
Det (
Delete (M,i,j)))) by
A35
.= ((M
* (i,j))
* (
Cofactor (M,i,j))) by
GROUP_1:def 3;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:24
Th24: for i, j st i
in (
Seg n) & j
in (
Seg n) holds (
Minor (M,i,j))
= (
Minor ((M
@ ),j,i))
proof
let i, j such that
A1: i
in (
Seg n) and
A2: j
in (
Seg n);
thus (
Minor (M,i,j))
= (
Det ((
Delete (M,i,j))
@ )) by
MATRIXR2: 43
.= (
Minor ((M
@ ),j,i)) by
A1,
A2,
Th14;
end;
definition
let n, K;
let M be
Matrix of n, K;
::
LAPLACE:def6
func
Matrix_of_Cofactor (M) ->
Matrix of n, K means
:
Def6: for i,j be
Nat st
[i, j]
in (
Indices it ) holds (it
* (i,j))
= (
Cofactor (M,i,j));
existence
proof
reconsider N = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
deffunc
C(
Nat,
Nat) = (
Cofactor (M,$1,$2));
ex M be
Matrix of N, N, K st for i,j be
Nat st
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) holds (M
* (i,j))
=
C(i,j) from
MATRIX_0:sch 1;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let C1,C2 be
Matrix of n, K such that
A1: for i,j be
Nat st
[i, j]
in (
Indices C1) holds (C1
* (i,j))
= (
Cofactor (M,i,j)) and
A2: for i,j be
Nat st
[i, j]
in (
Indices C2) holds (C2
* (i,j))
= (
Cofactor (M,i,j));
now
A3: (
Indices C1)
= (
Indices C2) by
MATRIX_0: 26;
let i,j be
Nat such that
A4:
[i, j]
in (
Indices C1);
reconsider i9 = i, j9 = j as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
(C1
* (i,j))
= (
Cofactor (M,i9,j9)) by
A1,
A4;
hence (C1
* (i,j))
= (C2
* (i,j)) by
A2,
A4,
A3;
end;
hence thesis by
MATRIX_0: 27;
end;
end
begin
definition
let n, i, K;
let M be
Matrix of n, K;
::$Notion-Name
::
LAPLACE:def7
func
LaplaceExpL (M,i) ->
FinSequence of K means
:
Def7: (
len it )
= n & for j st j
in (
dom it ) holds (it
. j)
= ((M
* (i,j))
* (
Cofactor (M,i,j)));
existence
proof
reconsider N = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
deffunc
L(
Nat) = ((M
* (i,$1))
* (
Cofactor (M,i,$1)));
consider LL be
FinSequence such that
A1: (
len LL)
= N & for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom LL) holds (LL
. k)
=
L(k) from
FINSEQ_1:sch 2;
(
rng LL)
c= the
carrier of K
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
rng LL);
then
consider y be
object such that
A2: y
in (
dom LL) and
A3: (LL
. y)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
(
dom LL)
= (
Seg n) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
consider k be
Nat such that
A4: k
= y and 1
<= k and k
<= n by
A2;
L(k) is
Element of K;
then (LL
. k) is
Element of K by
A1,
A2,
A4;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4;
end;
then
reconsider LL as
FinSequence of K by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
take LL;
thus (
len LL)
= n by
A1;
thus thesis by
A1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let L1,L2 be
FinSequence of K such that
A5: (
len L1)
= n and
A6: for j st j
in (
dom L1) holds (L1
. j)
= ((M
* (i,j))
* (
Cofactor (M,i,j))) and
A7: (
len L2)
= n and
A8: for j st j
in (
dom L2) holds (L2
. j)
= ((M
* (i,j))
* (
Cofactor (M,i,j)));
A9: (
dom L2)
= (
Seg n) by
A7,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A10: (
dom L1)
= (
Seg n) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
now
let k be
Nat such that
A11: k
in (
dom L1);
(L1
. k)
= ((M
* (i,k))
* (
Cofactor (M,i,k))) by
A6,
A11;
hence (L1
. k)
= (L2
. k) by
A8,
A10,
A9,
A11;
end;
hence thesis by
A10,
A9,
FINSEQ_1: 13;
end;
end
definition
let n;
let j be
Nat, K;
let M be
Matrix of n, K;
::
LAPLACE:def8
func
LaplaceExpC (M,j) ->
FinSequence of K means
:
Def8: (
len it )
= n & for i st i
in (
dom it ) holds (it
. i)
= ((M
* (i,j))
* (
Cofactor (M,i,j)));
existence
proof
reconsider N = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
deffunc
L(
Nat) = ((M
* ($1,j))
* (
Cofactor (M,$1,j)));
consider LL be
FinSequence such that
A1: (
len LL)
= N & for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom LL) holds (LL
. k)
=
L(k) from
FINSEQ_1:sch 2;
(
rng LL)
c= the
carrier of K
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
rng LL);
then
consider y be
object such that
A2: y
in (
dom LL) and
A3: (LL
. y)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
(
dom LL)
= (
Seg n) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
consider k be
Nat such that
A4: k
= y and 1
<= k and k
<= n by
A2;
L(k) is
Element of K;
then (LL
. k) is
Element of K by
A1,
A2,
A4;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4;
end;
then
reconsider LL as
FinSequence of K by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
take LL;
thus (
len LL)
= n by
A1;
let i;
assume i
in (
dom LL);
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let L1,L2 be
FinSequence of K such that
A5: (
len L1)
= n and
A6: for i st i
in (
dom L1) holds (L1
. i)
= ((M
* (i,j))
* (
Cofactor (M,i,j))) and
A7: (
len L2)
= n and
A8: for i st i
in (
dom L2) holds (L2
. i)
= ((M
* (i,j))
* (
Cofactor (M,i,j)));
A9: (
dom L2)
= (
Seg n) by
A7,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A10: (
dom L1)
= (
Seg n) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
now
let k be
Nat such that
A11: k
in (
dom L1);
(L1
. k)
= ((M
* (k,j))
* (
Cofactor (M,k,j))) by
A6,
A11;
hence (L1
. k)
= (L2
. k) by
A8,
A10,
A9,
A11;
end;
hence thesis by
A10,
A9,
FINSEQ_1: 13;
end;
end
theorem ::
LAPLACE:25
Th25: for i be
Nat, M be
Matrix of n, K st i
in (
Seg n) holds (
Det M)
= (
Sum (
LaplaceExpL (M,i)))
proof
reconsider N = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
set P = (
Permutations n);
set KK = the
carrier of K;
set aa = the
addF of K;
A1: aa is
having_a_unity by
FVSUM_1: 8;
let i be
Nat, M be
Matrix of n, K such that
A2: i
in (
Seg n);
reconsider X = (
finSeg N) as non
empty
set by
A2;
set Path = (
Path_product M);
deffunc
G(
Element of (
Fin P)) = (aa
$$ ($1,Path));
consider g be
Function of (
Fin P), KK such that
A3: for x be
Element of (
Fin P) holds (g
. x)
=
G(x) from
FUNCT_2:sch 4;
A4: for A,B be
Element of (
Fin P) st A
misses B holds (aa
. ((g
. A),(g
. B)))
= (g
. (A
\/ B))
proof
let A,B be
Element of (
Fin P) such that
A5: A
misses B;
A6: (g
. A)
=
G(A) by
A3;
A7: (g
. B)
=
G(B) by
A3;
(g
. (A
\/ B))
=
G(\/) by
A3;
hence thesis by
A5,
A6,
A7,
FVSUM_1: 8,
SETWOP_2: 4;
end;
deffunc
F(
object) = { p : (p
. i)
= $1 };
consider f be
Function such that
A8: (
dom f)
= X & for x be
object st x
in X holds (f
. x)
=
F(x) from
FUNCT_1:sch 3;
(
rng f)
c= (
Fin P)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
rng f);
then
consider y be
object such that
A9: y
in (
dom f) and
A10: (f
. y)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
A11:
F(y)
c= P
proof
let z be
object;
assume z
in
F(y);
then ex p st p
= z & (p
. i)
= y;
hence thesis;
end;
F(y)
in (
Fin P) by
A11,
FINSUB_1:def 5;
hence thesis by
A8,
A9,
A10;
end;
then
reconsider f as
Function of X, (
Fin P) by
A8,
FUNCT_2: 2;
A12: (g
. (
In (P,(
Fin P))))
= (
Det M) by
A3;
set gf = (g
* f);
A13: (
dom gf)
= X by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A14: (gf
* (
id X))
= gf by
RELAT_1: 52;
A15: P
c= (
union (f
.: X))
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A16: x
in P;
then
reconsider p = x as
Permutation of X by
MATRIX_1:def 12;
A17: x
in
F(.) by
A16;
A18: (
rng p)
= X by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
(
dom p)
= X by
FUNCT_2: 52;
then
A19: (p
. i)
in X by
A2,
A18,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
A20: (f
. (p
. i))
in (f
.: X) by
A8,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
(f
. (p
. i))
=
F(.) by
A8,
A19;
hence thesis by
A17,
A20,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
set L = (
LaplaceExpL (M,i));
(
len L)
= n by
Def7;
then
A21: (
dom L)
= (
Seg n) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A22: (
dom (
id X))
= (
dom L);
reconsider X9 = X as
Element of (
Fin X) by
FINSUB_1:def 5;
P
in (
Fin P) by
FINSUB_1:def 5;
then
A23: (
In (P,(
Fin P)))
= P by
SUBSET_1:def 8;
(g
. (
{}. (
Fin P)))
= (aa
$$ ((
{}. P),Path)) by
A3;
then
A24: (g
.
{} )
= (
the_unity_wrt aa) by
FVSUM_1: 8,
SETWISEO: 31;
A25:
now
let x, y such that
A26: x
in X9 and
A27: y
in X9 and
A28: (f
. x)
meets (f
. y);
consider z be
object such that
A29: z
in (f
. x) and
A30: z
in (f
. y) by
A28,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
(f
. y)
=
F(y) by
A8,
A27;
then
A31: ex p st p
= z & (p
. i)
= y by
A30;
(f
. x)
=
F(x) by
A8,
A26;
then ex p st p
= z & (p
. i)
= x by
A29;
hence x
= y by
A31;
end;
now
A32: (
rng f)
c= (
Fin P) by
RELAT_1:def 19;
let x be
object such that
A33: x
in (
dom gf);
consider k be
Nat such that
A34: k
= x and 1
<= k and k
<= n by
A13,
A33;
(f
. k)
in (
rng f) by
A8,
A33,
A34,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
reconsider Fk =
F(k) as
Element of (
Fin P) by
A8,
A33,
A34,
A32;
A35: (f
. k)
= Fk by
A8,
A33,
A34;
(gf
. k)
= (g
. (f
. k)) by
A8,
A33,
A34,
FUNCT_1: 13;
then
A36: (gf
. k)
=
G(Fk) by
A3,
A35;
G(Fk)
= ((M
* (i,k))
* (
Cofactor (M,i,k))) by
A2,
A33,
A34,
Th23;
hence (L
. x)
= (gf
. x) by
A21,
A33,
A34,
A36,
Def7;
end;
then
A37: L
= gf by
A21,
A13,
FUNCT_1: 2;
set Laa = (
[#] (L,(
the_unity_wrt aa)));
A38: (
rng (
id X))
= X9;
A39: (Laa
| (
dom L))
= L by
SETWOP_2: 21;
(
union (f
.: X))
c= P
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
union (f
.: X));
then
consider y be
set such that
A40: x
in y and
A41: y
in (f
.: X) by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider z be
object such that
A42: z
in (
dom f) and z
in X and
A43: (f
. z)
= y by
A41,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
y
=
F(z) by
A8,
A42,
A43;
then ex p st x
= p & (p
. i)
= z by
A40;
hence thesis;
end;
then P
= (
union (f
.: X)) by
A15,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then
A44: (aa
$$ ((f
.: X9),g))
= (g
. (
In (P,(
Fin P)))) by
A25,
A4,
A1,
A24,
A23,
Th12;
(aa
$$ (X9,(g
* f)))
= (aa
$$ ((f
.: X9),g)) by
A25,
A4,
A1,
A24,
Th12;
hence (
Det M)
= (aa
$$ ((
findom L),Laa)) by
A22,
A38,
A39,
A14,
A37,
A44,
A12,
SETWOP_2: 5
.= (
Sum L) by
FVSUM_1: 8,
SETWOP_2:def 2;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:26
Th26: for i st i
in (
Seg n) holds (
LaplaceExpC (M,i))
= (
LaplaceExpL ((M
@ ),i))
proof
let i such that
A1: i
in (
Seg n);
set LL = (
LaplaceExpL ((M
@ ),i));
set LC = (
LaplaceExpC (M,i));
reconsider I = i as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
A2: (
len LL)
= n by
Def7;
A3: (
len LC)
= n by
Def8;
now
let k be
Nat such that
A4: 1
<= k and
A5: k
<= n;
A6: k
in (
Seg n) by
A4,
A5;
(
dom LC)
= (
Seg n) by
A3,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A7: (LC
. k)
= ((M
* (k,I))
* (
Cofactor (M,k,I))) by
A6,
Def8;
(
Indices M)
=
[:(
Seg n), (
Seg n):] by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
A8:
[k, i]
in (
Indices M) by
A1,
A6,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
(
dom LL)
= (
Seg n) by
A2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A9: (LL
. k)
= (((M
@ )
* (I,k))
* (
Cofactor ((M
@ ),I,k))) by
A6,
Def7;
(
Cofactor (M,k,I))
= (
Cofactor ((M
@ ),I,k)) by
A1,
A6,
Th24;
hence (LC
. k)
= (LL
. k) by
A8,
A7,
A9,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
end;
hence thesis by
A3,
A2;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:27
for j be
Nat, M be
Matrix of n, K st j
in (
Seg n) holds (
Det M)
= (
Sum (
LaplaceExpC (M,j)))
proof
let j be
Nat, M be
Matrix of n, K such that
A1: j
in (
Seg n);
thus (
Det M)
= (
Det (M
@ )) by
MATRIXR2: 43
.= (
Sum (
LaplaceExpL ((M
@ ),j))) by
A1,
Th25
.= (
Sum (
LaplaceExpC (M,j))) by
A1,
Th26;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:28
Th28: for p, i st (
len f)
= n & i
in (
Seg n) holds (
mlt ((
Line ((
Matrix_of_Cofactor M),i)),f))
= (
LaplaceExpL ((
RLine (M,i,f)),i))
proof
let p, i such that
A1: (
len f)
= n and
A2: i
in (
Seg n);
reconsider N = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
set KK = the
carrier of K;
set C = (
Matrix_of_Cofactor M);
reconsider Tp = f, TL = (
Line (C,i)) as
Element of (N
-tuples_on KK) by
A1,
FINSEQ_2: 92,
MATRIX_0: 24;
set R = (
RLine (M,i,f));
set LL = (
LaplaceExpL (R,i));
set MLT = (
mlt (TL,Tp));
A3: (
len LL)
= n by
Def7;
A4:
now
A5: (
dom LL)
= (
Seg n) by
A3,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A6: n
= (
width M) by
MATRIX_0: 24;
let j be
Nat such that
A7: 1
<= j and
A8: j
<= n;
A9: j
in (
Seg n) by
A7,
A8;
n
= (
width C) by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
A10: ((
Line (C,i))
. j)
= (C
* (i,j)) by
A9,
MATRIX_0:def 7;
(
Indices M)
=
[:(
Seg n), (
Seg n):] by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) by
A2,
A9,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A11: (R
* (i,j))
= (f
. j) by
A1,
A6,
MATRIX11:def 3;
(
Indices C)
=
[:(
Seg n), (
Seg n):] by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
[i, j]
in (
Indices C) by
A2,
A9,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then ((
Line (C,i))
. j)
= (
Cofactor (M,i,j)) by
A10,
Def6;
then
A12: (MLT
. j)
= ((
Cofactor (M,i,j))
* (R
* (i,j))) by
A9,
A11,
FVSUM_1: 61;
(
Cofactor (M,i,j))
= (
Cofactor (R,i,j)) by
A2,
A9,
Th15;
hence (MLT
. j)
= (LL
. j) by
A9,
A5,
A12,
Def7;
end;
(
len MLT)
= n by
CARD_1:def 7;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:29
Th29: i
in (
Seg n) implies ((
Line (M,j))
"*" (
Col (((
Matrix_of_Cofactor M)
@ ),i)))
= (
Det (
RLine (M,i,(
Line (M,j)))))
proof
assume
A1: i
in (
Seg n);
set C = (
Matrix_of_Cofactor M);
(
len C)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then (
dom C)
= (
Seg n) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A2: (
Line (C,i))
= (
Col ((C
@ ),i)) by
A1,
MATRIX_0: 58;
(
width M)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
A3: (
len (
Line (M,j)))
= n by
MATRIX_0:def 7;
thus (
Det (
RLine (M,i,(
Line (M,j)))))
= (
Sum (
LaplaceExpL ((
RLine (M,i,(
Line (M,j)))),i))) by
A1,
Th25
.= (
Sum (
mlt ((
Col ((C
@ ),i)),(
Line (M,j))))) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
Th28
.= ((
Line (M,j))
"*" (
Col ((C
@ ),i))) by
FVSUM_1: 64;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:30
Th30: (
Det M)
<> (
0. K) implies (M
* (((
Det M)
" )
* ((
Matrix_of_Cofactor M)
@ )))
= (
1. (K,n))
proof
set D = (
Det M);
set D9 = (D
" );
set C = (
Matrix_of_Cofactor M);
set DC = (D9
* (C
@ ));
set MC = (M
* DC);
set ID = (
1. (K,n));
assume
A1: D
<> (
0. K);
now
A2: (
Indices MC)
= (
Indices ID) by
MATRIX_0: 26;
reconsider N = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
let i,j be
Nat such that
A3:
[i, j]
in (
Indices MC);
reconsider COL = (
Col ((C
@ ),j)), L = (
Line (M,i)) as
Element of (N
-tuples_on the
carrier of K) by
MATRIX_0: 24;
reconsider i9 = i, j9 = j as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
A4: (
len DC)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
A5: (
Indices MC)
=
[:(
Seg n), (
Seg n):] by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
A6: i
in (
Seg n) by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
A7: j
in (
Seg n) by
A3,
A5,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A8: 1
<= j by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
(
width (C
@ ))
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then j
<= (
width (C
@ )) by
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (
Col (DC,j))
= (D9
* COL) by
A8,
MATRIXR1: 19;
then (
mlt ((
Line (M,i)),(
Col (DC,j))))
= (D9
* (
mlt (L,COL))) by
FVSUM_1: 69;
then
A9: ((
Line (M,i))
"*" (
Col (DC,j)))
= (D9
* ((
Line (M,i))
"*" (
Col ((C
@ ),j)))) by
FVSUM_1: 73
.= (D9
* (
Det (
RLine (M,j9,(
Line (M,i9)))))) by
A7,
Th29;
A10: (
width M)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
A11: (MC
* (i,j))
= (D9
* (
Det (
RLine (M,j,(
Line (M,i)))))) by
A3,
A4,
A9,
MATRIX_3:def 4;
per cases ;
suppose
A12: i
= j;
then
A13: (
RLine (M,j,(
Line (M,i))))
= M by
MATRIX11: 30;
A14: (D
* D9)
= (
1_ K) by
A1,
VECTSP_1:def 10;
(ID
* (i,j))
= (
1_ K) by
A3,
A2,
A12,
MATRIX_1:def 3;
hence (ID
* (i,j))
= (MC
* (i,j)) by
A3,
A10,
A4,
A9,
A13,
A14,
MATRIX_3:def 4;
end;
suppose
A15: i
<> j;
then
A16: (ID
* (i,j))
= (
0. K) by
A3,
A2,
MATRIX_1:def 3;
(
Det (
RLine (M,j9,(
Line (M,i9)))))
= (
0. K) by
A6,
A7,
A15,
MATRIX11: 51;
hence (ID
* (i,j))
= (MC
* (i,j)) by
A11,
A16;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
MATRIX_0: 27;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:31
Th31: for f, i st (
len f)
= n & i
in (
Seg n) holds (
mlt ((
Col ((
Matrix_of_Cofactor M),i)),f))
= (
LaplaceExpL ((
RLine ((M
@ ),i,f)),i))
proof
let f, i such that
A1: (
len f)
= n and
A2: i
in (
Seg n);
reconsider N = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
set KK = the
carrier of K;
set C = (
Matrix_of_Cofactor M);
reconsider Tp = f, TC = (
Col (C,i)) as
Element of (N
-tuples_on KK) by
A1,
FINSEQ_2: 92,
MATRIX_0: 24;
set R = (
RLine ((M
@ ),i,f));
set LL = (
LaplaceExpL (R,i));
set MCT = (
mlt (TC,Tp));
A3: (
len LL)
= n by
Def7;
A4:
now
A5: (
Indices (M
@ ))
=
[:(
Seg n), (
Seg n):] by
MATRIX_0: 24;
A6: (
dom LL)
= (
Seg n) by
A3,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A7: (
width (M
@ ))
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
let j be
Nat such that
A8: 1
<= j and
A9: j
<= n;
A10: j
in (
Seg n) by
A8,
A9;
then (
Delete ((M
@ ),i,j))
= ((
Delete (M,j,i))
@ ) by
A2,
Th14;
then
A11: (
Cofactor ((M
@ ),i,j))
= (
Cofactor (M,j,i)) by
MATRIXR2: 43;
(
Indices C)
=
[:(
Seg n), (
Seg n):] by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
[j, i]
in (
Indices C) by
A2,
A10,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A12: (C
* (j,i))
= (
Cofactor (M,j,i)) by
Def6;
n
= (
len C) by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then (
dom C)
= (
Seg n) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A13: ((
Col (C,i))
. j)
= (C
* (j,i)) by
A10,
MATRIX_0:def 8;
A14: (
Indices M)
=
[:(
Seg n), (
Seg n):] by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) by
A2,
A10,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then (R
* (i,j))
= (f
. j) by
A1,
A7,
A14,
A5,
MATRIX11:def 3;
then
A15: (MCT
. j)
= ((
Cofactor (M,j,i))
* (R
* (i,j))) by
A10,
A13,
A12,
FVSUM_1: 61;
(
Cofactor (R,i,j))
= (
Cofactor ((M
@ ),i,j)) by
A2,
A10,
Th15;
hence (MCT
. j)
= (LL
. j) by
A10,
A11,
A6,
A15,
Def7;
end;
(
len MCT)
= n by
CARD_1:def 7;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:32
Th32: i
in (
Seg n) & j
in (
Seg n) implies ((
Line (((
Matrix_of_Cofactor M)
@ ),i))
"*" (
Col (M,j)))
= (
Det (
RLine ((M
@ ),i,(
Line ((M
@ ),j)))))
proof
assume that
A1: i
in (
Seg n) and
A2: j
in (
Seg n);
set C = (
Matrix_of_Cofactor M);
set L = (
Line ((M
@ ),j));
A3: (
width C)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
(
width (M
@ ))
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
A4: (
len L)
= n by
MATRIX_0:def 7;
A5: (
width M)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
thus (
Det (
RLine ((M
@ ),i,L)))
= (
Sum (
LaplaceExpL ((
RLine ((M
@ ),i,L)),i))) by
A1,
Th25
.= (
Sum (
mlt ((
Col (C,i)),L))) by
A1,
A4,
Th31
.= ((
Line ((C
@ ),i))
"*" L) by
A1,
A3,
MATRIX_0: 59
.= ((
Line ((C
@ ),i))
"*" (
Col (M,j))) by
A2,
A5,
MATRIX_0: 59;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:33
Th33: (
Det M)
<> (
0. K) implies ((((
Det M)
" )
* ((
Matrix_of_Cofactor M)
@ ))
* M)
= (
1. (K,n))
proof
set D = (
Det M);
set D9 = (D
" );
set C = (
Matrix_of_Cofactor M);
set DC = (D9
* (C
@ ));
set CM = (DC
* M);
set ID = (
1. (K,n));
assume
A1: D
<> (
0. K);
now
A2: (
Indices CM)
= (
Indices ID) by
MATRIX_0: 26;
reconsider N = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
let i,j be
Nat such that
A3:
[i, j]
in (
Indices CM);
reconsider COL = (
Col (M,j)), L = (
Line ((C
@ ),i)) as
Element of (N
-tuples_on the
carrier of K) by
MATRIX_0: 24;
reconsider i9 = i, j9 = j as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
A4: (
len M)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
A5: (
Indices CM)
=
[:(
Seg n), (
Seg n):] by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
A6: i
in (
Seg n) by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A7: 1
<= i by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A8: j
in (
Seg n) by
A3,
A5,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
(
len (C
@ ))
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then i
<= (
len (C
@ )) by
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (
Line (DC,i))
= (D9
* L) by
A7,
MATRIXR1: 20;
then (
mlt ((
Line (DC,i)),(
Col (M,j))))
= (D9
* (
mlt (L,COL))) by
FVSUM_1: 69;
then
A9: ((
Line (DC,i))
"*" (
Col (M,j)))
= (D9
* ((
Line ((C
@ ),i))
"*" (
Col (M,j)))) by
FVSUM_1: 73
.= (D9
* (
Det (
RLine ((M
@ ),i9,(
Line ((M
@ ),j9)))))) by
A6,
A8,
Th32;
A10: (
width DC)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
A11: (CM
* (i,j))
= (D9
* (
Det (
RLine ((M
@ ),i,(
Line ((M
@ ),j)))))) by
A3,
A4,
A9,
MATRIX_3:def 4;
per cases ;
suppose
A12: i
= j;
then
A13: (
RLine ((M
@ ),i,(
Line ((M
@ ),j))))
= (M
@ ) by
MATRIX11: 30;
A14: D
= (
Det (M
@ )) by
MATRIXR2: 43;
A15: (D9
* D)
= (
1_ K) by
A1,
VECTSP_1:def 10;
(ID
* (i,j))
= (
1_ K) by
A3,
A2,
A12,
MATRIX_1:def 3;
hence (ID
* (i,j))
= (CM
* (i,j)) by
A3,
A10,
A4,
A9,
A13,
A15,
A14,
MATRIX_3:def 4;
end;
suppose
A16: i
<> j;
then
A17: (ID
* (i,j))
= (
0. K) by
A3,
A2,
MATRIX_1:def 3;
(
Det (
RLine ((M
@ ),i9,(
Line ((M
@ ),j9)))))
= (
0. K) by
A6,
A8,
A16,
MATRIX11: 51;
hence (ID
* (i,j))
= (CM
* (i,j)) by
A11,
A17;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
MATRIX_0: 27;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:34
Th34: M is
invertible iff (
Det M)
<> (
0. K)
proof
thus M is
invertible implies (
Det M)
<> (
0. K)
proof
reconsider N = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
assume M is
invertible;
then
consider M1 be
Matrix of n, K such that
A1: M
is_reverse_of M1 by
MATRIX_6:def 3;
per cases by
NAT_1: 14;
suppose N
=
0 ;
then (
Det M)
= (
1_ K) by
MATRIXR2: 41;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
A2: N
>= 1;
A3: (M
* M1)
= (
1. (K,n)) by
A1,
MATRIX_6:def 2;
(
Det (
1. (K,n)))
= (
1_ K) by
A2,
MATRIX_7: 16;
then ((
Det M)
* (
Det M1))
= (
1_ K) by
A2,
A3,
MATRIX11: 62;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
set C = (((
Det M)
" )
* ((
Matrix_of_Cofactor M)
@ ));
assume
A4: (
Det M)
<> (
0. K);
then
A5: (M
* C)
= (
1. (K,n)) by
Th30;
(C
* M)
= (
1. (K,n)) by
A4,
Th33;
then M
is_reverse_of C by
A5,
MATRIX_6:def 2;
hence thesis by
MATRIX_6:def 3;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:35
Th35: (
Det M)
<> (
0. K) implies (M
~ )
= (((
Det M)
" )
* ((
Matrix_of_Cofactor M)
@ ))
proof
set C = (((
Det M)
" )
* ((
Matrix_of_Cofactor M)
@ ));
assume
A1: (
Det M)
<> (
0. K);
then
A2: (M
* C)
= (
1. (K,n)) by
Th30;
(C
* M)
= (
1. (K,n)) by
A1,
Th33;
then
A3: M
is_reverse_of C by
A2,
MATRIX_6:def 2;
M is
invertible by
A1,
Th34;
hence thesis by
A3,
MATRIX_6:def 4;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:36
for M be
Matrix of n, K st M is
invertible holds for i, j st
[i, j]
in (
Indices (M
~ )) holds ((M
~ )
* (i,j))
= ((((
Det M)
" )
* ((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j))))
* (
Minor (M,j,i)))
proof
let M be
Matrix of n, K;
assume M is
invertible;
then
A1: (
Det M)
<> (
0. K) by
Th34;
set D = (
Det M);
set COF = (
Matrix_of_Cofactor M);
let i, j;
assume
[i, j]
in (
Indices (M
~ ));
then
A2:
[i, j]
in (
Indices (COF
@ )) by
MATRIX_0: 26;
then
A3:
[j, i]
in (
Indices COF) by
MATRIX_0:def 6;
thus ((M
~ )
* (i,j))
= (((D
" )
* (COF
@ ))
* (i,j)) by
A1,
Th35
.= ((D
" )
* ((COF
@ )
* (i,j))) by
A2,
MATRIX_3:def 5
.= ((D
" )
* (COF
* (j,i))) by
A3,
MATRIX_0:def 6
.= ((D
" )
* (
Cofactor (M,j,i))) by
A3,
Def6
.= (((D
" )
* ((
power K)
. ((
- (
1_ K)),(i
+ j))))
* (
Minor (M,j,i))) by
GROUP_1:def 3;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:37
Th37: for A be
Matrix of n, K st (
Det A)
<> (
0. K) holds for x,b be
Matrix of K st (
len x)
= n & (A
* x)
= b holds x
= ((A
~ )
* b) & for i, j st
[i, j]
in (
Indices x) holds (x
* (i,j))
= (((
Det A)
" )
* (
Det (
ReplaceCol (A,i,(
Col (b,j))))))
proof
let A be
Matrix of n, K such that
A1: (
Det A)
<> (
0. K);
A is
invertible by
A1,
Th34;
then (A
~ )
is_reverse_of A by
MATRIX_6:def 4;
then
A2: ((A
~ )
* A)
= (
1. (K,n)) by
MATRIX_6:def 2;
set MC = (
Matrix_of_Cofactor A);
set D = (
Det A);
A3: (
width MC)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
A4: (
len (MC
@ ))
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
A5: (
width (MC
@ ))
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
A6: (
width (A
~ ))
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
A7: (
width A)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
let x,b be
Matrix of K such that
A8: (
len x)
= n and
A9: (A
* x)
= b;
A10: (
len A)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
A11: (
len b)
= n by
A8,
A9,
A7,
MATRIX_3:def 4;
x
= ((
1. (K,n))
* x) by
A8,
MATRIXR2: 68;
hence
A12: x
= ((A
~ )
* b) by
A8,
A9,
A6,
A10,
A7,
A2,
MATRIX_3: 33;
let i, j such that
A13:
[i, j]
in (
Indices x);
A14: (
len (
Col (b,j)))
= n by
A11,
MATRIX_0:def 8;
(
Indices x)
=
[:(
Seg n), (
Seg (
width x)):] by
A8,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A15: i
in (
Seg n) by
A13,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A16: 1
<= i by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A17: i
<= n by
A15,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
thus (x
* (i,j))
= ((
Line ((A
~ ),i))
"*" (
Col (b,j))) by
A6,
A12,
A13,
A11,
MATRIX_3:def 4
.= ((
Line (((D
" )
* (MC
@ )),i))
"*" (
Col (b,j))) by
A1,
Th35
.= (((D
" )
* (
Line ((MC
@ ),i)))
"*" (
Col (b,j))) by
A4,
A16,
A17,
MATRIXR1: 20
.= (
Sum ((D
" )
* (
mlt ((
Line ((MC
@ ),i)),(
Col (b,j)))))) by
A5,
A11,
FVSUM_1: 68
.= ((D
" )
* ((
Line ((MC
@ ),i))
"*" (
Col (b,j)))) by
FVSUM_1: 73
.= ((D
" )
* ((
Col (MC,i))
"*" (
Col (b,j)))) by
A3,
A15,
MATRIX_0: 59
.= ((D
" )
* (
Sum (
LaplaceExpL ((
RLine ((A
@ ),i,(
Col (b,j)))),i)))) by
A15,
A14,
Th31
.= ((D
" )
* (
Det (
RLine ((A
@ ),i,(
Col (b,j)))))) by
A15,
Th25
.= ((D
" )
* (
Det ((
RLine ((A
@ ),i,(
Col (b,j))))
@ ))) by
MATRIXR2: 43
.= ((D
" )
* (
Det (
RCol (A,i,(
Col (b,j)))))) by
Th19;
end;
theorem ::
LAPLACE:38
Th38: for A be
Matrix of n, K st (
Det A)
<> (
0. K) holds for x,b be
Matrix of K st (
width x)
= n & (x
* A)
= b holds x
= (b
* (A
~ )) & for i, j st
[i, j]
in (
Indices x) holds (x
* (i,j))
= (((
Det A)
" )
* (
Det (
ReplaceLine (A,j,(
Line (b,i))))))
proof
let A be
Matrix of n, K such that
A1: (
Det A)
<> (
0. K);
A is
invertible by
A1,
Th34;
then (A
~ )
is_reverse_of A by
MATRIX_6:def 4;
then
A2: (A
* (A
~ ))
= (
1. (K,n)) by
MATRIX_6:def 2;
A3: (
width A)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
let x,b be
Matrix of K such that
A4: (
width x)
= n and
A5: (x
* A)
= b;
A6: (
len A)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
A7: (
width b)
= n by
A4,
A5,
A3,
MATRIX_3:def 4;
set MC = (
Matrix_of_Cofactor A);
set D = (
Det A);
A8: (
len (MC
@ ))
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
A9: (
width (MC
@ ))
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
(
len MC)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
A10: (
Seg n)
= (
dom MC) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A11: (
len (A
~ ))
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
x
= (x
* (
1. (K,n))) by
A4,
MATRIXR2: 67;
hence
A12: x
= (b
* (A
~ )) by
A4,
A5,
A11,
A6,
A3,
A2,
MATRIX_3: 33;
let i, j such that
A13:
[i, j]
in (
Indices x);
A14: j
in (
Seg n) by
A4,
A13,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A15: 1
<= j by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A16: (
len (
Line (b,i)))
= n by
A7,
MATRIX_0:def 7;
A17: j
<= n by
A14,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
thus (x
* (i,j))
= ((
Line (b,i))
"*" (
Col ((A
~ ),j))) by
A11,
A12,
A13,
A7,
MATRIX_3:def 4
.= ((
Line (b,i))
"*" (
Col (((D
" )
* (MC
@ )),j))) by
A1,
Th35
.= ((
Line (b,i))
"*" ((D
" )
* (
Col ((MC
@ ),j)))) by
A9,
A15,
A17,
MATRIXR1: 19
.= (((D
" )
* (
Col ((MC
@ ),j)))
"*" (
Line (b,i))) by
FVSUM_1: 90
.= (
Sum ((D
" )
* (
mlt ((
Col ((MC
@ ),j)),(
Line (b,i)))))) by
A8,
A7,
FVSUM_1: 69
.= ((D
" )
* ((
Col ((MC
@ ),j))
"*" (
Line (b,i)))) by
FVSUM_1: 73
.= ((D
" )
* ((
Line (MC,j))
"*" (
Line (b,i)))) by
A14,
A10,
MATRIX_0: 58
.= ((D
" )
* (
Sum (
LaplaceExpL ((
RLine (A,j,(
Line (b,i)))),j)))) by
A14,
A16,
Th28
.= ((D
" )
* (
Det (
RLine (A,j,(
Line (b,i)))))) by
A14,
Th25;
end;
begin
definition
let D be non
empty
set;
let f be
FinSequence of D;
:: original:
<*
redefine
func
<*f*> ->
Matrix of 1, (
len f), D ;
coherence by
MATRIX_0: 11;
end
definition
let K;
let M be
Matrix of K;
let f be
FinSequence of K;
::
LAPLACE:def9
func M
* f ->
Matrix of K equals (M
* (
<*f*>
@ ));
coherence ;
::
LAPLACE:def10
func f
* M ->
Matrix of K equals (
<*f*>
* M);
coherence ;
end
theorem ::
LAPLACE:39
for A be
Matrix of n, K st (
Det A)
<> (
0. K) holds for x,b be
FinSequence of K st (
len x)
= n & (A
* x)
= (
<*b*>
@ ) holds (
<*x*>
@ )
= ((A
~ )
* b) & for i st i
in (
Seg n) holds (x
. i)
= (((
Det A)
" )
* (
Det (
ReplaceCol (A,i,b))))
proof
let A be
Matrix of n, K such that
A1: (
Det A)
<> (
0. K);
let x,b be
FinSequence of K such that
A2: (
len x)
= n and
A3: (A
* x)
= (
<*b*>
@ );
set X =
<*x*>;
(
len X)
= 1 by
MATRIX_0:def 2;
then
A4: (
len x)
= (
width X) by
MATRIX_0: 20;
then
A5: (
len (X
@ ))
= (
len x) by
MATRIX_0:def 6;
hence (X
@ )
= ((A
~ )
* b) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
Th37;
set B =
<*b*>;
A6: 1
in (
Seg 1);
then
A7: (
Line (X,1))
= (X
. 1) by
MATRIX_0: 52;
(
len B)
= 1 by
MATRIX_0:def 2;
then
A8: 1
in (
dom B) by
A6,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A9: (
Line (B,1))
= (B
. 1) by
A6,
MATRIX_0: 52;
let i such that
A10: i
in (
Seg n);
n
>
0 by
A10;
then (
width (X
@ ))
= (
len X) by
A2,
A4,
MATRIX_0: 54
.= 1 by
MATRIX_0:def 2;
then (
Indices (X
@ ))
=
[:(
Seg n), (
Seg 1):] by
A2,
A5,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A11:
[i, 1]
in (
Indices (X
@ )) by
A10,
A6,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
[1, i]
in (
Indices X) by
MATRIX_0:def 6;
then ((X
@ )
* (i,1))
= (X
* (1,i)) by
MATRIX_0:def 6
.= ((
Line (X,1))
. i) by
A2,
A4,
A10,
MATRIX_0:def 7
.= (x
. i) by
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
hence (x
. i)
= (((
Det A)
" )
* (
Det (
ReplaceCol (A,i,(
Col ((B
@ ),1)))))) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
A5,
A11,
Th37
.= (((
Det A)
" )
* (
Det (
ReplaceCol (A,i,(
Line (B,1)))))) by
A8,
MATRIX_0: 58
.= (((
Det A)
" )
* (
Det (
ReplaceCol (A,i,b)))) by
A9,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
end;
::$Notion-Name
theorem ::
LAPLACE:40
for A be
Matrix of n, K st (
Det A)
<> (
0. K) holds for x,b be
FinSequence of K st (
len x)
= n & (x
* A)
=
<*b*> holds
<*x*>
= (b
* (A
~ )) & for i st i
in (
Seg n) holds (x
. i)
= (((
Det A)
" )
* (
Det (
ReplaceLine (A,i,b))))
proof
let A be
Matrix of n, K such that
A1: (
Det A)
<> (
0. K);
let x,b be
FinSequence of K such that
A2: (
len x)
= n and
A3: (x
* A)
=
<*b*>;
set X =
<*x*>;
A4: (
width X)
= (
len x) by
MATRIX_0: 23;
hence X
= (b
* (A
~ )) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
Th38;
A5:
[:(
Seg 1), (
Seg n):]
= (
Indices X) by
A2,
MATRIX_0: 23;
set B =
<*b*>;
A6: 1
in (
Seg 1);
then
A7: (
Line (X,1))
= (X
. 1) by
MATRIX_0: 52;
let i such that
A8: i
in (
Seg n);
A9:
[1, i]
in
[:(
Seg 1), (
Seg n):] by
A8,
A6,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
A10: (
Line (B,1))
= (B
. 1) by
A6,
MATRIX_0: 52;
(X
* (1,i))
= ((
Line (X,1))
. i) by
A2,
A4,
A8,
MATRIX_0:def 7
.= (x
. i) by
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
hence (x
. i)
= (((
Det A)
" )
* (
Det (
ReplaceLine (A,i,(
Line (B,1)))))) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
A4,
A9,
A5,
Th38
.= (((
Det A)
" )
* (
Det (
ReplaceLine (A,i,b)))) by
A10,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
end;