pencil_1.miz
begin
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:1
Th1: for f,g be
Function st (
product f)
= (
product g) holds f is
non-empty implies g is
non-empty
proof
let f,g be
Function;
assume
A1: (
product f)
= (
product g);
now
assume that
A2: f is
non-empty and
A3: not g is
non-empty;
ex n be
object st n
in (
dom g) & (g
. n) is
empty by
A3,
FUNCT_1:def 9;
then
{}
in (
rng g) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then (
product g)
=
{} by
CARD_3: 26;
then
{}
in (
rng f) by
A1,
CARD_3: 26;
then ex n be
object st n
in (
dom f) & (f
. n)
=
{} by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence contradiction by
A2,
FUNCT_1:def 9;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:2
Th2: for X be
set holds 2
c= (
card X) iff ex x,y be
object st x
in X & y
in X & x
<> y
proof
let X be
set;
thus 2
c= (
card X) implies ex x,y be
object st x
in X & y
in X & x
<> y
proof
assume 2
c= (
card X);
then (
card 2)
c= (
card X);
then
consider f be
Function such that
A1: f is
one-to-one and
A2: (
dom f)
= 2 and
A3: (
rng f)
c= X by
CARD_1: 10;
take x = (f
.
0 );
take y = (f
. 1);
A4:
0
in (
dom f) by
A2,
CARD_1: 50,
TARSKI:def 2;
then (f
.
0 )
in (
rng f) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence x
in X by
A3;
A5: 1
in (
dom f) by
A2,
CARD_1: 50,
TARSKI:def 2;
then (f
. 1)
in (
rng f) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence y
in X by
A3;
thus thesis by
A1,
A4,
A5,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
end;
given x,y be
object such that
A6: x
in X & y
in X and
A7: x
<> y;
{x, y}
c= X by
A6,
TARSKI:def 2;
then (
card
{x, y})
c= (
card X) by
CARD_1: 11;
hence thesis by
A7,
CARD_2: 57;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:3
Th3: for X be
set st 2
c= (
card X) holds for x be
object holds ex y be
object st y
in X & x
<> y
proof
let X be
set;
assume 2
c= (
card X);
then
consider a,b be
object such that
A1: a
in X and
A2: b
in X & a
<> b by
Th2;
let x be
object;
per cases ;
suppose
A3: x
= a;
take b;
thus thesis by
A2,
A3;
end;
suppose
A4: x
<> a;
take a;
thus thesis by
A1,
A4;
end;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:4
Th4: for X be
set holds 2
c= (
card X) iff X is non
trivial
proof
let X be
set;
set z = the
Element of X;
thus 2
c= (
card X) implies X is non
trivial
proof
assume 2
c= (
card X);
then
consider x,y be
object such that
A1: x
in X and
A2: y
in X and
A3: x
<> y by
Th2;
now
given z be
object such that
A4: X
=
{z};
thus x
= z by
A1,
A4,
TARSKI:def 1
.= y by
A2,
A4,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 131;
end;
assume
A5: X is non
trivial;
then X
c=
{z} implies X
=
{z};
then
consider w be
object such that
A6: w
in X and
A7: not w
in
{z} by
A5;
w
<> z by
A7,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis by
A6,
Th2;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:5
Th5: for X be
set holds 3
c= (
card X) iff ex x,y,z be
object st x
in X & y
in X & z
in X & x
<> y & x
<> z & y
<> z
proof
let X be
set;
thus 3
c= (
card X) implies ex x,y,z be
object st x
in X & y
in X & z
in X & x
<> y & x
<> z & y
<> z
proof
assume 3
c= (
card X);
then (
card 3)
c= (
card X);
then
consider f be
Function such that
A1: f is
one-to-one and
A2: (
dom f)
= 3 and
A3: (
rng f)
c= X by
CARD_1: 10;
take x = (f
.
0 );
take y = (f
. 1);
take z = (f
. 2);
A4:
0
in (
dom f) by
A2,
ENUMSET1:def 1,
YELLOW11: 1;
then (f
.
0 )
in (
rng f) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence x
in X by
A3;
A5: 1
in (
dom f) by
A2,
ENUMSET1:def 1,
YELLOW11: 1;
then (f
. 1)
in (
rng f) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence y
in X by
A3;
A6: 2
in (
dom f) by
A2,
ENUMSET1:def 1,
YELLOW11: 1;
then (f
. 2)
in (
rng f) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence z
in X by
A3;
thus x
<> y by
A1,
A4,
A5,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
thus x
<> z by
A1,
A4,
A6,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
thus thesis by
A1,
A5,
A6,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
end;
given x,y,z be
object such that
A7: x
in X & y
in X & z
in X and
A8: x
<> y & x
<> z & y
<> z;
{x, y, z}
c= X by
A7,
ENUMSET1:def 1;
then (
card
{x, y, z})
c= (
card X) by
CARD_1: 11;
hence thesis by
A8,
CARD_2: 58;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:6
Th6: for X be
set st 3
c= (
card X) holds for x,y be
object holds ex z be
object st z
in X & x
<> z & y
<> z
proof
let X be
set;
assume 3
c= (
card X);
then
consider a,b,c be
object such that
A1: a
in X and
A2: b
in X and
A3: c
in X and
A4: a
<> b and
A5: a
<> c & b
<> c by
Th5;
let x,y be
object;
per cases ;
suppose x
<> a & y
<> a;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
suppose x
<> a & y
= a & x
= b;
hence thesis by
A3,
A5;
end;
suppose x
<> a & y
= a & x
<> b;
hence thesis by
A2,
A4;
end;
suppose x
= a & y
<> a & y
= b;
hence thesis by
A3,
A5;
end;
suppose x
= a & y
<> a & y
<> b;
hence thesis by
A2,
A4;
end;
suppose x
= a & y
= a;
hence thesis by
A2,
A4;
end;
end;
begin
definition
let S be
TopStruct;
mode
Block of S is
Element of the
topology of S;
end
definition
let S be
TopStruct;
let x,y be
Point of S;
::
PENCIL_1:def1
pred x,y
are_collinear means x
= y or ex l be
Block of S st
{x, y}
c= l;
end
definition
let S be
TopStruct;
let T be
Subset of S;
::
PENCIL_1:def2
attr T is
closed_under_lines means for l be
Block of S st 2
c= (
card (l
/\ T)) holds l
c= T;
::
PENCIL_1:def3
attr T is
strong means for x,y be
Point of S st x
in T & y
in T holds (x,y)
are_collinear ;
end
definition
let S be
TopStruct;
::
PENCIL_1:def4
attr S is
void means
:
Def4: the
topology of S is
empty;
::
PENCIL_1:def5
attr S is
degenerated means the
carrier of S is
Block of S;
::
PENCIL_1:def6
attr S is
with_non_trivial_blocks means
:
Def6: for k be
Block of S holds 2
c= (
card k);
::
PENCIL_1:def7
attr S is
identifying_close_blocks means
:
Def7: for k,l be
Block of S st 2
c= (
card (k
/\ l)) holds k
= l;
::
PENCIL_1:def8
attr S is
truly-partial means ex x,y be
Point of S st not (x,y)
are_collinear ;
::
PENCIL_1:def9
attr S is
without_isolated_points means
:
Def9: for x be
Point of S holds ex l be
Block of S st x
in l;
::
PENCIL_1:def10
attr S is
connected means for x,y be
Point of S holds ex f be
FinSequence of the
carrier of S st x
= (f
. 1) & y
= (f
. (
len f)) & for i be
Nat st 1
<= i & i
< (
len f) holds for a,b be
Point of S st a
= (f
. i) & b
= (f
. (i
+ 1)) holds (a,b)
are_collinear ;
::
PENCIL_1:def11
attr S is
strongly_connected means for x be
Point of S holds for X be
Subset of S st X is
closed_under_lines
strong holds ex f be
FinSequence of (
bool the
carrier of S) st X
= (f
. 1) & x
in (f
. (
len f)) & (for W be
Subset of S st W
in (
rng f) holds W is
closed_under_lines
strong) & for i be
Nat st 1
<= i & i
< (
len f) holds 2
c= (
card ((f
. i)
/\ (f
. (i
+ 1))));
end
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:7
Th7: for X be non
empty
set st 3
c= (
card X) holds for S be
TopStruct st the
carrier of S
= X & the
topology of S
= { L where L be
Subset of X : 2
= (
card L) } holds S is non
empty non
void non
degenerated non
truly-partial
with_non_trivial_blocks
identifying_close_blocks
without_isolated_points
proof
let X be non
empty
set;
assume
A1: 3
c= (
card X);
A2: (
Segm 2)
c= (
Segm 3) by
NAT_1: 39;
then 2
c= (
card X) by
A1;
then
consider x,y be
object such that
A3: x
in X & y
in X and
A4: x
<> y by
Th2;
{x, y}
c= X by
A3,
TARSKI:def 2;
then
reconsider l =
{x, y} as
Subset of X;
let S be
TopStruct;
assume that
A5: the
carrier of S
= X and
A6: the
topology of S
= { L where L be
Subset of X : 2
= (
card L) };
thus S is non
empty by
A5;
2
= (
card l) by
A4,
CARD_2: 57;
then
A7: l
in the
topology of S by
A6;
then
reconsider F = { L where L be
Subset of X : 2
= (
card L) } as non
empty
set by
A6;
thus S is non
void by
A7;
now
assume X
in F;
then ex L be
Subset of X st X
= L & 2
= (
card L);
then (
Segm 3)
c= (
Segm 2) by
A1;
hence contradiction by
NAT_1: 39;
end;
then not X is
Element of F;
hence S is non
degenerated by
A5,
A6;
for x,y be
Point of S holds (x,y)
are_collinear
proof
let x,y be
Point of S;
per cases ;
suppose
A8: x
= y;
consider z be
object such that
A9: z
in X and
A10: z
<> x by
A1,
A2,
Th3,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
reconsider z as
Point of S by
A5,
A9;
A11:
{x, y}
c=
{x, z}
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in
{x, y};
then a
= x or a
= y by
TARSKI:def 2;
hence thesis by
A8,
TARSKI:def 2;
end;
{x, z}
c= X
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in
{x, z};
then a
= x or a
= z by
TARSKI:def 2;
hence thesis by
A5;
end;
then
reconsider l =
{x, z} as
Subset of X;
(
card l)
= 2 by
A10,
CARD_2: 57;
then l
in the
topology of S by
A6;
hence thesis by
A11;
end;
suppose
A12: x
<> y;
{x, y}
c= X
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in
{x, y};
then a
= x or a
= y by
TARSKI:def 2;
hence thesis by
A5;
end;
then
reconsider l =
{x, y} as
Subset of X;
(
card
{x, y})
= 2 by
A12,
CARD_2: 57;
then l
in the
topology of S by
A6;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
hence S is non
truly-partial;
thus S is
with_non_trivial_blocks
proof
let k be
Block of S;
k
in the
topology of S by
A7;
then ex m be
Subset of X st m
= k & (
card m)
= 2 by
A6;
hence thesis;
end;
thus S is
identifying_close_blocks
proof
let k,l be
Block of S;
assume 2
c= (
card (k
/\ l));
then
consider a,b be
object such that
A13: a
in (k
/\ l) & b
in (k
/\ l) and
A14: a
<> b by
Th2;
A15:
{a, b}
c= (k
/\ l) by
A13,
TARSKI:def 2;
l
in the
topology of S by
A7;
then
A16: ex n be
Subset of X st n
= l & (
card n)
= 2 by
A6;
then
reconsider l1 = l as
finite
set;
A17: (k
/\ l)
c= l1 by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
k
in the
topology of S by
A7;
then
A18: ex m be
Subset of X st m
= k & (
card m)
= 2 by
A6;
then
reconsider k1 = k as
finite
set;
A19: (
card
{a, b})
= 2 by
A14,
CARD_2: 57;
(k
/\ l)
c= k1 by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then
{a, b}
= k1 by
A18,
A15,
A19,
CARD_2: 102,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
hence thesis by
A15,
A19,
A16,
A17,
CARD_2: 102,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
end;
thus S is
without_isolated_points
proof
let x be
Point of S;
consider z be
object such that
A20: z
in X and
A21: z
<> x by
A1,
A2,
Th3,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
{x, z}
c= X
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in
{x, z};
then a
= x or a
= z by
TARSKI:def 2;
hence thesis by
A5,
A20;
end;
then
reconsider l =
{x, z} as
Subset of X;
(
card
{x, z})
= 2 by
A21,
CARD_2: 57;
then l
in the
topology of S by
A6;
then
reconsider l as
Block of S;
take l;
thus thesis by
TARSKI:def 2;
end;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:8
Th8: for X be non
empty
set st 3
c= (
card X) holds for K be
Subset of X st (
card K)
= 2 holds for S be
TopStruct st the
carrier of S
= X & the
topology of S
= ({ L where L be
Subset of X : 2
= (
card L) }
\
{K}) holds S is non
empty non
void non
degenerated
truly-partial
with_non_trivial_blocks
identifying_close_blocks
without_isolated_points
proof
let X be non
empty
set;
assume
A1: 3
c= (
card X);
let K be
Subset of X;
assume
A2: (
card K)
= 2;
then
reconsider K9 = K as
finite
Subset of X;
consider x,y be
object such that
A3: x
<> y and
A4: K9
=
{x, y} by
A2,
CARD_2: 60;
let S be
TopStruct;
assume that
A5: the
carrier of S
= X and
A6: the
topology of S
= ({ L where L be
Subset of X : 2
= (
card L) }
\
{K});
reconsider x, y as
Point of S by
A5,
A4,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
consider z be
object such that
A7: z
in X and
A8: z
<> x and
A9: z
<> y by
A1,
Th6;
{x, z}
c= X
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in
{x, z};
then a
= x or a
= z by
TARSKI:def 2;
hence thesis by
A5,
A7;
end;
then
reconsider l =
{x, z} as
Subset of X;
(
card l)
= 2 by
A8,
CARD_2: 57;
then
A10: z
in l & l
in { L where L be
Subset of X : 2
= (
card L) } by
TARSKI:def 2;
thus S is non
empty by
A5;
not z
in K9 by
A4,
A8,
A9,
TARSKI:def 2;
then
A11: not { L where L be
Subset of X : 2
= (
card L) }
c=
{K} by
A10,
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A12: ({ L where L be
Subset of X : 2
= (
card L) }
\
{K}) is non
empty by
XBOOLE_1: 37;
hence S is non
void by
A6;
reconsider F = ({ L where L be
Subset of X : 2
= (
card L) }
\
{K}) as non
empty
set by
A11,
XBOOLE_1: 37;
now
assume X
in F;
then X
in { L where L be
Subset of X : 2
= (
card L) };
then ex L be
Subset of X st X
= L & 2
= (
card L);
then (
Segm 3)
c= (
Segm 2) by
A1;
hence contradiction by
NAT_1: 39;
end;
then not X is
Element of F;
hence S is non
degenerated by
A5,
A6;
thus S is
truly-partial
proof
take x, y;
for l be
Block of S holds not
{x, y}
c= l
proof
let l be
Block of S;
l
in { L where L be
Subset of X : 2
= (
card L) } by
A6,
A12,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
consider L be
Subset of X such that
A13: l
= L and
A14: (
card L)
= 2;
reconsider L9 = L as
finite
Subset of X by
A14;
consider a,b be
object such that a
<> b and
A15: L9
=
{a, b} by
A14,
CARD_2: 60;
A16: not l
in
{K} by
A6,
A12,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
now
assume
A17:
{x, y}
c= l;
then y
in L9 by
A13,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
then
A18: y
= a or y
= b by
A15,
TARSKI:def 2;
x
in L9 by
A13,
A17,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
then x
= a or x
= b by
A15,
TARSKI:def 2;
hence contradiction by
A3,
A4,
A16,
A13,
A15,
A18,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
thus S is
with_non_trivial_blocks
proof
let k be
Block of S;
k
in { L where L be
Subset of X : 2
= (
card L) } by
A6,
A12,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then ex m be
Subset of X st m
= k & (
card m)
= 2;
hence thesis;
end;
thus S is
identifying_close_blocks
proof
let k,l be
Block of S;
assume 2
c= (
card (k
/\ l));
then
consider a,b be
object such that
A19: a
in (k
/\ l) & b
in (k
/\ l) and
A20: a
<> b by
Th2;
A21:
{a, b}
c= (k
/\ l) by
A19,
TARSKI:def 2;
l
in { L where L be
Subset of X : 2
= (
card L) } by
A6,
A12,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
A22: ex n be
Subset of X st n
= l & (
card n)
= 2;
then
reconsider l1 = l as
finite
set;
A23: (k
/\ l)
c= l1 by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
k
in { L where L be
Subset of X : 2
= (
card L) } by
A6,
A12,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
A24: ex m be
Subset of X st m
= k & (
card m)
= 2;
then
reconsider k1 = k as
finite
set;
A25: (
card
{a, b})
= 2 by
A20,
CARD_2: 57;
(k
/\ l)
c= k1 by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then
{a, b}
= k1 by
A24,
A21,
A25,
CARD_2: 102,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
hence thesis by
A21,
A25,
A22,
A23,
CARD_2: 102,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
end;
A26: (
Segm 2)
c= (
Segm 3) by
NAT_1: 39;
thus S is
without_isolated_points
proof
let p be
Point of S;
per cases ;
suppose
A27: p
<> x & p
<> y;
consider z be
object such that
A28: z
in X and
A29: z
<> p by
A1,
A26,
Th3,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
{p, z}
c= X
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in
{p, z};
then a
= p or a
= z by
TARSKI:def 2;
hence thesis by
A5,
A28;
end;
then
reconsider el =
{p, z} as
Subset of X;
(
card
{p, z})
= 2 by
A29,
CARD_2: 57;
then
A30: el
in { L where L be
Subset of X : 2
= (
card L) };
p
in el by
TARSKI:def 2;
then el
<> K by
A4,
A27,
TARSKI:def 2;
then not el
in
{K} by
TARSKI:def 1;
then
reconsider el as
Block of S by
A6,
A30,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
take el;
thus thesis by
TARSKI:def 2;
end;
suppose
A31: p
= x or p
= y;
consider z be
object such that
A32: z
in X and
A33: z
<> x & z
<> y by
A1,
Th6;
{p, z}
c= X
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in
{p, z};
then a
= p or a
= z by
TARSKI:def 2;
hence thesis by
A5,
A32;
end;
then
reconsider el =
{p, z} as
Subset of X;
(
card
{p, z})
= 2 by
A31,
A33,
CARD_2: 57;
then
A34: el
in { L where L be
Subset of X : 2
= (
card L) };
z
in el by
TARSKI:def 2;
then el
<> K by
A4,
A33,
TARSKI:def 2;
then not el
in
{K} by
TARSKI:def 1;
then
reconsider el as
Block of S by
A6,
A34,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
take el;
thus thesis by
TARSKI:def 2;
end;
end;
end;
registration
cluster
strict non
empty non
void non
degenerated non
truly-partial
with_non_trivial_blocks
identifying_close_blocks
without_isolated_points for
TopStruct;
existence
proof
{ L where L be
Subset of (
Segm 3) : 2
= (
card L) }
c= (
bool 3)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in { L where L be
Subset of (
Segm 3) : 2
= (
card L) };
then ex L be
Subset of 3 st x
= L & 2
= (
card L);
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider B = { L where L be
Subset of 3 : 2
= (
card L) } as
Subset-Family of 3;
take
TopStruct (# 3, B #);
3
= (
card 3);
then for S be
TopStruct st the
carrier of S
= (
Segm 3) & the
topology of S
= { L where L be
Subset of (
Segm 3) : 2
= (
card L) } holds S is non
empty non
void non
degenerated non
truly-partial
with_non_trivial_blocks
identifying_close_blocks
without_isolated_points by
Th7;
hence thesis;
end;
cluster
strict non
empty non
void non
degenerated
truly-partial
with_non_trivial_blocks
identifying_close_blocks
without_isolated_points for
TopStruct;
existence
proof
(
Segm 2)
c= (
Segm 3) & (
card 2)
= 2 by
NAT_1: 39;
then
consider K be
Subset of 3 such that
A1: (
card K)
= 2;
{ L where L be
Subset of 3 : 2
= (
card L) }
c= (
bool 3)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in { L where L be
Subset of 3 : 2
= (
card L) };
then ex L be
Subset of 3 st x
= L & 2
= (
card L);
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider B = ({ L where L be
Subset of (
Segm 3) : 2
= (
card L) }
\
{K}) as
Subset-Family of (
Segm 3) by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
take
TopStruct (# (
Segm 3), B #);
3
c= (
card 3);
then for K be
Subset of (
Segm 3) st (
card K)
= 2 holds for S be
TopStruct st the
carrier of S
= (
Segm 3) & the
topology of S
= ({ L where L be
Subset of (
Segm 3) : 2
= (
card L) }
\
{K}) holds S is non
empty non
void non
degenerated
truly-partial
with_non_trivial_blocks
identifying_close_blocks
without_isolated_points by
Th8;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
end
registration
let S be non
void
TopStruct;
cluster the
topology of S -> non
empty;
coherence by
Def4;
end
definition
let S be
without_isolated_points
TopStruct;
let x,y be
Point of S;
:: original:
are_collinear
redefine
::
PENCIL_1:def12
pred x,y
are_collinear means ex l be
Block of S st
{x, y}
c= l;
compatibility
proof
thus (x,y)
are_collinear implies ex l be
Block of S st
{x, y}
c= l
proof
assume
A1: (x,y)
are_collinear ;
per cases ;
suppose
A2: x
= y;
consider l be
Block of S such that
A3: x
in l by
Def9;
take l;
thus thesis by
A2,
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
end;
suppose x
<> y;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
end;
given l be
Block of S such that
A4:
{x, y}
c= l;
thus thesis by
A4;
end;
end
definition
mode
PLS is non
empty non
void non
degenerated
with_non_trivial_blocks
identifying_close_blocks
TopStruct;
end
definition
::$Canceled
let F be
Relation;
::
PENCIL_1:def14
attr F is
non-void-yielding means for S be
TopStruct st S
in (
rng F) holds S is non
void;
end
definition
let F be
TopStruct-yielding
Function;
:: original:
non-void-yielding
redefine
::
PENCIL_1:def15
attr F is
non-void-yielding means for i be
set st i
in (
rng F) holds i is non
void
TopStruct;
compatibility by
WAYBEL18:def 1;
end
definition
let F be
Relation;
::
PENCIL_1:def16
attr F is
trivial-yielding means
:
Def16: for S be
set st S
in (
rng F) holds S is
trivial;
end
definition
let F be
Relation;
::
PENCIL_1:def17
attr F is
non-Trivial-yielding means
:
Def17: for S be
1-sorted st S
in (
rng F) holds S is non
trivial;
end
registration
cluster
non-Trivial-yielding ->
non-Empty for
Relation;
coherence ;
end
definition
let F be
1-sorted-yielding
Function;
:: original:
non-Trivial-yielding
redefine
::
PENCIL_1:def18
attr F is
non-Trivial-yielding means for i be
set st i
in (
rng F) holds i is non
trivial
1-sorted;
compatibility
proof
hereby
assume
A1: F is
non-Trivial-yielding;
let i be
set;
assume
A2: i
in (
rng F);
then ex x be
object st x
in (
dom F) & i
= (F
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence i is non
trivial
1-sorted by
A1,
A2,
PRALG_1:def 11;
end;
assume
A3: for i be
set st i
in (
rng F) holds i is non
trivial
1-sorted;
let S be
1-sorted;
thus thesis by
A3;
end;
end
definition
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
TopStruct-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
let j be
Element of I;
:: original:
.
redefine
func A
. j ->
TopStruct ;
coherence
proof
(
dom A)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then (A
. j)
in (
rng A) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let F be
Relation;
::
PENCIL_1:def19
attr F is
PLS-yielding means
:
Def19: for x be
set st x
in (
rng F) holds x is
PLS;
end
registration
cluster
PLS-yielding ->
non-Empty
TopStruct-yielding for
Function;
coherence ;
cluster
PLS-yielding ->
non-void-yielding for
TopStruct-yielding
Function;
coherence ;
cluster
PLS-yielding ->
non-Trivial-yielding for
TopStruct-yielding
Function;
coherence
proof
let f be
TopStruct-yielding
Function such that
A1: f is
PLS-yielding;
let x be
set;
assume x
in (
rng f);
then
reconsider S1 = x as
with_non_trivial_blocks non
void non
empty
TopStruct by
A1;
consider s be
object such that
A2: s
in the
topology of S1 by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
reconsider s as
Block of S1 by
A2;
2
c= (
card s) by
Def6;
then ex s1,s2 be
object st s1
in s & s2
in s & s1
<> s2 by
Th2;
hence thesis by
A2,
STRUCT_0:def 10;
end;
end
registration
let I be
set;
cluster
PLS-yielding for
ManySortedSet of I;
existence
proof
set R = the
PLS;
take (I
--> R);
let v be
set;
assume
A1: v
in (
rng (I
--> R));
(
rng (I
--> R))
c=
{R} by
FUNCOP_1: 13;
hence thesis by
A1,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
end
definition
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
PLS-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
let j be
Element of I;
:: original:
.
redefine
func A
. j ->
PLS ;
coherence
proof
(
dom A)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then (A
. j)
in (
rng A) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence thesis by
Def19;
end;
end
definition
let I be
set;
let A be
ManySortedSet of I;
::
PENCIL_1:def20
attr A is
Segre-like means
:
Def20: ex i be
Element of I st for j be
Element of I st i
<> j holds (A
. j) is 1
-element;
end
registration
let I be
set;
let A be
ManySortedSet of I;
cluster
{A} ->
trivial-yielding;
coherence
proof
let a be
set;
assume a
in (
rng
{A});
then
consider i be
object such that
A1: i
in (
dom
{A}) & a
= (
{A}
. i) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
(
dom
{A})
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then a
=
{(A
. i)} by
A1,
PZFMISC1:def 1;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:9
for I be non
empty
set holds for A be
ManySortedSet of I holds for i be
Element of I holds for S be non
trivial
set holds (A
+* (i,S)) is non
trivial-yielding
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
ManySortedSet of I;
let i be
Element of I;
let S be non
trivial
set;
take a = ((A
+* (i,S))
. i);
(
dom A)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then i
in (
dom A);
then i
in (
dom (A
+* (i,S))) by
FUNCT_7: 30;
hence a
in (
rng (A
+* (i,S))) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
(
dom A)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_7: 31;
end;
registration
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
ManySortedSet of I;
cluster
{A} ->
Segre-like;
coherence
proof
set i = the
Element of I;
take i;
let j be
Element of I such that i
<> j;
(
{A}
. j)
=
{(A
. j)} by
PZFMISC1:def 1;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:10
for I be non
empty
set holds for A be
ManySortedSet of I holds for i,S be
set holds (
{A}
+* (i,S)) is
Segre-like
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
ManySortedSet of I;
let i,S be
set;
per cases ;
suppose not i
in I;
then not i
in (
dom
{A}) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_7:def 3;
end;
suppose i
in I;
then
reconsider i as
Element of I;
take i;
let j be
Element of I such that
A1: i
<> j;
(
{A}
. j)
=
{(A
. j)} by
PZFMISC1:def 1;
hence thesis by
A1,
FUNCT_7: 32;
end;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:11
Th11: for I be non
empty
set holds for A be
non-Empty
1-sorted-yielding
ManySortedSet of I holds for B be
Element of (
Carrier A) holds
{B} is
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A)
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
non-Empty
1-sorted-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
let B be
Element of (
Carrier A);
{B}
c= (
Carrier A)
proof
let i be
object;
assume
A1: i
in I;
then
reconsider j = i as
Element of I;
j
in (
dom A) by
A1,
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then (A
. j)
in (
rng A) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
A2: (A
. j) is non
empty by
YELLOW_6:def 2;
(B
. j) is
Element of ((
Carrier A)
. j) by
PBOOLE:def 14;
then (B
. j) is
Element of (A
. j) by
YELLOW_6: 2;
then
{(B
. j)}
c= the
carrier of (A
. j) by
A2,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then (
{B}
. j)
c= the
carrier of (A
. j) by
PZFMISC1:def 1;
hence thesis by
YELLOW_6: 2;
end;
hence thesis by
PBOOLE:def 18;
end;
registration
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
non-Empty
1-sorted-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
cluster
Segre-like
trivial-yielding
non-empty for
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A);
existence
proof
set B = the
Element of (
Carrier A);
reconsider C =
{B} as
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) by
Th11;
take C;
thus thesis;
end;
end
registration
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
non-Trivial-yielding
1-sorted-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
cluster
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
non-empty for
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A);
existence
proof
set B = the
Element of (
Carrier A);
set i1 = the
Element of I;
A1: ex R be
1-sorted st R
= (A
. i1) & the
carrier of R
= ((
Carrier A)
. i1) by
PRALG_1:def 15;
then
reconsider b1 = (B
. i1) as
Element of (A
. i1) by
PBOOLE:def 14;
reconsider B as
ManySortedSet of I;
(
dom A)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then (A
. i1)
in (
rng A) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then (A
. i1) is non
trivial by
Def17;
then
reconsider Ai1 = the
carrier of (A
. i1) as non
trivial
set;
ex x1,x2 be
Element of Ai1 st x1
<> x2 by
SUBSET_1:def 7;
then 2
c= (
card the
carrier of (A
. i1)) by
Th2;
then
consider b2 be
object such that
A2: b2
in the
carrier of (A
. i1) and
A3: b1
<> b2 by
Th3;
reconsider b2 as
Element of (A
. i1) by
A2;
set B1 = (B
+* (i1,b2));
A4: for i be
set st i
in I holds (B1
. i) is
Element of ((
Carrier A)
. i)
proof
let i be
set such that
A5: i
in I;
per cases ;
suppose i
<> i1;
then (B1
. i)
= (B
. i) by
FUNCT_7: 32;
hence thesis by
A5,
PBOOLE:def 14;
end;
suppose
A6: i
= i1;
then i1
in (
dom B) by
A5,
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hence thesis by
A1,
A6,
FUNCT_7: 31;
end;
end;
{B, B1}
c= (
Carrier A)
proof
let i be
object;
assume
A7: i
in I;
then
reconsider j = i as
Element of I;
j
in (
dom A) by
A7,
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then (A
. j)
in (
rng A) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
A8: (A
. j) is non
empty by
YELLOW_6:def 2;
(B
. j) is
Element of ((
Carrier A)
. j) by
PBOOLE:def 14;
then
A9: (B
. j) is
Element of (A
. j) by
YELLOW_6: 2;
(B1
. j) is
Element of ((
Carrier A)
. j) by
A4;
then (B1
. j) is
Element of (A
. j) by
YELLOW_6: 2;
then
{(B
. j), (B1
. j)}
c= the
carrier of (A
. j) by
A8,
A9,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
then (
{B, B1}
. j)
c= the
carrier of (A
. j) by
PZFMISC1:def 2;
hence thesis by
YELLOW_6: 2;
end;
then
reconsider C =
{B, B1} as
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) by
PBOOLE:def 18;
(
dom B)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then (B1
. i1)
= b2 by
FUNCT_7: 31;
then
A10: (C
. i1)
=
{b1, b2} by
PZFMISC1:def 2;
A11:
now
assume (C
. i1) is
trivial;
then (C
. i1) is
empty or ex x be
object st (C
. i1)
=
{x} by
ZFMISC_1: 131;
hence contradiction by
A3,
A10,
ZFMISC_1: 5;
end;
take C;
thus C is
Segre-like
proof
take i1;
let j be
Element of I;
assume i1
<> j;
then (B
. j)
= (B1
. j) by
FUNCT_7: 32;
then (C
. j)
=
{(B
. j), (B
. j)} by
PZFMISC1:def 2
.=
{(B
. j)} by
ENUMSET1: 29;
hence thesis;
end;
(
dom C)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then (C
. i1)
in (
rng C) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence C is non
trivial-yielding by
A11;
thus thesis;
end;
end
registration
let I be non
empty
set;
cluster
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding for
ManySortedSet of I;
existence
proof
set B = the
ManySortedSet of I;
set i = the
Element of I;
take C = (
{B}
+* (i,
{
0 , 1}));
thus C is
Segre-like
proof
take i;
let j be
Element of I;
assume j
<> i;
then
A1: (C
. j)
= (
{B}
. j) by
FUNCT_7: 32;
j
in I;
then
A2: j
in (
dom
{B}) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then (C
. j)
in (
rng
{B}) by
A1,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then (C
. j) is non
empty
trivial by
A2,
A1,
Def16,
FUNCT_1:def 9;
hence (C
. j) is 1
-element;
end;
thus C is non
trivial-yielding
proof
take S = (C
. i);
(
dom C)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hence S
in (
rng C) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
(
dom
{B})
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A3: (C
. i)
=
{
0 , 1} by
FUNCT_7: 31;
0
in
{
0 , 1} & 1
in
{
0 , 1} by
TARSKI:def 2;
then 2
c= (
card
{
0 , 1}) by
Th2;
hence thesis by
A3,
Th4;
end;
end;
end
definition
let I be non
empty
set;
let B be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
::
PENCIL_1:def21
func
indx (B) ->
Element of I means
:
Def21: (B
. it ) is non
trivial;
existence
proof
consider i be
Element of I such that
A1: for j be
Element of I st i
<> j holds (B
. j) is 1
-element by
Def20;
take i;
now
assume
A2: (B
. i) is
trivial;
for S be
set st S
in (
rng B) holds S is
trivial
proof
let S be
set;
assume S
in (
rng B);
then
consider j be
object such that
A3: j
in (
dom B) and
A4: S
= (B
. j) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider j as
Element of I by
A3,
PARTFUN1:def 2;
per cases ;
suppose i
= j;
hence thesis by
A2,
A4;
end;
suppose i
<> j;
then (B
. j) is 1
-element by
A1;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
end;
hence contradiction by
Def16;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let i1,i2 be
Element of I;
assume that
A5: (B
. i1) is non
trivial and
A6: (B
. i2) is non
trivial;
consider i be
Element of I such that
A7: for j be
Element of I st i
<> j holds (B
. j) is 1
-element by
Def20;
A8: not (B
. i2) is 1
-element by
A6;
not (B
. i1) is 1
-element by
A5;
hence i1
= i by
A7
.= i2 by
A7,
A8;
end;
end
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:12
Th12: for I be non
empty
set holds for A be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSet of I holds for i be
Element of I st i
<> (
indx A) holds (A
. i) is 1
-element
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
let i be
Element of I;
consider j be
Element of I such that
A1: for k be
Element of I st k
<> j holds (A
. k) is 1
-element by
Def20;
A2:
now
assume (
indx A)
<> j;
then (A
. (
indx A)) is 1
-element by
A1;
hence contradiction by
Def21;
end;
assume i
<> (
indx A);
hence thesis by
A1,
A2;
end;
registration
let I be non
empty
set;
cluster
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding ->
non-empty for
ManySortedSet of I;
coherence
proof
let f be
ManySortedSet of I;
assume f is
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding;
then
reconsider g = f as
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
now
assume
{}
in (
rng g);
then
consider i be
object such that
A1: i
in (
dom f) and
A2: (g
. i)
=
{} by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider i as
Element of I by
A1,
PARTFUN1:def 2;
per cases ;
suppose i
= (
indx g);
hence contradiction by
A2,
Def21;
end;
suppose i
<> (
indx g);
then (g
. i) is 1
-element by
Th12;
hence contradiction by
A2;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
RELAT_1:def 9;
end;
end
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:13
Th13: for I be non
empty
set holds for A be
ManySortedSet of I holds 2
c= (
card (
product A)) iff A is
non-empty non
trivial-yielding
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
ManySortedSet of I;
A1: (
dom A)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
thus 2
c= (
card (
product A)) implies A is
non-empty non
trivial-yielding
proof
assume 2
c= (
card (
product A));
then
consider a,b be
object such that
A2: a
in (
product A) and
A3: b
in (
product A) and
A4: a
<> b by
Th2;
consider a1 be
Function such that
A5: a
= a1 & (
dom a1)
= (
dom A) and
A6: for e be
object st e
in (
dom A) holds (a1
. e)
in (A
. e) by
A2,
CARD_3:def 5;
thus A is
non-empty by
A1,
A6;
consider b1 be
Function such that
A7: b
= b1 & (
dom b1)
= (
dom A) and
A8: for e be
object st e
in (
dom A) holds (b1
. e)
in (A
. e) by
A3,
CARD_3:def 5;
consider e be
object such that
A9: e
in (
dom A) and
A10: (b1
. e)
<> (a1
. e) by
A4,
A5,
A7,
FUNCT_1: 2;
thus A is non
trivial-yielding
proof
take (A
. e);
thus (A
. e)
in (
rng A) by
A9,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
(a1
. e)
in (A
. e) & (b1
. e)
in (A
. e) by
A6,
A8,
A9;
then 2
c= (
card (A
. e)) by
A10,
Th2;
hence thesis by
Th4;
end;
end;
assume
A11: A is
non-empty non
trivial-yielding;
then
consider r be
set such that
A12: r
in (
rng A) and
A13: r is non
trivial;
now
assume
{}
in (
rng A);
then ex o be
object st o
in (
dom A) & (A
. o)
=
{} by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence contradiction by
A1,
A11;
end;
then (
product A) is non
empty by
CARD_3: 26;
then
consider a1 be
object such that
A14: a1
in (
product A);
consider p be
object such that
A15: p
in (
dom A) and
A16: r
= (A
. p) by
A12,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
consider a be
Function such that
A17: a
= a1 and
A18: (
dom a)
= (
dom A) and
A19: for o be
object st o
in (
dom A) holds (a
. o)
in (A
. o) by
A14,
CARD_3:def 5;
reconsider a as
ManySortedSet of I by
A1,
A18,
PARTFUN1:def 2,
RELAT_1:def 18;
2
c= (
card r) by
A13,
Th4;
then
consider t be
object such that
A20: t
in r and
A21: t
<> (a
. p) by
Th3;
reconsider p as
Element of I by
A15,
PARTFUN1:def 2;
set b = (a
+* (p,t));
A22:
now
let o be
object;
assume
A23: o
in (
dom A);
per cases ;
suppose o
<> p;
then (b
. o)
= (a
. o) by
FUNCT_7: 32;
hence (b
. o)
in (A
. o) by
A19,
A23;
end;
suppose o
= p;
hence (b
. o)
in (A
. o) by
A18,
A15,
A16,
A20,
FUNCT_7: 31;
end;
end;
(
dom b)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2
.= (
dom A) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A24: b
in (
product A) by
A22,
CARD_3: 9;
(b
. p)
= t by
A18,
A15,
FUNCT_7: 31;
hence thesis by
A14,
A17,
A21,
A24,
Th2;
end;
registration
let I be non
empty
set;
let B be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
cluster (
product B) -> non
trivial;
coherence
proof
consider f be
object such that
A1: f
in (
product B) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
A2: ex g be
Function st g
= f & (
dom g)
= (
dom B) & for x be
object st x
in (
dom B) holds (g
. x)
in (B
. x) by
A1,
CARD_3:def 5;
(
dom B)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
reconsider f as
ManySortedSet of I by
A2,
PARTFUN1:def 2,
RELAT_1:def 18;
(B
. (
indx B)) is non
trivial by
Def21;
then 2
c= (
card (B
. (
indx B))) by
Th4;
then
consider y be
object such that
A3: y
in (B
. (
indx B)) and
A4: y
<> (f
. (
indx B)) by
Th3;
set l = (f
+* ((
indx B),y));
A5: for x be
object st x
in (
dom B) holds (l
. x)
in (B
. x)
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A6: x
in (
dom B);
then x
in I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A7: x
in (
dom f) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
per cases ;
suppose x
= (
indx B);
hence thesis by
A3,
A7,
FUNCT_7: 31;
end;
suppose x
<> (
indx B);
then (l
. x)
= (f
. x) by
FUNCT_7: 32;
hence thesis by
A2,
A6;
end;
end;
(
dom f)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A8: (l
. (
indx B))
= y by
FUNCT_7: 31;
(
dom l)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2
.= (
dom B) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then l
in (
product B) by
A5,
CARD_3:def 5;
then 2
c= (
card (
product B)) by
A1,
A4,
A8,
Th2;
hence thesis by
Th4;
end;
end
begin
definition
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
non-Empty
TopStruct-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
::
PENCIL_1:def22
func
Segre_Blocks (A) ->
Subset-Family of (
product (
Carrier A)) means
:
Def22: for x be
set holds x
in it iff ex B be
Segre-like
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) st x
= (
product B) & ex i be
Element of I st (B
. i) is
Block of (A
. i);
existence
proof
defpred
P[
object] means ex B be
Segre-like
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) st $1
= (
product B) & ex i be
Element of I st (B
. i) is
Block of (A
. i);
consider S be
set such that
A1: for x be
object holds x
in S iff x
in (
bool (
product (
Carrier A))) &
P[x] from
XBOOLE_0:sch 1;
S
c= (
bool (
product (
Carrier A))) by
A1;
then
reconsider S as
Subset-Family of (
product (
Carrier A));
take S;
let x be
set;
thus x
in S implies ex B be
Segre-like
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) st x
= (
product B) & ex i be
Element of I st (B
. i) is
Block of (A
. i) by
A1;
given B be
Segre-like
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) such that
A2: x
= (
product B) and
A3: ex i be
Element of I st (B
. i) is
Block of (A
. i);
x
c= (
product (
Carrier A))
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in x;
then
consider g be
Function such that
A4: g
= a and
A5: (
dom g)
= (
dom B) and
A6: for y be
object st y
in (
dom B) holds (g
. y)
in (B
. y) by
A2,
CARD_3:def 5;
A7: for y be
object st y
in (
dom (
Carrier A)) holds (g
. y)
in ((
Carrier A)
. y)
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in (
dom (
Carrier A));
then
A8: y
in I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then y
in (
dom g) by
A5,
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A9: (g
. y)
in (B
. y) by
A5,
A6;
B
c= (
Carrier A) by
PBOOLE:def 18;
then (B
. y)
c= ((
Carrier A)
. y) by
A8;
hence thesis by
A9;
end;
(
dom g)
= I by
A5,
PARTFUN1:def 2
.= (
dom (
Carrier A)) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hence thesis by
A4,
A7,
CARD_3:def 5;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A3;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let S1,S2 be
Subset-Family of (
product (
Carrier A)) such that
A10: for x be
set holds x
in S1 iff ex B be
Segre-like
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) st x
= (
product B) & ex i be
Element of I st (B
. i) is
Block of (A
. i) and
A11: for x be
set holds x
in S2 iff ex B be
Segre-like
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) st x
= (
product B) & ex i be
Element of I st (B
. i) is
Block of (A
. i);
for x be
object holds x
in S1 iff x
in S2
proof
let x be
object;
x
in S1 iff ex B be
Segre-like
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) st x
= (
product B) & ex i be
Element of I st (B
. i) is
Block of (A
. i) by
A10;
hence thesis by
A11;
end;
hence thesis by
TARSKI: 2;
end;
end
definition
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
non-Empty
TopStruct-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
::
PENCIL_1:def23
func
Segre_Product A -> non
empty
TopStruct equals
TopStruct (# (
product (
Carrier A)), (
Segre_Blocks A) #);
correctness ;
end
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:14
Th14: for I be non
empty
set holds for A be
non-Empty
TopStruct-yielding
ManySortedSet of I holds for x be
Point of (
Segre_Product A) holds x is
ManySortedSet of I
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
non-Empty
TopStruct-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
let x be
Point of (
Segre_Product A);
ex f be
Function st x
= f & (
dom f)
= (
dom (
Carrier A)) & for a be
object st a
in (
dom (
Carrier A)) holds (f
. a)
in ((
Carrier A)
. a) by
CARD_3:def 5;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:15
Th15: for I be non
empty
set holds for A be
non-Empty
TopStruct-yielding
ManySortedSet of I st ex i be
Element of I st (A
. i) is non
void holds (
Segre_Product A) is non
void
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
non-Empty
TopStruct-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
set B = the
trivial-yielding
non-empty
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A);
given i be
Element of I such that
A1: (A
. i) is non
void;
set l = the
Block of (A
. i);
A2: the
topology of (A
. i) is non
empty by
A1;
A3: (B
+* (i,l))
c= (
Carrier A)
proof
let i1 be
object;
assume
A4: i1
in I;
then
A5: i1
in (
dom B) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
per cases ;
suppose
A6: i
= i1;
then ((B
+* (i,l))
. i1)
= l by
A5,
FUNCT_7: 31;
then
A7: ((B
+* (i,l))
. i1)
in the
topology of (A
. i) by
A2;
ex R be
1-sorted st R
= (A
. i1) & the
carrier of R
= ((
Carrier A)
. i1) by
A4,
PRALG_1:def 15;
hence thesis by
A6,
A7;
end;
suppose
A8: i1
<> i;
A9: B
c= (
Carrier A) by
PBOOLE:def 18;
((B
+* (i,l))
. i1)
= (B
. i1) by
A8,
FUNCT_7: 32;
hence thesis by
A4,
A9;
end;
end;
for j be
Element of I st i
<> j holds ((B
+* (i,l))
. j) is 1
-element
proof
let j be
Element of I;
assume i
<> j;
then
A10: ((B
+* (i,l))
. j)
= (B
. j) by
FUNCT_7: 32;
j
in I;
then
A11: j
in (
dom B) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then ((B
+* (i,l))
. j)
in (
rng B) by
A10,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then ((B
+* (i,l))
. j) is non
empty
trivial by
A11,
A10,
Def16,
FUNCT_1:def 9;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider C = (B
+* (i,l)) as
Segre-like
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) by
A3,
Def20,
PBOOLE:def 18;
(
dom B)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then (C
. i) is
Block of (A
. i) by
FUNCT_7: 31;
then (
product C)
in (
Segre_Blocks A) by
Def22;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:16
Th16: for I be non
empty
set holds for A be
non-Empty
TopStruct-yielding
ManySortedSet of I st for i be
Element of I holds (A
. i) is non
degenerated & ex i be
Element of I st (A
. i) is non
void holds (
Segre_Product A) is non
degenerated
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
non-Empty
TopStruct-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
assume
A1: for i be
Element of I holds (A
. i) is non
degenerated & ex i be
Element of I st (A
. i) is non
void;
then (
Segre_Product A) is non
void by
Th15;
then
reconsider SB = (
Segre_Blocks A) as non
empty
set;
now
assume (
product (
Carrier A))
in SB;
then
consider B be
Segre-like
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) such that
A2: (
product (
Carrier A))
= (
product B) and
A3: ex i be
Element of I st (B
. i) is
Block of (A
. i) by
Def22;
consider i be
Element of I such that
A4: (B
. i) is
Block of (A
. i) by
A3;
B is
non-empty by
A2,
Th1;
then (ex R be
1-sorted st R
= (A
. i) & the
carrier of R
= ((
Carrier A)
. i)) & ((
Carrier A)
. i) is
Block of (A
. i) by
A2,
A4,
PRALG_1:def 15,
PUA2MSS1: 2;
then (A
. i) is
degenerated;
hence contradiction by
A1;
end;
then not (
product (
Carrier A)) is
Element of SB;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:17
Th17: for I be non
empty
set holds for A be
non-Empty
TopStruct-yielding
ManySortedSet of I st for i be
Element of I holds (A
. i) is
with_non_trivial_blocks & ex i be
Element of I st (A
. i) is non
void holds (
Segre_Product A) is
with_non_trivial_blocks
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
non-Empty
TopStruct-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
assume
A1: for i be
Element of I holds (A
. i) is
with_non_trivial_blocks & ex i be
Element of I st (A
. i) is non
void;
for k be
Block of (
Segre_Product A) holds 2
c= (
card k)
proof
let k be
Block of (
Segre_Product A);
(
Segre_Product A) is non
void by
A1,
Th15;
then
consider B be
Segre-like
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) such that
A2: k
= (
product B) and
A3: ex i be
Element of I st (B
. i) is
Block of (A
. i) by
Def22;
consider i be
Element of I such that
A4: (B
. i) is
Block of (A
. i) by
A3;
(A
. i) is
with_non_trivial_blocks by
A1;
then 2
c= (
card (B
. i)) by
A4;
then
A5: (B
. i) is non
trivial by
Th4;
(
dom B)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then (B
. i)
in (
rng B) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
reconsider BB = B as
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSet of I by
A5,
Def16;
(
product BB) is non
trivial;
hence thesis by
A2,
Th4;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:18
Th18: for I be non
empty
set holds for A be
non-Empty
TopStruct-yielding
ManySortedSet of I st for i be
Element of I holds (A
. i) is
identifying_close_blocks
with_non_trivial_blocks & ex i be
Element of I st (A
. i) is non
void holds (
Segre_Product A) is
identifying_close_blocks
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
non-Empty
TopStruct-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
assume
A1: for i be
Element of I holds (A
. i) is
identifying_close_blocks
with_non_trivial_blocks & ex i be
Element of I st (A
. i) is non
void;
for k,l be
Block of (
Segre_Product A) st 2
c= (
card (k
/\ l)) holds k
= l
proof
let k,l be
Block of (
Segre_Product A);
assume 2
c= (
card (k
/\ l));
then
consider a,b be
object such that
A2: a
in (k
/\ l) and
A3: b
in (k
/\ l) and
A4: a
<> b by
Th2;
(
Segre_Product A) is non
void by
A1,
Th15;
then
consider B be
Segre-like
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) such that
A5: k
= (
product B) and
A6: ex i be
Element of I st (B
. i) is
Block of (A
. i) by
Def22;
A7: b
in (
product B) by
A5,
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
reconsider b as
Function by
CARD_3: 48;
A8: (
dom b)
= (
dom B) by
A7,
CARD_3: 9
.= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
reconsider b as
ManySortedSet of I by
PARTFUN1:def 2,
RELAT_1:def 18;
A9: a
in (
product B) by
A5,
A2,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
consider i be
Element of I such that
A10: (B
. i) is
Block of (A
. i) by
A6;
A11: for j be
Element of I st j
<> i holds (B
. j) is 1
-element
proof
let j be
Element of I;
assume
A12: j
<> i;
consider i1 be
Element of I such that
A13: for j1 be
Element of I st j1
<> i1 holds (B
. j1) is 1
-element by
Def20;
(A
. i) is
with_non_trivial_blocks by
A1;
then 2
c= (
card (B
. i)) by
A10;
then not (B
. i) is 1
-element by
Th4;
then i1
= i by
A13;
hence thesis by
A12,
A13;
end;
(
Segre_Product A) is non
void by
A1,
Th15;
then
consider C be
Segre-like
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) such that
A14: l
= (
product C) and
A15: ex i be
Element of I st (C
. i) is
Block of (A
. i) by
Def22;
A16: (
dom C)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
consider j be
Element of I such that
A17: (C
. j) is
Block of (A
. j) by
A15;
reconsider a as
Function by
A9,
CARD_3: 48;
A18: (
dom a)
= (
dom B) by
A9,
CARD_3: 9
.= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
reconsider a as
ManySortedSet of I by
PARTFUN1:def 2,
RELAT_1:def 18;
consider x be
object such that
A19: x
in I and
A20: (a
. x)
<> (b
. x) by
A4,
A18,
A8,
FUNCT_1: 2;
reconsider x as
Element of I by
A19;
(
dom B)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A21: (b
. x)
in (B
. x) by
A7,
CARD_3: 9;
(
dom B)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A22: (a
. x)
in (B
. x) by
A9,
CARD_3: 9;
then 2
c= (
card (B
. x)) by
A20,
A21,
Th2;
then not (B
. x) is 1
-element by
Th4;
then
A23: x
= i by
A11;
b
in (
product C) by
A14,
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A24: (b
. x)
in (C
. x) by
A16,
CARD_3: 9;
A25: a
in (
product C) by
A14,
A2,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A26: for i be
Element of I st j
<> i holds (C
. i) is 1
-element
proof
let i be
Element of I;
assume
A27: j
<> i;
consider j1 be
Element of I such that
A28: for i1 be
Element of I st j1
<> i1 holds (C
. i1) is 1
-element by
Def20;
(A
. j) is
with_non_trivial_blocks by
A1;
then 2
c= (
card (C
. j)) by
A17;
then not (C
. j) is 1
-element by
Th4;
then j1
= j by
A28;
hence thesis by
A27,
A28;
end;
A29: (
dom B)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2
.= (
dom C) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
(
dom C)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A30: (a
. x)
in (C
. x) by
A25,
CARD_3: 9;
then 2
c= (
card (C
. x)) by
A20,
A24,
Th2;
then not (C
. x) is 1
-element by
Th4;
then
A31: x
= j by
A26;
for s be
object st s
in (
dom B) holds (B
. s)
c= (C
. s)
proof
let s be
object;
assume
A32: s
in (
dom B);
then
reconsider t = s as
Element of I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
per cases ;
suppose
A33: t
= x;
then
reconsider Ct = (C
. t) as
Block of (A
. t) by
A17,
A31;
reconsider Bt = (B
. t) as
Block of (A
. t) by
A10,
A23,
A33;
(a
. t)
in (Bt
/\ Ct) & (b
. t)
in (Bt
/\ Ct) by
A22,
A21,
A30,
A24,
A33,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A34: 2
c= (
card (Bt
/\ Ct)) by
A20,
A33,
Th2;
(A
. t) is
identifying_close_blocks by
A1;
hence thesis by
A34;
end;
suppose s
<> x;
then (B
. t) is 1
-element by
A11,
A23;
then
consider y be
object such that
A35: (B
. t)
=
{y} by
ZFMISC_1: 131;
A36: (a
. t)
in (C
. t) by
A25,
A29,
A32,
CARD_3: 9;
(a
. t)
in (B
. t) by
A9,
A32,
CARD_3: 9;
then (a
. t)
= y by
A35,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis by
A35,
A36,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
end;
end;
hence k
c= l by
A5,
A14,
A29,
CARD_3: 27;
for s be
object st s
in (
dom C) holds (C
. s)
c= (B
. s)
proof
let s be
object;
assume
A37: s
in (
dom C);
then
reconsider t = s as
Element of I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
per cases ;
suppose
A38: t
= x;
then
reconsider Ct = (C
. t) as
Block of (A
. t) by
A17,
A31;
reconsider Bt = (B
. t) as
Block of (A
. t) by
A10,
A23,
A38;
(a
. t)
in (Bt
/\ Ct) & (b
. t)
in (Bt
/\ Ct) by
A22,
A21,
A30,
A24,
A38,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A39: 2
c= (
card (Bt
/\ Ct)) by
A20,
A38,
Th2;
(A
. t) is
identifying_close_blocks by
A1;
hence thesis by
A39;
end;
suppose s
<> x;
then (C
. t) is 1
-element by
A26,
A31;
then
consider y be
object such that
A40: (C
. t)
=
{y} by
ZFMISC_1: 131;
A41: (a
. t)
in (B
. t) by
A9,
A29,
A37,
CARD_3: 9;
(a
. t)
in (C
. t) by
A25,
A37,
CARD_3: 9;
then (a
. t)
= y by
A40,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis by
A40,
A41,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A5,
A14,
A29,
CARD_3: 27;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
registration
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
PLS-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
cluster (
Segre_Product A) -> non
void non
degenerated
with_non_trivial_blocks
identifying_close_blocks;
coherence
proof
A1: (for j be
Element of I holds (A
. j) is
with_non_trivial_blocks) & for j be
Element of I holds (A
. j) is
identifying_close_blocks;
(A
. the
Element of I) is non
void & for j be
Element of I holds (A
. j) is non
degenerated;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th15,
Th16,
Th17,
Th18;
end;
end
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:19
for T be
TopStruct holds for S be
Subset of T holds S is
trivial implies S is
strong
closed_under_lines
proof
let T be
TopStruct;
let S be
Subset of T;
assume
A1: S is
trivial;
thus S is
strong
proof
let x,y be
Point of T;
assume
A2: x
in S & y
in S;
thus (x,y)
are_collinear
proof
per cases ;
suppose x
= y;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose x
<> y;
then 2
c= (
card S) by
A2,
Th2;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th4;
end;
end;
end;
thus S is
closed_under_lines
proof
let l be
Block of T;
A3: (
card (l
/\ S))
c= (
card S) by
CARD_1: 11,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
assume 2
c= (
card (l
/\ S));
then 2
c= (
card S) by
A3;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th4;
end;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:20
Th20: for S be
identifying_close_blocks
TopStruct, l be
Block of S holds for L be
Subset of S st L
= l holds L is
closed_under_lines by
Def7;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:21
Th21: for S be
TopStruct, l be
Block of S holds for L be
Subset of S st L
= l holds L is
strong
proof
let S be
TopStruct;
let l be
Block of S;
let L be
Subset of S;
assume
A1: L
= l;
thus L is
strong
proof
let x,y be
Point of S;
assume x
in L & y
in L;
then
{x, y}
c= l by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:22
for S be non
void
TopStruct holds (
[#] S) is
closed_under_lines
proof
let S be non
void
TopStruct;
thus (
[#] S) is
closed_under_lines
proof
let K be
Block of S;
assume 2
c= (
card (K
/\ (
[#] S)));
K
in the
topology of S;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:23
Th23: for I be non
empty
set holds for A be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSet of I holds for x,y be
ManySortedSet of I st x
in (
product A) & y
in (
product A) holds for i be
object st i
<> (
indx A) holds (x
. i)
= (y
. i)
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
let x,y be
ManySortedSet of I such that
A1: x
in (
product A) and
A2: y
in (
product A);
let i be
object;
A3: (
dom A)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
assume
A4: i
<> (
indx A);
per cases ;
suppose
A5: not i
in I;
then
A6: not i
in (
dom y) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
not i
in (
dom x) by
A5,
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hence (x
. i)
=
{} by
FUNCT_1:def 2
.= (y
. i) by
A6,
FUNCT_1:def 2;
end;
suppose i
in I;
then
reconsider ii = i as
Element of I;
consider j be
Element of I such that
A7: for k be
Element of I st k
<> j holds (A
. k) is 1
-element by
Def20;
now
assume j
<> (
indx A);
then (A
. (
indx A)) is 1
-element by
A7;
hence contradiction by
Def21;
end;
then (A
. ii) is 1
-element by
A4,
A7;
then
consider o be
object such that
A8: (A
. i)
=
{o} by
ZFMISC_1: 131;
A9: (x
. ii)
in (A
. ii) by
A1,
A3,
CARD_3: 9;
(y
. ii)
in (A
. ii) by
A2,
A3,
CARD_3: 9;
hence (y
. i)
= o by
A8,
TARSKI:def 1
.= (x
. i) by
A8,
A9,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:24
Th24: for I be non
empty
set holds for A be
PLS-yielding
ManySortedSet of I holds for x be
set holds x is
Block of (
Segre_Product A) iff ex L be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) st x
= (
product L) & (L
. (
indx L)) is
Block of (A
. (
indx L))
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
PLS-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
let x be
set;
thus x is
Block of (
Segre_Product A) implies ex L be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) st x
= (
product L) & (L
. (
indx L)) is
Block of (A
. (
indx L))
proof
assume
A1: x is
Block of (
Segre_Product A);
then
consider L be
Segre-like
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) such that
A2: x
= (
product L) and
A3: ex i be
Element of I st (L
. i) is
Block of (A
. i) by
Def22;
2
c= (
card (
product L)) by
A1,
A2,
Def6;
then
reconsider L as
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) by
Th13;
consider i be
Element of I such that
A4: (L
. i) is
Block of (A
. i) by
A3;
now
assume i
<> (
indx L);
then
A5: (L
. i) is 1
-element by
Th12;
2
c= (
card (L
. i)) by
A4,
Def6;
hence contradiction by
A5,
Th4;
end;
hence thesis by
A2,
A4;
end;
given L be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) such that
A6: x
= (
product L) & (L
. (
indx L)) is
Block of (A
. (
indx L));
thus thesis by
A6,
Def22;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:25
Th25: for I be non
empty
set holds for A be
PLS-yielding
ManySortedSet of I holds for P be
ManySortedSet of I st P is
Point of (
Segre_Product A) holds for i be
Element of I holds for p be
Point of (A
. i) holds (P
+* (i,p)) is
Point of (
Segre_Product A)
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
PLS-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
let P be
ManySortedSet of I such that
A1: P is
Point of (
Segre_Product A);
let j be
Element of I;
let p be
Point of (A
. j);
A2: for i be
object st i
in (
dom (
Carrier A)) holds ((P
+* (j,p))
. i)
in ((
Carrier A)
. i)
proof
let i be
object;
assume
A3: i
in (
dom (
Carrier A));
then i
in I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A4: i
in (
dom P) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
per cases ;
suppose i
<> j;
then ((P
+* (j,p))
. i)
= (P
. i) by
FUNCT_7: 32;
hence thesis by
A1,
A3,
CARD_3: 9;
end;
suppose
A5: i
= j;
A6: p
in the
carrier of (A
. j);
((P
+* (j,p))
. i)
= p by
A4,
A5,
FUNCT_7: 31;
hence thesis by
A5,
A6,
YELLOW_6: 2;
end;
end;
(
dom (P
+* (j,p)))
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2
.= (
dom (
Carrier A)) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hence thesis by
A2,
CARD_3: 9;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:26
Th26: for I be non
empty
set holds for A,B be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSet of I st 2
c= (
card ((
product A)
/\ (
product B))) holds (
indx A)
= (
indx B) & for i be
object st i
<> (
indx A) holds (A
. i)
= (B
. i)
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let A,B be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
A1: (
dom B)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
assume 2
c= (
card ((
product A)
/\ (
product B)));
then
consider a,b be
object such that
A2: a
in ((
product A)
/\ (
product B)) and
A3: b
in ((
product A)
/\ (
product B)) and
A4: a
<> b by
Th2;
b
in (
product A) by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider b1 be
Function such that
A5: b1
= b and
A6: (
dom b1)
= (
dom A) and
A7: for o be
object st o
in (
dom A) holds (b1
. o)
in (A
. o) by
CARD_3:def 5;
a
in (
product A) by
A2,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider a1 be
Function such that
A8: a1
= a and
A9: (
dom a1)
= (
dom A) and
A10: for o be
object st o
in (
dom A) holds (a1
. o)
in (A
. o) by
CARD_3:def 5;
consider o be
object such that
A11: o
in (
dom A) and
A12: (a1
. o)
<> (b1
. o) by
A4,
A8,
A9,
A5,
A6,
FUNCT_1: 2;
reconsider o as
Element of I by
A11,
PARTFUN1:def 2;
b
in (
product B) by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A13: (b1
. o)
in (B
. o) by
A5,
A1,
CARD_3: 9;
A14: a
in (
product B) by
A2,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (a1
. o)
in (B
. o) by
A8,
A1,
CARD_3: 9;
then 2
c= (
card (B
. o)) by
A12,
A13,
Th2;
then
A15: (B
. o) is non
trivial by
Th4;
then
A16: o
= (
indx B) by
Def21;
A17: (b1
. o)
in (A
. o) by
A7,
A11;
(a1
. o)
in (A
. o) by
A10,
A11;
then 2
c= (
card (A
. o)) by
A12,
A17,
Th2;
then (A
. o) is non
trivial by
Th4;
then
A18: o
= (
indx A) by
Def21;
hence (
indx A)
= (
indx B) by
A15,
Def21;
let i be
object;
assume
A19: i
<> (
indx A);
per cases ;
suppose
A20: i
in I;
then (B
. i) is 1
-element by
A18,
A16,
A19,
Th12;
then
A21: ex y be
object st (B
. i)
=
{y} by
ZFMISC_1: 131;
(A
. i) is 1
-element by
A19,
A20,
Th12;
then
consider x be
object such that
A22: (A
. i)
=
{x} by
ZFMISC_1: 131;
(
dom B)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A23: (a1
. i)
in (B
. i) by
A8,
A14,
A20,
CARD_3: 9;
(
dom A)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then (a1
. i)
in (A
. i) by
A10,
A20;
then (a1
. i)
= x by
A22,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis by
A22,
A21,
A23,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
suppose
A24: not i
in I;
then
A25: not i
in (
dom B) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
not i
in (
dom A) by
A24,
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hence (A
. i)
=
{} by
FUNCT_1:def 2
.= (B
. i) by
A25,
FUNCT_1:def 2;
end;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:27
Th27: for I be non
empty
set holds for A be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSet of I holds for N be non
trivial
set holds (A
+* ((
indx A),N)) is
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
let N be non
trivial
set;
thus (A
+* ((
indx A),N)) is
Segre-like
proof
take (
indx A);
let i be
Element of I;
assume
A1: i
<> (
indx A);
then ((A
+* ((
indx A),N))
. i)
= (A
. i) by
FUNCT_7: 32;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th12;
end;
thus (A
+* ((
indx A),N)) is non
trivial-yielding
proof
take ((A
+* ((
indx A),N))
. (
indx A));
(
dom (A
+* ((
indx A),N)))
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hence ((A
+* ((
indx A),N))
. (
indx A))
in (
rng (A
+* ((
indx A),N))) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
I
= (
dom A) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_7: 31;
end;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:28
for S be non
empty non
void
identifying_close_blocks
without_isolated_points
TopStruct holds S is
strongly_connected implies S is
connected
proof
let S be non
empty non
void
identifying_close_blocks
without_isolated_points
TopStruct;
assume
A1: S is
strongly_connected;
thus S is
connected
proof
let x,y be
Point of S;
A2: (
len
<*x*>)
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
A3: (
len
<*y*>)
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
consider K be
Block of S such that
A4: x
in K by
Def9;
K
in the
topology of S;
then
reconsider L = K as
Subset of S;
L is
closed_under_lines
strong by
Th20,
Th21;
then
consider f be
FinSequence of (
bool the
carrier of S) such that
A5: L
= (f
. 1) and
A6: y
in (f
. (
len f)) and
A7: for W be
Subset of S st W
in (
rng f) holds W is
closed_under_lines
strong and
A8: for i be
Nat st 1
<= i & i
< (
len f) holds 2
c= (
card ((f
. i)
/\ (f
. (i
+ 1)))) by
A1;
A9: (
len f)
in (
dom f) by
A6,
FUNCT_1:def 2;
A10: 1
in (
dom f) by
A4,
A5,
FUNCT_1:def 2;
then
reconsider n = ((
len f)
- 1) as
Nat by
FINSEQ_3: 26;
deffunc
F(
Nat) = ((f
. $1)
/\ (f
. ($1
+ 1)));
reconsider n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
consider h be
FinSequence such that
A11: (
len h)
= n & for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom h) holds (h
. k)
=
F(k) from
FINSEQ_1:sch 2;
A12: (
dom h)
= (
Seg n) by
A11,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A13: ((
len h)
+ 1)
= (
len f) by
A11;
now
assume
{}
in (
rng h);
then
consider i be
object such that
A14: i
in (
dom h) and
A15: (h
. i)
=
{} by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider i as
Element of
NAT by
A14;
A16: i
<= (
len h) by
A14,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then
A17: i
< (
len f) by
A13,
NAT_1: 13;
A18: 1
<= i by
A14,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then i
in (
Seg n) by
A11,
A16,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (h
. i)
= ((f
. i)
/\ (f
. (i
+ 1))) by
A11,
A12;
then 2
c= (
card (h
. i)) by
A8,
A18,
A17;
hence contradiction by
A15;
end;
then (
product h)
<>
{} by
CARD_3: 26;
then
consider c be
object such that
A19: c
in (
product h) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
A20: ex ce be
Function st ce
= c & (
dom ce)
= (
dom h) & for a be
object st a
in (
dom h) holds (ce
. a)
in (h
. a) by
A19,
CARD_3:def 5;
then
reconsider c as
Function;
A21: (
dom h)
= (
Seg n) by
A11,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider c as
FinSequence by
A20,
FINSEQ_1:def 2;
A22: (
rng f)
c= (
bool the
carrier of S) by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
(
rng ((
<*x*>
^ c)
^
<*y*>))
c= the
carrier of S
proof
let r be
object;
assume r
in (
rng ((
<*x*>
^ c)
^
<*y*>));
then r
in ((
rng (
<*x*>
^ c))
\/ (
rng
<*y*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 31;
then r
in (
rng (
<*x*>
^ c)) or r
in (
rng
<*y*>) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
A23: r
in ((
rng
<*x*>)
\/ (
rng c)) or r
in (
rng
<*y*>) by
FINSEQ_1: 31;
per cases by
A23,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose r
in (
rng
<*x*>);
then r
in
{x} by
FINSEQ_1: 38;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose r
in (
rng c);
then
consider o be
object such that
A24: o
in (
dom c) and
A25: r
= (c
. o) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider o as
Element of
NAT by
A24;
(h
. o)
= ((f
. o)
/\ (f
. (o
+ 1))) by
A11,
A20,
A24;
then r
in ((f
. o)
/\ (f
. (o
+ 1))) by
A20,
A24,
A25;
then
A26: r
in (f
. o) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
(
len h)
<= (
len f) by
A13,
NAT_1: 11;
then (
dom h)
c= (
dom f) by
FINSEQ_3: 30;
then (f
. o)
in (
rng f) by
A20,
A24,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence thesis by
A22,
A26;
end;
suppose r
in (
rng
<*y*>);
then r
in
{y} by
FINSEQ_1: 38;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
then
reconsider g = ((
<*x*>
^ c)
^
<*y*>) as
FinSequence of the
carrier of S by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
A27: (
len (
<*x*>
^ c))
= ((
len
<*x*>)
+ (
len c)) by
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then
A28: (
len (
<*x*>
^ c))
= ((
len c)
+ 1) by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
take g;
A29: g
= (
<*x*>
^ (c
^
<*y*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 32;
hence x
= (g
. 1) by
FINSEQ_1: 41;
(
len g)
= ((
len (
<*x*>
^ c))
+ (
len
<*y*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then
A30: ((
len (
<*x*>
^ c))
+ 1)
= (
len g) by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
hence
A31: y
= (g
. (
len g)) by
FINSEQ_1: 42;
let i be
Nat;
assume that
A32: 1
<= i and
A33: i
< (
len g);
A34: i
<= (
len (
<*x*>
^ c)) by
A30,
A33,
NAT_1: 13;
let a,b be
Point of S;
assume that
A35: a
= (g
. i) and
A36: b
= (g
. (i
+ 1));
reconsider i as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
per cases by
A28,
A32,
A34,
NAT_1: 8,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A37: i
= 1 & i
<= (
len c);
(
len (c
^
<*y*>))
= ((
len c)
+ 1) & (
len (
<*x*>
^ (c
^
<*y*>)))
= ((
len
<*x*>)
+ (
len (c
^
<*y*>))) by
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then
A38: (
len (
<*x*>
^ (c
^
<*y*>)))
= ((1
+ 1)
+ (
len c)) by
A2;
A39: 1
in (
dom c) by
A37,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
b
= ((
<*x*>
^ (c
^
<*y*>))
. 2) by
A36,
A37,
FINSEQ_1: 32;
then b
= ((c
^
<*y*>)
. (2
- (
len
<*x*>))) by
A2,
A38,
FINSEQ_1: 24,
NAT_1: 11;
then b
= ((c
^
<*y*>)
. (2
- 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
then
A40: b
= (c
. 1) by
A39,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
(c
. 1)
in (h
. 1) & (h
. 1)
= ((f
. 1)
/\ (f
. (1
+ 1))) by
A11,
A20,
A39;
then
A41: b
in (f
. 1) by
A40,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A42: (f
. 1)
in (
rng f) by
A10,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
reconsider f1 = (f
. 1) as
Subset of S by
A22;
A43: f1 is
closed_under_lines
strong by
A7,
A42;
a
= x by
A29,
A35,
A37,
FINSEQ_1: 41;
hence thesis by
A4,
A5,
A41,
A43;
end;
suppose
A44: i
= 1 & i
= ((
len c)
+ 1);
A45: (f
. 1)
in (
rng f) by
A10,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
reconsider f1 = (f
. 1) as
Subset of S by
A22;
A46: f1 is
closed_under_lines
strong by
A7,
A45;
(
len
<*x*>)
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
then
A47: (
len g)
= (i
+ 1) by
A30,
A44,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
(
len h)
=
0 by
A20,
A44,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then (x,y)
are_collinear by
A4,
A5,
A6,
A11,
A46;
hence thesis by
A29,
A31,
A35,
A36,
A44,
A47,
FINSEQ_1: 41;
end;
suppose
A48: 1
< i & i
<= (
len c);
A49: (
len h)
<= ((
len h)
+ 1) & (
len c)
= (
len h) by
A20,
FINSEQ_3: 29,
NAT_1: 11;
then i
<= ((
len h)
+ 1) by
A48,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A50: i
in (
dom f) by
A11,
A48,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then
reconsider j = (i
- 1) as
Nat by
FINSEQ_3: 26;
i
<= ((
len c)
+ 1) by
A48,
A49,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then i
in (
dom (
<*x*>
^ c)) by
A28,
A48,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then
A51: a
= ((
<*x*>
^ c)
. i) by
A35,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
i
<= (
len (
<*x*>
^ c)) by
A27,
A2,
A48,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A52: a
= (c
. j) by
A2,
A48,
A51,
FINSEQ_1: 24;
(j
+ 1)
= i;
then
A53: 1
<= j by
A48,
NAT_1: 13;
A54: (f
. i)
in (
rng f) by
A50,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
reconsider ff = (f
. i) as
Subset of S by
A22;
A55: j
<= (j
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 11;
A56: (
len
<*x*>)
< (i
+ 1) & (i
+ 1)
<= ((
len c)
+ 1) by
A2,
A48,
NAT_1: 13,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (i
+ 1)
in (
dom (
<*x*>
^ c)) by
A27,
A2,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then b
= ((
<*x*>
^ c)
. (i
+ 1)) by
A36,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
then
A57: b
= (c
. ((i
+ 1)
- (
len
<*x*>))) by
A28,
A56,
FINSEQ_1: 24;
i
<= (
len h) by
A20,
A48,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A58: i
in (
Seg n) by
A11,
A48,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (c
. i)
in (h
. i) by
A20,
A21;
then b
in ((f
. i)
/\ (f
. (i
+ 1))) by
A11,
A12,
A2,
A58,
A57;
then
A59: b
in ff by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
i
<= (
len h) by
A20,
A48,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then j
<= n by
A11,
A55,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A60: j
in (
Seg n) by
A53,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (c
. j)
in (h
. j) by
A20,
A21;
then a
in ((f
. j)
/\ (f
. (j
+ 1))) by
A11,
A12,
A60,
A52;
then
A61: a
in ff by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
ff is
closed_under_lines
strong by
A7,
A54;
hence thesis by
A61,
A59;
end;
suppose
A62: 1
< i & i
= ((
len c)
+ 1);
then (
0
+ 1)
< ((
len c)
+ 1);
then ex k be
Nat st (
len c)
= (k
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 6;
then 1
<= (
len c) by
NAT_1: 11;
then
A63: (
len c)
in (
dom h) by
A20,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
A64: (
len (
<*x*>
^ c))
= (1
+ (
len c)) by
A2,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then i
in (
dom (
<*x*>
^ c)) by
A62,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then a
= ((
<*x*>
^ c)
. i) by
A35,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= (c
. (((
len c)
+ 1)
- 1)) by
A2,
A62,
A64,
FINSEQ_1: 24
.= (c
. (
len c));
then a
in (h
. (
len c)) by
A20,
A63;
then
A65: a
in ((f
. (
len c))
/\ (f
. ((
len c)
+ 1))) by
A11,
A63;
A66: (f
. (
len f))
in (
rng f) by
A9,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
reconsider ff = (f
. (
len f)) as
Subset of S by
A22;
A67: ff is
closed_under_lines
strong by
A7,
A66;
(
len c)
= (
len h) by
A20,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A68: a
in ff by
A11,
A65,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
b
= y by
A36,
A62,
A64,
FINSEQ_1: 42;
hence thesis by
A6,
A67,
A68;
end;
end;
end;
theorem ::
PENCIL_1:29
for I be non
empty
set holds for A be
PLS-yielding
ManySortedSet of I holds for S be
Subset of (
Segre_Product A) holds S is non
trivial
strong
closed_under_lines iff ex B be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) st S
= (
product B) & for C be
Subset of (A
. (
indx B)) st C
= (B
. (
indx B)) holds C is
strong
closed_under_lines
proof
let I be non
empty
set;
let A be
PLS-yielding
ManySortedSet of I;
let S be
Subset of (
Segre_Product A);
thus S is non
trivial
strong
closed_under_lines implies ex B be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) st S
= (
product B) & for C be
Subset of (A
. (
indx B)) st C
= (B
. (
indx B)) holds C is
strong
closed_under_lines
proof
assume
A1: S is non
trivial
strong
closed_under_lines;
then 2
c= (
card S) by
Th4;
then
consider a,b be
object such that
A2: a
in S and
A3: b
in S and
A4: a
<> b by
Th2;
reconsider a, b as
Point of (
Segre_Product A) by
A2,
A3;
(a,b)
are_collinear by
A1,
A2,
A3;
then
consider C be
Block of (
Segre_Product A) such that
A5:
{a, b}
c= C by
A4;
consider CC be
Segre-like
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) such that
A6: C
= (
product CC) and ex i be
Element of I st (CC
. i) is
Block of (A
. i) by
Def22;
a
in (
product CC) & b
in (
product CC) by
A5,
A6,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
then 2
c= (
card (
product CC)) by
A4,
Th2;
then
reconsider CC as
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) by
Th13;
A7: (
dom CC)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
reconsider a1 = a, b1 = b as
ManySortedSet of I by
Th14;
A8: (
dom a1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
A9: (
dom b1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
A10:
now
assume
A11: (a1
. (
indx CC))
= (b1
. (
indx CC));
for i be
object st i
in I holds (a1
. i)
= (b1
. i)
proof
let i be
object;
assume i
in I;
per cases ;
suppose i
= (
indx CC);
hence thesis by
A11;
end;
suppose
A12: i
<> (
indx CC);
a1
in (
product CC) & b1
in (
product CC) by
A5,
A6,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
hence thesis by
A12,
Th23;
end;
end;
hence contradiction by
A4,
A8,
A9,
FUNCT_1: 2;
end;
A13: for f be
ManySortedSet of I st f
in S holds for i be
Element of I st i
<> (
indx CC) holds (f
. i)
in (CC
. i)
proof
let f be
ManySortedSet of I;
assume
A14: f
in S;
then
reconsider f1 = f as
Point of (
Segre_Product A);
let i be
Element of I;
assume
A15: i
<> (
indx CC);
now
b1
in (
product CC) by
A5,
A6,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
then
A16: (b1
. i)
in (CC
. i) by
A7,
CARD_3: 9;
assume
A17: not (f
. i)
in (CC
. i);
(f1,b)
are_collinear by
A1,
A3,
A14;
then
consider lb be
Block of (
Segre_Product A) such that
A18:
{f1, b}
c= lb by
A17,
A16;
consider Lb be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) such that
A19: lb
= (
product Lb) and (Lb
. (
indx Lb)) is
Block of (A
. (
indx Lb)) by
Th24;
A20: b1
in (
product Lb) by
A18,
A19,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
A21: f
in (
product Lb) by
A18,
A19,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
then (
indx Lb)
= i by
A17,
A16,
A20,
Th23;
then (Lb
. (
indx CC)) is 1
-element by
A15,
Th12;
then
consider cb be
object such that
A22: (Lb
. (
indx CC))
=
{cb} by
ZFMISC_1: 131;
A23: (
dom Lb)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then (b1
. (
indx CC))
in
{cb} by
A20,
A22,
CARD_3: 9;
then
A24: (b1
. (
indx CC))
= cb by
TARSKI:def 1;
a1
in (
product CC) by
A5,
A6,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
then
A25: (a1
. i)
in (CC
. i) by
A7,
CARD_3: 9;
(f1,a)
are_collinear by
A1,
A2,
A14;
then
consider la be
Block of (
Segre_Product A) such that
A26:
{f1, a}
c= la by
A17,
A25;
consider La be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) such that
A27: la
= (
product La) and (La
. (
indx La)) is
Block of (A
. (
indx La)) by
Th24;
A28: a1
in (
product La) by
A26,
A27,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
A29: f
in (
product La) by
A26,
A27,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
then (
indx La)
= i by
A17,
A25,
A28,
Th23;
then (La
. (
indx CC)) is 1
-element by
A15,
Th12;
then
consider ca be
object such that
A30: (La
. (
indx CC))
=
{ca} by
ZFMISC_1: 131;
A31: (
dom La)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then (a1
. (
indx CC))
in
{ca} by
A28,
A30,
CARD_3: 9;
then
A32: ca
<> cb by
A10,
A24,
TARSKI:def 1;
(f
. (
indx CC))
in
{ca} by
A29,
A30,
A31,
CARD_3: 9;
then
A33: (f
. (
indx CC))
<> cb by
A32,
TARSKI:def 1;
(f
. (
indx CC))
in
{cb} by
A21,
A22,
A23,
CARD_3: 9;
hence contradiction by
A33,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
(a1
. (
indx CC))
in (
pi (S,(
indx CC))) & (b1
. (
indx CC))
in (
pi (S,(
indx CC))) by
A2,
A3,
CARD_3:def 6;
then 2
c= (
card (
pi (S,(
indx CC)))) by
A10,
Th2;
then
reconsider p = (
pi (S,(
indx CC))) as non
trivial
set by
Th4;
(CC
+* ((
indx CC),p))
c= (
Carrier A)
proof
let i be
object;
assume
A34: i
in I;
per cases ;
suppose
A35: i
<> (
indx CC);
A36: CC
c= (
Carrier A) by
PBOOLE:def 18;
((CC
+* ((
indx CC),p))
. i)
= (CC
. i) by
A35,
FUNCT_7: 32;
hence thesis by
A34,
A36;
end;
suppose
A37: i
= (
indx CC);
A38: p
c= ((
Carrier A)
. i)
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in p;
then
A39: ex f be
Function st f
in S & y
= (f
. i) by
A37,
CARD_3:def 6;
i
in (
dom (
Carrier A)) by
A34,
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hence thesis by
A39,
CARD_3: 9;
end;
(
dom CC)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hence thesis by
A37,
A38,
FUNCT_7: 31;
end;
end;
then
reconsider B = (CC
+* ((
indx CC),p)) as
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) by
Th27,
PBOOLE:def 18;
take B;
A40: (
dom B)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
A41: (B
. (
indx CC))
= p by
A7,
FUNCT_7: 31;
thus
A42: S
= (
product B)
proof
thus S
c= (
product B)
proof
let e be
object;
assume
A43: e
in S;
then
reconsider f = e as
ManySortedSet of I by
Th14;
A44:
now
let i be
object;
assume i
in I;
then
reconsider j = i as
Element of I;
per cases ;
suppose j
= (
indx CC);
hence (f
. i)
in (B
. i) by
A41,
A43,
CARD_3:def 6;
end;
suppose
A45: j
<> (
indx CC);
then (f
. j)
in (CC
. j) by
A13,
A43;
hence (f
. i)
in (B
. i) by
A45,
FUNCT_7: 32;
end;
end;
(
dom f)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hence thesis by
A40,
A44,
CARD_3: 9;
end;
let e be
object;
assume e
in (
product B);
then
consider f be
Function such that
A46: e
= f & (
dom f)
= I and
A47: for i be
object st i
in I holds (f
. i)
in (B
. i) by
A40,
CARD_3:def 5;
(f
. (
indx CC))
in p by
A41,
A47;
then
consider g be
Function such that
A48: g
in S and
A49: (f
. (
indx CC))
= (g
. (
indx CC)) by
CARD_3:def 6;
reconsider g as
ManySortedSet of I by
A48;
A50:
now
let i be
object;
assume i
in I;
then
reconsider j = i as
Element of I;
per cases ;
suppose i
= (
indx CC);
hence (f
. i)
= (g
. i) by
A49;
end;
suppose
A51: i
<> (
indx CC);
then (CC
. j) is 1
-element by
Th12;
then
consider c be
object such that
A52: (CC
. i)
=
{c} by
ZFMISC_1: 131;
A53: (g
. j)
in (CC
. j) by
A13,
A48,
A51;
(f
. j)
in (B
. j) by
A47;
then (f
. j)
in
{c} by
A51,
A52,
FUNCT_7: 32;
hence (f
. i)
= c by
TARSKI:def 1
.= (g
. i) by
A52,
A53,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
end;
(
dom g)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hence thesis by
A46,
A48,
A50,
FUNCT_1: 2;
end;
let SS be
Subset of (A
. (
indx B));
assume
A54: SS
= (B
. (
indx B));
thus SS is
strong
proof
let q,r be
Point of (A
. (
indx B));
assume that
A55: q
in SS and
A56: r
in SS;
thus (q,r)
are_collinear
proof
per cases ;
suppose q
= r;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
A57: q
<> r;
reconsider R = (a1
+* ((
indx B),r)) as
Point of (
Segre_Product A) by
Th25;
reconsider Q = (a1
+* ((
indx B),q)) as
Point of (
Segre_Product A) by
Th25;
reconsider Q1 = Q, R1 = R as
ManySortedSet of I;
A58:
now
(
dom a1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A59: (Q1
. (
indx B))
= q by
FUNCT_7: 31;
A60: (
dom a1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
assume Q
= R;
hence contradiction by
A57,
A59,
A60,
FUNCT_7: 31;
end;
A61: for i be
object st i
in (
dom B) holds (Q1
. i)
in (B
. i)
proof
let i be
object;
assume
A62: i
in (
dom B);
then i
in I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A63: i
in (
dom a1) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
per cases ;
suppose i
<> (
indx B);
then (Q1
. i)
= (a1
. i) by
FUNCT_7: 32;
hence thesis by
A2,
A42,
A62,
CARD_3: 9;
end;
suppose i
= (
indx B);
hence thesis by
A54,
A55,
A63,
FUNCT_7: 31;
end;
end;
A64: for i be
object st i
in (
dom B) holds (R1
. i)
in (B
. i)
proof
let i be
object;
assume
A65: i
in (
dom B);
then i
in I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A66: i
in (
dom a1) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
per cases ;
suppose i
<> (
indx B);
then (R1
. i)
= (a1
. i) by
FUNCT_7: 32;
hence thesis by
A2,
A42,
A65,
CARD_3: 9;
end;
suppose i
= (
indx B);
hence thesis by
A54,
A56,
A66,
FUNCT_7: 31;
end;
end;
(
dom R1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2
.= (
dom B) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A67: R
in (
product B) by
A64,
CARD_3: 9;
(
dom Q1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2
.= (
dom B) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then Q
in (
product B) by
A61,
CARD_3: 9;
then (Q,R)
are_collinear by
A1,
A42,
A67;
then
consider L be
Block of (
Segre_Product A) such that
A68:
{Q, R}
c= L by
A58;
(
dom a1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A69: (R1
. (
indx B))
= r by
FUNCT_7: 31;
consider L1 be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) such that
A70: L
= (
product L1) and
A71: (L1
. (
indx L1)) is
Block of (A
. (
indx L1)) by
Th24;
A72: (
dom L1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
Q1
in (
product L1) by
A68,
A70,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
then
A73: (Q1
. (
indx B))
in (L1
. (
indx B)) by
A72,
CARD_3: 9;
A74: (
dom L1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
R1
in (
product L1) by
A68,
A70,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
then
A75: (R1
. (
indx B))
in (L1
. (
indx B)) by
A74,
CARD_3: 9;
now
(
dom a1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A76: (Q1
. (
indx B))
= q by
FUNCT_7: 31;
A77: (
dom a1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
assume (Q1
. (
indx B))
= (R1
. (
indx B));
hence contradiction by
A57,
A76,
A77,
FUNCT_7: 31;
end;
then 2
c= (
card (L1
. (
indx B))) by
A73,
A75,
Th2;
then
A78: (L1
. (
indx B)) is non
trivial by
Th4;
then
reconsider LI = (L1
. (
indx L1)) as
Block of (A
. (
indx B)) by
A71,
Def21;
(
dom a1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A79: (Q1
. (
indx B))
= q by
FUNCT_7: 31;
(
indx B)
= (
indx L1) by
A78,
Def21;
then
{q, r}
c= LI by
A73,
A75,
A79,
A69,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
end;
thus SS is
closed_under_lines
proof
let L be
Block of (A
. (
indx B));
A80: (
dom B)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
2
c= (
card L) by
Def6;
then
reconsider L1 = L as non
trivial
set by
Th4;
L
in the
topology of (A
. (
indx B));
then
A81: L
c= the
carrier of (A
. (
indx B));
(B
+* ((
indx B),L1))
c= (
Carrier A)
proof
let o be
object;
assume
A82: o
in I;
thus ((B
+* ((
indx B),L1))
. o)
c= ((
Carrier A)
. o)
proof
per cases ;
suppose
A83: o
<> (
indx B);
A84: B
c= (
Carrier A) by
PBOOLE:def 18;
((B
+* ((
indx B),L1))
. o)
= (B
. o) by
A83,
FUNCT_7: 32;
hence thesis by
A82,
A84;
end;
suppose
A85: o
= (
indx B);
then ((B
+* ((
indx B),L1))
. o)
= L by
A40,
FUNCT_7: 31;
hence thesis by
A81,
A85,
YELLOW_6: 2;
end;
end;
end;
then
reconsider L2 = (B
+* ((
indx B),L1)) as
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) by
Th27,
PBOOLE:def 18;
A86: (L2
. (
indx B))
= L1 by
A40,
FUNCT_7: 31;
then (
indx B)
= (
indx L2) by
Def21;
then (L2
. (
indx L2)) is
Block of (A
. (
indx L2)) by
A80,
FUNCT_7: 31;
then
reconsider L3 = (
product L2) as
Block of (
Segre_Product A) by
Th24;
assume 2
c= (
card (L
/\ SS));
then
consider x,y be
object such that
A87: x
in (L
/\ SS) and
A88: y
in (L
/\ SS) and
A89: x
<> y by
Th2;
set y1 = (a1
+* ((
indx B),y));
A90: (
dom y1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
now
let o be
object;
assume
A91: o
in I;
per cases ;
suppose o
<> (
indx B);
then (y1
. o)
= (a1
. o) by
FUNCT_7: 32;
hence (y1
. o)
in (B
. o) by
A2,
A40,
A42,
A91,
CARD_3: 9;
end;
suppose
A92: o
= (
indx B);
then (y1
. o)
= y by
A8,
FUNCT_7: 31;
hence (y1
. o)
in (B
. o) by
A54,
A88,
A92,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
end;
then
A93: y1
in S by
A40,
A42,
A90,
CARD_3: 9;
A94: (
dom L2)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
now
let o be
object;
assume
A95: o
in (
dom L2);
per cases ;
suppose
A96: o
<> (
indx B);
then
A97: (y1
. o)
= (a1
. o) by
FUNCT_7: 32;
(a1
. o)
in (B
. o) by
A2,
A40,
A42,
A94,
A95,
CARD_3: 9;
hence (y1
. o)
in (L2
. o) by
A96,
A97,
FUNCT_7: 32;
end;
suppose
A98: o
= (
indx B);
then (y1
. o)
= y by
A8,
FUNCT_7: 31;
hence (y1
. o)
in (L2
. o) by
A88,
A86,
A98,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
end;
then y1
in L3 by
A94,
A90,
CARD_3: 9;
then
A99: y1
in (L3
/\ S) by
A93,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
set x1 = (a1
+* ((
indx B),x));
A100: (
dom x1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
now
let o be
object;
assume
A101: o
in I;
per cases ;
suppose o
<> (
indx B);
then (x1
. o)
= (a1
. o) by
FUNCT_7: 32;
hence (x1
. o)
in (B
. o) by
A2,
A40,
A42,
A101,
CARD_3: 9;
end;
suppose
A102: o
= (
indx B);
then (x1
. o)
= x by
A8,
FUNCT_7: 31;
hence (x1
. o)
in (B
. o) by
A54,
A87,
A102,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
end;
then
A103: x1
in S by
A40,
A42,
A100,
CARD_3: 9;
A104: (x1
. (
indx B))
= x & (y1
. (
indx B))
= y by
A8,
FUNCT_7: 31;
now
let o be
object;
assume
A105: o
in (
dom L2);
per cases ;
suppose
A106: o
<> (
indx B);
then
A107: (x1
. o)
= (a1
. o) by
FUNCT_7: 32;
(a1
. o)
in (B
. o) by
A2,
A40,
A42,
A94,
A105,
CARD_3: 9;
hence (x1
. o)
in (L2
. o) by
A106,
A107,
FUNCT_7: 32;
end;
suppose
A108: o
= (
indx B);
then (x1
. o)
= x by
A8,
FUNCT_7: 31;
hence (x1
. o)
in (L2
. o) by
A87,
A86,
A108,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
end;
then x1
in L3 by
A94,
A100,
CARD_3: 9;
then x1
in (L3
/\ S) by
A103,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then 2
c= (
card (L3
/\ S)) by
A89,
A104,
A99,
Th2;
then
A109: L3
c= S by
A1;
thus L
c= SS
proof
let e be
object;
consider f be
object such that
A110: f
in L3 by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
A111: ex F be
Function st F
= f & (
dom F)
= I & for o be
object st o
in I holds (F
. o)
in (L2
. o) by
A94,
A110,
CARD_3:def 5;
then
reconsider f as
ManySortedSet of I by
PARTFUN1:def 2,
RELAT_1:def 18;
assume
A112: e
in L;
A113:
now
let o be
object;
assume
A114: o
in (
dom L2);
per cases ;
suppose o
<> (
indx B);
then ((f
+* ((
indx B),e))
. o)
= (f
. o) by
FUNCT_7: 32;
hence ((f
+* ((
indx B),e))
. o)
in (L2
. o) by
A94,
A111,
A114;
end;
suppose
A115: o
= (
indx B);
then ((f
+* ((
indx B),e))
. o)
= e by
A111,
FUNCT_7: 31;
hence ((f
+* ((
indx B),e))
. o)
in (L2
. o) by
A40,
A112,
A115,
FUNCT_7: 31;
end;
end;
(
dom (f
+* ((
indx B),e)))
= (
dom L2) by
A94,
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then (f
+* ((
indx B),e))
in L3 by
A113,
CARD_3: 9;
then ((f
+* ((
indx B),e))
. (
indx B))
in (B
. (
indx B)) by
A40,
A42,
A109,
CARD_3: 9;
hence thesis by
A54,
A111,
FUNCT_7: 31;
end;
end;
end;
given B be
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) such that
A116: S
= (
product B) and
A117: for C be
Subset of (A
. (
indx B)) st C
= (B
. (
indx B)) holds C is
strong
closed_under_lines;
thus S is non
trivial by
A116;
A118: (
dom B)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
A119: (
dom (
Carrier A))
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
thus S is
strong
proof
let x,y be
Point of (
Segre_Product A);
assume that
A120: x
in S and
A121: y
in S;
per cases ;
suppose x
= y;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
A122: x
<> y;
consider y1 be
Function such that
A123: y1
= y and
A124: (
dom y1)
= (
dom (
Carrier A)) and
A125: for a be
object st a
in (
dom (
Carrier A)) holds (y1
. a)
in ((
Carrier A)
. a) by
CARD_3:def 5;
A126: (
dom (
Carrier A))
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
reconsider y1 as
ManySortedSet of I by
A124,
PARTFUN1:def 2,
RELAT_1:def 18;
consider x1 be
Function such that
A127: x1
= x and
A128: (
dom x1)
= (
dom (
Carrier A)) and
A129: for a be
object st a
in (
dom (
Carrier A)) holds (x1
. a)
in ((
Carrier A)
. a) by
CARD_3:def 5;
reconsider x1 as
ManySortedSet of I by
A128,
A126,
PARTFUN1:def 2,
RELAT_1:def 18;
A130:
now
assume
A131: (x1
. (
indx B))
= (y1
. (
indx B));
now
let i be
object;
assume i
in (
dom (
Carrier A));
per cases ;
suppose i
<> (
indx B);
hence (x1
. i)
= (y1
. i) by
A116,
A120,
A121,
A127,
A123,
Th23;
end;
suppose i
= (
indx B);
hence (x1
. i)
= (y1
. i) by
A131;
end;
end;
hence contradiction by
A122,
A127,
A128,
A123,
A124,
FUNCT_1: 2;
end;
B
c= (
Carrier A) by
PBOOLE:def 18;
then (B
. (
indx B))
c= ((
Carrier A)
. (
indx B));
then
reconsider C = (B
. (
indx B)) as
Subset of (A
. (
indx B)) by
YELLOW_6: 2;
A132: C is
strong by
A117;
(y1
. (
indx B))
in ((
Carrier A)
. (
indx B)) by
A119,
A125;
then
reconsider y1i = (y1
. (
indx B)) as
Point of (A
. (
indx B)) by
YELLOW_6: 2;
A133: y1i
in C by
A116,
A118,
A121,
A123,
CARD_3: 9;
(x1
. (
indx B))
in ((
Carrier A)
. (
indx B)) by
A119,
A129;
then
reconsider x1i = (x1
. (
indx B)) as
Point of (A
. (
indx B)) by
YELLOW_6: 2;
x1i
in C by
A116,
A118,
A120,
A127,
CARD_3: 9;
then (x1i,y1i)
are_collinear by
A133,
A132;
then
consider l be
Block of (A
. (
indx B)) such that
A134:
{x1i, y1i}
c= l by
A130;
A135: (
dom
{x1})
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
A136: for a be
object st a
in (
dom (
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))) holds (y1
. a)
in ((
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))
. a)
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in (
dom (
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l)));
then
A137: a
in I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
per cases ;
suppose
A138: a
= (
indx B);
then ((
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))
. a)
= l by
A135,
FUNCT_7: 31;
hence thesis by
A134,
A138,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
end;
suppose
A139: a
<> (
indx B);
(x1
. a)
in
{(x1
. a)} by
TARSKI:def 1;
then (x1
. a)
in (
{x1}
. a) by
A137,
PZFMISC1:def 1;
then (y1
. a)
in (
{x1}
. a) by
A116,
A120,
A121,
A127,
A123,
A139,
Th23;
hence thesis by
A139,
FUNCT_7: 32;
end;
end;
(
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))
c= (
Carrier A)
proof
let i be
object;
assume
A140: i
in I;
then
reconsider i1 = i as
Element of I;
thus ((
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))
. i)
c= ((
Carrier A)
. i)
proof
per cases ;
suppose
A141: i
= (
indx B);
then ((
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))
. i)
= l by
A135,
FUNCT_7: 31;
then ((
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))
. i)
in the
topology of (A
. (
indx B));
then ((
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))
. i)
c= the
carrier of (A
. (
indx B));
hence thesis by
A141,
YELLOW_6: 2;
end;
suppose
A142: i
<> (
indx B);
(x1
. i)
in ((
Carrier A)
. i1) by
A119,
A129;
then (x1
. i)
in the
carrier of (A
. i1) by
YELLOW_6: 2;
then
A143:
{(x1
. i)}
c= the
carrier of (A
. i1) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
((
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))
. i)
= (
{x1}
. i) by
A142,
FUNCT_7: 32
.=
{(x1
. i)} by
A140,
PZFMISC1:def 1;
hence thesis by
A143,
YELLOW_6: 2;
end;
end;
end;
then
A144: (
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l)) is
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) by
PBOOLE:def 18;
for i be
Element of I st i
<> (
indx B) holds ((
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))
. i) is 1
-element
proof
let i be
Element of I;
assume i
<> (
indx B);
then ((
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))
. i)
= (
{x1}
. i) by
FUNCT_7: 32
.=
{(x1
. i)} by
PZFMISC1:def 1;
hence thesis;
end;
then
A145: (
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l)) is
Segre-like;
A146: for a be
object st a
in (
dom (
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))) holds (x1
. a)
in ((
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))
. a)
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in (
dom (
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l)));
then
A147: a
in I by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
per cases ;
suppose
A148: a
= (
indx B);
then ((
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))
. a)
= l by
A135,
FUNCT_7: 31;
hence thesis by
A134,
A148,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
end;
suppose
A149: a
<> (
indx B);
(x1
. a)
in
{(x1
. a)} by
TARSKI:def 1;
then (x1
. a)
in (
{x1}
. a) by
A147,
PZFMISC1:def 1;
hence thesis by
A149,
FUNCT_7: 32;
end;
end;
((
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))
. (
indx B)) is
Block of (A
. (
indx B)) by
A135,
FUNCT_7: 31;
then
reconsider L = (
product (
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))) as
Block of (
Segre_Product A) by
A145,
A144,
Def22;
(
dom y1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2
.= (
dom (
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then
A150: y1
in L by
A136,
CARD_3: 9;
(
dom x1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2
.= (
dom (
{x1}
+* ((
indx B),l))) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
then x1
in L by
A146,
CARD_3: 9;
then
{x, y}
c= L by
A127,
A123,
A150,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
thus S is
closed_under_lines
proof
let l be
Block of (
Segre_Product A);
consider L be
Segre-like
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) such that
A151: l
= (
product L) and
A152: ex i be
Element of I st (L
. i) is
Block of (A
. i) by
Def22;
assume
A153: 2
c= (
card (l
/\ S));
then
consider a,b be
object such that
A154: a
in (l
/\ S) and
A155: b
in (l
/\ S) and
A156: a
<> b by
Th2;
(
card (l
/\ S))
c= (
card l) by
CARD_1: 11,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then 2
c= (
card l) by
A153;
then
reconsider L as
Segre-like non
trivial-yielding
ManySortedSubset of (
Carrier A) by
A151,
Th13;
reconsider a1 = a, b1 = b as
ManySortedSet of I by
A154,
A155,
Th14;
A157: (
dom L)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2
.= (
dom B) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
A158: (
indx B)
= (
indx L) by
A116,
A153,
A151,
Th26;
for a be
object st a
in (
dom L) holds (L
. a)
c= (B
. a)
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in (
dom L);
per cases ;
suppose a
<> (
indx B);
hence thesis by
A116,
A153,
A151,
Th26;
end;
suppose
A159: a
= (
indx B);
B
c= (
Carrier A) by
PBOOLE:def 18;
then (B
. (
indx B))
c= ((
Carrier A)
. (
indx B));
then
reconsider C = (B
. (
indx B)) as
Subset of (A
. (
indx B)) by
YELLOW_6: 2;
consider j be
Element of I such that
A160: (L
. j) is
Block of (A
. j) by
A152;
2
c= (
card (L
. j)) by
A160,
Def6;
then (L
. j) is non
trivial by
Th4;
then j
= (
indx L) by
Def21;
then
reconsider Li = (L
. (
indx B)) as
Block of (A
. (
indx B)) by
A158,
A160;
A161: C is
closed_under_lines by
A117;
a1
in (
product L) by
A154,
A151,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A162: (a1
. (
indx B))
in (L
. (
indx B)) by
A118,
A157,
CARD_3: 9;
b1
in (
product L) by
A155,
A151,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A163: (b1
. (
indx B))
in (L
. (
indx B)) by
A118,
A157,
CARD_3: 9;
A164: b1
in (
product B) by
A116,
A155,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (b1
. (
indx B))
in (B
. (
indx B)) by
A118,
CARD_3: 9;
then
A165: (b1
. (
indx B))
in (Li
/\ C) by
A163,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A166: a1
in (
product B) by
A116,
A154,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A167:
now
assume
A168: (a1
. (
indx B))
= (b1
. (
indx B));
A169: for o be
object st o
in (
dom a1) holds (a1
. o)
= (b1
. o)
proof
let o be
object;
assume o
in (
dom a1);
per cases ;
suppose o
<> (
indx B);
hence thesis by
A166,
A164,
Th23;
end;
suppose o
= (
indx B);
hence thesis by
A168;
end;
end;
(
dom a1)
= I by
PARTFUN1:def 2
.= (
dom b1) by
PARTFUN1:def 2;
hence contradiction by
A156,
A169,
FUNCT_1: 2;
end;
(a1
. (
indx B))
in (B
. (
indx B)) by
A118,
A166,
CARD_3: 9;
then (a1
. (
indx B))
in (Li
/\ C) by
A162,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then 2
c= (
card (Li
/\ C)) by
A167,
A165,
Th2;
hence thesis by
A159,
A161;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A116,
A151,
A157,
CARD_3: 27;
end;
end;