yellow_9.miz
begin
scheme ::
YELLOW_9:sch1
FraenkelInvolution { A() -> non
empty
set , X,Y() ->
Subset of A() , F(
set) ->
Element of A() } :
X()
= { F(a) where a be
Element of A() : a
in Y() }
provided
A1: Y()
= { F(a) where a be
Element of A() : a
in X() }
and
A2: for a be
Element of A() holds F(F)
= a;
hereby
let x be
object;
assume
A3: x
in X();
then
reconsider a = x as
Element of A();
A4: F(a)
in Y() by
A1,
A3;
F(F)
= a by
A2;
hence x
in { F(b) where b be
Element of A() : b
in Y() } by
A4;
end;
let x be
object;
assume x
in { F(b) where b be
Element of A() : b
in Y() };
then
consider b be
Element of A() such that
A5: x
= F(b) and
A6: b
in Y();
ex a be
Element of A() st (b
= F(a)) & (a
in X()) by
A1,
A6;
hence thesis by
A2,
A5;
end;
scheme ::
YELLOW_9:sch2
FraenkelComplement1 { A() -> non
empty
RelStr , X() ->
Subset-Family of A() , Y() ->
set , F(
set) ->
Subset of A() } :
(
COMPLEMENT X())
= { (F(a)
` ) where a be
Element of A() : a
in Y() }
provided
A1: X()
= { F(a) where a be
Element of A() : a
in Y() };
hereby
let x be
object;
assume
A2: x
in (
COMPLEMENT X());
then
reconsider y = x as
Subset of A();
(y
` )
in X() by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 7;
then
A3: ex b be
Element of A() st ((y
` )
= F(b)) & (b
in Y()) by
A1;
x
= ((y
` )
` );
hence x
in { (F(a)
` ) where a be
Element of A() : a
in Y() } by
A3;
end;
let x be
object;
assume x
in { (F(a)
` ) where a be
Element of A() : a
in Y() };
then
consider a be
Element of A() such that
A4: x
= (F(a)
` ) and
A5: a
in Y();
F(a)
in X() by
A1,
A5;
hence thesis by
A4,
YELLOW_8: 5;
end;
scheme ::
YELLOW_9:sch3
FraenkelComplement2 { A() -> non
empty
RelStr , X() ->
Subset-Family of A() , Y() ->
set , F(
set) ->
Subset of A() } :
(
COMPLEMENT X())
= { F(a) where a be
Element of A() : a
in Y() }
provided
A1: X()
= { (F(a)
` ) where a be
Element of A() : a
in Y() };
hereby
let x be
object;
assume
A2: x
in (
COMPLEMENT X());
then
reconsider y = x as
Subset of A();
(y
` )
in X() by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 7;
then
A3: ex b be
Element of A() st ((y
` )
= (F(b)
` )) & (b
in Y()) by
A1;
x
= ((y
` )
` );
hence x
in { F(a) where a be
Element of A() : a
in Y() } by
A3;
end;
let x be
object;
assume x
in { F(a) where a be
Element of A() : a
in Y() };
then
consider a be
Element of A() such that
A4: x
= F(a) and
A5: a
in Y();
(F(a)
` )
in X() by
A1,
A5;
hence thesis by
A4,
SETFAM_1:def 7;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:1
for R be non
empty
RelStr, x,y be
Element of R holds y
in ((
uparrow x)
` ) iff not x
<= y
proof
let R be non
empty
RelStr, x,y be
Element of R;
((
uparrow x)
` )
= (the
carrier of R
\ (
uparrow x)) by
SUBSET_1:def 4;
then y
in ((
uparrow x)
` ) iff not y
in (
uparrow x) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence thesis by
WAYBEL_0: 18;
end;
scheme ::
YELLOW_9:sch4
ABC { A() ->
TopSpace , F(
set) ->
set , f() ->
Function , P[
set] } :
(f()
" (
union { F(x) where x be
Subset of A() : P[x] }))
= (
union { (f()
" F(y)) where y be
Subset of A() : P[y] });
set X = { F(x) where x be
Subset of A() : P[x] };
set Y = { (f()
" F(y)) where y be
Subset of A() : P[y] };
hereby
let x be
object;
assume
A1: x
in (f()
" (
union X));
then
A2: x
in (
dom f()) by
FUNCT_1:def 7;
(f()
. x)
in (
union X) by
A1,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then
consider y be
set such that
A3: (f()
. x)
in y and
A4: y
in X by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider a be
Subset of A() such that
A5: y
= F(a) and
A6: P[a] by
A4;
A7: x
in (f()
" F(a)) by
A2,
A3,
A5,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
(f()
" F(a))
in Y by
A6;
hence x
in (
union Y) by
A7,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
union Y);
then
consider y be
set such that
A8: x
in y and
A9: y
in Y by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider a be
Subset of A() such that
A10: y
= (f()
" F(a)) and
A11: P[a] by
A9;
A12: (f()
. x)
in F(a) by
A8,
A10,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
F(a)
in X by
A11;
then
A13: (f()
. x)
in (
union X) by
A12,
TARSKI:def 4;
x
in (
dom f()) by
A8,
A10,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
hence thesis by
A13,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:2
Th2: for S be
1-sorted, T be non
empty
1-sorted, f be
Function of S, T holds for X be
Subset of T holds ((f
" X)
` )
= (f
" (X
` ))
proof
let S be
1-sorted, T be non
empty
1-sorted, f be
Function of S, T;
let X be
Subset of T;
thus ((f
" X)
` )
= (the
carrier of S
\ (f
" X)) by
SUBSET_1:def 4
.= ((f
" the
carrier of T)
\ (f
" X)) by
FUNCT_2: 40
.= (f
" (the
carrier of T
\ X)) by
FUNCT_1: 69
.= (f
" (X
` )) by
SUBSET_1:def 4;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:3
Th3: for T be
1-sorted, F be
Subset-Family of T holds (
COMPLEMENT F)
= { (a
` ) where a be
Subset of T : a
in F }
proof
let T be
1-sorted, F be
Subset-Family of T;
set X = { (a
` ) where a be
Subset of T : a
in F };
hereby
let x be
object;
assume
A1: x
in (
COMPLEMENT F);
then
reconsider P = x as
Subset of T;
A2: (P
` )
in F by
A1,
SETFAM_1:def 7;
((P
` )
` )
= P;
hence x
in X by
A2;
end;
let x be
object;
assume x
in X;
then ex P be
Subset of T st x
= (P
` ) & P
in F;
hence thesis by
YELLOW_8: 5;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:4
Th4: for R be non
empty
RelStr holds for F be
Subset of R holds (
uparrow F)
= (
union { (
uparrow x) where x be
Element of R : x
in F }) & (
downarrow F)
= (
union { (
downarrow x) where x be
Element of R : x
in F })
proof
let R be non
empty
RelStr, F be
Subset of R;
A1: (
uparrow F)
= { x where x be
Element of R : ex y be
Element of R st x
>= y & y
in F } by
WAYBEL_0: 15;
A2: (
downarrow F)
= { x where x be
Element of R : ex y be
Element of R st x
<= y & y
in F } by
WAYBEL_0: 14;
hereby
let a be
object;
assume a
in (
uparrow F);
then
consider x be
Element of R such that
A3: a
= x and
A4: ex y be
Element of R st x
>= y & y
in F by
A1;
consider y be
Element of R such that
A5: x
>= y and
A6: y
in F by
A4;
A7: (
uparrow y)
in { (
uparrow z) where z be
Element of R : z
in F } by
A6;
x
in (
uparrow y) by
A5,
WAYBEL_0: 18;
hence a
in (
union { (
uparrow z) where z be
Element of R : z
in F }) by
A3,
A7,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
hereby
let a be
object;
assume a
in (
union { (
uparrow x) where x be
Element of R : x
in F });
then
consider X be
set such that
A8: a
in X and
A9: X
in { (
uparrow x) where x be
Element of R : x
in F } by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider x be
Element of R such that
A10: X
= (
uparrow x) and
A11: x
in F by
A9;
reconsider y = a as
Element of R by
A8,
A10;
y
>= x by
A8,
A10,
WAYBEL_0: 18;
hence a
in (
uparrow F) by
A1,
A11;
end;
hereby
let a be
object;
assume a
in (
downarrow F);
then
consider x be
Element of R such that
A12: a
= x and
A13: ex y be
Element of R st x
<= y & y
in F by
A2;
consider y be
Element of R such that
A14: x
<= y and
A15: y
in F by
A13;
A16: (
downarrow y)
in { (
downarrow z) where z be
Element of R : z
in F } by
A15;
x
in (
downarrow y) by
A14,
WAYBEL_0: 17;
hence a
in (
union { (
downarrow z) where z be
Element of R : z
in F }) by
A12,
A16,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
hereby
let a be
object;
assume a
in (
union { (
downarrow x) where x be
Element of R : x
in F });
then
consider X be
set such that
A17: a
in X and
A18: X
in { (
downarrow x) where x be
Element of R : x
in F } by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider x be
Element of R such that
A19: X
= (
downarrow x) and
A20: x
in F by
A18;
reconsider y = a as
Element of R by
A17,
A19;
y
<= x by
A17,
A19,
WAYBEL_0: 17;
hence a
in (
downarrow F) by
A2,
A20;
end;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:5
for R be non
empty
RelStr holds for A be
Subset-Family of R, F be
Subset of R st A
= { ((
uparrow x)
` ) where x be
Element of R : x
in F } holds (
Intersect A)
= ((
uparrow F)
` )
proof
let R be non
empty
RelStr;
deffunc
F(
Element of R) = (
uparrow $1);
let A be
Subset-Family of R, F be
Subset of R such that
A1: A
= { (
F(x)
` ) where x be
Element of R : x
in F };
A2: (
COMPLEMENT A)
= {
F(x) where x be
Element of R : x
in F } from
FraenkelComplement2(
A1);
reconsider C = (
COMPLEMENT A) as
Subset-Family of R;
(
COMPLEMENT C)
= A;
hence (
Intersect A)
= ((
union C)
` ) by
YELLOW_8: 6
.= ((
uparrow F)
` ) by
A2,
Th4;
end;
registration
cluster
strict
complete1
-element for
TopLattice;
existence
proof
take the
strict
reflexive1
-element
discrete
finite
TopRelStr;
thus thesis;
end;
end
registration
let S be non
empty
RelStr, T be
upper-bounded non
empty
reflexive
antisymmetric
RelStr;
cluster
infs-preserving for
Function of S, T;
existence
proof
take f = (S
--> (
Top T));
let A be
Subset of S;
assume
ex_inf_of (A,S);
A1: (
rng f)
=
{(
Top T)} by
FUNCOP_1: 8;
(f
.: A)
c= (
rng f) by
RELAT_1: 111;
then
A2: (f
.: A)
=
{} or (f
.: A)
=
{(
Top T)} by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 33;
hence
ex_inf_of ((f
.: A),T) by
YELLOW_0: 38,
YELLOW_0: 43;
thus (
inf (f
.: A))
= (
Top T) by
A2,
YELLOW_0: 39
.= (f
. (
inf A)) by
FUNCOP_1: 7;
end;
end
registration
let S be non
empty
RelStr, T be
lower-bounded non
empty
reflexive
antisymmetric
RelStr;
cluster
sups-preserving for
Function of S, T;
existence
proof
take f = (S
--> (
Bottom T));
let A be
Subset of S;
assume
ex_sup_of (A,S);
A1: (
rng f)
=
{(
Bottom T)} by
FUNCOP_1: 8;
(f
.: A)
c= (
rng f) by
RELAT_1: 111;
then
A2: (f
.: A)
=
{} or (f
.: A)
=
{(
Bottom T)} by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 33;
hence
ex_sup_of ((f
.: A),T) by
YELLOW_0: 38,
YELLOW_0: 42;
thus (
sup (f
.: A))
= (
Bottom T) by
A2,
YELLOW_0: 39
.= (f
. (
sup A)) by
FUNCOP_1: 7;
end;
end
definition
let R,S be
1-sorted;
assume
A1: the
carrier of S
c= the
carrier of R;
A2: (
dom (
id the
carrier of S))
= the
carrier of S;
A3: (
rng (
id the
carrier of S))
= the
carrier of S;
::
YELLOW_9:def1
func
incl (S,R) ->
Function of S, R equals
:
Def1: (
id the
carrier of S);
coherence by
A1,
A2,
A3,
FUNCT_2: 2;
end
registration
let R be non
empty
RelStr;
let S be non
empty
SubRelStr of R;
cluster (
incl (S,R)) ->
monotone;
coherence
proof
let x,y be
Element of S;
reconsider a = x, b = y as
Element of R by
YELLOW_0: 58;
the
carrier of S
c= the
carrier of R by
YELLOW_0:def 13;
then
A1: (
incl (S,R))
= (
id the
carrier of S) by
Def1;
then
A2: ((
incl (S,R))
. x)
= a;
((
incl (S,R))
. y)
= b by
A1;
hence thesis by
A2,
YELLOW_0: 59;
end;
end
definition
let R be non
empty
RelStr, X be non
empty
Subset of R;
::
YELLOW_9:def2
func X
+id ->
strict non
empty
NetStr over R equals ((
incl ((
subrelstr X),R))
* ((
subrelstr X)
+id ));
coherence ;
::
YELLOW_9:def3
func X
opp+id ->
strict non
empty
NetStr over R equals ((
incl ((
subrelstr X),R))
* ((
subrelstr X)
opp+id ));
coherence ;
end
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:6
for R be non
empty
RelStr, X be non
empty
Subset of R holds the
carrier of (X
+id )
= X & (X
+id ) is
full
SubRelStr of R & for x be
Element of (X
+id ) holds ((X
+id )
. x)
= x
proof
let R be non
empty
RelStr, X be non
empty
Subset of R;
A1: the RelStr of (X
+id )
= the RelStr of ((
subrelstr X)
+id ) by
WAYBEL_9:def 8;
A2: the
mapping of (X
+id )
= ((
incl ((
subrelstr X),R))
* the
mapping of ((
subrelstr X)
+id )) by
WAYBEL_9:def 8;
A3: the
carrier of (
subrelstr X)
= X by
YELLOW_0:def 15;
hence
A4: the
carrier of (X
+id )
= X by
A1,
WAYBEL_9:def 5;
A5: the RelStr of ((
subrelstr X)
+id )
= (
subrelstr X) by
WAYBEL_9:def 5;
the
InternalRel of (
subrelstr X)
c= the
InternalRel of R by
YELLOW_0:def 13;
then
reconsider S = (X
+id ) as
SubRelStr of R by
A1,
A3,
A5,
YELLOW_0:def 13;
the
InternalRel of S
= (the
InternalRel of R
|_2 the
carrier of S) by
A1,
A5,
YELLOW_0:def 14;
hence (X
+id ) is
full
SubRelStr of R by
YELLOW_0:def 14;
let x be
Element of (X
+id );
(
id (
subrelstr X))
= (
id X) by
YELLOW_0:def 15;
then
A6: the
mapping of ((
subrelstr X)
+id )
= (
id X) by
WAYBEL_9:def 5;
A7: (
dom (
id X))
= X;
(
incl ((
subrelstr X),R))
= (
id X) by
A3,
Def1;
then the
mapping of (X
+id )
= (
id X) by
A2,
A6,
A7,
RELAT_1: 52;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:7
for R be non
empty
RelStr, X be non
empty
Subset of R holds the
carrier of (X
opp+id )
= X & (X
opp+id ) is
full
SubRelStr of (R
opp ) & for x be
Element of (X
opp+id ) holds ((X
opp+id )
. x)
= x
proof
let R be non
empty
RelStr, X be non
empty
Subset of R;
A1: the RelStr of (X
opp+id )
= the RelStr of ((
subrelstr X)
opp+id ) by
WAYBEL_9:def 8;
A2: the
mapping of (X
opp+id )
= ((
incl ((
subrelstr X),R))
* the
mapping of ((
subrelstr X)
opp+id )) by
WAYBEL_9:def 8;
A3: the
carrier of (
subrelstr X)
= X by
YELLOW_0:def 15;
A4: the
carrier of ((
subrelstr X)
opp+id )
= the
carrier of (
subrelstr X) by
WAYBEL_9:def 6;
A5: the
InternalRel of ((
subrelstr X)
opp+id )
= (the
InternalRel of (
subrelstr X)
~ ) by
WAYBEL_9:def 6;
thus the
carrier of (X
opp+id )
= X by
A1,
A3,
WAYBEL_9:def 6;
A6: (R
opp )
=
RelStr (# the
carrier of R, (the
InternalRel of R
~ ) #) by
LATTICE3:def 5;
the
InternalRel of (
subrelstr X)
= (the
InternalRel of R
|_2 X) by
A3,
YELLOW_0:def 14;
then
A7: the
InternalRel of ((
subrelstr X)
opp+id )
= ((the
InternalRel of R
~ )
|_2 X) by
A5,
ORDERS_1: 83;
then the
InternalRel of ((
subrelstr X)
opp+id )
c= the
InternalRel of (R
opp ) by
A6,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then
reconsider S = (X
opp+id ) as
SubRelStr of (R
opp ) by
A1,
A3,
A4,
A6,
YELLOW_0:def 13;
the
InternalRel of S
= (the
InternalRel of (R
opp )
|_2 the
carrier of S) by
A1,
A4,
A6,
A7,
YELLOW_0:def 15;
hence (X
opp+id ) is
full
SubRelStr of (R
opp ) by
YELLOW_0:def 14;
let x be
Element of (X
opp+id );
(
id (
subrelstr X))
= (
id X) by
YELLOW_0:def 15;
then
A8: the
mapping of ((
subrelstr X)
opp+id )
= (
id X) by
WAYBEL_9:def 6;
A9: (
dom (
id X))
= X;
(
incl ((
subrelstr X),R))
= (
id X) by
A3,
Def1;
then the
mapping of (X
opp+id )
= (
id X) by
A2,
A8,
A9,
RELAT_1: 52;
hence thesis by
A1,
A3,
A4;
end;
registration
let R be non
empty
reflexive
RelStr;
let X be non
empty
Subset of R;
cluster (X
+id ) ->
reflexive;
coherence ;
cluster (X
opp+id ) ->
reflexive;
coherence ;
end
registration
let R be non
empty
transitive
RelStr;
let X be non
empty
Subset of R;
cluster (X
+id ) ->
transitive;
coherence ;
cluster (X
opp+id ) ->
transitive;
coherence ;
end
registration
let R be non
empty
reflexive
RelStr;
let I be
directed
Subset of R;
cluster (
subrelstr I) ->
directed;
coherence
proof
let x,y be
Element of (
subrelstr I);
A1: the
carrier of (
subrelstr I)
= I by
YELLOW_0:def 15;
assume that
A2: x
in (
[#] (
subrelstr I)) and
A3: y
in (
[#] (
subrelstr I));
reconsider a = x, b = y as
Element of R by
A1,
A2,
A3;
consider c be
Element of R such that
A4: c
in I and
A5: a
<= c and
A6: b
<= c by
A1,
A2,
WAYBEL_0:def 1;
reconsider z = c as
Element of (
subrelstr I) by
A4,
YELLOW_0:def 15;
take z;
thus thesis by
A2,
A5,
A6,
YELLOW_0: 60;
end;
end
registration
let R be non
empty
reflexive
RelStr;
let I be
directed non
empty
Subset of R;
cluster (I
+id ) ->
directed;
coherence ;
end
registration
let R be non
empty
reflexive
RelStr;
let F be
filtered non
empty
Subset of R;
cluster ((
subrelstr F)
opp+id ) ->
directed;
coherence
proof
set I = F, A = ((
subrelstr I)
opp+id );
let x,y be
Element of ((
subrelstr I)
opp+id );
A1: the
carrier of (
subrelstr I)
= I by
YELLOW_0:def 15;
A2: the
carrier of A
= the
carrier of (
subrelstr F) by
WAYBEL_9:def 6;
assume that
A3: x
in (
[#] A) and
A4: y
in (
[#] A);
reconsider a = x, b = y as
Element of R by
A1,
A2,
A3,
A4;
A5: the RelStr of A
= the RelStr of ((
subrelstr F)
opp ) by
WAYBEL_9: 11;
consider c be
Element of R such that
A6: c
in I and
A7: a
>= c and
A8: b
>= c by
A1,
A2,
WAYBEL_0:def 2;
reconsider a1 = x, b1 = y, c1 = c as
Element of (
subrelstr F) by
A6,
WAYBEL_9:def 6,
YELLOW_0:def 15;
reconsider z = c as
Element of A by
A2,
A6,
YELLOW_0:def 15;
take z;
A9: (a1
~ )
= a1 by
LATTICE3:def 6;
A10: (b1
~ )
= b1 by
LATTICE3:def 6;
A11: (c1
~ )
= c1 by
LATTICE3:def 6;
A12: a1
>= c1 by
A7,
YELLOW_0: 60;
A13: b1
>= c1 by
A8,
YELLOW_0: 60;
A14: (a1
~ )
<= (c1
~ ) by
A12,
LATTICE3: 9;
(b1
~ )
<= (c1
~ ) by
A13,
LATTICE3: 9;
hence thesis by
A5,
A9,
A10,
A11,
A14;
end;
end
registration
let R be non
empty
reflexive
RelStr;
let F be
filtered non
empty
Subset of R;
cluster (F
opp+id ) ->
directed;
coherence ;
end
begin
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:8
Th8: for T be
TopSpace st T is
empty holds the
topology of T
=
{
{} }
proof
let T1 be
TopSpace;
assume T1 is
empty;
then
A1: the
carrier of T1
=
{} ;
then
{}
in the
topology of T1 by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
hence thesis by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 1,
ZFMISC_1: 33;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:9
Th9: for T be 1
-element
TopSpace holds the
topology of T
= (
bool the
carrier of T) & for x be
Point of T holds the
carrier of T
=
{x} & the
topology of T
=
{
{} ,
{x}}
proof
let T be 1
-element
TopSpace;
thus the
topology of T
c= (
bool the
carrier of T);
consider x be
Point of T such that
A1: the
carrier of T
=
{x} by
TEX_1:def 1;
A2:
{}
in the
topology of T by
PRE_TOPC: 1;
A3: the
carrier of T
in the
topology of T by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
A4: (
bool
{x})
=
{
{} ,
{x}} by
ZFMISC_1: 24;
hence (
bool the
carrier of T)
c= the
topology of T by
A1,
A2,
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
let a be
Point of T;
a
= x by
STRUCT_0:def 10;
hence the
carrier of T
=
{a} & the
topology of T
c=
{
{} ,
{a}} &
{
{} ,
{a}}
c= the
topology of T by
A1,
A2,
A3,
A4,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:10
for T be 1
-element
TopSpace holds
{the
carrier of T} is
Basis of T &
{} is
prebasis of T &
{
{} } is
prebasis of T
proof
let T be 1
-element
TopSpace;
set BB =
{the
carrier of T};
A1: the
carrier of T
c= the
carrier of T;
A2: the
topology of T
= (
bool the
carrier of T) by
Th9;
reconsider BB as
Subset-Family of T by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
set x = the
Element of T;
A3: the
topology of T
=
{
{} ,
{x}} by
Th9;
A4: the
carrier of T
=
{x} by
Th9;
A5:
{}
c= (
bool the
carrier of T);
A6:
{}
c= BB;
A7:
{}
c= the
carrier of T;
reconsider C =
{} as
Subset-Family of T by
XBOOLE_1: 2;
the
topology of T
c= (
UniCl BB)
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in the
topology of T;
then a
=
{x} & (
union
{
{x}})
=
{x} & BB
c= BB & BB
c= (
bool the
carrier of T) or a
=
{} by
A3,
TARSKI:def 2,
ZFMISC_1: 25;
hence thesis by
A4,
A5,
A6,
A7,
CANTOR_1:def 1,
ZFMISC_1: 2;
end;
hence
A8:
{the
carrier of T} is
Basis of T by
A2,
CANTOR_1:def 2,
TOPS_2: 64;
A9:
{}
c= the
topology of T;
BB
c= (
FinMeetCl C)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in BB;
then x
= the
carrier of T by
TARSKI:def 1;
then (
Intersect C)
= x by
SETFAM_1:def 9;
hence thesis by
CANTOR_1:def 3;
end;
hence
{} is
prebasis of T by
A8,
A9,
CANTOR_1:def 4,
TOPS_2: 64;
{}
c= the
carrier of T;
then
reconsider D =
{
{} } as
Subset-Family of T by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
A10: D
c= the
topology of T by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 7;
BB
c= (
FinMeetCl D)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in BB;
then
A11: x
= the
carrier of T by
TARSKI:def 1;
A12: (
Intersect C)
= the
carrier of T by
SETFAM_1:def 9;
C
c= D;
hence thesis by
A11,
A12,
CANTOR_1:def 3;
end;
hence thesis by
A8,
A10,
CANTOR_1:def 4,
TOPS_2: 64;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:11
Th11: for X,Y be
set, A be
Subset-Family of X st A
=
{Y} holds (
FinMeetCl A)
=
{Y, X} & (
UniCl A)
=
{Y,
{} }
proof
let X,Z be
set, A be
Subset-Family of X such that
A1: A
=
{Z};
thus (
FinMeetCl A)
c=
{Z, X}
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
FinMeetCl A);
then
consider Y be
Subset-Family of X such that
A2: Y
c= A and Y is
finite and
A3: x
= (
Intersect Y) by
CANTOR_1:def 3;
Y
=
{} or Y
=
{Z} by
A1,
A2,
ZFMISC_1: 33;
then x
= X or x
= (
meet
{Z}) by
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 9;
then x
= X or x
= Z by
SETFAM_1: 10;
hence thesis by
TARSKI:def 2;
end;
reconsider E =
{} as
Subset-Family of X by
XBOOLE_1: 2;
reconsider E as
Subset-Family of X;
hereby
let x be
object;
assume x
in
{Z, X};
then x
= X or x
= Z by
TARSKI:def 2;
then x
= X or x
= (
meet
{Z}) by
SETFAM_1: 10;
then x
= (
Intersect E) & E
c= A or x
= (
Intersect A) & A
c= A by
A1,
SETFAM_1:def 9;
hence x
in (
FinMeetCl A) by
A1,
CANTOR_1:def 3;
end;
hereby
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
UniCl A);
then
consider Y be
Subset-Family of X such that
A4: Y
c= A and
A5: x
= (
union Y) by
CANTOR_1:def 1;
Y
=
{} or Y
=
{Z} by
A1,
A4,
ZFMISC_1: 33;
then x
=
{} or x
= Z by
A5,
ZFMISC_1: 2,
ZFMISC_1: 25;
hence x
in
{Z,
{} } by
TARSKI:def 2;
end;
let x be
object;
assume x
in
{Z,
{} };
then x
=
{} or x
= Z by
TARSKI:def 2;
then x
= (
union E) & E
c= A or x
= (
union A) & A
c= A by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 2,
ZFMISC_1: 25;
hence thesis by
CANTOR_1:def 1;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:12
for X be
set, A,B be
Subset-Family of X st A
= (B
\/
{X}) or B
= (A
\
{X}) holds (
Intersect A)
= (
Intersect B)
proof
let X be
set, A,B be
Subset-Family of X;
assume
A1: A
= (B
\/
{X}) or B
= (A
\
{X});
hereby
let x be
object;
assume
A2: x
in (
Intersect A);
now
let y be
set;
assume y
in B;
then y
in A by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 3,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence x
in y by
A2,
SETFAM_1: 43;
end;
hence x
in (
Intersect B) by
A2,
SETFAM_1: 43;
end;
let x be
object;
assume
A3: x
in (
Intersect B);
now
let y be
set;
assume y
in A;
then y
in B & not y
in
{X} or y
in
{X} by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 3,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then y
in B or y
= X by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence x
in y by
A3,
SETFAM_1: 43;
end;
hence thesis by
A3,
SETFAM_1: 43;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:13
for X be
set, A,B be
Subset-Family of X st A
= (B
\/
{X}) or B
= (A
\
{X}) holds (
FinMeetCl A)
= (
FinMeetCl B)
proof
let X be
set, A,B be
Subset-Family of X;
assume
A1: A
= (B
\/
{X}) or B
= (A
\
{X});
X
in (
FinMeetCl B) by
CANTOR_1: 8;
then
A2:
{X}
c= (
FinMeetCl B) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
A3: B
c= (
FinMeetCl B) by
CANTOR_1: 4;
((A
\
{X})
\/
{X})
= (A
\/
{X}) by
XBOOLE_1: 39;
then
A4: A
c= (B
\/
{X}) by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
(B
\/
{X})
c= (
FinMeetCl B) by
A2,
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
then A
c= (
FinMeetCl B) by
A4;
then (
FinMeetCl A)
c= (
FinMeetCl (
FinMeetCl B)) by
CANTOR_1: 14;
hence (
FinMeetCl A)
c= (
FinMeetCl B) by
CANTOR_1: 11;
thus thesis by
A1,
CANTOR_1: 14,
XBOOLE_1: 7,
XBOOLE_1: 36;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:14
Th14: for X be
set, A be
Subset-Family of X st X
in A holds for x be
set holds x
in (
FinMeetCl A) iff ex Y be
finite non
empty
Subset-Family of X st Y
c= A & x
= (
Intersect Y)
proof
let X be
set, A be
Subset-Family of X;
assume
A1: X
in A;
then
A2:
{X}
c= A by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
reconsider Z =
{X} as
finite non
empty
Subset-Family of X by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
reconsider Z as
finite non
empty
Subset-Family of X;
A3: (
Intersect Z)
= (
meet Z) by
SETFAM_1:def 9
.= X by
SETFAM_1: 10;
let x be
set;
hereby
assume x
in (
FinMeetCl A);
then
consider Y be
Subset-Family of X such that
A4: Y
c= A and
A5: Y is
finite and
A6: x
= (
Intersect Y) by
CANTOR_1:def 3;
per cases ;
suppose Y
=
{} ;
then x
= X by
A6,
SETFAM_1:def 9;
hence ex Y be
finite non
empty
Subset-Family of X st Y
c= A & x
= (
Intersect Y) by
A2,
A3;
end;
suppose Y
<>
{} ;
hence ex Y be
finite non
empty
Subset-Family of X st Y
c= A & x
= (
Intersect Y) by
A4,
A5,
A6;
end;
end;
thus thesis by
CANTOR_1:def 3;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:15
Th15: for X be
set, A be
Subset-Family of X holds (
UniCl (
UniCl A))
= (
UniCl A)
proof
let X be
set, A be
Subset-Family of X;
hereby
let x be
object;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume x
in (
UniCl (
UniCl A));
then
consider Y be
Subset-Family of X such that
A1: Y
c= (
UniCl A) and
A2: x
= (
union Y) by
CANTOR_1:def 1;
set Z = { y where y be
Subset of X : y
in A & y
c= xx };
Z
c= (
bool X)
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in Z;
then ex y be
Subset of X st a
= y & y
in A & y
c= xx;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider Z as
Subset-Family of X;
A3: xx
= (
union Z)
proof
hereby
let a be
object;
assume a
in xx;
then
consider s be
set such that
A4: a
in s and
A5: s
in Y by
A2,
TARSKI:def 4;
consider t be
Subset-Family of X such that
A6: t
c= A and
A7: s
= (
union t) by
A1,
A5,
CANTOR_1:def 1;
consider u be
set such that
A8: a
in u and
A9: u
in t by
A4,
A7,
TARSKI:def 4;
reconsider u as
Subset of X by
A9;
A10: u
c= s by
A7,
A9,
ZFMISC_1: 74;
s
c= xx by
A2,
A5,
ZFMISC_1: 74;
then u
c= xx by
A10;
then u
in Z by
A6,
A9;
hence a
in (
union Z) by
A8,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
let a be
object;
assume a
in (
union Z);
then
consider u be
set such that
A11: a
in u and
A12: u
in Z by
TARSKI:def 4;
ex y be
Subset of X st u
= y & y
in A & y
c= xx by
A12;
hence thesis by
A11;
end;
Z
c= A
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in Z;
then ex y be
Subset of X st a
= y & y
in A & y
c= xx;
hence thesis;
end;
hence x
in (
UniCl A) by
A3,
CANTOR_1:def 1;
end;
thus thesis by
CANTOR_1: 1;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:16
Th16: for X be
set, A be
empty
Subset-Family of X holds (
UniCl A)
=
{
{} }
proof
let X be
set, A be
empty
Subset-Family of X;
hereby
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
UniCl A);
then
consider B be
Subset-Family of X such that
A1: B
c= A and
A2: x
= (
union B) by
CANTOR_1:def 1;
B
=
{} by
A1;
hence x
in
{
{} } by
A2,
TARSKI:def 1,
ZFMISC_1: 2;
end;
let x be
object;
assume x
in
{
{} };
then
A3: x
=
{} by
TARSKI:def 1;
(
union (
{} (
bool X)))
=
{} by
ZFMISC_1: 2;
hence thesis by
A3,
CANTOR_1:def 1;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:17
Th17: for X be
set, A be
empty
Subset-Family of X holds (
FinMeetCl A)
=
{X}
proof
let X be
set, A be
empty
Subset-Family of X;
hereby
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
FinMeetCl A);
then
consider B be
Subset-Family of X such that
A1: B
c= A and B is
finite and
A2: x
= (
Intersect B) by
CANTOR_1:def 3;
B
=
{} by
A1;
then x
= X by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 9;
hence x
in
{X} by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
let x be
object;
assume x
in
{X};
then
A3: x
= X by
TARSKI:def 1;
(
Intersect (
{} (
bool X)))
= X by
SETFAM_1:def 9;
hence thesis by
A3,
CANTOR_1:def 3;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:18
Th18: for X be
set, A be
Subset-Family of X st A
=
{
{} , X} holds (
UniCl A)
= A & (
FinMeetCl A)
= A
proof
let X be
set, A be
Subset-Family of X such that
A1: A
=
{
{} , X};
hereby
let a be
object;
assume a
in (
UniCl A);
then
consider y be
Subset-Family of X such that
A2: y
c= A and
A3: a
= (
union y) by
CANTOR_1:def 1;
y
=
{} or y
=
{
{} } or y
=
{X} or y
=
{
{} , X} by
A1,
A2,
ZFMISC_1: 36;
then a
=
{} or a
= X or a
= (
{}
\/ X) & (
{}
\/ X)
= X by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 2,
ZFMISC_1: 25,
ZFMISC_1: 75;
hence a
in A by
A1,
TARSKI:def 2;
end;
thus A
c= (
UniCl A) by
CANTOR_1: 1;
hereby
let a be
object;
assume a
in (
FinMeetCl A);
then
consider y be
Subset-Family of X such that
A4: y
c= A and y is
finite and
A5: a
= (
Intersect y) by
CANTOR_1:def 3;
y
=
{} or y
=
{
{} } or y
=
{X} or y
=
{
{} , X} by
A1,
A4,
ZFMISC_1: 36;
then a
= X or a
= (
meet
{
{} }) or a
= (
meet
{X}) or a
= (
meet
{
{} , X}) by
A5,
SETFAM_1:def 9;
then a
= X or a
=
{} or a
= (
{}
/\ X) & (
{}
/\ X)
=
{} by
SETFAM_1: 10,
SETFAM_1: 11;
hence a
in A by
A1,
TARSKI:def 2;
end;
thus thesis by
CANTOR_1: 4;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:19
Th19: for X,Y be
set, A be
Subset-Family of X, B be
Subset-Family of Y holds (A
c= B implies (
UniCl A)
c= (
UniCl B)) & (A
= B implies (
UniCl A)
= (
UniCl B))
proof
let X,Y be
set, A be
Subset-Family of X, B be
Subset-Family of Y;
A1:
now
let X,Y be
set;
let A be
Subset-Family of X, B be
Subset-Family of Y such that
A2: A
c= B;
thus (
UniCl A)
c= (
UniCl B)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
UniCl A);
then
consider y be
Subset-Family of X such that
A3: y
c= A and
A4: x
= (
union y) by
CANTOR_1:def 1;
y
c= B by
A2,
A3;
then y is
Subset-Family of Y by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
then ex y be
Subset-Family of Y st y
c= B & x
= (
union y) by
A2,
A3,
A4,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
hence thesis by
CANTOR_1:def 1;
end;
end;
hence A
c= B implies (
UniCl A)
c= (
UniCl B);
assume A
= B;
hence (
UniCl A)
c= (
UniCl B) & (
UniCl B)
c= (
UniCl A) by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:20
Th20: for X,Y be
set, A be
Subset-Family of X, B be
Subset-Family of Y st A
= B & X
in A holds (
FinMeetCl B)
= (
{Y}
\/ (
FinMeetCl A))
proof
let X,Y be
set, A be
Subset-Family of X, B be
Subset-Family of Y such that
A1: A
= B and
A2: X
in A;
thus (
FinMeetCl B)
c= (
{Y}
\/ (
FinMeetCl A))
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
FinMeetCl B);
then
consider y be
Subset-Family of Y such that
A3: y
c= B and
A4: y is
finite and
A5: x
= (
Intersect y) by
CANTOR_1:def 3;
reconsider z = y as
Subset-Family of X by
A1,
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
reconsider z as
Subset-Family of X;
per cases ;
suppose y
=
{} ;
then x
= Y by
A5,
SETFAM_1:def 9;
then x
in
{Y} by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
suppose
A6: y
<>
{} ;
then
A7: (
Intersect y)
= (
meet y) by
SETFAM_1:def 9;
(
Intersect z)
= (
meet y) by
A6,
SETFAM_1:def 9;
then x
in (
FinMeetCl A) by
A1,
A3,
A4,
A5,
A7,
CANTOR_1:def 3;
hence thesis by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
end;
let x be
object;
assume
A8: x
in (
{Y}
\/ (
FinMeetCl A));
per cases by
A8,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose x
in
{Y};
then
A9: x
= Y by
TARSKI:def 1;
A10: (
Intersect (
{} (
bool Y)))
= Y by
SETFAM_1:def 9;
(
{} (
bool Y))
c= B;
hence thesis by
A9,
A10,
CANTOR_1:def 3;
end;
suppose x
in (
FinMeetCl A);
then
consider y be non
empty
finite
Subset-Family of X such that
A11: y
c= A and
A12: x
= (
Intersect y) by
A2,
Th14;
reconsider z = y as
Subset-Family of Y by
A1,
A11,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
reconsider z as
Subset-Family of Y;
x
= (
meet z) by
A12,
SETFAM_1:def 9
.= (
Intersect z) by
SETFAM_1:def 9;
hence thesis by
A1,
A11,
CANTOR_1:def 3;
end;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:21
Th21: for X be
set, A be
Subset-Family of X holds (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl (
UniCl A)))
= (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl A))
proof
let X be
set, A be
Subset-Family of X;
per cases ;
suppose
A1: A
=
{} ;
then
A2: (
FinMeetCl A)
=
{X} by
Th17;
(
UniCl A)
=
{
{} } by
A1,
Th16;
then
A3: (
FinMeetCl (
UniCl A))
=
{
{} , X} by
Th11;
(
UniCl (
FinMeetCl A))
=
{X,
{} } by
A2,
Th11;
hence thesis by
A3,
Th18;
end;
suppose A
<>
{} ;
then
reconsider A as non
empty
Subset-Family of X;
A4: (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl (
UniCl A)))
c= (
UniCl (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl A)))
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl (
UniCl A)));
then
consider Y be
Subset-Family of X such that
A5: Y
c= (
FinMeetCl (
UniCl A)) and
A6: x
= (
union Y) by
CANTOR_1:def 1;
Y
c= (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl A))
proof
let y be
object;
reconsider yy = y as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume y
in Y;
then
consider Z be
Subset-Family of X such that
A7: Z
c= (
UniCl A) and
A8: Z is
finite and
A9: y
= (
Intersect Z) by
A5,
CANTOR_1:def 3;
per cases ;
suppose Z
=
{} ;
then y
= X by
A9,
SETFAM_1:def 9;
then
A10: y
in (
FinMeetCl A) by
CANTOR_1: 8;
(
FinMeetCl A)
c= (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl A)) by
CANTOR_1: 1;
hence thesis by
A10;
end;
suppose
A11: Z
<>
{} ;
then
A12: y
= (
meet Z) by
A9,
SETFAM_1:def 9;
set G = { (
meet (
rng f)) where f be
Element of (
Funcs (Z,A)) : for z be
set st z
in Z holds (f
. z)
c= z };
A13: G
c= (
FinMeetCl A)
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in G;
then
consider f be
Element of (
Funcs (Z,A)) such that
A14: a
= (
meet (
rng f)) and for z be
set st z
in Z holds (f
. z)
c= z;
reconsider B = (
rng f) as
Subset-Family of X by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
reconsider B as
Subset-Family of X;
(
Intersect B)
= a by
A11,
A14,
SETFAM_1:def 9;
hence thesis by
A8,
CANTOR_1:def 3;
end;
then
reconsider G as
Subset-Family of X by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
reconsider G as
Subset-Family of X;
(
union G)
= yy
proof
hereby
let a be
object;
assume a
in (
union G);
then
consider b be
set such that
A15: a
in b and
A16: b
in G by
TARSKI:def 4;
consider f be
Element of (
Funcs (Z,A)) such that
A17: b
= (
meet (
rng f)) and
A18: for z be
set st z
in Z holds (f
. z)
c= z by
A16;
A19: (
dom f)
= Z by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
reconsider B = (
rng f) as
Subset-Family of X by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
reconsider B as
Subset-Family of X;
b
c= yy
proof
let c be
object;
assume
A20: c
in b;
now
let d be
set;
assume
A21: d
in Z;
then (f
. d)
in B by
A19,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
A22: b
c= (f
. d) by
A17,
SETFAM_1: 3;
A23: (f
. d)
c= d by
A18,
A21;
c
in (f
. d) by
A20,
A22;
hence c
in d by
A23;
end;
hence thesis by
A11,
A12,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
end;
hence a
in yy by
A15;
end;
let a be
object;
assume
A24: a
in yy;
defpred
P[
object,
object] means ex A,B be
set st A
= $1 & B
= $2 & a
in B & B
c= A;
A25:
now
let z be
object;
assume
A26: z
in Z;
reconsider zz = z as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
A27: a
in zz by
A12,
A24,
SETFAM_1:def 1,
A26;
consider C be
Subset-Family of X such that
A28: C
c= A and
A29: z
= (
union C) by
A7,
A26,
CANTOR_1:def 1;
consider w be
set such that
A30: a
in w and
A31: w
in C by
A27,
A29,
TARSKI:def 4;
reconsider w as
object;
take w;
thus w
in A by
A28,
A31;
thus
P[z, w] by
A29,
A30,
A31,
ZFMISC_1: 74;
end;
consider f be
Function such that
A32: (
dom f)
= Z & (
rng f)
c= A and
A33: for z be
object st z
in Z holds
P[z, (f
. z)] from
FUNCT_1:sch 6(
A25);
reconsider f as
Element of (
Funcs (Z,A)) by
A32,
FUNCT_2:def 2;
for z be
set st z
in Z holds (f
. z)
c= z
proof
let z be
set;
assume z
in Z;
then
P[z, (f
. z)] by
A33;
hence thesis;
end;
then
A34: (
meet (
rng f))
in G;
now
thus (
rng f)
<>
{} by
A11;
let y be
set;
assume y
in (
rng f);
then
consider z be
object such that
A35: z
in Z & y
= (f
. z) by
A32,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
P[z, (f
. z)] by
A33,
A35;
hence a
in y by
A35;
end;
then a
in (
meet (
rng f)) by
SETFAM_1:def 1;
hence thesis by
A34,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
hence thesis by
A13,
CANTOR_1:def 1;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A6,
CANTOR_1:def 1;
end;
(
FinMeetCl A)
c= (
FinMeetCl (
UniCl A)) by
CANTOR_1: 1,
CANTOR_1: 14;
then
A36: (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl A))
c= (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl (
UniCl A))) by
CANTOR_1: 9;
(
UniCl (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl A)))
= (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl A)) by
Th15;
hence thesis by
A4,
A36;
end;
end;
begin
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:22
Th22: for T be
TopSpace, K be
Subset-Family of T holds the
topology of T
= (
UniCl K) iff K is
Basis of T
proof
let T be
TopSpace, K be
Subset-Family of T;
thus the
topology of T
= (
UniCl K) implies K is
Basis of T by
CANTOR_1: 1,
CANTOR_1:def 2,
TOPS_2: 64;
assume
A1: K is
Basis of T;
then K
c= the
topology of T by
TOPS_2: 64;
then
A2: (
UniCl K)
c= (
UniCl the
topology of T) by
CANTOR_1: 9;
the
topology of T
c= (
UniCl K) by
A1,
CANTOR_1:def 2;
hence the
topology of T
c= (
UniCl K) & (
UniCl K)
c= the
topology of T by
A2,
CANTOR_1: 6;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:23
Th23: for T be
TopSpace, K be
Subset-Family of T holds K is
prebasis of T iff (
FinMeetCl K) is
Basis of T
proof
let T be
TopSpace, BB be
Subset-Family of T;
A1: T is
empty implies the
topology of T
= (
bool the
carrier of T) by
ZFMISC_1: 1,
Th8;
thus BB is
prebasis of T implies (
FinMeetCl BB) is
Basis of T
proof
assume
A2: BB is
prebasis of T;
then BB
c= the
topology of T by
TOPS_2: 64;
then (
FinMeetCl BB)
c= (
FinMeetCl the
topology of T) by
CANTOR_1: 14;
then
A3: (
FinMeetCl BB)
c= the
topology of T by
A1,
CANTOR_1: 5;
consider A be
Basis of T such that
A4: A
c= (
FinMeetCl BB) by
A2,
CANTOR_1:def 4;
A5: the
topology of T
c= (
UniCl A) by
CANTOR_1:def 2;
(
UniCl A)
c= (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl BB)) by
A4,
CANTOR_1: 9;
then the
topology of T
c= (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl BB)) by
A5;
hence thesis by
A3,
CANTOR_1:def 2,
TOPS_2: 64;
end;
assume
A6: (
FinMeetCl BB) is
Basis of T;
A7: BB
c= (
FinMeetCl BB) by
CANTOR_1: 4;
(
FinMeetCl BB)
c= the
topology of T by
A6,
TOPS_2: 64;
then BB
c= the
topology of T by
A7;
hence thesis by
A6,
CANTOR_1:def 4,
TOPS_2: 64;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:24
Th24: for T be non
empty
TopSpace, B be
Subset-Family of T st (
UniCl B) is
prebasis of T holds B is
prebasis of T
proof
let T be non
empty
TopSpace, B be
Subset-Family of T;
assume (
UniCl B) is
prebasis of T;
then (
FinMeetCl (
UniCl B)) is
Basis of T by
Th23;
then (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl (
UniCl B)))
= the
topology of T by
Th22;
then (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl B))
= the
topology of T by
Th21;
then (
FinMeetCl B) is
Basis of T by
Th22;
hence thesis by
Th23;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:25
Th25: for T1,T2 be
TopSpace, B be
Basis of T1 st the
carrier of T1
= the
carrier of T2 & B is
Basis of T2 holds the
topology of T1
= the
topology of T2
proof
let T1,T2 be
TopSpace, B be
Basis of T1;
assume that
A1: the
carrier of T1
= the
carrier of T2 and
A2: B is
Basis of T2;
reconsider C = B as
Basis of T2 by
A2;
thus the
topology of T1
= (
UniCl C) by
A1,
Th22
.= the
topology of T2 by
Th22;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:26
Th26: for T1,T2 be
TopSpace, P be
prebasis of T1 st the
carrier of T1
= the
carrier of T2 & P is
prebasis of T2 holds the
topology of T1
= the
topology of T2
proof
let T1,T2 be
TopSpace, P be
prebasis of T1;
assume that
A1: the
carrier of T1
= the
carrier of T2 and
A2: P is
prebasis of T2;
reconsider C = P as
prebasis of T2 by
A2;
A3: (
FinMeetCl P) is
Basis of T1 by
Th23;
(
FinMeetCl C) is
Basis of T2 by
Th23;
hence thesis by
A1,
A3,
Th25;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:27
for T be
TopSpace, K be
Basis of T holds K is
open & K is
prebasis of T;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:28
for T be
TopSpace, K be
prebasis of T holds K is
open;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:29
Th29: for T be non
empty
TopSpace, B be
prebasis of T holds (B
\/
{the
carrier of T}) is
prebasis of T
proof
let T be non
empty
TopSpace, B be
prebasis of T;
set C = (B
\/
{the
carrier of T});
A1: the
carrier of T
in the
topology of T by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
A2: B
c= the
topology of T by
TOPS_2: 64;
A3:
{the
carrier of T}
c= the
topology of T by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then C
c= the
topology of T by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
then
reconsider C as
Subset-Family of T by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
A4: C
c= the
topology of T by
A2,
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
A5: (
FinMeetCl B)
c= (
FinMeetCl C) by
CANTOR_1: 14,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
(
FinMeetCl B) is
Basis of T by
Th23;
hence thesis by
A4,
A5,
CANTOR_1:def 4,
TOPS_2: 64;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:30
for T be
TopSpace, B be
Basis of T holds (B
\/
{the
carrier of T}) is
Basis of T
proof
let T be
TopSpace, B be
Basis of T;
set C = (B
\/
{the
carrier of T});
A1: the
carrier of T
in the
topology of T by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
A2: B
c= the
topology of T by
TOPS_2: 64;
A3:
{the
carrier of T}
c= the
topology of T by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then C
c= the
topology of T by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
then
reconsider C as
Subset-Family of T by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
A4: C
c= the
topology of T by
A2,
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
A5: (
UniCl B)
c= (
UniCl C) by
CANTOR_1: 9,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
the
topology of T
c= (
UniCl B) by
CANTOR_1:def 2;
then the
topology of T
c= (
UniCl C) by
A5;
hence thesis by
A4,
CANTOR_1:def 2,
TOPS_2: 64;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:31
Th31: for T be
TopSpace, B be
Basis of T holds for A be
Subset of T holds A is
open iff for p be
Point of T st p
in A holds ex a be
Subset of T st a
in B & p
in a & a
c= A
proof
let T be
TopSpace, K be
Basis of T, A be
Subset of T;
hereby
assume A is
open;
then
A1: A
= (
union { G where G be
Subset of T : G
in K & G
c= A }) by
YELLOW_8: 9;
let p be
Point of T;
assume p
in A;
then
consider Z be
set such that
A2: p
in Z and
A3: Z
in { G where G be
Subset of T : G
in K & G
c= A } by
A1,
TARSKI:def 4;
ex a be
Subset of T st Z
= a & a
in K & a
c= A by
A3;
hence ex a be
Subset of T st a
in K & p
in a & a
c= A by
A2;
end;
assume
A4: for p be
Point of T st p
in A holds ex a be
Subset of T st a
in K & p
in a & a
c= A;
set F = { G where G be
Subset of T : G
in K & G
c= A };
F
c= (
bool the
carrier of T)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in F;
then ex G be
Subset of T st x
= G & G
in K & G
c= A;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider F as
Subset-Family of T;
reconsider F as
Subset-Family of T;
A5: F is
open
proof
let x be
Subset of T;
assume x
in F;
then
A6: ex G be
Subset of T st x
= G & G
in K & G
c= A;
K
c= the
topology of T by
TOPS_2: 64;
hence x
in the
topology of T by
A6;
end;
A
= (
union F)
proof
hereby
let x be
object;
assume
A7: x
in A;
then
reconsider p = x as
Point of T;
consider a be
Subset of T such that
A8: a
in K and
A9: p
in a and
A10: a
c= A by
A4,
A7;
a
in F by
A8,
A10;
hence x
in (
union F) by
A9,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
F
c= (
bool A)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in F;
then ex G be
Subset of T st x
= G & G
in K & G
c= A;
hence thesis;
end;
then (
union F)
c= (
union (
bool A)) by
ZFMISC_1: 77;
hence thesis by
ZFMISC_1: 81;
end;
hence thesis by
A5,
TOPS_2: 19;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:32
Th32: for T be
TopSpace, B be
Subset-Family of T st B
c= the
topology of T & for A be
Subset of T st A is
open holds for p be
Point of T st p
in A holds ex a be
Subset of T st a
in B & p
in a & a
c= A holds B is
Basis of T
proof
let T be
TopSpace, B be
Subset-Family of T such that
A1: B
c= the
topology of T and
A2: for A be
Subset of T st A is
open holds for p be
Point of T st p
in A holds ex a be
Subset of T st a
in B & p
in a & a
c= A;
A3: B is
open by
A1,
TOPS_2: 64;
B is
quasi_basis
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A4: x
in the
topology of T;
then
reconsider A = x as
Subset of T;
set Y = { V where V be
Subset of T : V
in B & V
c= A };
Y
c= (
bool the
carrier of T)
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in Y;
then ex V be
Subset of T st y
= V & V
in B & V
c= A;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider Y as
Subset-Family of T;
A5: Y
c= B
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in Y;
then ex V be
Subset of T st y
= V & V
in B & V
c= A;
hence thesis;
end;
A
= (
union Y)
proof
hereby
let p be
object;
assume
A6: p
in A;
then p
in A;
then
reconsider q = p as
Point of T;
A is
open by
A4;
then
consider a be
Subset of T such that
A7: a
in B and
A8: q
in a and
A9: a
c= A by
A2,
A6;
a
in Y by
A7,
A9;
hence p
in (
union Y) by
A8,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
let p be
object;
assume p
in (
union Y);
then
consider a be
set such that
A10: p
in a and
A11: a
in Y by
TARSKI:def 4;
ex V be
Subset of T st a
= V & V
in B & V
c= A by
A11;
hence thesis by
A10;
end;
hence thesis by
A5,
CANTOR_1:def 1;
end;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:33
Th33: for S be
TopSpace, T be non
empty
TopSpace, K be
Basis of T holds for f be
Function of S, T holds f is
continuous iff for A be
Subset of T st A
in K holds (f
" (A
` )) is
closed
proof
let S be
TopSpace, T be non
empty
TopSpace, BB be
Basis of T, f be
Function of S, T;
A1: BB
c= the
topology of T by
TOPS_2: 64;
hereby
assume
A2: f is
continuous;
let A be
Subset of T;
assume A
in BB;
then A is
open by
A1;
then (A
` ) is
closed by
TOPS_1: 4;
hence (f
" (A
` )) is
closed by
A2;
end;
assume
A3: for A be
Subset of T st A
in BB holds (f
" (A
` )) is
closed;
let A be
Subset of T;
assume A is
closed;
then (A
` ) is
open by
TOPS_1: 3;
then
A4: (A
` )
= (
union { G where G be
Subset of T : G
in BB & G
c= (A
` ) }) by
YELLOW_8: 9;
set F = { (f
" G) where G be
Subset of T : G
in BB & G
c= (A
` ) };
F
c= (
bool the
carrier of S)
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in F;
then ex G be
Subset of T st a
= (f
" G) & G
in BB & G
c= (A
` );
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider F as
Subset-Family of S;
reconsider F as
Subset-Family of S;
F
c= the
topology of S
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in F;
then
consider G be
Subset of T such that
A5: a
= (f
" G) and
A6: G
in BB and G
c= (A
` );
A7: (f
" (G
` )) is
closed by
A3,
A6;
((f
" G)
` )
= (f
" (G
` )) by
Th2;
then (f
" G) is
open by
A7,
TOPS_1: 4;
hence thesis by
A5;
end;
then
A8: (
union F)
in the
topology of S by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
defpred
P[
Subset of T] means $1
in BB & $1
c= (A
` );
deffunc
F(
Subset of T) = $1;
(f
" (
union {
F(G) where G be
Subset of T :
P[G] }))
= (
union { (f
"
F(G)) where G be
Subset of T :
P[G] }) from
ABC;
then (f
" (A
` )) is
open by
A4,
A8;
then ((f
" A)
` ) is
open by
Th2;
hence thesis by
TOPS_1: 3;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:34
for S be
TopSpace, T be non
empty
TopSpace, K be
Basis of T holds for f be
Function of S, T holds f is
continuous iff for A be
Subset of T st A
in K holds (f
" A) is
open
proof
let S be
TopSpace, T be non
empty
TopSpace, K be
Basis of T;
let f be
Function of S, T;
hereby
assume
A1: f is
continuous;
let A be
Subset of T;
assume A
in K;
then (f
" (A
` )) is
closed by
A1,
Th33;
then ((f
" A)
` ) is
closed by
Th2;
hence (f
" A) is
open by
TOPS_1: 4;
end;
assume
A2: for A be
Subset of T st A
in K holds (f
" A) is
open;
now
let A be
Subset of T;
assume A
in K;
then (f
" A) is
open by
A2;
then ((f
" A)
` ) is
closed by
TOPS_1: 4;
hence (f
" (A
` )) is
closed by
Th2;
end;
hence thesis by
Th33;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:35
Th35: for S be
TopSpace, T be non
empty
TopSpace, K be
prebasis of T holds for f be
Function of S, T holds f is
continuous iff for A be
Subset of T st A
in K holds (f
" (A
` )) is
closed
proof
let S be
TopSpace, T be non
empty
TopSpace, BB be
prebasis of T, f be
Function of S, T;
A1: BB
c= the
topology of T by
TOPS_2: 64;
hereby
assume
A2: f is
continuous;
let A be
Subset of T;
assume A
in BB;
then A is
open by
A1;
then (A
` ) is
closed by
TOPS_1: 4;
hence (f
" (A
` )) is
closed by
A2;
end;
assume
A3: for A be
Subset of T st A
in BB holds (f
" (A
` )) is
closed;
reconsider C = (
FinMeetCl BB) as
Basis of T by
Th23;
now
let A be
Subset of T;
assume A
in C;
then
consider Y be
Subset-Family of T such that
A4: Y
c= BB and
A5: Y is
finite and
A6: A
= (
Intersect Y) by
CANTOR_1:def 3;
reconsider Y as
Subset-Family of T;
reconsider CY = (
COMPLEMENT Y) as
Subset-Family of T;
defpred
P[
set] means $1
in Y;
deffunc
F(
Subset of T) = ($1
` );
A7: (f
" (A
` ))
= (f
" (
union CY)) by
A6,
YELLOW_8: 7
.= (f
" (
union {
F(a) where a be
Subset of T :
P[a] })) by
Th3
.= (
union { (f
"
F(y)) where y be
Subset of T :
P[y] }) from
ABC;
set X = { (f
" (y
` )) where y be
Subset of T : y
in Y };
X
c= (
bool the
carrier of S)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in X;
then ex y be
Subset of T st x
= (f
" (y
` )) & y
in Y;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider X as
Subset-Family of S;
reconsider X as
Subset-Family of S;
A8: X is
closed
proof
let a be
Subset of S;
assume a
in X;
then ex y be
Subset of T st a
= (f
" (y
` )) & y
in Y;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4;
end;
A9: Y is
finite by
A5;
deffunc
F(
Subset of T) = (f
" ($1
` ));
{
F(y) where y be
Subset of T : y
in Y } is
finite from
FRAENKEL:sch 21(
A9);
hence (f
" (A
` )) is
closed by
A7,
A8,
TOPS_2: 21;
end;
hence thesis by
Th33;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:36
for S be
TopSpace, T be non
empty
TopSpace, K be
prebasis of T holds for f be
Function of S, T holds f is
continuous iff for A be
Subset of T st A
in K holds (f
" A) is
open
proof
let S be
TopSpace, T be non
empty
TopSpace, K be
prebasis of T;
let f be
Function of S, T;
hereby
assume
A1: f is
continuous;
let A be
Subset of T;
assume A
in K;
then (f
" (A
` )) is
closed by
A1,
Th35;
then ((f
" A)
` ) is
closed by
Th2;
hence (f
" A) is
open by
TOPS_1: 4;
end;
assume
A2: for A be
Subset of T st A
in K holds (f
" A) is
open;
now
let A be
Subset of T;
assume A
in K;
then (f
" A) is
open by
A2;
then ((f
" A)
` ) is
closed by
TOPS_1: 4;
hence (f
" (A
` )) is
closed by
Th2;
end;
hence thesis by
Th35;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:37
Th37: for T be non
empty
TopSpace, x be
Point of T, X be
Subset of T holds for K be
Basis of T st for A be
Subset of T st A
in K & x
in A holds A
meets X holds x
in (
Cl X)
proof
let T be non
empty
TopSpace, x be
Point of T, X be
Subset of T;
let BB be
Basis of T such that
A1: for A be
Subset of T st A
in BB & x
in A holds A
meets X;
now
let G be
a_neighborhood of x;
A2: (
Int G)
= (
union { A where A be
Subset of T : A
in BB & A
c= G }) by
YELLOW_8: 11;
x
in (
Int G) by
CONNSP_2:def 1;
then
consider Z be
set such that
A3: x
in Z and
A4: Z
in { A where A be
Subset of T : A
in BB & A
c= G } by
A2,
TARSKI:def 4;
ex A be
Subset of T st (Z
= A) & (A
in BB) & (A
c= G) by
A4;
hence G
meets X by
A1,
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 63;
end;
hence thesis by
CONNSP_2: 27;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:38
Th38: for T be non
empty
TopSpace, x be
Point of T, X be
Subset of T holds for K be
prebasis of T st for Z be
finite
Subset-Family of T st Z
c= K & x
in (
Intersect Z) holds (
Intersect Z)
meets X holds x
in (
Cl X)
proof
let T be non
empty
TopSpace, x be
Point of T, X be
Subset of T;
let BB be
prebasis of T such that
A1: for Z be
finite
Subset-Family of T st Z
c= BB & x
in (
Intersect Z) holds (
Intersect Z)
meets X;
reconsider BB9 = (
FinMeetCl BB) as
Basis of T by
Th23;
now
let A be
Subset of T;
assume A
in BB9;
then
A2: ex Y be
Subset-Family of T st (Y
c= BB) & (Y is
finite) & (A
= (
Intersect Y)) by
CANTOR_1:def 3;
assume x
in A;
hence A
meets X by
A1,
A2;
end;
hence thesis by
Th37;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:39
for T be non
empty
TopSpace, K be
prebasis of T, x be
Point of T holds for N be
net of T st for A be
Subset of T st A
in K & x
in A holds N
is_eventually_in A holds for S be
Subset of T st (
rng (
netmap (N,T)))
c= S holds x
in (
Cl S)
proof
let T be non
empty
TopSpace, BB be
prebasis of T, x be
Point of T, N be
net of T such that
A1: for A be
Subset of T st A
in BB & x
in A holds N
is_eventually_in A;
let S be
Subset of T such that
A2: (
rng (
netmap (N,T)))
c= S;
A3: (
[#] N) is
directed by
WAYBEL_0:def 6;
now
let Z be
finite
Subset-Family of T;
assume that
A4: Z
c= BB and
A5: x
in (
Intersect Z);
defpred
P[
object,
object] means for i,j be
Element of N st $2
= i & i
<= j holds ex pp be
set st pp
= $1 & (N
. j)
in pp;
A6:
now
let a be
object;
assume
A7: a
in Z;
then
reconsider A = a as
Subset of T;
x
in A by
A5,
A7,
SETFAM_1: 43;
then N
is_eventually_in A by
A1,
A4,
A7;
then
consider i be
Element of N such that
A8: for j be
Element of N st i
<= j holds (N
. j)
in A;
reconsider b = i as
object;
take b;
thus b
in the
carrier of N &
P[a, b] by
A8;
end;
consider f be
Function such that
A9: (
dom f)
= Z & (
rng f)
c= the
carrier of N & for a be
object st a
in Z holds
P[a, (f
. a)] from
FUNCT_1:sch 6(
A6);
set k = the
Element of N;
per cases by
A9,
RELAT_1: 42;
suppose Z
=
{} ;
then
A10: (
Intersect Z)
= the
carrier of T by
SETFAM_1:def 9;
(N
. k)
in (
rng (
netmap (N,T))) by
FUNCT_2: 4;
hence (
Intersect Z)
meets S by
A2,
A10,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
end;
suppose (
rng f)
<>
{} ;
then
reconsider Y = (
rng f) as
finite non
empty
Subset of N by
A9,
FINSET_1: 8;
consider i be
Element of N such that i
in the
carrier of N and
A11: i
is_>=_than Y by
A3,
WAYBEL_0: 1;
now
let y be
set;
assume
A12: y
in Z;
then
A13: (f
. y)
in Y by
A9,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
reconsider j = (f
. y) as
Element of N;
A14: j
<= i by
A11,
A13,
LATTICE3:def 9;
P[y, j] by
A9,
A12;
then ex pp be
set st pp
= y & (N
. i)
in pp by
A14;
hence (N
. i)
in y;
end;
then
A15: (N
. i)
in (
Intersect Z) by
SETFAM_1: 43;
(N
. i)
in (
rng (
netmap (N,T))) by
FUNCT_2: 4;
hence (
Intersect Z)
meets S by
A2,
A15,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
Th38;
end;
begin
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:40
Th40: for T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace holds for B1 be
Basis of T1, B2 be
Basis of T2 holds {
[:a, b:] where a be
Subset of T1, b be
Subset of T2 : a
in B1 & b
in B2 } is
Basis of
[:T1, T2:]
proof
let T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace;
let B1 be
Basis of T1, B2 be
Basis of T2;
set BB = {
[:a, b:] where a be
Subset of T1, b be
Subset of T2 : a
in B1 & b
in B2 };
set T =
[:T1, T2:];
A1: the
carrier of T
=
[:the
carrier of T1, the
carrier of T2:] by
BORSUK_1:def 2;
BB
c= (
bool the
carrier of T)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in BB;
then ex a be
Subset of T1, b be
Subset of T2 st x
=
[:a, b:] & a
in B1 & b
in B2;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider BB as
Subset-Family of T;
A2: B1
c= the
topology of T1 by
TOPS_2: 64;
A3: B2
c= the
topology of T2 by
TOPS_2: 64;
BB is
Basis of T
proof
A4: BB is
open
proof
let x be
Subset of T;
assume x
in BB;
then
consider a be
Subset of T1, b be
Subset of T2 such that
A5: x
=
[:a, b:] and
A6: a
in B1 and
A7: b
in B2;
A8: a is
open by
A2,
A6;
b is
open by
A3,
A7;
hence x is
open by
A5,
A8,
BORSUK_1: 6;
end;
BB is
quasi_basis
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A9: x
in the
topology of T;
then
reconsider X = x as
Subset of T;
X is
open by
A9;
then
A10: X
= (
union (
Base-Appr X)) by
BORSUK_1: 13;
set Y = (BB
/\ (
Base-Appr X));
A11: Y
c= BB by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
reconsider Y as
Subset-Family of T;
(
union Y)
= X
proof
thus (
union Y)
c= X by
A10,
XBOOLE_1: 17,
ZFMISC_1: 77;
let z be
object;
assume
A12: z
in X;
then
reconsider p = z as
Point of T;
consider z1,z2 be
object such that
A13: z1
in the
carrier of T1 and
A14: z2
in the
carrier of T2 and
A15: p
=
[z1, z2] by
A1,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider z1 as
Point of T1 by
A13;
reconsider z2 as
Point of T2 by
A14;
consider Z be
set such that
A16: z
in Z and
A17: Z
in (
Base-Appr X) by
A10,
A12,
TARSKI:def 4;
A18: (
Base-Appr X)
= {
[:a, b:] where a be
Subset of T1, b be
Subset of T2 :
[:a, b:]
c= X & a is
open & b is
open } by
BORSUK_1:def 3;
then
consider a be
Subset of T1, b be
Subset of T2 such that
A19: Z
=
[:a, b:] and
A20:
[:a, b:]
c= X and
A21: a is
open and
A22: b is
open by
A17;
A23: z1
in a by
A15,
A16,
A19,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
A24: z2
in b by
A15,
A16,
A19,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
consider a9 be
Subset of T1 such that
A25: a9
in B1 and
A26: z1
in a9 and
A27: a9
c= a by
A21,
A23,
Th31;
consider b9 be
Subset of T2 such that
A28: b9
in B2 and
A29: z2
in b9 and
A30: b9
c= b by
A22,
A24,
Th31;
[:a9, b9:]
c=
[:a, b:] by
A27,
A30,
ZFMISC_1: 96;
then
A31:
[:a9, b9:]
c= X by
A20;
A32: a9 is
open by
A2,
A25;
b9 is
open by
A3,
A28;
then
A33:
[:a9, b9:]
in (
Base-Appr X) by
A18,
A31,
A32;
A34:
[:a9, b9:]
in BB by
A25,
A28;
A35: p
in
[:a9, b9:] by
A15,
A26,
A29,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
[:a9, b9:]
in Y by
A33,
A34,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence thesis by
A35,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
hence thesis by
A11,
CANTOR_1:def 1;
end;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:41
Th41: for T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace holds for B1 be
prebasis of T1, B2 be
prebasis of T2 holds ({
[:the
carrier of T1, b:] where b be
Subset of T2 : b
in B2 }
\/ {
[:a, the
carrier of T2:] where a be
Subset of T1 : a
in B1 }) is
prebasis of
[:T1, T2:]
proof
let T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace;
set T =
[:T1, T2:];
let B1 be
prebasis of T1, B2 be
prebasis of T2;
set C2 = {
[:the
carrier of T1, b:] where b be
Subset of T2 : b
in B2 };
set C1 = {
[:a, the
carrier of T2:] where a be
Subset of T1 : a
in B1 };
reconsider D1 = (
FinMeetCl B1) as
Basis of T1 by
Th23;
reconsider D2 = (
FinMeetCl B2) as
Basis of T2 by
Th23;
reconsider D = {
[:a, b:] where a be
Subset of T1, b be
Subset of T2 : a
in D1 & b
in D2 } as
Basis of T by
Th40;
the
carrier of T1
c= the
carrier of T1;
then
reconsider cT1 = the
carrier of T1 as
Subset of T1;
the
carrier of T2
c= the
carrier of T2;
then
reconsider cT2 = the
carrier of T2 as
Subset of T2;
A1: cT1
in the
topology of T1 by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
A2: cT2
in the
topology of T2 by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
A3: B1
c= the
topology of T1 by
TOPS_2: 64;
A4: B2
c= the
topology of T2 by
TOPS_2: 64;
C1
c= (
bool the
carrier of T)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in C1;
then ex a be
Subset of T1 st x
=
[:a, cT2:] & a
in B1;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider C1 as
Subset-Family of T;
reconsider C1 as
Subset-Family of T;
C2
c= (
bool the
carrier of T)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in C2;
then ex a be
Subset of T2 st x
=
[:cT1, a:] & a
in B2;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider C2 as
Subset-Family of T;
reconsider C2 as
Subset-Family of T;
reconsider C = (C2
\/ C1) as
Subset-Family of T;
C is
prebasis of T
proof
A5: C is
open
proof
let x be
Subset of T;
assume x
in C;
then x
in C1 or x
in C2 by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then (ex a be
Subset of T1 st x
=
[:a, cT2:] & a
in B1) or ex a be
Subset of T2 st x
=
[:cT1, a:] & a
in B2;
then
consider a be
Subset of T1, b be
Subset of T2 such that
A6: x
=
[:a, b:] and
A7: a
in the
topology of T1 and
A8: b
in the
topology of T2 by
A1,
A2,
A3,
A4;
A9: a is
open by
A7;
b is
open by
A8;
hence x is
open by
A6,
A9,
BORSUK_1: 6;
end;
C is
quasi_prebasis
proof
take D;
let d be
object;
assume d
in D;
then
consider a be
Subset of T1, b be
Subset of T2 such that
A10: d
=
[:a, b:] and
A11: a
in D1 and
A12: b
in D2;
consider aY be
Subset-Family of T1 such that
A13: aY
c= B1 and
A14: aY is
finite and
A15: a
= (
Intersect aY) by
A11,
CANTOR_1:def 3;
consider bY be
Subset-Family of T2 such that
A16: bY
c= B2 and
A17: bY is
finite and
A18: b
= (
Intersect bY) by
A12,
CANTOR_1:def 3;
deffunc
F(
Subset of T1) =
[:$1, cT2:];
A19: {
F(s) where s be
Subset of T1 : s
in aY } is
finite from
FRAENKEL:sch 21(
A14);
deffunc
G(
Subset of T2) =
[:cT1, $1:];
A20: {
G(s) where s be
Subset of T2 : s
in bY } is
finite from
FRAENKEL:sch 21(
A17);
set Y1 = {
[:s, cT2:] where s be
Subset of T1 : s
in aY };
set Y2 = {
[:cT1, s:] where s be
Subset of T2 : s
in bY };
A21: Y1
c= C
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in Y1;
then ex s be
Subset of T1 st (x
=
[:s, cT2:]) & (s
in aY);
then x
in C1 by
A13;
hence thesis by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
A22: Y2
c= C
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in Y2;
then ex s be
Subset of T2 st (x
=
[:cT1, s:]) & (s
in bY);
then x
in C2 by
A16;
hence thesis by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
set Y = (Y1
\/ Y2);
A23: Y
c= C by
A21,
A22,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
then
reconsider Y as
Subset-Family of T by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
(
Intersect Y)
=
[:a, b:]
proof
hereby
let p be
object;
assume
A24: p
in (
Intersect Y);
then
consider p1 be
Point of T1, p2 be
Point of T2 such that
A25: p
=
[p1, p2] by
BORSUK_1: 10;
now
let z be
set;
assume
A26: z
in aY;
then
reconsider z9 = z as
Subset of T1;
[:z9, cT2:]
in Y1 by
A26;
then
[:z9, cT2:]
in Y by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then p
in
[:z9, cT2:] by
A24,
SETFAM_1: 43;
hence p1
in z by
A25,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
end;
then
A27: p1
in a by
A15,
SETFAM_1: 43;
now
let z be
set;
assume
A28: z
in bY;
then
reconsider z9 = z as
Subset of T2;
[:cT1, z9:]
in Y2 by
A28;
then
[:cT1, z9:]
in Y by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then p
in
[:cT1, z9:] by
A24,
SETFAM_1: 43;
hence p2
in z by
A25,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
end;
then p2
in b by
A18,
SETFAM_1: 43;
hence p
in
[:a, b:] by
A25,
A27,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
end;
let p be
object;
assume p
in
[:a, b:];
then
consider p1,p2 be
object such that
A29: p1
in a and
A30: p2
in b and
A31:
[p1, p2]
= p by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider p1 as
Point of T1 by
A29;
reconsider p2 as
Point of T2 by
A30;
now
let z be
set;
assume
A32: z
in Y;
per cases by
A32,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose z
in Y1;
then
consider s be
Subset of T1 such that
A33: z
=
[:s, cT2:] and
A34: s
in aY;
p1
in s by
A15,
A29,
A34,
SETFAM_1: 43;
hence
[p1, p2]
in z by
A33,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
end;
suppose z
in Y2;
then
consider s be
Subset of T2 such that
A35: z
=
[:cT1, s:] and
A36: s
in bY;
p2
in s by
A18,
A30,
A36,
SETFAM_1: 43;
hence
[p1, p2]
in z by
A35,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A31,
SETFAM_1: 43;
end;
hence thesis by
A19,
A20,
A23,
CANTOR_1:def 3,
A10;
end;
hence thesis by
A5;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:42
for X1,X2 be
set, A be
Subset-Family of
[:X1, X2:] holds for A1 be non
empty
Subset-Family of X1 holds for A2 be non
empty
Subset-Family of X2 st A
= {
[:a, b:] where a be
Subset of X1, b be
Subset of X2 : a
in A1 & b
in A2 } holds (
Intersect A)
=
[:(
Intersect A1), (
Intersect A2):]
proof
let X1,X2 be
set, A be
Subset-Family of
[:X1, X2:];
let A1 be non
empty
Subset-Family of X1, A2 be non
empty
Subset-Family of X2 such that
A1: A
= {
[:a, b:] where a be
Subset of X1, b be
Subset of X2 : a
in A1 & b
in A2 };
hereby
let x be
object;
assume
A2: x
in (
Intersect A);
then
consider x1,x2 be
object such that
A3: x1
in X1 and
A4: x2
in X2 and
A5:
[x1, x2]
= x by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
set a1 = the
Element of A1, a2 = the
Element of A2;
reconsider a1 as
Subset of X1;
reconsider a2 as
Subset of X2;
now
let a be
set;
assume a
in A1;
then
[:a, a2:]
in A by
A1;
then x
in
[:a, a2:] by
A2,
SETFAM_1: 43;
hence x1
in a by
A5,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
end;
then
A6: x1
in (
Intersect A1) by
A3,
SETFAM_1: 43;
now
let a be
set;
assume a
in A2;
then
[:a1, a:]
in A by
A1;
then x
in
[:a1, a:] by
A2,
SETFAM_1: 43;
hence x2
in a by
A5,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
end;
then x2
in (
Intersect A2) by
A4,
SETFAM_1: 43;
hence x
in
[:(
Intersect A1), (
Intersect A2):] by
A5,
A6,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
end;
let x be
object;
assume
A7: x
in
[:(
Intersect A1), (
Intersect A2):];
then
consider x1,x2 be
object such that
A8: x1
in (
Intersect A1) and
A9: x2
in (
Intersect A2) and
A10:
[x1, x2]
= x by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
now
let c be
set;
assume c
in A;
then
consider a be
Subset of X1, b be
Subset of X2 such that
A11: c
=
[:a, b:] and
A12: a
in A1 and
A13: b
in A2 by
A1;
A14: x1
in a by
A8,
A12,
SETFAM_1: 43;
x2
in b by
A9,
A13,
SETFAM_1: 43;
hence x
in c by
A10,
A11,
A14,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
end;
hence thesis by
A7,
SETFAM_1: 43;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:43
for T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace holds for B1 be
prebasis of T1, B2 be
prebasis of T2 st (
union B1)
= the
carrier of T1 & (
union B2)
= the
carrier of T2 holds {
[:a, b:] where a be
Subset of T1, b be
Subset of T2 : a
in B1 & b
in B2 } is
prebasis of
[:T1, T2:]
proof
let T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace;
let B1 be
prebasis of T1, B2 be
prebasis of T2 such that
A1: (
union B1)
= the
carrier of T1 and
A2: (
union B2)
= the
carrier of T2;
set cT1 = the
carrier of T1, cT2 = the
carrier of T2;
set BB1 = {
[:the
carrier of T1, b:] where b be
Subset of T2 : b
in B2 }, BB2 = {
[:a, the
carrier of T2:] where a be
Subset of T1 : a
in B1 };
set CC = {
[:a, b:] where a be
Subset of T1, b be
Subset of T2 : a
in B1 & b
in B2 };
set T =
[:T1, T2:];
reconsider BB = (BB1
\/ BB2) as
prebasis of
[:T1, T2:] by
Th41;
A3: (
FinMeetCl BB) is
Basis of T by
Th23;
CC
c= (
bool the
carrier of
[:T1, T2:])
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in CC;
then ex a be
Subset of T1, b be
Subset of T2 st x
=
[:a, b:] & a
in B1 & b
in B2;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider CC as
Subset-Family of
[:T1, T2:];
reconsider CC as
Subset-Family of
[:T1, T2:];
CC
c= the
topology of T
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in CC;
then
consider a be
Subset of T1, b be
Subset of T2 such that
A4: x
=
[:a, b:] and
A5: a
in B1 and
A6: b
in B2;
A7: B1
c= the
topology of T1 by
TOPS_2: 64;
A8: B2
c= the
topology of T2 by
TOPS_2: 64;
A9: a is
open by
A5,
A7;
b is
open by
A6,
A8;
then
[:a, b:] is
open by
A9,
BORSUK_1: 6;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
then (
UniCl CC)
c= (
UniCl the
topology of T) by
CANTOR_1: 9;
then
A10: (
UniCl CC)
c= the
topology of T by
CANTOR_1: 6;
BB
c= (
UniCl CC)
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A11: x
in BB;
per cases by
A11,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose x
in BB1;
then
consider b be
Subset of T2 such that
A12: x
=
[:cT1, b:] and
A13: b
in B2;
set Y = {
[:a, b:] where a be
Subset of T1 : a
in B1 };
Y
c= (
bool the
carrier of T)
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in Y;
then ex a be
Subset of T1 st y
=
[:a, b:] & a
in B1;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider Y as
Subset-Family of T;
reconsider Y as
Subset-Family of T;
A14: Y
c= CC
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in Y;
then ex a be
Subset of T1 st y
=
[:a, b:] & a
in B1;
hence thesis by
A13;
end;
[:cT1, b:]
= (
union Y)
proof
hereby
let z be
object;
assume z
in
[:cT1, b:];
then
consider p1,p2 be
object such that
A15: p1
in cT1 and
A16: p2
in b and
A17:
[p1, p2]
= z by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
consider a be
set such that
A18: p1
in a and
A19: a
in B1 by
A1,
A15,
TARSKI:def 4;
reconsider a as
Subset of T1 by
A19;
A20:
[:a, b:]
in Y by
A19;
z
in
[:a, b:] by
A16,
A17,
A18,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
hence z
in (
union Y) by
A20,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
let z be
object;
assume z
in (
union Y);
then
consider y be
set such that
A21: z
in y and
A22: y
in Y by
TARSKI:def 4;
ex a be
Subset of T1 st y
=
[:a, b:] & a
in B1 by
A22;
then y
c=
[:cT1, b:] by
ZFMISC_1: 95;
hence thesis by
A21;
end;
hence thesis by
A14,
CANTOR_1:def 1,
A12;
end;
suppose x
in BB2;
then
consider a be
Subset of T1 such that
A23: x
=
[:a, cT2:] and
A24: a
in B1;
set Y = {
[:a, b:] where b be
Subset of T2 : b
in B2 };
Y
c= (
bool the
carrier of T)
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in Y;
then ex b be
Subset of T2 st y
=
[:a, b:] & b
in B2;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider Y as
Subset-Family of T;
reconsider Y as
Subset-Family of T;
A25: Y
c= CC
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in Y;
then ex b be
Subset of T2 st y
=
[:a, b:] & b
in B2;
hence thesis by
A24;
end;
[:a, cT2:]
= (
union Y)
proof
hereby
let z be
object;
assume z
in
[:a, cT2:];
then
consider p1,p2 be
object such that
A26: p1
in a and
A27: p2
in cT2 and
A28:
[p1, p2]
= z by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
consider b be
set such that
A29: p2
in b and
A30: b
in B2 by
A2,
A27,
TARSKI:def 4;
reconsider b as
Subset of T2 by
A30;
A31:
[:a, b:]
in Y by
A30;
z
in
[:a, b:] by
A26,
A28,
A29,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
hence z
in (
union Y) by
A31,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
let z be
object;
assume z
in (
union Y);
then
consider y be
set such that
A32: z
in y and
A33: y
in Y by
TARSKI:def 4;
ex b be
Subset of T2 st y
=
[:a, b:] & b
in B2 by
A33;
then y
c=
[:a, cT2:] by
ZFMISC_1: 95;
hence thesis by
A32;
end;
hence thesis by
A25,
CANTOR_1:def 1,
A23;
end;
end;
then (
FinMeetCl BB)
c= (
FinMeetCl (
UniCl CC)) by
CANTOR_1: 14;
then (
UniCl CC) is
prebasis of T by
A3,
A10,
CANTOR_1:def 4,
TOPS_2: 64;
hence thesis by
Th24;
end;
begin
definition
let R be
RelStr;
::
YELLOW_9:def4
mode
TopAugmentation of R ->
TopRelStr means
:
Def4: the RelStr of it
= the RelStr of R;
existence
proof
take
TopRelStr (# the
carrier of R, the
InternalRel of R, (
{} (
bool the
carrier of R)) #);
thus thesis;
end;
end
notation
let R be
RelStr;
let T be
TopAugmentation of R;
synonym T is
correct for T is
TopSpace-like;
end
registration
let R be
RelStr;
cluster
correct
discrete
strict for
TopAugmentation of R;
existence
proof
reconsider BB = (
bool the
carrier of R) as
Subset-Family of R;
set T =
TopRelStr (# the
carrier of R, the
InternalRel of R, BB #);
the RelStr of R
= the RelStr of T;
then
reconsider T as
TopAugmentation of R by
Def4;
take T;
T is
discrete
TopStruct by
TDLAT_3:def 1;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:44
for T be
TopRelStr holds T is
TopAugmentation of T
proof
let T be
TopRelStr;
thus the RelStr of T
= the RelStr of T;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:45
for S be
TopRelStr, T be
TopAugmentation of S holds S is
TopAugmentation of T
proof
let S be
TopRelStr, T be
TopAugmentation of S;
thus the RelStr of S
= the RelStr of T by
Def4;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:46
for R be
RelStr, T1 be
TopAugmentation of R holds for T2 be
TopAugmentation of T1 holds T2 is
TopAugmentation of R
proof
let R be
RelStr, T1 be
TopAugmentation of R;
let T2 be
TopAugmentation of T1;
thus the RelStr of T2
= the RelStr of T1 by
Def4
.= the RelStr of R by
Def4;
end;
registration
let R be non
empty
RelStr;
cluster -> non
empty for
TopAugmentation of R;
coherence
proof
let T be
TopAugmentation of R;
the RelStr of T
= the RelStr of R by
Def4;
hence the
carrier of T is non
empty;
end;
end
registration
let R be
reflexive
RelStr;
cluster ->
reflexive for
TopAugmentation of R;
coherence
proof
let T be
TopAugmentation of R;
the RelStr of T
= the RelStr of R by
Def4;
hence the
InternalRel of T
is_reflexive_in the
carrier of T by
ORDERS_2:def 2;
end;
end
registration
let R be
transitive
RelStr;
cluster ->
transitive for
TopAugmentation of R;
coherence
proof
let T be
TopAugmentation of R;
the RelStr of T
= the RelStr of R by
Def4;
then the
InternalRel of T
is_transitive_in the
carrier of T by
ORDERS_2:def 3;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let R be
antisymmetric
RelStr;
cluster ->
antisymmetric for
TopAugmentation of R;
coherence
proof
let T be
TopAugmentation of R;
the RelStr of T
= the RelStr of R by
Def4;
then the
InternalRel of T
is_antisymmetric_in the
carrier of T by
ORDERS_2:def 4;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let R be
complete non
empty
RelStr;
cluster ->
complete for
TopAugmentation of R;
coherence
proof
let T be
TopAugmentation of R;
the RelStr of T
= the RelStr of R by
Def4;
hence thesis by
YELLOW_0: 3;
end;
end
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:47
Th47: for S be
up-complete
antisymmetric non
empty
reflexive
RelStr, T be non
empty
reflexive
RelStr st the RelStr of S
= the RelStr of T holds for A be
Subset of S, C be
Subset of T st A
= C & A is
inaccessible holds C is
inaccessible
proof
let S be
up-complete
antisymmetric non
empty
reflexive
RelStr, T be non
empty
reflexive
RelStr such that
A1: the RelStr of S
= the RelStr of T;
let A be
Subset of S, C be
Subset of T such that
A2: A
= C and
A3: for D be non
empty
directed
Subset of S st (
sup D)
in A holds D
meets A;
let D be non
empty
directed
Subset of T such that
A4: (
sup D)
in C;
reconsider E = D as non
empty
directed
Subset of S by
A1,
WAYBEL_0: 3;
ex_sup_of (E,S) by
WAYBEL_0: 75;
then (
sup D)
= (
sup E) by
A1,
YELLOW_0: 26;
hence thesis by
A2,
A3,
A4;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:48
Th48: for S be non
empty
reflexive
RelStr, T be
TopAugmentation of S st the
topology of T
= (
sigma S) holds T is
correct
proof
let R be non
empty
reflexive
RelStr;
let T be
TopAugmentation of R such that
A1: the
topology of T
= (
sigma R);
A2: the RelStr of T
= the RelStr of R by
Def4;
set IT = (
ConvergenceSpace (
Scott-Convergence R));
A3: the
carrier of IT
= the
carrier of R by
YELLOW_6:def 24;
then
A4: the
carrier of T
in (
sigma R) by
A2,
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
A5: for a be
Subset-Family of T st a
c= the
topology of T holds (
union a)
in the
topology of T by
A1,
A2,
A3,
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
for a,b be
Subset of T st a
in the
topology of T & b
in the
topology of T holds (a
/\ b)
in the
topology of T by
A1,
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
hence thesis by
A1,
A4,
A5;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:49
Th49: for S be
complete
LATTICE, T be
TopAugmentation of S st the
topology of T
= (
sigma S) holds T is
Scott
proof
let R be
complete
LATTICE;
let T be
TopAugmentation of R such that
A1: the
topology of T
= (
sigma R);
A2: the RelStr of T
= the RelStr of R by
Def4;
T is
Scott
proof
let S be
Subset of T;
reconsider A = S as
Subset of R by
A2;
thus S is
open implies S is
inaccessible
upper by
A1,
WAYBEL11: 31,
A2,
Th47,
WAYBEL_0: 25;
assume S is
inaccessible
upper;
then A is
inaccessible
upper by
A2,
Th47,
WAYBEL_0: 25;
hence S
in the
topology of T by
A1,
WAYBEL11: 31;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
registration
let R be
complete
LATTICE;
cluster
Scott
strict
correct for
TopAugmentation of R;
existence
proof
set T =
TopRelStr (# the
carrier of R, the
InternalRel of R, (
sigma R) #);
the RelStr of T
= the RelStr of R;
then
reconsider T as
TopAugmentation of R by
Def4;
take T;
thus thesis by
Th48,
Th49;
end;
end
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:50
Th50: for S,T be
complete
Scott non
empty
reflexive
transitive
antisymmetric
TopRelStr st the RelStr of S
= the RelStr of T holds for F be
Subset of S, G be
Subset of T st F
= G holds F is
open implies G is
open
proof
let S,T be
complete
Scott non
empty
reflexive
transitive
antisymmetric
TopRelStr such that
A1: the RelStr of S
= the RelStr of T;
let F be
Subset of S, G be
Subset of T;
assume that
A2: F
= G and
A3: F is
open;
F is
upper
inaccessible by
A3,
WAYBEL11:def 4;
then G is
upper
inaccessible by
A1,
A2,
Th47,
WAYBEL_0: 25;
hence thesis by
WAYBEL11:def 4;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:51
Th51: for S be
complete
LATTICE, T be
Scott
TopAugmentation of S holds the
topology of T
= (
sigma S)
proof
let S be
complete
LATTICE;
let T be
Scott
TopAugmentation of S;
set R =
TopRelStr (# the
carrier of S, the
InternalRel of S, (
sigma S) #);
the RelStr of R
= the RelStr of S;
then
reconsider R as
TopAugmentation of S by
Def4;
reconsider R as
correct
Scott
TopAugmentation of S by
Th48,
Th49;
A1: the RelStr of T
= the RelStr of R by
Def4;
thus the
topology of T
c= (
sigma S)
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A2: x
in the
topology of T;
then
reconsider A = x as
Subset of T;
reconsider C = A as
Subset of R by
A1;
A is
open by
A2;
then C is
open by
A1,
Th50;
hence thesis;
end;
let x be
object;
assume
A3: x
in (
sigma S);
then
reconsider A = x as
Subset of R;
reconsider C = A as
Subset of T by
A1;
A is
open by
A3;
then C is
open by
A1,
Th50;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:52
for S,T be
complete
LATTICE st the RelStr of S
= the RelStr of T holds (
sigma S)
= (
sigma T)
proof
let S,T be
complete
LATTICE such that
A1: the RelStr of S
= the RelStr of T;
set A = the
Scott
correct
TopAugmentation of S;
the RelStr of A
= the RelStr of S by
Def4;
then A is
Scott
correct
TopAugmentation of T by
A1,
Def4;
then the
topology of A
= (
sigma T) by
Th51;
hence thesis by
Th51;
end;
registration
let R be
complete
LATTICE;
cluster
Scott ->
correct for
TopAugmentation of R;
coherence
proof
let T be
TopAugmentation of R;
assume T is
Scott;
then the
topology of T
= (
sigma R) by
Th51;
hence thesis by
Th48;
end;
end
Lm1: for S be
TopStruct holds ex T be
strict
TopSpace st the
carrier of T
= the
carrier of S & the
topology of S is
prebasis of T
proof
let S be
TopStruct;
set T =
TopStruct (# the
carrier of S, (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl the
topology of S)) #);
A1:
{
{} ,
{} }
=
{
{} } by
ENUMSET1: 29;
now
assume
A2: the
carrier of S
=
{} ;
then the
topology of S
=
{} or the
topology of S
=
{
{} } by
ZFMISC_1: 1,
ZFMISC_1: 33;
then (
FinMeetCl the
topology of S)
=
{
{} } by
A1,
A2,
Th11,
Th17;
then (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl the
topology of S))
=
{
{} } by
A1,
Th11;
hence T is
discrete
TopStruct by
A2,
TDLAT_3:def 1,
ZFMISC_1: 1;
end;
then
reconsider T as
strict
TopSpace by
CANTOR_1: 15;
take T;
A3: the
topology of S
c= (
FinMeetCl the
topology of S) by
CANTOR_1: 4;
(
FinMeetCl the
topology of S)
c= the
topology of T by
CANTOR_1: 1;
then
A4: the
topology of S
c= the
topology of T by
A3;
(
FinMeetCl the
topology of S) is
Basis of T by
Th22;
hence thesis by
A4,
CANTOR_1:def 4,
TOPS_2: 64;
end;
begin
definition
let T be
TopStruct;
::
YELLOW_9:def5
mode
TopExtension of T ->
TopSpace means
:
Def5: the
carrier of T
= the
carrier of it & the
topology of T
c= the
topology of it ;
existence
proof
consider R be
strict
TopSpace such that
A1: the
carrier of R
= the
carrier of T and
A2: the
topology of T is
prebasis of R by
Lm1;
take R;
thus thesis by
A1,
A2,
TOPS_2: 64;
end;
end
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:53
Th53: for S be
TopStruct holds ex T be
TopExtension of S st T is
strict & the
topology of S is
prebasis of T
proof
let S be
TopStruct;
consider T be
strict
TopSpace such that
A1: the
carrier of T
= the
carrier of S and
A2: the
topology of S is
prebasis of T by
Lm1;
the
topology of S
c= the
topology of T by
A2,
TOPS_2: 64;
then
reconsider T as
TopExtension of S by
A1,
Def5;
take T;
thus thesis by
A2;
end;
registration
let T be
TopStruct;
cluster
strict
discrete for
TopExtension of T;
existence
proof
reconsider S = (
bool the
carrier of T) as
Subset-Family of T;
reconsider S as
Subset-Family of T;
set R =
TopStruct (# the
carrier of T, S #);
A1: R is
discrete
TopStruct by
TDLAT_3:def 1;
the
topology of T
c= S;
then R is
TopExtension of T by
A1,
Def5;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
end
definition
let T1,T2 be
TopStruct;
::
YELLOW_9:def6
mode
Refinement of T1,T2 ->
TopSpace means
:
Def6: the
carrier of it
= (the
carrier of T1
\/ the
carrier of T2) & (the
topology of T1
\/ the
topology of T2) is
prebasis of it ;
existence
proof
set c1 = the
carrier of T1, c2 = the
carrier of T2;
set t1 = the
topology of T1, t2 = the
topology of T2;
A1: (
bool c1)
c= (
bool (c1
\/ c2)) by
XBOOLE_1: 7,
ZFMISC_1: 67;
A2: (
bool c2)
c= (
bool (c1
\/ c2)) by
XBOOLE_1: 7,
ZFMISC_1: 67;
A3: t1
c= (
bool (c1
\/ c2)) by
A1;
t2
c= (
bool (c1
\/ c2)) by
A2;
then
reconsider t = (t1
\/ t2) as
Subset-Family of (c1
\/ c2) by
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
reconsider t as
Subset-Family of (c1
\/ c2);
set S =
TopStruct (# (c1
\/ c2), t #);
consider T be
TopExtension of S such that
A4: T is
strict and
A5: t is
prebasis of T by
Th53;
reconsider T as
strict
TopExtension of S by
A4;
take T;
thus thesis by
A5,
Def5;
end;
end
registration
let T1 be non
empty
TopStruct, T2 be
TopStruct;
cluster -> non
empty for
Refinement of T1, T2;
coherence
proof
let T be
Refinement of T1, T2;
the
carrier of T
= (the
carrier of T2
\/ the
carrier of T1) by
Def6;
hence the
carrier of T is non
empty;
end;
cluster -> non
empty for
Refinement of T2, T1;
coherence
proof
let T be
Refinement of T2, T1;
the
carrier of T
= (the
carrier of T2
\/ the
carrier of T1) by
Def6;
hence the
carrier of T is non
empty;
end;
end
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:54
for T1,T2 be
TopStruct, T,T9 be
Refinement of T1, T2 holds the TopStruct of T
= the TopStruct of T9
proof
let T1,T2 be
TopStruct, T,T9 be
Refinement of T1, T2;
A1: the
carrier of T
= (the
carrier of T1
\/ the
carrier of T2) by
Def6;
A2: (the
topology of T1
\/ the
topology of T2) is
prebasis of T by
Def6;
A3: the
carrier of T9
= (the
carrier of T1
\/ the
carrier of T2) by
Def6;
(the
topology of T1
\/ the
topology of T2) is
prebasis of T9 by
Def6;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A3,
Th26;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:55
for T1,T2 be
TopStruct, T be
Refinement of T1, T2 holds T is
Refinement of T2, T1
proof
let T1,T2 be
TopStruct, T be
Refinement of T1, T2;
A1: the
carrier of T
= (the
carrier of T1
\/ the
carrier of T2) by
Def6;
(the
topology of T1
\/ the
topology of T2) is
prebasis of T by
Def6;
hence thesis by
A1,
Def6;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:56
for T1,T2 be
TopStruct, T be
Refinement of T1, T2 holds for X be
Subset-Family of T st X
= (the
topology of T1
\/ the
topology of T2) holds the
topology of T
= (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl X))
proof
let T1,T2 be
TopStruct, T be
Refinement of T1, T2;
let X be
Subset-Family of T;
assume X
= (the
topology of T1
\/ the
topology of T2);
then X is
prebasis of T by
Def6;
then (
FinMeetCl X) is
Basis of T by
Th23;
hence thesis by
Th22;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:57
for T1,T2 be
TopStruct st the
carrier of T1
= the
carrier of T2 holds for T be
Refinement of T1, T2 holds T is
TopExtension of T1 & T is
TopExtension of T2
proof
let T1,T2 be
TopStruct such that
A1: the
carrier of T1
= the
carrier of T2;
let T be
Refinement of T1, T2;
A2: the
carrier of T
= (the
carrier of T1
\/ the
carrier of T2) by
Def6
.= the
carrier of T1 by
A1;
A3: (the
topology of T1
\/ the
topology of T2) is
prebasis of T by
Def6;
A4: the
topology of T1
c= (the
topology of T1
\/ the
topology of T2) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
A5: the
topology of T2
c= (the
topology of T1
\/ the
topology of T2) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
A6: (the
topology of T1
\/ the
topology of T2)
c= the
topology of T by
A3,
TOPS_2: 64;
then
A7: the
topology of T1
c= the
topology of T by
A4;
the
topology of T2
c= the
topology of T by
A5,
A6;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A7,
Def5;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:58
for T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace, T be
Refinement of T1, T2 holds for B1 be
prebasis of T1, B2 be
prebasis of T2 holds ((B1
\/ B2)
\/
{the
carrier of T1, the
carrier of T2}) is
prebasis of T
proof
let T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace, T be
Refinement of T1, T2;
let B1 be
prebasis of T1, B2 be
prebasis of T2;
reconsider B = (the
topology of T1
\/ the
topology of T2) as
prebasis of T by
Def6;
set cT1 = the
carrier of T1, cT2 = the
carrier of T2;
reconsider C1 = (B1
\/
{cT1}) as
prebasis of T1 by
Th29;
reconsider C2 = (B2
\/
{cT2}) as
prebasis of T2 by
Th29;
A1: B1
c= the
topology of T1 by
TOPS_2: 64;
A2: C1
c= the
topology of T1 by
TOPS_2: 64;
A3: B2
c= the
topology of T2 by
TOPS_2: 64;
A4: C2
c= the
topology of T2 by
TOPS_2: 64;
A5: cT1
in the
topology of T1 by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
A6: cT2
in the
topology of T2 by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
A7: (B1
\/ B2)
c= B by
A1,
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 13;
A8: B
c= the
topology of T by
TOPS_2: 64;
A9: cT1
in B by
A5,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
A10: cT2
in B by
A6,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
A11: (B1
\/ B2)
c= the
topology of T by
A7,
A8;
A12:
{cT1, cT2}
c= the
topology of T by
A8,
A9,
A10,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
A13:
{cT1, cT2}
c= B by
A9,
A10,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
((B1
\/ B2)
\/
{cT1, cT2})
c= the
topology of T by
A11,
A12,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
then
reconsider BB = ((B1
\/ B2)
\/
{cT1, cT2}) as
Subset-Family of T by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
A14: the
topology of T1
c= B by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
A15: the
topology of T2
c= B by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
A16: C1
c= B by
A2,
A14;
C2
c= B by
A4,
A15;
then
reconsider D1 = C1, D2 = C2 as
Subset-Family of T by
A16,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
reconsider D1, D2 as
Subset-Family of T;
reconsider D1, D2 as
Subset-Family of T;
A17: (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl BB))
= (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl (
FinMeetCl BB))) by
CANTOR_1: 11
.= (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl BB)))) by
Th21;
A18: (
FinMeetCl B) is
Basis of T by
Th23;
A19: (
FinMeetCl C1) is
Basis of T1 by
Th23;
A20: (
FinMeetCl C2) is
Basis of T2 by
Th23;
A21: (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl B))
= the
topology of T by
A18,
Th22;
A22: (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl C1))
= the
topology of T1 by
A19,
Th22;
A23: (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl C2))
= the
topology of T2 by
A20,
Th22;
A24: B1
c= (B1
\/ B2) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
A25: B2
c= (B1
\/ B2) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
A26:
{cT1}
c=
{cT1, cT2} by
ZFMISC_1: 7;
A27:
{cT2}
c=
{cT1, cT2} by
ZFMISC_1: 7;
A28: D1
c= BB by
A24,
A26,
XBOOLE_1: 13;
A29: D2
c= BB by
A25,
A27,
XBOOLE_1: 13;
BB
c= B by
A7,
A13,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
then
A30: (
FinMeetCl BB)
c= (
FinMeetCl B) by
CANTOR_1: 14;
A31: (
FinMeetCl D1)
c= (
FinMeetCl BB) by
A28,
CANTOR_1: 14;
A32: (
FinMeetCl D2)
c= (
FinMeetCl BB) by
A29,
CANTOR_1: 14;
A33: (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl BB))
c= the
topology of T by
A21,
A30,
CANTOR_1: 9;
A34: cT1
in
{cT1} by
TARSKI:def 1;
A35: cT2
in
{cT2} by
TARSKI:def 1;
A36: cT1
in C1 by
A34,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
A37: cT2
in C2 by
A35,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
A38: (
FinMeetCl D1)
= (
{the
carrier of T}
\/ (
FinMeetCl C1)) by
A36,
Th20;
A39: (
FinMeetCl D2)
= (
{the
carrier of T}
\/ (
FinMeetCl C2)) by
A37,
Th20;
A40: (
FinMeetCl C1)
c= (
FinMeetCl D1) by
A38,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
A41: (
FinMeetCl C2)
c= (
FinMeetCl D2) by
A39,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
A42: (
FinMeetCl C1)
c= (
FinMeetCl BB) by
A31,
A40;
A43: (
FinMeetCl C2)
c= (
FinMeetCl BB) by
A32,
A41;
A44: the
topology of T1
c= (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl BB)) by
A22,
A42,
Th19;
the
topology of T2
c= (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl BB)) by
A23,
A43,
Th19;
then B
c= (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl BB)) by
A44,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
then (
FinMeetCl B)
c= (
FinMeetCl (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl BB))) by
CANTOR_1: 14;
then the
topology of T
c= (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl BB)) by
A17,
A21,
CANTOR_1: 9;
then the
topology of T
= (
UniCl (
FinMeetCl BB)) by
A33;
then (
FinMeetCl BB) is
Basis of T by
Th22;
hence thesis by
Th23;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:59
Th59: for T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace holds for B1 be
Basis of T1, B2 be
Basis of T2 holds for T be
Refinement of T1, T2 holds ((B1
\/ B2)
\/ (
INTERSECTION (B1,B2))) is
Basis of T
proof
let T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace;
let B1 be
Basis of T1, B2 be
Basis of T2;
let T be
Refinement of T1, T2;
set BB = ((B1
\/ B2)
\/ (
INTERSECTION (B1,B2)));
reconsider B = (the
topology of T1
\/ the
topology of T2) as
prebasis of T by
Def6;
A1: (
FinMeetCl B) is
Basis of T by
Th23;
A2: (the
carrier of T1
\/ the
carrier of T2)
= the
carrier of T by
Def6;
A3: B1
c= the
topology of T1 by
TOPS_2: 64;
A4: B2
c= the
topology of T2 by
TOPS_2: 64;
A5: the
topology of T1
c= B by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
A6: the
topology of T2
c= B by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
A7: B1
c= B by
A3,
A5;
A8: B2
c= B by
A4,
A6;
A9: B
c= (
FinMeetCl B) by
CANTOR_1: 4;
then
A10: B1
c= (
FinMeetCl B) by
A7;
A11: B2
c= (
FinMeetCl B) by
A8,
A9;
A12: (B1
\/ B2)
c= B by
A3,
A4,
XBOOLE_1: 13;
A13: (
INTERSECTION (B1,B2))
c= (
FinMeetCl B) by
A10,
A11,
CANTOR_1: 13;
(B1
\/ B2)
c= (
FinMeetCl B) by
A9,
A12;
then
A14: BB
c= (
FinMeetCl B) by
A13,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
A15: (
FinMeetCl B)
c= the
topology of T by
A1,
TOPS_2: 64;
reconsider BB as
Subset-Family of T by
A14,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
now
let A be
Subset of T such that
A16: A is
open;
let p be
Point of T;
assume p
in A;
then
consider a be
Subset of T such that
A17: a
in (
FinMeetCl B) and
A18: p
in a and
A19: a
c= A by
A1,
A16,
Th31;
consider Y be
Subset-Family of T such that
A20: Y
c= B and
A21: Y is
finite and
A22: a
= (
Intersect Y) by
A17,
CANTOR_1:def 3;
reconsider Y1 = (Y
/\ the
topology of T1) as
Subset-Family of T1;
reconsider Y2 = (Y
/\ the
topology of T2) as
Subset-Family of T2;
A23: Y
= (B
/\ Y) by
A20,
XBOOLE_1: 28
.= (Y1
\/ Y2) by
XBOOLE_1: 23;
the
carrier of T1
c= the
carrier of T1;
then
reconsider cT1 = the
carrier of T1 as
Subset of T1;
the
carrier of T2
c= the
carrier of T2;
then
reconsider cT2 = the
carrier of T2 as
Subset of T2;
A24: cT1
in the
topology of T1 by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
A25: cT2
in the
topology of T2 by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
A26: cT1 is
open by
A24;
A27: cT2 is
open by
A25;
thus ex a be
Subset of T st a
in BB & p
in a & a
c= A
proof
per cases by
A2,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
A28: (Y1
\/ Y2)
=
{} & p
in cT1;
then
consider b1 be
Subset of T1 such that
A29: b1
in B1 and
A30: p
in b1 and b1
c= cT1 by
A26,
Th31;
A31: b1
in (B1
\/ B2) by
A29,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
A32: a
= the
carrier of T by
A22,
A23,
A28,
SETFAM_1:def 9;
b1
in BB by
A31,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence thesis by
A19,
A30,
A32,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
end;
suppose
A33: (Y1
\/ Y2)
=
{} & p
in cT2;
then
consider b2 be
Subset of T2 such that
A34: b2
in B2 and
A35: p
in b2 and b2
c= cT2 by
A27,
Th31;
A36: b2
in (B1
\/ B2) by
A34,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
A37: a
= the
carrier of T by
A22,
A23,
A33,
SETFAM_1:def 9;
b2
in BB by
A36,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence thesis by
A19,
A35,
A37,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
end;
suppose
A38: Y1
=
{} & Y2
<>
{} & Y
<>
{} ;
then
A39: a
= (
meet Y2) by
A22,
A23,
SETFAM_1:def 9
.= (
Intersect Y2) by
A38,
SETFAM_1:def 9;
Y2
c= the
topology of T2 by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then a
in (
FinMeetCl the
topology of T2) by
A21,
A39,
CANTOR_1:def 3;
then
A40: a
in the
topology of T2 by
CANTOR_1: 5;
the
topology of T2
= (
UniCl B2) by
Th22;
then
consider Z be
Subset-Family of T2 such that
A41: Z
c= B2 and
A42: a
= (
union Z) by
A40,
CANTOR_1:def 1;
consider z be
set such that
A43: p
in z and
A44: z
in Z by
A18,
A42,
TARSKI:def 4;
z
in (B1
\/ B2) by
A41,
A44,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
A45: z
in BB by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
z
c= a by
A42,
A44,
ZFMISC_1: 74;
hence thesis by
A19,
A43,
A45,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
end;
suppose
A46: Y1
<>
{} & Y2
=
{} & Y
<>
{} ;
then
A47: a
= (
meet Y1) by
A22,
A23,
SETFAM_1:def 9
.= (
Intersect Y1) by
A46,
SETFAM_1:def 9;
Y1
c= the
topology of T1 by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then a
in (
FinMeetCl the
topology of T1) by
A21,
A47,
CANTOR_1:def 3;
then
A48: a
in the
topology of T1 by
CANTOR_1: 5;
the
topology of T1
= (
UniCl B1) by
Th22;
then
consider Z be
Subset-Family of T1 such that
A49: Z
c= B1 and
A50: a
= (
union Z) by
A48,
CANTOR_1:def 1;
consider z be
set such that
A51: p
in z and
A52: z
in Z by
A18,
A50,
TARSKI:def 4;
z
in (B1
\/ B2) by
A49,
A52,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
A53: z
in BB by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
z
c= a by
A50,
A52,
ZFMISC_1: 74;
hence thesis by
A19,
A51,
A53,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
end;
suppose
A54: Y1
<>
{} & Y2
<>
{} & Y
<>
{} ;
then
A55: a
= (
meet Y) by
A22,
SETFAM_1:def 9
.= ((
meet Y1)
/\ (
meet Y2)) by
A23,
A54,
SETFAM_1: 9
.= ((
meet Y1)
/\ (
Intersect Y2)) by
A54,
SETFAM_1:def 9
.= ((
Intersect Y1)
/\ (
Intersect Y2)) by
A54,
SETFAM_1:def 9;
A56: Y1
c= the
topology of T1 by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
A57: Y2
c= the
topology of T2 by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
A58: (
Intersect Y1)
in (
FinMeetCl the
topology of T1) by
A21,
A56,
CANTOR_1:def 3;
A59: (
Intersect Y2)
in (
FinMeetCl the
topology of T2) by
A21,
A57,
CANTOR_1:def 3;
A60: (
Intersect Y1)
in the
topology of T1 by
A58,
CANTOR_1: 5;
A61: the
topology of T1
= (
UniCl B1) by
Th22;
A62: (
Intersect Y2)
in the
topology of T2 by
A59,
CANTOR_1: 5;
A63: the
topology of T2
= (
UniCl B2) by
Th22;
consider Z1 be
Subset-Family of T1 such that
A64: Z1
c= B1 and
A65: (
Intersect Y1)
= (
union Z1) by
A60,
A61,
CANTOR_1:def 1;
p
in (
Intersect Y1) by
A18,
A55,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider z1 be
set such that
A66: p
in z1 and
A67: z1
in Z1 by
A65,
TARSKI:def 4;
consider Z2 be
Subset-Family of T2 such that
A68: Z2
c= B2 and
A69: (
Intersect Y2)
= (
union Z2) by
A62,
A63,
CANTOR_1:def 1;
p
in (
Intersect Y2) by
A18,
A55,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider z2 be
set such that
A70: p
in z2 and
A71: z2
in Z2 by
A69,
TARSKI:def 4;
A72: (z1
/\ z2)
in (
INTERSECTION (B1,B2)) by
A64,
A67,
A68,
A71,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
A73: z1
c= (
union Z1) by
A67,
ZFMISC_1: 74;
A74: z2
c= (
union Z2) by
A71,
ZFMISC_1: 74;
A75: (z1
/\ z2)
in BB by
A72,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
A76: (z1
/\ z2)
c= a by
A55,
A65,
A69,
A73,
A74,
XBOOLE_1: 27;
p
in (z1
/\ z2) by
A66,
A70,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence thesis by
A19,
A75,
A76,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
end;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A14,
A15,
Th32,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:60
Th60: for T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace st the
carrier of T1
= the
carrier of T2 holds for T be
Refinement of T1, T2 holds (
INTERSECTION (the
topology of T1,the
topology of T2)) is
Basis of T
proof
let T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace such that
A1: the
carrier of T1
= the
carrier of T2;
let T be
Refinement of T1, T2;
set B1 = the
topology of T1, B2 = the
topology of T2;
(
UniCl B1)
= B1 by
CANTOR_1: 6;
then
reconsider B1 as
Basis of T1 by
Th22;
(
UniCl B2)
= B2 by
CANTOR_1: 6;
then
reconsider B2 as
Basis of T2 by
Th22;
A2: ((B1
\/ B2)
\/ (
INTERSECTION (B1,B2))) is
Basis of T by
Th59;
A3: the
carrier of T1
in B1 by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
A4: the
carrier of T2
in B2 by
PRE_TOPC:def 1;
A5: B1
c= (
INTERSECTION (B1,B2))
proof
let a be
object;
reconsider aa = a as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume
A6: a
in B1;
then (aa
/\ the
carrier of T1)
in (
INTERSECTION (B1,B2)) by
A1,
A4,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
hence thesis by
A6,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
end;
B2
c= (
INTERSECTION (B1,B2))
proof
let a be
object;
reconsider aa = a as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume
A7: a
in B2;
then (aa
/\ the
carrier of T2)
in (
INTERSECTION (B1,B2)) by
A1,
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 5;
hence thesis by
A7,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
end;
hence thesis by
A2,
A5,
XBOOLE_1: 8,
XBOOLE_1: 12;
end;
theorem ::
YELLOW_9:61
for L be non
empty
RelStr holds for T1,T2 be
correct
TopAugmentation of L holds for T be
Refinement of T1, T2 holds (
INTERSECTION (the
topology of T1,the
topology of T2)) is
Basis of T
proof
let L be non
empty
RelStr;
let T1,T2 be
correct
TopAugmentation of L;
A1: the RelStr of T1
= the RelStr of L by
Def4;
the RelStr of T2
= the RelStr of L by
Def4;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th60;
end;