group_9.miz
begin
definition
let O,E be
set;
let A be
Action of O, E;
let IT be
set;
::
GROUP_9:def1
pred IT
is_stable_under_the_action_of A means for o be
Element of O, f be
Function of E, E st o
in O & f
= (A
. o) holds (f
.: IT)
c= IT;
end
definition
let O,E be
set;
let A be
Action of O, E;
let X be
Subset of E;
::
GROUP_9:def2
func
the_stable_subset_generated_by (X,A) ->
Subset of E means
:
Def2: X
c= it & it
is_stable_under_the_action_of A & for Y be
Subset of E st Y
is_stable_under_the_action_of A & X
c= Y holds it
c= Y;
existence
proof
defpred
P[
set] means ex B be
Subset of E st $1
= B & X
c= $1 & B
is_stable_under_the_action_of A;
consider XX be
set such that
A1: for Y be
set holds Y
in XX iff Y
in (
bool E) &
P[Y] from
XFAMILY:sch 1;
set M = (
meet XX);
(
[#] E)
is_stable_under_the_action_of A;
then
A2: E
in XX by
A1;
then for x be
object st x
in M holds x
in E by
SETFAM_1:def 1;
then
reconsider M as
Subset of E by
TARSKI:def 3;
take M;
now
let x be
object;
assume
A3: x
in X;
now
let Y be
set;
assume Y
in XX;
then ex B be
Subset of E st Y
= B & X
c= Y & B
is_stable_under_the_action_of A by
A1;
hence x
in Y by
A3;
end;
hence x
in M by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
end;
hence X
c= M;
now
let o be
Element of O;
let f be
Function of E, E;
assume
A4: o
in O;
assume
A5: f
= (A
. o);
now
let y be
object;
assume
A6: y
in (f
.: M);
now
let Y be
set;
assume
A7: Y
in XX;
then ex B be
Subset of E st Y
= B & X
c= Y & B
is_stable_under_the_action_of A by
A1;
then
A8: (f
.: Y)
c= Y by
A4,
A5;
(f
.: M)
c= (f
.: Y) by
A7,
RELAT_1: 123,
SETFAM_1: 3;
then (f
.: M)
c= Y by
A8;
hence y
in Y by
A6;
end;
hence y
in M by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
end;
hence (f
.: M)
c= M;
end;
hence M
is_stable_under_the_action_of A;
for Y be
Subset of E st Y
is_stable_under_the_action_of A & X
c= Y holds M
c= Y by
A1,
SETFAM_1: 3;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let B1,B2 be
Subset of E;
assume X
c= B1 & B1
is_stable_under_the_action_of A & (for Y be
Subset of E st Y
is_stable_under_the_action_of A & X
c= Y holds B1
c= Y) & X
c= B2 & (B2
is_stable_under_the_action_of A & for Y be
Subset of E st Y
is_stable_under_the_action_of A & X
c= Y holds B2
c= Y);
then B1
c= B2 & B2
c= B1;
hence thesis by
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
end;
end
definition
let O,E be
set;
let A be
Action of O, E;
let F be
FinSequence of O;
::
GROUP_9:def3
func
Product (F,A) ->
Function of E, E means
:
Def3: it
= (
id E) if (
len F)
=
0
otherwise ex PF be
FinSequence of (
Funcs (E,E)) st it
= (PF
. (
len F)) & (
len PF)
= (
len F) & (PF
. 1)
= (A
. (F
. 1)) & for n be
Nat st n
<>
0 & n
< (
len F) holds ex f,g be
Function of E, E st f
= (PF
. n) & g
= (A
. (F
. (n
+ 1))) & (PF
. (n
+ 1))
= (f
* g);
existence
proof
per cases ;
suppose (
len F)
=
0 ;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
A1: (
len F)
<>
0 ;
defpred
P[
Nat] means for F be
FinSequence of O st (
len F)
= $1 & (
len F)
<>
0 holds (ex PF be
FinSequence of (
Funcs (E,E)), IT be
Function of E, E st IT
= (PF
. (
len PF)) & (
len PF)
= (
len F) & (PF
. 1)
= (A
. (F
. 1)) & (for k be
Nat st k
<>
0 & k
< (
len F) holds ex f,g be
Function of E, E st f
= (PF
. k) & g
= (A
. (F
. (k
+ 1))) & (PF
. (k
+ 1))
= (f
* g)));
A2: for k be
Nat st
P[k] holds
P[(k
+ 1)]
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A3:
P[k];
thus
P[(k
+ 1)]
proof
let F be
FinSequence of O;
assume that
A4: (
len F)
= (k
+ 1) and (
len F)
<>
0 ;
reconsider G = (F
| (
Seg k)) as
FinSequence of O by
FINSEQ_1: 18;
A5: (
len G)
= k by
A4,
FINSEQ_3: 53;
per cases ;
suppose
A6: (
len G)
=
0 ;
set IT = (A
. (F
. 1));
1
in (
Seg (
len F)) by
A4,
A5,
A6;
then 1
in (
dom F) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (F
. 1)
in (
rng F) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then (F
. 1)
in O;
then (F
. 1)
in (
dom A) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A7: IT
in (
rng A) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
set f = the
Function of E, E;
reconsider IT as
Element of (
Funcs (E,E)) by
A7;
set PF =
<*IT*>;
ex f be
Function st IT
= f & (
dom f)
= E & (
rng f)
c= E by
FUNCT_2:def 2;
then
reconsider IT as
Function of E, E by
FUNCT_2: 2;
take PF, IT;
(
len PF)
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
hence IT
= (PF
. (
len PF)) by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
thus (
len PF)
= (
len F) by
A4,
A5,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
thus (PF
. 1)
= (A
. (F
. 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
let k be
Nat;
assume
A8: k
<>
0 & k
< (
len F);
take f, f;
thus f
= (PF
. k) & f
= (A
. (F
. (k
+ 1))) by
A4,
A5,
A6,
A8,
NAT_1: 14;
thus thesis by
A4,
A5,
A6,
A8,
NAT_1: 14;
end;
suppose
A9: (
len G)
<>
0 ;
set g = (A
. (F
. (k
+ 1)));
A10: (
0
+ k)
<= (k
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
A11: (
0
+ 1)
< (k
+ 1) by
A5,
A9,
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A12: 1
<= k by
NAT_1: 13;
then 1
in (
Seg k);
then 1
in ((
Seg (k
+ 1))
/\ (
Seg k)) by
A10,
FINSEQ_1: 7;
then
A13: 1
in ((
dom F)
/\ (
Seg k)) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(k
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len F)) by
A4,
A11;
then (k
+ 1)
in (
dom F) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (F
. (k
+ 1))
in (
rng F) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then (F
. (k
+ 1))
in O;
then (F
. (k
+ 1))
in (
dom A) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then g
in (
rng A) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then ex f be
Function st g
= f & (
dom f)
= E & (
rng f)
c= E by
FUNCT_2:def 2;
then
reconsider g as
Function of E, E by
FUNCT_2: 2;
consider PFk be
FinSequence of (
Funcs (E,E)), ITk be
Function of E, E such that ITk
= (PFk
. (
len PFk)) and
A14: (
len PFk)
= (
len G) and
A15: (PFk
. 1)
= (A
. (G
. 1)) and
A16: for k be
Nat st k
<>
0 & k
< (
len G) holds ex f,g be
Function of E, E st f
= (PFk
. k) & g
= (A
. (G
. (k
+ 1))) & (PFk
. (k
+ 1))
= (f
* g) by
A3,
A4,
A9,
FINSEQ_3: 53;
set f = (PFk
. k);
k
in (
Seg (
len PFk)) by
A5,
A14,
A12;
then
A17: k
in (
dom PFk) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (PFk
. k)
in (
Funcs (E,E)) by
FINSEQ_2: 11;
then ex f be
Function st (PFk
. k)
= f & (
dom f)
= E & (
rng f)
c= E by
FUNCT_2:def 2;
then
reconsider f as
Function of E, E by
FUNCT_2: 2;
set IT = (f
* g);
set PF = (PFk
^
<*IT*>);
IT
in (
Funcs (E,E)) by
FUNCT_2: 9;
then
<*IT*> is
FinSequence of (
Funcs (E,E)) by
FINSEQ_1: 74;
then
reconsider PF as
FinSequence of (
Funcs (E,E)) by
FINSEQ_1: 75;
take PF, IT;
A18: (
len PF)
= ((
len G)
+ (
len
<*IT*>)) by
A14,
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= (k
+ 1) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1: 39;
then (
len PF)
= ((
len PFk)
+ 1) by
A4,
A14,
FINSEQ_3: 53;
hence
A19: IT
= (PF
. (
len PF)) & (
len PF)
= (
len F) by
A4,
A18,
FINSEQ_1: 42;
(
0
+ 1)
< ((
len G)
+ 1) by
A9,
XREAL_1: 6;
then 1
<= (
len G) by
NAT_1: 13;
then 1
in (
Seg (
len PFk)) by
A14;
then 1
in (
dom PFk) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (PF
. 1)
= (A
. (G
. 1)) by
A15,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
hence (PF
. 1)
= (A
. (F
. 1)) by
A13,
FUNCT_1: 48;
let n be
Nat;
assume
A20: n
<>
0 ;
assume n
< (
len F);
then
A21: n
<= k by
A4,
NAT_1: 13;
per cases ;
suppose
A22: n
>= k;
then (A
. (F
. (n
+ 1)))
= g by
A21,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
reconsider g9 = (A
. (F
. (n
+ 1))) as
Function of E, E;
A23: n
= k by
A21,
A22,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
reconsider f9 = (PF
. n) as
Function of E, E by
A17,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
take f9, g9;
thus f9
= (PF
. n) & g9
= (A
. (F
. (n
+ 1)));
thus thesis by
A17,
A18,
A19,
A23,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
end;
suppose
A24: n
< k;
A25: (
0
+ 1)
< (n
+ 1) by
A20,
XREAL_1: 6;
then 1
<= n by
NAT_1: 13;
then n
in (
Seg (
len PFk)) by
A5,
A14,
A24;
then
A26: n
in (
dom PFk) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
consider f9,g9 be
Function of E, E such that
A27: f9
= (PFk
. n) & g9
= (A
. (G
. (n
+ 1))) and
A28: (PFk
. (n
+ 1))
= (f9
* g9) by
A5,
A16,
A20,
A24;
take f9, g9;
A29: (
0
+ k)
<= (1
+ k) by
XREAL_1: 6;
A30: (n
+ 1)
<= k by
A24,
NAT_1: 13;
then (n
+ 1)
in (
Seg k) by
A25;
then (n
+ 1)
in ((
Seg (k
+ 1))
/\ (
Seg k)) by
A29,
FINSEQ_1: 7;
then (n
+ 1)
in ((
dom F)
/\ (
Seg k)) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
hence f9
= (PF
. n) & g9
= (A
. (F
. (n
+ 1))) by
A27,
A26,
FINSEQ_1:def 7,
FUNCT_1: 48;
(n
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len PFk)) by
A5,
A14,
A25,
A30;
then (n
+ 1)
in (
dom PFk) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
hence thesis by
A28,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
end;
end;
end;
end;
A31:
P[
0 ];
for k be
Nat holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A31,
A2);
then ex PF be
FinSequence of (
Funcs (E,E)), IT be
Function of E, E st IT
= (PF
. (
len PF)) & (
len PF)
= (
len F) & (PF
. 1)
= (A
. (F
. 1)) & for k be
Nat st k
<>
0 & k
< (
len F) holds ex f,g be
Function of E, E st f
= (PF
. k) & g
= (A
. (F
. (k
+ 1))) & (PF
. (k
+ 1))
= (f
* g) by
A1;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
uniqueness
proof
now
let IT1,IT2 be
Function of E, E;
given PF1 be
FinSequence of (
Funcs (E,E)) such that
A32: IT1
= (PF1
. (
len F)) and
A33: (
len PF1)
= (
len F) and
A34: (PF1
. 1)
= (A
. (F
. 1)) and
A35: for k be
Nat st k
<>
0 & k
< (
len F) holds ex f,g be
Function of E, E st f
= (PF1
. k) & g
= (A
. (F
. (k
+ 1))) & (PF1
. (k
+ 1))
= (f
* g);
given PF2 be
FinSequence of (
Funcs (E,E)) such that
A36: IT2
= (PF2
. (
len F)) & (
len PF2)
= (
len F) and
A37: (PF2
. 1)
= (A
. (F
. 1)) and
A38: for k be
Nat st k
<>
0 & k
< (
len F) holds ex f,g be
Function of E, E st f
= (PF2
. k) & g
= (A
. (F
. (k
+ 1))) & (PF2
. (k
+ 1))
= (f
* g);
defpred
P[
Nat] means 1
<= $1 & $1
<= (
len PF1) implies (PF1
. $1)
= (PF2
. $1);
A39: for k be
Nat st
P[k] holds
P[(k
+ 1)]
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A40:
P[k];
now
assume 1
<= (k
+ 1);
assume
A41: (k
+ 1)
<= (
len PF1);
then
A42: k
< (
len PF1) by
NAT_1: 13;
per cases ;
suppose k
=
0 ;
hence (PF1
. (k
+ 1))
= (PF2
. (k
+ 1)) by
A34,
A37;
end;
suppose
A43: k
<>
0 ;
then
A44: (
0
+ 1)
< (k
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
(ex f1,g1 be
Function of E, E st f1
= (PF1
. k) & g1
= (A
. (F
. (k
+ 1))) & (PF1
. (k
+ 1))
= (f1
* g1)) & ex f2,g2 be
Function of E, E st f2
= (PF2
. k) & g2
= (A
. (F
. (k
+ 1))) & (PF2
. (k
+ 1))
= (f2
* g2) by
A33,
A35,
A38,
A42,
A43;
hence (PF1
. (k
+ 1))
= (PF2
. (k
+ 1)) by
A40,
A41,
A44,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
A45:
P[
0 ];
for k be
Nat holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A45,
A39);
hence IT1
= IT2 by
A32,
A33,
A36,
FINSEQ_1: 14;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
consistency ;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
Group;
let IT be
Action of O, the
carrier of G;
::
GROUP_9:def4
attr IT is
distributive means for o be
Element of O st o
in O holds (IT
. o) is
Homomorphism of G, G;
end
definition
let O be
set;
struct (
multMagma)
HGrWOpStr over O
(# the
carrier ->
set,
the
multF ->
BinOp of the carrier,
the
action ->
Action of O, the carrier #)
attr strict
strict;
end
registration
let O be
set;
cluster non
empty for
HGrWOpStr over O;
existence
proof
set A = the non
empty
set, m = the
BinOp of A, h = the
Action of O, A;
take
HGrWOpStr (# A, m, h #);
thus thesis;
end;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let IT be non
empty
HGrWOpStr over O;
::
GROUP_9:def5
attr IT is
distributive means
:
Def5: for G be
Group, a be
Action of O, the
carrier of G st a
= the
action of IT & the multMagma of G
= the multMagma of IT holds a is
distributive;
end
Lm1: for O,E be
set holds
[:O,
{(
id E)}:] is
Action of O, E
proof
let O,E be
set;
set h =
[:O,
{(
id E)}:];
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in
{(
id E)};
then
reconsider f = x as
Function of E, E by
TARSKI:def 1;
f
in (
Funcs (E,E)) by
FUNCT_2: 9;
hence x
in (
Funcs (E,E));
end;
then
{(
id E)}
c= (
Funcs (E,E));
then
reconsider h as
Relation of O, (
Funcs (E,E)) by
ZFMISC_1: 95;
A1:
now
thus ((
Funcs (E,E))
=
{} implies O
=
{} ) implies O
= (
dom h)
proof
assume (
Funcs (E,E))
=
{} implies O
=
{} ;
now
let x be
object;
assume
A2: x
in O;
reconsider y = (
id E) as
object;
take y;
y
in
{(
id E)} by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence
[x, y]
in h by
A2,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
end;
hence thesis by
RELSET_1: 9;
end;
assume O
=
{} ;
hence h
=
{} ;
end;
now
let x,y1,y2 be
object;
assume that
A3:
[x, y1]
in h and
A4:
[x, y2]
in h;
consider x9,y9 be
object such that x9
in O and
A5: y9
in
{(
id E)} &
[x, y1]
=
[x9, y9] by
A3,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
A6: y9
= (
id E) & y1
= y9 by
A5,
TARSKI:def 1,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
consider x99,y99 be
object such that x99
in O and
A7: y99
in
{(
id E)} and
A8:
[x, y2]
=
[x99, y99] by
A4,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
y99
= (
id E) by
A7,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence y1
= y2 by
A8,
A6,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
then
reconsider h as
PartFunc of O, (
Funcs (E,E)) by
FUNCT_1:def 1;
h is
Action of O, E by
A1,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
hence thesis;
end;
Lm2: for O be
set, G be
strict
Group holds ex H be non
empty
HGrWOpStr over O st H is
strict
distributive
Group-like
associative & G
= the multMagma of H
proof
let O be
set;
let G be
strict
Group;
reconsider h =
[:O,
{(
id the
carrier of G)}:] as
Action of O, the
carrier of G by
Lm1;
set A = the
carrier of G;
set m = the
multF of G;
set GO =
HGrWOpStr (# A, m, h #);
reconsider GO as non
empty
HGrWOpStr over O;
reconsider G9 = GO as non
empty
multMagma;
A1:
now
set e = (
1_ G);
reconsider e9 = e as
Element of G9;
take e9;
let h9 be
Element of G9;
reconsider h = h9 as
Element of G;
set g = (h
" );
reconsider g9 = g as
Element of G9;
(h9
* e9)
= (h
* e)
.= h by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence (h9
* e9)
= h9;
(e9
* h9)
= (e
* h)
.= h by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence (e9
* h9)
= h9;
take g9;
(h9
* g9)
= (h
* g)
.= (
1_ G) by
GROUP_1:def 5;
hence (h9
* g9)
= e9;
(g9
* h9)
= (g
* h)
.= (
1_ G) by
GROUP_1:def 5;
hence (g9
* h9)
= e9;
end;
take GO;
A2:
now
let G99 be
Group;
let a be
Action of O, the
carrier of G99;
assume
A3: a
= the
action of GO;
assume
A4: the multMagma of G99
= the multMagma of GO;
now
let o be
Element of O;
assume o
in O;
then o
in (
dom h) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
[o, (h
. o)]
in
[:O,
{(
id the
carrier of G99)}:] by
A4,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
consider x,y be
object such that x
in O and
A5: y
in
{(
id the
carrier of G99)} &
[o, (h
. o)]
=
[x, y] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
y
= (
id the
carrier of G99) & (h
. o)
= y by
A5,
TARSKI:def 1,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence (a
. o) is
Homomorphism of G99, G99 by
A3,
GROUP_6: 38;
end;
hence a is
distributive;
end;
now
let x9,y9,z9 be
Element of G9;
reconsider x = x9, y = y9, z = z9 as
Element of G;
((x9
* y9)
* z9)
= ((x
* y)
* z)
.= (x
* (y
* z)) by
GROUP_1:def 3;
hence ((x9
* y9)
* z9)
= (x9
* (y9
* z9));
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
GROUP_1:def 2,
GROUP_1:def 3;
end;
registration
let O be
set;
cluster
strict
distributive
Group-like
associative for non
empty
HGrWOpStr over O;
existence
proof
set G = the
strict
Group;
consider H be non
empty
HGrWOpStr over O such that
A1: H is
strict
distributive
Group-like
associative and the multMagma of H
= G by
Lm2;
take H;
thus thesis by
A1;
end;
end
definition
let O be
set;
mode
GroupWithOperators of O is
distributive
Group-like
associative non
empty
HGrWOpStr over O;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let o be
Element of O;
::
GROUP_9:def6
func G
^ o ->
Homomorphism of G, G equals
:
Def6: (the
action of G
. o) if o
in O
otherwise (
id the
carrier of G);
correctness
proof
now
assume
A1: o
in O;
consider G9 be
Group such that
A2: the multMagma of G9
= the multMagma of G;
reconsider a = the
action of G as
Action of O, the
carrier of G9 by
A2;
a is
distributive by
A2,
Def5;
then
reconsider f9 = (a
. o) as
Homomorphism of G9, G9 by
A1;
reconsider f = f9 as
Function of G, G by
A2;
now
let g1,g2 be
Element of G;
reconsider g19 = g1, g29 = g2 as
Element of G9 by
A2;
(f
. (g1
* g2))
= (f9
. (g19
* g29)) by
A2
.= ((f9
. g19)
* (f9
. g29)) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= (the
multF of G
. ((f
. g1),(f
. g2))) by
A2;
hence (f
. (g1
* g2))
= ((f
. g1)
* (f
. g2));
end;
hence (the
action of G
. o) is
Homomorphism of G, G by
GROUP_6:def 6;
end;
hence thesis by
GROUP_6: 38;
end;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
::
GROUP_9:def7
mode
StableSubgroup of G ->
distributive
Group-like
associative non
empty
HGrWOpStr over O means
:
Def7: it is
Subgroup of G & for o be
Element of O holds (it
^ o)
= ((G
^ o)
| the
carrier of it );
correctness
proof
set H = G;
take H;
thus thesis by
GROUP_2: 54;
end;
end
Lm3: for O be
set, G be
GroupWithOperators of O holds the HGrWOpStr of G is
StableSubgroup of G
proof
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
reconsider G9 = the HGrWOpStr of G as non
empty
multMagma;
A1:
now
set e = (
1_ G);
reconsider e9 = e as
Element of G9;
take e9;
let h9 be
Element of G9;
reconsider h = h9 as
Element of G;
set g = (h
" );
reconsider g9 = g as
Element of G9;
(h9
* e9)
= (h
* e)
.= h by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence (h9
* e9)
= h9;
(e9
* h9)
= (e
* h)
.= h by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence (e9
* h9)
= h9;
take g9;
(h9
* g9)
= (h
* g)
.= (
1_ G) by
GROUP_1:def 5;
hence (h9
* g9)
= e9;
(g9
* h9)
= (g
* h)
.= (
1_ G) by
GROUP_1:def 5;
hence (g9
* h9)
= e9;
end;
now
let x9,y9,z9 be
Element of G9;
reconsider x = x9, y = y9, z = z9 as
Element of G;
((x9
* y9)
* z9)
= ((x
* y)
* z)
.= (x
* (y
* z)) by
GROUP_1:def 3;
hence ((x9
* y9)
* z9)
= (x9
* (y9
* z9));
end;
then
reconsider G9 as
strict
Group-like
associative non
empty
HGrWOpStr over O by
A1,
GROUP_1:def 2,
GROUP_1:def 3;
for G be
Group, a be
Action of O, the
carrier of G st a
= the
action of G9 & the multMagma of G
= the multMagma of G9 holds a is
distributive by
Def5;
then
reconsider G9 as
distributive
Group-like
associative non
empty
HGrWOpStr over O by
Def5;
A2:
now
let o be
Element of O;
A3:
now
per cases ;
suppose
A4: o
in O;
then (G9
^ o)
= (the
action of G9
. o) by
Def6;
hence (G9
^ o)
= (G
^ o) by
A4,
Def6;
end;
suppose
A5: not o
in O;
then (G9
^ o)
= (
id the
carrier of G9) by
Def6;
hence (G9
^ o)
= (G
^ o) by
A5,
Def6;
end;
end;
thus (G9
^ o)
= ((G
^ o)
| the
carrier of G9) by
A3;
end;
the
multF of G9
= (the
multF of G
|| the
carrier of G9);
then G9 is
Subgroup of G by
GROUP_2:def 5;
hence thesis by
A2,
Def7;
end;
registration
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
cluster
strict for
StableSubgroup of G;
correctness
proof
reconsider G9 = the HGrWOpStr of G as
StableSubgroup of G by
Lm3;
take G9;
thus thesis;
end;
end
Lm4: for O be
set, G be
GroupWithOperators of O, H1,H2 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st the
carrier of H1
= the
carrier of H2 holds H1
= H2
proof
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let H1,H2 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider H19 = H1, H29 = H2 as
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
A1: (
dom the
action of H2)
= O by
FUNCT_2:def 1
.= (
dom the
action of H1) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
assume
A2: the
carrier of H1
= the
carrier of H2;
A3:
now
let x be
object;
assume
A4: x
in (
dom the
action of H2);
then
reconsider o = x as
Element of O;
A5: (H1
^ o)
= (the
action of H1
. o) by
A4,
Def6;
(H1
^ o)
= ((G
^ o)
| the
carrier of H2) by
A2,
Def7
.= (H2
^ o) by
Def7;
hence (the
action of H1
. x)
= (the
action of H2
. x) by
A4,
A5,
Def6;
end;
the multMagma of H19
= the multMagma of H29 by
A2,
GROUP_2: 59;
hence thesis by
A1,
A3,
FUNCT_1: 2;
end;
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
::
GROUP_9:def8
func
(1). G ->
strict
StableSubgroup of G means
:
Def8: the
carrier of it
=
{(
1_ G)};
existence
proof
set G9 = (
(1). G);
consider H be non
empty
HGrWOpStr over O such that
A1: H is
strict
distributive
Group-like
associative and
A2: G9
= the multMagma of H by
Lm2;
reconsider H as
strict
GroupWithOperators of O by
A1;
A3: the
carrier of H
c= the
carrier of G by
A2,
GROUP_2:def 5;
the
multF of H
= (the
multF of G
|| the
carrier of H) by
A2,
GROUP_2:def 5;
then
A4: H is
Subgroup of G by
A3,
GROUP_2:def 5;
now
let o be
Element of O;
reconsider f9 = (H
^ o), f = ((G
^ o)
| the
carrier of H) as
Function;
A5: (
dom f)
= (
dom ((G
^ o)
* (
id the
carrier of H))) by
RELAT_1: 65
.= ((
dom (G
^ o))
/\ the
carrier of H) by
FUNCT_1: 19
.= (the
carrier of G
/\ the
carrier of H) by
FUNCT_2:def 1
.= the
carrier of (
(1). G) by
A2,
A3,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
A6:
now
let x be
object;
assume
A7: x
in (
dom f);
then
A8: x
in (
dom (
id the
carrier of H)) by
A2,
A5;
x
in
{(
1_ G)} by
A5,
A7,
GROUP_2:def 7;
then
A9: x
= (
1_ G) by
TARSKI:def 1;
then x
= (
1_ H) by
A4,
GROUP_2: 44;
then
A10: (f9
. x)
= (
1_ H) by
GROUP_6: 31;
(f
. x)
= (((G
^ o)
* (
id the
carrier of H))
. x) by
RELAT_1: 65
.= ((G
^ o)
. ((
id the
carrier of H)
. x)) by
A8,
FUNCT_1: 13
.= ((G
^ o)
. x) by
A2,
A5,
A7,
FUNCT_1: 18
.= (
1_ G) by
A9,
GROUP_6: 31;
hence (f
. x)
= (f9
. x) by
A4,
A10,
GROUP_2: 44;
end;
(
dom f9)
= the
carrier of (
(1). G) by
A2,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
hence (H
^ o)
= ((G
^ o)
| the
carrier of H) by
A5,
A6,
FUNCT_1: 2;
end;
then
reconsider H as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
A4,
Def7;
take H;
thus thesis by
A2,
GROUP_2:def 7;
end;
uniqueness by
Lm4;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
::
GROUP_9:def9
func
(Omega). G ->
strict
StableSubgroup of G equals the HGrWOpStr of G;
correctness by
Lm3;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let IT be
StableSubgroup of G;
::
GROUP_9:def10
attr IT is
normal means
:
Def10: for H be
strict
Subgroup of G st H
= the multMagma of IT holds H is
normal;
end
registration
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
cluster
strict
normal for
StableSubgroup of G;
existence
proof
set H = (
(1). G);
set H9 = H;
reconsider H as
StableSubgroup of G;
take H9;
now
reconsider G9 = G as
Group;
let H99 be
strict
Subgroup of G;
assume
A1: H99
= the multMagma of H;
A2: the
multF of (
(1). G9)
= (the
multF of G9
|| the
carrier of (
(1). G9)) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
the
carrier of (
(1). G9)
=
{(
1_ G9)} by
GROUP_2:def 7
.= the
carrier of (
(1). G) by
Def8;
hence H99 is
normal by
A1,
A2,
GROUP_2:def 5;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let H be
StableSubgroup of G;
cluster
normal for
StableSubgroup of H;
existence
proof
reconsider H9 = (
(1). H) as
GroupWithOperators of O;
reconsider H9 as
StableSubgroup of H;
take H9;
now
let H99 be
strict
Subgroup of H;
reconsider H as
Group;
assume the multMagma of H9
= H99;
then the
carrier of H99
=
{(
1_ H)} by
Def8;
then H99
= (
(1). H) by
GROUP_2:def 7;
hence H99 is
normal;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
cluster (
(1). G) ->
normal;
correctness
proof
now
reconsider G9 = G as
Group;
let H be
strict
Subgroup of G;
reconsider H9 = H as
strict
Subgroup of G9;
assume H
= the multMagma of (
(1). G);
then the
carrier of H
=
{(
1_ G)} by
Def8;
then H9
= (
(1). G9) by
GROUP_2:def 7;
hence H is
normal;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
cluster (
(Omega). G) ->
normal;
correctness
proof
now
reconsider G9 = G as
Group;
let H be
strict
Subgroup of G;
reconsider H9 = H as
strict
Subgroup of G9;
assume H
= the multMagma of (
(Omega). G);
then H9
= (
(Omega). G9);
hence H is
normal;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
::
GROUP_9:def11
func
the_stable_subgroups_of G ->
set means
:
Def11: for x be
object holds x
in it iff x is
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
existence
proof
defpred
P[
object,
object] means ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st $2
= H & $1
= the
carrier of H;
defpred
P[
set] means ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st $1
= the
carrier of H;
consider B be
set such that
A1: for x be
set holds x
in B iff x
in (
bool the
carrier of G) &
P[x] from
XFAMILY:sch 1;
A2: for x,y1,y2 be
object st
P[x, y1] &
P[x, y2] holds y1
= y2 by
Lm4;
consider f be
Function such that
A3: for x,y be
object holds
[x, y]
in f iff x
in B &
P[x, y] from
FUNCT_1:sch 1(
A2);
for x be
object holds x
in B iff ex y be
object st
[x, y]
in f
proof
let x be
object;
thus x
in B implies ex y be
object st
[x, y]
in f
proof
assume
A4: x
in B;
then
consider H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G such that
A5: x
= the
carrier of H by
A1;
reconsider y = H as
object;
take y;
thus thesis by
A3,
A4,
A5;
end;
given y be
object such that
A6:
[x, y]
in f;
thus thesis by
A3,
A6;
end;
then
A7: B
= (
dom f) by
XTUPLE_0:def 12;
for y be
object holds y
in (
rng f) iff y is
strict
StableSubgroup of G
proof
let y be
object;
thus y
in (
rng f) implies y is
strict
StableSubgroup of G
proof
assume y
in (
rng f);
then
consider x be
object such that
A8: x
in (
dom f) & y
= (f
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
[x, y]
in f by
A8,
FUNCT_1:def 2;
then ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st y
= H & x
= the
carrier of H by
A3;
hence thesis;
end;
assume y is
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
then
reconsider H = y as
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider x = the
carrier of H as
set;
A9: y is
set by
TARSKI: 1;
H is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
then the
carrier of H
c= the
carrier of G by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then
A10: x
in (
dom f) by
A1,
A7;
then
[x, y]
in f by
A3,
A7;
then y
= (f
. x) by
A10,
FUNCT_1:def 2,
A9;
hence thesis by
A10,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
defpred
P[
object] means $1 is
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
let A1,A2 be
set;
assume
A11: for x be
object holds x
in A1 iff
P[x];
assume
A12: for x be
object holds x
in A2 iff
P[x];
thus thesis from
XBOOLE_0:sch 2(
A11,
A12);
end;
end
registration
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
cluster (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) -> non
empty;
correctness
proof
(
(1). G)
in (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
Def11;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let IT be
Group;
::
GROUP_9:def12
attr IT is
simple means not IT is
trivial & not ex H be
strict
normal
Subgroup of IT st H
<> (
(Omega). IT) & H
<> (
(1). IT);
end
Lm5: (
Group_of_Perm 2) is
simple
proof
set G = (
Group_of_Perm 2);
A1:
now
let H be
strict
normal
Subgroup of G;
assume
A2: H
<> (
(Omega). G);
assume
A3: H
<> (
(1). G);
(
1_ G)
in H by
GROUP_2: 46;
then (
1_ G)
in the
carrier of H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then
{(
1_ G)}
c= the
carrier of H by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
{
<*1, 2*>}
c= the
carrier of H by
FINSEQ_2: 52,
MATRIX_1: 15;
then
A4:
<*1, 2*>
in the
carrier of H by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
the
carrier of H
c= the
carrier of G by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then
A5: the
carrier of H
c=
{
<*1, 2*>,
<*2, 1*>} by
MATRIX_1:def 13,
MATRIX_7: 3;
per cases by
A5,
ZFMISC_1: 36;
suppose the
carrier of H
=
{} ;
hence contradiction;
end;
suppose the
carrier of H
=
{
<*1, 2*>};
then
{(
1_ G)}
= the
carrier of H by
FINSEQ_2: 52,
MATRIX_1: 15;
hence contradiction by
A3,
GROUP_2:def 7;
end;
suppose the
carrier of H
=
{
<*2, 1*>};
then (
<*2, 1*>
. 1)
= (
<*1, 2*>
. 1) by
A4,
TARSKI:def 1;
then 2
= (
<*1, 2*>
. 1) by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
hence contradiction by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
end;
suppose the
carrier of H
=
{
<*1, 2*>,
<*2, 1*>};
then the
carrier of H
= the
carrier of G by
MATRIX_1:def 13,
MATRIX_7: 3;
hence contradiction by
A2,
GROUP_2: 61;
end;
end;
now
assume G is
trivial;
then
consider e be
object such that
A6: the
carrier of G
=
{e};
(
Permutations 2)
=
{e} by
A6,
MATRIX_1:def 13;
then
<*2, 1*>
=
<*1, 2*> by
MATRIX_7: 3,
ZFMISC_1: 5;
then 2
= (
<*1, 2*>
. 1) by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
hence contradiction by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
registration
cluster
strict
simple for
Group;
existence by
Lm5;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let IT be
GroupWithOperators of O;
::
GROUP_9:def13
attr IT is
simple means
:
Def13: not IT is
trivial & not ex H be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of IT st H
<> (
(Omega). IT) & H
<> (
(1). IT);
end
Lm6: for O be
set, G be
GroupWithOperators of O, N be
normal
StableSubgroup of G holds the multMagma of N is
strict
normal
Subgroup of G
proof
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let N be
normal
StableSubgroup of G;
set H = the multMagma of N;
reconsider H as non
empty
multMagma;
now
set e = (
1_ N);
reconsider e9 = e as
Element of H;
take e9;
let h9 be
Element of H;
reconsider h = h9 as
Element of N;
set g = (h
" );
reconsider g9 = g as
Element of H;
(h9
* e9)
= (h
* e)
.= h by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence (h9
* e9)
= h9;
(e9
* h9)
= (e
* h)
.= h by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence (e9
* h9)
= h9;
take g9;
(h9
* g9)
= (h
* g)
.= (
1_ N) by
GROUP_1:def 5;
hence (h9
* g9)
= e9;
(g9
* h9)
= (g
* h)
.= (
1_ N) by
GROUP_1:def 5;
hence (g9
* h9)
= e9;
end;
then
reconsider H as
Group-like non
empty
multMagma by
GROUP_1:def 2;
N is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
then the
carrier of H
c= the
carrier of G & the
multF of H
= (the
multF of G
|| the
carrier of H) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then
reconsider H as
Subgroup of G by
GROUP_2:def 5;
H is
normal by
Def10;
hence thesis;
end;
Lm7: for G1,G2 be
Group, A1 be
Subset of G1, A2 be
Subset of G2, H1 be
strict
Subgroup of G1, H2 be
strict
Subgroup of G2 st the multMagma of G1
= the multMagma of G2 & A1
= A2 & H1
= H2 holds (A1
* H1)
= (A2
* H2) & (H1
* A1)
= (H2
* A2)
proof
let G1,G2 be
Group;
let A1 be
Subset of G1;
let A2 be
Subset of G2;
let H1 be
strict
Subgroup of G1;
let H2 be
strict
Subgroup of G2;
assume
A1: the multMagma of G1
= the multMagma of G2;
A2:
now
let A1,B1 be
Subset of G1;
let A2,B2 be
Subset of G2;
set X = { (g
* h) where g,h be
Element of G1 : g
in A1 & h
in B1 };
set Y = { (g
* h) where g,h be
Element of G2 : g
in A2 & h
in B2 };
assume
A3: A1
= A2 & B1
= B2;
A4:
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in X;
then
consider g,h be
Element of G1 such that
A5: x
= (g
* h) & g
in A1 & h
in B1;
set h9 = h;
set g9 = g;
reconsider g9, h9 as
Element of G2 by
A1;
(g
* h)
= (g9
* h9) by
A1;
hence x
in Y by
A3,
A5;
end;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in Y;
then
consider g,h be
Element of G2 such that
A6: x
= (g
* h) & g
in A2 & h
in B2;
reconsider g9 = g, h9 = h as
Element of G1 by
A1;
(g
* h)
= (g9
* h9) by
A1;
hence x
in X by
A3,
A6;
end;
hence X
= Y by
A4,
TARSKI: 2;
end;
assume
A7: A1
= A2;
assume
A8: H1
= H2;
hence (A1
* H1)
= (A2
* H2) by
A7,
A2;
thus thesis by
A7,
A8,
A2;
end;
registration
let O be
set;
cluster
strict
simple for
GroupWithOperators of O;
existence
proof
set Gp2 = (
Group_of_Perm 2);
consider G be non
empty
HGrWOpStr over O such that
A1: G is
strict
distributive
Group-like
associative and
A2: Gp2
= the multMagma of G by
Lm2;
reconsider G as
strict
GroupWithOperators of O by
A1;
take G;
now
assume
A3: not G is
simple;
per cases by
A3;
suppose G is
trivial;
hence contradiction by
A2,
Lm5;
end;
suppose
A4: ex H be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G st H
<> (
(Omega). G) & H
<> (
(1). G);
reconsider G9 = G as
Group;
consider H be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G such that
A5: H
<> (
(Omega). G) and
A6: H
<> (
(1). G) by
A4;
reconsider H9 = the multMagma of H as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
reconsider H9 as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G9;
set H99 = H9;
the
carrier of H99
c= the
carrier of G9 & the
multF of H99
= (the
multF of G9
|| the
carrier of H99) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then
reconsider H99 as
strict
Subgroup of Gp2 by
A2,
GROUP_2:def 5;
now
let A be
Subset of Gp2;
reconsider A9 = A as
Subset of G9 by
A2;
(A
* H99)
= (A9
* H9) by
A2,
Lm7
.= (H9
* A9) by
GROUP_3: 120;
hence (A
* H99)
= (H99
* A) by
A2,
Lm7;
end;
then
reconsider H99 as
strict
normal
Subgroup of Gp2 by
GROUP_3: 120;
A7:
now
reconsider e = (
1_ Gp2) as
Element of G by
A2;
A8:
now
let h be
Element of G;
reconsider h9 = h as
Element of Gp2 by
A2;
(h
* e)
= (h9
* (
1_ Gp2)) by
A2
.= h9 by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence (h
* e)
= h;
(e
* h)
= ((
1_ Gp2)
* h9) by
A2
.= h9 by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence (e
* h)
= h;
end;
assume H99
= (
(1). Gp2);
then the
carrier of H99
=
{(
1_ Gp2)} by
GROUP_2:def 7;
then the
carrier of H
=
{(
1_ G)} by
A8,
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence contradiction by
A6,
Def8;
end;
H99
<> (
(Omega). Gp2) by
A2,
A5,
Lm4;
hence contradiction by
A7,
Lm5;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let N be
normal
StableSubgroup of G;
::
GROUP_9:def14
func
Cosets N ->
set means
:
Def14: for H be
strict
normal
Subgroup of G st H
= the multMagma of N holds it
= (
Cosets H);
existence
proof
reconsider H = the multMagma of N as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
set x = (
Cosets H);
take x;
let H be
strict
normal
Subgroup of G;
assume H
= the multMagma of N;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
reconsider H = the multMagma of N as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
let y1,y2 be
set;
assume for H be
strict
normal
Subgroup of G st H
= the multMagma of N holds y1
= (
Cosets H);
then
A1: y1
= (
Cosets H);
assume for H be
strict
normal
Subgroup of G st H
= the multMagma of N holds y2
= (
Cosets H);
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let N be
normal
StableSubgroup of G;
::
GROUP_9:def15
func
CosOp N ->
BinOp of (
Cosets N) means
:
Def15: for H be
strict
normal
Subgroup of G st H
= the multMagma of N holds it
= (
CosOp H);
existence
proof
reconsider H = the multMagma of N as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
(
Cosets N)
= (
Cosets H) by
Def14;
then
reconsider x = (
CosOp H) as
BinOp of (
Cosets N);
take x;
let H be
strict
normal
Subgroup of G;
assume H
= the multMagma of N;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
reconsider H = the multMagma of N as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
let y1,y2 be
BinOp of (
Cosets N);
assume for H be
strict
normal
Subgroup of G st H
= the multMagma of N holds y1
= (
CosOp H);
then
A1: y1
= (
CosOp H);
assume for H be
strict
normal
Subgroup of G st H
= the multMagma of N holds y2
= (
CosOp H);
hence y1
= y2 by
A1;
end;
end
Lm8: for G be
Group, N be
normal
Subgroup of G, A be
Element of (
Cosets N), g be
Element of G holds g
in A iff A
= (g
* N)
proof
let G be
Group;
let N be
normal
Subgroup of G;
let A be
Element of (
Cosets N);
let g be
Element of G;
hereby
consider a be
Element of G such that
A1: A
= (a
* N) by
GROUP_2:def 15;
assume g
in A;
then
consider h be
Element of G such that
A2: g
= (a
* h) and
A3: h
in N by
A1,
GROUP_2: 103;
((g
" )
* a)
= (((h
" )
* (a
" ))
* a) by
A2,
GROUP_1: 17
.= ((h
" )
* ((a
" )
* a)) by
GROUP_1:def 3
.= ((h
" )
* (
1_ G)) by
GROUP_1:def 5
.= (h
" ) by
GROUP_1:def 4;
then ((g
" )
* a)
in N by
A3,
GROUP_2: 51;
hence A
= (g
* N) by
A1,
GROUP_2: 114;
end;
g
= (g
* (
1_ G)) & (
1_ G)
in N by
GROUP_1:def 4,
GROUP_2: 46;
hence thesis by
GROUP_2: 103;
end;
Lm9: for O be
set, o be
Element of O, G be
GroupWithOperators of O, H be
StableSubgroup of G, g be
Element of G st g
in H holds ((G
^ o)
. g)
in H
proof
let O be
set;
let o be
Element of O;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let H be
StableSubgroup of G;
let g be
Element of G;
set f = (G
^ o);
assume g
in H;
then
A1: g
in the
carrier of H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (f
. g)
= ((f
| the
carrier of H)
. g) by
FUNCT_1: 49;
then
A2: (f
. g)
= ((H
^ o)
. g) by
Def7;
((H
^ o)
. g)
in the
carrier of H by
A1,
FUNCT_2: 5;
hence thesis by
A2,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let N be
normal
StableSubgroup of G;
::
GROUP_9:def16
func
CosAc N ->
Action of O, (
Cosets N) means
:
Def16: for o be
Element of O holds (it
. o)
= {
[A, B] where A,B be
Element of (
Cosets N) : ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g) } if not O is
empty
otherwise it
=
[:
{} ,
{(
id (
Cosets N))}:];
existence
proof
A1:
now
deffunc
F(
object) = {
[A, B] where A,B be
Element of (
Cosets N) : for o be
Element of O st $1
= o holds ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g) };
reconsider H = the multMagma of N as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
assume
A2: not O is
empty;
A3: (
Cosets N)
= (
Cosets H) by
Def14;
A4:
now
let x be
object;
set f =
F(x);
A5:
now
let y be
object;
assume y
in f;
then
consider A,B be
Element of (
Cosets N) such that
A6: y
=
[A, B] and for o be
Element of O st x
= o holds ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g);
reconsider A, B as
object;
take A, B;
thus y
=
[A, B] by
A6;
end;
assume
A7: x
in O;
now
reconsider o = x as
Element of O by
A7;
let y,y1,y2 be
object;
assume
[y, y1]
in f;
then
consider A1,B1 be
Element of (
Cosets N) such that
A8:
[y, y1]
=
[A1, B1] and
A9: for o be
Element of O st x
= o holds ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A1 & h
in B1 & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g);
assume
[y, y2]
in f;
then
consider A2,B2 be
Element of (
Cosets N) such that
A10:
[y, y2]
=
[A2, B2] and
A11: for o be
Element of O st x
= o holds ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A2 & h
in B2 & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g);
A12: y1
= B1 by
A8,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
A13: y2
= B2 by
A10,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
A14: y
= A2 by
A10,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
set f = (G
^ o);
A15: y
= A1 by
A8,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
consider g1,h1 be
Element of G such that
A16: g1
in A1 and
A17: h1
in B1 and
A18: h1
= ((G
^ o)
. g1) by
A9;
consider g2,h2 be
Element of G such that
A19: g2
in A2 and
A20: h2
in B2 and
A21: h2
= ((G
^ o)
. g2) by
A11;
reconsider A1, A2, B1, B2 as
Element of (
Cosets H) by
Def14;
A22: A2
= (g2
* H) by
A19,
Lm8;
A1
= (g1
* H) by
A16,
Lm8;
then ((g2
" )
* g1)
in H by
A15,
A14,
A22,
GROUP_2: 114;
then ((g2
" )
* g1)
in the
carrier of H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((g2
" )
* g1)
in N by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (f
. ((g2
" )
* g1))
in N by
Lm9;
then ((f
. (g2
" ))
* (f
. g1))
in N by
GROUP_6:def 6;
then ((h2
" )
* h1)
in N by
A18,
A21,
GROUP_6: 32;
then ((h2
" )
* h1)
in the
carrier of N by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then
A23: ((h2
" )
* h1)
in H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
A24: B2
= (h2
* H) by
A20,
Lm8;
B1
= (h1
* H) by
A17,
Lm8;
hence y1
= y2 by
A12,
A13,
A23,
A24,
GROUP_2: 114;
end;
then
reconsider f as
Function by
A5,
FUNCT_1:def 1,
RELAT_1:def 1;
now
let y1 be
object;
hereby
reconsider o = x as
Element of O by
A7;
assume
A25: y1
in (
Cosets N);
then
reconsider A = y1 as
Element of (
Cosets N);
y1
in (
Cosets H) by
A25,
Def14;
then
consider g be
Element of G such that
A26: y1
= (g
* H) and y1
= (H
* g) by
GROUP_6: 13;
set h = ((G
^ o)
. g);
reconsider B = (h
* H) as
Element of (
Cosets N) by
A3,
GROUP_2:def 15;
reconsider y2 = B as
object;
take y2;
now
let o be
Element of O;
assume
A27: x
= o;
take g, h;
thus g
in A by
A3,
A26,
Lm8;
thus h
in B by
A3,
Lm8;
thus h
= ((G
^ o)
. g) by
A27;
end;
hence
[y1, y2]
in f;
end;
given y2 be
object such that
A28:
[y1, y2]
in f;
consider A,B be
Element of (
Cosets N) such that
A29:
[y1, y2]
=
[A, B] and for o be
Element of O st x
= o holds ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g) by
A28;
A
in (
Cosets N) by
A3;
hence y1
in (
Cosets N) by
A29,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
then
A30: (
dom f)
= (
Cosets N) by
XTUPLE_0:def 12;
now
let y2 be
object;
assume y2
in (
rng f);
then
consider y1 be
object such that
A31:
[y1, y2]
in f by
XTUPLE_0:def 13;
consider A,B be
Element of (
Cosets N) such that
A32:
[y1, y2]
=
[A, B] and for o be
Element of O st x
= o holds ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g) by
A31;
B
in (
Cosets N) by
A3;
hence y2
in (
Cosets N) by
A32,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
then (
rng f)
c= (
Cosets N);
hence
F(x)
in (
Funcs ((
Cosets N),(
Cosets N))) by
A30,
FUNCT_2:def 2;
end;
ex f be
Function of O, (
Funcs ((
Cosets N),(
Cosets N))) st for x be
object st x
in O holds (f
. x)
=
F(x) from
FUNCT_2:sch 2(
A4);
then
consider IT be
Function of O, (
Funcs ((
Cosets N),(
Cosets N))) such that
A33: for x be
object st x
in O holds (IT
. x)
=
F(x);
reconsider IT as
Action of O, (
Cosets N);
take IT;
let o be
Element of O;
reconsider x = o as
set;
set X = {
[A, B] where A,B be
Element of (
Cosets N) : for o be
Element of O st x
= o holds ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g) };
set Y = {
[A, B] where A,B be
Element of (
Cosets N) : ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g) };
A34:
now
let y be
object;
hereby
assume y
in X;
then
consider A,B be
Element of (
Cosets N) such that
A35: y
=
[A, B] and
A36: for o be
Element of O st x
= o holds ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g);
ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g) by
A36;
hence y
in Y by
A35;
end;
assume y
in Y;
then
consider A,B be
Element of (
Cosets N) such that
A37: y
=
[A, B] and
A38: ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g);
for o be
Element of O st x
= o holds ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g) by
A38;
hence y
in X by
A37;
end;
(IT
. o)
= X by
A2,
A33;
hence (IT
. o)
= Y by
A34,
TARSKI: 2;
end;
now
assume O is
empty;
then
reconsider IT =
[:
{} ,
{(
id (
Cosets N))}:] as
Action of O, (
Cosets N) by
Lm1;
take IT;
thus IT
=
[:
{} ,
{(
id (
Cosets N))}:];
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
now
assume not O is
empty;
let IT1,IT2 be
Action of O, (
Cosets N);
assume
A39: for o be
Element of O holds (IT1
. o)
= {
[A, B] where A,B be
Element of (
Cosets N) : ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g) };
assume
A40: for o be
Element of O holds (IT2
. o)
= {
[A, B] where A,B be
Element of (
Cosets N) : ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g) };
A41:
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
dom IT1);
then
reconsider o = x as
Element of O;
(IT1
. o)
= {
[A, B] where A,B be
Element of (
Cosets N) : ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g) } by
A39;
hence (IT1
. x)
= (IT2
. x) by
A40;
end;
(
dom IT1)
= O & (
dom IT2)
= O by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
hence IT1
= IT2 by
A41;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
correctness ;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let N be
normal
StableSubgroup of G;
::
GROUP_9:def17
func G
./. N ->
HGrWOpStr over O equals
HGrWOpStr (# (
Cosets N), (
CosOp N), (
CosAc N) #);
correctness ;
end
registration
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let N be
normal
StableSubgroup of G;
cluster (G
./. N) -> non
empty;
correctness
proof
reconsider H = the multMagma of N as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
(
Cosets N)
= (
Cosets H) by
Def14;
hence thesis;
end;
cluster (G
./. N) ->
distributive
Group-like
associative;
correctness
proof
reconsider H = the multMagma of N as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
set G9 = the multMagma of (G
./. N);
A1:
now
set e9 = (
1_ (G
./. H));
reconsider e = e9 as
Element of (G
./. N) by
Def14;
take e;
let h be
Element of (G
./. N);
reconsider h9 = h as
Element of (G
./. H) by
Def14;
set g = (h9
" );
set g9 = g;
(h
* e)
= (h9
* e9) by
Def15
.= h9 by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence (h
* e)
= h;
(e
* h)
= (e9
* h9) by
Def15
.= h9 by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence (e
* h)
= h;
reconsider g as
Element of (G
./. N) by
Def14;
take g;
(h
* g)
= (h9
* g9) by
Def15
.= (
1_ (G
./. H)) by
GROUP_1:def 5;
hence (h
* g)
= e;
(g
* h)
= (g9
* h9) by
Def15
.= (
1_ (G
./. H)) by
GROUP_1:def 5;
hence (g
* h)
= e;
end;
A2:
now
let G9 be
Group;
let a be
Action of O, the
carrier of G9;
assume
A3: a
= the
action of (G
./. N);
assume
A4: the multMagma of G9
= the multMagma of (G
./. N);
now
let o be
Element of O;
assume
A5: o
in O;
then
A6: (a
. o)
= {
[A, B] where A,B be
Element of (
Cosets N) : ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g) } by
A3,
Def16;
(a
. o)
in (
Funcs ((
Cosets N),(
Cosets N))) by
A3,
A5,
FUNCT_2: 5;
then
consider f be
Function such that
A7: (a
. o)
= f and
A8: (
dom f)
= (
Cosets N) and
A9: (
rng f)
c= (
Cosets N) by
FUNCT_2:def 2;
reconsider f as
Function of the
carrier of G9, the
carrier of G9 by
A4,
A8,
A9,
FUNCT_2: 2;
now
let A1,A2 be
Element of G9;
set A3 = (A1
* A2);
set B1 = (f
. A1), B2 = (f
. A2), B3 = (f
. A3);
[A1, B1]
in f by
A4,
A8,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
consider A19,B19 be
Element of (
Cosets N) such that
A10:
[A1, B1]
=
[A19, B19] and
A11: ex g1,h1 be
Element of G st g1
in A19 & h1
in B19 & h1
= ((G
^ o)
. g1) by
A6,
A7;
[A2, B2]
in f by
A4,
A8,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
consider A29,B29 be
Element of (
Cosets N) such that
A12:
[A2, B2]
=
[A29, B29] and
A13: ex g2,h2 be
Element of G st g2
in A29 & h2
in B29 & h2
= ((G
^ o)
. g2) by
A6,
A7;
[A3, B3]
in f by
A4,
A8,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
consider A39,B39 be
Element of (
Cosets N) such that
A14:
[A3, B3]
=
[A39, B39] and
A15: ex g3,h3 be
Element of G st g3
in A39 & h3
in B39 & h3
= ((G
^ o)
. g3) by
A6,
A7;
consider g3,h3 be
Element of G such that
A16: g3
in A39 and
A17: h3
in B39 and
A18: h3
= ((G
^ o)
. g3) by
A15;
consider g2,h2 be
Element of G such that
A19: g2
in A29 and
A20: h2
in B29 and
A21: h2
= ((G
^ o)
. g2) by
A13;
consider g1,h1 be
Element of G such that
A22: g1
in A19 and
A23: h1
in B19 and
A24: h1
= ((G
^ o)
. g1) by
A11;
A25: (
@ ((
nat_hom H)
. g1))
= ((
nat_hom H)
. g1) & (
@ ((
nat_hom H)
. g2))
= ((
nat_hom H)
. g2);
A26: ((
nat_hom H)
. g1)
= (g1
* H) & ((
nat_hom H)
. g2)
= (g2
* H) by
GROUP_6:def 8;
reconsider A19, A29, A39, B19, B29, B39 as
Element of (
Cosets H) by
Def14;
A27: A29
= (g2
* H) by
A19,
Lm8;
A28: A39
= (g3
* H) by
A16,
Lm8;
A29: B29
= (h2
* H) by
A20,
Lm8;
reconsider A19, A29, B19, B29 as
Element of (G
./. H);
A2
= (g2
* H) by
A12,
A27,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then (A1
* A2)
= (the
multF of G9
. (A19,A29)) by
A10,
A27,
XTUPLE_0: 1
.= (
@ (A19
* A29)) by
A4,
Def15
.= ((
@ A19)
* (
@ A29)) by
GROUP_6: 20;
then (A1
* A2)
= ((g1
* H)
* (g2
* H)) by
A22,
A27,
Lm8
.= (((
nat_hom H)
. g1)
* ((
nat_hom H)
. g2)) by
A25,
A26,
GROUP_6: 19
.= ((
nat_hom H)
. (g1
* g2)) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((g1
* g2)
* H) by
GROUP_6:def 8;
then (g3
* H)
= ((g1
* g2)
* H) by
A14,
A28,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then ((g3
" )
* (g1
* g2))
in H by
GROUP_2: 114;
then ((g3
" )
* (g1
* g2))
in the
carrier of H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((g3
" )
* (g1
* g2))
in N by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((G
^ o)
. ((g3
" )
* (g1
* g2)))
in N by
Lm9;
then (((G
^ o)
. (g3
" ))
* ((G
^ o)
. (g1
* g2)))
in N by
GROUP_6:def 6;
then (((G
^ o)
. (g3
" ))
* (((G
^ o)
. g1)
* ((G
^ o)
. g2)))
in N by
GROUP_6:def 6;
then ((h3
" )
* (h1
* h2))
in N by
A24,
A21,
A18,
GROUP_6: 32;
then ((h3
" )
* (h1
* h2))
in the
carrier of N by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then
A30: ((h3
" )
* (h1
* h2))
in H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
A31: ((
nat_hom H)
. h1)
= (h1
* H) & ((
nat_hom H)
. h2)
= (h2
* H) by
GROUP_6:def 8;
B39
= (h3
* H) by
A17,
Lm8;
then
A32: B3
= (h3
* H) by
A14,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
A33: (
@ ((
nat_hom H)
. h1))
= ((
nat_hom H)
. h1) & (
@ ((
nat_hom H)
. h2))
= ((
nat_hom H)
. h2);
B2
= (h2
* H) by
A12,
A29,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then (B1
* B2)
= (the
multF of G9
. (B19,B29)) by
A10,
A29,
XTUPLE_0: 1
.= (
@ (B19
* B29)) by
A4,
Def15
.= ((
@ B19)
* (
@ B29)) by
GROUP_6: 20;
then (B1
* B2)
= ((h1
* H)
* (h2
* H)) by
A23,
A29,
Lm8
.= (((
nat_hom H)
. h1)
* ((
nat_hom H)
. h2)) by
A33,
A31,
GROUP_6: 19
.= ((
nat_hom H)
. (h1
* h2)) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((h1
* h2)
* H) by
GROUP_6:def 8;
hence (f
. A3)
= ((f
. A1)
* (f
. A2)) by
A32,
A30,
GROUP_2: 114;
end;
hence (a
. o) is
Homomorphism of G9, G9 by
A7,
GROUP_6:def 6;
end;
hence a is
distributive;
end;
the
carrier of (G
./. N)
= the
carrier of (G
./. H) by
Def14;
then
A34: G9 is
Group-like
associative by
Def15;
now
let x,y,z be
Element of (G
./. N);
reconsider x9 = x, y9 = y, z9 = z as
Element of G9;
((x9
* y9)
* z9)
= ((x
* y)
* z) & (x9
* (y9
* z9))
= (x
* (y
* z));
hence ((x
* y)
* z)
= (x
* (y
* z)) by
A34,
GROUP_1:def 3;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
GROUP_1:def 2,
GROUP_1:def 3;
end;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let f be
Function of G, H;
::
GROUP_9:def18
attr f is
homomorphic means
:
Def18: for o be
Element of O, g be
Element of G holds (f
. ((G
^ o)
. g))
= ((H
^ o)
. (f
. g));
end
registration
let O be
set;
let G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O;
cluster
multiplicative
homomorphic for
Function of G, H;
existence
proof
take f = (
1: (G,H));
thus f is
multiplicative;
let o be
Element of O;
let g be
Element of G;
((H
^ o)
. (f
. g))
= ((H
^ o)
. (
1_ H)) by
FUNCOP_1: 7
.= (
1_ H) by
GROUP_6: 31;
hence thesis by
FUNCOP_1: 7;
end;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O;
mode
Homomorphism of G,H is
multiplicative
homomorphic
Function of G, H;
end
Lm10: for O be
set, G,H,I be
GroupWithOperators of O, h be
Homomorphism of G, H holds for h1 be
Homomorphism of H, I holds (h1
* h) is
Homomorphism of G, I
proof
let O be
set;
let G,H,I be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let h be
Homomorphism of G, H;
let h1 be
Homomorphism of H, I;
reconsider f = (h1
* h) as
Function of G, I;
now
let o be
Element of O;
let g be
Element of G;
thus (f
. ((G
^ o)
. g))
= (h1
. (h
. ((G
^ o)
. g))) by
FUNCT_2: 15
.= (h1
. ((H
^ o)
. (h
. g))) by
Def18
.= ((I
^ o)
. (h1
. (h
. g))) by
Def18
.= ((I
^ o)
. (f
. g)) by
FUNCT_2: 15;
end;
hence thesis by
Def18;
end;
definition
let O be
set;
let G,H,I be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let h be
Homomorphism of G, H;
let h1 be
Homomorphism of H, I;
:: original:
*
redefine
func h1
* h ->
Homomorphism of G, I ;
correctness by
Lm10;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O;
::
GROUP_9:def19
pred G,H
are_isomorphic means ex h be
Homomorphism of G, H st h is
bijective;
reflexivity
proof
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
reconsider G9 = G as
Group;
set h = (
id the
carrier of G9);
for o be
Element of O, g be
Element of G holds (h
. ((G
^ o)
. g))
= ((G
^ o)
. (h
. g));
then
reconsider h as
Homomorphism of G, G by
Def18,
GROUP_6: 38;
take h;
h is
onto;
hence thesis;
end;
end
Lm11: for O be
set, G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O holds (G,H)
are_isomorphic implies (H,G)
are_isomorphic
proof
let O be
set;
let G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O;
assume (G,H)
are_isomorphic ;
then
consider f be
Homomorphism of G, H such that
A1: f is
bijective;
set f9 = (f
" );
A2: (
rng f)
= the
carrier of H by
A1,
FUNCT_2:def 3;
then
A3: (
dom f9)
= the
carrier of H by
A1,
FUNCT_1: 33;
A4: (
dom f)
= the
carrier of G by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A5: (
rng f9)
= the
carrier of G by
A1,
FUNCT_1: 33;
then
reconsider f9 as
Function of H, G by
A3,
FUNCT_2: 1;
A6:
now
let o be
Element of O;
let h be
Element of H;
set g = (f9
. h);
thus (f9
. ((H
^ o)
. h))
= (f9
. ((H
^ o)
. (f
. g))) by
A1,
A2,
FUNCT_1: 35
.= (f9
. (f
. ((G
^ o)
. g))) by
Def18
.= ((G
^ o)
. (f9
. h)) by
A1,
A4,
FUNCT_1: 34;
end;
now
let h1,h2 be
Element of H;
set g1 = (f9
. h1);
set g2 = (f9
. h2);
(f
. g1)
= h1 & (f
. g2)
= h2 by
A1,
A2,
FUNCT_1: 35;
hence (f9
. (h1
* h2))
= (f9
. (f
. (g1
* g2))) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((f9
. h1)
* (f9
. h2)) by
A1,
A4,
FUNCT_1: 34;
end;
then
reconsider f9 as
Homomorphism of H, G by
A6,
Def18,
GROUP_6:def 6;
take f9;
f9 is
onto by
A5;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
definition
let O be
set, G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O;
:: original:
are_isomorphic
redefine
pred G,H
are_isomorphic ;
symmetry by
Lm11;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let N be
normal
StableSubgroup of G;
::
GROUP_9:def20
func
nat_hom N ->
Homomorphism of G, (G
./. N) means
:
Def20: for H be
strict
normal
Subgroup of G st H
= the multMagma of N holds it
= (
nat_hom H);
existence
proof
set H = the multMagma of N;
reconsider H as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
set IT = (
nat_hom H);
reconsider K = (G
./. N) as
GroupWithOperators of O;
reconsider IT9 = IT as
Function of G, K by
Def14;
A1:
now
let a,b be
Element of G;
(IT9
. (a
* b))
= ((IT
. a)
* (IT
. b)) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((IT9
. a)
* (IT9
. b)) by
Def15;
hence (IT9
. (a
* b))
= ((IT9
. a)
* (IT9
. b));
end;
now
let o be
Element of O;
let g be
Element of G;
per cases ;
suppose
A2: O
<>
{} ;
then (the
action of K
. o)
in (
Funcs (the
carrier of K,the
carrier of K)) by
FUNCT_2: 5;
then
consider f be
Function such that
A3: f
= (the
action of K
. o) and
A4: (
dom f)
= the
carrier of K and (
rng f)
c= the
carrier of K by
FUNCT_2:def 2;
A5: f
= {
[A, B] where A,B be
Element of (
Cosets N) : ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g) } by
A2,
A3,
Def16;
[(IT9
. g), (f
. (IT9
. g))]
in f by
A4,
FUNCT_1:def 2;
then
consider A,B be
Element of (
Cosets N) such that
A6:
[(IT9
. g), (f
. (IT9
. g))]
=
[A, B] and
A7: ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g) by
A5;
A8: (IT9
. g)
= A by
A6,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
consider g9,h9 be
Element of G such that
A9: g9
in A and
A10: h9
in B & h9
= ((G
^ o)
. g9) by
A7;
A11: ((G
^ o)
. ((g9
" )
* g))
= (((G
^ o)
. (g9
" ))
* ((G
^ o)
. g)) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((((G
^ o)
. g9)
" )
* ((G
^ o)
. g)) by
GROUP_6: 32;
reconsider A, B as
Element of (
Cosets H) by
Def14;
A
= (g9
* H) by
A9,
Lm8;
then (g
* H)
= (g9
* H) by
A8,
GROUP_6:def 8;
then ((g9
" )
* g)
in H by
GROUP_2: 114;
then ((g9
" )
* g)
in the
carrier of N by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((g9
" )
* g)
in N by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((G
^ o)
. ((g9
" )
* g))
in N by
Lm9;
then ((G
^ o)
. ((g9
" )
* g))
in the
carrier of N by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then
A12: ((G
^ o)
. ((g9
" )
* g))
in H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
A13: ((K
^ o)
. (IT9
. g))
= (f
. (IT9
. g)) by
A2,
A3,
Def6;
(IT9
. ((G
^ o)
. g))
= (((G
^ o)
. g)
* H) by
GROUP_6:def 8
.= (((G
^ o)
. g9)
* H) by
A12,
A11,
GROUP_2: 114
.= B by
A10,
Lm8;
hence (IT9
. ((G
^ o)
. g))
= ((K
^ o)
. (IT9
. g)) by
A13,
A6,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
suppose
A14: O
=
{} ;
then (G
^ o)
= (
id the
carrier of G) by
Def6;
then
A15: ((G
^ o)
. g)
= g;
(K
^ o)
= (
id the
carrier of K) by
A14,
Def6;
hence (IT9
. ((G
^ o)
. g))
= ((K
^ o)
. (IT9
. g)) by
A15;
end;
end;
then
reconsider IT9 as
Homomorphism of G, K by
A1,
Def18,
GROUP_6:def 6;
reconsider IT9 as
Homomorphism of G, (G
./. N);
take IT9;
let H be
strict
normal
Subgroup of G;
assume H
= the multMagma of N;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
reconsider H = the multMagma of N as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
let IT1,IT2 be
Homomorphism of G, (G
./. N);
assume for H be
strict
normal
Subgroup of G st H
= the multMagma of N holds IT1
= (
nat_hom H);
then
A16: IT1
= (
nat_hom H);
assume for H be
strict
normal
Subgroup of G st H
= the multMagma of N holds IT2
= (
nat_hom H);
hence thesis by
A16;
end;
end
Lm12: for O be
set, G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O, g be
Homomorphism of G, H holds (g
. (
1_ G))
= (
1_ H)
proof
let O be
set;
let G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let g be
Homomorphism of G, H;
(g
. (
1_ G))
= (g
. ((
1_ G)
* (
1_ G))) by
GROUP_1:def 4
.= ((g
. (
1_ G))
* (g
. (
1_ G))) by
GROUP_6:def 6;
hence thesis by
GROUP_1: 7;
end;
Lm13: for O be
set, G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O, a be
Element of G, g be
Homomorphism of G, H holds (g
. (a
" ))
= ((g
. a)
" )
proof
let O be
set;
let G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let a be
Element of G;
let g be
Homomorphism of G, H;
((g
. (a
" ))
* (g
. a))
= (g
. ((a
" )
* a)) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= (g
. (
1_ G)) by
GROUP_1:def 5
.= (
1_ H) by
Lm12;
hence thesis by
GROUP_1: 12;
end;
Lm14: for O be
set, G be
GroupWithOperators of O, A be
Subset of G st A
<>
{} & (for g1,g2 be
Element of G st g1
in A & g2
in A holds (g1
* g2)
in A) & (for g be
Element of G st g
in A holds (g
" )
in A) & (for o be
Element of O, g be
Element of G st g
in A holds ((G
^ o)
. g)
in A) holds ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st the
carrier of H
= A
proof
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let A be
Subset of G;
assume
A1: A
<>
{} ;
assume
A2: for g1,g2 be
Element of G st g1
in A & g2
in A holds (g1
* g2)
in A;
assume for g be
Element of G st g
in A holds (g
" )
in A;
then
consider H9 be
strict
Subgroup of G such that
A3: the
carrier of H9
= A by
A1,
A2,
GROUP_2: 52;
set m9 = the
multF of H9;
set A9 = the
carrier of H9;
assume
A4: for o be
Element of O, g be
Element of G st g
in A holds ((G
^ o)
. g)
in A;
A5:
now
let H be non
empty
HGrWOpStr over O;
let a9 be
Action of O, A9;
assume
A6: H
=
HGrWOpStr (# A9, m9, a9 #);
now
let x,y,z be
Element of H;
reconsider x9 = x, y9 = y, z9 = z as
Element of H9 by
A6;
((x
* y)
* z)
= ((x9
* y9)
* z9) by
A6
.= (x9
* (y9
* z9)) by
GROUP_1:def 3;
hence ((x
* y)
* z)
= (x
* (y
* z)) by
A6;
end;
hence H is
associative by
GROUP_1:def 3;
now
set e9 = (
1_ H9);
reconsider e = e9 as
Element of H by
A6;
take e;
let h be
Element of H;
reconsider h9 = h as
Element of H9 by
A6;
set g9 = (h9
" );
(h
* e)
= (h9
* e9) by
A6
.= h9 by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence (h
* e)
= h;
(e
* h)
= (e9
* h9) by
A6
.= h9 by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence (e
* h)
= h;
reconsider g = g9 as
Element of H by
A6;
take g;
(h
* g)
= (h9
* g9) by
A6
.= (
1_ H9) by
GROUP_1:def 5;
hence (h
* g)
= e;
(g
* h)
= (g9
* h9) by
A6
.= (
1_ H9) by
GROUP_1:def 5;
hence (g
* h)
= e;
end;
hence H is
Group-like by
GROUP_1:def 2;
end;
per cases ;
suppose
A7: O is
empty;
set a9 =
[:
{} ,
{(
id A9)}:];
reconsider a9 as
Action of O, A9 by
A7,
Lm1;
set H =
HGrWOpStr (# A9, m9, a9 #);
reconsider H as non
empty
HGrWOpStr over O;
for G9 be
Group, a be
Action of O, the
carrier of G9 st a
= the
action of H & the multMagma of G9
= the multMagma of H holds a is
distributive by
A7;
then
reconsider H as
GroupWithOperators of O by
A5,
Def5;
A8: the
carrier of H
c= the
carrier of G by
GROUP_2:def 5;
A9:
now
let o be
Element of O;
A10:
now
let x,y be
object;
assume
A11:
[x, y]
in ((
id the
carrier of G)
| the
carrier of H);
then
[x, y]
in (
id the
carrier of G) by
RELAT_1:def 11;
then
A12: x
= y by
RELAT_1:def 10;
x
in the
carrier of H by
A11,
RELAT_1:def 11;
hence
[x, y]
in (
id the
carrier of H) by
A12,
RELAT_1:def 10;
end;
A13:
now
let x,y be
object;
assume
A14:
[x, y]
in (
id the
carrier of H);
then
A15: x
in the
carrier of H by
RELAT_1:def 10;
x
= y by
A14,
RELAT_1:def 10;
then
[x, y]
in (
id the
carrier of G) by
A8,
A15,
RELAT_1:def 10;
hence
[x, y]
in ((
id the
carrier of G)
| the
carrier of H) by
A15,
RELAT_1:def 11;
end;
(H
^ o)
= (
id the
carrier of H) by
A7,
Def6
.= ((
id the
carrier of G)
| the
carrier of H) by
A13,
A10;
hence (H
^ o)
= ((G
^ o)
| the
carrier of H) by
A7,
Def6;
end;
the
multF of H
= (the
multF of G
|| the
carrier of H) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then H is
Subgroup of G by
A8,
GROUP_2:def 5;
then
reconsider H as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
A9,
Def7;
take H;
thus thesis by
A3;
end;
suppose
A16: not O is
empty;
set a9 = the set of all
[o, ((G
^ o)
| A9)] where o be
Element of O;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in a9;
then ex o be
Element of O st x
=
[o, ((G
^ o)
| A9)];
hence ex y1,y2 be
object st x
=
[y1, y2];
end;
then
reconsider a9 as
Relation by
RELAT_1:def 1;
A17:
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in O;
then
reconsider o = x as
Element of O;
reconsider y = ((G
^ o)
| A9) as
object;
take y;
thus
[x, y]
in a9;
end;
now
let x be
object;
given y be
object such that
A18:
[x, y]
in a9;
consider o be
Element of O such that
A19:
[x, y]
=
[o, ((G
^ o)
| A9)] by
A18;
o
in O by
A16;
hence x
in O by
A19,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
then
A20: (
dom a9)
= O by
A17,
XTUPLE_0:def 12;
now
let x,y1,y2 be
object;
assume
[x, y1]
in a9;
then
consider o1 be
Element of O such that
A21:
[x, y1]
=
[o1, ((G
^ o1)
| A9)];
A22: x
= o1 by
A21,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
assume
[x, y2]
in a9;
then
consider o2 be
Element of O such that
A23:
[x, y2]
=
[o2, ((G
^ o2)
| A9)];
x
= o2 by
A23,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence y1
= y2 by
A21,
A23,
A22,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
then
reconsider a9 as
Function by
FUNCT_1:def 1;
now
let y be
object;
assume y
in (
rng a9);
then
consider x be
object such that
A24: x
in (
dom a9) & y
= (a9
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
[x, y]
in a9 by
A24,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
consider o be
Element of O such that
A25:
[x, y]
=
[o, ((G
^ o)
| A9)];
now
reconsider f = ((G
^ o)
| A9) as
Function;
take f;
A26: (
dom ((G
^ o)
| A9))
= (
dom ((G
^ o)
* (
id A9))) by
RELAT_1: 65
.= ((
dom (G
^ o))
/\ A9) by
FUNCT_1: 19
.= (the
carrier of G
/\ A9) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
thus y
= f by
A25,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
A9
c= the
carrier of G by
GROUP_2:def 5;
hence
A27: (
dom f)
= A9 by
A26,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
now
let y be
object;
A28: (
dom f)
= (
dom ((G
^ o)
* (
id A9))) by
RELAT_1: 65;
assume y
in (
rng f);
then
consider x be
object such that
A29: x
in (
dom f) and
A30: y
= (f
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
y
= (((G
^ o)
* (
id A9))
. x) by
A30,
RELAT_1: 65
.= ((G
^ o)
. ((
id A9)
. x)) by
A28,
A29,
FUNCT_1: 12
.= ((G
^ o)
. x) by
A27,
A29,
FUNCT_1: 18;
hence y
in A9 by
A4,
A3,
A27,
A29;
end;
hence (
rng f)
c= A9;
end;
hence y
in (
Funcs (A9,A9)) by
FUNCT_2:def 2;
end;
then (
rng a9)
c= (
Funcs (A9,A9));
then
reconsider a9 as
Action of O, A9 by
A20,
FUNCT_2: 2;
reconsider H =
HGrWOpStr (# A9, m9, a9 #) as non
empty
HGrWOpStr over O;
A31: the
multF of H
= (the
multF of G
|| the
carrier of H) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
H is
Group-like & the
carrier of H
c= the
carrier of G by
A5,
GROUP_2:def 5;
then
A32: H is
Subgroup of G by
A31,
GROUP_2:def 5;
now
let G9 be
Group;
let a be
Action of O, the
carrier of G9;
assume
A33: a
= the
action of H;
assume
A34: the multMagma of G9
= the multMagma of H;
now
let o be
Element of O;
assume o
in O;
then
A35: o
in (
dom a) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (a
. o)
in (
rng a) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
consider f be
Function such that
A36: (a
. o)
= f and
A37: (
dom f)
= the
carrier of G9 & (
rng f)
c= the
carrier of G9 by
FUNCT_2:def 2;
reconsider f as
Function of G9, G9 by
A37,
FUNCT_2: 2;
[o, (a
. o)]
in a9 by
A33,
A35,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
consider o9 be
Element of O such that
A38:
[o, (a
. o)]
=
[o9, ((G
^ o9)
| A9)];
A39: o
= o9 & (a
. o)
= ((G
^ o9)
| A9) by
A38,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
now
let a9,b9 be
Element of G9;
b9
in the
carrier of H9 by
A34;
then
A40: b9
in (
dom (
id A9));
reconsider a = a9, b = b9 as
Element of H by
A34;
reconsider g1 = a, g2 = b as
Element of G by
GROUP_2: 42;
a9
in the
carrier of H9 by
A34;
then
A41: a9
in (
dom (
id A9));
reconsider h1 = ((G
^ o)
. g1), h2 = ((G
^ o)
. g2) as
Element of H by
A4,
A3;
(a9
* b9)
in the
carrier of H9 by
A34;
then
A42: (a9
* b9)
in (
dom (
id A9));
A43: (f
. b9)
= (((G
^ o)
* (
id A9))
. b9) by
A36,
A39,
RELAT_1: 65
.= ((G
^ o)
. ((
id A9)
. b9)) by
A40,
FUNCT_1: 13
.= h2;
A44: (f
. a9)
= (((G
^ o)
* (
id A9))
. a9) by
A36,
A39,
RELAT_1: 65
.= ((G
^ o)
. ((
id A9)
. a9)) by
A41,
FUNCT_1: 13
.= h1;
thus (f
. (a9
* b9))
= (((G
^ o)
* (
id A9))
. (a9
* b9)) by
A36,
A39,
RELAT_1: 65
.= ((G
^ o)
. ((
id A9)
. (a9
* b9))) by
A42,
FUNCT_1: 13
.= ((G
^ o)
. (a
* b)) by
A34
.= ((G
^ o)
. (g1
* g2)) by
A32,
GROUP_2: 43
.= (((G
^ o)
. g1)
* ((G
^ o)
. g2)) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= (h1
* h2) by
A32,
GROUP_2: 43
.= ((f
. a9)
* (f
. b9)) by
A34,
A44,
A43;
end;
hence (a
. o) is
Homomorphism of G9, G9 by
A36,
GROUP_6:def 6;
end;
hence a is
distributive;
end;
then
reconsider H as
GroupWithOperators of O by
A5,
Def5;
now
let o be
Element of O;
o
in O by
A16;
then o
in (
dom a9) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
[o, (a9
. o)]
in a9 by
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
consider o9 be
Element of O such that
A45:
[o, (a9
. o)]
=
[o9, ((G
^ o9)
| A9)];
o
= o9 & (a9
. o)
= ((G
^ o9)
| A9) by
A45,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence (H
^ o)
= ((G
^ o)
| the
carrier of H) by
A16,
Def6;
end;
then
reconsider H as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
A32,
Def7;
take H;
thus thesis by
A3;
end;
end;
definition
let O be
set;
let G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let g be
Homomorphism of G, H;
::
GROUP_9:def21
func
Ker g ->
strict
StableSubgroup of G means
:
Def21: the
carrier of it
= { a where a be
Element of G : (g
. a)
= (
1_ H) };
existence
proof
defpred
P[
set] means (g
. $1)
= (
1_ H);
reconsider A = { a where a be
Element of G :
P[a] } as
Subset of G from
DOMAIN_1:sch 7;
A1:
now
let a,b be
Element of G;
assume a
in A & b
in A;
then
A2: (ex a1 be
Element of G st a1
= a & (g
. a1)
= (
1_ H)) & ex b1 be
Element of G st b1
= b & (g
. b1)
= (
1_ H);
(g
. (a
* b))
= ((g
. a)
* (g
. b)) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= (
1_ H) by
A2,
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence (a
* b)
in A;
end;
A3:
now
let a be
Element of G;
assume a
in A;
then ex a1 be
Element of G st a1
= a & (g
. a1)
= (
1_ H);
then (g
. (a
" ))
= ((
1_ H)
" ) by
Lm13
.= (
1_ H) by
GROUP_1: 8;
hence (a
" )
in A;
end;
A4:
now
let o be
Element of O;
let a be
Element of G;
assume a
in A;
then ex a1 be
Element of G st a1
= a & (g
. a1)
= (
1_ H);
then (g
. ((G
^ o)
. a))
= ((H
^ o)
. (
1_ H)) by
Def18
.= (
1_ H) by
GROUP_6: 31;
hence ((G
^ o)
. a)
in A;
end;
(g
. (
1_ G))
= (
1_ H) by
Lm12;
then (
1_ G)
in A;
then
consider B be
strict
StableSubgroup of G such that
A5: the
carrier of B
= A by
A1,
A3,
A4,
Lm14;
take B;
thus thesis by
A5;
end;
uniqueness by
Lm4;
end
registration
let O be
set;
let G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let g be
Homomorphism of G, H;
cluster (
Ker g) ->
normal;
correctness
proof
now
reconsider G9 = G, H9 = H as
Group;
let N be
strict
Subgroup of G;
reconsider g9 = g as
Homomorphism of G9, H9;
A1: the
carrier of (
Ker g9)
= { a where a be
Element of G : (g
. a)
= (
1_ H) } by
GROUP_6:def 9;
assume N
= the multMagma of (
Ker g);
then the
carrier of (
Ker g9)
= the
carrier of N by
A1,
Def21;
hence N is
normal by
GROUP_2: 59;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
Lm15: for O be
set, G be
GroupWithOperators of O, H be
StableSubgroup of G holds the multMagma of H is
strict
Subgroup of G
proof
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let H be
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider H9 = the multMagma of H as non
empty
multMagma;
now
set e = (
1_ H);
reconsider e9 = e as
Element of H9;
take e9;
let h9 be
Element of H9;
reconsider h = h9 as
Element of H;
set g = (h
" );
reconsider g9 = g as
Element of H9;
(h9
* e9)
= (h
* e)
.= h by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence (h9
* e9)
= h9;
(e9
* h9)
= (e
* h)
.= h by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence (e9
* h9)
= h9;
take g9;
(h9
* g9)
= (h
* g)
.= (
1_ H) by
GROUP_1:def 5;
hence (h9
* g9)
= e9;
(g9
* h9)
= (g
* h)
.= (
1_ H) by
GROUP_1:def 5;
hence (g9
* h9)
= e9;
end;
then
reconsider H9 as
Group-like non
empty
multMagma by
GROUP_1:def 2;
H is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
then the
carrier of H9
c= the
carrier of G & the
multF of H9
= (the
multF of G
|| the
carrier of H9) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
hence thesis by
GROUP_2:def 5;
end;
Lm16: for O be
set, G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O, G9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G, f be
Homomorphism of G, H holds ex H9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of H st the
carrier of H9
= (f
.: the
carrier of G9)
proof
let O be
set;
let G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let G9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider G99 = the multMagma of G9 as
strict
Subgroup of G by
Lm15;
let f be
Homomorphism of G, H;
set A = { (f
. g) where g be
Element of G : g
in G99 };
(
1_ G)
in G99 by
GROUP_2: 46;
then (f
. (
1_ G))
in A;
then
reconsider A as non
empty
set;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in A;
then ex g be
Element of G st x
= (f
. g) & g
in G99;
hence x
in the
carrier of H;
end;
then
reconsider A as
Subset of H by
TARSKI:def 3;
A1:
now
let h1,h2 be
Element of H;
assume that
A2: h1
in A and
A3: h2
in A;
consider a be
Element of G such that
A4: h1
= (f
. a) & a
in G99 by
A2;
consider b be
Element of G such that
A5: h2
= (f
. b) & b
in G99 by
A3;
(f
. (a
* b))
= (h1
* h2) & (a
* b)
in G99 by
A4,
A5,
GROUP_2: 50,
GROUP_6:def 6;
hence (h1
* h2)
in A;
end;
A6:
now
let o be
Element of O;
let h be
Element of H;
assume h
in A;
then
consider g be
Element of G such that
A7: h
= (f
. g) and
A8: g
in G99;
g
in the
carrier of G99 by
A8,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then g
in G9 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((G
^ o)
. g)
in G9 by
Lm9;
then ((G
^ o)
. g)
in the
carrier of G9 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then
A9: ((G
^ o)
. g)
in G99 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
((H
^ o)
. h)
= (f
. ((G
^ o)
. g)) by
A7,
Def18;
hence ((H
^ o)
. h)
in A by
A9;
end;
now
let h be
Element of H;
assume h
in A;
then
consider g be
Element of G such that
A10: h
= (f
. g) & g
in G99;
(g
" )
in G99 & (h
" )
= (f
. (g
" )) by
A10,
Lm13,
GROUP_2: 51;
hence (h
" )
in A;
end;
then
consider H99 be
strict
StableSubgroup of H such that
A11: the
carrier of H99
= A by
A1,
A6,
Lm14;
take H99;
now
set R = f;
let h be
Element of H;
reconsider R as
Relation of the
carrier of G, the
carrier of H;
hereby
assume h
in A;
then
consider g be
Element of G such that
A12: h
= (f
. g) and
A13: g
in G99;
A14: g
in the
carrier of G9 by
A13,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
(
dom f)
= the
carrier of G by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
[g, h]
in f by
A12,
FUNCT_1: 1;
hence h
in (f
.: the
carrier of G9) by
A14,
RELSET_1: 29;
end;
assume h
in (f
.: the
carrier of G9);
then
consider g be
Element of G such that
A15:
[g, h]
in R & g
in the
carrier of G9 by
RELSET_1: 29;
(f
. g)
= h & g
in G99 by
A15,
FUNCT_1: 1,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
hence h
in A;
end;
hence thesis by
A11,
SUBSET_1: 3;
end;
definition
let O be
set;
let G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let g be
Homomorphism of G, H;
::
GROUP_9:def22
func
Image g ->
strict
StableSubgroup of H means
:
Def22: the
carrier of it
= (g
.: the
carrier of G);
existence
proof
reconsider G9 = the HGrWOpStr of G as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
Lm3;
consider H9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of H such that
A1: the
carrier of H9
= (g
.: the
carrier of G9) by
Lm16;
take H9;
thus thesis by
A1;
end;
uniqueness by
Lm4;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let H be
StableSubgroup of G;
::
GROUP_9:def23
func
carr (H) ->
Subset of G equals the
carrier of H;
coherence
proof
reconsider H9 = H as
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
(
carr H9) is
Subset of G;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let H1,H2 be
StableSubgroup of G;
::
GROUP_9:def24
func H1
* H2 ->
Subset of G equals ((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2));
coherence ;
end
Lm17: for O be
set, G be
GroupWithOperators of O, H be
StableSubgroup of G holds (
1_ G)
in H
proof
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let H be
StableSubgroup of G;
H is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
hence thesis by
GROUP_2: 46;
end;
Lm18: for O be
set, G be
GroupWithOperators of O, H be
StableSubgroup of G, g1,g2 be
Element of G holds g1
in H & g2
in H implies (g1
* g2)
in H
proof
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let H be
StableSubgroup of G;
let g1,g2 be
Element of G;
assume
A1: g1
in H & g2
in H;
H is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
hence thesis by
A1,
GROUP_2: 50;
end;
Lm19: for O be
set, G be
GroupWithOperators of O, H be
StableSubgroup of G, g be
Element of G holds g
in H implies (g
" )
in H
proof
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let H be
StableSubgroup of G;
let g be
Element of G;
assume
A1: g
in H;
H is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
hence thesis by
A1,
GROUP_2: 51;
end;
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let H1,H2 be
StableSubgroup of G;
::
GROUP_9:def25
func H1
/\ H2 ->
strict
StableSubgroup of G means
:
Def25: the
carrier of it
= ((
carr H1)
/\ (
carr H2));
existence
proof
set A = ((
carr H1)
/\ (
carr H2));
(
1_ G)
in H2 by
Lm17;
then
A1: (
1_ G)
in the
carrier of H2 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
A2:
now
let g1,g2 be
Element of G;
assume that
A3: g1
in A and
A4: g2
in A;
g2
in (
carr H2) by
A4,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A5: g2
in H2 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
g1
in (
carr H2) by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then g1
in H2 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (g1
* g2)
in H2 by
A5,
Lm18;
then
A6: (g1
* g2)
in (
carr H2) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
g2
in (
carr H1) by
A4,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A7: g2
in H1 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
g1
in (
carr H1) by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then g1
in H1 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (g1
* g2)
in H1 by
A7,
Lm18;
then (g1
* g2)
in (
carr H1) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
hence (g1
* g2)
in A by
A6,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
A8:
now
let o be
Element of O;
let a be
Element of G;
assume
A9: a
in A;
then a
in (
carr H2) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then a
in H2 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((G
^ o)
. a)
in H2 by
Lm9;
then
A10: ((G
^ o)
. a)
in (
carr H2) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
a
in (
carr H1) by
A9,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then a
in H1 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((G
^ o)
. a)
in H1 by
Lm9;
then ((G
^ o)
. a)
in (
carr H1) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
hence ((G
^ o)
. a)
in A by
A10,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
A11:
now
let g be
Element of G;
assume
A12: g
in A;
then g
in (
carr H2) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then g
in H2 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (g
" )
in H2 by
Lm19;
then
A13: (g
" )
in (
carr H2) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
g
in (
carr H1) by
A12,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then g
in H1 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (g
" )
in H1 by
Lm19;
then (g
" )
in (
carr H1) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
hence (g
" )
in A by
A13,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
end;
(
1_ G)
in H1 by
Lm17;
then (
1_ G)
in the
carrier of H1 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then A
<>
{} by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence thesis by
A2,
A11,
A8,
Lm14;
end;
uniqueness by
Lm4;
commutativity ;
end
Lm20: for O be
set, G be
GroupWithOperators of O, H1,H2 be
StableSubgroup of G holds the
carrier of H1
c= the
carrier of H2 implies H1 is
StableSubgroup of H2
proof
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let H1,H2 be
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider H19 = H1, H29 = H2 as
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
assume
A1: the
carrier of H1
c= the
carrier of H2;
A2:
now
let o be
Element of O;
thus (H1
^ o)
= ((G
^ o)
| the
carrier of H1) by
Def7
.= (((G
^ o)
| the
carrier of H2)
| the
carrier of H1) by
A1,
RELAT_1: 74
.= ((H2
^ o)
| the
carrier of H1) by
Def7;
end;
H19 is
Subgroup of H29 by
A1,
GROUP_2: 57;
hence thesis by
A2,
Def7;
end;
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let A be
Subset of G;
::
GROUP_9:def26
func
the_stable_subgroup_of A ->
strict
StableSubgroup of G means
:
Def26: A
c= the
carrier of it & for H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st A
c= the
carrier of H holds it is
StableSubgroup of H;
existence
proof
defpred
P[
set] means ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st $1
= (
carr H) & A
c= $1;
consider X be
set such that
A1: for Y be
set holds Y
in X iff Y
in (
bool the
carrier of G) &
P[Y] from
XFAMILY:sch 1;
set M = (
meet X);
A2: (
carr (
(Omega). G))
= the
carrier of (
(Omega). G);
then
A3: X
<>
{} by
A1;
A4: the
carrier of G
in X by
A1,
A2;
A5: M
c= the
carrier of G by
A4,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
now
let Y be
set;
assume Y
in X;
then
consider H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G such that
A6: Y
= (
carr H) and A
c= Y by
A1;
(
1_ G)
in H by
Lm17;
hence (
1_ G)
in Y by
A6,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
then
A7: M
<>
{} by
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
reconsider M as
Subset of G by
A5;
A8:
now
let o be
Element of O;
let a be
Element of G;
assume
A9: a
in M;
now
let Y be
set;
assume
A10: Y
in X;
then
consider H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G such that
A11: Y
= (
carr H) and A
c= Y by
A1;
a
in (
carr H) by
A9,
A10,
A11,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
then a
in H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((G
^ o)
. a)
in H by
Lm9;
hence ((G
^ o)
. a)
in Y by
A11,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
hence ((G
^ o)
. a)
in M by
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
end;
A12:
now
let a,b be
Element of G;
assume that
A13: a
in M and
A14: b
in M;
now
let Y be
set;
assume
A15: Y
in X;
then
consider H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G such that
A16: Y
= (
carr H) and A
c= Y by
A1;
b
in (
carr H) by
A14,
A15,
A16,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
then
A17: b
in H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
a
in (
carr H) by
A13,
A15,
A16,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
then a
in H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (a
* b)
in H by
A17,
Lm18;
hence (a
* b)
in Y by
A16,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
hence (a
* b)
in M by
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
end;
now
let a be
Element of G;
assume
A18: a
in M;
now
let Y be
set;
assume
A19: Y
in X;
then
consider H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G such that
A20: Y
= (
carr H) and A
c= Y by
A1;
a
in (
carr H) by
A18,
A19,
A20,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
then a
in H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (a
" )
in H by
Lm19;
hence (a
" )
in Y by
A20,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
hence (a
" )
in M by
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
end;
then
consider H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G such that
A21: the
carrier of H
= M by
A7,
A12,
A8,
Lm14;
take H;
now
let Y be
set;
assume Y
in X;
then ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st Y
= (
carr H) & A
c= Y by
A1;
hence A
c= Y;
end;
hence A
c= the
carrier of H by
A3,
A21,
SETFAM_1: 5;
let H1 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
A22: the
carrier of H1
= (
carr H1);
assume A
c= the
carrier of H1;
then the
carrier of H1
in X by
A1,
A22;
hence thesis by
A21,
Lm20,
SETFAM_1: 3;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let H1,H2 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
assume that
A23: A
c= the
carrier of H1 and
A24: (for H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st A
c= the
carrier of H holds H1 is
StableSubgroup of H) & A
c= the
carrier of H2 and
A25: for H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st A
c= the
carrier of H holds H2 is
StableSubgroup of H;
H1 is
StableSubgroup of H2 by
A24;
then H1 is
Subgroup of H2 by
Def7;
then
A26: the
carrier of H1
c= the
carrier of H2 by
GROUP_2:def 5;
H2 is
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A23,
A25;
then H2 is
Subgroup of H1 by
Def7;
then the
carrier of H2
c= the
carrier of H1 by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then the
carrier of H1
= the
carrier of H2 by
A26,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
hence thesis by
Lm4;
end;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let H1,H2 be
StableSubgroup of G;
::
GROUP_9:def27
func H1
"\/" H2 ->
strict
StableSubgroup of G equals (
the_stable_subgroup_of ((
carr H1)
\/ (
carr H2)));
correctness ;
end
begin
reserve x,O for
set,
o for
Element of O,
G,H,I for
GroupWithOperators of O,
A,B for
Subset of G,
N for
normal
StableSubgroup of G,
H1,H2,H3 for
StableSubgroup of G,
g1,g2 for
Element of G,
h1,h2 for
Element of H1,
h for
Homomorphism of G, H;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:1
Th1: for x be
object holds x
in H1 implies x
in G
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A1: x
in H1;
H1 is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
hence thesis by
A1,
GROUP_2: 40;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:2
Th2: h1 is
Element of G
proof
H1 is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
hence thesis by
GROUP_2: 42;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:3
Th3: h1
= g1 & h2
= g2 implies (h1
* h2)
= (g1
* g2)
proof
assume
A1: h1
= g1 & h2
= g2;
H1 is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
hence thesis by
A1,
GROUP_2: 43;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:4
Th4: (
1_ G)
= (
1_ H1)
proof
reconsider H19 = H1 as
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
(
1_ H1)
= (
1_ H19);
hence thesis by
GROUP_2: 44;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:5
(
1_ G)
in H1 by
Lm17;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:6
Th6: h1
= g1 implies (h1
" )
= (g1
" )
proof
reconsider g9 = (h1
" ) as
Element of G by
Th2;
A1: (h1
* (h1
" ))
= (
1_ H1) by
GROUP_1:def 5;
assume h1
= g1;
then (g1
* g9)
= (
1_ H1) by
A1,
Th3
.= (
1_ G) by
Th4;
hence thesis by
GROUP_1: 12;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:7
g1
in H1 & g2
in H1 implies (g1
* g2)
in H1 by
Lm18;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:8
g1
in H1 implies (g1
" )
in H1 by
Lm19;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:9
A
<>
{} & (for g1, g2 st g1
in A & g2
in A holds (g1
* g2)
in A) & (for g1 st g1
in A holds (g1
" )
in A) & (for o, g1 st g1
in A holds ((G
^ o)
. g1)
in A) implies ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st the
carrier of H
= A by
Lm14;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:10
Th10: G is
StableSubgroup of G
proof
A1: for o be
Element of O holds (G
^ o)
= ((G
^ o)
| the
carrier of G);
G is
Subgroup of G by
GROUP_2: 54;
hence thesis by
A1,
Def7;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:11
Th11: for G1,G2,G3 be
GroupWithOperators of O holds G1 is
StableSubgroup of G2 & G2 is
StableSubgroup of G3 implies G1 is
StableSubgroup of G3
proof
let G1,G2,G3 be
GroupWithOperators of O;
assume that
A1: G1 is
StableSubgroup of G2 and
A2: G2 is
StableSubgroup of G3;
A3: G1 is
Subgroup of G2 by
A1,
Def7;
A4:
now
let o be
Element of O;
A5: the
carrier of G1
c= the
carrier of G2 by
A3,
GROUP_2:def 5;
(G1
^ o)
= ((G2
^ o)
| the
carrier of G1) by
A1,
Def7
.= (((G3
^ o)
| the
carrier of G2)
| the
carrier of G1) by
A2,
Def7
.= ((G3
^ o)
| (the
carrier of G2
/\ the
carrier of G1)) by
RELAT_1: 71;
hence (G1
^ o)
= ((G3
^ o)
| the
carrier of G1) by
A5,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
end;
G2 is
Subgroup of G3 by
A2,
Def7;
then G1 is
Subgroup of G3 by
A3,
GROUP_2: 56;
hence thesis by
A4,
Def7;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:12
the
carrier of H1
c= the
carrier of H2 implies H1 is
StableSubgroup of H2 by
Lm20;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:13
Th13: (for g be
Element of G st g
in H1 holds g
in H2) implies H1 is
StableSubgroup of H2
proof
assume
A1: for g be
Element of G st g
in H1 holds g
in H2;
the
carrier of H1
c= the
carrier of H2
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in the
carrier of H1;
then
reconsider g = x as
Element of H1;
reconsider g as
Element of G by
Th2;
g
in H1 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then g
in H2 by
A1;
hence thesis by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
hence thesis by
Lm20;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:14
for H1,H2 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st the
carrier of H1
= the
carrier of H2 holds H1
= H2 by
Lm4;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:15
Th15: (
(1). G)
= (
(1). H1)
proof
A1: (
1_ H1)
= (
1_ G) by
Th4;
(
(1). H1) is
StableSubgroup of G & the
carrier of (
(1). H1)
=
{(
1_ H1)} by
Def8,
Th11;
hence thesis by
A1,
Def8;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:16
Th16: (
(1). G) is
StableSubgroup of H1
proof
(
(1). G)
= (
(1). H1) by
Th15;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:17
Th17: ((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2))
= ((
carr H2)
* (
carr H1)) implies ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st the
carrier of H
= ((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2))
proof
assume
A1: ((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2))
= ((
carr H2)
* (
carr H1));
A2:
now
let o be
Element of O;
let g be
Element of G;
assume g
in ((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2));
then
consider a,b be
Element of G such that
A3: g
= (a
* b) and
A4: a
in (
carr H1) and
A5: b
in (
carr H2);
a
in H1 by
A4,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((G
^ o)
. a)
in H1 by
Lm9;
then
A6: ((G
^ o)
. a)
in (
carr H1) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
b
in H2 by
A5,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((G
^ o)
. b)
in H2 by
Lm9;
then ((G
^ o)
. b)
in (
carr H2) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (((G
^ o)
. a)
* ((G
^ o)
. b))
in ((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2)) by
A6;
hence ((G
^ o)
. g)
in ((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2)) by
A3,
GROUP_6:def 6;
end;
A7: H2 is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
A8: H1 is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
A9:
now
let g be
Element of G;
assume
A10: g
in ((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2));
then
consider a,b be
Element of G such that
A11: g
= (a
* b) and a
in (
carr H1) and b
in (
carr H2);
consider b1,a1 be
Element of G such that
A12: (a
* b)
= (b1
* a1) and
A13: b1
in (
carr H2) and
A14: a1
in (
carr H1) by
A1,
A10,
A11;
b1
in H2 by
A13,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (b1
" )
in H2 by
A7,
GROUP_2: 51;
then
A15: (b1
" )
in (
carr H2) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
a1
in H1 by
A14,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (a1
" )
in H1 by
A8,
GROUP_2: 51;
then
A16: (a1
" )
in (
carr H1) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
(g
" )
= ((a1
" )
* (b1
" )) by
A11,
A12,
GROUP_1: 17;
hence (g
" )
in ((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2)) by
A16,
A15;
end;
A17:
now
let g1,g2 be
Element of G;
assume that
A18: g1
in ((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2)) and
A19: g2
in ((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2));
consider a1,b1 be
Element of G such that
A20: g1
= (a1
* b1) and
A21: a1
in (
carr H1) and
A22: b1
in (
carr H2) by
A18;
consider a2,b2 be
Element of G such that
A23: g2
= (a2
* b2) and
A24: a2
in (
carr H1) and
A25: b2
in (
carr H2) by
A19;
(b1
* a2)
in ((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2)) by
A1,
A22,
A24;
then
consider a,b be
Element of G such that
A26: (b1
* a2)
= (a
* b) and
A27: a
in (
carr H1) and
A28: b
in (
carr H2);
A29: a
in H1 by
A27,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
A30: b
in H2 by
A28,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
b2
in H2 by
A25,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (b
* b2)
in H2 by
A7,
A30,
GROUP_2: 50;
then
A31: (b
* b2)
in (
carr H2) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
a1
in H1 by
A21,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (a1
* a)
in H1 by
A8,
A29,
GROUP_2: 50;
then
A32: (a1
* a)
in (
carr H1) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
(g1
* g2)
= (((a1
* b1)
* a2)
* b2) by
A20,
A23,
GROUP_1:def 3
.= ((a1
* (b1
* a2))
* b2) by
GROUP_1:def 3;
then (g1
* g2)
= (((a1
* a)
* b)
* b2) by
A26,
GROUP_1:def 3
.= ((a1
* a)
* (b
* b2)) by
GROUP_1:def 3;
hence (g1
* g2)
in ((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2)) by
A32,
A31;
end;
((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2))
<>
{} by
GROUP_2: 9;
hence thesis by
A17,
A9,
A2,
Lm14;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:18
Th18: (for H be
StableSubgroup of G st H
= (H1
/\ H2) holds the
carrier of H
= (the
carrier of H1
/\ the
carrier of H2)) & for H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G holds the
carrier of H
= (the
carrier of H1
/\ the
carrier of H2) implies H
= (H1
/\ H2)
proof
A1: the
carrier of H1
= (
carr H1) & the
carrier of H2
= (
carr H2);
thus for H be
StableSubgroup of G st H
= (H1
/\ H2) holds the
carrier of H
= (the
carrier of H1
/\ the
carrier of H2)
proof
let H be
StableSubgroup of G;
assume H
= (H1
/\ H2);
hence the
carrier of H
= ((
carr H1)
/\ (
carr H2)) by
Def25
.= (the
carrier of H1
/\ the
carrier of H2);
end;
let H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
assume the
carrier of H
= (the
carrier of H1
/\ the
carrier of H2);
hence thesis by
A1,
Def25;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:19
Th19: for H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G holds (H
/\ H)
= H
proof
let H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
the
carrier of (H
/\ H)
= ((
carr H)
/\ (
carr H)) by
Def25
.= the
carrier of H;
hence thesis by
Lm4;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:20
Th20: ((H1
/\ H2)
/\ H3)
= (H1
/\ (H2
/\ H3))
proof
the
carrier of ((H1
/\ H2)
/\ H3)
= ((
carr (H1
/\ H2))
/\ (
carr H3)) by
Def25
.= (((
carr H1)
/\ (
carr H2))
/\ (
carr H3)) by
Def25
.= ((
carr H1)
/\ ((
carr H2)
/\ (
carr H3))) by
XBOOLE_1: 16
.= ((
carr H1)
/\ (
carr (H2
/\ H3))) by
Def25
.= the
carrier of (H1
/\ (H2
/\ H3)) by
Def25;
hence thesis by
Lm4;
end;
Lm21: for H1 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G holds H1 is
StableSubgroup of H2 iff (H1
/\ H2)
= H1
proof
let H1 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
thus H1 is
StableSubgroup of H2 implies (H1
/\ H2)
= H1
proof
assume H1 is
StableSubgroup of H2;
then H1 is
Subgroup of H2 by
Def7;
then
A1: the
carrier of H1
c= the
carrier of H2 by
GROUP_2:def 5;
the
carrier of (H1
/\ H2)
= ((
carr H1)
/\ (
carr H2)) by
Def25;
hence thesis by
A1,
Lm4,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
end;
assume (H1
/\ H2)
= H1;
then the
carrier of H1
= ((
carr H1)
/\ (
carr H2)) by
Def25
.= (the
carrier of H1
/\ the
carrier of H2);
hence thesis by
Lm20,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:21
Th21: ((
(1). G)
/\ H1)
= (
(1). G) & (H1
/\ (
(1). G))
= (
(1). G)
proof
A1: (
(1). G) is
StableSubgroup of H1 by
Th16;
hence ((
(1). G)
/\ H1)
= (
(1). G) by
Lm21;
thus thesis by
A1,
Lm21;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:22
Th22: (
union (
Cosets N))
= the
carrier of G
proof
reconsider H = the multMagma of N as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
now
set h = the
Element of H;
let x be
object;
reconsider g = h as
Element of G by
GROUP_2: 42;
assume x
in the
carrier of G;
then
reconsider a = x as
Element of G;
A1: a
= (a
* (
1_ G)) by
GROUP_1:def 4
.= (a
* ((g
" )
* g)) by
GROUP_1:def 5
.= ((a
* (g
" ))
* g) by
GROUP_1:def 3;
A2: ((a
* (g
" ))
* H)
in (
Cosets H) by
GROUP_2:def 15;
h
in H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then a
in ((a
* (g
" ))
* H) by
A1,
GROUP_2: 103;
hence x
in (
union (
Cosets H)) by
A2,
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
then
A3: the
carrier of G
c= (
union (
Cosets H));
(
Cosets N)
= (
Cosets H) by
Def14;
hence thesis by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:23
Th23: for N1,N2 be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G holds ex N be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G st the
carrier of N
= ((
carr N1)
* (
carr N2))
proof
let N1,N2 be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G;
set N19 = the multMagma of N1;
set N29 = the multMagma of N2;
reconsider N19, N29 as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
set A = ((
carr N19)
* (
carr N29));
set B = (
carr N19);
set C = (
carr N29);
((
carr N19)
* (
carr N29))
= ((
carr N29)
* (
carr N19)) by
GROUP_3: 125;
then
consider H9 be
strict
Subgroup of G such that
A1: the
carrier of H9
= A by
GROUP_2: 78;
A2:
now
let o be
Element of O;
let g be
Element of G;
assume g
in A;
then
consider a,b be
Element of G such that
A3: g
= (a
* b) and
A4: a
in (
carr N1) and
A5: b
in (
carr N2);
a
in N1 by
A4,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((G
^ o)
. a)
in N1 by
Lm9;
then
A6: ((G
^ o)
. a)
in (
carr N1) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
b
in N2 by
A5,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((G
^ o)
. b)
in N2 by
Lm9;
then ((G
^ o)
. b)
in (
carr N2) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (((G
^ o)
. a)
* ((G
^ o)
. b))
in ((
carr N1)
* (
carr N2)) by
A6;
hence ((G
^ o)
. g)
in A by
A3,
GROUP_6:def 6;
end;
A7:
now
let g be
Element of G;
assume g
in A;
then g
in H9 by
A1,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (g
" )
in H9 by
GROUP_2: 51;
hence (g
" )
in A by
A1,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
now
let g1,g2 be
Element of G;
assume g1
in A & g2
in A;
then g1
in H9 & g2
in H9 by
A1,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (g1
* g2)
in H9 by
GROUP_2: 50;
hence (g1
* g2)
in A by
A1,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
then
consider H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G such that
A8: the
carrier of H
= A by
A1,
A7,
A2,
Lm14;
now
let a be
Element of G;
thus (a
* H9)
= ((a
* N19)
* C) by
A1,
GROUP_2: 29
.= ((N19
* a)
* C) by
GROUP_3: 117
.= (B
* (a
* N29)) by
GROUP_2: 30
.= (B
* (N29
* a)) by
GROUP_3: 117
.= (H9
* a) by
A1,
GROUP_2: 31;
end;
then H9 is
normal
Subgroup of G by
GROUP_3: 117;
then for H99 be
strict
Subgroup of G st H99
= the multMagma of H holds H99 is
normal by
A1,
A8,
GROUP_2: 59;
then H is
normal;
hence thesis by
A8;
end;
Lm22: for F1 be
FinSequence, y be
Element of
NAT st y
in (
dom F1) holds (((
len F1)
- y)
+ 1) is
Element of
NAT & (((
len F1)
- y)
+ 1)
>= 1 & (((
len F1)
- y)
+ 1)
<= (
len F1)
proof
let F1 be
FinSequence, y be
Element of
NAT ;
assume
A1: y
in (
dom F1);
now
assume (((
len F1)
- y)
+ 1)
<
0 ;
then 1
< (
0 qua
Nat
- ((
len F1)
- y)) by
XREAL_1: 20;
then 1
< (y
- (
len F1));
then
A2: ((
len F1)
+ 1)
< y by
XREAL_1: 20;
y
<= (
len F1) by
A1,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
hence contradiction by
A2,
NAT_1: 12;
end;
then
reconsider n = (((
len F1)
- y)
+ 1) as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
y
>= 1 by
A1,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then ((n
- 1)
- y)
<= (((
len F1)
- y)
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 13;
then
A3: (n
- (y
+ 1))
<= ((
len F1)
- (y
+ 1));
(y
+
0 )
<= (
len F1) by
A1,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then (
0
+ 1)
= 1 &
0
<= ((
len F1)
- y) by
XREAL_1: 19;
hence thesis by
A3,
XREAL_1: 6,
XREAL_1: 9;
end;
Lm23: for G,H be
Group, F1 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, F2 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of H, I be
FinSequence of
INT , f be
Homomorphism of G, H st (for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom F1) holds (F2
. k)
= (f
. (F1
. k))) & (
len F1)
= (
len I) & (
len F2)
= (
len I) holds (f
. (
Product (F1
|^ I)))
= (
Product (F2
|^ I))
proof
defpred
P[
Nat] means for G,H be
Group, F1 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, F2 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of H, I be
FinSequence of
INT , f be
Homomorphism of G, H st (for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom F1) holds (F2
. k)
= (f
. (F1
. k))) & (
len F1)
= (
len I) & (
len F2)
= (
len I) & $1
= (
len I) holds (f
. (
Product (F1
|^ I)))
= (
Product (F2
|^ I));
let G,H be
Group;
let F1 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G;
let F2 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of H;
let I be
FinSequence of
INT ;
let f be
Homomorphism of G, H;
assume
A1: (for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom F1) holds (F2
. k)
= (f
. (F1
. k))) & (
len F1)
= (
len I) & (
len F2)
= (
len I);
A2:
now
let n be
Nat;
assume
A3:
P[n];
thus
P[(n
+ 1)]
proof
let G,H be
Group;
let F1 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G;
let F2 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of H;
let I be
FinSequence of
INT ;
let f be
Homomorphism of G, H;
assume
A4: for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom F1) holds (F2
. k)
= (f
. (F1
. k));
assume that
A5: (
len F1)
= (
len I) and
A6: (
len F2)
= (
len I) and
A7: (n
+ 1)
= (
len I);
consider F1n be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, g be
Element of G such that
A8: F1
= (F1n
^
<*g*>) by
A5,
A7,
FINSEQ_2: 19;
A9: (
len F1)
= ((
len F1n)
+ (
len
<*g*>)) by
A8,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then
A10: (n
+ 1)
= ((
len F1n)
+ 1) by
A5,
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
consider F2n be
FinSequence of the
carrier of H, h be
Element of H such that
A11: F2
= (F2n
^
<*h*>) by
A6,
A7,
FINSEQ_2: 19;
A12: (
dom F1)
= (
dom F2) & (
dom F2)
= (
dom I) by
A5,
A6,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
1
<= (n
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 11;
then
A13: (n
+ 1)
in (
dom I) by
A7,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
set F21 =
<*h*>;
set F11 =
<*g*>;
consider In be
FinSequence of
INT , i be
Element of
INT such that
A14: I
= (In
^
<*i*>) by
A7,
FINSEQ_2: 19;
set I1 =
<*i*>;
(
len I)
= ((
len In)
+ (
len
<*i*>)) by
A14,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then
A15: (n
+ 1)
= ((
len In)
+ 1) by
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
A16: (
len F2)
= ((
len F2n)
+ (
len
<*h*>)) by
A11,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then
A17: (n
+ 1)
= ((
len F2n)
+ 1) by
A6,
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
A18:
now
let k be
Nat;
(
0
+ n)
<= (1
+ n) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A19: (
dom F1n)
c= (
dom F1) by
A5,
A7,
A10,
FINSEQ_3: 30;
assume
A20: k
in (
dom F1n);
then k
in (
dom F2n) by
A10,
A17,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
hence (F2n
. k)
= (F2
. k) by
A11,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= (f
. (F1
. k)) by
A4,
A20,
A19
.= (f
. (F1n
. k)) by
A8,
A20,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
end;
A21: (F2
. (n
+ 1))
= ((F2n
^
<*h*>)
. ((
len F2n)
+ 1)) by
A6,
A7,
A11,
A16,
FINSEQ_1: 40
.= h by
FINSEQ_1: 42;
A22: (F1
. (n
+ 1))
= ((F1n
^
<*g*>)
. ((
len F1n)
+ 1)) by
A5,
A7,
A8,
A9,
FINSEQ_1: 40
.= g by
FINSEQ_1: 42;
(
len F21)
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 40
.= (
len I1) by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
then
A23: (
Product (F2
|^ I))
= (
Product ((F2n
|^ In)
^ (F21
|^ I1))) by
A14,
A11,
A15,
A17,
GROUP_4: 19
.= ((
Product (F2n
|^ In))
* (
Product (F21
|^ I1))) by
GROUP_4: 5;
A24: (f
. (
Product (F11
|^ I1)))
= (f
. (
Product (
<*g*>
|^
<*(
@ i)*>)))
.= (f
. (
Product
<*(g
|^ i)*>)) by
GROUP_4: 22
.= (f
. (g
|^ i)) by
GROUP_4: 9
.= ((f
. g)
|^ i) by
GROUP_6: 37
.= (h
|^ i) by
A4,
A13,
A12,
A22,
A21
.= (
Product
<*(h
|^ i)*>) by
GROUP_4: 9
.= (
Product (
<*h*>
|^
<*(
@ i)*>)) by
GROUP_4: 22
.= (
Product (F21
|^ I1));
(
len F11)
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 40
.= (
len I1) by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
then (
Product (F1
|^ I))
= (
Product ((F1n
|^ In)
^ (F11
|^ I1))) by
A14,
A8,
A15,
A10,
GROUP_4: 19
.= ((
Product (F1n
|^ In))
* (
Product (F11
|^ I1))) by
GROUP_4: 5;
then (f
. (
Product (F1
|^ I)))
= ((f
. (
Product (F1n
|^ In)))
* (f
. (
Product (F11
|^ I1)))) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((
Product (F2n
|^ In))
* (
Product (F21
|^ I1))) by
A3,
A15,
A10,
A17,
A18,
A24;
hence thesis by
A23;
end;
end;
A25:
P[
0 ]
proof
let G,H be
Group;
let F1 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G;
let F2 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of H;
let I be
FinSequence of
INT ;
let f be
Homomorphism of G, H;
assume for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom F1) holds (F2
. k)
= (f
. (F1
. k));
assume that
A26: (
len F1)
= (
len I) and
A27: (
len F2)
= (
len I) and
A28:
0
= (
len I);
(
len (F2
|^ I))
=
0 by
A27,
A28,
GROUP_4:def 3;
then (F2
|^ I)
= (
<*> the
carrier of H);
then
A29: (
Product (F2
|^ I))
= (
1_ H) by
GROUP_4: 8;
(
len (F1
|^ I))
=
0 by
A26,
A28,
GROUP_4:def 3;
then (F1
|^ I)
= (
<*> the
carrier of G);
then (
Product (F1
|^ I))
= (
1_ G) by
GROUP_4: 8;
hence thesis by
A29,
GROUP_6: 31;
end;
for n be
Nat holds
P[n] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A25,
A2);
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:24
Th24: g1
in (
the_stable_subgroup_of A) iff ex F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, I be
FinSequence of
INT , C be
Subset of G st C
= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (A,the
action of G)) & (
len F)
= (
len I) & (
rng F)
c= C & (
Product (F
|^ I))
= g1
proof
set H9 = (
the_stable_subgroup_of A);
set Y = the
carrier of H9;
A1: A
c= the
carrier of H9 by
Def26;
thus g1
in (
the_stable_subgroup_of A) implies ex F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, I be
FinSequence of
INT , C be
Subset of G st C
= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (A,the
action of G)) & (
len F)
= (
len I) & (
rng F)
c= C & (
Product (F
|^ I))
= g1
proof
defpred
P[
set] means ex F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, I be
FinSequence of
INT , C be
Subset of G st C
= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (A,the
action of G)) & $1
= (
Product (F
|^ I)) & (
len F)
= (
len I) & (
rng F)
c= C;
assume
A2: g1
in (
the_stable_subgroup_of A);
reconsider B = { b where b be
Element of G :
P[b] } as
Subset of G from
DOMAIN_1:sch 7;
A3:
now
let c,d be
Element of G;
assume that
A4: c
in B and
A5: d
in B;
ex d1 be
Element of G st c
= d1 & ex F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, I be
FinSequence of
INT , C be
Subset of G st C
= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (A,the
action of G)) & d1
= (
Product (F
|^ I)) & (
len F)
= (
len I) & (
rng F)
c= C by
A4;
then
consider F1 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, I1 be
FinSequence of
INT , C be
Subset of G such that
A6: C
= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (A,the
action of G)) and
A7: c
= (
Product (F1
|^ I1)) and
A8: (
len F1)
= (
len I1) and
A9: (
rng F1)
c= C;
ex d2 be
Element of G st d
= d2 & ex F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, I be
FinSequence of
INT , C be
Subset of G st C
= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (A,the
action of G)) & d2
= (
Product (F
|^ I)) & (
len F)
= (
len I) & (
rng F)
c= C by
A5;
then
consider F2 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, I2 be
FinSequence of
INT , C be
Subset of G such that
A10: C
= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (A,the
action of G)) and
A11: d
= (
Product (F2
|^ I2)) and
A12: (
len F2)
= (
len I2) and
A13: (
rng F2)
c= C;
A14: (
len (F1
^ F2))
= ((
len I1)
+ (
len I2)) by
A8,
A12,
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= (
len (I1
^ I2)) by
FINSEQ_1: 22;
(
rng (F1
^ F2))
= ((
rng F1)
\/ (
rng F2)) by
FINSEQ_1: 31;
then
A15: (
rng (F1
^ F2))
c= C by
A6,
A9,
A10,
A13,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
(c
* d)
= (
Product ((F1
|^ I1)
^ (F2
|^ I2))) by
A7,
A11,
GROUP_4: 5
.= (
Product ((F1
^ F2)
|^ (I1
^ I2))) by
A8,
A12,
GROUP_4: 19;
hence (c
* d)
in B by
A10,
A15,
A14;
end;
A16:
now
let o be
Element of O;
let c be
Element of G;
assume c
in B;
then ex d1 be
Element of G st c
= d1 & ex F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, I be
FinSequence of
INT , C be
Subset of G st C
= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (A,the
action of G)) & d1
= (
Product (F
|^ I)) & (
len F)
= (
len I) & (
rng F)
c= C;
then
consider F1 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, I1 be
FinSequence of
INT , C be
Subset of G such that
A17: C
= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (A,the
action of G)) and
A18: c
= (
Product (F1
|^ I1)) and
A19: (
len F1)
= (
len I1) and
A20: (
rng F1)
c= C;
deffunc
F(
Nat) = ((G
^ o)
. (F1
. $1));
consider F2 be
FinSequence such that
A21: (
len F2)
= (
len F1) and
A22: for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom F2) holds (F2
. k)
=
F(k) from
FINSEQ_1:sch 2;
A23: (
dom F2)
= (
dom F1) by
A21,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
A24: (
Seg (
len F1))
= (
dom F1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
now
A25: C
is_stable_under_the_action_of the
action of G by
A17,
Def2;
let y be
object;
assume y
in (
rng F2);
then
consider x be
object such that
A26: x
in (
dom F2) and
A27: y
= (F2
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
A28: x
in (
Seg (
len F1)) by
A21,
A26,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
reconsider x as
Element of
NAT by
A26;
A29: (F2
. x)
= ((G
^ o)
. (F1
. x)) by
A22,
A26;
A30: (F1
. x)
in (
rng F1) by
A24,
A28,
FUNCT_1: 3;
per cases ;
suppose
A31: O
<>
{} ;
set f = (the
action of G
. o);
A32: (G
^ o)
= (the
action of G
. o) by
A31,
Def6;
then
reconsider f as
Function of G, G;
(
dom f)
= the
carrier of G by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A33: y
in (f
.: C) by
A20,
A27,
A29,
A30,
A32,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
(f
.: C)
c= C by
A25,
A31;
hence y
in C by
A33;
end;
suppose O
=
{} ;
then (G
^ o)
= (
id the
carrier of G) by
Def6;
then ((G
^ o)
. (F1
. x))
= (F1
. x) by
A30,
FUNCT_1: 18;
hence y
in C by
A20,
A27,
A29,
A30;
end;
end;
then
A34: (
rng F2)
c= C;
then (
rng F2)
c= the
carrier of G by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
then
reconsider F2 as
FinSequence of the
carrier of G by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
((G
^ o)
. c)
= (
Product (F2
|^ I1)) by
A18,
A19,
A21,
A22,
A23,
Lm23;
hence ((G
^ o)
. c)
in B by
A17,
A19,
A21,
A34;
end;
A35:
now
let c be
Element of G;
assume c
in B;
then ex d1 be
Element of G st c
= d1 & ex F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, I be
FinSequence of
INT , C be
Subset of G st C
= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (A,the
action of G)) & d1
= (
Product (F
|^ I)) & (
len F)
= (
len I) & (
rng F)
c= C;
then
consider F1 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, I1 be
FinSequence of
INT , C be
Subset of G such that
A36: C
= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (A,the
action of G)) & c
= (
Product (F1
|^ I1)) and
A37: (
len F1)
= (
len I1) and
A38: (
rng F1)
c= C;
deffunc
F(
Nat) = (F1
. (((
len F1)
- $1)
+ 1));
consider F2 be
FinSequence such that
A39: (
len F2)
= (
len F1) and
A40: for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom F2) holds (F2
. k)
=
F(k) from
FINSEQ_1:sch 2;
A41: (
Seg (
len I1))
= (
dom I1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A42: (
rng F2)
c= (
rng F1)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
rng F2);
then
consider y be
object such that
A43: y
in (
dom F2) and
A44: (F2
. y)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider y as
Element of
NAT by
A43;
reconsider n = (((
len F1)
- y)
+ 1) as
Element of
NAT by
A39,
A43,
Lm22;
1
<= n & n
<= (
len F1) by
A39,
A43,
Lm22;
then
A45: n
in (
dom F1) by
FINSEQ_3: 25;
x
= (F1
. (((
len F1)
- y)
+ 1)) by
A40,
A43,
A44;
hence thesis by
A45,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
then
A46: (
rng F2)
c= C by
A38;
set p = (F1
|^ I1);
A47: (
Seg (
len F1))
= (
dom F1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A48: (
len p)
= (
len F1) by
GROUP_4:def 3;
defpred
P[
Nat,
object] means ex i be
Integer st i
= (I1
. (((
len I1)
- $1)
+ 1)) & $2
= (
- i);
A49: for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg (
len I1)) holds ex x be
object st
P[k, x]
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume k
in (
Seg (
len I1));
then
A50: k
in (
dom I1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider n = (((
len I1)
- k)
+ 1) as
Element of
NAT by
Lm22;
1
<= n & n
<= (
len I1) by
A50,
Lm22;
then n
in (
dom I1) by
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then (I1
. n)
in (
rng I1) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
reconsider i = (I1
. n) as
Element of
INT qua non
empty
set;
take (
- i), i;
thus thesis;
end;
consider I2 be
FinSequence such that
A51: (
dom I2)
= (
Seg (
len I1)) and
A52: for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg (
len I1)) holds
P[k, (I2
. k)] from
FINSEQ_1:sch 1(
A49);
A53: (
len F2)
= (
len I2) by
A37,
A39,
A51,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A54: (
rng I2)
c=
INT
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
rng I2);
then
consider y be
object such that
A55: y
in (
dom I2) and
A56: x
= (I2
. y) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider y as
Element of
NAT by
A55;
ex i be
Integer st i
= (I1
. (((
len I1)
- y)
+ 1)) & x
= (
- i) by
A51,
A52,
A55,
A56;
hence thesis by
INT_1:def 2;
end;
A57: (
rng F2)
c= the
carrier of G by
A42,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
A58: (
dom F2)
= (
dom I2) by
A37,
A39,
A51,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
reconsider I2 as
FinSequence of
INT by
A54,
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
reconsider F2 as
FinSequence of the
carrier of G by
A57,
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
set q = (F2
|^ I2);
A59: (
len q)
= (
len F2) by
GROUP_4:def 3;
then
A60: (
dom q)
= (
dom F2) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
A61: (
dom F1)
= (
dom I1) by
A37,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
now
let k be
Nat;
A62: (I2
/. k)
= (
@ (I2
/. k));
assume
A63: k
in (
dom q);
then
reconsider n = (((
len p)
- k)
+ 1) as
Element of
NAT by
A39,
A48,
A59,
Lm22;
A64: (I1
/. n)
= (
@ (I1
/. n)) & (q
/. k)
= (q
. k) by
A63,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
A65: (F2
/. k)
= (F2
. k) & (F2
. k)
= (F1
. n) by
A40,
A48,
A60,
A63,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
1
<= n & (
len p)
>= n by
A39,
A48,
A59,
A63,
Lm22;
then
A66: n
in (
dom I2) by
A37,
A51,
A48;
then
A67: (I1
. n)
= (I1
/. n) by
A51,
A41,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
(
dom q)
= (
dom I1) by
A37,
A39,
A59,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
consider i be
Integer such that
A68: i
= (I1
. n) and
A69: (I2
. k)
= (
- i) by
A37,
A52,
A41,
A48,
A63;
(I2
. k)
= (I2
/. k) by
A58,
A60,
A63,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
then
A70: (q
. k)
= ((F2
/. k)
|^ (
- i)) by
A60,
A63,
A69,
A62,
GROUP_4:def 3;
(F1
/. n)
= (F1
. n) by
A37,
A47,
A51,
A66,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
then (q
. k)
= (((F1
/. n)
|^ i)
" ) by
A70,
A65,
GROUP_1: 36;
hence ((q
/. k)
" )
= (p
. (((
len p)
- k)
+ 1)) by
A61,
A51,
A41,
A66,
A68,
A67,
A64,
GROUP_4:def 3;
end;
then ((
Product p)
" )
= (
Product q) by
A39,
A48,
A59,
GROUP_4: 14;
hence (c
" )
in B by
A36,
A53,
A46;
end;
A71: (
rng (
<*> the
carrier of G))
=
{} &
{}
c= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (A,the
action of G));
(
1_ G)
= (
Product (
<*> the
carrier of G)) & ((
<*> the
carrier of G)
|^ (
<*>
INT ))
=
{} by
GROUP_4: 8,
GROUP_4: 21;
then (
1_ G)
in B by
A71;
then
consider H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G such that
A72: the
carrier of H
= B by
A3,
A35,
A16,
Lm14;
A
c= B
proof
set C = (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (A,the
action of G));
reconsider p = 1 as
Integer;
let x be
object;
assume
A73: x
in A;
then
reconsider a = x as
Element of G;
A
c= C by
Def2;
then
A74: (
rng
<*a*>)
=
{a} &
{a}
c= C by
A73,
FINSEQ_1: 39,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
A75: (
Product (
<*a*>
|^
<*(
@ p)*>))
= (
Product
<*(a
|^ 1)*>) by
GROUP_4: 22
.= (a
|^ 1) by
GROUP_4: 9
.= a by
GROUP_1: 26;
(
len
<*a*>)
= 1 & (
len
<*(
@ p)*>)
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
hence thesis by
A75,
A74;
end;
then (
the_stable_subgroup_of A) is
StableSubgroup of H by
A72,
Def26;
then (
the_stable_subgroup_of A) is
Subgroup of H by
Def7;
then g1
in H by
A2,
GROUP_2: 40;
then g1
in B by
A72,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ex b be
Element of G st b
= g1 & ex F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, I be
FinSequence of
INT , C be
Subset of G st C
= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (A,the
action of G)) & b
= (
Product (F
|^ I)) & (
len F)
= (
len I) & (
rng F)
c= C;
hence thesis;
end;
given F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, I be
FinSequence of
INT , C be
Subset of G such that
A76: C
= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (A,the
action of G)) and (
len F)
= (
len I) and
A77: (
rng F)
c= C and
A78: (
Product (F
|^ I))
= g1;
H9 is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
then
reconsider Y as
Subset of G by
GROUP_2:def 5;
now
let o be
Element of O;
let f be
Function of G, G;
assume
A79: o
in O;
assume
A80: f
= (the
action of G
. o);
now
let y be
object;
assume y
in (f
.: Y);
then
consider x be
object such that
A81: x
in (
dom f) and
A82: x
in Y and
A83: y
= (f
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
reconsider x as
Element of G by
A81;
x
in H9 by
A82,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((G
^ o)
. x)
in H9 by
Lm9;
then (f
. x)
in H9 by
A79,
A80,
Def6;
hence y
in Y by
A83,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
hence (f
.: Y)
c= Y;
end;
then
A84: Y
is_stable_under_the_action_of the
action of G;
reconsider H9 as
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
C
c= the
carrier of H9 by
A76,
A1,
A84,
Def2;
then (
rng F)
c= (
carr H9) by
A77;
hence thesis by
A78,
GROUP_4: 20;
end;
Lm24: A is
empty implies (
the_stable_subgroup_of A)
= (
(1). G)
proof
A1:
now
let H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
assume A
c= the
carrier of H;
(
(1). G)
= (
(1). H) by
Th15;
hence (
(1). G) is
StableSubgroup of H;
end;
assume A is
empty;
then A
c= the
carrier of (
(1). G);
hence thesis by
A1,
Def26;
end;
Lm25: for O be non
empty
set, E be
set, o be
Element of O, A be
Action of O, E holds (
Product (
<*o*>,A))
= (A
. o)
proof
let O be non
empty
set;
let E be
set;
let o be
Element of O;
let A be
Action of O, E;
(
len
<*o*>)
= 1 & ex PF be
FinSequence of (
Funcs (E,E)) st (
Product (
<*o*>,A))
= (PF
. (
len
<*o*>)) & (
len PF)
= (
len
<*o*>) & (PF
. 1)
= (A
. (
<*o*>
. 1)) & for k be
Nat st k
<>
0 & k
< (
len
<*o*>) holds ex f,g be
Function of E, E st f
= (PF
. k) & g
= (A
. (
<*o*>
. (k
+ 1))) & (PF
. (k
+ 1))
= (f
* g) by
Def3,
FINSEQ_1: 39;
hence thesis by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
end;
Lm26: for O be non
empty
set, E be
set, o be
Element of O, F be
FinSequence of O, A be
Action of O, E holds (
Product ((F
^
<*o*>),A))
= ((
Product (F,A))
* (
Product (
<*o*>,A)))
proof
let O be non
empty
set;
let E be
set;
let o be
Element of O;
let F be
FinSequence of O;
let A be
Action of O, E;
set F1 = (F
^
<*o*>);
A1: (
len F1)
= ((
len F)
+ (
len
<*o*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= ((
len F)
+ 1) by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
consider PF1 be
FinSequence of (
Funcs (E,E)) such that
A2: (
Product (F1,A))
= (PF1
. (
len F1)) and
A3: (
len PF1)
= (
len F1) and
A4: (PF1
. 1)
= (A
. (F1
. 1)) and
A5: for k be
Nat st k
<>
0 & k
< (
len F1) holds ex f,g be
Function of E, E st f
= (PF1
. k) & g
= (A
. (F1
. (k
+ 1))) & (PF1
. (k
+ 1))
= (f
* g) by
Def3;
per cases ;
suppose
A6: (
len F)
<>
0 ;
reconsider PF = (PF1
| (
Seg (
len F))) as
FinSequence of (
Funcs (E,E)) by
FINSEQ_1: 18;
set IT = (PF
. (
len F));
A7: (
Product (
<*o*>,A))
= (A
. o) by
Lm25
.= (A
. (F1
. ((
len F)
+ 1))) by
FINSEQ_1: 42;
A8:
now
let k be
Nat;
assume
A9: k
<>
0 ;
then
A10: (
0
+ 1)
< (k
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
assume
A11: k
< (
len F);
then k
< (
len F1) by
A1,
NAT_1: 13;
then
consider f,g be
Function of E, E such that
A12: f
= (PF1
. k) and
A13: g
= (A
. (F1
. (k
+ 1))) and
A14: (PF1
. (k
+ 1))
= (f
* g) by
A5,
A9;
take f, g;
1
<= k by
A10,
NAT_1: 13;
then k
in (
Seg (
len F)) by
A11;
hence f
= (PF
. k) by
A12,
FUNCT_1: 49;
(k
+ 1)
<= (
len F) by
A11,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A15: (k
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len F)) by
A10;
then (k
+ 1)
in (
dom F) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
hence g
= (A
. (F
. (k
+ 1))) by
A13,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
thus (PF
. (k
+ 1))
= (f
* g) by
A14,
A15,
FUNCT_1: 49;
end;
A16: (
len F)
< (
len F1) by
A1,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A17: ex f,g be
Function of E, E st f
= (PF1
. (
len F)) & g
= (A
. (F1
. ((
len F)
+ 1))) & (PF1
. ((
len F)
+ 1))
= (f
* g) by
A5,
A6;
(
0
+ 1)
< ((
len F)
+ 1) by
A6,
XREAL_1: 6;
then 1
<= (
len F) by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A18: 1
in (
Seg (
len F));
then
A19: 1
in (
dom F) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A20: (
len F)
in (
Seg (
len F)) by
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 3;
(
Seg (
len F))
c= (
Seg (
len PF1)) by
A3,
A16,
FINSEQ_1: 5;
then (
len F)
in (
Seg (
len PF1)) by
A20;
then (
len F)
in (
dom PF1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (
len F)
in ((
dom PF1)
/\ (
Seg (
len F))) by
A20,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (
len F)
in (
dom PF) by
RELAT_1: 61;
then IT
in (
rng PF) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then ex f be
Function st IT
= f & (
dom f)
= E & (
rng f)
c= E by
FUNCT_2:def 2;
then
reconsider IT as
Function of E, E by
FUNCT_2: 2;
A21: (
len PF)
= (
len F) by
A3,
A16,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
(PF
. 1)
= (A
. (F1
. 1)) by
A4,
A18,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (A
. (F
. 1)) by
A19,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
then IT
= (
Product (F,A)) by
A6,
A21,
A8,
Def3;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A6,
A17,
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 3,
FUNCT_1: 49;
end;
suppose
A22: (
len F)
=
0 ;
then F
= (
<*> O);
hence (
Product ((F
^
<*o*>),A))
= (
Product (
<*o*>,A)) by
FINSEQ_1: 34
.= ((
id E)
* (
Product (
<*o*>,A))) by
FUNCT_2: 17
.= ((
Product (F,A))
* (
Product (
<*o*>,A))) by
A22,
Def3;
end;
end;
Lm27: for O be non
empty
set, E be
set, o be
Element of O, F be
FinSequence of O, A be
Action of O, E holds (
Product ((
<*o*>
^ F),A))
= ((
Product (
<*o*>,A))
* (
Product (F,A)))
proof
let O be non
empty
set;
let E be
set;
let o be
Element of O;
let F be
FinSequence of O;
let A be
Action of O, E;
defpred
P[
Nat] means for F be
FinSequence of O st (
len F)
= $1 holds (
Product ((
<*o*>
^ F),A))
= ((
Product (
<*o*>,A))
* (
Product (F,A)));
reconsider k = (
len F) as
Element of
NAT ;
A1: k
= (
len F);
A2: for k be
Nat st
P[k] holds
P[(k
+ 1)]
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A3:
P[k];
now
let F be
FinSequence of O;
assume
A4: (
len F)
= (k
+ 1);
then
consider Fk be
FinSequence of O, o9 be
Element of O such that
A5: F
= (Fk
^
<*o9*>) by
FINSEQ_2: 19;
(
len F)
= ((
len Fk)
+ (
len
<*o9*>)) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then
A6: (k
+ 1)
= ((
len Fk)
+ 1) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 39;
set F2k = (
<*o*>
^ Fk);
thus (
Product ((
<*o*>
^ F),A))
= (
Product (((
<*o*>
^ Fk)
^
<*o9*>),A)) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1: 32
.= ((
Product (F2k,A))
* (
Product (
<*o9*>,A))) by
Lm26
.= (((
Product (
<*o*>,A))
* (
Product (Fk,A)))
* (
Product (
<*o9*>,A))) by
A3,
A6
.= ((
Product (
<*o*>,A))
* ((
Product (Fk,A))
* (
Product (
<*o9*>,A)))) by
RELAT_1: 36
.= ((
Product (
<*o*>,A))
* (
Product (F,A))) by
A5,
Lm26;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
A7:
P[
0 ]
proof
let F be
FinSequence of O;
assume
A8: (
len F)
=
0 ;
then F
= (
<*> O);
hence (
Product ((
<*o*>
^ F),A))
= (
Product (
<*o*>,A)) by
FINSEQ_1: 34
.= ((
Product (
<*o*>,A))
* (
id E)) by
FUNCT_2: 17
.= ((
Product (
<*o*>,A))
* (
Product (F,A))) by
A8,
Def3;
end;
for k be
Nat holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A7,
A2);
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
Lm28: for O be non
empty
set, E be
set, F1,F2 be
FinSequence of O, A be
Action of O, E holds (
Product ((F1
^ F2),A))
= ((
Product (F1,A))
* (
Product (F2,A)))
proof
let O be non
empty
set, E be
set;
let F1,F2 be
FinSequence of O;
let A be
Action of O, E;
defpred
P[
Nat] means for F1,F2 be
FinSequence of O st (
len F1)
= $1 holds (
Product ((F1
^ F2),A))
= ((
Product (F1,A))
* (
Product (F2,A)));
reconsider k = (
len F1) as
Element of
NAT ;
A1: k
= (
len F1);
A2: for k be
Nat st
P[k] holds
P[(k
+ 1)]
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A3:
P[k];
now
let F1,F2 be
FinSequence of O;
assume
A4: (
len F1)
= (k
+ 1);
then
consider F1k be
FinSequence of O, o be
Element of O such that
A5: F1
= (F1k
^
<*o*>) by
FINSEQ_2: 19;
set F2k = (
<*o*>
^ F2);
(
len F1)
= ((
len F1k)
+ (
len
<*o*>)) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then
A6: (k
+ 1)
= ((
len F1k)
+ 1) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 39;
thus (
Product ((F1
^ F2),A))
= (
Product ((F1k
^ F2k),A)) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1: 32
.= ((
Product (F1k,A))
* (
Product (F2k,A))) by
A3,
A6
.= ((
Product (F1k,A))
* ((
Product (
<*o*>,A))
* (
Product (F2,A)))) by
Lm27
.= (((
Product (F1k,A))
* (
Product (
<*o*>,A)))
* (
Product (F2,A))) by
RELAT_1: 36
.= ((
Product (F1,A))
* (
Product (F2,A))) by
A3,
A5,
A6;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
A7:
P[
0 ]
proof
let F1,F2 be
FinSequence of O;
assume
A8: (
len F1)
=
0 ;
then F1
= (
<*> O);
hence (
Product ((F1
^ F2),A))
= (
Product (F2,A)) by
FINSEQ_1: 34
.= ((
id E)
* (
Product (F2,A))) by
FUNCT_2: 17
.= ((
Product (F1,A))
* (
Product (F2,A))) by
A8,
Def3;
end;
for k be
Nat holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A7,
A2);
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
Lm29: for O,E be
set, F be
FinSequence of O, Y be
Subset of E, A be
Action of O, E st Y
is_stable_under_the_action_of A holds ((
Product (F,A))
.: Y)
c= Y
proof
let O,E be
set;
let F be
FinSequence of O;
let Y be
Subset of E;
let A be
Action of O, E;
assume
A1: Y
is_stable_under_the_action_of A;
per cases ;
suppose O
=
{} ;
then (
len F)
=
0 ;
then (
Product (F,A))
= (
id E) by
Def3;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_1: 92;
end;
suppose
A2: O
<>
{} ;
defpred
P[
Nat] means for F be
FinSequence of O st (
len F)
= $1 holds ((
Product (F,A))
.: Y)
c= Y;
A3: for k be
Nat st
P[k] holds
P[(k
+ 1)]
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A4:
P[k];
now
let F be
FinSequence of O;
assume
A5: (
len F)
= (k
+ 1);
then
consider Fk be
FinSequence of O, o be
Element of O such that
A6: F
= (Fk
^
<*o*>) by
FINSEQ_2: 19;
(
len F)
= ((
len Fk)
+ (
len
<*o*>)) by
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then (k
+ 1)
= ((
len Fk)
+ 1) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1: 39;
then
A7: ((
Product (Fk,A))
.: Y)
c= Y by
A4;
reconsider F1 =
<*o*> as
FinSequence of O by
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 36;
(
Product (F,A))
= ((
Product (Fk,A))
* (
Product (F1,A))) by
A2,
A6,
Lm28;
then
A8: ((
Product (F,A))
.: Y)
= ((
Product (Fk,A))
.: ((
Product (F1,A))
.: Y)) by
RELAT_1: 126;
(
Product (F1,A))
= (A
. o) by
A2,
Lm25;
then ((
Product (F1,A))
.: Y)
c= Y by
A1,
A2;
then ((
Product (F,A))
.: Y)
c= ((
Product (Fk,A))
.: Y) by
A8,
RELAT_1: 123;
hence ((
Product (F,A))
.: Y)
c= Y by
A7;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
reconsider k = (
len F) as
Element of
NAT ;
A9: k
= (
len F);
A10:
P[
0 ]
proof
let F be
FinSequence of O;
assume (
len F)
=
0 ;
then (
Product (F,A))
= (
id E) by
Def3;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_1: 92;
end;
for k be
Nat holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A10,
A3);
hence thesis by
A9;
end;
end;
Lm30: for E be non
empty
set, A be
Action of O, E holds for X be
Subset of E, a be
Element of E st not X is
empty holds a
in (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (X,A)) iff ex F be
FinSequence of O, x be
Element of X st ((
Product (F,A))
. x)
= a
proof
let E be non
empty
set;
let A be
Action of O, E;
let X be
Subset of E;
let a be
Element of E;
defpred
P[
set] means ex F be
FinSequence of O, x be
Element of X st ((
Product (F,A))
. x)
= $1;
set B = { e where e be
Element of E :
P[e] };
reconsider B as
Subset of E from
DOMAIN_1:sch 7;
assume
A1: not X is
empty;
A2:
now
let Y be
Subset of E;
assume
A3: Y
is_stable_under_the_action_of A;
assume
A4: X
c= Y;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in B;
then
consider e be
Element of E such that
A5: x
= e and
A6: ex F be
FinSequence of O, x9 be
Element of X st ((
Product (F,A))
. x9)
= e;
consider F be
FinSequence of O, x9 be
Element of X such that
A7: ((
Product (F,A))
. x9)
= e by
A6;
A8: x9
in X by
A1;
then x9
in E;
then x9
in (
dom (
Product (F,A))) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A9: ((
Product (F,A))
. x9)
in ((
Product (F,A))
.: Y) by
A4,
A8,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
((
Product (F,A))
.: Y)
c= Y by
A3,
Lm29;
hence x
in Y by
A5,
A7,
A9;
end;
hence B
c= Y;
end;
now
let o be
Element of O;
let f be
Function of E, E;
assume
A10: o
in O;
assume
A11: f
= (A
. o);
per cases ;
suppose O
=
{} ;
hence (f
.: B)
c= B by
A10;
end;
suppose
A12: O
<>
{} ;
now
reconsider o as
Element of O;
reconsider F99 =
<*o*> as
FinSequence of O by
A12,
FINSEQ_1: 74;
let y be
object;
assume y
in (f
.: B);
then
consider x be
object such that
A13: x
in (
dom f) and
A14: x
in B and
A15: y
= (f
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
y
in (
rng f) by
A13,
A15,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider e = y as
Element of E;
consider e9 be
Element of E such that
A16: e9
= x and
A17: ex F9 be
FinSequence of O, x9 be
Element of X st ((
Product (F9,A))
. x9)
= e9 by
A14;
consider F9 be
FinSequence of O, x9 be
Element of X such that
A18: ((
Product (F9,A))
. x9)
= e9 by
A17;
reconsider F = (F99
^ F9) as
FinSequence of O;
x9
in X by
A1;
then x9
in E;
then
A19: x9
in (
dom (
Product (F9,A))) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
((
Product (F,A))
. x9)
= (((
Product (F99,A))
* (
Product (F9,A)))
. x9) by
A12,
Lm28
.= ((
Product (F99,A))
. ((
Product (F9,A))
. x9)) by
A19,
FUNCT_1: 13
.= e by
A11,
A12,
A15,
A16,
A18,
Lm25;
hence y
in B;
end;
hence (f
.: B)
c= B;
end;
end;
then
A20: B
is_stable_under_the_action_of A;
now
set F = (
<*> O);
let x be
object;
assume
A21: x
in X;
then
reconsider e = x as
Element of E;
reconsider x9 = e as
Element of X by
A21;
(
len F)
=
0 ;
then ((
Product (F,A))
. x)
= ((
id E)
. x) by
Def3
.= x by
A21,
FUNCT_1: 18;
then ((
Product (F,A))
. x9)
= e;
hence x
in B;
end;
then X
c= B;
then
A22: B
= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (X,A)) by
A20,
A2,
Def2;
hereby
assume a
in (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (X,A));
then
consider e be
Element of E such that
A23: a
= e and
A24: ex F be
FinSequence of O, x be
Element of X st ((
Product (F,A))
. x)
= e by
A22;
consider F be
FinSequence of O, x be
Element of X such that
A25: ((
Product (F,A))
. x)
= e by
A24;
take F, x;
thus ((
Product (F,A))
. x)
= a by
A23,
A25;
end;
given F be
FinSequence of O, x be
Element of X such that
A26: ((
Product (F,A))
. x)
= a;
thus thesis by
A22,
A26;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:25
Th25: for H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G holds (
the_stable_subgroup_of (
carr H))
= H
proof
let H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
for H1 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st (
carr H)
c= the
carrier of H1 holds H is
StableSubgroup of H1 by
Lm20;
hence thesis by
Def26;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:26
Th26: A
c= B implies (
the_stable_subgroup_of A) is
StableSubgroup of (
the_stable_subgroup_of B)
proof
assume
A1: A
c= B;
per cases ;
suppose
A2: A is
empty;
reconsider H1 = (
(1). G), H2 = (
(1). (
the_stable_subgroup_of B)) as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
Th11;
the
carrier of H1
=
{(
1_ G)} by
Def8
.=
{(
1_ (
the_stable_subgroup_of B))} by
Th4
.= the
carrier of H2 by
Def8;
then (
(1). G)
= (
(1). (
the_stable_subgroup_of B)) by
Lm4;
hence thesis by
A2,
Lm24;
end;
suppose
A3: not A is
empty;
now
set D = (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (B,the
action of G));
let a be
Element of G;
assume a
in (
the_stable_subgroup_of A);
then
consider F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, I be
FinSequence of
INT , C be
Subset of G such that
A4: C
= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (A,the
action of G)) and
A5: (
len F)
= (
len I) and
A6: (
rng F)
c= C and
A7: (
Product (F
|^ I))
= a by
Th24;
now
let y be
object;
assume
A8: y
in C;
then
reconsider b = y as
Element of G;
consider F1 be
FinSequence of O, x be
Element of A such that
A9: ((
Product (F1,the
action of G))
. x)
= b by
A3,
A4,
A8,
Lm30;
x
in A by
A3;
hence y
in D by
A1,
A9,
Lm30;
end;
then C
c= D;
then (
rng F)
c= D by
A6;
hence a
in (
the_stable_subgroup_of B) by
A5,
A7,
Th24;
end;
hence thesis by
Th13;
end;
end;
scheme ::
GROUP_9:sch1
MeetSbgWOpEx { O() ->
set , G() ->
GroupWithOperators of O() , P[
set] } :
ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G() st the
carrier of H
= (
meet { A where A be
Subset of G() : ex K be
strict
StableSubgroup of G() st A
= the
carrier of K & P[K] })
provided
A1: ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G() st P[H];
set X = { A where A be
Subset of G() : ex K be
strict
StableSubgroup of G() st A
= the
carrier of K & P[K] };
consider T be
strict
StableSubgroup of G() such that
A2: P[T] by
A1;
A3: (
carr T)
in X by
A2;
then
reconsider Y = (
meet X) as
Subset of G() by
SETFAM_1: 7;
A4:
now
let a be
Element of G();
assume
A5: a
in Y;
now
let Z be
set;
assume
A6: Z
in X;
then
consider A be
Subset of G() such that
A7: A
= Z and
A8: ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G() st A
= the
carrier of H & P[H];
consider H be
StableSubgroup of G() such that
A9: A
= the
carrier of H and P[H] by
A8;
a
in the
carrier of H by
A5,
A6,
A7,
A9,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
then a
in H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (a
" )
in H by
Lm19;
hence (a
" )
in Z by
A7,
A9,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
hence (a
" )
in Y by
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
end;
A10:
now
let a,b be
Element of G();
assume that
A11: a
in Y and
A12: b
in Y;
now
let Z be
set;
assume
A13: Z
in X;
then
consider A be
Subset of G() such that
A14: A
= Z and
A15: ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G() st A
= the
carrier of H & P[H];
consider H be
StableSubgroup of G() such that
A16: A
= the
carrier of H and P[H] by
A15;
b
in the
carrier of H by
A12,
A13,
A14,
A16,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
then
A17: b
in H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
a
in the
carrier of H by
A11,
A13,
A14,
A16,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
then a
in H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (a
* b)
in H by
A17,
Lm18;
hence (a
* b)
in Z by
A14,
A16,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
hence (a
* b)
in Y by
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
end;
A18:
now
let o be
Element of O();
let a be
Element of G();
assume
A19: a
in Y;
now
let Z be
set;
assume
A20: Z
in X;
then
consider A be
Subset of G() such that
A21: A
= Z and
A22: ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G() st A
= the
carrier of H & P[H];
consider H be
StableSubgroup of G() such that
A23: A
= the
carrier of H and P[H] by
A22;
a
in the
carrier of H by
A19,
A20,
A21,
A23,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
then a
in H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((G()
^ o)
. a)
in H by
Lm9;
hence ((G()
^ o)
. a)
in Z by
A21,
A23,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
hence ((G()
^ o)
. a)
in Y by
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
end;
now
let Z be
set;
assume Z
in X;
then
consider A be
Subset of G() such that
A24: Z
= A and
A25: ex K be
strict
StableSubgroup of G() st A
= the
carrier of K & P[K];
consider H be
StableSubgroup of G() such that
A26: A
= the
carrier of H and P[H] by
A25;
(
1_ G())
in H by
Lm17;
hence (
1_ G())
in Z by
A24,
A26,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
then Y
<>
{} by
A3,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
hence thesis by
A10,
A4,
A18,
Lm14;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:27
Th27: the
carrier of (
the_stable_subgroup_of A)
= (
meet { B where B be
Subset of G : ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st B
= the
carrier of H & A
c= (
carr H) })
proof
defpred
P[
StableSubgroup of G] means A
c= (
carr $1);
set X = { B where B be
Subset of G : ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st B
= the
carrier of H & A
c= (
carr H) };
A1:
now
let Y be
set;
assume Y
in X;
then ex B be
Subset of G st Y
= B & ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st B
= the
carrier of H & A
c= (
carr H);
hence A
c= Y;
end;
the
carrier of (
(Omega). G)
= (
carr (
(Omega). G));
then
A2: ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st
P[H];
consider H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G such that
A3: the
carrier of H
= (
meet { B where B be
Subset of G : ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st B
= the
carrier of H &
P[H] }) from
MeetSbgWOpEx(
A2);
A4:
now
let H1 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
A5: the
carrier of H1
= (
carr H1);
assume A
c= the
carrier of H1;
then the
carrier of H1
in X by
A5;
hence H is
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A3,
Lm20,
SETFAM_1: 3;
end;
(
carr (
(Omega). G))
in X;
then A
c= the
carrier of H by
A3,
A1,
SETFAM_1: 5;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4,
Def26;
end;
Lm31: B
= the
carrier of (
gr A) implies (
the_stable_subgroup_of A)
= (
the_stable_subgroup_of B)
proof
A1: A
c= the
carrier of (
gr A) by
GROUP_4:def 4;
assume
A2: B
= the
carrier of (
gr A);
A3:
now
let H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider H9 = the multMagma of H as
strict
Subgroup of G by
Lm15;
assume A
c= the
carrier of H;
then (
gr A) is
Subgroup of H9 by
GROUP_4:def 4;
then B
c= the
carrier of H9 by
A2,
GROUP_2:def 5;
hence (
the_stable_subgroup_of B) is
StableSubgroup of H by
Def26;
end;
the
carrier of (
gr A)
c= the
carrier of (
the_stable_subgroup_of B) by
A2,
Def26;
then A
c= the
carrier of (
the_stable_subgroup_of B) by
A1;
hence thesis by
A3,
Def26;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:28
Th28: for N1,N2 be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G holds (N1
* N2)
= (N2
* N1)
proof
let N1,N2 be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider N19 = the multMagma of N1, N29 = the multMagma of N2 as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
thus (N1
* N2)
= ((
carr N29)
* (
carr N19)) by
GROUP_3: 125
.= (N2
* N1);
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:29
Th29: (H1
"\/" H2)
= (
the_stable_subgroup_of (H1
* H2))
proof
reconsider H19 = H1, H29 = H2 as
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
reconsider Y = the
carrier of (H19
"\/" H29) as
Subset of G by
GROUP_2:def 5;
A1: Y
= the
carrier of (
gr (H19
* H29)) by
GROUP_4: 50;
(H1
"\/" H2)
= (
the_stable_subgroup_of Y) by
Lm31
.= (
the_stable_subgroup_of (H19
* H29)) by
A1,
Lm31;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:30
Th30: (H1
* H2)
= (H2
* H1) implies the
carrier of (H1
"\/" H2)
= (H1
* H2)
proof
assume (H1
* H2)
= (H2
* H1);
then
consider H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G such that
A1: the
carrier of H
= ((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2)) by
Th17;
now
set A = ((
carr H1)
\/ (
carr H2));
let a be
Element of G;
set X = { B where B be
Subset of G : ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st B
= the
carrier of H & A
c= (
carr H) };
assume a
in H;
then a
in ((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2)) by
A1,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then
consider b,c be
Element of G such that
A2: a
= (b
* c) and
A3: b
in (
carr H1) and
A4: c
in (
carr H2);
A5:
now
let Y be
set;
assume Y
in X;
then
consider B be
Subset of G such that
A6: Y
= B and
A7: ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st B
= the
carrier of H & A
c= (
carr H);
consider H9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G such that
A8: B
= the
carrier of H9 and
A9: A
c= (
carr H9) by
A7;
c
in A by
A4,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
A10: c
in H9 by
A9,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
A11: H9 is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
b
in A by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then b
in H9 by
A9,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (b
* c)
in H9 by
A11,
A10,
GROUP_2: 50;
hence a
in Y by
A2,
A6,
A8,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
(
carr (
(Omega). G))
in X;
then a
in (
meet X) by
A5,
SETFAM_1:def 1;
then a
in the
carrier of (
the_stable_subgroup_of A) by
Th27;
hence a
in (H1
"\/" H2) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
then H is
StableSubgroup of (H1
"\/" H2) by
Th13;
then H is
Subgroup of (H1
"\/" H2) by
Def7;
then
A12: the
carrier of H
c= the
carrier of (H1
"\/" H2) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
((
carr H1)
\/ (
carr H2))
c= ((
carr H1)
* (
carr H2))
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A13: x
in ((
carr H1)
\/ (
carr H2));
then
reconsider a = x as
Element of G;
now
per cases by
A13,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
A14: x
in (
carr H1);
(
1_ G)
in H2 by
Lm17;
then
A15: (
1_ G)
in (
carr H2) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
(a
* (
1_ G))
= a by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A14,
A15;
end;
suppose
A16: x
in (
carr H2);
(
1_ G)
in H1 by
Lm17;
then
A17: (
1_ G)
in (
carr H1) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
((
1_ G)
* a)
= a by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A16,
A17;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
then (H1
"\/" H2) is
StableSubgroup of H by
A1,
Def26;
then (H1
"\/" H2) is
Subgroup of H by
Def7;
then the
carrier of (H1
"\/" H2)
c= the
carrier of H by
GROUP_2:def 5;
hence thesis by
A1,
A12,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:31
Th31: for N1,N2 be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G holds the
carrier of (N1
"\/" N2)
= (N1
* N2)
proof
let N1,N2 be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G;
(N1
* N2)
= (N2
* N1) by
Th28;
hence thesis by
Th30;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:32
Th32: for N1,N2 be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G holds (N1
"\/" N2) is
normal
StableSubgroup of G
proof
let N1,N2 be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G;
(ex N be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G st the
carrier of N
= ((
carr N1)
* (
carr N2))) & the
carrier of (N1
"\/" N2)
= (N1
* N2) by
Th23,
Th31;
hence thesis by
Lm4;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:33
Th33: for H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G holds ((
(1). G)
"\/" H)
= H & (H
"\/" (
(1). G))
= H
proof
let H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
(
1_ G)
in H by
Lm17;
then (
1_ G)
in (
carr H) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then
{(
1_ G)}
c= (
carr H) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
A1: (
{(
1_ G)}
\/ (
carr H))
= (
carr H) by
XBOOLE_1: 12;
(
carr (
(1). G))
=
{(
1_ G)} by
Def8;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th25;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:34
Th34: ((
(Omega). G)
"\/" H1)
= (
(Omega). G) & (H1
"\/" (
(Omega). G))
= (
(Omega). G)
proof
(the
carrier of (
(Omega). G)
\/ (
carr H1))
= (
[#] the
carrier of G) by
SUBSET_1: 11;
hence thesis by
Th25;
end;
Lm32: H1 is
StableSubgroup of (H1
"\/" H2)
proof
(
carr H1)
c= ((
carr H1)
\/ (
carr H2)) & ((
carr H1)
\/ (
carr H2))
c= the
carrier of (
the_stable_subgroup_of ((
carr H1)
\/ (
carr H2))) by
Def26,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
hence thesis by
Lm20,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:35
Th35: H1 is
StableSubgroup of (H1
"\/" H2) & H2 is
StableSubgroup of (H1
"\/" H2)
proof
(H1
"\/" H2)
= (H2
"\/" H1);
hence thesis by
Lm32;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:36
Th36: for H2 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G holds H1 is
StableSubgroup of H2 iff (H1
"\/" H2)
= H2
proof
let H2 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
thus H1 is
StableSubgroup of H2 implies (H1
"\/" H2)
= H2
proof
assume H1 is
StableSubgroup of H2;
then H1 is
Subgroup of H2 by
Def7;
then the
carrier of H1
c= the
carrier of H2 by
GROUP_2:def 5;
hence (H1
"\/" H2)
= (
the_stable_subgroup_of (
carr H2)) by
XBOOLE_1: 12
.= H2 by
Th25;
end;
thus thesis by
Th35;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:37
Th37: for H3 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G holds H1 is
StableSubgroup of H3 & H2 is
StableSubgroup of H3 implies (H1
"\/" H2) is
StableSubgroup of H3
proof
let H3 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
assume that
A1: H1 is
StableSubgroup of H3 and
A2: H2 is
StableSubgroup of H3;
H2 is
Subgroup of H3 by
A2,
Def7;
then
A3: (
carr H2)
c= (
carr H3) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
H1 is
Subgroup of H3 by
A1,
Def7;
then (
carr H1)
c= (
carr H3) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then (
the_stable_subgroup_of ((
carr H1)
\/ (
carr H2))) is
StableSubgroup of (
the_stable_subgroup_of (
carr H3)) by
A3,
Th26,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
hence thesis by
Th25;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:38
Th38: for H2,H3 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G holds H1 is
StableSubgroup of H2 implies (H1
"\/" H3) is
StableSubgroup of (H2
"\/" H3)
proof
let H2,H3 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
assume H1 is
StableSubgroup of H2;
then H1 is
Subgroup of H2 by
Def7;
then (
carr H1)
c= (
carr H2) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
hence thesis by
Th26,
XBOOLE_1: 9;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:39
Th39: for X,Y be
StableSubgroup of H1, X9,Y9 be
StableSubgroup of G st X
= X9 & Y
= Y9 holds (X9
/\ Y9)
= (X
/\ Y)
proof
let X,Y be
StableSubgroup of H1;
reconsider Z = (X
/\ Y) as
StableSubgroup of G by
Th11;
let X9,Y9 be
StableSubgroup of G;
assume
A1: X
= X9 & Y
= Y9;
the
carrier of (X
/\ Y)
= ((
carr X)
/\ (
carr Y)) by
Def25;
then (X9
/\ Y9)
= Z by
A1,
Th18;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:40
Th40: N is
StableSubgroup of H1 implies N is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1
proof
assume N is
StableSubgroup of H1;
then
reconsider N9 = N as
StableSubgroup of H1;
now
reconsider N99 = the multMagma of N as
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
let H be
strict
Subgroup of H1;
assume
A1: H
= the multMagma of N9;
reconsider N as
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
H1 is
Subgroup of G & N99 is
Subgroup of N by
Def7,
GROUP_2: 57;
hence H is
normal by
A1,
GROUP_6: 8;
end;
hence thesis by
Def10;
end;
Lm33: (H1
/\ H2) is
StableSubgroup of H1
proof
the
carrier of (H1
/\ H2)
= (the
carrier of H1
/\ the
carrier of H2) by
Th18;
hence thesis by
Lm20,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:41
Th41: (H1
/\ N) is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 & (N
/\ H1) is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1
proof
thus (H1
/\ N) is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1
proof
reconsider A = (H1
/\ N) as
StableSubgroup of H1 by
Lm33;
now
reconsider N9 = the multMagma of N as
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
let H be
strict
Subgroup of H1;
assume
A1: H
= the multMagma of A;
now
let b be
Element of H1;
thus (b
* H)
c= (H
* b)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (b
* H);
then
consider a be
Element of H1 such that
A2: x
= (b
* a) and
A3: a
in H by
GROUP_2: 103;
reconsider a9 = a, b9 = b as
Element of G by
Th2;
reconsider x9 = x as
Element of H1 by
A2;
A4: (b9
" )
= (b
" ) by
Th6;
a
in the
carrier of A by
A1,
A3,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then a
in ((
carr H1)
/\ (
carr N)) by
Def25;
then a
in (
carr N9) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A5: a
in N9 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
x
= (b9
* a9) by
A2,
Th3;
then
A6: x
in (b9
* N9) by
A5,
GROUP_2: 103;
(b9
* N9)
c= (N9
* b9) by
GROUP_3: 118;
then
consider b1 be
Element of G such that
A7: x
= (b1
* b9) and
A8: b1
in N9 by
A6,
GROUP_2: 104;
reconsider x99 = x as
Element of G by
A7;
b1
= (x99
* (b9
" )) by
A7,
GROUP_1: 14;
then
A9: b1
= (x9
* (b
" )) by
A4,
Th3;
then
reconsider b19 = b1 as
Element of H1;
b1
in the
carrier of N by
A8,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then b1
in ((
carr H1)
/\ (
carr N)) by
A9,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then b19
in the
carrier of A by
Def25;
then
A10: b19
in H by
A1,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
(b19
* b)
= x by
A7,
Th3;
hence thesis by
A10,
GROUP_2: 104;
end;
end;
hence H is
normal by
GROUP_3: 118;
end;
hence thesis by
Def10;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:42
Th42: for G be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O holds G is
trivial implies (
(1). G)
= G
proof
let G be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O;
reconsider H = G as
StableSubgroup of G by
Lm3;
assume G is
trivial;
then ex x be
object st the
carrier of G
=
{x};
then the
carrier of H
=
{(
1_ G)} by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis by
Def8;
end;
Lm34: for N9 be
normal
Subgroup of G st N9
= the multMagma of N holds (G
./. N9)
= the multMagma of (G
./. N) & (
1_ (G
./. N9))
= (
1_ (G
./. N))
proof
let N9 be
normal
Subgroup of G;
assume
A1: N9
= the multMagma of N;
then
reconsider e = (
1_ (G
./. N9)) as
Element of (G
./. N) by
Def14;
(
Cosets N9)
= (
Cosets N) by
A1,
Def14;
hence (G
./. N9)
= the multMagma of (G
./. N) by
A1,
Def15;
now
let h be
Element of (G
./. N);
reconsider h9 = h as
Element of (G
./. N9) by
A1,
Def14;
thus (h
* e)
= (h9
* (
1_ (G
./. N9))) by
A1,
Def15
.= h by
GROUP_1:def 4;
thus (e
* h)
= ((
1_ (G
./. N9))
* h9) by
A1,
Def15
.= h by
GROUP_1:def 4;
end;
hence thesis by
GROUP_1: 4;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:43
Th43: (
1_ (G
./. N))
= (
carr N)
proof
reconsider N9 = the multMagma of N as
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
(
1_ (G
./. N9))
= (
carr N9) by
GROUP_6: 24;
hence thesis by
Lm34;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:44
Th44: for M,N be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G, MN be
normal
StableSubgroup of N st MN
= M & M is
StableSubgroup of N holds (N
./. MN) is
normal
StableSubgroup of (G
./. M)
proof
let M,N be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider M9 = the multMagma of M as
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
reconsider N9 = the multMagma of N as
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
let MN be
normal
StableSubgroup of N;
assume
A1: MN
= M;
reconsider MN99 = ((N9,M9)
`*` ) as
normal
Subgroup of N9;
reconsider MN9 = the multMagma of MN as
normal
Subgroup of N by
Lm6;
assume M is
StableSubgroup of N;
then M is
Subgroup of N by
Def7;
then the
carrier of M
c= the
carrier of N & the
multF of M
= (the
multF of N
|| the
carrier of M) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then
A2: M9 is
Subgroup of N9 by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then
A3: ((N9,M9)
`*` )
= MN9 by
A1,
GROUP_6:def 1;
reconsider K = (N9
./. ((N9,M9)
`*` )) as
normal
Subgroup of (G
./. M9) by
A2,
GROUP_6: 29;
A4:
now
let x be
object;
hereby
assume x
in (
Cosets MN9);
then
consider a be
Element of N such that
A5: x
= (a
* MN9) and x
= (MN9
* a) by
GROUP_6: 13;
reconsider a9 = a as
Element of N9;
reconsider A =
{a} as
Subset of N by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
reconsider A9 =
{a9} as
Subset of N9 by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
now
let y be
object;
hereby
assume y
in { (g
* h) where g,h be
Element of N : g
in A & h
in (
carr MN9) };
then
consider g,h be
Element of N such that
A6: y
= (g
* h) and
A7: g
in A & h
in (
carr MN9);
reconsider h9 = h as
Element of N9;
reconsider g9 = g as
Element of N9;
y
= (g9
* h9) by
A6;
hence y
in { (g99
* h99) where g99,h99 be
Element of N9 : g99
in A9 & h99
in (
carr MN99) } by
A3,
A7;
end;
assume y
in { (g
* h) where g,h be
Element of N9 : g
in A9 & h
in (
carr MN99) };
then
consider g,h be
Element of N9 such that
A8: y
= (g
* h) and
A9: g
in A9 & h
in (
carr MN99);
reconsider h9 = h as
Element of N;
reconsider g9 = g as
Element of N;
y
= (g9
* h9) by
A8;
hence y
in { (g99
* h99) where g99,h99 be
Element of N : g99
in A & h99
in (
carr MN9) } by
A3,
A9;
end;
then x
= (a9
* MN99) by
A5,
TARSKI: 2;
hence x
in (
Cosets MN99) by
GROUP_6: 14;
end;
assume x
in (
Cosets MN99);
then
consider a9 be
Element of N9 such that
A10: x
= (a9
* MN99) and x
= (MN99
* a9) by
GROUP_6: 13;
reconsider a = a9 as
Element of N;
reconsider A9 =
{a9} as
Subset of N9 by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
reconsider A =
{a} as
Subset of N by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
now
let y be
object;
hereby
assume y
in { (g
* h) where g,h be
Element of N : g
in A & h
in (
carr MN9) };
then
consider g,h be
Element of N such that
A11: y
= (g
* h) and
A12: g
in A & h
in (
carr MN9);
reconsider h9 = h as
Element of N9;
reconsider g9 = g as
Element of N9;
y
= (g9
* h9) by
A11;
hence y
in { (g99
* h99) where g99,h99 be
Element of N9 : g99
in A9 & h99
in (
carr MN99) } by
A3,
A12;
end;
assume y
in { (g
* h) where g,h be
Element of N9 : g
in A9 & h
in (
carr MN99) };
then
consider g,h be
Element of N9 such that
A13: y
= (g
* h) and
A14: g
in A9 & h
in (
carr MN99);
reconsider h9 = h as
Element of N;
reconsider g9 = g as
Element of N;
y
= (g9
* h9) by
A13;
hence y
in { (g99
* h99) where g99,h99 be
Element of N : g99
in A & h99
in (
carr MN9) } by
A3,
A14;
end;
then x
= (a
* MN9) by
A10,
TARSKI: 2;
hence x
in (
Cosets MN9) by
GROUP_6: 14;
end;
then
A15: the
carrier of K
= (
Cosets MN9) by
TARSKI: 2
.= the
carrier of (N
./. MN) by
Def14;
A16:
now
let H be
strict
Subgroup of (G
./. M);
assume
A17: H
= the multMagma of (N
./. MN);
now
let a be
Element of (G
./. M);
reconsider a9 = a as
Element of (G
./. M9) by
Def14;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in (a
* (
carr H));
then
consider b be
Element of (G
./. M) such that
A18: x
= (a
* b) and
A19: b
in (
carr H) by
GROUP_2: 27;
reconsider b9 = b as
Element of (G
./. M9) by
Def14;
A20: x
= (a9
* b9) by
A18,
Def15;
then
reconsider x9 = x as
Element of (G
./. M9);
(a9
* K)
c= (K
* a9) & x9
in (a9
* (
carr K)) by
A15,
A17,
A19,
A20,
GROUP_2: 27,
GROUP_3: 118;
then
consider c9 be
Element of (G
./. M9) such that
A21: x9
= (c9
* a9) and
A22: c9
in (
carr K) by
GROUP_2: 28;
reconsider c = c9 as
Element of (G
./. M) by
Def14;
x
= (c
* a) by
A21,
Def15;
hence x
in ((
carr H)
* a) by
A15,
A17,
A22,
GROUP_2: 28;
end;
hence (a
* H)
c= (H
* a);
end;
hence H is
normal by
GROUP_3: 118;
end;
A23: the
carrier of (G
./. M)
= the
carrier of (G
./. M9) by
Def14;
then
A24: the
carrier of (N
./. MN)
c= the
carrier of (G
./. M) by
A15,
GROUP_2:def 5;
A25:
now
let o be
Element of O;
per cases ;
suppose
A26: not o
in O;
A27: the
carrier of (N
./. MN)
c= the
carrier of (G
./. M) by
A23,
A15,
GROUP_2:def 5;
A28:
now
let x,y be
object;
assume
A29:
[x, y]
in (
id the
carrier of (N
./. MN));
then
A30: x
in the
carrier of (N
./. MN) by
RELAT_1:def 10;
x
= y by
A29,
RELAT_1:def 10;
then
[x, y]
in (
id the
carrier of (G
./. M)) by
A27,
A30,
RELAT_1:def 10;
hence
[x, y]
in ((
id the
carrier of (G
./. M))
| the
carrier of (N
./. MN)) by
A30,
RELAT_1:def 11;
end;
A31:
now
let x,y be
object;
assume
A32:
[x, y]
in ((
id the
carrier of (G
./. M))
| the
carrier of (N
./. MN));
then
[x, y]
in (
id the
carrier of (G
./. M)) by
RELAT_1:def 11;
then
A33: x
= y by
RELAT_1:def 10;
x
in the
carrier of (N
./. MN) by
A32,
RELAT_1:def 11;
hence
[x, y]
in (
id the
carrier of (N
./. MN)) by
A33,
RELAT_1:def 10;
end;
thus ((N
./. MN)
^ o)
= (
id the
carrier of (N
./. MN)) by
A26,
Def6
.= ((
id the
carrier of (G
./. M))
| the
carrier of (N
./. MN)) by
A28,
A31
.= (((G
./. M)
^ o)
| the
carrier of (N
./. MN)) by
A26,
Def6;
end;
suppose
A34: o
in O;
then (the
action of (G
./. M)
. o)
in (
Funcs (the
carrier of (G
./. M),the
carrier of (G
./. M))) by
FUNCT_2: 5;
then
consider f be
Function such that
A35: f
= (the
action of (G
./. M)
. o) and
A36: (
dom f)
= the
carrier of (G
./. M) and (
rng f)
c= the
carrier of (G
./. M) by
FUNCT_2:def 2;
A37: f
= {
[A, B] where A,B be
Element of (
Cosets M) : ex a,b be
Element of G st a
in A & b
in B & b
= ((G
^ o)
. a) } by
A34,
A35,
Def16;
(the
action of (N
./. MN)
. o)
in (
Funcs (the
carrier of (N
./. MN),the
carrier of (N
./. MN))) by
A34,
FUNCT_2: 5;
then
consider g be
Function such that
A38: g
= (the
action of (N
./. MN)
. o) and
A39: (
dom g)
= the
carrier of (N
./. MN) and (
rng g)
c= the
carrier of (N
./. MN) by
FUNCT_2:def 2;
A40: (
dom g)
= ((
dom f)
/\ the
carrier of (N
./. MN)) by
A24,
A36,
A39,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
A41: g
= {
[A, B] where A,B be
Element of (
Cosets MN) : ex a,b be
Element of N st a
in A & b
in B & b
= ((N
^ o)
. a) } by
A34,
A38,
Def16;
A42:
now
let x be
object;
assume
A43: x
in (
dom g);
then
[x, (g
. x)]
in g by
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
consider A2,B2 be
Element of (
Cosets MN) such that
A44:
[x, (g
. x)]
=
[A2, B2] and
A45: ex a,b be
Element of N st a
in A2 & b
in B2 & b
= ((N
^ o)
. a) by
A41;
A46: A2
= x by
A44,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
[x, (f
. x)]
in f by
A24,
A36,
A39,
A43,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
consider A1,B1 be
Element of (
Cosets M) such that
A47:
[x, (f
. x)]
=
[A1, B1] and
A48: ex a,b be
Element of G st a
in A1 & b
in B1 & b
= ((G
^ o)
. a) by
A37;
A49: A1
= x by
A47,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
reconsider A29 = A2, B29 = B2 as
Element of (
Cosets MN9) by
Def14;
reconsider A19 = A1, B19 = B1 as
Element of (
Cosets M9) by
Def14;
set fo = (G
^ o);
N is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
then
A50: the
carrier of N
c= the
carrier of G by
GROUP_2:def 5;
consider a2,b2 be
Element of N such that
A51: a2
in A2 and
A52: b2
in B2 and
A53: b2
= ((N
^ o)
. a2) by
A45;
A54: B29
= (b2
* MN9) by
A52,
Lm8;
reconsider a29 = a2, b29 = b2 as
Element of G by
A50;
consider a1,b1 be
Element of G such that
A55: a1
in A1 and
A56: b1
in B1 and
A57: b1
= ((G
^ o)
. a1) by
A48;
A58: A19
= (a1
* M9) by
A55,
Lm8;
now
let x be
object;
hereby
assume x
in (b2
* (
carr MN9));
then
consider h be
Element of N such that
A59: x
= (b2
* h) and
A60: h
in (
carr MN9) by
GROUP_2: 27;
reconsider h9 = h as
Element of G by
A50;
x
= (b29
* h9) by
A59,
Th3;
hence x
in (b29
* (
carr M9)) by
A1,
A60,
GROUP_2: 27;
end;
assume x
in (b29
* (
carr M9));
then
consider h be
Element of G such that
A61: x
= (b29
* h) and
A62: h
in (
carr M9) by
GROUP_2: 27;
h
in (
carr MN9) by
A1,
A62;
then
reconsider h9 = h as
Element of N;
x
= (b2
* h9) by
A61,
Th3;
hence x
in (b2
* (
carr MN9)) by
A1,
A62,
GROUP_2: 27;
end;
then
A63: (b29
* M9)
= (b2
* MN9) by
TARSKI: 2;
A64: B2
= (g
. x) by
A44,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
A65: B1
= (f
. x) by
A47,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
now
let x be
object;
hereby
assume x
in (a2
* (
carr MN9));
then
consider h be
Element of N such that
A66: x
= (a2
* h) and
A67: h
in (
carr MN9) by
GROUP_2: 27;
reconsider h9 = h as
Element of G by
A50;
x
= (a29
* h9) by
A66,
Th3;
hence x
in (a29
* (
carr M9)) by
A1,
A67,
GROUP_2: 27;
end;
assume x
in (a29
* (
carr M9));
then
consider h be
Element of G such that
A68: x
= (a29
* h) and
A69: h
in (
carr M9) by
GROUP_2: 27;
h
in (
carr MN9) by
A1,
A69;
then
reconsider h9 = h as
Element of N;
x
= (a2
* h9) by
A68,
Th3;
hence x
in (a2
* (
carr MN9)) by
A1,
A69,
GROUP_2: 27;
end;
then
A70: (a2
* MN9)
= (a29
* M9) by
TARSKI: 2;
A29
= (a2
* MN9) by
A51,
Lm8;
then ((a1
" )
* a29)
in M9 by
A49,
A46,
A58,
A70,
GROUP_2: 114;
then ((a1
" )
* a29)
in the
carrier of M by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((a1
" )
* a29)
in M by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then
A71: (fo
. ((a1
" )
* a29))
in M by
Lm9;
A72: (b1
" )
= (fo
. (a1
" )) by
A57,
GROUP_6: 32;
b29
= (((G
^ o)
| the
carrier of N)
. a2) by
A53,
Def7
.= (fo
. a29) by
FUNCT_1: 49;
then ((b1
" )
* b29)
in M by
A72,
A71,
GROUP_6:def 6;
then ((b1
" )
* b29)
in the
carrier of M by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then
A73: ((b1
" )
* b29)
in M9 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
B19
= (b1
* M9) by
A56,
Lm8;
hence (g
. x)
= (f
. x) by
A65,
A64,
A63,
A73,
A54,
GROUP_2: 114;
end;
thus ((N
./. MN)
^ o)
= (the
action of (N
./. MN)
. o) by
A34,
Def6
.= (f
| the
carrier of (N
./. MN)) by
A38,
A40,
A42,
FUNCT_1: 46
.= (((G
./. M)
^ o)
| the
carrier of (N
./. MN)) by
A34,
A35,
Def6;
end;
end;
(
Cosets MN99)
= (
Cosets MN9) by
A4,
TARSKI: 2;
then
reconsider f = (
CosOp MN99) as
BinOp of (
Cosets MN9);
now
let W1,W2 be
Element of (
Cosets MN9);
reconsider W19 = W1, W29 = W2 as
Element of (
Cosets MN99) by
A4;
let A1,A2 be
Subset of N;
assume
A74: W1
= A1;
reconsider A19 = A1, A29 = A2 as
Subset of N9;
assume
A75: W2
= A2;
A76:
now
let x be
object;
hereby
assume x
in (A1
* A2);
then
consider g,h be
Element of N such that
A77: x
= (g
* h) and
A78: g
in A1 & h
in A2;
reconsider g9 = g, h9 = h as
Element of N9;
x
= (g9
* h9) by
A77;
hence x
in (A19
* A29) by
A78;
end;
assume x
in (A19
* A29);
then
consider g9,h9 be
Element of N9 such that
A79: x
= (g9
* h9) and
A80: g9
in A19 & h9
in A29;
reconsider g = g9, h = h9 as
Element of N;
x
= (g
* h) by
A79;
hence x
in (A1
* A2) by
A80;
end;
thus (f
. (W1,W2))
= (f
. (W19,W29))
.= (A19
* A29) by
A74,
A75,
GROUP_6:def 3
.= (A1
* A2) by
A76,
TARSKI: 2;
end;
then the
multF of K
= (
CosOp MN9) by
GROUP_6:def 3
.= the
multF of (N
./. MN) by
Def15;
then the
multF of (N
./. MN)
= (the
multF of (G
./. M9)
|| the
carrier of K) by
GROUP_2:def 5
.= (the
multF of (G
./. M)
|| the
carrier of (N
./. MN)) by
A15,
Def15;
then (N
./. MN) is
Subgroup of (G
./. M) by
A24,
GROUP_2:def 5;
hence thesis by
A16,
A25,
Def7,
Def10;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:45
(h
. (
1_ G))
= (
1_ H) by
Lm12;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:46
(h
. (g1
" ))
= ((h
. g1)
" ) by
Lm13;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:47
Th47: g1
in (
Ker h) iff (h
. g1)
= (
1_ H)
proof
thus g1
in (
Ker h) implies (h
. g1)
= (
1_ H)
proof
assume g1
in (
Ker h);
then g1
in the
carrier of (
Ker h) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then g1
in { b where b be
Element of G : (h
. b)
= (
1_ H) } by
Def21;
then ex b be
Element of G st g1
= b & (h
. b)
= (
1_ H);
hence thesis;
end;
assume (h
. g1)
= (
1_ H);
then g1
in { b where b be
Element of G : (h
. b)
= (
1_ H) };
then g1
in the
carrier of (
Ker h) by
Def21;
hence thesis by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:48
Th48: for N be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G holds (
Ker (
nat_hom N))
= N
proof
let N be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider N9 = the multMagma of N as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
A1: (
nat_hom N)
= (
nat_hom N9) & (
1_ (G
./. N))
= (
1_ (G
./. N9)) by
Def20,
Lm34;
the
carrier of (
Ker (
nat_hom N))
= { a where a be
Element of G : ((
nat_hom N)
. a)
= (
1_ (G
./. N)) } by
Def21
.= { a where a be
Element of G : ((
nat_hom N9)
. a)
= (
1_ (G
./. N9)) } by
A1
.= the
carrier of (
Ker (
nat_hom N9)) by
GROUP_6:def 9
.= the
carrier of N by
GROUP_6: 43;
hence thesis by
Lm4;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:49
Th49: (
rng h)
= the
carrier of (
Image h)
proof
the
carrier of (
Image h)
= (h
.: the
carrier of G) by
Def22
.= (h
.: (
dom h)) by
FUNCT_2:def 1
.= (
rng h) by
RELAT_1: 113;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:50
Th50: (
Image (
nat_hom N))
= (G
./. N)
proof
reconsider N9 = the multMagma of N as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
reconsider H = (G
./. N) as
strict
StableSubgroup of (G
./. N) by
Lm3;
A1: (G
./. N9)
= the multMagma of (G
./. N) by
Lm34;
the
carrier of (
Image (
nat_hom N))
= ((
nat_hom N)
.: the
carrier of G) by
Def22
.= ((
nat_hom N9)
.: the
carrier of G) by
Def20
.= the
carrier of (
Image (
nat_hom N9)) by
GROUP_6:def 10
.= the
carrier of H by
A1,
GROUP_6: 48;
hence thesis by
Lm4;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:51
Th51: for H be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O, h be
Homomorphism of G, H holds h is
onto iff (
Image h)
= H
proof
let H be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O, h be
Homomorphism of G, H;
thus h is
onto implies (
Image h)
= H
proof
reconsider H9 = H as
strict
StableSubgroup of H by
Lm3;
assume (
rng h)
= the
carrier of H;
then the
carrier of H9
= the
carrier of (
Image h) by
Th49;
hence thesis by
Lm4;
end;
assume
A1: (
Image h)
= H;
the
carrier of H
c= (
rng h)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in the
carrier of H;
then x
in (h
.: the
carrier of G) by
A1,
Def22;
then ex y be
object st y
in (
dom h) & y
in the
carrier of G & (h
. y)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
then (
rng h)
= the
carrier of H by
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:52
Th52: for H be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O, h be
Homomorphism of G, H st h is
onto holds for c be
Element of H holds ex a be
Element of G st (h
. a)
= c
proof
let H be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O;
let h be
Homomorphism of G, H;
assume
A1: h is
onto;
let c be
Element of H;
(
rng h)
= the
carrier of H by
A1;
then
consider a be
object such that
A2: a
in (
dom h) and
A3: c
= (h
. a) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider a as
Element of G by
A2;
take a;
thus thesis by
A3;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:53
Th53: (
nat_hom N) is
onto
proof
(
Image (
nat_hom N))
= (G
./. N) by
Th50;
hence thesis by
Th51;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:54
Th54: (
nat_hom (
(1). G)) is
bijective
proof
reconsider H = the multMagma of (
(1). G) as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
set g = (
nat_hom (
(1). G));
reconsider G9 = G as
Group;
A1: the
carrier of H
=
{(
1_ G9)} by
Def8;
A2: (
nat_hom (
(1). G9)) is
bijective & g is
onto by
Th53,
GROUP_6: 65;
(
nat_hom (
(1). G))
= (
nat_hom H) by
Def20
.= (
nat_hom (
(1). G9)) by
A1,
GROUP_2:def 7;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:55
Th55: (G,H)
are_isomorphic & (H,I)
are_isomorphic implies (G,I)
are_isomorphic
proof
assume that
A1: (G,H)
are_isomorphic and
A2: (H,I)
are_isomorphic ;
consider g be
Homomorphism of G, H such that
A3: g is
bijective by
A1;
consider h1 be
Homomorphism of H, I such that
A4: h1 is
bijective by
A2;
A5: (
rng h1)
= the
carrier of I by
A4,
FUNCT_2:def 3;
(
rng g)
= the
carrier of H by
A3,
FUNCT_2:def 3;
then (
dom h1)
= (
rng g) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (
rng (h1
* g))
= the
carrier of I by
A5,
RELAT_1: 28;
then (h1
* g) is
onto;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:56
Th56: for G be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O holds (G,(G
./. (
(1). G)))
are_isomorphic
proof
let G be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O;
(
nat_hom (
(1). G)) is
bijective by
Th54;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:57
Th57: for G be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O holds (G
./. (
(Omega). G)) is
trivial
proof
let G be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O;
reconsider G9 = G as
Group;
reconsider H = the multMagma of (
(Omega). G) as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
A1: H
= (
(Omega). G9);
the
carrier of (G
./. (
(Omega). G))
= (
Cosets H) by
Def14
.=
{the
carrier of G} by
A1,
GROUP_2: 142;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:58
Th58: for G,H be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O holds (G,H)
are_isomorphic & G is
trivial implies H is
trivial
proof
let G,H be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O;
assume that
A1: (G,H)
are_isomorphic and
A2: G is
trivial;
consider e be
object such that
A3: the
carrier of G
=
{e} by
A2;
consider g be
Homomorphism of G, H such that
A4: g is
bijective by
A1;
e
in the
carrier of G by
A3,
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A5: e
in (
dom g) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
the
carrier of H
= the
carrier of (
Image g) by
A4,
Th51
.= (
Im (g,e)) by
A3,
Def22
.=
{(g
. e)} by
A5,
FUNCT_1: 59;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:59
Th59: ((G
./. (
Ker h)),(
Image h))
are_isomorphic
proof
reconsider G9 = G, H9 = H as
Group;
reconsider h9 = h as
Homomorphism of G9, H9;
consider g9 be
Homomorphism of (G9
./. (
Ker h9)), (
Image h9) such that
A1: g9 is
bijective and
A2: h9
= (g9
* (
nat_hom (
Ker h9))) by
GROUP_6: 79;
A3: the
carrier of (
Image h9)
= (h9
.: the
carrier of G9) by
GROUP_6:def 10
.= the
carrier of (
Image h) by
Def22;
now
let x be
object;
hereby
assume x
in the
carrier of (
Ker h);
then x
in { a where a be
Element of G : (h
. a)
= (
1_ H) } by
Def21;
hence x
in the
carrier of (
Ker h9) by
GROUP_6:def 9;
end;
assume x
in the
carrier of (
Ker h9);
then x
in { a9 where a9 be
Element of G9 : (h9
. a9)
= (
1_ H9) } by
GROUP_6:def 9;
hence x
in the
carrier of (
Ker h) by
Def21;
end;
then
A4: the
carrier of (
Ker h9)
= the
carrier of (
Ker h) by
TARSKI: 2;
(
Ker h) is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
then
A5: the multMagma of (
Ker h9)
= the multMagma of (
Ker h) by
A4,
GROUP_2: 59;
then the
carrier of (G9
./. (
Ker h9))
= the
carrier of (G
./. (
Ker h)) by
Def14;
then
reconsider g = g9 as
Function of (G
./. (
Ker h)), (
Image h) by
A3;
(
Image h) is
Subgroup of H by
Def7;
then
A6: the multMagma of (
Image h9)
= the multMagma of (
Image h) by
A3,
GROUP_2: 59;
A7:
now
let a,b be
Element of (G
./. (
Ker h));
reconsider b9 = b as
Element of (G9
./. (
Ker h9)) by
A5,
Def14;
reconsider a9 = a as
Element of (G9
./. (
Ker h9)) by
A5,
Def14;
thus (g
. (a
* b))
= (g9
. (a9
* b9)) by
A5,
Def15
.= ((g9
. a9)
* (g9
. b9)) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((g
. a)
* (g
. b)) by
A6;
end;
now
let o be
Element of O;
let a be
Element of (G
./. (
Ker h));
per cases ;
suppose
A8: O is
empty;
hence (g
. (((G
./. (
Ker h))
^ o)
. a))
= (g
. ((
id the
carrier of (G
./. (
Ker h)))
. a)) by
Def6
.= ((
id the
carrier of (
Image h))
. (g
. a))
.= (((
Image h)
^ o)
. (g
. a)) by
A8,
Def6;
end;
suppose
A9: not O is
empty;
reconsider G99 = (G
./. (
Ker h)) as
Group;
set f = (the
action of (G
./. (
Ker h))
. o);
A10: f
= {
[A, B] where A,B be
Element of (
Cosets (
Ker h)) : ex g,h be
Element of G st g
in A & h
in B & h
= ((G
^ o)
. g) } by
A9,
Def16;
f
= ((G
./. (
Ker h))
^ o) by
A9,
Def6;
then
reconsider f as
Homomorphism of G99, G99;
a
in the
carrier of G99;
then a
in (
dom f) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
[a, (f
. a)]
in f by
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
consider A,B be
Element of (
Cosets (
Ker h)) such that
A11:
[A, B]
=
[a, (f
. a)] and
A12: ex g1,g2 be
Element of G st g1
in A & g2
in B & g2
= ((G
^ o)
. g1) by
A10;
reconsider A, B as
Element of (
Cosets (
Ker h9)) by
A5,
Def14;
consider g1,g2 be
Element of G9 such that
A13: g1
in A and
A14: g2
in B and
A15: g2
= ((G
^ o)
. g1) by
A12;
A16: A
= (g1
* (
Ker h9)) by
A13,
Lm8;
g1
in the
carrier of G9;
then
A17: g1
in (
dom (
nat_hom (
Ker h9))) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
g2
in the
carrier of G9;
then
A18: g2
in (
dom (
nat_hom (
Ker h9))) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A19: (((
Image h)
^ o)
. (g
. a))
= (((H
^ o)
| the
carrier of (
Image h))
. (g
. a)) by
Def7
.= ((H
^ o)
. (g
. a)) by
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((H
^ o)
. (g9
. (g1
* (
Ker h9)))) by
A11,
A16,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
A20: B
= (g2
* (
Ker h9)) by
A14,
Lm8;
(h9
. g2)
= ((H
^ o)
. (h9
. g1)) by
A15,
Def18;
then (g9
. ((
nat_hom (
Ker h9))
. g2))
= ((H
^ o)
. ((g9
* (
nat_hom (
Ker h9)))
. g1)) by
A2,
A18,
FUNCT_1: 13;
then (g9
. ((
nat_hom (
Ker h9))
. g2))
= ((H
^ o)
. (g9
. ((
nat_hom (
Ker h9))
. g1))) by
A17,
FUNCT_1: 13;
then
A21: (g9
. (g2
* (
Ker h9)))
= ((H
^ o)
. (g9
. ((
nat_hom (
Ker h9))
. g1))) by
GROUP_6:def 8;
(g
. (((G
./. (
Ker h))
^ o)
. a))
= (g
. (f
. a)) by
A9,
Def6
.= (g9
. (g2
* (
Ker h9))) by
A11,
A20,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence (g
. (((G
./. (
Ker h))
^ o)
. a))
= (((
Image h)
^ o)
. (g
. a)) by
A19,
A21,
GROUP_6:def 8;
end;
end;
then
reconsider g as
Homomorphism of (G
./. (
Ker h)), (
Image h) by
A7,
Def18,
GROUP_6:def 6;
g is
onto by
A1,
A3;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:60
Th60: for H,F1,F2 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st F1 is
normal
StableSubgroup of F2 holds (H
/\ F1) is
normal
StableSubgroup of (H
/\ F2)
proof
let H,F1,F2 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider F = (F2
/\ H) as
StableSubgroup of F2 by
Lm33;
assume
A1: F1 is
normal
StableSubgroup of F2;
then
A2: (F1
/\ H)
= ((F1
/\ F2)
/\ H) by
Lm21
.= (F1
/\ (F2
/\ H)) by
Th20;
reconsider F1 as
normal
StableSubgroup of F2 by
A1;
(F1
/\ F) is
normal
StableSubgroup of F by
Th41;
hence thesis by
A2,
Th39;
end;
begin
reserve E for
set,
A for
Action of O, E,
C for
Subset of G,
N1 for
normal
StableSubgroup of H1;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:61
(
[#] E)
is_stable_under_the_action_of A;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:62
[:O,
{(
id E)}:] is
Action of O, E by
Lm1;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:63
for O be non
empty
set, E be
set, o be
Element of O, A be
Action of O, E holds (
Product (
<*o*>,A))
= (A
. o) by
Lm25;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:64
for O be non
empty
set, E be
set, F1,F2 be
FinSequence of O, A be
Action of O, E holds (
Product ((F1
^ F2),A))
= ((
Product (F1,A))
* (
Product (F2,A))) by
Lm28;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:65
for F be
FinSequence of O, Y be
Subset of E st Y
is_stable_under_the_action_of A holds ((
Product (F,A))
.: Y)
c= Y by
Lm29;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:66
for E be non
empty
set, A be
Action of O, E holds for X be
Subset of E, a be
Element of E st not X is
empty holds a
in (
the_stable_subset_generated_by (X,A)) iff ex F be
FinSequence of O, x be
Element of X st ((
Product (F,A))
. x)
= a by
Lm30;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:67
for G be
strict
Group holds ex H be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O st G
= the multMagma of H
proof
let G be
strict
Group;
consider H be non
empty
HGrWOpStr over O such that
A1: H is
strict
distributive
Group-like
associative and
A2: G
= the multMagma of H by
Lm2;
reconsider H as
strict
GroupWithOperators of O by
A1;
take H;
thus thesis by
A2;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:68
the multMagma of H1 is
strict
Subgroup of G by
Lm15;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:69
the multMagma of N is
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:70
g1
in H1 implies ((G
^ o)
. g1)
in H1 by
Lm9;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:71
for O be
set, G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O, G9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G, f be
Homomorphism of G, H holds ex H9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of H st the
carrier of H9
= (f
.: the
carrier of G9) by
Lm16;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:72
B is
empty implies (
the_stable_subgroup_of B)
= (
(1). G) by
Lm24;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:73
B
= the
carrier of (
gr C) implies (
the_stable_subgroup_of C)
= (
the_stable_subgroup_of B) by
Lm31;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:74
for N9 be
normal
Subgroup of G st N9
= the multMagma of N holds (G
./. N9)
= the multMagma of (G
./. N) & (
1_ (G
./. N9))
= (
1_ (G
./. N)) by
Lm34;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:75
Th75: the
carrier of H1
= the
carrier of H2 implies the HGrWOpStr of H1
= the HGrWOpStr of H2
proof
reconsider H19 = H1, H29 = H2 as
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
A1: (
dom the
action of H2)
= O by
FUNCT_2:def 1
.= (
dom the
action of H1) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
assume
A2: the
carrier of H1
= the
carrier of H2;
A3:
now
let x be
object;
assume
A4: x
in (
dom the
action of H2);
then
reconsider o = x as
Element of O;
A5: (H1
^ o)
= (the
action of H1
. o) by
A4,
Def6;
(H1
^ o)
= ((G
^ o)
| the
carrier of H2) by
A2,
Def7
.= (H2
^ o) by
Def7;
hence (the
action of H1
. x)
= (the
action of H2
. x) by
A4,
A5,
Def6;
end;
the multMagma of H19
= the multMagma of H29 by
A2,
GROUP_2: 59;
hence thesis by
A1,
A3,
FUNCT_1: 2;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:76
Th76: (H1
./. N1) is
trivial implies the HGrWOpStr of H1
= the HGrWOpStr of N1
proof
reconsider N9 = N1 as
StableSubgroup of G by
Th11;
set H = H1;
reconsider N = the multMagma of N1 as
normal
Subgroup of H by
Lm6;
assume
A1: (H1
./. N1) is
trivial;
(
Cosets N1)
= (
Cosets N) by
Def14;
then
consider e be
object such that
A2: the
carrier of (H
./. N)
=
{e} by
A1;
A3: the
carrier of H
= (
union
{e}) by
A2,
GROUP_2: 137;
A4:
now
assume not the
carrier of H
c= the
carrier of N;
then (the
carrier of H
\ the
carrier of N)
<>
{} by
XBOOLE_1: 37;
then
consider x be
object such that
A5: x
in (the
carrier of H
\ the
carrier of N) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
reconsider x as
Element of H1 by
A5;
A6:
now
assume (x
* N)
= e;
then (x
* N)
= the
carrier of H by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 25;
then
consider x9 be
Element of H such that
A7: (
1_ H)
= (x
* x9) and
A8: x9
in N by
GROUP_2: 103;
x9
= (x
" ) by
A7,
GROUP_1: 12;
then ((x
" )
" )
in N by
A8,
GROUP_2: 51;
then x
in (
carr N) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
hence contradiction by
A5,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
(x
* N)
in (
Cosets N) by
GROUP_6: 14;
hence contradiction by
A2,
A6,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
the
carrier of N
c= the
carrier of H by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then the
carrier of N9
= the
carrier of H1 by
A4,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
hence thesis by
Th75;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:77
Th77: the
carrier of H1
= the
carrier of N1 implies (H1
./. N1) is
trivial
proof
reconsider N19 = the multMagma of N1 as
strict
normal
Subgroup of H1 by
Lm6;
assume
A1: the
carrier of H1
= the
carrier of N1;
now
let x be
object;
hereby
assume
A2: x
in (
Left_Cosets N19);
then
reconsider A = x as
Subset of H1;
consider a be
Element of H1 such that
A3: A
= (a
* N19) by
A2,
GROUP_2:def 15;
A
= (a
* (
[#] the
carrier of H1)) by
A1,
A3;
hence x
= the
carrier of H1 by
GROUP_2: 17;
end;
the
carrier of H1
= ((
1_ H1)
* (
[#] the
carrier of H1)) by
GROUP_2: 17;
then
A4: the
carrier of H1
= ((
1_ H1)
* N19) by
A1;
assume x
= the
carrier of H1;
hence x
in (
Left_Cosets N19) by
A4,
GROUP_2:def 15;
end;
then
A5:
{the
carrier of H1}
= (
Left_Cosets N19) by
TARSKI:def 1;
(
Cosets N1)
= (
Cosets N19) by
Def14;
hence thesis by
A5;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:78
Th78: for G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O, N be
StableSubgroup of G, H9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of H, f be
Homomorphism of G, H st N
= (
Ker f) holds ex G9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st the
carrier of G9
= (f
" the
carrier of H9) & (H9 is
normal implies N is
normal
StableSubgroup of G9 & G9 is
normal)
proof
let G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let N be
StableSubgroup of G;
let H9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of H;
reconsider H99 = the multMagma of H9 as
strict
Subgroup of H by
Lm15;
let f be
Homomorphism of G, H;
assume
A1: N
= (
Ker f);
set A = { g where g be
Element of G : (f
. g)
in H99 };
A2: (
1_ H)
in H99 by
GROUP_2: 46;
then (f
. (
1_ G))
in H99 by
Lm12;
then (
1_ G)
in A;
then
reconsider A as non
empty
set;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in A;
then ex g be
Element of G st x
= g & (f
. g)
in H99;
hence x
in the
carrier of G;
end;
then
reconsider A as
Subset of G by
TARSKI:def 3;
A3:
now
let g1,g2 be
Element of G;
assume that
A4: g1
in A and
A5: g2
in A;
consider b be
Element of G such that
A6: b
= g2 and
A7: (f
. b)
in H99 by
A5;
consider a be
Element of G such that
A8: a
= g1 and
A9: (f
. a)
in H99 by
A4;
set fb = (f
. b);
set fa = (f
. a);
(f
. (a
* b))
= ((f
. a)
* (f
. b)) & (fa
* fb)
in H99 by
A9,
A7,
GROUP_2: 50,
GROUP_6:def 6;
hence (g1
* g2)
in A by
A8,
A6;
end;
A10:
now
let o be
Element of O;
let g be
Element of G;
assume g
in A;
then
consider a be
Element of G such that
A11: a
= g and
A12: (f
. a)
in H99;
(f
. a)
in the
carrier of H99 by
A12,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (f
. a)
in H9 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((H
^ o)
. (f
. g))
in H9 by
A11,
Lm9;
then (f
. ((G
^ o)
. g))
in H9 by
Def18;
then (f
. ((G
^ o)
. g))
in the
carrier of H9 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (f
. ((G
^ o)
. g))
in H99 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
hence ((G
^ o)
. g)
in A;
end;
now
let g be
Element of G;
assume g
in A;
then
consider a be
Element of G such that
A13: a
= g and
A14: (f
. a)
in H99;
((f
. a)
" )
in H99 by
A14,
GROUP_2: 51;
then (f
. (a
" ))
in H99 by
Lm13;
hence (g
" )
in A by
A13;
end;
then
consider G99 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G such that
A15: the
carrier of G99
= A by
A3,
A10,
Lm14;
take G99;
now
reconsider R = f as
Relation of the
carrier of G, the
carrier of H;
let g be
Element of G;
hereby
assume g
in A;
then ex a be
Element of G st a
= g & (f
. a)
in H99;
then
A16: (f
. g)
in the
carrier of H9 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
(
dom f)
= the
carrier of G by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
[g, (f
. g)]
in f by
FUNCT_1: 1;
hence g
in (f
" the
carrier of H9) by
A16,
RELSET_1: 30;
end;
assume g
in (f
" the
carrier of H9);
then
consider h be
Element of H such that
A17:
[g, h]
in R & h
in the
carrier of H9 by
RELSET_1: 30;
(f
. g)
= h & h
in H99 by
A17,
FUNCT_1: 1,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
hence g
in A;
end;
hence the
carrier of G99
= (f
" the
carrier of H9) by
A15,
SUBSET_1: 3;
reconsider G9 = the multMagma of G99 as
strict
Subgroup of G by
Lm15;
now
assume
A18: H9 is
normal;
now
let g be
Element of G;
assume g
in N;
then (f
. g)
= (
1_ H) by
A1,
Th47;
then g
in the
carrier of G99 by
A2,
A15;
hence g
in G99 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
hence N is
normal
StableSubgroup of G99 by
A1,
Th13,
Th40;
now
let g be
Element of G;
now
H99 is
normal by
A18;
then
A19: (H99
|^ ((f
. g)
" ))
= H99 by
GROUP_3:def 13;
let x be
object;
assume x
in (g
* G9);
then
consider h be
Element of G such that
A20: x
= (g
* h) and
A21: h
in A by
A15,
GROUP_2: 27;
set h9 = ((g
* h)
* (g
" ));
A22: (f
. h9)
= ((f
. (g
* h))
* (f
. (g
" ))) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= (((f
. g)
* (f
. h))
* (f
. (g
" ))) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= (((((f
. g)
" )
" )
* (f
. h))
* ((f
. g)
" )) by
Lm13
.= ((f
. h)
|^ ((f
. g)
" )) by
GROUP_3:def 2;
ex a be
Element of G st a
= h & (f
. a)
in H99 by
A21;
then (f
. h9)
in H99 by
A19,
A22,
GROUP_3: 58;
then
A23: h9
in A;
(h9
* g)
= ((g
* h)
* ((g
" )
* g)) by
GROUP_1:def 3
.= ((g
* h)
* (
1_ G)) by
GROUP_1:def 5
.= x by
A20,
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence x
in (G9
* g) by
A15,
A23,
GROUP_2: 28;
end;
hence (g
* G9)
c= (G9
* g);
end;
then for H be
strict
Subgroup of G st H
= the multMagma of G99 holds H is
normal by
GROUP_3: 118;
hence G99 is
normal;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:79
Th79: for G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O, N be
StableSubgroup of G, G9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G, f be
Homomorphism of G, H st N
= (
Ker f) holds ex H9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of H st the
carrier of H9
= (f
.: the
carrier of G9) & (f
" the
carrier of H9)
= the
carrier of (G9
"\/" N) & (f is
onto & G9 is
normal implies H9 is
normal)
proof
let G,H be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let N be
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider N9 = the multMagma of N as
strict
Subgroup of G by
Lm15;
let G9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider G99 = the multMagma of G9 as
strict
Subgroup of G by
Lm15;
let f be
Homomorphism of G, H;
set A = { (f
. g) where g be
Element of G : g
in G99 };
A1: (G99
* N9)
= (G9
* N) & (N9
* G99)
= (N
* G9);
(
1_ G)
in G99 by
GROUP_2: 46;
then (f
. (
1_ G))
in A;
then
reconsider A as non
empty
set;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in A;
then ex g be
Element of G st x
= (f
. g) & g
in G99;
hence x
in the
carrier of H;
end;
then
reconsider A as
Subset of H by
TARSKI:def 3;
A2:
now
let h1,h2 be
Element of H;
assume that
A3: h1
in A and
A4: h2
in A;
consider a be
Element of G such that
A5: h1
= (f
. a) & a
in G99 by
A3;
consider b be
Element of G such that
A6: h2
= (f
. b) & b
in G99 by
A4;
(f
. (a
* b))
= (h1
* h2) & (a
* b)
in G99 by
A5,
A6,
GROUP_2: 50,
GROUP_6:def 6;
hence (h1
* h2)
in A;
end;
A7:
now
let o be
Element of O;
let h be
Element of H;
assume h
in A;
then
consider g be
Element of G such that
A8: h
= (f
. g) and
A9: g
in G99;
g
in the
carrier of G99 by
A9,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then g
in G9 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((G
^ o)
. g)
in G9 by
Lm9;
then ((G
^ o)
. g)
in the
carrier of G9 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then
A10: ((G
^ o)
. g)
in G99 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
((H
^ o)
. h)
= (f
. ((G
^ o)
. g)) by
A8,
Def18;
hence ((H
^ o)
. h)
in A by
A10;
end;
now
let h be
Element of H;
assume h
in A;
then
consider g be
Element of G such that
A11: h
= (f
. g) & g
in G99;
(g
" )
in G99 & (h
" )
= (f
. (g
" )) by
A11,
Lm13,
GROUP_2: 51;
hence (h
" )
in A;
end;
then
consider H99 be
strict
StableSubgroup of H such that
A12: the
carrier of H99
= A by
A2,
A7,
Lm14;
assume
A13: N
= (
Ker f);
then N9 is
normal by
Def10;
then
A14: ((
carr G99)
* N9)
= (N9
* (
carr G99)) by
GROUP_3: 120;
reconsider H9 = the multMagma of H99 as
strict
Subgroup of H by
Lm15;
take H99;
A15:
now
reconsider R = f as
Relation of the
carrier of G, the
carrier of H;
let h be
Element of H;
hereby
assume h
in A;
then
consider g be
Element of G such that
A16: h
= (f
. g) and
A17: g
in G99;
A18: g
in the
carrier of G9 by
A17,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
(
dom f)
= the
carrier of G by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
[g, h]
in f by
A16,
FUNCT_1: 1;
hence h
in (f
.: the
carrier of G9) by
A18,
RELSET_1: 29;
end;
assume h
in (f
.: the
carrier of G9);
then
consider g be
Element of G such that
A19:
[g, h]
in R & g
in the
carrier of G9 by
RELSET_1: 29;
(f
. g)
= h & g
in G99 by
A19,
FUNCT_1: 1,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
hence h
in A;
end;
hence
A20: the
carrier of H99
= (f
.: the
carrier of G9) by
A12,
SUBSET_1: 3;
A21:
now
let x be
object;
assume
A22: x
in (f
" the
carrier of H9);
then (f
. x)
in the
carrier of H9 by
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then
consider g1 be
object such that
A23: g1
in (
dom f) and
A24: g1
in the
carrier of G9 and
A25: (f
. g1)
= (f
. x) by
A20,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
reconsider g1, g2 = x as
Element of G by
A22,
A23;
consider g3 be
Element of G such that
A26: g2
= (g1
* g3) by
GROUP_1: 15;
(f
. g2)
= ((f
. g2)
* (f
. g3)) by
A25,
A26,
GROUP_6:def 6;
then (f
. g3)
= (
1_ H) by
GROUP_1: 7;
then g3
in (
Ker f) by
Th47;
then g3
in the
carrier of N by
A13,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
hence x
in (G99
* N9) by
A24,
A26;
end;
A27: (
dom f)
= the
carrier of G by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
now
let x be
object;
assume
A28: x
in (G99
* N9);
then
consider g1,g2 be
Element of G such that
A29: x
= (g1
* g2) and
A30: g1
in (
carr G9) and
A31: g2
in (
carr N9);
A32: g2
in (
Ker f) by
A13,
A31,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
(f
. x)
= ((f
. g1)
* (f
. g2)) by
A29,
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((f
. g1)
* (
1_ H)) by
A32,
Th47
.= (f
. g1) by
GROUP_1:def 4;
then (f
. x)
in (f
.: the
carrier of G9) by
A27,
A30,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
then x
in (f
" (f
.: the
carrier of G9)) by
A27,
A28,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
hence x
in (f
" the
carrier of H9) by
A12,
A15,
SUBSET_1: 3;
end;
then (f
" the
carrier of H9)
= ((
carr G9)
* (
carr N)) by
A21,
TARSKI: 2;
hence (f
" the
carrier of H99)
= the
carrier of (G9
"\/" N) by
A14,
A1,
Th30;
now
assume that
A33: f is
onto and
A34: G9 is
normal;
A35: G99 is
normal by
A34;
now
let h1 be
Element of H;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in (h1
* H9);
then
consider h2 be
Element of H such that
A36: x
= (h1
* h2) and
A37: h2
in A by
A12,
GROUP_2: 27;
set h29 = ((h1
* h2)
* (h1
" ));
h2
in (f
.: the
carrier of G9) by
A15,
A37;
then
consider g2 be
object such that
A38: g2
in (
dom f) and
A39: g2
in the
carrier of G99 and
A40: (f
. g2)
= h2 by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
(
rng f)
= the
carrier of H by
A33;
then
consider g1 be
object such that
A41: g1
in (
dom f) and
A42: h1
= (f
. g1) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider g1, g2 as
Element of G by
A38,
A41;
set g29 = ((g1
* g2)
* (g1
" ));
g29
= ((((g1
" )
" )
* g2)
* (g1
" ));
then
A43: g29
= (g2
|^ (g1
" )) by
GROUP_3:def 2;
g2
in G99 by
A39,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then g29
in (G99
|^ (g1
" )) by
A43,
GROUP_3: 58;
then
A44: g29
in the
carrier of (G99
|^ (g1
" )) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
(G99
|^ (g1
" )) is
Subgroup of G99 by
A35,
GROUP_3: 122;
then
A45: the
carrier of (G99
|^ (g1
" ))
c= the
carrier of G99 by
GROUP_2:def 5;
h29
= (((f
. g1)
* (f
. g2))
* (f
. (g1
" ))) by
A40,
A42,
Lm13
.= ((f
. (g1
* g2))
* (f
. (g1
" ))) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= (f
. g29) by
GROUP_6:def 6;
then h29
in (f
.: the
carrier of G99) by
A27,
A44,
A45,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
then
A46: h29
in A by
A15;
(h29
* h1)
= ((h1
* h2)
* ((h1
" )
* h1)) by
GROUP_1:def 3
.= ((h1
* h2)
* (
1_ H)) by
GROUP_1:def 5
.= x by
A36,
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence x
in (H9
* h1) by
A12,
A46,
GROUP_2: 28;
end;
hence (h1
* H9)
c= (H9
* h1);
end;
then for H1 be
strict
Subgroup of H st H1
= the multMagma of H99 holds H1 is
normal by
GROUP_3: 118;
hence H99 is
normal;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:80
Th80: for G be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O, N be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G, H be
strict
StableSubgroup of (G
./. N) st the
carrier of G
= ((
nat_hom N)
" the
carrier of H) holds H
= (
(Omega). (G
./. N))
proof
let G be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O;
let N be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider N9 = the multMagma of N as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
let H be
strict
StableSubgroup of (G
./. N);
reconsider H9 = the multMagma of H as
strict
Subgroup of (G
./. N) by
Lm15;
A1: the
carrier of H9
c= the
carrier of (G
./. N) & the
multF of H9
= (the
multF of (G
./. N)
|| the
carrier of H9) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
the
carrier of (G
./. N)
= the
carrier of (G
./. N9) & the
multF of (G
./. N)
= the
multF of (G
./. N9) by
Def14,
Def15;
then
reconsider H9 as
strict
Subgroup of (G
./. N9) by
A1,
GROUP_2:def 5;
assume the
carrier of G
= ((
nat_hom N)
" the
carrier of H);
then
A2: the
carrier of G
= ((
nat_hom N9)
" the
carrier of H9) by
Def20;
now
reconsider R = (
nat_hom N9) as
Relation of the
carrier of G, the
carrier of (G
./. N9);
let h be
Element of (G
./. N9);
thus h
in H9 implies h
in (
(Omega). (G
./. N9)) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
assume h
in (
(Omega). (G
./. N9));
h
in (
Left_Cosets N9);
then
consider g be
Element of G such that
A3: h
= (g
* N9) by
GROUP_2:def 15;
consider h9 be
Element of (G
./. N9) such that
A4:
[g, h9]
in R and
A5: h9
in the
carrier of H9 by
A2,
RELSET_1: 30;
((
nat_hom N9)
. g)
= h9 by
A4,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then h
in the
carrier of H9 by
A3,
A5,
GROUP_6:def 8;
hence h
in H9 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
then H9
= (
(Omega). (G
./. N9));
then the
carrier of H
= (
Cosets N) by
Def14;
hence thesis by
Lm4;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:81
Th81: for G be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O, N be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G, H be
strict
StableSubgroup of (G
./. N) st the
carrier of N
= ((
nat_hom N)
" the
carrier of H) holds H
= (
(1). (G
./. N))
proof
let G be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O;
let N be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider N9 = the multMagma of N as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
Lm6;
let H be
strict
StableSubgroup of (G
./. N);
reconsider H9 = the multMagma of H as
strict
Subgroup of (G
./. N) by
Lm15;
A1: the
carrier of H9
c= the
carrier of (G
./. N) & the
multF of H9
= (the
multF of (G
./. N)
|| the
carrier of H9) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
the
carrier of (G
./. N)
= the
carrier of (G
./. N9) & the
multF of (G
./. N)
= the
multF of (G
./. N9) by
Def14,
Def15;
then
reconsider H9 as
strict
Subgroup of (G
./. N9) by
A1,
GROUP_2:def 5;
assume the
carrier of N
= ((
nat_hom N)
" the
carrier of H);
then
A2: the
carrier of N9
= ((
nat_hom N9)
" the
carrier of H9) by
Def20;
assume not H
= (
(1). (G
./. N));
then not the
carrier of H
=
{(
1_ (G
./. N))} by
Def8;
then
consider h be
object such that
A3: not (h
in the
carrier of H iff h
in
{(
1_ (G
./. N))}) by
TARSKI: 2;
per cases by
A3;
suppose
A4: h
in the
carrier of H & not h
in
{(
1_ (G
./. N))};
then
{h}
c= the
carrier of H by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
A5: ((
nat_hom N9)
"
{h})
c= the
carrier of N9 by
A2,
RELAT_1: 143;
A6: (
rng (
nat_hom N9))
= the
carrier of (
Image (
nat_hom N9)) by
GROUP_6: 44
.= the
carrier of (G
./. N9) by
GROUP_6: 48;
the
carrier of H9
c= the
carrier of (G
./. N9) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then
consider x be
object such that
A7: x
in (
dom (
nat_hom N9)) and
A8: ((
nat_hom N9)
. x)
= h by
A4,
A6,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
((
nat_hom N9)
. x)
in
{h} by
A8,
TARSKI:def 1;
then x
in ((
nat_hom N9)
"
{h}) by
A7,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then
A9: x
in N9 by
A5,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
h
<> (
1_ (G
./. N)) by
A4,
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A10: h
<> (
carr N) by
Th43;
reconsider x as
Element of G by
A7;
(x
* N9)
= h by
A8,
GROUP_6:def 8;
hence contradiction by
A10,
A9,
GROUP_2: 113;
end;
suppose not h
in the
carrier of H & h
in
{(
1_ (G
./. N))};
then h
= (
1_ (G
./. N)) & not h
in H by
STRUCT_0:def 5,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence contradiction by
Lm17;
end;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:82
Th82: for G,H be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O st (G,H)
are_isomorphic & G is
simple holds H is
simple
proof
let G,H be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O;
assume
A1: (G,H)
are_isomorphic ;
assume
A2: G is
simple;
assume
A3: not H is
simple;
per cases by
A3;
suppose H is
trivial;
then G is
trivial by
A1,
Th58;
hence contradiction by
A2;
end;
suppose ex H9 be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of H st H9
<> (
(Omega). H) & H9
<> (
(1). H);
then
consider H9 be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of H such that
A4: H9
<> (
(Omega). H) and
A5: H9
<> (
(1). H);
consider f be
Homomorphism of G, H such that
A6: f is
bijective by
A1;
reconsider H99 = the multMagma of H9 as
strict
normal
Subgroup of H by
Lm6;
the multMagma of H9
<> the multMagma of H by
A4,
Lm4;
then
consider h be
Element of H such that
A7: not h
in H99 by
GROUP_2: 62;
the
carrier of H9
<>
{(
1_ H)} by
A5,
Def8;
then
consider x be
object such that
A8: x
in the
carrier of H9 and
A9: x
<> (
1_ H) by
ZFMISC_1: 35;
A10: x
in H99 by
A8,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then x
in H by
GROUP_2: 40;
then
reconsider x as
Element of H by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
consider y be
Element of G such that
A11: (f
. y)
= x by
A6,
Th52;
set A = { g where g be
Element of G : (f
. g)
in H99 };
consider g be
Element of G such that
A12: (f
. g)
= h by
A6,
Th52;
(
1_ H)
in H99 by
GROUP_2: 46;
then (f
. (
1_ G))
in H99 by
Lm12;
then (
1_ G)
in A;
then
reconsider A as non
empty
set;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in A;
then ex g be
Element of G st x
= g & (f
. g)
in H99;
hence x
in the
carrier of G;
end;
then
reconsider A as
Subset of G by
TARSKI:def 3;
A13:
now
let g1,g2 be
Element of G;
assume that
A14: g1
in A and
A15: g2
in A;
consider b be
Element of G such that
A16: b
= g2 and
A17: (f
. b)
in H99 by
A15;
consider a be
Element of G such that
A18: a
= g1 and
A19: (f
. a)
in H99 by
A14;
set fb = (f
. b);
set fa = (f
. a);
(f
. (a
* b))
= ((f
. a)
* (f
. b)) & (fa
* fb)
in H99 by
A19,
A17,
GROUP_2: 50,
GROUP_6:def 6;
hence (g1
* g2)
in A by
A18,
A16;
end;
A20:
now
let o be
Element of O;
let g be
Element of G;
assume g
in A;
then
consider a be
Element of G such that
A21: a
= g and
A22: (f
. a)
in H99;
(f
. a)
in the
carrier of H99 by
A22,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (f
. a)
in H9 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then ((H
^ o)
. (f
. g))
in H9 by
A21,
Lm9;
then (f
. ((G
^ o)
. g))
in H9 by
Def18;
then (f
. ((G
^ o)
. g))
in the
carrier of H9 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (f
. ((G
^ o)
. g))
in H99 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
hence ((G
^ o)
. g)
in A;
end;
now
let g be
Element of G;
assume g
in A;
then
consider a be
Element of G such that
A23: a
= g and
A24: (f
. a)
in H99;
((f
. a)
" )
in H99 by
A24,
GROUP_2: 51;
then (f
. (a
" ))
in H99 by
Lm13;
hence (g
" )
in A by
A23;
end;
then
consider G99 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G such that
A25: the
carrier of G99
= A by
A13,
A20,
Lm14;
reconsider G9 = the multMagma of G99 as
strict
Subgroup of G by
Lm15;
now
let g be
Element of G;
now
let x be
object;
A26: (H99
|^ ((f
. g)
" ))
= H99 by
GROUP_3:def 13;
assume x
in (g
* G9);
then
consider h be
Element of G such that
A27: x
= (g
* h) and
A28: h
in A by
A25,
GROUP_2: 27;
set h9 = ((g
* h)
* (g
" ));
A29: (f
. h9)
= ((f
. (g
* h))
* (f
. (g
" ))) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= (((f
. g)
* (f
. h))
* (f
. (g
" ))) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= (((((f
. g)
" )
" )
* (f
. h))
* ((f
. g)
" )) by
Lm13
.= ((f
. h)
|^ ((f
. g)
" )) by
GROUP_3:def 2;
ex a be
Element of G st a
= h & (f
. a)
in H99 by
A28;
then (f
. h9)
in H99 by
A26,
A29,
GROUP_3: 58;
then
A30: h9
in A;
(h9
* g)
= ((g
* h)
* ((g
" )
* g)) by
GROUP_1:def 3
.= ((g
* h)
* (
1_ G)) by
GROUP_1:def 5
.= x by
A27,
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence x
in (G9
* g) by
A25,
A30,
GROUP_2: 28;
end;
hence (g
* G9)
c= (G9
* g);
end;
then for H be
strict
Subgroup of G st H
= the multMagma of G99 holds H is
normal by
GROUP_3: 118;
then
A31: G99 is
normal;
A32: y
<> (
1_ G) by
A9,
A11,
Lm12;
y
in the
carrier of G99 by
A25,
A10,
A11;
then the
carrier of G99
<>
{(
1_ G)} by
A32,
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A33: G99
<> (
(1). G) by
Def8;
now
assume g
in A;
then ex g9 be
Element of G st g9
= g & (f
. g9)
in H99;
hence contradiction by
A7,
A12;
end;
then G99
<> (
(Omega). G) by
A25;
hence contradiction by
A2,
A33,
A31;
end;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:83
Th83: for G be
GroupWithOperators of O, H be
StableSubgroup of G, FG be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, FH be
FinSequence of the
carrier of H, I be
FinSequence of
INT st FG
= FH & (
len FG)
= (
len I) holds (
Product (FG
|^ I))
= (
Product (FH
|^ I))
proof
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let H be
StableSubgroup of G;
let FG be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G;
let FH be
FinSequence of the
carrier of H;
let I be
FinSequence of
INT ;
assume
A1: FG
= FH & (
len FG)
= (
len I);
defpred
P[
Nat] means for FG be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, FH be
FinSequence of the
carrier of H, I be
FinSequence of
INT st (
len FG)
= $1 & FG
= FH & (
len FG)
= (
len I) holds (
Product (FG
|^ I))
= (
Product (FH
|^ I));
A2:
now
let n be
Nat;
assume
A3:
P[n];
thus
P[(n
+ 1)]
proof
let FG be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G;
let FH be
FinSequence of the
carrier of H;
let I be
FinSequence of
INT ;
assume
A4: (
len FG)
= (n
+ 1);
then
consider FGn be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, g be
Element of G such that
A5: FG
= (FGn
^
<*g*>) by
FINSEQ_2: 19;
A6: (
len FG)
= ((
len FGn)
+ (
len
<*g*>)) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then
A7: (n
+ 1)
= ((
len FGn)
+ 1) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
assume that
A8: FG
= FH and
A9: (
len FG)
= (
len I);
consider FHn be
FinSequence of the
carrier of H, h be
Element of H such that
A10: FH
= (FHn
^
<*h*>) by
A4,
A8,
FINSEQ_2: 19;
consider In be
FinSequence of
INT , i be
Element of
INT such that
A11: I
= (In
^
<*i*>) by
A4,
A9,
FINSEQ_2: 19;
set FG1 =
<*g*>;
set I1 =
<*i*>;
(
len I)
= ((
len In)
+ (
len
<*i*>)) by
A11,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then
A12: (n
+ 1)
= ((
len In)
+ 1) by
A4,
A9,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
A13: (
len FH)
= ((
len FHn)
+ (
len
<*h*>)) by
A10,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then
A14: (FH
. (n
+ 1))
= ((FHn
^
<*h*>)
. ((
len FHn)
+ 1)) by
A4,
A8,
A10,
FINSEQ_1: 40
.= h by
FINSEQ_1: 42;
A15: (n
+ 1)
= ((
len FHn)
+ 1) by
A4,
A8,
A13,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
A16: (FG
. (n
+ 1))
= ((FGn
^
<*g*>)
. ((
len FGn)
+ 1)) by
A4,
A5,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 40
.= g by
FINSEQ_1: 42;
A17:
now
reconsider H9 = H as
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
reconsider h9 = h as
Element of H9;
(g
|^ i)
= (h9
|^ i) by
A8,
A16,
A14,
GROUP_4: 2;
hence (g
|^ i)
= (h
|^ i);
end;
(
len FG1)
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 40
.= (
len I1) by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
then
A18: (
Product (FG
|^ I))
= (
Product ((FGn
|^ In)
^ (FG1
|^ I1))) by
A11,
A5,
A12,
A7,
GROUP_4: 19
.= ((
Product (FGn
|^ In))
* (
Product (FG1
|^ I1))) by
GROUP_4: 5;
set FH1 =
<*h*>;
A19: (
len FH1)
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 40
.= (
len I1) by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
A20: (
Product (FG1
|^ I1))
= (
Product (
<*g*>
|^
<*(
@ i)*>))
.= (
Product
<*(g
|^ i)*>) by
GROUP_4: 22
.= (h
|^ i) by
A17,
GROUP_4: 9
.= (
Product
<*(h
|^ i)*>) by
GROUP_4: 9
.= (
Product (
<*h*>
|^
<*(
@ i)*>)) by
GROUP_4: 22
.= (
Product (FH1
|^ I1));
FGn
= FHn by
A8,
A5,
A10,
A16,
A14,
FINSEQ_1: 33;
then (
Product (FGn
|^ In))
= (
Product (FHn
|^ In)) by
A3,
A12,
A15;
then (
Product (FG
|^ I))
= ((
Product (FHn
|^ In))
* (
Product (FH1
|^ I1))) by
A18,
A20,
Th3
.= (
Product ((FHn
|^ In)
^ (FH1
|^ I1))) by
GROUP_4: 5
.= (
Product ((FHn
^ FH1)
|^ (In
^ I1))) by
A12,
A15,
A19,
GROUP_4: 19;
hence thesis by
A11,
A10;
end;
end;
A21:
P[
0 ]
proof
let FG be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G;
let FH be
FinSequence of the
carrier of H;
let I be
FinSequence of
INT ;
assume
A22: (
len FG)
=
0 ;
then (
len (FG
|^ I))
=
0 by
GROUP_4:def 3;
then (FG
|^ I)
= (
<*> the
carrier of G);
then
A23: (
Product (FG
|^ I))
= (
1_ G) by
GROUP_4: 8;
assume that
A24: FG
= FH and (
len FG)
= (
len I);
(
len (FH
|^ I))
=
0 by
A22,
A24,
GROUP_4:def 3;
then (FH
|^ I)
= (
<*> the
carrier of H);
then (
Product (FH
|^ I))
= (
1_ H) by
GROUP_4: 8;
hence thesis by
A23,
Th4;
end;
for n be
Nat holds
P[n] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A21,
A2);
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:84
Th84: for O,E1,E2 be
set, A1 be
Action of O, E1, A2 be
Action of O, E2, F be
FinSequence of O st E1
c= E2 & (for o be
Element of O, f1 be
Function of E1, E1, f2 be
Function of E2, E2 st f1
= (A1
. o) & f2
= (A2
. o) holds f1
= (f2
| E1)) holds (
Product (F,A1))
= ((
Product (F,A2))
| E1)
proof
let O,E1,E2 be
set;
let A1 be
Action of O, E1;
let A2 be
Action of O, E2;
let F be
FinSequence of O;
defpred
P[
Nat] means for F be
FinSequence of O st (
len F)
= $1 holds (
Product (F,A1))
= ((
Product (F,A2))
| E1);
assume
A1: E1
c= E2;
A2:
P[
0 ]
proof
let F be
FinSequence of O;
A3:
now
let x be
object;
assume
A4: x
in (
dom (
id E1));
then
A5: x
in E1;
thus ((
id E1)
. x)
= x by
A4,
FUNCT_1: 18
.= ((
id E2)
. x) by
A1,
A5,
FUNCT_1: 18;
end;
E1
= (E2
/\ E1) by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
then (
dom (
id E1))
= (E2
/\ E1);
then
A6: (
dom (
id E1))
= ((
dom (
id E2))
/\ E1);
assume
A7: (
len F)
=
0 ;
hence (
Product (F,A1))
= (
id E1) by
Def3
.= ((
id E2)
| E1) by
A6,
A3,
FUNCT_1: 46
.= ((
Product (F,A2))
| E1) by
A7,
Def3;
end;
assume
A8: for o be
Element of O, f1 be
Function of E1, E1, f2 be
Function of E2, E2 st f1
= (A1
. o) & f2
= (A2
. o) holds f1
= (f2
| E1);
per cases ;
suppose O is
empty;
then (
len F)
=
0 ;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
suppose
A9: O is non
empty;
A10: for k be
Nat st
P[k] holds
P[(k
+ 1)]
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A11:
P[k];
now
let F be
FinSequence of O;
assume
A12: (
len F)
= (k
+ 1);
then
consider Fk be
FinSequence of O, o be
Element of O such that
A13: F
= (Fk
^
<*o*>) by
FINSEQ_2: 19;
(
len F)
= ((
len Fk)
+ (
len
<*o*>)) by
A13,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then
A14: (k
+ 1)
= ((
len Fk)
+ 1) by
A12,
FINSEQ_1: 39;
A15:
now
{o}
c= O by
A9,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then (
rng
<*o*>)
c= O by
FINSEQ_1: 38;
then
reconsider Fo =
<*o*> as
FinSequence of O by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
let x be
object;
assume
A16: x
in (
dom (
Product (F,A1)));
then
A17: x
in E1;
A18: o
in O by
A9;
then o
in (
dom A1) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (A1
. o)
in (
rng A1) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
consider f1 be
Function such that
A19: f1
= (A1
. o) and
A20: (
dom f1)
= E1 and
A21: (
rng f1)
c= E1 by
FUNCT_2:def 2;
A22: (
Product (Fo,A1))
= f1 by
A9,
A19,
Lm25;
o
in (
dom A2) by
A18,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (A2
. o)
in (
rng A2) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
consider f2 be
Function such that
A23: f2
= (A2
. o) and
A24: (
dom f2)
= E2 and (
rng f2)
c= E2 by
FUNCT_2:def 2;
A25: (
Product (Fo,A2))
= f2 by
A9,
A23,
Lm25;
A26: (f1
. x)
in (
rng f1) by
A16,
A20,
FUNCT_1: 3;
A27: (
Product (F,A2))
= ((
Product (Fk,A2))
* (
Product (Fo,A2))) by
A9,
A13,
Lm28
.= ((
Product (Fk,A2))
* f2) by
A9,
A23,
Lm25;
(
Product (F,A1))
= ((
Product (Fk,A1))
* (
Product (Fo,A1))) by
A9,
A13,
Lm28
.= ((
Product (Fk,A1))
* f1) by
A9,
A19,
Lm25;
hence ((
Product (F,A1))
. x)
= ((
Product (Fk,A1))
. (f1
. x)) by
A16,
A20,
FUNCT_1: 13
.= (((
Product (Fk,A2))
| E1)
. (f1
. x)) by
A11,
A14
.= ((
Product (Fk,A2))
. (f1
. x)) by
A21,
A26,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((
Product (Fk,A2))
. ((f2
| E1)
. x)) by
A8,
A19,
A23,
A22,
A25
.= ((
Product (Fk,A2))
. (f2
. x)) by
A16,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (((
Product (Fk,A2))
* f2)
. x) by
A1,
A17,
A24,
FUNCT_1: 13
.= (((
Product (F,A2))
| E1)
. x) by
A16,
A27,
FUNCT_1: 49;
end;
(
Product (F,A2))
in (
Funcs (E2,E2)) by
FUNCT_2: 9;
then ex f2 be
Function st (
Product (F,A2))
= f2 & (
dom f2)
= E2 & (
rng f2)
c= E2 by
FUNCT_2:def 2;
then
A28: (
dom ((
Product (F,A2))
| E1))
= (E2
/\ E1) by
RELAT_1: 61
.= E1 by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
(
Product (F,A1))
in (
Funcs (E1,E1)) by
FUNCT_2: 9;
then ex f1 be
Function st (
Product (F,A1))
= f1 & (
dom f1)
= E1 & (
rng f1)
c= E1 by
FUNCT_2:def 2;
hence (
Product (F,A1))
= ((
Product (F,A2))
| E1) by
A28,
A15,
FUNCT_1: 2;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
A29: for k be
Nat holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A2,
A10);
reconsider k = (
len F) as
Element of
NAT ;
k
= (
len F);
hence thesis by
A29;
end;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:85
Th85: for N1,N2 be
strict
StableSubgroup of H1, N19,N29 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st N1
= N19 & N2
= N29 holds (N19
* N29)
= (N1
* N2)
proof
let N1,N2 be
strict
StableSubgroup of H1;
let N19,N29 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
set X = { (g
* h) where g,h be
Element of G : g
in (
carr N19) & h
in (
carr N29) };
set Y = { (g
* h) where g,h be
Element of H1 : g
in (
carr N1) & h
in (
carr N2) };
assume
A1: N1
= N19 & N2
= N29;
A2:
now
N2 is
Subgroup of H1 by
Def7;
then
A3: the
carrier of N2
c= the
carrier of H1 by
GROUP_2:def 5;
let x be
object;
assume x
in X;
then
consider g,h be
Element of G such that
A4: x
= (g
* h) and
A5: g
in (
carr N19) & h
in (
carr N29);
N1 is
Subgroup of H1 by
Def7;
then the
carrier of N1
c= the
carrier of H1 by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then
reconsider g, h as
Element of H1 by
A1,
A5,
A3;
x
= (g
* h) by
A4,
Th3;
hence x
in Y by
A1,
A5;
end;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in Y;
then
consider g,h be
Element of H1 such that
A6: x
= (g
* h) and
A7: g
in (
carr N1) & h
in (
carr N2);
reconsider g, h as
Element of G by
Th2;
x
= (g
* h) by
A6,
Th3;
hence x
in X by
A1,
A7;
end;
hence thesis by
A2,
TARSKI: 2;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:86
Th86: for N1,N2 be
strict
StableSubgroup of H1, N19,N29 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st N1
= N19 & N2
= N29 holds (N19
"\/" N29)
= (N1
"\/" N2)
proof
let N1,N2 be
strict
StableSubgroup of H1;
reconsider S2 = (
the_stable_subgroup_of (N1
* N2)) as
StableSubgroup of G by
Th11;
let N19,N29 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
set S1 = (
the_stable_subgroup_of (N19
* N29));
set X1 = { B where B be
Subset of G : ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st B
= the
carrier of H & (N19
* N29)
c= (
carr H) };
set X2 = { B where B be
Subset of H1 : ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of H1 st B
= the
carrier of H & (N1
* N2)
c= (
carr H) };
A1: (N19
"\/" N29)
= (
the_stable_subgroup_of (N19
* N29)) & (N1
"\/" N2)
= (
the_stable_subgroup_of (N1
* N2)) by
Th29;
A2: the
carrier of (
the_stable_subgroup_of (N19
* N29))
= (
meet X1) & the
carrier of (
the_stable_subgroup_of (N1
* N2))
= (
meet X2) by
Th27;
assume
A3: N1
= N19 & N2
= N29;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in X2;
then
consider B be
Subset of H1 such that
A4: x
= B and
A5: ex H be
strict
StableSubgroup of H1 st B
= the
carrier of H & (N1
* N2)
c= (
carr H);
now
consider H be
strict
StableSubgroup of H1 such that
A6: B
= the
carrier of H & (N1
* N2)
c= (
carr H) by
A5;
reconsider H as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
Th11;
take H;
thus B
= the
carrier of H & (N19
* N29)
c= (
carr H) by
A3,
A6,
Th85;
end;
hence x
in X1 by
A4;
end;
then
A7: X2
c= X1;
now
set x9 = (
carr H1);
reconsider x = x9 as
set;
take x;
now
set H = (
(Omega). H1);
take H;
thus x9
= the
carrier of H;
thus (N1
* N2)
c= (
carr H);
end;
hence x
in X2;
end;
then
A8: (
meet X1)
c= (
meet X2) by
A7,
SETFAM_1: 6;
now
let x be
object;
assume
A9: x
in the
carrier of (
the_stable_subgroup_of (N1
* N2));
(
the_stable_subgroup_of (N1
* N2)) is
Subgroup of H1 by
Def7;
then the
carrier of (
the_stable_subgroup_of (N1
* N2))
c= the
carrier of H1 by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then
reconsider g = x as
Element of H1 by
A9;
g
in (
the_stable_subgroup_of (N1
* N2)) by
A9,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then
consider F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of H1, I be
FinSequence of
INT , C be
Subset of H1 such that
A10: C
= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by ((N1
* N2),the
action of H1)) and
A11: (
len F)
= (
len I) and
A12: (
rng F)
c= C and
A13: (
Product (F
|^ I))
= g by
Th24;
now
N2 is
Subgroup of H1 by
Def7;
then (
1_ H1)
in N2 by
GROUP_2: 46;
then
A14: (
1_ H1)
in (
carr N2) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
let x be
object;
assume
A15: x
in (
the_stable_subset_generated_by ((N1
* N2),the
action of H1));
then
reconsider a = x as
Element of H1;
N1 is
Subgroup of H1 by
Def7;
then (
1_ H1)
in N1 by
GROUP_2: 46;
then
A16: (
1_ H1)
in (
carr N1) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
(
1_ H1)
= ((
1_ H1)
* (
1_ H1)) by
GROUP_1:def 4;
then
A17: (
1_ H1)
in ((
carr N1)
* (
carr N2)) by
A16,
A14;
then
consider F be
FinSequence of O, h be
Element of (N1
* N2) such that
A18: ((
Product (F,the
action of H1))
. h)
= a by
A15,
Lm30;
H1 is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
then
A19: the
carrier of H1
c= the
carrier of G by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then
reconsider a as
Element of G;
A20: h
in (N1
* N2) by
A17;
reconsider h as
Element of (N19
* N29) by
A3,
Th85;
now
let o be
Element of O;
let f1 be
Function of the
carrier of H1, the
carrier of H1;
let f2 be
Function of the
carrier of G, the
carrier of G;
assume that
A21: f1
= (the
action of H1
. o) and
A22: f2
= (the
action of G
. o);
per cases ;
suppose o
in O;
then (H1
^ o)
= f1 & (G
^ o)
= f2 by
A21,
A22,
Def6;
hence f1
= (f2
| the
carrier of H1) by
Def7;
end;
suppose not o
in O;
then not o
in (
dom the
action of H1);
hence f1
= (f2
| the
carrier of H1) by
A21,
FUNCT_1:def 2;
end;
end;
then (
Product (F,the
action of H1))
= ((
Product (F,the
action of G))
| the
carrier of H1) by
A19,
Th84;
then
A23: ((
Product (F,the
action of G))
. h)
= a by
A18,
A20,
FUNCT_1: 49;
(N19
* N29) is non
empty by
A3,
A20,
Th85;
hence x
in (
the_stable_subset_generated_by ((N19
* N29),the
action of G)) by
A23,
Lm30;
end;
then (
the_stable_subset_generated_by ((N1
* N2),the
action of H1))
c= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by ((N19
* N29),the
action of G));
then
A24: (
rng F)
c= (
the_stable_subset_generated_by ((N19
* N29),the
action of G)) by
A10,
A12;
reconsider g as
Element of G by
Th2;
H1 is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
then the
carrier of H1
c= the
carrier of G by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then (
rng F)
c= the
carrier of G;
then
reconsider F as
FinSequence of the
carrier of G by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
(
Product (F
|^ I))
= g by
A11,
A13,
Th83;
then
A25: g
in (
the_stable_subgroup_of (N19
* N29)) by
A11,
A24,
Th24;
assume not x
in the
carrier of (
the_stable_subgroup_of (N19
* N29));
hence contradiction by
A25,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
end;
then (
meet X2)
c= (
meet X1) by
A2;
then the
carrier of S1
= the
carrier of S2 by
A2,
A8,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
hence thesis by
A1,
Lm4;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:87
Th87: for N1,N2 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st N1 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 & N2 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 holds (N1
"\/" N2) is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1
proof
let N1,N2 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
assume
A1: N1 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 & N2 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1;
then
reconsider N19 = N1, N29 = N2 as
StableSubgroup of H1;
(N1
"\/" N2)
= (N19
"\/" N29) by
Th86;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th32;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:88
Th88: for f be
Homomorphism of G, H holds for g be
Homomorphism of H, I holds the
carrier of (
Ker (g
* f))
= (f
" the
carrier of (
Ker g))
proof
let f be
Homomorphism of G, H;
let g be
Homomorphism of H, I;
A1:
now
let x be
object;
assume
A2: x
in (f
" the
carrier of (
Ker g));
then (f
. x)
in the
carrier of (
Ker g) by
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then (f
. x)
in { b where b be
Element of H : (g
. b)
= (
1_ I) } by
Def21;
then
A3: ex b be
Element of H st b
= (f
. x) & (g
. b)
= (
1_ I);
x
in (
dom f) by
A2,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then (
1_ I)
= ((g
* f)
. x) by
A3,
FUNCT_1: 13;
then x
in { a9 where a9 be
Element of G : ((g
* f)
. a9)
= (
1_ I) } by
A2;
hence x
in the
carrier of (
Ker (g
* f)) by
Def21;
end;
A4: (
dom f)
= the
carrier of G by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in the
carrier of (
Ker (g
* f));
then x
in { a where a be
Element of G : ((g
* f)
. a)
= (
1_ I) } by
Def21;
then
consider a be
Element of G such that
A5: x
= a and
A6: ((g
* f)
. a)
= (
1_ I);
reconsider b = (f
. a) as
Element of H;
(g
. b)
= (
1_ I) by
A4,
A6,
FUNCT_1: 13;
then (f
. x)
in { b9 where b9 be
Element of H : (g
. b9)
= (
1_ I) } by
A5;
then (f
. x)
in the
carrier of (
Ker g) by
Def21;
hence x
in (f
" the
carrier of (
Ker g)) by
A4,
A5,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
TARSKI: 2;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:89
Th89: for G9 be
StableSubgroup of G, H9 be
StableSubgroup of H, f be
Homomorphism of G, H st the
carrier of H9
= (f
.: the
carrier of G9) or the
carrier of G9
= (f
" the
carrier of H9) holds (f
| the
carrier of G9) is
Homomorphism of G9, H9
proof
let G9 be
StableSubgroup of G;
let H9 be
StableSubgroup of H;
let f be
Homomorphism of G, H;
set g = (f
| the
carrier of G9);
G9 is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
then
A1: the
carrier of G9
c= the
carrier of G by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then
A2: the
carrier of G9
c= (
dom f) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A3: (
dom g)
= the
carrier of G9 by
RELAT_1: 62;
assume
A4: the
carrier of H9
= (f
.: the
carrier of G9) or the
carrier of G9
= (f
" the
carrier of H9);
A5: for x st x
in the
carrier of G9 holds (f
. x)
in the
carrier of H9
proof
let x;
assume
A6: x
in the
carrier of G9;
per cases by
A4;
suppose
A7: the
carrier of H9
= (f
.: the
carrier of G9);
assume not (f
. x)
in the
carrier of H9;
hence contradiction by
A2,
A6,
A7,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
end;
suppose the
carrier of G9
= (f
" the
carrier of H9);
hence thesis by
A6,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
end;
end;
now
let y be
object;
assume y
in (
rng g);
then
consider x be
object such that
A8: x
in (
dom g) and
A9: y
= (g
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
A10: x
in the
carrier of G9 by
A2,
A8,
RELAT_1: 62;
then y
= (f
. x) by
A9,
FUNCT_1: 49;
hence y
in the
carrier of H9 by
A5,
A10;
end;
then (
rng g)
c= the
carrier of H9;
then
reconsider g as
Function of G9, H9 by
A3,
RELSET_1: 4;
A11:
now
let a9,b9 be
Element of G9;
reconsider a = a9, b = b9 as
Element of G by
A1;
A12: (f
. a)
= (g
. a9) & (f
. b)
= (g
. b9) by
FUNCT_1: 49;
thus (g
. (a9
* b9))
= (f
. (a9
* b9)) by
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (f
. (a
* b)) by
Th3
.= ((f
. a)
* (f
. b)) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((g
. a9)
* (g
. b9)) by
A12,
Th3;
end;
now
let o be
Element of O;
let a9 be
Element of G9;
reconsider a = a9 as
Element of G by
A1;
thus (g
. ((G9
^ o)
. a9))
= (f
. ((G9
^ o)
. a9)) by
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (f
. (((G
^ o)
| the
carrier of G9)
. a9)) by
Def7
.= (f
. ((G
^ o)
. a)) by
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((H
^ o)
. (f
. a)) by
Def18
.= ((H
^ o)
. (g
. a9)) by
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (((H
^ o)
| the
carrier of H9)
. (g
. a9)) by
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((H9
^ o)
. (g
. a9)) by
Def7;
end;
hence thesis by
A11,
Def18,
GROUP_6:def 6;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:90
Th90: for G,H be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O, N,L,G9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G, f be
Homomorphism of G, H st N
= (
Ker f) & L is
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G9 holds (L
"\/" (G9
/\ N)) is
normal
StableSubgroup of G9 & (L
"\/" N) is
normal
StableSubgroup of (G9
"\/" N) & for N1 be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of (G9
"\/" N), N2 be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G9 st N1
= (L
"\/" N) & N2
= (L
"\/" (G9
/\ N)) holds (((G9
"\/" N)
./. N1),(G9
./. N2))
are_isomorphic
proof
let G,H be
strict
GroupWithOperators of O;
let N,L,G9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider N9 = (G9
/\ N) as
StableSubgroup of G9 by
Lm33;
reconsider Gs9 = the multMagma of G9 as
strict
Subgroup of G by
Lm15;
let f be
Homomorphism of G, H;
reconsider L99 = L as
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
assume
A1: N
= (
Ker f);
then
consider H9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of H such that
A2: the
carrier of H9
= (f
.: the
carrier of G9) and
A3: (f
" the
carrier of H9)
= the
carrier of (G9
"\/" N) and f is
onto & G9 is
normal implies H9 is
normal by
Th79;
reconsider f99 = (f
| the
carrier of (G9
"\/" N)) as
Homomorphism of (G9
"\/" N), H9 by
A3,
Th89;
reconsider Ns = the multMagma of N as
strict
normal
Subgroup of G by
A1,
Lm6;
((
carr Gs9)
* Ns)
= (Ns
* (
carr Gs9)) by
GROUP_3: 120;
then
A4: (G9
* N)
= (N
* G9);
A5:
now
let y be
object;
assume y
in (f
.: the
carrier of G9);
then
consider x be
object such that
A6: x
in (
dom f) and
A7: x
in the
carrier of G9 and
A8: y
= (f
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
reconsider x as
Element of G by
A6;
consider x9 be
set such that
A9: x9
= (x
* (
1_ G));
A10: x9
in (
dom f) by
A6,
A9,
GROUP_1:def 4;
A11: y
= ((f
. x)
* (
1_ H)) by
A8,
GROUP_1:def 4
.= ((f
. x)
* (f
. (
1_ G))) by
Lm12
.= (f
. x9) by
A9,
GROUP_6:def 6;
(f
. (
1_ G))
= (
1_ H) by
Lm12;
then (
1_ G)
in (
Ker f) by
Th47;
then (
1_ G)
in (
carr N) by
A1,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then x9
in (G9
* N) by
A7,
A9;
hence y
in (f
.: (G9
* N)) by
A10,
A11,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
end;
A12: (
dom f)
= the
carrier of G by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
now
let y be
object;
assume y
in (f
.: (G9
* N));
then
consider x be
object such that
A13: x
in (
dom f) and
A14: x
in (G9
* N) and
A15: y
= (f
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
reconsider x as
Element of G by
A13;
consider g1,g2 be
Element of G such that
A16: x
= (g1
* g2) and
A17: g1
in (
carr G9) and
A18: g2
in (
carr N) by
A14;
A19: g2
in N by
A18,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
y
= ((f
. g1)
* (f
. g2)) by
A15,
A16,
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((f
. g1)
* (
1_ H)) by
A1,
A19,
Th47
.= (f
. g1) by
GROUP_1:def 4;
hence y
in (f
.: the
carrier of G9) by
A12,
A17,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
end;
then (f
.: the
carrier of G9)
= (f
.: (G9
* N)) by
A5,
TARSKI: 2;
then
A20: (f99
.: the
carrier of (G9
"\/" N))
= (f
.: the
carrier of (G9
"\/" N)) & the
carrier of H9
= (f
.: the
carrier of (G9
"\/" N)) by
A2,
A4,
Th30,
RELAT_1: 129;
A21:
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in (f99
" (f
.: the
carrier of L));
then
A22: x
in (the
carrier of (G9
"\/" N)
/\ (f
" (f
.: the
carrier of L))) by
FUNCT_1: 70;
then x
in (f
" (f
.: the
carrier of L)) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then (f
. x)
in (f
.: the
carrier of L) by
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then
consider g1 be
object such that
A23: g1
in (
dom f) and
A24: g1
in the
carrier of L and
A25: (f
. x)
= (f
. g1) by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
reconsider g1, g2 = x as
Element of G by
A22,
A23;
consider g3 be
Element of G such that
A26: g2
= (g1
* g3) by
GROUP_1: 15;
(f
. g2)
= ((f
. g2)
* (f
. g3)) by
A25,
A26,
GROUP_6:def 6;
then (f
. g3)
= (
1_ H) by
GROUP_1: 7;
then g3
in (
Ker f) by
Th47;
then g3
in the
carrier of N by
A1,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
hence x
in (L
* N) by
A24,
A26;
end;
reconsider f9 = (f
| the
carrier of G9) as
Homomorphism of G9, H9 by
A2,
Th89;
A27:
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in the
carrier of N9;
then
A28: x
in ((
carr G9)
/\ (
carr N)) by
Def25;
then
reconsider a9 = x as
Element of G9 by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
reconsider a99 = a9 as
Element of G by
Th2;
x
in (
carr N) by
A28,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then x
in N by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then (f
. a99)
= (
1_ H) by
A1,
Th47;
then (f
. a9)
= (
1_ H9) by
Th4;
then (f9
. a9)
= (
1_ H9) by
FUNCT_1: 49;
hence x
in { a where a be
Element of G9 : (f9
. a)
= (
1_ H9) };
end;
assume
A29: L is
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G9;
then
reconsider L9 = L as
strict
StableSubgroup of G9;
reconsider N1 = (L
"\/" N) as
StableSubgroup of (G9
"\/" N) by
A29,
Th38;
((
carr L99)
* Ns)
= (Ns
* (
carr L99)) by
GROUP_3: 120;
then
A30: (L
* N)
= (N
* L);
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in { a where a be
Element of G9 : (f9
. a)
= (
1_ H9) };
then
consider a be
Element of G9 such that
A31: x
= a and
A32: (f9
. a)
= (
1_ H9);
reconsider a as
Element of G by
Th2;
(f
. a)
= (
1_ H9) by
A32,
FUNCT_1: 49;
then (f
. a)
= (
1_ H) by
Th4;
then x
in N by
A1,
A31,
Th47;
then x
in (
carr N) by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then x
in ((
carr G9)
/\ (
carr N)) by
A31,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence x
in the
carrier of N9 by
Def25;
end;
then the
carrier of N9
= { a where a be
Element of G9 : (f9
. a)
= (
1_ H9) } by
A27,
TARSKI: 2;
then
A33: N9
= (
Ker f9) by
Def21;
then
consider H99 be
strict
StableSubgroup of H9 such that
A34: the
carrier of H99
= (f9
.: the
carrier of L9) and
A35: (f9
" the
carrier of H99)
= the
carrier of (L9
"\/" N9) and
A36: f9 is
onto & L9 is
normal implies H99 is
normal by
Th79;
consider N2 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G9 such that
A37: the
carrier of N2
= (f9
" the
carrier of H99) and
A38: H99 is
normal implies N9 is
normal
StableSubgroup of N2 & N2 is
normal by
A33,
Th78;
(f9
.: the
carrier of G9)
= (f
.: the
carrier of G9) & H9 is
strict
StableSubgroup of H9 by
Lm3,
RELAT_1: 129;
then (
Image f9)
= H9 by
A2,
Def22;
then
A39: (
rng f9)
= the
carrier of H9 by
Th49;
then
reconsider H99 as
normal
StableSubgroup of H9 by
A29,
A36;
A40: N2
= (L9
"\/" N9) by
A35,
A37,
Lm4;
hence (L
"\/" (G9
/\ N)) is
normal
StableSubgroup of G9 by
A29,
A36,
A38,
A39,
Th86;
set l = (
nat_hom H99);
set f1 = (l
* f99);
A41: N2
= (L
"\/" (G9
/\ N)) by
A40,
Th86;
A42: (L
"\/" N) is
StableSubgroup of (G9
"\/" N) by
A29,
Th38;
A43:
now
let x be
object;
assume
A44: x
in (L
* N);
then
consider g1,g2 be
Element of G such that
A45: x
= (g1
* g2) and
A46: g1
in (
carr L) and
A47: g2
in (
carr N);
A48: g2
in N by
A47,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
(f
. x)
= ((f
. g1)
* (f
. g2)) by
A45,
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((f
. g1)
* (
1_ H)) by
A1,
A48,
Th47
.= (f
. g1) by
GROUP_1:def 4;
then
A49: (f
. x)
in (f
.: the
carrier of L) by
A12,
A46,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
(L
"\/" N) is
Subgroup of (G9
"\/" N) by
A42,
Def7;
then
A50: the
carrier of (L
"\/" N)
c= the
carrier of (G9
"\/" N) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
A51: x
in the
carrier of (L
"\/" N) by
A30,
A44,
Th30;
then x
in (G9
"\/" N) by
A50,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then x
in G by
Th1;
then x
in (
dom f) by
A12,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then x
in (f
" (f
.: the
carrier of L)) by
A49,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
then x
in (the
carrier of (G9
"\/" N)
/\ (f
" (f
.: the
carrier of L))) by
A51,
A50,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence x
in (f99
" (f
.: the
carrier of L)) by
FUNCT_1: 70;
end;
L is
Subgroup of G9 by
A29,
Def7;
then the
carrier of L
c= the
carrier of G9 by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then (f9
.: the
carrier of L)
= (f
.: the
carrier of L) by
RELAT_1: 129;
then (f99
" (f9
.: the
carrier of L))
= (L
* N) by
A21,
A43,
TARSKI: 2;
then
A52: (f99
" the
carrier of H99)
= the
carrier of N1 by
A34,
A30,
Th30;
A53: (f99
" the
carrier of (
Ker l))
= (f99
" the
carrier of H99) by
Th48;
then the
carrier of (
Ker f1)
= the
carrier of N1 by
A52,
Th88;
hence (L
"\/" N) is
normal
StableSubgroup of (G9
"\/" N) by
Lm4;
A54: (
Ker f1)
= N1 by
A52,
A53,
Lm4,
Th88;
now
set f2 = (l
* f9);
let N19 be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of (G9
"\/" N);
let N29 be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G9;
assume
A55: N19
= (L
"\/" N);
(f99
.: the
carrier of (G9
"\/" N))
= (f9
.: the
carrier of G9) & (f1
.: the
carrier of (G9
"\/" N))
= (l
.: (f99
.: the
carrier of (G9
"\/" N))) by
A2,
A20,
RELAT_1: 126,
RELAT_1: 129;
then
A56: (f1
.: the
carrier of (G9
"\/" N))
= (f2
.: the
carrier of G9) by
RELAT_1: 126;
A57: (f9
" the
carrier of (
Ker l))
= (f9
" the
carrier of H99) by
Th48;
assume N29
= (L
"\/" (G9
/\ N));
then
A58: N29
= (
Ker f2) by
A37,
A41,
A57,
Lm4,
Th88;
the
carrier of (
Image f1)
= (f1
.: the
carrier of (G9
"\/" N)) by
Def22
.= the
carrier of (
Image f2) by
A56,
Def22;
then
A59: (
Image f1)
= (
Image f2) by
Lm4;
(((G9
"\/" N)
./. (
Ker f1)),(
Image f1))
are_isomorphic & ((
Image f2),(G9
./. (
Ker f2)))
are_isomorphic by
Th59;
hence (((G9
"\/" N)
./. N19),(G9
./. N29))
are_isomorphic by
A54,
A55,
A59,
A58,
Th55;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
begin
theorem ::
GROUP_9:91
Th91: for H,K,H9,K9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G, JH be
normal
StableSubgroup of (H9
"\/" (H
/\ K)), HK be
normal
StableSubgroup of (H
/\ K) st H9 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H & K9 is
normal
StableSubgroup of K & JH
= (H9
"\/" (H
/\ K9)) & HK
= ((H9
/\ K)
"\/" (K9
/\ H)) holds (((H9
"\/" (H
/\ K))
./. JH),((H
/\ K)
./. HK))
are_isomorphic
proof
let H,K,H9,K9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider GG = H as
GroupWithOperators of O;
set G9 = (H
/\ K);
set L = (H
/\ K9);
reconsider G9 as
strict
StableSubgroup of GG by
Lm33;
let JH be
normal
StableSubgroup of (H9
"\/" (H
/\ K));
let HK be
normal
StableSubgroup of (H
/\ K);
assume that
A1: H9 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H and
A2: K9 is
normal
StableSubgroup of K;
A3: L is
normal
StableSubgroup of G9 by
A2,
Th60;
reconsider N9 = H9 as
normal
StableSubgroup of GG by
A1;
assume that
A4: JH
= (H9
"\/" (H
/\ K9)) and
A5: HK
= ((H9
/\ K)
"\/" (K9
/\ H));
reconsider N = N9 as
StableSubgroup of GG;
set N1 = (G9
/\ N);
A6: (G9
"\/" N)
= ((H
/\ K)
"\/" H9) by
Th86
.= (H9
"\/" (H
/\ K));
reconsider L as
StableSubgroup of GG by
A3,
Th11;
N1
= ((H
/\ K)
/\ H9) by
Th39;
then
A7: (L
"\/" N1)
= ((H
/\ K9)
"\/" ((H
/\ K)
/\ H9)) by
Th86
.= (((H9
/\ H)
/\ K)
"\/" (K9
/\ H)) by
Th20
.= HK by
A1,
A5,
Lm21;
reconsider HH = (GG
./. N9) as
GroupWithOperators of O;
reconsider f = (
nat_hom N9) as
Homomorphism of GG, HH;
A8: N
= (
Ker f) by
Th48;
(L
"\/" N)
= ((H
/\ K9)
"\/" H9) by
Th86
.= JH by
A4;
hence thesis by
A3,
A7,
A8,
A6,
Th90;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:92
Th92: for H,K,H9,K9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G st H9 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H & K9 is
normal
StableSubgroup of K holds (H9
"\/" (H
/\ K9)) is
normal
StableSubgroup of (H9
"\/" (H
/\ K))
proof
let H,K,H9,K9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
reconsider GG = H as
GroupWithOperators of O;
reconsider G9 = (H
/\ K) as
strict
StableSubgroup of GG by
Lm33;
assume that
A1: H9 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H and
A2: K9 is
normal
StableSubgroup of K;
reconsider N9 = H9 as
normal
StableSubgroup of GG by
A1;
reconsider N = N9 as
StableSubgroup of GG;
reconsider HH = (GG
./. N9) as
GroupWithOperators of O;
reconsider f = (
nat_hom N9) as
Homomorphism of GG, HH;
set L = (H
/\ K9);
A3: L is
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of G9 by
A2,
Th60;
then
reconsider L as
strict
StableSubgroup of GG by
Th11;
A4: N
= (
Ker f) by
Th48;
A5: (G9
"\/" N)
= ((H
/\ K)
"\/" H9) by
Th86
.= (H9
"\/" (H
/\ K));
(L
"\/" N)
= ((H
/\ K9)
"\/" H9) by
Th86
.= (H9
"\/" (H
/\ K9));
hence thesis by
A3,
A4,
A5,
Th90;
end;
::$Notion-Name
theorem ::
GROUP_9:93
Th93: for H,K,H9,K9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G, JH be
normal
StableSubgroup of (H9
"\/" (H
/\ K)), JK be
normal
StableSubgroup of (K9
"\/" (K
/\ H)) st JH
= (H9
"\/" (H
/\ K9)) & JK
= (K9
"\/" (K
/\ H9)) & H9 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H & K9 is
normal
StableSubgroup of K holds (((H9
"\/" (H
/\ K))
./. JH),((K9
"\/" (K
/\ H))
./. JK))
are_isomorphic
proof
let H,K,H9,K9 be
strict
StableSubgroup of G;
let JH be
normal
StableSubgroup of (H9
"\/" (H
/\ K));
let JK be
normal
StableSubgroup of (K9
"\/" (K
/\ H));
assume that
A1: JH
= (H9
"\/" (H
/\ K9)) and
A2: JK
= (K9
"\/" (K
/\ H9));
set HK = ((H9
/\ K)
"\/" (K9
/\ H));
assume
A3: H9 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H;
then
A4: (H9
/\ K) is
normal
StableSubgroup of (H
/\ K) by
Th60;
assume
A5: K9 is
normal
StableSubgroup of K;
then (K9
/\ H) is
normal
StableSubgroup of (H
/\ K) by
Th60;
then
reconsider HK as
normal
StableSubgroup of (H
/\ K) by
A4,
Th87;
HK
= ((K9
/\ H)
"\/" (H9
/\ K));
then
A6: (((K9
"\/" (K
/\ H))
./. JK),((H
/\ K)
./. HK))
are_isomorphic by
A2,
A3,
A5,
Th91;
(((H9
"\/" (H
/\ K))
./. JH),((H
/\ K)
./. HK))
are_isomorphic by
A1,
A3,
A5,
Th91;
hence thesis by
A6,
Th55;
end;
begin
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let IT be
FinSequence of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G);
::
GROUP_9:def28
attr IT is
composition_series means
:
Def28: (IT
. 1)
= (
(Omega). G) & (IT
. (
len IT))
= (
(1). G) & for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom IT) & (i
+ 1)
in (
dom IT) holds for H1,H2 be
StableSubgroup of G st H1
= (IT
. i) & H2
= (IT
. (i
+ 1)) holds H2 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1;
end
registration
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
cluster
composition_series for
FinSequence of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G);
existence
proof
take H =
<*(
(Omega). G), (
(1). G)*>;
(
(Omega). G) is
Element of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) & (
(1). G) is
Element of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
Def11;
then
reconsider H as
FinSequence of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
FINSEQ_2: 13;
A1: (H
. (
len H))
= (H
. 2) by
FINSEQ_1: 44
.= (
(1). G) by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
A2: for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom H) & (i
+ 1)
in (
dom H) holds for H1,H2 be
StableSubgroup of G st H1
= (H
. i) & H2
= (H
. (i
+ 1)) holds H2 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1
proof
let i be
Nat;
assume
A3: i
in (
dom H);
assume
A4: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom H);
(
len H)
= 2 by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
then
A5: (
dom H)
=
{1, 2} by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
per cases by
A3,
A5,
TARSKI:def 2;
suppose
A6: i
= 1;
let H1,H2 be
StableSubgroup of G;
assume H1
= (H
. i);
assume H2
= (H
. (i
+ 1));
then
A7: H2
= (
(1). G) by
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 44;
then
reconsider H2 as
StableSubgroup of H1 by
Th16;
now
let H be
strict
Subgroup of H1;
reconsider H1 as
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
assume the multMagma of H2
= H;
then the
carrier of H
=
{(
1_ G)} by
A7,
Def8;
then the
carrier of H
=
{(
1_ H1)} by
GROUP_2: 44;
then H
= (
(1). H1) by
GROUP_2:def 7;
hence H is
normal;
end;
hence thesis by
Def10;
end;
suppose i
= 2;
hence thesis by
A4,
A5,
TARSKI:def 2;
end;
end;
(H
. 1)
= (
(Omega). G) by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
Def28;
end;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
mode
CompositionSeries of G is
composition_series
FinSequence of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G);
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let s1,s2 be
CompositionSeries of G;
::
GROUP_9:def29
pred s1
is_finer_than s2 means ex x be
set st x
c= (
dom s1) & s2
= (s1
* (
Sgm x));
reflexivity
proof
now
let s1 be
CompositionSeries of G;
set x = (
dom s1);
reconsider x as
set;
take x;
thus x
c= (
dom s1);
set i = (
len s1);
(
Sgm x)
= (
Sgm (
Seg i)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
idseq i) by
FINSEQ_3: 48;
hence s1
= (s1
* (
Sgm x)) by
FINSEQ_2: 54;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let IT be
CompositionSeries of G;
::
GROUP_9:def30
attr IT is
strictly_decreasing means for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom IT) & (i
+ 1)
in (
dom IT) holds for H be
StableSubgroup of G, N be
normal
StableSubgroup of H st H
= (IT
. i) & N
= (IT
. (i
+ 1)) holds not (H
./. N) is
trivial;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let IT be
CompositionSeries of G;
::
GROUP_9:def31
attr IT is
jordan_holder means IT is
strictly_decreasing & not ex s be
CompositionSeries of G st s
<> IT & s is
strictly_decreasing & s
is_finer_than IT;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G1,G2 be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let s1 be
CompositionSeries of G1;
let s2 be
CompositionSeries of G2;
::
GROUP_9:def32
pred s1
is_equivalent_with s2 means (
len s1)
= (
len s2) & for n be
Nat st (n
+ 1)
= (
len s1) holds ex p be
Permutation of (
Seg n) st for H1 be
StableSubgroup of G1, H2 be
StableSubgroup of G2, N1 be
normal
StableSubgroup of H1, N2 be
normal
StableSubgroup of H2, i,j be
Nat st 1
<= i & i
<= n & j
= (p
. i) & H1
= (s1
. i) & H2
= (s2
. j) & N1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) & N2
= (s2
. (j
+ 1)) holds ((H1
./. N1),(H2
./. N2))
are_isomorphic ;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let G be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let s be
CompositionSeries of G;
::
GROUP_9:def33
func
the_series_of_quotients_of s ->
FinSequence means
:
Def33: (
len s)
= ((
len it )
+ 1) & for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom it ) holds for H be
StableSubgroup of G, N be
normal
StableSubgroup of H st H
= (s
. i) & N
= (s
. (i
+ 1)) holds (it
. i)
= (H
./. N) if (
len s)
> 1
otherwise it
=
{} ;
existence
proof
now
set i = ((
len s)
- 1);
assume (
len s)
> 1;
then ((
len s)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider i as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
defpred
P[
set,
object] means for H be
StableSubgroup of G, N be
normal
StableSubgroup of H, j be
Nat st $1
in (
Seg i) & j
= $1 & H
= (s
. j) & N
= (s
. (j
+ 1)) holds $2
= (H
./. N);
A1: for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg i) holds ex x be
object st
P[k, x]
proof
let k be
Nat;
reconsider k1 = k as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
assume
A2: k
in (
Seg i);
then
A3: 1
<= k by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
k
<= i by
A2,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A4: (k
+ 1)
<= (((
len s)
- 1)
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
(
0
+ k)
<= (1
+ k) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then k
<= (
len s) by
A4,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then k1
in (
Seg (
len s)) by
A3;
then
A5: k
in (
dom s) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(1
+ 1)
<= (k
+ 1) by
A3,
XREAL_1: 6;
then 1
<= (k
+ 1) by
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (k1
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s)) by
A4;
then
A6: (k
+ 1)
in (
dom s) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider H = (s
. k), N = (s
. (k
+ 1)) as
Element of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
A5,
FINSEQ_2: 11;
reconsider H, N as
StableSubgroup of G by
Def11;
reconsider N as
normal
StableSubgroup of H by
A5,
A6,
Def28;
take (H
./. N);
thus thesis;
end;
consider f be
FinSequence such that
A7: (
dom f)
= (
Seg i) & for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg i) holds
P[k, (f
. k)] from
FINSEQ_1:sch 1(
A1);
take f;
(
len f)
= i by
A7,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
hence (
len s)
= ((
len f)
+ 1);
let j be
Nat;
assume
A8: j
in (
dom f);
let H be
StableSubgroup of G;
let N be
normal
StableSubgroup of H;
assume
A9: H
= (s
. j);
assume N
= (s
. (j
+ 1));
hence (f
. j)
= (H
./. N) by
A7,
A8,
A9;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let f1,f2 be
FinSequence;
now
assume (
len s)
> 1;
assume
A10: (
len s)
= ((
len f1)
+ 1);
assume
A11: for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom f1) holds for H1 be
StableSubgroup of G, N1 be
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 st H1
= (s
. i) & N1
= (s
. (i
+ 1)) holds (f1
. i)
= (H1
./. N1);
assume
A12: (
len s)
= ((
len f2)
+ 1);
assume
A13: for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom f2) holds for H1 be
StableSubgroup of G, N1 be
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 st H1
= (s
. i) & N1
= (s
. (i
+ 1)) holds (f2
. i)
= (H1
./. N1);
for k be
Nat st 1
<= k & k
<= (
len f1) holds (f1
. k)
= (f2
. k)
proof
let k be
Nat;
reconsider k1 = k as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
assume that
A14: 1
<= k and
A15: k
<= (
len f1);
A16: (k
+ 1)
<= (((
len s)
- 1)
+ 1) by
A10,
A15,
XREAL_1: 6;
(
0
+ k)
<= (1
+ k) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then k
<= (
len s) by
A16,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then k1
in (
Seg (
len s)) by
A14;
then
A17: k
in (
dom s) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(1
+ 1)
<= (k
+ 1) by
A14,
XREAL_1: 6;
then 1
<= (k
+ 1) by
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (k1
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s)) by
A16;
then
A18: (k
+ 1)
in (
dom s) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider H1 = (s
. k), N1 = (s
. (k
+ 1)) as
Element of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
A17,
FINSEQ_2: 11;
reconsider H1, N1 as
StableSubgroup of G by
Def11;
reconsider N1 as
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A17,
A18,
Def28;
A19: k1
in (
Seg (
len f1)) by
A14,
A15;
then k
in (
dom f1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A20: (f1
. k)
= (H1
./. N1) by
A11;
k
in (
dom f2) by
A10,
A12,
A19,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
hence thesis by
A13,
A20;
end;
hence f1
= f2 by
A10,
A12;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
consistency ;
end
definition
let O be
set;
let f1,f2 be
FinSequence;
let p be
Permutation of (
dom f1);
::
GROUP_9:def34
pred f1,f2
are_equivalent_under p,O means (
len f1)
= (
len f2) & for H1,H2 be
GroupWithOperators of O, i,j be
Nat st i
in (
dom f1) & j
= ((p
" )
. i) & H1
= (f1
. i) & H2
= (f2
. j) holds (H1,H2)
are_isomorphic ;
end
reserve y for
set,
H19,H29 for
StableSubgroup of G,
N19 for
normal
StableSubgroup of H19,
s1,s19,s2,s29 for
CompositionSeries of G,
fs for
FinSequence of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G),
f1,f2 for
FinSequence,
i,j,n for
Nat;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:94
Th94: i
in (
dom s1) & (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) & (s1
. i)
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) & fs
= (
Del (s1,i)) implies fs is
composition_series
proof
assume
A1: i
in (
dom s1);
then
consider k be
Nat such that
A2: (
len s1)
= (k
+ 1) and
A3: (
len (
Del (s1,i)))
= k by
FINSEQ_3: 104;
assume (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1);
then (i
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A4: (i
+ 1)
<= (
len s1) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
assume
A5: (s1
. i)
= (s1
. (i
+ 1));
assume
A6: fs
= (
Del (s1,i));
A7: i
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A8: 1
<= i by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (1
+ 1)
<= (i
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then (1
+ 1)
<= ((
len fs)
+ 1) by
A6,
A4,
A2,
A3,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A9: 1
<= (
len fs) by
XREAL_1: 6;
per cases by
A9,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A10: (
len fs)
= 1;
A11:
now
let n be
Nat;
assume n
in (
dom fs);
then n
in (
Seg 1) by
A10,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A12: n
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
TARSKI:def 1;
assume
A13: (n
+ 1)
in (
dom fs);
let H1, H2;
assume that H1
= (fs
. n) and H2
= (fs
. (n
+ 1));
2
in (
Seg 1) by
A10,
A12,
A13,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
hence H2 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
A14: (s1
. 1)
= (
(Omega). G) by
Def28;
A15: 1
<= i by
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A16: i
<= 1 by
A6,
A4,
A2,
A3,
A10,
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A17: i
= 1 by
A15,
XXREAL_0: 1;
(
dom s1)
= (
Seg 2) by
A6,
A2,
A3,
A10,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then 1
in (
dom s1);
then
A18: i
in (
dom s1) by
A15,
A16,
XXREAL_0: 1;
i
<= 1 by
A6,
A4,
A2,
A3,
A10,
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A19: (fs
. (
len fs))
= (s1
. (1
+ 1)) by
A6,
A2,
A3,
A10,
A18,
FINSEQ_3: 111
.= (
(1). G) by
A6,
A2,
A3,
A10,
Def28;
(s1
. 2)
= (
(1). G) by
A6,
A2,
A3,
A10,
Def28;
hence thesis by
A5,
A10,
A17,
A14,
A19,
A11;
end;
suppose
A20: (
len fs)
> 1;
A21: (fs
. 1)
= (
(Omega). G)
proof
per cases by
A8,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A22: i
= 1;
then (fs
. 1)
= (s1
. (1
+ 1)) by
A1,
A6,
A2,
A3,
A20,
FINSEQ_3: 111;
hence thesis by
A5,
A22,
Def28;
end;
suppose
A23: i
> 1;
reconsider i as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
(fs
. 1)
= (s1
. 1) by
A23,
A6,
FINSEQ_3: 110;
hence thesis by
Def28;
end;
end;
A24:
now
let n be
Nat;
assume that
A25: n
in (
dom fs) and
A26: (n
+ 1)
in (
dom fs);
A27: n
in (
Seg (
len fs)) by
A25,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A28: n
<= k by
A6,
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
reconsider n1 = (n
+ 1) as
Nat;
A29: (n
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len fs)) by
A26,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A30: n1
<= k by
A6,
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A31: (
0
+ (
len fs))
< (1
+ (
len fs)) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A32: (
Seg (
len fs))
c= (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A6,
A2,
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 5;
then n
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A27;
then
A33: n
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
n1
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A29,
A32;
then
A34: n1
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
n1
<= (
len fs) by
A29,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then n1
< (
len s1) by
A6,
A2,
A3,
A31,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (n1
+ 1)
<= (k
+ 1) by
A2,
NAT_1: 13;
then (
Seg (n1
+ 1))
c= (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A2,
FINSEQ_1: 5;
then
A35: (
Seg (n1
+ 1))
c= (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A36: (n1
+ 1)
in (
Seg (n1
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 4;
let H1, H2;
assume
A37: H1
= (fs
. n);
assume
A38: H2
= (fs
. (n
+ 1));
reconsider i, n as
Nat;
per cases ;
suppose
A39: n
< i;
then
A40: n1
<= i by
NAT_1: 13;
reconsider n9 = n, i as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
A41: ((
Del (s1,i))
. n9)
= (s1
. n9) by
A39,
FINSEQ_3: 110;
per cases by
A40,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A42: n1
< i;
reconsider n19 = n1, i as
Element of
NAT ;
((
Del (s1,i))
. n19)
= (s1
. n19) by
A42,
FINSEQ_3: 110;
hence H2 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A6,
A37,
A38,
A33,
A34,
A41,
Def28;
end;
suppose
A43: n1
= i;
then ((
Del (s1,i))
. n1)
= (s1
. (n1
+ 1)) by
A1,
A2,
A30,
FINSEQ_3: 111;
hence H2 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A5,
A6,
A37,
A38,
A33,
A34,
A41,
A43,
Def28;
end;
end;
suppose
A44: n
>= i;
reconsider n9 = n, i as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
A45: ((
Del (s1,i))
. n9)
= (s1
. (n9
+ 1)) by
A1,
A2,
A28,
A44,
FINSEQ_3: 111;
reconsider n19 = n1, i, k as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
(
0
+ n)
<= (n
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A46: i
<= n19 by
A44,
XXREAL_0: 2;
n19
<= k by
A6,
A3,
A29,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then ((
Del (s1,i))
. n19)
= (s1
. (n19
+ 1)) by
A1,
A2,
A46,
FINSEQ_3: 111;
hence H2 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A6,
A37,
A38,
A34,
A35,
A36,
A45,
Def28;
end;
end;
i
<= (
len fs) by
A6,
A4,
A2,
A3,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (fs
. (
len fs))
= (s1
. (
len s1)) by
A1,
A6,
A2,
A3,
FINSEQ_3: 111;
then (fs
. (
len fs))
= (
(1). G) by
Def28;
hence thesis by
A21,
A24;
end;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:95
Th95: s1
is_finer_than s2 implies ex n st (
len s1)
= ((
len s2)
+ n)
proof
set n = ((
len s1)
- (
len s2));
assume s1
is_finer_than s2;
then
consider x such that
A1: x
c= (
dom s1) and
A2: s2
= (s1
* (
Sgm x));
A3: x
c= (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
reconsider x as
finite
set by
A1;
now
let y1 be
object;
assume y1
in (
dom s2);
then y1
in (
dom (
Sgm x)) by
A2,
FUNCT_1: 11;
then
A4: y1
in (
Seg (
card x)) by
A3,
FINSEQ_3: 40;
(
card x)
<= (
card (
dom s1)) by
A1,
NAT_1: 43;
then (
Seg (
card x))
c= (
Seg (
card (
dom s1))) by
FINSEQ_1: 5;
then y1
in (
Seg (
card (
dom s1))) by
A4;
then y1
in (
Seg (
card (
Seg (
len s1)))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then y1
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 57;
hence y1
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
end;
then (
dom s2)
c= (
dom s1);
then (
Seg (
len s2))
c= (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (
Seg (
len s2))
c= (
Seg (
len s1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (
len s2)
<= (
len s1) by
FINSEQ_1: 5;
then ((
len s2)
- (
len s2))
<= ((
len s1)
- (
len s2)) by
XREAL_1: 9;
then n
in
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
then
reconsider n as
Nat;
take n;
thus thesis;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:96
Th96: (
len s2)
= (
len s1) & s2
is_finer_than s1 implies s1
= s2
proof
reconsider X = (
Seg (
len s2)) as
finite
set;
assume (
len s2)
= (
len s1);
then
A1: (
dom s1)
= (
Seg (
len s2)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
dom s2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
assume s2
is_finer_than s1;
then
consider x such that
A2: x
c= (
dom s2) and
A3: s1
= (s2
* (
Sgm x));
set y = (X
\ x);
A4: x
c= (
Seg (
len s2)) by
A2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then x
= (
rng (
Sgm x)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
then
A5: (
dom (s2
* (
Sgm x)))
= (
dom (
Sgm x)) by
A2,
RELAT_1: 27;
reconsider x, y as
finite
set by
A2;
(
dom (
Sgm x))
= (
Seg (
len s2)) by
A3,
A1,
A5,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (
len (
Sgm x))
= (
len s2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A6: (
card x)
= (
len s2) by
A4,
FINSEQ_3: 39;
A7: X
= (X
\/ x) by
A4,
XBOOLE_1: 12
.= (x
\/ y) by
XBOOLE_1: 39;
(
card (x
\/ y))
= ((
card x)
+ (
card y)) by
CARD_2: 40,
XBOOLE_1: 79;
then (
len s2)
= ((
card x)
+ (
card y)) by
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 57;
then y
=
{} by
A6;
then (
Sgm x)
= (
idseq (
len s2)) by
A7,
FINSEQ_3: 48;
hence thesis by
A3,
FINSEQ_2: 54;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:97
Th97: not s1 is
empty & s2
is_finer_than s1 implies not s2 is
empty;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:98
s1
is_finer_than s2 & s1 is
jordan_holder & s2 is
jordan_holder implies s1
= s2;
Lm35: for P,R be
Relation holds P
= ((
rng P)
|` R) iff (P
~ )
= ((R
~ )
| (
dom (P
~ )))
proof
let P,R be
Relation;
hereby
assume
A1: P
= ((
rng P)
|` R);
now
let x,y be
object;
hereby
assume
A2:
[x, y]
in (P
~ );
then
[y, x]
in P by
RELAT_1:def 7;
then
[y, x]
in R by
A1,
RELAT_1:def 12;
then
A3:
[x, y]
in (R
~ ) by
RELAT_1:def 7;
x
in (
dom (P
~ )) by
A2,
XTUPLE_0:def 12;
hence
[x, y]
in ((R
~ )
| (
dom (P
~ ))) by
A3,
RELAT_1:def 11;
end;
assume
A4:
[x, y]
in ((R
~ )
| (
dom (P
~ )));
then
[x, y]
in (R
~ ) by
RELAT_1:def 11;
then
A5:
[y, x]
in R by
RELAT_1:def 7;
x
in (
dom (P
~ )) by
A4,
RELAT_1:def 11;
then x
in (
rng P) by
RELAT_1: 20;
then
[y, x]
in ((
rng P)
|` R) by
A5,
RELAT_1:def 12;
hence
[x, y]
in (P
~ ) by
A1,
RELAT_1:def 7;
end;
hence (P
~ )
= ((R
~ )
| (
dom (P
~ )));
end;
assume
A6: (P
~ )
= ((R
~ )
| (
dom (P
~ )));
now
let x,y be
object;
hereby
assume
[x, y]
in P;
then
A7:
[y, x]
in (P
~ ) by
RELAT_1:def 7;
then
[y, x]
in (R
~ ) by
A6,
RELAT_1:def 11;
then
A8:
[x, y]
in R by
RELAT_1:def 7;
y
in (
dom (P
~ )) by
A6,
A7,
RELAT_1:def 11;
then y
in (
rng P) by
RELAT_1: 20;
hence
[x, y]
in ((
rng P)
|` R) by
A8,
RELAT_1:def 12;
end;
assume
A9:
[x, y]
in ((
rng P)
|` R);
then
[x, y]
in R by
RELAT_1:def 12;
then
A10:
[y, x]
in (R
~ ) by
RELAT_1:def 7;
y
in (
rng P) by
A9,
RELAT_1:def 12;
then y
in (
dom (P
~ )) by
RELAT_1: 20;
then
[y, x]
in ((R
~ )
| (
dom (P
~ ))) by
A10,
RELAT_1:def 11;
hence
[x, y]
in P by
A6,
RELAT_1:def 7;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
Lm36: for X be
set, P,R be
Relation holds (P
* (R
| X))
= ((X
|` P)
* R)
proof
let X be
set;
let P,R be
Relation;
A1:
now
let x be
object;
assume
A2: x
in ((X
|` P)
* R);
then
consider y,z be
object such that
A3: x
=
[y, z] by
RELAT_1:def 1;
consider w be
object such that
A4:
[y, w]
in (X
|` P) and
A5:
[w, z]
in R by
A2,
A3,
RELAT_1:def 8;
w
in X by
A4,
RELAT_1:def 12;
then
A6:
[w, z]
in (R
| X) by
A5,
RELAT_1:def 11;
[y, w]
in P by
A4,
RELAT_1:def 12;
hence x
in (P
* (R
| X)) by
A3,
A6,
RELAT_1:def 8;
end;
now
let x be
object;
assume
A7: x
in (P
* (R
| X));
then
consider y,z be
object such that
A8: x
=
[y, z] by
RELAT_1:def 1;
consider w be
object such that
A9:
[y, w]
in P and
A10:
[w, z]
in (R
| X) by
A7,
A8,
RELAT_1:def 8;
w
in X by
A10,
RELAT_1:def 11;
then
A11:
[y, w]
in (X
|` P) by
A9,
RELAT_1:def 12;
[w, z]
in R by
A10,
RELAT_1:def 11;
hence x
in ((X
|` P)
* R) by
A8,
A11,
RELAT_1:def 8;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
Lm37: for n be
Nat, X be
set, f be
PartFunc of
REAL ,
REAL st X
c= (
Seg n) & X
c= (
dom f) & (f
| X) is
increasing & (f
.: X)
c= (
NAT
\
{
0 }) holds (
Sgm (f
.: X))
= (f
* (
Sgm X))
proof
let n be
Nat;
let X be
set;
let f be
PartFunc of
REAL ,
REAL ;
assume
A1: X
c= (
Seg n);
then
A2: (
rng (
Sgm X))
= X by
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
assume
A3: X
c= (
dom f);
assume
A4: (f
| X) is
increasing;
assume
A5: (f
.: X)
c= (
NAT
\
{
0 });
per cases ;
suppose
A6: X
misses (
dom f);
then
A7: (f
.: X)
=
{} by
RELAT_1: 118;
then (f
.: X)
c= (
Seg
0 );
then (
Sgm (f
.: X))
=
{} by
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 51;
hence thesis by
A2,
A6,
RELAT_1: 44;
end;
suppose
A8: X
meets (
dom f);
reconsider X9 = X as
finite
set by
A1;
set fX = (f
.: X);
reconsider f9 = f as
Function;
AA: (f9
.: X9) is
finite;
fX
c= (
NAT
\
{
0 }) by
A5;
then
reconsider fX as
finite non
empty
natural-membered
set by
A8,
AA,
RELAT_1: 118;
reconsider k = (
max fX) as
Nat by
TARSKI: 1;
set fs = (f
* (
Sgm X));
(
rng (
Sgm X))
c= (
dom f) by
A1,
A3,
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
then
reconsider fs as
FinSequence by
FINSEQ_1: 16;
(f
.: (
rng (
Sgm X)))
c= (
NAT
\
{
0 }) by
A1,
A5,
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
then
A9: (
rng fs)
c= (
NAT
\
{
0 }) by
RELAT_1: 127;
(
rng fs)
c=
NAT by
A9,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
then
reconsider fs as
FinSequence of
NAT by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
now
let x be
object;
assume
A10: x
in (f
.: X);
then
reconsider k9 = x as
Nat by
A5;
not k9
in
{
0 } by
A5,
A10,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then k9
<>
0 by
TARSKI:def 1;
then (
0
+ 1)
< (k9
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A11: 1
<= k9 by
NAT_1: 13;
k9
<= k by
A10,
XXREAL_2:def 8;
hence x
in (
Seg k) by
A11;
end;
then
A12: (f
.: X)
c= (
Seg k);
A13:
now
A14: (
dom fs)
= (
Seg (
len fs)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
let l,m,k1,k2 be
Nat;
assume that
A15: 1
<= l and
A16: l
< m and
A17: m
<= (
len fs);
set k19 = ((
Sgm X)
. l);
l
<= (
len fs) by
A16,
A17,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A18: l
in (
dom fs) by
A15,
A14;
then l
in (
dom (
Sgm X)) by
FUNCT_1: 11;
then
A19: k19
in X by
A2,
FUNCT_1: 3;
set k29 = ((
Sgm X)
. m);
1
<= m by
A15,
A16,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A20: m
in (
dom fs) by
A17,
A14;
then
A21: m
in (
dom (
Sgm X)) by
FUNCT_1: 11;
then
A22: k29
in X by
A2,
FUNCT_1: 3;
reconsider k19, k29 as
Nat;
m
in (
Seg (
len (
Sgm X))) by
A21,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then m
<= (
len (
Sgm X)) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A23: k19
< k29 by
A1,
A15,
A16,
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
reconsider k19, k29 as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
reconsider k19, k29 as
Element of
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
((
Sgm X)
. l)
in (
dom f) by
A18,
FUNCT_1: 11;
then
A24: k19
in (X
/\ (
dom f)) by
A19,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
assume that
A25: k1
= (fs
. l) and
A26: k2
= (fs
. m);
A27: k2
= (f
. ((
Sgm X)
. m)) by
A26,
A20,
FUNCT_1: 12;
((
Sgm X)
. m)
in (
dom f) by
A20,
FUNCT_1: 11;
then
A28: k29
in (X
/\ (
dom f)) by
A22,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
k1
= (f
. ((
Sgm X)
. l)) by
A25,
A18,
FUNCT_1: 12;
hence k1
< k2 by
A4,
A27,
A23,
A24,
A28,
RFUNCT_2: 20;
end;
(
rng fs)
= (f
.: X) by
A2,
RELAT_1: 127;
hence thesis by
A12,
A13,
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
end;
end;
Lm38: y
c= (
Seg (n
+ 1)) & i
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) & not i
in y implies ex x st (
Sgm x)
= (((
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i}))
" )
* (
Sgm y)) & x
c= (
Seg n)
proof
set x1 = { k where k be
Element of
NAT : k
in y & k
< i };
set x2 = { (k
- 1) where k be
Element of
NAT : k
in y & k
> i };
set x = (x1
\/ x2);
set f1 = (
id x1);
assume
A1: y
c= (
Seg (n
+ 1));
then
A2: y
= (
rng (
Sgm y)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
assume
A3: i
in (
Seg (n
+ 1));
then
A4: 1
<= i by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A5: i
<= (n
+ 1) by
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A6:
now
let z be
object;
assume
A7: z
in x;
per cases by
A7,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose z
in x1;
then
A8: ex k be
Element of
NAT st k
= z & k
in y & k
< i;
then
reconsider z9 = z as
Element of
NAT ;
z9
< (n
+ 1) by
A5,
A8,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A9: z9
<= n by
NAT_1: 13;
1
<= z9 by
A1,
A8,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
hence z
in (
Seg n) by
A9;
end;
suppose z
in x2;
then
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A10: (k
- 1)
= z and
A11: k
in y and
A12: k
> i;
reconsider z9 = z as
Integer by
A10;
1
< k by
A4,
A12,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (1
+ 1)
< (k
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then 2
<= k by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A13: (2
- 1)
<= (k
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider z9 as
Element of
NAT by
A10,
INT_1: 3;
k
<= (n
+ 1) by
A1,
A11,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (k
- 1)
<= ((n
+ 1)
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
then z9
<= n by
A10;
hence z
in (
Seg n) by
A10,
A13;
end;
end;
then
A14: x
c= (
Seg n);
then
reconsider x9 = x, y9 = y as
finite
set by
A1;
set f2 = {
[(k
- 1), k] where k be
Element of
NAT : k
in y9 & k
> i };
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in f2;
then
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A15:
[(k
- 1), k]
= x and k
in y9 and k
> i;
reconsider y = (k
- 1), z = k as
object;
take y, z;
thus x
=
[y, z] by
A15;
end;
then
reconsider f2 as
Relation by
RELAT_1:def 1;
set f = (f1
\/ f2);
A16:
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in x2;
then
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A17: (k
- 1)
= x & k
in y9 & k
> i;
reconsider y = k as
set;
[x, y]
in f2 by
A17;
hence x
in (
dom f2) by
XTUPLE_0:def 12;
end;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
dom f2);
then
consider y be
object such that
A18:
[x, y]
in f2 by
XTUPLE_0:def 12;
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A19:
[(k
- 1), k]
=
[x, y] and
A20: k
in y9 & k
> i by
A18;
(k
- 1)
= x by
A19,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence x
in x2 by
A20;
end;
then
A21: (
dom f2)
= x2 by
A16,
TARSKI: 2;
A22:
now
let x,y1,y2 be
object;
assume
A23:
[x, y1]
in f;
assume
A24:
[x, y2]
in f;
A25: y1 is
set & y2 is
set by
TARSKI: 1;
per cases by
A23,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
A26:
[x, y1]
in f1;
then
A27: x
in (
dom f1) by
XTUPLE_0:def 12;
then (f1
. x)
= x by
FUNCT_1: 17;
then
A28: y1
= x by
A26,
A27,
FUNCT_1:def 2,
A25;
per cases by
A24,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
A29:
[x, y2]
in f1;
then
A30: x
in (
dom f1) by
XTUPLE_0:def 12;
then (f1
. x)
= x by
FUNCT_1: 17;
hence y1
= y2 by
A28,
A29,
A30,
FUNCT_1:def 2,
A25;
end;
suppose
A31:
[x, y2]
in f2;
x
in x1 by
A27;
then
consider k9 be
Element of
NAT such that
A32: k9
= x and k9
in y and
A33: k9
< i;
x
in x2 by
A21,
A31,
XTUPLE_0:def 12;
then ex k be
Element of
NAT st (k
- 1)
= x & k
in y & k
> i;
then (k9
+ 1)
> i by
A32;
hence y1
= y2 by
A33,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
end;
suppose
[x, y1]
in f2;
then
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A34:
[(k
- 1), k]
=
[x, y1] and k
in y9 and
A35: k
> i;
A36: (k
- 1)
= x by
A34,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
per cases by
A24,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
[x, y2]
in f1;
then x
in (
dom f1) by
XTUPLE_0:def 12;
then x
in x1;
then
consider k9 be
Element of
NAT such that
A37: k9
= x and k9
in y and
A38: k9
< i;
k9
= (k
- 1) by
A34,
A37,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then (k9
+ 1)
> i by
A35;
hence y1
= y2 by
A38,
NAT_1: 13;
end;
suppose
[x, y2]
in f2;
then
consider k9 be
Element of
NAT such that
A39:
[(k9
- 1), k9]
=
[x, y2] and k9
in y9 and k9
> i;
(k9
- 1)
= x by
A39,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence y1
= y2 by
A34,
A36,
A39,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
end;
end;
A40:
now
let x,y1,y2 be
object;
assume
[x, y1]
in f2;
then
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A41:
[(k
- 1), k]
=
[x, y1] and k
in y9 and k
> i;
A42: (k
- 1)
= x by
A41,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
assume
[x, y2]
in f2;
then
consider k9 be
Element of
NAT such that
A43:
[(k9
- 1), k9]
=
[x, y2] and k9
in y9 and k9
> i;
(k9
- 1)
= x by
A43,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence y1
= y2 by
A41,
A43,
A42,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
reconsider f as
Function by
A22,
FUNCT_1:def 1;
A44:
now
let x be
object;
A45: f1
c= f by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
(
dom f)
= ((
dom f1)
\/ (
dom f2)) by
XTUPLE_0: 23;
then
A46: (
dom f1)
c= (
dom f) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
assume
A47: x
in (
dom f1);
then
[x, (f1
. x)]
in f1 by
FUNCT_1:def 2;
hence (f
. x)
= (f1
. x) by
A47,
A46,
A45,
FUNCT_1:def 2;
end;
reconsider f2 as
Function by
A40,
FUNCT_1:def 1;
assume
A48: not i
in y;
A49:
now
let z be
object;
set k = z;
assume
A50: z
in y9;
then k
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
A1;
then
reconsider k as
Element of
NAT ;
per cases ;
suppose k
<= i;
then k
< i by
A48,
A50,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then z
in x1 by
A50;
then z
in (
rng f1);
then z
in ((
rng f1)
\/ (
rng f2)) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence z
in (
rng f) by
RELAT_1: 12;
end;
suppose
A51: k
> i;
set x99 = (k
- 1);
[x99, z]
in f2 by
A50,
A51;
then z
in (
rng f2) by
XTUPLE_0:def 13;
then z
in ((
rng f1)
\/ (
rng f2)) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence z
in (
rng f) by
RELAT_1: 12;
end;
end;
now
let z be
object;
assume z
in (
rng f);
then
A52: z
in ((
rng f1)
\/ (
rng f2)) by
RELAT_1: 12;
per cases by
A52,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose z
in (
rng f1);
then z
in x1;
then ex k be
Element of
NAT st k
= z & k
in y & k
< i;
hence z
in y9;
end;
suppose z
in (
rng f2);
then
consider x99 be
object such that
A53:
[x99, z]
in f2 by
XTUPLE_0:def 13;
ex k be
Element of
NAT st
[(k
- 1), k]
=
[x99, z] & k
in y9 & k
> i by
A53;
hence z
in y9 by
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
end;
then
A54: (
rng f)
= y9 by
A49,
TARSKI: 2;
now
let a,b be
object;
hereby
assume
A55:
[a, b]
in f;
per cases by
A55,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
A56:
[a, b]
in f1;
reconsider i9 = i, n9 = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
A57: a
= b by
A56,
RELAT_1:def 10;
a
in x1 by
A56,
RELAT_1:def 10;
then
consider a9 be
Element of
NAT such that
A58: a9
= a and
A59: a9
in y and
A60: a9
< i;
A61: 1
<= a9 by
A1,
A59,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
i
<= (n
+ 1) by
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then a9
< (n
+ 1) by
A60,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then a9
<= n by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A62: a
in (
Seg n) by
A58,
A61;
then a
in (
Seg (
len (
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i})))) by
A3,
FINSEQ_3: 107;
then
A63: a
in (
dom (
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i}))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
a9
= ((
Sgm ((
Seg (n9
+ 1))
\
{i9}))
. a9) by
A3,
A58,
A60,
A61,
A62,
FINSEQ_3: 108;
then
[a, b]
in (
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i})) by
A57,
A58,
A63,
FUNCT_1: 1;
hence
[a, b]
in ((
rng f)
|` (
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i}))) by
A54,
A57,
A58,
A59,
RELAT_1:def 12;
end;
suppose
A64:
[a, b]
in f2;
reconsider i9 = i, n9 = n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
consider b9 be
Element of
NAT such that
A65:
[a, b]
=
[(b9
- 1), b9] and
A66: b9
in y9 and
A67: b9
> i by
A64;
A68: a
= (b9
- 1) by
A65,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
reconsider a9 = (b9
- 1) as
Integer;
(i
+ 1)
<= b9 by
A67,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A69: ((i
+ 1)
- 1)
<= (b9
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
then
A70: 1
<= a9 by
A4,
XXREAL_0: 2;
reconsider a9 as
Element of
NAT by
A69,
INT_1: 3;
b9
<= (n
+ 1) by
A1,
A66,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A71: (b9
- 1)
<= ((n
+ 1)
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
then
A72: a9
in (
Seg n) by
A70;
then a
in (
Seg n) by
A65,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then a
in (
Seg (
len (
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i})))) by
A3,
FINSEQ_3: 107;
then
A73: a
in (
dom (
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i}))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(a9
+ 1)
= ((
Sgm ((
Seg (n9
+ 1))
\
{i9}))
. a9) by
A3,
A71,
A69,
A72,
FINSEQ_3: 108;
then
[a, b]
in (
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i})) by
A65,
A68,
A73,
FUNCT_1: 1;
hence
[a, b]
in ((
rng f)
|` (
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i}))) by
A54,
A65,
A66,
RELAT_1:def 12;
end;
end;
assume
A74:
[a, b]
in ((
rng f)
|` (
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i})));
then
A75:
[a, b]
in (
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i})) by
RELAT_1:def 12;
then
A76: a
in (
dom (
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i}))) by
XTUPLE_0:def 12;
b
in (
rng f) by
A74,
RELAT_1:def 12;
then b
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
A1,
A54;
then
reconsider a9 = a, b9 = b as
Element of
NAT by
A76;
A77: a
in (
Seg (
len (
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i})))) by
A76,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A78: 1
<= a9 by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A79: b
in y by
A54,
A74,
RELAT_1:def 12;
A80: a
in (
Seg n) by
A3,
A77,
FINSEQ_3: 107;
reconsider i, n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
A81: a9
<= n by
A80,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
per cases ;
suppose
A82: a9
< i;
then ((
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i}))
. a9)
= a9 by
A3,
A80,
A78,
FINSEQ_3: 108;
then
A83: b
= a by
A75,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then a9
in x1 by
A79,
A82;
then
[a, b]
in (
id x1) by
A83,
RELAT_1:def 10;
hence
[a, b]
in f by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
suppose
A84: i
<= a9;
then ((
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i}))
. a9)
= (a9
+ 1) by
A3,
A80,
A81,
FINSEQ_3: 108;
then
A85: b9
= (a9
+ 1) by
A75,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
A86: b9
> i by
A84,
NAT_1: 13;
A87: a
= (b9
- 1) by
A85;
b9
in y9 by
A54,
A74,
RELAT_1:def 12;
then
[a, b]
in f2 by
A86,
A87;
hence
[a, b]
in f by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
end;
then
A88: f
= ((
rng f)
|` (
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i})));
reconsider g = (f
" ) as
PartFunc of (
dom (f
" )), (
rng (f
" )) by
RELSET_1: 4;
A89:
now
let x be
set;
A90: f2
c= f by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
(
dom f)
= ((
dom f1)
\/ (
dom f2)) by
XTUPLE_0: 23;
then
A91: (
dom f2)
c= (
dom f) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
assume
A92: x
in (
dom f2);
then
[x, (f2
. x)]
in f2 by
FUNCT_1:def 2;
hence (f
. x)
= (f2
. x) by
A92,
A91,
A90,
FUNCT_1:def 2;
end;
now
let y1,y2 be
object;
assume y1
in (
dom f);
then
A93: y1
in ((
dom f1)
\/ (
dom f2)) by
XTUPLE_0: 23;
assume y2
in (
dom f);
then
A94: y2
in ((
dom f1)
\/ (
dom f2)) by
XTUPLE_0: 23;
assume
A95: (f
. y1)
= (f
. y2);
per cases by
A93,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
A96: y1
in (
dom f1);
then
A97: (f1
. y1)
= y1 by
FUNCT_1: 17;
then
A98: (f
. y1)
= y1 by
A44,
A96;
per cases by
A94,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
A99: y2
in (
dom f1);
then (f1
. y2)
= y2 by
FUNCT_1: 17;
hence y1
= y2 by
A44,
A95,
A98,
A99;
end;
suppose
A100: y2
in (
dom f2);
then (f
. y2)
= (f2
. y2) by
A89;
then
[y2, (f
. y2)]
in f2 by
A100,
FUNCT_1:def 2;
then
A101: ex k be
Element of
NAT st
[(k
- 1), k]
=
[y2, (f
. y2)] & k
in y9 & k
> i;
(f
. y1)
= (f1
. y1) by
A44,
A96;
then (f
. y1)
in x1 by
A96,
A97;
then ex k9 be
Element of
NAT st k9
= (f
. y1) & k9
in y & k9
< i;
hence y1
= y2 by
A95,
A101,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
end;
suppose
A102: y1
in (
dom f2);
then (f
. y1)
= (f2
. y1) by
A89;
then
[y1, (f
. y1)]
in f2 by
A102,
FUNCT_1:def 2;
then
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A103:
[(k
- 1), k]
=
[y1, (f
. y1)] and k
in y9 and
A104: k
> i;
A105: k
= (f
. y1) by
A103,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
per cases by
A94,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
A106: y2
in (
dom f1);
then (f1
. y2)
= y2 by
FUNCT_1: 17;
then (f
. y2)
in (
dom f1) by
A44,
A106;
then (f
. y2)
in x1;
then ex k9 be
Element of
NAT st k9
= (f
. y2) & k9
in y & k9
< i;
hence y1
= y2 by
A95,
A103,
A104,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
suppose
A107: y2
in (
dom f2);
then (f
. y2)
= (f2
. y2) by
A89;
then
[y2, (f
. y2)]
in f2 by
A107,
FUNCT_1:def 2;
then
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A108:
[(k
- 1), k]
=
[y2, (f
. y2)] and k
in y9 and k
> i;
k
= (f
. y2) by
A108,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence y1
= y2 by
A95,
A103,
A105,
A108,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
end;
end;
then
A109: f is
one-to-one by
FUNCT_1:def 4;
then (f
" )
= (f
~ ) by
FUNCT_1:def 5;
then
A110: (f
" )
= (((
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i}))
~ )
| (
dom (f
" ))) by
A88,
Lm35;
(
dom f1)
= x1;
then
A111: (
dom f)
= x9 by
A21,
XTUPLE_0: 23;
then (
dom f)
c=
NAT by
A14,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
then (
rng g)
c=
NAT by
A109,
FUNCT_1: 33;
then
A112: (
rng g)
c=
REAL by
NUMBERS: 19;
(
rng f)
c=
NAT by
A1,
A54,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
then (
dom g)
c=
NAT by
A109,
FUNCT_1: 33;
then (
dom g)
c=
REAL by
NUMBERS: 19;
then
reconsider g as
PartFunc of
REAL ,
REAL by
A112,
RELSET_1: 7;
A113: (
dom (f
" ))
= y by
A109,
A54,
FUNCT_1: 33;
now
let r1,r2 be
Real;
A114: g
= ((f1
\/ f2)
~ ) by
A109,
FUNCT_1:def 5
.= ((f1
~ )
\/ (f2
~ )) by
RELAT_1: 23;
assume r1
in (y
/\ (
dom g));
then
A115:
[r1, (g
. r1)]
in g by
A113,
FUNCT_1: 1;
assume r2
in (y
/\ (
dom g));
then
A116:
[r2, (g
. r2)]
in g by
A113,
FUNCT_1: 1;
assume
A117: r1
< r2;
per cases by
A115,
A114,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
[r1, (g
. r1)]
in (f1
~ );
then
A118:
[r1, (g
. r1)]
in (
id x1);
then
A119: r1
= (g
. r1) by
RELAT_1:def 10;
r1
in x1 by
A118,
RELAT_1:def 10;
then
A120: ex k9 be
Element of
NAT st (g
. r1)
= k9 & k9
in y & k9
< i by
A119;
per cases by
A116,
A114,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
[r2, (g
. r2)]
in (f1
~ );
then
[r2, (g
. r2)]
in (
id x1);
hence (g
. r1)
< (g
. r2) by
A117,
A119,
RELAT_1:def 10;
end;
suppose
[r2, (g
. r2)]
in (f2
~ );
then
[(g
. r2), r2]
in f2 by
RELAT_1:def 7;
then
consider k99 be
Element of
NAT such that
A121:
[(k99
- 1), k99]
=
[(g
. r2), r2] and k99
in y9 and
A122: k99
> i;
reconsider k999 = (g
. r2), i9 = (i
- 1) as
Integer by
A121,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
(k99
- 1)
= (g
. r2) by
A121,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then (i
- 1)
< (g
. r2) by
A122,
XREAL_1: 9;
then (i9
+ 1)
<= k999 by
INT_1: 7;
hence (g
. r1)
< (g
. r2) by
A120,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
end;
suppose
[r1, (g
. r1)]
in (f2
~ );
then
[(g
. r1), r1]
in f2 by
RELAT_1:def 7;
then
consider k9 be
Element of
NAT such that
A123:
[(k9
- 1), k9]
=
[(g
. r1), r1] and k9
in y9 and
A124: k9
> i;
A125: (k9
- 1)
= (g
. r1) by
A123,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
A126: r1
= k9 by
A123,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
per cases by
A116,
A114,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
suppose
[r2, (g
. r2)]
in (f1
~ );
then
[r2, (g
. r2)]
in (
id x1);
then r2
in x1 by
RELAT_1:def 10;
then ex k99 be
Element of
NAT st r2
= k99 & k99
in y & k99
< i;
hence (g
. r1)
< (g
. r2) by
A117,
A124,
A126,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
suppose
[r2, (g
. r2)]
in (f2
~ );
then
[(g
. r2), r2]
in f2 by
RELAT_1:def 7;
then
consider k99 be
Element of
NAT such that
A127:
[(k99
- 1), k99]
=
[(g
. r2), r2] and k99
in y9 and k99
> i;
(k99
- 1)
= (g
. r2) & r2
= k99 by
A127,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence (g
. r1)
< (g
. r2) by
A117,
A125,
A126,
XREAL_1: 9;
end;
end;
end;
then
A128: (g
| y) is
increasing by
RFUNCT_2: 20;
A129: (
rng (f
" ))
= x by
A109,
A111,
FUNCT_1: 33;
then
A130: x
= ((f
" )
.: y) by
A113,
RELAT_1: 113;
now
let x9 be
object;
assume
A131: x9
in (g
.: y);
then not x9
=
0 by
A14,
A130,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A132: not x9
in
{
0 } by
TARSKI:def 1;
x9
in (
Seg n) by
A6,
A130,
A131;
hence x9
in (
NAT
\
{
0 }) by
A132,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
then
A133: (g
.: y)
c= (
NAT
\
{
0 });
take x;
(
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i})) is
one-to-one by
FINSEQ_3: 92,
XBOOLE_1: 36;
then
A134: ((
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i}))
" )
= ((
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i}))
~ ) by
FUNCT_1:def 5;
(
Sgm x)
= (
Sgm (g
.: y)) by
A113,
A129,
RELAT_1: 113
.= ((((
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i}))
" )
| y)
* (
Sgm y)) by
A1,
A113,
A128,
A133,
A134,
A110,
Lm37
.= (((
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i}))
" )
* (y
|` (
Sgm y))) by
Lm36
.= (((
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i}))
" )
* (
Sgm y)) by
A2;
hence (
Sgm x)
= (((
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i}))
" )
* (
Sgm y));
thus thesis by
A6;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:99
Th99: i
in (
dom s1) & (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) & (s1
. i)
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) & s19
= (
Del (s1,i)) & s2 is
jordan_holder & s1
is_finer_than s2 implies s19
is_finer_than s2
proof
assume that
A1: i
in (
dom s1) and
A2: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1);
A3: i
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A4: 1
<= i by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
set k = ((
len s1)
- 1);
assume
A5: (s1
. i)
= (s1
. (i
+ 1));
reconsider k as
Integer;
assume
A6: s19
= (
Del (s1,i));
assume
A7: s2 is
jordan_holder;
i
<= (
len s1) by
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then 1
<= (
len s1) by
A4,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (1
- 1)
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider k as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
A8: (
dom s1)
= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
assume s1
is_finer_than s2;
then
consider z be
set such that
A9: z
c= (
dom s1) and
A10: s2
= (s1
* (
Sgm z));
A11: (i
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
now
per cases ;
suppose
A12: not i
in z;
set y = z;
take y;
thus y
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A9,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
thus not i
in y by
A12;
thus s2
= (s1
* (
Sgm y)) by
A10;
end;
suppose
A13: i
in z;
now
let x be
object;
assume
A14: x
in (
{(i
+ 1)}
/\
{i});
then x
in
{i} by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A15: x
= i by
TARSKI:def 1;
x
in
{(i
+ 1)} by
A14,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then x
= (i
+ 1) by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence contradiction by
A15;
end;
then (
{(i
+ 1)}
/\
{i})
=
{} by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
then
A16:
{(i
+ 1)}
misses
{i} by
XBOOLE_0:def 7;
reconsider y = ((z
\/
{(i
+ 1)})
\
{i}) as
set;
take y;
{(i
+ 1)}
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A11,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
A17: (z
\/
{(i
+ 1)})
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A9,
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
hence
A18: y
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1));
then y
c= (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A19: (
rng (
Sgm y))
c= (
dom s1) by
A18,
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
reconsider y9 = y, z as
finite
set by
A9;
A20: (
dom (
Sgm y9))
= (
Seg (
card y9)) by
A17,
FINSEQ_3: 40,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
i
in (z
\/
{(i
+ 1)}) by
A13,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
{i}
c= (z
\/
{(i
+ 1)}) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then (
card ((z
\/
{(i
+ 1)})
\
{i}))
= ((
card (z
\/
{(i
+ 1)}))
- (
card
{i})) by
CARD_2: 44;
then
A21: (
card y9)
= ((
card (z
\/
{(i
+ 1)}))
- 1) by
CARD_1: 30;
A22:
now
A23: (
0
+ i)
< (1
+ i) by
XREAL_1: 6;
assume (i
+ 1)
in z;
then (i
+ 1)
in (
rng (
Sgm z)) by
A9,
A8,
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
then
consider x99 be
object such that
A24: x99
in (
dom (
Sgm z)) and
A25: (i
+ 1)
= ((
Sgm z)
. x99) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
i
in (
rng (
Sgm z)) by
A9,
A8,
A13,
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
then
consider x9 be
object such that
A26: x9
in (
dom (
Sgm z)) and
A27: i
= ((
Sgm z)
. x9) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider x9, x99 as
Element of
NAT by
A26,
A24;
A28: (
dom (
Sgm z))
= (
Seg (
len (
Sgm z))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A29: x9
<= (
len (
Sgm z)) by
A26,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
1
<= x99 by
A24,
A28,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then x9
< x99 by
A9,
A8,
A27,
A25,
A23,
A29,
FINSEQ_3: 41;
then
reconsider l = (x99
- x9) as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 5;
per cases ;
suppose l
=
0 ;
hence contradiction by
A27,
A25,
A23;
end;
suppose
A30:
0
< l;
set x999 = (x9
+ 1);
(
0
+ 1)
< (l
+ 1) by
A30,
XREAL_1: 6;
then ((x9
+ 1)
- x9)
<= (x99
- x9) by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A31: x999
<= x99 by
XREAL_1: 9;
x99
<= (
len (
Sgm z)) by
A24,
A28,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A32: x999
<= (
len (
Sgm z)) by
A31,
XXREAL_0: 2;
A33: (1
+ x9)
> (
0
+ x9) & 1
<= x9 by
A26,
A28,
FINSEQ_1: 1,
XREAL_1: 6;
then 1
<= x999 by
XXREAL_0: 2;
then x999
in (
dom (
Sgm z)) by
A28,
A32;
then
reconsider k3 = ((
Sgm z)
. x999) as
Element of
NAT by
FINSEQ_2: 11;
i
< k3 by
A9,
A8,
A27,
A33,
A32,
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
then
A34: (i
+ 1)
<= k3 by
NAT_1: 13;
A35: 1
<= x999 & x999
< x99 & x99
<= (
len (
Sgm z)) or x999
= x99 by
A24,
A28,
A31,
A33,
FINSEQ_1: 1,
XXREAL_0: 1,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A36: (x9
+ 1)
in (
dom s2) by
A2,
A9,
A10,
A8,
A24,
A25,
A34,
FINSEQ_1:def 13,
FUNCT_1: 11;
A37: s2 is
strictly_decreasing by
A7;
A38: x9
in (
dom s2) by
A1,
A10,
A26,
A27,
FUNCT_1: 11;
then
reconsider H1 = (s2
. x9), H2 = (s2
. (x9
+ 1)) as
Element of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
A36,
FINSEQ_2: 11;
reconsider H1, H2 as
StableSubgroup of G by
Def11;
reconsider H1 as
GroupWithOperators of O;
reconsider H2 as
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A38,
A36,
Def28;
(s2
. x9)
= (s1
. ((
Sgm z)
. x9)) by
A10,
A26,
FUNCT_1: 13
.= (s2
. (x9
+ 1)) by
A5,
A9,
A10,
A8,
A27,
A24,
A25,
A35,
A34,
FINSEQ_1:def 13,
FUNCT_1: 13;
then the
carrier of H1
= the
carrier of H2;
then (H1
./. H2) is
trivial by
Th77;
hence contradiction by
A38,
A36,
A37;
end;
end;
then (
card (z
\/
{(i
+ 1)}))
= ((
card z)
+ 1) by
CARD_2: 41;
then
A39: (
dom (
Sgm y9))
= (
dom (
Sgm z)) by
A9,
A8,
A21,
A20,
FINSEQ_3: 40;
set z2 = { x where x be
Element of
NAT : x
in z & (i
+ 1)
< x };
set z1 = { x where x be
Element of
NAT : x
in z & x
< i };
A40:
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in ((z1
\/
{i})
\/ z2);
then x
in (z1
\/
{i}) or x
in z2 by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then x
in z1 or x
in
{i} or x
in z2 by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
consider x9,x99 be
Element of
NAT such that
A41: x
= x9 & x9
in z & x9
< i or x
in
{i} or x
= x99 & x99
in z & (i
+ 1)
< x99;
per cases by
A41;
suppose x
= x9 & x9
in z & x9
< i;
hence x
in z;
end;
suppose x
in
{i};
hence x
in z by
A13,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
suppose x
= x99 & x99
in z & (i
+ 1)
< x99;
hence x
in z;
end;
end;
A42: z
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A9,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A43:
now
let x be
object;
assume
A44: x
in z;
then x
in (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A42;
then
reconsider x9 = x as
Element of
NAT ;
x9
<= i or (i
+ 1)
<= x9 by
NAT_1: 13;
then x9
< i or x9
= i or (i
+ 1)
< x9 by
A22,
A44,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then x
in z1 or x
in
{i} or x
in z2 by
A44,
TARSKI:def 1;
then x
in (z1
\/
{i}) or x
in z2 by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence x
in ((z1
\/
{i})
\/ z2) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
then
A45: z
= ((z1
\/
{i})
\/ z2) by
A40,
TARSKI: 2;
then z2
c= z by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then
A46: z2
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A42;
z1
c= z by
A45,
XBOOLE_1: 7,
XBOOLE_1: 11;
then
A47: z1
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A42;
now
let x be
object;
assume
A48: x
in (z2
/\
{i});
then x
in z2 by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider x9 be
Element of
NAT such that
A49: x9
= x and x9
in z and
A50: (i
+ 1)
< x9;
x
in
{i} by
A48,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then x9
= i by
A49,
TARSKI:def 1;
then ((i
+ 1)
- i)
< (i
- i) by
A50,
XREAL_1: 9;
then 1
<
0 ;
hence contradiction;
end;
then (z2
/\
{i})
=
{} by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
then
A51: z2
misses
{i} by
XBOOLE_0:def 7;
now
let x be
object;
assume
A52: x
in (z1
/\
{i});
then x
in z1 by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A53: ex x9 be
Element of
NAT st x9
= x & x9
in z & x9
< i;
x
in
{i} by
A52,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence contradiction by
A53,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
then (z1
/\
{i})
=
{} by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
then
A54: z1
misses
{i} by
XBOOLE_0:def 7;
A55: y
= ((((z1
\/
{i})
\/ z2)
\/
{(i
+ 1)})
\
{i}) by
A43,
A40,
TARSKI: 2
.= ((((z1
\/
{i})
\/ z2)
\
{i})
\/ (
{(i
+ 1)}
\
{i})) by
XBOOLE_1: 42
.= ((((z1
\/
{i})
\/ z2)
\
{i})
\/
{(i
+ 1)}) by
A16,
XBOOLE_1: 83
.= ((((z1
\/
{i})
\
{i})
\/ (z2
\
{i}))
\/
{(i
+ 1)}) by
XBOOLE_1: 42
.= ((((z1
\/
{i})
\
{i})
\/ z2)
\/
{(i
+ 1)}) by
A51,
XBOOLE_1: 83
.= ((((z1
\
{i})
\/ (
{i}
\
{i}))
\/ z2)
\/
{(i
+ 1)}) by
XBOOLE_1: 42
.= ((((z1
\
{i})
\/
{} )
\/ z2)
\/
{(i
+ 1)}) by
XBOOLE_1: 37
.= (((z1
\/
{} )
\/ z2)
\/
{(i
+ 1)}) by
A54,
XBOOLE_1: 83
.= ((z1
\/
{(i
+ 1)})
\/ z2) by
XBOOLE_1: 4;
then
{(i
+ 1)}
c= y by
XBOOLE_1: 7,
XBOOLE_1: 11;
then
A56:
{(i
+ 1)}
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A18;
z2
c= y by
A55,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then
A57: z2
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A18;
now
assume i
in y;
then not i
in
{i} by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence contradiction by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
hence not i
in y;
A58:
now
let m,n be
Nat;
assume m
in (z1
\/
{i});
then m
in z1 or m
in
{i} by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
A59: ex x9 be
Element of
NAT st (m
= x9 & x9
in z & x9
< i or m
in
{i});
assume n
in z2;
then
A60: ex x99 be
Element of
NAT st n
= x99 & x99
in z & (i
+ 1)
< x99;
(
0
+ i)
< (1
+ i) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then m
< (i
+ 1) by
A59,
TARSKI:def 1,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence m
< n by
A60,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
A61:
now
let m,n be
Nat;
assume m
in z1;
then
A62: ex x9 be
Element of
NAT st m
= x9 & x9
in z & x9
< i;
assume n
in
{i};
hence m
< n by
A62,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
A63:
now
let m,n be
Nat;
assume m
in (z1
\/
{(i
+ 1)});
then m
in z1 or m
in
{(i
+ 1)} by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
A64: ex x9 be
Element of
NAT st (m
= x9 & x9
in z & x9
< i or m
in
{(i
+ 1)});
assume n
in z2;
then
A65: ex x99 be
Element of
NAT st n
= x99 & x99
in z & (i
+ 1)
< x99;
(
0
+ i)
< (1
+ i) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then m
< (i
+ 1) or m
= (i
+ 1) by
A64,
TARSKI:def 1,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence m
< n by
A65,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
A66:
now
let m,n be
Nat;
A67: (
0
+ i)
< (1
+ i) by
XREAL_1: 6;
assume m
in z1;
then
A68: ex x9 be
Element of
NAT st m
= x9 & x9
in z & x9
< i;
assume n
in
{(i
+ 1)};
then n
= (i
+ 1) by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence m
< n by
A68,
A67,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
z1
c= y by
A55,
XBOOLE_1: 7,
XBOOLE_1: 11;
then z1
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A18;
then
A69: (
Sgm (z1
\/
{(i
+ 1)}))
= ((
Sgm z1)
^ (
Sgm
{(i
+ 1)})) by
A56,
A66,
FINSEQ_3: 42;
(z1
\/
{i})
c= z by
A45,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then (z1
\/
{i})
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A42;
then
A70: (
Sgm z)
= ((
Sgm (z1
\/
{i}))
^ (
Sgm z2)) by
A45,
A46,
A58,
FINSEQ_3: 42;
{i}
c= z by
A45,
XBOOLE_1: 7,
XBOOLE_1: 11;
then
{i}
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A42;
then
A71: (
Sgm (z1
\/
{i}))
= ((
Sgm z1)
^ (
Sgm
{i})) by
A47,
A61,
FINSEQ_3: 42;
then
A72: (
Sgm z)
= (((
Sgm z1)
^
<*i*>)
^ (
Sgm z2)) by
A4,
A70,
FINSEQ_3: 44;
(z1
\/
{(i
+ 1)})
c= y by
A55,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then (z1
\/
{(i
+ 1)})
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A18;
then
A73: (
Sgm y)
= ((
Sgm (z1
\/
{(i
+ 1)}))
^ (
Sgm z2)) by
A55,
A57,
A63,
FINSEQ_3: 42;
then
A74: (
Sgm y)
= (((
Sgm z1)
^
<*(i
+ 1)*>)
^ (
Sgm z2)) by
A69,
FINSEQ_3: 44;
A75:
now
let x;
A76: (
len ((
Sgm z1)
^
<*i*>))
= ((
len (
Sgm z1))
+ (
len
<*i*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= ((
len (
Sgm z1))
+ 1) by
FINSEQ_1: 40
.= ((
len (
Sgm z1))
+ (
len
<*(i
+ 1)*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 40
.= (
len ((
Sgm z1)
^
<*(i
+ 1)*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 22;
assume
A77: x
in (
dom (
Sgm z));
then
reconsider x9 = x as
Element of
NAT ;
A78: (
dom ((
Sgm z1)
^
<*i*>))
= (
Seg (
len ((
Sgm z1)
^
<*i*>))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
dom ((
Sgm z1)
^
<*(i
+ 1)*>)) by
A76,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
per cases by
A72,
A77,
FINSEQ_1: 25;
suppose
A79: x9
in (
dom ((
Sgm z1)
^
<*i*>));
per cases by
A79,
FINSEQ_1: 25;
suppose
A80: x9
in (
dom (
Sgm z1));
then
A81: ((
Sgm z1)
. x9)
= (((
Sgm z1)
^
<*i*>)
. x9) by
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= ((((
Sgm z1)
^
<*i*>)
^ (
Sgm z2))
. x9) by
A79,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= ((
Sgm z)
. x9) by
A4,
A70,
A71,
FINSEQ_3: 44;
((
Sgm z1)
. x9)
= (((
Sgm z1)
^
<*(i
+ 1)*>)
. x9) by
A80,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= ((((
Sgm z1)
^
<*(i
+ 1)*>)
^ (
Sgm z2))
. x9) by
A78,
A79,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= ((
Sgm y)
. x9) by
A73,
A69,
FINSEQ_3: 44;
hence ((
Sgm z)
. x)
<> i implies ((
Sgm y)
. x)
= ((
Sgm z)
. x) by
A81;
thus ((
Sgm z)
. x)
= i implies ((
Sgm y)
. x)
= (i
+ 1)
proof
assume ((
Sgm z)
. x)
= i;
then i
in (
rng (
Sgm z1)) by
A80,
A81,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then i
in z1 by
A47,
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
then ex x999 be
Element of
NAT st x999
= i & x999
in z & x999
< i;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
suppose ex x99 be
Nat st x99
in (
dom
<*i*>) & x9
= ((
len (
Sgm z1))
+ x99);
then
consider x99 be
Nat such that
A82: x99
in (
dom
<*i*>) and
A83: x9
= ((
len (
Sgm z1))
+ x99);
A84: x99
in (
Seg 1) by
A82,
FINSEQ_1: 38;
then
A85: x99
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
TARSKI:def 1;
then i
= (
<*i*>
. x99) by
FINSEQ_1: 40
.= (((
Sgm z1)
^
<*i*>)
. x9) by
A82,
A83,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= ((((
Sgm z1)
^
<*i*>)
^ (
Sgm z2))
. x9) by
A79,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= ((
Sgm z)
. x9) by
A4,
A70,
A71,
FINSEQ_3: 44;
hence ((
Sgm z)
. x)
<> i implies ((
Sgm y)
. x)
= ((
Sgm z)
. x);
thus ((
Sgm z)
. x)
= i implies ((
Sgm y)
. x)
= (i
+ 1)
proof
assume ((
Sgm z)
. x)
= i;
A86: x99
in (
dom
<*(i
+ 1)*>) by
A84,
FINSEQ_1: 38;
(i
+ 1)
= (
<*(i
+ 1)*>
. x99) by
A85,
FINSEQ_1: 40
.= (((
Sgm z1)
^
<*(i
+ 1)*>)
. x9) by
A83,
A86,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= ((((
Sgm z1)
^
<*(i
+ 1)*>)
^ (
Sgm z2))
. x9) by
A78,
A79,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
hence thesis by
A73,
A69,
FINSEQ_3: 44;
end;
end;
end;
suppose ex x99 be
Nat st x99
in (
dom (
Sgm z2)) & x9
= ((
len ((
Sgm z1)
^
<*i*>))
+ x99);
then
consider x99 be
Nat such that
A87: x99
in (
dom (
Sgm z2)) and
A88: x9
= ((
len ((
Sgm z1)
^
<*i*>))
+ x99);
((
Sgm y)
. x9)
= ((
Sgm z2)
. x99) by
A74,
A76,
A87,
A88,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
hence ((
Sgm z)
. x)
<> i implies ((
Sgm y)
. x)
= ((
Sgm z)
. x) by
A72,
A87,
A88,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
thus ((
Sgm z)
. x)
= i implies ((
Sgm y)
. x)
= (i
+ 1)
proof
assume ((
Sgm z)
. x)
= i;
then ((
Sgm z2)
. x99)
= i by
A72,
A87,
A88,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
then i
in (
rng (
Sgm z2)) by
A87,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then i
in z2 by
A57,
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
then ex x999 be
Element of
NAT st x999
= i & x999
in z & (i
+ 1)
< x999;
then ((i
+ 1)
- i)
< (i
- i) by
XREAL_1: 9;
then 1
<
0 ;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
end;
(
rng (
Sgm z))
c= (
dom s1) by
A9,
A8,
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
then
A89: (
dom (s1
* (
Sgm z)))
= (
dom (
Sgm z)) by
RELAT_1: 27;
then
A90: (
dom (s1
* (
Sgm y)))
= (
dom (s1
* (
Sgm z))) by
A39,
A19,
RELAT_1: 27;
now
let x be
object;
assume
A91: x
in (
dom (s1
* (
Sgm y)));
then
A92: x
in (
dom (
Sgm z)) by
A39,
A19,
RELAT_1: 27;
A93: x
in (
dom (s1
* (
Sgm z))) by
A39,
A19,
A89,
A91,
RELAT_1: 27;
per cases ;
suppose
A94: ((
Sgm z)
. x)
= i;
((s1
* (
Sgm y))
. x)
= (s1
. ((
Sgm y)
. x)) by
A91,
FUNCT_1: 12
.= (s1
. ((
Sgm z)
. x)) by
A5,
A75,
A92,
A94
.= ((s1
* (
Sgm z))
. x) by
A90,
A91,
FUNCT_1: 12;
hence ((s1
* (
Sgm y))
. x)
= ((s1
* (
Sgm z))
. x);
end;
suppose
A95: ((
Sgm z)
. x)
<> i;
((s1
* (
Sgm y))
. x)
= (s1
. ((
Sgm y)
. x)) by
A91,
FUNCT_1: 12
.= (s1
. ((
Sgm z)
. x)) by
A75,
A92,
A95
.= ((s1
* (
Sgm z))
. x) by
A93,
FUNCT_1: 12;
hence ((s1
* (
Sgm y))
. x)
= ((s1
* (
Sgm z))
. x);
end;
end;
hence s2
= (s1
* (
Sgm y)) by
A10,
A39,
A19,
A89,
FUNCT_1: 2,
RELAT_1: 27;
end;
end;
then
consider y be
set such that
A96: y
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) and
A97: not i
in y and
A98: s2
= (s1
* (
Sgm y));
now
consider x such that
A99: (
Sgm x)
= (((
Sgm ((
Seg (k
+ 1))
\
{i}))
" )
* (
Sgm y)) and
A100: x
c= (
Seg k) by
A3,
A96,
A97,
Lm38;
take x;
ex m be
Nat st (
len s1)
= (m
+ 1) & (
len (
Del (s1,i)))
= m by
A1,
FINSEQ_3: 104;
hence x
c= (
dom s19) by
A6,
A100,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
set f = (
Sgm ((
Seg (k
+ 1))
\
{i}));
set X = (
dom f);
set Y = (
rng f);
reconsider f as
Function of X, Y by
FUNCT_2: 1;
A101: f is
one-to-one by
FINSEQ_3: 92,
XBOOLE_1: 36;
((
Seg (k
+ 1))
\
{i})
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
XBOOLE_1: 36;
then
A102: (
rng f)
= ((
Seg (k
+ 1))
\
{i}) by
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
now
let x9 be
object;
assume
A103: x9
in y;
then not x9
in
{i} by
A97,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence x9
in (
rng f) by
A96,
A102,
A103,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
then y
c= (
rng f);
then
A104: (
rng (
Sgm y))
c= (
rng f) by
A96,
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
A105:
now
1
<= i by
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A106: (1
+ 1)
<= (i
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
(i
+ 1)
<= (
len s1) by
A11,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then 2
<= (
len s1) by
A106,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (
Seg 2)
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 5;
then
A107: ((
Seg 2)
\
{i})
c= (
rng f) by
A102,
XBOOLE_1: 33;
assume
A108: (
rng f)
=
{} ;
per cases by
A108,
A107,
XBOOLE_1: 3,
ZFMISC_1: 58;
suppose (
Seg 2)
=
{} ;
hence contradiction;
end;
suppose (
Seg 2)
=
{i};
hence contradiction by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
ZFMISC_1: 5;
end;
end;
(s19
* (
Sgm x))
= ((s1
* f)
* (
Sgm x)) by
A6,
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (((s1
* f)
* (f
" ))
* (
Sgm y)) by
A99,
RELAT_1: 36
.= ((s1
* (f
* (f
" )))
* (
Sgm y)) by
RELAT_1: 36
.= ((s1
* (
id (
rng f)))
* (
Sgm y)) by
A101,
A105,
FUNCT_2: 29
.= (s1
* ((
id (
rng f))
* (
Sgm y))) by
RELAT_1: 36
.= (s1
* (
Sgm y)) by
A104,
RELAT_1: 53;
hence s2
= (s19
* (
Sgm x)) by
A98;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:100
Th100: (
len s1)
> 1 & s2
<> s1 & s2 is
strictly_decreasing & s2
is_finer_than s1 implies ex i, j st i
in (
dom s1) & i
in (
dom s2) & (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) & (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s2) & j
in (
dom s2) & (i
+ 1)
< j & (s1
. i)
= (s2
. i) & (s1
. (i
+ 1))
<> (s2
. (i
+ 1)) & (s1
. (i
+ 1))
= (s2
. j)
proof
assume (
len s1)
> 1;
then (
len s1)
>= (1
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
then (
Seg 2)
c= (
Seg (
len s1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 5;
then
A1: (
Seg 2)
c= (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
assume
A2: s2
<> s1;
assume
A3: s2 is
strictly_decreasing;
assume
A4: s2
is_finer_than s1;
then
consider n such that
A5: (
len s2)
= ((
len s1)
+ n) by
Th95;
n
<>
0 by
A2,
A4,
A5,
Th96;
then
A6: (
0
+ (
len s1))
< (n
+ (
len s1)) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
Seg (
len s1))
c= (
Seg (
len s2)) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1: 5;
then (
Seg (
len s1))
c= (
dom s2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A7: (
dom s1)
c= (
dom s2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
now
set fX = { k where k be
Element of
NAT : k
in (
dom s1) & (s1
. k)
= (s2
. k) };
A8: 1
in (
Seg 2);
(s1
. 1)
= (
(Omega). G) & (s2
. 1)
= (
(Omega). G) by
Def28;
then
A9: 1
in fX by
A1,
A8;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in fX;
then ex k be
Element of
NAT st x
= k & k
in (
dom s1) & (s1
. k)
= (s2
. k);
hence x
in (
dom s1);
end;
then fX
c= (
dom s1);
then
reconsider fX as
finite non
empty
real-membered
set by
A9;
set i = (
max fX);
i
in fX by
XXREAL_2:def 8;
then
A10: ex k be
Element of
NAT st i
= k & k
in (
dom s1) & (s1
. k)
= (s2
. k);
then
reconsider i as
Element of
NAT ;
take i;
thus i
in (
dom s1) & (s1
. i)
= (s2
. i) by
A10;
A11:
now
assume not (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1);
then
A12: not (i
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
per cases by
A12;
suppose 1
> (i
+ 1);
then (1
- 1)
> ((i
+ 1)
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
then
0
> i;
hence contradiction;
end;
suppose
A13: (i
+ 1)
> (
len s1);
i
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A10,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A14: i
<= (
len s1) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
i
>= (
len s1) by
A13,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A15: i
= (
len s1) by
A14,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then (
0
+ 1)
<= (i
+ 1) & (i
+ 1)
<= (
len s2) by
A5,
A6,
NAT_1: 13;
then (i
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s2));
then
A16: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider H1 = (s2
. i), H2 = (s2
. (i
+ 1)) as
Element of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
A10,
FINSEQ_2: 11;
reconsider H1, H2 as
StableSubgroup of G by
Def11;
A17: (s2
. i)
= (
(1). G) by
A10,
A15,
Def28;
then
A18: the
carrier of H1
=
{(
1_ G)} by
Def8;
reconsider H2 as
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A7,
A10,
A16,
Def28;
(
1_ G)
in H2 by
Lm17;
then (
1_ G)
in the
carrier of H2 by
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then
A19:
{(
1_ G)}
c= the
carrier of H2 by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
H2 is
Subgroup of (
(1). G) by
A17,
Def7;
then the
carrier of H2
c= the
carrier of (
(1). G) by
GROUP_2:def 5;
then the
carrier of H2
c=
{(
1_ G)} by
Def8;
then the
carrier of H2
=
{(
1_ G)} by
A19,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then (H1
./. H2) is
trivial by
A18,
Th77;
hence contradiction by
A3,
A7,
A10,
A16;
end;
end;
hence (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1);
now
A20: (1
+ i)
> (
0
+ i) by
XREAL_1: 6;
assume (s1
. (i
+ 1))
= (s2
. (i
+ 1));
then
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A21: k
> i and
A22: k
in (
dom s1) & (s1
. k)
= (s2
. k) by
A11,
A20;
k
in fX by
A22;
hence contradiction by
A21,
XXREAL_2:def 8;
end;
hence (s1
. (i
+ 1))
<> (s2
. (i
+ 1));
end;
then
consider i such that
A23: i
in (
dom s1) and
A24: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) and
A25: (s1
. i)
= (s2
. i) and
A26: (s1
. (i
+ 1))
<> (s2
. (i
+ 1));
now
consider x such that
A27: x
c= (
dom s2) and
A28: s1
= (s2
* (
Sgm x)) by
A4;
set j = ((
Sgm x)
. (i
+ 1));
A29: x
c= (
Seg (
len s2)) by
A27,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A30: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom (
Sgm x)) by
A24,
A28,
FUNCT_1: 11;
then j
in (
rng (
Sgm x)) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then j
in x by
A29,
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
then
A31: j
in (
Seg (
len s2)) by
A29;
then
reconsider j as
Element of
NAT ;
A32: (i
+ 1)
<= j by
A29,
A30,
FINSEQ_3: 152;
take j;
thus j
in (
dom s2) by
A31,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
thus (s1
. (i
+ 1))
= (s2
. j) by
A24,
A28,
FUNCT_1: 12;
j
<> (i
+ 1) by
A24,
A26,
A28,
FUNCT_1: 12;
hence (i
+ 1)
< j by
A32,
XXREAL_0: 1;
end;
then
consider j such that
A33: j
in (
dom s2) & (i
+ 1)
< j and
A34: (s1
. (i
+ 1))
= (s2
. j);
take i, j;
thus i
in (
dom s1) & i
in (
dom s2) by
A7,
A23;
thus (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) & (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s2) by
A7,
A24;
thus j
in (
dom s2) & (i
+ 1)
< j by
A33;
thus (s1
. i)
= (s2
. i) & (s1
. (i
+ 1))
<> (s2
. (i
+ 1)) by
A25,
A26;
thus thesis by
A34;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:101
Th101: i
in (
dom s1) & j
in (
dom s1) & i
<= j & H1
= (s1
. i) & H2
= (s1
. j) implies H2 is
StableSubgroup of H1
proof
assume that
A1: i
in (
dom s1) and
A2: j
in (
dom s1);
defpred
P[
Nat] means for n, H2 st (i
+ $1)
in (
dom s1) & H2
= (s1
. (i
+ $1)) holds H2 is
StableSubgroup of H1;
assume
A3: i
<= j;
assume that
A4: H1
= (s1
. i) and
A5: H2
= (s1
. j);
A6: for n st
P[n] holds
P[(n
+ 1)]
proof
let n;
assume
A7:
P[n];
set H2 = (s1
. (i
+ n));
per cases ;
suppose
A8: (i
+ n)
in (
dom s1);
then
reconsider H2 as
Element of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
FINSEQ_2: 11;
reconsider H2 as
StableSubgroup of G by
Def11;
A9: H2 is
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A7,
A8;
now
let k be
Element of
NAT ;
let H3;
assume (i
+ (n
+ 1))
in (
dom s1);
then
A10: ((i
+ n)
+ 1)
in (
dom s1);
assume H3
= (s1
. (i
+ (n
+ 1)));
then H3 is
StableSubgroup of H2 by
A8,
A10,
Def28;
hence H3 is
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A9,
Th11;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose not (i
+ n)
in (
dom s1);
then
A11: not (i
+ n)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
per cases by
A11;
suppose (i
+ n)
< (
0
+ 1);
then n
=
0 by
NAT_1: 13;
hence thesis by
A1,
A4,
Def28;
end;
suppose
A12: (i
+ n)
> (
len s1);
A13: (1
+ (
len s1))
> (
0
+ (
len s1)) by
XREAL_1: 6;
((i
+ n)
+ 1)
> ((
len s1)
+ 1) by
A12,
XREAL_1: 6;
then ((i
+ n)
+ 1)
> (
len s1) by
A13,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then not ((i
+ n)
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
hence thesis by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
end;
end;
end;
A14:
P[
0 ] by
A4,
Th10;
A15: for n holds
P[n] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A14,
A6);
set n = (j
- i);
(i
- i)
<= (j
- i) by
A3,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider n as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
reconsider n as
Nat;
j
= (i
+ n);
hence thesis by
A2,
A5,
A15;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:102
Th102: y
in (
rng (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) implies y is
strict
GroupWithOperators of O
proof
assume
A1: y
in (
rng (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1));
set f1 = (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1);
A2: (
len f1)
=
0 or (
len f1)
>= (
0
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
per cases by
A2;
suppose (
len f1)
=
0 ;
then f1
=
{} ;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
suppose (
len f1)
>= 1;
then
A3: (
len s1)
> 1 by
Def33,
CARD_1: 27;
then
A4: (
len s1)
= ((
len f1)
+ 1) by
Def33;
consider i be
object such that
A5: i
in (
dom f1) and
A6: (f1
. i)
= y by
A1,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider i as
Nat by
A5;
A7: i
in (
Seg (
len f1)) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A8: 1
<= i by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
1
<= i by
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (1
+ 1)
<= (i
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A9: 1
<= (i
+ 1) by
XXREAL_0: 2;
A10: i
<= (
len f1) by
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (
0
+ i)
<= (1
+ i) & (i
+ 1)
<= ((
len f1)
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then i
<= (
len s1) by
A4,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then i
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A8;
then
A11: i
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (s1
. i)
in (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
FINSEQ_2: 11;
then
reconsider H1 = (s1
. i) as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
Def11;
(i
+ 1)
<= ((
len f1)
+ 1) by
A10,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (i
+ 1)
<= (
len s1) by
A3,
Def33;
then (i
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A9;
then
A12: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (s1
. (i
+ 1))
in (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
FINSEQ_2: 11;
then
reconsider N1 = (s1
. (i
+ 1)) as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
Def11;
reconsider N1 as
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A11,
A12,
Def28;
y
= (H1
./. N1) by
A3,
A5,
A6,
Def33;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:103
Th103: i
in (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) & (for H st H
= ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)
. i) holds H is
trivial) implies i
in (
dom s1) & (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) & (s1
. i)
= (s1
. (i
+ 1))
proof
assume
A1: i
in (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1));
set f1 = (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1);
assume
A2: for H st H
= ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)
. i) holds H is
trivial;
A3: (
len f1)
=
0 or (
len f1)
>= (
0
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
per cases by
A3,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose (
len f1)
=
0 ;
then f1
=
{} ;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
suppose
A4: (
len f1)
= 1;
(f1
. i)
in (
rng f1) by
A1,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider H = (f1
. i) as
strict
GroupWithOperators of O by
Th102;
set H1 = (
(Omega). G);
A5: H is
trivial by
A2;
A6: (
len s1)
> 1 by
A4,
Def33,
CARD_1: 27;
then
A7: (
len s1)
= ((
len f1)
+ 1) by
Def33;
then
A8: (s1
. 2)
= (
(1). G) by
A4,
Def28;
i
in (
Seg 1) by
A1,
A4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A9: i
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
TARSKI:def 1;
then i
in (
Seg 2);
hence i
in (
dom s1) by
A4,
A7,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
reconsider N1 = (
(1). G) as
StableSubgroup of H1 by
Th16;
A10: (s1
. 1)
= (
(Omega). G) by
Def28;
A11: (
(1). G)
= (
(1). H1) by
Th15;
then
reconsider N1 as
normal
StableSubgroup of H1;
A12: (H1,(H1
./. N1))
are_isomorphic by
A11,
Th56;
(i
+ 1)
in (
Seg 2) by
A9;
hence (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) by
A4,
A7,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
for H1, N1 st H1
= (s1
. i) & N1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) holds (f1
. i)
= (H1
./. N1) by
A1,
A6,
Def33;
then (H1
./. N1) is
trivial by
A10,
A8,
A9,
A5;
hence thesis by
A10,
A8,
A9,
A11,
A12,
Th42,
Th58;
end;
suppose
A13: (
len f1)
> 1;
(f1
. i)
in (
rng f1) by
A1,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider H = (f1
. i) as
strict
GroupWithOperators of O by
Th102;
A14: i
in (
Seg (
len f1)) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A15: 1
<= i by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
1
<= i by
A14,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (1
+ 1)
<= (i
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A16: 1
<= (i
+ 1) by
XXREAL_0: 2;
A17: i
<= (
len f1) by
A14,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A18: (
0
+ i)
<= (1
+ i) & (i
+ 1)
<= ((
len f1)
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
A19: (
len s1)
> 1 by
A13,
Def33,
CARD_1: 27;
then (
len s1)
= ((
len f1)
+ 1) by
Def33;
then i
<= (
len s1) by
A18,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A20: i
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A15;
hence i
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(i
+ 1)
<= ((
len f1)
+ 1) by
A17,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (i
+ 1)
<= (
len s1) by
A19,
Def33;
then
A21: (i
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A16;
hence (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A22: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) by
A21,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (s1
. (i
+ 1))
in (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
FINSEQ_2: 11;
then
reconsider N1 = (s1
. (i
+ 1)) as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
Def11;
A23: i
in (
dom s1) by
A20,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (s1
. i)
in (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
FINSEQ_2: 11;
then
reconsider H1 = (s1
. i) as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
Def11;
reconsider N1 as
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A23,
A22,
Def28;
H is
trivial by
A2;
then (H1
./. N1) is
trivial by
A1,
A19,
Def33;
hence thesis by
Th76;
end;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:104
Th104: i
in (
dom s1) & (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) & (s1
. i)
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) & s2
= (
Del (s1,i)) implies (
the_series_of_quotients_of s2)
= (
Del ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1),i))
proof
set f1 = (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1);
assume
A1: i
in (
dom s1);
then
consider k be
Nat such that
A2: (
len s1)
= (k
+ 1) and
A3: (
len (
Del (s1,i)))
= k by
FINSEQ_3: 104;
assume (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1);
then (i
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A4: (i
+ 1)
<= (
len s1) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
assume
A5: (s1
. i)
= (s1
. (i
+ 1));
A6: i
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then 1
<= i by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A7: (1
+ 1)
<= (i
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then 2
<= (
len s1) by
A4,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A8: 1
< (
len s1) by
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A9: (
len s1)
= ((
len f1)
+ 1) by
Def33;
assume
A10: s2
= (
Del (s1,i));
then (1
+ 1)
<= ((
len s2)
+ 1) by
A7,
A4,
A2,
A3,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A11: 1
<= (
len s2) by
XREAL_1: 6;
per cases by
A11,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A12: (
len s2)
= 1;
then 1
in (
Seg (
len f1)) by
A10,
A2,
A3,
A9;
then 1
in (
dom f1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A13: ex k1 be
Nat st (
len f1)
= (k1
+ 1) & (
len (
Del (f1,1)))
= k1 by
FINSEQ_3: 104;
A14: 1
<= i by
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A15: (
the_series_of_quotients_of s2)
=
{} by
A12,
Def33;
i
<= 1 by
A10,
A4,
A2,
A3,
A12,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
len (
Del (f1,i)))
=
0 by
A10,
A2,
A3,
A9,
A12,
A13,
A14,
XXREAL_0: 1;
hence thesis by
A15;
end;
suppose
A16: (
len s2)
> 1;
((i
+ 1)
- 1)
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= i by
A6,
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 1,
XREAL_1: 9;
then i
in (
Seg (
len f1)) by
A9;
then
A17: i
in (
dom f1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
consider k1 be
Nat such that
A18: (
len f1)
= (k1
+ 1) and
A19: (
len (
Del (f1,i)))
= k1 by
FINSEQ_3: 104;
now
let n;
set n1 = (n
+ 1);
assume n
in (
dom (
Del (f1,i)));
then
A20: n
in (
Seg (
len (
Del (f1,i)))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A21: n
<= k1 by
A19,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A22: n1
<= k by
A2,
A9,
A18,
XREAL_1: 6;
1
<= n by
A20,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (1
+ 1)
<= (n
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then 1
<= n1 by
XXREAL_0: 2;
then n1
in (
Seg (
len f1)) by
A2,
A9,
A22;
then
A23: n1
in (
dom f1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
reconsider n1 as
Nat;
let H1, N1;
assume
A24: H1
= (s2
. n);
(
0
+ n)
< (1
+ n) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A25: n
<= k by
A22,
XXREAL_0: 2;
(((
len f1)
- (
len (
Del (f1,i))))
+ (
len (
Del (f1,i))))
> (
0
+ (
len (
Del (f1,i)))) by
A18,
A19,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
Seg (
len (
Del (f1,i))))
c= (
Seg (
len f1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 5;
then n
in (
Seg (
len f1)) by
A20;
then
A26: n
in (
dom f1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
assume
A27: N1
= (s2
. (n
+ 1));
per cases ;
suppose
A28: n
< i;
then
A29: n1
<= i by
NAT_1: 13;
per cases by
A29,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A30: n1
< i;
reconsider n9 = n as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
A31: (s1
. (n9
+ 1))
= N1 by
A10,
A27,
A30,
FINSEQ_3: 110;
(s1
. n9)
= H1 by
A10,
A24,
A28,
FINSEQ_3: 110;
then (f1
. n)
= (H1
./. N1) by
A8,
A26,
A31,
Def33;
hence ((
Del (f1,i))
. n)
= (H1
./. N1) by
A28,
FINSEQ_3: 110;
end;
suppose n1
= i;
then (s1
. n)
= H1 & (s1
. (n
+ 1))
= N1 by
A1,
A5,
A10,
A2,
A24,
A27,
A22,
A28,
FINSEQ_3: 110,
FINSEQ_3: 111;
then (f1
. n)
= (H1
./. N1) by
A8,
A26,
Def33;
hence ((
Del (f1,i))
. n)
= (H1
./. N1) by
A28,
FINSEQ_3: 110;
end;
end;
suppose
A32: n
>= i;
reconsider n19 = n1 as
Element of
NAT ;
(
0
+ i)
< (1
+ i) & (n
+ 1)
>= (i
+ 1) by
A32,
XREAL_1: 6;
then n1
>= i by
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A33: (s1
. (n19
+ 1))
= N1 by
A1,
A10,
A2,
A27,
A22,
FINSEQ_3: 111;
(s1
. n19)
= H1 by
A1,
A10,
A2,
A24,
A25,
A32,
FINSEQ_3: 111;
then (f1
. n1)
= (H1
./. N1) by
A8,
A23,
A33,
Def33;
hence ((
Del (f1,i))
. n)
= (H1
./. N1) by
A17,
A18,
A21,
A32,
FINSEQ_3: 111;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A10,
A2,
A3,
A9,
A16,
A18,
A19,
Def33;
end;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:105
f1
= (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1) & i
in (
dom f1) & (for H st H
= (f1
. i) holds H is
trivial) implies (
Del (s1,i)) is
CompositionSeries of G & for s2 st s2
= (
Del (s1,i)) holds (
the_series_of_quotients_of s2)
= (
Del (f1,i))
proof
assume
A1: f1
= (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1);
assume
A2: i
in (
dom f1);
assume
A3: for H st H
= (f1
. i) holds H is
trivial;
then
A4: (s1
. i)
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) by
A1,
A2,
Th103;
A5: i
in (
dom s1) & (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
Th103;
hence (
Del (s1,i)) is
CompositionSeries of G by
A4,
Th94,
FINSEQ_3: 105;
let s2;
assume s2
= (
Del (s1,i));
hence thesis by
A1,
A5,
A4,
Th104;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:106
Th106: i
in (
dom f1) & (ex p be
Permutation of (
dom f1) st (f1,f2)
are_equivalent_under (p,O) & j
= ((p
" )
. i)) implies ex p9 be
Permutation of (
dom (
Del (f1,i))) st ((
Del (f1,i)),(
Del (f2,j)))
are_equivalent_under (p9,O)
proof
A1: (
len f1)
=
0 or (
len f1)
>= (
0
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
assume
A2: i
in (
dom f1);
given p be
Permutation of (
dom f1) such that
A3: (f1,f2)
are_equivalent_under (p,O) and
A4: j
= ((p
" )
. i);
A5: (
len f1)
= (
len f2) by
A3;
(
rng (p
" ))
c= (
dom f1);
then
A6: (
rng (p
" ))
c= (
Seg (
len f1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
((p
" )
. i)
in (
rng (p
" )) by
A2,
FUNCT_2: 4;
then ((p
" )
. i)
in (
Seg (
len f1)) by
A6;
then
A7: j
in (
dom f2) by
A4,
A5,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A8: ex k2 be
Nat st (
len f2)
= (k2
+ 1) & (
len (
Del (f2,j)))
= k2 by
FINSEQ_3: 104;
consider k1 be
Nat such that
A9: (
len f1)
= (k1
+ 1) and
A10: (
len (
Del (f1,i)))
= k1 by
A2,
FINSEQ_3: 104;
per cases by
A1,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A11: (
len f1)
=
0 ;
set p9 = the
Permutation of (
dom (
Del (f1,i)));
take p9;
thus thesis by
A9,
A11;
end;
suppose
A12: (
len f1)
= 1;
reconsider p9 =
{} as
Function of (
dom
{} ), (
rng
{} ) by
FUNCT_2: 1;
reconsider p9 as
Function of
{} ,
{} ;
A13: p9 is
onto;
(
Del (f1,i))
=
{} by
A9,
A10,
A12;
then
reconsider p9 as
Permutation of (
dom (
Del (f1,i))) by
A13;
take p9;
thus thesis by
A5,
A9,
A10,
A8;
end;
suppose
A14: (
len f1)
> 1;
set Y = ((
dom f2)
\
{j});
A15:
now
assume Y
=
{} ;
then
A16: (
dom f2)
c=
{j} by
XBOOLE_1: 37;
{j}
c= (
dom f2) by
A7,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
A17: (
dom f2)
=
{j} by
A16,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
consider k be
Nat such that
A18: (
dom f2)
= (
Seg k) by
FINSEQ_1:def 2;
k
in
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
then k
= (
len f2) by
A18,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then k
>= (1
+ 1) by
A5,
A14,
NAT_1: 13;
then (
Seg 2)
c= (
Seg k) by
FINSEQ_1: 5;
then
{1, 2}
=
{j} by
A17,
A18,
FINSEQ_1: 2,
ZFMISC_1: 21;
hence contradiction by
ZFMISC_1: 5;
end;
set X = ((
dom f1)
\
{i});
set p9 = ((((
Sgm X)
" )
* p)
* (
Sgm Y));
Y
c= (
dom f2) by
XBOOLE_1: 36;
then
A19: Y
c= (
Seg (
len f2)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
X
c= (
dom f1) by
XBOOLE_1: 36;
then
A20: X
c= (
Seg (
len f1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A21: (
rng (
Sgm X))
= X by
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
Y
c= (
dom f2) by
XBOOLE_1: 36;
then Y
c= (
Seg (
len f2)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A22: (
Sgm Y) is
one-to-one & (
rng (
Sgm Y))
= Y by
FINSEQ_1:def 13,
FINSEQ_3: 92;
A23: (
dom f1)
= (
Seg (
len f1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
dom f2) by
A3,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A24: (p
. j)
= ((p
* (p
" ))
. i) by
A2,
A4,
FUNCT_2: 15
.= ((
id (
dom f1))
. i) by
FUNCT_2: 61
.= i by
A2,
FUNCT_1: 18;
A25: p9 is
Permutation of (
dom (
Del (f1,i))) & (p9
" )
= ((((
Sgm Y)
" )
* (p
" ))
* (
Sgm X))
proof
set R6 = p;
set R5 = (p
" );
set R4 = (
Sgm X);
set R3 = ((
Sgm X)
" );
set R2 = (
Sgm Y);
set R1 = ((
Sgm Y)
" );
set p99 = ((((
Sgm Y)
" )
* (p
" ))
* (
Sgm X));
A26:
{i}
c= (
dom f1) by
A2,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
A27: (X
\/
{i})
= ((
dom f1)
\/
{i}) by
XBOOLE_1: 39
.= (
dom f1) by
A26,
XBOOLE_1: 12;
(
card (X
\/
{i}))
= ((
card X)
+ (
card
{i})) by
CARD_2: 40,
XBOOLE_1: 79;
then
A28: ((
card X)
+ 1)
= (
card (X
\/
{i})) by
CARD_1: 30
.= (
card (
Seg (
len f1))) by
A27,
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (k1
+ 1) by
A9,
FINSEQ_1: 57;
A29:
{j}
c= (
dom f2) by
A7,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
A30: (Y
\/
{j})
= ((
dom f2)
\/
{j}) by
XBOOLE_1: 39
.= (
dom f2) by
A29,
XBOOLE_1: 12;
A31: (
Sgm X) is
one-to-one by
A20,
FINSEQ_3: 92;
then
A32: (
dom ((
Sgm X)
" ))
= X by
A21,
FUNCT_1: 33;
then (
dom ((
Sgm X)
" ))
c= (
dom f1) by
XBOOLE_1: 36;
then
A33: (
dom ((
Sgm X)
" ))
c= (
rng p) by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
A34:
now
let x be
object;
assume
A35: x
in Y;
(
dom f1)
= (
dom p) by
A2,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A36: x
in (
dom p) by
A23,
A35,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
not x
in
{j} by
A35,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then x
<> j by
TARSKI:def 1;
then (p
. x)
<> i by
A7,
A23,
A24,
A36,
FUNCT_2: 56;
then
A37: not (p
. x)
in
{i} by
TARSKI:def 1;
(
dom f1)
= (
rng p) by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
then (p
. x)
in (
dom f1) by
A36,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then (p
. x)
in X by
A37,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence x
in (
dom (((
Sgm X)
" )
* p)) by
A32,
A36,
FUNCT_1: 11;
end;
now
let x be
object;
assume
A38: x
in (
dom (((
Sgm X)
" )
* p));
then (p
. x)
in (
dom ((
Sgm X)
" )) by
FUNCT_1: 11;
then (p
. x)
in X by
A21,
A31,
FUNCT_1: 33;
then not (p
. x)
in
{i} by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then (p
. x)
<> i by
TARSKI:def 1;
then
A39: not x
in
{j} by
A24,
TARSKI:def 1;
x
in (
dom p) by
A38,
FUNCT_1: 11;
hence x
in Y by
A23,
A39,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
then (
dom (((
Sgm X)
" )
* p))
= Y by
A34,
TARSKI: 2;
then
A40: (
dom (((
Sgm X)
" )
* p))
= (
rng (
Sgm Y)) by
A19,
FINSEQ_1:def 13;
then (
rng ((((
Sgm X)
" )
* p)
* (
Sgm Y)))
= (
rng (((
Sgm X)
" )
* p)) by
RELAT_1: 28
.= (
rng ((
Sgm X)
" )) by
A33,
RELAT_1: 28
.= (
dom (
Sgm X)) by
A31,
FUNCT_1: 33;
then
A41: (
rng p9)
= (
Seg k1) by
A20,
A28,
FINSEQ_3: 40;
(
card (Y
\/
{j}))
= ((
card Y)
+ (
card
{j})) by
CARD_2: 40,
XBOOLE_1: 79;
then ((
card Y)
+ 1)
= (
card (Y
\/
{j})) by
CARD_1: 30
.= (
card (
Seg (
len f2))) by
A30,
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (k1
+ 1) by
A3,
A9,
FINSEQ_1: 57;
then (
dom (
Sgm Y))
= (
Seg k1) by
A19,
FINSEQ_3: 40;
then
A42: (
dom p9)
= (
Seg k1) by
A40,
RELAT_1: 27;
A43: (
dom (
Del (f1,i)))
= (
Seg k1) by
A10,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider p9 as
Function of (
dom (
Del (f1,i))), (
dom (
Del (f1,i))) by
A41,
A42,
FUNCT_2: 1;
A44: p9 is
onto by
A43,
A41;
(
Sgm Y) is
one-to-one by
A19,
FINSEQ_3: 92;
then
reconsider p9 as
Permutation of (
dom (
Del (f1,i))) by
A31,
A44;
set R7 = p9;
reconsider R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7, p9, p99 as
Function;
A45: R3
= (R4
~ ) by
A31,
FUNCT_1:def 5;
A46: (
Sgm Y) is
one-to-one & R5
= (R6
~ ) by
A19,
FINSEQ_3: 92,
FUNCT_1:def 5;
reconsider R1, R2, R3, R4, R5, R6, R7 as
Relation;
(p9
" )
= (R7
~ ) by
FUNCT_1:def 5
.= (((R6
* R3)
~ )
* (R2
~ )) by
RELAT_1: 35
.= (((R3
~ )
* (R6
~ ))
* (R2
~ )) by
RELAT_1: 35
.= ((((R4
~ )
~ )
* R5)
* R1) by
A45,
A46,
FUNCT_1:def 5
.= p99 by
RELAT_1: 36;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider p9 as
Permutation of (
dom (
Del (f1,i)));
take p9;
A47: (
Sgm Y) is
Function of (
dom (
Sgm Y)), (
rng (
Sgm Y)) by
FUNCT_2: 1;
now
let H1,H2 be
GroupWithOperators of O, l be
Nat, n;
assume
A48: l
in (
dom (
Del (f1,i)));
set n1 = ((
Sgm Y)
. n);
reconsider n1 as
Nat;
A49: ((
Sgm Y)
* (p9
" ))
= ((
Sgm Y)
* (((
Sgm Y)
" )
* ((p
" )
* (
Sgm X)))) by
A25,
RELAT_1: 36
.= (((
Sgm Y)
* ((
Sgm Y)
" ))
* ((p
" )
* (
Sgm X))) by
RELAT_1: 36
.= ((
id Y)
* ((p
" )
* (
Sgm X))) by
A22,
A15,
A47,
FUNCT_2: 29
.= (((
id Y)
* (p
" ))
* (
Sgm X)) by
RELAT_1: 36
.= ((Y
|` (p
" ))
* (
Sgm X)) by
RELAT_1: 92;
assume
A50: n
= ((p9
" )
. l);
A51: l
in (
dom (p9
" )) by
A48,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then n
in (
rng (p9
" )) by
A50,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then n
in (
dom (
Del (f1,i)));
then n
in (
Seg (
len (
Del (f2,j)))) by
A5,
A9,
A10,
A8,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A52: n
in (
dom (
Del (f2,j))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
set l1 = ((
Sgm X)
. l);
A53: (
dom (
Del (f1,i)))
c= (
dom (
Sgm X)) by
RELAT_1: 25;
then l1
in (
rng (
Sgm X)) by
A48,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
A54: l1
in (
dom f1) by
A21,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
assume that
A55: H1
= ((
Del (f1,i))
. l) and
A56: H2
= ((
Del (f2,j))
. n);
reconsider l1 as
Nat;
A57: H1
= (f1
. l1) by
A48,
A55,
A53,
FUNCT_1: 13;
A58: (
dom f1)
= (
rng p) by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
then
A59: l1
in (
dom (p
" )) by
A54,
FUNCT_1: 33;
A60:
now
assume ((p
" )
. l1)
in
{j};
then
A61: ((p
" )
. l1)
= ((p
" )
. i) by
A4,
TARSKI:def 1;
i
in (
dom (p
" )) by
A2,
A58,
FUNCT_1: 33;
then l1
= i by
A59,
A61,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
then i
in (
rng (
Sgm X)) by
A48,
A53,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then not i
in
{i} by
A21,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence contradiction by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
((p
" )
. l1)
in (
rng (p
" )) by
A59,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
A62: ((p
" )
. l1)
in Y by
A23,
A60,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
(
dom (
Del (f2,j)))
c= (
dom (
Sgm Y)) by
RELAT_1: 25;
then
A63: H2
= (f2
. n1) by
A56,
A52,
FUNCT_1: 13;
n1
= (((
Sgm Y)
* (p9
" ))
. l) by
A50,
A51,
FUNCT_1: 13
.= ((Y
|` (p
" ))
. l1) by
A48,
A53,
A49,
FUNCT_1: 13
.= ((p
" )
. l1) by
A54,
A62,
FUNCT_2: 34;
hence (H1,H2)
are_isomorphic by
A3,
A54,
A57,
A63;
end;
hence thesis by
A5,
A9,
A10,
A8;
end;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:107
for G1,G2 be
GroupWithOperators of O, s1 be
CompositionSeries of G1, s2 be
CompositionSeries of G2 st s1 is
empty & s2 is
empty holds s1
is_equivalent_with s2;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:108
Th108: for G1,G2 be
GroupWithOperators of O, s1 be
CompositionSeries of G1, s2 be
CompositionSeries of G2 st not s1 is
empty & not s2 is
empty holds s1
is_equivalent_with s2 iff ex p be
Permutation of (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) st ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1),(
the_series_of_quotients_of s2))
are_equivalent_under (p,O)
proof
let G1,G2 be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let s1 be
CompositionSeries of G1, s2 be
CompositionSeries of G2;
assume that
A1: not s1 is
empty and
A2: not s2 is
empty;
set f2 = (
the_series_of_quotients_of s2);
set f1 = (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1);
hereby
assume
A3: s1
is_equivalent_with s2;
then
A4: (
len s1)
= (
len s2);
per cases ;
suppose
A5: (
len s1)
<= 1;
reconsider fs1 = f1, fs2 = f2 as
FinSequence;
set p = the
Permutation of (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1));
reconsider pf = p as
Permutation of (
dom fs1);
fs1
=
{} by
A5,
Def33;
then
A6: for H1,H2 be
GroupWithOperators of O, i, j st i
in (
dom fs1) & j
= ((pf
" )
. i) & H1
= (fs1
. i) & H2
= (fs2
. j) holds (H1,H2)
are_isomorphic ;
take p;
fs2
=
{} by
A4,
A5,
Def33;
then (
len f1)
= (
len f2) by
A5,
Def33;
hence ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1),(
the_series_of_quotients_of s2))
are_equivalent_under (p,O) by
A6;
end;
suppose
A7: (
len s1)
> 1;
set n = ((
len s1)
- 1);
((
len s1)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) by
A7,
XREAL_1: 9;
then n
in
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
then
reconsider n as
Nat;
(n
+ 1)
= (
len s1);
then
consider p be
Permutation of (
Seg n) such that
A8: for H1 be
StableSubgroup of G1, H2 be
StableSubgroup of G2, N1 be
normal
StableSubgroup of H1, N2 be
normal
StableSubgroup of H2, i, j st 1
<= i & i
<= n & j
= (p
. i) & H1
= (s1
. i) & H2
= (s2
. j) & N1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) & N2
= (s2
. (j
+ 1)) holds ((H1
./. N1),(H2
./. N2))
are_isomorphic by
A3;
A9: (
len s1)
= ((
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1))
+ 1) by
A7,
Def33;
then (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1))
= (
Seg n) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider p9 = (p
" ) as
Permutation of (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1));
reconsider fs1 = f1, fs2 = f2 as
FinSequence;
A10: (
len s2)
= ((
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s2))
+ 1) by
A4,
A7,
Def33;
reconsider pf = p9 as
Permutation of (
dom fs1);
take p9;
A11: (pf
" )
= p by
FUNCT_1: 43;
now
let H19,H29 be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let i, j;
set H1 = (s1
. i);
set H2 = (s2
. j);
set N1 = (s1
. (i
+ 1));
set N2 = (s2
. (j
+ 1));
assume
A12: i
in (
dom fs1);
then
A13: i
in (
Seg (
len fs1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A14: 1
<= i by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A15: i
<= (
len fs1) by
A13,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A16: (i
+ 1)
<= ((
len fs1)
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
(
0
+ i)
< (1
+ i) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then 1
<= (i
+ 1) by
A14,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (i
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A9,
A16;
then
A17: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
assume
A18: j
= ((pf
" )
. i);
(
0
+ (
len fs1))
< (1
+ (
len fs1)) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then i
<= (
len s1) by
A9,
A15,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then i
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A14;
then
A19: i
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider H1, N1 as
Element of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G1) by
A17,
FINSEQ_2: 11;
reconsider H1, N1 as
StableSubgroup of G1 by
Def11;
reconsider N1 as
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A19,
A17,
Def28;
assume that
A20: H19
= (fs1
. i) and
A21: H29
= (fs2
. j);
i
in (
dom p) by
A9,
A13,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A22: j
in (
rng p) by
A11,
A18,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
A23: 1
<= j by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A24: j
<= (
len fs2) by
A4,
A10,
A22,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A25: (j
+ 1)
<= ((
len fs2)
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
(
0
+ j)
< (1
+ j) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then 1
<= (j
+ 1) by
A23,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (j
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s2)) by
A10,
A25;
then
A26: (j
+ 1)
in (
dom s2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(
0
+ (
len fs2))
< (1
+ (
len fs2)) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then j
<= (
len s2) by
A10,
A24,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then j
in (
Seg (
len s2)) by
A23;
then
A27: j
in (
dom s2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider H2, N2 as
Element of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G2) by
A26,
FINSEQ_2: 11;
reconsider H2, N2 as
StableSubgroup of G2 by
Def11;
reconsider N2 as
normal
StableSubgroup of H2 by
A27,
A26,
Def28;
(
dom fs1)
= (
Seg n) by
A9,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then 1
<= i & i
<= n by
A12,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A28: ((H1
./. N1),(H2
./. N2))
are_isomorphic by
A8,
A11,
A18;
j
in (
Seg (
len f2)) by
A4,
A10,
A22;
then j
in (
dom fs2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (H2
./. N2)
= H29 by
A4,
A7,
A21,
Def33;
hence (H19,H29)
are_isomorphic by
A7,
A12,
A20,
A28,
Def33;
end;
hence ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1),(
the_series_of_quotients_of s2))
are_equivalent_under (p9,O) by
A4,
A9,
A10;
end;
end;
given p be
Permutation of (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) such that
A29: ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1),(
the_series_of_quotients_of s2))
are_equivalent_under (p,O);
A30: (
len f1)
= (
len f2) by
A29;
per cases ;
suppose
A31: (
len s1)
<= 1;
A32: (
len s1)
>= (
0
+ 1) by
A1,
NAT_1: 13;
A33:
now
let n;
set p = the
Permutation of (
Seg n);
assume (n
+ 1)
= (
len s1);
then (n
+ 1)
= 1 by
A31,
A32,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A34: n
=
0 ;
take p;
let H1 be
StableSubgroup of G1;
let H2 be
StableSubgroup of G2;
let N1 be
normal
StableSubgroup of H1;
let N2 be
normal
StableSubgroup of H2;
let i, j;
assume that
A35: 1
<= i & i
<= n and j
= (p
. i);
assume that H1
= (s1
. i) and H2
= (s2
. j);
assume that N1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) and N2
= (s2
. (j
+ 1));
thus ((H1
./. N1),(H2
./. N2))
are_isomorphic by
A34,
A35;
end;
A36: f1
=
{} by
A31,
Def33;
now
assume
A37: (
len s2)
<> 1;
(
len s2)
>= (
0
+ 1) by
A2,
NAT_1: 13;
then (
len s2)
> 1 by
A37,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then ((
len f2)
+ 1)
> (
0
+ 1) by
Def33;
hence contradiction by
A30,
A36;
end;
then (
len s1)
= (
len s2) by
A31,
A32,
XXREAL_0: 1;
hence thesis by
A33;
end;
suppose
A38: (
len s1)
> 1;
then
A39: (
len s1)
= ((
len f1)
+ 1) by
Def33;
A40:
now
assume (
len s2)
<= 1;
then f2
=
{} by
Def33;
then (
len f2)
=
0 ;
hence contradiction by
A30,
A38,
A39;
end;
A41:
now
let n;
assume
A42: (n
+ 1)
= (
len s1);
then
A43: (
dom f1)
= (
Seg n) by
A39,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider p9 = (p
" ) as
Permutation of (
Seg n);
take p9;
let H1 be
StableSubgroup of G1;
let H2 be
StableSubgroup of G2;
let N1 be
normal
StableSubgroup of H1;
let N2 be
normal
StableSubgroup of H2;
let i, j;
assume 1
<= i & i
<= n;
then
A44: i
in (
dom f1) by
A43;
assume
A45: j
= (p9
. i);
assume that
A46: H1
= (s1
. i) and
A47: H2
= (s2
. j);
assume that
A48: N1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) and
A49: N2
= (s2
. (j
+ 1));
i
in (
dom p9) by
A44,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then j
in (
rng p9) by
A45,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then j
in (
Seg n);
then j
in (
dom f2) by
A30,
A39,
A42,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A50: (f2
. j)
= (H2
./. N2) by
A40,
A47,
A49,
Def33;
(f1
. i)
= (H1
./. N1) by
A38,
A44,
A46,
A48,
Def33;
hence ((H1
./. N1),(H2
./. N2))
are_isomorphic by
A29,
A44,
A45,
A50;
end;
(
len s1)
= (
len s2) by
A30,
A39,
A40,
Def33;
hence thesis by
A41;
end;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:109
Th109: s1
is_finer_than s2 & s2 is
jordan_holder & (
len s1)
> (
len s2) implies ex i st i
in (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) & for H st H
= ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)
. i) holds H is
trivial
proof
assume
A1: s1
is_finer_than s2;
assume
A2: s2 is
jordan_holder;
assume
A3: (
len s1)
> (
len s2);
then not s1 is
strictly_decreasing by
A1,
A2;
then not for i st i
in (
dom s1) & (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) holds for H1, N1 st H1
= (s1
. i) & N1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) holds not (H1
./. N1) is
trivial;
then
consider i, H1, N1 such that
A4: i
in (
dom s1) and
A5: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) and
A6: H1
= (s1
. i) & N1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) & (H1
./. N1) is
trivial;
(i
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A7: (i
+ 1)
<= (
len s1) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
(
0
+ 1)
<= (i
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A8: 1
<= (
len s1) by
A7,
XXREAL_0: 2;
per cases ;
suppose (
len s1)
<= 1;
then
A9: (
len s1)
= 1 by
A8,
XXREAL_0: 1;
now
let i;
assume i
in (
dom s1);
then i
in (
Seg 1) by
A9,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A10: i
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
TARSKI:def 1;
assume
A11: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1);
let H1, N1;
assume H1
= (s1
. i);
assume N1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1));
assume (H1
./. N1) is
trivial;
2
in (
Seg 1) by
A9,
A10,
A11,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
hence contradiction by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
then s1 is
strictly_decreasing;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A3;
end;
suppose
A12: (
len s1)
> 1;
take i;
A13: ((i
+ 1)
- 1)
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) by
A7,
XREAL_1: 9;
i
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A14: 1
<= i by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
(
len s1)
= ((
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1))
+ 1) by
A12,
Def33;
then i
in (
Seg (
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1))) by
A14,
A13;
hence
A15: i
in (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
let H;
assume H
= ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)
. i);
hence thesis by
A6,
A12,
A15,
Def33;
end;
end;
Lm39: for k,m be
Element of
NAT holds k
< m iff k
<= (m
- 1)
proof
let k,m be
Element of
NAT ;
A1:
now
assume k
<= (m
- 1);
then
A2: (k
+ 1)
<= m by
XREAL_1: 19;
k
< (k
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 29;
hence k
< m by
A2,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
now
assume k
< m;
then (k
+ 1)
<= m by
INT_1: 7;
hence k
<= (m
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 19;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
Lm40: for a be
Element of
NAT , fs be
FinSequence holds a
in (
dom fs) implies ex fs1,fs2 be
FinSequence st fs
= ((fs1
^
<*(fs
. a)*>)
^ fs2) & (
len fs1)
= (a
- 1) & (
len fs2)
= ((
len fs)
- a)
proof
let a be
Element of
NAT ;
let fs be
FinSequence;
assume
A1: a
in (
dom fs);
then a
>= 1 & a
<= (
len fs) by
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then
reconsider b = ((
len fs)
- a), d = (a
- 1) as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 5;
(
len fs)
= (a
+ b);
then
consider fs3,fs2 be
FinSequence such that
A2: (
len fs3)
= a and
A3: (
len fs2)
= b and
A4: fs
= (fs3
^ fs2) by
FINSEQ_2: 22;
a
= (d
+ 1);
then
consider fs1 be
FinSequence, v be
object such that
A5: fs3
= (fs1
^
<*v*>) by
A2,
FINSEQ_2: 18;
A6: ((
len fs1)
+ 1)
= (d
+ 1) by
A2,
A5,
FINSEQ_2: 16;
fs3
<>
{} by
A1,
A2,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then a
in (
dom fs3) by
A2,
FINSEQ_5: 6;
then (fs3
. a)
= (fs
. a) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
then (fs
. a)
= v by
A5,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 42;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4,
A5,
A6;
end;
Lm41: for a be
Element of
NAT , fs,fs1,fs2 be
FinSequence, v be
set holds a
in (
dom fs) & fs
= ((fs1
^
<*v*>)
^ fs2) & (
len fs1)
= (a
- 1) implies (
Del (fs,a))
= (fs1
^ fs2)
proof
let a be
Element of
NAT ;
let fs,fs1,fs2 be
FinSequence;
let v be
set;
assume that
A1: a
in (
dom fs) and
A2: fs
= ((fs1
^
<*v*>)
^ fs2) and
A3: (
len fs1)
= (a
- 1);
A4: ((
len (
Del (fs,a)))
+ 1)
= (
len fs) by
A1,
WSIERP_1:def 1;
(
len fs)
= ((
len (fs1
^
<*v*>))
+ (
len fs2)) by
A2,
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= (((
len fs1)
+ 1)
+ (
len fs2)) by
FINSEQ_2: 16
.= (a
+ (
len fs2)) by
A3;
then (
len (
Del (fs,a)))
= ((
len fs2)
+ (
len fs1)) by
A3,
A4;
then
A5: (
len (fs1
^ fs2))
= (
len (
Del (fs,a))) by
FINSEQ_1: 22;
A6: (
len
<*v*>)
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
A7: fs
= (fs1
^ (
<*v*>
^ fs2)) by
A2,
FINSEQ_1: 32;
then (
len fs)
= ((a
- 1)
+ (
len (
<*v*>
^ fs2))) by
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then
A8: (
len (
<*v*>
^ fs2))
= ((
len fs)
- (a
- 1));
now
let e be
Nat;
assume that
A9: 1
<= e and
A10: e
<= (
len (
Del (fs,a)));
reconsider e1 = e as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
now
per cases ;
suppose
A11: e
< a;
then e1
<= (a
- 1) by
Lm39;
then
A12: e
in (
dom fs1) by
A3,
A9,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
hence ((fs1
^ fs2)
. e)
= (fs1
. e) by
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= (fs
. e1) by
A7,
A12,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= ((
Del (fs,a))
. e) by
A1,
A11,
WSIERP_1:def 1;
end;
suppose
A13: e
>= a;
then
A14: e1
> (a
- 1) by
Lm39;
then
A15: (e
+ 1)
> a by
XREAL_1: 19;
then ((e
+ 1)
- a)
>
0 by
XREAL_1: 50;
then
A16: (((e
+ 1)
- a)
+ 1)
> (
0
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
A17: (e
+ 1)
> (a
- 1) by
A15,
XREAL_1: 146,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then ((e
+ 1)
- (a
- 1))
>
0 by
XREAL_1: 50;
then
reconsider f = ((e
+ 1)
- (a
- 1)) as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
A18: (e
+ 1)
<= (
len fs) by
A4,
A10,
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A19: ((e
+ 1)
- (a
- 1))
<= (
len (
<*v*>
^ fs2)) by
A8,
XREAL_1: 9;
thus ((fs1
^ fs2)
. e)
= (fs2
. (e
- (
len fs1))) by
A3,
A5,
A10,
A14,
FINSEQ_1: 24
.= (fs2
. (f
- 1)) by
A3
.= ((
<*v*>
^ fs2)
. f) by
A6,
A16,
A19,
FINSEQ_1: 24
.= ((fs1
^ (
<*v*>
^ fs2))
. (e1
+ 1)) by
A3,
A7,
A17,
A18,
FINSEQ_1: 24
.= ((
Del (fs,a))
. e) by
A1,
A7,
A13,
WSIERP_1:def 1;
end;
end;
hence ((fs1
^ fs2)
. e)
= ((
Del (fs,a))
. e);
end;
hence thesis by
A5;
end;
Lm42: for a be
Element of
NAT , fs1,fs2 be
FinSequence holds (a
<= (
len fs1) implies (
Del ((fs1
^ fs2),a))
= ((
Del (fs1,a))
^ fs2)) & (a
>= 1 implies (
Del ((fs1
^ fs2),((
len fs1)
+ a)))
= (fs1
^ (
Del (fs2,a))))
proof
let a be
Element of
NAT ;
let fs1,fs2 be
FinSequence;
set f = (fs1
^ fs2);
A1: (
len f)
= ((
len fs1)
+ (
len fs2)) by
FINSEQ_1: 22;
A2:
now
set f2 = (fs1
^ (
Del (fs2,a)));
set f1 = (
Del (f,((
len fs1)
+ a)));
assume
A3: a
>= 1;
now
per cases ;
suppose
A4: a
> (
len fs2);
then
A5: not a
in (
dom fs2) by
FINSEQ_3: 25;
((
len fs1)
+ a)
> (
len f) by
A1,
A4,
XREAL_1: 6;
then not ((
len fs1)
+ a)
in (
dom f) by
FINSEQ_3: 25;
hence f1
= (fs1
^ fs2) by
WSIERP_1:def 1
.= f2 by
A5,
WSIERP_1:def 1;
end;
suppose
A6: a
<= (
len fs2);
then
A7: a
in (
dom fs2) by
A3,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
(a
- 1)
>=
0 by
A3,
XREAL_1: 48;
then
A8: ((a
- 1)
+ (
len fs1))
>= (
0
+ (
len fs1)) by
XREAL_1: 6;
A9: ((
len fs1)
+ a)
>= 1 by
A3,
NAT_1: 12;
((
len fs1)
+ a)
<= (
len f) by
A1,
A6,
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A10: ((
len fs1)
+ a)
in (
dom f) by
A9,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then
consider g1,g2 be
FinSequence such that
A11: f
= ((g1
^
<*(f
. ((
len fs1)
+ a))*>)
^ g2) and
A12: (
len g1)
= (((
len fs1)
+ a)
- 1) and (
len g2)
= ((
len f)
- ((
len fs1)
+ a)) by
Lm40;
A13: f1
= (g1
^ g2) by
A10,
A11,
A12,
Lm41;
f
= (g1
^ (
<*(f
. ((
len fs1)
+ a))*>
^ g2)) by
A11,
FINSEQ_1: 32;
then
consider t be
FinSequence such that
A14: (fs1
^ t)
= g1 by
A12,
A8,
FINSEQ_1: 47;
(fs1
^ ((t
^
<*(f
. ((
len fs1)
+ a))*>)
^ g2))
= ((fs1
^ (t
^
<*(f
. ((
len fs1)
+ a))*>))
^ g2) by
FINSEQ_1: 32
.= f by
A11,
A14,
FINSEQ_1: 32;
then
A15: fs2
= ((t
^
<*(f
. ((
len fs1)
+ a))*>)
^ g2) by
FINSEQ_1: 33;
((
len fs1)
+ (a
- 1))
= ((
len fs1)
+ (
len t)) by
A12,
A14,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then (
Del (fs2,a))
= (t
^ g2) by
A7,
A15,
Lm41;
hence f1
= f2 by
A13,
A14,
FINSEQ_1: 32;
end;
end;
hence f1
= f2;
end;
now
set f3 =
<*(f
. a)*>;
set f2 = ((
Del (fs1,a))
^ fs2);
set f1 = (
Del (f,a));
assume
A16: a
<= (
len fs1);
(
len fs1)
<= (
len f) by
A1,
NAT_1: 11;
then
A17: a
<= (
len f) by
A16,
XXREAL_0: 2;
now
per cases ;
suppose
A18: a
< 1;
then
A19: not a
in (
dom fs1) by
FINSEQ_3: 25;
not a
in (
dom f) by
A18,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
hence f1
= f by
WSIERP_1:def 1
.= f2 by
A19,
WSIERP_1:def 1;
end;
suppose
A20: a
>= 1;
then
A21: a
in (
dom f) by
A17,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then
consider g1,g2 be
FinSequence such that
A22: f
= ((g1
^ f3)
^ g2) and
A23: (
len g1)
= (a
- 1) and (
len g2)
= ((
len f)
- a) by
Lm40;
(
len (g1
^ f3))
= ((a
- 1)
+ 1) by
A23,
FINSEQ_2: 16
.= a;
then
consider t be
FinSequence such that
A24: fs1
= ((g1
^ f3)
^ t) by
A16,
A22,
FINSEQ_1: 47;
((g1
^ f3)
^ g2)
= ((g1
^ f3)
^ (t
^ fs2)) by
A22,
A24,
FINSEQ_1: 32;
then
A25: g2
= (t
^ fs2) by
FINSEQ_1: 33;
a
in (
dom fs1) by
A16,
A20,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then
A26: (
Del (fs1,a))
= (g1
^ t) by
A23,
A24,
Lm41;
thus f1
= (g1
^ g2) by
A21,
A22,
A23,
Lm41
.= f2 by
A26,
A25,
FINSEQ_1: 32;
end;
end;
hence f1
= f2;
end;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
Lm43: for D be non
empty
set, f be
FinSequence of D, p be
Element of D, n be
Nat st n
in (
dom f) holds f
= (
Del ((
Ins (f,n,p)),(n
+ 1)))
proof
let D be non
empty
set;
let f be
FinSequence of D;
let p be
Element of D;
let n be
Nat;
set fs1 = ((f
| n)
^
<*p*>);
set fs2 = (f
/^ n);
assume n
in (
dom f);
then n
in (
Seg (
len f)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then n
<= (
len f) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A1: (
len (f
| n))
= n by
FINSEQ_1: 59;
(
len fs1)
= ((
len (f
| n))
+ (
len
<*p*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= (n
+ 1) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 39;
then (
Del ((
Ins (f,n,p)),(n
+ 1)))
= ((
Del (fs1,(n
+ 1)))
^ fs2) by
Lm42
.= ((f
| n)
^ fs2) by
A1,
WSIERP_1: 40;
hence thesis by
RFINSEQ: 8;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:110
Th110: (
len s1)
> 1 implies (s1 is
jordan_holder iff for i st i
in (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) holds ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)
. i) is
strict
simple
GroupWithOperators of O)
proof
assume
A1: (
len s1)
> 1;
A2:
now
assume
A3: s1 is
jordan_holder;
assume not for i st i
in (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) holds ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)
. i) is
strict
simple
GroupWithOperators of O;
then
consider i such that
A4: i
in (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) and
A5: not ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)
. i) is
strict
simple
GroupWithOperators of O;
A6: i
in (
Seg (
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1))) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A7: i
<= (
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
(
len s1)
= ((
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1))
+ 1) by
A1,
Def33;
then
A8: (i
+ 1)
<= (
len s1) by
A7,
XREAL_1: 6;
(
0
+ 1)
<= (i
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then (i
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A8;
then
A10: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(
0
+ (
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)))
< (1
+ (
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1))) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A11: (
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1))
< (
len s1) by
A1,
Def33;
then
A12: i
<= (
len s1) by
A7,
XXREAL_0: 2;
1
<= i by
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then i
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A12;
then
A13: i
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider H1 = (s1
. i), N1 = (s1
. (i
+ 1)) as
Element of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
A10,
FINSEQ_2: 11;
reconsider H1, N1 as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
Def11;
reconsider N1 as
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A13,
A10,
Def28;
A14: not (H1
./. N1) is
strict
simple
GroupWithOperators of O by
A1,
A4,
A5,
Def33;
per cases by
A14,
Def13;
suppose
A15: (H1
./. N1) is
trivial;
s1 is
strictly_decreasing by
A3;
hence contradiction by
A13,
A10,
A15;
end;
suppose ex H be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of (H1
./. N1) st H
<> (
(Omega). (H1
./. N1)) & H
<> (
(1). (H1
./. N1));
then
consider H be
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of (H1
./. N1) such that
A16: H
<> (
(Omega). (H1
./. N1)) and
A17: H
<> (
(1). (H1
./. N1));
N1
= (
Ker (
nat_hom N1)) by
Th48;
then
consider N2 be
strict
StableSubgroup of H1 such that
A18: the
carrier of N2
= ((
nat_hom N1)
" the
carrier of H) and
A19: H is
normal implies N1 is
normal
StableSubgroup of N2 & N2 is
normal by
Th78;
A20: N2 is
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
Th11;
reconsider i as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
A21: 1
<= i & s1 is non
empty by
A1,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
reconsider N2 as
Element of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
A20,
Def11;
set s2 = (
Ins (s1,i,N2));
A22: (
len s2)
= ((
len s1)
+ 1) by
FINSEQ_5: 69;
then
A23: s1
<> s2;
A24:
now
let j be
Nat;
assume j
in (
dom s2);
then
A26: j
in (
Seg (
len s2)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A27: 1
<= j by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A28: j
<= (
len s2) by
A26,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
j
< i or j
= i or j
> i by
XXREAL_0: 1;
then (j
+ 1)
<= i or j
= i or j
>= (i
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A29: ((j
+ 1)
- 1)
<= (i
- 1) or j
= i or j
>= (i
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
assume (j
+ 1)
in (
dom s2);
then
A31: (j
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s2)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A32: 1
<= (j
+ 1) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A33: (j
+ 1)
<= (
len s2) by
A31,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
let H19, H29;
assume
A34: H19
= (s2
. j);
assume
A35: H29
= (s2
. (j
+ 1));
per cases by
A29,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A36: j
<= (i
- 1);
A37: (
Seg (
len (s1
| i)))
= (
Seg i) by
A11,
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 59,
XXREAL_0: 2;
A38: (
dom (s1
| i))
c= (
dom s1) by
RELAT_1: 60;
((
- 1)
+ i)
< (
0
+ i) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then j
<= i by
A36,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then j
in (
Seg (
len (s1
| i))) by
A27,
A37;
then
A39: j
in (
dom (s1
| i)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(j
+ 1)
<= ((i
- 1)
+ 1) by
A36,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (j
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len (s1
| i))) by
A32,
A37;
then
A40: (j
+ 1)
in (
dom (s1
| i)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A41: (s2
. (j
+ 1))
= (s1
. (j
+ 1)) by
A40,
FINSEQ_5: 72;
(s2
. j)
= (s1
. j) by
A39,
FINSEQ_5: 72;
hence H29 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H19 by
A34,
A35,
A38,
A39,
A40,
A41,
Def28;
end;
suppose
A42: j
= i;
then
A43: j
in (
Seg i) by
A27;
(
Seg (
len (s1
| i)))
= (
Seg i) by
A11,
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 59,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A44: j
in (
dom (s1
| i)) by
A43,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A46: (s2
. j)
= (s1
. j) by
A44,
FINSEQ_5: 72;
(s2
. (j
+ 1))
= N2 by
A11,
A7,
A42,
FINSEQ_5: 73,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence H29 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H19 by
A19,
A34,
A35,
A42,
A46;
end;
suppose
A47: j
= (i
+ 1);
then
A48: H19
= N2 by
A34,
A11,
A7,
FINSEQ_5: 73,
XXREAL_0: 2;
H29
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) by
A35,
A47,
A8,
FINSEQ_5: 74;
hence H29 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H19 by
A19,
A48;
end;
suppose
A50: (i
+ 1)
< j;
set j9 = (j
- 1);
(
0
+ 1)
<= (i
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A51: (
0
+ 1)
< j by
A50,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A52: ((
0
+ 1)
- 1)
< (j
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider j9 as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
A53: (j
- 1)
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) by
A28,
XREAL_1: 9;
(
0
+ 1)
<= j9 by
A52,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A54: j9
in (
dom s1) by
A22,
A53,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
((i
+ 1)
+ 1)
<= j by
A50,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A55: (((i
+ 1)
+ 1)
- 1)
<= (j
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
(
0
+ j9)
< (1
+ j9) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A56: (i
+ 1)
<= (j9
+ 1) by
A55,
XXREAL_0: 2;
A57: ((j
+ 1)
- 1)
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) by
A33,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
A58: (j9
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) by
A22,
A51,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
A59: (s2
. (j
+ 1))
= (s1
. (j9
+ 1)) by
A22,
A56,
A57,
FINSEQ_5: 74;
(s2
. j)
= (s2
. (j9
+ 1))
.= (s1
. j9) by
A22,
A55,
A53,
FINSEQ_5: 74;
hence H29 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H19 by
A34,
A35,
A54,
A58,
A59,
Def28;
end;
end;
A63: (s2
. (
len s2))
= (s2
. ((
len s1)
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_5: 69
.= (s1
. (
len s1)) by
A8,
FINSEQ_5: 74
.= (
(1). G) by
Def28;
(s2
. 1)
= (s1
. 1) by
A21,
FINSEQ_5: 75
.= (
(Omega). G) by
Def28;
then
reconsider s2 as
CompositionSeries of G by
A63,
A24,
Def28;
now
let j be
Nat;
assume j
in (
dom s2);
then
A65: j
in (
Seg (
len s2)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A66: 1
<= j by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
j
< i or j
= i or j
> i by
XXREAL_0: 1;
then (j
+ 1)
<= i or j
= i or j
>= (i
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A67: ((j
+ 1)
- 1)
<= (i
- 1) or j
= i or j
>= (i
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
assume (j
+ 1)
in (
dom s2);
then
A69: (j
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s2)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A70: 1
<= (j
+ 1) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A71: (j
+ 1)
<= (
len s2) by
A69,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
let H19, N19;
assume
A72: H19
= (s2
. j);
A73: j
<= (
len s2) by
A65,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A74: s1 is
strictly_decreasing by
A3;
assume
A75: N19
= (s2
. (j
+ 1));
per cases by
A67,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A76: j
<= (i
- 1);
(
Seg (
len (s1
| i)))
= (
Seg i) by
A11,
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 59,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
S: (
dom (s1
| i))
= (
Seg i) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A78: (
dom (s1
| i))
c= (
dom s1) by
RELAT_1: 60;
((
- 1)
+ i)
< (
0
+ i) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then j
<= i by
A76,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A79: j
in (
dom (s1
| i)) by
A66,
S;
(j
+ 1)
<= ((i
- 1)
+ 1) by
A76,
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A80: (j
+ 1)
in (
dom (s1
| i)) by
A70,
S;
then
A81: (s2
. (j
+ 1))
= (s1
. (j
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_5: 72;
(s2
. j)
= (s1
. j) by
A79,
FINSEQ_5: 72;
hence not (H19
./. N19) is
trivial by
A72,
A75,
A74,
A78,
A79,
A80,
A81;
end;
suppose
A82: j
= i;
then
A83: j
in (
Seg i) by
A66;
(
Seg (
len (s1
| i)))
= (
Seg i) by
A11,
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 59,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A84: j
in (
dom (s1
| i)) by
A83,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A85: (s2
. (j
+ 1))
= N2 by
A82,
A11,
A7,
FINSEQ_5: 73,
XXREAL_0: 2;
reconsider N2 as
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A19;
A87: (s2
. j)
= (s1
. j) by
A84,
FINSEQ_5: 72;
now
assume (H19
./. N19) is
trivial;
then H1
= N2 by
A72,
A75,
A82,
A85,
A87,
Th76;
hence contradiction by
A16,
A18,
Th80;
end;
hence not (H19
./. N19) is
trivial;
end;
suppose
A88: j
= (i
+ 1);
then
A89: H19
= N2 by
A72,
A11,
A7,
FINSEQ_5: 73,
XXREAL_0: 2;
A91: N19
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) by
A8,
FINSEQ_5: 74,
A75,
A88;
now
assume (H19
./. N19) is
trivial;
then the
carrier of N1
= ((
nat_hom N1)
" the
carrier of H) by
A18,
A89,
A91,
Th76;
hence contradiction by
A17,
Th81;
end;
hence not (H19
./. N19) is
trivial;
end;
suppose
A92: (i
+ 1)
< j;
set j9 = (j
- 1);
A93: (
0
+ 1)
<= (i
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
0
+ 1)
< j by
A92,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A94: ((
0
+ 1)
- 1)
< (j
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider j9 as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
A95: ((j
+ 1)
- 1)
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) by
A71,
XREAL_1: 9;
((i
+ 1)
+ 1)
<= j by
A92,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A96: (((i
+ 1)
+ 1)
- 1)
<= (j
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
1
<= (j9
+ 1) by
A92,
A93,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A97: (j9
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) by
A22,
A95,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
(
0
+ j9)
< (1
+ j9) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A98: (i
+ 1)
<= (j9
+ 1) by
A96,
XXREAL_0: 2;
A99: (s2
. (j
+ 1))
= (s1
. (j9
+ 1)) by
A22,
A98,
A95,
FINSEQ_5: 74;
A100: (j
- 1)
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) by
A73,
XREAL_1: 9;
(
0
+ 1)
<= j9 by
A94,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A101: j9
in (
dom s1) by
A22,
A100,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
(s2
. j)
= (s2
. (j9
+ 1))
.= (s1
. j9) by
A22,
A96,
A100,
FINSEQ_5: 74;
hence not (H19
./. N19) is
trivial by
A72,
A75,
A74,
A101,
A97,
A99;
end;
end;
then
A102: s2 is
strictly_decreasing;
((
dom s2)
\
{(i
+ 1)})
c= (
dom s2) & s1
= (
Del (s2,(i
+ 1))) by
A13,
Lm43,
XBOOLE_1: 36;
then s2
is_finer_than s1;
hence contradiction by
A3,
A23,
A102;
end;
end;
now
assume
A103: for i st i
in (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) holds ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)
. i) is
strict
simple
GroupWithOperators of O;
assume
A104: not s1 is
jordan_holder;
per cases by
A104;
suppose not s1 is
strictly_decreasing;
then not for i st i
in (
dom s1) & (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) holds for H1, N1 st H1
= (s1
. i) & N1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) holds not (H1
./. N1) is
trivial;
then
consider i, H1, N1 such that
A105: i
in (
dom s1) and
A106: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) and
A107: H1
= (s1
. i) & N1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) and
A108: (H1
./. N1) is
trivial;
A109: (i
+ 1)
<= (
len s1) by
FINSEQ_3: 25,
A106;
A110: 1
<= i by
A105,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then (1
+ 1)
<= (i
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then (1
+ 1)
<= (
len s1) by
A109,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A111: (
len s1)
> 1 by
NAT_1: 13;
then ((
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1))
+ 1)
= (
len s1) by
Def33;
then (
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1))
= ((
len s1)
- 1);
then ((i
+ 1)
- 1)
<= (
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) by
A109,
XREAL_1: 9;
then i
in (
Seg (
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1))) by
A110;
then
A112: i
in (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)
. i)
= (H1
./. N1) by
A107,
A111,
Def33;
then (H1
./. N1) is
strict
simple
GroupWithOperators of O by
A103,
A112;
hence contradiction by
A108,
Def13;
end;
suppose ex s2 st s2
<> s1 & s2 is
strictly_decreasing & s2
is_finer_than s1;
then
consider s2 such that
A113: s2
<> s1 and
A114: s2 is
strictly_decreasing and
A115: s2
is_finer_than s1;
consider i, j such that
A116: i
in (
dom s1) and
A117: i
in (
dom s2) and
A118: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) and
A119: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s2) and
A120: j
in (
dom s2) & (i
+ 1)
< j and
A121: (s1
. i)
= (s2
. i) and
A122: (s1
. (i
+ 1))
<> (s2
. (i
+ 1)) and
A123: (s1
. (i
+ 1))
= (s2
. j) by
A1,
A113,
A114,
A115,
Th100;
reconsider H1 = (s1
. i), H2 = (s1
. (i
+ 1)), H = (s2
. (i
+ 1)) as
Element of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
A116,
A118,
A119,
FINSEQ_2: 11;
reconsider H1, H2, H as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
Def11;
reconsider H2 as
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A116,
A118,
Def28;
reconsider H as
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A117,
A119,
A121,
Def28;
reconsider H29 = H2 as
normal
StableSubgroup of H by
A119,
A120,
A123,
Th40,
Th101;
reconsider J = (H
./. H29) as
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of (H1
./. H2) by
Th44;
A124:
now
assume J
= (
(Omega). (H1
./. H2));
then
A125: the
carrier of H
= (
union (
Cosets H2)) by
Th22;
then
A126: H
= H1 by
Lm4,
Th22;
then
reconsider H1 as
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of H;
H1
= (
(Omega). H) by
A125,
Lm4,
Th22;
then (H
./. H1) is
trivial by
Th57;
hence contradiction by
A114,
A117,
A119,
A121,
A126;
end;
reconsider H3 = the HGrWOpStr of H2 as
strict
normal
StableSubgroup of H by
A119,
A120,
A123,
Th40,
Th101;
now
assume J
= (
(1). (H1
./. H2));
then (
union (
Cosets H3))
= (
union
{(
1_ (H1
./. H2))}) by
Def8;
then the
carrier of H
= (
union
{(
1_ (H1
./. H2))}) by
Th22;
then the
carrier of H
= (
1_ (H1
./. H2)) by
ZFMISC_1: 25;
then the
carrier of H
= (
carr H2) by
Th43;
hence contradiction by
A122,
Lm4;
end;
then
A127: not (H1
./. H2) is
simple
GroupWithOperators of O by
A124,
Def13;
(i
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A118,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A128: (i
+ 1)
<= (
len s1) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
i
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A116,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A129: 1
<= i by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (1
+ 1)
<= (i
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then (1
+ 1)
<= (
len s1) by
A128,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A130: (
len s1)
> 1 by
NAT_1: 13;
then ((
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1))
+ 1)
= (
len s1) by
Def33;
then (
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1))
= ((
len s1)
- 1);
then ((i
+ 1)
- 1)
<= (
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) by
A128,
XREAL_1: 9;
then i
in (
Seg (
len (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1))) by
A129;
then
A131: i
in (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)
. i)
= (H1
./. H2) by
A130,
Def33;
hence contradiction by
A103,
A127,
A131;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:111
Th111: 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) implies (s1
. i) is
strict
StableSubgroup of G & (s1
. (i
+ 1)) is
strict
StableSubgroup of G
proof
assume that
A1: 1
<= i and
A2: i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1);
A3: (
0
+ i)
<= (1
+ i) by
XREAL_1: 6;
A4: (i
+ 1)
<= (((
len s1)
- 1)
+ 1) by
A2,
XREAL_1: 6;
then i
<= (
len s1) by
A3,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then i
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A1;
then i
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (s1
. i) is
Element of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
FINSEQ_2: 11;
hence (s1
. i) is
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
Def11;
1
<= (i
+ 1) by
A1,
A3,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (i
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A4;
then (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (s1
. (i
+ 1)) is
Element of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
FINSEQ_2: 11;
hence thesis by
Def11;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:112
Th112: 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & H1
= (s1
. i) & H2
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) implies H2 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1
proof
assume that
A1: 1
<= i and
A2: i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1);
A3: (i
+ 1)
<= (((
len s1)
- 1)
+ 1) by
A2,
XREAL_1: 6;
A4: (
0
+ i)
<= (1
+ i) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then 1
<= (i
+ 1) by
A1,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (i
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A3;
then
A5: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
i
<= (
len s1) by
A4,
A3,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then i
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A1;
then
A6: i
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
assume H1
= (s1
. i) & H2
= (s1
. (i
+ 1));
hence thesis by
A5,
A6,
Def28;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:113
Th113: s1
is_equivalent_with s1
proof
per cases ;
suppose s1 is
empty;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
A1: not s1 is
empty;
set f1 = (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1);
now
set p = (
id (
dom f1));
reconsider p as
Function of (
dom f1), (
dom f1);
p is
onto;
then
reconsider p as
Permutation of (
dom f1);
take p;
A2:
now
let H1,H2 be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let i, j;
assume
A3: i
in (
dom f1) & j
= ((p
" )
. i);
A4: (p
" )
= p by
FUNCT_1: 45;
assume H1
= (f1
. i) & H2
= (f1
. j);
hence (H1,H2)
are_isomorphic by
A3,
A4,
FUNCT_1: 18;
end;
thus (f1,f1)
are_equivalent_under (p,O) by
A2;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th108;
end;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:114
Th114: ((
len s1)
<= 1 or (
len s2)
<= 1) & (
len s1)
<= (
len s2) implies s2
is_finer_than s1
proof
assume
A1: (
len s1)
<= 1 or (
len s2)
<= 1;
assume
A2: (
len s1)
<= (
len s2);
then
A3: (
len s1)
<= 1 by
A1,
XXREAL_0: 2;
per cases ;
suppose
A4: (
len s1)
= 1;
then
A5: s1
=
<*(s1
. 1)*> by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
now
reconsider D = (
Seg (
len s2)) as non
empty
set by
A2,
A4;
set x =
{1};
take x;
set f = s2;
set p =
<*1*>;
(
dom f)
= (
Seg (
len s2)) & (
rng f)
c= (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider f as
Function of D, (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
FUNCT_2: 2;
A6: 1
in (
Seg (
len s2)) by
A2,
A4;
then 1
in (
dom s2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
hence x
c= (
dom s2) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
{1}
c= D by
A6,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then (
rng p)
c= D by
FINSEQ_1: 38;
then
reconsider p as
FinSequence of D by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
(
Sgm x)
= p & (f
* p)
=
<*(f
. 1)*> by
FINSEQ_2: 35,
FINSEQ_3: 44;
then (s2
* (
Sgm x))
=
<*(
(Omega). G)*> by
Def28;
hence s1
= (s2
* (
Sgm x)) by
A5,
Def28;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose (
len s1)
<> 1;
then (
len s1)
< (
0
+ 1) by
A3,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A7: s1
=
{} by
NAT_1: 13;
now
set x =
{} ;
take x;
thus x
c= (
dom s2);
thus s1
= (s2
* (
Sgm x)) by
A7,
FINSEQ_3: 43;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:115
Th115: s1
is_equivalent_with s2 & s1 is
jordan_holder implies s2 is
jordan_holder
proof
assume
A1: s1
is_equivalent_with s2;
assume
A2: s1 is
jordan_holder;
per cases ;
suppose
A3: (
len s1)
<= (
0
+ 1);
per cases by
A3,
NAT_1: 25;
suppose
A4: (
len s1)
=
0 ;
then (
len s2)
=
0 by
A1;
then
A5: s2
=
{} ;
s1
=
{} by
A4;
hence thesis by
A2,
A5;
end;
suppose
A6: (
len s1)
= 1;
then
A7: (s1
. 1)
= (
(1). G) by
Def28;
A8: (
len s2)
= 1 by
A1,
A6;
s1
=
<*(s1
. 1)*> by
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 40
.=
<*(s2
. 1)*> by
A7,
A8,
Def28
.= s2 by
A8,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
end;
suppose
A9: (
len s1)
> 1;
set f2 = (
the_series_of_quotients_of s2);
set f1 = (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1);
A10: not s1 is
empty by
A9;
A11: (
len s2)
> 1 by
A1,
A9;
then not s2 is
empty;
then
consider p be
Permutation of (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) such that
A12: ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1),(
the_series_of_quotients_of s2))
are_equivalent_under (p,O) by
A1,
A10,
Th108;
A13: (
len f1)
= (
len f2) by
A12;
now
let j;
set i = (p
. j);
set H1 = (f1
. i);
set H2 = (f2
. j);
assume
A14: j
in (
dom f2);
then
A15: (f2
. j)
in (
rng f2) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
A16: (
dom f1)
= (
Seg (
len f1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
dom f2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3,
A12;
then
A17: (p
. j)
in (
dom f2) by
A14,
FUNCT_2: 5;
then
reconsider i as
Element of
NAT ;
(p
. j)
in (
Seg (
len f2)) by
A17,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A18: i
in (
dom f1) by
A13,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (f1
. i)
in (
rng f1) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider H1, H2 as
strict
GroupWithOperators of O by
A15,
Th102;
i
in (
dom f1) & j
= ((p
" )
. i) by
A14,
A16,
FUNCT_2: 5,
FUNCT_2: 26;
then
A19: (H1,H2)
are_isomorphic by
A12;
H1 is
strict
simple
GroupWithOperators of O by
A2,
A9,
A18,
Th110;
hence (f2
. j) is
strict
simple
GroupWithOperators of O by
A19,
Th82;
end;
hence thesis by
A11,
Th110;
end;
end;
Lm44: for k,l be
Nat st k
in (
Seg l) & (
len s1)
> 1 & (
len s2)
> 1 & l
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1) holds k
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1) or ex i, j st k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1)
proof
let k,l be
Nat;
set l9 = ((
len s1)
- 1);
set l99 = ((
len s2)
- 1);
assume
A1: k
in (
Seg l);
then
A2: k
<= l by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
assume that
A3: (
len s1)
> 1 and
A4: (
len s2)
> 1 and
A5: l
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1);
assume not k
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1);
then
A6: k
< l by
A2,
A5,
XXREAL_0: 1;
((
len s2)
+ 1)
> (1
+ 1) by
A4,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
len s2)
>= 2 by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A7: ((
len s2)
- 1)
>= (2
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
((
len s1)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) by
A3,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider l9 as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
A8: ((
len s2)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) by
A4,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider l99 as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
A9: k
= (((k
div l99)
* l99)
+ (k
mod l99)) by
A8,
NAT_D: 2;
per cases ;
suppose
A10: (k
mod l99)
=
0 ;
set i = (k
div l99);
set j = l99;
take i, j;
thus k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) by
A9,
A10;
i
>
0 by
A1,
A9,
A10,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (i
+ 1)
> (
0
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
hence 1
<= i by
NAT_1: 13;
(i
* l99)
<= (((
len s1)
- 1)
* l99) by
A5,
A6,
A9,
A10,
INT_1: 7;
then ((i
* l99)
/ l99)
<= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* l99)
/ l99) by
XREAL_1: 72;
then i
<= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* l99)
/ l99) by
A8,
XCMPLX_1: 89;
hence i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) by
A8,
XCMPLX_1: 89;
thus thesis by
A7;
end;
suppose
A11: (k
mod l99)
<>
0 ;
set i = ((k
div l99)
+ 1);
set j = (k
mod l99);
take i, j;
thus k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) by
A8,
NAT_D: 2;
(
0
+ 1)
<= ((k
div l99)
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
hence 1
<= i;
(k
+ 1)
<= l by
A6,
INT_1: 7;
then
A12: ((k
+ 1)
- 1)
<= (l
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
((k
mod l99)
+ (l99
* (k
div l99)))
>= (
0
+ (l99
* (k
div l99))) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A13: ((k
div l99)
* l99)
<= k by
A8,
NAT_D: 2;
k
<> (l9
* l99) by
A11,
NAT_D: 13;
then k
< (((
len s1)
- 1)
* l99) by
A5,
A12,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then ((k
div l99)
* l99)
< (((
len s1)
- 1)
* l99) by
A13,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (((k
div l99)
* l99)
/ l99)
< ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* l99)
/ l99) by
A8,
XREAL_1: 74;
then (k
div l99)
< ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* l99)
/ l99) by
A8,
XCMPLX_1: 89;
then (k
div l99)
< ((
len s1)
- 1) by
A8,
XCMPLX_1: 89;
hence i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) by
INT_1: 7;
(j
+ 1)
> (
0
+ 1) by
A11,
XREAL_1: 6;
hence 1
<= j by
NAT_1: 13;
thus thesis by
A8,
NAT_D: 1;
end;
end;
Lm45: for i1,j1,i2,j2 be
Nat, s1, s2 st (
len s2)
> 1 & (((i1
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j1)
= (((i2
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j2) & 1
<= i1 & 1
<= j1 & j1
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) & 1
<= i2 & 1
<= j2 & j2
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) holds j1
= j2 & i1
= i2
proof
let i1,j1,i2,j2 be
Nat;
let s1, s2;
set l99 = ((
len s2)
- 1);
set i19 = (i1
- 1);
set i29 = (i2
- 1);
assume (
len s2)
> 1;
then
A1: ((
len s2)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider l99 as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
A2: (l99
/ l99)
= 1 by
A1,
XCMPLX_1: 60;
assume
A3: (((i1
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j1)
= (((i2
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j2);
assume that
A4: 1
<= i1 and
A5: 1
<= j1 and
A6: j1
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
(i1
- 1)
>= (1
- 1) by
A4,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider i19 as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
assume that
A7: 1
<= i2 and
A8: 1
<= j2 and
A9: j2
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
(i2
- 1)
>= (1
- 1) by
A7,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider i29 as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
A10: (j1
mod l99)
= (((i19
* l99)
+ j1)
mod l99) by
NAT_D: 21
.= (((i29
* l99)
+ j2)
mod l99) by
A3
.= (j2
mod l99) by
NAT_D: 21;
A11: j1
= j2
proof
per cases ;
suppose
A12: j1
= l99;
assume j2
<> j1;
then j2
< l99 by
A9,
A12,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then j2
= (j1
mod l99) by
A10,
NAT_D: 24;
hence contradiction by
A8,
A12,
NAT_D: 25;
end;
suppose j1
<> l99;
then j1
< l99 by
A6,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A13: j1
= (j2
mod l99) by
A10,
NAT_D: 24;
per cases ;
suppose j2
= l99;
hence thesis by
A5,
A13,
NAT_D: 25;
end;
suppose j2
<> l99;
then j2
< l99 by
A9,
XXREAL_0: 1;
hence thesis by
A13,
NAT_D: 24;
end;
end;
end;
hence j1
= j2;
(i19
* (l99
/ l99))
= ((i29
* l99)
/ l99) by
A3,
A11,
XCMPLX_1: 74;
then (i19
* 1)
= (i29
* 1) by
A2,
XCMPLX_1: 74;
hence thesis;
end;
Lm46: for k be
Integer, i,j be
Nat, s1, s2 st (
len s2)
> 1 & k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) holds 1
<= k & k
<= (((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
proof
let k be
Integer;
let i,j be
Nat;
let s1, s2;
set l9 = ((
len s1)
- 1);
set l99 = ((
len s2)
- 1);
assume (
len s2)
> 1;
then
A1: ((
len s2)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
assume
A2: k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j);
assume that
A3: 1
<= i and
A4: i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1);
assume that
A5: 1
<= j and
A6: j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
(i
- 1)
<= (l9
- 1) by
A4,
XREAL_1: 9;
then ((i
- 1)
* l99)
<= ((l9
- 1)
* l99) by
A1,
XREAL_1: 64;
then
A7: k
<= (((l9
* l99)
- (1
* l99))
+ l99) by
A2,
A6,
XREAL_1: 7;
(1
- 1)
<= (i
- 1) by
A3,
XREAL_1: 9;
then (
0
+ 1)
<= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) by
A5,
A1,
XREAL_1: 7;
hence thesis by
A2,
A7;
end;
begin
definition
let O, G, s1, s2;
assume that
A1: (
len s1)
> 1 and
A2: (
len s2)
> 1;
::
GROUP_9:def35
func
the_schreier_series_of (s1,s2) ->
CompositionSeries of G means
:
Def35: for k,i,j be
Nat, H1,H2,H3 be
StableSubgroup of G holds (k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) & H1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) & H2
= (s1
. i) & H3
= (s2
. j) implies (it
. k)
= (H1
"\/" (H2
/\ H3))) & (k
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1) implies (it
. k)
= (
(1). G)) & (
len it )
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1);
existence
proof
((
len s2)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) by
A2,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider l99 = ((
len s2)
- 1) as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
((
len s2)
+ 1)
> (1
+ 1) by
A2,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
len s2)
>= 2 by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A3: ((
len s2)
- 1)
>= (2
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
((
len s1)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) by
A1,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider l9 = ((
len s1)
- 1) as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
defpred
P[
set,
object] means for i,j be
Nat, H1,H2,H3 be
StableSubgroup of G holds ($1
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) & H1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) & H2
= (s1
. i) & H3
= (s2
. j) implies $2
= (H1
"\/" (H2
/\ H3))) & ($1
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1) implies $2
= (
(1). G));
((
len s2)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) by
A2,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
A4: (l99
/ l99)
= 1 by
XCMPLX_1: 60;
((
len s1)
+ 1)
> (1
+ 1) by
A1,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
len s1)
>= 2 by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A5: ((
len s1)
- 1)
>= (2
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
then
A6: ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)
>= (
0
+ 1) by
A3,
XREAL_1: 6;
reconsider l = ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1) as
Element of
NAT by
A5,
A3,
INT_1: 3;
A7: 1
in (
Seg l) by
A6;
A8: for k be
Nat st k
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1) holds not ex i, j st k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1)
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A9: k
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1);
assume ex i, j st k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
then
consider i, j such that
A10: k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) and
A11: 1
<= i and
A12: i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) and
A13: 1
<= j and
A14: j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
set i9 = (i
- 1);
(i
- 1)
>= (1
- 1) by
A11,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider i9 as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
A15: (1
mod l99)
= (((l9
* l99)
+ 1)
mod l99) by
NAT_D: 21
.= (((i9
* l99)
+ j)
mod l99) by
A9,
A10
.= (j
mod l99) by
NAT_D: 21;
j
= 1
proof
per cases ;
suppose
A16: j
= l99;
assume j
<> 1;
then 1
< l99 by
A13,
A16,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then 1
= (j
mod l99) by
A15,
NAT_D: 24;
hence contradiction by
A16,
NAT_D: 25;
end;
suppose j
<> l99;
then j
< l99 by
A14,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A17: (j
mod l99)
= j by
NAT_D: 24;
per cases ;
suppose 1
= l99;
hence thesis by
A13,
A14,
XXREAL_0: 1;
end;
suppose
A18: 1
<> l99;
1
<= l99 by
A13,
A14,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then 1
< l99 by
A18,
XXREAL_0: 1;
hence thesis by
A15,
A17,
NAT_D: 24;
end;
end;
end;
then
A19: (l9
* (l99
/ l99))
= ((i9
* l99)
/ l99) by
A9,
A10,
XCMPLX_1: 74;
(l99
/ l99)
= 1 by
A13,
A14,
XCMPLX_1: 60;
then
A20: (l9
* 1)
= (i9
* 1) by
A19,
XCMPLX_1: 74;
((
- 1)
+ i)
< (
0
+ i) by
XREAL_1: 6;
hence contradiction by
A12,
A20;
end;
A21: for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg l) holds ex x be
object st
P[k, x]
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A22: k
in (
Seg l);
per cases by
A1,
A2,
A22,
Lm44;
suppose
A23: ex i, j st k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
then
consider i, j such that
A24: k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) and
A25: 1
<= i and
A26: i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) and
A27: 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
reconsider H1 = (s1
. (i
+ 1)), H2 = (s1
. i), H3 = (s2
. j) as
StableSubgroup of G by
A25,
A26,
A27,
Th111;
take x = (H1
"\/" (H2
/\ H3));
now
let i1,j1 be
Nat;
let H1,H2,H3 be
StableSubgroup of G;
thus k
= (((i1
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j1) & 1
<= i1 & i1
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j1 & j1
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) & H1
= (s1
. (i1
+ 1)) & H2
= (s1
. i1) & H3
= (s2
. j1) implies x
= (H1
"\/" (H2
/\ H3))
proof
assume that
A28: k
= (((i1
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j1) and
A29: 1
<= i1 and i1
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) and
A30: 1
<= j1 & j1
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
assume
A31: H1
= (s1
. (i1
+ 1)) & H2
= (s1
. i1) & H3
= (s2
. j1);
i
= i1 by
A2,
A24,
A25,
A27,
A28,
A29,
A30,
Lm45;
hence thesis by
A24,
A28,
A31;
end;
assume k
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1);
hence x
= (
(1). G) by
A8,
A23;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
A32: k
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1);
take (
(1). G);
thus thesis by
A8,
A32;
end;
end;
consider f be
FinSequence such that
A33: (
dom f)
= (
Seg l) & for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg l) holds
P[k, (f
. k)] from
FINSEQ_1:sch 1(
A21);
for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom f) holds (f
. k)
in (
the_stable_subgroups_of G)
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A34: k
in (
dom f);
then
A35: for i,j be
Nat, H1,H2,H3 be
StableSubgroup of G holds (k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) & H1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) & H2
= (s1
. i) & H3
= (s2
. j) implies (f
. k)
= (H1
"\/" (H2
/\ H3))) & (k
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1) implies (f
. k)
= (
(1). G)) by
A33;
per cases by
A1,
A2,
A33,
A34,
Lm44;
suppose ex i, j st k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
then
consider i, j such that
A36: k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) and
A37: 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
reconsider H1 = (s1
. (i
+ 1)), H2 = (s1
. i), H3 = (s2
. j) as
StableSubgroup of G by
A37,
Th111;
(f
. k)
= (H1
"\/" (H2
/\ H3)) by
A33,
A34,
A36,
A37;
hence thesis by
Def11;
end;
suppose k
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1);
hence thesis by
A35,
Def11;
end;
end;
then
reconsider f as
FinSequence of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
FINSEQ_2: 12;
l
in (
Seg l) by
A6;
then
P[l, (f
. l)] by
A33;
then
A38: (f
. (
len f))
= (
(1). G) by
A33,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A39: for i, s1, H st 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & H
= (s1
. i) holds (s1
. (i
+ 1)) is
normal
StableSubgroup of H
proof
let i, s1, H;
assume that
A40: 1
<= i and
A41: i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1);
A42: (
0
+ i)
<= (1
+ i) by
XREAL_1: 6;
A43: (i
+ 1)
<= (((
len s1)
- 1)
+ 1) by
A41,
XREAL_1: 6;
then i
<= (
len s1) by
A42,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then i
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A40;
then
A44: i
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
reconsider H1 = (s1
. i), H2 = (s1
. (i
+ 1)) as
StableSubgroup of G by
A40,
A41,
Th111;
assume
A45: H
= (s1
. i);
1
<= (i
+ 1) by
A40,
A42,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (i
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A43;
then (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then H2 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A44,
Def28;
hence thesis by
A45;
end;
A46: for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom f) & (k
+ 1)
in (
dom f) holds for H1, H2 st H1
= (f
. k) & H2
= (f
. (k
+ 1)) holds H2 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H1
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A47: k
in (
dom f);
set k9 = (k
+ 1);
assume
A48: (k
+ 1)
in (
dom f);
then (k
+ 1)
<= l by
A33,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then k
<> l by
NAT_1: 13;
then
consider i, j such that
A49: k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) and
A50: 1
<= i and
A51: i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) and
A52: 1
<= j and
A53: j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
A33,
A47,
Lm44;
reconsider H19 = (s1
. (i
+ 1)), H29 = (s1
. i), H39 = (s2
. j) as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
A50,
A51,
A52,
A53,
Th111;
A54: (f
. k)
= (H19
"\/" (H29
/\ H39)) by
A33,
A47,
A49,
A50,
A51,
A52,
A53;
let H1, H2;
assume
A55: H1
= (f
. k);
A56: H19 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H29 by
A39,
A50,
A51;
assume
A57: H2
= (f
. (k
+ 1));
per cases ;
suppose
A58: j
<> ((
len s2)
- 1);
reconsider j9 = (j
+ 1) as
Nat;
j
< ((
len s2)
- 1) by
A53,
A58,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A59: j9
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) by
INT_1: 7;
reconsider H399 = (s2
. j9) as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
A52,
A53,
Th111;
(
0
+ j)
<= (1
+ j) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A60: 1
<= j9 by
A52,
XXREAL_0: 2;
A61: H399 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H39 by
A39,
A52,
A53;
k9
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j9) by
A49;
then H2
= (H19
"\/" (H29
/\ H399)) by
A33,
A48,
A50,
A51,
A57,
A59,
A60;
hence thesis by
A55,
A56,
A54,
A61,
Th92;
end;
suppose
A62: j
= ((
len s2)
- 1);
per cases ;
suppose
A63: i
<> ((
len s1)
- 1);
set i9 = (i
+ 1);
A64: (
0
+ i9)
<= (1
+ i9) by
XREAL_1: 6;
set j9 = 1;
H19 is
StableSubgroup of H1 by
A55,
A54,
Th35;
then H19 is
Subgroup of H1 by
Def7;
then
A65: the
carrier of H19
c= the
carrier of H1 by
GROUP_2:def 5;
(1
+ 1)
<= (i
+ 1) by
A50,
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A66: 1
<= i9 by
XXREAL_0: 2;
i
< l9 by
A51,
A63,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A67: (i
+ 1)
<= l9 by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A68: (i9
+ 1)
<= (((
len s1)
- 1)
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then i9
<= (
len s1) by
A64,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then i9
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A66;
then
A69: i9
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
((
len s2)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) by
A2,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
A70: l99
>= (
0
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
then
reconsider H199 = (s1
. (i9
+ 1)), H299 = (s1
. i9), H399 = (s2
. j9) as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
A67,
A66,
Th111;
1
<= (i9
+ 1) by
A66,
A64,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (i9
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A68;
then (i9
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A71: H199 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H299 by
A69,
Def28;
now
let x be
object;
H299 is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
then
A72: the
carrier of H299
c= the
carrier of G by
GROUP_2:def 5;
assume x
in the
carrier of H299;
hence x
in the
carrier of (
(Omega). G) by
A72;
end;
then the
carrier of H299
c= the
carrier of (
(Omega). G);
then
A73: the
carrier of H299
= (the
carrier of H299
/\ the
carrier of (
(Omega). G)) by
XBOOLE_1: 28;
A74: H399
= (
(Omega). G) by
Def28;
k9
= (((i9
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j9) by
A49,
A62;
then H2
= (H199
"\/" (H299
/\ H399)) by
A33,
A48,
A57,
A67,
A66,
A70;
then H2
= (H199
"\/" H299) by
A74,
A73,
Th18;
then
A75: H2
= H19 by
A71,
Th36;
(H29
/\ H39) is
StableSubgroup of H29 by
Lm33;
then
A76: H1 is
StableSubgroup of H29 by
A55,
A56,
A54,
Th37;
then
A77: H1 is
Subgroup of H29 by
Def7;
now
let H9 be
strict
Subgroup of H1;
assume
A78: H9
= the multMagma of H2;
now
let a be
Element of H1;
reconsider a9 = a as
Element of H29 by
A76,
Th2;
now
reconsider H1s9 = the multMagma of H19 as
normal
Subgroup of H29 by
A56,
Lm6;
let x be
object;
assume x
in (a
* H9);
then
consider b be
Element of H1 such that
A79: x
= (a
* b) and
A80: b
in H9 by
GROUP_2: 103;
set b9 = b;
A81: H1 is
Subgroup of H29 by
A76,
Def7;
then
reconsider b9 as
Element of H29 by
GROUP_2: 42;
x
= (a9
* b9) by
A79,
A81,
GROUP_2: 43;
then (a9
* H1s9)
c= (H1s9
* a9) & x
in (a9
* H1s9) by
A75,
A78,
A80,
GROUP_2: 103,
GROUP_3: 118;
then
consider b99 be
Element of H29 such that
A82: x
= (b99
* a9) and
A83: b99
in H1s9 by
GROUP_2: 104;
b99
in the
carrier of H19 by
A83,
STRUCT_0:def 5;
then
reconsider b99 as
Element of H1 by
A65;
x
= (b99
* a) by
A77,
A82,
GROUP_2: 43;
hence x
in (H9
* a) by
A75,
A78,
A83,
GROUP_2: 104;
end;
hence (a
* H9)
c= (H9
* a);
end;
hence H9 is
normal by
GROUP_3: 118;
end;
hence thesis by
A55,
A54,
A75,
Def10,
Th35;
end;
suppose i
= ((
len s1)
- 1);
then H2
= (
(1). G) by
A33,
A48,
A49,
A57,
A62
.= (
(1). H1) by
Th15;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
end;
((
len s1)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) & ((
len s2)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
XREAL_1: 9;
then (((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
> (
0
* ((
len s2)
- 1)) by
XREAL_1: 68;
then 1
<> l;
then
consider i, j such that
A84: 1
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) and
A85: 1
<= i and
A86: i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) and
A87: 1
<= j and
A88: j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
A7,
Lm44;
set i9 = (i
- 1);
(i
- 1)
>= (1
- 1) by
A85,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider i9 as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
reconsider H1 = (s1
. (i
+ 1)), H2 = (s1
. i), H3 = (s2
. j) as
StableSubgroup of G by
A85,
A86,
A87,
A88,
Th111;
(1
mod l99)
= (((i9
* l99)
+ j)
mod l99) by
A84;
then
A89: (1
mod l99)
= (j
mod l99) by
NAT_D: 21;
A90: j
= 1
proof
per cases ;
suppose l99
= 1;
hence thesis by
A87,
A88,
XXREAL_0: 1;
end;
suppose l99
<> 1;
then 1
< l99 by
A3,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A91: 1
= (j
mod l99) by
A89,
NAT_D: 14;
then j
<> l99 by
NAT_D: 25;
then l99
> j by
A88,
XXREAL_0: 1;
hence thesis by
A91,
NAT_D: 24;
end;
end;
then
A92: H3
= (
(Omega). G) by
Def28;
((i9
* l99)
/ l99)
= (
0
/ l99) by
A84,
A90;
then (i9
* 1)
=
0 by
A4,
XCMPLX_1: 74;
then
A93: H2
= (
(Omega). G) by
Def28;
(f
. 1)
= (H1
"\/" (H2
/\ H3)) by
A33,
A7,
A84,
A85,
A86,
A87,
A88;
then (f
. 1)
= (H1
"\/" (
(Omega). G)) by
A93,
A92,
Th19;
then (f
. 1)
= (
(Omega). G) by
Th34;
then
reconsider f as
CompositionSeries of G by
A38,
A46,
Def28;
take f;
let k,i,j be
Nat, H1,H2,H3 be
StableSubgroup of G;
A94: for k,i,j be
Nat st k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) holds k
in (
Seg l)
proof
let k,i,j be
Nat;
assume
A95: k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j);
assume that
A96: 1
<= i and
A97: i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1);
assume that
A98: 1
<= j and
A99: j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
(i
- 1)
<= (l9
- 1) by
A97,
XREAL_1: 9;
then ((i
- 1)
* l99)
<= ((l9
- 1)
* l99) by
XREAL_1: 64;
then (
0
+ (l9
* l99))
<= (1
+ (l9
* l99)) & k
<= (((l9
* l99)
- (1
* l99))
+ l99) by
A95,
A99,
XREAL_1: 7;
then
A100: k
<= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1) by
XXREAL_0: 2;
(1
- 1)
<= (i
- 1) by
A96,
XREAL_1: 9;
then (
0
+ 1)
<= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) by
A3,
A98,
XREAL_1: 7;
hence thesis by
A95,
A100;
end;
now
assume that
A101: k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) and
A102: H1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) & H2
= (s1
. i) & H3
= (s2
. j);
k
in (
Seg l) by
A94,
A101;
hence (f
. k)
= (H1
"\/" (H2
/\ H3)) by
A33,
A101,
A102;
end;
hence k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) & H1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) & H2
= (s1
. i) & H3
= (s2
. j) implies (f
. k)
= (H1
"\/" (H2
/\ H3));
now
assume
A103: k
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1);
then k
in (
Seg l) by
A6;
hence (f
. k)
= (
(1). G) by
A33,
A103;
end;
hence thesis by
A33,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let f1,f2 be
CompositionSeries of G;
assume
A104: for k,i,j be
Nat, H1,H2,H3 be
StableSubgroup of G holds (k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) & H1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) & H2
= (s1
. i) & H3
= (s2
. j) implies (f1
. k)
= (H1
"\/" (H2
/\ H3))) & (k
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1) implies (f1
. k)
= (
(1). G)) & (
len f1)
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1);
assume
A105: for k,i,j be
Nat, H1,H2,H3 be
StableSubgroup of G holds (k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) & H1
= (s1
. (i
+ 1)) & H2
= (s1
. i) & H3
= (s2
. j) implies (f2
. k)
= (H1
"\/" (H2
/\ H3))) & (k
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1) implies (f2
. k)
= (
(1). G)) & (
len f2)
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1);
A106:
now
set l = (
len f1);
let k be
Nat;
assume k
in (
dom f1);
then
A107: k
in (
Seg l) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
per cases by
A1,
A2,
A104,
A107,
Lm44;
suppose ex i, j st k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
then
consider i, j such that
A108: k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) and
A109: 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
reconsider H1 = (s1
. (i
+ 1)), H2 = (s1
. i), H3 = (s2
. j) as
StableSubgroup of G by
A109,
Th111;
(f1
. k)
= (H1
"\/" (H2
/\ H3)) by
A104,
A108,
A109;
hence (f1
. k)
= (f2
. k) by
A105,
A108,
A109;
end;
suppose
A110: k
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1);
then (f1
. k)
= (
(1). G) by
A104;
hence (f1
. k)
= (f2
. k) by
A105,
A110;
end;
end;
(
dom f1)
= (
Seg (
len f2)) by
A104,
A105,
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
dom f2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
hence thesis by
A106,
FINSEQ_1: 13;
end;
end
theorem ::
GROUP_9:116
Th116: (
len s1)
> 1 & (
len s2)
> 1 implies (
the_schreier_series_of (s1,s2))
is_finer_than s1
proof
assume that
A1: (
len s1)
> 1 and
A2: (
len s2)
> 1;
now
set rR = (
rng s1);
set R = s1;
set l = ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1);
set X = (
Seg (
len s1));
set g = {
[k, (((k
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)] where k be
Element of
NAT : 1
<= k & k
<= (
len s1) };
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in g;
then
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A3:
[k, (((k
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)]
= x and 1
<= k and k
<= (
len s1);
set z = (((k
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1);
set y = k;
reconsider y, z as
object;
take y, z;
thus x
=
[y, z] by
A3;
end;
then
reconsider g as
Relation by
RELAT_1:def 1;
A4:
now
let y be
object;
assume y
in (
rng g);
then
consider x be
object such that
A5:
[x, y]
in g by
XTUPLE_0:def 13;
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A6:
[k, (((k
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)]
=
[x, y] and 1
<= k and k
<= (
len s1) by
A5;
(((k
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)
= y by
A6,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence y
in
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
end;
A7:
now
let x,y1,y2 be
object;
assume
[x, y1]
in g;
then
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A8:
[k, (((k
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)]
=
[x, y1] and 1
<= k and k
<= (
len s1);
A9: k
= x by
A8,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
assume
[x, y2]
in g;
then
consider k9 be
Element of
NAT such that
A10:
[k9, (((k9
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)]
=
[x, y2] and 1
<= k9 and k9
<= (
len s1);
k9
= x by
A10,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence y1
= y2 by
A8,
A10,
A9,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
dom g);
then
consider y be
object such that
A11:
[x, y]
in g by
XTUPLE_0:def 12;
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A12:
[k, (((k
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)]
=
[x, y] and 1
<= k and k
<= (
len s1) by
A11;
k
= x by
A12,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence x
in
NAT ;
end;
then
A13: (
dom g)
c=
NAT ;
reconsider g as
Function by
A7,
FUNCT_1:def 1;
A14: (
rng g)
c=
REAL by
A4;
reconsider f = g as
PartFunc of (
dom g), (
rng g) by
RELSET_1: 4;
(
dom g)
c=
REAL by
A13,
NUMBERS: 19;
then
reconsider f as
PartFunc of
REAL ,
REAL by
A14,
RELSET_1: 7;
set dR = (
dom s1);
set t = (
the_schreier_series_of (s1,s2));
set fX = (f
.: X);
take fX;
reconsider R as
Relation of dR, rR by
FUNCT_2: 1;
A15: ((
id dR)
* R)
= R by
FUNCT_2: 17;
((
len s2)
+ 1)
> (1
+ 1) by
A2,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
len s2)
>= 2 by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A16: ((
len s2)
- 1)
>= (2
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
((
len s1)
+ 1)
> (1
+ 1) by
A1,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
len s1)
>= 2 by
NAT_1: 13;
then ((
len s1)
- 1)
>= (2
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider l as
Element of
NAT by
A16,
INT_1: 3;
A17: (
len (
the_schreier_series_of (s1,s2)))
= l by
A1,
A2,
Def35;
then
A18: (
dom (
the_schreier_series_of (s1,s2)))
= (
Seg l) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
((
len s2)
+ 1)
> (1
+ 1) by
A2,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
len s2)
>= 2 by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A19: ((
len s2)
- 1)
>= (2
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
now
let y be
object;
assume y
in fX;
then
consider x be
object such that
A20:
[x, y]
in g and x
in X by
RELAT_1:def 13;
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A21:
[k, (((k
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)]
=
[x, y] and
A22: 1
<= k and
A23: k
<= (
len s1) by
A20;
reconsider y9 = y as
Integer by
A21,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
A24: (k
- 1)
>= (1
- 1) by
A22,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
A25: y9
>
0 by
A19,
A21,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
(k
- 1)
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) by
A23,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
A26: ((k
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
<= (((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1)) by
A19,
XREAL_1: 64;
(((k
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)
>= (
0
+ 1) by
A19,
A24,
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A27: y9
>= 1 by
A21,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
reconsider y9 as
Element of
NAT by
A25,
INT_1: 3;
(((k
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)
= y by
A21,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then y9
<= l by
A26,
XREAL_1: 6;
hence y
in (
Seg l) by
A27;
end;
then
A28: fX
c= (
Seg l);
hence fX
c= (
dom (
the_schreier_series_of (s1,s2))) by
A17,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
now
let x be
object;
assume
A29: x
in X;
then
reconsider k = x as
Element of
NAT ;
set y = (((k
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1);
1
<= k & k
<= (
len s1) by
A29,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
[x, y]
in f;
hence x
in (
dom f) by
XTUPLE_0:def 12;
end;
then
A30: X
c= (
dom f);
then
A31: (
dom s1)
c= (
dom f) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
dom f);
then
consider y be
object such that
A32:
[x, y]
in f by
XTUPLE_0:def 12;
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A33:
[k, (((k
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)]
=
[x, y] & 1
<= k & k
<= (
len s1) by
A32;
k
in (
Seg (
len s1)) & k
= x by
A33,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence x
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
end;
then (
dom f)
c= (
dom s1);
then
A34: (
dom s1)
= (
dom f) by
A31,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then X
= (
dom f) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A35: (
rng f)
c= (
Seg l) by
A28,
RELAT_1: 113;
then
A36: (
dom s1)
= (
dom (t
* f)) by
A18,
A34,
RELAT_1: 27;
A37:
now
let x be
object;
assume
A38: x
in (
dom s1);
then
[x, (f
. x)]
in f by
A31,
FUNCT_1:def 2;
then
consider i be
Element of
NAT such that
A39:
[i, (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)]
=
[x, (f
. x)] and
A40: 1
<= i and
A41: i
<= (
len s1);
set k = (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1);
(((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)
= (f
. x) by
A39,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then k
in (
rng f) by
A31,
A38,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then k
in (
Seg l) by
A35;
then
reconsider k as
Element of
NAT ;
A42: x
in (
dom (t
* f)) by
A18,
A34,
A35,
A38,
RELAT_1: 27;
per cases ;
suppose
A43: i
= (
len s1);
((t
* f)
. x)
= (t
. (f
. x)) by
A42,
FUNCT_1: 12
.= (t
. k) by
A39,
XTUPLE_0: 1
.= (
(1). G) by
A1,
A2,
A43,
Def35
.= (s1
. (
len s1)) by
Def28;
hence (s1
. x)
= ((t
* f)
. x) by
A39,
A43,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
suppose i
<> (
len s1);
then i
< (
len s1) by
A41,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A44: (i
+ 1)
<= (
len s1) by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A45: ((i
+ 1)
- 1)
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
A46: (s2
. 1)
= (
(Omega). G) by
Def28;
then
reconsider H1 = (s1
. (i
+ 1)), H2 = (s1
. i), H3 = (s2
. 1) as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
A40,
A45,
Th111;
now
let x be
object;
H2 is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
then
A47: the
carrier of H2
c= the
carrier of G by
GROUP_2:def 5;
assume x
in the
carrier of H2;
hence x
in the
carrier of (
(Omega). G) by
A47;
end;
then the
carrier of H2
c= the
carrier of (
(Omega). G);
then
A48: the
carrier of H2
= (the
carrier of H2
/\ the
carrier of H3) by
A46,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
((
len s2)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) by
A2,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
A49: ((
len s2)
- 1)
>= (
0
+ 1) by
INT_1: 7;
(
0
+ i)
<= (1
+ i) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then 1
<= (i
+ 1) by
A40,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (i
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A44;
then
A50: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
i
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A40,
A41;
then i
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A51: H1 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H2 by
A50,
Def28;
((t
* f)
. x)
= (t
. (f
. x)) by
A42,
FUNCT_1: 12
.= (t
. k) by
A39,
XTUPLE_0: 1
.= (H1
"\/" (H2
/\ H3)) by
A1,
A2,
A40,
A45,
A49,
Def35
.= (H1
"\/" H2) by
A48,
Th18
.= H2 by
A51,
Th36;
hence (s1
. x)
= ((t
* f)
. x) by
A39,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
end;
now
let r1,r2 be
Real;
assume r1
in (X
/\ (
dom f));
then r1
in (
dom f) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
[r1, (f
. r1)]
in f by
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
consider k9 be
Element of
NAT such that
A52:
[k9, (((k9
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)]
=
[r1, (f
. r1)] and 1
<= k9 and k9
<= (
len s1);
assume r2
in (X
/\ (
dom f));
then r2
in (
dom f) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
[r2, (f
. r2)]
in f by
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
consider k99 be
Element of
NAT such that
A53:
[k99, (((k99
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)]
=
[r2, (f
. r2)] and 1
<= k99 and k99
<= (
len s1);
A54: k99
= r2 by
A53,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
assume
A55: r1
< r2;
k9
= r1 by
A52,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then (k9
- 1)
< (k99
- 1) by
A55,
A54,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
A56: ((k9
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
< ((k99
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1)) by
A19,
XREAL_1: 68;
A57: (((k99
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)
= (f
. r2) by
A53,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
(((k9
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)
= (f
. r1) by
A52,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence (f
. r1)
< (f
. r2) by
A57,
A56,
XREAL_1: 6;
end;
then
A58: (f
| X) is
increasing by
RFUNCT_2: 20;
now
let y be
object;
assume y
in (f
.: X);
then
consider x be
object such that
A59:
[x, y]
in g and x
in X by
RELAT_1:def 13;
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A60:
[k, (((k
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)]
=
[x, y] and
A61: 1
<= k and k
<= (
len s1) by
A59;
reconsider y9 = y as
Integer by
A60,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
(((k
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)
= y & (k
- 1)
>= (1
- 1) by
A60,
A61,
XREAL_1: 9,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then y9
in
NAT & not y
in
{
0 } by
A19,
INT_1: 3,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence y
in (
NAT
\
{
0 }) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
then (f
.: X)
c= (
NAT
\
{
0 });
then ((
the_schreier_series_of (s1,s2))
* (
Sgm fX))
= ((
the_schreier_series_of (s1,s2))
* (f
* (
Sgm X))) by
A30,
A58,
Lm37
.= (((
the_schreier_series_of (s1,s2))
* f)
* (
Sgm X)) by
RELAT_1: 36
.= (s1
* (
Sgm X)) by
A36,
A37,
FUNCT_1: 2
.= (s1
* (
idseq (
len s1))) by
FINSEQ_3: 48
.= (s1
* (
id (
Seg (
len s1)))) by
FINSEQ_2:def 1
.= (s1
* (
id (
dom s1))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
hence s1
= ((
the_schreier_series_of (s1,s2))
* (
Sgm fX)) by
A15;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:117
Th117: (
len s1)
> 1 & (
len s2)
> 1 implies (
the_schreier_series_of (s1,s2))
is_equivalent_with (
the_schreier_series_of (s2,s1))
proof
assume that
A1: (
len s1)
> 1 and
A2: (
len s2)
> 1;
set s21 = (
the_schreier_series_of (s2,s1));
A3: ((
len s1)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) & ((
len s2)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
XREAL_1: 9;
set s12 = (
the_schreier_series_of (s1,s2));
A4: (
len s12)
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1) by
A1,
A2,
Def35;
A5: (
len s21)
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1) by
A1,
A2,
Def35;
then
A6: not s21 is
empty by
A3;
(((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
> (
0
* ((
len s2)
- 1)) by
A3,
XREAL_1: 68;
then
A7: ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1)
> (
0
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
A8:
now
set p = {
[(((j
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i), (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j)] where i,j be
Element of
NAT : 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) };
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in p;
then
consider i,j be
Element of
NAT such that
A9:
[(((j
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i), (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j)]
= x and 1
<= i and i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) and 1
<= j and j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
set z = (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j);
set y = (((j
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i);
reconsider y, z as
object;
take y, z;
thus x
=
[y, z] by
A9;
end;
then
reconsider p as
Relation by
RELAT_1:def 1;
set X = (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s12));
set f1 = (
the_series_of_quotients_of s12);
set f2 = (
the_series_of_quotients_of s21);
now
let x,y1,y2 be
object;
assume
[x, y1]
in p;
then
consider i1,j1 be
Element of
NAT such that
A10:
[(((j1
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i1), (((i1
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j1)]
=
[x, y1] and
A11: 1
<= i1 & i1
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j1 and j1
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
A12: (((j1
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i1)
= x by
A10,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
assume
[x, y2]
in p;
then
consider i2,j2 be
Element of
NAT such that
A13:
[(((j2
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i2), (((i2
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j2)]
=
[x, y2] and
A14: 1
<= i2 & i2
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j2 and j2
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
A15: (((j2
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i2)
= x by
A13,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then j1
= j2 by
A1,
A11,
A14,
A12,
Lm45;
hence y1
= y2 by
A10,
A13,
A12,
A15,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
then
reconsider p as
Function by
FUNCT_1:def 1;
A16: (
len s12)
> 1 by
A1,
A2,
A7,
Def35;
then
A17: ((
len f1)
+ 1)
= (
len s12) by
Def33;
A18: (
len s12)
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1) by
A1,
A2,
Def35;
now
set l9 = (((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1));
reconsider l9 as
Element of
NAT by
A3,
INT_1: 3;
let y be
object;
assume
A19: y
in X;
then
reconsider k = y as
Element of
NAT ;
A20: y
in (
Seg (
len f1)) by
A19,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A21: 1
<= k by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A22: k
<= (((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1)) by
A17,
A18,
A20,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
(
0
+ (((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1)))
<= (1
+ (((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then k
<= (l9
+ 1) by
A22,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A23: k
in (
Seg (l9
+ 1)) by
A21;
k
<> (l9
+ 1) by
A22,
NAT_1: 13;
then
consider i,j be
Nat such that
A24: k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
A23,
Lm44;
reconsider j, i as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
set x = (((j
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i);
reconsider x as
set;
[x, y]
in p by
A24;
hence y
in (
rng p) by
XTUPLE_0:def 13;
end;
then
A25: X
c= (
rng p);
A26: X
= (
Seg (
len f1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
now
set l9 = (((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1));
reconsider l9 as
Element of
NAT by
A3,
INT_1: 3;
let x be
object;
assume
A27: x
in X;
then
reconsider k = x as
Element of
NAT ;
A28: k
<= (((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1)) by
A17,
A18,
A26,
A27,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
(
0
+ (((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1)))
<= (1
+ (((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A29: k
<= (l9
+ 1) by
A28,
XXREAL_0: 2;
1
<= k by
A26,
A27,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A30: k
in (
Seg (l9
+ 1)) by
A29;
k
<> (l9
+ 1) by
A28,
NAT_1: 13;
then
consider j,i be
Nat such that
A31: k
= (((j
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) & 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
A30,
Lm44;
reconsider j, i as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
set y = (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j);
reconsider y as
set;
[x, y]
in p by
A31;
hence x
in (
dom p) by
XTUPLE_0:def 12;
end;
then
A32: X
c= (
dom p);
now
let y be
object;
set k = y;
assume y
in (
rng p);
then
consider x be
object such that
A33:
[x, y]
in p by
XTUPLE_0:def 13;
consider i,j be
Element of
NAT such that
A34:
[(((j
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i), (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j)]
=
[x, y] and
A35: 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) by
A33;
A36: k
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) by
A34,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
reconsider k as
Integer by
A34,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
1
<= k by
A2,
A35,
A36,
Lm46;
then
reconsider k as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
1
<= k & k
<= (
len f1) by
A2,
A17,
A18,
A35,
A36,
Lm46;
hence y
in X by
A26;
end;
then (
rng p)
c= X;
then
A37: (
rng p)
= X by
A25,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
now
let x be
object;
set k = x;
assume x
in (
dom p);
then
consider y be
object such that
A38:
[x, y]
in p by
XTUPLE_0:def 12;
consider i,j be
Element of
NAT such that
A39:
[(((j
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i), (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j)]
=
[x, y] and
A40: 1
<= i & i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) & 1
<= j & j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) by
A38;
A41: k
= (((j
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i) by
A39,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
reconsider k as
Integer by
A39,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
1
<= k by
A1,
A40,
A41,
Lm46;
then
reconsider k as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
1
<= k & k
<= (
len f1) by
A1,
A17,
A18,
A40,
A41,
Lm46;
hence x
in X by
A26;
end;
then (
dom p)
c= X;
then
A42: (
dom p)
= X by
A32,
XBOOLE_0:def 10;
then
reconsider p as
Function of X, X by
A37,
FUNCT_2: 1;
A43: p is
onto by
A37;
now
let x1,x2 be
object;
assume that
A44: x1
in X and
A45: x2
in X;
assume
A46: (p
. x1)
= (p
. x2);
[x1, (p
. x1)]
in p by
A32,
A44,
FUNCT_1:def 2;
then
consider i1,j1 be
Element of
NAT such that
A47:
[(((j1
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i1), (((i1
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j1)]
=
[x1, (p
. x1)] and
A48: 1
<= i1 and i1
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) and
A49: 1
<= j1 & j1
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
[x2, (p
. x2)]
in p by
A32,
A45,
FUNCT_1:def 2;
then
consider i2,j2 be
Element of
NAT such that
A50:
[(((j2
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i2), (((i2
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j2)]
=
[x2, (p
. x2)] and
A51: 1
<= i2 and i2
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) and
A52: 1
<= j2 & j2
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
A53: (((i2
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j2)
= (p
. x2) by
A50,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
A54: (((i1
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j1)
= (p
. x1) by
A47,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then i1
= i2 by
A2,
A46,
A48,
A49,
A51,
A52,
A53,
Lm45;
hence x1
= x2 by
A46,
A47,
A50,
A54,
A53,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
then p is
one-to-one by
FUNCT_2: 56;
then
reconsider p as
Permutation of X by
A43;
take p;
A55: (
len s21)
> 1 by
A1,
A2,
A7,
Def35;
then
A56: ((
len f2)
+ 1)
= (
len s21) by
Def33;
now
((
len s2)
+ 1)
> (1
+ 1) by
A2,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
len s2)
>= 2 by
NAT_1: 13;
then
A57: ((
len s2)
- 1)
>= (2
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
set l = ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1);
let H1,H2 be
GroupWithOperators of O;
let k1,k2 be
Nat;
assume that
A58: k1
in (
dom f1) and
A59: k2
= ((p
" )
. k1);
((
len s1)
+ 1)
> (1
+ 1) by
A1,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
len s1)
>= 2 by
NAT_1: 13;
then ((
len s1)
- 1)
>= (2
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
then
reconsider l as
Element of
NAT by
A57,
INT_1: 3;
assume that
A60: H1
= (f1
. k1) and
A61: H2
= (f2
. k2);
A62: (
len s12)
= ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1) by
A1,
A2,
Def35;
(
0
+ (((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1)))
<= (1
+ (((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A63: (
Seg (
len f1))
c= (
Seg l) by
A17,
A62,
FINSEQ_1: 5;
A64: k1
in (
Seg (
len f1)) by
A58,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then k1
<= (
len f1) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then k1
<> ((((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ 1) by
A17,
A62,
NAT_1: 13;
then
consider i,j be
Nat such that
A65: k1
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j) and
A66: 1
<= i and
A67: i
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) and
A68: 1
<= j and
A69: j
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) by
A1,
A2,
A64,
A63,
Lm44;
reconsider H = (s1
. i), K = (s2
. j), H9 = (s1
. (i
+ 1)), K9 = (s2
. (j
+ 1)) as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
A66,
A67,
A68,
A69,
Th111;
A70: ((p
" )
. k1)
in (
rng (p
" )) by
A58,
FUNCT_2: 4;
(p
. k2)
= k1 by
A25,
A58,
A59,
FUNCT_1: 35;
then
[k2, k1]
in p by
A42,
A59,
A70,
FUNCT_1: 1;
then
consider i9,j9 be
Element of
NAT such that
A71:
[k2, k1]
=
[(((j9
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i9), (((i9
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j9)] and
A72: 1
<= i9 and i9
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) and
A73: 1
<= j9 & j9
<= ((
len s2)
- 1);
set JK = (K9
"\/" (K
/\ H9));
A74: (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j)
= (((i9
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j9) by
A65,
A71,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then
A75: i
= i9 by
A2,
A66,
A68,
A69,
A72,
A73,
Lm45;
A76:
now
per cases ;
suppose
A77: i
= ((
len s1)
- 1);
per cases ;
suppose
A78: j
<> ((
len s2)
- 1);
set j9 = (j
+ 1);
A79: (
0
+ j9)
<= (1
+ j9) by
XREAL_1: 6;
set i9 = 1;
set H3 = (s1
. i9);
H9
= (
(1). G) by
A77,
Def28;
then
A80: JK
= (K9
"\/" (
(1). G)) by
Th21
.= K9 by
Th33;
set H2 = (s2
. j9);
set H1 = (s2
. (j9
+ 1));
(1
+ 1)
<= (j
+ 1) by
A68,
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A81: 1
<= j9 by
XXREAL_0: 2;
j
< ((
len s2)
- 1) by
A69,
A78,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A82: (j
+ 1)
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) by
INT_1: 7;
then
A83: (j9
+ 1)
<= (((
len s2)
- 1)
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then j9
<= (
len s2) by
A79,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then j9
in (
Seg (
len s2)) by
A81;
then
A84: j9
in (
dom s2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
((
len s1)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) by
A1,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
A85: ((
len s1)
- 1)
>= (
0
+ 1) by
INT_1: 7;
then
reconsider H1, H2, H3 as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
A82,
A81,
Th111;
A86: H3
= (
(Omega). G) by
Def28;
now
let x be
object;
H2 is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
then
A87: the
carrier of H2
c= the
carrier of G by
GROUP_2:def 5;
assume x
in the
carrier of H2;
hence x
in the
carrier of (
(Omega). G) by
A87;
end;
then the
carrier of H2
c= the
carrier of (
(Omega). G);
then
A88: the
carrier of H2
= (the
carrier of H2
/\ the
carrier of (
(Omega). G)) by
XBOOLE_1: 28;
(k2
+ 1)
= (((j9
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i9) by
A71,
A74,
A75,
A77,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then (s21
. (k2
+ 1))
= (H1
"\/" (H2
/\ H3)) by
A1,
A2,
A82,
A81,
A85,
Def35;
then
A89: (s21
. (k2
+ 1))
= (H1
"\/" H2) by
A86,
A88,
Th18;
1
<= (j9
+ 1) by
A81,
A79,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (j9
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s2)) by
A83;
then (j9
+ 1)
in (
dom s2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then H1 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H2 by
A84,
Def28;
hence (s21
. (k2
+ 1))
= JK by
A89,
A80,
Th36;
end;
suppose
A90: j
= ((
len s2)
- 1);
then
A91: K9
= (
(1). G) by
Def28;
H9
= (
(1). G) by
A77,
Def28;
then
A92: JK
= ((
(1). G)
"\/" (
(1). G)) by
A91,
Th21
.= (
(1). G) by
Th33;
k2
= (((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1)) by
A71,
A74,
A75,
A77,
A90,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence (s21
. (k2
+ 1))
= JK by
A1,
A2,
A92,
Def35;
end;
end;
suppose i
<> ((
len s1)
- 1);
then i
< ((
len s1)
- 1) by
A67,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A93: (i
+ 1)
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) by
INT_1: 7;
set i9 = (i
+ 1);
set k29 = (k2
+ 1);
(1
+ 1)
<= (i
+ 1) by
A66,
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A94: 1
<= (i
+ 1) by
XXREAL_0: 2;
(k2
+ 1)
= ((((j
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i)
+ 1) by
A71,
A74,
A75,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then k29
= (((j
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i9);
hence (s21
. (k2
+ 1))
= JK by
A1,
A2,
A68,
A69,
A93,
A94,
Def35;
end;
end;
(
rng (p
" ))
c= X;
then (
rng (p
" ))
c= (
Seg (
len f1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then ((p
" )
. k1)
in (
Seg (
len f1)) by
A70;
then
A95: k2
in (
dom f2) by
A4,
A5,
A17,
A56,
A59,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A96: H9 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H & K9 is
normal
StableSubgroup of K by
A66,
A67,
A68,
A69,
Th112;
then
reconsider JK as
normal
StableSubgroup of (K9
"\/" (K
/\ H)) by
Th92;
k2
= (((j
- 1)
* ((
len s1)
- 1))
+ i) by
A71,
A74,
A75,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
then (s21
. k2)
= (K9
"\/" (K
/\ H)) by
A1,
A2,
A66,
A67,
A68,
A69,
Def35;
then
A97: H2
= ((K9
"\/" (K
/\ H))
./. JK) by
A55,
A61,
A95,
A76,
Def33;
set JH = (H9
"\/" (H
/\ K9));
A98:
now
per cases ;
suppose
A99: j
= ((
len s2)
- 1);
per cases ;
suppose
A100: i
<> ((
len s1)
- 1);
set j9 = 1;
set H3 = (s2
. j9);
set i9 = (i
+ 1);
A101: (
0
+ i9)
<= (1
+ i9) by
XREAL_1: 6;
set H2 = (s1
. i9);
set H1 = (s1
. (i9
+ 1));
(1
+ 1)
<= (i
+ 1) by
A66,
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A102: 1
<= i9 by
XXREAL_0: 2;
i
< ((
len s1)
- 1) by
A67,
A100,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A103: (i
+ 1)
<= ((
len s1)
- 1) by
INT_1: 7;
then
A104: (i9
+ 1)
<= (((
len s1)
- 1)
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then i9
<= (
len s1) by
A101,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then i9
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A102;
then
A105: i9
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
((
len s2)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) by
A2,
XREAL_1: 9;
then
A106: ((
len s2)
- 1)
>= (
0
+ 1) by
INT_1: 7;
then
reconsider H1, H2, H3 as
strict
StableSubgroup of G by
A103,
A102,
Th111;
A107: H3
= (
(Omega). G) by
Def28;
now
let x be
object;
H2 is
Subgroup of G by
Def7;
then
A108: the
carrier of H2
c= the
carrier of G by
GROUP_2:def 5;
assume x
in the
carrier of H2;
hence x
in the
carrier of (
(Omega). G) by
A108;
end;
then the
carrier of H2
c= the
carrier of (
(Omega). G);
then
A109: the
carrier of H2
= (the
carrier of H2
/\ the
carrier of (
(Omega). G)) by
XBOOLE_1: 28;
(k1
+ 1)
= (((i9
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j9) by
A65,
A99;
then (s12
. (k1
+ 1))
= (H1
"\/" (H2
/\ H3)) by
A1,
A2,
A103,
A102,
A106,
Def35;
then
A110: (s12
. (k1
+ 1))
= (H1
"\/" H2) by
A107,
A109,
Th18;
1
<= (i9
+ 1) by
A102,
A101,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then (i9
+ 1)
in (
Seg (
len s1)) by
A104;
then (i9
+ 1)
in (
dom s1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A111: H1 is
normal
StableSubgroup of H2 by
A105,
Def28;
JH
= (H9
"\/" (H
/\ (
(1). G))) by
A99,
Def28
.= (H9
"\/" (
(1). G)) by
Th21
.= H9 by
Th33;
hence (s12
. (k1
+ 1))
= JH by
A110,
A111,
Th36;
end;
suppose
A112: i
= ((
len s1)
- 1);
then
A113: k1
= (((
len s1)
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1)) by
A65,
A99;
A114: K9
= (
(1). G) by
A99,
Def28;
H9
= (
(1). G) by
A112,
Def28;
then JH
= ((
(1). G)
"\/" (
(1). G)) by
A114,
Th21
.= (
(1). G) by
Th33;
hence (s12
. (k1
+ 1))
= JH by
A1,
A2,
A113,
Def35;
end;
end;
suppose j
<> ((
len s2)
- 1);
then j
< ((
len s2)
- 1) by
A69,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A115: (j
+ 1)
<= ((
len s2)
- 1) by
INT_1: 7;
set j9 = (j
+ 1);
set k19 = (k1
+ 1);
(1
+ 1)
<= (j
+ 1) by
A68,
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A116: 1
<= (j
+ 1) by
XXREAL_0: 2;
k19
= (((i
- 1)
* ((
len s2)
- 1))
+ j9) by
A65;
hence (s12
. (k1
+ 1))
= JH by
A1,
A2,
A66,
A67,
A115,
A116,
Def35;
end;
end;
reconsider JH as
normal
StableSubgroup of (H9
"\/" (H
/\ K)) by
A96,
Th92;
(s12
. k1)
= (H9
"\/" (H
/\ K)) by
A1,
A2,
A65,
A66,
A67,
A68,
A69,
Def35;
then H1
= ((H9
"\/" (H
/\ K))
./. JH) by
A16,
A58,
A60,
A98,
Def33;
hence (H1,H2)
are_isomorphic by
A96,
A97,
Th93;
end;
hence (f1,f2)
are_equivalent_under (p,O) by
A4,
A5,
A17,
A56;
end;
not s12 is
empty by
A3,
A4;
hence thesis by
A6,
A8,
Th108;
end;
::$Notion-Name
theorem ::
GROUP_9:118
Th118: ex s19, s29 st s19
is_finer_than s1 & s29
is_finer_than s2 & s19
is_equivalent_with s29
proof
per cases ;
suppose
A1: (
len s1)
> 1 & (
len s2)
> 1;
set s29 = (
the_schreier_series_of (s2,s1));
set s19 = (
the_schreier_series_of (s1,s2));
take s19, s29;
thus s19
is_finer_than s1 & s29
is_finer_than s2 by
A1,
Th116;
thus thesis by
A1,
Th117;
end;
suppose
A2: (
len s1)
<= 1 or (
len s2)
<= 1;
per cases ;
suppose
A3: (
len s1)
<= (
len s2);
set s29 = s2;
set s19 = s2;
take s19, s29;
thus s19
is_finer_than s1 & s29
is_finer_than s2 by
A2,
A3,
Th114;
thus thesis by
Th113;
end;
suppose
A4: (
len s1)
> (
len s2);
set s29 = s1;
set s19 = s1;
take s19, s29;
thus s19
is_finer_than s1 & s29
is_finer_than s2 by
A2,
A4,
Th114;
thus thesis by
Th113;
end;
end;
end;
begin
::$Notion-Name
theorem ::
GROUP_9:119
s1 is
jordan_holder & s2 is
jordan_holder implies s1
is_equivalent_with s2
proof
assume
A1: s1 is
jordan_holder;
assume
A2: s2 is
jordan_holder;
per cases ;
suppose
A3: s1 is
empty;
now
now
set x =
{} ;
take x;
thus x
c= (
dom s2);
thus s1
= (s2
* (
Sgm x)) by
A3,
FINSEQ_3: 43;
end;
then
A4: s2
is_finer_than s1;
assume
A5: not s2 is
empty;
s2 is
strictly_decreasing by
A2;
hence contradiction by
A1,
A3,
A5,
A4;
end;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
suppose
A6: not s1 is
empty;
defpred
P[
Nat] means for s19, s29 st not s19 is
empty & not s29 is
empty & (
len s19)
= ((
len s1)
+ $1) & s19
is_finer_than s1 & s29
is_finer_than s2 & ex p be
Permutation of (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s19)) st ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s19),(
the_series_of_quotients_of s29))
are_equivalent_under (p,O) holds ex p be
Permutation of (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) st ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1),(
the_series_of_quotients_of s2))
are_equivalent_under (p,O);
A7:
now
assume
A8: s2 is
empty;
now
set x =
{} ;
take x;
thus x
c= (
dom s1);
thus s2
= (s1
* (
Sgm x)) by
A8,
FINSEQ_3: 43;
end;
then
A9: s1
is_finer_than s2;
s1 is
strictly_decreasing by
A1;
hence contradiction by
A2,
A6,
A8,
A9;
end;
A10: for n st
P[n] holds
P[(n
+ 1)]
proof
let n;
assume
A11:
P[n];
now
let s19, s29;
assume that not s19 is
empty and not s29 is
empty;
assume
A12: (
len s19)
= (((
len s1)
+ n)
+ 1);
set f1 = (
the_series_of_quotients_of s19);
assume
A13: s19
is_finer_than s1;
((n
+ 1)
+ (
len s1))
> (
0
+ (
len s1)) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
consider i such that
A14: i
in (
dom f1) and
A15: for H st H
= (f1
. i) holds H is
trivial by
A1,
A12,
A13,
Th109;
reconsider s199 = (
Del (s19,i)) as
FinSequence of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
FINSEQ_3: 105;
A16: i
in (
dom s19) by
A14,
A15,
Th103;
A17: (i
+ 1)
in (
dom s19) & (s19
. i)
= (s19
. (i
+ 1)) by
A14,
A15,
Th103;
then
reconsider s199 as
CompositionSeries of G by
A16,
Th94;
A18: (
the_series_of_quotients_of s199)
= (
Del (f1,i)) by
A16,
A17,
Th104;
set f2 = (
the_series_of_quotients_of s29);
assume
A19: s29
is_finer_than s2;
given p be
Permutation of (
dom f1) such that
A20: (f1,f2)
are_equivalent_under (p,O);
set H1 = (f1
. i);
A21: (f1
. i)
in (
rng f1) by
A14,
FUNCT_1: 3;
set j = ((p
" )
. i);
reconsider j as
Nat;
set H2 = (f2
. j);
reconsider s299 = (
Del (s29,j)) as
FinSequence of (
the_stable_subgroups_of G) by
FINSEQ_3: 105;
(
rng (p
" ))
c= (
dom f1);
then
A22: (
rng (p
" ))
c= (
Seg (
len f1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A23: (
len f1)
= (
len f2) by
A20;
((p
" )
. i)
in (
rng (p
" )) by
A14,
FUNCT_2: 4;
then ((p
" )
. i)
in (
Seg (
len f1)) by
A22;
then
A24: j
in (
dom f2) by
A23,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (f2
. j)
in (
rng f2) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider H1, H2 as
strict
GroupWithOperators of O by
A21,
Th102;
A25: H1 is
trivial by
A15;
(H1,H2)
are_isomorphic by
A20,
A14;
then
A26: for H st H
= (f2
. j) holds H is
trivial by
A25,
Th58;
then
A27: j
in (
dom s29) & (j
+ 1)
in (
dom s29) by
A24,
Th103;
A28: (s29
. j)
= (s29
. (j
+ 1)) by
A24,
A26,
Th103;
then
reconsider s299 as
CompositionSeries of G by
A27,
Th94;
A29: s299
is_finer_than s2 & not s299 is
empty by
A2,
A7,
A19,
A27,
A28,
Th97,
Th99;
A30: (
len s199)
= ((
len s1)
+ n) by
A12,
A16,
FINSEQ_3: 109;
(
the_series_of_quotients_of s299)
= (
Del (f2,j)) by
A27,
A28,
Th104;
then
A31: ex p be
Permutation of (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s199)) st ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s199),(
the_series_of_quotients_of s299))
are_equivalent_under (p,O) by
A20,
A14,
A18,
Th106;
s199
is_finer_than s1 & not s199 is
empty by
A1,
A6,
A13,
A16,
A17,
Th97,
Th99;
hence thesis by
A11,
A30,
A29,
A31;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
A32:
P[
0 ]
proof
let s19, s29;
assume
A33: not s19 is
empty & not s29 is
empty;
assume
A34: (
len s19)
= ((
len s1)
+
0 ) & s19
is_finer_than s1;
assume
A35: s29
is_finer_than s2;
given p be
Permutation of (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s19)) such that
A36: ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s19),(
the_series_of_quotients_of s29))
are_equivalent_under (p,O);
A37: s19
is_equivalent_with s29 by
A33,
A36,
Th108;
s19
= s1 by
A34,
Th96;
then s29 is
jordan_holder by
A1,
A37,
Th115;
then s29
= s2 by
A2,
A35;
then s1
is_equivalent_with s2 by
A34,
A37,
Th96;
hence thesis by
A6,
A7,
Th108;
end;
A38: for n holds
P[n] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A32,
A10);
consider s19, s29 such that
A39: s19
is_finer_than s1 and
A40: s29
is_finer_than s2 and
A41: s19
is_equivalent_with s29 by
Th118;
A42: not s19 is
empty by
A6,
A39;
A43: ex n st (
len s19)
= ((
len s1)
+ n) by
A39,
Th95;
A44: not s29 is
empty by
A7,
A40;
then ex p9 be
Permutation of (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s19)) st ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s19),(
the_series_of_quotients_of s29))
are_equivalent_under (p9,O) by
A41,
A42,
Th108;
then ex p be
Permutation of (
dom (
the_series_of_quotients_of s1)) st ((
the_series_of_quotients_of s1),(
the_series_of_quotients_of s2))
are_equivalent_under (p,O) by
A39,
A40,
A42,
A44,
A38,
A43;
hence thesis by
A6,
A7,
Th108;
end;
end;
begin
theorem ::
GROUP_9:120
for P,R be
Relation holds P
= ((
rng P)
|` R) iff (P
~ )
= ((R
~ )
| (
dom (P
~ ))) by
Lm35;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:121
for X be
set, P,R be
Relation holds (P
* (R
| X))
= ((X
|` P)
* R) by
Lm36;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:122
for n be
Nat, X be
set, f be
PartFunc of
REAL ,
REAL st X
c= (
Seg n) & X
c= (
dom f) & (f
| X) is
increasing & (f
.: X)
c= (
NAT
\
{
0 }) holds (
Sgm (f
.: X))
= (f
* (
Sgm X)) by
Lm37;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:123
for y be
set, i,n be
Nat st y
c= (
Seg (n
+ 1)) & i
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) & not i
in y holds ex x st (
Sgm x)
= (((
Sgm ((
Seg (n
+ 1))
\
{i}))
" )
* (
Sgm y)) & x
c= (
Seg n) by
Lm38;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:124
for D be non
empty
set, f be
FinSequence of D, p be
Element of D, n be
Nat st n
in (
dom f) holds f
= (
Del ((
Ins (f,n,p)),(n
+ 1))) by
Lm43;
theorem ::
GROUP_9:125
for G,H be
Group, F1 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of G, F2 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of H, I be
FinSequence of
INT , f be
Homomorphism of G, H st (for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom F1) holds (F2
. k)
= (f
. (F1
. k))) & (
len F1)
= (
len I) & (
len F2)
= (
len I) holds (f
. (
Product (F1
|^ I)))
= (
Product (F2
|^ I)) by
Lm23;