field_1.miz
begin
reserve n for
Nat;
notation
let L be non
empty
ZeroStr;
let p be
Polynomial of L;
synonym
LM p for
Leading-Monomial p;
end
theorem ::
FIELD_1:1
Th2: for L be non
empty
ZeroStr, p be
Polynomial of L holds (
deg p) is
Element of
NAT iff p
<> (
0_. L)
proof
let L be non
empty
ZeroStr;
let p be
Polynomial of L;
now
assume p
<> (
0_. L);
then (
len p)
<>
0 by
POLYNOM4: 5;
then ((
len p)
+ 1)
> (
0
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
len p)
>= 1 by
NAT_1: 13;
hence (
deg p) is
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
end;
hence thesis by
HURWITZ: 20;
end;
definition
let R be non
degenerated
Ring;
let p be non
zero
Polynomial of R;
:: original:
deg
redefine
func
deg p ->
Element of
NAT ;
coherence
proof
p
<> (
0_. R);
hence thesis by
Th2;
end;
end
registration
let R be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
right-distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr;
let f be
additive
Function of R, R;
reduce (f
. (
0. R)) to (
0. R);
reducibility by
RING_2: 6;
end
theorem ::
FIELD_1:2
Th3: for R be
Ring, I be
Ideal of R holds for x be
Element of (R
/ I), a be
Element of R st x
= (
Class ((
EqRel (R,I)),a)) holds for n be
Nat holds (x
|^ n)
= (
Class ((
EqRel (R,I)),(a
|^ n)))
proof
let R be
Ring, I be
Ideal of R;
let x be
Element of (R
/ I), a be
Element of R;
assume
A1: x
= (
Class ((
EqRel (R,I)),a));
let n be
Nat;
defpred
P[
Nat] means (x
|^ $1)
= (
Class ((
EqRel (R,I)),(a
|^ $1)));
(x
|^
0 )
= (
1_ (R
/ I)) by
BINOM: 8
.= (
Class ((
EqRel (R,I)),(
1_ R))) by
RING_1:def 6
.= (
Class ((
EqRel (R,I)),(a
|^
0 ))) by
BINOM: 8;
then
A2:
P[
0 ];
A3:
now
let i be
Nat;
assume
A4:
P[i];
(
Class ((
EqRel (R,I)),(a
|^ (i
+ 1))))
= (
Class ((
EqRel (R,I)),((a
|^ i)
* (a
|^ 1)))) by
BINOM: 10
.= (
Class ((
EqRel (R,I)),((a
|^ i)
* a))) by
BINOM: 8
.= ((x
|^ i)
* x) by
A1,
A4,
RING_1: 14
.= ((x
|^ i)
* (x
|^ 1)) by
BINOM: 8
.= (x
|^ (i
+ 1)) by
BINOM: 10;
hence
P[(i
+ 1)];
end;
for i be
Nat holds
P[i] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A2,
A3);
hence thesis;
end;
definition
let R be
Ring, a,b be
Element of R;
::
FIELD_1:def1
pred b
is_a_irreducible_factor_of a means b
divides a & b is
irreducible;
end
registration
cluster non
almost_left_invertible
factorial for
domRing;
existence ;
end
theorem ::
FIELD_1:3
Th4: for R be non
almost_left_invertible
factorial
domRing, a be non
zero
NonUnit of R holds ex b be
Element of R st b
is_a_irreducible_factor_of a
proof
let R be non
almost_left_invertible
factorial
domRing, a be non
zero
NonUnit of R;
consider F be non
empty
FinSequence of R such that
A1: F
is_a_factorization_of a by
RING_2:def 12;
(
len F)
<>
0 ;
then
consider G be
FinSequence of R, d be
Element of R such that
A2: F
= (G
^
<*d*>) by
FINSEQ_2: 19;
take d;
((
Product G)
* (
Product
<*d*>))
= a by
A1,
A2,
GROUP_4: 5;
then
A3: (
Product
<*d*>)
divides a by
GCD_1:def 1;
reconsider lf = (
len F) as
Element of (
dom F) by
FINSEQ_5: 6;
(
len F)
= ((
len G)
+ (
len
<*d*>)) by
A2,
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= ((
len G)
+ 1) by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
then (F
. lf)
= d by
A2,
FINSEQ_1: 42;
hence thesis by
A1,
A3,
GROUP_4: 9;
end;
begin
notation
let R be
Ring;
let a be
Element of R;
let n be
Nat;
synonym
anpoly (a,n) for
seq (n,a);
end
Lm1: for R be non
degenerated
Ring, a be non
zero
Element of R holds (
deg (
anpoly (a,n)))
= n
proof
let R be non
degenerated
Ring, a be non
zero
Element of R;
(
len (
anpoly (a,n)))
= (n
+ 1) by
POLYDIFF: 27;
hence thesis;
end;
registration
let R be non
degenerated
Ring, a be non
zero
Element of R, n be
Nat;
cluster (
anpoly (a,n)) -> non
zero;
coherence
proof
(
deg (
anpoly (a,n)))
= n & n
<> (
- 1) by
Lm1;
hence thesis by
HURWITZ: 20,
UPROOTS:def 5;
end;
end
registration
let R be
Ring, a be
zero
Element of R, n be
Nat;
cluster (
anpoly (a,n)) ->
zero;
coherence
proof
set q = (
anpoly (a,n));
A1: a
= (
0. R) by
STRUCT_0:def 12;
now
let i be
Element of
NAT ;
per cases ;
suppose
A2: i
= n;
(q
. n)
= (
0. R) by
A1,
POLYDIFF: 24
.= ((
0_. R)
. n) by
FUNCOP_1: 7,
ORDINAL1:def 12;
hence (q
. i)
= ((
0_. R)
. i) by
A2;
end;
suppose i
<> n;
then (q
. i)
= (
0. R) by
POLYDIFF: 25
.= ((
0_. R)
. i) by
FUNCOP_1: 7;
hence (q
. i)
= ((
0_. R)
. i);
end;
end;
then q
= (
0_. R);
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
FIELD_1:4
for R be non
degenerated
Ring, a be non
zero
Element of R holds (
deg (
anpoly (a,n)))
= n by
Lm1;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:5
for R be non
degenerated
Ring, a be
Element of R holds (
LC (
anpoly (a,n)))
= a
proof
let R be non
degenerated
Ring, a be
Element of R;
set q = (
anpoly (a,n));
per cases ;
suppose
A1: a
= (
0. R);
then q
= (
0_. R) by
UPROOTS:def 5;
then (q
. ((
len q)
-' 1))
= (
0. R) by
FUNCOP_1: 7;
hence thesis by
A1,
RATFUNC1:def 6;
end;
suppose a
<> (
0. R);
then a is non
zero;
then
A2: n
= (
deg q) by
Lm1
.= ((
len q)
- 1);
then (n
+ 1)
= (
len q);
then ((
len q)
-' 1)
= n by
A2,
XREAL_1: 233,
NAT_1: 11;
hence a
= (q
. ((
len q)
-' 1)) by
POLYDIFF: 24
.= (
LC q) by
RATFUNC1:def 6;
end;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:6
for R be non
degenerated
Ring, n be non
zero
Nat, a,x be
Element of R holds (
eval ((
anpoly (a,n)),x))
= (a
* (x
|^ n))
proof
let R be non
degenerated
Ring, n be non
zero
Nat, a,x be
Element of R;
set q = (
anpoly (a,n));
per cases ;
suppose
A1: a
= (
0. R);
then q
= (
0_. R) by
UPROOTS:def 5;
hence (
eval (q,x))
= (a
* (x
|^ n)) by
A1,
POLYNOM4: 17;
end;
suppose a
<> (
0. R);
then
A2: a is non
zero;
consider F be
FinSequence of R such that
A3: (
eval (q,x))
= (
Sum F) and
A4: (
len F)
= (
len q) and
A5: for j be
Element of
NAT st j
in (
dom F) holds (F
. j)
= ((q
. (j
-' 1))
* ((
power R)
. (x,(j
-' 1)))) by
POLYNOM4:def 2;
n
= (
deg q) by
A2,
Lm1
.= ((
len q)
- 1);
then
A7: (
dom F)
= (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A8: 1
<= (n
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 11;
A9: ((n
+ 1)
-' 1)
= ((n
+ 1)
- 1) by
NAT_1: 11,
XREAL_1: 233;
A10: (F
/. (n
+ 1))
= (F
. (n
+ 1)) by
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 3,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((q
. n)
* ((
power R)
. (x,((n
+ 1)
-' 1)))) by
A9,
A5,
A8,
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 1
.= (a
* ((
power R)
. (x,((n
+ 1)
-' 1)))) by
POLYDIFF: 24
.= (a
* (x
|^ n)) by
A9,
BINOM:def 2;
now
let j be
Element of
NAT ;
assume
A11: j
in (
dom F) & j
<> (n
+ 1);
then
A12: 1
<= j
<= (n
+ 1) by
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then j
< (n
+ 1) by
A11,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A13: 1
<= j
<= n by
A11,
NAT_1: 13,
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A14: (j
-' 1)
= (j
- 1) by
A12,
XREAL_0:def 2;
A15: (j
- 1)
< (j
-
0 ) by
XREAL_1: 15;
thus (F
/. j)
= (F
. j) by
A11,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((q
. (j
-' 1))
* ((
power R)
. (x,(j
-' 1)))) by
A5,
A11
.= ((
0. R)
* ((
power R)
. (x,(j
-' 1)))) by
A15,
A13,
A14,
POLYDIFF: 25
.= (
0. R);
end;
hence thesis by
A3,
A10,
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 3,
POLYNOM2: 3;
end;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:7
for R be non
degenerated
Ring, a be
Element of R holds (
anpoly (a,
0 ))
= (a
| R);
theorem ::
FIELD_1:8
Th9: for R be non
degenerated
Ring, n be non
zero
Element of
NAT holds (
anpoly ((
1. R),n))
= (
rpoly (n,(
0. R)))
proof
let R be non
degenerated
Ring, n be non
zero
Element of
NAT ;
set p = (
anpoly ((
1. R),n)), r = (
rpoly (n,(
0. R)));
now
let i be
Element of
NAT ;
A1: 1
<= n by
NAT_1: 53;
per cases ;
suppose
A2: i
=
0 ;
then (r
. i)
= (
- ((
power R)
. ((
0. R),n))) by
HURWITZ: 25
.= (
- ((
0. R)
|^ n)) by
BINOM:def 2
.= (
- (
0. R)) by
A1,
EC_PF_2: 5
.= (p
. i) by
A2,
POLYDIFF: 25;
hence (p
. i)
= (r
. i);
end;
suppose
A3: i
= n;
then (r
. i)
= (
1_ R) by
HURWITZ: 25
.= (p
. i) by
A3,
POLYDIFF: 24;
hence (p
. i)
= (r
. i);
end;
suppose
A4: i
<>
0 & i
<> n;
then (r
. i)
= (
0. R) by
HURWITZ: 26
.= (p
. i) by
A4,
POLYDIFF: 25;
hence (p
. i)
= (r
. i);
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:9
Th10: for R be non
degenerated
comRing, a,b be non
zero
Element of R holds (b
* (
anpoly (a,n)))
= (
anpoly ((a
* b),n))
proof
let R be non
degenerated
comRing, a,b be non
zero
Element of R;
now
let i be
Element of
NAT ;
set p = (
anpoly (a,n)), q = (
anpoly ((a
* b),n));
per cases ;
suppose
A1: i
= n;
((b
* p)
. i)
= (b
* (p
. i)) by
POLYNOM5:def 4
.= (b
* a) by
A1,
POLYDIFF: 24
.= (q
. i) by
A1,
POLYDIFF: 24;
hence ((b
* p)
. i)
= (q
. i);
end;
suppose
A2: i
<> n;
((b
* p)
. i)
= (b
* (p
. i)) by
POLYNOM5:def 4
.= (b
* (
0. R)) by
A2,
POLYDIFF: 25
.= (q
. i) by
A2,
POLYDIFF: 25;
hence ((b
* p)
. i)
= (q
. i);
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:10
Th11: for R be non
degenerated
comRing, a,b be non
zero
Element of R, n,m be
Nat holds ((
anpoly (a,n))
*' (
anpoly (b,m)))
= (
anpoly ((a
* b),(n
+ m)))
proof
let R be non
degenerated
comRing, a,b be non
zero
Element of R, n,m be
Nat;
set p = (
anpoly (a,n)), q = (
anpoly (b,m)), r = (
anpoly ((a
* b),(n
+ m)));
per cases ;
suppose
A1: n
=
0 ;
hence (p
*' q)
= ((a
| R)
*' q)
.= ((a
* (
1_. R))
*' q) by
RING_4: 16
.= (a
* ((
1_. R)
*' q)) by
RING_4: 10
.= r by
A1,
Th10;
end;
suppose
A2: m
=
0 ;
hence (p
*' q)
= (p
*' (b
| R))
.= (p
*' (b
* (
1_. R))) by
RING_4: 16
.= (b
* (p
*' (
1_. R))) by
RING_4: 10
.= r by
A2,
Th10;
end;
suppose
A3: n
<>
0 & m
<>
0 ;
then
A4: n
>= (
0
+ 1) & m
>= (
0
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 13;
now
let i be
Element of
NAT ;
consider F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of R such that
A5: (
len F)
= (i
+ 1) & ((p
*' q)
. i)
= (
Sum F) & for k be
Element of
NAT st k
in (
dom F) holds (F
. k)
= ((p
. (k
-' 1))
* (q
. ((i
+ 1)
-' k))) by
POLYNOM3:def 9;
A6: for k be
Element of
NAT st k
in (
dom F) & k
<> (
len p) holds (F
/. k)
= (
0. R)
proof
let k be
Element of
NAT ;
assume
A7: k
in (
dom F) & k
<> (
len p);
A8: (
deg p)
= n by
Lm1;
now
assume
A9: (k
-' 1)
= n;
then (k
- 1)
= (k
-' 1) by
A3,
XREAL_0:def 2;
hence contradiction by
A7,
A9,
A8;
end;
then
A10: (p
. (k
-' 1))
= (
0. R) by
POLYDIFF: 25;
thus (F
/. k)
= (F
. k) by
A7,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((
0. R)
* (q
. ((i
+ 1)
-' k))) by
A10,
A7,
A5
.= (
0. R);
end;
A11: (
dom F)
= (
Seg (i
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3,
A5;
per cases ;
suppose
A12: i
= (n
+ m);
A13: (
deg p)
= n by
Lm1;
then
A14: (
len p)
<= ((n
+ 1)
+ m) by
NAT_1: 11;
A15: (
dom F)
= (
Seg ((n
+ m)
+ 1)) by
A12,
A5,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(((
len p)
- 1)
+ 1)
>= (1
+ 1) by
A13,
A4,
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A16: 1
<= (
len p) by
XXREAL_0: 2;
A17: ((
len p)
-' 1)
= n by
A13,
XREAL_0:def 2;
m
= ((i
+ 1)
- (
len p)) by
A13,
A12;
then
A18: ((i
+ 1)
-' (
len p))
= m by
XREAL_0:def 2;
(
Sum F)
= (F
/. (
len p)) by
A16,
A6,
A14,
A15,
FINSEQ_1: 1,
POLYNOM2: 3
.= (F
. (
len p)) by
A16,
A14,
A15,
FINSEQ_1: 1,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((p
. n)
* (q
. m)) by
A16,
A14,
A15,
FINSEQ_1: 1,
A17,
A18,
A5
.= (a
* (q
. m)) by
POLYDIFF: 24
.= (a
* b) by
POLYDIFF: 24;
hence (r
. i)
= ((p
*' q)
. i) by
A5,
A12,
POLYDIFF: 24;
end;
suppose
A19: i
<> (n
+ m);
(
Sum F)
= (
0. R)
proof
per cases ;
suppose i
< ((
len p)
- 1);
then
A20: (i
+ 1)
< (((
len p)
- 1)
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
now
let k be
Element of
NAT ;
assume
A21: k
in (
dom F);
then 1
<= k
<= (i
+ 1) by
A11,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
hence (
0. R)
= (F
/. k) by
A20,
A21,
A6
.= (F
. k) by
A21,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
end;
hence thesis by
POLYNOM3: 1;
end;
suppose
A22: i
>= ((
len p)
- 1);
now
let k be
Element of
NAT ;
assume
A23: k
in (
dom F);
per cases ;
suppose k
<> (
len p);
hence (
0. R)
= (F
/. k) by
A23,
A6
.= (F
. k) by
A23,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
end;
suppose
A24: k
= (
len p);
A25: (
deg p)
= n by
Lm1;
(i
+ 1)
>= (((
len p)
- 1)
+ 1) by
A22,
XREAL_1: 6;
then ((i
+ 1)
- (
len p))
>= ((
len p)
- (
len p)) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then ((i
+ 1)
-' (
len p))
= (i
- n) by
A25,
XREAL_0:def 2;
then
A26: ((i
+ 1)
-' (
len p))
<> m by
A19;
thus (F
. k)
= ((p
. ((
len p)
-' 1))
* (q
. ((i
+ 1)
-' (
len p)))) by
A5,
A23,
A24
.= ((p
. ((
len p)
-' 1))
* (
0. R)) by
A26,
POLYDIFF: 25
.= (
0. R);
end;
end;
hence thesis by
POLYNOM3: 1;
end;
end;
hence (r
. i)
= ((p
*' q)
. i) by
A5,
A19,
POLYDIFF: 25;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:11
Th12: for R be non
degenerated
Ring, p be non
zero
Polynomial of R holds (
LM p)
= (
anpoly ((p
. (
deg p)),(
deg p)))
proof
let R be non
degenerated
Ring, p be non
zero
Polynomial of R;
set q = (
anpoly ((p
. (
deg p)),(
deg p))), r = (
LM p), n = (
deg p);
reconsider degp = (
deg p) as
Element of
NAT ;
A1: n
= ((
len p)
-' 1) by
XREAL_0:def 2;
now
let i be
Element of
NAT ;
per cases ;
suppose
A3: i
<> n;
then (r
. i)
= (
0. R) by
A1,
POLYNOM4:def 1
.= (q
. i) by
A3,
POLYDIFF: 25;
hence (r
. i)
= (q
. i);
end;
suppose
A4: i
= n;
then (r
. i)
= (p
. n) by
A1,
POLYNOM4:def 1
.= (q
. i) by
A4,
POLYDIFF: 24;
hence (r
. i)
= (q
. i);
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:12
Th13: for R be non
degenerated
comRing holds (
<%(
0. R), (
1. R)%>
`^ n)
= (
anpoly ((
1. R),n))
proof
let R be non
degenerated
comRing;
defpred
P[
Nat] means (
<%(
0. R), (
1. R)%>
`^ $1)
= (
anpoly ((
1. R),$1));
A1:
P[
0 ]
proof
thus (
<%(
0. R), (
1. R)%>
`^
0 )
= (
1_. R) by
POLYNOM5: 15
.= (
anpoly ((
1. R),
0 ));
end;
A2:
now
let n be
Nat;
assume
P[n];
then (
<%(
0. R), (
1. R)%>
`^ (n
+ 1))
= ((
anpoly ((
1. R),n))
*'
<%(
- (
0. R)), (
1. R)%>) by
POLYNOM5: 19
.= ((
anpoly ((
1. R),n))
*' (
rpoly (1,(
0. R)))) by
RING_5: 10
.= ((
anpoly ((
1. R),n))
*' (
anpoly ((
1. R),1))) by
Th9
.= (
anpoly (((
1. R)
* (
1. R)),(n
+ 1))) by
Th11
.= (
anpoly ((
1. R),(n
+ 1)));
hence
P[(n
+ 1)];
end;
for k be
Nat holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A1,
A2);
hence thesis;
end;
begin
theorem ::
FIELD_1:13
Th14: for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for a be
Element of R, n be
Nat holds (h
. (a
|^ n))
= ((h
. a)
|^ n)
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
let a be
Element of R, n be
Nat;
defpred
P[
Nat] means (h
. (a
|^ $1))
= ((h
. a)
|^ $1);
A1:
P[
0 ]
proof
thus (h
. (a
|^
0 ))
= (h
. (
1_ R)) by
BINOM: 8
.= (
1_ S) by
GROUP_1:def 13
.= ((h
. a)
|^
0 ) by
BINOM: 8;
end;
A2:
now
let k be
Nat;
assume
A3:
P[k];
(h
. (a
|^ (k
+ 1)))
= (h
. ((a
|^ k)
* (a
|^ 1))) by
BINOM: 10
.= ((h
. (a
|^ k))
* (h
. (a
|^ 1))) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= (((h
. a)
|^ k)
* (h
. a)) by
A3,
BINOM: 8
.= (((h
. a)
|^ k)
* ((h
. a)
|^ 1)) by
BINOM: 8
.= ((h
. a)
|^ (k
+ 1)) by
BINOM: 10;
hence
P[(k
+ 1)];
end;
for n be
Nat holds
P[n] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A1,
A2);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:14
for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds (h
. (
Sum (
<*> the
carrier of R)))
= (
0. S)
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
thus (h
. (
Sum (
<*> the
carrier of R)))
= (h
. (
0. R)) by
RLVECT_1: 43
.= (
0. S) by
RING_2: 6;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:15
for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for F be
FinSequence of R, a be
Element of R holds (h
. (
Sum (
<*a*>
^ F)))
= ((h
. a)
+ (h
. (
Sum F)))
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
let F be
FinSequence of R, a be
Element of R;
thus (h
. (
Sum (
<*a*>
^ F)))
= (h
. ((
Sum
<*a*>)
+ (
Sum F))) by
RLVECT_1: 41
.= ((h
. (
Sum
<*a*>))
+ (h
. (
Sum F))) by
VECTSP_1:def 20
.= ((h
. a)
+ (h
. (
Sum F))) by
RLVECT_1: 44;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:16
Th17: for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for F be
FinSequence of R, a be
Element of R holds (h
. (
Sum (F
^
<*a*>)))
= ((h
. (
Sum F))
+ (h
. a))
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
let F be
FinSequence of R, a be
Element of R;
thus (h
. (
Sum (F
^
<*a*>)))
= (h
. ((
Sum F)
+ (
Sum
<*a*>))) by
RLVECT_1: 41
.= ((h
. (
Sum F))
+ (h
. (
Sum
<*a*>))) by
VECTSP_1:def 20
.= ((h
. (
Sum F))
+ (h
. a)) by
RLVECT_1: 44;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:17
for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for F,G be
FinSequence of R holds (h
. (
Sum (F
^ G)))
= ((h
. (
Sum F))
+ (h
. (
Sum G)))
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
let F,G be
FinSequence of R;
thus (h
. (
Sum (F
^ G)))
= (h
. ((
Sum F)
+ (
Sum G))) by
RLVECT_1: 41
.= ((h
. (
Sum F))
+ (h
. (
Sum G))) by
VECTSP_1:def 20;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:18
for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds (h
. (
Product (
<*> the
carrier of R)))
= (
1. S)
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
thus (h
. (
Product (
<*> the
carrier of R)))
= (h
. (
1_ R)) by
GROUP_4: 8
.= (
1_ S) by
GROUP_1:def 13
.= (
1. S);
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:19
for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for F be
FinSequence of R, a be
Element of R holds (h
. (
Product (
<*a*>
^ F)))
= ((h
. a)
* (h
. (
Product F)))
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
let F be
FinSequence of R, a be
Element of R;
thus (h
. (
Product (
<*a*>
^ F)))
= (h
. ((
Product
<*a*>)
* (
Product F))) by
GROUP_4: 5
.= ((h
. (
Product
<*a*>))
* (h
. (
Product F))) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((h
. a)
* (h
. (
Product F))) by
GROUP_4: 9;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:20
for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for F be
FinSequence of R, a be
Element of R holds (h
. (
Product (F
^
<*a*>)))
= ((h
. (
Product F))
* (h
. a))
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
let F be
FinSequence of R, a be
Element of R;
thus (h
. (
Product (F
^
<*a*>)))
= (h
. ((
Product F)
* (
Product
<*a*>))) by
GROUP_4: 5
.= ((h
. (
Product F))
* (h
. (
Product
<*a*>))) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((h
. (
Product F))
* (h
. a)) by
GROUP_4: 9;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:21
for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for F,G be
FinSequence of R holds (h
. (
Product (F
^ G)))
= ((h
. (
Product F))
* (h
. (
Product G)))
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
let F,G be
FinSequence of R;
thus (h
. (
Product (F
^ G)))
= (h
. ((
Product F)
* (
Product G))) by
GROUP_4: 5
.= ((h
. (
Product F))
* (h
. (
Product G))) by
GROUP_6:def 6;
end;
begin
definition
let R,S be
Ring;
let f be
Function of (
Polynom-Ring R), (
Polynom-Ring S);
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
:: original:
.
redefine
func f
. p ->
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring S) ;
coherence
proof
(f
. p) is
Element of (
Polynom-Ring S);
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
additive
Function of R, S;
::
FIELD_1:def2
func
PolyHom h ->
Function of (
Polynom-Ring R), (
Polynom-Ring S) means
:
Def2: for f be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds for i be
Nat holds ((it
. f)
. i)
= (h
. (f
. i));
existence
proof
A1: for f be
Polynomial of R holds ex g be
Polynomial of S st for i be
Nat holds (g
. i)
= (h
. (f
. i))
proof
let f be
Polynomial of R;
deffunc
F(
Nat) = (h
. (f
. $1));
consider q be
AlgSequence of S such that
A2: (
len q)
<= (
len f) & for k be
Nat st k
< (
len f) holds (q
. k)
=
F(k) from
ALGSEQ_1:sch 1;
take q;
now
let i be
Nat;
per cases ;
suppose i
< (
len f);
hence (q
. i)
= (h
. (f
. i)) by
A2;
end;
suppose
A3: i
>= (
len f);
then (f
. i)
= (
0. R) by
ALGSEQ_1: 8;
hence (h
. (f
. i))
= (
0. S) by
RING_2: 6
.= (q
. i) by
A3,
A2,
ALGSEQ_1: 8,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
defpred
P[
object,
object] means ex f be
Polynomial of R, g be
Polynomial of S st $1
= f & $2
= g & for i be
Nat holds (g
. i)
= (h
. (f
. i));
A4: for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds ex y be
object st y
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring S) &
P[x, y]
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
then
reconsider y = x as
Polynomial of R by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
consider z be
Polynomial of S such that
A5: for i be
Nat holds (z
. i)
= (h
. (y
. i)) by
A1;
take z;
thus thesis by
A5,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
consider F be
Function of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R), the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring S) such that
A6: for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds
P[x, (F
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A4);
take F;
now
let f be
Polynomial of R, g be
Polynomial of S;
assume
A7: g
= (F
. f);
let i be
Nat;
f
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then
P[f, (F
. f)] by
A6;
hence (g
. i)
= (h
. (f
. i)) by
A7;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let F,G be
Function of (
Polynom-Ring R), (
Polynom-Ring S);
assume that
A8: for f be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds for i be
Nat holds ((F
. f)
. i)
= (h
. (f
. i)) and
A9: for f be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds for i be
Nat holds ((G
. f)
. i)
= (h
. (f
. i));
now
let o be
object;
assume o
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
then
reconsider p = o as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
now
let u be
object;
assume u
in
NAT ;
then
reconsider m = u as
Nat;
((F
. p)
. m)
= (h
. (p
. m)) by
A8
.= ((G
. p)
. m) by
A9;
hence ((F
. p)
. u)
= ((G
. p)
. u);
end;
then (F
. p)
= (G
. p);
hence (F
. o)
= (G
. o);
end;
hence F
= G;
end;
end
registration
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
cluster (
PolyHom h) ->
additive
multiplicative
unity-preserving;
coherence
proof
set g = (
PolyHom h);
set RP = (
Polynom-Ring R), SP = (
Polynom-Ring S);
reconsider 1RP = (
1_ RP) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
reconsider 1SP = (
1_ SP) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring S);
now
let a,b be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
reconsider gab = ((g
. a)
+ (g
. b)) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring S);
reconsider a1 = a, b1 = b as
sequence of R;
set ab1 = (a1
+ b1);
set ga = (g
. a), gb = (g
. b);
reconsider ga1 = ga, gb1 = gb as
sequence of S;
set gab1 = (ga1
+ gb1);
now
let m be
Element of
NAT ;
(a1
+ b1)
= (a
+ b) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then ((g
. (a
+ b))
. m)
= (h
. (ab1
. m)) by
Def2
.= (h
. ((a1
. m)
+ (b1
. m))) by
NORMSP_1:def 2
.= ((h
. (a
. m))
+ (h
. (b
. m))) by
VECTSP_1:def 20
.= (((g
. a)
. m)
+ (h
. (b
. m))) by
Def2
.= ((ga1
. m)
+ (gb1
. m)) by
Def2
.= (gab1
. m) by
NORMSP_1:def 2;
hence ((g
. (a
+ b))
. m)
= (gab
. m) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
hence (g
. (a
+ b))
= ((g
. a)
+ (g
. b)) by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
hence g is
additive;
now
let a,b be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
reconsider ab = (a
* b) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
reconsider gab = ((g
. a)
* (g
. b)) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring S);
reconsider a1 = a, b1 = b as
sequence of R;
reconsider ab1 = (a1
*' b1) as
sequence of R;
reconsider ga = (g
. a), gb = (g
. b) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring S);
reconsider ga1 = ga, gb1 = gb as
sequence of S;
set gab1 = (ga1
*' gb1);
now
let m be
Element of
NAT ;
consider r be
FinSequence of the
carrier of R such that
A1: (
len r)
= (m
+ 1) & (ab1
. m)
= (
Sum r) & for k be
Element of
NAT st k
in (
dom r) holds (r
. k)
= ((a1
. (k
-' 1))
* (b1
. ((m
+ 1)
-' k))) by
POLYNOM3:def 9;
consider s be
FinSequence of the
carrier of S such that
A2: (
len s)
= (m
+ 1) & (gab1
. m)
= (
Sum s) & for k be
Element of
NAT st k
in (
dom s) holds (s
. k)
= ((ga1
. (k
-' 1))
* (gb1
. ((m
+ 1)
-' k))) by
POLYNOM3:def 9;
A5: (
dom r)
= (
Seg (m
+ 1)) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
dom s) by
A2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A3: for k be
Element of
NAT st k
in (
dom r) holds (h
. (r
. k))
= (s
. k)
proof
let k be
Element of
NAT ;
assume
A4: k
in (
dom r);
hence (h
. (r
. k))
= (h
. ((a1
. (k
-' 1))
* (b1
. ((m
+ 1)
-' k)))) by
A1
.= ((h
. (a1
. (k
-' 1)))
* (h
. (b1
. ((m
+ 1)
-' k)))) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((ga1
. (k
-' 1))
* (h
. (b1
. ((m
+ 1)
-' k)))) by
Def2
.= ((ga1
. (k
-' 1))
* (gb1
. ((m
+ 1)
-' k))) by
Def2
.= (s
. k) by
A5,
A4,
A2;
end;
reconsider m1 = (m
+ 1) as
Element of
NAT ;
A6: 1
<= (m
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 11;
defpred
P[
Nat] means (h
. (
Sum (r
| $1)))
= (
Sum (s
| $1));
A7:
P[1]
proof
A8: (
len (r
| 1))
= 1 by
A1,
NAT_1: 11,
FINSEQ_1: 59;
A9: (
dom (r
| 1))
= (
Seg 1) by
A1,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
then ((r
| 1)
. 1)
in (
rng (r
| 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 3,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider a = ((r
| 1)
. 1) as
Element of the
carrier of R;
(r
| 1)
=
<*a*> by
A8,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
then
A11: (h
. (
Sum (r
| 1)))
= (h
. a) by
RLVECT_1: 44;
A12: (
len (s
| 1))
= 1 by
A2,
NAT_1: 11,
FINSEQ_1: 59;
A13: (
dom (s
| 1))
= (
Seg 1) by
A2,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
then ((s
| 1)
. 1)
in (
rng (s
| 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 3,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider b = ((s
| 1)
. 1) as
Element of the
carrier of S;
A15: (s
| 1)
=
<*b*> by
A12,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
A16: (
dom r)
= (
Seg (m
+ 1)) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A17: 1
in (
dom (s
| (
Seg 1))) by
A13;
1
in (
dom (r
| (
Seg 1))) by
A9;
then (h
. a)
= (h
. (r
. 1)) by
FUNCT_1: 47
.= (s
. 1) by
A16,
A3,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 1
.= b by
A17,
FUNCT_1: 47;
hence thesis by
A11,
A15,
RLVECT_1: 44;
end;
A19:
now
let j be
Element of
NAT ;
assume
A20: 1
<= j & j
< m1;
assume
A21:
P[j];
A22: (j
+ 1)
<= (m
+ 1) by
A20,
NAT_1: 13;
then
A23: (
len (r
| (j
+ 1)))
= (j
+ 1) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 59;
A24: (r
| (
Seg j))
= (r
| j);
then
reconsider rj = (r
| (
Seg j)) as
FinSequence of R;
((r
| (j
+ 1))
| j)
= (r
| j) by
NAT_1: 11,
FINSEQ_1: 82;
then
consider q be
FinSequence such that
A25: (r
| (j
+ 1))
= (rj
^ q) by
FINSEQ_1: 80;
a26: 1
<= (j
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 11;
then
A27: (r
. (j
+ 1))
in (
rng r) by
FUNCT_1: 3,
A1,
A22,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
A28: (j
+ 1)
= (
len (r
| (j
+ 1))) by
A22,
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 59
.= ((
len rj)
+ (
len q)) by
A25,
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= (j
+ (
len q)) by
A20,
A24,
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 59;
then (
dom q)
= (
Seg 1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A29: 1
in (
dom q);
A30: (
len (r
| j))
= j by
A20,
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 59;
then
A31: ((r
| (j
+ 1))
. (j
+ 1))
= (q
. 1) by
A25,
A29,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
(
dom (r
| (j
+ 1)))
= (
Seg (j
+ 1)) by
A23,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A32: (r
. (j
+ 1))
= ((r
| (j
+ 1))
. (j
+ 1)) by
FUNCT_1: 47,
FINSEQ_1: 3;
then
reconsider a = (q
. 1) as
Element of R by
A30,
A27,
A25,
A29,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
A33: (h
. a)
= (s
. (j
+ 1)) by
A31,
A32,
a26,
A3,
A1,
A22,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
q
=
<*a*> by
A28,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
then (h
. (
Sum (r
| (j
+ 1))))
= ((h
. (
Sum rj))
+ (h
. a)) by
A25,
Th17
.= ((
Sum (s
| j))
+ (
Sum
<*(h
. a)*>)) by
RLVECT_1: 44,
A21
.= (
Sum ((s
| j)
^
<*(h
. a)*>)) by
RLVECT_1: 41
.= (
Sum (s
| (j
+ 1))) by
A20,
A2,
A33,
FINSEQ_5: 83;
hence
P[(j
+ 1)];
end;
A34: for i be
Element of
NAT st 1
<= i & i
<= m1 holds
P[i] from
INT_1:sch 7(
A7,
A19);
A35: (
Sum s)
= (
Sum (s
| (m
+ 1))) by
A2,
FINSEQ_1: 58
.= (h
. (
Sum (r
| (m
+ 1)))) by
A34,
A6
.= (h
. (
Sum r)) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 58;
(a1
*' b1)
= (a
* b) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then ((g
. (a
* b))
. m)
= (gab1
. m) by
A35,
A2,
A1,
Def2;
hence ((g
. (a
* b))
. m)
= (gab
. m) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
hence (g
. (a
* b))
= ((g
. a)
* (g
. b)) by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
hence g is
multiplicative;
now
let m be
Element of
NAT ;
per cases ;
suppose
A36: m
=
0 ;
then (h
. (1RP
. m))
= (h
. ((
1_. R)
.
0 )) by
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= (h
. (
1_ R)) by
POLYNOM3: 30
.= (
1_ S) by
GROUP_1:def 13
.= ((
1_. S)
.
0 ) by
POLYNOM3: 30
.= (1SP
. m) by
A36,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
hence ((g
. (
1_ RP))
. m)
= (1SP
. m) by
Def2;
end;
suppose
A37: m
<>
0 ;
(h
. (1RP
. m))
= (h
. ((
1_. R)
. m)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= (h
. (
0. R)) by
A37,
POLYNOM3: 30
.= (
0. S) by
RING_2: 6
.= ((
1_. S)
. m) by
A37,
POLYNOM3: 30
.= (1SP
. m) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
hence ((g
. (
1_ RP))
. m)
= (1SP
. m) by
Def2;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
end
theorem ::
FIELD_1:22
Th23: for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds ((
PolyHom h)
. (
0_. R))
= (
0_. S)
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
A1: (
0_. R)
= (
0. (
Polynom-Ring R)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider f = ((
PolyHom h)
. (
0. (
Polynom-Ring R))) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring S);
now
let i be
Element of
NAT ;
(f
. i)
= (h
. ((
0_. R)
. i)) by
Def2,
A1
.= (h
. (
0. R)) by
FUNCOP_1: 7
.= (
0. S) by
RING_2: 6
.= ((
0_. S)
. i) by
FUNCOP_1: 7;
hence (f
. i)
= ((
0_. S)
. i);
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:23
for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds ((
PolyHom h)
. (
1_. R))
= (
1_. S)
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
thus ((
PolyHom h)
. (
1_. R))
= ((
PolyHom h)
. (
1_ (
Polynom-Ring R))) by
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= (
1_ (
Polynom-Ring S)) by
GROUP_1:def 13
.= (
1_. S) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:24
for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for p,q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds ((
PolyHom h)
. (p
+ q))
= (((
PolyHom h)
. p)
+ ((
PolyHom h)
. q)) by
VECTSP_1:def 20;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:25
for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for p,q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds ((
PolyHom h)
. (p
* q))
= (((
PolyHom h)
. p)
* ((
PolyHom h)
. q)) by
GROUP_6:def 6;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:26
Th27: for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R), b be
Element of R holds ((
PolyHom h)
. (b
* p))
= ((h
. b)
* ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R), b be
Element of R;
reconsider q = (b
* p) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider f = ((
PolyHom h)
. q) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring S);
now
let i be
Element of
NAT ;
(f
. i)
= (h
. (q
. i)) by
Def2
.= (h
. (b
* (p
. i))) by
POLYNOM5:def 4
.= ((h
. b)
* (h
. (p
. i))) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((h
. b)
* (((
PolyHom h)
. p)
. i)) by
Def2
.= (((h
. b)
* ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
. i) by
POLYNOM5:def 4;
hence (f
. i)
= (((h
. b)
* ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
. i);
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
Lm2: for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds (
len ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
<= (
len p)
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
reconsider f = ((
PolyHom h)
. p) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring S);
now
let i be
Nat;
assume i
>= (
len p);
then (p
. i)
= (
0. R) by
ALGSEQ_1: 8;
hence (f
. i)
= (h
. (
0. R)) by
Def2
.= (
0. S) by
RING_2: 6;
end;
then (
len p)
is_at_least_length_of f;
hence thesis by
ALGSEQ_1:def 3;
end;
Lm3: for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) st (
len p)
<>
0 holds (
len ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
= (
len p) iff (h
. (p
. ((
len p)
-' 1)))
<> (
0. S)
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
set lp1 = ((
len p)
-' 1);
assume (
len p)
<>
0 ;
then
A2: ((
len p)
- 1)
= ((
len p)
-' 1) by
XREAL_0:def 2;
then
A3: (lp1
+ 1)
= (
len p);
A4: (
len ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
<= (
len p) by
Lm2;
A5:
now
assume (h
. (p
. ((
len p)
-' 1)))
<> (
0. S);
then
A6: (((
PolyHom h)
. p)
. ((
len p)
-' 1))
<> (
0. S) by
Def2;
now
assume (
len ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
< (
len p);
then (
len ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
<= lp1 by
A3,
NAT_1: 13;
hence contradiction by
A6,
ALGSEQ_1: 8;
end;
hence (
len ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
= (
len p) by
A4,
XXREAL_0: 1;
end;
now
assume (
len ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
= (
len p);
then (
len ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
= (lp1
+ 1) by
A2;
then (((
PolyHom h)
. p)
. lp1)
<> (
0. S) by
ALGSEQ_1: 10;
hence (h
. (p
. ((
len p)
-' 1)))
<> (
0. S) by
Def2;
end;
hence thesis by
A5;
end;
Lm4: for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for p,L be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) st L
= (
LM p) holds for a be
Element of R holds (h
. (
eval ((
LM p),a)))
= (
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. L),(h
. a)))
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
let p,L be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
assume
A1: L
= (
LM p);
let a be
Element of R;
per cases ;
suppose
A2: p
= (
0_. R);
then
A3: L
= (
0_. R) by
A1,
POLYNOM4: 13;
thus (h
. (
eval ((
LM p),a)))
= (h
. (
eval ((
0_. R),a))) by
A2,
POLYNOM4: 13
.= (h
. (
0. R)) by
POLYNOM4: 17
.= (
0. S) by
RING_2: 6
.= (
eval ((
0_. S),(h
. a))) by
POLYNOM4: 17
.= (
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. L),(h
. a))) by
A3,
Th23;
end;
suppose
A4: p
<> (
0_. R);
set f = (
PolyHom h);
reconsider q = ((
PolyHom h)
. L) as
Polynomial of S;
consider F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of R such that
A5: (
eval ((
LM p),a))
= (
Sum F) & (
len F)
= (
len (
LM p)) & for n be
Element of
NAT st n
in (
dom F) holds (F
. n)
= (((
LM p)
. (n
-' 1))
* ((
power R)
. (a,(n
-' 1)))) by
POLYNOM4:def 2;
A6: (
Sum F)
= ((p
. ((
len p)
-' 1))
* ((
power R)
. (a,((
len p)
-' 1)))) by
A5,
POLYNOM4: 22
.= (((
LM p)
. ((
len p)
-' 1))
* ((
power R)
. (a,((
len p)
-' 1)))) by
POLYNOM4:def 1;
consider G be
FinSequence of the
carrier of S such that
A7: (
eval (q,(h
. a)))
= (
Sum G) & (
len G)
= (
len q) & for n be
Element of
NAT st n
in (
dom G) holds (G
. n)
= ((q
. (n
-' 1))
* ((
power S)
. ((h
. a),(n
-' 1)))) by
POLYNOM4:def 2;
A8: (
len q)
<= (
len L) by
Lm2;
A9: (
len G)
<= (
len F) by
A1,
A5,
A7,
Lm2;
A10: (
len F)
= (
len p) by
A5,
POLYNOM4: 15;
then
A11: (
len F)
<>
0 by
A4,
POLYNOM4: 5;
then
A12: (
0
+ 1)
<= (
len F) by
NAT_1: 13;
A13: ((
len p)
-' 1)
= ((
len p)
- 1) by
A11,
A10,
XREAL_0:def 2;
A15: for n be
Element of
NAT st n
in (
dom G) holds n
in (
dom F)
proof
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
assume n
in (
dom G);
then 1
<= n
<= (
len q) by
A7,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then 1
<= n
<= (
len L) by
A8,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence thesis by
A1,
A5,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
end;
A16: for n be
Element of
NAT st n
in (
dom G) holds (h
. (F
. n))
= (G
. n)
proof
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
assume
A17: n
in (
dom G);
hence (h
. (F
. n))
= (h
. (((
LM p)
. (n
-' 1))
* ((
power R)
. (a,(n
-' 1))))) by
A15,
A5
.= ((h
. (L
. (n
-' 1)))
* (h
. ((
power R)
. (a,(n
-' 1))))) by
A1,
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((q
. (n
-' 1))
* (h
. ((
power R)
. (a,(n
-' 1))))) by
Def2
.= ((q
. (n
-' 1))
* (h
. (a
|^ (n
-' 1)))) by
BINOM:def 2
.= ((q
. (n
-' 1))
* ((h
. a)
|^ (n
-' 1))) by
Th14
.= ((q
. (n
-' 1))
* ((
power S)
. ((h
. a),(n
-' 1)))) by
BINOM:def 2
.= (G
. n) by
A17,
A7;
end;
A18: for n be
Element of
NAT st n
in (
dom G) & n
<> (
len p) holds (G
/. n)
= (
0. S)
proof
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
assume
A19: n
in (
dom G) & n
<> (
len p);
then 1
<= n by
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then (n
- 1)
= (n
-' 1) by
XREAL_0:def 2;
then
A20: (n
-' 1)
<> ((
len p)
-' 1) by
A19,
A13;
thus (G
/. n)
= (G
. n) by
A19,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (h
. (F
. n)) by
A16,
A19
.= (h
. (((
LM p)
. (n
-' 1))
* ((
power R)
. (a,(n
-' 1))))) by
A5,
A19,
A15
.= (h
. ((
0. R)
* ((
power R)
. (a,(n
-' 1))))) by
A20,
POLYNOM4:def 1
.= (
0. S) by
RING_2: 6;
end;
per cases by
A9,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A21: (
len G)
= (
len F);
then
A22: (
len G)
in (
dom G) by
A12,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
(
Sum G)
= (G
/. (
len G)) by
A18,
A21,
A10,
POLYNOM2: 3,
A12,
FINSEQ_3: 25
.= (G
. (
len G)) by
A22,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (h
. (F
. (
len F))) by
A12,
FINSEQ_3: 25,
A16,
A21
.= (h
. (
Sum F)) by
A6,
FINSEQ_3: 25,
A12,
A5,
A10;
hence thesis by
A5,
A7;
end;
suppose
A23: (
len G)
< (
len F);
then (
0. S)
= (h
. (L
. ((
len L)
-' 1))) by
A7,
A5,
A1,
Lm3
.= (h
. (L
. ((
len p)
-' 1))) by
A1,
POLYNOM4: 15
.= (h
. (p
. ((
len p)
-' 1))) by
A1,
POLYNOM4:def 1;
then
A24: (
0. S)
= ((h
. (p
. ((
len p)
-' 1)))
* (h
. ((
power R)
. (a,((
len p)
-' 1)))))
.= (h
. ((p
. ((
len p)
-' 1))
* ((
power R)
. (a,((
len p)
-' 1))))) by
GROUP_6:def 6
.= (h
. (
eval ((
LM p),a))) by
POLYNOM4: 22;
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
assume
A25: n
in (
dom G);
then n
in (
Seg (
len G)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then n
<> (
len p) by
A23,
A10,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
hence (
0. S)
= (G
/. n) by
A25,
A18
.= (G
. n) by
A25,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
end;
hence thesis by
A24,
A7,
POLYNOM3: 1;
end;
end;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:27
Th28: for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R), a be
Element of R holds (h
. (
eval (p,a)))
= (
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. p),(h
. a)))
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R), a be
Element of R;
defpred
P[
Nat] means for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R), a be
Element of R st (
len p)
= $1 holds (h
. (
eval (p,a)))
= (
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. p),(h
. a)));
A1:
P[
0 ]
proof
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R), a be
Element of R;
assume
A2: (
len p)
=
0 ;
then
A3: p
= (
0_. R) by
POLYNOM4: 5;
thus (h
. (
eval (p,a)))
= (h
. (
eval ((
0_. R),a))) by
A2,
POLYNOM4: 5
.= (h
. (
0. R)) by
POLYNOM4: 17
.= (
0. S) by
RING_2: 6
.= (
eval ((
0_. S),(h
. a))) by
POLYNOM4: 17
.= (
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. p),(h
. a))) by
A3,
Th23;
end;
A4:
now
let k be
Nat;
assume
A5: for m be
Nat st m
< k holds
P[m];
now
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R), a be
Element of R;
assume
A6: (
len p)
= k;
per cases ;
suppose k
=
0 ;
hence (h
. (
eval (p,a)))
= (
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. p),(h
. a))) by
A6,
A1;
end;
suppose k
>
0 ;
then
consider q be
Polynomial of R such that
A7: (
len q)
< (
len p) & p
= (q
+ (
LM p)) & for n be
Element of
NAT st n
< ((
len p)
- 1) holds (q
. n)
= (p
. n) by
A6,
POLYNOM4: 16;
reconsider g = q as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider LMp = (
LM p) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider g1 = ((
PolyHom h)
. g), g2 = ((
PolyHom h)
. LMp) as
Polynomial of S;
A8: (((
PolyHom h)
. g)
+ ((
PolyHom h)
. LMp))
= (g1
+ g2) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A9: (h
. (
eval (q,a)))
= (
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. g),(h
. a))) by
A6,
A7,
A5;
thus (h
. (
eval (p,a)))
= (h
. ((
eval (q,a))
+ (
eval (LMp,a)))) by
A7,
POLYNOM4: 19
.= ((h
. (
eval (q,a)))
+ (h
. (
eval (LMp,a)))) by
VECTSP_1:def 20
.= ((
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. g),(h
. a)))
+ (
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. LMp),(h
. a)))) by
A9,
Lm4
.= (
eval ((g1
+ g2),(h
. a))) by
POLYNOM4: 19
.= (
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. (g
+ LMp)),(h
. a))) by
A8,
VECTSP_1:def 20
.= (
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. p),(h
. a))) by
A7,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
end;
hence
P[k];
end;
A10: for k be
Nat holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 4(
A4);
ex n be
Nat st n
= (
len p);
hence thesis by
A10;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:28
for R be
domRing, S be R
-homomorphic
domRing holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R), b,x be
Element of R holds (h
. (
eval ((b
* p),x)))
= ((h
. b)
* (
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. p),(h
. x))))
proof
let R be
domRing, S be R
-homomorphic
domRing;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R), b,x be
Element of R;
reconsider q = (b
* p) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
(h
. (
eval ((b
* p),x)))
= (
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. q),(h
. x))) by
Th28
.= (
eval (((h
. b)
* ((
PolyHom h)
. p)),(h
. x))) by
Th27
.= ((h
. b)
* (
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. p),(h
. x)))) by
RING_5: 7;
hence thesis;
end;
registration
let R be
Ring;
cluster R
-homomorphicR
-monomorphic for
Ring;
existence
proof
take R;
(
id R) is
RingHomomorphism;
hence R is R
-homomorphic;
(
id R) is
RingMonomorphism;
hence R is R
-monomorphic by
RING_3:def 3;
end;
cluster R
-homomorphicR
-isomorphic for
Ring;
existence
proof
take R;
(
id R) is
RingHomomorphism;
hence R is R
-homomorphic;
(
id R) is
RingIsomorphism;
hence R is R
-isomorphic by
RING_3:def 4;
end;
end
registration
let R be
Ring;
cluster R
-monomorphic -> R
-homomorphic for
Ring;
coherence ;
end
registration
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphicR
-monomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Monomorphism of R, S;
cluster (
PolyHom h) ->
monomorphism;
coherence
proof
set f = (
PolyHom h);
now
let x1,x2 be
object;
assume
A1: x1
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) & x2
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) & (f
. x1)
= (f
. x2);
then
reconsider p = x1, q = x2 as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
now
let i be
Element of
NAT ;
(h
. (p
. i))
= ((f
. q)
. i) by
A1,
Def2
.= (h
. (q
. i)) by
Def2;
hence (p
. i)
= (q
. i) by
FUNCT_2: 19;
end;
then p
= q;
hence x1
= x2;
end;
then f is
one-to-one by
FUNCT_2: 19;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let R be
Ring, S be R
-isomorphicR
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Isomorphism of R, S;
cluster (
PolyHom h) ->
isomorphism;
coherence
proof
set f = (
PolyHom h);
A1: for o be
object st o
in (
rng f) holds o
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring S);
now
let o be
object;
assume o
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring S);
then
reconsider p = o as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring S);
deffunc
F(
object) = ((h
" )
. (p
. $1));
A2: for o be
object st o
in
NAT holds
F(o)
in the
carrier of R
proof
let o be
object;
assume o
in
NAT ;
then
reconsider i = o as
Element of
NAT ;
F(i)
= ((h
" )
. (p
. i));
hence thesis;
end;
consider q be
Function of
NAT , the
carrier of R such that
A3: for x be
object st x
in
NAT holds (q
. x)
=
F(x) from
FUNCT_2:sch 2(
A2);
ex n be
Nat st for i be
Nat st i
>= n holds (q
. i)
= (
0. R)
proof
take n = (
len p);
now
let i be
Nat;
A4: (h
" ) is
Isomorphism of S, R by
RING_3: 73;
assume i
>= n;
then (p
. i)
= (
0. S) by
ALGSEQ_1: 8;
hence (q
. i)
= ((h
" )
. (
0. S)) by
A3,
ORDINAL1:def 12
.= (
0. R) by
A4,
RING_2: 6;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider q as
Polynomial of R by
ALGSEQ_1:def 1;
reconsider q as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A5: (
dom f)
= the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
now
let i be
Element of
NAT ;
A6: (
dom (h
" ))
= the
carrier of S by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
((f
. q)
. i)
= (h
. (q
. i)) by
Def2
.= (((h
" )
" )
. ((h
" )
. (p
. i))) by
A3
.= (p
. i) by
A6,
FUNCT_1: 34;
hence ((f
. q)
. i)
= (p
. i);
end;
then (f
. q)
= p;
hence o
in (
rng f) by
A5,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
then f is
onto by
A1,
TARSKI: 2;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
FIELD_1:29
for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds (
deg ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
<= (
deg p) by
Lm2,
XREAL_1: 6;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:30
for R be non
degenerated
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for p be non
zero
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds (
deg ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
= (
deg p) iff (h
. (
LC p))
<> (
0. S)
proof
let R be non
degenerated
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
let p be non
zero
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
p
<> (
0_. R);
then
A1: (
len p)
<>
0 by
POLYNOM4: 5;
hereby
assume (
deg ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
= (
deg p);
then (h
. (p
. ((
len p)
-' 1)))
<> (
0. S) by
A1,
Lm3;
hence (h
. (
LC p))
<> (
0. S) by
RATFUNC1:def 6;
end;
assume (h
. (
LC p))
<> (
0. S);
then (h
. (p
. ((
len p)
-' 1)))
<> (
0. S) by
RATFUNC1:def 6;
hence (
deg ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
= (
deg p) by
A1,
Lm3;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:31
Th32: for R be
Ring, S be R
-monomorphicR
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Monomorphism of R, S holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds (
deg ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
= (
deg p)
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-monomorphicR
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Monomorphism of R, S;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
reconsider f = ((
PolyHom h)
. p) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring S);
A1:
now
let i be
Nat;
assume i
>= (
len p);
then (p
. i)
= (
0. R) by
ALGSEQ_1: 8;
hence (f
. i)
= (h
. (
0. R)) by
Def2
.= (
0. S) by
RING_2: 6;
end;
now
let m be
Nat;
assume
A2: m
is_at_least_length_of f;
now
assume (
len p)
> m;
then ((
len p)
- 1)
> (m
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
A3: ((
len p)
- 1)
>= ((m
- 1)
+ 1) by
INT_1: 7;
then
reconsider lp = ((
len p)
- 1) as
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
A4: (lp
+ 1)
= (
len p);
(h
. (
0. R))
= (
0. S) by
RING_2: 6
.= (f
. lp) by
A3,
A2
.= (h
. (p
. lp)) by
Def2;
then (p
. lp)
= (
0. R) by
FUNCT_2: 19;
hence contradiction by
A4,
ALGSEQ_1: 10;
end;
hence (
len p)
<= m;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
ALGSEQ_1:def 2,
ALGSEQ_1:def 3;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:32
Th33: for R be
Ring, S be R
-monomorphicR
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Monomorphism of R, S holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds (
LM ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
= ((
PolyHom h)
. (
LM p))
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-monomorphicR
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Monomorphism of R, S;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
reconsider f = ((
PolyHom h)
. p) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring S);
reconsider LMp = (
LM p) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A1: (
deg f)
= (
deg p) by
Th32
.= ((
len p)
- 1);
now
let i be
Element of
NAT ;
per cases ;
suppose
A2: i
= ((
len p)
-' 1);
then ((
LM f)
. i)
= (f
. ((
len p)
-' 1)) by
A1,
POLYNOM4:def 1
.= (h
. (p
. ((
len p)
-' 1))) by
Def2
.= (h
. ((
LM p)
. i)) by
A2,
POLYNOM4:def 1
.= (((
PolyHom h)
. LMp)
. i) by
Def2;
hence ((
LM f)
. i)
= (((
PolyHom h)
. LMp)
. i);
end;
suppose
A3: i
<> ((
len p)
-' 1);
then ((
LM f)
. i)
= (
0. S) by
A1,
POLYNOM4:def 1
.= (h
. (
0. R)) by
RING_2: 6
.= (h
. ((
LM p)
. i)) by
A3,
POLYNOM4:def 1
.= (((
PolyHom h)
. LMp)
. i) by
Def2;
hence ((
LM f)
. i)
= (((
PolyHom h)
. LMp)
. i);
end;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:33
Th34: for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R), a be
Element of R holds a
is_a_root_of p implies (h
. a)
is_a_root_of ((
PolyHom h)
. p)
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R), a be
Element of R;
assume a
is_a_root_of p;
then (
eval (p,a))
= (
0. R) by
POLYNOM5:def 7;
then (
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. p),(h
. a)))
= (h
. (
0. R)) by
Th28
.= (
0. S) by
RING_2: 6;
hence thesis by
POLYNOM5:def 7;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:34
Th35: for R be
Ring, S be R
-monomorphicR
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Monomorphism of R, S holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R), a be
Element of R holds a
is_a_root_of p iff (h
. a)
is_a_root_of ((
PolyHom h)
. p)
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-monomorphicR
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Monomorphism of R, S;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R), a be
Element of R;
now
assume
A1: (h
. a)
is_a_root_of ((
PolyHom h)
. p);
(h
. (
0. R))
= (
0. S) by
RING_2: 6
.= (
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. p),(h
. a))) by
A1,
POLYNOM5:def 7
.= (h
. (
eval (p,a))) by
Th28;
then (
eval (p,a))
= (
0. R) by
FUNCT_2: 19;
hence a
is_a_root_of p by
POLYNOM5:def 7;
end;
hence thesis by
Th34;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:35
Th36: for R be
Ring, S be R
-isomorphicR
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Isomorphism of R, S holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R), b be
Element of S holds b
is_a_root_of ((
PolyHom h)
. p) iff ex a be
Element of R st a
is_a_root_of p & (h
. a)
= b
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-isomorphicR
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Isomorphism of R, S;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R), b be
Element of S;
A1:
now
assume
A2: b
is_a_root_of ((
PolyHom h)
. p);
set a = ((h
" )
. b);
A3: (
dom (h
" ))
= the
carrier of S by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A4: (h
. a)
= (((h
" )
" )
. ((h
" )
. b))
.= b by
A3,
FUNCT_1: 34;
(h
. (
eval (p,a)))
= (
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. p),(h
. a))) by
Th28
.= (
0. S) by
A4,
A2,
POLYNOM5:def 7
.= (h
. (
0. R)) by
RING_2: 6;
then (
eval (p,a))
= (
0. R) by
FUNCT_2: 19;
hence ex a be
Element of R st (h
. a)
= b & a
is_a_root_of p by
A4,
POLYNOM5:def 7;
end;
now
assume ex a be
Element of R st (h
. a)
= b & a
is_a_root_of p;
then
consider a be
Element of R such that
A5: (h
. a)
= b & a
is_a_root_of p;
(
eval (((
PolyHom h)
. p),b))
= (h
. (
eval (p,a))) by
A5,
Th28
.= (h
. (
0. R)) by
A5,
POLYNOM5:def 7
.= (
0. S) by
RING_2: 6;
hence b
is_a_root_of ((
PolyHom h)
. p) by
POLYNOM5:def 7;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:36
Th37: for R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Homomorphism of R, S holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds (
Roots p)
c= { a where a be
Element of R : (h
. a)
in (
Roots ((
PolyHom h)
. p)) }
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Homomorphism of R, S;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
let o be
object;
assume
A1: o
in (
Roots p);
then
reconsider a = o as
Element of R;
a
is_a_root_of p by
A1,
POLYNOM5:def 10;
then (h
. a)
is_a_root_of ((
PolyHom h)
. p) by
Th34;
then (h
. a)
in (
Roots ((
PolyHom h)
. p)) by
POLYNOM5:def 10;
hence o
in { a where a be
Element of R : (h
. a)
in (
Roots ((
PolyHom h)
. p)) };
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:37
for R be
Ring, S be R
-monomorphicR
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Monomorphism of R, S holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds (
Roots p)
= { a where a be
Element of R : (h
. a)
in (
Roots ((
PolyHom h)
. p)) }
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-monomorphicR
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Monomorphism of R, S;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
A1: (
Roots p)
c= { a where a be
Element of R : (h
. a)
in (
Roots ((
PolyHom h)
. p)) } by
Th37;
now
let o be
object;
assume o
in { a where a be
Element of R : (h
. a)
in (
Roots ((
PolyHom h)
. p)) };
then
consider a be
Element of R such that
A2: o
= a & (h
. a)
in (
Roots ((
PolyHom h)
. p));
(h
. a)
is_a_root_of ((
PolyHom h)
. p) by
A2,
POLYNOM5:def 10;
then a
is_a_root_of p by
Th35;
hence o
in (
Roots p) by
A2,
POLYNOM5:def 10;
end;
hence thesis by
TARSKI: 2,
A1;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:38
Th39: for R be
Ring, S be R
-isomorphicR
-homomorphic
Ring holds for h be
Isomorphism of R, S holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds (
Roots ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
= { (h
. a) where a be
Element of R : a
in (
Roots p) }
proof
let R be
Ring, S be R
-isomorphicR
-homomorphic
Ring;
let h be
Isomorphism of R, S;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
A1:
now
let o be
object;
assume
A2: o
in (
Roots ((
PolyHom h)
. p));
then
reconsider b = o as
Element of S;
b
is_a_root_of ((
PolyHom h)
. p) by
A2,
POLYNOM5:def 10;
then
consider a be
Element of R such that
A3: a
is_a_root_of p & (h
. a)
= b by
Th36;
a
in (
Roots p) by
A3,
POLYNOM5:def 10;
hence o
in { (h
. a) where a be
Element of R : a
in (
Roots p) } by
A3;
end;
now
let o be
object;
assume o
in { (h
. a) where a be
Element of R : a
in (
Roots p) };
then
consider a be
Element of R such that
A4: o
= (h
. a) & a
in (
Roots p);
a
is_a_root_of p by
A4,
POLYNOM5:def 10;
then (h
. a)
is_a_root_of ((
PolyHom h)
. p) by
Th36;
hence o
in (
Roots ((
PolyHom h)
. p)) by
A4,
POLYNOM5:def 10;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
TARSKI: 2;
end;
begin
reserve F for
Field,
p for
irreducible
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F),
f for
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F),
a for
Element of F;
definition
let F, p;
::
FIELD_1:def3
func
KroneckerField (F,p) ->
Field equals ((
Polynom-Ring F)
/ (
{p}
-Ideal ));
coherence ;
end
definition
let F, p;
::
FIELD_1:def4
func
emb p ->
Function of F, (
KroneckerField (F,p)) equals ((
canHom (
{p}
-Ideal ))
* (
canHom F));
coherence ;
end
registration
let F, p;
cluster (
emb p) ->
additive
multiplicative
unity-preserving;
coherence ;
end
registration
let F, p;
cluster (
emb p) ->
monomorphism;
coherence ;
end
registration
let F, p;
cluster (
KroneckerField (F,p)) -> F
-homomorphicF
-monomorphic;
coherence
proof
(
emb p) is
monomorphism;
hence thesis by
RING_3:def 3;
end;
end
definition
let F, p, f;
::
FIELD_1:def5
func
emb (f,p) ->
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring (
KroneckerField (F,p))) equals ((
PolyHom (
emb p))
. f);
coherence ;
end
definition
let F, p;
::
FIELD_1:def6
func
KrRoot p ->
Element of (
KroneckerField (F,p)) equals (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),
<%(
0. F), (
1. F)%>));
coherence
proof
set E = (
KroneckerField (F,p));
reconsider q =
<%(
0. F), (
1. F)%> as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
(
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),q)) is
Element of E by
RING_1: 12;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
FIELD_1:39
Th40: for F, p, a holds ((
emb p)
. a)
= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),(a
| F)))
proof
let F, p, a;
reconsider pa = (a
| F) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
(
dom (
canHom F))
= the
carrier of F by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
hence ((
emb p)
. a)
= ((
canHom (
{p}
-Ideal ))
. ((
canHom F)
. a)) by
FUNCT_1: 13
.= ((
canHom (
{p}
-Ideal ))
. pa) by
RING_4:def 6
.= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),(a
| F))) by
RING_2:def 5;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:40
Th41: ((
emb (f,p))
. n)
= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),((f
. n)
| F)))
proof
thus ((
emb (f,p))
. n)
= ((
emb p)
. (f
. n)) by
Def2
.= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),((f
. n)
| F))) by
Th40;
end;
Lm5: (
eval ((
LM (
emb (f,p))),(
KrRoot p)))
= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),(
LM f)))
proof
set LMf = (
Leading-Monomial f), LMfe = (
Leading-Monomial (
emb (f,p)));
set z = (
KrRoot p), E = (
KroneckerField (F,p));
set efp = (
emb (f,p));
set n = ((
len efp)
-' 1);
per cases ;
suppose
A1: f
= (
0_. F);
then (
emb (f,p))
= (
0_. E) by
Th23;
then LMfe
= (
0_. E) by
POLYNOM4: 13;
then
A2: (
eval (LMfe,(
KrRoot p)))
= (
0. E) by
POLYNOM4: 17
.= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),(
0. (
Polynom-Ring F)))) by
RING_1:def 6;
(
0. (
Polynom-Ring F))
= (
0_. F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
POLYNOM4: 13;
end;
suppose f
<> (
0_. F);
then
reconsider f1 = f as non
zero
Polynomial of F by
UPROOTS:def 5;
reconsider fnF = ((f
. n)
| F) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider x =
<%(
0. F), (
1. F)%> as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A3: (efp
. n)
= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),((f
. n)
| F))) by
Th41;
A4: ((
power E)
. (z,n))
= (z
|^ n) by
BINOM:def 2
.= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),(x
|^ n))) by
Th3;
set a = (f
. n);
A5: (
deg f)
= (
deg efp) by
Th32
.= ((
len efp)
- 1);
then
A6: n
= (
deg f1) by
XREAL_0:def 2;
(
LC f1) is non
zero;
then
A7: a is non
zero by
A5,
RATFUNC1:def 6;
(x
|^ n)
= ((
power (
Polynom-Ring F))
. (
<%(
0. F), (
1. F)%>,n)) by
BINOM:def 2
.= (
<%(
0. F), (
1. F)%>
`^ n) by
POLYNOM5:def 3
.= (
anpoly ((
1. F),n)) by
Th13;
then
A8: (fnF
* (x
|^ n))
= ((
anpoly (a,
0 ))
*' (
anpoly ((
1. F),n))) by
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= (
anpoly ((a
* (
1. F)),(
0
+ n))) by
A7,
Th11
.= (
LM f) by
A6,
Th12;
thus (
eval (LMfe,(
KrRoot p)))
= ((efp
. n)
* ((
power E)
. (z,n))) by
POLYNOM4: 22
.= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),LMf)) by
A8,
A3,
A4,
RING_1: 14;
end;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:41
Th42: (
eval ((
emb (f,p)),(
KrRoot p)))
= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),f))
proof
set z = (
KrRoot p), E = (
KroneckerField (F,p)), h = (
canHom (
emb p));
defpred
P[
Nat] means for f st (
len f)
= $1 holds (
eval ((
emb (f,p)),z))
= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),f));
A1:
now
let f be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
assume (
len f)
=
0 ;
then f
= (
0_. F) by
POLYNOM4: 5;
then
A2: f
= (
0. (
Polynom-Ring F)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
(
0_. E)
= (
0. (
Polynom-Ring E)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= (
emb (f,p)) by
A2,
RING_2: 6;
hence (
eval ((
emb (f,p)),z))
= (
0. E) by
POLYNOM4: 17
.= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),f)) by
A2,
RING_1:def 6;
end;
A3:
now
let k be
Nat;
assume
A4: for m be
Nat st m
< k holds
P[m];
now
let f be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
assume
A5: (
len f)
= k;
per cases ;
suppose k
=
0 ;
hence (
eval ((
emb (f,p)),z))
= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),f)) by
A5,
A1;
end;
suppose k
>
0 ;
then
consider q be
Polynomial of F such that
A6: (
len q)
< (
len f) & f
= (q
+ (
Leading-Monomial f)) & for n be
Element of
NAT st n
< ((
len f)
- 1) holds (q
. n)
= (f
. n) by
A5,
POLYNOM4: 16;
reconsider g = q as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider LMf = (
LM f) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider r1 = (
emb (LMf,p)), r2 = (
emb (g,p)) as
Polynomial of E;
A7: (
emb ((LMf
+ g),p))
= ((
emb (LMf,p))
+ (
emb (g,p))) by
VECTSP_1:def 20
.= (r1
+ r2) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
(
Leading-Monomial (
emb (f,p)))
= (
emb (LMf,p)) by
Th33;
then
A8: (
eval ((
emb (LMf,p)),z))
= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),LMf)) by
Lm5;
A9: (
eval ((
emb (g,p)),z))
= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),g)) by
A6,
A5,
A4;
A10: ((
eval ((
emb (LMf,p)),z))
+ (
eval ((
emb (g,p)),z)))
= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),(LMf
+ g))) by
A9,
A8,
RING_1: 13
.= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),f)) by
A6,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
thus (
eval ((
emb (f,p)),z))
= (
eval ((r1
+ r2),z)) by
A7,
A6,
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),f)) by
A10,
POLYNOM4: 19;
end;
end;
hence
P[k];
end;
A11: for k be
Nat holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 4(
A3);
ex n be
Nat st (
len f)
= n;
hence thesis by
A11;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:42
Th43: (
KrRoot p)
is_a_root_of (
emb (p,p))
proof
A1: (p
- (
0. (
Polynom-Ring F)))
in (
{p}
-Ideal ) by
IDEAL_1: 66;
(
eval ((
emb (p,p)),(
KrRoot p)))
= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),p)) by
Th42
.= (
Class ((
EqRel ((
Polynom-Ring F),(
{p}
-Ideal ))),(
0. (
Polynom-Ring F)))) by
A1,
RING_1: 6
.= (
0. (
KroneckerField (F,p))) by
RING_1:def 6;
hence thesis by
POLYNOM5:def 7;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:43
f is non
constant implies ex p be
irreducible
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) st (
emb (f,p)) is
with_roots
proof
assume f is non
constant;
then
consider p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) such that
A2: p
is_a_irreducible_factor_of f by
Th4;
reconsider p as
irreducible
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
A2;
take p;
consider q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) such that
A3: (p
* q)
= f by
A2,
GCD_1:def 1;
A4: (
emb (f,p))
= (((
PolyHom (
emb p))
. p)
* ((
PolyHom (
emb p))
. q)) by
A3,
GROUP_6:def 6
.= ((
emb (p,p))
*' (
emb (q,p))) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
(
KrRoot p)
is_a_root_of (
emb (p,p)) by
Th43;
then (
emb (p,p)) is
with_roots by
POLYNOM5:def 8;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:44
Th45: (
emb p) is
isomorphism implies p is
with_roots
proof
set h = (
emb p);
assume
A1: (
emb p) is
isomorphism;
then
reconsider K = (
KroneckerField (F,p)) as F
-isomorphicF
-homomorphic
Ring by
RING_3:def 4;
reconsider h as
Isomorphism of F, K by
A1;
A2: (
Roots ((
PolyHom h)
. p))
= { (h
. a) where a be
Element of F : a
in (
Roots p) } by
Th39;
(
KrRoot p)
is_a_root_of (
emb (p,p)) by
Th43;
then (
KrRoot p)
in (
Roots ((
PolyHom h)
. p)) by
POLYNOM5:def 10;
then ex a be
Element of F st (
KrRoot p)
= (h
. a) & a
in (
Roots p) by
A2;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
FIELD_1:45
p is non
with_roots implies (
emb p) is non
isomorphism by
Th45;