ring_4.miz
begin
definition
let R be non
empty
doubleLoopStr, a be
Element of R;
:: original:
{
redefine
func
{a} ->
Subset of R ;
coherence
proof
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in
{a};
then x
= a by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence x
in the
carrier of R;
end;
hence thesis by
TARSKI:def 3;
end;
end
registration
cluster
almost_left_invertible
commutative ->
almost_right_invertible for
Ring;
coherence
proof
let R be
Ring;
assume
AS: R is
almost_left_invertible
commutative;
now
let x be
Element of R;
assume x
<> (
0. R);
then x is
left_invertible by
AS;
then
consider y be
Element of R such that
A1: (y
* x)
= (
1. R);
(x
* y)
= (
1. R) by
A1,
AS,
GROUP_1:def 12;
hence x is
right_invertible;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
cluster
almost_right_invertible
commutative ->
almost_left_invertible for
Ring;
coherence
proof
let R be
Ring;
assume
AS: R is
almost_right_invertible
commutative;
now
let x be
Element of R;
assume x
<> (
0. R);
then x is
right_invertible by
AS;
then
consider y be
Element of R such that
A1: (x
* y)
= (
1. R);
(y
* x)
= (
1. R) by
A1,
AS,
GROUP_1:def 12;
hence x is
left_invertible;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
cluster
almost_left_cancelable
commutative ->
almost_right_cancelable for
Ring;
coherence
proof
let R be
Ring;
assume
AS: R is
almost_left_cancelable
commutative;
now
let x be
Element of R;
assume x
<> (
0. R);
then
AS1: x is
left_mult-cancelable by
AS;
now
let y,z be
Element of R;
assume (y
* x)
= (z
* x);
then (x
* y)
= (z
* x) by
AS,
GROUP_1:def 12
.= (x
* z) by
AS,
GROUP_1:def 12;
hence y
= z by
AS1;
end;
hence x is
right_mult-cancelable;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
cluster
almost_right_cancelable
commutative ->
almost_left_cancelable for
Ring;
coherence
proof
let R be
Ring;
assume
AS: R is
almost_right_cancelable
commutative;
now
let x be
Element of R;
assume x
<> (
0. R);
then
AS1: x is
right_mult-cancelable by
AS;
now
let y,z be
Element of R;
assume (x
* y)
= (x
* z);
then (y
* x)
= (x
* z) by
AS,
GROUP_1:def 12
.= (z
* x) by
AS,
GROUP_1:def 12;
hence y
= z by
AS1;
end;
hence x is
left_mult-cancelable;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let L be non
empty
ZeroStr;
let X be
set;
::
RING_4:def1
attr X is L
-polynomial-membered means
:
polymem: for p be
object st p
in X holds p is
Polynomial of L;
end
definition
let L be non
empty
ZeroStr;
let X be
1-sorted;
::
RING_4:def2
attr X is L
-polynomial-membered means
:
polymem1: the
carrier of X is L
-polynomial-membered;
end
registration
let L be non
empty
ZeroStr;
cluster non
emptyL
-polynomial-membered for
set;
existence
proof
take s =
{(
0_. L)};
thus s is non
empty;
thus s is L
-polynomial-membered by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
end
registration
let L be non
empty
ZeroStr;
cluster non
emptyL
-polynomial-membered for
1-sorted;
existence
proof
take
1-sorted (# the non
emptyL
-polynomial-membered
set #);
thus thesis;
end;
end
registration
let L be non
empty
ZeroStr;
let X be non
emptyL
-polynomial-membered
1-sorted;
cluster the
carrier of X -> L
-polynomial-membered;
coherence by
polymem1;
end
registration
let L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr;
cluster (
Polynom-Ring L) -> L
-polynomial-membered;
coherence
proof
thus the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring L) is L
-polynomial-membered by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
end
definition
let L be non
empty
ZeroStr;
let X be non
emptyL
-polynomial-membered
set;
:: original:
Element
redefine
mode
Element of X ->
Polynomial of L ;
coherence by
polymem;
end
lm:
now
let L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr, a be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring L), p be
Polynomial of L;
reconsider x = (
- p) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring L) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
assume a
= p;
then (a
+ x)
= (p
- p) by
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= (
0_. L) by
POLYNOM3: 29
.= (
0. (
Polynom-Ring L)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then a
= (
- x) by
RLVECT_1: 6;
hence (
- a)
= (
- p);
end;
registration
let R be
Ring;
cluster
zero for
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
existence
proof
take (
0_. R);
thus thesis by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
cluster
zero for
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R);
existence
proof
take (
0. (
Polynom-Ring R));
thus thesis;
end;
cluster
zero for
Polynomial of R;
existence
proof
take (
0_. R);
thus thesis;
end;
end
registration
let R be non
degenerated
Ring;
cluster non
zero for
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
existence
proof
take (
1_. R);
thus thesis by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
cluster non
zero for
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R);
existence
proof
take (
1. (
Polynom-Ring R));
thus thesis;
end;
end
T8a: for L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
distributive non
trivial
doubleLoopStr, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring L) holds (
deg p) is
Element of
NAT iff p
<> (
0. (
Polynom-Ring L))
proof
let L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
distributive non
trivial
doubleLoopStr;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring L);
set R = (
Polynom-Ring L);
reconsider pp = p as
Polynomial of L;
A:
now
assume (
deg p) is
Element of
NAT ;
then p
<> (
0_. L) by
HURWITZ: 20;
hence p
<> (
0. R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
now
assume p
<> (
0. R);
then p
<> (
0_. L) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then (
len p)
<>
0 by
POLYNOM4: 5;
then ((
len p)
+ 1)
> (
0
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
len p)
>= 1 by
NAT_1: 13;
then ((
len p)
- 1)
>= (1
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
hence (
deg p) is
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
end;
hence thesis by
A;
end;
T8b: for L be non
empty
ZeroStr, p be
Polynomial of L holds (
deg p) is
Element of
NAT iff p
<> (
0_. L)
proof
let L be non
empty
ZeroStr;
let p be
Polynomial of L;
now
assume p
<> (
0_. L);
then (
len p)
<>
0 by
POLYNOM4: 5;
then ((
len p)
+ 1)
> (
0
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
len p)
>= 1 by
NAT_1: 13;
then ((
len p)
- 1)
>= (1
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
hence (
deg p) is
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
end;
hence thesis by
HURWITZ: 20;
end;
definition
let L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr;
let p,q be
Polynomial of L;
::
RING_4:def3
pred p
divides q means ex a,b be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring L) st a
= p & b
= q & a
divides b;
end
theorem ::
RING_4:1
T2: for L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr holds for p,q be
Polynomial of L holds p
divides q iff ex r be
Polynomial of L st (p
*' r)
= q
proof
let L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr;
let p,q be
Polynomial of L;
X:
now
assume p
divides q;
then
consider a,b be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring L) such that
B: a
= p & b
= q & a
divides b;
consider u be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring L) such that
C: (a
* u)
= b by
B;
reconsider z = u as
Polynomial of L by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
q
= (p
*' z) by
B,
C,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
hence ex r be
Polynomial of L st (p
*' r)
= q;
end;
now
assume ex r be
Polynomial of L st (p
*' r)
= q;
then
consider r be
Polynomial of L such that
H: q
= (p
*' r);
reconsider a = p, b = q, u = r as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring L) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
b
= (a
* u) by
H,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then a
divides b;
hence p
divides q;
end;
hence thesis by
X;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:2
div1: for F be
Field, p,q be
Polynomial of F st (
deg p)
< (
deg q) holds (p
mod q)
= p
proof
let F be
Field, p,q be
Polynomial of F;
assume
A1: (
deg p)
< (
deg q);
(
0_. F)
= (
0. (
Polynom-Ring F)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then
H: (
- (
0_. F))
= (
- (
0. (
Polynom-Ring F))) by
lm
.= (
0. (
Polynom-Ring F));
A0:
now
assume
A0: q
= (
0_. F);
then (
deg p)
< (
- 1) by
A1,
HURWITZ: 20;
hence contradiction by
A0,
A1,
T8b;
end;
p
= ((
0_. F)
+ p) by
POLYNOM3: 28
.= (((
0_. F)
*' q)
+ p) by
POLYNOM3: 34;
hence (p
mod q)
= (p
- ((
0_. F)
*' q)) by
A0,
A1,
HURWITZ:def 5
.= (p
- (
0_. F)) by
POLYNOM3: 34
.= (p
+ (
0_. F)) by
H,
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= p by
POLYNOM3: 28;
end;
div0: for F be
Field, p,q be
Polynomial of F st q
divides p holds ((p
div q)
*' q)
= p
proof
let F be
Field, p,q be
Polynomial of F;
assume q
divides p;
then
consider r be
Polynomial of F such that
A2: (q
*' r)
= p by
T2;
per cases ;
suppose
A3: q
= (
0_. F);
thus ((p
div q)
*' q)
= (
0_. F) by
A3,
POLYNOM3: 34
.= p by
A2,
A3,
POLYNOM3: 34;
end;
suppose
A3: q
<> (
0_. F);
A4: p
= ((q
*' r)
+ (
0_. F)) by
A2,
POLYNOM3: 28;
(
deg (
0_. F))
= (
- 1) by
HURWITZ: 20;
then (
deg (
0_. F))
< (
deg q) by
T8b,
A3;
hence ((p
div q)
*' q)
= p by
A2,
A4,
HURWITZ:def 5;
end;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:3
div2: for F be
Field, p,q be
Polynomial of F holds (p
mod q)
= (
0_. F) iff q
divides p
proof
let F be
Field, p,q be
Polynomial of F;
A:
now
assume (p
mod q)
= (
0_. F);
then ((p
div q)
*' q)
= ((p
- ((p
div q)
*' q))
+ ((p
div q)
*' q)) by
POLYNOM3: 28
.= (p
+ ((
- ((p
div q)
*' q))
+ ((p
div q)
*' q))) by
POLYNOM3: 26
.= (p
+ (((p
div q)
*' q)
- ((p
div q)
*' q)))
.= (p
+ (
0_. F)) by
POLYNOM3: 29
.= p by
POLYNOM3: 28;
hence q
divides p by
T2;
end;
now
assume
A: q
divides p;
thus (p
mod q)
= (p
- p) by
A,
div0
.= (
0_. F) by
POLYNOM3: 29;
end;
hence thesis by
A;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:4
div5: for F be
Field, p,q be
Polynomial of F holds p
= (((p
div q)
*' q)
+ (p
mod q))
proof
let F be
Field, p,q be
Polynomial of F;
thus p
= (p
+ (
0_. F)) by
POLYNOM3: 28
.= (p
+ (((p
div q)
*' q)
- ((p
div q)
*' q))) by
POLYNOM3: 29
.= ((p
+ (
- ((p
div q)
*' q)))
+ ((p
div q)
*' q)) by
POLYNOM3: 26
.= (((p
div q)
*' q)
+ (p
mod q));
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:5
div4: for F be
Field, p,r be
Polynomial of F holds for q be non
zero
Polynomial of F holds ((p
+ r)
div q)
= ((p
div q)
+ (r
div q)) & ((p
+ r)
mod q)
= ((p
mod q)
+ (r
mod q))
proof
let F be
Field, p,r be
Polynomial of F;
let q be non
zero
Polynomial of F;
H: q
<> (
0_. F);
A: (p
+ r)
= ((((p
div q)
*' q)
+ (p
mod q))
+ r) by
div5
.= ((((p
div q)
*' q)
+ (p
mod q))
+ (((r
div q)
*' q)
+ (r
mod q))) by
div5
.= (((p
div q)
*' q)
+ ((p
mod q)
+ (((r
div q)
*' q)
+ (r
mod q)))) by
POLYNOM3: 26
.= (((p
div q)
*' q)
+ (((p
mod q)
+ (r
mod q))
+ ((r
div q)
*' q))) by
POLYNOM3: 26
.= ((((p
div q)
*' q)
+ ((r
div q)
*' q))
+ ((p
mod q)
+ (r
mod q))) by
POLYNOM3: 26
.= ((((p
div q)
+ (r
div q))
*' q)
+ ((p
mod q)
+ (r
mod q))) by
POLYNOM3: 32;
B: (
deg ((p
mod q)
+ (r
mod q)))
<= (
max ((
deg (p
mod q)),(
deg (r
mod q)))) by
HURWITZ: 22;
C: (
deg (p
mod q))
< (
deg q) by
RING_2: 29;
(
deg (r
mod q))
< (
deg q) by
RING_2: 29;
then (
max ((
deg (p
mod q)),(
deg (r
mod q))))
< (
max ((
deg q),(
deg q))) by
C,
XXREAL_0: 27;
then
D: (
deg ((p
mod q)
+ (r
mod q)))
< (
deg q) by
B,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence ((p
+ r)
div q)
= ((p
div q)
+ (r
div q)) by
A,
H,
HURWITZ:def 5;
thus ((p
+ r)
mod q)
= (((((p
div q)
+ (r
div q))
*' q)
+ ((p
mod q)
+ (r
mod q)))
- (((p
div q)
+ (r
div q))
*' q)) by
D,
A,
H,
HURWITZ:def 5
.= (((((p
div q)
+ (r
div q))
*' q)
- (((p
div q)
+ (r
div q))
*' q))
+ ((p
mod q)
+ (r
mod q))) by
POLYNOM3: 26
.= ((
0_. F)
+ ((p
mod q)
+ (r
mod q))) by
POLYNOM3: 29
.= ((p
mod q)
+ (r
mod q)) by
POLYNOM3: 28;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:6
div3a: for F be
Field, p,r be
Polynomial of F holds for q be non
zero
Polynomial of F holds ((p
*' r)
mod q)
= (((p
mod q)
*' (r
mod q))
mod q)
proof
let F be
Field, p,r be
Polynomial of F;
let q be non
zero
Polynomial of F;
H1: ((((p
div q)
*' q)
*' ((r
div q)
*' q))
+ (((p
div q)
*' q)
*' (r
mod q)))
= (((((p
div q)
*' q)
*' (r
div q))
*' q)
+ (((p
div q)
*' q)
*' (r
mod q))) by
POLYNOM3: 33
.= ((q
*' (((p
div q)
*' q)
*' (r
div q)))
+ (q
*' ((p
div q)
*' (r
mod q)))) by
POLYNOM3: 33
.= (q
*' ((((p
div q)
*' q)
*' (r
div q))
+ ((p
div q)
*' (r
mod q)))) by
POLYNOM3: 31;
H2: ((p
mod q)
*' ((r
div q)
*' q))
= (q
*' ((p
mod q)
*' (r
div q))) by
POLYNOM3: 33;
(p
*' r)
= ((((p
div q)
*' q)
+ (p
mod q))
*' r) by
div5
.= ((((p
div q)
*' q)
+ (p
mod q))
*' (((r
div q)
*' q)
+ (r
mod q))) by
div5
.= ((((p
div q)
*' q)
*' (((r
div q)
*' q)
+ (r
mod q)))
+ ((p
mod q)
*' (((r
div q)
*' q)
+ (r
mod q)))) by
POLYNOM3: 31
.= (((((p
div q)
*' q)
*' ((r
div q)
*' q))
+ (((p
div q)
*' q)
*' (r
mod q)))
+ ((p
mod q)
*' (((r
div q)
*' q)
+ (r
mod q)))) by
POLYNOM3: 31
.= (((((p
div q)
*' q)
*' ((r
div q)
*' q))
+ (((p
div q)
*' q)
*' (r
mod q)))
+ (((p
mod q)
*' ((r
div q)
*' q))
+ ((p
mod q)
*' (r
mod q)))) by
POLYNOM3: 31;
hence ((p
*' r)
mod q)
= ((((((p
div q)
*' q)
*' ((r
div q)
*' q))
+ (((p
div q)
*' q)
*' (r
mod q)))
mod q)
+ ((((p
mod q)
*' ((r
div q)
*' q))
+ ((p
mod q)
*' (r
mod q)))
mod q)) by
div4
.= ((
0_. F)
+ ((((p
mod q)
*' ((r
div q)
*' q))
+ ((p
mod q)
*' (r
mod q)))
mod q)) by
div2,
H1,
T2
.= ((((p
mod q)
*' ((r
div q)
*' q))
+ ((p
mod q)
*' (r
mod q)))
mod q) by
POLYNOM3: 28
.= ((((p
mod q)
*' ((r
div q)
*' q))
mod q)
+ (((p
mod q)
*' (r
mod q))
mod q)) by
div4
.= ((
0_. F)
+ (((p
mod q)
*' (r
mod q))
mod q)) by
div2,
H2,
T2
.= (((p
mod q)
*' (r
mod q))
mod q) by
POLYNOM3: 28;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:7
div3: for F be
Field, r,q,u be
Polynomial of F holds for p be non
zero
Polynomial of F holds ((((r
*' q)
mod p)
*' u)
mod p)
= (((r
*' q)
*' u)
mod p)
proof
let F be
Field, r,q,u be
Polynomial of F;
let p be non
zero
Polynomial of F;
A: ((((r
*' q)
mod p)
*' u)
mod p)
= ((((r
*' q)
*' u)
+ ((
- (((r
*' q)
div p)
*' p))
*' u))
mod p) by
POLYNOM3: 32
.= ((((r
*' q)
*' u)
mod p)
+ (((
- (((r
*' q)
div p)
*' p))
*' u)
mod p)) by
div4;
((
- (((r
*' q)
div p)
*' p))
*' u)
= ((p
*' (
- ((r
*' q)
div p)))
*' u) by
HURWITZ: 12
.= (p
*' ((
- ((r
*' q)
div p))
*' u)) by
POLYNOM3: 33;
hence ((((r
*' q)
mod p)
*' u)
mod p)
= ((((r
*' q)
*' u)
mod p)
+ (
0_. F)) by
A,
div2,
T2
.= (((r
*' q)
*' u)
mod p) by
POLYNOM3: 28;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:8
for L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
left-distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr, p be
sequence of L holds ((
0. L)
* p)
= (
0_. L)
proof
let L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
left-distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr, p be
sequence of L;
set t = ((
0. L)
* p);
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in
NAT ;
then
reconsider i = x as
Element of
NAT ;
thus (t
. x)
= ((
0. L)
* (p
. i)) by
POLYNOM5:def 4
.= ((
0_. L)
. x) by
FUNCOP_1: 7;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 12;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:9
poly2a: for L be
left_unital non
empty
doubleLoopStr, p be
sequence of L holds ((
1. L)
* p)
= p
proof
let L be
left_unital non
empty
doubleLoopStr, p be
sequence of L;
set t = ((
1. L)
* p);
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in
NAT ;
then
reconsider i = x as
Element of
NAT ;
thus (t
. x)
= ((
1. L)
* (p
. i)) by
POLYNOM5:def 4
.= (p
. x);
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 12;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:10
poly2: for L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
right_unital
distributive
associative
commutative non
empty
doubleLoopStr, p,q be
sequence of L, a be
Element of L holds (a
* (p
*' q))
= (p
*' (a
* q))
proof
let R be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
right_unital
distributive
associative
commutative non
empty
doubleLoopStr, p,q be
sequence of R, a be
Element of R;
set t = (a
* (p
*' q));
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in
NAT ;
then
reconsider i = x as
Element of
NAT ;
consider F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of R such that
H1: (
len F)
= (i
+ 1) & ((p
*' q)
. i)
= (
Sum F) & for k be
Element of
NAT st k
in (
dom F) holds (F
. k)
= ((p
. (k
-' 1))
* (q
. ((i
+ 1)
-' k))) by
POLYNOM3:def 9;
consider G be
FinSequence of the
carrier of R such that
H2: (
len G)
= (i
+ 1) & ((p
*' (a
* q))
. i)
= (
Sum G) & for k be
Element of
NAT st k
in (
dom G) holds (G
. k)
= ((p
. (k
-' 1))
* ((a
* q)
. ((i
+ 1)
-' k))) by
POLYNOM3:def 9;
H3: (
dom F)
= (
Seg (i
+ 1)) by
H1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
dom G) by
H2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
now
let x be
object;
assume
H4: x
in (
dom F);
then
reconsider j = x as
Element of
NAT ;
H5: (F
. j)
= ((p
. (j
-' 1))
* (q
. ((i
+ 1)
-' j))) by
H4,
H1;
(G
/. j)
= (G
. j) by
H3,
H4,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((p
. (j
-' 1))
* ((a
* q)
. ((i
+ 1)
-' j))) by
H2,
H4,
H3
.= ((p
. (j
-' 1))
* (a
* (q
. ((i
+ 1)
-' j)))) by
POLYNOM5:def 4
.= (((p
. (j
-' 1))
* (q
. ((i
+ 1)
-' j)))
* a) by
GROUP_1:def 3
.= (a
* (F
/. j)) by
PARTFUN1:def 6,
H5,
H4;
hence (G
/. x)
= (a
* (F
/. x));
end;
then G
= (a
* F) by
H3,
POLYNOM1:def 1;
then (
Sum G)
= (a
* (
Sum F)) by
POLYNOM1: 12;
hence (t
. x)
= ((p
*' (a
* q))
. x) by
H1,
POLYNOM5:def 4,
H2;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 12;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:11
poly3: for L be
associative non
empty
multMagma, p be
sequence of L, a,b be
Element of L holds ((a
* b)
* p)
= (a
* (b
* p))
proof
let L be
associative non
empty
multMagma, p be
sequence of L, a,b be
Element of L;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in
NAT ;
then
reconsider i = x as
Element of
NAT ;
thus (((a
* b)
* p)
. x)
= ((a
* b)
* (p
. i)) by
POLYNOM5:def 4
.= (a
* (b
* (p
. i))) by
GROUP_1:def 3
.= (a
* ((b
* p)
. i)) by
POLYNOM5:def 4
.= ((a
* (b
* p))
. x) by
POLYNOM5:def 4;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 12;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:12
poly1: for L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
left-distributive
left_unital non
empty
doubleLoopStr holds for p be
sequence of L holds ((
1_. L)
*' p)
= p
proof
let R be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
left-distributive
left_unital non
empty
doubleLoopStr, p be
sequence of R;
set q = (
1_. R);
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in
NAT ;
then
reconsider i = x as
Element of
NAT ;
consider F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of R such that
H: (
len F)
= (i
+ 1) & ((q
*' p)
. i)
= (
Sum F) & for k be
Element of
NAT st k
in (
dom F) holds (F
. k)
= ((q
. (k
-' 1))
* (p
. ((i
+ 1)
-' k))) by
POLYNOM3:def 9;
D:
now
let j be
Element of
NAT ;
assume
B: j
in (
dom F) & j
<> 1;
then j
in (
Seg (
len F)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then 1
<= j & j
<= (i
+ 1) by
H,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then j
> 1 by
B,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then (q
. (j
-' 1))
= (
0. R) by
POLYNOM3: 30,
NAT_D: 36;
hence (
0. R)
= ((q
. (j
-' 1))
* (p
. ((i
+ 1)
-' j)))
.= (F
. j) by
B,
H
.= (F
/. j) by
B,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
end;
G: (
dom F)
= (
Seg (i
+ 1)) by
H,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
E: 1
<= 1 & 1
<= (i
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 11;
then
F: (
Sum F)
= (F
/. 1) by
D,
POLYNOM2: 3,
G,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
(F
. 1)
= ((q
. (1
-' 1))
* (p
. ((i
+ 1)
-' 1))) by
H,
E,
G,
FINSEQ_1: 1
.= ((q
.
0 )
* (p
. ((i
+ 1)
-' 1))) by
XREAL_1: 232
.= ((q
.
0 )
* (p
. i)) by
NAT_D: 34
.= ((
1. R)
* (p
. i)) by
POLYNOM3: 30
.= (p
. i);
hence ((q
*' p)
. x)
= (p
. x) by
E,
H,
F,
PARTFUN1:def 6,
G,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 12;
end;
registration
let L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
well-unital
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr;
cluster (
Polynom-Ring L) ->
well-unital;
coherence
proof
set R = (
Polynom-Ring L);
now
let x be
Element of R;
reconsider p = x as
Polynomial of L by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
set e = (
1. R);
A2: (
1. R)
= (
1_. L) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
hence (x
* e)
= (p
*' (
1_. L)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= x by
POLYNOM3: 35;
thus (e
* x)
= ((
1_. L)
*' p) by
A2,
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= x by
poly1;
end;
hence thesis by
VECTSP_1:def 6;
end;
end
begin
definition
let R be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr;
let x be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
::
RING_4:def4
attr x is
constant means
:
defconst: (
deg x)
<=
0 ;
end
registration
let R be non
degenerated
Ring;
cluster non
zero
constant for
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R);
existence
proof
reconsider a = (
1_. R) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider p = a as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
take a;
thus a is non
zero by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
thus a is
constant by
RATFUNC1:def 2;
end;
cluster non
zero
constant for
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
existence
proof
reconsider a = (
1_. R) as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
take a;
thus a is non
zero;
(
len (
1_. R))
= 1 by
POLYNOM4: 4;
hence a is
constant;
end;
end
registration
let R be
domRing;
cluster non
constant for
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R);
existence
proof
set p = ((
rpoly (1,(
0. R)))
*' (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))));
reconsider a = p as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
take a;
(
deg ((
rpoly (1,(
0. R)))
*' (
rpoly (1,(
0. R)))))
= ((
deg (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))))
+ (
deg (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))))) by
HURWITZ: 23
.= (1
+ (
deg (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))))) by
HURWITZ: 27
.= (1
+ 1) by
HURWITZ: 27;
hence a is non
constant;
end;
cluster non
constant for
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
existence
proof
set p = ((
rpoly (1,(
0. R)))
*' (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))));
reconsider a = p as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
take a;
(
deg ((
rpoly (1,(
0. R)))
*' (
rpoly (1,(
0. R)))))
= ((
deg (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))))
+ (
deg (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))))) by
HURWITZ: 23
.= (1
+ (
deg (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))))) by
HURWITZ: 27
.= (1
+ 1) by
HURWITZ: 27;
hence a is non
constant;
end;
end
definition
let L be non
empty
ZeroStr;
let a be
Element of L;
::
RING_4:def5
func a
| L ->
sequence of L equals ((
0_. L)
+* (
0 ,a));
coherence ;
end
registration
let L be non
empty
ZeroStr;
let a be
Element of L;
cluster (a
| L) ->
finite-Support;
coherence
proof
take 1;
let i be
Nat;
assume i
>= 1;
hence ((a
| L)
. i)
= ((
0_. L)
. i) by
FUNCT_7: 32
.= (
0. L) by
ORDINAL1:def 12,
FUNCOP_1: 7;
end;
end
Th28: for L be non
empty
ZeroStr, a be
Element of L holds ((a
| L)
.
0 )
= a & for n be
Nat st n
<>
0 holds ((a
| L)
. n)
= (
0. L)
proof
let L be non
empty
ZeroStr, a be
Element of L;
0
in
NAT ;
then
0
in (
dom (
0_. L)) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
hence ((a
| L)
.
0 )
= a by
FUNCT_7: 31;
let n be
Nat;
assume n
<>
0 ;
hence ((a
| L)
. n)
= ((
0_. L)
. n) by
FUNCT_7: 32
.= (
0. L) by
ORDINAL1:def 12,
FUNCOP_1: 7;
end;
T6: for L be non
empty
ZeroStr holds ((
0. L)
| L)
= (
0_. L)
proof
let L be non
empty
ZeroStr;
set p = ((
0. L)
| L);
A2:
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
dom p);
then
reconsider i = x as
Element of
NAT ;
per cases ;
suppose i
=
0 ;
hence (p
. x)
= (
0. L) by
Th28;
end;
suppose i
<>
0 ;
hence (p
. x)
= (
0. L) by
Th28;
end;
end;
(
dom p)
=
NAT by
NORMSP_1: 12;
hence thesis by
A2,
FUNCOP_1: 11;
end;
registration
let L be non
empty
ZeroStr;
let a be
Element of L;
cluster (a
| L) ->
constant;
coherence
proof
per cases ;
suppose a
= (
0. L);
then (a
| L)
= (
0_. L) by
T6;
then (
len (a
| L))
=
0 by
POLYNOM4: 3;
then (
deg (a
| L))
= (
- 1);
hence thesis by
RATFUNC1:def 2;
end;
suppose
A0: a
<> (
0. L);
A1:
now
let i be
Nat;
assume that
A2: i
is_at_least_length_of (a
| L) and
A3: (
0
+ 1)
> i;
0
>= i by
A3,
NAT_1: 13;
then ((a
| L)
.
0 )
= (
0. L) by
A2,
ALGSEQ_1:def 2;
hence contradiction by
A0,
Th28;
end;
for i be
Nat st i
>= 1 holds ((a
| L)
. i)
= (
0. L) by
Th28;
then (
len (a
| L))
= 1 by
A1,
ALGSEQ_1:def 3,
ALGSEQ_1:def 2;
then (
deg (a
| L))
=
0 ;
hence thesis by
RATFUNC1:def 2;
end;
end;
end
registration
let L be non
trivial
ZeroStr;
let a be non
zero
Element of L;
cluster (a
| L) -> non
zero;
coherence
proof
((a
| L)
.
0 )
= a by
Th28;
then (a
| L)
<> (
0_. L) by
FUNCOP_1: 7;
hence thesis by
UPROOTS:def 5;
end;
end
registration
let L be non
trivial
ZeroStr;
cluster non
zero
constant for
Polynomial of L;
existence
proof
take ( the non
zero
Element of L
| L);
thus thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
RING_4:13
for L be non
empty
ZeroStr holds ((
0. L)
| L)
= (
0_. L) by
T6;
theorem ::
RING_4:14
for L be non
empty
multLoopStr_0 holds ((
1. L)
| L)
= (
1_. L);
registration
let L be non
empty
ZeroStr;
cluster ((
0. L)
| L) ->
zero;
coherence by
T6;
end
registration
let L be non
degenerated
multLoopStr_0;
cluster ((
1. L)
| L) -> non
zero;
coherence ;
end
theorem ::
RING_4:15
LX: for L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring L) holds p is non
zero
constant iff (
deg p)
=
0
proof
let L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring L);
A:
now
assume
AS: p is non
zero
constant;
now
assume (
deg p)
<>
0 ;
then (((
len p)
- 1)
+ 1)
< (
0
+ 1) by
AS,
XREAL_1: 6;
then (
len p)
=
0 by
NAT_1: 14;
then (
deg p)
= (
- 1);
then p
= (
0_. L) by
HURWITZ: 20;
hence contradiction by
AS;
end;
hence (
deg p)
=
0 ;
end;
now
assume
AS: (
deg p)
=
0 ;
then p
<> (
0_. L) by
HURWITZ: 20;
hence p is non
zero by
UPROOTS:def 5;
thus p is
constant by
AS;
end;
hence thesis by
A;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:16
LX1: for L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
right-distributive
right_unital non
empty
doubleLoopStr, a be
Element of L holds (a
| L)
= (a
* (
1_. L))
proof
let L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
right-distributive
right_unital non
empty
doubleLoopStr, a be
Element of L;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in
NAT ;
then
reconsider i = x as
Element of
NAT ;
per cases ;
suppose
A: i
=
0 ;
thus ((a
* (
1_. L))
. x)
= (a
* ((
1_. L)
. i)) by
POLYNOM5:def 4
.= (a
* (
1. L)) by
A,
POLYNOM3: 30
.= a
.= ((a
| L)
. x) by
Th28,
A;
end;
suppose
A: i
>
0 ;
thus ((a
* (
1_. L))
. x)
= (a
* ((
1_. L)
. i)) by
POLYNOM5:def 4
.= (a
* (
0. L)) by
A,
POLYNOM3: 30
.= ((a
| L)
. x) by
Th28,
A;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 12;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:17
T4a: for R be
Ring holds for a,b be
Element of R holds ((a
| R)
+ (b
| R))
= ((a
+ b)
| R)
proof
let R be
Ring, a,b be
Element of R;
set p = ((a
| R)
+ (b
| R)), q = ((a
+ b)
| R);
A: (
dom p)
=
NAT by
FUNCT_2:def 1
.= (
dom q) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
dom q);
then
reconsider i = x as
Element of
NAT ;
B: (p
. i)
= (((a
| R)
. i)
+ ((b
| R)
. i)) by
NORMSP_1:def 2;
per cases ;
suppose
S: i
=
0 ;
hence (q
. x)
= (a
+ b) by
Th28
.= (((a
| R)
. i)
+ b) by
S,
Th28
.= (p
. x) by
B,
S,
Th28;
end;
suppose
S: i
<>
0 ;
hence (q
. x)
= (
0. R) by
Th28
.= (((a
| R)
. i)
+ (
0. R)) by
S,
Th28
.= (p
. x) by
B,
S,
Th28;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A,
FUNCT_1: 2;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:18
T4: for R be
Ring holds for a,b be
Element of R holds ((a
| R)
*' (b
| R))
= ((a
* b)
| R)
proof
let R be
Ring, a,b be
Element of R;
set p = (a
| R), q = (b
| R);
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in
NAT ;
then
reconsider i = x as
Element of
NAT ;
consider F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of R such that
H: (
len F)
= (i
+ 1) & ((p
*' q)
. i)
= (
Sum F) & for k be
Element of
NAT st k
in (
dom F) holds (F
. k)
= ((p
. (k
-' 1))
* (q
. ((i
+ 1)
-' k))) by
POLYNOM3:def 9;
per cases ;
suppose
A: i
=
0 ;
then 1
in (
Seg (
len F)) by
H,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then 1
in (
dom F) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (F
. 1)
= ((p
. ((
0
+ 1)
-' 1))
* (q
. ((i
+ 1)
-' 1))) by
H
.= ((p
.
0 )
* (q
. ((i
+ 1)
-' 1))) by
NAT_D: 34
.= ((p
.
0 )
* (q
.
0 )) by
NAT_D: 34,
A
.= (a
* (q
.
0 )) by
Th28
.= (a
* b) by
Th28;
then F
=
<*(a
* b)*> by
FINSEQ_1: 40,
A,
H;
hence ((p
*' q)
. x)
= (a
* b) by
H,
RLVECT_1: 44
.= (((a
* b)
| R)
. x) by
A,
Th28;
end;
suppose
A: i
>
0 ;
now
let j be
Element of
NAT ;
assume
B: j
in (
dom F);
then j
in (
Seg (
len F)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
C: 1
<= j & j
<= (i
+ 1) by
H,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
(p
. (j
-' 1))
= (
0. R) or (q
. ((i
+ 1)
-' j))
= (
0. R)
proof
assume (p
. (j
-' 1))
<> (
0. R);
then j
<= 1 by
NAT_D: 36,
Th28;
then j
= 1 by
C,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then ((i
+ 1)
-' j)
= i by
NAT_D: 34;
hence (q
. ((i
+ 1)
-' j))
= (
0. R) by
A,
Th28;
end;
hence (
0. R)
= ((p
. (j
-' 1))
* (q
. ((i
+ 1)
-' j)))
.= (F
. j) by
B,
H;
end;
hence ((p
*' q)
. x)
= (
0. R) by
H,
POLYNOM3: 1
.= (((a
* b)
| R)
. x) by
A,
Th28;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 12;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:19
T9: for R be
Ring holds for a,b be
Element of R holds (a
| R)
= (b
| R) iff a
= b
proof
let R be
Ring, a,b be
Element of R;
now
assume (a
| R)
= (b
| R);
hence a
= ((b
| R)
.
0 ) by
Th28
.= b by
Th28;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:20
T11: for R be
Ring holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds p is
constant iff ex a be
Element of R st p
= (a
| R)
proof
let L be
Ring, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring L);
reconsider g = p as
Polynomial of L;
now
assume p is
constant;
then
AS: (((
len p)
- 1)
+ 1)
<= (
0
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
per cases by
AS,
NAT_1: 25;
suppose (
len p)
=
0 ;
then p
= (
0_. L) by
POLYNOM4: 5
.= ((
0. L)
| L) by
T6;
hence ex a be
Element of L st p
= (a
| L);
end;
suppose
AS: (
len p)
= 1;
set q = ((p
.
0 )
| L);
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in
NAT ;
then
reconsider i = x as
Element of
NAT ;
per cases ;
suppose i
=
0 ;
hence (q
. x)
= (p
. x) by
Th28;
end;
suppose
B: i
<>
0 ;
then (i
+ 1)
> (
0
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then i
>= (
len p) by
AS,
NAT_1: 13;
hence (p
. x)
= (
0. L) by
ALGSEQ_1: 8
.= (q
. x) by
B,
Th28;
end;
end;
hence ex a be
Element of L st p
= (a
| L) by
FUNCT_2: 12;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
RATFUNC1:def 2;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:21
T11a: for R be
Ring, a be
Element of R holds (
deg (a
| R))
=
0 iff a
<> (
0. R)
proof
let L be
Ring, a be
Element of L;
now
assume
Y: a
<> (
0. L);
now
assume (
deg (a
| L))
<
0 ;
then (a
| L)
= (
0_. L) by
T8b
.= ((
0. L)
| L) by
T6;
hence contradiction by
Y,
T9;
end;
hence (
deg (a
| L))
=
0 by
RATFUNC1:def 2;
end;
hence thesis by
T8b,
T6;
end;
begin
notation
let L be non
empty
doubleLoopStr;
let p be
Polynomial of L;
synonym p is
monic for p is
normalized;
end
registration
let L be non
degenerated
doubleLoopStr;
cluster (
1_. L) ->
monic;
coherence
proof
((
len (
1_. L))
-' 1)
= (1
-' 1) by
POLYNOM4: 4
.=
0 by
XREAL_1: 232;
then (
LC (
1_. L))
= (
1. L) by
POLYNOM3: 30;
hence (
1_. L) is
monic by
RATFUNC1:def 7;
end;
cluster (
0_. L) -> non
monic;
coherence
proof
C: (
1. L)
<> (
0. L);
(
LC (
0_. L))
= (
0. L) by
FUNCOP_1: 7;
hence (
0_. L) is non
monic by
C,
RATFUNC1:def 7;
end;
end
registration
let L be non
degenerated
doubleLoopStr;
cluster
monic for
Polynomial of L;
existence
proof
(
1_. L) is
monic;
hence thesis;
end;
cluster non
monic for
Polynomial of L;
existence
proof
(
0_. L) is non
monic;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let L be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
distributive non
degenerated
doubleLoopStr;
cluster
monic for
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring L);
existence
proof
(
1_. L) is
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring L) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
hence thesis;
end;
cluster non
monic for
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring L);
existence
proof
(
0_. L) is
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring L) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let L be
well-unital non
degenerated
doubleLoopStr;
let x be
Element of L;
cluster (
rpoly (1,x)) ->
monic;
coherence
proof
set p = (
rpoly (1,x));
1
= (
deg p) by
HURWITZ: 27
.= ((
len p)
- 1);
then (1
+ 1)
= (
len p);
then ((
len p)
-' 1)
= 1 by
NAT_D: 34;
then (
LC p)
= (
1. L) by
HURWITZ: 25;
hence p is
monic by
RATFUNC1:def 7;
end;
end
definition
let L be
Field;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring L);
:: original:
NormPolynomial
redefine
func
NormPolynomial p ->
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring L) ;
coherence by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end
registration
let F be
Field;
let p be non
zero
Polynomial of F;
cluster (
NormPolynomial p) ->
monic;
coherence ;
end
registration
let L be
Field;
let p be non
zero
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring L);
cluster (
NormPolynomial p) ->
monic;
coherence ;
end
theorem ::
RING_4:22
npl0: for F be
Field holds (
NormPolynomial (
0_. F))
= (
0_. F)
proof
let F be
Field;
set q = (
0_. F);
set p = (
NormPolynomial q);
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in
NAT ;
then
reconsider i = x as
Element of
NAT ;
(p
. i)
= ((q
. i)
/ (q
. ((
len q)
-' 1))) by
POLYNOM5:def 11
.= ((
0. F)
* ((q
. ((
len q)
-' 1))
" )) by
FUNCOP_1: 7
.= (q
. i) by
FUNCOP_1: 7;
hence (p
. x)
= (q
. x);
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 12;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:23
npl: for F be
Field, p be non
zero
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds (
NormPolynomial p)
= (((
LC p)
" )
* p)
proof
let F be
Field, p be non
zero
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in
NAT ;
then
reconsider i = x as
Element of
NAT ;
thus ((((
LC p)
" )
* p)
. x)
= (((
LC p)
" )
* (p
. i)) by
POLYNOM5:def 4
.= ((p
. i)
/ (p
. ((
len p)
-' 1)))
.= ((
NormPolynomial p)
. x) by
POLYNOM5:def 11;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 12;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:24
for F be
Field, p be non
zero
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds p is
monic iff (
NormPolynomial p)
= p
proof
let F be
Field, p be non
zero
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
hereby
assume p is
monic;
then (
LC p)
= (
1. F) by
RATFUNC1:def 7;
hence (
NormPolynomial p)
= (((
1. F)
" )
* p) by
npl
.= p by
poly2a;
end;
thus thesis;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:25
np1: for F be
Field, p,q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds q
divides p iff (
NormPolynomial q)
divides p
proof
let F be
Field, p,q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
per cases ;
suppose q
= (
0_. F);
hence thesis by
npl0;
end;
suppose
AS: q
<> (
0_. F);
then
AS1: q is non
zero by
UPROOTS:def 5;
A:
now
assume q
divides p;
then
consider r be
Polynomial of F such that
A1: p
= (q
*' r) by
T2;
set a = ((
LC q)
" );
reconsider qq = (
NormPolynomial q) as
Polynomial of F;
q is non
zero by
AS,
UPROOTS:def 5;
then (
LC q)
<> (
0. F);
then (((
LC q)
" )
* (
LC q))
= (
1. F) by
VECTSP_1:def 10;
then a
<> (
0. F);
then ((a
" )
* a)
= (
1. F) by
VECTSP_1:def 10;
then p
= ((a
* (a
" ))
* p) by
poly2a
.= (a
* ((a
" )
* (q
*' r))) by
A1,
poly3
.= (a
* (q
*' ((a
" )
* r))) by
poly2
.= ((a
* q)
*' ((a
" )
* r)) by
poly2
.= (qq
*' ((a
" )
* r)) by
AS1,
npl;
hence (
NormPolynomial q)
divides p by
T2;
end;
now
assume
A0: (
NormPolynomial q)
divides p;
reconsider qq = (
NormPolynomial q) as
Polynomial of F;
consider r be
Polynomial of F such that
A1: p
= (qq
*' r) by
A0,
T2;
p
= ((((
LC q)
" )
* q)
*' r) by
AS1,
A1,
npl
.= (((
LC q)
" )
* (q
*' r)) by
poly2
.= (q
*' (((
LC q)
" )
* r)) by
poly2;
hence q
divides p by
T2;
end;
hence thesis by
A;
end;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:26
np2: for F be
Field, p,q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds q
divides p iff q
divides (
NormPolynomial p)
proof
let F be
Field, p,q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
per cases ;
suppose p
= (
0_. F);
hence thesis by
npl0;
end;
suppose
AS: p
<> (
0_. F);
then
AS1: p is non
zero by
UPROOTS:def 5;
A:
now
assume q
divides p;
then
consider r be
Polynomial of F such that
A1: p
= (q
*' r) by
T2;
set a = ((
LC p)
" );
(
NormPolynomial p)
= (a
* (q
*' r)) by
AS1,
A1,
npl
.= (q
*' (a
* r)) by
poly2;
hence q
divides (
NormPolynomial p) by
T2;
end;
now
assume q
divides (
NormPolynomial p);
then
consider r be
Polynomial of F such that
A1: (
NormPolynomial p)
= (q
*' r) by
T2;
set a = ((
LC p)
" );
p is non
zero by
AS,
UPROOTS:def 5;
then (
LC p)
<> (
0. F);
then (((
LC p)
" )
* (
LC p))
= (
1. F) by
VECTSP_1:def 10;
then a
<> (
0. F);
then ((a
" )
* a)
= (
1. F) by
VECTSP_1:def 10;
then p
= (((a
" )
* a)
* p) by
poly2a
.= ((a
" )
* (a
* p)) by
poly3
.= ((a
" )
* (q
*' r)) by
AS1,
A1,
npl
.= (q
*' ((a
" )
* r)) by
poly2;
hence q
divides p by
T2;
end;
hence thesis by
A;
end;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:27
np3: for F be
Field, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds (
NormPolynomial p)
is_associated_to p
proof
let F be
Field, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
reconsider a = p, b = (
NormPolynomial p) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
A: (p
*' (
1_. F))
= p by
POLYNOM3: 35;
then
B: p
divides (
NormPolynomial p) by
T2,
np2;
(
NormPolynomial p)
divides p by
A,
np1,
T2;
hence thesis by
B;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:28
thirr2: for F be
Field, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds (
NormPolynomial p) is
irreducible iff p is
irreducible
proof
let F be
Field, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
now
assume
B: (
NormPolynomial p) is
irreducible;
(
NormPolynomial p)
is_associated_to p by
np3;
hence p is
irreducible by
B,
RING_2: 23;
end;
hence thesis by
np3,
RING_2: 23;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:29
np00: for R be
domRing, p,q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds p
is_associated_to q implies (
deg p)
= (
deg q)
proof
let R be
domRing, p,q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
assume
A: p
is_associated_to q;
then
consider c be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R) such that
K2: q
= (p
* c) by
GCD_1:def 1;
reconsider r = c as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
consider d be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R) such that
K3: p
= (q
* d) by
A,
GCD_1:def 1;
reconsider s = d as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
K4: q
= (p
*' r) by
K2,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
K5: p
= (q
*' s) by
K3,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
per cases ;
suppose p
= (
0_. R);
hence thesis by
K4,
POLYNOM3: 34;
end;
suppose q
= (
0_. R);
hence thesis by
K5,
POLYNOM3: 34;
end;
suppose
A: p
<> (
0_. R) & q
<> (
0_. R);
then
A1: r
<> (
0_. R) & s
<> (
0_. R) by
K4,
K5,
POLYNOM3: 34;
then
A2: (
deg r) is
Element of
NAT & (
deg s) is
Element of
NAT by
T8b;
A3: (
deg q)
= ((
deg p)
+ (
deg r)) & (
deg p)
= ((
deg q)
+ (
deg s)) by
A,
A1,
K4,
K5,
HURWITZ: 23;
then ((
deg r)
+ (
deg s))
=
0 ;
then (
deg r)
=
0 & (
deg s)
=
0 by
A2;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:30
np0: for R be
domRing, p,q be
monic
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds p
is_associated_to q iff p
= q
proof
let R be
domRing, p,q be
monic
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
K1: (
LC p)
= (
1. R) & (
LC q)
= (
1. R) by
RATFUNC1:def 7;
now
assume
AS: p
is_associated_to q;
then
consider c be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R) such that
K2: q
= (p
* c) by
GCD_1:def 1;
reconsider r = c as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
K3: q
= (p
*' r) by
K2,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
r
<> (
0_. R) by
K3,
POLYNOM3: 34;
then (
deg q)
= ((
deg p)
+ (
deg r)) by
K3,
HURWITZ: 23
.= ((
deg q)
+ (
deg r)) by
AS,
np00;
then r is
constant;
then
consider a be
Element of R such that
K5: r
= (a
| R) by
T11;
X: (
deg p)
= (
deg q) by
AS,
np00;
r
= (a
* (
1_. R)) by
K5,
LX1;
then q
= (a
* (p
*' (
1_. R))) by
K3,
poly2
.= (a
* p) by
poly1;
then (q
. ((
len q)
-' 1))
= (a
* (
1. R)) by
X,
K1,
POLYNOM5:def 4
.= a;
then r
= (
1_. R) by
K5,
K1;
hence p
= q by
K3,
poly1;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
begin
definition
let R be
Ring;
::
RING_4:def6
func
canHom R ->
Function of R, (
Polynom-Ring R) means
:
defcanhom: for x be
Element of R holds (it
. x)
= (x
| R);
existence
proof
set B = (
Polynom-Ring R);
defpred
P[
object,
object] means ex a be
Element of R st $1
= a & $2
= (a
| R);
X: for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of R holds ex y be
object st y
in the
carrier of B &
P[x, y]
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in the
carrier of R;
then
reconsider a = x as
Element of R;
reconsider y = (a
| R) as
Element of B by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
take y;
thus thesis;
end;
consider g be
Function of the
carrier of R, the
carrier of B such that
Z: for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of R holds
P[x, (g
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
X);
now
let x be
Element of R;
consider a be
Element of R such that
H: x
= a & (g
. x)
= (a
| R) by
Z;
thus (g
. x)
= (x
| R) by
H;
end;
then
consider f be
Function of R, B such that
Y: for x be
Element of R holds (f
. x)
= (x
| R);
take f;
thus thesis by
Y;
end;
uniqueness
proof
set B = (
Polynom-Ring R);
let g1,g2 be
Function of R, B such that
A1: for a be
Element of R holds (g1
. a)
= (a
| R) and
A2: for a be
Element of R holds (g2
. a)
= (a
| R);
A: (
dom g1)
= the
carrier of R by
FUNCT_2:def 1
.= (
dom g2) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
dom g1);
then
reconsider a = x as
Element of R;
thus (g1
. x)
= (a
| R) by
A1
.= (g2
. x) by
A2;
end;
hence thesis by
A,
FUNCT_1: 2;
end;
end
registration
let R be
Ring;
cluster (
canHom R) ->
additive
multiplicative
unity-preserving;
coherence
proof
set f = (
canHom R);
hereby
let x,y be
Element of R;
(f
. x)
= (x
| R) & (f
. y)
= (y
| R) by
defcanhom;
hence ((f
. x)
+ (f
. y))
= ((x
| R)
+ (y
| R)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= ((x
+ y)
| R) by
T4a
.= (f
. (x
+ y)) by
defcanhom;
end;
hereby
let x,y be
Element of R;
(f
. x)
= (x
| R) & (f
. y)
= (y
| R) by
defcanhom;
hence ((f
. x)
* (f
. y))
= ((x
| R)
*' (y
| R)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= ((x
* y)
| R) by
T4
.= (f
. (x
* y)) by
defcanhom;
end;
thus (f
. (
1_ R))
= ((
1. R)
| R) by
defcanhom
.= (
1_. R)
.= (
1_ (
Polynom-Ring R)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
end
registration
let R be
Ring;
cluster (
canHom R) ->
monomorphism;
coherence
proof
set f = (
canHom R);
A: f is
linear by
RINGCAT1:def 1;
now
let x1,x2 be
object;
assume
AS: x1
in the
carrier of R & x2
in the
carrier of R & (f
. x1)
= (f
. x2);
then
reconsider a = x1, b = x2 as
Element of R;
(a
| R)
= (f
. x2) by
AS,
defcanhom
.= (b
| R) by
defcanhom;
hence x1
= x2 by
T9;
end;
then f is
one-to-one by
FUNCT_2: 19;
hence thesis by
A;
end;
end
registration
let R be
Ring;
cluster (
Polynom-Ring R) -> R
-homomorphicR
-monomorphic;
coherence
proof
A: (
canHom R) is
additive
multiplicative
unity-preserving
monomorphism;
hence (
Polynom-Ring R) is R
-homomorphic by
RING_2:def 4;
thus thesis by
A,
RING_3:def 3;
end;
end
theorem ::
RING_4:31
for R be
Ring holds (
Char (
Polynom-Ring R))
= (
Char R) by
RING_3: 88;
registration
let R be non
degenerated
Ring;
cluster (
Polynom-Ring R) ->
infinite;
coherence
proof
set PR = (
Polynom-Ring R);
defpred
P[
Element of
NAT ,
object] means $2
= (
rpoly ($1,(
0. R)));
A0: for x be
Element of
NAT holds ex y be
Element of the
carrier of PR st
P[x, y]
proof
let x be
Element of
NAT ;
take (
rpoly (x,(
0. R)));
thus thesis by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
consider f be
Function of
NAT , the
carrier of PR such that
A1: for x be
Element of
NAT holds
P[x, (f
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 3(
A0);
A2: (
dom f)
=
NAT by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
now
let x1,x2 be
object;
assume
A3: x1
in
NAT & x2
in
NAT & (f
. x1)
= (f
. x2);
then
reconsider n = x1, m = x2 as
Element of
NAT ;
(
rpoly (n,(
0. R)))
= (f
. m) by
A1,
A3
.= (
rpoly (m,(
0. R))) by
A1;
then n
= (
deg (
rpoly (m,(
0. R)))) by
HURWITZ: 27
.= m by
HURWITZ: 27;
hence x1
= x2;
end;
then f is
one-to-one by
FUNCT_2: 19;
then (
rng f) is
infinite by
A2,
CARD_1: 59;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
cluster ->
infinite for
0
-characteristic
Ring;
coherence
proof
let R be
0
-characteristic
Ring;
set f = (
canHom_Int R);
(
dom f)
= the
carrier of
INT.Ring by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (
rng f) is
infinite by
CARD_1: 59;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
RING_4:32
for R be
Ring st (
Char R)
=
0 holds R is
infinite
proof
let R be
Ring;
assume (
Char R)
=
0 ;
then R is
0
-characteristic by
RING_3:def 6;
hence thesis;
end;
registration
let n be non
trivial
Nat;
cluster (
Polynom-Ring (
Z/ n)) ->
infinite;
coherence ;
end
theorem ::
RING_4:33
for n be non
trivial
Nat holds (
Char (
Polynom-Ring (
Z/ n)))
<>
0 ;
registration
let n be non
trivial
Nat;
cluster n
-characteristic
infinite for
Ring;
existence
proof
take (
Polynom-Ring (
Z/ n));
thus thesis;
end;
end
begin
lemr: for R be
domRing holds (
Polynom-Ring R) is non
almost_left_invertible
proof
let R be
domRing;
set PR = (
Polynom-Ring R);
reconsider p = (
rpoly (2,(
0. R))) as
Element of the
carrier of PR by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A3: p
<> (
0. PR) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
now
assume ex q be
Element of PR st (q
* p)
= (
1. PR);
then
consider q be
Element of PR such that
A1: (q
* p)
= (
1. PR);
A9: q
<> (
0. PR) by
A1;
reconsider q as
Element of the
carrier of PR;
A4: q
<> (
0_. R) by
A9,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then
A5: (
deg q) is
Element of
NAT by
T8b;
(q
*' p)
= (
1. PR) by
A1,
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= (
1_. R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then
A2: ((
deg q)
+ (
deg p))
= (
deg (
1_. R)) by
A4,
HURWITZ: 23;
A8: (
len (
1_. R))
= 1 by
POLYNOM4: 4;
(
deg p)
= 2 by
HURWITZ: 27;
hence contradiction by
A5,
A8,
A2;
end;
then not p is
left_invertible;
hence PR is non
almost_left_invertible by
A3;
end;
registration
cluster non
almost_left_invertible for
domRing;
existence
proof
take (
Polynom-Ring the
Field);
thus thesis by
lemr;
end;
end
lemf: for R be
domRing holds R is
Field iff for a be
NonUnit of R holds a
= (
0. R)
proof
let R be
domRing;
A:
now
assume R is
Field;
then
B: R is
almost_left_invertible;
let a be
NonUnit of R;
now
assume a
<> (
0. R);
then
consider b be
Element of R such that
C: (b
* a)
= (
1. R) by
B,
ALGSTR_0:def 27;
a
divides (
1. R) by
C;
hence contradiction by
GCD_1:def 2;
end;
hence a
= (
0. R);
end;
now
assume
B: for a be
NonUnit of R holds a
= (
0. R);
now
let a be
Element of R;
assume a
<> (
0. R);
then a is
Unit of R by
B;
then a
divides (
1. R) by
GCD_1:def 2;
then
consider b be
Element of R such that
C: (a
* b)
= (
1. R);
thus a is
left_invertible by
C;
end;
then R is
almost_left_invertible;
hence R is
Field;
end;
hence thesis by
A;
end;
registration
let R be non
almost_left_invertible
domRing;
cluster non
zero for
NonUnit of R;
existence
proof
consider a be
NonUnit of R such that
H: a
<> (
0. R) by
lemf;
a is non
zero by
H;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
cluster
INT.Ring -> non
almost_left_invertible;
coherence
proof
set R =
INT.Ring ;
set a = ((
1. R)
+ (
1. R));
now
assume ex y be
Element of R st (y
* a)
= (
1. R);
then
consider y be
Element of R such that
A1: (y
* a)
= (
1. R);
reconsider i = y as
Integer;
consider k be
Nat such that
A2: k
= (1
* (2
" )) or (
- k)
= (1
* (2
" )) by
A1,
INT_1:def 1;
thus contradiction by
A2,
NAT_1: 14;
end;
then not a is
left_invertible;
hence R is non
almost_left_invertible;
end;
end
registration
let R be
domRing;
cluster (
Polynom-Ring R) -> non
almost_left_invertible;
coherence by
lemr;
end
theorem ::
RING_4:34
for R be
domRing holds R is
Field iff for a be
NonUnit of R holds a
= (
0. R) by
lemf;
theorem ::
RING_4:35
Th90: for R be
domRing, a be
Element of R holds (a
| R) is
Unit of (
Polynom-Ring R) iff a is
Unit of R
proof
let L be
domRing, a be
Element of L;
set R = (
Polynom-Ring L);
H1: (
1. R)
= (
1_. L) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider p = (a
| L) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring L) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A:
now
assume
AS: p is
Unit of R;
then (a
| L)
divides (
1_. L) by
H1,
GCD_1:def 2;
then
consider q be
Polynomial of L such that
H3: ((a
| L)
*' q)
= (
1_. L) by
T2;
reconsider qq = q as
Element of R by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
p
<> (
0. R) by
AS;
then
H4: (a
| L)
<> (
0_. L) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
q
<> (
0_. L) by
H3,
POLYNOM3: 34;
then
H6: ((
deg (a
| L))
+ (
deg q))
= (
deg (
1_. L)) by
H3,
H4,
HURWITZ: 23
.= (1
- 1) by
POLYNOM4: 4;
(
deg (a
| L)) is
Element of
NAT by
H4,
T8b;
then qq is
constant by
H6;
then
consider b be
Element of L such that
H5: qq
= (b
| L) by
T11;
((a
* b)
| L)
= ((
1. L)
| L) by
H3,
H5,
T4;
then a
divides (
1. L) by
T9;
hence a is
Unit of L by
GCD_1:def 2;
end;
now
assume a is
Unit of L;
then a
divides (
1. L) by
GCD_1:def 2;
then
consider b be
Element of L such that
H3: (a
* b)
= (
1. L);
((a
| L)
*' (b
| L))
= ((
1. L)
| L) by
T4,
H3
.= (
1_. L);
then (a
| L)
divides (
1_. L) by
T2;
hence p is
Unit of R by
H1,
GCD_1:def 2;
end;
hence thesis by
A;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:36
T88: for F be
domRing, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds p is
Unit of (
Polynom-Ring F) implies (
deg p)
=
0
proof
let L be
domRing;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring L);
set R = (
Polynom-Ring L);
H: (
1. R)
= (
1_. L) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
assume
AS: p is
Unit of R;
then
H0: p
<> (
0. R);
then
H1: p
<> (
0_. L) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider degp = (
deg p) as
Element of
NAT by
H0,
T8a;
p
divides (
1_. L) by
AS,
H,
GCD_1:def 2;
then
consider t be
Polynomial of L such that
H3: (p
*' t)
= (
1_. L) by
T2;
reconsider t as
Element of the
carrier of R by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
H5: t
<> (
0_. L) by
POLYNOM3: 34,
H3;
then t
<> (
0. R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then
reconsider degt = (
deg t) as
Element of
NAT by
T8a;
(degt
+ degp)
= (
deg (
1_. L)) by
H1,
H3,
H5,
HURWITZ: 23
.= (1
- 1) by
POLYNOM4: 4;
hence (
deg p)
=
0 ;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:37
T8: for F be
Field, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds p is
Unit of (
Polynom-Ring F) iff (
deg p)
=
0
proof
let L be
Field;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring L);
set R = (
Polynom-Ring L);
H: (
1. R)
= (
1_. L) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A:
now
assume
AS: p is
Unit of R;
then
H0: p
<> (
0. R);
then
H1: p
<> (
0_. L) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider degp = (
deg p) as
Element of
NAT by
H0,
T8a;
p
divides (
1_. L) by
AS,
H,
GCD_1:def 2;
then
consider t be
Polynomial of L such that
H3: (p
*' t)
= (
1_. L) by
T2;
reconsider t as
Element of the
carrier of R by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
H5: t
<> (
0_. L) by
POLYNOM3: 34,
H3;
then t
<> (
0. R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then
reconsider degt = (
deg t) as
Element of
NAT by
T8a;
(degt
+ degp)
= (
deg (
1_. L)) by
H1,
H3,
H5,
HURWITZ: 23
.= (1
- 1) by
POLYNOM4: 4;
hence (
deg p)
=
0 ;
end;
now
assume
AS: (
deg p)
=
0 ;
then
AS1: p
<> (
0_. L) by
HURWITZ: 20;
p
<> (
0. R) by
AS1,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then
reconsider degp = (
deg p) as
Nat by
T8a;
p is
constant by
AS;
then
consider a be
Element of L such that
X: p
= (a
| L) by
T11;
H3: a
<> (
0. L) by
X,
AS,
HURWITZ: 20,
UPROOTS:def 5;
set t = ((a
" )
| L);
(t
*' p)
= (((a
" )
* a)
| L) by
X,
T4
.= (
1_. L) by
H3,
VECTSP_1:def 10;
then p
divides (
1_. L) by
T2;
hence p is
Unit of R by
H,
GCD_1:def 2;
end;
hence thesis by
A;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:38
for R be
domRing, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds p is
Unit of (
Polynom-Ring R) implies p is non
zero
constant
proof
let F be
domRing, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
p is
Unit of (
Polynom-Ring F) implies (
deg p)
=
0 by
T88;
hence thesis by
LX;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:39
for F be
Field, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds p is
Unit of (
Polynom-Ring F) iff p is non
zero
constant
proof
let F be
Field, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
p is
Unit of (
Polynom-Ring F) iff (
deg p)
=
0 by
T8;
hence thesis by
LX;
end;
registration
let R be
domRing;
cluster non
constant -> non
zero non
unital for
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R);
coherence
proof
let a be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R);
reconsider p = a as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
assume
AS: a is non
constant;
then
A: (
deg p)
>
0 ;
now
assume a
= (
0. (
Polynom-Ring R));
then p
= (
0_. R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then (
len p)
=
0 by
POLYNOM4: 3;
hence contradiction by
A;
end;
hence a is non
zero;
thus a is non
unital by
AS,
T88;
end;
end
registration
let F be
domRing;
cluster non
constant -> non
zero non
unital for
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
coherence
proof
let a be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
assume
AS: a is non
constant;
now
assume a
= (
0_. F);
then (
len a)
=
0 by
POLYNOM4: 3;
hence contradiction by
AS;
end;
hence a is non
zero by
UPROOTS:def 5;
thus a is non
unital by
AS;
end;
end
registration
let F be
Field;
cluster non
zero
constant ->
unital for
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
coherence
proof
let p be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
assume
AS: p is non
zero
constant;
then
A: p
<> (
0_. F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider pp = p as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
pp is non
zero by
A,
UPROOTS:def 5;
then (
deg pp)
=
0 by
AS;
hence p is
unital by
T8;
end;
cluster
unital -> non
zero
constant for
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
coherence ;
end
registration
let F be
Field;
cluster non
zero
constant ->
unital for
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
coherence
proof
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
assume p is non
zero
constant;
then (
deg p)
=
0 ;
hence p is
unital by
T8;
end;
cluster
unital -> non
zero
constant for
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
coherence
proof
let a be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
reconsider p = a as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
assume
AS: a is
unital;
then (
deg a)
=
0 by
T88;
then a
<> (
0_. F) by
HURWITZ: 20;
hence a is non
zero by
UPROOTS:def 5;
thus thesis by
AS;
end;
end
theorem ::
RING_4:40
T88a: for R be
domRing holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds (ex q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) st q
divides p & 1
<= (
deg q) & (
deg q)
< (
deg p)) implies p is
reducible
proof
let R be
domRing, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
set K = (
Polynom-Ring R);
reconsider pp = p as
Polynomial of R;
assume ex q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) st q
divides p & 1
<= (
deg q) & (
deg q)
< (
deg p);
then
consider q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) such that
A0: q
divides p & 1
<= (
deg q) & (
deg q)
< (
deg p);
A1: not q is
Unit of K by
T88,
A0;
now
assume q
is_associated_to p;
then
consider r be
Element of K such that
A2: r is
unital & (q
* r)
= p by
GCD_1: 18;
reconsider rr = r as
Element of the
carrier of K;
A5: p
= (q
*' rr) by
A2,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then
A4: r
<> (
0_. R) by
HURWITZ: 20,
A0,
POLYNOM3: 34;
q
<> (
0_. R) by
A5,
A0,
POLYNOM3: 34;
then (
deg p)
= ((
deg q)
+ (
deg rr)) by
A4,
A5,
HURWITZ: 23
.= ((
deg q)
+
0 ) by
A2,
T88;
hence contradiction by
A0;
end;
hence p is
reducible by
A0,
A1,
RING_2:def 9;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:41
T88b: for F be
Field holds for p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds p is
reducible iff (p
= (
0_. F) or p is
Unit of (
Polynom-Ring F) or ex q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) st q
divides p & 1
<= (
deg q) & (
deg q)
< (
deg p))
proof
let R be
Field, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
set K = (
Polynom-Ring R);
reconsider pp = p as
Polynomial of R;
A:
now
assume p is
reducible;
then
AS: p
= (
0. K) or p is
Unit of K or ex a be
Element of K st a
divides p & not (a is
Unit of K) & not (a
is_associated_to p) by
RING_2:def 9;
thus p
= (
0_. R) or p is
Unit of (
Polynom-Ring R) or ex q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) st q
divides p & 1
<= (
deg q) & (
deg q)
< (
deg p)
proof
assume
A0: not (p
= (
0_. R)) & not (p is
Unit of K);
then
consider a be
Element of K such that
A1: a
divides p & not (a is
Unit of K) & not (a
is_associated_to p) by
AS,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider q = a as
Polynomial of R by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
q
divides pp by
A1;
then
consider r be
Polynomial of R such that
A2: pp
= (q
*' r) by
T2;
reconsider rr = r as
Element of K by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A10: p
= (a
* rr) by
A2,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A5: q
<> (
0_. R) by
A0,
A2,
POLYNOM3: 34;
A6: r
<> (
0_. R) by
A0,
A2,
POLYNOM3: 34;
then
A9: (
deg p)
= ((
deg q)
+ (
deg r)) by
A2,
A5,
HURWITZ: 23;
A11: (
deg q) is
Element of
NAT & (
deg r) is
Element of
NAT by
A5,
A6,
T8b;
then
A7: (
deg q)
<= (
deg p) by
A9,
NAT_1: 11;
A3:
now
assume (
deg q)
= (
deg p);
then rr is
Unit of K by
A9,
T8;
hence contradiction by
A1,
A10,
GCD_1: 18;
end;
thus ex b be
Element of the
carrier of K st b
divides p & 1
<= (
deg b) & (
deg b)
< (
deg p)
proof
reconsider qq = q as
Element of the
carrier of K;
take qq;
thus qq
divides p by
A1;
thus 1
<= (
deg qq) by
A1,
A11,
T8,
NAT_1: 14;
thus (
deg qq)
< (
deg p) by
A3,
A7,
XXREAL_0: 1;
end;
end;
end;
now
assume
AS: p
= (
0_. R) or p is
Unit of (
Polynom-Ring R) or ex q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) st q
divides p & 1
<= (
deg q) & (
deg q)
< (
deg p);
per cases by
AS;
suppose p
= (
0_. R);
then p
= (
0. K) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
hence p is
reducible;
end;
suppose p is
Unit of (
Polynom-Ring R);
hence p is
reducible;
end;
suppose ex q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) st q
divides p & 1
<= (
deg q) & (
deg q)
< (
deg p);
hence p is
reducible by
T88a;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:42
thirr0: for R be
domRing, p be
monic
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) st (
deg p)
= 1 holds p is
irreducible
proof
let R be
domRing, p be
monic
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
set K = (
Polynom-Ring R);
reconsider x = p as
Element of K;
assume
AS: (
deg p)
= 1;
then ((
len p)
-' 1)
= ((1
+ 1)
-' 1)
.= 1 by
NAT_D: 34;
then (
LC p)
= (p
. 1);
then
E: (p
. 1)
= (
1. R) by
RATFUNC1:def 7;
p
<> (
0_. R);
then
A: x
<> (
0. K) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
B: not x is
Unit of K by
AS,
T88;
now
let a be
Element of K;
assume a
divides x;
then
consider b be
Element of K such that
H1: (a
* b)
= x;
reconsider q = a, r = b as
Element of the
carrier of K;
(q
*' r)
= p by
H1,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then
H2: q
<> (
0_. R) & r
<> (
0_. R) by
POLYNOM3: 34;
then
H4: ((
deg q)
+ (
deg r))
= (
deg (q
*' r)) by
HURWITZ: 23
.= 1 by
AS,
H1,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
per cases ;
suppose (
deg q)
=
0 ;
then q is
constant;
then
consider u be
Element of R such that
C1: q
= (u
| R) by
T11;
q
= (u
* (
1_. R)) by
LX1,
C1;
then (q
*' r)
= (u
* ((
1_. R)
*' r)) by
poly2
.= (u
* r) by
poly1;
then (u
* (r
. 1))
= ((q
*' r)
. 1) by
POLYNOM5:def 4
.= (
1. R) by
H1,
POLYNOM3:def 10,
E;
then u
divides (
1. R);
then u is
Unit of R by
GCD_1:def 2;
hence a is
Unit of K or a
is_associated_to x by
Th90,
C1;
end;
suppose (
deg q)
<>
0 ;
then (
deg q)
>
0 by
H2,
T8b;
then ((
deg q)
+ (
deg r))
> (
0
+ (
deg r)) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then r is
constant by
H4,
NAT_1: 14;
then
consider u be
Element of R such that
C1: r
= (u
| R) by
T11;
C3: r
= (u
* (
1_. R)) by
LX1,
C1;
(q
*' r)
= (u
* ((
1_. R)
*' q)) by
C3,
poly2
.= (u
* q) by
poly1;
then (u
* (q
. 1))
= ((q
*' r)
. 1) by
POLYNOM5:def 4
.= (
1. R) by
H1,
POLYNOM3:def 10,
E;
then u
divides (
1. R);
then u is
Unit of R by
GCD_1:def 2;
then r is
Unit of K by
Th90,
C1;
hence a is
Unit of K or a
is_associated_to x by
H1,
GCD_1: 18;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A,
B,
RING_2:def 9;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:43
ex p be non
monic
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring
INT.Ring ) st (
deg p)
= 1 & p is
reducible
proof
set R =
INT.Ring ;
set K = (
Polynom-Ring R);
set a = ((
1. R)
+ (
1. R));
set p = ((a
| R)
*' (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))));
a
<> (
0. R);
then
reconsider a as non
zero
Element of R by
STRUCT_0:def 12;
reconsider q = (a
| R) as
Element of the
carrier of K by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
q is
constant by
RATFUNC1:def 2;
then
reconsider q as non
zero
constant
Element of the
carrier of K;
reconsider r = (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))) as
Element of the
carrier of K by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A1: p
= ((a
* (
1_. R))
*' (
rpoly (1,(
0. R)))) by
LX1
.= (a
* ((
1_. R)
*' (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))))) by
poly2
.= (a
* (
rpoly (1,(
0. R)))) by
poly1;
A2: (
deg p)
= ((
deg q)
+ (
deg (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))))) by
HURWITZ: 23
.= (
0
+ (
deg (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))))) by
LX
.= 1 by
HURWITZ: 27;
then (p
. ((
len p)
-' 1))
= ((a
* (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))))
. (2
- 1)) by
A1,
XREAL_1: 233
.= (a
* ((
rpoly (1,(
0. R)))
. 1)) by
POLYNOM5:def 4
.= (a
* (
1. R)) by
HURWITZ: 25
.= a;
then (
LC p)
= a;
then
reconsider pp = p as non
monic
Element of the
carrier of K by
RATFUNC1:def 7,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
take pp;
thus (
deg pp)
= 1 by
A2;
B0: p
= (q
* r) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
B1: q
divides pp by
B0,
GCD_1:def 1;
B4:
now
assume q is
Unit of K;
then a is
Unit of R by
Th90;
then a
divides (
1. R) by
GCD_1:def 2;
then
consider c be
Element of the
carrier of R such that
C1: (a
* c)
= (
1. R);
thus contradiction by
C1,
INT_1: 9;
end;
now
assume q
is_associated_to pp;
then
consider c be
Element of the
carrier of K such that
C1: c is
unital & (q
* c)
= p by
GCD_1: 18;
C2: ((a
| R)
*' c)
= p by
C1,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
(
deg c)
=
0 by
C1,
T88;
then c
<> (
0_. R) by
HURWITZ: 20;
then 1
= ((
deg q)
+ (
deg c)) by
HURWITZ: 23,
C2,
A2
.= (
0
+ (
deg c)) by
LX;
hence contradiction by
C1,
T88;
end;
hence pp is
reducible by
B1,
B4,
RING_2:def 9;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:44
thirr: for F be
Field, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) st (
deg p)
= 1 holds p is
irreducible
proof
let R be
Field, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
set K = (
Polynom-Ring R);
reconsider x = p as
Element of K;
assume
AS: (
deg p)
= 1;
then p
<> (
0_. R) by
HURWITZ: 20;
then
A: x
<> (
0. K) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
B: not x is
Unit of K by
AS,
T88;
now
let a be
Element of K;
assume a
divides x;
then
consider b be
Element of K such that
H1: (a
* b)
= x;
reconsider q = a, r = b as
Element of the
carrier of K;
(q
*' r)
= p by
H1,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then
H2: q
<> (
0_. R) & r
<> (
0_. R) by
AS,
HURWITZ: 20,
POLYNOM3: 34;
then
H4: ((
deg q)
+ (
deg r))
= (
deg (q
*' r)) by
HURWITZ: 23
.= 1 by
AS,
H1,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
per cases ;
suppose
C0: (
deg q)
=
0 ;
then q is
constant;
then
consider u be
Element of R such that
C1: q
= (u
| R) by
T11;
u is non
zero by
C1,
C0,
T11a;
hence a is
Unit of K or a
is_associated_to x by
Th90,
C1;
end;
suppose (
deg q)
<>
0 ;
then (
deg q)
>
0 by
H2,
T8b;
then ((
deg q)
+ (
deg r))
> (
0
+ (
deg r)) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then r is
constant by
H4,
NAT_1: 14;
then
consider u be
Element of R such that
C1: r
= (u
| R) by
T11;
u is non
zero by
C1,
T6,
H2;
then r is
Unit of K by
Th90,
C1;
hence a is
Unit of K or a
is_associated_to x by
H1,
GCD_1: 18;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A,
B,
RING_2:def 9;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:45
thirr1: for F be
algebraic-closed
Field, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds p is
irreducible iff (
deg p)
= 1
proof
let R be
algebraic-closed
Field, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
set K = (
Polynom-Ring R);
now
assume
AS: p is
irreducible;
then p is non
constant;
then (((
len p)
- 1)
+ 1)
> (
0
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 6;
then
consider x be
Element of R such that
A: x
is_a_root_of p by
POLYNOM5:def 8,
POLYNOM5:def 9;
consider q be
Polynomial of R such that
B: p
= ((
rpoly (1,x))
*' q) by
A,
HURWITZ: 33;
reconsider y = q, z = (
rpoly (1,x)) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
p
= (z
* y) by
B,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then z
divides p;
then
C: z is
Unit of K or z
is_associated_to p by
AS,
RING_2:def 9;
z is non
constant by
HURWITZ: 27;
then
consider e be
Element of K such that
D: e is
unital & (z
* e)
= p by
C,
GCD_1: 18;
reconsider u = e as
Element of the
carrier of K;
F: (
deg u)
=
0 by
D,
T88;
((
rpoly (1,x))
*' u)
= p by
D,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
hence (
deg p)
= ((
deg (
rpoly (1,x)))
+ (
deg u)) by
D,
HURWITZ: 23
.= 1 by
F,
HURWITZ: 27;
end;
hence thesis by
thirr;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:46
for F be
Field holds F is
algebraic-closed iff for p be
monic
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds p is
irreducible iff (
deg p)
= 1
proof
let R be
Field;
now
assume
AS: for p be
monic
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) holds p is
irreducible iff (
deg p)
= 1;
now
let p be
Polynomial of R;
assume
A: (
len p)
> 1;
then
A1: p
<> (
0_. R) by
POLYNOM4: 3;
A4: ((
len p)
- 1)
> (1
- 1) by
A,
XREAL_1: 9;
then (
deg p) is
Element of
NAT by
INT_1: 3;
then
A3: (
deg p)
>= 1 by
NAT_1: 14,
A4;
defpred
P[
Nat] means for p be
Polynomial of R st (
deg p)
= $1 holds p is
with_roots;
II: for k be
Nat st k
>= 1 & (for n be
Nat st n
>= 1 & n
< k holds
P[n]) holds
P[k]
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
IAS: k
>= 1 & for n be
Nat st n
>= 1 & n
< k holds
P[n];
per cases by
IAS,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
IA1: k
= 1;
thus
P[k]
proof
now
let p be
Polynomial of R;
assume (
deg p)
= 1;
then
consider x,z be
Element of R such that
I1: x
<> (
0. R) & p
= (x
* (
rpoly (1,z))) by
HURWITZ: 28;
(
eval (p,z))
= (x
* (
eval ((
rpoly (1,z)),z))) by
I1,
POLYNOM5: 30
.= (x
* (z
- z)) by
HURWITZ: 29
.= (x
* (
0. R)) by
RLVECT_1: 15;
hence p is
with_roots by
POLYNOM5:def 8,
POLYNOM5:def 7;
end;
hence thesis by
IA1;
end;
end;
suppose
IA1: k
> 1;
thus
P[k]
proof
now
let p be
Polynomial of R;
reconsider pp = p as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
set q = (
NormPolynomial p);
reconsider qq = q as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
assume
K: (
deg p)
= k;
then (
len p)
<>
0 ;
then
I3: (
deg q)
> 1 by
K,
IA1,
POLYNOM5: 57;
p
<> (
0_. R) by
K,
HURWITZ: 20;
then p is non
zero by
UPROOTS:def 5;
then
I4: qq is
reducible by
AS,
I3;
I5: pp
<> (
0_. R) by
K,
HURWITZ: 20;
not p is
Unit of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
T8,
K,
IA1;
then
consider r be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) such that
I6: r
divides p & 1
<= (
deg r) & (
deg r)
< (
deg p) by
I4,
I5,
T88b,
thirr2;
r
<> (
0_. R) by
I6,
HURWITZ: 20;
then (
deg r) is
Element of
NAT by
T8b;
then
consider x be
Element of R such that
I8: x
is_a_root_of r by
K,
I6,
IAS,
POLYNOM5:def 8;
reconsider rr = r, ppp = p as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
rr
divides ppp by
I6;
then
consider u be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R) such that
I10: ppp
= (rr
* u);
p
= (r
*' u) by
I10,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then (
eval (p,x))
= ((
eval (r,x))
* (
eval (u,x))) by
POLYNOM4: 24
.= ((
0. R)
* (
eval (u,x))) by
I8,
POLYNOM5:def 7
.= (
0. R);
hence p is
with_roots by
POLYNOM5:def 8,
POLYNOM5:def 7;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
end;
I: for k be
Nat st 1
<= k holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 9(
II);
(
deg p) is
Element of
NAT by
A1,
T8b;
then
consider n be
Nat such that
H: n
>= 1 & (
deg p)
= n by
A3;
thus p is
with_roots by
H,
I;
end;
hence R is
algebraic-closed by
POLYNOM5:def 9;
end;
hence thesis by
thirr1;
end;
registration
let R be
domRing;
cluster
irreducible for
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R);
existence
proof
set K = (
Polynom-Ring R);
reconsider x = (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))) as
Element of K by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
(
deg (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))))
= 1 by
HURWITZ: 27;
then x is
irreducible by
thirr0;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let R be
domRing;
cluster
irreducible for
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
existence
proof
set K = (
Polynom-Ring R);
reconsider x = (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))) as
Element of the
carrier of K by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
(
deg (
rpoly (1,(
0. R))))
= 1 by
HURWITZ: 27;
then x is
irreducible by
thirr0;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let R be
Ring;
cluster
reducible for
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R);
existence
proof
take p = (
0. (
Polynom-Ring R));
thus thesis;
end;
end
registration
let R be
Ring;
cluster
reducible for
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring R);
existence
proof
take p = (
0_. R);
reconsider q = p as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
q
= (
0. (
Polynom-Ring R)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let R be
domRing;
cluster (
IRR (
Polynom-Ring R)) -> non
empty;
coherence
proof
now
let p be
irreducible
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R);
p
in { x where x be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R) : x is
irreducible };
hence p
in (
IRR (
Polynom-Ring R)) by
RING_2:def 10;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let F be
Field;
cluster
constant ->
reducible for
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
coherence ;
end
registration
let F be
Field;
cluster
constant ->
reducible for
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
coherence ;
end
registration
let F be
Field;
cluster
irreducible -> non
constant for
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
coherence ;
end
registration
let F be
Field;
cluster
irreducible -> non
constant for
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
coherence ;
end
begin
registration
let F be
Field, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
cluster ((
Polynom-Ring F)
/ (
{p}
-Ideal )) ->
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
commutative
associative
well-unital
distributive;
coherence ;
end
registration
let F be
Field, p be
irreducible
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
cluster ((
Polynom-Ring F)
/ (
{p}
-Ideal )) -> non
degenerated
almost_left_invertible;
coherence by
RING_2: 26,
RING_1: 21;
end
definition
let F be
Field, p be
Polynomial of F;
::
RING_4:def7
func
poly_mult_mod p ->
BinOp of (
Polynom-Ring F) means
:
defpmm: for r,q be
Polynomial of F holds (it
. (r,q))
= ((r
*' q)
mod p);
existence
proof
set B = (
Polynom-Ring F);
set D = the
carrier of B;
defpred
P[
object,
object,
object] means ex r,q be
Element of D st $1
= r & $2
= q & $3
= ((r
*' q)
mod p);
I:
now
let x,y be
object;
assume x
in D & y
in D;
then
reconsider xx = x, yy = y as
Element of D;
reconsider r = xx, q = yy as
Polynomial of F;
thus ex z be
object st z
in D &
P[x, y, z]
proof
take s = ((r
*' q)
mod p);
thus s
in D by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
take xx, yy;
thus thesis;
end;
end;
consider f be
Function of
[:D, D:], D such that
H: for x,y be
object st x
in D & y
in D holds
P[x, y, (f
. (x,y))] from
BINOP_1:sch 1(
I);
take f;
now
let r,q be
Polynomial of F;
r
in D & q
in D by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then
P[r, q, (f
. (r,q))] by
H;
then
consider rr,qq be
Element of D such that
K: rr
= r & qq
= q & (f
. (rr,qq))
= ((rr
*' qq)
mod p);
thus (f
. (r,q))
= ((r
*' q)
mod p) by
K;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
set B = (
Polynom-Ring F);
let g1,g2 be
BinOp of B such that
A1: for r,q be
Polynomial of F holds (g1
. (r,q))
= ((r
*' q)
mod p) and
A2: for r,q be
Polynomial of F holds (g2
. (r,q))
= ((r
*' q)
mod p);
A: (
dom g1)
=
[:the
carrier of B, the
carrier of B:] by
FUNCT_2:def 1
.= (
dom g2) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
dom g1);
then
consider r,q be
object such that
H: r
in the
carrier of B & q
in the
carrier of B & x
=
[r, q] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider r, q as
Polynomial of F by
H,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
thus (g1
. x)
= (g1
. (r,q)) by
H
.= ((r
*' q)
mod p) by
A1
.= (g2
. (r,q)) by
A2
.= (g2
. x) by
H;
end;
hence thesis by
A,
FUNCT_1: 2;
end;
end
pr1: for F be
Field, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds { q where q be
Polynomial of F : (
deg q)
< (
deg p) } is
Preserv of the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
proof
let F be
Field, p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
set C = { q where q be
Polynomial of F : (
deg q)
< (
deg p) };
now
let x be
set;
assume x
in C;
then ex r be
Polynomial of F st x
= r & (
deg r)
< (
deg p);
hence x
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
then C
c= the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
then
reconsider C as
Subset of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
set A = the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F);
now
let x be
set;
assume x
in
[:C, C:];
then
consider a,b be
object such that
A2: a
in C and
A3: b
in C and
A4: x
=
[a, b] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
consider u be
Polynomial of F such that
A5: a
= u & (
deg u)
< (
deg p) by
A2;
consider v be
Polynomial of F such that
A6: b
= v & (
deg v)
< (
deg p) by
A3;
reconsider a, b as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
A5,
A6,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A7: (
deg (u
+ v))
<= (
max ((
deg u),(
deg v))) by
HURWITZ: 22;
(
max ((
deg u),(
deg v)))
< (
deg p) by
A5,
A6,
XXREAL_0: 29;
then
A8: (
deg (u
+ v))
< (
deg p) by
A7,
XXREAL_0: 2;
(A
. x)
= (a
+ b) by
A4
.= (u
+ v) by
A5,
A6,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
hence (A
. x)
in C by
A8;
end;
hence thesis by
REALSET1:def 1;
end;
pr2: for F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds { q where q be
Polynomial of F : (
deg q)
< (
deg p) } is
Preserv of (
poly_mult_mod p)
proof
let F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
set C = { q where q be
Polynomial of F : (
deg q)
< (
deg p) };
now
let x be
set;
assume x
in C;
then ex r be
Polynomial of F st x
= r & (
deg r)
< (
deg p);
hence x
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
then C
c= the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
then
reconsider C as
Subset of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
set A = (
poly_mult_mod p);
now
let x be
set;
assume x
in
[:C, C:];
then
consider a,b be
object such that
A2: a
in C and
A3: b
in C and
A4: x
=
[a, b] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
consider u be
Polynomial of F such that
A5: a
= u & (
deg u)
< (
deg p) by
A2;
consider v be
Polynomial of F such that
A6: b
= v & (
deg v)
< (
deg p) by
A3;
reconsider a, b as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
A5,
A6,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A8: (
deg ((u
*' v)
mod p))
< (
deg p) by
RING_2: 29;
(A
. x)
= ((
poly_mult_mod p)
. (u,v)) by
A5,
A6,
A4
.= ((u
*' v)
mod p) by
defpmm;
hence (A
. x)
in C by
A8;
end;
hence thesis by
REALSET1:def 1;
end;
pr3: for F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds (
1_. F)
in { q where q be
Polynomial of F : (
deg q)
< (
deg p) }
proof
let F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
A: (
deg p)
>
0 by
defconst;
(
len (
1_. F))
= 1 by
POLYNOM4: 4;
then (
deg (
1_. F))
=
0 ;
hence thesis by
A;
end;
pr4: for F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds (
0_. F)
in { q where q be
Polynomial of F : (
deg q)
< (
deg p) }
proof
let F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
(
deg (
0_. F))
= (
- 1) by
HURWITZ: 20;
hence thesis;
end;
definition
let F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
::
RING_4:def8
func
Polynom-Ring (p) ->
strict
doubleLoopStr means
:
defprfp: the
carrier of it
= { q where q be
Polynomial of F : (
deg q)
< (
deg p) } & the
addF of it
= (the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
|| the
carrier of it ) & the
multF of it
= ((
poly_mult_mod p)
|| the
carrier of it ) & the
OneF of it
= (
1_. F) & the
ZeroF of it
= (
0_. F);
existence
proof
set B = (
Polynom-Ring F);
set C = { q where q be
Polynomial of F : (
deg q)
< (
deg p) };
set A = the
addF of B;
set M = (
poly_mult_mod p);
reconsider C1 = C as
Preserv of A by
pr1;
reconsider ad = (A
|| C1) as
BinOp of C;
reconsider C2 = C as
Preserv of M by
pr2;
reconsider mu = (M
|| C2) as
BinOp of C;
reconsider O = (
1_. F) as
Element of C by
pr3;
reconsider Z = (
0_. F) as
Element of C by
pr4;
take
doubleLoopStr (# C, ad, mu, O, Z #);
thus thesis;
end;
uniqueness ;
end
registration
let F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
cluster (
Polynom-Ring p) -> non
degenerated;
coherence
proof
set P = (
Polynom-Ring p);
(
1. P)
= (
1_. F) by
defprfp;
hence (
0. P)
<> (
1. P) by
defprfp;
end;
end
registration
let F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
cluster (
Polynom-Ring p) ->
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable;
coherence
proof
set P = (
Polynom-Ring p);
set C = { q where q be
Polynomial of F : (
deg q)
< (
deg p) };
H0: C
= the
carrier of P by
defprfp;
H1: (
0. P)
= (
0_. F) by
defprfp;
now
let x,y be
Element of P;
x
in the
carrier of P;
then x
in C by
defprfp;
then
consider q be
Polynomial of F such that
A1: x
= q & (
deg q)
< (
deg p);
y
in the
carrier of P;
then y
in C by
defprfp;
then
consider r be
Polynomial of F such that
A2: y
= r & (
deg r)
< (
deg p);
reconsider q, r as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A3:
[x, y]
in
[:C, C:] &
[y, x]
in
[:C, C:] by
H0,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
thus (x
+ y)
= ((the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
|| C)
. (x,y)) by
H0,
defprfp
.= (q
+ r) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
. (y,x)) by
A1,
A2,
ALGSTR_0:def 1
.= ((the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
|| C)
. (y,x)) by
A3,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (y
+ x) by
H0,
defprfp;
end;
hence P is
Abelian by
RLVECT_1:def 2;
now
let x,y,z be
Element of P;
x
in the
carrier of P;
then x
in C by
defprfp;
then
consider q be
Polynomial of F such that
A1: x
= q & (
deg q)
< (
deg p);
y
in the
carrier of P;
then y
in C by
defprfp;
then
consider r be
Polynomial of F such that
A2: y
= r & (
deg r)
< (
deg p);
z
in the
carrier of P;
then z
in C by
defprfp;
then
consider u be
Polynomial of F such that
A3: z
= u & (
deg u)
< (
deg p);
A3a:
[x, y]
in
[:C, C:] &
[y, z]
in
[:C, C:] by
H0,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
A3b:
[(x
+ y), z]
in
[:C, C:] &
[x, (y
+ z)]
in
[:C, C:] by
H0,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider q, r, u as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A4: (x
+ y)
= ((the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
|| C)
. (x,y)) by
H0,
defprfp
.= (q
+ r) by
A1,
A2,
A3a,
FUNCT_1: 49;
A5: (y
+ z)
= ((the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
|| C)
. (y,z)) by
H0,
defprfp
.= (r
+ u) by
A3,
A2,
A3a,
FUNCT_1: 49;
A6: ((x
+ y)
+ z)
= ((the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
|| C)
. ((x
+ y),z)) by
H0,
defprfp
.= ((q
+ r)
+ u) by
A3,
A4,
A3b,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (q
+ (r
+ u)) by
RLVECT_1:def 3;
thus (x
+ (y
+ z))
= ((the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
|| C)
. (x,(y
+ z))) by
H0,
defprfp
.= ((x
+ y)
+ z) by
A6,
A5,
A1,
A3b,
FUNCT_1: 49;
end;
hence P is
add-associative by
RLVECT_1:def 3;
now
let x be
Element of P;
x
in the
carrier of P;
then x
in C by
defprfp;
then
consider q be
Polynomial of F such that
A1: x
= q & (
deg q)
< (
deg p);
reconsider q1 = q as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider r = (
0_. F) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A3:
[x, (
0. P)]
in
[:C, C:] by
H0,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
thus (x
+ (
0. P))
= ((the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
|| C)
. (x,(
0. P))) by
H0,
defprfp
.= (the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
. (x,(
0. P))) by
A3,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (q1
+ r) by
defprfp,
A1
.= (q
+ (
0_. F)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= x by
A1,
POLYNOM3: 28;
end;
hence P is
right_zeroed by
RLVECT_1:def 4;
now
let x be
Element of P;
x
in the
carrier of P;
then x
in C by
defprfp;
then
consider q be
Polynomial of F such that
A1: x
= q & (
deg q)
< (
deg p);
reconsider q1 = q as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider r = (
- q) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
(
deg (
- q))
= (
deg q) by
POLYNOM4: 8;
then (
- q)
in C by
A1;
then
reconsider y = (
- q) as
Element of P by
defprfp;
A3:
[x, y]
in
[:C, C:] by
H0,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
(x
+ y)
= ((the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
|| C)
. (x,y)) by
H0,
defprfp
.= (q1
+ r) by
A1,
A3,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (q
- q) by
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= (
0_. F) by
POLYNOM3: 29;
hence x is
right_complementable by
H1;
end;
hence P is
right_complementable;
end;
end
registration
let F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
cluster (
Polynom-Ring p) ->
associative
well-unital
distributive;
coherence
proof
set P = (
Polynom-Ring p);
set C = { q where q be
Polynomial of F : (
deg q)
< (
deg p) };
H0: C
= the
carrier of P by
defprfp;
H2: (
1. P)
= (
1_. F) by
defprfp;
reconsider p1 = p as
Polynomial of F;
now
let x,y,z be
Element of P;
x
in the
carrier of P;
then x
in C by
defprfp;
then
consider q be
Polynomial of F such that
A1: x
= q & (
deg q)
< (
deg p);
y
in the
carrier of P;
then y
in C by
defprfp;
then
consider r be
Polynomial of F such that
A2: y
= r & (
deg r)
< (
deg p);
z
in the
carrier of P;
then z
in C by
defprfp;
then
consider u be
Polynomial of F such that
A3: z
= u & (
deg u)
< (
deg p);
A3a:
[x, y]
in
[:C, C:] &
[y, z]
in
[:C, C:] by
H0,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
A3b:
[(x
* y), z]
in
[:C, C:] &
[x, (y
* z)]
in
[:C, C:] by
H0,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
A4: (x
* y)
= (((
poly_mult_mod p)
|| C)
. (x,y)) by
H0,
defprfp
.= ((
poly_mult_mod p)
. (x,y)) by
A3a,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((q
*' r)
mod p1) by
A1,
A2,
defpmm;
A5: (y
* z)
= (((
poly_mult_mod p)
|| C)
. (y,z)) by
H0,
defprfp
.= ((
poly_mult_mod p)
. (y,z)) by
A3a,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((r
*' u)
mod p1) by
A3,
A2,
defpmm;
A6: ((x
* y)
* z)
= (((
poly_mult_mod p)
|| C)
. ((x
* y),z)) by
H0,
defprfp
.= ((
poly_mult_mod p)
. ((x
* y),z)) by
A3b,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((((q
*' r)
mod p1)
*' u)
mod p1) by
A3,
A4,
defpmm
.= (((q
*' r)
*' u)
mod p1) by
div3;
thus (x
* (y
* z))
= (((
poly_mult_mod p)
|| C)
. (x,(y
* z))) by
H0,
defprfp
.= ((
poly_mult_mod p)
. (x,(y
* z))) by
A3b,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((((r
*' u)
mod p1)
*' q)
mod p1) by
A1,
A5,
defpmm
.= (((r
*' u)
*' q)
mod p1) by
div3
.= ((x
* y)
* z) by
A6,
POLYNOM3: 33;
end;
hence P is
associative by
GROUP_1:def 3;
now
let x be
Element of P;
x
in the
carrier of P;
then x
in C by
defprfp;
then
consider q be
Polynomial of F such that
A1: x
= q & (
deg q)
< (
deg p);
A3a:
[x, (
1. P)]
in
[:C, C:] &
[(
1. P), x]
in
[:C, C:] by
H0,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
thus (x
* (
1. P))
= (((
poly_mult_mod p)
|| C)
. (x,(
1. P))) by
H0,
defprfp
.= ((
poly_mult_mod p)
. (x,(
1. P))) by
A3a,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((q
*' (
1_. F))
mod p1) by
H2,
A1,
defpmm
.= (q
mod p1) by
POLYNOM3: 35
.= x by
A1,
div1;
thus ((
1. P)
* x)
= (((
poly_mult_mod p)
|| C)
. ((
1. P),x)) by
H0,
defprfp
.= ((
poly_mult_mod p)
. ((
1. P),x)) by
A3a,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (((
1_. F)
*' q)
mod p1) by
H2,
A1,
defpmm
.= (q
mod p1) by
POLYNOM3: 35
.= x by
A1,
div1;
end;
hence P is
well-unital by
VECTSP_1:def 6;
now
let x,y,z be
Element of P;
x
in the
carrier of P;
then x
in C by
defprfp;
then
consider q be
Polynomial of F such that
A1: x
= q & (
deg q)
< (
deg p);
y
in the
carrier of P;
then y
in C by
defprfp;
then
consider r be
Polynomial of F such that
A2: y
= r & (
deg r)
< (
deg p);
z
in the
carrier of P;
then z
in C by
defprfp;
then
consider u be
Polynomial of F such that
A3: z
= u & (
deg u)
< (
deg p);
reconsider q1 = q, r1 = r, u1 = u as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A3a:
[x, y]
in
[:C, C:] &
[x, z]
in
[:C, C:] &
[y, z]
in
[:C, C:] by
H0,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
A3b:
[(x
* y), (x
* z)]
in
[:C, C:] &
[x, (y
* z)]
in
[:C, C:] &
[x, (y
+ z)]
in
[:C, C:] by
H0,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
A4: (y
+ z)
= ((the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
|| C)
. (y,z)) by
H0,
defprfp
.= (r1
+ u1) by
A2,
A3,
A3a,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (r
+ u) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A5: (x
* (y
+ z))
= (((
poly_mult_mod p)
|| C)
. (x,(y
+ z))) by
H0,
defprfp
.= ((
poly_mult_mod p)
. (x,(y
+ z))) by
A3b,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((q
*' (r
+ u))
mod p1) by
A1,
A4,
defpmm;
A6: (x
* y)
= (((
poly_mult_mod p)
|| C)
. (x,y)) by
H0,
defprfp
.= ((
poly_mult_mod p)
. (x,y)) by
A3a,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((q
*' r)
mod p1) by
A1,
A2,
defpmm;
A7: (x
* z)
= (((
poly_mult_mod p)
|| C)
. (x,z)) by
H0,
defprfp
.= ((
poly_mult_mod p)
. (x,z)) by
A3a,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((q
*' u)
mod p1) by
A1,
A3,
defpmm;
reconsider s = ((q
*' r)
mod p1) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider t = ((q
*' u)
mod p1) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
thus ((x
* y)
+ (x
* z))
= ((the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
|| C)
. ((x
* y),(x
* z))) by
H0,
defprfp
.= (s
+ t) by
A6,
A7,
A3b,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (((q
*' r)
mod p1)
+ ((q
*' u)
mod p1)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= (((q
*' r)
+ (q
*' u))
mod p1) by
div4
.= (x
* (y
+ z)) by
A5,
POLYNOM3: 31;
A3a:
[y, x]
in
[:C, C:] &
[z, x]
in
[:C, C:] &
[y, z]
in
[:C, C:] by
H0,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
A3b:
[(y
* x), (z
* x)]
in
[:C, C:] &
[x, (y
* z)]
in
[:C, C:] &
[(y
+ z), x]
in
[:C, C:] by
H0,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
A4: (y
+ z)
= ((the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
|| C)
. (y,z)) by
H0,
defprfp
.= (r1
+ u1) by
A2,
A3,
A3a,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (r
+ u) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A5: ((y
+ z)
* x)
= (((
poly_mult_mod p)
|| C)
. ((y
+ z),x)) by
H0,
defprfp
.= ((
poly_mult_mod p)
. ((y
+ z),x)) by
A3b,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (((r
+ u)
*' q)
mod p1) by
A1,
A4,
defpmm;
A6: (y
* x)
= (((
poly_mult_mod p)
|| C)
. (y,x)) by
H0,
defprfp
.= ((
poly_mult_mod p)
. (y,x)) by
A3a,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((r
*' q)
mod p1) by
A1,
A2,
defpmm;
A7: (z
* x)
= (((
poly_mult_mod p)
|| C)
. (z,x)) by
H0,
defprfp
.= ((
poly_mult_mod p)
. (z,x)) by
A3a,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((u
*' q)
mod p1) by
A1,
A3,
defpmm;
reconsider s = ((r
*' q)
mod p1) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider t = ((u
*' q)
mod p1) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
thus ((y
* x)
+ (z
* x))
= ((the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
|| C)
. ((y
* x),(z
* x))) by
H0,
defprfp
.= (s
+ t) by
A6,
A7,
A3b,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (((q
*' r)
mod p1)
+ ((q
*' u)
mod p1)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= (((q
*' r)
+ (q
*' u))
mod p1) by
div4
.= ((y
+ z)
* x) by
A5,
POLYNOM3: 31;
end;
hence P is
distributive by
VECTSP_1:def 7;
end;
end
definition
let F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
::
RING_4:def9
func
poly_mod p ->
Function of (
Polynom-Ring F), (
Polynom-Ring p) means
:
dpm: for q be
Polynomial of F holds (it
. q)
= (q
mod p);
existence
proof
set B = (
Polynom-Ring F);
set D = the
carrier of B;
defpred
P[
object,
object] means ex q be
Element of D st $1
= q & $2
= (q
mod p);
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in D;
then
reconsider xx = x as
Element of D;
reconsider r = xx as
Polynomial of F;
thus ex z be
object st z
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring p) &
P[x, z]
proof
take s = (r
mod p);
(
deg s)
< (
deg p) by
RING_2: 29;
then s
in { q where q be
Polynomial of F : (
deg q)
< (
deg p) };
hence s
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring p) by
defprfp;
take xx;
thus thesis;
end;
end;
then
I: for x be
object st x
in D holds ex y be
object st y
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring p) &
P[x, y];
consider f be
Function of D, (
Polynom-Ring p) such that
H: for x be
object st x
in D holds
P[x, (f
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
I);
reconsider f as
Function of B, (
Polynom-Ring p);
take f;
now
let q be
Polynomial of F;
q
in B by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then
P[q, (f
. q)] by
H;
then
consider qq be
Element of D such that
K: qq
= q & (f
. qq)
= (qq
mod p);
thus (f
. q)
= (q
mod p) by
K;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
set B = (
Polynom-Ring F);
let g1,g2 be
Function of B, (
Polynom-Ring p) such that
A1: for q be
Polynomial of F holds (g1
. q)
= (q
mod p) and
A2: for q be
Polynomial of F holds (g2
. q)
= (q
mod p);
A: (
dom g1)
= the
carrier of B by
FUNCT_2:def 1
.= (
dom g2) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
dom g1);
then
reconsider q = x as
Polynomial of F by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
thus (g1
. x)
= (q
mod p) by
A1
.= (g2
. x) by
A2;
end;
hence thesis by
A,
FUNCT_1: 2;
end;
end
registration
let F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
cluster (
poly_mod p) ->
additive
multiplicative
unity-preserving;
coherence
proof
set f = (
poly_mod p), K = (
Polynom-Ring p);
set C = the
carrier of K;
hereby
let x1,y1 be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
reconsider x = x1, y = y1 as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
H: (f
. x)
= (x
mod p) & (f
. y)
= (y
mod p) by
dpm;
then
reconsider fx = (f
. x), fy = (f
. y) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A3:
[(f
. x), (f
. y)]
in
[:C, C:] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
thus ((f
. x1)
+ (f
. y1))
= ((the
addF of (
Polynom-Ring F)
|| the
carrier of K)
. ((f
. x1),(f
. y1))) by
defprfp
.= (fx
+ fy) by
A3,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((x
mod p)
+ (y
mod p)) by
H,
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= ((x
+ y)
mod p) by
div4
.= (f
. (x
+ y)) by
dpm
.= (f
. (x1
+ y1)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
hereby
let x1,y1 be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
reconsider x = x1, y = y1 as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
H: (f
. x)
= (x
mod p) & (f
. y)
= (y
mod p) by
dpm;
then
reconsider fx = (f
. x), fy = (f
. y) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A3:
[(f
. x), (f
. y)]
in
[:C, C:] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
thus ((f
. x1)
* (f
. y1))
= (((
poly_mult_mod p)
|| the
carrier of K)
. ((f
. x1),(f
. y1))) by
defprfp
.= ((
poly_mult_mod p)
. ((f
. x),(f
. y))) by
A3,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (((x
mod p)
*' (y
mod p))
mod p) by
H,
defpmm
.= ((x
*' y)
mod p) by
div3a
.= (f
. (x
*' y)) by
dpm
.= (f
. (x1
* y1)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
(
deg p)
>
0 by
defconst;
then
H: (
deg (
1_. F))
< (
deg p) by
RATFUNC1:def 2;
thus (f
. (
1_ (
Polynom-Ring F)))
= (f
. (
1_. F)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= ((
1_. F)
mod p) by
dpm
.= (
1_. F) by
H,
div1
.= (
1_ K) by
defprfp;
end;
end
registration
let F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
cluster (
Polynom-Ring p) -> (
Polynom-Ring F)
-homomorphic;
coherence
proof
(
poly_mod p) is
linear
proof
thus (
poly_mod p) is
additive
multiplicative
unity-preserving;
end;
hence thesis by
RING_2:def 4;
end;
end
registration
let F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
cluster (
poly_mod p) ->
onto;
coherence
proof
set f = (
poly_mod p);
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring p);
then x
in { q where q be
Polynomial of F : (
deg q)
< (
deg p) } by
defprfp;
then
consider q be
Polynomial of F such that
B: q
= x & (
deg q)
< (
deg p);
(q
mod p)
= q by
B,
div1;
then
C: (f
. x)
= q by
B,
dpm;
(
dom f)
= the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then q
in (
dom f) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
hence x
in (
rng f) by
B,
C,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
then for x be
object holds x
in (
rng f) iff x
in the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring p);
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2:def 3,
TARSKI: 2;
end;
end
lemminuspoly: for R be
Ring, a be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R), b be
Polynomial of R st a
= b holds (
- a)
= (
- b)
proof
let R be
Ring, a be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R), b be
Polynomial of R;
assume
AS: a
= b;
set K = (
Polynom-Ring R);
reconsider c = (
- b) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring R) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
(a
+ c)
= (b
- b) by
AS,
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= (
0_. R) by
POLYNOM3: 29
.= (
0. K) by
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= (a
+ (
- a)) by
RLVECT_1: 5;
hence thesis by
RLVECT_1: 8;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:47
kerp: for F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds (
ker (
poly_mod p))
= (
{p}
-Ideal )
proof
let F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
set R = (
Polynom-Ring F), S = (
Polynom-Ring p);
set f = (
poly_mod p);
reconsider p1 = p as
Element of R;
A:
now
let x be
object;
assume
A0: x
in (
ker f);
then x
in { v where v be
Element of R : (f
. v)
= (
0. S) } by
VECTSP10:def 9;
then
consider y be
Element of R such that
A1: y
= x & (f
. y)
= (
0. S);
reconsider q = x as
Element of the
carrier of R by
A0;
reconsider q1 = x as
Element of R by
A0;
A2: (q
- ((q
div p)
*' p))
= (q
mod p)
.= (
0. S) by
A1,
dpm
.= (
0_. F) by
defprfp;
reconsider qp = (q
div p) as
Element of R by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
(qp
* p1)
= ((q
div p)
*' p) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then
A3: (
- (qp
* p1))
= (
- ((q
div p)
*' p)) by
lemminuspoly;
(q1
- (qp
* p1))
= (q
+ (
- ((q
div p)
*' p))) by
A3,
POLYNOM3:def 10
.= (
0. R) by
A2,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then (qp
* p1)
= q1 by
RLVECT_1: 21;
then q
in the set of all (p
* r) where r be
Element of R;
hence x
in (
{p}
-Ideal ) by
IDEAL_1: 64;
end;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
{p}
-Ideal );
then x
in the set of all (p
* r) where r be
Element of R by
IDEAL_1: 64;
then
consider y be
Element of R such that
A1: x
= (p
* y);
reconsider q = y as
Element of the
carrier of R;
(p
* y)
= (p
*' q) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then (f
. x)
= ((p
*' q)
mod p) by
A1,
dpm
.= (
0_. F) by
T2,
div2
.= (
0. S) by
defprfp;
then x
in { v where v be
Element of R : (f
. v)
= (
0. S) } by
A1;
hence x
in (
ker (
poly_mod p)) by
VECTSP10:def 9;
end;
hence thesis by
A,
TARSKI: 2;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:48
ISO: for F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds (((
Polynom-Ring F)
/ (
{p}
-Ideal )),(
Polynom-Ring p))
are_isomorphic
proof
let F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
set R = (
Polynom-Ring F), S = (
Polynom-Ring p);
((R
/ (
ker (
poly_mod p))),S)
are_isomorphic by
RING_2: 16;
hence thesis by
kerp;
end;
registration
let F be
Field, p be non
constant
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
cluster (
Polynom-Ring p) ->
commutative;
coherence
proof
set R = ((
Polynom-Ring F)
/ (
{p}
-Ideal )), S = (
Polynom-Ring p);
ex f be
Function of R, S st f is
RingIsomorphism by
ISO,
QUOFIELD:def 23;
then (
Polynom-Ring p) is R
-isomorphic by
RING_3:def 4;
hence S is
commutative;
end;
end
registration
let F be
Field, p be
irreducible
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
cluster (
Polynom-Ring p) ->
almost_left_invertible;
coherence
proof
set R = ((
Polynom-Ring F)
/ (
{p}
-Ideal )), S = (
Polynom-Ring p);
ex f be
Function of R, S st f is
RingIsomorphism by
ISO,
QUOFIELD:def 23;
then (
Polynom-Ring p) is R
-isomorphic by
RING_3:def 4;
hence thesis;
end;
end
begin
definition
let L be non
empty
multMagma;
let x,y be
Element of L;
let z be
Element of L;
::
RING_4:def10
attr z is x,y
-gcd means
:
defGCD: z
divides x & z
divides y & for r be
Element of L st r
divides x & r
divides y holds r
divides z;
end
registration
let L be
gcdDomain;
let x,y be
Element of L;
cluster x, y
-gcd for
Element of L;
existence
proof
consider z be
Element of L such that
H: z
divides x & z
divides y & for zz be
Element of L st zz
divides x & zz
divides y holds zz
divides z by
GCD_1:def 11;
take z;
thus thesis by
H;
end;
end
definition
let L be
gcdDomain;
let x,y be
Element of L;
mode
a_gcd of x,y is x, y
-gcd
Element of L;
end
theorem ::
RING_4:49
gcd1: for L be
gcdDomain holds for x,y be
Element of L holds for u,v be
a_gcd of x, y holds u
is_associated_to v
proof
let L be
gcdDomain;
let p,q be
Element of L;
let u,v be
a_gcd of p, q;
A: u
divides p & u
divides q by
defGCD;
v
divides p & v
divides q by
defGCD;
hence thesis by
A,
defGCD;
end;
registration
let L be
gcdDomain;
let x,y be
Element of L;
cluster x, y
-gcd -> y, x
-gcd for
Element of L;
coherence ;
end
definition
let F be
Field;
let p,q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
::
RING_4:def11
func p
gcd q ->
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) means
:
dpg: it
= (
0_. F) if p
= (
0_. F) & q
= (
0_. F)
otherwise it is
a_gcd of p, q & it is
monic;
existence
proof
per cases ;
suppose p
= (
0_. F) & q
= (
0_. F);
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
AS: p
<> (
0_. F) or q
<> (
0_. F);
reconsider g = the
a_gcd of p, q as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
reconsider p1 = p, q1 = q as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
set r = (
NormPolynomial g);
reconsider r1 = r as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
A:
now
assume g is
zero;
then g
= (
0_. F) by
UPROOTS:def 5;
then
D1: g
= (
0. (
Polynom-Ring F)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
g
divides p1 by
defGCD;
then
consider u be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) such that
D2: (g
* u)
= p1;
g
divides q1 by
defGCD;
then
consider v be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) such that
D4: (g
* v)
= q1;
thus contradiction by
D1,
D4,
D2,
AS,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
g
divides p1 by
defGCD;
then g
divides p;
then
F: r
divides p by
np1;
g
divides q1 by
defGCD;
then g
divides q;
then
B: r
divides q by
np1;
now
let z be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
reconsider z1 = z as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
assume z
divides p & z
divides q;
then z
divides g by
defGCD;
then z1
divides g;
then z1
divides r by
np2;
hence z
divides r1;
end;
then r1 is p, q
-gcd by
B,
F;
hence thesis by
A;
end;
end;
uniqueness
proof
per cases ;
suppose p
= (
0_. F) & q
= (
0_. F);
hence thesis;
end;
suppose p
<> (
0_. F) or q
<> (
0_. F);
thus thesis by
gcd1,
np0;
end;
end;
consistency ;
end
definition
let F be
Field;
let p,q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
:: original:
gcd
redefine
func p
gcd q;
commutativity
proof
now
let p,q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
per cases ;
suppose
AS: p
= (
0_. F) & q
= (
0_. F);
thus (p
gcd q)
= (q
gcd p) by
AS;
end;
suppose
AS: p
<> (
0_. F) or q
<> (
0_. F);
then (p
gcd q) is
a_gcd of p, q & (p
gcd q) is
monic by
dpg;
hence (p
gcd q)
= (q
gcd p) by
AS,
dpg;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let F be
Field;
let p,q be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
:: original:
gcd
redefine
func p
gcd q;
commutativity
proof
for p,q be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds (p
gcd q)
= (q
gcd p);
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let F be
Field;
let p,q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
cluster (p
gcd q) -> p, q
-gcd;
coherence
proof
per cases ;
suppose
A: p
= (
0_. F) & q
= (
0_. F);
reconsider g = (p
gcd q) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
g
divides p & g
divides q by
A,
dpg;
hence thesis by
A,
dpg;
end;
suppose
A: p
<> (
0_. F) or q
<> (
0_. F);
set g = (p
gcd q);
reconsider p1 = p, q1 = q as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
set g1 = (p1
gcd q1);
reconsider g1 as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
thus thesis by
A,
dpg;
end;
end;
end
registration
let F be
Field;
let p,q be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
cluster (p
gcd q) -> p, q
-gcd;
coherence ;
end
registration
let F be
Field;
let p be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
let q be non
zero
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
cluster (p
gcd q) -> non
zero
monic;
coherence
proof
reconsider p1 = p, q1 = q as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
set g1 = (p1
gcd q1);
set g = (p
gcd q);
reconsider g1 as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
D:
now
assume g is
zero;
then g
= (
0_. F) by
UPROOTS:def 5;
then
D1: g
= (
0. (
Polynom-Ring F)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
D3: q
<> (
0_. F);
g1
divides q1 by
defGCD;
then
consider v be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) such that
D4: (g1
* v)
= q;
thus contradiction by
D1,
D4,
D3,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
end;
hence g is non
zero;
g
<> (
0_. F) by
D;
hence thesis by
dpg;
end;
end
registration
let F be
Field;
let p be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
let q be non
zero
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
cluster (p
gcd q) -> non
zero
monic;
coherence
proof
set g = (p
gcd q);
reconsider g1 = g as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
q
<> (
0. (
Polynom-Ring F));
then
D3: q
<> (
0_. F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
now
assume g is
zero;
then g
= (
0_. F) by
UPROOTS:def 5;
then
D1: g
= (
0. (
Polynom-Ring F)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
g1
divides q by
defGCD;
then
consider v be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) such that
D4: (g1
* v)
= q;
thus contradiction by
D1,
D4;
end;
hence g is non
zero;
thus thesis by
D3,
dpg;
end;
end
registration
let F be
Field;
let p,q be
zero
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
cluster (p
gcd q) ->
zero;
coherence
proof
reconsider g = (p
gcd q) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
p
= (
0_. F) & q
= (
0_. F) by
UPROOTS:def 5;
hence (p
gcd q) is
zero by
dpg;
end;
end
registration
let F be
Field;
let p,q be
zero
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
cluster (p
gcd q) ->
zero;
coherence
proof
reconsider g = (p
gcd q) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
p
= (
0. (
Polynom-Ring F)) & q
= (
0. (
Polynom-Ring F)) by
STRUCT_0:def 12;
then p
= (
0_. F) & q
= (
0_. F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
hence (p
gcd q) is
zero;
end;
end
theorem ::
RING_4:50
for F be
Field, p,q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds (p
gcd q)
divides p & (p
gcd q)
divides q & for r be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) st r
divides p & r
divides q holds r
divides (p
gcd q)
proof
let F be
Field, p,q be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
set g = (p
gcd q);
reconsider g1 = (p
gcd q) as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
g1
divides p & g1
divides q by
defGCD;
hence g
divides p & g
divides q;
now
let r be
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F);
reconsider r1 = r as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
assume r
divides p & r
divides q;
then r1
divides g1 by
defGCD;
hence r
divides g;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:51
for F be
Field, p,q be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) holds (p
gcd q)
divides p & (p
gcd q)
divides q & for r be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) st r
divides p & r
divides q holds r
divides (p
gcd q) by
defGCD;
definition
let F be
Field;
let p,q be
Polynomial of F;
::
RING_4:def12
func p
gcd q ->
Polynomial of F means
:
dd: ex a,b be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) st a
= p & b
= q & it
= (a
gcd b);
existence
proof
reconsider a = p, b = q as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
take (a
gcd b);
thus thesis;
end;
uniqueness ;
end
definition
let F be
Field;
let p,q be
Polynomial of F;
:: original:
gcd
redefine
func p
gcd q;
commutativity
proof
now
let p,q be
Polynomial of F;
reconsider a = p, b = q as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
thus (p
gcd q)
= (a
gcd b) by
dd
.= (q
gcd p) by
dd;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let F be
Field;
let p be
Polynomial of F;
let q be non
zero
Polynomial of F;
cluster (p
gcd q) -> non
zero
monic;
coherence
proof
reconsider a = p, b = q as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
A0: (p
gcd q)
= (a
gcd b) by
dd;
q
<> (
0_. F);
then q
<> (
0. (
Polynom-Ring F)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then
reconsider b as non
zero
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
STRUCT_0:def 12;
thus (p
gcd q) is non
zero by
A0;
thus thesis by
A0;
end;
end
registration
let F be
Field;
let p,q be
zero
Polynomial of F;
cluster (p
gcd q) ->
zero;
coherence
proof
p
= (
0_. F) & q
= (
0_. F) by
UPROOTS:def 5;
then p
= (
0. (
Polynom-Ring F)) & q
= (
0. (
Polynom-Ring F)) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then
reconsider a = p, b = q as
zero
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
(p
gcd q)
= (a
gcd b) by
dd;
hence (p
gcd q) is
zero;
end;
end
theorem ::
RING_4:52
G1: for F be
Field, p,q be
Polynomial of F holds (p
gcd q)
divides p & (p
gcd q)
divides q & for r be
Polynomial of F st r
divides p & r
divides q holds r
divides (p
gcd q)
proof
let F be
Field, p,q be
Polynomial of F;
reconsider a = p, b = q as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
set g = (a
gcd b);
A0: (p
gcd q)
= g by
dd;
g
divides a by
defGCD;
then
consider c be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) such that
A1: (g
* c)
= a;
reconsider r = c as
Polynomial of F by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
((p
gcd q)
*' r)
= p by
A0,
A1,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
hence (p
gcd q)
divides p by
T2;
g
divides b by
defGCD;
then
consider c be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) such that
A1: (g
* c)
= b;
reconsider r = c as
Polynomial of F by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
((p
gcd q)
*' r)
= q by
A0,
A1,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
hence (p
gcd q)
divides q by
T2;
now
let r be
Polynomial of F;
assume
A1: r
divides p & r
divides q;
reconsider c = r as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
consider s be
Polynomial of F such that
A2: (r
*' s)
= p by
A1,
T2;
consider t be
Polynomial of F such that
A3: (r
*' t)
= q by
A1,
T2;
reconsider x = s, y = t as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
(c
* x)
= a & (c
* y)
= b by
A2,
A3,
POLYNOM3:def 10;
then c
divides a & c
divides b;
then c
divides (a
gcd b) by
defGCD;
hence r
divides (p
gcd q) by
dd;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
RING_4:53
for F be
Field holds for p be
Polynomial of F holds for q be non
zero
Polynomial of F holds for s be
monic
Polynomial of F holds s
= (p
gcd q) iff (s
divides p & s
divides q & for r be
Polynomial of F st r
divides p & r
divides q holds r
divides s)
proof
let F be
Field, p be
Polynomial of F;
let q be non
zero
Polynomial of F;
let s be
monic
Polynomial of F;
now
assume
AS: s
divides p & s
divides q & for r be
Polynomial of F st r
divides p & r
divides q holds r
divides s;
reconsider a = p, b = q as
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
reconsider g = s as
Element of the
carrier of (
Polynom-Ring F) by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
B: b
<> (
0_. F);
now
let d be
Element of (
Polynom-Ring F);
assume
C: d
divides a & d
divides b;
reconsider h = d as
Polynomial of F by
POLYNOM3:def 10;
h
divides p & h
divides q by
C;
then h
divides s by
AS;
hence d
divides g;
end;
then g is a, b
-gcd by
AS;
then g
= (a
gcd b) by
dpg,
B;
hence s
= (p
gcd q) by
dd;
end;
hence thesis by
G1;
end;