qc_trans.miz
begin
reserve Al for
QC-alphabet;
reserve PHI for
Consistent
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al),
p,q,r,s for
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al),
A for non
empty
set,
J for
interpretation of Al, A,
v for
Element of (
Valuations_in (Al,A)),
m,n,i,j,k for
Nat,
l for
CQC-variable_list of k, Al,
P for
QC-pred_symbol of k, Al,
x,y,z for
bound_QC-variable of Al,
b for
QC-symbol of Al,
PR for
FinSequence of
[:(
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al),
Proof_Step_Kinds :];
definition
let Al;
let Al2 be
QC-alphabet;
::
QC_TRANS:def1
attr Al2 is Al
-expanding means
:
Def1: Al
c= Al2;
end
registration
let Al;
cluster Al
-expanding for
QC-alphabet;
existence by
Def1;
end
registration
let Al1,Al2 be
countable
QC-alphabet;
cluster
countableAl1
-expandingAl2
-expanding for
QC-alphabet;
existence
proof
set Al3 = (Al1
\/ Al2);
Al1
=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al1):] & Al2
=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al2):] by
QC_LANG1: 5;
then
A1: Al3
=
[:
NAT , ((
QC-symbols Al1)
\/ (
QC-symbols Al2)):] by
ZFMISC_1: 97;
NAT
c= ((
QC-symbols Al1)
\/ (
QC-symbols Al2)) by
XBOOLE_1: 10,
QC_LANG1: 3;
then
reconsider Al3 as
QC-alphabet by
A1,
QC_LANG1:def 1;
take Al3;
thus thesis by
CARD_2: 85,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
end;
end
definition
let Al,Al2 be
QC-alphabet;
let P be
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al);
::
QC_TRANS:def2
attr P is Al2
-Consistent means for S be
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al2) st P
= S holds S is
Consistent;
end
registration
let Al;
cluster non
empty
Consistent for
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al);
existence
proof
{(
VERUM Al)} is
Consistent by
HENMODEL: 13;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let Al;
cluster
Consistent -> Al
-Consistent for
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al);
coherence ;
cluster Al
-Consistent ->
Consistent for
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al);
coherence ;
end
reserve Al2 for Al
-expanding
QC-alphabet,
J2 for
interpretation of Al2, A,
Jp for
interpretation of Al, A,
v2 for
Element of (
Valuations_in (Al2,A)),
vp for
Element of (
Valuations_in (Al,A));
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:1
Th1: (
the_arity_of P)
= (
len l)
proof
thus (
len l)
= k by
CARD_1:def 7
.= (
the_arity_of P) by
QC_LANG1: 11;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:2
Th2: (
QC-symbols Al)
c= (
QC-symbols Al2)
proof
Al
c= Al2 & Al
=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al):] & Al2
=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al2):] by
Def1,
QC_LANG1: 5;
hence (
QC-symbols Al)
c= (
QC-symbols Al2) by
ZFMISC_1: 115;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:3
Th3: (
QC-pred_symbols Al)
c= (
QC-pred_symbols Al2)
proof
for Q be
object st Q
in (
QC-pred_symbols Al) holds Q
in (
QC-pred_symbols Al2)
proof
let Q be
object such that
A1: Q
in (
QC-pred_symbols Al);
set preds = {
[k, b] : 7
<= k };
set preds2 = {
[k, b2] where b2 be
QC-symbol of Al2 : 7
<= k };
consider k, b such that
A2: Q
=
[k, b] & 7
<= k by
A1;
b
in (
QC-symbols Al2) by
Th2,
TARSKI:def 3;
hence Q
in (
QC-pred_symbols Al2) by
A2;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:4
Th4: (
bound_QC-variables Al)
c= (
bound_QC-variables Al2)
proof
A1: (
QC-symbols Al)
c= (
QC-symbols Al2) by
Th2;
thus thesis by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 96;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:5
Th5: for k, l holds l is
CQC-variable_list of k, Al2
proof
let k, l;
(
rng l)
c= (
bound_QC-variables Al) & (
bound_QC-variables Al)
c= (
bound_QC-variables Al2) by
Th4;
then (
rng l)
c= (
bound_QC-variables Al2);
hence thesis by
FINSEQ_1:def 4,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:6
Th6: P is
QC-pred_symbol of k, Al2
proof
(
the_arity_of P)
= k by
QC_LANG1: 11;
then
A1: (P
`1 )
= (7
+ k) by
QC_LANG1:def 8;
reconsider P as
QC-pred_symbol of Al2 by
Th3,
TARSKI:def 3;
(
the_arity_of P)
= k by
QC_LANG1:def 8,
A1;
hence thesis by
QC_LANG3: 1;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:7
Th7: for Al2 be Al
-expanding
QC-alphabet holds for p holds p is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2)
proof
let Al2 be Al
-expanding
QC-alphabet;
defpred
P[
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al)] means $1 is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2);
A1:
P[(
VERUM Al)]
proof
(
VERUM Al)
= (
VERUM Al2);
hence thesis;
end;
A2: for k, P, l holds
P[(P
! l)]
proof
let k, P, l;
A3: (
the_arity_of P)
= (
len l) by
Th1;
P is
QC-pred_symbol of k, Al2 & l is
CQC-variable_list of k, Al2 by
Th5,
Th6;
then
consider P2 be
QC-pred_symbol of k, Al2, l2 be
CQC-variable_list of k, Al2 such that
A4: P
= P2 & l
= l2;
(
the_arity_of P2)
= (
len l2) by
Th1;
then (P2
! l2)
= (
<*P2*>
^ l2) by
QC_LANG1:def 12;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4,
QC_LANG1:def 12;
end;
A5:
P[p] implies
P[(
'not' p)]
proof
assume
P[p];
then
consider q be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A6: p
= q;
(
'not' p)
= (
'not' q) by
A6;
hence thesis;
end;
A7:
P[p] &
P[q] implies
P[(p
'&' q)]
proof
assume
P[p] &
P[q];
then
consider t,u be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A8: p
= t & q
= u;
(p
'&' q)
= (t
'&' u) by
A8;
hence thesis;
end;
A9: for x holds
P[p] implies
P[(
All (x,p))]
proof
let x;
assume
P[p];
then
consider q be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A10: p
= q;
x is
bound_QC-variable of Al2 by
Th4,
TARSKI:def 3;
then
consider y be
bound_QC-variable of Al2 such that
A11: x
= y;
(
All (x,p))
= (
All (y,q)) by
A10,
A11;
hence thesis;
end;
A12: for r,s be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al) holds for x be
bound_QC-variable of Al holds for k holds for l be
CQC-variable_list of k, Al holds for P be
QC-pred_symbol of k, Al holds
P[(
VERUM Al)] &
P[(P
! l)] & (
P[r] implies
P[(
'not' r)]) & (
P[r] &
P[s] implies
P[(r
'&' s)]) & (
P[r] implies
P[(
All (x,r))]) by
A1,
A2,
A5,
A7,
A9;
for p holds
P[p] from
CQC_LANG:sch 1(
A12);
hence for p holds p is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2);
end;
definition
let Al;
let Al2 be Al
-expanding
QC-alphabet;
let p be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al);
::
QC_TRANS:def3
func Al2
-Cast (p) ->
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) equals p;
coherence by
Th7;
end
definition
let Al;
let Al2 be Al
-expanding
QC-alphabet;
let x be
bound_QC-variable of Al;
::
QC_TRANS:def4
func Al2
-Cast (x) ->
bound_QC-variable of Al2 equals x;
coherence by
Th4,
TARSKI:def 3;
end
definition
let Al;
let Al2 be Al
-expanding
QC-alphabet;
let k;
let P be
QC-pred_symbol of k, Al;
::
QC_TRANS:def5
func Al2
-Cast (P) ->
QC-pred_symbol of k, Al2 equals P;
coherence by
Th6;
end
definition
let Al;
let Al2 be Al
-expanding
QC-alphabet;
let k;
let l be
CQC-variable_list of k, Al;
::
QC_TRANS:def6
func Al2
-Cast (l) ->
CQC-variable_list of k, Al2 equals l;
coherence by
Th5;
end
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:8
Th8: for p, r, x, P, l holds for Al2 be Al
-expanding
QC-alphabet holds (Al2
-Cast (
VERUM Al))
= (
VERUM Al2) & (Al2
-Cast (P
! l))
= ((Al2
-Cast P)
! (Al2
-Cast l)) & (Al2
-Cast (
'not' p))
= (
'not' (Al2
-Cast p)) & (Al2
-Cast (p
'&' r))
= ((Al2
-Cast p)
'&' (Al2
-Cast r)) & (Al2
-Cast (
All (x,p)))
= (
All ((Al2
-Cast x),(Al2
-Cast p)))
proof
let p, r, x, P, l;
let Al2 be Al
-expanding
QC-alphabet;
A1: (
the_arity_of P)
= (
len l) by
Th1;
A2: (
the_arity_of (Al2
-Cast P))
= (
len (Al2
-Cast l)) by
Th1;
thus (Al2
-Cast (
VERUM Al))
= (
VERUM Al2);
thus (Al2
-Cast (P
! l))
= (
<*P*>
^ l) by
A1,
QC_LANG1:def 12
.= ((Al2
-Cast P)
! (Al2
-Cast l)) by
A2,
QC_LANG1:def 12;
thus (Al2
-Cast (
'not' p))
= (
'not' (Al2
-Cast p));
thus (Al2
-Cast (p
'&' r))
= ((Al2
-Cast p)
'&' (Al2
-Cast r));
thus (Al2
-Cast (
All (x,p)))
= (
All ((Al2
-Cast x),(Al2
-Cast p)));
end;
begin
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:9
Th9: Jp
= (J2
| (
QC-pred_symbols Al)) & vp
= (v2
| (
bound_QC-variables Al)) implies ((J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast r) iff (Jp,vp)
|= r)
proof
defpred
T[
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al)] means for J2, Jp, v2, vp holds Jp
= (J2
| (
QC-pred_symbols Al)) & vp
= (v2
| (
bound_QC-variables Al)) implies (((J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast $1)) iff (Jp,vp)
|= $1);
A1:
T[(
VERUM Al)]
proof
let J2, Jp, v2, vp;
(J2,v2)
|= (
VERUM Al2) by
VALUAT_1: 32;
hence thesis by
VALUAT_1: 32;
end;
A2: for k, P, l holds
T[(P
! l)]
proof
let k, P, l;
let J2, Jp, v2, vp;
assume
A3: Jp
= (J2
| (
QC-pred_symbols Al)) & vp
= (v2
| (
bound_QC-variables Al));
set p = (P
! l);
(
the_arity_of P)
= (
len l) by
Th1;
then
A4: (P
! l)
= (
<*P*>
^ l) by
QC_LANG1:def 12;
P is
QC-pred_symbol of k, Al2 & l is
CQC-variable_list of k, Al2 by
Th5,
Th6;
then
consider P2 be
QC-pred_symbol of k, Al2, l2 be
CQC-variable_list of k, Al2 such that
A5: P
= P2 & l
= l2;
A6: (
the_arity_of P2)
= (
len l2) by
Th1;
A7: (v2
*' l2)
= (vp
*' l)
proof
A8: (
bound_QC-variables Al)
c= (
bound_QC-variables Al2) by
Th4;
A9: for j st 1
<= j & j
<= (
len l) holds (l
. j)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al) iff (l
. j)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al2)
proof
let j such that
A10: 1
<= j & j
<= (
len l);
thus (l
. j)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al) implies (l
. j)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al2) by
A8;
hereby
assume (l
. j)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al2);
(
len l)
= k by
CARD_1:def 7;
then j
in (
Seg k) by
A10,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then j
in (
dom l) by
FINSEQ_1: 89;
hence (l
. j)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al) by
FUNCT_1: 102;
end;
end;
set t1 = { (l
. i) : 1
<= i & i
<= (
len l) & (l
. i)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al) };
set t2 = { (l
. i) : 1
<= i & i
<= (
len l) & (l
. i)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al2) };
A11: t1
= t2
proof
thus t1
c= t2
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in t1;
then
consider i such that
A12: x
= (l
. i) & 1
<= i & i
<= (
len l) & (l
. i)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al);
x
= (l
. i) & 1
<= i & i
<= (
len l) & (l
. i)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al2) by
A9,
A12;
hence x
in t2;
end;
thus t2
c= t1
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in t2;
then
consider i such that
A13: x
= (l
. i) & 1
<= i & i
<= (
len l) & (l
. i)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al2);
x
= (l
. i) & 1
<= i & i
<= (
len l) & (l
. i)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al) by
A9,
A13;
hence x
in t1;
end;
end;
A14: (
still_not-bound_in l)
= (
still_not-bound_in l2) by
A5,
A11;
A15: (vp
| (
still_not-bound_in l))
= (v2
| ((
bound_QC-variables Al)
/\ (
still_not-bound_in l))) by
A3,
RELAT_1: 71
.= (v2
| (
still_not-bound_in l)) by
XBOOLE_1: 28;
(v2
*' l2)
= (l
* (vp
| (
still_not-bound_in l))) by
A5,
A14,
A15,
SUBLEMMA: 59
.= (vp
*' l) by
SUBLEMMA: 59;
hence thesis;
end;
A16: (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast (P
! l)) implies (Jp,vp)
|= (P
! l)
proof
assume (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast (P
! l));
then (J2,v2)
|= (P2
! l2) by
A4,
A5,
A6,
QC_LANG1:def 12;
then ((
Valid ((P2
! l2),J2))
. v2)
=
TRUE by
VALUAT_1:def 7;
then ((l2
'in' (J2
. P2))
. v2)
=
TRUE by
VALUAT_1: 6;
then
A17: (vp
*' l)
in (J2
. P2) by
A7,
VALUAT_1:def 4;
(vp
*' l)
in (Jp
. P) by
FUNCT_1: 49,
A3,
A5,
A17;
then ((l
'in' (Jp
. P))
. vp)
=
TRUE by
VALUAT_1:def 4;
then ((
Valid ((P
! l),Jp))
. vp)
=
TRUE by
VALUAT_1: 6;
hence thesis by
VALUAT_1:def 7;
end;
( not (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast (P
! l))) implies ( not (Jp,vp)
|= (P
! l))
proof
assume not (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast (P
! l));
then not (J2,v2)
|= (P2
! l2) by
A4,
A5,
A6,
QC_LANG1:def 12;
then not ((
Valid ((P2
! l2),J2))
. v2)
=
TRUE by
VALUAT_1:def 7;
then not ((l2
'in' (J2
. P2))
. v2)
=
TRUE by
VALUAT_1: 6;
then
A18: not (vp
*' l)
in (J2
. P2) by
A7,
VALUAT_1:def 4;
not (vp
*' l)
in (Jp
. P) by
FUNCT_1: 49,
A3,
A5,
A18;
then not ((l
'in' (Jp
. P))
. vp)
=
TRUE by
VALUAT_1:def 4;
then not ((
Valid ((P
! l),Jp))
. vp)
=
TRUE by
VALUAT_1: 6;
hence thesis by
VALUAT_1:def 7;
end;
hence thesis by
A16;
end;
A19: for p holds
T[p] implies
T[(
'not' p)]
proof
let p;
assume
A20:
T[p];
let J2, Jp, v2, vp;
assume
A21: Jp
= (J2
| (
QC-pred_symbols Al)) & vp
= (v2
| (
bound_QC-variables Al));
per cases ;
suppose
A22: not (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast p);
then
A23: not (Jp,vp)
|= p by
A20,
A21;
(J2,v2)
|= (
'not' (Al2
-Cast p)) by
A22,
VALUAT_1: 17;
hence thesis by
A23,
VALUAT_1: 17;
end;
suppose
A24: (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast p);
then
A25: (Jp,vp)
|= p by
A20,
A21;
not (J2,v2)
|= (
'not' (Al2
-Cast p)) by
VALUAT_1: 17,
A24;
hence thesis by
A25,
VALUAT_1: 17;
end;
end;
A26: for p, r holds (
T[p] &
T[r]) implies
T[(p
'&' r)]
proof
let p, r;
assume
A27:
T[p] &
T[r];
let J2, Jp, v2, vp;
assume
A28: Jp
= (J2
| (
QC-pred_symbols Al)) & vp
= (v2
| (
bound_QC-variables Al));
A29: (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast (p
'&' r)) implies (Jp,vp)
|= (p
'&' r)
proof
assume (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast (p
'&' r));
then (J2,v2)
|= ((Al2
-Cast p)
'&' (Al2
-Cast r));
then (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast p) & (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast r) by
VALUAT_1: 18;
then (Jp,vp)
|= p & (Jp,vp)
|= r by
A27,
A28;
hence (Jp,vp)
|= (p
'&' r) by
VALUAT_1: 18;
end;
(Jp,vp)
|= (p
'&' r) implies (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast (p
'&' r))
proof
assume (Jp,vp)
|= (p
'&' r);
then (Jp,vp)
|= p & (Jp,vp)
|= r by
VALUAT_1: 18;
then (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast p) & (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast r) by
A27,
A28;
then (J2,v2)
|= ((Al2
-Cast p)
'&' (Al2
-Cast r)) by
VALUAT_1: 18;
hence (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast (p
'&' r));
end;
hence thesis by
A29;
end;
A30: for x, r holds
T[r] implies
T[(
All (x,r))]
proof
let x, r;
assume
A31:
T[r];
let J2, Jp, v2, vp;
assume
A32: Jp
= (J2
| (
QC-pred_symbols Al)) & vp
= (v2
| (
bound_QC-variables Al));
A33: (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast (
All (x,r))) implies (Jp,vp)
|= (
All (x,r))
proof
assume (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast (
All (x,r)));
then
A34: (J2,v2)
|= (
All ((Al2
-Cast x),(Al2
-Cast r)));
for vp1 be
Element of (
Valuations_in (Al,A)) st for y be
bound_QC-variable of Al st x
<> y holds (vp1
. y)
= (vp
. y) holds (Jp,vp1)
|= r
proof
let vp1 be
Element of (
Valuations_in (Al,A)) such that
A35: for y be
bound_QC-variable of Al st x
<> y holds (vp1
. y)
= (vp
. y);
set s = ((Al2
-Cast x)
.--> (vp1
. x));
A36: s
= (
{(Al2
-Cast x)}
--> (vp1
. x)) by
FUNCOP_1:def 9;
set v21 = (v2
+* s);
v2 is
Element of (
Funcs ((
bound_QC-variables Al2),A)) by
VALUAT_1:def 1;
then
A37: (
dom v2)
= (
bound_QC-variables Al2) & (
rng v2)
c= A by
FUNCT_2: 92;
(
dom s)
=
{(Al2
-Cast x)} by
A36;
then (
dom v21)
= ((
dom v2)
\/
{(Al2
-Cast x)}) by
FUNCT_4:def 1;
then
A38: (
dom v21)
= (
bound_QC-variables Al2) by
A37,
XBOOLE_1: 12;
A39: ((
rng v2)
\/
{(vp1
. x)})
c= A by
A37,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
(
rng s)
=
{(vp1
. x)} by
A36,
FUNCOP_1: 8;
then (
rng v21)
c= ((
rng v2)
\/
{(vp1
. x)}) by
FUNCT_4: 17;
then (
rng v21)
c= A by
A39;
then v21 is
Element of (
Funcs ((
bound_QC-variables Al2),A)) by
A38,
FUNCT_2:def 2;
then
reconsider v21 as
Element of (
Valuations_in (Al2,A)) by
VALUAT_1:def 1;
for y be
bound_QC-variable of Al2 st (Al2
-Cast x)
<> y holds (v21
. y)
= (v2
. y) by
FUNCT_4: 83;
then
A40: (J2,v21)
|= (Al2
-Cast r) by
A34,
VALUAT_1: 29;
vp1 is
Element of (
Funcs ((
bound_QC-variables Al),A)) by
VALUAT_1:def 1;
then
A41: (
dom vp1)
= (
bound_QC-variables Al) by
FUNCT_2: 92
.= ((
dom v21)
/\ (
bound_QC-variables Al)) by
A38,
Th4,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
for c be
object st c
in (
dom vp1) holds (vp1
. c)
= (v21
. c)
proof
let c be
object such that
A42: c
in (
dom vp1);
per cases ;
suppose
A43: c
= (Al2
-Cast x);
then c
in (
dom s) by
FUNCOP_1: 74;
hence (v21
. c)
= (s
. c) by
FUNCT_4: 13
.= (vp1
. c) by
A43,
FUNCOP_1: 72;
end;
suppose
A44: c
<> (Al2
-Cast x);
reconsider c as
bound_QC-variable of Al by
A41,
A42,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
(v21
. c)
= (v2
. c) by
A44,
FUNCT_4: 83
.= ((v2
| (
bound_QC-variables Al))
. c) by
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (vp1
. c) by
A32,
A35,
A44;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
then (v21
| (
bound_QC-variables Al))
= vp1 by
FUNCT_1: 46,
A41;
hence (Jp,vp1)
|= r by
A32,
A31,
A40;
end;
hence (Jp,vp)
|= (
All (x,r)) by
VALUAT_1: 29;
end;
(Jp,vp)
|= (
All (x,r)) implies (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast (
All (x,r)))
proof
assume
A45: (Jp,vp)
|= (
All (x,r));
for v21 be
Element of (
Valuations_in (Al2,A)) st for y be
bound_QC-variable of Al2 st (Al2
-Cast x)
<> y holds (v21
. y)
= (v2
. y) holds (J2,v21)
|= (Al2
-Cast r)
proof
let v21 be
Element of (
Valuations_in (Al2,A)) such that
A46: for y be
bound_QC-variable of Al2 st (Al2
-Cast x)
<> y holds (v21
. y)
= (v2
. y);
set s = (x
.--> (v21
. (Al2
-Cast x)));
A47: s
= (
{x}
--> (v21
. (Al2
-Cast x))) by
FUNCOP_1:def 9;
set vp1 = (vp
+* s);
vp is
Element of (
Funcs ((
bound_QC-variables Al),A)) by
VALUAT_1:def 1;
then
A48: (
dom vp)
= (
bound_QC-variables Al) & (
rng vp)
c= A by
FUNCT_2: 92;
(
dom s)
=
{x} by
A47;
then (
dom vp1)
= ((
dom vp)
\/
{x}) by
FUNCT_4:def 1;
then
A49: (
dom vp1)
= (
bound_QC-variables Al) by
A48,
XBOOLE_1: 12;
A50: ((
rng vp)
\/
{(v21
. (Al2
-Cast x))})
c= A by
A48,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
(
rng s)
=
{(v21
. (Al2
-Cast x))} by
A47,
FUNCOP_1: 8;
then (
rng vp1)
c= ((
rng vp)
\/
{(v21
. (Al2
-Cast x))}) by
FUNCT_4: 17;
then (
rng vp1)
c= A by
A50;
then vp1 is
Element of (
Funcs ((
bound_QC-variables Al),A)) by
A49,
FUNCT_2:def 2;
then
reconsider vp1 as
Element of (
Valuations_in (Al,A)) by
VALUAT_1:def 1;
for y be
bound_QC-variable of Al st x
<> y holds (vp1
. y)
= (vp
. y) by
FUNCT_4: 83;
then
A51: (Jp,vp1)
|= r by
A45,
VALUAT_1: 29;
v21 is
Element of (
Funcs ((
bound_QC-variables Al2),A)) by
VALUAT_1:def 1;
then
A52: (
dom v21)
= (
bound_QC-variables Al2) by
FUNCT_2: 92;
vp1 is
Element of (
Funcs ((
bound_QC-variables Al),A)) by
VALUAT_1:def 1;
then
A53: (
dom vp1)
= (
bound_QC-variables Al) by
FUNCT_2: 92
.= ((
dom v21)
/\ (
bound_QC-variables Al)) by
A52,
Th4,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
for c be
object st c
in (
dom vp1) holds (vp1
. c)
= (v21
. c)
proof
let c be
object such that
A54: c
in (
dom vp1);
per cases ;
suppose
A55: c
= x;
then c
in (
dom s) by
FUNCOP_1: 74;
then (vp1
. c)
= (s
. x) by
A55,
FUNCT_4: 13
.= (v21
. c) by
A55,
FUNCOP_1: 72;
hence (vp1
. c)
= (v21
. c);
end;
suppose
A56: c
<> x;
A57: c
in (
bound_QC-variables Al) by
A53,
A54,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
vp1 is
Element of (
Funcs ((
bound_QC-variables Al),A)) by
VALUAT_1:def 1;
then (
dom vp1)
= (
bound_QC-variables Al) by
FUNCT_2: 92;
then
A58: (
dom vp1)
c= (
bound_QC-variables Al2) by
Th4;
(vp1
. c)
= (vp
. c) by
A56,
FUNCT_4: 83
.= (v2
. c) by
A32,
A57,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (v21
. c) by
A56,
A46,
A54,
A58;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
then (v21
| (
bound_QC-variables Al))
= vp1 by
FUNCT_1: 46,
A53;
hence (J2,v21)
|= (Al2
-Cast r) by
A32,
A31,
A51;
end;
then (J2,v2)
|= (
All ((Al2
-Cast x),(Al2
-Cast r))) by
VALUAT_1: 29;
hence (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast (
All (x,r)));
end;
hence thesis by
A33;
end;
A59: for r,s be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al) holds for x be
bound_QC-variable of Al holds for k holds for l be
CQC-variable_list of k, Al holds for P be
QC-pred_symbol of k, Al holds
T[(
VERUM Al)] &
T[(P
! l)] & (
T[r] implies
T[(
'not' r)]) & (
T[r] &
T[s] implies
T[(r
'&' s)]) & (
T[r] implies
T[(
All (x,r))]) by
A1,
A2,
A19,
A26,
A30;
for r be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al) holds
T[r] from
CQC_LANG:sch 1(
A59);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:10
for Al2 be Al
-expanding
QC-alphabet, THETA be
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al2) st PHI
c= THETA holds for A2 be non
empty
set, J2 be
interpretation of Al2, A2, v2 be
Element of (
Valuations_in (Al2,A2)) st (J2,v2)
|= THETA holds ex A, J, v st (J,v)
|= PHI
proof
let Al2 be Al
-expanding
QC-alphabet, THETA be
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A1: PHI
c= THETA;
let A2 be non
empty
set, J2 be
interpretation of Al2, A2, v2 be
Element of (
Valuations_in (Al2,A2)) such that
A2: (J2,v2)
|= THETA;
set A = A2;
A3: (
QC-pred_symbols Al)
c= (
QC-pred_symbols Al2) by
Th3;
set Jp = (J2
| (
QC-pred_symbols Al));
reconsider Jp as
Function of (
QC-pred_symbols Al), (
relations_on A) by
A3,
FUNCT_2: 32;
for P be
Element of (
QC-pred_symbols Al), r be
Element of (
relations_on A) st (Jp
. P)
= r holds r
= (
empty_rel A) or (
the_arity_of P)
= (
the_arity_of r)
proof
let P be
Element of (
QC-pred_symbols Al), r be
Element of (
relations_on A) such that
A4: (Jp
. P)
= r;
P is
Element of (
QC-pred_symbols Al2) by
Th3,
TARSKI:def 3;
then
consider Q be
Element of (
QC-pred_symbols Al2) such that
A5: P
= Q;
A6: (P
`1 )
= (7
+ (
the_arity_of P)) & (Q
`1 )
= (7
+ (
the_arity_of Q)) by
QC_LANG1:def 8;
(Jp
. P)
= (J2
. Q) by
A5,
FUNCT_1: 49;
hence thesis by
A4,
A5,
A6,
VALUAT_1:def 5;
end;
then
reconsider Jp as
interpretation of Al, A by
VALUAT_1:def 5;
A7: (
bound_QC-variables Al)
c= (
bound_QC-variables Al2) by
Th4;
set vp = (v2
| (
bound_QC-variables Al));
reconsider vp as
Function of (
bound_QC-variables Al), A by
A7,
FUNCT_2: 32;
A8: (
Funcs ((
bound_QC-variables Al),A))
= (
Valuations_in (Al,A)) by
VALUAT_1:def 1;
reconsider vp as
Element of (
Valuations_in (Al,A)) by
A8,
FUNCT_2: 8;
for r be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al) holds r
in PHI implies (Jp,vp)
|= r
proof
let r be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al) such that
A9: r
in PHI;
(J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast r) by
A1,
A2,
A9,
CALCUL_1:def 11;
hence thesis by
Th9;
end;
hence thesis by
CALCUL_1:def 11;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:11
Th11: for f be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2), g be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al) st f
= g holds (
Ant f)
= (
Ant g) & (
Suc f)
= (
Suc g)
proof
let f be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2), g be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al) such that
A1: f
= g;
per cases ;
suppose
A2: (
len f)
>
0 ;
then
consider k be
Nat such that
A3: (
len f)
= (k
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 6;
reconsider k as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
thus (
Ant f)
= (g
| (
Seg k)) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
CALCUL_1:def 1
.= (
Ant g) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
CALCUL_1:def 1;
(
Suc f)
= (g
. (
len g)) by
A1,
A2,
CALCUL_1:def 2
.= (
Suc g) by
A1,
A2,
CALCUL_1:def 2;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
A4: not (
len f)
>
0 ;
thus (
Ant f)
=
{} by
A4,
CALCUL_1:def 1
.= (
Ant g) by
A1,
A4,
CALCUL_1:def 1;
thus (
Suc f)
= (
VERUM Al2) by
A4,
CALCUL_1:def 2
.= (
VERUM Al)
.= (
Suc g) by
A1,
A4,
CALCUL_1:def 2;
end;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:12
Th12: for p holds (
still_not-bound_in p)
= (
still_not-bound_in (Al2
-Cast p))
proof
defpred
A[
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al)] means (
still_not-bound_in $1)
= (
still_not-bound_in (Al2
-Cast $1));
A1:
A[(
VERUM Al)]
proof
thus (
still_not-bound_in (
VERUM Al))
=
{} by
QC_LANG3: 3
.= (
still_not-bound_in (
VERUM Al2)) by
QC_LANG3: 3
.= (
still_not-bound_in (Al2
-Cast (
VERUM Al)));
end;
A2: for k, P, l holds
A[(P
! l)]
proof
let k, P, l;
A3: (
still_not-bound_in l)
= (
still_not-bound_in (Al2
-Cast l))
proof
for x be
object st x
in (
still_not-bound_in l) holds x
in (
still_not-bound_in (Al2
-Cast l))
proof
let x be
object such that
A4: x
in (
still_not-bound_in l);
consider n such that
A5: x
= (l
. n) & 1
<= n & n
<= (
len l) & (l
. n)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al) by
A4;
set y = (l
. n);
reconsider y as
bound_QC-variable of Al by
A5;
y
= (Al2
-Cast y);
hence thesis by
A5;
end;
hence (
still_not-bound_in l)
c= (
still_not-bound_in (Al2
-Cast l));
for x be
object st x
in (
still_not-bound_in (Al2
-Cast l)) holds x
in (
still_not-bound_in l)
proof
let x be
object such that
A6: x
in (
still_not-bound_in (Al2
-Cast l));
consider n such that
A7: x
= ((Al2
-Cast l)
. n) & 1
<= n & n
<= (
len (Al2
-Cast l)) & ((Al2
-Cast l)
. n)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al2) by
A6;
set y = ((Al2
-Cast l)
. n);
(
rng l)
c= (
bound_QC-variables Al) & (
dom l)
= (
Seg (
len l)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then y
= (l
. n) & n
in (
dom l) & l is
FinSequence of (
bound_QC-variables Al) by
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 1,
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
then y
in (
bound_QC-variables Al) by
FINSEQ_2: 11;
hence thesis by
A7;
end;
hence (
still_not-bound_in (Al2
-Cast l))
c= (
still_not-bound_in l);
end;
thus (
still_not-bound_in (P
! l))
= (
still_not-bound_in l) by
QC_LANG3: 5
.= (
still_not-bound_in ((Al2
-Cast P)
! (Al2
-Cast l))) by
A3,
QC_LANG3: 5
.= (
still_not-bound_in (Al2
-Cast (P
! l))) by
Th8;
end;
A8: for p holds
A[p] implies
A[(
'not' p)]
proof
let p such that
A9:
A[p];
thus (
still_not-bound_in (
'not' p))
= (
still_not-bound_in p) by
QC_LANG3: 7
.= (
still_not-bound_in (
'not' (Al2
-Cast p))) by
A9,
QC_LANG3: 7
.= (
still_not-bound_in (Al2
-Cast (
'not' p)));
end;
A10: for p, q holds
A[p] &
A[q] implies
A[(p
'&' q)]
proof
let p, q such that
A11:
A[p] &
A[q];
set p2 = (Al2
-Cast p);
set q2 = (Al2
-Cast q);
reconsider p2, q2 as
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2);
(p
'&' q) is
conjunctive & (p2
'&' q2) is
conjunctive;
then
A12: p
= (
the_left_argument_of (p
'&' q)) & q
= (
the_right_argument_of (p
'&' q)) & p2
= (
the_left_argument_of (p2
'&' q2)) & q2
= (
the_right_argument_of (p2
'&' q2)) by
QC_LANG1:def 25,
QC_LANG1:def 26;
hence (
still_not-bound_in (p
'&' q))
= ((
still_not-bound_in p)
\/ (
still_not-bound_in q)) by
QC_LANG1:def 20,
QC_LANG3: 9
.= (
still_not-bound_in (Al2
-Cast (p
'&' q))) by
A11,
A12,
QC_LANG1:def 20,
QC_LANG3: 9;
end;
for x, p holds
A[p] implies
A[(
All (x,p))]
proof
let x, p such that
A13:
A[p];
set x2 = (Al2
-Cast x);
set p2 = (Al2
-Cast p);
reconsider p2 as
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2);
reconsider x2 as
bound_QC-variable of Al2;
(
All (x,p)) is
universal & (
All (x2,p2)) is
universal;
then
A14: p
= (
the_scope_of (
All (x,p))) & x
= (
bound_in (
All (x,p))) & p2
= (
the_scope_of (
All (x2,p2))) & x2
= (
bound_in (
All (x2,p2))) by
QC_LANG1:def 27,
QC_LANG1:def 28;
then (
still_not-bound_in (
All (x,p)))
= ((
still_not-bound_in p)
\
{x}) by
QC_LANG3: 11,
QC_LANG1:def 21
.= (
still_not-bound_in (Al2
-Cast (
All (x,p)))) by
A13,
A14,
QC_LANG1:def 21,
QC_LANG3: 11;
hence thesis;
end;
then
A15: for p, q, x, k, l, P holds
A[(
VERUM Al)] &
A[(P
! l)] & (
A[p] implies
A[(
'not' p)]) & (
A[p] &
A[q] implies
A[(p
'&' q)]) & (
A[p] implies
A[(
All (x,p))]) by
A1,
A2,
A8,
A10;
for p holds
A[p] from
CQC_LANG:sch 1(
A15);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:13
Th13: for p2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2), S be
CQC_Substitution of Al, S2 be
CQC_Substitution of Al2, x2 be
bound_QC-variable of Al2, x, p st p
= p2 & S
= S2 & x
= x2 holds (
RestrictSub (x,p,S))
= (
RestrictSub (x2,p2,S2))
proof
let p2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2), S be
CQC_Substitution of Al, S2 be
CQC_Substitution of Al2, x2 be
bound_QC-variable of Al2, x, p such that
A1: p
= p2 & S
= S2 & x
= x2;
set rset = { y where y be
bound_QC-variable of Al : y
in (
still_not-bound_in p) & y is
Element of (
dom S) & y
<> x & y
<> (S
. y) };
set rset2 = { y2 where y2 be
bound_QC-variable of Al2 : y2
in (
still_not-bound_in p2) & y2 is
Element of (
dom S2) & y2
<> x2 & y2
<> (S2
. y2) };
rset
= rset2
proof
for s be
object st s
in rset holds s
in rset2
proof
let s be
object such that
A2: s
in rset;
consider y be
bound_QC-variable of Al such that
A3: s
= y & y
in (
still_not-bound_in p) & y is
Element of (
dom S) & y
<> x & y
<> (S
. y) by
A2;
reconsider y as
bound_QC-variable of Al2 by
Th4,
TARSKI:def 3;
p2
= (Al2
-Cast p) by
A1;
then y
in (
still_not-bound_in p2) & y is
Element of (
dom S2) & y
<> x2 & y
<> (S2
. y) by
A1,
A3,
Th12;
hence s
in rset2 by
A3;
end;
hence rset
c= rset2;
for s2 be
object st s2
in rset2 holds s2
in rset
proof
let s2 be
object such that
A4: s2
in rset2;
consider y2 be
bound_QC-variable of Al2 such that
A5: s2
= y2 & y2
in (
still_not-bound_in p2) & y2 is
Element of (
dom S2) & y2
<> x2 & y2
<> (S2
. y2) by
A4;
p2
= (Al2
-Cast p) by
A1;
then
A6: y2
in (
still_not-bound_in p) by
A5,
Th12;
then
reconsider y2 as
bound_QC-variable of Al;
thus s2
in rset by
A1,
A5,
A6;
end;
hence rset2
c= rset;
end;
then (S
| rset)
= (S2
| rset2) & (S
| rset)
= (
RestrictSub (x,p,S)) & (S2
| rset2)
= (
RestrictSub (x2,p2,S2)) by
A1,
SUBSTUT1:def 6;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:14
Th14: for p2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2), S be
finite
CQC_Substitution of Al, S2 be
finite
CQC_Substitution of Al2, p st S
= S2 & p
= p2 holds (
upVar (S,p))
= (
upVar (S2,p2))
proof
let p2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2), S be
finite
CQC_Substitution of Al, S2 be
finite
CQC_Substitution of Al2, p such that
A1: S
= S2 & p
= p2;
A2: (
Sub_Var S)
= (
Sub_Var S2)
proof
for s be
object st s
in (
Sub_Var S) holds s
in (
Sub_Var S2)
proof
let s be
object such that
A3: s
in (
Sub_Var S);
s
in { t where t be
QC-symbol of Al : (
x. t)
in (
rng S) } by
A3,
SUBSTUT1:def 10;
then
consider s2 be
QC-symbol of Al such that
A4: s
= s2 & (
x. s2)
in (
rng S);
s2
in (
QC-symbols Al) & (
QC-symbols Al)
c= (
QC-symbols Al2) by
Th2;
then
consider s3 be
QC-symbol of Al2 such that
A5: s3
= s2;
(
x. s2)
=
[4, s2] by
QC_LANG3:def 2
.= (
x. s3) by
A5,
QC_LANG3:def 2;
then s3
in { t where t be
QC-symbol of Al2 : (
x. t)
in (
rng S2) } by
A1,
A4;
hence thesis by
A4,
A5,
SUBSTUT1:def 10;
end;
hence (
Sub_Var S)
c= (
Sub_Var S2);
for s be
object st s
in (
Sub_Var S2) holds s
in (
Sub_Var S)
proof
let s be
object such that
A6: s
in (
Sub_Var S2);
s
in { t where t be
QC-symbol of Al2 : (
x. t)
in (
rng S2) } by
A6,
SUBSTUT1:def 10;
then
consider s2 be
QC-symbol of Al2 such that
A7: s
= s2 & (
x. s2)
in (
rng S2);
A8: (
rng (
@ S))
c= (
bound_QC-variables Al) by
SUBSTUT1: 39;
(
x. s2)
in (
rng (
@ S)) by
A1,
A7,
SUBSTUT1:def 2;
then (
x. s2)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al) by
A8;
then
[4, s2]
in
[:
{4}, (
QC-symbols Al):] by
QC_LANG3:def 2;
then s2
in (
QC-symbols Al) by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
consider s3 be
QC-symbol of Al such that
A9: s3
= s2;
(
x. s2)
=
[4, s2] by
QC_LANG3:def 2
.= (
x. s3) by
A9,
QC_LANG3:def 2;
then s3
in { t where t be
QC-symbol of Al : (
x. t)
in (
rng S) } by
A1,
A7;
hence thesis by
A7,
A9,
SUBSTUT1:def 10;
end;
hence (
Sub_Var S2)
c= (
Sub_Var S);
end;
defpred
P[
Element of (
QC-WFF Al)] means for q2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) st $1
= q2 holds (
Bound_Vars $1)
= (
Bound_Vars q2);
A10:
P[(
VERUM Al)]
proof
let q2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A11: q2
= (
VERUM Al);
q2
= (
VERUM Al2) by
A11;
hence (
Bound_Vars q2)
=
{} by
SUBSTUT1: 2
.= (
Bound_Vars (
VERUM Al)) by
SUBSTUT1: 2;
end;
A12: for k, P, l holds
P[(P
! l)]
proof
let k, P, l;
set P2 = (Al2
-Cast P);
set l2 = (Al2
-Cast l);
let q2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A13: (P
! l)
= q2;
A14: q2
= (Al2
-Cast (P
! l)) by
A13
.= (P2
! l2) by
Th8;
thus (
Bound_Vars (P
! l))
= (
still_not-bound_in (P
! l)) by
SUBLEMMA: 43
.= (
still_not-bound_in (Al2
-Cast (P
! l))) by
Th12
.= (
still_not-bound_in (P2
! l2)) by
Th8
.= (
Bound_Vars q2) by
A14,
SUBLEMMA: 43;
end;
A15: for r, s st
P[r] &
P[s] holds
P[(r
'&' s)]
proof
let r, s such that
A16:
P[r] &
P[s];
set q = (r
'&' s);
set r2 = (Al2
-Cast r);
set s2 = (Al2
-Cast s);
let q2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A17: (r
'&' s)
= q2;
A18: q2
= (r2
'&' s2) by
A17;
then q is
conjunctive & q2 is
conjunctive;
then
A19: (
the_left_argument_of q)
= r & (
the_right_argument_of q)
= s & (
the_left_argument_of q2)
= r2 & (
the_right_argument_of q2)
= s2 by
A18,
QC_LANG1:def 25,
QC_LANG1:def 26;
A20: (
Bound_Vars r)
= (
Bound_Vars r2) & (
Bound_Vars s)
= (
Bound_Vars s2) by
A16;
thus (
Bound_Vars q)
= ((
Bound_Vars r)
\/ (
Bound_Vars s)) by
A19,
SUBSTUT1: 5,
QC_LANG1:def 20
.= (
Bound_Vars q2) by
A18,
A19,
A20,
SUBSTUT1: 5,
QC_LANG1:def 20;
end;
A21: for r st
P[r] holds
P[(
'not' r)]
proof
let r such that
A22:
P[r];
set q = (
'not' r);
set r2 = (Al2
-Cast r);
let q2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A23: q
= q2;
A24: q2
= (
'not' r2) by
A23;
then q is
negative & q2 is
negative;
then
A25: (
the_argument_of q)
= r & (
the_argument_of q2)
= r2 by
A24,
QC_LANG1:def 24;
thus (
Bound_Vars q)
= (
Bound_Vars r) by
A25,
SUBSTUT1: 4,
QC_LANG1:def 19
.= (
Bound_Vars r2) by
A22
.= (
Bound_Vars q2) by
A24,
A25,
SUBSTUT1: 4,
QC_LANG1:def 19;
end;
A26: for x, r st
P[r] holds
P[(
All (x,r))]
proof
let x, r such that
A27:
P[r];
set q = (
All (x,r));
set r2 = (Al2
-Cast r);
set x2 = (Al2
-Cast x);
let q2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A28: q
= q2;
A29: q2
= (
All (x2,r2)) by
A28;
then q is
universal & q2 is
universal;
then
A30: (
the_scope_of q)
= r & (
bound_in q)
= x & (
the_scope_of q2)
= r2 & (
bound_in q2)
= x2 by
A29,
QC_LANG1:def 27,
QC_LANG1:def 28;
thus (
Bound_Vars q)
= ((
Bound_Vars r)
\/
{x}) by
A30,
SUBSTUT1: 6,
QC_LANG1:def 21
.= ((
Bound_Vars r2)
\/
{x2}) by
A27
.= (
Bound_Vars q2) by
A29,
A30,
SUBSTUT1: 6,
QC_LANG1:def 21;
end;
A31: for r, s, x, k, l, P holds
P[(
VERUM Al)] &
P[(P
! l)] & (
P[r] implies
P[(
'not' r)]) & (
P[r] &
P[s] implies
P[(r
'&' s)]) & (
P[r] implies
P[(
All (x,r))]) by
A10,
A12,
A15,
A21,
A26;
A32: for q be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al) holds
P[q] from
CQC_LANG:sch 1(
A31);
A33: (
Dom_Bound_Vars p)
= (
Dom_Bound_Vars p2)
proof
for s be
object st s
in (
Dom_Bound_Vars p) holds s
in (
Dom_Bound_Vars p2)
proof
let s be
object such that
A34: s
in (
Dom_Bound_Vars p);
s
in { b where b be
QC-symbol of Al : (
x. b)
in (
Bound_Vars p) } by
A34,
SUBSTUT1:def 9;
then
consider s2 be
QC-symbol of Al such that
A35: s
= s2 & (
x. s2)
in (
Bound_Vars p);
(
x. s2)
in (
Bound_Vars p2) by
A1,
A32,
A35;
then (
x. s2)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al2);
then
[4, s2]
in
[:
{4}, (
QC-symbols Al2):] by
QC_LANG3:def 2;
then s2
in (
QC-symbols Al2) by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
consider s3 be
QC-symbol of Al2 such that
A36: s3
= s2;
(
x. s2)
=
[4, s2] by
QC_LANG3:def 2
.= (
x. s3) by
A36,
QC_LANG3:def 2;
then (
x. s3)
in (
Bound_Vars p2) by
A1,
A32,
A35;
then s3
in { b where b be
QC-symbol of Al2 : (
x. b)
in (
Bound_Vars p2) };
hence thesis by
A35,
A36,
SUBSTUT1:def 9;
end;
hence (
Dom_Bound_Vars p)
c= (
Dom_Bound_Vars p2);
for s be
object st s
in (
Dom_Bound_Vars p2) holds s
in (
Dom_Bound_Vars p)
proof
let s be
object such that
A37: s
in (
Dom_Bound_Vars p2);
s
in { b where b be
QC-symbol of Al2 : (
x. b)
in (
Bound_Vars p2) } by
A37,
SUBSTUT1:def 9;
then
consider s2 be
QC-symbol of Al2 such that
A38: s
= s2 & (
x. s2)
in (
Bound_Vars p2);
(
x. s2)
in (
Bound_Vars p) by
A1,
A32,
A38;
then (
x. s2)
in (
bound_QC-variables Al);
then
[4, s2]
in
[:
{4}, (
QC-symbols Al):] by
QC_LANG3:def 2;
then s2
in (
QC-symbols Al) by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
consider s3 be
QC-symbol of Al such that
A39: s3
= s2;
(
x. s2)
=
[4, s2] by
QC_LANG3:def 2
.= (
x. s3) by
A39,
QC_LANG3:def 2;
then (
x. s3)
in (
Bound_Vars p) by
A1,
A32,
A38;
then s3
in { b where b be
QC-symbol of Al : (
x. b)
in (
Bound_Vars p) };
hence thesis by
A38,
A39,
SUBSTUT1:def 9;
end;
hence (
Dom_Bound_Vars p2)
c= (
Dom_Bound_Vars p);
end;
A40: (
NSub (p,S))
= (
NAT
\ ((
Dom_Bound_Vars p)
\/ (
Sub_Var S))) by
SUBSTUT1:def 11
.= (
NSub (p2,S2)) by
A2,
A33,
SUBSTUT1:def 11;
thus (
upVar (S,p))
= the
Element of (
NSub (p,S)) by
SUBSTUT1:def 12
.= (
upVar (S2,p2)) by
A40,
SUBSTUT1:def 12;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:15
Th15: for p2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2), S be
CQC_Substitution of Al, S2 be
CQC_Substitution of Al2, x2 be
bound_QC-variable of Al2, x, p st p
= p2 & S
= S2 & x
= x2 holds (
ExpandSub (x,p,(
RestrictSub (x,(
All (x,p)),S))))
= (
ExpandSub (x2,p2,(
RestrictSub (x2,(
All (x2,p2)),S2))))
proof
let p2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2), S be
CQC_Substitution of Al, S2 be
CQC_Substitution of Al2, x2 be
bound_QC-variable of Al2, x, p such that
A1: p
= p2 & S
= S2 & x
= x2;
set rsub = (
RestrictSub (x,(
All (x,p)),S));
set rsub2 = (
RestrictSub (x2,(
All (x2,p2)),S2));
set esub = (
ExpandSub (x,p,rsub));
set esub2 = (
ExpandSub (x2,p2,rsub2));
set uv = (
upVar (rsub,p));
set uv2 = (
upVar (rsub2,p2));
A2: (
x. uv)
=
[4, uv] by
QC_LANG3:def 2
.=
[4, uv2] by
A1,
Th13,
Th14
.= (
x. uv2) by
QC_LANG3:def 2;
per cases ;
suppose
A3: not x
in (
rng rsub);
then not x2
in (
rng rsub2) by
A1,
Th13;
hence esub2
= (rsub2
\/
{
[x2, x2]}) by
SUBSTUT1:def 13
.= (rsub
\/
{
[x, x]}) by
A1,
Th13
.= esub by
A3,
SUBSTUT1:def 13;
end;
suppose
A4: x
in (
rng rsub);
then x2
in (
rng rsub2) by
A1,
Th13;
hence esub2
= (rsub2
\/
{
[x2, (
x. uv2)]}) by
SUBSTUT1:def 13
.= (rsub
\/
{
[x, (
x. uv)]}) by
A1,
Th13,
A2
.= esub by
A4,
SUBSTUT1:def 13;
end;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:16
Th16: for Z be
Element of (
CQC-Sub-WFF Al), Z2 be
Element of (
CQC-Sub-WFF Al2) st (Z
`1 ) is
universal & (Z2
`1 ) is
universal & (
bound_in (Z
`1 ))
= (
bound_in (Z2
`1 )) & (
the_scope_of (Z
`1 ))
= (
the_scope_of (Z2
`1 )) & Z
= Z2 holds (
S_Bound (
@ Z))
= (
S_Bound (
@ Z2))
proof
let Z be
Element of (
CQC-Sub-WFF Al), Z2 be
Element of (
CQC-Sub-WFF Al2) such that
A1: (Z
`1 ) is
universal & (Z2
`1 ) is
universal & (
bound_in (Z
`1 ))
= (
bound_in (Z2
`1 )) & (
the_scope_of (Z
`1 ))
= (
the_scope_of (Z2
`1 )) & Z
= Z2;
set p = ((
@ Z)
`1 );
set p2 = ((
@ Z2)
`1 );
set S = ((
@ Z)
`2 );
set S2 = ((
@ Z2)
`2 );
reconsider p as
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al) by
A1,
SUBSTUT1:def 35;
reconsider p2 as
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
A1,
SUBSTUT1:def 35;
reconsider S as
CQC_Substitution of Al;
reconsider S2 as
CQC_Substitution of Al2;
set x = (
bound_in p);
set x2 = (
bound_in p2);
set q = (
the_scope_of p);
set q2 = (
the_scope_of p2);
p is
universal by
A1,
SUBSTUT1:def 35;
then p
= (
All (x,q)) by
QC_LANG2: 6;
then
reconsider q as
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al) by
CQC_LANG: 13;
p2 is
universal by
A1,
SUBSTUT1:def 35;
then p2
= (
All (x2,q2)) by
QC_LANG2: 6;
then
reconsider q2 as
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
CQC_LANG: 13;
reconsider x as
bound_QC-variable of Al;
reconsider x2 as
bound_QC-variable of Al2;
A2: p
= (Z
`1 ) by
SUBSTUT1:def 35
.= p2 by
A1,
SUBSTUT1:def 35;
A3: S
= (Z
`2 ) by
SUBSTUT1:def 35
.= S2 by
A1,
SUBSTUT1:def 35;
A4: x
= (
bound_in (Z
`1 )) by
SUBSTUT1:def 35
.= x2 by
A1,
SUBSTUT1:def 35;
A5: q
= (
the_scope_of (Z
`1 )) by
SUBSTUT1:def 35
.= q2 by
A1,
SUBSTUT1:def 35;
set rsub = (
RestrictSub (x,p,S));
set rsub2 = (
RestrictSub (x2,p2,S2));
per cases ;
suppose
A6: not x
in (
rng rsub);
then not x2
in (
rng rsub2) by
A2,
A3,
A4,
Th13;
hence (
S_Bound (
@ Z2))
= x2 by
SUBSTUT1:def 36
.= (
S_Bound (
@ Z)) by
A4,
A6,
SUBSTUT1:def 36;
end;
suppose
A7: x
in (
rng rsub);
then x2
in (
rng rsub2) by
A2,
A3,
A4,
Th13;
then (
S_Bound (
@ Z2))
= (
x. (
upVar (rsub2,q2))) by
SUBSTUT1:def 36
.=
[4, (
upVar (rsub2,q2))] by
QC_LANG3:def 2
.=
[4, (
upVar (rsub,q))] by
A5,
A2,
A3,
A4,
Th13,
Th14
.= (
x. (
upVar (rsub,q))) by
QC_LANG3:def 2
.= (
S_Bound (
@ Z)) by
A7,
SUBSTUT1:def 36;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:17
Th17: for p2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2), x2,y2 be
bound_QC-variable of Al2, p, x, y st p
= p2 & x
= x2 & y
= y2 holds (p
. (x,y))
= (p2
. (x2,y2))
proof
defpred
P[
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al)] means for p2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2), S be
CQC_Substitution of Al, S2 be
CQC_Substitution of Al2 st $1
= p2 & S
= S2 holds (
CQC_Sub
[$1, S])
= (
CQC_Sub
[p2, S2]);
A1:
P[(
VERUM Al)]
proof
set p = (
VERUM Al);
let p2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2), S be
CQC_Substitution of Al, S2 be
CQC_Substitution of Al2 such that
A2: p
= p2 & S
= S2;
A3: (
VERUM Al2)
= p2 by
A2;
A4:
[p, S] is Al
-Sub_VERUM &
[p2, S2] is Al2
-Sub_VERUM by
A3,
SUBSTUT1:def 19;
thus (
CQC_Sub
[p, S])
= (
VERUM Al2) by
A4,
SUBLEMMA: 3
.= (
CQC_Sub
[p2, S2]) by
A4,
SUBLEMMA: 3;
end;
A5: for k, P, l holds
P[(P
! l)]
proof
let k, P, l;
set P2 = (Al2
-Cast P);
set l2 = (Al2
-Cast l);
reconsider P2 as
QC-pred_symbol of k, Al2;
reconsider l2 as
CQC-variable_list of k, Al2;
let p2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2), S be
CQC_Substitution of Al, S2 be
CQC_Substitution of Al2 such that
A6: (P
! l)
= p2 & S
= S2;
A7: p2
= (Al2
-Cast (P
! l)) by
A6
.= (P2
! l2) by
Th8;
set p = (P
! l);
reconsider p as
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al);
set sub = (
CQC_Subst (l,S));
A8: sub
= (
CQC_Subst ((Al2
-Cast l),S2))
proof
A9: (
len sub)
= (
len l) by
SUBSTUT1:def 3
.= (
len (
CQC_Subst ((Al2
-Cast l),S2))) by
SUBSTUT1:def 3;
for n be
Nat st n
in (
dom sub) holds (sub
. n)
= ((
CQC_Subst ((Al2
-Cast l),S2))
. n)
proof
let n be
Nat such that
A10: n
in (
dom sub);
n
in (
Seg (
len sub)) by
A10,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then 1
<= n & n
<= (
len sub) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A11: 1
<= n & n
<= (
len l) by
SUBSTUT1:def 3;
reconsider n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
per cases ;
suppose
A12: (l
. n)
in (
dom S);
(sub
. n)
= (S
. (l
. n)) by
A11,
A12,
SUBSTUT1:def 3
.= ((
CQC_Subst ((Al2
-Cast l),S2))
. n) by
A6,
A11,
A12,
SUBSTUT1:def 3;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
A13: not (l
. n)
in (
dom S);
(sub
. n)
= (l
. n) by
A11,
A13,
SUBSTUT1:def 3
.= ((
CQC_Subst ((Al2
-Cast l),S2))
. n) by
A6,
A11,
A13,
SUBSTUT1:def 3;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A9,
FINSEQ_2: 9;
end;
(
the_arity_of P)
= (
len l) & (
the_arity_of P2)
= (
len l2) by
Th1;
then
A14:
[(P
! l), S]
= (
Sub_P (P,l,S)) &
[(P2
! l2), S2]
= (
Sub_P (P2,l2,S2)) by
SUBSTUT1:def 18;
(P
! l) is
atomic & (P2
! l2) is
atomic;
then
A15: P
= (
the_pred_symbol_of (P
! l)) & P2
= (
the_pred_symbol_of (P2
! l2)) by
QC_LANG1:def 22;
A16: (
[(P
! l), S]
`1 )
= (P
! l) & (
[(P
! l), S]
`2 )
= S & (
[(P2
! l2), S2]
`1 )
= (P2
! l2) & (
[(P2
! l2), S2]
`2 )
= S2 & (
Sub_the_arguments_of
[(P
! l), S])
= l & (
Sub_the_arguments_of
[(P2
! l2), S2])
= l2 by
A14,
SUBSTUT1:def 29;
thus (
CQC_Sub
[(P
! l), S])
= (Al2
-Cast (P
! (
CQC_Subst (l,S)))) by
A14,
A15,
A16,
SUBLEMMA: 6
.= ((Al2
-Cast P)
! (Al2
-Cast (
CQC_Subst (l,S)))) by
Th8
.= (
CQC_Sub
[p2, S2]) by
A7,
A8,
A14,
A15,
A16,
SUBLEMMA: 6;
end;
A17: for q st
P[q] holds
P[(
'not' q)]
proof
let q such that
A18:
P[q];
set p = (
'not' q);
reconsider p as
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al);
set q2 = (Al2
-Cast q);
reconsider q2 as
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2);
let p2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2), S be
CQC_Substitution of Al, S2 be
CQC_Substitution of Al2 such that
A19: (
'not' q)
= p2 & S
= S2;
A20: (
[q, S]
`1 )
= q & (
[q, S]
`2 )
= S & (
[q2, S2]
`1 )
= q2 & (
[q2, S2]
`2 )
= S2;
thus (
CQC_Sub
[(
'not' q), S])
= (
CQC_Sub (
Sub_not
[q, S])) by
A20,
SUBSTUT1:def 20
.= (Al2
-Cast (
'not' (
CQC_Sub
[q, S]))) by
SUBSTUT1: 29
.= (
'not' (
CQC_Sub
[q2, S2])) by
A18,
A19
.= (
CQC_Sub (
Sub_not
[q2, S2])) by
SUBSTUT1: 29
.= (
CQC_Sub
[(
'not' q2), S2]) by
A20,
SUBSTUT1:def 20
.= (
CQC_Sub
[p2, S2]) by
A19;
end;
A21: for r, s st
P[r] &
P[s] holds
P[(r
'&' s)]
proof
let r, s such that
A22:
P[r] &
P[s];
set r2 = (Al2
-Cast r);
set s2 = (Al2
-Cast s);
reconsider r2, s2 as
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2);
let p2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2), S be
CQC_Substitution of Al, S2 be
CQC_Substitution of Al2 such that
A23: (r
'&' s)
= p2 & S
= S2;
A24: (
CQC_Sub
[r, S])
= (
CQC_Sub
[r2, S2]) & (
CQC_Sub
[s, S])
= (
CQC_Sub
[s2, S2]) by
A22,
A23;
A25: (
[r, S]
`1 )
= r & (
[r, S]
`2 )
= S & (
[s, S]
`1 )
= s & (
[s, S]
`2 )
= S & (
[r2, S2]
`1 )
= r2 & (
[r2, S2]
`2 )
= S2 & (
[s2, S2]
`1 )
= s2 & (
[s2, S2]
`2 )
= S2;
thus (
CQC_Sub
[(r
'&' s), S])
= (
CQC_Sub (
CQCSub_& (
[r, S],
[s, S]))) by
SUBSTUT2: 19
.= (Al2
-Cast ((
CQC_Sub
[r, S])
'&' (
CQC_Sub
[s, S]))) by
A25,
SUBLEMMA: 23
.= ((Al2
-Cast (
CQC_Sub
[r, S]))
'&' (Al2
-Cast (
CQC_Sub
[s, S])))
.= (
CQC_Sub (
CQCSub_& (
[r2, S2],
[s2, S2]))) by
A24,
A25,
SUBLEMMA: 23
.= (
CQC_Sub
[(r2
'&' s2), S2]) by
SUBSTUT2: 19
.= (
CQC_Sub
[p2, S2]) by
A23;
end;
for z be
bound_QC-variable of Al, q st
P[q] holds
P[(
All (z,q))]
proof
let z be
bound_QC-variable of Al, q such that
A26:
P[q];
set p = (
All (z,q));
set q2 = (Al2
-Cast q);
set z2 = (Al2
-Cast z);
reconsider p as
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al);
let p2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2), S be
CQC_Substitution of Al, S2 be
CQC_Substitution of Al2 such that
A27: (
All (z,q))
= p2 & S
= S2;
set qsc = (
Qsc (q,z,S));
set qsc2 = (
Qsc (q2,z2,S2));
set sub =
[(
All (z,q)), S];
set sub2 =
[(
All (z2,q2)), S2];
set qscope =
[q, ((
CFQ Al)
. sub)];
set qscope2 =
[q2, ((
CFQ Al2)
. sub2)];
A28: (
QScope (q,z,S))
=
[qscope, z] by
SUBSTUT2:def 3;
reconsider qscope as
Element of (
CQC-Sub-WFF Al);
reconsider qsc as
second_Q_comp of
[qscope, z] by
SUBSTUT2:def 3;
A29: (
QScope (q2,z2,S2))
=
[qscope2, z2] by
SUBSTUT2:def 3;
reconsider qscope2 as
Element of (
CQC-Sub-WFF Al2);
reconsider qsc2 as
second_Q_comp of
[qscope2, z2] by
SUBSTUT2:def 3;
A30: sub
= (
CQCSub_All (
[qscope, z],qsc)) &
[qscope, z] is
quantifiable & sub2
= (
CQCSub_All (
[qscope2, z2],qsc2)) &
[qscope2, z2] is
quantifiable by
A28,
A29,
SUBSTUT2: 22;
set expandsub = (
ExpandSub (z,q,(
RestrictSub (z,(
All (z,q)),S))));
set expandsub2 = (
ExpandSub (z2,q2,(
RestrictSub (z2,(
All (z2,q2)),S2))));
A31: (
All (z,q)) is
universal & (
All (z2,q2)) is
universal;
then z
= (
bound_in (
All (z,q))) & q
= (
the_scope_of (
All (z,q))) & z2
= (
bound_in (
All (z2,q2))) & q2
= (
the_scope_of (
All (z2,q2))) by
QC_LANG1:def 27,
QC_LANG1:def 28;
then ((
All (z,q)),S)
PQSub expandsub & ((
All (z2,q2)),S2)
PQSub expandsub2 by
A31,
SUBSTUT1:def 14;
then
[sub, expandsub]
in (
QSub Al) &
[sub2, expandsub2]
in (
QSub Al2) by
SUBSTUT1:def 15;
then
[sub, expandsub]
in ((
QSub Al)
| (
CQC-Sub-WFF Al)) &
[sub2, expandsub2]
in ((
QSub Al2)
| (
CQC-Sub-WFF Al2)) by
RELAT_1:def 11;
then
A32:
[sub, expandsub]
in (
CFQ Al) &
[sub2, expandsub2]
in (
CFQ Al2) by
SUBSTUT2:def 2;
set scope = (
CQCSub_the_scope_of sub);
set scope2 = (
CQCSub_the_scope_of sub2);
A33: (
bound_in (sub
`1 ))
= z by
A31,
QC_LANG1:def 27
.= (
bound_in (sub2
`1 )) by
A31,
QC_LANG1:def 27;
A34: (
the_scope_of (sub
`1 ))
= q by
A31,
QC_LANG1:def 28
.= (
the_scope_of (sub2
`1 )) by
A31,
QC_LANG1:def 28;
A35: expandsub
= expandsub2 by
A27,
Th15;
A36: (
CQC_Sub qscope)
= (
CQC_Sub
[q, expandsub]) by
A32,
FUNCT_1: 1
.= (
CQC_Sub qscope2) by
A26,
A32,
A35,
FUNCT_1: 1;
(
CQC_Sub
[p, S])
= (
CQCQuant (sub,(
CQC_Sub scope))) by
A30,
SUBLEMMA: 27,
SUBLEMMA: 28
.= (
Quant (sub,(
CQC_Sub scope))) by
A30,
SUBLEMMA: 27,
SUBLEMMA:def 7
.= (
All ((
S_Bound (
@ sub)),(
CQC_Sub scope))) by
SUBSTUT1:def 37
.= (Al2
-Cast (
All ((
S_Bound (
@ sub)),(
CQC_Sub qscope)))) by
A30,
SUBLEMMA: 30
.= (
All ((
S_Bound (
@ sub2)),(
CQC_Sub qscope2))) by
A36,
A27,
A31,
A33,
A34,
Th16
.= (
All ((
S_Bound (
@ sub2)),(
CQC_Sub scope2))) by
A30,
SUBLEMMA: 30
.= (
Quant (sub2,(
CQC_Sub scope2))) by
SUBSTUT1:def 37
.= (
CQCQuant (sub2,(
CQC_Sub scope2))) by
A30,
SUBLEMMA: 27,
SUBLEMMA:def 7
.= (
CQC_Sub
[p2, S2]) by
A27,
A30,
SUBLEMMA: 27,
SUBLEMMA: 28;
hence thesis;
end;
then
A37: for r, s, x, k, l, P holds
P[(
VERUM Al)] &
P[(P
! l)] & (
P[r] implies
P[(
'not' r)]) & (
P[r] &
P[s] implies
P[(r
'&' s)]) & (
P[r] implies
P[(
All (x,r))]) by
A1,
A5,
A17,
A21;
A38: for p be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al) holds
P[p] from
CQC_LANG:sch 1(
A37);
let p2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2), x2,y2 be
bound_QC-variable of Al2, p, x, y such that
A39: p
= p2 & x
= x2 & y
= y2;
thus (p
. (x,y))
= (
CQC_Sub
[p, (
Sbst (x,y))]) by
SUBSTUT2:def 1
.= (
CQC_Sub
[p2, (
Sbst (x2,y2))]) by
A38,
A39
.= (p2
. (x2,y2)) by
SUBSTUT2:def 1;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:18
Th18: for PHI be
Consistent
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al2) st PHI is
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al) holds PHI is Al
-Consistent
proof
let PHI be
Consistent
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that PHI is
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al);
for S be
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al) st PHI
= S holds S is
Consistent
proof
let S be
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al) such that
A1: PHI
= S;
assume
A2: S is
Inconsistent;
PHI
|- (
'not' (
VERUM Al2))
proof
consider f be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al) such that
A3: (
rng f)
c= S &
|- (f
^
<*(
'not' (
VERUM Al))*>) by
A2,
GOEDELCP: 24,
HENMODEL:def 1;
set f2 = f;
for x be
object st x
in (
rng f2) holds x
in (
CQC-WFF Al2)
proof
let x be
object such that
A4: x
in (
rng f2);
x
in PHI by
A1,
A3,
A4;
hence x
in (
CQC-WFF Al2);
end;
then
reconsider f2 as
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 4,
TARSKI:def 3;
consider PR such that
A5: PR is
a_proof & (f
^
<*(
'not' (
VERUM Al))*>)
= ((PR
. (
len PR))
`1 ) by
A3,
CALCUL_1:def 9;
A6: PR
<>
{} & for n be
Nat st 1
<= n & n
<= (
len PR) holds (PR,n)
is_a_correct_step by
A5,
CALCUL_1:def 8;
set PR2 = PR;
PR2 is
FinSequence of
[:(
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2),
Proof_Step_Kinds :]
proof
for p be
object holds p
in (
CQC-WFF Al) implies p
in (
CQC-WFF Al2)
proof
let p be
object;
assume p
in (
CQC-WFF Al);
then p is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
Th7;
hence thesis;
end;
then
A7: (
CQC-WFF Al)
c= (
CQC-WFF Al2) & (
rng PR2)
c=
[:(
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al),
Proof_Step_Kinds :];
for x be
object holds x
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al) implies x
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al);
then
reconsider x as
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al) by
CALCUL_1:def 6;
(
rng x)
c= (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
A7;
then x is
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
CALCUL_1:def 6;
end;
then (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al)
c= (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2);
then
[:(
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al),
Proof_Step_Kinds :]
c=
[:(
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2),
Proof_Step_Kinds :] by
ZFMISC_1: 95;
then (
rng PR2)
c=
[:(
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2),
Proof_Step_Kinds :];
hence thesis by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
end;
then
reconsider PR2 as
FinSequence of
[:(
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2),
Proof_Step_Kinds :];
A8: PR2 is
a_proof
proof
for n be
Nat st 1
<= n & n
<= (
len PR2) holds (PR2,n)
is_a_correct_step
proof
let n be
Nat such that
A9: 1
<= n & n
<= (
len PR2);
A10: (for i st 1
<= i & i
< n holds ((PR2
. i)
`1 )
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2)) & (((PR2
. n)
`1 )
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2))
proof
thus for i st 1
<= i & i
< n holds ((PR2
. i)
`1 )
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2)
proof
let i such that
A11: 1
<= i & i
< n;
set k = ((
len PR2)
- n);
reconsider k as
Element of
NAT by
A9,
NAT_1: 21;
(
len PR2)
= (n
+ k);
then
A12: 1
<= i & i
<= (
len PR2) by
A11,
NAT_1: 12;
(
dom PR2)
= (
Seg (
len PR2)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then i
in (
dom PR2) by
A12,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (PR2
. i)
in (
rng PR2) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence ((PR2
. i)
`1 )
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2) by
MCART_1: 10;
end;
(
dom PR2)
= (
Seg (
len PR2)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then n
in (
dom PR2) by
A9,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (PR2
. n)
in (
rng PR2) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence ((PR2
. n)
`1 )
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2) by
MCART_1: 10;
end;
A13: (PR,n)
is_a_correct_step by
A5,
CALCUL_1:def 8,
A9;
((PR
. n)
`2 )
=
0 or ... or ((PR
. n)
`2 )
= 9 by
CALCUL_1: 31,
A9;
per cases ;
suppose
A14: ((PR2
. n)
`2 )
=
0 ;
then
consider g2 be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al) such that
A15: ((
Suc g2)
is_tail_of (
Ant g2) & ((PR2
. n)
`1 )
= g2) by
A13,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
g2 is
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
A10,
A15,
CALCUL_1:def 6;
then
consider g be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A16: g
= g2;
A17: (
Suc g)
= (
Suc g2) & (
Ant g)
= (
Ant g2) by
A16,
Th11;
thus thesis by
A14,
A15,
A16,
A17,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
end;
suppose
A18: ((PR2
. n)
`2 )
= 1;
then
consider g2 be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al) such that
A19: (((PR
. n)
`1 )
= (g2
^
<*(
VERUM Al)*>)) by
A13,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
(g2
^
<*(
VERUM Al)*>) is
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
A10,
A19,
CALCUL_1:def 6;
then
consider gp be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A20: gp
= (g2
^
<*(
VERUM Al)*>);
(
len gp)
<>
0 by
A20;
then
consider g be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2), v be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A21: gp
= (g
^
<*v*>) by
FINSEQ_2: 19;
v
= (
VERUM Al2) by
A20,
A21,
FINSEQ_2: 17;
hence thesis by
A18,
A19,
A20,
A21,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
end;
suppose
A22: ((PR2
. n)
`2 )
= 2;
then
consider i be
Nat, g2,h2 be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al) such that
A23: (1
<= i & i
< n & (
Ant g2)
is_Subsequence_of (
Ant h2) & (
Suc g2)
= (
Suc h2) & ((PR2
. i)
`1 )
= g2 & ((PR2
. n)
`1 )
= h2) by
A13,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
g2
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2) & h2
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2) by
A10,
A23;
then h2 is
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) & g2 is
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
CALCUL_1:def 6;
then
consider g,h be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A24: g
= g2 & h
= h2;
A25: (
Suc g)
= (
Suc g2) by
A24,
Th11
.= (
Suc h) by
A23,
A24,
Th11;
consider N be
Subset of
NAT such that
A26: (
Ant g2)
c= (
Seq ((
Ant h2)
| N)) by
A23,
CALCUL_1:def 4;
((
Ant h2)
| N)
= ((
Ant h)
| N) by
A24,
Th11;
then (
Ant g)
c= (
Seq ((
Ant h)
| N)) by
A24,
A26,
Th11;
then
A27: (
Ant g)
is_Subsequence_of (
Ant h) by
CALCUL_1:def 4;
thus thesis by
A22,
A23,
A24,
A25,
A27,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
end;
suppose
A28: ((PR2
. n)
`2 )
= 3;
then
consider i,j be
Nat, g,h be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al) such that
A29: (1
<= i & i
< n & 1
<= j & j
< i & (
len g)
> 1 & (
len h)
> 1 & (
Ant (
Ant g))
= (
Ant (
Ant h)) & (
'not' (
Suc (
Ant g)))
= (
Suc (
Ant h)) & (
Suc g)
= (
Suc h) & g
= ((PR2
. j)
`1 ) & h
= ((PR2
. i)
`1 ) & ((
Ant (
Ant g))
^
<*(
Suc g)*>)
= ((PR2
. n)
`1 )) by
A13,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
((PR2
. j)
`1 )
= g & ((PR2
. i)
`1 )
= h & j
< n by
A29,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then g
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2) & h
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2) by
A10,
A29;
then h is
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) & g is
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
CALCUL_1:def 6;
then
consider g2,h2 be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A30: g2
= g & h2
= h;
A31: (
Ant g2)
= (
Ant g) & (
Ant h2)
= (
Ant h) by
A30,
Th11;
then
A32: (
Ant (
Ant g2))
= (
Ant (
Ant g)) by
Th11
.= (
Ant (
Ant h2)) by
A29,
A31,
Th11;
A33: (
'not' (
Suc (
Ant g2)))
= (
'not' (Al2
-Cast (
Suc (
Ant g)))) by
A31,
Th11
.= (
Suc (
Ant h2)) by
A29,
A31,
Th11;
A34: (
Suc g2)
= (
Suc g) by
A30,
Th11
.= (
Suc h2) by
A29,
A30,
Th11;
A35: ((PR2
. n)
`1 )
= ((
Ant (
Ant g))
^
<*(
Suc g2)*>) by
A29,
A30,
Th11
.= ((
Ant (
Ant g2))
^
<*(
Suc g2)*>) by
A31,
Th11;
thus thesis by
A28,
A29,
A30,
A32,
A33,
A34,
A35,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
end;
suppose
A36: ((PR2
. n)
`2 )
= 4;
then
consider i,j be
Nat, g,h be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al), p be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al) such that
A37: (1
<= i & i
< n & 1
<= j & j
< i & (
len g)
> 1 & (
Ant g)
= (
Ant h) & (
Suc (
Ant g))
= (
'not' p) & (
'not' (
Suc g))
= (
Suc h) & g
= ((PR2
. j)
`1 ) & h
= ((PR2
. i)
`1 ) & ((
Ant (
Ant g))
^
<*p*>)
= ((PR2
. n)
`1 )) by
A13,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
((PR2
. j)
`1 )
= g & ((PR2
. i)
`1 )
= h & j
< n by
A37,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then g
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2) & h
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2) by
A10,
A37;
then h is
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) & g is
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
CALCUL_1:def 6;
then
consider g2,h2 be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A38: g2
= g & h2
= h;
A39: (
Ant g2)
= (
Ant g) by
A38,
Th11
.= (
Ant h2) by
A37,
A38,
Th11;
(
Ant g2)
= (
Ant g) by
A38,
Th11;
then
A40: (
Suc (
Ant g2))
= (
'not' (Al2
-Cast p)) by
A37,
Th11;
A41: (
'not' (
Suc g2))
= (
'not' (Al2
-Cast (
Suc g))) by
A38,
Th11
.= (
Suc h2) by
A37,
A38,
Th11;
(
Ant g2)
= (
Ant g) by
A38,
Th11;
then ((
Ant (
Ant g2))
^
<*(Al2
-Cast p)*>)
= ((PR2
. n)
`1 ) by
Th11,
A37;
hence thesis by
A36,
A37,
A38,
A39,
A40,
A41,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
end;
suppose
A42: ((PR2
. n)
`2 )
= 5;
then
consider i,j be
Nat, g,h be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al) such that
A43: (1
<= i & i
< n & 1
<= j & j
< i & (
Ant g)
= (
Ant h) & g
= ((PR2
. j)
`1 ) & h
= ((PR2
. i)
`1 ) & ((
Ant g)
^
<*((
Suc g)
'&' (
Suc h))*>)
= ((PR2
. n)
`1 )) by
A13,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
((PR2
. j)
`1 )
= g & ((PR2
. i)
`1 )
= h & j
< n by
A43,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then g
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2) & h
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2) by
A10,
A43;
then h is
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) & g is
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
CALCUL_1:def 6;
then
consider g2,h2 be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A44: g
= g2 & h
= h2;
(Al2
-Cast (
Suc g))
= (
Suc g2) & (Al2
-Cast (
Suc h))
= (
Suc h2) by
A44,
Th11;
then
A45: ((
Ant g2)
^
<*((
Suc g2)
'&' (
Suc h2))*>)
= ((PR2
. n)
`1 ) by
A43,
A44,
Th11;
(
Ant g2)
= (
Ant g) by
A44,
Th11
.= (
Ant h2) by
A43,
A44,
Th11;
hence thesis by
A42,
A43,
A44,
A45,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
end;
suppose
A46: ((PR2
. n)
`2 )
= 6;
then
consider i be
Nat, g be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al), p,q be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al) such that
A47: (1
<= i & i
< n & (p
'&' q)
= (
Suc g) & g
= ((PR2
. i)
`1 ) & ((
Ant g)
^
<*p*>)
= ((PR2
. n)
`1 )) by
A13,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
g
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2) by
A10,
A47;
then g is
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
CALCUL_1:def 6;
then
consider g2 be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A48: g
= g2;
A49: (
Suc g2)
= ((Al2
-Cast p)
'&' (Al2
-Cast q)) by
A47,
A48,
Th11;
((
Ant g2)
^
<*p*>)
= ((PR2
. n)
`1 ) by
A47,
A48,
Th11;
hence thesis by
A46,
A47,
A48,
A49,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
end;
suppose
A50: ((PR2
. n)
`2 )
= 7;
then
consider i be
Nat, g be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al), p,q be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al) such that
A51: (1
<= i & i
< n & (p
'&' q)
= (
Suc g) & g
= ((PR2
. i)
`1 ) & ((
Ant g)
^
<*q*>)
= ((PR2
. n)
`1 )) by
A13,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
g
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2) by
A10,
A51;
then g is
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
CALCUL_1:def 6;
then
reconsider g2 = g as
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2);
A52: (
Suc g2)
= ((Al2
-Cast p)
'&' (Al2
-Cast q)) by
A51,
Th11;
((
Ant g2)
^
<*(Al2
-Cast q)*>)
= ((PR2
. n)
`1 ) by
A51,
Th11;
hence thesis by
A50,
A51,
A52,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
end;
suppose
A53: ((PR2
. n)
`2 )
= 8;
then
consider i be
Nat, g be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al), p be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al), x,y be
bound_QC-variable of Al such that
A54: (1
<= i & i
< n & (
Suc g)
= (
All (x,p)) & g
= ((PR2
. i)
`1 ) & ((
Ant g)
^
<*(p
. (x,y))*>)
= ((PR2
. n)
`1 )) by
A13,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
g
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2) by
A10,
A54;
then g is
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
CALCUL_1:def 6;
then
consider g2 be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A55: g
= g2;
p is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) & x is
bound_QC-variable of Al2 & y is
bound_QC-variable of Al2 by
Th4,
Th7,
TARSKI:def 3;
then
consider q be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2), a,b be
bound_QC-variable of Al2 such that
A56: a
= x & b
= y & q
= p;
A57: ((PR2
. n)
`1 )
= ((
Ant g)
^
<*(q
. (a,b))*>) by
A54,
A56,
Th17
.= ((
Ant g2)
^
<*(q
. (a,b))*>) by
A55,
Th11;
(
Suc g2)
= (
All (a,q)) by
A54,
A55,
A56,
Th11;
hence thesis by
A53,
A54,
A55,
A57,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
end;
suppose
A58: ((PR2
. n)
`2 )
= 9;
then
consider i be
Nat, g be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al), p be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al), x,y be
bound_QC-variable of Al such that
A59: (1
<= i & i
< n & (
Suc g)
= (p
. (x,y)) & not y
in (
still_not-bound_in (
Ant g)) & not y
in (
still_not-bound_in (
All (x,p))) & g
= ((PR2
. i)
`1 ) & ((
Ant g)
^
<*(
All (x,p))*>)
= ((PR2
. n)
`1 )) by
A13,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
g
in (
set_of_CQC-WFF-seq Al2) by
A10,
A59;
then g is
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
CALCUL_1:def 6;
then
consider g2 be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A60: g
= g2;
p is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) & x is
bound_QC-variable of Al2 & y is
bound_QC-variable of Al2 by
Th4,
Th7,
TARSKI:def 3;
then
consider q be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2), a,b be
bound_QC-variable of Al2 such that
A61: q
= p & a
= x & b
= y;
A62: (
Suc g2)
= (
Suc g) by
A60,
Th11
.= (q
. (a,b)) by
A59,
A61,
Th17;
A63: (
still_not-bound_in (
All (x,p)))
= (
still_not-bound_in (Al2
-Cast (
All (x,p)))) by
Th12
.= (
still_not-bound_in (
All (a,q))) by
A61;
A64: not b
in (
still_not-bound_in (
Ant g2))
proof
assume b
in (
still_not-bound_in (
Ant g2));
then
consider i be
Nat, r be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A65: i
in (
dom (
Ant g2)) & r
= ((
Ant g2)
. i) & b
in (
still_not-bound_in r) by
CALCUL_1:def 5;
A66: (
dom (
Ant g2))
= (
dom (
Ant g)) by
A60,
Th11;
r
= ((
Ant g)
. i) by
A60,
A65,
Th11;
then
reconsider r as
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al) by
A65,
A66,
FINSEQ_2: 11;
i
in (
dom (
Ant g)) & (Al2
-Cast r)
= ((
Ant g)
. i) & b
in (
still_not-bound_in (Al2
-Cast r)) by
A60,
A65,
Th11;
then i
in (
dom (
Ant g)) & r
= ((
Ant g)
. i) & y
in (
still_not-bound_in r) by
A61,
Th12;
hence contradiction by
A59,
CALCUL_1:def 5;
end;
((
Ant g2)
^
<*(
All (a,q))*>)
= ((PR2
. n)
`1 ) by
A59,
A60,
A61,
Th11;
hence thesis by
A58,
A59,
A60,
A61,
A62,
A63,
A64,
CALCUL_1:def 7;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A6,
CALCUL_1:def 8;
end;
|- (f2
^
<*(
'not' (
VERUM Al2))*>) by
A5,
A8,
CALCUL_1:def 9;
hence thesis by
A1,
A3,
HENMODEL:def 1;
end;
hence contradiction by
GOEDELCP: 24;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
begin
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:19
Th19: for p holds ex Al1 be
countable
QC-alphabet st p is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al1) & Al is Al1
-expanding
proof
defpred
P[
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al)] means ex Al1 be
countable
QC-alphabet st $1 is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al1) & Al is Al1
-expanding;
A1:
P[(
VERUM Al)]
proof
set Al1 =
[:
NAT ,
NAT :];
reconsider Al1 as
countable
QC-alphabet by
QC_LANG1:def 1,
CARD_4: 7;
NAT
c= (
QC-symbols Al) & Al
=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al):] by
QC_LANG1: 3,
QC_LANG1: 5;
then Al1
c= Al by
ZFMISC_1: 95;
then
reconsider Al as Al1
-expanding
QC-alphabet by
Def1;
(
VERUM Al1)
= (
VERUM Al);
hence thesis;
end;
A2: for k, P, l holds
P[(P
! l)]
proof
let k, P, l;
(
bound_QC-variables Al)
c= (
QC-variables Al) & (
QC-variables Al)
c=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al):] by
QC_LANG1: 4;
then (
bound_QC-variables Al)
c=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al):];
then
consider A,B be
set such that
A3: A is
finite & A
c=
NAT & B is
finite & B
c= (
QC-symbols Al) & (
rng l)
c=
[:A, B:] by
FINSET_1: 13,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
[:A, B:]
c=
[:
NAT , B:] by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 95;
then
A4: (
rng l)
c=
[:
NAT , B:] by
A3;
set Al1 = ((
[:
NAT ,
NAT :]
\/
[:
NAT ,
{(P
`2 )}:])
\/
[:
NAT , B:]);
[:
NAT ,
NAT :] is
countable &
[:
NAT ,
{(P
`2 )}:] is
countable by
CARD_4: 7;
then
A5: (
[:
NAT ,
NAT :]
\/
[:
NAT ,
{(P
`2 )}:]) is
countable &
[:
NAT , B:] is
countable by
A3,
CARD_2: 85,
CARD_4: 7;
A6: Al1
= (
[:
NAT , (
NAT
\/
{(P
`2 )}):]
\/
[:
NAT , B:]) by
ZFMISC_1: 97
.=
[:
NAT , ((
NAT
\/
{(P
`2 )})
\/ B):] by
ZFMISC_1: 97;
NAT
c= (
NAT
\/
{(P
`2 )}) & (
NAT
\/
{(P
`2 )})
c= ((
NAT
\/
{(P
`2 )})
\/ B) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then
reconsider Al1 as
countable
QC-alphabet by
A5,
A6,
QC_LANG1:def 1,
CARD_2: 85,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
P
in
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al):] by
TARSKI:def 3,
QC_LANG1: 6;
then
consider a,b be
object such that
A7: a
in
NAT & b
in (
QC-symbols Al) & P
=
[a, b] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
(P
`2 )
in (
QC-symbols Al) by
A7;
then
{(P
`2 )}
c= (
QC-symbols Al) &
NAT
c=
NAT &
NAT
c= (
QC-symbols Al) by
QC_LANG1: 3,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
[:
NAT ,
{(P
`2 )}:]
c=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al):] &
[:
NAT ,
NAT :]
c=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al):] by
ZFMISC_1: 95;
then (
[:
NAT ,
NAT :]
\/
[:
NAT ,
{(P
`2 )}:])
c=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al):] &
[:
NAT , B:]
c=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al):] by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 95,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
then Al1
c=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al):] by
XBOOLE_1: 8;
then Al1
c= Al by
QC_LANG1: 5;
then
reconsider Al as Al1
-expanding
QC-alphabet by
Def1;
[:
NAT , ((
NAT
\/
{(P
`2 )})
\/ B):]
=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al1):] by
A6,
QC_LANG1: 5;
then
A8: (
QC-symbols Al1)
= ((
NAT
\/
{(P
`2 )})
\/ B) by
ZFMISC_1: 110;
set P2 =
[a, b];
b
= (P
`2 ) by
A7;
then b
in
{(P
`2 )} by
TARSKI:def 1;
then b
in (
NAT
\/
{(P
`2 )}) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
reconsider b as
QC-symbol of Al1 by
A8,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
reconsider a as
Element of
NAT by
A7;
A9: (P
`1 )
= (7
+ (
the_arity_of P)) & (P
`1 )
= a by
A7,
QC_LANG1:def 8;
then 7
<= a by
NAT_1: 11;
then
[a, b]
in {
[n, x] where x be
QC-symbol of Al1 : 7
<= n };
then
reconsider P2 as
QC-pred_symbol of Al1;
(P2
`1 )
= (7
+ k) by
A9,
QC_LANG1: 11;
then (
the_arity_of P2)
= k by
QC_LANG1:def 8;
then P2
in { Q where Q be
QC-pred_symbol of Al1 : (
the_arity_of Q)
= k };
then
reconsider P2 as
QC-pred_symbol of k, Al1;
set l2 = l;
for s be
object st s
in (
rng l2) holds s
in (
bound_QC-variables Al1)
proof
let s be
object such that
A10: s
in (
rng l2);
consider s1,s2 be
object such that
A11: s1
in
{4} & s2
in (
QC-symbols Al) & s
=
[s1, s2] by
A10,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
B
c= (
QC-symbols Al1) by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then
A12:
[:
NAT , B:]
c=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al1):] by
ZFMISC_1: 95;
s
in
[:
NAT , B:] by
A4,
A10;
then
consider s3,s4 be
object such that
A13: s3
in
NAT & s4
in (
QC-symbols Al1) & s
=
[s3, s4] by
A12,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
s
=
[s1, s4] by
A11,
A13,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence thesis by
A11,
A13,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
end;
then
A14: (
rng l2)
c= (
bound_QC-variables Al1);
reconsider l2 as
CQC-variable_list of k, Al1 by
A14,
FINSEQ_1:def 4,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
(P2
! l2)
= (Al
-Cast (P2
! l2))
.= ((Al
-Cast P2)
! (Al
-Cast l2)) by
Th8
.= (P
! l) by
A7;
then (P
! l) is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al1) & Al is Al1
-expanding;
hence thesis;
end;
A15: for r st
P[r] holds
P[(
'not' r)]
proof
let r such that
A16:
P[r];
consider Al1 be
countable
QC-alphabet such that
A17: r is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al1) & Al is Al1
-expanding by
A16;
reconsider Al as Al1
-expanding
QC-alphabet by
A17;
consider r2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al1) such that
A18: r
= r2 by
A17;
(
'not' r2)
= (
'not' r) by
A18;
hence thesis by
A17;
end;
A19: for r, s st
P[r] &
P[s] holds
P[(r
'&' s)]
proof
let r, s such that
A20:
P[r] &
P[s];
consider Al1,Al2 be
countable
QC-alphabet such that
A21: r is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al1) & s is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) & Al is Al1
-expanding & Al is Al2
-expanding by
A20;
set Al3 = (Al1
\/ Al2);
Al1
=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al1):] & Al2
=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al2):] by
QC_LANG1: 5;
then
A22: Al3
=
[:
NAT , ((
QC-symbols Al1)
\/ (
QC-symbols Al2)):] by
ZFMISC_1: 97;
NAT
c= ((
QC-symbols Al1)
\/ (
QC-symbols Al2)) by
XBOOLE_1: 10,
QC_LANG1: 3;
then
reconsider Al3 as
QC-alphabet by
A22,
QC_LANG1:def 1;
reconsider Al3 as
countableAl1
-expandingAl2
-expanding
QC-alphabet by
Def1,
CARD_2: 85,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
consider r2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al1), s2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A23: r2
= r & s2
= s by
A21;
reconsider r2 as
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al3) by
Th7;
reconsider s2 as
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al3) by
Th7;
Al1
c= Al & Al2
c= Al by
A21;
then
reconsider Al as Al3
-expanding
QC-alphabet by
Def1,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
(r2
'&' s2)
= (r
'&' s) by
A23;
then (r
'&' s) is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al3) & Al is Al3
-expanding;
hence thesis;
end;
for x, r st
P[r] holds
P[(
All (x,r))]
proof
let x, r such that
A24:
P[r];
consider Al1 be
countable
QC-alphabet such that
A25: r is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al1) & Al is Al1
-expanding by
A24;
consider s1,s2 be
object such that
A26: s1
in
{4} & s2
in (
QC-symbols Al) & x
=
[s1, s2] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
set Al2 =
[:
NAT , ((
QC-symbols Al1)
\/
{s2}):];
A27: Al1
=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al1):] & (
QC-symbols Al1)
c= ((
QC-symbols Al1)
\/
{s2}) &
NAT
c= (
QC-symbols Al1) by
QC_LANG1: 3,
QC_LANG1: 5,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then Al1
c= Al2 &
NAT
c= ((
QC-symbols Al1)
\/
{s2}) by
ZFMISC_1: 95;
then
reconsider Al2 as Al1
-expanding
QC-alphabet by
Def1,
QC_LANG1:def 1;
A28: Al2
= (
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al1):]
\/
[:
NAT ,
{s2}:]) &
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al1):]
c= Al by
A25,
A27,
ZFMISC_1: 97;
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al1):] is
countable &
[:
NAT ,
{s2}:] is
countable by
QC_LANG1: 5,
CARD_4: 7;
then
reconsider Al2 as
countableAl1
-expanding
QC-alphabet by
A28,
CARD_2: 85;
{s2}
c= (
QC-symbols Al) by
A26,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
[:
NAT ,
{s2}:]
c=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al):] & Al
=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al):] by
QC_LANG1: 5,
ZFMISC_1: 96;
then
reconsider Al as Al2
-expanding
QC-alphabet by
Def1,
A28,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
consider r2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al1) such that
A29: r
= r2 by
A25;
reconsider r2 as
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) by
Th7;
A30: x
=
[4, s2] by
A26,
TARSKI:def 1;
Al2
=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al2):] by
QC_LANG1: 5;
then (
QC-symbols Al2)
= ((
QC-symbols Al1)
\/
{s2}) & s2
in
{s2} by
TARSKI:def 1,
ZFMISC_1: 110;
then s2
in (
QC-symbols Al2) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then x is
bound_QC-variable of Al2 by
A30,
ZFMISC_1: 105;
then
consider x2 be
bound_QC-variable of Al2 such that
A31: x
= x2;
(
All (x2,r2))
= (
All (x,r)) by
A29,
A31;
then (
All (x,r)) is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) & Al is Al2
-expanding;
hence thesis;
end;
then
A32: for r, s, x, k, l, P holds
P[(
VERUM Al)] &
P[(P
! l)] & (
P[r] implies
P[(
'not' r)]) & (
P[r] &
P[s] implies
P[(r
'&' s)]) & (
P[r] implies
P[(
All (x,r))]) by
A1,
A2,
A15,
A19;
for p holds
P[p] from
CQC_LANG:sch 1(
A32);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:20
Th20: for PHI be
finite
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al) holds ex Al1 be
countable
QC-alphabet st PHI is
finite
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al1) & Al is Al1
-expanding
proof
let PHI be
finite
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al);
defpred
P[
set] means $1 is
finite
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al) implies ex Al1 be
countable
QC-alphabet st $1 is
finite
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al1) & Al is Al1
-expanding;
A1: PHI is
finite;
A2:
P[
{} ]
proof
set Al1 =
[:
NAT ,
NAT :];
reconsider Al1 as
countable
QC-alphabet by
QC_LANG1:def 1,
CARD_4: 7;
Al
=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al):] &
NAT
c= (
QC-symbols Al) by
QC_LANG1: 3,
QC_LANG1: 5;
then Al is Al1
-expanding &
{} is
finite
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al1) by
XBOOLE_1: 2,
ZFMISC_1: 96;
hence thesis;
end;
A3: for x,B be
set st x
in PHI & B
c= PHI &
P[B] holds
P[(B
\/
{x})]
proof
let x,B be
set such that
A4: x
in PHI & B
c= PHI &
P[B];
reconsider x as
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al) by
A4;
reconsider B as
finite
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al) by
A4,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
consider Al1 be
countable
QC-alphabet such that
A5: x is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al1) & Al is Al1
-expanding by
Th19;
consider Al2 be
countable
QC-alphabet such that
A6: B is
finite
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al2) & Al is Al2
-expanding by
A4;
set Al3 = (Al1
\/ Al2);
Al1
=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al1):] & Al2
=
[:
NAT , (
QC-symbols Al2):] by
QC_LANG1: 5;
then
A7: Al3
=
[:
NAT , ((
QC-symbols Al1)
\/ (
QC-symbols Al2)):] by
ZFMISC_1: 97;
NAT
c= ((
QC-symbols Al1)
\/ (
QC-symbols Al2)) by
QC_LANG1: 3,
XBOOLE_1: 10;
then
reconsider Al3 as
QC-alphabet by
A7,
QC_LANG1:def 1;
reconsider Al3 as
countableAl1
-expandingAl2
-expanding
QC-alphabet by
Def1,
CARD_2: 85,
XBOOLE_1: 7;
consider x2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al1) such that
A8: x
= x2 by
A5;
for s be
object st s
in B holds s
in (
CQC-WFF Al3)
proof
let s be
object such that
A9: s
in B;
consider s2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A10: s
= s2 by
A6,
A9;
s2 is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al3) by
Th7;
hence s
in (
CQC-WFF Al3) by
A10;
end;
then x2 is
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al3) & B
c= (
CQC-WFF Al3) by
Th7;
then
{x2}
c= (
CQC-WFF Al3) & B
c= (
CQC-WFF Al3) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
A11: (B
\/
{x})
c= (
CQC-WFF Al3) by
A8,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
Al1
c= Al & Al2
c= Al by
A5,
A6;
then Al is Al3
-expanding
QC-alphabet by
Def1,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
hence thesis by
A11;
end;
P[PHI] from
FINSET_1:sch 2(
A1,
A2,
A3);
hence thesis;
end;
registration
let Al;
let PHI be
finite
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al);
cluster (
still_not-bound_in PHI) ->
finite;
coherence
proof
deffunc
snb(
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al)) = (
still_not-bound_in $1);
A1: for x be
set st x
in {
snb(p) : p
in PHI } holds x is
finite
proof
let x be
set such that
A2: x
in { (
still_not-bound_in p) : p
in PHI };
ex p st x
= (
still_not-bound_in p) & p
in PHI by
A2;
hence x is
finite by
CQC_SIM1: 19;
end;
A3: PHI is
finite;
{
snb(p) : p
in PHI } is
finite from
FRAENKEL:sch 21(
A3);
then (
union {
snb(p) : p
in PHI }) is
finite by
A1,
FINSET_1: 7;
hence (
still_not-bound_in PHI) is
finite by
GOEDELCP:def 8;
end;
end
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:21
Th21: for THETA be
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al2) st PHI
= THETA holds for A, J, v st (J,v)
|= PHI holds ex A2 be non
empty
set, J2 be
interpretation of Al2, A2, v2 be
Element of (
Valuations_in (Al2,A2)) st (J2,v2)
|= THETA
proof
let THETA be
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A1: PHI
= THETA;
let A, J, v such that
A2: (J,v)
|= PHI;
set J2 = (((
QC-pred_symbols Al2)
--> (
empty_rel A))
+* J);
A3: (
dom J)
= (
QC-pred_symbols Al) & (
dom ((
QC-pred_symbols Al2)
--> (
empty_rel A)))
= (
QC-pred_symbols Al2) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (
dom J2)
= ((
QC-pred_symbols Al)
\/ (
QC-pred_symbols Al2)) by
FUNCT_4:def 1;
then
A4: (
dom J2)
= (
QC-pred_symbols Al2) by
Th3,
XBOOLE_1: 12;
J
in (
Funcs ((
QC-pred_symbols Al),(
relations_on A))) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
then (
rng J)
c= (
relations_on A) by
FUNCT_2: 92;
then ((
rng ((
QC-pred_symbols Al2)
--> (
empty_rel A)))
\/ (
rng J))
c= (
relations_on A) & (
rng J2)
c= ((
rng ((
QC-pred_symbols Al2)
--> (
empty_rel A)))
\/ (
rng J)) by
FUNCT_4: 17,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
then
reconsider J2 as
Function of (
QC-pred_symbols Al2), (
relations_on A) by
A4,
FUNCT_2: 2,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
A5: J
= (J2
| (
QC-pred_symbols Al)) by
A3,
FUNCT_4: 23;
for P2 be
Element of (
QC-pred_symbols Al2), r be
Element of (
relations_on A) st (J2
. P2)
= r holds r
= (
empty_rel A) or (
the_arity_of P2)
= (
the_arity_of r)
proof
let P2 be
Element of (
QC-pred_symbols Al2), r be
Element of (
relations_on A) such that
A6: (J2
. P2)
= r;
per cases ;
suppose P2
in (
QC-pred_symbols Al);
then
consider P be
QC-pred_symbol of Al such that
A7: P
= P2;
A8: (J
. P)
= r by
A3,
A6,
A7,
FUNCT_4: 13;
(7
+ (
the_arity_of P2))
= (P
`1 ) by
A7,
QC_LANG1:def 8
.= (7
+ (
the_arity_of P)) by
QC_LANG1:def 8;
hence thesis by
A8,
VALUAT_1:def 5;
end;
suppose not P2
in (
QC-pred_symbols Al);
then not P2
in (
dom J) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (J2
. P2)
= (((
QC-pred_symbols Al2)
--> (
empty_rel A))
. P2) by
FUNCT_4: 11
.= (
empty_rel A);
hence thesis by
A6;
end;
end;
then
reconsider J2 as
interpretation of Al2, A by
VALUAT_1:def 5;
set a = the
Element of A;
set v2 = (((
bound_QC-variables Al2)
--> a)
+* v);
v
in (
Valuations_in (Al,A));
then v
in (
Funcs ((
bound_QC-variables Al),A)) by
VALUAT_1:def 1;
then
A9: (
dom v)
= (
bound_QC-variables Al) & (
dom ((
bound_QC-variables Al2)
--> a))
= (
bound_QC-variables Al2) by
FUNCT_2: 92;
then (
dom v2)
= ((
bound_QC-variables Al)
\/ (
bound_QC-variables Al2)) by
FUNCT_4:def 1;
then
A10: (
dom v2)
= (
bound_QC-variables Al2) by
Th4,
XBOOLE_1: 12;
v
in (
Valuations_in (Al,A));
then v
in (
Funcs ((
bound_QC-variables Al),A)) by
VALUAT_1:def 1;
then (
rng v)
c= A by
FUNCT_2: 92;
then ((
rng ((
bound_QC-variables Al2)
--> a))
\/ (
rng v))
c= A & (
rng v2)
c= ((
rng ((
bound_QC-variables Al2)
--> a))
\/ (
rng v)) by
FUNCT_4: 17,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
then
reconsider v2 as
Function of (
bound_QC-variables Al2), A by
A10,
FUNCT_2: 2,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
A11: v
= (v2
| (
bound_QC-variables Al)) by
A9,
FUNCT_4: 23;
v2
in (
Funcs ((
bound_QC-variables Al2),A)) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
then
reconsider v2 as
Element of (
Valuations_in (Al2,A)) by
VALUAT_1:def 1;
for p2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) st p2
in THETA holds (J2,v2)
|= p2
proof
let p2 be
Element of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A12: p2
in THETA;
consider p such that
A13: p
= p2 & p
in PHI by
A1,
A12;
(J,v)
|= p by
A2,
A13,
CALCUL_1:def 11;
then (J2,v2)
|= (Al2
-Cast p) by
A5,
A11,
Th9;
hence thesis by
A13;
end;
hence thesis by
CALCUL_1:def 11;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:22
Th22: for CHI be
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al) st CHI
c= PHI holds CHI is
Consistent
proof
let CHI be
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al) such that
A1: CHI
c= PHI;
assume CHI is
Inconsistent;
then ex f be
FinSequence of (
CQC-WFF Al) st (
rng f)
c= CHI &
|- (f
^
<*(
'not' (
VERUM Al))*>) by
HENMODEL:def 1,
GOEDELCP: 24;
then PHI
|- (
'not' (
VERUM Al)) by
A1,
HENMODEL:def 1,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
hence contradiction by
GOEDELCP: 24;
end;
theorem ::
QC_TRANS:23
PHI is Al2
-Consistent
proof
let PSI be
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A1: PHI
= PSI;
for CHI be
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al2) st CHI
c= PSI & CHI is
finite holds CHI is
Consistent
proof
let CHI be
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A2: CHI
c= PSI & CHI is
finite;
reconsider CHI as
finite
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al) by
A1,
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
consider Al1 be
countable
QC-alphabet such that
A3: CHI is
finite
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al1) & Al is Al1
-expanding by
Th20;
reconsider Al as Al1
-expanding
QC-alphabet by
A3;
reconsider CHI as
finite
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al);
reconsider PHI as
Consistent
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al);
reconsider CHI as
Consistent
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al) by
A1,
A2,
Th22;
CHI is Al1
-Consistent by
Th18;
then
reconsider CHI as
Consistent
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al1) by
A3;
(
still_not-bound_in CHI) is
finite;
then
consider CZ be
Consistent
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al1), JH be
Henkin_interpretation of CZ such that
A4: (JH,(
valH Al1))
|= CHI by
GOEDELCP: 34;
Al1
c= Al & Al
c= Al2 by
Def1;
then
reconsider Al2 as Al1
-expanding
QC-alphabet by
Def1,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
consider CHI2 be
Subset of (
CQC-WFF Al2) such that
A5: CHI
= CHI2;
ex A be non
empty
set, J2 be
interpretation of Al2, A, v2 be
Element of (
Valuations_in (Al2,A)) st (J2,v2)
|= CHI2 by
A4,
A5,
Th21;
hence thesis by
A5,
HENMODEL: 12;
end;
hence thesis by
HENMODEL: 7;
end;