rlvect_2.miz
begin
reserve x,y,y1,y2 for
set,
p for
FinSequence,
i,k,l,n for
Nat,
V for
RealLinearSpace,
u,v,v1,v2,v3,w for
VECTOR of V,
a,b for
Real,
F,G,H1,H2 for
FinSequence of V,
A,B for
Subset of V,
f for
Function of the
carrier of V,
REAL ;
definition
let S be
1-sorted;
let x;
assume
A1: x
in S;
::
RLVECT_2:def1
func
vector (S,x) ->
Element of S equals
:
Def1: x;
coherence by
A1;
end
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:1
for S be non
empty
1-sorted, v be
Element of S holds (
vector (S,v))
= v by
Def1,
RLVECT_1: 1;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:2
Th2: for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, F,G,H be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V st (
len F)
= (
len G) & (
len F)
= (
len H) & for k st k
in (
dom F) holds (H
. k)
= ((F
/. k)
+ (G
/. k)) holds (
Sum H)
= ((
Sum F)
+ (
Sum G))
proof
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr;
defpred
P[
Nat] means for F,G,H be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V st (
len F)
= $1 & (
len F)
= (
len G) & (
len F)
= (
len H) & (for k st k
in (
dom F) holds (H
. k)
= ((F
/. k)
+ (G
/. k))) holds (
Sum H)
= ((
Sum F)
+ (
Sum G));
now
let k;
assume
A1: for F,G,H be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V st (
len F)
= k & (
len F)
= (
len G) & (
len F)
= (
len H) & (for k st k
in (
dom F) holds (H
. k)
= ((F
/. k)
+ (G
/. k))) holds (
Sum H)
= ((
Sum F)
+ (
Sum G));
let F,G,H be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V;
assume that
A2: (
len F)
= (k
+ 1) and
A3: (
len F)
= (
len G) and
A4: (
len F)
= (
len H) and
A5: for k st k
in (
dom F) holds (H
. k)
= ((F
/. k)
+ (G
/. k));
reconsider f = (F
| (
Seg k)), g = (G
| (
Seg k)), h = (H
| (
Seg k)) as
FinSequence of the
carrier of V by
FINSEQ_1: 18;
A6: (
len h)
= k by
A2,
A4,
FINSEQ_3: 53;
A7: (k
+ 1)
in (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 4;
then
A8: (k
+ 1)
in (
dom G) by
A2,
A3,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A9: (G
. (k
+ 1))
in (
rng G) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
(k
+ 1)
in (
dom H) by
A2,
A4,
A7,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A10: (H
. (k
+ 1))
in (
rng H) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
A11: (k
+ 1)
in (
dom F) by
A2,
A7,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (F
. (k
+ 1))
in (
rng F) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
reconsider v = (F
. (k
+ 1)), u = (G
. (k
+ 1)), w = (H
. (k
+ 1)) as
Element of V by
A9,
A10;
A12: w
= ((F
/. (k
+ 1))
+ (G
/. (k
+ 1))) by
A5,
A11
.= (v
+ (G
/. (k
+ 1))) by
A11,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (v
+ u) by
A8,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
G
= (g
^
<*u*>) by
A2,
A3,
FINSEQ_3: 55;
then
A13: (
Sum G)
= ((
Sum g)
+ (
Sum
<*u*>)) by
RLVECT_1: 41;
A14: (
Sum
<*v*>)
= v by
RLVECT_1: 44;
A15: (
len f)
= k by
A2,
FINSEQ_3: 53;
A16: (
len g)
= k by
A2,
A3,
FINSEQ_3: 53;
now
let i;
assume
A17: i
in (
dom f);
then
A18: (F
. i)
= (f
. i) by
FUNCT_1: 47;
(
len f)
<= (
len F) by
A2,
A15,
NAT_1: 12;
then
A19: (
dom f)
c= (
dom F) by
FINSEQ_3: 30;
then i
in (
dom F) by
A17;
then i
in (
dom G) by
A3,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A20: (G
/. i)
= (G
. i) by
PARTFUN1:def 6;
i
in (
dom h) by
A15,
A6,
A17,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A21: (H
. i)
= (h
. i) by
FUNCT_1: 47;
(F
/. i)
= (F
. i) by
A17,
A19,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
then
A22: (f
/. i)
= (F
/. i) by
A17,
A18,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
A23: i
in (
dom g) by
A15,
A16,
A17,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then (G
. i)
= (g
. i) by
FUNCT_1: 47;
then (g
/. i)
= (G
/. i) by
A23,
A20,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
hence (h
. i)
= ((f
/. i)
+ (g
/. i)) by
A5,
A17,
A21,
A19,
A22;
end;
then
A24: (
Sum h)
= ((
Sum f)
+ (
Sum g)) by
A1,
A15,
A16,
A6;
F
= (f
^
<*v*>) by
A2,
FINSEQ_3: 55;
then
A25: (
Sum F)
= ((
Sum f)
+ (
Sum
<*v*>)) by
RLVECT_1: 41;
A26: (
Sum
<*u*>)
= u by
RLVECT_1: 44;
H
= (h
^
<*w*>) by
A2,
A4,
FINSEQ_3: 55;
hence (
Sum H)
= ((
Sum h)
+ (
Sum
<*w*>)) by
RLVECT_1: 41
.= (((
Sum f)
+ (
Sum g))
+ (v
+ u)) by
A24,
A12,
RLVECT_1: 44
.= ((((
Sum f)
+ (
Sum g))
+ v)
+ u) by
RLVECT_1:def 3
.= (((
Sum F)
+ (
Sum g))
+ u) by
A25,
A14,
RLVECT_1:def 3
.= ((
Sum F)
+ (
Sum G)) by
A13,
A26,
RLVECT_1:def 3;
end;
then
A27: for k st
P[k] holds
P[(k
+ 1)];
A28:
P[
0 ]
proof
let F,G,H be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V;
assume that
A29: (
len F)
=
0 and
A30: (
len F)
= (
len G) and
A31: (
len F)
= (
len H);
A32: (
Sum H)
= (
0. V) by
A29,
A31,
RLVECT_1: 75;
(
Sum F)
= (
0. V) & (
Sum G)
= (
0. V) by
A29,
A30,
RLVECT_1: 75;
hence thesis by
A32;
end;
for k holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A28,
A27);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:3
(
len F)
= (
len G) & (for k st k
in (
dom F) holds (G
. k)
= (a
* (F
/. k))) implies (
Sum G)
= (a
* (
Sum F))
proof
assume that
A1: (
len F)
= (
len G) and
A2: for k st k
in (
dom F) holds (G
. k)
= (a
* (F
/. k));
A3: (
dom F)
= (
Seg (
len F)) & (
dom G)
= (
Seg (
len G)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
now
let k be
Nat, v;
assume that
A4: k
in (
dom G) and
A5: v
= (F
. k);
v
= (F
/. k) by
A1,
A3,
A4,
A5,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
hence (G
. k)
= (a
* v) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
A4;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
RLVECT_1: 39;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:4
Th4: for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, F,G be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V st (
len F)
= (
len G) & (for k st k
in (
dom F) holds (G
. k)
= (
- (F
/. k))) holds (
Sum G)
= (
- (
Sum F))
proof
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, F,G be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V;
assume that
A1: (
len F)
= (
len G) and
A2: for k st k
in (
dom F) holds (G
. k)
= (
- (F
/. k));
now
let k be
Nat;
let v be
Element of V;
assume that
A3: k
in (
dom G) and
A4: v
= (F
. k);
A5: (
dom G)
= (
Seg (
len G)) & (
dom F)
= (
Seg (
len F)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then v
= (F
/. k) by
A1,
A3,
A4,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
hence (G
. k)
= (
- v) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
A5;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
RLVECT_1: 40;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:5
for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, F,G,H be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V st (
len F)
= (
len G) & (
len F)
= (
len H) & (for k st k
in (
dom F) holds (H
. k)
= ((F
/. k)
- (G
/. k))) holds (
Sum H)
= ((
Sum F)
- (
Sum G))
proof
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, F,G,H be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V;
assume that
A1: (
len F)
= (
len G) and
A2: (
len F)
= (
len H) and
A3: for k st k
in (
dom F) holds (H
. k)
= ((F
/. k)
- (G
/. k));
deffunc
Q(
set) = (
- (G
/. $1));
consider I be
FinSequence such that
A4: (
len I)
= (
len G) and
A5: for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom I) holds (I
. k)
=
Q(k) from
FINSEQ_1:sch 2;
(
dom I)
= (
Seg (
len G)) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A6: (
dom G)
= (
Seg (
len G)) & for k st k
in (
Seg (
len G)) holds (I
. k)
=
Q(k) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(
rng I)
c= the
carrier of V
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
rng I);
then
consider y be
object such that
A7: y
in (
dom I) and
A8: (I
. y)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider y as
Element of
NAT by
A7;
x
= (
- (G
/. y)) by
A5,
A7,
A8;
then
reconsider v = x as
Element of V;
v
in V;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider I as
FinSequence of the
carrier of V by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
A9:
now
let k;
assume
A10: k
in (
dom F);
A11: (
dom F)
= (
Seg (
len F)) & (
dom I)
= (
Seg (
len I)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A12: (I
. k)
= (I
/. k) by
A1,
A4,
A10,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
thus (H
. k)
= ((F
/. k)
- (G
/. k)) by
A3,
A10
.= ((F
/. k)
+ (I
/. k)) by
A1,
A4,
A5,
A11,
A10,
A12;
end;
(
Sum I)
= (
- (
Sum G)) by
A4,
A6,
Th4;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A4,
A9,
Th2;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:6
Th6: for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, F,G be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V holds for f be
Permutation of (
dom F) st (
len F)
= (
len G) & (for i st i
in (
dom G) holds (G
. i)
= (F
. (f
. i))) holds (
Sum F)
= (
Sum G)
proof
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, F,G be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V;
let f be
Permutation of (
dom F);
defpred
P[
Nat] means for H1,H2 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V st (
len H1)
= $1 & (
len H1)
= (
len H2) holds for f be
Permutation of (
dom H1) st (for i st i
in (
dom H2) holds (H2
. i)
= (H1
. (f
. i))) holds (
Sum H1)
= (
Sum H2);
now
let k;
assume
A1: for H1,H2 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V st (
len H1)
= k & (
len H1)
= (
len H2) holds for f be
Permutation of (
dom H1) st (for i st i
in (
dom H2) holds (H2
. i)
= (H1
. (f
. i))) holds (
Sum H1)
= (
Sum H2);
let H1,H2 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V;
assume that
A2: (
len H1)
= (k
+ 1) and
A3: (
len H1)
= (
len H2);
reconsider p = (H2
| (
Seg k)) as
FinSequence of the
carrier of V by
FINSEQ_1: 18;
let f be
Permutation of (
dom H1);
A4: (
dom H1)
= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A5: (
rng f)
= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
FUNCT_2:def 3;
A6:
now
let n;
assume n
in (
dom f);
then (f
. n)
in (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A5,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence (f
. n) is
Element of
NAT ;
end;
A7: (
dom H2)
= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A2,
A3,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider v = (H2
. (k
+ 1)) as
Element of V by
FINSEQ_1: 4,
FUNCT_1: 102;
A8: (
dom p)
= (
Seg (
len p)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(
Seg (k
+ 1))
=
{} implies (
Seg (k
+ 1))
=
{} ;
then
A9: (
dom f)
= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A4,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A10: (k
+ 1)
in (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 4;
then
A11: (f
. (k
+ 1))
in (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A9,
A5,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
reconsider n = (f
. (k
+ 1)) as
Element of
NAT ;
A12: n
<= (k
+ 1) by
A11,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
consider m2 be
Nat such that
A13: (n
+ m2)
= (k
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 10;
defpred
P[
Nat,
object] means $2
= (H1
. (n
+ $1));
1
<= n by
A11,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
consider m1 be
Nat such that
A14: (1
+ m1)
= n by
NAT_1: 10;
reconsider m1, m2 as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
A15: for j be
Nat st j
in (
Seg m2) holds ex x be
object st
P[j, x];
consider q2 be
FinSequence such that
A16: (
dom q2)
= (
Seg m2) and
A17: for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg m2) holds
P[k, (q2
. k)] from
FINSEQ_1:sch 1(
A15);
(
rng q2)
c= the
carrier of V
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
rng q2);
then
consider y be
object such that
A18: y
in (
dom q2) and
A19: x
= (q2
. y) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider y as
Element of
NAT by
A18;
1
<= y by
A16,
A18,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A20: 1
<= (n
+ y) by
NAT_1: 12;
y
<= m2 by
A16,
A18,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (n
+ y)
<= (
len H1) by
A2,
A13,
XREAL_1: 7;
then (n
+ y)
in (
dom H1) by
A20,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then
reconsider xx = (H1
. (n
+ y)) as
Element of V by
FUNCT_1: 102;
xx
in the
carrier of V;
hence thesis by
A16,
A17,
A18,
A19;
end;
then
reconsider q2 as
FinSequence of the
carrier of V by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
reconsider q1 = (H1
| (
Seg m1)) as
FinSequence of the
carrier of V by
FINSEQ_1: 18;
defpred
P[
set,
object] means ((f
. $1)
in (
dom q1) implies $2
= (f
. $1)) & ( not (f
. $1)
in (
dom q1) implies for l st l
= (f
. $1) holds $2
= (l
- 1));
A21: k
<= (k
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 12;
then
A22: (
Seg k)
c= (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 5;
A23: for i be
Nat st i
in (
Seg k) holds ex y be
object st
P[i, y]
proof
let i be
Nat;
assume
A24: i
in (
Seg k);
now
(f
. i)
in (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A9,
A5,
A22,
A24,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
reconsider j = (f
. i) as
Element of
NAT ;
assume
A25: not (f
. i)
in (
dom q1);
take y = (j
- 1);
thus (f
. i)
in (
dom q1) implies y
= (f
. i) by
A25;
assume not (f
. i)
in (
dom q1);
let t be
Nat;
assume t
= (f
. i);
hence y
= (t
- 1);
end;
hence thesis;
end;
consider g be
FinSequence such that
A26: (
dom g)
= (
Seg k) and
A27: for i be
Nat st i
in (
Seg k) holds
P[i, (g
. i)] from
FINSEQ_1:sch 1(
A23);
A28: (
dom p)
= (
Seg k) by
A2,
A3,
A21,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
m1
<= n by
A14,
NAT_1: 11;
then
A29: m1
<= (k
+ 1) by
A12,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A30: (
dom q1)
= (
Seg m1) by
A2,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
A31:
now
let i, l;
assume that
A32: l
= (f
. i) and
A33: not (f
. i)
in (
dom q1) and
A34: i
in (
dom g);
A35: l
< 1 or m1
< l by
A30,
A32,
A33,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A36:
now
assume (m1
+ 1)
= l;
then (k
+ 1)
= i by
A10,
A9,
A14,
A22,
A26,
A32,
A34,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
then (k
+ 1)
<= (k
+
0 ) by
A26,
A34,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
hence contradiction by
XREAL_1: 6;
end;
(f
. i)
in (
rng f) by
A9,
A22,
A26,
A34,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then (m1
+ 1)
<= l by
A4,
A32,
A35,
FINSEQ_1: 1,
NAT_1: 13;
then (m1
+ 1)
< l by
A36,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then ((m1
+ 1)
+ 1)
<= l by
NAT_1: 13;
hence (m1
+ 2)
<= l;
end;
A37: (
len q1)
= m1 by
A2,
A29,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
A38:
now
let j be
Nat;
assume
A39: j
in (
dom q2);
(
len (q1
^
<*v*>))
= (m1
+ (
len
<*v*>)) by
A37,
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= n by
A14,
FINSEQ_1: 39;
hence (H1
. ((
len (q1
^
<*v*>))
+ j))
= (q2
. j) by
A16,
A17,
A39;
end;
(1
+ k)
= (1
+ (m1
+ m2)) by
A14,
A13;
then
A40: m1
<= k by
NAT_1: 11;
A41: (
rng g)
c= (
dom p)
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in (
rng g);
then
consider x be
object such that
A42: x
in (
dom g) and
A43: (g
. x)
= y by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider x as
Element of
NAT by
A42;
now
per cases ;
suppose
A44: (f
. x)
in (
dom q1);
A45: (
dom q1)
c= (
dom p) by
A40,
A30,
A28,
FINSEQ_1: 5;
(f
. x)
= (g
. x) by
A26,
A27,
A42,
A44;
hence thesis by
A43,
A44,
A45;
end;
suppose
A46: not (f
. x)
in (
dom q1);
reconsider j = (f
. x) as
Element of
NAT by
A9,
A22,
A6,
A26,
A42;
A47: (f
. x)
in (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A9,
A5,
A22,
A26,
A42,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
j
< 1 or m1
< j by
A30,
A46,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
reconsider l = (j
- 1) as
Element of
NAT by
A47,
FINSEQ_1: 1,
NAT_1: 20;
j
<= (k
+ 1) by
A47,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A48: l
<= ((k
+ 1)
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
(m1
+ 2)
<= j by
A31,
A42,
A46;
then
A49: ((m1
+ 2)
- 1)
<= l by
XREAL_1: 9;
1
<= (m1
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 12;
then
A50: 1
<= l by
A49,
XXREAL_0: 2;
(g
. x)
= (j
- 1) by
A26,
A27,
A42,
A46;
hence thesis by
A28,
A43,
A50,
A48,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
set q = (q1
^ q2);
A51: (
len q2)
= m2 by
A16,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A52: (
len q)
= (m1
+ m2) by
A37,
FINSEQ_1: 22;
then
A53: (
dom q)
= (
Seg k) by
A14,
A13,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider g as
Function of (
dom q), (
dom q) by
A28,
A26,
A41,
FUNCT_2: 2;
A54: (
len p)
= k by
A2,
A3,
A21,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
A55: (
rng g)
= (
dom q)
proof
thus (
rng g)
c= (
dom q);
let y be
object;
assume
A56: y
in (
dom q);
then
reconsider j = y as
Element of
NAT ;
consider x be
object such that
A57: x
in (
dom f) and
A58: (f
. x)
= y by
A5,
A22,
A53,
A56,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider x as
Element of
NAT by
A9,
A57;
now
per cases ;
suppose
A59: x
in (
dom g);
now
per cases ;
suppose (f
. x)
in (
dom q1);
then (g
. x)
= (f
. x) by
A26,
A27,
A59;
hence thesis by
A58,
A59,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
suppose
A60: not (f
. x)
in (
dom q1);
j
<= k by
A53,
A56,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then 1
<= (j
+ 1) & (j
+ 1)
<= (k
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 12,
XREAL_1: 7;
then (j
+ 1)
in (
rng f) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
consider x1 be
object such that
A61: x1
in (
dom f) and
A62: (f
. x1)
= (j
+ 1) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
A63:
now
assume not x1
in (
dom g);
then x1
in ((
Seg (k
+ 1))
\ (
Seg k)) by
A4,
A26,
A61,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then x1
in
{(k
+ 1)} by
FINSEQ_3: 15;
then
A64: (j
+ 1)
= (m1
+ 1) by
A14,
A62,
TARSKI:def 1;
1
<= j by
A53,
A56,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
hence contradiction by
A30,
A58,
A60,
A64,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
end;
j
< 1 or m1
< j by
A30,
A58,
A60,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then not (j
+ 1)
<= m1 by
A53,
A56,
FINSEQ_1: 1,
NAT_1: 13;
then not (f
. x1)
in (
dom q1) by
A30,
A62,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (g
. x1)
= ((j
+ 1)
- 1) by
A26,
A27,
A62,
A63
.= y;
hence thesis by
A63,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
A65: not x
in (
dom g);
j
<= k by
A53,
A56,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then 1
<= (j
+ 1) & (j
+ 1)
<= (k
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 12,
XREAL_1: 7;
then (j
+ 1)
in (
rng f) by
A5,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
consider x1 be
object such that
A66: x1
in (
dom f) and
A67: (f
. x1)
= (j
+ 1) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
x
in ((
Seg (k
+ 1))
\ (
Seg k)) by
A4,
A26,
A57,
A65,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then x
in
{(k
+ 1)} by
FINSEQ_3: 15;
then
A68: x
= (k
+ 1) by
TARSKI:def 1;
A69:
now
assume not x1
in (
dom g);
then x1
in ((
Seg (k
+ 1))
\ (
Seg k)) by
A4,
A26,
A66,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then x1
in
{(k
+ 1)} by
FINSEQ_3: 15;
then (j
+ 1)
= (j
+
0 ) by
A58,
A68,
A67,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence contradiction;
end;
m1
<= j by
A14,
A58,
A68,
XREAL_1: 29;
then not (j
+ 1)
<= m1 by
NAT_1: 13;
then not (f
. x1)
in (
dom q1) by
A30,
A67,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then (g
. x1)
= ((j
+ 1)
- 1) by
A26,
A27,
A67,
A69
.= y;
hence thesis by
A69,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
assume
A70: for i st i
in (
dom H2) holds (H2
. i)
= (H1
. (f
. i));
then
A71: (H2
. (k
+ 1))
= (H1
. (f
. (k
+ 1))) by
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 4;
A72:
now
let j be
Nat;
assume
A73: j
in (
dom (q1
^
<*v*>));
A74:
now
assume j
in (
Seg m1);
then
A75: j
in (
dom q1) by
A2,
A29,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
then (q1
. j)
= (H1
. j) by
FUNCT_1: 47;
hence (H1
. j)
= ((q1
^
<*v*>)
. j) by
A75,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
end;
A76:
now
1
in (
Seg 1) & (
len
<*v*>)
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 1,
FINSEQ_1: 39;
then 1
in (
dom
<*v*>) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A77: ((q1
^
<*v*>)
. ((
len q1)
+ 1))
= (
<*v*>
. 1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
assume j
in
{n};
then j
= n by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence ((q1
^
<*v*>)
. j)
= (H1
. j) by
A71,
A14,
A37,
A77,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
end;
(
len (q1
^
<*v*>))
= (m1
+ (
len
<*v*>)) by
A37,
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= (m1
+ 1) by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
then j
in (
Seg (m1
+ 1)) by
A73,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then j
in ((
Seg m1)
\/
{n}) by
A14,
FINSEQ_1: 9;
hence (H1
. j)
= ((q1
^
<*v*>)
. j) by
A74,
A76,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
g is
one-to-one
proof
let y1,y2 be
object;
assume that
A78: y1
in (
dom g) and
A79: y2
in (
dom g) and
A80: (g
. y1)
= (g
. y2);
reconsider j1 = y1, j2 = y2 as
Element of
NAT by
A26,
A78,
A79;
A81: (f
. y2)
in (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A9,
A5,
A22,
A26,
A79,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
A82: (f
. y1)
in (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
A9,
A5,
A22,
A26,
A78,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
reconsider a = (f
. y1), b = (f
. y2) as
Element of
NAT by
A81;
now
per cases ;
suppose (f
. y1)
in (
dom q1) & (f
. y2)
in (
dom q1);
then (g
. j1)
= (f
. y1) & (g
. j2)
= (f
. y2) by
A26,
A27,
A78,
A79;
hence thesis by
A9,
A22,
A26,
A78,
A79,
A80,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
end;
suppose
A83: (f
. y1)
in (
dom q1) & not (f
. y2)
in (
dom q1);
then
A84: a
<= m1 by
A30,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
(g
. j1)
= a & (g
. j2)
= (b
- 1) by
A26,
A27,
A78,
A79,
A83;
then
A85: ((b
- 1)
+ 1)
<= (m1
+ 1) by
A80,
A84,
XREAL_1: 6;
1
<= b by
A81,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A86: b
in (
Seg (m1
+ 1)) by
A85,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
not b
in (
Seg m1) by
A2,
A29,
A83,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
then b
in ((
Seg (m1
+ 1))
\ (
Seg m1)) by
A86,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then b
in
{(m1
+ 1)} by
FINSEQ_3: 15;
then b
= (m1
+ 1) by
TARSKI:def 1;
then y2
= (k
+ 1) by
A10,
A9,
A14,
A22,
A26,
A79,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A26,
A79,
FINSEQ_3: 8;
end;
suppose
A87: not (f
. y1)
in (
dom q1) & (f
. y2)
in (
dom q1);
then
A88: b
<= m1 by
A30,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
(g
. j1)
= (a
- 1) & (g
. j2)
= b by
A26,
A27,
A78,
A79,
A87;
then
A89: ((a
- 1)
+ 1)
<= (m1
+ 1) by
A80,
A88,
XREAL_1: 6;
1
<= a by
A82,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
A90: a
in (
Seg (m1
+ 1)) by
A89,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
not a
in (
Seg m1) by
A2,
A29,
A87,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
then a
in ((
Seg (m1
+ 1))
\ (
Seg m1)) by
A90,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then a
in
{(m1
+ 1)} by
FINSEQ_3: 15;
then a
= (m1
+ 1) by
TARSKI:def 1;
then y1
= (k
+ 1) by
A10,
A9,
A14,
A22,
A26,
A78,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
A26,
A78,
FINSEQ_3: 8;
end;
suppose
A91: not (f
. y1)
in (
dom q1) & not (f
. y2)
in (
dom q1);
then (g
. j2)
= (b
- 1) by
A26,
A27,
A79;
then
A92: (g
. y2)
= (b
+ (
- 1));
(g
. j1)
= (a
- 1) by
A26,
A27,
A78,
A91;
then (g
. j1)
= (a
+ (
- 1));
then a
= b by
A80,
A92,
XCMPLX_1: 2;
hence thesis by
A9,
A22,
A26,
A78,
A79,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider g as
Permutation of (
dom q) by
A55,
FUNCT_2: 57;
((
len (q1
^
<*v*>))
+ (
len q2))
= (((
len q1)
+ (
len
<*v*>))
+ m2) by
A51,
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= (k
+ 1) by
A14,
A13,
A37,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
then (
dom H1)
= (
Seg ((
len (q1
^
<*v*>))
+ (
len q2))) by
A2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A93: H1
= ((q1
^
<*v*>)
^ q2) by
A72,
A38,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
now
let i;
assume
A94: i
in (
dom p);
then (f
. i)
in (
rng f) by
A9,
A22,
A28,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
reconsider j = (f
. i) as
Element of
NAT by
A5;
now
per cases ;
suppose
A95: (f
. i)
in (
dom q1);
then
A96: (f
. i)
= (g
. i) & (H1
. j)
= (q1
. j) by
A28,
A27,
A94,
FUNCT_1: 47;
(H2
. i)
= (p
. i) & (H2
. i)
= (H1
. (f
. i)) by
A70,
A7,
A22,
A28,
A94,
FUNCT_1: 47;
hence (p
. i)
= (q
. (g
. i)) by
A95,
A96,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
end;
suppose
A97: not (f
. i)
in (
dom q1);
then (m1
+ 2)
<= j by
A28,
A26,
A31,
A94;
then
A98: ((m1
+ 2)
- 1)
<= (j
- 1) by
XREAL_1: 9;
m1
< (m1
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 29;
then
A99: m1
< (j
- 1) by
A98,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then m1
< j by
XREAL_1: 146,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
reconsider j1 = (j
- 1) as
Element of
NAT by
NAT_1: 20;
A100: not j1
in (
dom q1) by
A30,
A99,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
A101: (g
. i)
= (j
- 1) by
A28,
A27,
A94,
A97;
then (j
- 1)
in (
dom q) by
A28,
A26,
A55,
A94,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
consider a be
Nat such that
A102: a
in (
dom q2) and
A103: j1
= ((
len q1)
+ a) by
A100,
FINSEQ_1: 25;
A104: (
len
<*v*>)
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
A105: (H2
. i)
= (p
. i) & (H2
. i)
= (H1
. (f
. i)) by
A70,
A7,
A22,
A28,
A94,
FUNCT_1: 47;
A106: H1
= (q1
^ (
<*v*>
^ q2)) by
A93,
FINSEQ_1: 32;
j
in (
dom H1) by
A4,
A9,
A5,
A22,
A28,
A94,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
consider b be
Nat such that
A107: b
in (
dom (
<*v*>
^ q2)) and
A108: j
= ((
len q1)
+ b) by
A97,
A106,
FINSEQ_1: 25;
A109: (H1
. j)
= ((
<*v*>
^ q2)
. b) by
A106,
A107,
A108,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
A110: b
= (1
+ a) by
A103,
A108;
(q
. (j
- 1))
= (q2
. a) by
A102,
A103,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
hence (p
. i)
= (q
. (g
. i)) by
A101,
A105,
A102,
A109,
A110,
A104,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
end;
end;
hence (p
. i)
= (q
. (g
. i));
end;
then (
Sum p)
= (
Sum q) by
A1,
A14,
A13,
A54,
A52;
then (
Sum H2)
= ((
Sum q)
+ (
Sum
<*v*>)) by
A2,
A3,
A54,
A8,
RLVECT_1: 38,
RLVECT_1: 44
.= (((
Sum q1)
+ (
Sum q2))
+ (
Sum
<*v*>)) by
RLVECT_1: 41
.= ((
Sum q1)
+ ((
Sum
<*v*>)
+ (
Sum q2))) by
RLVECT_1:def 3
.= ((
Sum q1)
+ (
Sum (
<*v*>
^ q2))) by
RLVECT_1: 41
.= (
Sum (q1
^ (
<*v*>
^ q2))) by
RLVECT_1: 41
.= (
Sum H1) by
A93,
FINSEQ_1: 32;
hence (
Sum H1)
= (
Sum H2);
end;
then
A111: for k st
P[k] holds
P[(k
+ 1)];
A112:
P[
0 ]
proof
let H1,H2 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V;
assume that
A113: (
len H1)
=
0 and
A114: (
len H1)
= (
len H2);
(
Sum H1)
= (
0. V) by
A113,
RLVECT_1: 75;
hence thesis by
A113,
A114,
RLVECT_1: 75;
end;
for k holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A112,
A111);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:7
for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, F,G be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V holds for f be
Permutation of (
dom F) st G
= (F
* f) holds (
Sum F)
= (
Sum G)
proof
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, F,G be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V;
let f be
Permutation of (
dom F);
assume G
= (F
* f);
then (
len F)
= (
len G) & for i st i
in (
dom G) holds (G
. i)
= (F
. (f
. i)) by
FINSEQ_2: 44,
FUNCT_1: 12;
hence thesis by
Th6;
end;
definition
let V be non
empty
addLoopStr, T be
finite
Subset of V;
assume
A1: V is
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed;
::
RLVECT_2:def2
func
Sum (T) ->
Element of V means
:
Def2: ex F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V st (
rng F)
= T & F is
one-to-one & it
= (
Sum F);
existence
proof
consider p such that
A2: (
rng p)
= T and
A3: p is
one-to-one by
FINSEQ_4: 58;
reconsider p as
FinSequence of the
carrier of V by
A2,
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
take (
Sum p);
take p;
thus thesis by
A2,
A3;
end;
uniqueness by
A1,
RLVECT_1: 42;
end
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:8
Th8: for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed non
empty
addLoopStr holds (
Sum (
{} V))
= (
0. V)
proof
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed non
empty
addLoopStr;
(
Sum (
<*> the
carrier of V))
= (
0. V) by
RLVECT_1: 43;
hence thesis by
Def2,
RELAT_1: 38;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:9
for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, v be
Element of V holds (
Sum
{v})
= v
proof
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, v be
Element of V;
A1: (
Sum
<*v*>)
= v by
RLVECT_1: 44;
(
rng
<*v*>)
=
{v} &
<*v*> is
one-to-one by
FINSEQ_1: 39,
FINSEQ_3: 93;
hence thesis by
A1,
Def2;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:10
for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, v1,v2 be
Element of V holds v1
<> v2 implies (
Sum
{v1, v2})
= (v1
+ v2)
proof
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, v1,v2 be
Element of V;
assume v1
<> v2;
then
A1:
<*v1, v2*> is
one-to-one by
FINSEQ_3: 94;
(
rng
<*v1, v2*>)
=
{v1, v2} & (
Sum
<*v1, v2*>)
= (v1
+ v2) by
FINSEQ_2: 127,
RLVECT_1: 45;
hence thesis by
A1,
Def2;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:11
for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, v1,v2,v3 be
Element of V holds v1
<> v2 & v2
<> v3 & v1
<> v3 implies (
Sum
{v1, v2, v3})
= ((v1
+ v2)
+ v3)
proof
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, v1,v2,v3 be
Element of V;
assume v1
<> v2 & v2
<> v3 & v1
<> v3;
then
A1:
<*v1, v2, v3*> is
one-to-one by
FINSEQ_3: 95;
(
rng
<*v1, v2, v3*>)
=
{v1, v2, v3} & (
Sum
<*v1, v2, v3*>)
= ((v1
+ v2)
+ v3) by
FINSEQ_2: 128,
RLVECT_1: 46;
hence thesis by
A1,
Def2;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:12
Th12: for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed non
empty
addLoopStr, S,T be
finite
Subset of V holds T
misses S implies (
Sum (T
\/ S))
= ((
Sum T)
+ (
Sum S))
proof
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed non
empty
addLoopStr, S,T be
finite
Subset of V;
consider F be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V such that
A1: (
rng F)
= (T
\/ S) and
A2: F is
one-to-one & (
Sum (T
\/ S))
= (
Sum F) by
Def2;
consider G be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V such that
A3: (
rng G)
= T and
A4: G is
one-to-one and
A5: (
Sum T)
= (
Sum G) by
Def2;
consider H be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V such that
A6: (
rng H)
= S and
A7: H is
one-to-one and
A8: (
Sum S)
= (
Sum H) by
Def2;
set I = (G
^ H);
assume T
misses S;
then
A9: I is
one-to-one by
A3,
A4,
A6,
A7,
FINSEQ_3: 91;
(
rng I)
= (
rng F) by
A1,
A3,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 31;
hence (
Sum (T
\/ S))
= (
Sum I) by
A2,
A9,
RLVECT_1: 42
.= ((
Sum T)
+ (
Sum S)) by
A5,
A8,
RLVECT_1: 41;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:13
Th13: for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, S,T be
finite
Subset of V holds (
Sum (T
\/ S))
= (((
Sum T)
+ (
Sum S))
- (
Sum (T
/\ S)))
proof
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, S,T be
finite
Subset of V;
set A = (S
\ T);
set B = (T
\ S);
set Z = (A
\/ B);
set I = (T
/\ S);
A1: (A
\/ I)
= S by
XBOOLE_1: 51;
A2: (B
\/ I)
= T by
XBOOLE_1: 51;
A3: Z
= (T
\+\ S);
then (Z
\/ I)
= (T
\/ S) by
XBOOLE_1: 93;
then ((
Sum (T
\/ S))
+ (
Sum I))
= (((
Sum Z)
+ (
Sum I))
+ (
Sum I)) by
A3,
Th12,
XBOOLE_1: 103
.= ((((
Sum A)
+ (
Sum B))
+ (
Sum I))
+ (
Sum I)) by
Th12,
XBOOLE_1: 82
.= (((
Sum A)
+ ((
Sum I)
+ (
Sum B)))
+ (
Sum I)) by
RLVECT_1:def 3
.= (((
Sum A)
+ (
Sum I))
+ ((
Sum B)
+ (
Sum I))) by
RLVECT_1:def 3
.= ((
Sum S)
+ ((
Sum B)
+ (
Sum I))) by
A1,
Th12,
XBOOLE_1: 89
.= ((
Sum T)
+ (
Sum S)) by
A2,
Th12,
XBOOLE_1: 89;
hence thesis by
RLSUB_2: 61;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:14
for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, S,T be
finite
Subset of V holds (
Sum (T
/\ S))
= (((
Sum T)
+ (
Sum S))
- (
Sum (T
\/ S)))
proof
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, S,T be
finite
Subset of V;
(
Sum (T
\/ S))
= (((
Sum T)
+ (
Sum S))
- (
Sum (T
/\ S))) by
Th13;
then ((
Sum T)
+ (
Sum S))
= ((
Sum (T
/\ S))
+ (
Sum (T
\/ S))) by
RLSUB_2: 61;
hence thesis by
RLSUB_2: 61;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:15
Th15: for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, S,T be
finite
Subset of V holds (
Sum (T
\ S))
= ((
Sum (T
\/ S))
- (
Sum S))
proof
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, S,T be
finite
Subset of V;
(T
\ S)
misses S by
XBOOLE_1: 79;
then
A1: ((T
\ S)
/\ S)
= (
{} V);
((T
\ S)
\/ S)
= (T
\/ S) by
XBOOLE_1: 39;
then (
Sum (T
\/ S))
= (((
Sum (T
\ S))
+ (
Sum S))
- (
Sum ((T
\ S)
/\ S))) by
Th13;
then (
Sum (T
\/ S))
= (((
Sum (T
\ S))
+ (
Sum S))
- (
0. V)) by
A1,
Th8
.= ((
Sum (T
\ S))
+ (
Sum S));
hence thesis by
RLSUB_2: 61;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:16
Th16: for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, S,T be
finite
Subset of V holds (
Sum (T
\ S))
= ((
Sum T)
- (
Sum (T
/\ S)))
proof
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, S,T be
finite
Subset of V;
(T
\ (T
/\ S))
= (T
\ S) by
XBOOLE_1: 47;
then (
Sum (T
\ S))
= ((
Sum (T
\/ (T
/\ S)))
- (
Sum (T
/\ S))) by
Th15;
hence thesis by
XBOOLE_1: 22;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:17
for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, S,T be
finite
Subset of V holds (
Sum (T
\+\ S))
= ((
Sum (T
\/ S))
- (
Sum (T
/\ S)))
proof
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
addLoopStr, S,T be
finite
Subset of V;
(T
\+\ S)
= ((T
\/ S)
\ (T
/\ S)) by
XBOOLE_1: 101;
hence (
Sum (T
\+\ S))
= ((
Sum (T
\/ S))
- (
Sum ((T
\/ S)
/\ (T
/\ S)))) by
Th16
.= ((
Sum (T
\/ S))
- (
Sum (((T
\/ S)
/\ T)
/\ S))) by
XBOOLE_1: 16
.= ((
Sum (T
\/ S))
- (
Sum (T
/\ S))) by
XBOOLE_1: 21;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:18
for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed non
empty
addLoopStr, S,T be
finite
Subset of V holds (
Sum (T
\+\ S))
= ((
Sum (T
\ S))
+ (
Sum (S
\ T))) by
Th12,
XBOOLE_1: 82;
reconsider zz =
0 as
Element of
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
definition
let V be non
empty
ZeroStr;
::
RLVECT_2:def3
mode
Linear_Combination of V ->
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of V,
REAL )) means
:
Def3: ex T be
finite
Subset of V st for v be
Element of V st not v
in T holds (it
. v)
=
0 ;
existence
proof
reconsider f = (the
carrier of V
--> zz) as
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of V,
REAL )) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
take f, (
{} V);
thus thesis by
FUNCOP_1: 7;
end;
end
reserve K,L,L1,L2,L3 for
Linear_Combination of V;
notation
let V be non
empty
addLoopStr, L be
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of V,
REAL ));
synonym
Carrier L for
support L;
end
Lm1:
now
let V be non
empty
addLoopStr, L be
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of V,
REAL ));
A1: (
support L)
c= (
dom L) by
PRE_POLY: 37;
thus (
Carrier L)
c= the
carrier of V
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
support L);
then x
in (
dom L) by
A1;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
definition
let V be non
empty
addLoopStr, L be
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of V,
REAL ));
:: original:
Carrier
redefine
::
RLVECT_2:def4
func
Carrier (L) ->
Subset of V equals { v where v be
Element of V : (L
. v)
<>
0 };
coherence by
Lm1;
compatibility
proof
let X be
Subset of V;
set A = (
Carrier L);
set B = { v where v be
Element of V : (L
. v)
<>
0 };
thus X
= A implies X
= B
proof
assume
A1: X
= A;
thus X
c= B
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A2: x
in X;
then (L
. x)
<>
0 by
A1,
PRE_POLY:def 7;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
let x be
object;
assume x
in B;
then ex v be
Element of V st x
= v & (L
. v)
<>
0 ;
hence thesis by
A1,
PRE_POLY:def 7;
end;
assume
A3: X
= B;
thus X
c= A
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in X;
then ex v be
Element of V st x
= v & (L
. v)
<>
0 by
A3;
hence thesis by
PRE_POLY:def 7;
end;
let x be
object;
assume
A4: x
in A;
then
A5: (L
. x)
<>
0 by
PRE_POLY:def 7;
(
Carrier L)
c= the
carrier of V by
Lm1;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4,
A5;
end;
end
registration
let V be non
empty
addLoopStr, L be
Linear_Combination of V;
cluster (
Carrier L) ->
finite;
coherence
proof
set A = (
Carrier L);
consider T be
finite
Subset of V such that
A1: for v be
Element of V st not v
in T holds (L
. v)
=
0 by
Def3;
A
c= T
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in A;
then ex v be
Element of V st x
= v & (L
. v)
<>
0 ;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:19
for V be non
empty
addLoopStr, L be
Linear_Combination of V, v be
Element of V holds (L
. v)
=
0 iff not v
in (
Carrier L)
proof
let V be non
empty
addLoopStr, L be
Linear_Combination of V, v be
Element of V;
thus (L
. v)
=
0 implies not v
in (
Carrier L)
proof
assume
A1: (L
. v)
=
0 ;
assume not thesis;
then ex u be
Element of V st u
= v & (L
. u)
<>
0 ;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
thus thesis;
end;
definition
let V be non
empty
addLoopStr;
::
RLVECT_2:def5
func
ZeroLC (V) ->
Linear_Combination of V means
:
Def5: (
Carrier it )
=
{} ;
existence
proof
reconsider f = (the
carrier of V
--> zz) as
Function of the
carrier of V,
REAL ;
reconsider f as
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of V,
REAL )) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
f is
Linear_Combination of V
proof
reconsider T = (
{} V) as
empty
finite
Subset of V;
take T;
thus thesis by
FUNCOP_1: 7;
end;
then
reconsider f as
Linear_Combination of V;
take f;
set C = { v where v be
Element of V : (f
. v)
<>
0 };
now
set x = the
Element of C;
assume C
<>
{} ;
then x
in C;
then ex v be
Element of V st x
= v & (f
. v)
<>
0 ;
hence contradiction by
FUNCOP_1: 7;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let L,L9 be
Linear_Combination of V;
assume that
A1: (
Carrier L)
=
{} and
A2: (
Carrier L9)
=
{} ;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in the
carrier of V;
then
reconsider v = x as
Element of V;
A3:
now
assume (L9
. v)
<>
0 ;
then v
in { u where u be
Element of V : (L9
. u)
<>
0 };
hence contradiction by
A2;
end;
now
assume (L
. v)
<>
0 ;
then v
in { u where u be
Element of V : (L
. u)
<>
0 };
hence contradiction by
A1;
end;
hence (L
. x)
= (L9
. x) by
A3;
end;
hence L
= L9;
end;
end
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:20
Th20: for V be non
empty
addLoopStr, v be
Element of V holds ((
ZeroLC V)
. v)
=
0
proof
let V be non
empty
addLoopStr, v be
Element of V;
(
Carrier (
ZeroLC V))
=
{} & not v
in
{} by
Def5;
hence thesis;
end;
definition
let V be non
empty
addLoopStr;
let A be
Subset of V;
::
RLVECT_2:def6
mode
Linear_Combination of A ->
Linear_Combination of V means
:
Def6: (
Carrier it )
c= A;
existence
proof
take L = (
ZeroLC V);
(
Carrier L)
=
{} by
Def5;
hence thesis;
end;
end
reserve l,l1,l2 for
Linear_Combination of A;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:21
A
c= B implies l is
Linear_Combination of B
proof
assume
A1: A
c= B;
(
Carrier l)
c= A by
Def6;
then (
Carrier l)
c= B by
A1;
hence thesis by
Def6;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:22
Th22: (
ZeroLC V) is
Linear_Combination of A
proof
(
Carrier (
ZeroLC V))
=
{} &
{}
c= A by
Def5;
hence thesis by
Def6;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:23
Th23: for l be
Linear_Combination of (
{} the
carrier of V) holds l
= (
ZeroLC V)
proof
let l be
Linear_Combination of (
{} the
carrier of V);
(
Carrier l)
c=
{} by
Def6;
then (
Carrier l)
=
{} ;
hence thesis by
Def5;
end;
definition
let V;
let F;
let f;
::
RLVECT_2:def7
func f
(#) F ->
FinSequence of the
carrier of V means
:
Def7: (
len it )
= (
len F) & for i st i
in (
dom it ) holds (it
. i)
= ((f
. (F
/. i))
* (F
/. i));
existence
proof
deffunc
Q(
set) = ((f
. (F
/. $1))
* (F
/. $1));
consider G be
FinSequence such that
A1: (
len G)
= (
len F) and
A2: for n be
Nat st n
in (
dom G) holds (G
. n)
=
Q(n) from
FINSEQ_1:sch 2;
(
rng G)
c= the
carrier of V
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
rng G);
then
consider y be
object such that
A3: y
in (
dom G) and
A4: (G
. y)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
y
in (
Seg (
len F)) by
A1,
A3,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider y as
Element of
NAT ;
(G
. y)
= ((f
. (F
/. y))
* (F
/. y)) by
A2,
A3;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
then
reconsider G as
FinSequence of the
carrier of V by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
take G;
thus thesis by
A1,
A2;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let H1, H2;
assume that
A5: (
len H1)
= (
len F) and
A6: for i st i
in (
dom H1) holds (H1
. i)
= ((f
. (F
/. i))
* (F
/. i)) and
A7: (
len H2)
= (
len F) and
A8: for i st i
in (
dom H2) holds (H2
. i)
= ((f
. (F
/. i))
* (F
/. i));
now
let k be
Nat;
assume 1
<= k & k
<= (
len H1);
then
A9: k
in (
Seg (
len H1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then k
in (
dom H1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A10: (H1
. k)
= ((f
. (F
/. k))
* (F
/. k)) by
A6;
k
in (
dom H2) by
A5,
A7,
A9,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
hence (H1
. k)
= (H2
. k) by
A8,
A10;
end;
hence thesis by
A5,
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 14;
end;
end
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:24
Th24: i
in (
dom F) & v
= (F
. i) implies ((f
(#) F)
. i)
= ((f
. v)
* v)
proof
assume that
A1: i
in (
dom F) and
A2: v
= (F
. i);
A3: (F
/. i)
= (F
. i) by
A1,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
(
len (f
(#) F))
= (
len F) by
Def7;
then i
in (
dom (f
(#) F)) by
A1,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
hence thesis by
A2,
A3,
Def7;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:25
(f
(#) (
<*> the
carrier of V))
= (
<*> the
carrier of V)
proof
(
len (f
(#) (
<*> the
carrier of V)))
= (
len (
<*> the
carrier of V)) by
Def7
.=
0 ;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:26
Th26: (f
(#)
<*v*>)
=
<*((f
. v)
* v)*>
proof
A1: 1
in
{1} by
TARSKI:def 1;
A2: (
len (f
(#)
<*v*>))
= (
len
<*v*>) by
Def7
.= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
then (
dom (f
(#)
<*v*>))
=
{1} by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then ((f
(#)
<*v*>)
. 1)
= ((f
. (
<*v*>
/. 1))
* (
<*v*>
/. 1)) by
A1,
Def7
.= ((f
. (
<*v*>
/. 1))
* v) by
FINSEQ_4: 16
.= ((f
. v)
* v) by
FINSEQ_4: 16;
hence thesis by
A2,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:27
Th27: (f
(#)
<*v1, v2*>)
=
<*((f
. v1)
* v1), ((f
. v2)
* v2)*>
proof
A1: (
len (f
(#)
<*v1, v2*>))
= (
len
<*v1, v2*>) by
Def7
.= 2 by
FINSEQ_1: 44;
then
A2: (
dom (f
(#)
<*v1, v2*>))
=
{1, 2} by
FINSEQ_1: 2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
2
in
{1, 2} by
TARSKI:def 2;
then
A3: ((f
(#)
<*v1, v2*>)
. 2)
= ((f
. (
<*v1, v2*>
/. 2))
* (
<*v1, v2*>
/. 2)) by
A2,
Def7
.= ((f
. (
<*v1, v2*>
/. 2))
* v2) by
FINSEQ_4: 17
.= ((f
. v2)
* v2) by
FINSEQ_4: 17;
1
in
{1, 2} by
TARSKI:def 2;
then ((f
(#)
<*v1, v2*>)
. 1)
= ((f
. (
<*v1, v2*>
/. 1))
* (
<*v1, v2*>
/. 1)) by
A2,
Def7
.= ((f
. (
<*v1, v2*>
/. 1))
* v1) by
FINSEQ_4: 17
.= ((f
. v1)
* v1) by
FINSEQ_4: 17;
hence thesis by
A1,
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 44;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:28
(f
(#)
<*v1, v2, v3*>)
=
<*((f
. v1)
* v1), ((f
. v2)
* v2), ((f
. v3)
* v3)*>
proof
A1: (
len (f
(#)
<*v1, v2, v3*>))
= (
len
<*v1, v2, v3*>) by
Def7
.= 3 by
FINSEQ_1: 45;
then
A2: (
dom (f
(#)
<*v1, v2, v3*>))
=
{1, 2, 3} by
FINSEQ_1:def 3,
FINSEQ_3: 1;
3
in
{1, 2, 3} by
ENUMSET1:def 1;
then
A3: ((f
(#)
<*v1, v2, v3*>)
. 3)
= ((f
. (
<*v1, v2, v3*>
/. 3))
* (
<*v1, v2, v3*>
/. 3)) by
A2,
Def7
.= ((f
. (
<*v1, v2, v3*>
/. 3))
* v3) by
FINSEQ_4: 18
.= ((f
. v3)
* v3) by
FINSEQ_4: 18;
2
in
{1, 2, 3} by
ENUMSET1:def 1;
then
A4: ((f
(#)
<*v1, v2, v3*>)
. 2)
= ((f
. (
<*v1, v2, v3*>
/. 2))
* (
<*v1, v2, v3*>
/. 2)) by
A2,
Def7
.= ((f
. (
<*v1, v2, v3*>
/. 2))
* v2) by
FINSEQ_4: 18
.= ((f
. v2)
* v2) by
FINSEQ_4: 18;
1
in
{1, 2, 3} by
ENUMSET1:def 1;
then ((f
(#)
<*v1, v2, v3*>)
. 1)
= ((f
. (
<*v1, v2, v3*>
/. 1))
* (
<*v1, v2, v3*>
/. 1)) by
A2,
Def7
.= ((f
. (
<*v1, v2, v3*>
/. 1))
* v1) by
FINSEQ_4: 18
.= ((f
. v1)
* v1) by
FINSEQ_4: 18;
hence thesis by
A1,
A4,
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 45;
end;
definition
let V;
let L;
::
RLVECT_2:def8
func
Sum (L) ->
Element of V means
:
Def8: ex F st F is
one-to-one & (
rng F)
= (
Carrier L) & it
= (
Sum (L
(#) F));
existence
proof
consider F be
FinSequence such that
A1: (
rng F)
= (
Carrier L) and
A2: F is
one-to-one by
FINSEQ_4: 58;
reconsider F as
FinSequence of the
carrier of V by
A1,
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
take (
Sum (L
(#) F));
take F;
thus F is
one-to-one & (
rng F)
= (
Carrier L) by
A1,
A2;
thus thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let v1,v2 be
Element of V;
given F1 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V such that
A3: F1 is
one-to-one and
A4: (
rng F1)
= (
Carrier L) and
A5: v1
= (
Sum (L
(#) F1));
given F2 be
FinSequence of the
carrier of V such that
A6: F2 is
one-to-one and
A7: (
rng F2)
= (
Carrier L) and
A8: v2
= (
Sum (L
(#) F2));
defpred
P[
object,
object] means
{$2}
= (F1
"
{(F2
. $1)});
A9: (
dom F2)
= (
Seg (
len F2)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A10: (
dom F1)
= (
Seg (
len F1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A11: (
len F1)
= (
len F2) by
A3,
A4,
A6,
A7,
FINSEQ_1: 48;
A12: for x be
object st x
in (
dom F1) holds ex y be
object st y
in (
dom F1) &
P[x, y]
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
dom F1);
then (F2
. x)
in (
rng F1) by
A4,
A7,
A11,
A10,
A9,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
consider y be
object such that
A13: (F1
"
{(F2
. x)})
=
{y} by
A3,
FUNCT_1: 74;
take y;
y
in (F1
"
{(F2
. x)}) by
A13,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence y
in (
dom F1) by
FUNCT_1:def 7;
thus thesis by
A13;
end;
consider f be
Function of (
dom F1), (
dom F1) such that
A14: for x be
object st x
in (
dom F1) holds
P[x, (f
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A12);
A15: f is
one-to-one
proof
let y1,y2 be
object;
assume that
A16: y1
in (
dom f) and
A17: y2
in (
dom f) and
A18: (f
. y1)
= (f
. y2);
(F2
. y1)
in (
rng F1) by
A4,
A7,
A11,
A10,
A9,
A16,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
A19:
{(F2
. y1)}
c= (
rng F1) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
(F2
. y2)
in (
rng F1) by
A4,
A7,
A11,
A10,
A9,
A17,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
A20:
{(F2
. y2)}
c= (
rng F1) by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
(F1
"
{(F2
. y1)})
=
{(f
. y1)} & (F1
"
{(F2
. y2)})
=
{(f
. y2)} by
A14,
A16,
A17;
then
{(F2
. y1)}
=
{(F2
. y2)} by
A18,
A19,
A20,
FUNCT_1: 91;
then (F2
. y1)
= (F2
. y2) by
ZFMISC_1: 3;
hence thesis by
A6,
A11,
A10,
A9,
A16,
A17;
end;
set G1 = (L
(#) F1);
A21: (
len G1)
= (
len F1) by
Def7;
A22: (
rng f)
= (
dom F1)
proof
thus (
rng f)
c= (
dom F1);
let y be
object;
assume
A23: y
in (
dom F1);
then (F1
. y)
in (
rng F2) by
A4,
A7,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
consider x be
object such that
A24: x
in (
dom F2) and
A25: (F2
. x)
= (F1
. y) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
(F1
"
{(F2
. x)})
= (F1
" (
Im (F1,y))) by
A23,
A25,
FUNCT_1: 59;
then (F1
"
{(F2
. x)})
c=
{y} by
A3,
FUNCT_1: 82;
then
{(f
. x)}
c=
{y} by
A11,
A10,
A9,
A14,
A24;
then
A26: (f
. x)
= y by
ZFMISC_1: 18;
x
in (
dom f) by
A11,
A10,
A9,
A24,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
hence thesis by
A26,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
then
reconsider f as
Permutation of (
dom F1) by
A15,
FUNCT_2: 57;
(
dom F1)
= (
Seg (
len F1)) & (
dom G1)
= (
Seg (
len G1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider f as
Permutation of (
dom G1) by
A21;
set G2 = (L
(#) F2);
A27: (
dom G2)
= (
Seg (
len G2)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A28: (
len G2)
= (
len F2) by
Def7;
A29: (
dom G1)
= (
Seg (
len G1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
now
let i;
assume
A30: i
in (
dom G2);
then
reconsider u = (F2
. i) as
VECTOR of V by
A28,
A9,
A27,
FUNCT_1: 102;
A31: (G2
. i)
= ((L
. (F2
/. i))
* (F2
/. i)) & (F2
. i)
= (F2
/. i) by
A28,
A9,
A27,
A30,
Def7,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
i
in (
dom f) by
A11,
A21,
A28,
A29,
A27,
A30,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A32: (f
. i)
in (
dom F1) by
A22,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
reconsider m = (f
. i) as
Element of
NAT ;
reconsider v = (F1
. m) as
VECTOR of V by
A32,
FUNCT_1: 102;
{(F1
. (f
. i))}
= (
Im (F1,(f
. i))) by
A32,
FUNCT_1: 59
.= (F1
.: (F1
"
{(F2
. i)})) by
A11,
A28,
A10,
A27,
A14,
A30;
then
A33: u
= v by
FUNCT_1: 75,
ZFMISC_1: 18;
(F1
. m)
= (F1
/. m) by
A32,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
hence (G2
. i)
= (G1
. (f
. i)) by
A21,
A10,
A29,
A32,
A33,
A31,
Def7;
end;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4,
A5,
A6,
A7,
A8,
A21,
A28,
Th6,
FINSEQ_1: 48;
end;
end
Lm2: (
Sum (
ZeroLC V))
= (
0. V)
proof
consider F such that F is
one-to-one and
A1: (
rng F)
= (
Carrier (
ZeroLC V)) and
A2: (
Sum (
ZeroLC V))
= (
Sum ((
ZeroLC V)
(#) F)) by
Def8;
(
Carrier (
ZeroLC V))
=
{} by
Def5;
then F
=
{} by
A1,
RELAT_1: 41;
then (
len F)
=
0 ;
then (
len ((
ZeroLC V)
(#) F))
=
0 by
Def7;
hence thesis by
A2,
RLVECT_1: 75;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:29
A
<>
{} & A is
linearly-closed iff for l holds (
Sum l)
in A
proof
thus A
<>
{} & A is
linearly-closed implies for l holds (
Sum l)
in A
proof
defpred
P[
Nat] means for l st (
card (
Carrier l))
= $1 holds (
Sum l)
in A;
assume that
A1: A
<>
{} and
A2: A is
linearly-closed;
now
let l;
assume (
card (
Carrier l))
=
0 ;
then (
Carrier l)
=
{} ;
then l
= (
ZeroLC V) by
Def5;
then (
Sum l)
= (
0. V) by
Lm2;
hence (
Sum l)
in A by
A1,
A2,
RLSUB_1: 1;
end;
then
A3:
P[
0 ];
now
let k;
assume
A4: for l st (
card (
Carrier l))
= k holds (
Sum l)
in A;
let l;
deffunc
F(
Element of V) = (l
. $1);
consider F such that
A5: F is
one-to-one and
A6: (
rng F)
= (
Carrier l) and
A7: (
Sum l)
= (
Sum (l
(#) F)) by
Def8;
reconsider G = (F
| (
Seg k)) as
FinSequence of the
carrier of V by
FINSEQ_1: 18;
assume
A8: (
card (
Carrier l))
= (k
+ 1);
then
A9: (
len F)
= (k
+ 1) by
A5,
A6,
FINSEQ_4: 62;
then
A10: (
len (l
(#) F))
= (k
+ 1) by
Def7;
A11: (k
+ 1)
in (
Seg (k
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 4;
then
A12: (k
+ 1)
in (
dom F) by
A9,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(k
+ 1)
in (
dom F) by
A9,
A11,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider v = (F
. (k
+ 1)) as
VECTOR of V by
FUNCT_1: 102;
consider f be
Function of the
carrier of V,
REAL such that
A13: (f
. v)
= (
In (
0 ,
REAL )) and
A14: for u be
Element of V st u
<> v holds (f
. u)
=
F(u) from
FUNCT_2:sch 6;
reconsider f as
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of V,
REAL )) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
A15: v
in (
Carrier l) by
A6,
A12,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
now
let u;
assume
A16: not u
in (
Carrier l);
hence (f
. u)
= (l
. u) by
A15,
A14
.=
0 by
A16;
end;
then
reconsider f as
Linear_Combination of V by
Def3;
A17: (A
\
{v})
c= A by
XBOOLE_1: 36;
A18: (
Carrier l)
c= A by
Def6;
then
A19: ((l
. v)
* v)
in A by
A2,
A15;
A20: (
Carrier f)
= ((
Carrier l)
\
{v})
proof
thus (
Carrier f)
c= ((
Carrier l)
\
{v})
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
Carrier f);
then
consider u such that
A21: u
= x and
A22: (f
. u)
<>
0 ;
(f
. u)
= (l
. u) by
A13,
A14,
A22;
then
A23: x
in (
Carrier l) by
A21,
A22;
not x
in
{v} by
A13,
A21,
A22,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis by
A23,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
let x be
object;
assume
A24: x
in ((
Carrier l)
\
{v});
then x
in (
Carrier l) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
consider u such that
A25: x
= u and
A26: (l
. u)
<>
0 ;
not x
in
{v} by
A24,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then x
<> v by
TARSKI:def 1;
then (l
. u)
= (f
. u) by
A14,
A25;
hence thesis by
A25,
A26;
end;
then (
Carrier f)
c= (A
\
{v}) by
A18,
XBOOLE_1: 33;
then (
Carrier f)
c= A by
A17;
then
reconsider f as
Linear_Combination of A by
Def6;
A27: (
len G)
= k by
A9,
FINSEQ_3: 53;
then
A28: (
len (f
(#) G))
= k by
Def7;
A29: (
rng G)
= (
Carrier f)
proof
thus (
rng G)
c= (
Carrier f)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
rng G);
then
consider y be
object such that
A30: y
in (
dom G) and
A31: (G
. y)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider y as
Element of
NAT by
A30;
A32: (
dom G)
c= (
dom F) & (G
. y)
= (F
. y) by
A30,
FUNCT_1: 47,
RELAT_1: 60;
now
assume x
= v;
then
A33: (k
+ 1)
= y by
A5,
A12,
A30,
A31,
A32;
y
<= k by
A27,
A30,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
hence contradiction by
A33,
XREAL_1: 29;
end;
then
A34: not x
in
{v} by
TARSKI:def 1;
x
in (
rng F) by
A30,
A31,
A32,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence thesis by
A6,
A20,
A34,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
let x be
object;
assume
A35: x
in (
Carrier f);
then x
in (
rng F) by
A6,
A20,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
consider y be
object such that
A36: y
in (
dom F) and
A37: (F
. y)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider y as
Element of
NAT by
A36;
now
assume not y
in (
Seg k);
then y
in ((
dom F)
\ (
Seg k)) by
A36,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then y
in ((
Seg (k
+ 1))
\ (
Seg k)) by
A9,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then y
in
{(k
+ 1)} by
FINSEQ_3: 15;
then y
= (k
+ 1) by
TARSKI:def 1;
then not v
in
{v} by
A20,
A35,
A37,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hence contradiction by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
then y
in ((
dom F)
/\ (
Seg k)) by
A36,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A38: y
in (
dom G) by
RELAT_1: 61;
then (G
. y)
= (F
. y) by
FUNCT_1: 47;
hence thesis by
A37,
A38,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
((
Seg (k
+ 1))
/\ (
Seg k))
= (
Seg k) by
FINSEQ_1: 7,
NAT_1: 12
.= (
dom (f
(#) G)) by
A28,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A39: (
dom (f
(#) G))
= ((
dom (l
(#) F))
/\ (
Seg k)) by
A10,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
now
let x be
object;
assume
A40: x
in (
dom (f
(#) G));
then
reconsider n = x as
Element of
NAT ;
n
in (
dom (l
(#) F)) by
A39,
A40,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A41: n
in (
dom F) by
A9,
A10,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then (F
. n)
in (
rng F) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
reconsider w = (F
. n) as
VECTOR of V;
A42: n
in (
dom G) by
A27,
A28,
A40,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A43: (G
. n)
in (
rng G) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
reconsider u = (G
. n) as
VECTOR of V;
not u
in
{v} by
A20,
A29,
A43,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
A44: u
<> v by
TARSKI:def 1;
A45: ((f
(#) G)
. n)
= ((f
. u)
* u) by
A42,
Th24
.= ((l
. u)
* u) by
A14,
A44;
w
= u by
A42,
FUNCT_1: 47;
hence ((f
(#) G)
. x)
= ((l
(#) F)
. x) by
A45,
A41,
Th24;
end;
then
A46: (f
(#) G)
= ((l
(#) F)
| (
Seg k)) by
A39,
FUNCT_1: 46;
v
in (
rng F) by
A12,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
{v}
c= (
Carrier l) by
A6,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then (
card (
Carrier f))
= ((k
+ 1)
- (
card
{v})) by
A8,
A20,
CARD_2: 44
.= ((k
+ 1)
- 1) by
CARD_1: 30
.= k;
then
A47: (
Sum f)
in A by
A4;
G is
one-to-one by
A5,
FUNCT_1: 52;
then
A48: (
Sum (f
(#) G))
= (
Sum f) by
A29,
Def8;
(
dom (f
(#) G))
= (
Seg (
len (f
(#) G))) & ((l
(#) F)
. (
len F))
= ((l
. v)
* v) by
A9,
A12,
Th24,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (
Sum (l
(#) F))
= ((
Sum (f
(#) G))
+ ((l
. v)
* v)) by
A9,
A10,
A28,
A46,
RLVECT_1: 38;
hence (
Sum l)
in A by
A2,
A7,
A19,
A48,
A47;
end;
then
A49: for k st
P[k] holds
P[(k
+ 1)];
let l;
A50: (
card (
Carrier l))
= (
card (
Carrier l));
for k holds
P[k] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A3,
A49);
hence thesis by
A50;
end;
assume
A51: for l holds (
Sum l)
in A;
hence A
<>
{} ;
(
ZeroLC V) is
Linear_Combination of A & (
Sum (
ZeroLC V))
= (
0. V) by
Lm2,
Th22;
then
A52: (
0. V)
in A by
A51;
A53: for a, v st v
in A holds (a
* v)
in A
proof
let a, v;
assume
A54: v
in A;
now
per cases ;
suppose a
=
0 ;
hence thesis by
A52,
RLVECT_1: 10;
end;
suppose
A55: a
<>
0 ;
deffunc
F(
Element of V) = zz;
reconsider aa = a as
Element of
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
consider f such that
A56: (f
. v)
= aa and
A57: for u be
Element of V st u
<> v holds (f
. u)
=
F(u) from
FUNCT_2:sch 6;
reconsider f as
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of V,
REAL )) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
now
let u;
assume not u
in
{v};
then u
<> v by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence (f
. u)
=
0 by
A57;
end;
then
reconsider f as
Linear_Combination of V by
Def3;
A58: (
Carrier f)
=
{v}
proof
thus (
Carrier f)
c=
{v}
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
Carrier f);
then
consider u such that
A59: x
= u and
A60: (f
. u)
<>
0 ;
u
= v by
A57,
A60;
hence thesis by
A59,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
let x be
object;
assume x
in
{v};
then x
= v by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence thesis by
A55,
A56;
end;
{v}
c= A by
A54,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then
reconsider f as
Linear_Combination of A by
A58,
Def6;
consider F such that
A61: F is
one-to-one & (
rng F)
= (
Carrier f) and
A62: (
Sum (f
(#) F))
= (
Sum f) by
Def8;
F
=
<*v*> by
A58,
A61,
FINSEQ_3: 97;
then (f
(#) F)
=
<*((f
. v)
* v)*> by
Th26;
then (
Sum f)
= (a
* v) by
A56,
A62,
RLVECT_1: 44;
hence thesis by
A51;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
thus for v, u st v
in A & u
in A holds (v
+ u)
in A
proof
let v, u;
assume that
A63: v
in A and
A64: u
in A;
now
per cases ;
suppose u
= v;
then (v
+ u)
= ((1
* v)
+ v) by
RLVECT_1:def 8
.= ((1
* v)
+ (1
* v)) by
RLVECT_1:def 8
.= ((1
+ 1)
* v) by
RLVECT_1:def 6
.= (2
* v);
hence thesis by
A53,
A63;
end;
suppose
A65: v
<> u;
deffunc
F(
Element of V) = zz;
reconsider jj = 1 as
Element of
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
consider f such that
A66: (f
. v)
= jj & (f
. u)
= jj and
A67: for w be
Element of V st w
<> v & w
<> u holds (f
. w)
=
F(w) from
FUNCT_2:sch 7(
A65);
reconsider f as
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of V,
REAL )) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
now
let w;
assume not w
in
{v, u};
then w
<> v & w
<> u by
TARSKI:def 2;
hence (f
. w)
=
0 by
A67;
end;
then
reconsider f as
Linear_Combination of V by
Def3;
A68: (
Carrier f)
=
{v, u}
proof
thus (
Carrier f)
c=
{v, u}
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
Carrier f);
then ex w st x
= w & (f
. w)
<>
0 ;
then x
= v or x
= u by
A67;
hence thesis by
TARSKI:def 2;
end;
let x be
object;
assume x
in
{v, u};
then x
= v or x
= u by
TARSKI:def 2;
hence thesis by
A66;
end;
then
A69: (
Carrier f)
c= A by
A63,
A64,
ZFMISC_1: 32;
A70: (1
* u)
= u & (1
* v)
= v by
RLVECT_1:def 8;
reconsider f as
Linear_Combination of A by
A69,
Def6;
consider F such that
A71: F is
one-to-one & (
rng F)
= (
Carrier f) and
A72: (
Sum (f
(#) F))
= (
Sum f) by
Def8;
F
=
<*v, u*> or F
=
<*u, v*> by
A65,
A68,
A71,
FINSEQ_3: 99;
then (f
(#) F)
=
<*(1
* v), (1
* u)*> or (f
(#) F)
=
<*(1
* u), (1
* v)*> by
A66,
Th27;
then (
Sum f)
= (v
+ u) by
A72,
A70,
RLVECT_1: 45;
hence thesis by
A51;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
thus thesis by
A53;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:30
(
Sum (
ZeroLC V))
= (
0. V) by
Lm2;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:31
for l be
Linear_Combination of (
{} the
carrier of V) holds (
Sum l)
= (
0. V)
proof
let l be
Linear_Combination of (
{} the
carrier of V);
l
= (
ZeroLC V) by
Th23;
hence thesis by
Lm2;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:32
Th32: for l be
Linear_Combination of
{v} holds (
Sum l)
= ((l
. v)
* v)
proof
let l be
Linear_Combination of
{v};
A1: (
Carrier l)
c=
{v} by
Def6;
now
per cases by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 33;
suppose (
Carrier l)
=
{} ;
then
A2: l
= (
ZeroLC V) by
Def5;
hence (
Sum l)
= (
0. V) by
Lm2
.= (
0
* v) by
RLVECT_1: 10
.= ((l
. v)
* v) by
A2,
Th20;
end;
suppose (
Carrier l)
=
{v};
then
consider F such that
A3: F is
one-to-one & (
rng F)
=
{v} and
A4: (
Sum l)
= (
Sum (l
(#) F)) by
Def8;
F
=
<*v*> by
A3,
FINSEQ_3: 97;
then (l
(#) F)
=
<*((l
. v)
* v)*> by
Th26;
hence thesis by
A4,
RLVECT_1: 44;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:33
Th33: v1
<> v2 implies for l be
Linear_Combination of
{v1, v2} holds (
Sum l)
= (((l
. v1)
* v1)
+ ((l
. v2)
* v2))
proof
assume
A1: v1
<> v2;
let l be
Linear_Combination of
{v1, v2};
A2: (
Carrier l)
c=
{v1, v2} by
Def6;
now
per cases by
A2,
ZFMISC_1: 36;
suppose (
Carrier l)
=
{} ;
then
A3: l
= (
ZeroLC V) by
Def5;
hence (
Sum l)
= (
0. V) by
Lm2
.= ((
0. V)
+ (
0. V))
.= ((
0
* v1)
+ (
0. V)) by
RLVECT_1: 10
.= ((
0
* v1)
+ (
0
* v2)) by
RLVECT_1: 10
.= (((l
. v1)
* v1)
+ (
0
* v2)) by
A3,
Th20
.= (((l
. v1)
* v1)
+ ((l
. v2)
* v2)) by
A3,
Th20;
end;
suppose
A4: (
Carrier l)
=
{v1};
then
reconsider L = l as
Linear_Combination of
{v1} by
Def6;
A5: not v2
in (
Carrier l) by
A1,
A4,
TARSKI:def 1;
thus (
Sum l)
= (
Sum L)
.= ((l
. v1)
* v1) by
Th32
.= (((l
. v1)
* v1)
+ (
0. V))
.= (((l
. v1)
* v1)
+ (
0
* v2)) by
RLVECT_1: 10
.= (((l
. v1)
* v1)
+ ((l
. v2)
* v2)) by
A5;
end;
suppose
A6: (
Carrier l)
=
{v2};
then
reconsider L = l as
Linear_Combination of
{v2} by
Def6;
A7: not v1
in (
Carrier l) by
A1,
A6,
TARSKI:def 1;
thus (
Sum l)
= (
Sum L)
.= ((l
. v2)
* v2) by
Th32
.= ((
0. V)
+ ((l
. v2)
* v2))
.= ((
0
* v1)
+ ((l
. v2)
* v2)) by
RLVECT_1: 10
.= (((l
. v1)
* v1)
+ ((l
. v2)
* v2)) by
A7;
end;
suppose (
Carrier l)
=
{v1, v2};
then
consider F such that
A8: F is
one-to-one & (
rng F)
=
{v1, v2} and
A9: (
Sum l)
= (
Sum (l
(#) F)) by
Def8;
F
=
<*v1, v2*> or F
=
<*v2, v1*> by
A1,
A8,
FINSEQ_3: 99;
then (l
(#) F)
=
<*((l
. v1)
* v1), ((l
. v2)
* v2)*> or (l
(#) F)
=
<*((l
. v2)
* v2), ((l
. v1)
* v1)*> by
Th27;
hence thesis by
A9,
RLVECT_1: 45;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:34
(
Carrier L)
=
{} implies (
Sum L)
= (
0. V)
proof
assume (
Carrier L)
=
{} ;
then L
= (
ZeroLC V) by
Def5;
hence thesis by
Lm2;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:35
(
Carrier L)
=
{v} implies (
Sum L)
= ((L
. v)
* v)
proof
assume (
Carrier L)
=
{v};
then L is
Linear_Combination of
{v} by
Def6;
hence thesis by
Th32;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:36
(
Carrier L)
=
{v1, v2} & v1
<> v2 implies (
Sum L)
= (((L
. v1)
* v1)
+ ((L
. v2)
* v2))
proof
assume that
A1: (
Carrier L)
=
{v1, v2} and
A2: v1
<> v2;
L is
Linear_Combination of
{v1, v2} by
A1,
Def6;
hence thesis by
A2,
Th33;
end;
definition
let V be non
empty
addLoopStr;
let L1,L2 be
Linear_Combination of V;
:: original:
=
redefine
::
RLVECT_2:def9
pred L1
= L2 means for v be
Element of V holds (L1
. v)
= (L2
. v);
compatibility ;
end
definition
let V be non
empty
addLoopStr;
let L1,L2 be
Linear_Combination of V;
:: original:
+
redefine
::
RLVECT_2:def10
func L1
+ L2 ->
Linear_Combination of V means
:
Def10: for v be
Element of V holds (it
. v)
= ((L1
. v)
+ (L2
. v));
coherence
proof
reconsider f = (L1
+ L2) as
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of V,
REAL )) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
now
let v be
Element of V;
assume
A1: not v
in ((
Carrier L1)
\/ (
Carrier L2));
then not v
in (
Carrier L2) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
A2: (L2
. v)
=
0 ;
not v
in (
Carrier L1) by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then (L1
. v)
=
0 ;
hence (f
. v)
= (
0
+
0 ) by
A2,
VALUED_1: 1
.=
0 ;
end;
hence thesis by
Def3;
end;
compatibility
proof
let f be
Linear_Combination of V;
thus f
= (L1
+ L2) implies for v be
Element of V holds (f
. v)
= ((L1
. v)
+ (L2
. v)) by
VALUED_1: 1;
assume
A3: for v be
Element of V holds (f
. v)
= ((L1
. v)
+ (L2
. v));
thus f
= (L1
+ L2)
proof
let v be
Element of the
carrier of V;
thus (f
. v)
= ((L1
. v)
+ (L2
. v)) by
A3
.= ((L1
+ L2)
. v) by
VALUED_1: 1;
end;
end;
end
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:37
Th37: (
Carrier (L1
+ L2))
c= ((
Carrier L1)
\/ (
Carrier L2))
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
Carrier (L1
+ L2));
then
consider u such that
A1: x
= u and
A2: ((L1
+ L2)
. u)
<>
0 ;
((L1
+ L2)
. u)
= ((L1
. u)
+ (L2
. u)) by
Def10;
then (L1
. u)
<>
0 or (L2
. u)
<>
0 by
A2;
then x
in { v1 : (L1
. v1)
<>
0 } or x
in { v2 : (L2
. v2)
<>
0 } by
A1;
hence thesis by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:38
Th38: L1 is
Linear_Combination of A & L2 is
Linear_Combination of A implies (L1
+ L2) is
Linear_Combination of A
proof
assume L1 is
Linear_Combination of A & L2 is
Linear_Combination of A;
then (
Carrier L1)
c= A & (
Carrier L2)
c= A by
Def6;
then
A1: ((
Carrier L1)
\/ (
Carrier L2))
c= A by
XBOOLE_1: 8;
(
Carrier (L1
+ L2))
c= ((
Carrier L1)
\/ (
Carrier L2)) by
Th37;
hence (
Carrier (L1
+ L2))
c= A by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:39
for V be non
empty
addLoopStr, L1,L2 be
Linear_Combination of V holds (L1
+ L2)
= (L2
+ L1);
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:40
Th40: (L1
+ (L2
+ L3))
= ((L1
+ L2)
+ L3)
proof
let v;
thus ((L1
+ (L2
+ L3))
. v)
= ((L1
. v)
+ ((L2
+ L3)
. v)) by
Def10
.= ((L1
. v)
+ ((L2
. v)
+ (L3
. v))) by
Def10
.= (((L1
. v)
+ (L2
. v))
+ (L3
. v))
.= (((L1
+ L2)
. v)
+ (L3
. v)) by
Def10
.= (((L1
+ L2)
+ L3)
. v) by
Def10;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:41
Th41: (L
+ (
ZeroLC V))
= L & ((
ZeroLC V)
+ L)
= L
proof
thus (L
+ (
ZeroLC V))
= L
proof
let v;
thus ((L
+ (
ZeroLC V))
. v)
= ((L
. v)
+ ((
ZeroLC V)
. v)) by
Def10
.= ((L
. v)
+
0 ) by
Th20
.= (L
. v);
end;
hence thesis;
end;
definition
let V;
let a be
Real;
let L;
::
RLVECT_2:def11
func a
* L ->
Linear_Combination of V means
:
Def11: for v holds (it
. v)
= (a
* (L
. v));
existence
proof
deffunc
F(
Element of V) = (
In ((a
* (L
. $1)),
REAL ));
consider f be
Function of the
carrier of V,
REAL such that
A1: for v be
Element of V holds (f
. v)
=
F(v) from
FUNCT_2:sch 4;
reconsider f as
Element of (
Funcs (the
carrier of V,
REAL )) by
FUNCT_2: 8;
now
let v;
assume not v
in (
Carrier L);
then
A2: (L
. v)
=
0 ;
thus (f
. v)
=
F(v) by
A1
.= (a
*
0 ) by
A2
.=
0 ;
end;
then
reconsider f as
Linear_Combination of V by
Def3;
take f;
let v;
(f
. v)
=
F(v) by
A1;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let L1, L2;
assume
A3: for v holds (L1
. v)
= (a
* (L
. v));
assume
A4: for v holds (L2
. v)
= (a
* (L
. v));
let v;
thus (L1
. v)
= (a
* (L
. v)) by
A3
.= (L2
. v) by
A4;
end;
end
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:42
Th42: a
<>
0 implies (
Carrier (a
* L))
= (
Carrier L)
proof
set T = { u : ((a
* L)
. u)
<>
0 };
set S = { v : (L
. v)
<>
0 };
assume
A1: a
<>
0 ;
T
= S
proof
thus T
c= S
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in T;
then
consider u such that
A2: x
= u and
A3: ((a
* L)
. u)
<>
0 ;
((a
* L)
. u)
= (a
* (L
. u)) by
Def11;
then (L
. u)
<>
0 by
A3;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
let x be
object;
assume x
in S;
then
consider v such that
A4: x
= v and
A5: (L
. v)
<>
0 ;
((a
* L)
. v)
= (a
* (L
. v)) by
Def11;
then ((a
* L)
. v)
<>
0 by
A1,
A5,
XCMPLX_1: 6;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:43
Th43: (
0
* L)
= (
ZeroLC V)
proof
let v;
thus ((
0
* L)
. v)
= (
0
* (L
. v)) by
Def11
.= ((
ZeroLC V)
. v) by
Th20;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:44
Th44: L is
Linear_Combination of A implies (a
* L) is
Linear_Combination of A
proof
assume
A1: L is
Linear_Combination of A;
now
per cases ;
suppose a
=
0 ;
then (a
* L)
= (
ZeroLC V) by
Th43;
hence thesis by
Th22;
end;
suppose a
<>
0 ;
then (
Carrier (a
* L))
= (
Carrier L) by
Th42;
hence thesis by
A1,
Def6;
end;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:45
Th45: ((a
+ b)
* L)
= ((a
* L)
+ (b
* L))
proof
let v;
thus (((a
+ b)
* L)
. v)
= ((a
+ b)
* (L
. v)) by
Def11
.= ((a
* (L
. v))
+ (b
* (L
. v)))
.= (((a
* L)
. v)
+ (b
* (L
. v))) by
Def11
.= (((a
* L)
. v)
+ ((b
* L)
. v)) by
Def11
.= (((a
* L)
+ (b
* L))
. v) by
Def10;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:46
Th46: (a
* (L1
+ L2))
= ((a
* L1)
+ (a
* L2))
proof
let v;
thus ((a
* (L1
+ L2))
. v)
= (a
* ((L1
+ L2)
. v)) by
Def11
.= (a
* ((L1
. v)
+ (L2
. v))) by
Def10
.= ((a
* (L1
. v))
+ (a
* (L2
. v)))
.= (((a
* L1)
. v)
+ (a
* (L2
. v))) by
Def11
.= (((a
* L1)
. v)
+ ((a
* L2)
. v)) by
Def11
.= (((a
* L1)
+ (a
* L2))
. v) by
Def10;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:47
Th47: (a
* (b
* L))
= ((a
* b)
* L)
proof
let v;
thus ((a
* (b
* L))
. v)
= (a
* ((b
* L)
. v)) by
Def11
.= (a
* (b
* (L
. v))) by
Def11
.= ((a
* b)
* (L
. v))
.= (((a
* b)
* L)
. v) by
Def11;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:48
Th48: (1
* L)
= L
proof
let v;
thus ((1
* L)
. v)
= (1
* (L
. v)) by
Def11
.= (L
. v);
end;
definition
let V, L;
::
RLVECT_2:def12
func
- L ->
Linear_Combination of V equals ((
- 1)
* L);
correctness ;
end
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:49
Th49: ((
- L)
. v)
= (
- (L
. v))
proof
thus ((
- L)
. v)
= ((
- 1)
* (L
. v)) by
Def11
.= (
- (L
. v));
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:50
(L1
+ L2)
= (
ZeroLC V) implies L2
= (
- L1)
proof
assume
A1: (L1
+ L2)
= (
ZeroLC V);
let v;
((L1
. v)
+ (L2
. v))
= ((
ZeroLC V)
. v) by
A1,
Def10
.=
0 by
Th20;
hence (L2
. v)
= (
- (L1
. v))
.= ((
- L1)
. v) by
Th49;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:51
(
Carrier (
- L))
= (
Carrier L) by
Th42;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:52
L is
Linear_Combination of A implies (
- L) is
Linear_Combination of A by
Th44;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:53
(
- (
- L))
= L
proof
let v;
thus ((
- (
- L))
. v)
= ((((
- 1)
* (
- 1))
* L)
. v) by
Th47
.= (1
* (L
. v)) by
Def11
.= (L
. v);
end;
definition
let V;
let L1, L2;
::
RLVECT_2:def13
func L1
- L2 ->
Linear_Combination of V equals (L1
+ (
- L2));
correctness ;
end
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:54
Th54: ((L1
- L2)
. v)
= ((L1
. v)
- (L2
. v))
proof
thus ((L1
- L2)
. v)
= ((L1
. v)
+ ((
- L2)
. v)) by
Def10
.= ((L1
. v)
+ (
- (L2
. v))) by
Th49
.= ((L1
. v)
- (L2
. v));
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:55
(
Carrier (L1
- L2))
c= ((
Carrier L1)
\/ (
Carrier L2))
proof
(
Carrier (L1
- L2))
c= ((
Carrier L1)
\/ (
Carrier (
- L2))) by
Th37;
hence thesis by
Th42;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:56
L1 is
Linear_Combination of A & L2 is
Linear_Combination of A implies (L1
- L2) is
Linear_Combination of A
proof
assume that
A1: L1 is
Linear_Combination of A and
A2: L2 is
Linear_Combination of A;
(
- L2) is
Linear_Combination of A by
A2,
Th44;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th38;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:57
Th57: (L
- L)
= (
ZeroLC V)
proof
let v;
thus ((L
- L)
. v)
= ((L
. v)
- (L
. v)) by
Th54
.= ((
ZeroLC V)
. v) by
Th20;
end;
definition
let V;
::
RLVECT_2:def14
func
LinComb (V) ->
set means
:
Def14: x
in it iff x is
Linear_Combination of V;
existence
proof
defpred
P[
object] means $1 is
Linear_Combination of V;
consider A be
set such that
A1: for x be
object holds x
in A iff x
in (
Funcs (the
carrier of V,
REAL )) &
P[x] from
XBOOLE_0:sch 1;
take A;
let x;
thus x
in A implies x is
Linear_Combination of V by
A1;
assume x is
Linear_Combination of V;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let D1,D2 be
set;
assume
A2: for x holds x
in D1 iff x is
Linear_Combination of V;
assume
A3: for x holds x
in D2 iff x is
Linear_Combination of V;
thus D1
c= D2
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in D1;
then x is
Linear_Combination of V by
A2;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
let x be
object;
assume x
in D2;
then x is
Linear_Combination of V by
A3;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
end
registration
let V;
cluster (
LinComb V) -> non
empty;
coherence
proof
set x = the
Linear_Combination of V;
x
in (
LinComb V) by
Def14;
hence thesis;
end;
end
reserve e,e1,e2 for
Element of (
LinComb V);
definition
let V;
let e;
::
RLVECT_2:def15
func
@ e ->
Linear_Combination of V equals e;
coherence by
Def14;
end
definition
let V;
let L;
::
RLVECT_2:def16
func
@ L ->
Element of (
LinComb V) equals L;
coherence by
Def14;
end
definition
let V;
::
RLVECT_2:def17
func
LCAdd (V) ->
BinOp of (
LinComb V) means
:
Def17: for e1, e2 holds (it
. (e1,e2))
= ((
@ e1)
+ (
@ e2));
existence
proof
deffunc
F(
Element of (
LinComb V),
Element of (
LinComb V)) = (
@ ((
@ $1)
+ (
@ $2)));
consider o be
BinOp of (
LinComb V) such that
A1: for e1, e2 holds (o
. (e1,e2))
=
F(e1,e2) from
BINOP_1:sch 4;
take o;
let e1, e2;
thus (o
. (e1,e2))
= (
@ ((
@ e1)
+ (
@ e2))) by
A1
.= ((
@ e1)
+ (
@ e2));
end;
uniqueness
proof
let o1,o2 be
BinOp of (
LinComb V);
assume
A2: for e1, e2 holds (o1
. (e1,e2))
= ((
@ e1)
+ (
@ e2));
assume
A3: for e1, e2 holds (o2
. (e1,e2))
= ((
@ e1)
+ (
@ e2));
now
let e1, e2;
thus (o1
. (e1,e2))
= ((
@ e1)
+ (
@ e2)) by
A2
.= (o2
. (e1,e2)) by
A3;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let V;
::
RLVECT_2:def18
func
LCMult (V) ->
Function of
[:
REAL , (
LinComb V):], (
LinComb V) means
:
Def18: for a, e holds (it
.
[a, e])
= (a
* (
@ e));
existence
proof
defpred
P[
Real,
Element of (
LinComb V),
set] means ex a st a
= $1 & $3
= (a
* (
@ $2));
A1: for x be
Element of
REAL , e1 holds ex e2 st
P[x, e1, e2]
proof
let x be
Element of
REAL , e1;
take (
@ (x
* (
@ e1)));
take x;
thus thesis;
end;
consider g be
Function of
[:
REAL , (
LinComb V):], (
LinComb V) such that
A2: for x be
Element of
REAL , e holds
P[x, e, (g
. (x,e))] from
BINOP_1:sch 3(
A1);
take g;
let a, e;
reconsider aa = a as
Element of
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
ex b st b
= aa & (g
. (aa,e))
= (b
* (
@ e)) by
A2;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let g1,g2 be
Function of
[:
REAL , (
LinComb V):], (
LinComb V);
assume
A3: for a, e holds (g1
.
[a, e])
= (a
* (
@ e));
assume
A4: for a, e holds (g2
.
[a, e])
= (a
* (
@ e));
now
let x be
Element of
REAL , e;
thus (g1
. (x,e))
= (x
* (
@ e)) by
A3
.= (g2
. (x,e)) by
A4;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let V;
::
RLVECT_2:def19
func
LC_RLSpace V ->
RLSStruct equals
RLSStruct (# (
LinComb V), (
@ (
ZeroLC V)), (
LCAdd V), (
LCMult V) #);
coherence ;
end
registration
let V;
cluster (
LC_RLSpace V) ->
strict non
empty;
coherence ;
end
registration
let V;
cluster (
LC_RLSpace V) ->
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital;
coherence
proof
set S = (
LC_RLSpace V);
A1:
now
let v,u be
VECTOR of S, K, L;
A2: (
@ (
@ K))
= K & (
@ (
@ L))
= L;
assume v
= K & u
= L;
hence (v
+ u)
= (K
+ L) by
A2,
Def17;
end;
thus S is
Abelian
proof
let u,v be
Element of S;
reconsider K = u, L = v as
Linear_Combination of V by
Def14;
thus (u
+ v)
= (L
+ K) by
A1
.= (v
+ u) by
A1;
end;
thus S is
add-associative
proof
let u,v,w be
Element of S;
reconsider L = u, K = v, M = w as
Linear_Combination of V by
Def14;
A3: (v
+ w)
= (K
+ M) by
A1;
(u
+ v)
= (L
+ K) by
A1;
hence ((u
+ v)
+ w)
= ((L
+ K)
+ M) by
A1
.= (L
+ (K
+ M)) by
Th40
.= (u
+ (v
+ w)) by
A1,
A3;
end;
thus S is
right_zeroed
proof
let v be
Element of S;
reconsider K = v as
Linear_Combination of V by
Def14;
thus (v
+ (
0. S))
= (K
+ (
ZeroLC V)) by
A1
.= v by
Th41;
end;
thus S is
right_complementable
proof
let v be
Element of S;
reconsider K = v as
Linear_Combination of V by
Def14;
(
- K)
in the
carrier of S by
Def14;
then (
- K)
in S;
then (
- K)
= (
vector (S,(
- K))) by
Def1;
then (v
+ (
vector (S,(
- K))))
= (K
- K) by
A1
.= (
0. S) by
Th57;
hence ex w be
VECTOR of S st (v
+ w)
= (
0. S);
end;
A4:
now
let v be
VECTOR of S, L, a;
A5: (
@ (
@ L))
= L;
assume v
= L;
hence (a
* v)
= (a
* L) by
A5,
Def18;
end;
thus for a be
Real holds for v,w be
VECTOR of S holds (a
* (v
+ w))
= ((a
* v)
+ (a
* w))
proof
let a be
Real;
let v,w be
VECTOR of S;
reconsider K = v, M = w as
Linear_Combination of V by
Def14;
reconsider a as
Real;
A6: (a
* v)
= (a
* K) & (a
* w)
= (a
* M) by
A4;
(v
+ w)
= (K
+ M) by
A1;
then (a
* (v
+ w))
= (a
* (K
+ M)) by
A4
.= ((a
* K)
+ (a
* M)) by
Th46
.= ((a
* v)
+ (a
* w)) by
A1,
A6;
hence thesis;
end;
thus for a,b be
Real holds for v be
VECTOR of S holds ((a
+ b)
* v)
= ((a
* v)
+ (b
* v))
proof
let a,b be
Real;
let v be
VECTOR of S;
reconsider K = v as
Linear_Combination of V by
Def14;
reconsider a, b as
Real;
A7: (a
* v)
= (a
* K) & (b
* v)
= (b
* K) by
A4;
((a
+ b)
* v)
= ((a
+ b)
* K) by
A4
.= ((a
* K)
+ (b
* K)) by
Th45
.= ((a
* v)
+ (b
* v)) by
A1,
A7;
hence thesis;
end;
thus for a,b be
Real holds for v be
VECTOR of S holds ((a
* b)
* v)
= (a
* (b
* v))
proof
let a,b be
Real;
let v be
VECTOR of S;
reconsider K = v as
Linear_Combination of V by
Def14;
reconsider a, b as
Real;
A8: (b
* v)
= (b
* K) by
A4;
((a
* b)
* v)
= ((a
* b)
* K) by
A4
.= (a
* (b
* K)) by
Th47
.= (a
* (b
* v)) by
A4,
A8;
hence thesis;
end;
let v be
VECTOR of S;
reconsider K = v as
Linear_Combination of V by
Def14;
thus (1
* v)
= (1
* K) by
A4
.= v by
Th48;
end;
end
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:58
the
carrier of (
LC_RLSpace V)
= (
LinComb V);
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:59
(
0. (
LC_RLSpace V))
= (
ZeroLC V);
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:60
the
addF of (
LC_RLSpace V)
= (
LCAdd V);
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:61
the
Mult of (
LC_RLSpace V)
= (
LCMult V);
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:62
Th62: ((
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),L1))
+ (
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),L2)))
= (L1
+ L2)
proof
set v2 = (
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),L2));
A1: L1
= (
@ (
@ L1)) & L2
= (
@ (
@ L2));
L2
in the
carrier of (
LC_RLSpace V) by
Def14;
then
A2: L2
in (
LC_RLSpace V);
L1
in the
carrier of (
LC_RLSpace V) by
Def14;
then L1
in (
LC_RLSpace V);
hence ((
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),L1))
+ (
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),L2)))
= ((
LCAdd V)
.
[L1, v2]) by
Def1
.= ((
LCAdd V)
. ((
@ L1),(
@ L2))) by
A2,
Def1
.= (L1
+ L2) by
A1,
Def17;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:63
Th63: (a
* (
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),L)))
= (a
* L)
proof
A1: (
@ (
@ L))
= L;
L
in the
carrier of (
LC_RLSpace V) by
Def14;
then L
in (
LC_RLSpace V);
hence (a
* (
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),L)))
= ((
LCMult V)
.
[a, (
@ L)]) by
Def1
.= (a
* L) by
A1,
Def18;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:64
Th64: (
- (
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),L)))
= (
- L)
proof
thus (
- (
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),L)))
= ((
- 1)
* (
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),L))) by
RLVECT_1: 16
.= (
- L) by
Th63;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:65
((
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),L1))
- (
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),L2)))
= (L1
- L2)
proof
(
- L2)
in (
LinComb V) by
Def14;
then
A1: (
- L2)
in (
LC_RLSpace V);
(
- (
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),L2)))
= (
- L2) by
Th64
.= (
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),(
- L2))) by
A1,
Def1;
hence thesis by
Th62;
end;
definition
let V;
let A;
::
RLVECT_2:def20
func
LC_RLSpace (A) ->
strict
Subspace of (
LC_RLSpace V) means the
carrier of it
= the set of all l;
existence
proof
set X = the set of all l;
X
c= the
carrier of (
LC_RLSpace V)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in X;
then ex l st x
= l;
hence thesis by
Def14;
end;
then
reconsider X as
Subset of (
LC_RLSpace V);
A1: X is
linearly-closed
proof
thus for v,u be
VECTOR of (
LC_RLSpace V) st v
in X & u
in X holds (v
+ u)
in X
proof
let v,u be
VECTOR of (
LC_RLSpace V);
assume that
A2: v
in X and
A3: u
in X;
consider l1 such that
A4: v
= l1 by
A2;
consider l2 such that
A5: u
= l2 by
A3;
A6: u
= (
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),l2)) by
A5,
Def1,
RLVECT_1: 1;
v
= (
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),l1)) by
A4,
Def1,
RLVECT_1: 1;
then (v
+ u)
= (l1
+ l2) by
A6,
Th62;
then (v
+ u) is
Linear_Combination of A by
Th38;
hence thesis;
end;
let a be
Real;
let v be
VECTOR of (
LC_RLSpace V);
assume v
in X;
then
consider l such that
A7: v
= l;
(a
* v)
= (a
* (
vector ((
LC_RLSpace V),l))) by
A7,
Def1,
RLVECT_1: 1
.= (a
* l) by
Th63;
then (a
* v) is
Linear_Combination of A by
Th44;
hence thesis;
end;
(
ZeroLC V) is
Linear_Combination of A by
Th22;
then (
ZeroLC V)
in X;
hence thesis by
A1,
RLSUB_1: 35;
end;
uniqueness by
RLSUB_1: 30;
end
reserve x,y for
set,
k,n for
Nat;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:66
Th66: for R be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
Abelian
associative
well-unital
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr, a be
Element of R holds for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over R, F,G be
FinSequence of V st (
len F)
= (
len G) & for k holds for v be
Element of V st k
in (
dom F) & v
= (G
. k) holds (F
. k)
= (a
* v) holds (
Sum F)
= (a
* (
Sum G))
proof
let R be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
Abelian
associative
well-unital
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr, a be
Element of R;
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over R, F,G be
FinSequence of V;
defpred
P[
Nat] means for H,I be
FinSequence of V st (
len H)
= (
len I) & (
len H)
= $1 & (for k holds for v be
Element of V st k
in (
dom H) & v
= (I
. k) holds (H
. k)
= (a
* v)) holds (
Sum H)
= (a
* (
Sum I));
A1:
P[n] implies
P[(n
+ 1)]
proof
assume
A2: for H,I be
FinSequence of V st (
len H)
= (
len I) & (
len H)
= n & for k holds for v be
Element of V st k
in (
dom H) & v
= (I
. k) holds (H
. k)
= (a
* v) holds (
Sum H)
= (a
* (
Sum I));
let H,I be
FinSequence of V;
assume that
A3: (
len H)
= (
len I) and
A4: (
len H)
= (n
+ 1) and
A5: for k holds for v be
Element of V st k
in (
dom H) & v
= (I
. k) holds (H
. k)
= (a
* v);
reconsider p = (H
| (
Seg n)), q = (I
| (
Seg n)) as
FinSequence of V by
FINSEQ_1: 18;
A6: n
<= (n
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 12;
then
A7: q
= (I
| (
dom q)) by
A3,
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
A8: (
len p)
= n by
A4,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
A9: (
len q)
= n by
A3,
A4,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
A10:
now
A11: (
dom p)
c= (
dom H) by
A4,
A6,
A8,
FINSEQ_3: 30;
let k;
let v be
Element of V;
assume that
A12: k
in (
dom p) and
A13: v
= (q
. k);
(
dom q)
= (
dom p) by
A8,
A9,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then (I
. k)
= (q
. k) by
A12,
FUNCT_1: 47;
then (H
. k)
= (a
* v) by
A5,
A12,
A13,
A11;
hence (p
. k)
= (a
* v) by
A12,
FUNCT_1: 47;
end;
(n
+ 1)
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 4;
then
A14: (n
+ 1)
in (
dom H) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(
dom H)
= (
dom I) by
A3,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
reconsider v1 = (H
. (n
+ 1)), v2 = (I
. (n
+ 1)) as
Element of V by
A14,
FINSEQ_2: 11;
A15: v1
= (a
* v2) by
A5,
A14;
p
= (H
| (
dom p)) by
A4,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
hence (
Sum H)
= ((
Sum p)
+ v1) by
A4,
A8,
RLVECT_1: 38
.= ((a
* (
Sum q))
+ (a
* v2)) by
A2,
A8,
A9,
A10,
A15
.= (a
* ((
Sum q)
+ v2)) by
VECTSP_1:def 14
.= (a
* (
Sum I)) by
A3,
A4,
A9,
A7,
RLVECT_1: 38;
end;
A16:
P[
0 ]
proof
let H,I be
FinSequence of V;
assume that
A17: (
len H)
= (
len I) and
A18: (
len H)
=
0 and for k holds for v be
Element of V st k
in (
dom H) & v
= (I
. k) holds (H
. k)
= (a
* v);
H
= (
<*> the
carrier of V) by
A18;
then
A19: (
Sum H)
= (
0. V) by
RLVECT_1: 43;
I
= (
<*> the
carrier of V) by
A17,
A18;
then (
Sum I)
= (
0. V) by
RLVECT_1: 43;
hence thesis by
A19,
VECTSP_1: 14;
end;
for n holds
P[n] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A16,
A1);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:67
for R be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
Abelian
associative
well-unital
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr, a be
Element of R holds for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over R, F,G be
FinSequence of V st (
len F)
= (
len G) & for k st k
in (
dom F) holds (G
. k)
= (a
* (F
/. k)) holds (
Sum G)
= (a
* (
Sum F))
proof
let R be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
Abelian
associative
well-unital
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr, a be
Element of R;
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over R, F,G be
FinSequence of V;
assume that
A1: (
len F)
= (
len G) and
A2: for k st k
in (
dom F) holds (G
. k)
= (a
* (F
/. k));
now
let k;
let v be
Element of V;
assume that
A3: k
in (
dom G) and
A4: v
= (F
. k);
A5: k
in (
dom F) by
A1,
A3,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then v
= (F
/. k) by
A4,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
hence (G
. k)
= (a
* v) by
A2,
A5;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th66;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:68
for R be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
Abelian
associative
well-unital
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr holds for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
ModuleStr over R, F,G,H be
FinSequence of V st (
len F)
= (
len G) & (
len F)
= (
len H) & for k st k
in (
dom F) holds (H
. k)
= ((F
/. k)
- (G
/. k)) holds (
Sum H)
= ((
Sum F)
- (
Sum G))
proof
let R be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
Abelian
associative
well-unital
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr;
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable non
empty
ModuleStr over R, F,G,H be
FinSequence of V;
assume that
A1: (
len F)
= (
len G) and
A2: (
len F)
= (
len H) and
A3: for k st k
in (
dom F) holds (H
. k)
= ((F
/. k)
- (G
/. k));
deffunc
F(
Nat) = (
- (G
/. $1));
consider I be
FinSequence such that
A4: (
len I)
= (
len G) and
A5: for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom I) holds (I
. k)
=
F(k) from
FINSEQ_1:sch 2;
A6: (
dom I)
= (
Seg (
len G)) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A7: for k st k
in (
Seg (
len G)) holds (I
. k)
=
F(k) by
A5;
(
rng I)
c= the
carrier of V
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
rng I);
then
consider y be
object such that
A8: y
in (
dom I) and
A9: (I
. y)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider y as
Element of
NAT by
A8;
x
= (
- (G
/. y)) by
A5,
A8,
A9;
then
reconsider v = x as
Element of V;
v
in V;
hence thesis;
end;
then
reconsider I as
FinSequence of V by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
A10: (
Seg (
len G))
= (
dom G) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
now
let k;
A11: (
dom F)
= (
dom G) by
A1,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
assume
A12: k
in (
dom F);
then k
in (
dom I) by
A1,
A4,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A13: (I
. k)
= (I
/. k) by
PARTFUN1:def 6;
thus (H
. k)
= ((F
/. k)
- (G
/. k)) by
A3,
A12
.= ((F
/. k)
+ (
- (G
/. k)))
.= ((F
/. k)
+ (I
/. k)) by
A5,
A6,
A10,
A12,
A13,
A11;
end;
then
A14: (
Sum H)
= ((
Sum F)
+ (
Sum I)) by
A1,
A2,
A4,
Th2;
(
Sum I)
= (
- (
Sum G)) by
A4,
A7,
A10,
Th4;
hence thesis by
A14;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:69
for R be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
Abelian
associative
well-unital
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr, a be
Element of R holds for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over R holds (a
* (
Sum (
<*> the
carrier of V)))
= (
0. V)
proof
let R be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
Abelian
associative
well-unital
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr, a be
Element of R;
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over R;
thus (a
* (
Sum (
<*> the
carrier of V)))
= (a
* (
0. V)) by
RLVECT_1: 43
.= (
0. V) by
VECTSP_1: 14;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:70
for R be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
Abelian
associative
well-unital
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr, a be
Element of R holds for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over R, v,u be
Element of V holds (a
* (
Sum
<*v, u*>))
= ((a
* v)
+ (a
* u))
proof
let R be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
Abelian
associative
well-unital
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr, a be
Element of R;
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over R, v,u be
Element of V;
thus (a
* (
Sum
<*v, u*>))
= (a
* (v
+ u)) by
RLVECT_1: 45
.= ((a
* v)
+ (a
* u)) by
VECTSP_1:def 14;
end;
theorem ::
RLVECT_2:71
for R be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
Abelian
associative
well-unital
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr, a be
Element of R holds for V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over R, v,u,w be
Element of V holds (a
* (
Sum
<*v, u, w*>))
= (((a
* v)
+ (a
* u))
+ (a
* w))
proof
let R be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
Abelian
associative
well-unital
distributive non
empty
doubleLoopStr, a be
Element of R;
let V be
Abelian
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over R, v,u,w be
Element of V;
thus (a
* (
Sum
<*v, u, w*>))
= (a
* ((v
+ u)
+ w)) by
RLVECT_1: 46
.= ((a
* (v
+ u))
+ (a
* w)) by
VECTSP_1:def 14
.= (((a
* v)
+ (a
* u))
+ (a
* w)) by
VECTSP_1:def 14;
end;