seqfunc2.miz
begin
reserve D for non
empty
set,
D1,D2,x,y,Z for
set,
n,k for
Nat,
p,x1,r for
Real,
f for
Function,
Y for
RealNormSpace,
G,H,H1,H2,J for
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:1
f is
Functional_Sequence of D1, D2 iff ((
dom f)
=
NAT & for x st x
in
NAT holds (f
. x) is
PartFunc of D1, D2)
proof
thus f is
Functional_Sequence of D1, D2 implies ((
dom f)
=
NAT & for x st x
in
NAT holds (f
. x) is
PartFunc of D1, D2)
proof
assume
A1: f is
Functional_Sequence of D1, D2;
hence (
dom f)
=
NAT by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
let x;
assume x
in
NAT ;
then x
in (
dom f) by
A1,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A2: (f
. x)
in (
rng f) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
(
rng f)
c= (
PFuncs (D1,D2)) by
A1,
RELAT_1:def 19;
hence thesis by
A2,
PARTFUN1: 46;
end;
assume that
A3: (
dom f)
=
NAT and
A4: for x st x
in
NAT holds (f
. x) is
PartFunc of D1, D2;
now
let y be
object;
assume y
in (
rng f);
then
consider x be
object such that
A5: x
in (
dom f) and
A6: y
= (f
. x) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
(f
. x) is
PartFunc of D1, D2 by
A3,
A4,
A5;
hence y
in (
PFuncs (D1,D2)) by
A6,
PARTFUN1: 45;
end;
then (
rng f)
c= (
PFuncs (D1,D2));
hence thesis by
A3,
FUNCT_2:def 1,
RELSET_1: 4;
end;
definition
let D;
let Y be non
empty
NORMSTR;
let H be
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y;
let r be
Real;
::
SEQFUNC2:def1
func r
(#) H ->
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y means
:
Def1: for n be
Nat holds (it
. n)
= (r
(#) (H
. n));
existence
proof
deffunc
U(
Nat) = (r
(#) (H
. $1));
thus ex f be
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y st for n be
Nat holds (f
. n)
=
U(n) from
SEQFUNC:sch 1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let H1,H2 be
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y such that
A1: for n be
Nat holds (H1
. n)
= (r
(#) (H
. n)) and
A2: for n be
Nat holds (H2
. n)
= (r
(#) (H
. n));
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
(H1
. n)
= (r
(#) (H
. n)) by
A1;
hence (H1
. n)
= (H2
. n) by
A2;
end;
hence H1
= H2 by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
end
definition
let D;
let Y be
RealNormSpace;
let H be
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y;
::
SEQFUNC2:def2
func
- H ->
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y means
:
Def3: for n be
Nat holds (it
. n)
= (
- (H
. n));
existence
proof
take ((
- 1)
(#) H);
let n be
Nat;
for n be
Nat holds (((
- 1)
(#) H)
. n)
= (
- (H
. n))
proof
let n be
Nat;
thus (((
- 1)
(#) H)
. n)
= ((
- 1)
(#) (H
. n)) by
Def1
.= (
- (H
. n)) by
VFUNCT_1: 23;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let H1,H2 be
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y such that
A3: for n be
Nat holds (H1
. n)
= (
- (H
. n)) and
A4: for n be
Nat holds (H2
. n)
= (
- (H
. n));
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
(H1
. n)
= (
- (H
. n)) by
A3;
hence (H1
. n)
= (H2
. n) by
A4;
end;
hence H1
= H2 by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
involutiveness
proof
let G,H be
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y such that
A5: for n be
Nat holds (G
. n)
= (
- (H
. n));
let n be
Nat;
thus (H
. n)
= (
- (
- (H
. n))) by
VFUNCT_1: 24
.= (
- (G
. n)) by
A5;
end;
end
definition
let D;
let Y be non
empty
NORMSTR;
let H be
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y;
::
SEQFUNC2:def3
func
||.H.|| ->
Functional_Sequence of D,
REAL means
:
Def4: for n be
Nat holds (it
. n)
=
||.(H
. n).||;
existence
proof
deffunc
U(
Nat) =
||.(H
. $1).||;
thus ex f be
Functional_Sequence of D,
REAL st for n be
Nat holds (f
. n)
=
U(n) from
SEQFUNC:sch 1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let H1,H2 be
Functional_Sequence of D,
REAL such that
A6: for n be
Nat holds (H1
. n)
=
||.(H
. n).|| and
A7: for n be
Nat holds (H2
. n)
=
||.(H
. n).||;
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
(H2
. n)
=
||.(H
. n).|| by
A7;
hence (H1
. n)
= (H2
. n) by
A6;
end;
hence H1
= H2 by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
end
definition
let D;
let Y be non
empty
NORMSTR;
let G,H be
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y;
::
SEQFUNC2:def4
func G
+ H ->
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y means
:
Def5: for n be
Nat holds (it
. n)
= ((G
. n)
+ (H
. n));
existence
proof
deffunc
U(
Nat) = ((G
. $1)
+ (H
. $1));
thus ex f be
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y st for n be
Nat holds (f
. n)
=
U(n) from
SEQFUNC:sch 1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let H1,H2 be
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y such that
A1: for n be
Nat holds (H1
. n)
= ((G
. n)
+ (H
. n)) and
A2: for n be
Nat holds (H2
. n)
= ((G
. n)
+ (H
. n));
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
(H1
. n)
= ((G
. n)
+ (H
. n)) by
A1;
hence (H1
. n)
= (H2
. n) by
A2;
end;
hence H1
= H2 by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
end
definition
let D;
let Y be
RealNormSpace;
let G,H be
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y;
::
SEQFUNC2:def5
func G
- H ->
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y equals (G
+ (
- H));
correctness ;
end
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:2
Th3: H1
= (G
- H) iff for n holds (H1
. n)
= ((G
. n)
- (H
. n))
proof
thus H1
= (G
- H) implies for n holds (H1
. n)
= ((G
. n)
- (H
. n))
proof
assume
A1: H1
= (G
- H);
let n;
thus (H1
. n)
= ((G
. n)
+ ((
- H)
. n)) by
A1,
Def5
.= ((G
. n)
+ (
- (H
. n))) by
Def3
.= ((G
. n)
- (H
. n)) by
VFUNCT_1: 25;
end;
assume
A2: for n holds (H1
. n)
= ((G
. n)
- (H
. n));
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
thus (H1
. n)
= ((G
. n)
- (H
. n)) by
A2
.= ((G
. n)
+ (
- (H
. n))) by
VFUNCT_1: 25
.= ((G
. n)
+ ((
- H)
. n)) by
Def3
.= ((G
- H)
. n) by
Def5;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:3
(G
+ H)
= (H
+ G) & ((G
+ H)
+ J)
= (G
+ (H
+ J))
proof
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
thus ((G
+ H)
. n)
= ((H
. n)
+ (G
. n)) by
Def5
.= ((H
+ G)
. n) by
Def5;
end;
hence (G
+ H)
= (H
+ G) by
FUNCT_2: 63;
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
thus (((G
+ H)
+ J)
. n)
= (((G
+ H)
. n)
+ (J
. n)) by
Def5
.= (((G
. n)
+ (H
. n))
+ (J
. n)) by
Def5
.= ((G
. n)
+ ((H
. n)
+ (J
. n))) by
VFUNCT_1: 5
.= ((G
. n)
+ ((H
+ J)
. n)) by
Def5
.= ((G
+ (H
+ J))
. n) by
Def5;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:4
(
- H)
= ((
- 1)
(#) H)
proof
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
thus ((
- H)
. n)
= (
- (H
. n)) by
Def3
.= ((
- 1)
(#) (H
. n)) by
VFUNCT_1: 23
.= (((
- 1)
(#) H)
. n) by
Def1;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:5
(r
(#) (G
+ H))
= ((r
(#) G)
+ (r
(#) H)) & (r
(#) (G
- H))
= ((r
(#) G)
- (r
(#) H))
proof
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
thus ((r
(#) (G
+ H))
. n)
= (r
(#) ((G
+ H)
. n)) by
Def1
.= (r
(#) ((G
. n)
+ (H
. n))) by
Def5
.= ((r
(#) (G
. n))
+ (r
(#) (H
. n))) by
VFUNCT_1: 13
.= (((r
(#) G)
. n)
+ (r
(#) (H
. n))) by
Def1
.= (((r
(#) G)
. n)
+ ((r
(#) H)
. n)) by
Def1
.= (((r
(#) G)
+ (r
(#) H))
. n) by
Def5;
end;
hence (r
(#) (G
+ H))
= ((r
(#) G)
+ (r
(#) H)) by
FUNCT_2: 63;
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
thus ((r
(#) (G
- H))
. n)
= (r
(#) ((G
- H)
. n)) by
Def1
.= (r
(#) ((G
. n)
- (H
. n))) by
Th3
.= ((r
(#) (G
. n))
- (r
(#) (H
. n))) by
VFUNCT_1: 15
.= (((r
(#) G)
. n)
- (r
(#) (H
. n))) by
Def1
.= (((r
(#) G)
. n)
- ((r
(#) H)
. n)) by
Def1
.= (((r
(#) G)
- (r
(#) H))
. n) by
Th3;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:6
((r
* p)
(#) H)
= (r
(#) (p
(#) H))
proof
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
thus (((r
* p)
(#) H)
. n)
= ((r
* p)
(#) (H
. n)) by
Def1
.= (r
(#) (p
(#) (H
. n))) by
VFUNCT_1: 14
.= (r
(#) ((p
(#) H)
. n)) by
Def1
.= ((r
(#) (p
(#) H))
. n) by
Def1;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:7
(1
(#) H)
= H
proof
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
thus ((1
(#) H)
. n)
= (1
(#) (H
. n)) by
Def1
.= (H
. n) by
VFUNCT_1: 18;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:8
||.(r
(#) H).||
= (
|.r.|
(#)
||.H.||)
proof
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
thus (
||.(r
(#) H).||
. n)
=
||.((r
(#) H)
. n).|| by
Def4
.=
||.(r
(#) (H
. n)).|| by
Def1
.= (
|.r.|
(#)
||.(H
. n).||) by
VFUNCT_1: 22
.= (
|.r.|
(#) (
||.H.||
. n)) by
Def4
.= ((
|.r.|
(#)
||.H.||)
. n) by
SEQFUNC:def 1;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
begin
reserve x for
Element of D,
X for
set,
S1,S2 for
sequence of Y,
f for
PartFunc of D, the
carrier of Y;
definition
let D;
let Y be non
empty
NORMSTR;
let H be
Functional_Sequence of D, the
carrier of Y;
let x;
::
SEQFUNC2:def6
func H
# x ->
sequence of the
carrier of Y means
:
Def10: for n holds (it
. n)
= ((H
. n)
/. x);
existence
proof
deffunc
U(
Nat) = ((H
. $1)
/. x);
consider f be
sequence of the
carrier of Y such that
A1: for n be
Element of
NAT holds (f
. n)
=
U(n) from
FUNCT_2:sch 4;
reconsider f as
sequence of the
carrier of Y;
take f;
for n holds (f
. n)
= ((H
. n)
/. x)
proof
let n be
Nat;
n is
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
hence (f
. n)
= ((H
. n)
/. x) by
A1;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let S1,S2 be
sequence of the
carrier of Y such that
A2: for n holds (S1
. n)
= ((H
. n)
/. x) and
A3: for n holds (S2
. n)
= ((H
. n)
/. x);
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
(S1
. n)
= ((H
. n)
/. x) by
A2;
hence (S1
. n)
= (S2
. n) by
A3;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
end
definition
let D, Y, H, X;
::
SEQFUNC2:def7
pred H
is_point_conv_on X means X
common_on_dom H & ex f st X
= (
dom f) & for x st x
in X holds for p st p
>
0 holds ex k st for n st n
>= k holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p;
end
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:9
Th18: H
is_point_conv_on X iff X
common_on_dom H & ex f st X
= (
dom f) & for x st x
in X holds (H
# x) is
convergent & (
lim (H
# x))
= (f
. x)
proof
thus H
is_point_conv_on X implies X
common_on_dom H & ex f st X
= (
dom f) & for x st x
in X holds (H
# x) is
convergent & (
lim (H
# x))
= (f
. x)
proof
assume
A1: H
is_point_conv_on X;
hence X
common_on_dom H;
consider f such that
A2: X
= (
dom f) and
A3: for x st x
in X holds for p st p
>
0 holds ex k st for n st n
>= k holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A1;
take f;
thus X
= (
dom f) by
A2;
let x;
assume
A4: x
in X;
then
X4: (f
/. x)
= (f
. x) by
A2,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
A5:
now
let p be
Real;
assume
A6: p
>
0 ;
consider k such that
A7: for n st n
>= k holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A3,
A4,
A6;
take k;
let n be
Nat;
assume n
>= k;
then
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A7;
hence
||.(((H
# x)
. n)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
Def10;
end;
hence (H
# x) is
convergent by
NORMSP_1:def 6;
hence thesis by
X4,
A5,
NORMSP_1:def 7;
end;
assume
A8: X
common_on_dom H;
given f such that
A9: X
= (
dom f) and
A10: for x st x
in X holds (H
# x) is
convergent & (
lim (H
# x))
= (f
. x);
ex f st X
= (
dom f) & for x st x
in X holds for p st p
>
0 holds ex k st for n st n
>= k holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p
proof
take f;
thus X
= (
dom f) by
A9;
let x;
assume
X10: x
in X;
then
A11: (H
# x) is
convergent & (
lim (H
# x))
= (f
. x) by
A10;
X11: (f
/. x)
= (f
. x) by
PARTFUN1:def 6,
X10,
A9;
let p;
assume p
>
0 ;
then
consider k be
Nat such that
A12: for n be
Nat st n
>= k holds
||.(((H
# x)
. n)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A11,
NORMSP_1:def 7,
X11;
take k;
let n;
assume n
>= k;
then
||.(((H
# x)
. n)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A12;
hence thesis by
Def10;
end;
hence thesis by
A8;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:10
Th19: H
is_point_conv_on X iff X
common_on_dom H & for x st x
in X holds (H
# x) is
convergent
proof
defpred
X[
set] means $1
in X;
deffunc
U(
Element of D) = (
In ((
lim (H
# $1)),the
carrier of Y));
consider f such that
A1: for x holds x
in (
dom f) iff
X[x] and
A2: for x st x
in (
dom f) holds (f
. x)
=
U(x) from
SEQ_1:sch 3;
thus H
is_point_conv_on X implies X
common_on_dom H & for x st x
in X holds (H
# x) is
convergent
proof
assume
A3: H
is_point_conv_on X;
hence X
common_on_dom H;
let x;
assume
A4: x
in X;
ex f st X
= (
dom f) & for x st x
in X holds (H
# x) is
convergent & (
lim (H
# x))
= (f
. x) by
A3,
Th18;
hence thesis by
A4;
end;
assume that
A5: X
common_on_dom H and
A6: for x st x
in X holds (H
# x) is
convergent;
now
take f;
thus
A7: X
= (
dom f)
proof
thus X
c= (
dom f)
proof
let x be
object such that
A8: x
in X;
X
c= (
dom (H
.
0 )) by
A5;
then X
c= D by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
then
reconsider x9 = x as
Element of D by
A8;
x9
in (
dom f) by
A1,
A8;
hence thesis;
end;
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
dom f);
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
let x;
assume
A9: x
in X;
hence (H
# x) is
convergent by
A6;
(
In ((
lim (H
# x)),the
carrier of Y))
= (
lim (H
# x)) by
SUBSET_1:def 8;
hence (f
. x)
= (
lim (H
# x)) by
A2,
A7,
A9;
end;
hence thesis by
A5,
Th18;
end;
begin
definition
let D, Y, H, X;
::
SEQFUNC2:def8
pred H
is_unif_conv_on X means X
common_on_dom H & ex f st X
= (
dom f) & for p st p
>
0 holds ex k st for n, x st n
>= k & x
in X holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p;
end
definition
let D, Y, H, X;
assume
A1: H
is_point_conv_on X;
::
SEQFUNC2:def9
func
lim (H,X) ->
PartFunc of D, the
carrier of Y means
:
Def13: (
dom it )
= X & for x st x
in (
dom it ) holds (it
. x)
= (
lim (H
# x));
existence
proof
consider f such that
A2: X
= (
dom f) and
A3: for x st x
in X holds (H
# x) is
convergent & (
lim (H
# x))
= (f
. x) by
A1,
Th18;
take f;
thus (
dom f)
= X by
A2;
let x;
assume x
in (
dom f);
hence thesis by
A2,
A3;
end;
uniqueness
proof
deffunc
U(
Element of D) = (
lim (H
# $1));
thus for f1,f2 be
PartFunc of D, the
carrier of Y st (
dom f1)
= X & (for x st x
in (
dom f1) holds (f1
. x)
=
U(x)) & (
dom f2)
= X & for x st x
in (
dom f2) holds (f2
. x)
=
U(x) holds f1
= f2 from
SEQ_1:sch 4;
end;
end
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:11
Th20: H
is_point_conv_on X implies (f
= (
lim (H,X)) iff (
dom f)
= X & for x st x
in X holds for p st p
>
0 holds ex k st for n st n
>= k holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p)
proof
assume
A1: H
is_point_conv_on X;
thus f
= (
lim (H,X)) implies (
dom f)
= X & for x st x
in X holds for p st p
>
0 holds ex k st for n st n
>= k holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p
proof
assume
A2: f
= (
lim (H,X));
hence
A3: (
dom f)
= X by
A1,
Def13;
let x;
assume
A4: x
in X;
then
A5: (H
# x) is
convergent by
A1,
Th19;
X6: (f
/. x)
= (f
. x) by
PARTFUN1:def 6,
A4,
A3;
let p;
assume
A6: p
>
0 ;
(f
. x)
= (
lim (H
# x)) by
A1,
A2,
A3,
A4,
Def13;
then
consider k be
Nat such that
A7: for n be
Nat st n
>= k holds
||.(((H
# x)
. n)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
X6,
A5,
A6,
NORMSP_1:def 7;
take k;
let n;
assume n
>= k;
then
||.(((H
# x)
. n)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A7;
hence thesis by
Def10;
end;
assume that
A8: (
dom f)
= X and
A9: for x st x
in X holds for p st p
>
0 holds ex k st for n st n
>= k holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p;
now
let x such that
A10: x
in (
dom f);
X10: (f
/. x)
= (f
. x) by
A10,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
A11:
now
let p be
Real;
assume
A12: p
>
0 ;
then
consider k such that
A13: for n st n
>= k holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A8,
A9,
A10;
take k;
let n be
Nat;
assume n
>= k;
then
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A13;
hence
||.(((H
# x)
. n)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
Def10;
end;
then (H
# x) is
convergent by
NORMSP_1:def 6;
hence (f
. x)
= (
lim (H
# x)) by
X10,
A11,
NORMSP_1:def 7;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
A8,
Def13;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:12
Th21: H
is_unif_conv_on X implies H
is_point_conv_on X
proof
assume
A1: H
is_unif_conv_on X;
now
consider f such that
A3: X
= (
dom f) and
A4: for p st p
>
0 holds ex k st for n, x st n
>= k & x
in X holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A1;
take f;
thus X
= (
dom f) by
A3;
let x;
assume
A5: x
in X;
let p;
assume p
>
0 ;
then
consider k such that
A6: for n, x st n
>= k & x
in X holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A4;
take k;
let n;
assume n
>= k;
hence
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A5,
A6;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:13
Th22: Z
c= X & Z
<>
{} & X
common_on_dom H implies Z
common_on_dom H
proof
assume that
A1: Z
c= X and
A2: Z
<>
{} and
A3: X
common_on_dom H;
now
let n;
X
c= (
dom (H
. n)) by
A3;
hence Z
c= (
dom (H
. n)) by
A1;
end;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:14
Z
c= X & Z
<>
{} & H
is_point_conv_on X implies H
is_point_conv_on Z & ((
lim (H,X))
| Z)
= (
lim (H,Z))
proof
assume that
A1: Z
c= X and
A2: Z
<>
{} and
A3: H
is_point_conv_on X;
consider f such that
A4: X
= (
dom f) and
A5: for x st x
in X holds for p st p
>
0 holds ex k st for n st n
>= k holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A3;
now
take g = (f
| Z);
thus
A7: Z
= (
dom g) by
A1,
A4,
RELAT_1: 62;
let x;
assume
A8: x
in Z;
then
X8: (f
/. x)
= (f
. x) by
A1,
A4,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
(g
/. x)
= (g
. x) by
A7,
A8,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
then
X10: (g
/. x)
= (f
/. x) by
A7,
A8,
FUNCT_1: 47,
X8;
let p;
assume p
>
0 ;
then
consider k such that
A9: for n st n
>= k holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A1,
A5,
A8;
take k;
let n;
assume n
>= k;
hence
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (g
/. x)).||
< p by
A9,
X10;
end;
hence
A10: H
is_point_conv_on Z by
A1,
A2,
A3,
Th22;
A11:
now
let x;
assume
A12: x
in (
dom ((
lim (H,X))
| Z));
then
A13: x
in ((
dom (
lim (H,X)))
/\ Z) by
RELAT_1: 61;
then
A14: x
in (
dom (
lim (H,X))) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
x
in Z by
A13,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A15: x
in (
dom (
lim (H,Z))) by
A10,
Def13;
thus (((
lim (H,X))
| Z)
. x)
= ((
lim (H,X))
. x) by
A12,
FUNCT_1: 47
.= (
lim (H
# x)) by
A3,
A14,
Def13
.= ((
lim (H,Z))
. x) by
A10,
A15,
Def13;
end;
(
dom (
lim (H,X)))
= X by
A3,
Def13;
then ((
dom (
lim (H,X)))
/\ Z)
= Z by
A1,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
then (
dom ((
lim (H,X))
| Z))
= Z by
RELAT_1: 61;
then (
dom ((
lim (H,X))
| Z))
= (
dom (
lim (H,Z))) by
A10,
Def13;
hence thesis by
A11,
PARTFUN1: 5;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:15
Z
c= X & Z
<>
{} & H
is_unif_conv_on X implies H
is_unif_conv_on Z
proof
assume that
A1: Z
c= X and
A2: Z
<>
{} and
A3: H
is_unif_conv_on X;
consider f such that
A4: (
dom f)
= X and
A5: for p st p
>
0 holds ex k st for n, x st n
>= k & x
in X holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A3;
now
take g = (f
| Z);
thus
A7: (
dom g)
= ((
dom f)
/\ Z) by
RELAT_1: 61
.= Z by
A1,
A4,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
let p;
assume p
>
0 ;
then
consider k such that
A8: for n, x st n
>= k & x
in X holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A5;
take k;
let n, x;
assume that
A9: n
>= k and
A10: x
in Z;
x
in Z & x
in (
dom f) by
A7,
A10,
RELAT_1: 57;
then (f
/. x)
= (f
. x) by
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (g
. x) by
A7,
A10,
FUNCT_1: 47
.= (g
/. x) by
A10,
A7,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
hence
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (g
/. x)).||
< p by
A1,
A8,
A9,
A10;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A3,
Th22;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:16
Th25: X
common_on_dom H implies for x be
set st x
in X holds
{x}
common_on_dom H
proof
assume
A1: X
common_on_dom H;
let x be
set;
assume
A2: x
in X;
thus
{x}
<>
{} ;
now
let n;
X
c= (
dom (H
. n)) by
A1;
hence
{x}
c= (
dom (H
. n)) by
A2,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:17
H
is_point_conv_on X implies for x be
set st x
in X holds
{x}
common_on_dom H by
Th25;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:18
Th27:
{x}
common_on_dom H1 &
{x}
common_on_dom H2 implies ((H1
# x)
+ (H2
# x))
= ((H1
+ H2)
# x) & ((H1
# x)
- (H2
# x))
= ((H1
- H2)
# x)
proof
assume that
A1:
{x}
common_on_dom H1 and
A2:
{x}
common_on_dom H2;
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
A3:
{x}
c= (
dom (H2
. n)) by
A2;
x
in
{x} &
{x}
c= (
dom (H1
. n)) by
A1,
TARSKI:def 1;
then x
in ((
dom (H1
. n))
/\ (
dom (H2
. n))) by
A3,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A4: x
in (
dom ((H1
. n)
+ (H2
. n))) by
VFUNCT_1:def 1;
X4: (
dom ((H1
. n)
+ (H2
. n)))
= (
dom ((H1
+ H2)
. n)) by
Def5;
thus (((H1
# x)
+ (H2
# x))
. n)
= (((H1
# x)
. n)
+ ((H2
# x)
. n)) by
NORMSP_1:def 2
.= (((H1
. n)
/. x)
+ ((H2
# x)
. n)) by
Def10
.= (((H1
. n)
/. x)
+ ((H2
. n)
/. x)) by
Def10
.= (((H1
. n)
+ (H2
. n))
/. x) by
A4,
VFUNCT_1:def 1
.= (((H1
. n)
+ (H2
. n))
. x) by
A4,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (((H1
+ H2)
. n)
. x) by
Def5
.= (((H1
+ H2)
. n)
/. x) by
A4,
X4,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (((H1
+ H2)
# x)
. n) by
Def10;
end;
hence ((H1
# x)
+ (H2
# x))
= ((H1
+ H2)
# x) by
FUNCT_2: 63;
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
A5:
{x}
c= (
dom (H2
. n)) by
A2;
x
in
{x} &
{x}
c= (
dom (H1
. n)) by
A1,
TARSKI:def 1;
then x
in ((
dom (H1
. n))
/\ (
dom (H2
. n))) by
A5,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A6: x
in (
dom ((H1
. n)
- (H2
. n))) by
VFUNCT_1:def 2;
X6: (
dom ((H1
. n)
- (H2
. n)))
= (
dom ((H1
- H2)
. n)) by
Th3;
thus (((H1
# x)
- (H2
# x))
. n)
= (((H1
# x)
. n)
- ((H2
# x)
. n)) by
NORMSP_1:def 3
.= (((H1
. n)
/. x)
- ((H2
# x)
. n)) by
Def10
.= (((H1
. n)
/. x)
- ((H2
. n)
/. x)) by
Def10
.= (((H1
. n)
- (H2
. n))
/. x) by
A6,
VFUNCT_1:def 2
.= (((H1
. n)
- (H2
. n))
. x) by
A6,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (((H1
- H2)
. n)
. x) by
Th3
.= (((H1
- H2)
. n)
/. x) by
X6,
A6,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (((H1
- H2)
# x)
. n) by
Def10;
end;
hence ((H1
# x)
- (H2
# x))
= ((H1
- H2)
# x) by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
reserve x for
Element of D;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:19
Th28:
{x}
common_on_dom H implies (
||.H.||
# x)
=
||.(H
# x).|| & ((
- H)
# x)
= ((
- 1)
* (H
# x))
proof
assume
AS1:
{x}
common_on_dom H;
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
x
in
{x} &
{x}
c= (
dom (H
. n)) by
AS1,
TARSKI:def 1;
then x
in (
dom (H
. n));
then
A2: x
in (
dom
||.(H
. n).||) by
NORMSP_0:def 2;
thus ((
||.H.||
# x)
. n)
= ((
||.H.||
. n)
. x) by
SEQFUNC:def 10
.= (
||.(H
. n).||
. x) by
Def4
.=
||.((H
. n)
/. x).|| by
A2,
NORMSP_0:def 2
.=
||.((H
# x)
. n).|| by
Def10
.= (
||.(H
# x).||
. n) by
NORMSP_0:def 4;
end;
hence (
||.H.||
# x)
=
||.(H
# x).|| by
FUNCT_2: 63;
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
x
in
{x} &
{x}
c= (
dom (H
. n)) by
AS1,
TARSKI:def 1;
then x
in (
dom (H
. n));
then
A2: x
in (
dom (
- (H
. n))) by
VFUNCT_1:def 5;
thus (((
- H)
# x)
. n)
= (((
- H)
. n)
/. x) by
Def10
.= ((
- (H
. n))
/. x) by
Def3
.= (
- ((H
. n)
/. x)) by
A2,
VFUNCT_1:def 5
.= (
- ((H
# x)
. n)) by
Def10
.= ((
- 1)
* ((H
# x)
. n)) by
RLVECT_1: 16
.= (((
- 1)
* (H
# x))
. n) by
NORMSP_1:def 5;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:20
Th29:
{x}
common_on_dom H implies ((r
(#) H)
# x)
= (r
* (H
# x))
proof
assume
A1:
{x}
common_on_dom H;
now
let n be
Element of
NAT ;
x
in
{x} &
{x}
c= (
dom (H
. n)) by
A1,
TARSKI:def 1;
then x
in (
dom (H
. n));
then
A2: x
in (
dom (r
(#) (H
. n))) by
VFUNCT_1:def 4;
X2: ((r
(#) H)
. n)
= (r
(#) (H
. n)) by
Def1;
thus (((r
(#) H)
# x)
. n)
= (((r
(#) H)
. n)
/. x) by
Def10
.= (r
* ((H
. n)
/. x)) by
X2,
A2,
VFUNCT_1:def 4
.= (r
* ((H
# x)
. n)) by
Def10
.= ((r
* (H
# x))
. n) by
NORMSP_1:def 5;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:21
Th30: X
common_on_dom H1 & X
common_on_dom H2 implies for x st x
in X holds ((H1
# x)
+ (H2
# x))
= ((H1
+ H2)
# x) & ((H1
# x)
- (H2
# x))
= ((H1
- H2)
# x)
proof
assume
A1: X
common_on_dom H1 & X
common_on_dom H2;
let x;
assume x
in X;
then
{x}
common_on_dom H1 &
{x}
common_on_dom H2 by
A1,
Th25;
hence thesis by
Th27;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:22
{x}
common_on_dom H implies (
||.H.||
# x)
=
||.(H
# x).|| & ((
- H)
# x)
= ((
- 1)
* (H
# x)) by
Th28;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:23
Th32: X
common_on_dom H implies for x st x
in X holds ((r
(#) H)
# x)
= (r
* (H
# x))
proof
assume
A1: X
common_on_dom H;
let x;
assume x
in X;
then
{x}
common_on_dom H by
A1,
Th25;
hence thesis by
Th29;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:24
H1
is_point_conv_on X & H2
is_point_conv_on X implies for x st x
in X holds ((H1
# x)
+ (H2
# x))
= ((H1
+ H2)
# x) & ((H1
# x)
- (H2
# x))
= ((H1
- H2)
# x) by
Th30;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:25
{x}
common_on_dom H implies (
||.H.||
# x)
=
||.(H
# x).|| & ((
- H)
# x)
= ((
- 1)
* (H
# x)) by
Th28;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:26
H
is_point_conv_on X implies for x st x
in X holds ((r
(#) H)
# x)
= (r
* (H
# x)) by
Th32;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:27
Th36: X
common_on_dom H1 & X
common_on_dom H2 implies X
common_on_dom (H1
+ H2) & X
common_on_dom (H1
- H2)
proof
assume that
A1: X
common_on_dom H1 and
A2: X
common_on_dom H2;
now
let n;
X
c= (
dom (H1
. n)) & X
c= (
dom (H2
. n)) by
A1,
A2;
then X
c= ((
dom (H1
. n))
/\ (
dom (H2
. n))) by
XBOOLE_1: 19;
then X
c= (
dom ((H1
. n)
+ (H2
. n))) by
VFUNCT_1:def 1;
hence X
c= (
dom ((H1
+ H2)
. n)) by
Def5;
end;
hence X
common_on_dom (H1
+ H2) by
A1;
now
let n;
X
c= (
dom (H1
. n)) & X
c= (
dom (H2
. n)) by
A1,
A2;
then X
c= ((
dom (H1
. n))
/\ (
dom (H2
. n))) by
XBOOLE_1: 19;
then X
c= (
dom ((H1
. n)
- (H2
. n))) by
VFUNCT_1:def 2;
hence X
c= (
dom ((H1
- H2)
. n)) by
Th3;
end;
hence X
common_on_dom (H1
- H2) by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:28
Th37: X
common_on_dom H implies X
common_on_dom
||.H.|| & X
common_on_dom (
- H)
proof
assume
A1: X
common_on_dom H;
now
let n;
(
dom (H
. n))
= (
dom
||.(H
. n).||) by
NORMSP_0:def 3
.= (
dom (
||.H.||
. n)) by
Def4;
hence X
c= (
dom (
||.H.||
. n)) by
A1;
end;
hence X
common_on_dom
||.H.|| by
A1;
now
let n;
(
dom (H
. n))
= (
dom (
- (H
. n))) by
VFUNCT_1:def 5
.= (
dom ((
- H)
. n)) by
Def3;
hence X
c= (
dom ((
- H)
. n)) by
A1;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:29
Th38: X
common_on_dom H implies X
common_on_dom (r
(#) H)
proof
assume
A1: X
common_on_dom H;
now
let n;
(
dom (H
. n))
= (
dom (r
(#) (H
. n))) by
VFUNCT_1:def 4
.= (
dom ((r
(#) H)
. n)) by
Def1;
hence X
c= (
dom ((r
(#) H)
. n)) by
A1;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:30
H1
is_point_conv_on X & H2
is_point_conv_on X implies (H1
+ H2)
is_point_conv_on X & (
lim ((H1
+ H2),X))
= ((
lim (H1,X))
+ (
lim (H2,X))) & (H1
- H2)
is_point_conv_on X & (
lim ((H1
- H2),X))
= ((
lim (H1,X))
- (
lim (H2,X)))
proof
assume that
A1: H1
is_point_conv_on X and
A2: H2
is_point_conv_on X;
A3:
now
let x;
assume
A4: x
in X;
then (H1
# x) is
convergent & (H2
# x) is
convergent by
A1,
A2,
Th19;
then ((H1
# x)
+ (H2
# x)) is
convergent by
NORMSP_1: 19;
hence ((H1
+ H2)
# x) is
convergent by
A1,
A2,
A4,
Th30;
end;
A5:
now
let x;
assume
A6: x
in X;
then (H1
# x) is
convergent & (H2
# x) is
convergent by
A1,
A2,
Th19;
then ((H1
# x)
- (H2
# x)) is
convergent by
NORMSP_1: 20;
hence ((H1
- H2)
# x) is
convergent by
A1,
A2,
A6,
Th30;
end;
thus
A8: (H1
+ H2)
is_point_conv_on X by
A1,
A2,
A3,
Th36,
Th19;
A9:
now
let x;
assume
A10: x
in (
dom ((
lim (H1,X))
+ (
lim (H2,X))));
then
A11: x
in ((
dom (
lim (H1,X)))
/\ (
dom (
lim (H2,X)))) by
VFUNCT_1:def 1;
then
A12: x
in (
dom (
lim (H2,X))) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A13: x
in (
dom (
lim (H1,X))) by
A11,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A14: x
in X by
A1,
Def13;
then
A15: (H1
# x) is
convergent & (H2
# x) is
convergent by
A1,
A2,
Th19;
X15: ((
lim (H1,X))
. x)
= ((
lim (H1,X))
/. x) by
A13,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
X16: ((
lim (H2,X))
. x)
= ((
lim (H2,X))
/. x) by
A12,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
thus (((
lim (H1,X))
+ (
lim (H2,X)))
. x)
= (((
lim (H1,X))
+ (
lim (H2,X)))
/. x) by
A10,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (((
lim (H1,X))
/. x)
+ ((
lim (H2,X))
/. x)) by
A10,
VFUNCT_1:def 1
.= ((
lim (H1
# x))
+ ((
lim (H2,X))
/. x)) by
X15,
A1,
A13,
Def13
.= ((
lim (H1
# x))
+ (
lim (H2
# x))) by
X16,
A2,
A12,
Def13
.= (
lim ((H1
# x)
+ (H2
# x))) by
A15,
NORMSP_1: 25
.= (
lim ((H1
+ H2)
# x)) by
A1,
A2,
A14,
Th30;
end;
A24:
now
let x;
assume
A25: x
in (
dom ((
lim (H1,X))
- (
lim (H2,X))));
then
A26: x
in ((
dom (
lim (H1,X)))
/\ (
dom (
lim (H2,X)))) by
VFUNCT_1:def 2;
then
A27: x
in (
dom (
lim (H2,X))) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A28: x
in (
dom (
lim (H1,X))) by
A26,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A29: x
in X by
A1,
Def13;
then
A30: (H1
# x) is
convergent & (H2
# x) is
convergent by
A1,
A2,
Th19;
X15: ((
lim (H1,X))
. x)
= ((
lim (H1,X))
/. x) by
A28,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
X16: ((
lim (H2,X))
. x)
= ((
lim (H2,X))
/. x) by
A27,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
thus (((
lim (H1,X))
- (
lim (H2,X)))
. x)
= (((
lim (H1,X))
- (
lim (H2,X)))
/. x) by
A25,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (((
lim (H1,X))
/. x)
- ((
lim (H2,X))
/. x)) by
A25,
VFUNCT_1:def 2
.= ((
lim (H1
# x))
- ((
lim (H2,X))
/. x)) by
X15,
A1,
A28,
Def13
.= ((
lim (H1
# x))
- (
lim (H2
# x))) by
X16,
A2,
A27,
Def13
.= (
lim ((H1
# x)
- (H2
# x))) by
A30,
NORMSP_1: 26
.= (
lim ((H1
- H2)
# x)) by
A1,
A2,
A29,
Th30;
end;
(
dom ((
lim (H1,X))
+ (
lim (H2,X))))
= ((
dom (
lim (H1,X)))
/\ (
dom (
lim (H2,X)))) by
VFUNCT_1:def 1
.= (X
/\ (
dom (
lim (H2,X)))) by
A1,
Def13
.= (X
/\ X) by
A2,
Def13
.= X;
hence (
lim ((H1
+ H2),X))
= ((
lim (H1,X))
+ (
lim (H2,X))) by
A8,
A9,
Def13;
X
common_on_dom (H1
- H2) by
A1,
A2,
Th36;
hence
A31: (H1
- H2)
is_point_conv_on X by
A5,
Th19;
(
dom ((
lim (H1,X))
- (
lim (H2,X))))
= ((
dom (
lim (H1,X)))
/\ (
dom (
lim (H2,X)))) by
VFUNCT_1:def 2
.= (X
/\ (
dom (
lim (H2,X)))) by
A1,
Def13
.= (X
/\ X) by
A2,
Def13
.= X;
hence (
lim ((H1
- H2),X))
= ((
lim (H1,X))
- (
lim (H2,X))) by
A31,
A24,
Def13;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:31
H
is_point_conv_on X implies
||.H.||
is_point_conv_on X & (
lim (
||.H.||,X))
=
||.(
lim (H,X)).|| & (
- H)
is_point_conv_on X & (
lim ((
- H),X))
= (
- (
lim (H,X)))
proof
assume
A1: H
is_point_conv_on X;
A2:
now
let x;
assume
X0: x
in X;
then
X1:
{x}
common_on_dom H by
A1,
Th25;
||.(H
# x).|| is
convergent by
X0,
A1,
Th19,
NORMSP_1: 23;
hence (
||.H.||
# x) is
convergent by
Th28,
X1;
end;
A3:
now
let x;
assume
A30: x
in (
dom (
- (
lim (H,X))));
then
A4: x
in (
dom (
lim (H,X))) by
VFUNCT_1:def 5;
then
A5: x
in X by
A1,
Def13;
X5: ((
lim (H,X))
/. x)
= ((
lim (H,X))
. x) by
A4,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
X1:
{x}
common_on_dom H by
A5,
A1,
Th25;
thus ((
- (
lim (H,X)))
. x)
= ((
- (
lim (H,X)))
/. x) by
A30,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (
- ((
lim (H,X))
/. x)) by
A30,
VFUNCT_1:def 5
.= (
- (
lim (H
# x))) by
X5,
A1,
A4,
Def13
.= ((
- 1)
* (
lim (H
# x))) by
RLVECT_1: 16
.= (
lim ((
- 1)
* (H
# x))) by
A1,
A5,
Th19,
NORMSP_1: 28
.= (
lim ((
- H)
# x)) by
Th28,
X1;
end;
thus
A7:
||.H.||
is_point_conv_on X by
A1,
Th37,
A2,
SEQFUNC: 20;
A8:
now
let x;
assume
A91: x
in (
dom
||.(
lim (H,X)).||);
then
A9: x
in (
dom (
lim (H,X))) by
NORMSP_0:def 3;
then
A90: x
in X by
A1,
Def13;
then
A10: (H
# x) is
convergent by
A1,
Th19;
X1:
{x}
common_on_dom H by
A90,
A1,
Th25;
X10: ((
lim (H,X))
/. x)
= ((
lim (H,X))
. x) by
A9,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
thus (
||.(
lim (H,X)).||
. x)
=
||.((
lim (H,X))
/. x).|| by
A91,
NORMSP_0:def 3
.=
||.(
lim (H
# x)).|| by
A1,
A9,
X10,
Def13
.= (
lim
||.(H
# x).||) by
A10,
LOPBAN_1: 20
.= (
lim (
||.H.||
# x)) by
Th28,
X1;
end;
A11:
now
let x;
assume
A90: x
in X;
then
X10: ((
- 1)
* (H
# x)) is
convergent by
A1,
Th19,
NORMSP_1: 22;
{x}
common_on_dom H by
A90,
A1,
Th25;
hence ((
- H)
# x) is
convergent by
Th28,
X10;
end;
(
dom
||.(
lim (H,X)).||)
= (
dom (
lim (H,X))) by
NORMSP_0:def 3
.= X by
A1,
Def13;
hence (
lim (
||.H.||,X))
=
||.(
lim (H,X)).|| by
A7,
A8,
SEQFUNC:def 13;
thus
A12: (
- H)
is_point_conv_on X by
A1,
Th37,
A11,
Th19;
(
dom (
- (
lim (H,X))))
= (
dom (
lim (H,X))) by
VFUNCT_1:def 5
.= X by
A1,
Def13;
hence thesis by
A12,
A3,
Def13;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:32
H
is_point_conv_on X implies (r
(#) H)
is_point_conv_on X & (
lim ((r
(#) H),X))
= (r
(#) (
lim (H,X)))
proof
assume
A1: H
is_point_conv_on X;
A3:
now
let x;
assume
A4: x
in (
dom (r
(#) (
lim (H,X))));
then
A5: x
in (
dom (
lim (H,X))) by
VFUNCT_1:def 4;
then
A6: x
in X by
A1,
Def13;
X1: ((
lim (H,X))
/. x)
= ((
lim (H,X))
. x) by
PARTFUN1:def 6,
A5;
X2: ((r
(#) (
lim (H,X)))
. x)
= ((r
(#) (
lim (H,X)))
/. x) by
PARTFUN1:def 6,
A4;
thus ((r
(#) (
lim (H,X)))
. x)
= (r
* ((
lim (H,X))
/. x)) by
X2,
A4,
VFUNCT_1:def 4
.= (r
* (
lim (H
# x))) by
A1,
A5,
X1,
Def13
.= (
lim (r
* (H
# x))) by
A6,
A1,
Th19,
NORMSP_1: 28
.= (
lim ((r
(#) H)
# x)) by
A1,
A6,
Th32;
end;
A8:
now
let x;
assume
A9: x
in X;
then (r
* (H
# x)) is
convergent by
A1,
Th19,
NORMSP_1: 22;
hence ((r
(#) H)
# x) is
convergent by
A1,
A9,
Th32;
end;
A10: (r
(#) H)
is_point_conv_on X by
A1,
Th38,
A8,
Th19;
(
dom (r
(#) (
lim (H,X))))
= (
dom (
lim (H,X))) by
VFUNCT_1:def 4
.= X by
A1,
Def13;
hence thesis by
A10,
A3,
Def13;
end;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:33
Th42: H
is_unif_conv_on X iff X
common_on_dom H & H
is_point_conv_on X & for r st
0
< r holds ex k st for n, x st n
>= k & x
in X holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- ((
lim (H,X))
/. x)).||
< r
proof
thus H
is_unif_conv_on X implies X
common_on_dom H & H
is_point_conv_on X & for r st
0
< r holds ex k st for n, x st n
>= k & x
in X holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- ((
lim (H,X))
/. x)).||
< r
proof
assume
A1: H
is_unif_conv_on X;
then
consider f such that
A2: X
= (
dom f) and
A3: for p st p
>
0 holds ex k st for n, x st n
>= k & x
in X holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p;
thus X
common_on_dom H by
A1;
A4:
now
let x such that
A5: x
in X;
let p;
assume p
>
0 ;
then
consider k such that
A6: for n, x st n
>= k & x
in X holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A3;
take k;
let n;
assume n
>= k;
hence
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< p by
A5,
A6;
end;
thus H
is_point_conv_on X by
A1,
Th21;
then
A7: f
= (
lim (H,X)) by
A2,
A4,
Th20;
let r;
assume r
>
0 ;
then
consider k such that
A8: for n, x st n
>= k & x
in X holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- (f
/. x)).||
< r by
A3;
take k;
let n, x;
assume n
>= k & x
in X;
hence thesis by
A7,
A8;
end;
assume that
A9: X
common_on_dom H and
A10: H
is_point_conv_on X and
A11: for r st
0
< r holds ex k st for n, x st n
>= k & x
in X holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x)
- ((
lim (H,X))
/. x)).||
< r;
(
dom (
lim (H,X)))
= X by
A10,
Def13;
hence thesis by
A9,
A11;
end;
reserve V,W for
RealNormSpace,
H for
Functional_Sequence of the
carrier of V, the
carrier of W;
theorem ::
SEQFUNC2:34
H
is_unif_conv_on X & (for n holds ((H
. n)
| X)
is_continuous_on X) implies (
lim (H,X))
is_continuous_on X
proof
set l = (
lim (H,X));
assume that
A1: H
is_unif_conv_on X and
A2: for n holds ((H
. n)
| X)
is_continuous_on X;
A3: H
is_point_conv_on X by
A1,
Th21;
then
A4: (
dom l)
= X by
Def13;
A5: X
common_on_dom H by
A1;
for x0 be
Point of V st x0
in X holds (l
| X)
is_continuous_in x0
proof
let x0 be
Point of V;
assume
A6: x0
in X;
then
A60: x0
in (
dom (l
| X)) by
RELAT_1: 62,
A4;
for r be
Real st
0
< r holds ex s be
Real st
0
< s & for x1 be
Point of V st x1
in (
dom (l
| X)) &
||.(x1
- x0).||
< s holds
||.(((l
| X)
/. x1)
- ((l
| X)
/. x0)).||
< r
proof
let r be
Real;
assume
A7:
0
< r;
reconsider r as
Element of
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
consider k such that
A8: for n holds for x1 be
Element of V st n
>= k & x1
in X holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x1)
- (l
/. x1)).||
< (r
/ 3) by
A1,
A7,
XREAL_1: 222,
Th42;
0
< (r
/ 3) by
A7,
XREAL_1: 222;
then
consider k1 be
Nat such that
A9: for n st n
>= k1 holds
||.(((H
. n)
/. x0)
- (l
/. x0)).||
< (r
/ 3) by
A3,
A6,
Th20;
reconsider m = (
max (k,k1)) as
Nat by
TARSKI: 1;
set h = (H
. m);
A11: (
dom (h
| X))
= ((
dom h)
/\ X) by
RELAT_1: 61
.= X by
A5,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
(h
| X)
is_continuous_on X by
A2;
then h
is_continuous_on X by
NFCONT_1: 21;
then (h
| X)
is_continuous_in x0 by
A6,
NFCONT_1:def 7;
then
consider s be
Real such that
A12:
0
< s and
A13: for x1 be
Point of V st x1
in (
dom (h
| X)) &
||.(x1
- x0).||
< s holds
||.(((h
| X)
/. x1)
- ((h
| X)
/. x0)).||
< (r
/ 3) by
A7,
XREAL_1: 222,
NFCONT_1: 7;
take s;
thus
0
< s by
A12;
let x1 be
Point of V;
assume that
A14: x1
in (
dom (l
| X)) and
A15:
||.(x1
- x0).||
< s;
A16: (
dom (l
| X))
= ((
dom l)
/\ X) by
RELAT_1: 61
.= X by
A4;
then
||.(((h
| X)
/. x1)
- ((h
| X)
/. x0)).||
< (r
/ 3) by
A11,
A13,
A14,
A15;
then
||.((h
/. x1)
- ((h
| X)
/. x0)).||
< (r
/ 3) by
A16,
A11,
A14,
PARTFUN1: 80;
then
A17:
||.((h
/. x1)
- (h
/. x0)).||
< (r
/ 3) by
A11,
A6,
PARTFUN1: 80;
||.((h
/. x0)
- (l
/. x0)).||
< (r
/ 3) by
A9,
XXREAL_0: 25;
then
||.(((h
/. x1)
- (h
/. x0))
+ ((h
/. x0)
- (l
/. x0))).||
<= (
||.((h
/. x1)
- (h
/. x0)).||
+
||.((h
/. x0)
- (l
/. x0)).||) & (
||.((h
/. x1)
- (h
/. x0)).||
+
||.((h
/. x0)
- (l
/. x0)).||)
< ((r
/ 3)
+ (r
/ 3)) by
A17,
NORMSP_1:def 1,
XREAL_1: 8;
then
A18:
||.(((h
/. x1)
- (h
/. x0))
+ ((h
/. x0)
- (l
/. x0))).||
< ((r
/ 3)
+ (r
/ 3)) by
XXREAL_0: 2;
||.((l
/. x1)
- (l
/. x0)).||
=
||.((((l
/. x1)
- (h
/. x1))
+ (h
/. x1))
- (l
/. x0)).|| by
RLVECT_4: 1
.=
||.(((l
/. x1)
- (h
/. x1))
+ ((h
/. x1)
- (l
/. x0))).|| by
RLVECT_1: 28
.=
||.(((l
/. x1)
- (h
/. x1))
+ ((((h
/. x1)
- (h
/. x0))
+ (h
/. x0))
- (l
/. x0))).|| by
RLVECT_4: 1
.=
||.(((l
/. x1)
- (h
/. x1))
+ (((h
/. x1)
- (h
/. x0))
+ ((h
/. x0)
- (l
/. x0)))).|| by
RLVECT_1: 28;
then
A19:
||.((l
/. x1)
- (l
/. x0)).||
<= (
||.((l
/. x1)
- (h
/. x1)).||
+
||.(((h
/. x1)
- (h
/. x0))
+ ((h
/. x0)
- (l
/. x0))).||) by
NORMSP_1:def 1;
||.((h
/. x1)
- (l
/. x1)).||
< (r
/ 3) by
A8,
A16,
A14,
XXREAL_0: 25;
then
||.(
- ((l
/. x1)
- (h
/. x1))).||
< (r
/ 3) by
RLVECT_1: 33;
then
||.((l
/. x1)
- (h
/. x1)).||
< (r
/ 3) by
NORMSP_1: 2;
then (
||.((l
/. x1)
- (h
/. x1)).||
+
||.(((h
/. x1)
- (h
/. x0))
+ ((h
/. x0)
- (l
/. x0))).||)
< ((r
/ 3)
+ ((r
/ 3)
+ (r
/ 3))) by
A18,
XREAL_1: 8;
then
||.((l
/. x1)
- (l
/. x0)).||
< (((r
/ 3)
+ (r
/ 3))
+ (r
/ 3)) by
A19,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
||.(((l
| X)
/. x1)
- (l
/. x0)).||
< r by
A14,
PARTFUN1: 80;
hence thesis by
A4,
RELAT_1: 68;
end;
hence thesis by
NFCONT_1: 7,
A60;
end;
hence thesis by
NFCONT_1:def 7,
A4;
end;