zmatrlin.miz
begin
reserve x,y,z for
object,
i,j,k,l,n,m for
Nat,
D,E for non
empty
set;
reserve M for
Matrix of D;
reserve L for
Matrix of E;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:1
EQ2: for i,j be
Nat st M
= L &
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) holds (M
* (i,j))
= (L
* (i,j))
proof
let i,j be
Nat;
assume
AS1: M
= L &
[i, j]
in (
Indices M);
then
consider p be
FinSequence of D such that
A1: p
= (M
. i) & (M
* (i,j))
= (p
. j) by
MATRIX_0:def 5;
consider q be
FinSequence of E such that
A2: q
= (L
. i) & (L
* (i,j))
= (q
. j) by
MATRIX_0:def 5,
AS1;
thus (M
* (i,j))
= (L
* (i,j)) by
AS1,
A1,
A2;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:2
for i be
Nat st M
= L & i
in (
dom M) holds (
Line (M,i))
= (
Line (L,i))
proof
let i be
Nat;
assume
AS1: M
= L & i
in (
dom M);
A1: (
len (
Line (M,i)))
= (
width M) & for j st j
in (
Seg (
width M)) holds ((
Line (M,i))
. j)
= (M
* (i,j)) by
MATRIX_0:def 7;
A2: (
len (
Line (L,i)))
= (
width L) & for j st j
in (
Seg (
width L)) holds ((
Line (L,i))
. j)
= (L
* (i,j)) by
MATRIX_0:def 7;
A3: (
dom (
Line (M,i)))
= (
Seg (
width M)) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
dom (
Line (L,i))) by
AS1,
A2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
for j st j
in (
dom (
Line (M,i))) holds ((
Line (M,i))
. j)
= ((
Line (L,i))
. j)
proof
let j;
assume j
in (
dom (
Line (M,i)));
then
A4: j
in (
Seg (
width M)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3,
A1;
then
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) by
AS1,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A5: (M
* (i,j))
= (L
* (i,j)) by
AS1,
EQ2;
thus ((
Line (M,i))
. j)
= (M
* (i,j)) by
A4,
MATRIX_0:def 7
.= ((
Line (L,i))
. j) by
AS1,
A4,
A5,
MATRIX_0:def 7;
end;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:3
for i be
Nat st M
= L & i
in (
Seg (
width M)) holds (
Col (M,i))
= (
Col (L,i))
proof
let i be
Nat;
assume
AS1: M
= L & i
in (
Seg (
width M));
A1: (
len (
Col (M,i)))
= (
len M) & for j st j
in (
dom M) holds ((
Col (M,i))
. j)
= (M
* (j,i)) by
MATRIX_0:def 8;
A2: (
len (
Col (L,i)))
= (
len L) & for j st j
in (
dom L) holds ((
Col (L,i))
. j)
= (L
* (j,i)) by
MATRIX_0:def 8;
A3: (
dom (
Col (M,i)))
= (
Seg (
len M)) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
dom (
Col (L,i))) by
AS1,
A2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
for j st j
in (
dom (
Col (M,i))) holds ((
Col (M,i))
. j)
= ((
Col (L,i))
. j)
proof
let j;
assume j
in (
dom (
Col (M,i)));
then j
in (
Seg (
len M)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3,
A1;
then
A4: j
in (
dom M) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
[j, i]
in (
Indices M) by
AS1,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A5: (M
* (j,i))
= (L
* (j,i)) by
AS1,
EQ2;
thus ((
Col (M,i))
. j)
= (M
* (j,i)) by
A4,
MATRIX_0:def 8
.= ((
Col (L,i))
. j) by
AS1,
A4,
A5,
MATRIX_0:def 8;
end;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:4
EQ40: (
len M)
= (
len L) & (
width M)
= (
width L) & (for i,j be
Nat st
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) holds (M
* (i,j))
= (L
* (i,j))) implies M
= L
proof
assume that
A1: (
len M)
= (
len L) and
A2: (
width M)
= (
width L) and
A3: for i,j be
Nat st
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) holds (M
* (i,j))
= (L
* (i,j));
M is
Matrix of E
proof
consider n be
Nat such that
A0: for x be
object st x
in (
rng M) holds ex p be
FinSequence of D st x
= p & (
len p)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 9;
per cases ;
suppose (
len M)
=
0 ;
then M
=
{} ;
then (
rng M)
c= (E
* );
hence thesis by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
end;
suppose
I0: (
len M)
<>
0 ;
for x be
object st x
in (
rng M) holds ex p be
FinSequence of E st x
= p & (
len p)
= n
proof
let x be
object;
assume
S1: x
in (
rng M);
then
consider p be
FinSequence of D such that
S3: x
= p & (
len p)
= n by
A0;
X1: (
width M)
= n by
S1,
S3,
MATRIX_0:def 3,
I0;
for z be
object st z
in (
rng p) holds z
in E
proof
let z be
object;
assume z
in (
rng p);
then
consider j1 be
object such that
S4: j1
in (
dom p) & z
= (p
. j1) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
S5: j1
in (
Seg n) by
S3,
S4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
reconsider j1 as
Nat by
S4;
consider i1 be
object such that
S6: i1
in (
dom M) & x
= (M
. i1) by
S1,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider i1 as
Nat by
S6;
S8:
[i1, j1]
in (
Indices M) by
S6,
S5,
X1,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
consider q be
FinSequence of D such that
S9: q
= (M
. i1) & (M
* (i1,j1))
= (q
. j1) by
MATRIX_0:def 5;
(M
* (i1,j1))
= (L
* (i1,j1)) by
A3,
S8;
hence z
in E by
S3,
S4,
S6,
S9;
end;
then (
rng p)
c= E;
then
reconsider p as
FinSequence of E by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
take p;
thus x
= p & (
len p)
= n by
S3;
end;
hence M is
Matrix of E by
MATRIX_0: 9;
end;
end;
then
reconsider L0 = M as
Matrix of E;
for i,j be
Nat st
[i, j]
in (
Indices L0) holds (L0
* (i,j))
= (L
* (i,j))
proof
let i,j be
Nat;
assume
X3:
[i, j]
in (
Indices L0);
then
consider q be
FinSequence of D such that
S9: q
= (M
. i) & (M
* (i,j))
= (q
. j) by
MATRIX_0:def 5;
consider p be
FinSequence of E such that
T9: p
= (L0
. i) & (L0
* (i,j))
= (p
. j) by
MATRIX_0:def 5,
X3;
thus (L0
* (i,j))
= (L
* (i,j)) by
A3,
S9,
T9,
X3;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
MATRIX_0: 21;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:5
REALTOINT: for M be
Matrix of D st for i,j be
Nat st
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) holds (M
* (i,j))
in E holds M is
Matrix of E
proof
let M be
Matrix of D;
assume
AS: for i,j be
Nat st
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) holds (M
* (i,j))
in E;
consider n be
Nat such that
A0: for x be
object st x
in (
rng M) holds ex p be
FinSequence of D st x
= p & (
len p)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 9;
per cases ;
suppose (
len M)
=
0 ;
then M
=
{} ;
then (
rng M)
c= (E
* );
hence thesis by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
end;
suppose
I0: (
len M)
<>
0 ;
for x be
object st x
in (
rng M) holds ex p be
FinSequence of E st x
= p & (
len p)
= n
proof
let x be
object;
assume
S1: x
in (
rng M);
then
consider p be
FinSequence of D such that
S3: x
= p & (
len p)
= n by
A0;
X1: (
width M)
= n by
S1,
S3,
MATRIX_0:def 3,
I0;
for z be
object st z
in (
rng p) holds z
in E
proof
let z be
object;
assume z
in (
rng p);
then
consider j1 be
object such that
S4: j1
in (
dom p) & z
= (p
. j1) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
S5: j1
in (
Seg n) by
S3,
S4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
reconsider j1 as
Nat by
S4;
consider i1 be
object such that
S6: i1
in (
dom M) & x
= (M
. i1) by
S1,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider i1 as
Nat by
S6;
S8:
[i1, j1]
in (
Indices M) by
S6,
S5,
X1,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
consider q be
FinSequence of D such that
S9: q
= (M
. i1) & (M
* (i1,j1))
= (q
. j1) by
MATRIX_0:def 5;
thus z
in E by
AS,
S3,
S4,
S6,
S8,
S9;
end;
then (
rng p)
c= E;
then
reconsider p as
FinSequence of E by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
take p;
thus x
= p & (
len p)
= n by
S3;
end;
hence M is
Matrix of E by
MATRIX_0: 9;
end;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:6
M
= L implies (M
@ )
= (L
@ )
proof
assume
AS: M
= L;
for i,j be
Nat st
[i, j]
in (
Indices (M
@ )) holds ((M
@ )
* (i,j))
in E
proof
let i,j be
Nat;
assume
[i, j]
in (
Indices (M
@ ));
then
A2:
[j, i]
in (
Indices M) by
MATRIX_0:def 6;
then ((M
@ )
* (i,j))
= (M
* (j,i)) by
MATRIX_0:def 6
.= (L
* (j,i)) by
AS,
A2,
EQ2;
hence ((M
@ )
* (i,j))
in E;
end;
then
reconsider M1 = (M
@ ) as
Matrix of E by
REALTOINT;
P1: (
len M1)
= (
width L) by
AS,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
P2: for i,j be
Nat holds
[i, j]
in (
Indices M1) iff
[j, i]
in (
Indices L) by
AS,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
for i,j be
Nat st
[j, i]
in (
Indices L) holds (M1
* (i,j))
= (L
* (j,i))
proof
let i,j be
Nat;
assume
A2:
[j, i]
in (
Indices L);
then
[i, j]
in (
Indices (M
@ )) by
AS,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
then (M1
* (i,j))
= ((M
@ )
* (i,j)) by
EQ2
.= (M
* (j,i)) by
AS,
A2,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
hence (M1
* (i,j))
= (L
* (j,i)) by
AS,
A2,
EQ2;
end;
hence thesis by
P1,
P2,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:7
INTTOREAL: for M be
Matrix of
INT holds M is
Matrix of
REAL
proof
let M be
Matrix of
INT ;
(
INT
* )
c= (
REAL
* ) by
NUMBERS: 15,
FINSEQ_1: 62;
then (
rng M)
c= (
REAL
* );
hence thesis by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
end;
definition
let M be
Matrix of
INT ;
::
ZMATRLIN:def1
func
inttorealM (M) ->
Matrix of
REAL equals M;
correctness by
INTTOREAL;
end
definition
let n,m be
Nat;
let M be
Matrix of n, m,
INT ;
:: original:
inttorealM
redefine
func
inttorealM (M) ->
Matrix of n, m,
REAL ;
correctness
proof
B2: (
len M)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 25;
per cases ;
suppose
X11: not
0
< n;
then
X1: n
=
0 ;
M
=
{} by
B2,
X11;
hence (
inttorealM M) is
Matrix of n, m,
REAL by
X1,
MATRIX_0: 13;
end;
suppose
X2:
0
< n;
then (
width M)
= m by
B2,
MATRIX_0: 20;
hence (
inttorealM M) is
Matrix of n, m,
REAL by
X2,
B2,
MATRIX_0: 20;
end;
end;
end
definition
let n be
Nat;
let M be
Matrix of n,
INT ;
:: original:
inttorealM
redefine
func
inttorealM (M) ->
Matrix of n,
REAL ;
correctness
proof
(
inttorealM M) is
Matrix of n, n,
REAL ;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let M be
Matrix of
REAL ;
::
ZMATRLIN:def2
attr M is
integer means M is
Matrix of
INT ;
end
registration
cluster
integer for
Matrix of
REAL ;
correctness
proof
set M = the
Matrix of
INT ;
reconsider L = (
inttorealM M) as
Matrix of
REAL ;
take L;
thus L is
Matrix of
INT ;
end;
end
registration
let n,m be
Nat;
cluster
integer for
Matrix of n, m,
REAL ;
correctness
proof
set M = the
Matrix of n, m,
INT ;
reconsider L = (
inttorealM M) as
Matrix of n, m,
REAL ;
take L;
thus thesis;
end;
end
definition
let M be
integer
Matrix of
REAL ;
::
ZMATRLIN:def3
func
realtointM (M) ->
Matrix of
INT equals M;
correctness
proof
M is
integer;
then
reconsider L = M as
Matrix of
INT ;
L
= M;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let n,m be
Nat;
let M be
integer
Matrix of n, m,
REAL ;
:: original:
realtointM
redefine
func
realtointM (M) ->
Matrix of n, m,
INT ;
correctness
proof
B2: (
len M)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 25;
per cases ;
suppose
X11: not
0
< n;
then
X1: n
=
0 ;
M
=
{} by
B2,
X11;
hence (
realtointM M) is
Matrix of n, m,
INT by
X1,
MATRIX_0: 13;
end;
suppose
X2:
0
< n;
then (
width M)
= m by
B2,
MATRIX_0: 20;
hence (
realtointM M) is
Matrix of n, m,
INT by
X2,
B2,
MATRIX_0: 20;
end;
end;
end
definition
let n be
Nat;
let M be
integer
Matrix of n,
REAL ;
:: original:
realtointM
redefine
func
realtointM (M) ->
Matrix of n,
INT ;
correctness
proof
(
realtointM M) is
Matrix of n, n,
INT ;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let n,m be
Nat;
::
ZMATRLIN:def4
func
0. (n,m) ->
Matrix of n, m,
INT.Ring equals (n
|-> (m
|-> (
0.
INT.Ring )));
correctness by
MATRIX_0: 10;
end
begin
reserve k,t,i,j,m,n for
Nat,
D for non
empty
set;
reserve V for
free
Z_Module;
reserve a for
Element of
INT.Ring ,
W for
Element of V;
reserve KL1,KL2,KL3 for
Linear_Combination of V,
X for
Subset of V;
Th5: X is
linearly-independent & (
Carrier KL1)
c= X & (
Carrier KL2)
c= X & (
Sum KL1)
= (
Sum KL2) implies KL1
= KL2 by
ZMODUL03: 3;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:8
Th6: X is
linearly-independent & (
Carrier KL1)
c= X & (
Carrier KL2)
c= X & (
Carrier KL3)
c= X & (
Sum KL1)
= ((
Sum KL2)
+ (
Sum KL3)) implies KL1
= (KL2
+ KL3)
proof
assume that
A1: X is
linearly-independent & (
Carrier KL1)
c= X and
A2: (
Carrier KL2)
c= X & (
Carrier KL3)
c= X and
A3: (
Sum KL1)
= ((
Sum KL2)
+ (
Sum KL3));
(
Carrier (KL2
+ KL3))
c= ((
Carrier KL2)
\/ (
Carrier KL3)) & ((
Carrier KL2)
\/ (
Carrier KL3))
c= X by
A2,
ZMODUL02: 26,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
then
A4: (
Carrier (KL2
+ KL3))
c= X;
(
Sum KL1)
= (
Sum (KL2
+ KL3)) by
A3,
ZMODUL02: 52;
hence thesis by
A1,
A4,
Th5;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:9
Th7: X is
linearly-independent & (
Carrier KL1)
c= X & (
Carrier KL2)
c= X & a
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & (
Sum KL1)
= (a
* (
Sum KL2)) implies KL1
= (a
* KL2)
proof
assume that
A1: X is
linearly-independent & (
Carrier KL1)
c= X and
A2: (
Carrier KL2)
c= X & a
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) & (
Sum KL1)
= (a
* (
Sum KL2));
(
Carrier (a
* KL2))
c= X & (
Sum KL1)
= (
Sum (a
* KL2)) by
A2,
ZMODUL02: 29,
ZMODUL02: 53;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th5;
end;
reserve V for
finite-rank
free
Z_Module,
W for
Element of V;
reserve KL1,KL2,KL3 for
Linear_Combination of V,
X for
Subset of V;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:10
Th8: for b2 be
Basis of V holds ex KL be
Linear_Combination of V st W
= (
Sum KL) & (
Carrier KL)
c= b2
proof
let b2 be
Basis of V;
W
in the ModuleStr of V;
then W
in (
Lin b2) by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
then
consider KL1 be
Linear_Combination of b2 such that
A1: W
= (
Sum KL1) by
ZMODUL02: 64;
take KL = KL1;
thus W
= (
Sum KL) by
A1;
thus thesis by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
end;
definition
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module;
::
ZMATRLIN:def5
mode
OrdBasis of V ->
FinSequence of V means
:
defOrdBasis: it is
one-to-one & (
rng it ) is
Basis of V;
existence
proof
consider A be
finite
Subset of V such that
A1: A is
Basis of V by
ZMODUL03:def 3;
consider p be
FinSequence such that
A2: (
rng p)
= A and
A3: p is
one-to-one by
FINSEQ_4: 58;
reconsider p as
FinSequence of V by
A2,
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
take f = p;
thus f is
one-to-one by
A3;
thus thesis by
A1,
A2;
end;
end
reserve s for
FinSequence,
V1,V2,V3 for
finite-rank
free
Z_Module,
f,f1,f2 for
Function of V1, V2,
g for
Function of V2, V3,
b1 for
OrdBasis of V1,
b2 for
OrdBasis of V2,
b3 for
OrdBasis of V3,
v1,v2 for
Vector of V2,
v,w for
Element of V1;
reserve p2,F for
FinSequence of V1,
p1,d for
FinSequence of
INT.Ring ,
KL for
Linear_Combination of V1;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:11
Th9: for a be
Element of V1, F be
FinSequence of V1, G be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring st (
len F)
= (
len G) & for k holds for v be
Element of
INT.Ring st k
in (
dom F) & v
= (G
. k) holds (F
. k)
= (v
* a) holds (
Sum F)
= ((
Sum G)
* a)
proof
let a be
Element of V1;
let F be
FinSequence of V1;
let G be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring ;
defpred
P[
Nat] means for H be
FinSequence of V1, I be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring st (
len H)
= (
len I) & (
len H)
= $1 & (for k holds for v be
Element of
INT.Ring st k
in (
dom H) & v
= (I
. k) holds (H
. k)
= (v
* a)) holds (
Sum H)
= ((
Sum I)
* a);
A1: for n st
P[n] holds
P[(n
+ 1)]
proof
let n;
assume
A2: for H be
FinSequence of V1, I be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring st (
len H)
= (
len I) & (
len H)
= n & (for k holds for v be
Element of
INT.Ring st k
in (
dom H) & v
= (I
. k) holds (H
. k)
= (v
* a)) holds (
Sum H)
= ((
Sum I)
* a);
let H be
FinSequence of V1, I be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring ;
assume that
A3: (
len H)
= (
len I) and
A4: (
len H)
= (n
+ 1) and
A5: for k holds for v be
Element of
INT.Ring st k
in (
dom H) & v
= (I
. k) holds (H
. k)
= (v
* a);
reconsider q = (I
| (
Seg n)) as
FinSequence of
INT.Ring by
FINSEQ_1: 18;
reconsider p = (H
| (
Seg n)) as
FinSequence of V1 by
FINSEQ_1: 18;
A6: n
<= (n
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 12;
then
A7: (
len p)
= n by
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
A8: (
dom p)
= (
Seg n) by
A4,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
A9: (
len q)
= n by
A3,
A4,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
A10: (
dom q)
= (
Seg n) by
A3,
A4,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
A11:
now
(
len p)
<= (
len H) by
A4,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 17;
then
A12: (
dom p)
c= (
dom H) by
FINSEQ_3: 30;
let k;
let v be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
assume that
A13: k
in (
dom p) and
A14: v
= (q
. k);
(I
. k)
= (q
. k) by
A8,
A10,
A13,
FUNCT_1: 47;
then (H
. k)
= (v
* a) by
A5,
A13,
A14,
A12;
hence (p
. k)
= (v
* a) by
A13,
FUNCT_1: 47;
end;
reconsider n as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
(n
+ 1)
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 4;
then
A15: (n
+ 1)
in (
dom H) by
A4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider v1 = (H
. (n
+ 1)) as
Element of V1 by
FINSEQ_2: 11;
reconsider v2 = (I
. (n
+ 1)) as
Element of
INT.Ring by
INT_1:def 2;
A16: v1
= (v2
* a) by
A5,
A15;
A17: I
= (q
^
<*v2*>) by
FINSEQ_3: 55,
A3,
A4;
thus (
Sum H)
= ((
Sum p)
+ v1) by
A4,
A7,
A8,
RLVECT_1: 38
.= (((
Sum q)
* a)
+ (v2
* a)) by
A2,
A7,
A9,
A11,
A16
.= (((
Sum q)
+ v2)
* a) by
VECTSP_1:def 15
.= ((
Sum I)
* a) by
A17,
FVSUM_1: 71;
end;
A17:
P[
0 ]
proof
let H be
FinSequence of V1, I be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring ;
assume that
A18: (
len H)
= (
len I) and
A19: (
len H)
=
0 and for k holds for v be
Element of
INT.Ring st k
in (
dom H) & v
= (I
. k) holds (H
. k)
= (v
* a);
H
= (
<*> the
carrier of V1) by
A19;
then
A20: (
Sum H)
= (
0. V1) by
RLVECT_1: 43;
I
= (
<*> the
carrier of
INT.Ring ) by
A18,
A19;
then (
Sum I)
= (
0.
INT.Ring ) by
RLVECT_1: 43;
then ((
Sum I)
* a)
= (
0. V1) by
VECTSP_1: 14;
hence thesis by
A20;
end;
for n holds
P[n] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A17,
A1);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:12
Th10: for a be
Element of V1, F be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring , G be
FinSequence of V1 st (
len F)
= (
len G) & for k st k
in (
dom F) holds (G
. k)
= ((F
/. k)
* a) holds (
Sum G)
= ((
Sum F)
* a)
proof
let a be
Element of V1;
let F be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring ;
let G be
FinSequence of V1;
assume that
A1: (
len F)
= (
len G) and
A2: for k st k
in (
dom F) holds (G
. k)
= ((F
/. k)
* a);
now
let k;
let v be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
assume that
A3: k
in (
dom G) and
A4: v
= (F
. k);
A5: k
in (
dom F) by
A1,
A3,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then v
= (F
/. k) by
A4,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
hence (G
. k)
= (v
* a) by
A2,
A5;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
Th9;
end;
definition
let V1, p1, p2;
::
ZMATRLIN:def6
func
lmlt (p1,p2) ->
FinSequence of V1 equals (the
lmult of V1
.: (p1,p2));
coherence ;
end
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:13
Th12: (
dom p1)
= (
dom p2) implies (
dom (
lmlt (p1,p2)))
= (
dom p1)
proof
assume
A1: (
dom p1)
= (
dom p2);
A2:
[:(
rng p1), (
rng p2):]
c=
[:
INT , the
carrier of V1:] by
ZFMISC_1: 96;
A3: (
rng
<:p1, p2:>)
c=
[:(
rng p1), (
rng p2):] &
[:
INT , the
carrier of V1:]
= (
dom the
lmult of V1) by
FUNCT_2:def 1,
FUNCT_3: 51;
thus (
dom (
lmlt (p1,p2)))
= (
dom (the
lmult of V1
*
<:p1, p2:>)) by
FUNCOP_1:def 3
.= (
dom
<:p1, p2:>) by
A2,
A3,
RELAT_1: 27,
XBOOLE_1: 1
.= ((
dom p1)
/\ (
dom p2)) by
FUNCT_3:def 7
.= (
dom p1) by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:14
Th13: for M be
Matrix of the
carrier of V1 st (
len M)
=
0 holds (
Sum (
Sum M))
= (
0. V1)
proof
let M be
Matrix of the
carrier of V1;
assume (
len M)
=
0 ;
then (
len (
Sum M))
=
0 by
MATRLIN:def 6;
then (
Sum M)
= (
<*> the
carrier of V1);
hence thesis by
RLVECT_1: 43;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:15
Th14: for M be
Matrix of (m
+ 1),
0 , the
carrier of V1 holds (
Sum (
Sum M))
= (
0. V1)
proof
let M be
Matrix of (m
+ 1),
0 , the
carrier of V1;
for k st k
in (
dom (
Sum M)) holds ((
Sum M)
/. k)
= (
0. V1)
proof
let k such that
A1: k
in (
dom (
Sum M));
reconsider k1 = k as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
(
len M)
= (
len (
Sum M)) by
MATRLIN:def 6;
then (
dom M)
= (
dom (
Sum M)) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then (M
/. k1)
in (
rng M) by
A1,
PARTFUN2: 2;
then (
len (M
/. k))
=
0 by
MATRIX_0:def 2;
then
A2: (M
/. k)
= (
<*> the
carrier of V1);
thus ((
Sum M)
/. k)
= (
Sum (M
/. k)) by
A1,
MATRLIN:def 6
.= (
0. V1) by
A2,
RLVECT_1: 43;
end;
hence thesis by
MATRLIN: 11;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:16
Th16: for V1,V2 be
Z_Module, f be
Function of V1, V2, p be
FinSequence of V1 st f is
additive
homogeneous holds (f
. (
Sum p))
= (
Sum (f
* p))
proof
let V1,V2 be
Z_Module, f be
Function of V1, V2;
let p be
FinSequence of V1;
defpred
P[
FinSequence of V1] means (f
. (
Sum $1))
= (
Sum (f
* $1));
assume
A1: f is
additive
homogeneous;
A2: for p be
FinSequence of V1 holds for w be
Element of V1 st
P[p] holds
P[(p
^
<*w*>)]
proof
let p be
FinSequence of V1;
let w be
Element of V1 such that
A3: (f
. (
Sum p))
= (
Sum (f
* p));
thus (f
. (
Sum (p
^
<*w*>)))
= (f
. ((
Sum p)
+ (
Sum
<*w*>))) by
RLVECT_1: 41
.= ((
Sum (f
* p))
+ (f
. (
Sum
<*w*>))) by
A1,
A3
.= ((
Sum (f
* p))
+ (f
. w)) by
RLVECT_1: 44
.= ((
Sum (f
* p))
+ (
Sum
<*(f
. w)*>)) by
RLVECT_1: 44
.= (
Sum ((f
* p)
^
<*(f
. w)*>)) by
RLVECT_1: 41
.= (
Sum (f
* (p
^
<*w*>))) by
FINSEQOP: 8;
end;
set I0 = (
0.
INT.Ring );
(f
. (
Sum (
<*> the
carrier of V1)))
= (f
. (
0. V1)) by
RLVECT_1: 43
.= (f
. (I0
* (
0. V1))) by
ZMODUL01: 1
.= (I0
* (f
. (
0. V1))) by
A1
.= (
0. V2) by
ZMODUL01: 1
.= (
Sum (
<*> the
carrier of V2)) by
RLVECT_1: 43
.= (
Sum (f
* (
<*> the
carrier of V1)));
then
A4:
P[(
<*> the
carrier of V1)];
for p be
FinSequence of V1 holds
P[p] from
FINSEQ_2:sch 2(
A4,
A2);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:17
Th17: for a be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring , p be
FinSequence of V1 st (
len p)
= (
len a) holds f is
additive
homogeneous implies (f
* (
lmlt (a,p)))
= (
lmlt (a,(f
* p)))
proof
let a be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring , p be
FinSequence of V1;
assume (
len p)
= (
len a);
then
A1: (
dom p)
= (
dom a) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
(
dom f)
= the
carrier of V1 by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then (
rng p)
c= (
dom f);
then
A2: (
dom p)
= (
dom (f
* p)) by
RELAT_1: 27;
assume
A3: f is
additive
homogeneous;
A4:
now
set P = (f
* p);
let k be
Nat;
assume
A5: k
in (
dom (f
* (
lmlt (a,p))));
A6: (
dom (f
* (
lmlt (a,p))))
c= (
dom (
lmlt (a,p))) by
RELAT_1: 25;
then k
in (
dom (
lmlt (a,p))) by
A5;
then
A7: k
in (
dom p) by
A1,
Th12;
then
A8: (p
/. k)
= (p
. k) by
PARTFUN1:def 6;
A9: k
in (
dom (
lmlt (a,(f
* p)))) by
A1,
A2,
A7,
Th12;
A10: (a
/. k)
= (a
. k) by
A1,
A7,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
A11: (P
/. k)
= ((f
* p)
. k) by
A2,
A7,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
thus ((f
* (
lmlt (a,p)))
. k)
= (f
. ((
lmlt (a,p))
. k)) by
A5,
FUNCT_1: 12
.= (f
. ((a
/. k)
* (p
/. k))) by
A10,
A8,
A5,
A6,
FUNCOP_1: 22
.= ((a
/. k)
* (f
. (p
/. k))) by
A3
.= ((a
/. k)
* (P
/. k)) by
A7,
A8,
A11,
FUNCT_1: 13
.= ((
lmlt (a,(f
* p)))
. k) by
A9,
A10,
A11,
FUNCOP_1: 22;
end;
(
dom (
lmlt (a,p)))
= (
dom p) by
A1,
Th12
.= (
dom (
lmlt (a,(f
* p)))) by
A1,
A2,
Th12;
then (
len (
lmlt (a,p)))
= (
len (
lmlt (a,(f
* p)))) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then (
len (f
* (
lmlt (a,p))))
= (
len (
lmlt (a,(f
* p)))) by
FINSEQ_2: 33;
hence thesis by
A4,
FINSEQ_2: 9;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:18
Th18: for a be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring st (
len a)
= (
len b2) & g is
additive
homogeneous holds (g
. (
Sum (
lmlt (a,b2))))
= (
Sum (
lmlt (a,(g
* b2))))
proof
let a be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring such that
A1: (
len a)
= (
len b2) and
A2: g is
additive
homogeneous;
thus (g
. (
Sum (
lmlt (a,b2))))
= (
Sum (g
* (
lmlt (a,b2)))) by
A2,
Th16
.= (
Sum (
lmlt (a,(g
* b2)))) by
A1,
A2,
Th17;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:19
Th19: for F,F1 be
FinSequence of V1, KL be
Linear_Combination of V1, p be
Permutation of (
dom F) st F1
= (F
* p) holds (KL
(#) F1)
= ((KL
(#) F)
* p)
proof
let F,F1 be
FinSequence of V1;
let KL be
Linear_Combination of V1;
let p be
Permutation of (
dom F) such that
A1: F1
= (F
* p);
(
dom F)
= (
Seg (
len F)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (
dom F)
= (
Seg (
len (KL
(#) F))) by
VECTSP_6:def 5;
then
A2: (
dom F)
= (
dom (KL
(#) F)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
reconsider F2 = ((KL
(#) F)
* p) as
FinSequence of V1 by
FINSEQ_2: 47;
A31: (
len (KL
(#) F1))
= (
len F1) by
VECTSP_6:def 5
.= (
len F) by
A1,
FINSEQ_2: 44
.= (
len (KL
(#) F)) by
VECTSP_6:def 5
.= (
len F2) by
A2,
FINSEQ_2: 44;
then
A3: (
dom (KL
(#) F1))
= (
dom ((KL
(#) F)
* p)) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
(
len (KL
(#) F1))
= (
len F1) by
VECTSP_6:def 5;
then
A4: (
dom (KL
(#) F1))
= (
dom F1) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
now
let k be
Nat;
reconsider k0 = k as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
assume
A5: k
in (
dom (KL
(#) F1));
then k
in (
dom p) by
A3,
FUNCT_1: 11;
then
A6: (p
. k)
in (
rng p) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then (p
. k)
in (
dom F);
then
reconsider k1 = (p
. k0) as
Element of
NAT ;
(F1
/. k)
= (F1
. k) by
A4,
A5,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (F
. (p
. k)) by
A1,
A4,
A5,
FUNCT_1: 12
.= (F
/. (p
. k)) by
A6,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
hence ((KL
(#) F1)
. k)
= ((KL
. (F
/. k1))
* (F
/. k1)) by
A5,
VECTSP_6:def 5
.= ((KL
(#) F)
. k1) by
A2,
A6,
VECTSP_6:def 5
.= (F2
. k) by
A3,
A5,
FUNCT_1: 12;
end;
hence thesis by
A31,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:20
Th20: F is
one-to-one & (
Carrier KL)
c= (
rng F) implies (
Sum (KL
(#) F))
= (
Sum KL)
proof
assume
A1: F is
one-to-one;
assume
A2: (
Carrier KL)
c= (
rng F);
then
reconsider A = (
Carrier KL) as
Subset of (
rng F);
consider p1 be
Permutation of (
dom F) such that
A3: ((F
- (A
` ))
^ (F
- A))
= (F
* p1) by
FINSEQ_3: 115;
reconsider G1 = (F
- (A
` )), G2 = (F
- A) as
FinSequence of V1 by
FINSEQ_3: 86;
A4: G1 is
one-to-one by
A1,
FINSEQ_3: 87;
(
len (KL
(#) F))
= (
len F) by
VECTSP_6:def 5;
then (
dom (KL
(#) F))
= (
dom F) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
reconsider p1 as
Permutation of (
dom (KL
(#) F));
A5: (
rng G1)
= ((
rng F)
\ (A
` )) by
FINSEQ_3: 65
.= ((
rng F)
/\ (
Carrier KL)) by
XBOOLE_1: 48
.= (
Carrier KL) by
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 28;
for k st k
in (
dom (KL
(#) G2)) holds ((KL
(#) G2)
/. k)
= (
0. V1)
proof
let k such that
A6: k
in (
dom (KL
(#) G2));
(
len (KL
(#) G2))
= (
len G2) by
VECTSP_6:def 5;
then
A7: (
dom (KL
(#) G2))
= (
dom G2) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then (G2
. k)
in (
rng G2) by
A6,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then (G2
. k)
in ((
rng F)
\ (
Carrier KL)) by
FINSEQ_3: 65;
then not (G2
. k)
in (
Carrier KL) by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
then
A8: not (G2
/. k)
in (
Carrier KL) by
A6,
A7,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
reconsider k1 = k as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
thus ((KL
(#) G2)
/. k)
= ((KL
(#) G2)
. k) by
A6,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((KL
. (G2
/. k1))
* (G2
/. k1)) by
A6,
VECTSP_6:def 5
.= ((
0.
INT.Ring )
* (G2
/. k)) by
A8
.= (
0. V1) by
ZMODUL01: 1;
end;
then
A9: (
Sum (KL
(#) G2))
= (
0. V1) by
MATRLIN: 11;
(KL
(#) (G1
^ G2))
= ((KL
(#) F)
* p1) by
A3,
Th19;
hence (
Sum (KL
(#) F))
= (
Sum (KL
(#) (G1
^ G2))) by
RLVECT_2: 7
.= (
Sum ((KL
(#) G1)
^ (KL
(#) G2))) by
ZMODUL02: 51
.= ((
Sum (KL
(#) G1))
+ (
Sum (KL
(#) G2))) by
RLVECT_1: 41
.= (
Sum KL) by
A4,
A5,
A9,
VECTSP_6:def 6;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:21
Th21: for A be
set, p be
FinSequence of V1 st (
rng p)
c= A holds f1 is
additive
homogeneous & f2 is
additive
homogeneous & (for v st v
in A holds (f1
. v)
= (f2
. v)) implies (f1
. (
Sum p))
= (f2
. (
Sum p))
proof
let A be
set;
let p be
FinSequence of V1 such that
A1: (
rng p)
c= A;
defpred
P[
FinSequence of V1] means (
rng $1)
c= A implies (f1
. (
Sum $1))
= (f2
. (
Sum $1));
assume that
A2: f1 is
additive
homogeneous and
A3: f2 is
additive
homogeneous;
assume
A4: for v st v
in A holds (f1
. v)
= (f2
. v);
A5: for p be
FinSequence of V1, x be
Element of V1 st
P[p] holds
P[(p
^
<*x*>)]
proof
let p be
FinSequence of V1, x be
Element of V1 such that
A6: (
rng p)
c= A implies (f1
. (
Sum p))
= (f2
. (
Sum p));
A7: (
rng p)
c= ((
rng p)
\/ (
rng
<*x*>)) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
assume (
rng (p
^
<*x*>))
c= A;
then
A8: ((
rng p)
\/ (
rng
<*x*>))
c= A by
FINSEQ_1: 31;
(
rng
<*x*>)
c= ((
rng p)
\/ (
rng
<*x*>)) by
XBOOLE_1: 7;
then (
rng
<*x*>)
c= A by
A8;
then
A9:
{x}
c= A by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
thus (f1
. (
Sum (p
^
<*x*>)))
= (f1
. ((
Sum p)
+ (
Sum
<*x*>))) by
RLVECT_1: 41
.= ((f2
. (
Sum p))
+ (f1
. (
Sum
<*x*>))) by
A2,
A6,
A8,
A7
.= ((f2
. (
Sum p))
+ (f1
. x)) by
RLVECT_1: 44
.= ((f2
. (
Sum p))
+ (f2
. x)) by
A4,
A9,
ZFMISC_1: 31
.= ((f2
. (
Sum p))
+ (f2
. (
Sum
<*x*>))) by
RLVECT_1: 44
.= (f2
. ((
Sum p)
+ (
Sum
<*x*>))) by
A3
.= (f2
. (
Sum (p
^
<*x*>))) by
RLVECT_1: 41;
end;
A10:
P[(
<*> the
carrier of V1)]
proof
assume (
rng (
<*> the
carrier of V1))
c= A;
set I0 = (
0.
INT.Ring );
thus (f1
. (
Sum (
<*> the
carrier of V1)))
= (f1
. (
0. V1)) by
RLVECT_1: 43
.= (f1
. (I0
* (
0. V1))) by
ZMODUL01: 1
.= (I0
* (f1
. (
0. V1))) by
A2
.= (
0. V2) by
ZMODUL01: 1
.= (I0
* (f2
. (
0. V1))) by
ZMODUL01: 1
.= (f2
. (I0
* (
0. V1))) by
A3
.= (f2
. (
0. V1)) by
ZMODUL01: 1
.= (f2
. (
Sum (
<*> the
carrier of V1))) by
RLVECT_1: 43;
end;
for p be
FinSequence of V1 holds
P[p] from
FINSEQ_2:sch 2(
A10,
A5);
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:22
Th22: f1 is
additive
homogeneous & f2 is
additive
homogeneous implies for b1 be
OrdBasis of V1 st (
len b1)
>
0 holds (f1
* b1)
= (f2
* b1) implies f1
= f2
proof
assume that
A1: f1 is
additive
homogeneous and
A2: f2 is
additive
homogeneous;
let b1 be
OrdBasis of V1 such that
A3: (
len b1)
>
0 ;
reconsider b = (
rng b1) as
Basis of V1 by
defOrdBasis;
assume
A4: (f1
* b1)
= (f2
* b1);
now
(
len b1)
in (
Seg (
len b1)) by
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 3;
then
reconsider D = (
dom b1) as non
empty
set by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
let v be
Element of V1;
(
Lin b)
= the ModuleStr of V1 by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
then v
in (
Lin b);
then
consider KL be
Linear_Combination of b such that
A5: v
= (
Sum KL) by
ZMODUL02: 64;
set p = (KL
(#) b1);
set A = the set of all ((KL
. (b1
/. i))
* (b1
/. i)) where i be
Element of D;
A6: (
rng p)
c= A
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
rng p);
then
consider i be
Nat such that
A7: i
in (
dom p) and
A8: (p
. i)
= x by
FINSEQ_2: 10;
(
dom p)
= (
Seg (
len p)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then i
in (
Seg (
len b1)) by
A7,
VECTSP_6:def 5;
then
A9: i
in (
dom b1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
((KL
(#) b1)
. i)
= ((KL
. (b1
/. i))
* (b1
/. i)) by
A7,
VECTSP_6:def 5;
hence thesis by
A8,
A9;
end;
A10: for w st w
in A holds (f1
. w)
= (f2
. w)
proof
let w;
assume w
in A;
then
consider i be
Element of D such that
A11: w
= ((KL
. (b1
/. i))
* (b1
/. i));
(f1
. (b1
/. i))
= (f1
. (b1
. i)) by
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((f2
* b1)
. i) by
A4,
FUNCT_1: 13
.= (f2
. (b1
. i)) by
FUNCT_1: 13
.= (f2
. (b1
/. i)) by
PARTFUN1:def 6;
then (f1
. ((KL
. (b1
/. i))
* (b1
/. i)))
= ((KL
. (b1
/. i))
* (f2
. (b1
/. i))) by
A1
.= (f2
. ((KL
. (b1
/. i))
* (b1
/. i))) by
A2;
hence thesis by
A11;
end;
A12: b1 is
one-to-one & (
Carrier KL)
c= (
rng b1) by
defOrdBasis,
VECTSP_6:def 4;
hence (f1
. v)
= (f1
. (
Sum (KL
(#) b1))) by
A5,
Th20
.= (f2
. (
Sum p)) by
A1,
A2,
A6,
A10,
Th21
.= (f2
. v) by
A5,
A12,
Th20;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:23
Th27: for M1 be
Matrix of n, k, the
carrier of V, M2 be
Matrix of m, k, the
carrier of V holds (
Sum (M1
^ M2))
= ((
Sum M1)
^ (
Sum M2))
proof
let M1 be
Matrix of n, k, the
carrier of V;
let M2 be
Matrix of m, k, the
carrier of V;
A1: (
dom (
Sum (M1
^ M2)))
= (
Seg (
len (
Sum (M1
^ M2)))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A2:
now
let i be
Nat;
assume
A3: i
in (
dom (
Sum (M1
^ M2)));
then i
in (
Seg (
len (M1
^ M2))) by
A1,
MATRLIN:def 6;
then
A4: i
in (
dom (M1
^ M2)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
now
per cases by
A4,
FINSEQ_1: 25;
suppose
A5: i
in (
dom M1);
(
len M1)
= (
len (
Sum M1)) by
MATRLIN:def 6;
then
A6: (
dom M1)
= (
dom (
Sum M1)) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
thus ((
Sum (M1
^ M2))
. i)
= ((
Sum (M1
^ M2))
/. i) by
A3,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (
Sum ((M1
^ M2)
/. i)) by
A3,
MATRLIN:def 6
.= (
Sum (M1
/. i)) by
A5,
FINSEQ_4: 68
.= ((
Sum M1)
/. i) by
A5,
A6,
MATRLIN:def 6
.= ((
Sum M1)
. i) by
A5,
A6,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (((
Sum M1)
^ (
Sum M2))
. i) by
A5,
A6,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
end;
suppose
A7: ex n be
Nat st n
in (
dom M2) & i
= ((
len M1)
+ n);
A8: (
len M1)
= (
len (
Sum M1)) by
MATRLIN:def 6;
(
len M2)
= (
len (
Sum M2)) by
MATRLIN:def 6;
then
A9: (
dom M2)
= (
dom (
Sum M2)) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
consider n be
Nat such that
A10: n
in (
dom M2) and
A11: i
= ((
len M1)
+ n) by
A7;
thus ((
Sum (M1
^ M2))
. i)
= ((
Sum (M1
^ M2))
/. i) by
A3,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (
Sum ((M1
^ M2)
/. i)) by
A3,
MATRLIN:def 6
.= (
Sum (M2
/. n)) by
A10,
A11,
FINSEQ_4: 69
.= ((
Sum M2)
/. n) by
A10,
A9,
MATRLIN:def 6
.= ((
Sum M2)
. n) by
A10,
A9,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (((
Sum M1)
^ (
Sum M2))
. i) by
A10,
A11,
A8,
A9,
FINSEQ_1:def 7;
end;
end;
hence ((
Sum (M1
^ M2))
. i)
= (((
Sum M1)
^ (
Sum M2))
. i);
end;
(
len (
Sum (M1
^ M2)))
= (
len (M1
^ M2)) by
MATRLIN:def 6
.= ((
len M1)
+ (
len M2)) by
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= ((
len (
Sum M1))
+ (
len M2)) by
MATRLIN:def 6
.= ((
len (
Sum M1))
+ (
len (
Sum M2))) by
MATRLIN:def 6
.= (
len ((
Sum M1)
^ (
Sum M2))) by
FINSEQ_1: 22;
hence thesis by
A2,
FINSEQ_2: 9;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:24
Th29: for M1,M2 be
Matrix of the
carrier of V1 holds ((
Sum M1)
+ (
Sum M2))
= (
Sum (M1
^^ M2))
proof
let M1,M2 be
Matrix of the
carrier of V1;
reconsider m = (
min ((
len M1),(
len M2))) as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
A1: (
Seg m)
= ((
Seg (
len M1))
/\ (
Seg (
len M2))) by
FINSEQ_2: 2
.= ((
Seg (
len M1))
/\ (
dom M2)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= ((
dom M1)
/\ (
dom M2)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
dom (M1
^^ M2)) by
PRE_POLY:def 4
.= (
Seg (
len (M1
^^ M2))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A2: (
len ((
Sum M1)
+ (
Sum M2)))
= (
min ((
len (
Sum M1)),(
len (
Sum M2)))) by
FINSEQ_2: 71
.= (
min ((
len M1),(
len (
Sum M2)))) by
MATRLIN:def 6
.= (
min ((
len M1),(
len M2))) by
MATRLIN:def 6
.= (
len (M1
^^ M2)) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1: 6
.= (
len (
Sum (M1
^^ M2))) by
MATRLIN:def 6;
A3: (
dom ((
Sum M1)
+ (
Sum M2)))
= (
Seg (
len ((
Sum M1)
+ (
Sum M2)))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
now
let i be
Nat;
assume
A4: i
in (
dom ((
Sum M1)
+ (
Sum M2)));
then
A5: i
in (
dom (
Sum (M1
^^ M2))) by
A2,
A3,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
i
in (
Seg (
len (M1
^^ M2))) by
A2,
A3,
A4,
MATRLIN:def 6;
then
A6: i
in (
dom (M1
^^ M2)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A7: i
in ((
dom M1)
/\ (
dom M2)) by
PRE_POLY:def 4;
then
A8: i
in (
dom M1) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
A9: i
in (
dom M2) by
A7,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
reconsider m1 = (M1
. i), m2 = (M2
. i) as
FinSequence;
A10: ((M1
/. i)
^ (M2
/. i))
= (m1
^ (M2
/. i)) by
A8,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (m1
^ m2) by
A9,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((M1
^^ M2)
. i) by
A6,
PRE_POLY:def 4
.= ((M1
^^ M2)
/. i) by
A6,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
i
in (
Seg (
len M2)) by
A9,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then i
in (
Seg (
len (
Sum M2))) by
MATRLIN:def 6;
then
A11: i
in (
dom (
Sum M2)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A12: ((
Sum M2)
/. i)
= ((
Sum M2)
. i) by
PARTFUN1:def 6;
i
in (
Seg (
len M1)) by
A8,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then i
in (
Seg (
len (
Sum M1))) by
MATRLIN:def 6;
then
A13: i
in (
dom (
Sum M1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then ((
Sum M1)
/. i)
= ((
Sum M1)
. i) by
PARTFUN1:def 6;
hence (((
Sum M1)
+ (
Sum M2))
. i)
= (((
Sum M1)
/. i)
+ ((
Sum M2)
/. i)) by
A4,
A12,
FUNCOP_1: 22
.= ((
Sum (M1
/. i))
+ ((
Sum M2)
/. i)) by
A13,
MATRLIN:def 6
.= ((
Sum (M1
/. i))
+ (
Sum (M2
/. i))) by
A11,
MATRLIN:def 6
.= (
Sum ((M1
^^ M2)
/. i)) by
A10,
RLVECT_1: 41
.= ((
Sum (M1
^^ M2))
/. i) by
A5,
MATRLIN:def 6
.= ((
Sum (M1
^^ M2))
. i) by
A5,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
end;
hence thesis by
A2,
FINSEQ_2: 9;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:25
Th30: for P1,P2 be
FinSequence of V1 st (
len P1)
= (
len P2) holds (
Sum (P1
+ P2))
= ((
Sum P1)
+ (
Sum P2))
proof
let P1,P2 be
FinSequence of V1;
assume (
len P1)
= (
len P2);
then
reconsider R1 = P1, R2 = P2 as
Element of ((
len P1)
-tuples_on the
carrier of V1) by
FINSEQ_2: 92;
thus (
Sum (P1
+ P2))
= (
Sum (R1
+ R2))
.= ((
Sum P1)
+ (
Sum P2)) by
FVSUM_1: 76;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:26
Th31: for M1,M2 be
Matrix of the
carrier of V1 st (
len M1)
= (
len M2) holds ((
Sum (
Sum M1))
+ (
Sum (
Sum M2)))
= (
Sum (
Sum (M1
^^ M2)))
proof
let M1,M2 be
Matrix of the
carrier of V1 such that
A1: (
len M1)
= (
len M2);
(
len (
Sum M1))
= (
len M1) by
MATRLIN:def 6
.= (
len (
Sum M2)) by
A1,
MATRLIN:def 6;
hence ((
Sum (
Sum M1))
+ (
Sum (
Sum M2)))
= (
Sum ((
Sum M1)
+ (
Sum M2))) by
Th30
.= (
Sum (
Sum (M1
^^ M2))) by
Th29;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:27
Th32: for M be
Matrix of the
carrier of V1 holds (
Sum (
Sum M))
= (
Sum (
Sum (M
@ )))
proof
defpred
X[
Nat] means for M be
Matrix of the
carrier of V1 st (
len M)
= $1 holds (
Sum (
Sum M))
= (
Sum (
Sum (M
@ )));
let M be
Matrix of the
carrier of V1;
A1: for P be
FinSequence of V1 holds (
Sum (
Sum
<*P*>))
= (
Sum (
Sum (
<*P*>
@ )))
proof
defpred
X[
FinSequence of V1] means (
Sum (
Sum
<*$1*>))
= (
Sum (
Sum (
<*$1*>
@ )));
let P be
FinSequence of V1;
(
len
<*(
<*> the
carrier of V1)*>)
= 1 by
MATRIX_0:def 2;
then (
width
<*(
<*> the
carrier of V1)*>)
=
0 by
MATRIX_0: 20;
then
A2: (
len (
<*(
<*> the
carrier of V1)*>
@ ))
=
0 by
MATRIX_0:def 6;
A3: for P be
FinSequence of V1, x be
Element of V1 st
X[P] holds
X[(P
^
<*x*>)]
proof
let P be
FinSequence of V1, x be
Element of V1 such that
A4: (
Sum (
Sum
<*P*>))
= (
Sum (
Sum (
<*P*>
@ )));
(
Seg (
len (
<*P*>
^^
<*
<*x*>*>)))
= (
dom (
<*P*>
^^
<*
<*x*>*>)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= ((
dom
<*P*>)
/\ (
dom
<*
<*x*>*>)) by
PRE_POLY:def 4
.= ((
Seg 1)
/\ (
dom
<*
<*x*>*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 38
.= ((
Seg 1)
/\ (
Seg 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 38
.= (
Seg 1);
then
A5: (
len (
<*P*>
^^
<*
<*x*>*>))
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 6
.= (
len
<*(P
^
<*x*>)*>) by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
then
A6: (
dom (
<*P*>
^^
<*
<*x*>*>))
= (
Seg (
len
<*(P
^
<*x*>)*>)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A7:
now
let i be
Nat;
assume
A8: i
in (
dom (
<*P*>
^^
<*
<*x*>*>));
then i
in
{1} by
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 2,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
then
A9: i
= 1 by
TARSKI:def 1;
reconsider m1 = (
<*P*>
. i), m2 = (
<*
<*x*>*>
. i) as
FinSequence;
thus ((
<*P*>
^^
<*
<*x*>*>)
. i)
= (m1
^ m2) by
A8,
PRE_POLY:def 4
.= (P
^ m2) by
A9,
FINSEQ_1: 40
.= (P
^
<*x*>) by
A9,
FINSEQ_1: 40
.= (
<*(P
^
<*x*>)*>
. i) by
A9,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
end;
per cases ;
suppose (
len P)
=
0 ;
then
A10: P
=
{} ;
hence (
Sum (
Sum
<*(P
^
<*x*>)*>))
= (
Sum (
Sum
<*
<*x*>*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 34
.= (
Sum (
Sum (
<*
<*x*>*>
@ ))) by
MATRLIN: 15
.= (
Sum (
Sum (
<*(P
^
<*x*>)*>
@ ))) by
A10,
FINSEQ_1: 34;
end;
suppose
A11: (
len P)
<>
0 ;
A12: (
len
<*
<*x*>*>)
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
then
A13: (
width
<*
<*x*>*>)
= (
len
<*x*>) by
MATRIX_0: 20
.= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
then
A14: (
len (
<*
<*x*>*>
@ ))
= 1 by
MATRIX_0:def 6;
A15: (
len
<*P*>)
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
then
A16: (
width
<*P*>)
= (
len P) by
MATRIX_0: 20;
then
A17: (
len (
<*P*>
@ ))
= (
len P) by
MATRIX_0:def 6;
(
width (
<*P*>
@ ))
= 1 by
A11,
A15,
A16,
MATRIX_0: 54;
then
reconsider d1 = (
<*P*>
@ ) as
Matrix of (
len P), 1, the
carrier of V1 by
A11,
A17,
MATRIX_0: 20;
A18: (
len
<*(P
^
<*x*>)*>)
= 1 by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
then
A19: (
width
<*(P
^
<*x*>)*>)
= (
len (P
^
<*x*>)) by
MATRIX_0: 20
.= ((
len P)
+ (
len
<*x*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= ((
len P)
+ 1) by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
A20: ((
<*
<*x*>*>
@ )
@ )
=
<*
<*x*>*> by
A12,
A13,
MATRIX_0: 57;
A21: (
width (
<*P*>
@ ))
= (
len
<*P*>) by
A11,
A16,
MATRIX_0: 54
.= (
width (
<*
<*x*>*>
@ )) by
A15,
A12,
A13,
MATRIX_0: 54;
then (
width (
<*
<*x*>*>
@ ))
= 1 by
A11,
A15,
A16,
MATRIX_0: 54;
then
reconsider d2 = (
<*
<*x*>*>
@ ) as
Matrix of 1, 1, the
carrier of V1 by
A14,
MATRIX_0: 20;
A22: ((d1
^ d2)
@ )
= (((
<*P*>
@ )
@ )
^^ ((
<*
<*x*>*>
@ )
@ )) by
A21,
MATRLIN: 28
.= (
<*P*>
^^
<*
<*x*>*>) by
A11,
A15,
A16,
A20,
MATRIX_0: 57
.=
<*(P
^
<*x*>)*> by
A5,
A7,
FINSEQ_2: 9
.= ((
<*(P
^
<*x*>)*>
@ )
@ ) by
A18,
A19,
MATRIX_0: 57;
A23: (
len ((
<*P*>
@ )
^ (
<*
<*x*>*>
@ )))
= ((
len (
<*P*>
@ ))
+ (
len (
<*
<*x*>*>
@ ))) by
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= ((
width
<*P*>)
+ (
len (
<*
<*x*>*>
@ ))) by
MATRIX_0:def 6
.= ((
width
<*P*>)
+ (
width
<*
<*x*>*>)) by
MATRIX_0:def 6
.= (
len (
<*(P
^
<*x*>)*>
@ )) by
A16,
A13,
A19,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
thus (
Sum (
Sum
<*(P
^
<*x*>)*>))
= (
Sum (
Sum (
<*P*>
^^
<*
<*x*>*>))) by
A5,
A7,
FINSEQ_2: 9
.= ((
Sum (
Sum (
<*P*>
@ )))
+ (
Sum (
Sum
<*
<*x*>*>))) by
A4,
A15,
A12,
Th31
.= ((
Sum (
Sum (
<*P*>
@ )))
+ (
Sum (
Sum (
<*
<*x*>*>
@ )))) by
MATRLIN: 15
.= (
Sum ((
Sum d1)
^ (
Sum d2))) by
RLVECT_1: 41
.= (
Sum (
Sum (d1
^ d2))) by
Th27
.= (
Sum (
Sum (
<*(P
^
<*x*>)*>
@ ))) by
A23,
A22,
MATRIX_0: 53;
end;
end;
<*(
<*> the
carrier of V1)*> is
Matrix of (
0
+ 1),
0 , the
carrier of V1;
then (
Sum (
Sum
<*(
<*> the
carrier of V1)*>))
= (
0. V1) by
Th14
.= (
Sum (
Sum (
<*(
<*> the
carrier of V1)*>
@ ))) by
A2,
Th13;
then
A24:
X[(
<*> the
carrier of V1)];
for P be
FinSequence of V1 holds
X[P] from
FINSEQ_2:sch 2(
A24,
A3);
hence thesis;
end;
A25: for n st
X[n] holds
X[(n
+ 1)]
proof
let n such that
A26: for M be
Matrix of the
carrier of V1 st (
len M)
= n holds (
Sum (
Sum M))
= (
Sum (
Sum (M
@ )));
thus for M be
Matrix of the
carrier of V1 st (
len M)
= (n
+ 1) holds (
Sum (
Sum M))
= (
Sum (
Sum (M
@ )))
proof
let M be
Matrix of the
carrier of V1 such that
A27: (
len M)
= (n
+ 1);
A28: M
<>
{} by
A27;
A29: (
dom M)
= (
Seg (
len M)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
per cases ;
suppose
A30: n
=
0 ;
then (M
. 1)
= (
Line (M,1)) by
A27,
A29,
FINSEQ_1: 4,
MATRIX_0: 60;
then
reconsider G = (M
. 1) as
FinSequence of V1;
M
=
<*G*> by
A27,
A30,
FINSEQ_1: 40;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
suppose
A31: n
>
0 ;
A32: (M
. (n
+ 1))
= (
Line (M,(n
+ 1))) by
A27,
A29,
FINSEQ_1: 4,
MATRIX_0: 60;
then
reconsider M1 = (M
. (n
+ 1)) as
FinSequence of V1;
(
len M1)
= (
width M) by
A32,
MATRIX_0:def 7;
then
reconsider R =
<*M1*> as
Matrix of 1, (
width M), the
carrier of V1;
reconsider M9 = M as
Matrix of (n
+ 1), (
width M), the
carrier of V1 by
A27,
MATRIX_0: 20;
reconsider W = (
Del (M9,(n
+ 1))) as
Matrix of n, (
width M), the
carrier of V1 by
MATRLIN: 3;
A33: (
width W)
= (
width M9) by
A31,
MATRLIN: 2
.= (
width R) by
MATRLIN: 2;
A34: (
len (W
@ ))
= (
width W) by
MATRIX_0:def 6
.= (
len (R
@ )) by
A33,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
A35: (
len (
Del (M,(n
+ 1))))
= n by
A27,
PRE_POLY: 12;
thus (
Sum (
Sum M))
= (
Sum (
Sum (W
^ R))) by
A28,
PRE_POLY: 13,
A27
.= (
Sum ((
Sum W)
^ (
Sum R))) by
Th27
.= ((
Sum (
Sum (
Del (M,(n
+ 1)))))
+ (
Sum (
Sum R))) by
RLVECT_1: 41
.= ((
Sum (
Sum ((
Del (M,(n
+ 1)))
@ )))
+ (
Sum (
Sum R))) by
A26,
A35
.= ((
Sum (
Sum ((
Del (M,(n
+ 1)))
@ )))
+ (
Sum (
Sum (R
@ )))) by
A1
.= (
Sum (
Sum ((W
@ )
^^ (R
@ )))) by
A34,
Th31
.= (
Sum (
Sum ((W
^ R)
@ ))) by
A33,
MATRLIN: 28
.= (
Sum (
Sum (M
@ ))) by
A28,
PRE_POLY: 13,
A27;
end;
end;
end;
A36:
X[
0 ]
proof
let M be
Matrix of the
carrier of V1;
assume
A37: (
len M)
=
0 ;
then (
width M)
=
0 by
MATRIX_0:def 3;
then
A38: (
len (M
@ ))
=
0 by
MATRIX_0:def 6;
thus (
Sum (
Sum M))
= (
0. V1) by
A37,
Th13
.= (
Sum (
Sum (M
@ ))) by
A38,
Th13;
end;
for n holds
X[n] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
A36,
A25);
then
X[(
len M)];
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:28
Th33: for M be
Matrix of n, m,
INT.Ring st n
>
0 & m
>
0 holds for p,d be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring st (
len p)
= n & (
len d)
= m & for j st j
in (
dom d) holds (d
/. j)
= (
Sum (
mlt (p,(
Col (M,j))))) holds for b,c be
FinSequence of V1 st (
len b)
= m & (
len c)
= n & for i st i
in (
dom c) holds (c
/. i)
= (
Sum (
lmlt ((
Line (M,i)),b))) holds (
Sum (
lmlt (p,c)))
= (
Sum (
lmlt (d,b)))
proof
let M be
Matrix of n, m,
INT.Ring such that
A1: n
>
0 and
A2: m
>
0 ;
A3: (
len M)
= n by
A1,
MATRIX_0: 23;
reconsider n1 = n, m1 = m as
Element of
NAT by
ORDINAL1:def 12;
let p,d be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring such that
A4: (
len p)
= n and
A5: (
len d)
= m and
A6: for j st j
in (
dom d) holds (d
/. j)
= (
Sum (
mlt (p,(
Col (M,j)))));
let b,c be
FinSequence of V1 such that
A7: (
len b)
= m and
A8: (
len c)
= n and
A9: for i st i
in (
dom c) holds (c
/. i)
= (
Sum (
lmlt ((
Line (M,i)),b)));
deffunc
V(
Nat,
Nat) = (((p
/. $1)
* (M
* ($1,$2)))
* (b
/. $2));
consider M1 be
Matrix of n1, m1, the
carrier of V1 such that
A10: for i, j st
[i, j]
in (
Indices M1) holds (M1
* (i,j))
=
V(i,j) from
MATRIX_0:sch 1;
A11: (
width M1)
= (
len (M1
@ )) by
MATRIX_0:def 6
.= (
len (
Sum (M1
@ ))) by
MATRLIN:def 6;
A12: (
dom d)
= (
dom b) by
A5,
A7,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A13: (
dom (
lmlt (d,b)))
= (
dom b) by
Th12;
then
A14: (
len (
lmlt (d,b)))
= (
len b) by
FINSEQ_3: 29
.= (
len (
Sum (M1
@ ))) by
A1,
A7,
A11,
MATRIX_0: 23;
then
A15: (
dom (
lmlt (d,b)))
= (
Seg (
len (
Sum (M1
@ )))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A16: (
width M1)
= m by
A1,
MATRIX_0: 23;
A17: (
len M1)
= n by
A1,
MATRIX_0: 23;
A19:
now
A20: (
Seg (
len (
Sum (M1
@ ))))
= (
dom (
Sum (M1
@ ))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
let j be
Nat such that
A21: j
in (
dom (
lmlt (d,b)));
A22: j
in (
dom (
Sum (M1
@ ))) by
A15,
A21,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A23: j
in (
dom d) by
A12,
A21,
Th12;
A24: (d
/. j)
= (d
. j) & (b
/. j)
= (b
. j) by
A12,
A13,
A21,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
(
len (
Sum (M1
@ )))
= (
len (M1
@ )) by
MATRLIN:def 6;
then
A25: (
dom (
Sum (M1
@ )))
= (
dom (M1
@ )) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A26: ((M1
@ )
/. j)
= ((M1
@ )
. j) by
A22,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (
Line ((M1
@ ),j)) by
A22,
A25,
MATRIX_0: 60;
reconsider H = (
mlt (p,(
Col (M,j)))) as
FinSequence of
INT.Ring ;
deffunc
V(
Nat) = ((H
/. $1)
* (b
/. j));
consider G be
FinSequence of V1 such that
A27: (
len G)
= (
len p) & for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom G) holds (G
. i)
=
V(i) from
FINSEQ_2:sch 1;
A28: (
len p)
= (
len (
Col (M,j))) by
A4,
A3,
MATRIX_0:def 8;
then
A29: (
len (the
multF of
INT.Ring
.: (p,(
Col (M,j)))))
= (
len p) by
FINSEQ_2: 72;
then
A30: (
dom H)
= (
dom G) by
A27,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
A31: (
dom p)
= (
dom G) by
A27,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
A32: (
len (
Line ((M1
@ ),j)))
= (
width (M1
@ )) by
MATRIX_0:def 7
.= (
len ((M1
@ )
@ )) by
MATRIX_0:def 6
.= (
len G) by
A1,
A2,
A4,
A17,
A16,
A27,
MATRIX_0: 57;
then
A33: (
dom (
Line ((M1
@ ),j)))
= (
Seg (
len G)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A34: (
dom G)
= (
Seg (
len p)) by
A27,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A35:
now
let i be
Nat;
A36: (
dom M)
= (
Seg (
len M)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
assume
A37: i
in (
dom (
Line ((M1
@ ),j)));
then
A38: i
in (
Seg (
len (the
multF of
INT.Ring
.: (p,(
Col (M,j)))))) by
A27,
A28,
A33,
FINSEQ_2: 72;
then
A39: i
in (
dom H) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A40: i
in (
dom (
multint
.: (p,(
Col (M,j))))) by
A38,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A41: (
Seg (
len G))
= (
dom G) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (p
/. i)
= (p
. i) by
A31,
A33,
A37,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
then
A42: ((p
/. i)
* (M
* (i,j)))
= (
multint
. ((p
. i),((
Col (M,j))
. i))) by
A4,
A3,
A27,
A33,
A37,
A36,
MATRIX_0:def 8
.= ((
multint
.: (p,(
Col (M,j))))
. i) by
A40,
FUNCOP_1: 22
.= (H
/. i) by
A39,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
(
dom M1)
= (
dom G) by
A4,
A17,
A27,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A43:
[i, j]
in (
Indices M1) by
A11,
A15,
A21,
A33,
A37,
A41,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
i
in (
Seg (
width (M1
@ ))) by
A32,
A33,
A37,
MATRIX_0:def 7;
hence ((
Line ((M1
@ ),j))
. i)
= ((M1
@ )
* (j,i)) by
MATRIX_0:def 7
.= (M1
* (i,j)) by
A43,
MATRIX_0:def 6
.= ((H
/. i)
* (b
/. j)) by
A10,
A43,
A42
.= (G
. i) by
A27,
A34,
A33,
A37;
end;
thus ((
lmlt (d,b))
. j)
= (the
lmult of V1
. ((d
. j),(b
. j))) by
A21,
FUNCOP_1: 22
.= ((
Sum H)
* (b
/. j)) by
A6,
A23,
A24
.= (
Sum G) by
A27,
A29,
A30,
Th10
.= (
Sum ((M1
@ )
/. j)) by
A32,
A35,
A26,
FINSEQ_2: 9
.= ((
Sum (M1
@ ))
/. j) by
A22,
MATRLIN:def 6
.= ((
Sum (M1
@ ))
. j) by
A15,
A21,
A20,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
end;
A44: (
dom p)
= (
dom c) by
A4,
A8,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A45: (
dom (
lmlt (p,c)))
= (
dom p) by
Th12;
then
A46: (
len (
lmlt (p,c)))
= (
len p) by
FINSEQ_3: 29
.= (
len M1) by
A4,
MATRIX_0:def 2
.= (
len (
Sum M1)) by
MATRLIN:def 6;
now
let i be
Nat such that
A47: i
in (
dom (
Sum M1));
A48: i
in (
dom c) by
A44,
A45,
A46,
A47,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A49: (c
. i)
= (c
/. i) & (p
. i)
= (p
/. i) by
A44,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
i
in (
Seg (
len (
Sum M1))) by
A47,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then i
in (
Seg (
len M1)) by
MATRLIN:def 6;
then
A50: i
in (
dom M1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A51: (M1
/. i)
= (M1
. i) by
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (
Line (M1,i)) by
A50,
MATRIX_0: 60;
deffunc
V(
Nat) = ((p
/. i)
* ((
lmlt ((
Line (M,i)),b))
/. $1));
consider F be
FinSequence of V1 such that
A52: (
len F)
= (
len b) & for j be
Nat st j
in (
dom F) holds (F
. j)
=
V(j) from
FINSEQ_2:sch 1;
A53: (
len F)
= (
width M) by
A1,
A7,
A52,
MATRIX_0: 23;
A54: (
dom (
Line (M,i)))
= (
Seg (
len (
Line (M,i)))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
dom b) by
A52,
A53,
FINSEQ_1:def 3,
MATRIX_0:def 7;
then (
dom (
lmlt ((
Line (M,i)),b)))
= (
dom b) by
Th12;
then
A55: (
len F)
= (
len (
lmlt ((
Line (M,i)),b))) & (
dom F)
= (
dom (
lmlt ((
Line (M,i)),b))) by
A52,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
A56: (
len F)
= (
width M1) by
A1,
A7,
A52,
MATRIX_0: 23;
then
A57: (
len (
Line (M1,i)))
= (
len F) by
MATRIX_0:def 7;
then
A58: (
dom (M1
/. i))
= (
Seg (
len F)) by
A51,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A59: (
dom F)
= (
Seg (
len b)) by
A52,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A60:
now
let j be
Nat;
assume
A61: j
in (
dom (M1
/. i));
then
A62: ((
Line (M,i))
. j)
= (M
* (i,j)) by
A53,
A58,
MATRIX_0:def 7;
A63:
[i, j]
in (
Indices M1) by
A56,
A50,
A58,
A61,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
A64: j
in (
dom b) by
A52,
A58,
A61,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A65: (b
. j)
= (b
/. j) by
PARTFUN1:def 6;
A66: j
in (
dom (
lmlt ((
Line (M,i)),b))) by
A54,
A64,
Th12;
then
A67: ((
lmlt ((
Line (M,i)),b))
/. j)
= ((
lmlt ((
Line (M,i)),b))
. j) by
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((M
* (i,j))
* (b
/. j)) by
A65,
A62,
A66,
FUNCOP_1: 22;
thus ((M1
/. i)
. j)
= (M1
* (i,j)) by
A56,
A51,
A58,
A61,
MATRIX_0:def 7
.= (((p
/. i)
* (M
* (i,j)))
* (b
/. j)) by
A10,
A63
.= ((p
/. i)
* ((
lmlt ((
Line (M,i)),b))
/. j)) by
A67,
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= (F
. j) by
A52,
A59,
A58,
A61;
end;
A68: for j be
Nat, v be
Vector of V1 st j
in (
dom F) & v
= ((
lmlt ((
Line (M,i)),b))
. j) holds (F
. j)
= ((p
/. i)
* v)
proof
let j be
Nat, v be
Vector of V1;
assume
A681: j
in (
dom F) & v
= ((
lmlt ((
Line (M,i)),b))
. j);
thus (F
. j)
= ((p
/. i)
* ((
lmlt ((
Line (M,i)),b))
/. j)) by
A52,
A681
.= ((p
/. i)
* v) by
A55,
A681,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
end;
i
in (
dom (the
lmult of V1
.: (p,c))) by
A46,
A47,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
hence ((
lmlt (p,c))
. i)
= (the
lmult of V1
. ((p
. i),(c
. i))) by
FUNCOP_1: 22
.= ((p
/. i)
* (
Sum (
lmlt ((
Line (M,i)),b)))) by
A9,
A48,
A49
.= (
Sum F) by
A55,
A68,
ZMODUL01: 12
.= (
Sum (M1
/. i)) by
A57,
A51,
A60,
FINSEQ_2: 9
.= ((
Sum M1)
/. i) by
A47,
MATRLIN:def 6
.= ((
Sum M1)
. i) by
A47,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
end;
hence (
Sum (
lmlt (p,c)))
= (
Sum (
Sum M1)) by
A46,
FINSEQ_2: 9
.= (
Sum (
Sum (M1
@ ))) by
Th32
.= (
Sum (
lmlt (d,b))) by
A14,
A19,
FINSEQ_2: 9;
end;
begin
definition
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module;
let b1 be
OrdBasis of V;
let W be
Element of V;
::
ZMATRLIN:def7
func W
|-- b1 ->
FinSequence of
INT.Ring means
:
Def7: (
len it )
= (
len b1) & ex KL be
Linear_Combination of V st W
= (
Sum KL) & (
Carrier KL)
c= (
rng b1) & for k st 1
<= k & k
<= (
len it ) holds (it
/. k)
= (KL
. (b1
/. k));
existence
proof
reconsider b2 = (
rng b1) as
Basis of V by
defOrdBasis;
consider KL be
Linear_Combination of V such that
A1: W
= (
Sum KL) and
A2: (
Carrier KL)
c= b2 by
Th8;
deffunc
V(
Nat) = (KL
. (b1
/. $1));
consider A be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring such that
A3: (
len A)
= (
len b1) and
A4: for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom A) holds (A
. k)
=
V(k) from
FINSEQ_2:sch 1;
take A;
thus (
len A)
= (
len b1) by
A3;
take KL;
thus W
= (
Sum KL) by
A1;
thus (
Carrier KL)
c= (
rng b1) by
A2;
let k;
A5: (
dom A)
= (
Seg (
len b1)) by
A3,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
assume
A6: 1
<= k & k
<= (
len A);
then k
in (
Seg (
len b1)) by
A3,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then k
in (
dom A) by
A3,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (A
. k)
= (A
/. k) by
PARTFUN1:def 6;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4,
A5,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
reconsider b = (
rng b1) as
Basis of V by
defOrdBasis;
let F1,F2 be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring ;
assume
A7: (
len F1)
= (
len b1);
given KL1 be
Linear_Combination of V such that
A8: W
= (
Sum KL1) & (
Carrier KL1)
c= (
rng b1) and
A9: for k st 1
<= k & k
<= (
len F1) holds (F1
/. k)
= (KL1
. (b1
/. k));
assume
A10: (
len F2)
= (
len b1);
given KL2 be
Linear_Combination of V such that
A11: W
= (
Sum KL2) & (
Carrier KL2)
c= (
rng b1) and
A12: for k st 1
<= k & k
<= (
len F2) holds (F2
/. k)
= (KL2
. (b1
/. k));
A13: b is
linearly-independent by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
for k be
Nat st 1
<= k & k
<= (
len F1) holds (F1
. k)
= (F2
. k)
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A14: 1
<= k & k
<= (
len F1);
then
A15: k
in (
dom F2) by
A7,
A10,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
k
in (
dom F1) by
A14,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
hence (F1
. k)
= (F1
/. k) by
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (KL1
. (b1
/. k)) by
A9,
A14
.= (KL2
. (b1
/. k)) by
A8,
A11,
A13,
Th5
.= (F2
/. k) by
A7,
A10,
A12,
A14
.= (F2
. k) by
A15,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
end;
hence thesis by
A7,
A10,
FINSEQ_1: 14;
end;
end
Lm1: for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module holds for b be
OrdBasis of V holds for W be
Element of V holds (
dom (W
|-- b))
= (
dom b)
proof
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b be
OrdBasis of V, W be
Element of V;
(
len (W
|-- b))
= (
len b) by
Def7;
hence thesis by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:29
Th34: (v1
|-- b2)
= (v2
|-- b2) implies v1
= v2
proof
consider KL1 be
Linear_Combination of V2 such that
A1: v1
= (
Sum KL1) and
A2: (
Carrier KL1)
c= (
rng b2) and
A3: for t st 1
<= t & t
<= (
len (v1
|-- b2)) holds ((v1
|-- b2)
/. t)
= (KL1
. (b2
/. t)) by
Def7;
consider KL2 be
Linear_Combination of V2 such that
A4: v2
= (
Sum KL2) and
A5: (
Carrier KL2)
c= (
rng b2) and
A6: for t st 1
<= t & t
<= (
len (v2
|-- b2)) holds ((v2
|-- b2)
/. t)
= (KL2
. (b2
/. t)) by
Def7;
assume
A7: (v1
|-- b2)
= (v2
|-- b2);
A8:
now
let t be
Nat;
assume
A9: 1
<= t & t
<= (
len (v1
|-- b2));
hence (KL1
. (b2
/. t))
= ((v2
|-- b2)
/. t) by
A7,
A3
.= (KL2
. (b2
/. t)) by
A7,
A6,
A9;
end;
A10: ((
Carrier KL1)
\/ (
Carrier KL2))
c= (
rng b2) by
A2,
A5,
XBOOLE_1: 8;
now
let v be
Vector of V2;
per cases ;
suppose
A11: not v
in ((
Carrier KL1)
\/ (
Carrier KL2));
then not v
in (
Carrier KL2) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
then
A12: (KL2
. v)
=
0 ;
not v
in (
Carrier KL1) by
A11,
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence (KL1
. v)
= (KL2
. v) by
A12;
end;
suppose v
in ((
Carrier KL1)
\/ (
Carrier KL2));
then
consider x be
object such that
A13: x
in (
dom b2) and
A14: v
= (b2
. x) by
A10,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider x as
Nat by
A13;
x
<= (
len b2) by
A13,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then
A15: x
<= (
len (v1
|-- b2)) by
Def7;
v
= (b2
/. x) & 1
<= x by
A13,
A14,
FINSEQ_3: 25,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
hence (KL1
. v)
= (KL2
. v) by
A8,
A15;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
A4,
VECTSP_6:def 7;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:30
Th35: v
= (
Sum (
lmlt ((v
|-- b1),b1)))
proof
consider KL be
Linear_Combination of V1 such that
A1: v
= (
Sum KL) & (
Carrier KL)
c= (
rng b1) and
A2: for k st 1
<= k & k
<= (
len (v
|-- b1)) holds ((v
|-- b1)
/. k)
= (KL
. (b1
/. k)) by
Def7;
(
len (v
|-- b1))
= (
len b1) by
Def7;
then
A3: (
dom (v
|-- b1))
= (
dom b1) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A4: (
dom b1)
= (
dom (
lmlt ((v
|-- b1),b1))) by
Th12;
A51: (
len (KL
(#) b1))
= (
len b1) by
VECTSP_6:def 5
.= (
len (
lmlt ((v
|-- b1),b1))) by
A4,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A5: (
dom (KL
(#) b1))
= (
dom (
lmlt ((v
|-- b1),b1))) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
A6:
now
let t be
Nat;
assume
A7: t
in (
dom (
lmlt ((v
|-- b1),b1)));
then
A8: (b1
/. t)
= (b1
. t) by
A4,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
t
in (
dom (v
|-- b1)) by
A3,
A7,
Th12;
then
A9: t
<= (
len (v
|-- b1)) by
FINSEQ_3: 25;
A10: 1
<= t by
A7,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then
A11: ((v
|-- b1)
/. t)
= ((v
|-- b1)
. t) by
A9,
FINSEQ_4: 15;
t
in (
dom (KL
(#) b1)) by
A51,
A7,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
hence ((KL
(#) b1)
. t)
= ((KL
. (b1
/. t))
* (b1
/. t)) by
VECTSP_6:def 5
.= (((v
|-- b1)
/. t)
* (b1
/. t)) by
A2,
A10,
A9
.= ((
lmlt ((v
|-- b1),b1))
. t) by
A7,
A8,
A11,
FUNCOP_1: 22;
end;
thus v
= (
Sum (KL
(#) b1)) by
A1,
defOrdBasis,
Th20
.= (
Sum (
lmlt ((v
|-- b1),b1))) by
A5,
A6,
FINSEQ_1: 13;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:31
Th36: (
len d)
= (
len b1) implies d
= ((
Sum (
lmlt (d,b1)))
|-- b1)
proof
reconsider T = (
rng b1) as
finite
Subset of V1;
defpred
X[
Element of V1,
Element of
INT.Ring ] means ($1
in (
rng b1) implies (for k st k
in (
dom b1) & (b1
/. k)
= $1 holds $2
= (d
/. k))) & ( not $1
in (
rng b1) implies $2
= (
0.
INT.Ring ));
A1: for v holds ex u be
Element of
INT.Ring st
X[v, u]
proof
let v be
Element of V1;
per cases ;
suppose
A2: v
in (
rng b1);
then
consider k be
Element of
NAT such that
A3: k
in (
dom b1) and
A4: (b1
/. k)
= v by
PARTFUN2: 2;
take u = (d
/. k);
now
A5: b1 is
one-to-one by
defOrdBasis;
let i;
assume that
A6: i
in (
dom b1) and
A7: (b1
/. i)
= v;
(b1
. i)
= (b1
/. k) by
A4,
A6,
A7,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (b1
. k) by
A3,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
hence u
= (d
/. i) by
A3,
A6,
A5;
end;
hence thesis by
A2;
end;
suppose
A8: not v
in (
rng b1);
reconsider I0 = (
0.
INT.Ring ) as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
take I0;
thus thesis by
A8;
end;
end;
consider KL be
Function of V1, the
carrier of
INT.Ring such that
A9: for v holds
X[v, (KL
. v)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 3(
A1);
now
take f = KL;
thus KL
= f & (
dom f)
= the
carrier of V1 & (
rng f)
c= the
carrier of
INT.Ring by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
end;
then KL
in (
Funcs (the
carrier of V1,the
carrier of
INT.Ring )) by
FUNCT_2:def 2;
then
reconsider KL1 = KL as
Linear_Combination of V1 by
A9,
VECTSP_6:def 1;
assume
A11: (
len d)
= (
len b1);
now
take KL1;
thus
A13: for k st 1
<= k & k
<= (
len d) holds (d
/. k)
= (KL1
. (b1
/. k))
proof
let k;
assume
A141: 1
<= k & k
<= (
len d);
then
A14: k
in (
dom b1) by
A11,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
then (b1
. k)
= (b1
/. k) by
PARTFUN1:def 6;
then (b1
/. k)
in (
rng b1) by
A14,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence thesis by
A9,
A11,
A141,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
end;
for x be
object holds x
in (
Carrier KL1) implies x
in (
rng b1)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
Carrier KL1);
then
A15: ex v st x
= v & (KL1
. v)
<>
0 ;
assume not x
in (
rng b1);
hence contradiction by
A9,
A15;
end;
hence
A16: (
Carrier KL1)
c= (
rng b1);
A17: (
dom d)
= (
dom b1) by
A11,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A18: (
dom (
lmlt (d,b1)))
= (
dom b1) by
Th12;
then
A19: (
len (
lmlt (d,b1)))
= (
len b1) by
FINSEQ_3: 29
.= (
len (KL1
(#) b1)) by
VECTSP_6:def 5;
now
let k be
Nat;
assume
A20: k
in (
dom (
lmlt (d,b1)));
then
A21: k
in (
dom (KL1
(#) b1)) by
A19,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
A22: 1
<= k & k
<= (
len d) by
A11,
A18,
A20,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
A23: (d
/. k)
= (d
. k) & (b1
/. k)
= (b1
. k) by
A17,
A18,
A20,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
thus ((
lmlt (d,b1))
. k)
= (the
lmult of V1
. ((d
. k),(b1
. k))) by
A20,
FUNCOP_1: 22
.= ((KL1
. (b1
/. k))
* (b1
/. k)) by
A13,
A22,
A23
.= ((KL1
(#) b1)
. k) by
A21,
VECTSP_6:def 5;
end;
hence (
Sum (
lmlt (d,b1)))
= (
Sum (KL1
(#) b1)) by
A19,
FINSEQ_2: 9
.= (
Sum KL1) by
A16,
defOrdBasis,
Th20;
end;
hence thesis by
A11,
Def7;
end;
Lm2: for p be
FinSequence, k be
set st k
in (
dom p) holds (
len p)
>
0
proof
let p be
FinSequence, k be
set;
assume k
in (
dom p);
then p
<>
{} ;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:32
Th37: for a,d be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring st (
len a)
= (
len b1) holds for j be
Nat st j
in (
dom b2) & (
len d)
= (
len b1) & for k st k
in (
dom b1) holds (d
. k)
= (((f
. (b1
/. k))
|-- b2)
/. j) holds (
len b1)
>
0 implies (((
Sum (
lmlt (a,(f
* b1))))
|-- b2)
/. j)
= (
Sum (
mlt (a,d)))
proof
let a,d be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring such that
A1: (
len a)
= (
len b1);
reconsider B3 = (f
* b1) as
FinSequence of V2;
deffunc
V(
Nat,
Nat) = (((B3
/. $1)
|-- b2)
/. $2);
consider M be
Matrix of (
len b1), (
len b2),
INT.Ring such that
A2: for i, j st
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) holds (M
* (i,j))
=
V(i,j) from
MATRIX_0:sch 1;
deffunc
W(
Nat) = (
Sum (
mlt (a,(
Col (M,$1)))));
consider dd be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring such that
A3: (
len dd)
= (
len b2) & for j be
Nat st j
in (
dom dd) holds (dd
/. j)
=
W(j) from
FINSEQ_4:sch 2;
let j be
Nat such that
A4: j
in (
dom b2);
A5: j
in (
dom dd) by
A4,
A3,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
assume that
A6: (
len d)
= (
len b1) and
A7: for k st k
in (
dom b1) holds (d
. k)
= (((f
. (b1
/. k))
|-- b2)
/. j);
A8: (
len (
Col (M,j)))
= (
len M) by
MATRIX_0:def 8
.= (
len d) by
A6,
MATRIX_0:def 2;
(
len M)
= (
len b1) by
MATRIX_0:def 2;
then
A9: (
dom M)
= (
dom b1) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
A10: (
len b1)
= (
len B3) by
FINSEQ_2: 33;
then
A11: (
dom b1)
= (
dom B3) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
assume
A12: (
len b1)
>
0 ;
then
A13: (
width M)
= (
len b2) by
MATRIX_0: 23;
A14:
now
let i such that
A15: i
in (
dom B3);
A16:
now
let j be
Nat;
assume
A17: j
in (
dom ((B3
/. i)
|-- b2));
then j
in (
Seg (
len ((B3
/. i)
|-- b2))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A18: j
in (
Seg (
width M)) by
A13,
Def7;
then
A19:
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) by
A9,
A11,
A15,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
thus ((
Line (M,i))
. j)
= (M
* (i,j)) by
A18,
MATRIX_0:def 7
.= (((B3
/. i)
|-- b2)
/. j) by
A2,
A19
.= (((B3
/. i)
|-- b2)
. j) by
A17,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
end;
A20: (
len (
Line (M,i)))
= (
width M) by
MATRIX_0:def 7
.= (
len ((B3
/. i)
|-- b2)) by
A13,
Def7;
thus (B3
/. i)
= (
Sum (
lmlt (((B3
/. i)
|-- b2),b2))) by
Th35
.= (
Sum (
lmlt ((
Line (M,i)),b2))) by
A20,
A16,
FINSEQ_2: 9;
end;
(
Seg (
len b2))
= (
dom b2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A21: j
in (
Seg (
width M)) by
A4,
A12,
MATRIX_0: 23;
A22:
now
let i be
Nat;
assume i
in (
dom d);
then
A23: i
in (
dom b1) by
A6,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A24: (B3
/. i)
= (B3
. i) by
A11,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (f
. (b1
. i)) by
A23,
FUNCT_1: 13
.= (f
. (b1
/. i)) by
A23,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
A25:
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) by
A9,
A21,
A23,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
thus ((
Col (M,j))
. i)
= (M
* (i,j)) by
A9,
A23,
MATRIX_0:def 8
.= (((f
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)
/. j) by
A2,
A24,
A25
.= (d
. i) by
A7,
A23;
end;
(
len b2)
>
0 by
A4,
Lm2;
hence (((
Sum (
lmlt (a,(f
* b1))))
|-- b2)
/. j)
= (((
Sum (
lmlt (dd,b2)))
|-- b2)
/. j) by
A1,
A12,
A3,
A10,
A14,
Th33
.= (dd
/. j) by
A3,
Th36
.= (
Sum (
mlt (a,(
Col (M,j))))) by
A3,
A5
.= (
Sum (
mlt (a,d))) by
A8,
A22,
FINSEQ_2: 9;
end;
begin
definition
let V1,V2 be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module;
let f be
Function of V1, V2;
let b1 be
FinSequence of V1;
let b2 be
OrdBasis of V2;
::
ZMATRLIN:def8
func
AutMt (f,b1,b2) ->
Matrix of
INT.Ring means
:
Def8: (
len it )
= (
len b1) & for k st k
in (
dom b1) holds (it
/. k)
= ((f
. (b1
/. k))
|-- b2);
existence
proof
deffunc
V(
Nat) = ((f
. (b1
/. $1))
|-- b2);
consider M be
FinSequence such that
A1: (
len M)
= (
len b1) and
A2: for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom M) holds (M
. k)
=
V(k) from
FINSEQ_1:sch 2;
A3: (
dom M)
= (
Seg (
len b1)) by
A1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
ex n be
Nat st for x st x
in (
rng M) holds ex s st s
= x & (
len s)
= n
proof
take n = (
len ((f
. (b1
/. 1))
|-- b2));
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
rng M);
then
consider y be
object such that
A4: y
in (
dom M) and
A5: x
= (M
. y) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider y as
Nat by
A4;
(M
. y)
= ((f
. (b1
/. y))
|-- b2) by
A2,
A4;
then
reconsider s = (M
. y) as
FinSequence;
take s;
thus s
= x by
A5;
thus (
len s)
= (
len ((f
. (b1
/. y))
|-- b2)) by
A2,
A4
.= (
len b2) by
Def7
.= n by
Def7;
end;
then
reconsider M as
tabular
FinSequence by
MATRIX_0:def 1;
now
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
rng M);
then
consider y be
object such that
A6: y
in (
dom M) and
A7: x
= (M
. y) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider y as
Nat by
A6;
(M
. y)
= ((f
. (b1
/. y))
|-- b2) by
A2,
A6;
then
reconsider s = (M
. y) as
FinSequence of
INT ;
s
= x by
A7;
hence x
in (
INT
* ) by
FINSEQ_1:def 11;
end;
then (
rng M)
c= (the
carrier of
INT.Ring
* );
then
reconsider M as
Matrix of
INT.Ring by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
take M1 = M;
for k st k
in (
dom b1) holds (M1
/. k)
= ((f
. (b1
/. k))
|-- b2)
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A8: k
in (
dom b1);
then
A9: k
in (
Seg (
len b1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(
dom M1)
= (
dom b1) by
A1,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
hence (M1
/. k)
= (M1
. k) by
A8,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((f
. (b1
/. k))
|-- b2) by
A2,
A3,
A9;
end;
hence thesis by
A1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let K1,K2 be
Matrix of
INT.Ring such that
A10: (
len K1)
= (
len b1) and
A11: for k st k
in (
dom b1) holds (K1
/. k)
= ((f
. (b1
/. k))
|-- b2) and
A12: (
len K2)
= (
len b1) and
A13: for k st k
in (
dom b1) holds (K2
/. k)
= ((f
. (b1
/. k))
|-- b2);
for k be
Nat st 1
<= k & k
<= (
len K1) holds (K1
. k)
= (K2
. k)
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
A14: 1
<= k & k
<= (
len K1);
A16: k
in (
dom K2) by
A10,
A12,
A14,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
k
in (
dom K1) by
A14,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
hence (K1
. k)
= (K1
/. k) by
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((f
. (b1
/. k))
|-- b2) by
A10,
A11,
A14,
FINSEQ_3: 25
.= (K2
/. k) by
A10,
A13,
A14,
FINSEQ_3: 25
.= (K2
. k) by
A16,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
end;
hence thesis by
A10,
A12,
FINSEQ_1: 14;
end;
end
Lm3: (
dom (
AutMt (f,b1,b2)))
= (
dom b1)
proof
(
len (
AutMt (f,b1,b2)))
= (
len b1) by
Def8;
hence thesis by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:33
Th38: (
len b1)
=
0 implies (
AutMt (f,b1,b2))
=
{}
proof
assume (
len b1)
=
0 ;
then (
len (
AutMt (f,b1,b2)))
=
0 by
Def8;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:34
Th39: (
len b1)
>
0 implies (
width (
AutMt (f,b1,b2)))
= (
len b2)
proof
assume (
len b1)
>
0 ;
then (
len (
AutMt (f,b1,b2)))
>
0 by
Def8;
then
consider s be
FinSequence such that
A1: s
in (
rng (
AutMt (f,b1,b2))) and
A2: (
len s)
= (
width (
AutMt (f,b1,b2))) by
MATRIX_0:def 3;
consider i be
Nat such that
A3: i
in (
dom (
AutMt (f,b1,b2))) and
A4: ((
AutMt (f,b1,b2))
. i)
= s by
A1,
FINSEQ_2: 10;
(
len (
AutMt (f,b1,b2)))
= (
len b1) by
Def8;
then
A5: i
in (
dom b1) by
A3,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
s
= ((
AutMt (f,b1,b2))
/. i) by
A3,
A4,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((f
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2) by
A5,
Def8;
hence thesis by
A2,
Def7;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:35
f1 is
additive
homogeneous & f2 is
additive
homogeneous & (
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))
= (
AutMt (f2,b1,b2)) & (
len b1)
>
0 implies f1
= f2
proof
assume that
A1: f1 is
additive
homogeneous & f2 is
additive
homogeneous and
A2: (
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))
= (
AutMt (f2,b1,b2)) and
A3: (
len b1)
>
0 ;
A4: (
rng b1)
c= the
carrier of V1;
then
A5: (
rng b1)
c= (
dom f2) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
(
rng b1)
c= (
dom f1) by
A4,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A6: (
dom (f1
* b1))
= (
dom b1) by
RELAT_1: 27
.= (
dom (f2
* b1)) by
A5,
RELAT_1: 27;
now
let x be
object;
assume
A7: x
in (
dom (f1
* b1));
then
reconsider k = x as
Nat;
A8: (
dom (f1
* b1))
c= (
dom b1) by
RELAT_1: 25;
then
A9: ((f1
. (b1
/. k))
|-- b2)
= ((
AutMt (f2,b1,b2))
/. k) by
A2,
A7,
Def8
.= ((f2
. (b1
/. k))
|-- b2) by
A7,
A8,
Def8;
thus ((f1
* b1)
. x)
= (f1
. (b1
. x)) by
A7,
FUNCT_1: 12
.= (f1
. (b1
/. x)) by
A7,
A8,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (f2
. (b1
/. x)) by
A9,
Th34
.= (f2
. (b1
. x)) by
A7,
A8,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((f2
* b1)
. x) by
A6,
A7,
FUNCT_1: 12;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
A3,
A6,
Th22,
FUNCT_1: 2;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:36
LmSign1X: for F be
FinSequence of
F_Real , G be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring st F
= G holds (
Sum F)
= (
Sum G)
proof
defpred
P[
Nat] means for F be
FinSequence of
F_Real , G be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring st (
len F)
= $1 & F
= G holds (
Sum F)
= (
Sum G);
P1:
P[
0 ]
proof
let F be
FinSequence of
F_Real , G be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring ;
assume
AS1: (
len F)
=
0 & F
= G;
then F
= (
<*> the
carrier of
F_Real );
then
P1: (
Sum F)
= (
0.
F_Real ) by
RLVECT_1: 43
.=
0 ;
G
= (
<*>
REAL ) by
AS1;
then G
= (
<*> the
carrier of
INT.Ring );
then (
Sum G)
= (
0.
INT.Ring ) by
RLVECT_1: 43;
hence thesis by
P1;
end;
P2: for n be
Nat st
P[n] holds
P[(n
+ 1)]
proof
let n be
Nat;
assume
AS1:
P[n];
let F be
FinSequence of
F_Real , G be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring ;
assume
AS2: (
len F)
= (n
+ 1) & F
= G;
reconsider F0 = (F
| n) as
FinSequence of
F_Real ;
(n
+ 1)
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 4;
then (n
+ 1)
in (
dom F) by
AS2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (F
. (n
+ 1))
in (
rng F) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider af = (F
. (n
+ 1)) as
Element of
F_Real ;
P1: (
len F0)
= n by
FINSEQ_1: 59,
AS2,
NAT_1: 11;
then
P4: (
dom F0)
= (
Seg n) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A9: (
len F)
= ((
len F0)
+ 1) by
AS2,
FINSEQ_1: 59,
NAT_1: 11;
F0
= (F
| (
dom F0)) by
P4,
FINSEQ_1:def 15;
then
P3: (
Sum F)
= ((
Sum F0)
+ af) by
AS2,
A9,
RLVECT_1: 38;
reconsider G0 = (G
| n) as
FinSequence of
INT.Ring ;
(n
+ 1)
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 4;
then (n
+ 1)
in (
dom G) by
AS2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (G
. (n
+ 1))
in (
rng G) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider bf = (G
. (n
+ 1)) as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
(
len G)
= (n
+ 1) & G0
= (G
| (
Seg n)) by
AS2,
FINSEQ_1:def 15;
then G
= (G0
^
<*bf*>) by
FINSEQ_3: 55;
then (
Sum G)
= ((
Sum G0)
+ bf) by
FVSUM_1: 71;
hence (
Sum F)
= (
Sum G) by
AS1,
AS2,
P1,
P3;
end;
X1: for n be
Nat holds
P[n] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
P1,
P2);
let F be
FinSequence of
F_Real , G be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring ;
assume
X2: F
= G;
(
len F) is
Nat;
hence thesis by
X1,
X2;
end;
LMEQ5: for f,g,h be
Function st (f
| (
dom g))
= g & (
rng h)
c= (
dom g) & (
rng h)
c= (
dom f) holds (f
* h)
= (g
* h)
proof
let f,g,h be
Function;
assume
AS: (f
| (
dom g))
= g & (
rng h)
c= (
dom g) & (
rng h)
c= (
dom f);
P1: (
dom (f
* h))
= (
dom h) by
AS,
RELAT_1: 27;
P2: (
dom (g
* h))
= (
dom h) by
AS,
RELAT_1: 27;
for x be
object st x
in (
dom (f
* h)) holds ((f
* h)
. x)
= ((g
* h)
. x)
proof
let x be
object;
assume
AS1: x
in (
dom (f
* h));
then x
in (
dom h) by
AS,
RELAT_1: 27;
then
P3: (h
. x)
in (
rng h) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
thus ((f
* h)
. x)
= (f
. (h
. x)) by
FUNCT_1: 12,
AS1
.= ((f
| (
dom g))
. (h
. x)) by
AS,
P3,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= ((g
* h)
. x) by
AS,
AS1,
P1,
P2,
FUNCT_1: 12;
end;
hence thesis by
AS,
P1,
RELAT_1: 27;
end;
LMLT12:
multint
= (
multreal
|
[:
INT ,
INT :])
proof
set ad = (
multreal
|
[:
INT ,
INT :]);
[:
INT ,
INT :]
c=
[:
REAL ,
REAL :] by
NUMBERS: 15,
ZFMISC_1: 96;
then
A1:
[:
INT ,
INT :]
c= (
dom
multreal ) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A2: (
dom ad)
=
[:
INT ,
INT :] by
RELAT_1: 62;
A3: (
dom
multint )
=
[:
INT ,
INT :] by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
for z be
object st z
in (
dom ad) holds (ad
. z)
= (
multint
. z)
proof
let z be
object;
assume
A4: z
in (
dom ad);
then
consider x,y be
object such that
A5: x
in
INT & y
in
INT & z
=
[x, y] by
A2,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider x1 = x, y1 = y as
Integer by
A5;
thus (ad
. z)
= (
multreal
. (x1,y1)) by
A4,
A5,
A2,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (x1
* y1) by
BINOP_2:def 11
.= (
multint
. (x1,y1)) by
BINOP_2:def 22
.= (
multint
. z) by
A5;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
A3,
FUNCT_1: 2,
RELAT_1: 62;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:37
for p,q be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring , p1,q1 be
FinSequence of
F_Real st p
= p1 & q
= q1 holds (p
"*" q)
= (p1
"*" q1)
proof
let p,q be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring , p1,q1 be
FinSequence of
F_Real ;
assume
AS: p
= p1 & q
= q1;
A2:
[:(
rng p), (
rng q):]
c=
[:
INT ,
INT :] by
ZFMISC_1: 96;
A3: (
rng
<:p, q:>)
c=
[:(
rng p), (
rng q):] by
FUNCT_3: 51;
B1: (
dom
multreal )
=
[:
REAL ,
REAL :] by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
[:
INT ,
INT :]
c=
[:
REAL ,
REAL :] by
NUMBERS: 15,
ZFMISC_1: 96;
then
B2: (
rng
<:p, q:>)
c= (
dom
multreal ) by
A2,
A3,
B1;
[:
INT ,
INT :]
= (
dom
multint ) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
B3: (
rng
<:p, q:>)
c= (
dom
multint ) by
A2,
A3;
(
multreal
| (
dom
multint ))
=
multint by
LMLT12,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A6: (
multint
*
<:p, q:>)
= (
multreal
*
<:p, q:>) by
LMEQ5,
B3,
B2;
(
mlt (p,q))
= (
multint
*
<:p1, q1:>) by
AS,
FUNCOP_1:def 3
.= (
mlt (p1,q1)) by
AS,
A6,
FUNCOP_1:def 3;
hence thesis by
LmSign1X;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:38
ThComp1: g is
additive
homogeneous & (
len b1)
>
0 & (
len b2)
>
0 implies (
AutMt ((g
* f),b1,b3))
= ((
AutMt (f,b1,b2))
* (
AutMt (g,b2,b3)))
proof
assume
A1: g is
additive
homogeneous;
assume that
A2: (
len b1)
>
0 and
A3: (
len b2)
>
0 ;
A4: (
width (
AutMt (f,b1,b2)))
= (
len b2) by
A2,
Th39
.= (
len (
AutMt (g,b2,b3))) by
Def8;
A5: (
width (
AutMt ((g
* f),b1,b3)))
= (
len b3) by
A2,
Th39
.= (
width (
AutMt (g,b2,b3))) by
A3,
Th39;
A6: (
width (
AutMt ((g
* f),b1,b3)))
= (
width ((
AutMt (f,b1,b2))
* (
AutMt (g,b2,b3)))) by
A5,
A4,
MATRIX_3:def 4;
A7: (
len (
AutMt ((g
* f),b1,b3)))
= (
len b1) by
Def8
.= (
len (
AutMt (f,b1,b2))) by
Def8
.= (
len ((
AutMt (f,b1,b2))
* (
AutMt (g,b2,b3)))) by
A4,
MATRIX_3:def 4;
for i, j st
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
AutMt ((g
* f),b1,b3))) holds ((
AutMt ((g
* f),b1,b3))
* (i,j))
= (((
AutMt (f,b1,b2))
* (
AutMt (g,b2,b3)))
* (i,j))
proof
let i, j;
deffunc
V(
Nat) = (((g
. (b2
/. $1))
|-- b3)
/. j);
consider d be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring such that
A9: (
len d)
= (
len b2) & for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom d) holds (d
. k)
=
V(k) from
FINSEQ_2:sch 1;
assume
A10:
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
AutMt ((g
* f),b1,b3)));
then
A12: j
in (
Seg (
width (
AutMt ((g
* f),b1,b3)))) by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
A13: (
len (
Col ((
AutMt (g,b2,b3)),j)))
= (
len (
AutMt (g,b2,b3))) by
MATRIX_0:def 8
.= (
len d) by
A9,
Def8;
A14: (
dom d)
= (
Seg (
len b2)) by
A9,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A15:
[i, j]
in (
Indices ((
AutMt (f,b1,b2))
* (
AutMt (g,b2,b3)))) by
A6,
A7,
A10,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
A16: i
in (
dom (
AutMt ((g
* f),b1,b3))) by
A10,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
A17: (
width (
AutMt ((g
* f),b1,b3)))
<>
{} by
A10;
(
len b1)
= (
len (
AutMt ((g
* f),b1,b3))) by
Def8;
then (
len b1)
>
0 by
A17,
MATRIX_0:def 3;
then
A18: j
in (
Seg (
len b3)) by
A12,
Th39;
then
A19: j
in (
dom b3) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A20:
now
let k be
Nat;
assume
A21: 1
<= k & k
<= (
len d);
A23: k
in (
dom b2) by
A9,
A21,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
A24: (
len (
AutMt (g,b2,b3)))
= (
len b2) by
Def8;
then
A25: k
in (
dom (
AutMt (g,b2,b3))) by
A9,
A21,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
j
in (
Seg (
width (
AutMt (g,b2,b3)))) by
A5,
A10,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
[k, j]
in (
Indices (
AutMt (g,b2,b3))) by
A25,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
consider p2 be
FinSequence of
INT such that
A26: p2
= ((
AutMt (g,b2,b3))
. k) and
A27: ((
AutMt (g,b2,b3))
* (k,j))
= (p2
. j) by
MATRIX_0:def 5;
A28: p2
= ((
AutMt (g,b2,b3))
/. k) by
A25,
A26,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((g
. (b2
/. k))
|-- b3) by
A23,
Def8;
then j
in (
Seg (
len p2)) by
A18,
Def7;
then
A29: j
in (
dom p2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
k
in (
dom (
AutMt (g,b2,b3))) by
A9,
A21,
A24,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
hence ((
Col ((
AutMt (g,b2,b3)),j))
. k)
= (p2
. j) by
A27,
MATRIX_0:def 8
.= (((g
. (b2
/. k))
|-- b3)
/. j) by
A28,
A29,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (d
. k) by
A9,
A21,
FINSEQ_3: 25;
end;
(b1
/. i)
in the
carrier of V1;
then
A30: (b1
/. i)
in (
dom f) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
consider p1 be
FinSequence of
INT such that
A31: p1
= ((
AutMt ((g
* f),b1,b3))
. i) and
A32: ((
AutMt ((g
* f),b1,b3))
* (i,j))
= (p1
. j) by
A10,
MATRIX_0:def 5;
A33: (
len ((f
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2))
= (
len b2) by
Def7;
A34: (
len (
AutMt ((g
* f),b1,b3)))
= (
len b1) by
Def8;
then
A35: i
in (
dom b1) by
A16,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
A36: p1
= ((
AutMt ((g
* f),b1,b3))
/. i) by
A16,
A31,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (((g
* f)
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b3) by
A35,
Def8;
(
len (
AutMt (f,b1,b2)))
= (
len b1) by
Def8;
then
A37: i
in (
dom (
AutMt (f,b1,b2))) by
A16,
A34,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then
A38: (
Line ((
AutMt (f,b1,b2)),i))
= ((
AutMt (f,b1,b2))
. i) by
MATRIX_0: 60
.= ((
AutMt (f,b1,b2))
/. i) by
A37,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((f
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2) by
A35,
Def8;
A39: (
Seg (
len b2))
= (
dom b2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
j
in (
Seg (
len (((g
* f)
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b3))) by
A18,
Def7;
then
A40: j
in (
dom p1) by
A36,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
thus ((
AutMt ((g
* f),b1,b3))
* (i,j))
= ((((g
* f)
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b3)
/. j) by
A32,
A36,
A40,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (((g
. (f
. (b1
/. i)))
|-- b3)
/. j) by
A30,
FUNCT_1: 13
.= (((g
. (
Sum (
lmlt (((f
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2),b2))))
|-- b3)
/. j) by
Th35
.= (((
Sum (
lmlt (((f
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2),(g
* b2))))
|-- b3)
/. j) by
A1,
A33,
Th18
.= (
Sum (
mlt (((f
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2),d))) by
A3,
A19,
A9,
A14,
A39,
A33,
Th37
.= ((
Line ((
AutMt (f,b1,b2)),i))
"*" (
Col ((
AutMt (g,b2,b3)),j))) by
A38,
A13,
A20,
FINSEQ_1: 14
.= (((
AutMt (f,b1,b2))
* (
AutMt (g,b2,b3)))
* (i,j)) by
A4,
A15,
MATRIX_3:def 4;
end;
hence thesis by
A7,
A6,
MATRIX_0: 21;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:39
(
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2))
= ((
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))
+ (
AutMt (f2,b1,b2)))
proof
A1: (
len (
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2)))
= (
len b1) by
Def8
.= (
len (
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))) by
Def8;
A3: (
width (
AutMt (f1,b1,b2)))
= (
width (
AutMt (f2,b1,b2)))
proof
per cases ;
suppose
A4: (
len b1)
=
0 ;
then (
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))
=
{} by
Th38
.= (
AutMt (f2,b1,b2)) by
A4,
Th38;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
A5: (
len b1)
>
0 ;
hence (
width (
AutMt (f1,b1,b2)))
= (
len b2) by
Th39
.= (
width (
AutMt (f2,b1,b2))) by
A5,
Th39;
end;
end;
A6: (
width (
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2)))
= (
width (
AutMt (f1,b1,b2)))
proof
per cases ;
suppose
A7: (
len b1)
=
0 ;
then (
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2))
=
{} by
Th38
.= (
AutMt (f1,b1,b2)) by
A7,
Th38;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
A8: (
len b1)
>
0 ;
hence (
width (
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2)))
= (
len b2) by
Th39
.= (
width (
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))) by
A8,
Th39;
end;
end;
then
A9: (
width (
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2)))
= (
width ((
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))
+ (
AutMt (f2,b1,b2)))) by
MATRIX_3:def 3;
AX10: (
len (
AutMt (f1,b1,b2)))
= (
len b1) by
Def8
.= (
len (
AutMt (f2,b1,b2))) by
Def8;
A11: for i, j st
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2))) holds ((
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2))
* (i,j))
= (((
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))
+ (
AutMt (f2,b1,b2)))
* (i,j))
proof
let i, j;
assume
A12:
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2)));
then
A14:
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))) by
A1,
A6,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
A15:
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
AutMt (f2,b1,b2))) by
A1,
A3,
A6,
AX10,
A12,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
A15A: ((
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2))
* (i,j))
= (((
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))
* (i,j))
+ ((
AutMt (f2,b1,b2))
* (i,j)))
proof
consider KL3 be
Linear_Combination of V2 such that
A16: (f2
. (b1
/. i))
= (
Sum KL3) & (
Carrier KL3)
c= (
rng b2) and
A17: for t st 1
<= t & t
<= (
len ((f2
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)) holds (((f2
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)
/. t)
= (KL3
. (b2
/. t)) by
Def7;
consider KL2 be
Linear_Combination of V2 such that
A18: (f1
. (b1
/. i))
= (
Sum KL2) & (
Carrier KL2)
c= (
rng b2) and
A19: for t st 1
<= t & t
<= (
len ((f1
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)) holds (((f1
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)
/. t)
= (KL2
. (b2
/. t)) by
Def7;
A20: i
in (
dom (
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2))) by
A12,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A21: i
in (
dom b1) by
Lm3;
reconsider b4 = (
rng b2) as
Basis of V2 by
defOrdBasis;
consider p1 be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring such that
A22: p1
= ((
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2))
. i) and
A23: ((
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2))
* (i,j))
= (p1
. j) by
A12,
MATRIX_0:def 5;
consider KL1 be
Linear_Combination of V2 such that
A24: ((f1
+ f2)
. (b1
/. i))
= (
Sum KL1) & (
Carrier KL1)
c= (
rng b2) and
A25: for t st 1
<= t & t
<= (
len (((f1
+ f2)
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)) holds ((((f1
+ f2)
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)
/. t)
= (KL1
. (b2
/. t)) by
Def7;
Z: b4 is
linearly-independent by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
((f1
+ f2)
. (b1
/. i))
= ((f1
. (b1
/. i))
+ (f2
. (b1
/. i))) by
MATRLIN:def 3;
then
A26: (KL1
. (b2
/. j))
= ((KL2
+ KL3)
. (b2
/. j)) by
A24,
A18,
A16,
Th6,
Z
.= ((KL2
. (b2
/. j))
+ (KL3
. (b2
/. j))) by
VECTSP_6: 22;
A27: p1
= ((
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2))
/. i) by
A22,
A20,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (((f1
+ f2)
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2) by
A21,
Def8;
consider p3 be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring such that
A28: p3
= ((
AutMt (f2,b1,b2))
. i) and
A29: ((
AutMt (f2,b1,b2))
* (i,j))
= (p3
. j) by
A15,
MATRIX_0:def 5;
consider p2 be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring such that
A30: p2
= ((
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))
. i) and
A31: ((
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))
* (i,j))
= (p2
. j) by
A14,
MATRIX_0:def 5;
A32: j
in (
Seg (
width (
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2)))) by
A12,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A33: 1
<= j by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
(
len b1)
= (
len (
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2))) by
Def8;
then (
dom b1)
= (
dom (
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2))) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then (
dom b1)
<>
{} by
A12;
then (
Seg (
len b1))
<>
{} by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (
len b1)
>
0 ;
then
A34: j
in (
Seg (
len b2)) by
A32,
Th39;
then
A35: j
<= (
len b2) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then j
<= (
len (((f1
+ f2)
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)) by
Def7;
then
A36: (p1
/. j)
= (KL1
. (b2
/. j)) by
A33,
A27,
A25;
A37: j
in (
dom b2) by
A34,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
i
in (
dom (
AutMt (f2,b1,b2))) by
A21,
Lm3;
then
A38: p3
= ((
AutMt (f2,b1,b2))
/. i) by
A28,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((f2
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2) by
A21,
Def8;
then j
in (
dom p3) by
A37,
Lm1;
then
A39: ((
AutMt (f2,b1,b2))
* (i,j))
= (p3
/. j) by
A29,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
i
in (
dom (
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))) by
A21,
Lm3;
then
A40: p2
= ((
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))
/. i) by
A30,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((f1
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2) by
A21,
Def8;
then j
in (
dom p2) by
A37,
Lm1;
then
A41: ((
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))
* (i,j))
= (p2
/. j) by
A31,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
j
<= (
len ((f2
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)) by
A35,
Def7;
then
A42: (p3
/. j)
= (KL3
. (b2
/. j)) by
A33,
A38,
A17;
j
<= (
len ((f1
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)) by
A35,
Def7;
then
A43: (p2
/. j)
= (KL2
. (b2
/. j)) by
A33,
A40,
A19;
j
in (
dom p1) by
A37,
A27,
Lm1;
hence thesis by
A23,
A41,
A39,
A36,
A43,
A42,
A26,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
end;
thus ((
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2))
* (i,j))
= (((
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))
* (i,j))
+ ((
AutMt (f2,b1,b2))
* (i,j))) by
A15A
.= (((
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))
+ (
AutMt (f2,b1,b2)))
* (i,j)) by
A14,
MATRIX_3:def 3;
end;
(
len (
AutMt ((f1
+ f2),b1,b2)))
= (
len ((
AutMt (f1,b1,b2))
+ (
AutMt (f2,b1,b2)))) by
A1,
MATRIX_3:def 3;
hence thesis by
A9,
A11,
MATRIX_0: 21;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:40
a
<> (
0.
INT.Ring ) implies (
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2))
= (a
* (
AutMt (f,b1,b2)))
proof
assume
A1: a
<> (
0.
INT.Ring );
A2: (
width (
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2)))
= (
width (
AutMt (f,b1,b2)))
proof
per cases ;
suppose
A3: (
len b1)
=
0 ;
then (
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2))
=
{} by
Th38
.= (
AutMt (f,b1,b2)) by
A3,
Th38;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose
A4: (
len b1)
>
0 ;
hence (
width (
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2)))
= (
len b2) by
Th39
.= (
width (
AutMt (f,b1,b2))) by
A4,
Th39;
end;
end;
A5: (
width (
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2)))
= (
width (a
* (
AutMt (f,b1,b2)))) by
A2,
MATRIX_3:def 5;
A6: (
len (
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2)))
= (
len b1) by
Def8
.= (
len (
AutMt (f,b1,b2))) by
Def8;
A8: for i, j st
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2))) holds ((
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2))
* (i,j))
= ((a
* (
AutMt (f,b1,b2)))
* (i,j))
proof
let i, j;
assume
A9:
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2)));
then
A11:
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
AutMt (f,b1,b2))) by
A2,
A6,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
A11A: ((
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2))
* (i,j))
= (a
* ((
AutMt (f,b1,b2))
* (i,j)))
proof
consider p2 be
FinSequence of
INT such that
A12: p2
= ((
AutMt (f,b1,b2))
. i) and
A13: ((
AutMt (f,b1,b2))
* (i,j))
= (p2
. j) by
A11,
MATRIX_0:def 5;
A14: i
in (
dom (
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2))) by
A9,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A15: i
in (
dom b1) by
Lm3;
then i
in (
dom (
AutMt (f,b1,b2))) by
Lm3;
then
A16: p2
= ((
AutMt (f,b1,b2))
/. i) by
A12,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= ((f
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2) by
A15,
Def8;
reconsider b4 = (
rng b2) as
Basis of V2 by
defOrdBasis;
consider p1 be
FinSequence of
INT such that
A17: p1
= ((
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2))
. i) and
A18: ((
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2))
* (i,j))
= (p1
. j) by
A9,
MATRIX_0:def 5;
consider KL1 be
Linear_Combination of V2 such that
A19: ((a
* f)
. (b1
/. i))
= (
Sum KL1) & (
Carrier KL1)
c= (
rng b2) and
A20: for t st 1
<= t & t
<= (
len (((a
* f)
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)) holds ((((a
* f)
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)
/. t)
= (KL1
. (b2
/. t)) by
Def7;
consider KL2 be
Linear_Combination of V2 such that
A21: (f
. (b1
/. i))
= (
Sum KL2) & (
Carrier KL2)
c= (
rng b2) and
A22: for t st 1
<= t & t
<= (
len ((f
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)) holds (((f
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)
/. t)
= (KL2
. (b2
/. t)) by
Def7;
b4 is
linearly-independent & ((a
* f)
. (b1
/. i))
= (a
* (f
. (b1
/. i))) by
VECTSP_7:def 3,
MATRLIN:def 4;
then
A23: (KL1
. (b2
/. j))
= ((a
* KL2)
. (b2
/. j)) by
A1,
A19,
A21,
Th7
.= (a
* (KL2
. (b2
/. j))) by
VECTSP_6:def 9;
A24: j
in (
Seg (
width (
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2)))) by
A9,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A25: 1
<= j by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
(
len b1)
= (
len (
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2))) by
Def8;
then (
dom b1)
= (
dom (
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2))) by
FINSEQ_3: 29;
then (
dom b1)
<>
{} by
A9;
then (
Seg (
len b1))
<>
{} by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (
len b1)
>
0 ;
then
A26: j
in (
Seg (
len b2)) by
A24,
Th39;
then
A27: j
<= (
len b2) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then j
<= (
len ((f
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)) by
Def7;
then
A28: (p2
/. j)
= (KL2
. (b2
/. j)) by
A25,
A16,
A22;
A29: j
in (
dom b2) by
A26,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then j
in (
dom ((f
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)) by
Lm1;
then
A30: ((
AutMt (f,b1,b2))
* (i,j))
= (p2
/. j) by
A13,
A16,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
A31: p1
= ((
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2))
/. i) by
A17,
A14,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (((a
* f)
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2) by
A15,
Def8;
then
A32: j
in (
dom p1) by
A29,
Lm1;
j
<= (
len (((a
* f)
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b2)) by
A27,
Def7;
then (p1
/. j)
= (KL1
. (b2
/. j)) by
A25,
A31,
A20;
hence thesis by
A18,
A32,
A30,
A28,
A23,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
end;
A110:
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
AutMt (f,b1,b2))) by
A2,
A6,
A9,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
((
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2))
* (i,j))
= ((a
* (
AutMt (f,b1,b2)))
* (i,j)) by
A11A,
A110,
MATRIX_3:def 5;
hence thesis;
end;
(
len (
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2)))
= (
len (
AutMt ((a
* f),b1,b2)))
= (
len (a
* (
AutMt (f,b1,b2)))) by
A6,
MATRIX_3:def 5;
hence thesis by
A5,
A8,
MATRIX_0: 21;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:41
LmSign1B: for D,E be non
empty
set, n,m,i,j be
Nat, M be
Matrix of n, m, D st
0
< n & M is
Matrix of n, m, E &
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) holds (M
* (i,j)) is
Element of E
proof
let D,E be non
empty
set, n,m,i,j be
Nat, M be
Matrix of n, m, D;
assume that
A1:
0
< n and
A2: M is
Matrix of n, m, E and
A3:
[i, j]
in (
Indices M);
consider m1 be
Nat such that
A4: for x be
object st x
in (
rng M) holds ex q be
FinSequence of E st x
= q & (
len q)
= m1 by
MATRIX_0: 9,
A2;
consider p be
FinSequence of D such that
A5: p
= (M
. i) & (M
* (i,j))
= (p
. j) by
A3,
MATRIX_0:def 5;
A6: i
in (
dom M) & j
in (
Seg (
width M)) by
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
A7: p
in (
rng M) by
FUNCT_1: 3,
A5;
ex q be
FinSequence of E st p
= q & (
len q)
= m1 by
A4,
A5,
A6,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
A50: (
rng p)
c= E by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
(
len p)
= m by
A7,
MATRIX_0:def 2;
then (
len p)
= (
width M) by
A1,
MATRIX_0: 23;
then j
in (
dom p) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3,
A6;
hence thesis by
A5,
A50,
FUNCT_1: 3;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:42
LmSign1C: for F be
FinSequence of
F_Real st for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom F) holds (F
. i)
in
INT holds (
Sum F)
in
INT
proof
defpred
P[
Nat] means for F be
FinSequence of
F_Real st (
len F)
= $1 & for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom F) holds (F
. i)
in
INT holds (
Sum F)
in
INT ;
P1:
P[
0 ]
proof
let F be
FinSequence of
F_Real ;
assume
AS1: (
len F)
=
0 & for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom F) holds (F
. i)
in
INT ;
F
= (
<*> the
carrier of
F_Real ) by
AS1;
then (
Sum F)
= (
0.
F_Real ) by
RLVECT_1: 43
.=
0 ;
hence (
Sum F)
in
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
end;
P2: for n be
Nat st
P[n] holds
P[(n
+ 1)]
proof
let n be
Nat;
assume
AS1:
P[n];
let F be
FinSequence of
F_Real ;
assume
AS2: (
len F)
= (n
+ 1) & for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom F) holds (F
. i)
in
INT ;
reconsider F0 = (F
| n) as
FinSequence of
F_Real ;
(n
+ 1)
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 4;
then
A70: (n
+ 1)
in (
dom F) by
AS2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (F
. (n
+ 1))
in (
rng F) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider af = (F
. (n
+ 1)) as
Element of
F_Real ;
P1: (
len F0)
= n by
FINSEQ_1: 59,
AS2,
NAT_1: 11;
then
P4: (
dom F0)
= (
Seg n) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
A9: (
len F)
= ((
len F0)
+ 1) by
AS2,
FINSEQ_1: 59,
NAT_1: 11;
A11: F0
= (F
| (
dom F0)) by
P4,
FINSEQ_1:def 15;
then
P3: (
Sum F)
= ((
Sum F0)
+ af) by
AS2,
A9,
RLVECT_1: 38;
for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom F0) holds (F0
. i)
in
INT
proof
let i be
Nat;
assume
P40: i
in (
dom F0);
(
dom F)
= (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
AS2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (
dom F0)
c= (
dom F) by
P4,
FINSEQ_1: 5,
NAT_1: 11;
then (F
. i)
in
INT by
AS2,
P40;
hence thesis by
A11,
P40,
FUNCT_1: 47;
end;
then (
Sum F0)
in
INT by
P1,
AS1;
then
reconsider i1 = (
Sum F0) as
Integer;
(F
. (n
+ 1))
in
INT by
A70,
AS2;
then
reconsider i2 = af as
Integer;
(
Sum F)
= (i1
+ i2) by
P3;
hence (
Sum F)
in
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
end;
X1: for n be
Nat holds
P[n] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
P1,
P2);
let F be
FinSequence of
F_Real ;
assume
X2: for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom F) holds (F
. i)
in
INT ;
(
len F) is
Nat;
hence (
Sum F)
in
INT by
X1,
X2;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:43
LmSign1D: for i be
Nat, j be
Element of
F_Real st j
in
INT holds (((
power
F_Real )
. ((
- (
1_
F_Real )),i))
* j)
in
INT
proof
let i be
Nat, j be
Element of
F_Real ;
assume
AS: j
in
INT ;
defpred
P[
Nat] means (((
power
F_Real )
. ((
- (
1_
F_Real )),$1))
* j)
in
INT ;
P1:
P[
0 ]
proof
(((
power
F_Real )
. ((
- (
1_
F_Real )),
0 ))
* j)
= ((
1_
F_Real )
* j) by
GROUP_1:def 7
.= j;
hence thesis by
AS;
end;
P2: for n be
Nat st
P[n] holds
P[(n
+ 1)]
proof
let n be
Nat;
assume
AS1:
P[n];
P3: (((
power
F_Real )
. ((
- (
1_
F_Real )),(n
+ 1)))
* j)
= ((((
power
F_Real )
. ((
- (
1_
F_Real )),n))
* (
- (
1_
F_Real )))
* j) by
GROUP_1:def 7
.= ((
- (
1_
F_Real ))
* (((
power
F_Real )
. ((
- (
1_
F_Real )),n))
* j));
reconsider mi = (
- (
1_
F_Real )) as
Integer;
reconsider m0 = (((
power
F_Real )
. ((
- (
1_
F_Real )),n))
* j) as
Integer by
AS1;
(((
power
F_Real )
. ((
- (
1_
F_Real )),(n
+ 1)))
* j)
= (
- m0) by
P3;
hence (((
power
F_Real )
. ((
- (
1_
F_Real )),(n
+ 1)))
* j)
in
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
end;
for n be
Nat holds
P[n] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
P1,
P2);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:44
LmSign1F: for n,i,j,k,m be
Nat, M be
Matrix of (n
+ 1),
F_Real st
0
< n & M is
Matrix of (n
+ 1),
INT &
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) &
[k, m]
in (
Indices (
Delete (M,i,j))) holds ((
Delete (M,i,j))
* (k,m)) is
Element of
INT
proof
let n,i,j,k,m be
Nat, M be
Matrix of (n
+ 1),
F_Real ;
assume that
0
< n and
A2: M is
Matrix of (n
+ 1),
INT and
A3:
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) and
A4:
[k, m]
in (
Indices (
Delete (M,i,j)));
[i, j]
in
[:(
Seg (n
+ 1)), (
Seg (n
+ 1)):] by
A3,
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
A5: i
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) & j
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
set M0 = (
Delete (M,i,j));
((n
+ 1)
-' 1)
= n by
NAT_D: 34;
then (
len M0)
= n & (
width M0)
= n & (
Indices M0)
=
[:(
Seg n), (
Seg n):] by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
D5: k
in (
Seg n) & m
in (
Seg n) by
A4,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
D3: k
in (
Seg ((n
+ 1)
-' 1)) & m
in (
Seg ((n
+ 1)
-' 1)) by
NAT_D: 34;
FC0: 1
<= k & k
<= n & 1
<= m & m
<= n by
FINSEQ_1: 1,
D5;
then 1
<= k & (k
+
0 )
<= (n
+ 1) & 1
<= m & (m
+
0 )
<= (n
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 7;
then
FC1: k
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) & m
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
(1
+
0 )
<= (k
+ 1) & (k
+ 1)
<= (n
+ 1) & (1
+
0 )
<= (m
+ 1) & (m
+ 1)
<= (n
+ 1) by
FC0,
XREAL_1: 6;
then
FC3: (k
+ 1)
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) & (m
+ 1)
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
per cases ;
suppose k
< i & m
< j;
then
F11: ((
Delete (M,i,j))
* (k,m))
= (M
* (k,m)) by
LAPLACE: 13,
A5,
D3;
[k, m]
in
[:(
Seg (n
+ 1)), (
Seg (n
+ 1)):] by
FC1,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
[k, m]
in (
Indices M) by
MATRIX_0: 24;
hence thesis by
A2,
F11,
LmSign1B;
end;
suppose k
< i & m
>= j;
then
F21: ((
Delete (M,i,j))
* (k,m))
= (M
* (k,(m
+ 1))) by
LAPLACE: 13,
A5,
D3;
[k, (m
+ 1)]
in
[:(
Seg (n
+ 1)), (
Seg (n
+ 1)):] by
FC1,
FC3,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
[k, (m
+ 1)]
in (
Indices M) by
MATRIX_0: 24;
hence thesis by
A2,
F21,
LmSign1B;
end;
suppose k
>= i & m
< j;
then
F31: ((
Delete (M,i,j))
* (k,m))
= (M
* ((k
+ 1),m)) by
LAPLACE: 13,
A5,
D3;
[(k
+ 1), m]
in
[:(
Seg (n
+ 1)), (
Seg (n
+ 1)):] by
FC1,
FC3,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
[(k
+ 1), m]
in (
Indices M) by
MATRIX_0: 24;
hence thesis by
A2,
F31,
LmSign1B;
end;
suppose k
>= i & m
>= j;
then
F41: ((
Delete (M,i,j))
* (k,m))
= (M
* ((k
+ 1),(m
+ 1))) by
LAPLACE: 13,
A5,
D3;
[(k
+ 1), (m
+ 1)]
in
[:(
Seg (n
+ 1)), (
Seg (n
+ 1)):] by
FC3,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
[(k
+ 1), (m
+ 1)]
in (
Indices M) by
MATRIX_0: 24;
hence thesis by
A2,
F41,
LmSign1B;
end;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:45
LmSign1E: for n,i,j be
Nat, M be
Matrix of (n
+ 1),
F_Real st
0
< n & M is
Matrix of (n
+ 1),
INT &
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) holds (
Delete (M,i,j)) is
Matrix of n,
INT
proof
let n,i,j be
Nat, M be
Matrix of (n
+ 1),
F_Real ;
assume that
A1:
0
< n and
A2: M is
Matrix of (n
+ 1),
INT and
A3:
[i, j]
in (
Indices M);
set M0 = (
Delete (M,i,j));
X39: ((n
+ 1)
-' 1)
= n by
NAT_D: 34;
then
D2: (
len M0)
= n & (
width M0)
= n & (
Indices M0)
=
[:(
Seg n), (
Seg n):] by
MATRIX_0: 24;
for x be
object st x
in (
rng M0) holds ex p be
FinSequence of
INT st x
= p & (
len p)
= n
proof
let x be
object;
assume
S1: x
in (
rng M0);
then
reconsider p = x as
FinSequence of the
carrier of
F_Real by
FINSEQ_2:def 3;
S3: (
len p)
= n by
S1,
X39,
MATRIX_0:def 2;
for z be
object st z
in (
rng p) holds z
in
INT
proof
let z be
object;
assume z
in (
rng p);
then
consider j1 be
object such that
S4: j1
in (
dom p) & z
= (p
. j1) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
S5: j1
in (
Seg n) by
S3,
S4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
reconsider j1 as
Nat by
S4;
consider i1 be
object such that
S6: i1
in (
dom M0) & x
= (M0
. i1) by
S1,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
reconsider i1 as
Nat by
S6;
S8:
[i1, j1]
in (
Indices M0) by
D2,
S5,
S6,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
consider q be
FinSequence of
F_Real such that
S9: q
= (M0
. i1) & (M0
* (i1,j1))
= (q
. j1) by
MATRIX_0:def 5;
(M0
* (i1,j1)) is
Element of
INT by
A1,
A2,
A3,
S8,
LmSign1F;
hence z
in
INT by
S4,
S6,
S9;
end;
then (
rng p)
c=
INT ;
then p is
FinSequence of
INT by
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
hence thesis by
S3;
end;
hence thesis by
A1,
D2,
MATRIX_0: 9,
MATRIX_0: 20;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:46
LmSign1A: for n be
Nat, M be
Matrix of n,
F_Real st M is
Matrix of n,
INT holds (
Det M)
in
INT
proof
defpred
P[
Nat] means for M be
Matrix of $1,
F_Real st M is
Matrix of $1,
INT holds (
Det M)
in
INT ;
P0:
P[
0 ]
proof
let M be
Matrix of
0 ,
F_Real ;
assume M is
Matrix of
0 ,
INT ;
(
Det M)
= (
1.
F_Real ) by
MATRIXR2: 41
.= 1;
hence (
Det M)
in
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
end;
P1: for n be
Nat st
P[n] holds
P[(n
+ 1)]
proof
let n be
Nat;
assume
P10:
P[n];
let M be
Matrix of (n
+ 1),
F_Real ;
assume
AS1: M is
Matrix of (n
+ 1),
INT ;
reconsider j = 1 as
Nat;
X0: 1
<= 1 & 1
<= (n
+ 1) by
NAT_1: 14;
then j
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
X1: (
Det M)
= (
Sum (
LaplaceExpC (M,j))) by
LAPLACE: 27;
set L = (
LaplaceExpC (M,j));
X2: (
len L)
= (n
+ 1) & for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom L) holds (L
. i)
= ((M
* (i,j))
* (
Cofactor (M,i,j))) by
LAPLACE:def 8;
for i be
Nat st i
in (
dom L) holds (L
. i)
in
INT
proof
let i be
Nat;
assume
X30: i
in (
dom L);
then
X31: (L
. i)
= ((M
* (i,j))
* (
Cofactor (M,i,j))) by
LAPLACE:def 8;
i
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) & j
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
X0,
X2,
X30,
FINSEQ_1:def 3,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
then
[i, j]
in
[:(
Seg (n
+ 1)), (
Seg (n
+ 1)):] by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
X41:
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then
X32: (M
* (i,j)) is
Element of
INT by
AS1,
LmSign1B;
((n
+ 1)
-' 1)
= n by
NAT_D: 34;
then
reconsider DD = (
Delete (M,i,j)) as
Matrix of n,
F_Real ;
(
Det DD)
in
INT
proof
per cases ;
suppose
0
< n;
then DD is
Matrix of n,
INT by
LmSign1E,
AS1,
X41;
hence (
Det DD)
in
INT by
P10;
end;
suppose not
0
< n;
then n
=
0 ;
then (
Det DD)
= (
1.
F_Real ) by
MATRIXR2: 41
.= 1;
hence (
Det DD)
in
INT by
INT_1:def 2;
end;
end;
then (
Minor (M,i,j))
in
INT by
NAT_D: 34;
then (
Cofactor (M,i,j))
in
INT by
LmSign1D;
hence (L
. i)
in
INT by
X32,
X31,
INT_1:def 2;
end;
hence thesis by
X1,
LmSign1C;
end;
for n be
Nat holds
P[n] from
NAT_1:sch 2(
P0,
P1);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:47
for n be
Nat, M be
Matrix of n,
F_Real st M is
Matrix of n,
INT.Ring holds (
Det M)
in
INT by
LmSign1A;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:48
for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, I be
Basis of V holds ex J be
OrdBasis of V st (
rng J)
= I
proof
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, I be
Basis of V;
consider p be
FinSequence such that
A2: (
rng p)
= I and
A3: p is
one-to-one by
FINSEQ_4: 58;
reconsider p as
FinSequence of V by
A2,
FINSEQ_1:def 4;
take f = p;
thus f is
one-to-one by
A3;
thus thesis by
A2;
end;
registration
let V be
Z_Module;
cluster (
id V) ->
additive
homogeneous;
correctness ;
end
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:49
ThRank1: for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b be
OrdBasis of V holds (
len b)
= (
rank V)
proof
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b be
OrdBasis of V;
reconsider R = (
rng b) as
Basis of V by
defOrdBasis;
A1: b is
one-to-one by
defOrdBasis;
thus (
len b)
= (
card (
Seg (
len b))) by
FINSEQ_1: 57
.= (
card (
dom b)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
card R) by
A1,
CARD_1: 70
.= (
rank V) by
ZMODUL03:def 5;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:50
LMThMBF3: for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1,b2 be
OrdBasis of V holds (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b2)) is
Matrix of (
rank V),
INT.Ring
proof
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1,b2 be
OrdBasis of V;
set n = (
rank V);
A1: (
len b1)
= (
rank V) by
ThRank1;
A2: (
len b2)
= (
rank V) by
ThRank1;
P0: (
len (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b2)))
= (
len b1) by
Def8;
per cases ;
suppose
X1: (
len b1)
=
0 ;
then (
len (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b2)))
=
0 by
Def8;
then (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b2))
=
{} ;
hence thesis by
A1,
X1,
MATRIX_0: 13;
end;
suppose
P1:
0
< (
len b1);
then (
width (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b2)))
= (
len b2) by
Th39;
hence thesis by
P0,
P1,
A1,
A2,
MATRIX_0: 20;
end;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:51
for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1,b2 be
OrdBasis of V, M be
Matrix of (
rank V),
F_Real st M
= (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b2)) holds (
Det M)
in
INT
proof
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1,b2 be
OrdBasis of V, M be
Matrix of (
rank V),
F_Real ;
assume
A2: M
= (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b2));
per cases ;
suppose not
0
< (
rank V);
then (
rank V)
=
0 ;
then (
Det M)
= (
1.
F_Real ) by
MATRIXR2: 41;
hence (
Det M)
in
INT ;
end;
suppose
A3:
0
< (
rank V);
(
len M)
= (
rank V) & (
width M)
= (
rank V) by
MATRIX_0: 24;
then M is
Matrix of (
rank V),
INT by
A2,
A3,
MATRIX_0: 20;
hence thesis by
LmSign1A;
end;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:52
LmSign31X: for V1 be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1 be
OrdBasis of V1 holds for i,j be
Nat st i
in (
dom b1) & j
in (
dom b1) holds (i
= j implies (((b1
/. i)
|-- b1)
. j)
= 1) & (i
<> j implies (((b1
/. i)
|-- b1)
. j)
=
0 )
proof
let V1 be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1 be
OrdBasis of V1;
let i,j be
Nat;
assume that
A5: i
in (
dom b1) and
A18: j
in (
dom b1);
set bb = ((b1
/. i)
|-- b1);
consider KL be
Linear_Combination of V1 such that
A1: (b1
/. i)
= (
Sum KL) & (
Carrier KL)
c= (
rng b1) and
A2: for k st 1
<= k & k
<= (
len bb) holds (bb
/. k)
= (KL
. (b1
/. k)) by
Def7;
reconsider rb1 = (
rng b1) as
Basis of V1 by
defOrdBasis;
(b1
/. i)
in
{(b1
/. i)} by
TARSKI:def 1;
then (b1
/. i)
in (
Lin
{(b1
/. i)}) by
ZMODUL02: 65;
then
consider Lb be
Linear_Combination of
{(b1
/. i)} such that
A4: (b1
/. i)
= (
Sum Lb) by
ZMODUL02: 64;
A6: (b1
. i)
= (b1
/. i) by
A5,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
then
A7: (
Carrier Lb)
c=
{(b1
. i)} by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
A8: (b1
. i)
in rb1 by
A5,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
then
{(b1
. i)}
c= rb1 by
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then (
Carrier Lb)
c= rb1 by
A7;
then
A9: Lb
= KL by
A4,
A1,
Th5,
VECTSP_7:def 3;
A12: (
len b1)
= (
len bb) by
Def7;
A13: (b1
/. i)
<> (
0. V1) by
A6,
A8,
ZMODUL02: 57,
VECTSP_7:def 3;
j
in (
Seg (
len b1)) by
A18,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A15: 1
<= j & j
<= (
len bb) by
FINSEQ_1: 1,
A12;
A19: (
dom bb)
= (
dom b1) by
A12,
FINSEQ_3: 29;
set One = (
1.
INT.Ring );
reconsider KLi = (KL
. (b1
/. i)) as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
now
assume
A20: i
= j;
(KLi
* (b1
/. i))
= (b1
/. i) by
A4,
A9,
ZMODUL02: 21
.= (One
* (b1
/. i)) by
VECTSP_1:def 17;
then KLi
= One by
A13,
ZMODUL01: 11;
hence 1
= (bb
/. j) by
A2,
A15,
A20
.= (bb
. j) by
A18,
A19,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
end;
hence i
= j implies (((b1
/. i)
|-- b1)
. j)
= 1;
now
assume
A22: i
<> j;
b1 is
one-to-one by
defOrdBasis;
then (b1
. i)
<> (b1
. j) by
A5,
A18,
A22;
then
A23: not (b1
. j)
in (
Carrier Lb) by
A7,
TARSKI:def 1;
(b1
. j)
= (b1
/. j) by
A18,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
hence
0
= (KL
. (b1
/. j)) by
A9,
A23
.= (bb
/. j) by
A2,
A15
.= (bb
. j) by
A18,
A19,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
end;
hence i
<> j implies (((b1
/. i)
|-- b1)
. j)
=
0 ;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:53
LmSign31: for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1 be
OrdBasis of V st (
rank V)
>
0 holds (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1))
= (
1. (
INT.Ring ,(
rank V)))
proof
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1 be
OrdBasis of V;
assume
AS: (
rank V)
>
0 ;
B0: (
len b1)
= (
rank V) by
ThRank1;
B1: (
len (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1)))
= (
rank V) by
B0,
Def8;
B3: (
width (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1)))
= (
rank V) by
AS,
B0,
Th39;
P1: (
len (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1)))
= (
len (
1. (
INT.Ring ,(
rank V)))) by
B1,
MATRIX_0: 24;
P4: (
dom (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1)))
= (
Seg (
len (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1)))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
dom (
1. (
INT.Ring ,(
rank V)))) by
P1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
P2: (
width (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1)))
= (
width (
1. (
INT.Ring ,(
rank V)))) by
B3,
MATRIX_0: 24;
P5: (
Indices (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1)))
= (
Indices (
1. (
INT.Ring ,(
rank V)))) by
B3,
P4,
MATRIX_0: 24;
X2:
now
let i,j be
Nat;
assume
X20:
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1)));
then
X21: i
in (
dom (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1))) & j
in (
Seg (
width (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1)))) by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
(
dom (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1)))
= (
Seg (
len (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1)))) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
Seg (
len b1)) by
Def8
.= (
dom b1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
X23: i
in (
dom b1) by
X20,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
(
width (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1)))
= (
len b1) by
Th39,
AS,
B0;
then
Y23: j
in (
dom b1) by
X21,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
X25: ((
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1))
/. i)
= (((
id V)
. (b1
/. i))
|-- b1) by
Def8,
X23;
consider q be
FinSequence of
INT such that
X26: q
= ((
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1))
. i) & ((
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1))
* (i,j))
= (q
. j) by
MATRIX_0:def 5,
X20;
X27: ((
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1))
* (i,j))
= (((b1
/. i)
|-- b1)
. j) by
X21,
X25,
X26,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
thus i
<> j implies ((
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1))
* (i,j))
=
0 by
X23,
X27,
Y23,
LmSign31X;
thus i
= j implies ((
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1))
* (i,j))
= 1 by
X23,
X27,
LmSign31X;
end;
for i,j be
Nat st
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1))) holds ((
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1))
* (i,j))
= ((
1. (
INT.Ring ,(
rank V)))
* (i,j))
proof
let i,j be
Nat;
assume
P6:
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1)));
per cases ;
suppose
P8: i
<> j;
then ((
1. (
INT.Ring ,(
rank V)))
* (i,j))
= (
0.
INT.Ring ) by
P5,
P6,
MATRIX_1:def 3;
hence ((
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1))
* (i,j))
= ((
1. (
INT.Ring ,(
rank V)))
* (i,j)) by
P6,
P8,
X2;
end;
suppose
P10: i
= j;
then ((
1. (
INT.Ring ,(
rank V)))
* (i,j))
= (
1.
INT.Ring ) by
P5,
P6,
MATRIX_1:def 3;
hence ((
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1))
* (i,j))
= ((
1. (
INT.Ring ,(
rank V)))
* (i,j)) by
P6,
P10,
X2;
end;
end;
hence thesis by
P1,
P2,
EQ40;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:54
LmSign3: for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1,b2 be
OrdBasis of V st (
rank V)
>
0 holds ((
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b2))
* (
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1)))
= (
1. (
INT.Ring ,(
rank V)))
proof
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1,b2 be
OrdBasis of V;
assume
AS: (
rank V)
>
0 ;
then
A1: (
len b1)
>
0 & (
len b2)
>
0 by
ThRank1;
thus ((
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b2))
* (
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1)))
= (
AutMt (((
id V)
* (
id V)),b1,b1)) by
A1,
ThComp1
.= (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b1)) by
FUNCT_2: 17
.= (
1. (
INT.Ring ,(
rank V))) by
AS,
LmSign31;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:55
ThSign1: for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1,b2 be
OrdBasis of V, M be
Matrix of (
rank V),
INT.Ring st M
= (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b2)) holds
|.(
Det M).|
= 1
proof
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1,b2 be
OrdBasis of V, M be
Matrix of (
rank V),
INT.Ring ;
assume
AS1: M
= (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b2));
per cases ;
suppose (
rank V)
=
0 ;
then (
Det M)
= (
1.
INT.Ring ) by
MATRIXR2: 41;
hence thesis by
ABSVALUE:def 1;
end;
suppose
AS2: (
rank V)
>
0 ;
then
as2: (
rank V)
>= (1
+
0 ) by
NAT_1: 13;
B0: (
len b1)
= (
rank V) by
ThRank1;
B1: (
len (
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1)))
= (
len b2) by
Def8
.= (
rank V) by
ThRank1;
(
len b2)
= (
rank V) by
ThRank1;
then (
width (
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1)))
= (
len b1) by
AS2,
Th39;
then
reconsider M2 = (
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1)) as
Matrix of (
rank V),
INT.Ring by
AS2,
B0,
B1,
MATRIX_0: 20;
M
= (
AutMt ((
id V),b1,b2)) by
AS1;
then
A1: (M
* M2)
= (
1. (
INT.Ring ,(
rank V))) by
AS2,
LmSign3;
reconsider MM2 = (M
* M2) as
Matrix of (
rank V),
INT.Ring ;
A2: ((
Det M)
* (
Det M2))
= (
Det MM2) by
MATRIX11: 62,
AS2
.= (
1_
INT.Ring ) by
A1,
MATRIX_7: 16,
as2
.= (
1.
INT.Ring );
reconsider i = (
Det M) as
Integer;
reconsider j = (
Det M2) as
Integer;
(i
* j)
= 1 by
A2;
then i
= 1 & j
= 1 or i
= (
- 1) & j
= (
- 1) by
INT_1: 9;
then
|.i.|
= 1 or
|.i.|
= (
- (
- 1)) by
ABSVALUE:def 1;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
begin
registration
let V be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
cluster
additive
homogeneous
0-preserving for
Functional of V;
existence
proof
take (
0Functional V);
thus thesis;
end;
end
definition
let V be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
mode
linear-Functional of V is
additive
homogeneous
Functional of V;
end
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:56
VS10Th1: for a be
Element of
INT.Ring , V be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , v be
Vector of V holds ((
0.
INT.Ring )
* v)
= (
0. V) & (a
* (
0. V))
= (
0. V)
proof
let x be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
let V be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , v be
Vector of V;
A1: (v
+ ((
0.
INT.Ring )
* v))
= (((
1.
INT.Ring )
* v)
+ ((
0.
INT.Ring )
* v)) by
VECTSP_1:def 17
.= (((
1.
INT.Ring )
+ (
0.
INT.Ring ))
* v) by
VECTSP_1:def 15
.= (v
+ (
0. V)) by
VECTSP_1:def 17;
hence ((
0.
INT.Ring )
* v)
= (
0. V) by
RLVECT_1: 8;
hence (x
* (
0. V))
= ((x
* (
0.
INT.Ring ))
* v) by
VECTSP_1:def 16
.= (
0. V) by
A1,
RLVECT_1: 8;
end;
registration
let V be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
cluster
additive
0-preserving for
Functional of V;
existence
proof
take (
0Functional V);
thus thesis;
end;
end
registration
let V be
right_zeroed non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
cluster
additive ->
0-preserving for
Functional of V;
coherence
proof
let f be
Functional of V;
assume
A1: f is
additive;
(f
. (
0. V))
= (f
. ((
0. V)
+ (
0. V))) by
RLVECT_1:def 4
.= ((f
. (
0. V))
+ (f
. (
0. V))) by
A1;
hence (f
. (
0. V))
= (
0.
INT.Ring );
end;
end
registration
let V be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
cluster
homogeneous ->
0-preserving for
Functional of V;
coherence
proof
let f be
Functional of V;
assume
A1: f is
homogeneous;
thus (f
. (
0. V))
= (f
. ((
0.
INT.Ring )
* (
0. V))) by
VS10Th1
.= ((
0.
INT.Ring )
* (f
. (
0. V))) by
A1
.= (
0.
INT.Ring );
end;
end
registration
let V be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
cluster (
0Functional V) ->
constant;
coherence ;
end
registration
let V be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
cluster
constant for
Functional of V;
existence
proof
take (
0Functional V);
thus thesis;
end;
end
definition
let V be
right_zeroed non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
0-preserving
Functional of V;
:: original:
constant
redefine
::
ZMATRLIN:def9
attr f is
constant means f
= (
0Functional V);
compatibility
proof
A1: (f
. (
0. V))
= (
0.
INT.Ring ) & the
carrier of V
= (
dom f) by
FUNCT_2:def 1,
HAHNBAN1:def 9;
hereby
assume f is
constant;
then for v be
Vector of V holds (f
. v)
= ((
0Functional V)
. v) by
A1;
hence f
= (
0Functional V) by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
assume
A3: f
= (
0Functional V);
now
let x,y be
object;
assume x
in (
dom f) & y
in (
dom f);
then
reconsider v = x, w = y as
Vector of V;
thus (f
. x)
= ((
0Functional V)
. v) by
A3
.=
0
.= ((
0Functional V)
. w)
.= (f
. y) by
A3;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let V be
right_zeroed non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
cluster
constant
additive
0-preserving for
Functional of V;
existence
proof
take (
0Functional V);
thus thesis;
end;
end
LMPROJ1: for V be
free
Z_Module, A,B be
Subset of V st A
c= B & B is
Basis of V holds ex F be
linear-transformation of V, V st (for v be
Vector of V holds ex vA,vB be
Vector of V st vA
in (
Lin A) & vB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & v
= (vA
+ vB) & (F
. v)
= vA) & for v,vA,vB be
Vector of V st vA
in (
Lin A) & vB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & v
= (vA
+ vB) holds (F
. v)
= vA
proof
let V be
free
Z_Module, A,B be
Subset of V;
assume A
c= B & B is
Basis of V;
then
P0: V
is_the_direct_sum_of ((
Lin A),(
Lin (B
\ A))) by
ZMODUL05: 50;
defpred
P[
Element of V,
object] means ex vA,vB be
Vector of V st vA
in (
Lin A) & vB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & $1
= (vA
+ vB) & $2
= vA;
A1: for v be
Element of V holds ex vA be
Element of V st
P[v, vA]
proof
let v be
Element of V;
consider vA,vB be
Vector of V such that
A2: vA
in (
Lin A) & vB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & v
= (vA
+ vB) by
P0,
ZMODUL01: 133;
take vA;
thus thesis by
A2;
end;
consider f be
Function of V, V such that
A9: for v be
Vector of V holds
P[v, (f
. v)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 3(
A1);
A10: for v,vA,vB be
Vector of V st vA
in (
Lin A) & vB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & v
= (vA
+ vB) holds (f
. v)
= vA
proof
let v,vA,vB be
Vector of V;
assume
A11: vA
in (
Lin A) & vB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & v
= (vA
+ vB);
consider vA1,vB1 be
Vector of V such that
A12: vA1
in (
Lin A) & vB1
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & v
= (vA1
+ vB1) & (f
. v)
= vA1 by
A9;
thus thesis by
A11,
A12,
P0,
ZMODUL01: 134;
end;
A13: f is
additive
proof
let x,y be
Element of V;
consider xA,xB be
Vector of V such that
A14: xA
in (
Lin A) & xB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & x
= (xA
+ xB) & (f
. x)
= xA by
A9;
consider yA,yB be
Vector of V such that
A15: yA
in (
Lin A) & yB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & y
= (yA
+ yB) & (f
. y)
= yA by
A9;
consider xyA,xyB be
Vector of V such that
A16: xyA
in (
Lin A) & xyB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & (x
+ y)
= (xyA
+ xyB) & (f
. (x
+ y))
= xyA by
A9;
A17: (xyA
+ xyB)
= (((xA
+ xB)
+ yA)
+ yB) by
A14,
A15,
A16,
RLVECT_1:def 3
.= ((xB
+ (xA
+ yA))
+ yB) by
RLVECT_1:def 3
.= ((xA
+ yA)
+ (xB
+ yB)) by
RLVECT_1:def 3;
A18: (xA
+ yA)
in (
Lin A) by
A14,
A15,
ZMODUL01: 36;
(xB
+ yB)
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) by
A14,
A15,
ZMODUL01: 36;
hence (f
. (x
+ y))
= ((f
. x)
+ (f
. y)) by
A14,
A15,
A16,
A17,
A18,
P0,
ZMODUL01: 134;
end;
for r be
Element of
INT.Ring , x be
Element of V holds (f
. (r
* x))
= (r
* (f
. x))
proof
let r be
Element of
INT.Ring , x be
Element of V;
consider xA,xB be
Vector of V such that
A14: xA
in (
Lin A) & xB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & x
= (xA
+ xB) & (f
. x)
= xA by
A9;
consider rxA,rxB be
Vector of V such that
A15: rxA
in (
Lin A) & rxB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & (r
* x)
= (rxA
+ rxB) & (f
. (r
* x))
= rxA by
A9;
A16: (rxA
+ rxB)
= ((r
* xA)
+ (r
* xB)) by
A14,
A15,
VECTSP_1:def 14;
A18: (r
* xA)
in (
Lin A) by
A14,
ZMODUL01: 37;
(r
* xB)
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) by
A14,
ZMODUL01: 37;
hence (f
. (r
* x))
= (r
* (f
. x)) by
A14,
A15,
A16,
A18,
P0,
ZMODUL01: 134;
end;
then f is
homogeneous;
then
reconsider f as
linear-transformation of V, V by
A13;
take f;
thus thesis by
A10,
A9;
end;
definition
let V be
free
Z_Module, A,B be
Subset of V;
assume
AS: A
c= B & B is
Basis of V;
::
ZMATRLIN:def10
func
Proj (A,B) ->
linear-transformation of V, V means (for v be
Vector of V holds ex vA,vB be
Vector of V st vA
in (
Lin A) & vB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & v
= (vA
+ vB) & (it
. v)
= vA) & for v,vA,vB be
Vector of V st vA
in (
Lin A) & vB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & v
= (vA
+ vB) holds (it
. v)
= vA;
existence by
LMPROJ1,
AS;
uniqueness
proof
let F1,F2 be
linear-transformation of V, V;
assume
A1: (for v be
Vector of V holds ex vA,vB be
Vector of V st vA
in (
Lin A) & vB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & v
= (vA
+ vB) & (F1
. v)
= vA) & for v,vA,vB be
Vector of V st vA
in (
Lin A) & vB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & v
= (vA
+ vB) holds (F1
. v)
= vA;
assume
A2: (for v be
Vector of V holds ex vA,vB be
Vector of V st vA
in (
Lin A) & vB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & v
= (vA
+ vB) & (F2
. v)
= vA) & for v,vA,vB be
Vector of V st vA
in (
Lin A) & vB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & v
= (vA
+ vB) holds (F2
. v)
= vA;
now
let v be
Vector of V;
consider vA,vB be
Vector of V such that
A3: vA
in (
Lin A) & vB
in (
Lin (B
\ A)) & v
= (vA
+ vB) & (F1
. v)
= vA by
A1;
thus (F1
. v)
= (F2
. v) by
A2,
A3;
end;
hence F1
= F2 by
FUNCT_2:def 7;
end;
end
definition
let V be
free
Z_Module, B be
Basis of V, u be
Vector of V;
::
ZMATRLIN:def11
func
Coordinate (u,B) ->
Function of V,
INT.Ring means
:
defCoord: (for v be
Vector of V holds ex Lu be
Linear_Combination of B st v
= (
Sum Lu) & (it
. v)
= (Lu
. u)) & (for v be
Vector of V, Lv be
Linear_Combination of B st v
= (
Sum Lv) holds (it
. v)
= (Lv
. u)) & (for v1,v2 be
Vector of V holds (it
. (v1
+ v2))
= ((it
. v1)
+ (it
. v2))) & (for v be
Vector of V, r be
Element of
INT.Ring holds (it
. (r
* v))
= (r
* (it
. v)));
existence
proof
X1: B is
linearly-independent & (
Lin B)
= the ModuleStr of V by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
defpred
P[
Element of V,
object] means ex L be
Linear_Combination of B st $1
= (
Sum L) & $2
= (L
. u);
A1: for v be
Element of V holds ex r be
Element of
INT.Ring st
P[v, r]
proof
let v be
Element of V;
v
in (
Lin B) by
X1;
then
consider Lv be
Linear_Combination of B such that
A4: v
= (
Sum Lv) by
ZMODUL02: 64;
reconsider r = (Lv
. u) as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
take r;
thus thesis by
A4;
end;
consider f be
Function of V, the
carrier of
INT.Ring such that
A9: for v be
Vector of V holds
P[v, (f
. v)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 3(
A1);
A10: for v be
Vector of V, Lv be
Linear_Combination of B st v
= (
Sum Lv) holds (f
. v)
= (Lv
. u)
proof
let v be
Vector of V, Lv be
Linear_Combination of B;
assume
A11: v
= (
Sum Lv);
consider L be
Linear_Combination of B such that
A12: v
= (
Sum L) & (f
. v)
= (L
. u) by
A9;
(
Carrier L)
c= B & (
Carrier Lv)
c= B by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
hence (f
. v)
= (Lv
. u) by
A11,
A12,
Th5,
VECTSP_7:def 3;
end;
A15: for v1,v2 be
Vector of V holds (f
. (v1
+ v2))
= ((f
. v1)
+ (f
. v2))
proof
let v1,v2 be
Vector of V;
consider Lv1 be
Linear_Combination of B such that
P1: v1
= (
Sum Lv1) & (f
. v1)
= (Lv1
. u) by
A9;
consider Lv2 be
Linear_Combination of B such that
P2: v2
= (
Sum Lv2) & (f
. v2)
= (Lv2
. u) by
A9;
consider Lv12 be
Linear_Combination of B such that
P3: (v1
+ v2)
= (
Sum Lv12) & (f
. (v1
+ v2))
= (Lv12
. u) by
A9;
(
Carrier Lv1)
c= B & (
Carrier Lv2)
c= B & (
Carrier Lv12)
c= B by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
then
S: Lv12
= (Lv1
+ Lv2) by
P1,
P2,
P3,
Th6,
VECTSP_7:def 3;
(f
. (v1
+ v2))
= (Lv12
. u) by
P3
.= ((Lv1
. u)
+ (Lv2
. u)) by
S,
VECTSP_6: 22
.= ((f
. v1)
+ (f
. v2)) by
P1,
P2;
hence (f
. (v1
+ v2))
= ((f
. v1)
+ (f
. v2));
end;
A15A: (f
. (
0. V))
= (f
. ((
0. V)
+ (
0. V)))
.= ((f
. (
0. V))
+ (f
. (
0. V))) by
A15;
A16: for v be
Vector of V, r be
Element of
INT.Ring holds (f
. (r
* v))
= (r
* (f
. v))
proof
let v be
Vector of V, r be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
per cases ;
suppose r
= (
0.
INT.Ring );
hence (f
. (r
* v))
= (r
* (f
. v)) by
A15A,
ZMODUL01: 1;
end;
suppose
A162: r
<> (
0.
INT.Ring );
consider Lv be
Linear_Combination of B such that
P1: v
= (
Sum Lv) & (f
. v)
= (Lv
. u) by
A9;
consider rLv be
Linear_Combination of B such that
P2: (r
* v)
= (
Sum rLv) & (f
. (r
* v))
= (rLv
. u) by
A9;
(
Carrier Lv)
c= B & (
Carrier rLv)
c= B by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
then (r
* Lv)
= rLv by
A162,
P1,
P2,
Th7,
VECTSP_7:def 3;
hence (f
. (r
* v))
= (r
* (f
. v)) by
P1,
P2,
VECTSP_6:def 9;
end;
end;
take f;
thus thesis by
A9,
A10,
A15,
A16;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let f1,f2 be
Function of V,
INT.Ring ;
assume
A1: (for v be
Vector of V holds ex Lu be
Linear_Combination of B st v
= (
Sum Lu) & (f1
. v)
= (Lu
. u)) & (for v be
Vector of V, Lv be
Linear_Combination of B st v
= (
Sum Lv) holds (f1
. v)
= (Lv
. u)) & (for v1,v2 be
Vector of V holds (f1
. (v1
+ v2))
= ((f1
. v1)
+ (f1
. v2))) & (for v be
Vector of V, r be
Element of
INT.Ring holds (f1
. (r
* v))
= (r
* (f1
. v)));
assume
A2: (for v be
Vector of V holds ex Lu be
Linear_Combination of B st v
= (
Sum Lu) & (f2
. v)
= (Lu
. u)) & (for v be
Vector of V, Lv be
Linear_Combination of B st v
= (
Sum Lv) holds (f2
. v)
= (Lv
. u)) & (for v1,v2 be
Vector of V holds (f2
. (v1
+ v2))
= ((f2
. v1)
+ (f2
. v2))) & (for v be
Vector of V, r be
Element of
INT.Ring holds (f2
. (r
* v))
= (r
* (f2
. v)));
now
let v be
Vector of V;
consider Lu be
Linear_Combination of B such that
A3: v
= (
Sum Lu) & (f1
. v)
= (Lu
. u) by
A1;
thus (f1
. v)
= (f2
. v) by
A2,
A3;
end;
hence f1
= f2 by
FUNCT_2:def 7;
end;
end
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:57
PROJ4: for V be
free
Z_Module, B be
Basis of V, u be
Vector of V holds ((
Coordinate (u,B))
. (
0. V))
=
0
proof
let V be
free
Z_Module, B be
Basis of V, u be
Vector of V;
set f = (
Coordinate (u,B));
(f
. (
0. V))
= (f
. ((
0. V)
+ (
0. V)))
.= ((f
. (
0. V))
+ (f
. (
0. V))) by
defCoord;
hence (f
. (
0. V))
=
0 ;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:58
PROJ5: for V be
free
Z_Module, X be
Basis of V, v be
Vector of V st v
in X & v
<> (
0. V) holds ((
Coordinate (v,X))
. v)
= 1
proof
let V be
free
Z_Module, X be
Basis of V, v be
Vector of V;
assume
AS: v
in X & v
<> (
0. V);
set f = (
Coordinate (v,X));
consider KL be
Linear_Combination of X such that
A1: v
= (
Sum KL) & (f
. v)
= (KL
. v) by
defCoord;
A3: (
Carrier KL)
c= X by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
v
in
{v} by
TARSKI:def 1;
then v
in (
Lin
{v}) by
ZMODUL02: 65;
then
consider Lb be
Linear_Combination of
{v} such that
A4: v
= (
Sum Lb) by
ZMODUL02: 64;
A7: (
Carrier Lb)
c=
{v} by
VECTSP_6:def 4;
{v}
c= X by
AS,
ZFMISC_1: 31;
then (
Carrier Lb)
c= X by
A7;
then
A9: Lb
= KL by
A4,
A1,
A3,
Th5,
VECTSP_7:def 3;
((Lb
. v)
* v)
= v by
A4,
ZMODUL02: 21
.= ((
1.
INT.Ring )
* v) by
VECTSP_1:def 17;
hence (f
. v)
= 1 by
AS,
A1,
A9,
ZMODUL01: 11;
end;
registration
let V be non
trivial
free
Z_Module;
cluster
additive
homogeneous non
constant non
trivial for
Functional of V;
existence
proof
set X = the
Basis of V;
X1: X is
linearly-independent & (
Lin X)
= the ModuleStr of V by
VECTSP_7:def 3;
X
<>
{}
proof
assume X
=
{} ;
then X
= (
{} the
carrier of V);
then
X3: the ModuleStr of V
= (
(0). V) by
X1,
ZMODUL02: 67;
for x,y be
object st x
in the
carrier of V & y
in the
carrier of V holds x
= y
proof
let x,y be
object;
assume x
in the
carrier of V & y
in the
carrier of V;
then
reconsider x1 = x, y1 = y as
Vector of V;
x1
in (
(0). V) & y1
in (
(0). V) by
X3;
then x1
= (
0. V) & y1
= (
0. V) by
ZMODUL02: 66;
hence thesis;
end;
then V is
trivial;
hence contradiction;
end;
then
consider v be
object such that
X2: v
in X by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
reconsider v as
Vector of V by
X2;
X20: v
<> (
0. V) by
X2,
ZMODUL02: 57,
VECTSP_7:def 3;
reconsider f = (
Coordinate (v,X)) as
Function of V,
INT.Ring ;
DM1: (
dom f)
= the
carrier of V by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
J1: (f
. (
0. V))
=
0 by
PROJ4;
A16: (f
. v)
= 1 by
X2,
X20,
PROJ5;
take f;
thus thesis by
A16,
DM1,
J1,
defCoord;
end;
end
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:59
VS10Th28: for V be non
trivial
free
Z_Module, f be non
constant
0-preserving
Functional of V holds ex v be
Vector of V st v
<> (
0. V) & (f
. v)
<> (
0.
INT.Ring )
proof
let V be non
trivial
free
Z_Module, f be non
constant
0-preserving
Functional of V;
A1: (f
. (
0. V))
= (
0.
INT.Ring ) by
HAHNBAN1:def 9;
assume
A2: for v be
Vector of V st v
<> (
0. V) holds (f
. v)
= (
0.
INT.Ring );
now
let x,y be
object;
assume x
in (
dom f) & y
in (
dom f);
then
reconsider v = x, w = y as
Vector of V;
thus (f
. x)
= (f
. v)
.=
0 by
A2,
A1
.= (f
. w) by
A2,
A1
.= (f
. y);
end;
hence contradiction by
FUNCT_1:def 10;
end;
begin
definition
let V,W be
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
::
ZMATRLIN:def12
func
NulForm (V,W) ->
Form of V, W equals (
[:the
carrier of V, the
carrier of W:]
--> (
0.
INT.Ring ));
coherence ;
end
definition
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f,g be
Form of V, W;
::
ZMATRLIN:def13
func f
+ g ->
Form of V, W means
:
BLDef2: for v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds (it
. (v,w))
= ((f
. (v,w))
+ (g
. (v,w)));
existence
proof
set X = the
carrier of V, Y = the
carrier of W;
deffunc
F(
Element of X,
Element of Y) = ((f
. ($1,$2))
+ (g
. ($1,$2)));
consider ff be
Function of
[:X, Y:],
INT.Ring such that
A1: for x be
Element of X holds for y be
Element of Y holds (ff
. (x,y))
=
F(x,y) from
BINOP_1:sch 4;
reconsider ff as
Form of V, W;
take ff;
thus thesis by
A1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let F,G be
Form of V, W such that
A2: for v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds (F
. (v,w))
= ((f
. (v,w))
+ (g
. (v,w))) and
A3: for v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds (G
. (v,w))
= ((f
. (v,w))
+ (g
. (v,w)));
now
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
thus (F
. (v,w))
= ((f
. (v,w))
+ (g
. (v,w))) by
A2
.= (G
. (v,w)) by
A3;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
Form of V, W;
let a be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
::
ZMATRLIN:def14
func a
* f ->
Form of V, W means
:
BLDef3: for v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds (it
. (v,w))
= (a
* (f
. (v,w)));
existence
proof
reconsider aa = a as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
set X = the
carrier of V, Y = the
carrier of W;
deffunc
F(
Element of X,
Element of Y) = (
In ((aa
* (f
. ($1,$2))),the
carrier of
INT.Ring ));
consider ff be
Function of
[:X, Y:],
INT.Ring such that
A1: for x be
Element of X holds for y be
Element of Y holds (ff
. (x,y))
=
F(x,y) from
BINOP_1:sch 4;
reconsider ff as
Form of V, W;
take ff;
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
(ff
. (v,w))
=
F(v,w) by
A1;
then (ff
. (v,w))
= (a
* (f
. (v,w)));
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let F,G be
Form of V, W such that
A2: for v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds (F
. (v,w))
= (a
* (f
. (v,w))) and
A3: for v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds (G
. (v,w))
= (a
* (f
. (v,w)));
now
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
thus (F
. (v,w))
= (a
* (f
. (v,w))) by
A2
.= (G
. (v,w)) by
A3;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
Form of V, W;
::
ZMATRLIN:def15
func
- f ->
Form of V, W means
:
BLDef4: for v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds (it
. (v,w))
= (
- (f
. (v,w)));
existence
proof
set X = the
carrier of V, Y = the
carrier of W;
deffunc
F(
Element of X,
Element of Y) = (
In ((
- (f
. ($1,$2))),the
carrier of
INT.Ring ));
consider ff be
Function of
[:X, Y:],
INT.Ring such that
A1: for x be
Element of X holds for y be
Element of Y holds (ff
. (x,y))
=
F(x,y) from
BINOP_1:sch 4;
reconsider ff as
Form of V, W;
take ff;
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
(ff
. (v,w))
=
F(v,w) by
A1;
then (ff
. (v,w))
= (
- (f
. (v,w)));
hence thesis;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let F,G be
Form of V, W such that
A2: for v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds (F
. (v,w))
= (
- (f
. (v,w))) and
A3: for v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds (G
. (v,w))
= (
- (f
. (v,w)));
now
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
thus (F
. (v,w))
= (
- (f
. (v,w))) by
A2
.= (G
. (v,w)) by
A3;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
Form of V, W;
:: original:
-
redefine
::
ZMATRLIN:def16
func
- f equals ((
- (
1.
INT.Ring ))
* f);
compatibility
proof
let g be
Form of V, W;
thus g
= (
- f) implies g
= ((
- (
1.
INT.Ring ))
* f)
proof
assume
A1: g
= (
- f);
now
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
thus (g
. (v,w))
= (
- (f
. (v,w))) by
A1,
BLDef4
.= ((
- (
1.
INT.Ring ))
* (f
. (v,w)))
.= (((
- (
1.
INT.Ring ))
* f)
. (v,w)) by
BLDef3;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
assume
A2: g
= ((
- (
1.
INT.Ring ))
* f);
now
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
thus (g
. (v,w))
= ((
- (
1.
INT.Ring ))
* (f
. (v,w))) by
A2,
BLDef3
.= (
- (f
. (v,w)))
.= ((
- f)
. (v,w)) by
BLDef4;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f,g be
Form of V, W;
::
ZMATRLIN:def17
func f
- g ->
Form of V, W equals (f
+ (
- g));
correctness ;
end
definition
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f,g be
Form of V, W;
:: original:
-
redefine
::
ZMATRLIN:def18
func f
- g means
:
BLDef7: for v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds (it
. (v,w))
= ((f
. (v,w))
- (g
. (v,w)));
compatibility
proof
let h be
Form of V, W;
thus h
= (f
- g) implies for v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds (h
. (v,w))
= ((f
. (v,w))
- (g
. (v,w)))
proof
assume
A1: h
= (f
- g);
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
thus (h
. (v,w))
= ((f
. (v,w))
+ ((
- g)
. (v,w))) by
A1,
BLDef2
.= ((f
. (v,w))
- (g
. (v,w))) by
BLDef4;
end;
assume
A2: for v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds (h
. (v,w))
= ((f
. (v,w))
- (g
. (v,w)));
now
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
thus (h
. (v,w))
= ((f
. (v,w))
- (g
. (v,w))) by
A2
.= ((f
. (v,w))
+ ((
- g)
. (v,w))) by
BLDef4
.= ((f
- g)
. (v,w)) by
BLDef2;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f,g be
Form of V, W;
:: original:
+
redefine
func f
+ g;
commutativity
proof
let f,g be
Form of V, W;
now
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
thus ((f
+ g)
. (v,w))
= ((f
. (v,w))
+ (g
. (v,w))) by
BLDef2
.= ((g
+ f)
. (v,w)) by
BLDef2;
end;
hence (f
+ g)
= (g
+ f);
end;
end
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:60
for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W holds (f
+ (
NulForm (V,W)))
= f
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W;
set g = (
NulForm (V,W));
now
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
thus ((f
+ g)
. (v,w))
= ((f
. (v,w))
+ (g
. (v,w))) by
BLDef2
.= ((f
. (v,w))
+
0 ) by
FUNCOP_1: 70
.= (f
. (v,w));
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:61
for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f,g,h be
Form of V, W holds ((f
+ g)
+ h)
= (f
+ (g
+ h))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f,g,h be
Form of V, W;
now
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
thus (((f
+ g)
+ h)
. (v,w))
= (((f
+ g)
. (v,w))
+ (h
. (v,w))) by
BLDef2
.= (((f
. (v,w))
+ (g
. (v,w)))
+ (h
. (v,w))) by
BLDef2
.= ((f
. (v,w))
+ ((g
. (v,w))
+ (h
. (v,w))))
.= ((f
. (v,w))
+ ((g
+ h)
. (v,w))) by
BLDef2
.= ((f
+ (g
+ h))
. (v,w)) by
BLDef2;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:62
for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W holds (f
- f)
= (
NulForm (V,W))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W;
now
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
thus ((f
- f)
. (v,w))
= ((f
. (v,w))
- (f
. (v,w))) by
BLDef7
.= ((
NulForm (V,W))
. (v,w)) by
FUNCOP_1: 70;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:63
for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , a be
Element of
INT.Ring , f,g be
Form of V, W holds (a
* (f
+ g))
= ((a
* f)
+ (a
* g))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , r be
Element of
INT.Ring , f,g be
Form of V, W;
now
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
thus ((r
* (f
+ g))
. (v,w))
= (r
* ((f
+ g)
. (v,w))) by
BLDef3
.= (r
* ((f
. (v,w))
+ (g
. (v,w)))) by
BLDef2
.= ((r
* (f
. (v,w)))
+ (r
* (g
. (v,w))))
.= (((r
* f)
. (v,w))
+ (r
* (g
. (v,w)))) by
BLDef3
.= (((r
* f)
. (v,w))
+ ((r
* g)
. (v,w))) by
BLDef3
.= (((r
* f)
+ (r
* g))
. (v,w)) by
BLDef2;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:64
for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , a,b be
Element of
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W holds ((a
+ b)
* f)
= ((a
* f)
+ (b
* f))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , r,s be
Element of
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W;
now
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
thus (((r
+ s)
* f)
. (v,w))
= ((r
+ s)
* (f
. (v,w))) by
BLDef3
.= ((r
* (f
. (v,w)))
+ (s
* (f
. (v,w))))
.= (((r
* f)
. (v,w))
+ (s
* (f
. (v,w)))) by
BLDef3
.= (((r
* f)
. (v,w))
+ ((s
* f)
. (v,w))) by
BLDef3
.= (((r
* f)
+ (s
* f))
. (v,w)) by
BLDef2;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:65
for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , a,b be
Element of
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W holds ((a
* b)
* f)
= (a
* (b
* f))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , r,s be
Element of
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W;
now
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
thus (((r
* s)
* f)
. (v,w))
= ((r
* s)
* (f
. (v,w))) by
BLDef3
.= (r
* (s
* (f
. (v,w))))
.= (r
* ((s
* f)
. (v,w))) by
BLDef3
.= ((r
* (s
* f))
. (v,w)) by
BLDef3;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:66
for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W holds ((
1.
INT.Ring )
* f)
= f
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W;
now
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
thus (((
1.
INT.Ring )
* f)
. (v,w))
= ((
1.
INT.Ring )
* (f
. (v,w))) by
BLDef3
.= (f
. (v,w));
end;
hence thesis;
end;
definition
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
Form of V, W, v be
Vector of V;
::
ZMATRLIN:def19
func
FunctionalFAF (f,v) ->
Functional of W equals ((
curry f)
. v);
correctness ;
end
definition
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
Form of V, W, w be
Vector of W;
::
ZMATRLIN:def20
func
FunctionalSAF (f,w) ->
Functional of V equals ((
curry' f)
. w);
correctness ;
end
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:67
BLTh8: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W, v be
Vector of V holds (
dom (
FunctionalFAF (f,v)))
= the
carrier of W & (
rng (
FunctionalFAF (f,v)))
c= the
carrier of
INT.Ring & for w be
Vector of W holds ((
FunctionalFAF (f,v))
. w)
= (f
. (v,w))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
Form of V, W, v be
Vector of V;
set F = (
FunctionalFAF (f,v));
(
dom f)
=
[:the
carrier of V, the
carrier of W:] by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A1: ex g be
Function st ((
curry f)
. v)
= g & (
dom g)
= the
carrier of W & (
rng g)
c= (
rng f) & for y be
object st y
in the
carrier of W holds (g
. y)
= (f
. (v,y)) by
FUNCT_5: 29;
hence (
dom F)
= the
carrier of W & (
rng F)
c= the
carrier of
INT.Ring ;
let y be
Vector of W;
thus thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:68
BLTh9: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W, w be
Vector of W holds (
dom (
FunctionalSAF (f,w)))
= the
carrier of V & (
rng (
FunctionalSAF (f,w)))
c= the
carrier of
INT.Ring & for v be
Vector of V holds ((
FunctionalSAF (f,w))
. v)
= (f
. (v,w))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W, w be
Vector of W;
set F = (
FunctionalSAF (f,w));
(
dom f)
=
[:the
carrier of V, the
carrier of W:] by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A1: ex g be
Function st ((
curry' f)
. w)
= g & (
dom g)
= the
carrier of V & (
rng g)
c= (
rng f) & for y be
object st y
in the
carrier of V holds (g
. y)
= (f
. (y,w)) by
FUNCT_5: 32;
hence (
dom F)
= the
carrier of V & (
rng F)
c= the
carrier of
INT.Ring ;
let v be
Vector of V;
thus thesis by
A1;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:69
BLTh10: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , v be
Vector of V holds (
FunctionalFAF ((
NulForm (V,W)),v))
= (
0Functional W)
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , v be
Vector of V;
set N = (
NulForm (V,W));
now
let y be
Vector of W;
thus ((
FunctionalFAF (N,v))
. y)
= (N
. (v,y)) by
BLTh8
.= (
0.
INT.Ring ) by
FUNCOP_1: 70
.= ((
0Functional W)
. y);
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:70
BLTh11: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , w be
Vector of W holds (
FunctionalSAF ((
NulForm (V,W)),w))
= (
0Functional V)
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , y be
Vector of W;
set N = (
NulForm (V,W));
now
let v be
Vector of V;
thus ((
FunctionalSAF (N,y))
. v)
= (N
. (v,y)) by
BLTh9
.= (
0.
INT.Ring ) by
FUNCOP_1: 70
.= ((
0Functional V)
. v);
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:71
BLTh12: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f,g be
Form of V, W, w be
Vector of W holds (
FunctionalSAF ((f
+ g),w))
= ((
FunctionalSAF (f,w))
+ (
FunctionalSAF (g,w)))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f,g be
Form of V, W, w be
Vector of W;
now
let v be
Vector of V;
thus ((
FunctionalSAF ((f
+ g),w))
. v)
= ((f
+ g)
. (v,w)) by
BLTh9
.= ((f
. (v,w))
+ (g
. (v,w))) by
BLDef2
.= (((
FunctionalSAF (f,w))
. v)
+ (g
. (v,w))) by
BLTh9
.= (((
FunctionalSAF (f,w))
. v)
+ ((
FunctionalSAF (g,w))
. v)) by
BLTh9
.= (((
FunctionalSAF (f,w))
+ (
FunctionalSAF (g,w)))
. v) by
HAHNBAN1:def 3;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:72
BLTh13: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f,g be
Form of V, W, v be
Vector of V holds (
FunctionalFAF ((f
+ g),v))
= ((
FunctionalFAF (f,v))
+ (
FunctionalFAF (g,v)))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f,g be
Form of V, W, w be
Vector of V;
now
let v be
Vector of W;
thus ((
FunctionalFAF ((f
+ g),w))
. v)
= ((f
+ g)
. (w,v)) by
BLTh8
.= ((f
. (w,v))
+ (g
. (w,v))) by
BLDef2
.= (((
FunctionalFAF (f,w))
. v)
+ (g
. (w,v))) by
BLTh8
.= (((
FunctionalFAF (f,w))
. v)
+ ((
FunctionalFAF (g,w))
. v)) by
BLTh8
.= (((
FunctionalFAF (f,w))
+ (
FunctionalFAF (g,w)))
. v) by
HAHNBAN1:def 3;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:73
BLTh14: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W, a be
Element of
INT.Ring , w be
Vector of W holds (
FunctionalSAF ((a
* f),w))
= (a
* (
FunctionalSAF (f,w)))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W, a be
Element of
INT.Ring , w be
Vector of W;
now
let v be
Vector of V;
thus ((
FunctionalSAF ((a
* f),w))
. v)
= ((a
* f)
. (v,w)) by
BLTh9
.= (a
* (f
. (v,w))) by
BLDef3
.= (a
* ((
FunctionalSAF (f,w))
. v)) by
BLTh9
.= ((a
* (
FunctionalSAF (f,w)))
. v) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:74
BLTh15: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W, a be
Element of
INT.Ring , v be
Vector of V holds (
FunctionalFAF ((a
* f),v))
= (a
* (
FunctionalFAF (f,v)))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W, a be
Element of
INT.Ring , w be
Vector of V;
now
let v be
Vector of W;
thus ((
FunctionalFAF ((a
* f),w))
. v)
= ((a
* f)
. (w,v)) by
BLTh8
.= (a
* (f
. (w,v))) by
BLDef3
.= (a
* ((
FunctionalFAF (f,w))
. v)) by
BLTh8
.= ((a
* (
FunctionalFAF (f,w)))
. v) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:75
for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W, w be
Vector of W holds (
FunctionalSAF ((
- f),w))
= (
- (
FunctionalSAF (f,w)))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W, w be
Vector of W;
now
let v be
Vector of V;
thus ((
FunctionalSAF ((
- f),w))
. v)
= ((
- f)
. (v,w)) by
BLTh9
.= (
- (f
. (v,w))) by
BLDef4
.= (
- ((
FunctionalSAF (f,w))
. v)) by
BLTh9
.= ((
- (
FunctionalSAF (f,w)))
. v) by
HAHNBAN1:def 4;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:76
for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W, v be
Vector of V holds (
FunctionalFAF ((
- f),v))
= (
- (
FunctionalFAF (f,v)))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W, w be
Vector of V;
now
let v be
Vector of W;
thus ((
FunctionalFAF ((
- f),w))
. v)
= ((
- f)
. (w,v)) by
BLTh8
.= (
- (f
. (w,v))) by
BLDef4
.= (
- ((
FunctionalFAF (f,w))
. v)) by
BLTh8
.= ((
- (
FunctionalFAF (f,w)))
. v) by
HAHNBAN1:def 4;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:77
for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f,g be
Form of V, W, w be
Vector of W holds (
FunctionalSAF ((f
- g),w))
= ((
FunctionalSAF (f,w))
- (
FunctionalSAF (g,w)))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f,g be
Form of V, W, w be
Vector of W;
now
let v be
Vector of V;
thus ((
FunctionalSAF ((f
- g),w))
. v)
= ((f
- g)
. (v,w)) by
BLTh9
.= ((f
. (v,w))
- (g
. (v,w))) by
BLDef7
.= (((
FunctionalSAF (f,w))
. v)
- (g
. (v,w))) by
BLTh9
.= (((
FunctionalSAF (f,w))
. v)
- ((
FunctionalSAF (g,w))
. v)) by
BLTh9
.= (((
FunctionalSAF (f,w))
. v)
+ ((
- (
FunctionalSAF (g,w)))
. v)) by
HAHNBAN1:def 4
.= (((
FunctionalSAF (f,w))
- (
FunctionalSAF (g,w)))
. v) by
HAHNBAN1:def 3;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:78
for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f,g be
Form of V, W, v be
Vector of V holds (
FunctionalFAF ((f
- g),v))
= ((
FunctionalFAF (f,v))
- (
FunctionalFAF (g,v)))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f,g be
Form of V, W, w be
Vector of V;
now
let v be
Vector of W;
thus ((
FunctionalFAF ((f
- g),w))
. v)
= ((f
- g)
. (w,v)) by
BLTh8
.= ((f
. (w,v))
- (g
. (w,v))) by
BLDef7
.= (((
FunctionalFAF (f,w))
. v)
- (g
. (w,v))) by
BLTh8
.= (((
FunctionalFAF (f,w))
. v)
- ((
FunctionalFAF (g,w))
. v)) by
BLTh8
.= (((
FunctionalFAF (f,w))
. v)
+ ((
- (
FunctionalFAF (g,w)))
. v)) by
HAHNBAN1:def 4
.= (((
FunctionalFAF (f,w))
- (
FunctionalFAF (g,w)))
. v) by
HAHNBAN1:def 3;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
definition
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
Functional of V;
let g be
Functional of W;
::
ZMATRLIN:def21
func
FormFunctional (f,g) ->
Form of V, W means
:
BLDef10: for v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds (it
. (v,w))
= ((f
. v)
* (g
. w));
existence
proof
deffunc
F(
Vector of V,
Vector of W) = ((f
. $1)
* (g
. $2));
set c1 = the
carrier of V, c2 = the
carrier of W;
consider i be
Function of
[:c1, c2:], the
carrier of
INT.Ring such that
A1: for x be
Element of c1 holds for y be
Element of c2 holds (i
. (x,y))
=
F(x,y) from
BINOP_1:sch 4;
reconsider i as
Form of V, W;
take i;
thus thesis by
A1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let F1,F2 be
Form of V, W such that
A2: for v be
Vector of V, y be
Vector of W holds (F1
. (v,y))
= ((f
. v)
* (g
. y)) and
A3: for v be
Vector of V, y be
Vector of W holds (F2
. (v,y))
= ((f
. v)
* (g
. y));
now
let v be
Vector of V, y be
Vector of W;
thus (F1
. (v,y))
= ((f
. v)
* (g
. y)) by
A2
.= (F2
. (v,y)) by
A3;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
end
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:79
BLTh20: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Functional of V, v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds ((
FormFunctional (f,(
0Functional W)))
. (v,w))
=
0
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
Functional of V, v be
Vector of V, y be
Vector of W;
set 0F = (
0Functional W), F = (
FormFunctional (f,0F));
thus (F
. (v,y))
= ((f
. v)
* (0F
. y)) by
BLDef10
.= ((f
. v)
*
0 )
.=
0 ;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:80
BLTh21: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , g be
Functional of W, v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds ((
FormFunctional ((
0Functional V),g))
. (v,w))
=
0
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let h be
Functional of W, v be
Vector of V, y be
Vector of W;
set 0F = (
0Functional V), F = (
FormFunctional (0F,h));
thus (F
. (v,y))
= ((0F
. v)
* (h
. y)) by
BLDef10
.= (
0
* (h
. y))
.=
0 ;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:81
for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Functional of V holds (
FormFunctional (f,(
0Functional W)))
= (
NulForm (V,W))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Functional of V;
now
let v be
Vector of V, y be
Vector of W;
thus ((
FormFunctional (f,(
0Functional W)))
. (v,y))
=
0 by
BLTh20
.= ((
NulForm (V,W))
. (v,y)) by
FUNCOP_1: 70;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:82
for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , g be
Functional of W holds (
FormFunctional ((
0Functional V),g))
= (
NulForm (V,W))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , h be
Functional of W;
now
let v be
Vector of V, y be
Vector of W;
thus ((
FormFunctional ((
0Functional V),h))
. (v,y))
=
0 by
BLTh21
.= ((
NulForm (V,W))
. (v,y)) by
FUNCOP_1: 70;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:83
BLTh24: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Functional of V, g be
Functional of W, v be
Vector of V holds (
FunctionalFAF ((
FormFunctional (f,g)),v))
= ((f
. v)
* g)
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
Functional of V, h be
Functional of W, v be
Vector of V;
set F = (
FormFunctional (f,h)), FF = (
FunctionalFAF (F,v));
now
let y be
Vector of W;
thus (FF
. y)
= (F
. (v,y)) by
BLTh8
.= ((f
. v)
* (h
. y)) by
BLDef10
.= (((f
. v)
* h)
. y) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:84
BLTh25: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Functional of V, g be
Functional of W, w be
Vector of W holds (
FunctionalSAF ((
FormFunctional (f,g)),w))
= ((g
. w)
* f)
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
Functional of V, h be
Functional of W, y be
Vector of W;
set F = (
FormFunctional (f,h)), FF = (
FunctionalSAF (F,y));
now
let v be
Vector of V;
thus (FF
. v)
= (F
. (v,y)) by
BLTh9
.= ((f
. v)
* (h
. y)) by
BLDef10
.= (((h
. y)
* f)
. v) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6;
end;
hence thesis by
FUNCT_2: 63;
end;
definition
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
Form of V, W;
::
ZMATRLIN:def22
attr f is
additiveFAF means
:
BLDef11: for v be
Vector of V holds (
FunctionalFAF (f,v)) is
additive;
::
ZMATRLIN:def23
attr f is
additiveSAF means
:
BLDef12: for w be
Vector of W holds (
FunctionalSAF (f,w)) is
additive;
end
definition
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
Form of V, W;
::
ZMATRLIN:def24
attr f is
homogeneousFAF means
:
BLDef13: for v be
Vector of V holds (
FunctionalFAF (f,v)) is
homogeneous;
::
ZMATRLIN:def25
attr f is
homogeneousSAF means
:
BLDef14: for w be
Vector of W holds (
FunctionalSAF (f,w)) is
homogeneous;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
cluster (
NulForm (V,W)) ->
additiveFAF;
coherence
proof
let v be
Vector of V;
(
FunctionalFAF ((
NulForm (V,W)),v))
= (
0Functional W) by
BLTh10;
hence thesis;
end;
cluster (
NulForm (V,W)) ->
additiveSAF;
coherence
proof
let y be
Vector of W;
(
FunctionalSAF ((
NulForm (V,W)),y))
= (
0Functional V) by
BLTh11;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
cluster (
NulForm (V,W)) ->
homogeneousFAF;
coherence
proof
let v be
Vector of V;
(
FunctionalFAF ((
NulForm (V,W)),v))
= (
0Functional W) by
BLTh10;
hence thesis;
end;
cluster (
NulForm (V,W)) ->
homogeneousSAF;
coherence
proof
let y be
Vector of W;
(
FunctionalSAF ((
NulForm (V,W)),y))
= (
0Functional V) by
BLTh11;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
cluster
additiveFAF
homogeneousFAF
additiveSAF
homogeneousSAF for
Form of V, W;
existence
proof
take (
NulForm (V,W));
thus thesis;
end;
end
definition
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
mode
bilinear-Form of V,W is
additiveSAF
homogeneousSAF
additiveFAF
homogeneousFAF
Form of V, W;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
additiveFAF
Form of V, W, v be
Vector of V;
cluster (
FunctionalFAF (f,v)) ->
additive;
coherence by
BLDef11;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
additiveSAF
Form of V, W, w be
Vector of W;
cluster (
FunctionalSAF (f,w)) ->
additive;
coherence by
BLDef12;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
homogeneousFAF
Form of V, W, v be
Vector of V;
cluster (
FunctionalFAF (f,v)) ->
homogeneous;
coherence by
BLDef13;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
homogeneousSAF
Form of V, W, w be
Vector of W;
cluster (
FunctionalSAF (f,w)) ->
homogeneous;
coherence by
BLDef14;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
Functional of V, g be
additive
Functional of W;
cluster (
FormFunctional (f,g)) ->
additiveFAF;
coherence
proof
let v be
Vector of V;
set fg = (
FormFunctional (f,g)), F = (
FunctionalFAF (fg,v));
let y,y9 be
Vector of W;
A1: F
= ((f
. v)
* g) by
BLTh24;
hence (F
. (y
+ y9))
= ((f
. v)
* (g
. (y
+ y9))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6
.= ((f
. v)
* ((g
. y)
+ (g
. y9))) by
VECTSP_1:def 20
.= (((f
. v)
* (g
. y))
+ ((f
. v)
* (g
. y9)))
.= (((f
. v)
* (g
. y))
+ (F
. y9)) by
A1,
HAHNBAN1:def 6
.= ((F
. y)
+ (F
. y9)) by
A1,
HAHNBAN1:def 6;
end;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
additive
Functional of V, g be
Functional of W;
cluster (
FormFunctional (f,g)) ->
additiveSAF;
coherence
proof
let y be
Vector of W;
set fg = (
FormFunctional (f,g)), F = (
FunctionalSAF (fg,y));
F
= ((g
. y)
* f) by
BLTh25;
hence thesis;
end;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
Functional of V, g be
homogeneous
Functional of W;
cluster (
FormFunctional (f,g)) ->
homogeneousFAF;
coherence
proof
let v be
Vector of V;
set fg = (
FormFunctional (f,g)), F = (
FunctionalFAF (fg,v));
let y be
Vector of W, r be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
A1: F
= ((f
. v)
* g) by
BLTh24;
hence (F
. (r
* y))
= ((f
. v)
* (g
. (r
* y))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6
.= ((f
. v)
* (r
* (g
. y))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 8
.= (r
* ((f
. v)
* (g
. y)))
.= (r
* (F
. y)) by
A1,
HAHNBAN1:def 6;
end;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
homogeneous
Functional of V, g be
Functional of W;
cluster (
FormFunctional (f,g)) ->
homogeneousSAF;
coherence
proof
let y be
Vector of W;
set fg = (
FormFunctional (f,g));
set F = (
FunctionalSAF (fg,y));
let v be
Vector of V, r be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
A1: F
= ((g
. y)
* f) by
BLTh25;
hence (F
. (r
* v))
= ((g
. y)
* (f
. (r
* v))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6
.= ((g
. y)
* (r
* (f
. v))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 8
.= (r
* ((g
. y)
* (f
. v)))
.= (r
* (F
. v)) by
A1,
HAHNBAN1:def 6;
end;
end
registration
let V be non
trivial
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , W be
Z_Module;
let f be
Functional of V, g be
Functional of W;
cluster (
FormFunctional (f,g)) -> non
trivial;
coherence
proof
set fg = (
FormFunctional (f,g));
set w = the
Vector of W;
consider v be
Vector of V such that
A1: v
<> (
0. V) by
STRUCT_0:def 18;
A2:
[(
0. V), (
0. W)]
<>
[v, w] by
A1,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
(
dom fg)
=
[:the
carrier of V, the
carrier of W:] by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A3:
[
[(
0. V), (
0. W)], (fg
. ((
0. V),(
0. W)))]
in fg &
[
[v, w], (fg
. (v,w))]
in fg by
FUNCT_1: 1;
assume
A4: fg is
trivial;
per cases by
A4,
ZFMISC_1: 131;
suppose fg
=
{} ;
hence contradiction;
end;
suppose ex x be
object st fg
=
{x};
then
consider x be
object such that
A5: fg
=
{x};
[
[(
0. V), (
0. W)], (fg
. ((
0. V),(
0. W)))]
= x & x
=
[
[v, w], (fg
. (v,w))] by
A3,
A5,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence contradiction by
A2,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
end;
end
registration
let V be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , W be non
trivial
Z_Module;
let f be
Functional of V, g be
Functional of W;
cluster (
FormFunctional (f,g)) -> non
trivial;
coherence
proof
set fg = (
FormFunctional (f,g));
set v = the
Vector of V;
consider w be
Vector of W such that
A1: w
<> (
0. W) by
STRUCT_0:def 18;
A2:
[(
0. V), (
0. W)]
<>
[v, w] by
A1,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
(
dom fg)
=
[:the
carrier of V, the
carrier of W:] by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A3:
[
[(
0. V), (
0. W)], (fg
. ((
0. V),(
0. W)))]
in fg &
[
[v, w], (fg
. (v,w))]
in fg by
FUNCT_1: 1;
assume
A4: fg is
trivial;
per cases by
A4,
ZFMISC_1: 131;
suppose fg
=
{} ;
hence contradiction;
end;
suppose ex x be
object st fg
=
{x};
then
consider x be
object such that
A5: fg
=
{x};
[
[(
0. V), (
0. W)], (fg
. ((
0. V),(
0. W)))]
= x & x
=
[
[v, w], (fg
. (v,w))] by
A3,
A5,
TARSKI:def 1;
hence contradiction by
A2,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
end;
end
registration
let V,W be non
trivial
free
Z_Module;
let f be non
constant
0-preserving
Functional of V, g be non
constant
0-preserving
Functional of W;
cluster (
FormFunctional (f,g)) -> non
constant;
coherence
proof
set fg = (
FormFunctional (f,g));
consider v be
Vector of V such that v
<> (
0. V) and
A1: (f
. v)
<>
0 by
VS10Th28;
consider w be
Vector of W such that w
<> (
0. W) and
A2: (g
. w)
<>
0 by
VS10Th28;
(fg
. (v,w))
= ((f
. v)
* (g
. w)) by
BLDef10;
then
A3: (
dom fg)
=
[:the
carrier of V, the
carrier of W:] & (fg
. (v,w))
<>
0 by
A1,
A2,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
(fg
. ((
0. V),(
0. W)))
= ((f
. (
0. V))
* (g
. (
0. W))) by
BLDef10
.= ((
0.
INT.Ring )
* (g
. (
0. W))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 9
.= (
0.
INT.Ring );
hence thesis by
A3,
BINOP_1: 19;
end;
end
registration
let V,W be non
trivial
free
Z_Module;
cluster non
trivial non
constant
additiveFAF
homogeneousFAF
additiveSAF
homogeneousSAF for
Form of V, W;
existence
proof
set f = the non
constant non
trivial
linear-Functional of V, g = the non
constant non
trivial
linear-Functional of W;
take (
FormFunctional (f,g));
thus thesis;
end;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f,g be
additiveSAF
Form of V, W;
cluster (f
+ g) ->
additiveSAF;
correctness
proof
let w be
Vector of W;
set Ffg = (
FunctionalSAF ((f
+ g),w)), Ff = (
FunctionalSAF (f,w));
set Fg = (
FunctionalSAF (g,w));
let v,y be
Vector of V;
A1: Ff is
additive;
A2: Fg is
additive;
thus (Ffg
. (v
+ y))
= ((Ff
+ Fg)
. (v
+ y)) by
BLTh12
.= ((Ff
. (v
+ y))
+ (Fg
. (v
+ y))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 3
.= (((Ff
. v)
+ (Ff
. y))
+ (Fg
. (v
+ y))) by
A1
.= (((Ff
. v)
+ (Ff
. y))
+ ((Fg
. v)
+ (Fg
. y))) by
A2
.= ((((Ff
. v)
+ (Fg
. v))
+ (Ff
. y))
+ (Fg
. y))
.= ((((Ff
+ Fg)
. v)
+ (Ff
. y))
+ (Fg
. y)) by
HAHNBAN1:def 3
.= (((Ff
+ Fg)
. v)
+ ((Ff
. y)
+ (Fg
. y)))
.= (((Ff
+ Fg)
. v)
+ ((Ff
+ Fg)
. y)) by
HAHNBAN1:def 3
.= ((Ffg
. v)
+ ((Ff
+ Fg)
. y)) by
BLTh12
.= ((Ffg
. v)
+ (Ffg
. y)) by
BLTh12;
end;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f,g be
additiveFAF
Form of V, W;
cluster (f
+ g) ->
additiveFAF;
correctness
proof
let w be
Vector of V;
set Ffg = (
FunctionalFAF ((f
+ g),w)), Ff = (
FunctionalFAF (f,w));
set Fg = (
FunctionalFAF (g,w));
let v,y be
Vector of W;
A1: Ff is
additive;
A2: Fg is
additive;
thus (Ffg
. (v
+ y))
= ((Ff
+ Fg)
. (v
+ y)) by
BLTh13
.= ((Ff
. (v
+ y))
+ (Fg
. (v
+ y))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 3
.= (((Ff
. v)
+ (Ff
. y))
+ (Fg
. (v
+ y))) by
A1
.= (((Ff
. v)
+ (Ff
. y))
+ ((Fg
. v)
+ (Fg
. y))) by
A2
.= ((((Ff
. v)
+ (Fg
. v))
+ (Ff
. y))
+ (Fg
. y))
.= ((((Ff
+ Fg)
. v)
+ (Ff
. y))
+ (Fg
. y)) by
HAHNBAN1:def 3
.= (((Ff
+ Fg)
. v)
+ ((Ff
. y)
+ (Fg
. y)))
.= (((Ff
+ Fg)
. v)
+ ((Ff
+ Fg)
. y)) by
HAHNBAN1:def 3
.= ((Ffg
. v)
+ ((Ff
+ Fg)
. y)) by
BLTh13
.= ((Ffg
. v)
+ (Ffg
. y)) by
BLTh13;
end;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
additiveSAF
Form of V, W;
let a be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
cluster (a
* f) ->
additiveSAF;
correctness
proof
let w be
Vector of W;
set Ffg = (
FunctionalSAF ((a
* f),w)), Ff = (
FunctionalSAF (f,w));
let v,y be
Vector of V;
A1: Ff is
additive;
thus (Ffg
. (v
+ y))
= ((a
* Ff)
. (v
+ y)) by
BLTh14
.= (a
* (Ff
. (v
+ y))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6
.= (a
* ((Ff
. v)
+ (Ff
. y))) by
A1
.= ((a
* (Ff
. v))
+ (a
* (Ff
. y)))
.= (((a
* Ff)
. v)
+ (a
* (Ff
. y))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6
.= (((a
* Ff)
. v)
+ ((a
* Ff)
. y)) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6
.= ((Ffg
. v)
+ ((a
* Ff)
. y)) by
BLTh14
.= ((Ffg
. v)
+ (Ffg
. y)) by
BLTh14;
end;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
additiveFAF
Form of V, W;
let a be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
cluster (a
* f) ->
additiveFAF;
correctness
proof
let w be
Vector of V;
set Ffg = (
FunctionalFAF ((a
* f),w)), Ff = (
FunctionalFAF (f,w));
let v,y be
Vector of W;
A1: Ff is
additive;
thus (Ffg
. (v
+ y))
= ((a
* Ff)
. (v
+ y)) by
BLTh15
.= (a
* (Ff
. (v
+ y))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6
.= (a
* ((Ff
. v)
+ (Ff
. y))) by
A1
.= ((a
* (Ff
. v))
+ (a
* (Ff
. y)))
.= (((a
* Ff)
. v)
+ (a
* (Ff
. y))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6
.= (((a
* Ff)
. v)
+ ((a
* Ff)
. y)) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6
.= ((Ffg
. v)
+ ((a
* Ff)
. y)) by
BLTh15
.= ((Ffg
. v)
+ (Ffg
. y)) by
BLTh15;
end;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
additiveSAF
Form of V, W;
cluster (
- f) ->
additiveSAF;
correctness ;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
additiveFAF
Form of V, W;
cluster (
- f) ->
additiveFAF;
correctness ;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f,g be
additiveSAF
Form of V, W;
cluster (f
- g) ->
additiveSAF;
correctness ;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f,g be
additiveFAF
Form of V, W;
cluster (f
- g) ->
additiveFAF;
correctness ;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f,g be
homogeneousSAF
Form of V, W;
cluster (f
+ g) ->
homogeneousSAF;
correctness
proof
let w be
Vector of W;
set Ffg = (
FunctionalSAF ((f
+ g),w)), Ff = (
FunctionalSAF (f,w));
set Fg = (
FunctionalSAF (g,w));
let v be
Vector of V, a be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
thus (Ffg
. (a
* v))
= ((Ff
+ Fg)
. (a
* v)) by
BLTh12
.= ((Ff
. (a
* v))
+ (Fg
. (a
* v))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 3
.= ((a
* (Ff
. v))
+ (Fg
. (a
* v))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 8
.= ((a
* (Ff
. v))
+ (a
* (Fg
. v))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 8
.= (a
* ((Ff
. v)
+ (Fg
. v)))
.= (a
* ((Ff
+ Fg)
. v)) by
HAHNBAN1:def 3
.= (a
* (Ffg
. v)) by
BLTh12;
end;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f,g be
homogeneousFAF
Form of V, W;
cluster (f
+ g) ->
homogeneousFAF;
correctness
proof
let w be
Vector of V;
set Ffg = (
FunctionalFAF ((f
+ g),w)), Ff = (
FunctionalFAF (f,w));
set Fg = (
FunctionalFAF (g,w));
let v be
Vector of W, a be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
thus (Ffg
. (a
* v))
= ((Ff
+ Fg)
. (a
* v)) by
BLTh13
.= ((Ff
. (a
* v))
+ (Fg
. (a
* v))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 3
.= ((a
* (Ff
. v))
+ (Fg
. (a
* v))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 8
.= ((a
* (Ff
. v))
+ (a
* (Fg
. v))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 8
.= (a
* ((Ff
. v)
+ (Fg
. v)))
.= (a
* ((Ff
+ Fg)
. v)) by
HAHNBAN1:def 3
.= (a
* (Ffg
. v)) by
BLTh13;
end;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
homogeneousSAF
Form of V, W;
let a be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
cluster (a
* f) ->
homogeneousSAF;
correctness
proof
let w be
Vector of W;
set Ffg = (
FunctionalSAF ((a
* f),w)), Ff = (
FunctionalSAF (f,w));
let v be
Vector of V, b be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
thus (Ffg
. (b
* v))
= ((a
* Ff)
. (b
* v)) by
BLTh14
.= (a
* (Ff
. (b
* v))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6
.= (a
* (b
* (Ff
. v))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 8
.= (b
* (a
* (Ff
. v)))
.= (b
* ((a
* Ff)
. v)) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6
.= (b
* (Ffg
. v)) by
BLTh14;
end;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
homogeneousFAF
Form of V, W;
let a be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
cluster (a
* f) ->
homogeneousFAF;
correctness
proof
let w be
Vector of V;
set Ffg = (
FunctionalFAF ((a
* f),w)), Ff = (
FunctionalFAF (f,w));
let v be
Vector of W, b be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
thus (Ffg
. (b
* v))
= ((a
* Ff)
. (b
* v)) by
BLTh15
.= (a
* (Ff
. (b
* v))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6
.= (a
* (b
* (Ff
. v))) by
HAHNBAN1:def 8
.= (b
* (a
* (Ff
. v)))
.= (b
* ((a
* Ff)
. v)) by
HAHNBAN1:def 6
.= (b
* (Ffg
. v)) by
BLTh15;
end;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
homogeneousSAF
Form of V, W;
cluster (
- f) ->
homogeneousSAF;
correctness ;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
homogeneousFAF
Form of V, W;
cluster (
- f) ->
homogeneousFAF;
correctness ;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f,g be
homogeneousSAF
Form of V, W;
cluster (f
- g) ->
homogeneousSAF;
correctness ;
end
registration
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f,g be
homogeneousFAF
Form of V, W;
cluster (f
- g) ->
homogeneousFAF;
correctness ;
end
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:85
BLTh26: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , v,u be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W, f be
Form of V, W st f is
additiveSAF holds (f
. ((v
+ u),w))
= ((f
. (v,w))
+ (f
. (u,w)))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let v,w be
Vector of V, y be
Vector of W, f be
Form of V, W;
set F = (
FunctionalSAF (f,y));
assume f is
additiveSAF;
then
A1: F is
additive;
thus (f
. ((v
+ w),y))
= (F
. (v
+ w)) by
BLTh9
.= ((F
. v)
+ (F
. w)) by
A1
.= ((f
. (v,y))
+ (F
. w)) by
BLTh9
.= ((f
. (v,y))
+ (f
. (w,y))) by
BLTh9;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:86
BLTh27: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , v be
Vector of V, u,w be
Vector of W, f be
Form of V, W st f is
additiveFAF holds (f
. (v,(u
+ w)))
= ((f
. (v,u))
+ (f
. (v,w)))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let v be
Vector of V, y,z be
Vector of W, f be
Form of V, W;
set F = (
FunctionalFAF (f,v));
assume f is
additiveFAF;
then
A1: F is
additive;
thus (f
. (v,(y
+ z)))
= (F
. (y
+ z)) by
BLTh8
.= ((F
. y)
+ (F
. z)) by
A1
.= ((f
. (v,y))
+ (F
. z)) by
BLTh8
.= ((f
. (v,y))
+ (f
. (v,z))) by
BLTh8;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:87
BLTh28: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , v,u be
Vector of V, w,t be
Vector of W, f be
additiveSAF
additiveFAF
Form of V, W holds (f
. ((v
+ u),(w
+ t)))
= (((f
. (v,w))
+ (f
. (v,t)))
+ ((f
. (u,w))
+ (f
. (u,t))))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let v,w be
Vector of V, y,z be
Vector of W, f be
additiveSAF
additiveFAF
Form of V, W;
set v1 = (f
. (v,y)), v3 = (f
. (v,z)), v4 = (f
. (w,y)), v5 = (f
. (w,z));
thus (f
. ((v
+ w),(y
+ z)))
= ((f
. (v,(y
+ z)))
+ (f
. (w,(y
+ z)))) by
BLTh26
.= ((v1
+ v3)
+ (f
. (w,(y
+ z)))) by
BLTh27
.= ((v1
+ v3)
+ (v4
+ v5)) by
BLTh27;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:88
BLTh29: for V,W be
right_zeroed non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
additiveFAF
Form of V, W, v be
Vector of V holds (f
. (v,(
0. W)))
=
0
proof
let V,W be
right_zeroed non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
additiveFAF
Form of V, W, v be
Vector of V;
(f
. (v,(
0. W)))
= (f
. (v,((
0. W)
+ (
0. W)))) by
RLVECT_1:def 4
.= ((f
. (v,(
0. W)))
+ (f
. (v,(
0. W)))) by
BLTh27;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:89
BLTh30: for V,W be
right_zeroed non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
additiveSAF
Form of V, W, w be
Vector of W holds (f
. ((
0. V),w))
=
0
proof
let V,W be
right_zeroed non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
additiveSAF
Form of V, W, v be
Vector of W;
(f
. ((
0. V),v))
= (f
. (((
0. V)
+ (
0. V)),v)) by
RLVECT_1:def 4
.= ((f
. ((
0. V),v))
+ (f
. ((
0. V),v))) by
BLTh26;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:90
BLTh31: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W, a be
Element of
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W st f is
homogeneousSAF holds (f
. ((a
* v),w))
= (a
* (f
. (v,w)))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let v be
Vector of V, y be
Vector of W, r be
Element of
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W;
set F = (
FunctionalSAF (f,y));
assume f is
homogeneousSAF;
then
A1: F is
homogeneous;
thus (f
. ((r
* v),y))
= (F
. (r
* v)) by
BLTh9
.= (r
* (F
. v)) by
A1
.= (r
* (f
. (v,y))) by
BLTh9;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:91
BLTh32: for V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W, a be
Element of
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W st f is
homogeneousFAF holds (f
. (v,(a
* w)))
= (a
* (f
. (v,w)))
proof
let V,W be non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let v be
Vector of V, y be
Vector of W, r be
Element of
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W;
set F = (
FunctionalFAF (f,v));
assume f is
homogeneousFAF;
then
A1: F is
homogeneous;
thus (f
. (v,(r
* y)))
= (F
. (r
* y)) by
BLTh8
.= (r
* (F
. y)) by
A1
.= (r
* (f
. (v,y))) by
BLTh8;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:92
for V,W be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
homogeneousSAF
Form of V, W, w be
Vector of W holds (f
. ((
0. V),w))
= (
0.
INT.Ring )
proof
let V,W be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
homogeneousSAF
Form of V, W, v be
Vector of W;
((
0.
INT.Ring )
* (
0. V))
= (
0. V) by
VS10Th1;
hence (f
. ((
0. V),v))
= ((
0.
INT.Ring )
* (f
. ((
0. V),v))) by
BLTh31
.= (
0.
INT.Ring );
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:93
for V,W be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
homogeneousFAF
Form of V, W, v be
Vector of V holds (f
. (v,(
0. W)))
= (
0.
INT.Ring )
proof
let V,W be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring ;
let f be
homogeneousFAF
Form of V, W, v be
Vector of V;
((
0.
INT.Ring )
* (
0. W))
= (
0. W) by
VS10Th1;
hence (f
. (v,(
0. W)))
= ((
0.
INT.Ring )
* (f
. (v,(
0. W)))) by
BLTh32
.= (
0.
INT.Ring );
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:94
BLTh35: for V,W be
Z_Module, v,u be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W, f be
additiveSAF
homogeneousSAF
Form of V, W holds (f
. ((v
- u),w))
= ((f
. (v,w))
- (f
. (u,w)))
proof
let V,W be
Z_Module, v,w be
Vector of V, y be
Vector of W;
let f be
additiveSAF
homogeneousSAF
Form of V, W;
thus (f
. ((v
- w),y))
= ((f
. (v,y))
+ (f
. ((
- w),y))) by
BLTh26
.= ((f
. (v,y))
+ (f
. (((
- (
1.
INT.Ring ))
* w),y))) by
ZMODUL01: 2
.= ((f
. (v,y))
+ ((
- (
1.
INT.Ring ))
* (f
. (w,y)))) by
BLTh31
.= ((f
. (v,y))
- (f
. (w,y)));
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:95
BLTh36: for V,W be
Z_Module, v be
Vector of V, w,t be
Vector of W, f be
additiveFAF
homogeneousFAF
Form of V, W holds (f
. (v,(w
- t)))
= ((f
. (v,w))
- (f
. (v,t)))
proof
let V,W be
Z_Module, v be
Vector of V, y,z be
Vector of W, f be
additiveFAF
homogeneousFAF
Form of V, W;
thus (f
. (v,(y
- z)))
= ((f
. (v,y))
+ (f
. (v,(
- z)))) by
BLTh27
.= ((f
. (v,y))
+ (f
. (v,((
- (
1.
INT.Ring ))
* z)))) by
ZMODUL01: 2
.= ((f
. (v,y))
+ ((
- (
1.
INT.Ring ))
* (f
. (v,z)))) by
BLTh32
.= ((f
. (v,y))
- (f
. (v,z)));
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:96
BLTh37: for V,W be
Z_Module, v,u be
Vector of V, w,t be
Vector of W, f be
bilinear-Form of V, W holds (f
. ((v
- u),(w
- t)))
= (((f
. (v,w))
- (f
. (v,t)))
- ((f
. (u,w))
- (f
. (u,t))))
proof
let V,W be
Z_Module;
let v,w be
Vector of V, y,z be
Vector of W, f be
bilinear-Form of V, W;
set v1 = (f
. (v,y)), v3 = (f
. (v,z)), v4 = (f
. (w,y)), v5 = (f
. (w,z));
thus (f
. ((v
- w),(y
- z)))
= ((f
. (v,(y
- z)))
- (f
. (w,(y
- z)))) by
BLTh35
.= ((v1
- v3)
- (f
. (w,(y
- z)))) by
BLTh36
.= ((v1
- v3)
- (v4
- v5)) by
BLTh36;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:97
for V,W be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , v,u be
Vector of V, w,t be
Vector of W, a,b be
Element of
INT.Ring , f be
bilinear-Form of V, W holds (f
. ((v
+ (a
* u)),(w
+ (b
* t))))
= (((f
. (v,w))
+ (b
* (f
. (v,t))))
+ ((a
* (f
. (u,w)))
+ (a
* (b
* (f
. (u,t))))))
proof
let V,W be
add-associative
right_zeroed
right_complementable
vector-distributive
scalar-distributive
scalar-associative
scalar-unital non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , v,w be
Vector of V, y,z be
Vector of W, a,b be
Element of
INT.Ring ;
let f be
bilinear-Form of V, W;
set v1 = (f
. (v,y)), v3 = (f
. (v,z)), v4 = (f
. (w,y)), v5 = (f
. (w,z));
thus (f
. ((v
+ (a
* w)),(y
+ (b
* z))))
= ((v1
+ (f
. (v,(b
* z))))
+ ((f
. ((a
* w),y))
+ (f
. ((a
* w),(b
* z))))) by
BLTh28
.= ((v1
+ (b
* v3))
+ ((f
. ((a
* w),y))
+ (f
. ((a
* w),(b
* z))))) by
BLTh32
.= ((v1
+ (b
* v3))
+ ((a
* v4)
+ (f
. ((a
* w),(b
* z))))) by
BLTh31
.= ((v1
+ (b
* v3))
+ ((a
* v4)
+ (a
* (f
. (w,(b
* z)))))) by
BLTh31
.= ((v1
+ (b
* v3))
+ ((a
* v4)
+ (a
* (b
* v5)))) by
BLTh32;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:98
for V,W be
Z_Module, v,u be
Vector of V, w,t be
Vector of W, a,b be
Element of
INT.Ring , f be
bilinear-Form of V, W holds (f
. ((v
- (a
* u)),(w
- (b
* t))))
= (((f
. (v,w))
- (b
* (f
. (v,t))))
- ((a
* (f
. (u,w)))
- (a
* (b
* (f
. (u,t))))))
proof
let V,W be
Z_Module, v,w be
Vector of V, y,z be
Vector of W, a,b be
Element of
INT.Ring , f be
bilinear-Form of V, W;
set v1 = (f
. (v,y)), v3 = (f
. (v,z)), v4 = (f
. (w,y)), v5 = (f
. (w,z));
thus (f
. ((v
- (a
* w)),(y
- (b
* z))))
= ((v1
- (f
. (v,(b
* z))))
- ((f
. ((a
* w),y))
- (f
. ((a
* w),(b
* z))))) by
BLTh37
.= ((v1
- (b
* v3))
- ((f
. ((a
* w),y))
- (f
. ((a
* w),(b
* z))))) by
BLTh32
.= ((v1
- (b
* v3))
- ((a
* v4)
- (f
. ((a
* w),(b
* z))))) by
BLTh31
.= ((v1
- (b
* v3))
- ((a
* v4)
- (a
* (f
. (w,(b
* z)))))) by
BLTh31
.= ((v1
- (b
* v3))
- ((a
* v4)
- (a
* (b
* v5)))) by
BLTh32;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:99
for V,W be
right_zeroed non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W st f is
additiveFAF or f is
additiveSAF holds f is
constant iff for v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds (f
. (v,w))
=
0
proof
let V,W be
right_zeroed non
empty
ModuleStr over
INT.Ring , f be
Form of V, W;
A1: (
dom f)
=
[:the
carrier of V, the
carrier of W:] by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
assume
A2: f is
additiveFAF or f is
additiveSAF;
hereby
assume
A3: f is
constant;
let v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W;
per cases by
A2;
suppose
A4: f is
additiveFAF;
thus (f
. (v,w))
= (f
. (v,(
0. W))) by
A1,
A3,
BINOP_1: 19
.=
0 by
A4,
BLTh29;
end;
suppose
A5: f is
additiveSAF;
thus (f
. (v,w))
= (f
. ((
0. V),w)) by
A1,
A3,
BINOP_1: 19
.=
0 by
A5,
BLTh30;
end;
end;
hereby
assume
A6: for v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W holds (f
. (v,w))
=
0 ;
now
let x,y be
object such that
A7: x
in (
dom f) and
A8: y
in (
dom f);
consider v be
Vector of V, w be
Vector of W such that
A9: x
=
[v, w] by
A7,
DOMAIN_1: 1;
consider s be
Vector of V, t be
Vector of W such that
A10: y
=
[s, t] by
A8,
DOMAIN_1: 1;
thus (f
. x)
= (f
. (v,w)) by
A9
.=
0 by
A6
.= (f
. (s,t)) by
A6
.= (f
. y) by
A10;
end;
hence f is
constant;
end;
end;
begin
definition
let V1,V2 be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module;
let b1 be
OrdBasis of V1, b2 be
OrdBasis of V2;
let f be
bilinear-Form of V1, V2;
::
ZMATRLIN:def26
func
BilinearM (f,b1,b2) ->
Matrix of (
len b1), (
len b2),
INT.Ring means
:
defBilinearM: for i,j be
Nat st i
in (
dom b1) & j
in (
dom b2) holds (it
* (i,j))
= (f
. ((b1
/. i),(b2
/. j)));
existence
proof
deffunc
F(
Nat,
Nat) = (
In ((f
. ((b1
/. $1),(b2
/. $2))),the
carrier of
INT.Ring ));
consider M be
Matrix of (
len b1), (
len b2),
INT.Ring such that
A20: for i, j st
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) holds (M
* (i,j))
=
F(i,j) from
MATRIX_0:sch 1;
take M;
thus for i,j be
Nat st i
in (
dom b1) & j
in (
dom b2) holds (M
* (i,j))
= (f
. ((b1
/. i),(b2
/. j)))
proof
let i,j be
Nat;
assume
A21: i
in (
dom b1) & j
in (
dom b2);
(
len b1)
<>
0
proof
assume (
len b1)
=
0 ;
then (
Seg (
len b1))
=
{} ;
hence contradiction by
A21,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
end;
then (
Indices M)
=
[:(
Seg (
len b1)), (
Seg (
len b2)):] by
MATRIX_0: 23
.=
[:(
dom b1), (
Seg (
len b2)):] by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.=
[:(
dom b1), (
dom b2):] by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
[i, j]
in (
Indices M) by
A21,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then (M
* (i,j))
=
F(i,j) by
A20;
hence (M
* (i,j))
= (f
. ((b1
/. i),(b2
/. j)));
end;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let M1,M2 be
Matrix of (
len b1), (
len b2),
INT.Ring ;
assume that
A22: for i,j be
Nat st i
in (
dom b1) & j
in (
dom b2) holds (M1
* (i,j))
= (f
. ((b1
/. i),(b2
/. j))) and
A23: for i,j be
Nat st i
in (
dom b1) & j
in (
dom b2) holds (M2
* (i,j))
= (f
. ((b1
/. i),(b2
/. j)));
now
let i, j;
assume
A25:
[i, j]
in (
Indices M1);
then (
len b1)
<>
0 by
MATRIX_0: 22;
then (
Indices M1)
=
[:(
Seg (
len b1)), (
Seg (
len b2)):] by
MATRIX_0: 23
.=
[:(
dom b1), (
Seg (
len b2)):] by
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.=
[:(
dom b1), (
dom b2):] by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
A26: i
in (
dom b1) & j
in (
dom b2) by
A25,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
thus (M1
* (i,j))
= (f
. ((b1
/. i),(b2
/. j))) by
A22,
A26
.= (M2
* (i,j)) by
A26,
A23;
end;
hence thesis by
MATRIX_0: 27;
end;
end
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:100
for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, i be
Nat, a1 be
Element of
INT.Ring , a2 be
Element of V, p1 be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring , p2 be
FinSequence of V st i
in (
dom (
lmlt (p1,p2))) & a1
= (p1
. i) & a2
= (p2
. i) holds ((
lmlt (p1,p2))
. i)
= (a1
* a2) by
FUNCOP_1: 22;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:101
LMThMBF1X0: for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, F be
linear-Functional of V, y be
FinSequence of V, x be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring , X,Y be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring st X
= x & (
len y)
= (
len x) & (
len X)
= (
len Y) & (for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg (
len x)) holds (Y
. k)
= (F
. (y
/. k))) holds (X
"*" Y)
= (F
. (
Sum (
lmlt (x,y))))
proof
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, F be
linear-Functional of V;
defpred
P[
FinSequence of V] means for x be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring , X,Y be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring st X
= x & (
len $1)
= (
len x) & (
len X)
= (
len Y) & (for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg (
len x)) holds (Y
. k)
= (F
. ($1
/. k))) holds (X
"*" Y)
= (F
. (
Sum (
lmlt (x,$1))));
A2: for y be
FinSequence of V holds for w be
Element of V st
P[y] holds
P[(y
^
<*w*>)]
proof
let y be
FinSequence of V;
let w be
Element of V such that
P1: for x be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring , X,Y be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring st X
= x & (
len y)
= (
len x) & (
len X)
= (
len Y) & (for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg (
len x)) holds (Y
. k)
= (F
. (y
/. k))) holds (X
"*" Y)
= (F
. (
Sum (
lmlt (x,y))));
thus for x be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring , X,Y be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring st X
= x & (
len (y
^
<*w*>))
= (
len x) & (
len X)
= (
len Y) & (for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg (
len x)) holds (Y
. k)
= (F
. ((y
^
<*w*>)
/. k))) holds (X
"*" Y)
= (F
. (
Sum (
lmlt (x,(y
^
<*w*>)))))
proof
let x be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring , X,Y be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring ;
assume that
R1: X
= x and
R2: (
len (y
^
<*w*>))
= (
len x) and
R3: (
len X)
= (
len Y) and
R4: for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg (
len x)) holds (Y
. k)
= (F
. ((y
^
<*w*>)
/. k));
X1: F is
additive;
X2: F is
homogeneous;
set n = (
len y);
set X0 = (X
| n);
set Y0 = (Y
| n);
set x0 = (x
| n);
Q0: (
len (y
^
<*w*>))
= ((
len y)
+ (
len
<*w*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= (n
+ 1) by
FINSEQ_1: 39;
LN4: (
len x0)
= n by
Q0,
R2,
FINSEQ_1: 59,
NAT_1: 11;
LN5: (
len X0)
= n by
Q0,
R1,
R2,
FINSEQ_1: 59,
NAT_1: 11;
LN6: (
len Y0)
= n by
Q0,
R1,
R2,
R3,
FINSEQ_1: 59,
NAT_1: 11;
LN7: (n
+ 1)
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 4;
W1: X0
= (X
| (
Seg n)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 15;
W2: Y0
= (Y
| (
Seg n)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 15;
W3: x0
= (x
| (
Seg n)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 15;
Q2: (
len y)
= (
len x0) by
Q0,
R2,
FINSEQ_1: 59,
NAT_1: 11;
Q3: (
len X0)
= (
len Y0) by
LN5,
Q0,
R1,
R2,
R3,
FINSEQ_1: 59,
NAT_1: 11;
for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg (
len x0)) holds (Y0
. k)
= (F
. (y
/. k))
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
Q31: k
in (
Seg (
len x0));
then
Q34: k
in (
dom y) by
LN4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
Q32: (
Seg (
len x0))
c= (
Seg (
len x)) by
FINSEQ_3: 18,
Q0,
R2,
LN4;
then k
in (
Seg (
len x)) by
Q31;
then
Q33: k
in (
dom (y
^
<*w*>)) by
R2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
Q35: ((y
^
<*w*>)
/. k)
= ((y
^
<*w*>)
. k) by
Q33,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (y
. k) by
FINSEQ_1:def 7,
Q34
.= (y
/. k) by
Q34,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
thus (Y0
. k)
= (Y
. k) by
W2,
LN4,
Q31,
FUNCT_1: 49
.= (F
. (y
/. k)) by
R4,
Q31,
Q32,
Q35;
end;
then
Q4: (X0
"*" Y0)
= (F
. (
Sum (
lmlt (x0,y)))) by
R1,
Q2,
Q3,
P1;
Q51: (n
+ 1)
in (
dom X) by
LN7,
Q0,
R1,
R2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
Q61: (n
+ 1)
in (
dom Y) by
LN7,
Q0,
R1,
R2,
R3,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
Q71: (n
+ 1)
in (
dom x) by
LN7,
Q0,
R2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
Q9: (X
/. (n
+ 1))
= (X
. (n
+ 1)) by
Q51,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (x
/. (n
+ 1)) by
R1,
Q71,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
Q103: (n
+ 1)
in (
dom (y
^
<*w*>)) by
LN7,
Q0,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
Q102: ((y
^
<*w*>)
/. (n
+ 1))
= ((y
^
<*w*>)
. (n
+ 1)) by
Q103,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= w by
FINSEQ_1: 42;
(Y
/. (n
+ 1))
= (Y
. (n
+ 1)) by
Q61,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (F
. w) by
Q0,
Q102,
R2,
R4,
FINSEQ_1: 4;
then
Q11: ((X
/. (n
+ 1))
* (Y
/. (n
+ 1)))
= ((x
/. (n
+ 1))
* (F
. w)) by
Q9
.= (F
. ((x
/. (n
+ 1))
* w)) by
X2;
(
len (
mlt (X,Y)))
= (n
+ 1) by
Q0,
R1,
R2,
R3,
MATRIX_3: 6;
then
Q85: (
dom (
mlt (X,Y)))
= (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
Q82: (
len (
mlt (X0,Y0)))
= n by
LN5,
LN6,
MATRIX_3: 6;
Q88: (
len ((
mlt (X0,Y0))
^
<*((X
/. (n
+ 1))
* (Y
/. (n
+ 1)))*>))
= ((
len (
mlt (X0,Y0)))
+ (
len
<*((X
/. (n
+ 1))
* (Y
/. (n
+ 1)))*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= (n
+ 1) by
Q82,
FINSEQ_1: 39;
for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom (
mlt (X,Y))) holds ((
mlt (X,Y))
. k)
= (((
mlt (X0,Y0))
^
<*((X
/. (n
+ 1))
* (Y
/. (n
+ 1)))*>)
. k)
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
V1: k
in (
dom (
mlt (X,Y)));
then
V2: 1
<= k & k
<= (n
+ 1) by
Q85,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
set f = ((
mlt (X0,Y0))
^
<*((X
/. (n
+ 1))
* (Y
/. (n
+ 1)))*>);
per cases ;
suppose k
<= n;
then
V3: k
in (
Seg n) by
FINSEQ_1: 1,
V2;
then
V4: k
in (
dom (
mlt (X0,Y0))) by
Q82,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
V5: k
in (
dom X0) by
LN5,
V3,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
V6: k
in (
dom Y0) by
LN6,
V3,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(X0
. k)
in (
rng X0) by
V5,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider X0k = (X0
. k) as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
(Y0
. k)
in (
rng Y0) by
V6,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider Y0k = (Y0
. k) as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
k
in (
dom X) by
V1,
Q0,
Q85,
R1,
R2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (X
. k)
in (
rng X) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider Xk = (X
. k) as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
k
in (
dom Y) by
V1,
Q0,
Q85,
R1,
R2,
R3,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (Y
. k)
in (
rng Y) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider Yk = (Y
. k) as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
(f
. k)
= ((
mlt (X0,Y0))
. k) by
V4,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= (X0k
* Y0k) by
V4,
FVSUM_1: 60
.= ((X
. k)
* (Y0
. k)) by
W1,
V5,
FUNCT_1: 47
.= (Xk
* Yk) by
W2,
V6,
FUNCT_1: 47
.= ((
mlt (X,Y))
. k) by
V1,
FVSUM_1: 60;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose not k
<= n;
then (n
+ 1)
<= k by
NAT_1: 13;
then
V8: k
= (n
+ 1) by
XXREAL_0: 1,
V2;
(
Seg 1)
= (
dom
<*((X
/. (n
+ 1))
* (Y
/. (n
+ 1)))*>) by
FINSEQ_1: 38;
then
V10: 1
in (
dom
<*((X
/. (n
+ 1))
* (Y
/. (n
+ 1)))*>) by
FINSEQ_1: 3;
Q9: (X
/. (n
+ 1))
= (X
. (n
+ 1)) by
Q51,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
then
reconsider Xn = (X
. (n
+ 1)) as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
Q10: (Y
/. (n
+ 1))
= (Y
. (n
+ 1)) by
Q61,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
then
reconsider Yn = (Y
. (n
+ 1)) as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
(f
. k)
= (
<*((X
/. (n
+ 1))
* (Y
/. (n
+ 1)))*>
. 1) by
Q82,
FINSEQ_1:def 7,
V8,
V10
.= ((X
/. (n
+ 1))
* (Y
/. (n
+ 1))) by
FINSEQ_1: 40
.= ((
mlt (X,Y))
. k) by
Q9,
Q10,
V1,
V8,
FVSUM_1: 60;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
then
Q8: (
mlt (X,Y))
= ((
mlt (X0,Y0))
^
<*((X
/. (n
+ 1))
* (Y
/. (n
+ 1)))*>) by
Q85,
Q88,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
QX121: (
dom x)
= (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
Q0,
R2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3
.= (
dom (y
^
<*w*>)) by
Q0,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
Q121: (
dom (
lmlt (x,(y
^
<*w*>))))
= (
dom x) by
Th12;
(
dom x0)
= (
Seg n) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3,
LN4
.= (
dom y) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then (
dom (
lmlt (x0,y)))
= (
dom x0) by
Th12;
then
Q124: (
dom (
lmlt (x0,y)))
= (
Seg n) by
LN4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
Q125: (
len (
lmlt (x0,y)))
= n by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
(
len ((
lmlt (x0,y))
^
<*((x
/. (n
+ 1))
* w)*>))
= ((
len (
lmlt (x0,y)))
+ (
len
<*((x
/. (n
+ 1))
* w)*>)) by
FINSEQ_1: 22
.= (n
+ 1) by
Q125,
FINSEQ_1: 39;
then
Q126: (
dom ((
lmlt (x0,y))
^
<*((x
/. (n
+ 1))
* w)*>))
= (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
for k be
Nat st k
in (
dom (
lmlt (x,(y
^
<*w*>)))) holds ((
lmlt (x,(y
^
<*w*>)))
. k)
= (((
lmlt (x0,y))
^
<*((x
/. (n
+ 1))
* w)*>)
. k)
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume
V1: k
in (
dom (
lmlt (x,(y
^
<*w*>))));
then
V0: k
in (
Seg (n
+ 1)) by
Q121,
Q0,
R2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
V2: 1
<= k & k
<= (n
+ 1) by
FINSEQ_1: 1;
set f = ((
lmlt (x0,y))
^
<*((x
/. (n
+ 1))
* w)*>);
per cases ;
suppose
VX3: k
<= n;
then
V3: k
in (
Seg n) by
V2,
FINSEQ_1: 1;
V5: k
in (
dom x0) by
V3,
LN4,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
V6: k
in (
dom y) by
V3,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
XX1: (x0
. k)
in (
rng x0) by
V5,
FUNCT_1: 3;
reconsider x0k = (x0
. k) as
Element of
INT.Ring by
XX1;
(y
. k)
in (
rng y) by
V6,
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider y0k = (y
. k) as
Element of V;
k
in (
dom x) by
V1,
QX121,
Th12;
then
XX2: (x
. k)
in (
rng x) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
reconsider xk = (x
. k) as
Element of
INT.Ring by
XX2;
k
in (
dom (y
^
<*w*>)) by
V0,
Q0,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then ((y
^
<*w*>)
. k)
in (
rng (y
^
<*w*>)) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
then
reconsider yk = ((y
^
<*w*>)
. k) as
Element of V;
W: y0k
= ((y
^
<*w*>)
. k) by
FINSEQ_1:def 7,
V6
.= yk;
(f
. k)
= ((
lmlt (x0,y))
. k) by
V3,
Q124,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= (x0k
* y0k) by
V2,
VX3,
Q124,
FUNCOP_1: 22,
FINSEQ_1: 1
.= (xk
* y0k) by
V5,
W3,
FUNCT_1: 47
.= ((
lmlt (x,(y
^
<*w*>)))
. k) by
W,
V1,
FUNCOP_1: 22;
hence thesis;
end;
suppose not k
<= n;
then (n
+ 1)
<= k by
NAT_1: 13;
then
V8: k
= (n
+ 1) by
XXREAL_0: 1,
V2;
(
Seg 1)
= (
dom
<*((x
/. (n
+ 1))
* w)*>) by
FINSEQ_1: 38;
then
V10: 1
in (
dom
<*((x
/. (n
+ 1))
* w)*>) by
FINSEQ_1: 3;
(
Seg 1)
= (
dom
<*w*>) by
FINSEQ_1: 38;
then
V11: 1
in (
dom
<*w*>) by
FINSEQ_1: 3;
Q9: (x
/. (n
+ 1))
= (x
. (n
+ 1)) by
Q71,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
then
reconsider xn = (x
. (n
+ 1)) as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
((y
^
<*w*>)
/. (n
+ 1))
= ((y
^
<*w*>)
. (n
+ 1)) by
Q103,
PARTFUN1:def 6;
then
reconsider yn = ((y
^
<*w*>)
. (n
+ 1)) as
Element of V;
Q11: ((y
^
<*w*>)
. (n
+ 1))
= (
<*w*>
. 1) by
V11,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= w by
FINSEQ_1: 40;
(f
. k)
= (
<*((x
/. (n
+ 1))
* w)*>
. 1) by
Q125,
V8,
V10,
FINSEQ_1:def 7
.= (xn
* w) by
Q9,
FINSEQ_1: 40
.= ((
lmlt (x,(y
^
<*w*>)))
. k) by
Q11,
V1,
V8,
FUNCOP_1: 22;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
then
Q12: (
lmlt (x,(y
^
<*w*>)))
= ((
lmlt (x0,y))
^
<*((x
/. (n
+ 1))
* w)*>) by
Q0,
Q121,
Q126,
R2,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
thus (X
"*" Y)
= ((
Sum (
mlt (X0,Y0)))
+ ((X
/. (n
+ 1))
* (Y
/. (n
+ 1)))) by
FVSUM_1: 71,
Q8
.= (F
. ((
Sum (
lmlt (x0,y)))
+ ((x
/. (n
+ 1))
* w))) by
Q4,
Q11,
X1
.= (F
. (
Sum (
lmlt (x,(y
^
<*w*>))))) by
FVSUM_1: 71,
Q12;
end;
end;
A4:
P[(
<*> the
carrier of V)]
proof
let x be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring , X,Y be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring ;
assume that
R1: X
= x and
R2: (
len (
<*> the
carrier of V))
= (
len x) and (
len X)
= (
len Y) and for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg (
len x)) holds (Y
. k)
= (F
. ((
<*> the
carrier of V)
/. k));
set y = (
<*> the
carrier of V);
Q2: X
= (
<*> the
carrier of
INT.Ring ) by
R1,
R2;
Q4: (
mlt (X,Y))
= (the
multF of
INT.Ring
*
<:X, Y:>) by
FUNCOP_1:def 3
.= (
<*> the
carrier of
INT.Ring ) by
Q2;
Q5: (
lmlt (x,y))
= (the
lmult of V
*
<:x, y:>) by
FUNCOP_1:def 3
.= (
<*> the
carrier of V);
reconsider I0 =
0 as
Element of
INT.Ring ;
X1: F is
additive;
X2: (F
. (
0. V))
= (F
. ((
0. V)
+ (
0. V)))
.= ((F
. (
0. V))
+ (F
. (
0. V))) by
X1;
thus (X
"*" Y)
= (
0.
INT.Ring ) by
Q4,
RLVECT_1: 43
.= (F
. (
Sum (
lmlt (x,y)))) by
Q5,
X2,
RLVECT_1: 43;
end;
for p be
FinSequence of V holds
P[p] from
FINSEQ_2:sch 2(
A4,
A2);
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:102
LMThMBF1X: for V1,V2 be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b2 be
OrdBasis of V2, b3 be
OrdBasis of V2, f be
bilinear-Form of V1, V2, v1 be
Vector of V1, v2 be
Vector of V2, X,Y be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring st (
len X)
= (
len b2) & (
len Y)
= (
len b2) & (for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg (
len b2)) holds (Y
. k)
= (f
. (v1,(b2
/. k)))) & X
= (v2
|-- b2) holds (Y
"*" X)
= (f
. (v1,v2))
proof
let V1,V2 be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b2 be
OrdBasis of V2, b3 be
OrdBasis of V2, f be
bilinear-Form of V1, V2, v1 be
Vector of V1, v2 be
Vector of V2, X,Y be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring ;
assume that
A1: (
len X)
= (
len b2) and
A2: (
len Y)
= (
len b2) and
A3: (for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg (
len b2)) holds (Y
. k)
= (f
. (v1,(b2
/. k)))) and
A4: X
= (v2
|-- b2);
set x = (v2
|-- b2);
P2: for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg (
len x)) holds (Y
. k)
= ((
FunctionalFAF (f,v1))
. (b2
/. k))
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume k
in (
Seg (
len x));
then (Y
. k)
= (f
. (v1,(b2
/. k))) by
A1,
A3,
A4;
hence (Y
. k)
= ((
FunctionalFAF (f,v1))
. (b2
/. k)) by
BLTh8;
end;
thus (Y
"*" X)
= (X
"*" Y) by
FVSUM_1: 90
.= ((
FunctionalFAF (f,v1))
. (
Sum (
lmlt ((v2
|-- b2),b2)))) by
LMThMBF1X0,
A1,
A2,
A4,
P2
.= (f
. (v1,(
Sum (
lmlt ((v2
|-- b2),b2))))) by
BLTh8
.= (f
. (v1,v2)) by
Th35;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:103
LMThMBF1Y: for V1,V2 be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1 be
OrdBasis of V1, f be
bilinear-Form of V1, V2, v1 be
Vector of V1, v2 be
Vector of V2, X,Y be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring st (
len X)
= (
len b1) & (
len Y)
= (
len b1) & (for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg (
len b1)) holds (Y
. k)
= (f
. ((b1
/. k),v2))) & X
= (v1
|-- b1) holds (X
"*" Y)
= (f
. (v1,v2))
proof
let V1,V2 be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1 be
OrdBasis of V1, f be
bilinear-Form of V1, V2, v1 be
Vector of V1, v2 be
Vector of V2, X,Y be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring ;
assume that
A1: (
len X)
= (
len b1) and
A2: (
len Y)
= (
len b1) and
A3: for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg (
len b1)) holds (Y
. k)
= (f
. ((b1
/. k),v2)) and
A4: X
= (v1
|-- b1);
set x = (v1
|-- b1);
P2: for k be
Nat st k
in (
Seg (
len x)) holds (Y
. k)
= ((
FunctionalSAF (f,v2))
. (b1
/. k))
proof
let k be
Nat;
assume k
in (
Seg (
len x));
then (Y
. k)
= (f
. ((b1
/. k),v2)) by
A1,
A3,
A4;
hence (Y
. k)
= ((
FunctionalSAF (f,v2))
. (b1
/. k)) by
BLTh9;
end;
thus (X
"*" Y)
= ((
FunctionalSAF (f,v2))
. (
Sum (
lmlt ((v1
|-- b1),b1)))) by
LMThMBF1X0,
A1,
A2,
A4,
P2
.= (f
. ((
Sum (
lmlt ((v1
|-- b1),b1))),v2)) by
BLTh9
.= (f
. (v1,v2)) by
Th35;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:104
ThMBF1: for V1,V2 be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1 be
OrdBasis of V1, b2 be
OrdBasis of V2, b3 be
OrdBasis of V2, f be
bilinear-Form of V1, V2 st
0
< (
rank V1) holds (
BilinearM (f,b1,b3))
= ((
BilinearM (f,b1,b2))
* ((
AutMt ((
id V2),b3,b2))
@ ))
proof
let V1,V2 be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1 be
OrdBasis of V1, b2 be
OrdBasis of V2, b3 be
OrdBasis of V2, f be
bilinear-Form of V1, V2;
assume
AS:
0
< (
rank V1);
set n = (
len b2);
A2: (
len b2)
= (
rank V2) by
ThRank1;
A3: (
len b3)
= (
rank V2) by
ThRank1;
reconsider IM1 = (
AutMt ((
id V2),b3,b2)) as
Matrix of n,
INT.Ring by
LMThMBF3,
A2;
reconsider M1 = (IM1
@ ) as
Matrix of n,
INT.Ring ;
set M2 = ((
BilinearM (f,b1,b2))
* M1);
B1: (
len M1)
= n & (
width M1)
= n & (
Indices M1)
=
[:(
Seg n), (
Seg n):] by
MATRIX_0: 24;
F1: (
len IM1)
= n & (
width IM1)
= n & (
Indices IM1)
=
[:(
Seg n), (
Seg n):] by
MATRIX_0: 24;
B2:
0
< (
len b1) by
AS,
ThRank1;
then
B3: (
len (
BilinearM (f,b1,b2)))
= (
len b1) & (
width (
BilinearM (f,b1,b2)))
= (
len b2) by
MATRIX_0: 23;
C1: (
width (
BilinearM (f,b1,b2)))
= (
len M1) by
B1,
B2,
MATRIX_0: 23;
(
len M2)
= (
len b1) & (
width M2)
= n by
B1,
B3,
MATRIX_3:def 4;
then
reconsider M2 as
Matrix of (
len b1), n,
INT.Ring by
B2,
MATRIX_0: 20;
set FM1 = M1;
set FBM = (
BilinearM (f,b1,b2));
for i,j be
Nat st
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
BilinearM (f,b1,b3))) holds ((
BilinearM (f,b1,b3))
* (i,j))
= (M2
* (i,j))
proof
let i,j be
Nat;
assume
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
BilinearM (f,b1,b3)));
then
B6:
[i, j]
in
[:(
Seg (
len b1)), (
Seg (
len b3)):] by
B2,
MATRIX_0: 23;
then
B7: i
in (
Seg (
len b1)) & j
in (
Seg (
len b3)) by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
B8: i
in (
dom b1) & j
in (
dom b3) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
B9: ((
BilinearM (f,b1,b3))
* (i,j))
= (f
. ((b1
/. i),(b3
/. j))) by
defBilinearM;
[i, j]
in (
Indices M2) by
B2,
B6,
A2,
A3,
MATRIX_0: 23;
then
B11: (M2
* (i,j))
= ((
Line (FBM,i))
"*" (
Col (FM1,j))) by
C1,
MATRIX_3:def 4;
B12: (
len (
Line (FBM,i)))
= (
len b2) by
B3,
MATRIX_0:def 7;
B13:
now
let k be
Nat;
assume
B131: k
in (
Seg (
len b2));
then
B132: k
in (
Seg (
width FBM)) by
B2,
MATRIX_0: 23;
B81: k
in (
dom b2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3,
B131;
thus ((
Line (FBM,i))
. k)
= (FBM
* (i,k)) by
B132,
MATRIX_0:def 7
.= (f
. ((b1
/. i),(b2
/. k))) by
B8,
B81,
defBilinearM;
end;
B14: (
len (
Col (FM1,j)))
= (
len b2) by
B1,
MATRIX_0:def 8;
B135: j
in (
Seg n) by
B6,
A2,
A3,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
B15:
now
let k be
Nat;
assume 1
<= k & k
<= (
len (
Col (FM1,j)));
then
B131: k
in (
Seg (
len b2)) by
FINSEQ_1: 1,
B14;
then
B132: k
in (
dom FM1) by
B1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
B132A: j
in (
dom IM1) by
B135,
F1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
Y1:
[j, k]
in (
Indices IM1) by
F1,
B131,
B135,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
consider p be
FinSequence of
INT such that
B133: p
= (IM1
. j) & (IM1
* (j,k))
= (p
. k) by
MATRIX_0:def 5;
B81A: j
in (
dom b3) by
B7,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
X0: ((
Col (FM1,j))
. k)
= (FM1
* (k,j)) by
B132,
MATRIX_0:def 8
.= ((
AutMt ((
id V2),b3,b2))
* (j,k)) by
Y1,
MATRIX_0:def 6;
(IM1
. j)
= ((
AutMt ((
id V2),b3,b2))
/. j) by
B132A,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (((
id V2)
. (b3
/. j))
|-- b2) by
B81A,
Def8;
hence ((
Col (FM1,j))
. k)
= (((b3
/. j)
|-- b2)
. k) by
B133,
X0;
end;
(
len (
Col (FM1,j)))
= (
len ((b3
/. j)
|-- b2)) by
B14,
Def7;
hence thesis by
B9,
B11,
B12,
B13,
B14,
B15,
LMThMBF1X,
FINSEQ_1:def 17;
end;
hence thesis by
MATRIX_0: 27,
A2,
A3;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:105
ThMBF2: for V1,V2 be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1 be
OrdBasis of V1, b2 be
OrdBasis of V2, b3 be
OrdBasis of V1, f be
bilinear-Form of V1, V2 st
0
< (
rank V1) holds (
BilinearM (f,b3,b2))
= ((
AutMt ((
id V1),b3,b1))
* (
BilinearM (f,b1,b2)))
proof
let V1,V2 be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1 be
OrdBasis of V1, b2 be
OrdBasis of V2, b3 be
OrdBasis of V1, f be
bilinear-Form of V1, V2;
assume
AS:
0
< (
rank V1);
set n = (
len b3);
A1: (
len b1)
= (
rank V1) by
ThRank1;
A3: (
len b3)
= (
rank V1) by
ThRank1;
reconsider IM1 = (
AutMt ((
id V1),b3,b1)) as
Matrix of n,
INT.Ring by
LMThMBF3,
A3;
reconsider M1 = IM1 as
Matrix of n,
INT.Ring ;
set M2 = (M1
* (
BilinearM (f,b1,b2)));
B1: (
len M1)
= n & (
width M1)
= n & (
Indices M1)
=
[:(
Seg n), (
Seg n):] by
MATRIX_0: 24;
0
< (
len b1) by
AS,
ThRank1;
then
B3: (
len (
BilinearM (f,b1,b2)))
= (
len b1) & (
width (
BilinearM (f,b1,b2)))
= (
len b2) by
MATRIX_0: 23;
then (
len M2)
= n & (
width M2)
= (
len b2) by
A1,
A3,
B1,
MATRIX_3:def 4;
then
reconsider M2 as
Matrix of n, (
len b2),
INT.Ring by
A3,
AS,
MATRIX_0: 20;
set FM1 = M1;
set FBM = (
BilinearM (f,b1,b2));
for i,j be
Nat st
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
BilinearM (f,b3,b2))) holds ((
BilinearM (f,b3,b2))
* (i,j))
= (M2
* (i,j))
proof
let i,j be
Nat;
assume
[i, j]
in (
Indices (
BilinearM (f,b3,b2)));
then
B6:
[i, j]
in
[:(
Seg (
len b3)), (
Seg (
len b2)):] by
AS,
A3,
MATRIX_0: 23;
then i
in (
Seg (
len b3)) & j
in (
Seg (
len b2)) by
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
B8: i
in (
dom b3) & j
in (
dom b2) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
then
B9: ((
BilinearM (f,b3,b2))
* (i,j))
= (f
. ((b3
/. i),(b2
/. j))) by
defBilinearM;
[i, j]
in (
Indices M2) by
AS,
A3,
B6,
MATRIX_0: 23;
then
B11: (M2
* (i,j))
= ((
Line (FM1,i))
"*" (
Col (FBM,j))) by
A1,
A3,
B1,
B3,
MATRIX_3:def 4;
B12: (
len (
Line (FM1,i)))
= (
len b3) by
B1,
MATRIX_0:def 7;
B14: (
len (
Col (FBM,j)))
= (
len b3) by
B3,
A1,
A3,
MATRIX_0:def 8;
B13:
now
let k be
Nat;
assume
B131: k
in (
Seg (
len b1));
then
B132: k
in (
dom FBM) by
B3,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
B81: k
in (
dom b1) by
FINSEQ_1:def 3,
B131;
thus ((
Col (FBM,j))
. k)
= (FBM
* (k,j)) by
B132,
MATRIX_0:def 8
.= (f
. ((b1
/. k),(b2
/. j))) by
B8,
B81,
defBilinearM;
end;
B135: i
in (
Seg n) by
B6,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
B135A: i
in (
dom M1) by
B1,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
B136: i
in (
dom b3) by
B135,
FINSEQ_1:def 3;
B15:
now
let k be
Nat;
assume
BX131: 1
<= k & k
<= (
len (
Line (FM1,i)));
then
B131: k
in (
Seg (
len b1)) by
FINSEQ_1: 1,
B12,
A1,
A3;
[i, k]
in (
Indices M1) by
A1,
A3,
B1,
B131,
B135,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
then
consider p be
FinSequence of
INT.Ring such that
B133: p
= (M1
. i) & (M1
* (i,k))
= (p
. k) by
MATRIX_0:def 5;
X0: ((
Line (FM1,i))
. k)
= (FM1
* (i,k)) by
B1,
B12,
BX131,
FINSEQ_1: 1,
MATRIX_0:def 7
.= ((
AutMt ((
id V1),b3,b1))
* (i,k));
(M1
. i)
= ((
AutMt ((
id V1),b3,b1))
/. i) by
B135A,
PARTFUN1:def 6
.= (((
id V1)
. (b3
/. i))
|-- b1) by
B136,
Def8;
hence ((
Line (FM1,i))
. k)
= (((b3
/. i)
|-- b1)
. k) by
B133,
X0;
end;
(
len (
Line (FM1,i)))
= (
len ((b3
/. i)
|-- b1)) by
A1,
A3,
B12,
Def7;
hence thesis by
A1,
A3,
B9,
B11,
B12,
B13,
B14,
B15,
LMThMBF1Y,
FINSEQ_1:def 17;
end;
hence thesis by
MATRIX_0: 27;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:106
ThMBF3: for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1,b2 be
OrdBasis of V, f be
bilinear-Form of V, V st
0
< (
rank V) holds (
BilinearM (f,b2,b2))
= (((
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1))
* (
BilinearM (f,b1,b1)))
* ((
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1))
@ ))
proof
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1,b2 be
OrdBasis of V, f be
bilinear-Form of V, V;
assume
AS:
0
< (
rank V);
set n = (
len b1);
A1: (
len b1)
= (
rank V) by
ThRank1;
reconsider IM1 = (
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1)) as
Matrix of n,
INT.Ring by
LMThMBF3,
A1;
reconsider IM2 = (
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1)) as
Matrix of n,
INT.Ring by
LMThMBF3,
A1;
reconsider M1 = (IM1
@ ) as
Matrix of n,
INT.Ring ;
reconsider M2 = IM2 as
Matrix of n,
INT.Ring ;
Y1: (
width IM1)
= n by
MATRIX_0: 24;
Yb: (
width (
BilinearM (f,b1,b1)))
= (
len b1) by
MATRIX_0: 24;
X1: (
width (
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1)))
= (
len (
BilinearM (f,b1,b1))) & (
width (
BilinearM (f,b1,b1)))
= (
len ((
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1))
@ )) by
MATRIX_0:def 2,
Y1,
Yb;
thus (
BilinearM (f,b2,b2))
= ((
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1))
* (
BilinearM (f,b1,b2))) by
ThMBF2,
AS
.= ((
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1))
* ((
BilinearM (f,b1,b1))
* ((
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1))
@ ))) by
ThMBF1,
AS
.= (((
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1))
* (
BilinearM (f,b1,b1)))
* ((
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1))
@ )) by
MATRIX_3: 33,
X1;
end;
theorem ::
ZMATRLIN:107
for V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1,b2 be
OrdBasis of V, f be
bilinear-Form of V, V holds
|.(
Det (
BilinearM (f,b2,b2))).|
=
|.(
Det (
BilinearM (f,b1,b1))).|
proof
let V be
finite-rank
free
Z_Module, b1,b2 be
OrdBasis of V, f be
bilinear-Form of V, V;
set n = (
len b1);
A1: (
len b1)
= (
rank V) by
ThRank1;
A2: (
len b2)
= (
rank V) by
ThRank1;
reconsider B1 = (
BilinearM (f,b1,b1)) as
Matrix of n,
INT.Ring ;
reconsider B2 = (
BilinearM (f,b2,b2)) as
Matrix of n,
INT.Ring by
A1,
A2;
per cases ;
suppose (
rank V)
=
0 ;
hence
|.(
Det (
BilinearM (f,b2,b2))).|
=
|.(
Det (
BilinearM (f,b1,b1))).| by
A1,
A2,
MATRIX_0: 45;
end;
suppose
ZZ: (
rank V)
>
0 ;
then
B2: (
BilinearM (f,b2,b2))
= (((
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1))
* (
BilinearM (f,b1,b1)))
* ((
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1))
@ )) by
ThMBF3;
reconsider IM1 = (
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1)) as
Matrix of n,
INT.Ring by
A1,
LMThMBF3;
reconsider IM2 = (
AutMt ((
id V),b2,b1)) as
Matrix of n,
INT.Ring by
A1,
LMThMBF3;
reconsider M1 = (IM1
@ ) as
Matrix of n,
INT.Ring ;
reconsider M2 = IM2 as
Matrix of n,
INT.Ring ;
n
>= (1
+
0 ) by
A1,
ZZ,
NAT_1: 13;
then
X1: (
Det IM1)
= (
Det M1) by
MATRIX_7: 37;
reconsider M2B1 = (M2
* B1) as
Matrix of n,
INT.Ring ;
(
Det B2)
= ((
Det M2B1)
* (
Det M1)) by
B2,
MATRIX11: 62,
ZZ,
A1
.= (((
Det M2)
* (
Det B1))
* (
Det M1)) by
ZZ,
A1,
MATRIX11: 62;
hence
|.(
Det (
BilinearM (f,b2,b2))).|
= (
|.((
Det M2)
* (
Det B1)).|
*
|.(
Det M1).|) by
A1,
A2,
COMPLEX1: 65
.= (
|.((
Det M2)
* (
Det B1)).|
* 1) by
A1,
X1,
ThSign1
.= (
|.(
Det M2).|
*
|.(
Det B1).|) by
COMPLEX1: 65
.= (
|.(
Det B1).|
* 1) by
A1,
ThSign1
.=
|.(
Det (
BilinearM (f,b1,b1))).|;
end;
end;