topgen_6.miz
begin
Lm1: for f be
Function, x,y be
set st x
in (f
"
{y}) holds (f
. x)
= y
proof
let f be
Function, x,y be
set such that
A1: x
in (f
"
{y});
(f
. x)
in
{y} by
A1,
FUNCT_1:def 7;
hence (f
. x)
= y by
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
reserve T for
TopSpace,
x,y,a,b,U,Ux,rx for
set,
p,q for
Rational,
F,G for
Subset-Family of T,
Us,I for
Subset-Family of
Sorgenfrey-line ;
Lm2:
Sorgenfrey-line is
T_2
proof
set T =
Sorgenfrey-line ;
consider B be
Subset-Family of
REAL such that
A1: the
topology of
Sorgenfrey-line
= (
UniCl B) and
A2: B
= {
[.x, q.[ where x,q be
Real : x
< q & q is
rational } by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
let x,y be
Point of T;
reconsider a = x, b = y as
Element of
REAL by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
A3: B
c= the
topology of T by
A1,
CANTOR_1: 1;
assume
A4: x
<> y;
per cases by
A4,
XXREAL_0: 1;
suppose
A5: a
< b;
consider q be
Rational such that
A6: b
< q and q
< (b
+ 1) by
RAT_1: 7,
XREAL_1: 29;
[.b, q.[
in B by
A2,
A6;
then
A7:
[.b, q.[
in the
topology of T by
A3;
consider w be
Rational such that
A8: a
< w and
A9: w
< b by
A5,
RAT_1: 7;
[.a, w.[
in B by
A2,
A8;
then
[.a, w.[
in the
topology of T by
A3;
then
reconsider U =
[.a, w.[, V =
[.b, q.[ as
open
Subset of T by
A7,
PRE_TOPC:def 2;
take U, V;
A10: (U
/\ V)
=
{}
proof
thus (U
/\ V)
c=
{}
proof
let p be
object;
assume
A11: p
in (U
/\ V);
then
reconsider d = p as
ExtReal;
d
in
[.a, w.[ & d
in
[.b, q.[ by
XBOOLE_0:def 4,
A11;
then d
< w & b
<= d by
XXREAL_1: 3;
hence p
in
{} by
A9,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
thus
{}
c= (U
/\ V) by
XBOOLE_1: 2;
end;
thus U is
open & V is
open;
thus thesis by
A6,
A8,
XXREAL_1: 3,
A10,
XBOOLE_0:def 7;
end;
suppose
A12: a
> b;
consider q be
Rational such that
A13: a
< q and q
< (a
+ 1) by
RAT_1: 7,
XREAL_1: 29;
[.a, q.[
in B by
A2,
A13;
then
A14:
[.a, q.[
in the
topology of T by
A3;
consider w be
Rational such that
A15: b
< w and
A16: w
< a by
A12,
RAT_1: 7;
[.b, w.[
in B by
A2,
A15;
then
[.b, w.[
in the
topology of T by
A3;
then
reconsider V =
[.b, w.[, U =
[.a, q.[ as
open
Subset of T by
A14,
PRE_TOPC:def 2;
take U, V;
A17: (U
/\ V)
=
{}
proof
thus (U
/\ V)
c=
{}
proof
let p be
object;
assume
A18: p
in (U
/\ V);
then
reconsider d = p as
ExtReal;
d
in
[.a, q.[ & d
in
[.b, w.[ by
XBOOLE_0:def 4,
A18;
then d
< w & a
<= d by
XXREAL_1: 3;
hence p
in
{} by
A16,
XXREAL_0: 2;
end;
thus
{}
c= (U
/\ V)
proof
let p be
object;
assume p
in
{} ;
hence thesis;
end;
end;
thus U is
open & V is
open;
thus thesis by
A15,
A13,
XXREAL_1: 3,
A17,
XBOOLE_0:def 7;
end;
end;
registration
cluster
Sorgenfrey-line ->
T_2;
coherence by
Lm2;
end
theorem ::
TOPGEN_6:1
Th1: for x,a,b be
Real st x
in
].a, b.[ holds ex p,r be
Rational st x
in
].p, r.[ &
].p, r.[
c=
].a, b.[
proof
let x,a,b be
Real such that
A1: x
in
].a, b.[;
A2: x
> a & x
< b by
XXREAL_1: 4,
A1;
consider p be
Rational such that
A3: p
> a & x
> p by
A2,
RAT_1: 7;
consider r be
Rational such that
A4: x
< r & r
< b by
A2,
RAT_1: 7;
take p, r;
thus x
in
].p, r.[ by
A3,
A4,
XXREAL_1: 4;
thus
].p, r.[
c=
].a, b.[
proof
let y be
object;
assume
A5: y
in
].p, r.[;
then
reconsider y1 = y as
Element of
REAL ;
y1
> p & y1
< r by
XXREAL_1: 4,
A5;
then y1
> a & y1
< b by
A3,
A4,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence y
in
].a, b.[ by
XXREAL_1: 4;
end;
end;
Lm3: for T be
SubSpace of
R^1 holds T is
Lindelof
proof
let T be
SubSpace of
R^1 ;
let U be
Subset-Family of T such that
A1: U is
open and
A2: U is
Cover of T;
per cases ;
suppose
A3: the
carrier of T
=
{} ;
reconsider G =
{} as
Subset-Family of T by
XBOOLE_1: 2;
take G;
thus G
c= U by
XBOOLE_1: 2;
thus G is
Cover of T
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in the
carrier of T;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
thus G is
countable;
end;
suppose
A4: the
carrier of T
<>
{} ;
A5: (
card
[:
RAT ,
RAT :])
c=
omega by
CARD_3:def 14,
CARD_4: 7;
set Q = the set of all
].p, r.[ where p,r be
Rational;
defpred
P[
object,
object] means ex a,b be
Rational st $1
=
].a, b.[ & $2
=
[a, b];
A6: for x be
object st x
in Q holds ex y be
object st y
in
[:
RAT ,
RAT :] &
P[x, y]
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in Q;
then
consider a,b be
Rational such that
A7: x
=
].a, b.[;
take y =
[a, b];
a
in
RAT & b
in
RAT by
RAT_1:def 2;
hence y
in
[:
RAT ,
RAT :] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
thus
P[x, y] by
A7;
end;
consider h be
Function of Q,
[:
RAT ,
RAT :] such that
A8: for x be
object st x
in Q holds
P[x, (h
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A6);
A9: (
rng h)
c=
[:
RAT ,
RAT :];
A10: (
dom h)
= Q by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
h is
one-to-one
proof
let x1,x2 be
object such that
A11: x1
in (
dom h) and
A12: x2
in (
dom h) and
A13: (h
. x1)
= (h
. x2);
consider p1,r1 be
Rational such that
A14: x1
=
].p1, r1.[ and
A15: (h
. x1)
=
[p1, r1] by
A8,
A11;
consider p2,r2 be
Rational such that
A16: x2
=
].p2, r2.[ and
A17: (h
. x2)
=
[p2, r2] by
A8,
A12;
p1
= p2 & r1
= r2 by
XTUPLE_0: 1,
A13,
A15,
A17;
hence x1
= x2 by
A14,
A16;
end;
then (
card Q)
c= (
card
[:
RAT ,
RAT :]) by
CARD_1: 10,
A9,
A10;
then
A18: Q is
countable by
CARD_3:def 14,
A5,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
defpred
Pf[
object,
object] means ex S be
set st S
= $2 & $1
in S & $2
in U;
A19: for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of T holds ex y be
object st y
in U &
Pf[x, y]
proof
let x be
object such that
A20: x
in the
carrier of T;
x
in (
union U) by
SETFAM_1:def 11,
A2,
A20,
TARSKI:def 3;
then
consider Ux be
set such that
A21: x
in Ux & Ux
in U by
TARSKI:def 4;
thus thesis by
A21;
end;
consider f be
Function of the
carrier of T, U such that
A22: for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of T holds
Pf[x, (f
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A19);
A23: U
<>
{}
proof
assume
A24: U
=
{} ;
the
carrier of T
c= (
union U) by
A2,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
hence contradiction by
A24,
ZFMISC_1: 2,
A4;
end;
defpred
Pf1[
object,
object] means ex S be
set st S
= $2 & $2
in Q & $1
in S & (S
/\ (
[#] T))
c= (f
. $1);
A25: for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of T holds ex y be
object st y
in Q &
Pf1[x, y]
proof
let x be
object such that
A26: x
in the
carrier of T;
A27:
Pf[x, (f
. x)] by
A22,
A26;
reconsider Ux = (f
. x) as
Subset of T by
A27;
Ux is
open by
A27,
A1,
TOPS_2:def 1;
then
consider Vx be
Subset of
R^1 such that
A28: Vx
in the
topology of
R^1 & Ux
= (Vx
/\ (
[#] T)) by
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
reconsider x as
Real by
A26;
Ux
c= Vx by
A28,
XBOOLE_1: 17;
then
consider r1 be
Real such that
A29: r1
>
0 &
].(x
- r1), (x
+ r1).[
c= Vx by
A27,
FRECHET: 8,
A28,
PRE_TOPC:def 2;
set a = (x
- r1), b = (x
+ r1);
A30: x
< (x
+ r1) by
XREAL_1: 29,
A29;
x
> (x
- r1) by
XREAL_1: 44,
A29;
then
consider p1,p2 be
Rational such that
A31: x
in
].p1, p2.[ &
].p1, p2.[
c=
].a, b.[ by
Th1,
A30,
XXREAL_1: 4;
set q =
].p1, p2.[;
A32: q
c= Vx by
A29,
A31,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
take q;
thus q
in Q;
take q;
thus thesis by
A28,
A31,
A32,
XBOOLE_1: 26;
end;
consider f1 be
Function of the
carrier of T, Q such that
A33: for x be
object st x
in the
carrier of T holds
Pf1[x, (f1
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A25);
deffunc
F(
object) = (f
. the
Element of (f1
"
{$1}));
].2, 1.[
in Q;
then
A34: (
dom f1)
= the
carrier of T by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A35: for x be
object st x
in (
rng f1) holds
F(x)
in U
proof
let x be
object such that
A36: x
in (
rng f1);
(f1
"
{x})
<>
{} by
A36,
FUNCT_1: 72;
then
A37: the
Element of (f1
"
{x})
in (f1
"
{x});
the
Element of (f1
"
{x})
in the
carrier of T by
A37;
then the
Element of (f1
"
{x})
in (
dom f) by
A23,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
F(x)
in (
rng f) by
FUNCT_1: 3;
hence thesis;
end;
consider g be
Function of (
rng f1), U such that
A38: for q be
object st q
in (
rng f1) holds (g
. q)
=
F(q) from
FUNCT_2:sch 2(
A35);
A39: (
card (
rng f1))
c=
omega by
CARD_3:def 14,
A18;
A40: (
dom g)
= (
rng f1) by
FUNCT_2:def 1,
A23;
then
A41: (
card (
rng g))
c= (
card (
rng f1)) by
CARD_1: 12;
reconsider G = (
rng g) as
Subset-Family of T by
TOPS_2: 2;
take G;
thus G
c= U;
thus G is
Cover of T
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A42: x
in the
carrier of T;
set q = (f1
. x);
A43:
[x, q]
in f1 by
FUNCT_1:def 2,
A42,
A34;
A44: q
in
{q} by
TARSKI:def 1;
A45: q
in (
rng f1) by
FUNCT_1: 3,
A34,
A42;
A46:
Pf1[x, (f1
. x)] by
A33,
A42;
set y = the
Element of (f1
"
{q});
A47: (f1
"
{q})
<>
{} by
A45,
A43,
A44,
RELAT_1: 131;
then
A48: x
in (f1
. y) by
A46,
Lm1;
A49: (f
. y)
= (g
. q) by
A38,
FUNCT_1: 3,
A34,
A42;
y
in (f1
"
{q}) by
A47;
then
A50:
Pf1[y, (f1
. y)] by
A33;
A51: x
in ((f1
. y)
/\ (
[#] T)) by
A42,
A48,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
(g
. q)
in (
rng g) by
FUNCT_1: 3,
A45,
A40;
hence x
in (
union G) by
A51,
TARSKI:def 4,
A49,
A50;
end;
thus G is
countable by
A41,
CARD_3:def 14,
A39,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
end;
end;
registration
cluster ->
Lindelof for
SubSpace of
R^1 ;
coherence by
Lm3;
end
Lm4: for p,r be
Real st r
> p holds ex q be
Rational st q
in
[.p, r.[
proof
let p,r be
Real such that
A1: r
> p;
consider q be
Rational such that
A2: p
< q & q
< r by
A1,
RAT_1: 7;
thus thesis by
A2,
XXREAL_1: 3;
end;
Lm5: the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line
=
REAL by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
consider BB be
Subset-Family of
REAL such that
Lm6: the
topology of
Sorgenfrey-line
= (
UniCl BB) and
Lm7: BB
= {
[.x, q.[ where x,q be
Real : x
< q & q is
rational } by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
Lm8: BB is
Basis of
Sorgenfrey-line by
Lm5,
Lm6,
CANTOR_1: 1,
CANTOR_1:def 2,
TOPS_2: 64;
Lm9:
Sorgenfrey-line is
Lindelof
proof
set S =
Sorgenfrey-line ;
let U be
Subset-Family of S such that
A1: U is
open and
A2: U is
Cover of S;
A3: U
<>
{}
proof
assume
A4: U
=
{} ;
the
carrier of S
c= (
union U) by
SETFAM_1:def 11,
A2;
hence contradiction by
A4,
ZFMISC_1: 2;
end;
set V = { (
Int u) where u be
Subset of
R^1 : u
in U };
set W = (
union V);
reconsider K = ((
[#] S)
\ W) as
set;
V is non
empty
Subset-Family of
R^1
proof
consider u be
object such that
A5: u
in U by
XBOOLE_0:def 1,
A3;
reconsider u as
Subset of
R^1 by
TOPGEN_3:def 2,
TOPMETR: 17,
A5;
set v = (
Int u);
A6: V
c= (
bool (
[#]
R^1 ))
proof
let x be
object such that
A7: x
in V;
consider u be
Subset of
R^1 such that
A8: (
Int u)
= x and u
in U by
A7;
thus x
in (
bool (
[#]
R^1 )) by
A8;
end;
v
in V by
A5;
hence thesis by
A6;
end;
then
reconsider V as non
empty
Subset-Family of
R^1 ;
W
c= (
[#]
R^1 )
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in W;
then
consider v be
set such that
A9: x
in v and
A10: v
in V by
TARSKI:def 4;
thus x
in (
[#]
R^1 ) by
A9,
A10;
end;
then
reconsider W as
Subset of
R^1 ;
defpred
Ph[
object,
object] means ex y be
Subset of
R^1 st $2
= y & y
in U & $1
= (
Int y);
A11: for x be
object st x
in V holds ex y be
object st y
in U &
Ph[x, y]
proof
let x be
object such that
A12: x
in V;
consider u be
Subset of
R^1 such that
A13: x
= (
Int u) and
A14: u
in U by
A12;
take u;
thus u
in U by
A14;
thus
Ph[x, u] by
A13,
A14;
end;
consider h be
Function of V, U such that
A15: for x be
object st x
in V holds
Ph[x, (h
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A11);
A16: for x be
Element of V, hx be
Subset of
R^1 st hx
= (h
. x) holds x
= (
Int hx)
proof
let x be
Element of V, hx be
Subset of
R^1 such that
A17: hx
= (h
. x);
consider y be
Subset of
R^1 such that
A18: (h
. x)
= y and y
in U and
A19: x
= (
Int y) by
A15;
thus x
= (
Int hx) by
A18,
A19,
A17;
end;
reconsider T = (
R^1
| W) as
SubSpace of
R^1 ;
V
c= (
bool (
[#] T))
proof
let x be
object such that
A20: x
in V;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
xx
c= W
proof
let y be
object;
thus thesis by
TARSKI:def 4,
A20;
end;
then xx
c= (
[#] T) by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
hence x
in (
bool (
[#] T));
end;
then
reconsider V1 = V as non
empty
Subset-Family of T;
A21: V1 is
open
proof
let v be
Subset of T such that
A22: v
in V1;
consider u be
Subset of
R^1 such that
A23: v
= (
Int u) and u
in U by
A22;
A24: v
in the
topology of
R^1 by
A23,
PRE_TOPC:def 2;
(v
/\ (
[#] T))
= v
proof
thus (v
/\ (
[#] T))
c= v by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
thus v
c= (v
/\ (
[#] T)) by
XBOOLE_1: 19;
end;
hence v is
open by
A24,
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
end;
A25: the
carrier of T
c= (
union V)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in the
carrier of T;
then x
in (
[#] T);
hence x
in (
union V) by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
end;
consider B be
Subset-Family of T such that
A26: B
c= V and
A27: B is
Cover of T and
A28: B is
countable by
METRIZTS:def 2,
A21,
A25,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
deffunc
Ff(
object) = (h
. $1);
A29: for x be
object st x
in B holds
Ff(x)
in U
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in B;
then (h
. x)
in (
rng h) by
A3,
FUNCT_2: 4,
A26;
hence (h
. x)
in U;
end;
consider f be
Function of B, U such that
A30: for x be
object st x
in B holds (f
. x)
=
Ff(x) from
FUNCT_2:sch 2(
A29);
reconsider Y = (
rng f) as
Subset-Family of S by
TOPS_2: 2;
A31: Y is
Cover of W
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A32: x
in W;
B is
Cover of (
[#] T) by
A27;
then B is
Cover of W by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
then x
in (
union B) by
A32,
SETFAM_1:def 11,
TARSKI:def 3;
then
consider b be
set such that
A33: x
in b & b
in B by
TARSKI:def 4;
B
= (
dom f) by
FUNCT_2:def 1,
A3;
then
A34: (f
. b)
in Y by
FUNCT_1: 3,
A33;
b
c= (f
. b)
proof
let x be
object such that
A35: x
in b;
A36: (f
. b)
= (h
. b) by
A30,
A33;
reconsider b1 = b as
Element of V qua
set by
A26,
A33;
(h
. b1)
in U by
A3;
then
reconsider hb = (h
. b1) as
Subset of
R^1 by
TOPGEN_3:def 2,
TOPMETR: 17;
A37: b1
= (
Int hb) by
A16;
b1
c= hb by
A37,
TOPS_1: 16;
hence x
in (f
. b) by
A36,
A35;
end;
hence x
in (
union Y) by
A34,
TARSKI:def 4,
A33;
end;
A38: (
card B)
c=
omega by
CARD_3:def 14,
A28;
(
dom f)
= B by
FUNCT_2:def 1,
A3;
then (
card (
rng f))
c= (
card B) by
CARD_1: 12;
then
A39: Y is
countable by
CARD_3:def 14,
A38,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
defpred
Pg[
object,
object] means ex S be
set st S
= $2 & $1
in S;
A40: for x be
object st x
in K holds ex y be
object st y
in U &
Pg[x, y]
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in K;
then x
in (
union U) by
SETFAM_1:def 11,
A2,
TARSKI:def 3;
then
consider Ux be
set such that
A41: x
in Ux and
A42: Ux
in U by
TARSKI:def 4;
take Ux;
thus Ux
in U by
A42;
thus
Pg[x, Ux] by
A41;
end;
consider g be
Function of K, U such that
A43: for x be
object st x
in K holds
Pg[x, (g
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A40);
set Q = {
[.p, r.[ where p,r be
Real : r
> p };
defpred
Pk[
object,
object] means ex S be
set st S
= $2 & S
c= (g
. $1) & ex x,rx be
Real st $1
= x & $2
=
[.x, rx.[;
A44: for x be
object st x
in K holds ex y be
object st y
in Q &
Pk[x, y]
proof
let x be
object such that
A45: x
in K;
(g
. x)
in U by
FUNCT_2: 5,
A45,
A3;
then
reconsider gx = (g
. x) as
open
Subset of S by
A1,
TOPS_2:def 1;
reconsider x1 = x as
Point of S by
A45;
Pg[x, (g
. x)] by
A43,
A45;
then
consider a be
Subset of S such that
A46: a
in BB and
A47: x1
in a and
A48: a
c= gx by
YELLOW_9: 31,
Lm8;
consider p,r be
Real such that
A49: a
=
[.p, r.[ and r
> p and r is
rational by
Lm7,
A46;
reconsider x2 = x1 as
Real by
A47,
A49;
A50: p
<= x2 & x2
< r by
A47,
A49,
XXREAL_1: 3;
set y =
[.x2, r.[;
take y;
A51: y
c= a
proof
let z be
object such that
A52: z
in y;
reconsider z1 = z as
Real by
A52;
x2
<= z1 & z1
< r by
A52,
XXREAL_1: 3;
then p
<= z1 & z1
< r by
A50,
XXREAL_0: 2;
hence z
in a by
A49,
XXREAL_1: 3;
end;
thus y
in Q by
A50;
thus
Pk[x, y] by
A51,
A48,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
end;
consider k be
Function of K, Q such that
A53: for x be
object st x
in K holds
Pk[x, (k
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A44);
defpred
Pj[
object,
object] means ex S be
set st S
= $1 & $2
in S;
A54: for x be
object st x
in (
rng k) holds ex y be
object st y
in
RAT &
Pj[x, y]
proof
let x be
object such that
A55: x
in (
rng k);
x
in Q by
A55;
then
consider p,r be
Real such that
A56: x
=
[.p, r.[ and
A57: r
> p;
reconsider xx = x as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
consider y be
Rational such that
A58: y
in xx by
A56,
A57,
Lm4;
take y;
thus y
in
RAT by
RAT_1:def 2;
take xx;
thus thesis by
A58;
end;
consider j be
Function of (
rng k),
RAT such that
A59: for x be
object st x
in (
rng k) holds
Pj[x, (j
. x)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A54);
A60: for x,y be
Element of S st x
in K & y
in K & x
<> y holds (k
. x)
misses (k
. y)
proof
let x,y be
Element of S such that
A61: x
in K and
A62: y
in K and
A63: x
<> y;
A64:
Pk[x, (k
. x)] &
Pk[y, (k
. y)] by
A53,
A61,
A62;
A65: (g
. x)
in U & (g
. y)
in U by
A3,
A61,
A62,
FUNCT_2: 5;
thus ((k
. x)
/\ (k
. y))
=
{}
proof
assume not ((k
. x)
/\ (k
. y))
=
{} ;
then
consider l be
object such that
A66: l
in ((k
. x)
/\ (k
. y)) by
XBOOLE_0: 7;
A67: l
in (k
. x) & l
in (k
. y) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4,
A66;
Pk[x, (k
. x)] by
A53,
A61;
then
consider x1,rx be
Real such that
A68: x
= x1 and
A69: (k
. x)
=
[.x1, rx.[;
Pk[y, (k
. y)] by
A53,
A62;
then
consider y1,ry be
Real such that
A70: y
= y1 and
A71: (k
. y)
=
[.y1, ry.[;
reconsider l as
Real by
A69,
A66;
A72: x1
<= l & l
< rx by
A69,
A67,
XXREAL_1: 3;
A73: y1
<= l & l
< ry by
A71,
A67,
XXREAL_1: 3;
per cases by
A63,
XXREAL_0: 1,
A68,
A70;
suppose
A74: x1
< y1;
y1
< rx by
A72,
A73,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A75: y1
in
].x1, rx.[ by
XXREAL_1: 4,
A74;
reconsider Y =
].x1, rx.[ as
Subset of
R^1 by
TOPMETR: 17;
Y
c= (k
. x) by
XXREAL_1: 22,
A69;
then
A76: Y
c= (g
. x) by
A64,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
reconsider gx = (g
. x) as
Subset of
R^1 by
TOPGEN_3:def 2,
TOPMETR: 17,
A65;
A77: y
in (
Int gx) by
A76,
BORSUK_5: 40,
A70,
A75,
TOPS_1: 22;
(
Int gx)
in V by
A65;
then y
in (
union V) by
A77,
TARSKI:def 4;
hence contradiction by
A62,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
suppose
A78: x1
> y1;
x1
< ry by
A72,
A73,
XXREAL_0: 2;
then
A79: x1
in
].y1, ry.[ by
XXREAL_1: 4,
A78;
reconsider X =
].y1, ry.[ as
Subset of
R^1 by
TOPMETR: 17;
X
c= (k
. y) by
XXREAL_1: 22,
A71;
then
A80: X
c= (g
. y) by
A64,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
reconsider gy = (g
. y) as
Subset of
R^1 by
A65,
TOPGEN_3:def 2,
TOPMETR: 17;
A81: x
in (
Int gy) by
A80,
BORSUK_5: 40,
A68,
A79,
TOPS_1: 22;
(
Int gy)
in V by
A65;
then x
in (
union V) by
A81,
TARSKI:def 4;
hence contradiction by
A61,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
end;
end;
end;
A82: (
rng j)
c=
RAT ;
A83: (
dom j)
= (
rng k) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A84: j is
one-to-one
proof
let x1,x2 be
object such that
A85: x1
in (
dom j) and
A86: x2
in (
dom j) and
A87: (j
. x1)
= (j
. x2);
reconsider x1, x2 as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
consider y1 be
object such that
A88: y1
in (
dom k) & x1
= (k
. y1) by
FUNCT_1:def 3,
A85;
consider y2 be
object such that
A89: y2
in (
dom k) & x2
= (k
. y2) by
FUNCT_1:def 3,
A86;
A90: y1
in K & y2
in K by
A88,
A89;
Pj[x1, (j
. x1)] &
Pj[x2, (j
. x2)] by
A85,
A86,
A59;
then ((k
. y1)
/\ (k
. y2))
<>
{} by
A88,
A89,
XBOOLE_0:def 4,
A87;
hence thesis by
A88,
A89,
A60,
A90,
XBOOLE_0:def 7;
end;
A91: (
card (
rng k))
c=
omega by
TOPGEN_3: 17,
CARD_1: 10,
A82,
A83,
A84;
A92:
[.1, 2.[
in Q;
then
A93: (
dom k)
= K by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A94: k is
one-to-one
proof
let x1,x2 be
object such that
A95: x1
in (
dom k) and
A96: x2
in (
dom k) and
A97: (k
. x1)
= (k
. x2);
A98: x1
in K & x2
in K by
A95,
A96;
(k
. x1)
in (
rng k) & (k
. x2)
in (
rng k) by
A92,
A95,
A96,
FUNCT_2: 4;
then
A99: (k
. x1)
in Q & (k
. x2)
in Q;
consider p1,r1 be
Real such that
A100: (k
. x1)
=
[.p1, r1.[ and
A101: r1
> p1 by
A99;
consider q be
Rational such that
A102: q
in (k
. x1) by
A100,
A101,
Lm4;
q
in ((k
. x1)
/\ (k
. x2)) by
A102,
A97;
hence x1
= x2 by
A60,
XBOOLE_0:def 7,
A98;
end;
A103: (
card K)
c= (
card (
rng k)) by
CARD_1: 10,
A93,
A94;
A104: (
card K)
c=
omega by
A103,
A91,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
(
dom g)
= K by
FUNCT_2:def 1,
A3;
then (
card (
rng g))
c= (
card K) by
CARD_1: 12;
then
A105: (
rng g) is
countable by
CARD_3:def 14,
A104,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
reconsider Z = (
rng g) as
Subset-Family of S by
TOPS_2: 2;
A106: Z is
Cover of K
proof
let x be
object;
assume
A107: x
in K;
then
A108:
Pg[x, (g
. x)] by
A43;
x
in (
dom g) by
A107,
FUNCT_2:def 1,
A3;
then (g
. x)
in Z by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
hence x
in (
union Z) by
TARSKI:def 4,
A108;
end;
W
c= (
[#] S)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in W;
then x
in (
[#]
R^1 );
hence x
in (
[#] S) by
TOPMETR: 17,
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
end;
then
A109: (W
\/ K)
= (
[#] S) by
XBOOLE_1: 45;
A110: (Z
\/ Y) is
Cover of (
[#] S)
proof
let x be
object;
assume x
in (
[#] S);
then x
in W or x
in K by
XBOOLE_0:def 3,
A109;
then x
in (
union Y) or x
in (
union Z) by
A31,
A106,
TARSKI:def 3,
SETFAM_1:def 11;
then x
in ((
union Y)
\/ (
union Z)) by
XBOOLE_0:def 3;
hence x
in (
union (Z
\/ Y)) by
ZFMISC_1: 78;
end;
reconsider G = (Z
\/ Y) as
Subset-Family of S;
take G;
thus G
c= U by
XBOOLE_1: 8;
thus G is
Cover of S by
A110;
thus G is
countable by
CARD_2: 85,
A105,
A39;
end;
registration
cluster
Sorgenfrey-line ->
Lindelof;
coherence by
Lm9;
end
definition
::
TOPGEN_6:def1
func
Sorgenfrey-plane -> non
empty
strict
TopSpace equals
[:
Sorgenfrey-line ,
Sorgenfrey-line :];
correctness ;
end
definition
::
TOPGEN_6:def2
func
real-anti-diagonal ->
Subset of
[:
REAL ,
REAL :] equals {
[x, y] where x,y be
Real : y
= (
- x) };
correctness
proof
set L = {
[x, y] where x,y be
Real : y
= (
- x) };
L
c=
[:
REAL ,
REAL :]
proof
let z be
object;
assume z
in L;
then
consider x,y be
Real such that
A1: z
=
[x, y] and y
= (
- x);
x
in
REAL & y
in
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
hence z
in
[:
REAL ,
REAL :] by
A1,
ZFMISC_1: 87;
end;
hence L is
Subset of
[:
REAL ,
REAL :];
end;
end
theorem ::
TOPGEN_6:2
Th2:
[:
RAT ,
RAT :] is
dense
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-plane
proof
[:
RAT ,
RAT :]
c= (
[#]
Sorgenfrey-plane )
proof
let z be
object;
assume z
in
[:
RAT ,
RAT :];
then
consider x,y be
object such that
A1: x
in
RAT & y
in
RAT and
A2: z
=
[x, y] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
x
in
REAL & y
in
REAL by
A1,
NUMBERS: 12;
then x
in (
[#]
Sorgenfrey-line ) & y
in (
[#]
Sorgenfrey-line ) by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
then z
in
[:(
[#]
Sorgenfrey-line ), (
[#]
Sorgenfrey-line ):] by
A2,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
hence z
in (
[#]
Sorgenfrey-plane );
end;
then
reconsider C =
[:
RAT ,
RAT :] as
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-plane ;
for A be
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-plane st A
<>
{} & A is
open holds A
meets C
proof
let A be
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-plane such that
A3: A
<>
{} and
A4: A is
open;
consider B be
Subset-Family of
Sorgenfrey-plane such that
A5: A
= (
union B) and
A6: (for e be
set st e
in B holds ex X1 be
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line , Y1 be
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line st (e
=
[:X1, Y1:] & X1 is
open & Y1 is
open)) by
BORSUK_1: 5,
A4;
now
assume
A7: for e be
set st e
in B holds e
=
{} ;
(
union B)
c=
{}
proof
let z be
object;
assume z
in (
union B);
then
consider y be
set such that
A8: z
in y & y
in B by
TARSKI:def 4;
thus z
in
{} by
A8,
A7;
end;
hence contradiction by
A5,
A3;
end;
then
consider e be
set such that
A9: e
in B & e
<>
{} ;
consider X1,Y1 be
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line such that
A10: e
=
[:X1, Y1:] and
A11: X1 is
open & Y1 is
open by
A6,
A9;
A12: X1
<>
{} & Y1
<>
{} by
ZFMISC_1: 90,
A9,
A10;
consider x1 be
object such that
A13: x1
in X1 by
A12,
XBOOLE_0: 7;
consider y1 be
object such that
A14: y1
in Y1 by
A12,
XBOOLE_0: 7;
consider ax be
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line such that
A15: ax
in BB and x1
in ax and
A16: ax
c= X1 by
YELLOW_9: 31,
A11,
A13,
Lm8;
consider ay be
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line such that
A17: ay
in BB and y1
in ay and
A18: ay
c= Y1 by
YELLOW_9: 31,
A11,
A14,
Lm8;
consider px,qx be
Real such that
A19: ax
=
[.px, qx.[ and
A20: px
< qx & qx is
rational by
A15,
Lm7;
consider py,qy be
Real such that
A21: ay
=
[.py, qy.[ and
A22: py
< qy & qy is
rational by
A17,
Lm7;
consider rx be
Rational such that
A23: px
< rx & rx
< qx by
RAT_1: 7,
A20;
A24: rx
in ax by
A23,
XXREAL_1: 3,
A19;
consider ry be
Rational such that
A25: py
< ry & ry
< qy by
RAT_1: 7,
A22;
A26: ry
in ay by
A25,
XXREAL_1: 3,
A21;
rx
in
RAT & ry
in
RAT by
RAT_1:def 2;
then
A27:
[rx, ry]
in C by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
[rx, ry]
in
[:X1, Y1:] by
A24,
A26,
A16,
A18,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
then
A28:
[rx, ry]
in A by
A5,
A9,
A10,
TARSKI:def 4;
thus A
meets C by
A27,
A28,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
end;
hence
[:
RAT ,
RAT :] is
dense
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-plane by
TOPS_1: 45;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_6:3
Th3: (
card
real-anti-diagonal )
=
continuum
proof
(
REAL ,
real-anti-diagonal )
are_equipotent
proof
defpred
P[
object,
object] means ex x be
Real st $1
= x & $2
=
[x, (
- x)];
A1: for r be
object st r
in
REAL holds ex a be
object st a
in
real-anti-diagonal &
P[r, a]
proof
let r be
object;
assume r
in
REAL ;
then
reconsider r as
Real;
set a =
[r, (
- r)];
a
in
real-anti-diagonal ;
hence thesis;
end;
consider Z be
Function of
REAL ,
real-anti-diagonal such that
A2: for r be
object st r
in
REAL holds
P[r, (Z
. r)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A1);
take Z;
A3:
real-anti-diagonal
<>
{}
proof
reconsider x = 1, y = (
- 1) as
Element of
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
set z =
[x, y];
z
in
real-anti-diagonal ;
hence
real-anti-diagonal
<>
{} ;
end;
thus Z is
one-to-one
proof
let r1,r2 be
object such that
A4: r1
in (
dom Z) & r2
in (
dom Z) and
A5: (Z
. r1)
= (Z
. r2);
consider x1 be
Real such that
A6: r1
= x1 & (Z
. r1)
=
[x1, (
- x1)] by
A2,
A4;
consider x2 be
Real such that
A7: r2
= x2 & (Z
. r2)
=
[x2, (
- x2)] by
A2,
A4;
thus r1
= r2 by
A6,
A7,
A5,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
thus (
dom Z)
=
REAL by
A3,
FUNCT_2:def 1;
thus (
rng Z)
=
real-anti-diagonal
proof
thus (
rng Z)
c=
real-anti-diagonal ;
thus
real-anti-diagonal
c= (
rng Z)
proof
let z be
object;
assume z
in
real-anti-diagonal ;
then
consider x,y be
Real such that
A8: z
=
[x, y] and
A9: y
= (
- x);
consider x1 be
Real such that
A10: x
= x1 & (Z
. x)
=
[x1, (
- x1)] by
A2,
XREAL_0:def 1;
thus z
in (
rng Z) by
A10,
A8,
A9,
FUNCT_2: 4,
A3,
XREAL_0:def 1;
end;
end;
end;
hence (
card
real-anti-diagonal )
=
continuum by
TOPGEN_3:def 4,
CARD_1: 5;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_6:4
Th4:
real-anti-diagonal is
closed
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-plane
proof
set L =
real-anti-diagonal ;
set S2 =
Sorgenfrey-plane ;
A1: L
c= (
[#] S2)
proof
let z be
object;
assume z
in L;
then
consider x,y be
Real such that
A2: z
=
[x, y] and y
= (
- x);
x
in
REAL & y
in
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
then x
in (
[#]
Sorgenfrey-line ) & y
in (
[#]
Sorgenfrey-line ) by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
then
[x, y]
in
[:(
[#]
Sorgenfrey-line ), (
[#]
Sorgenfrey-line ):] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
hence z
in (
[#]
Sorgenfrey-plane ) by
A2;
end;
reconsider L =
real-anti-diagonal as
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-plane by
A1;
defpred
Pf[
object,
object] means ex x,y be
Real st $1
=
[x, y] & $2
= (x
+ y);
A3: for z be
object st z
in the
carrier of S2 holds ex u be
object st u
in the
carrier of
R^1 &
Pf[z, u]
proof
let z be
object;
assume z
in the
carrier of S2;
then z
in
[:the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line , the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line :] by
BORSUK_1:def 2;
then
consider x,y be
object such that
A4: x
in the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line and
A5: y
in the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line and
A6: z
=
[x, y] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider x as
Element of
REAL by
A4,
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
reconsider y as
Element of
REAL by
A5,
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
set u = (x
+ y);
u
in the
carrier of
R^1 by
TOPMETR: 17;
hence thesis by
A6;
end;
consider f be
Function of S2,
R^1 such that
A7: for z be
object st z
in the
carrier of S2 holds
Pf[z, (f
. z)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A3);
A8: for x,y be
Element of
REAL st
[x, y]
in the
carrier of S2 holds (f
.
[x, y])
= (x
+ y)
proof
let x,y be
Element of
REAL such that
A9:
[x, y]
in the
carrier of S2;
consider x1,y1 be
Real such that
A10:
[x, y]
=
[x1, y1] & (f
.
[x, y])
= (x1
+ y1) by
A9,
A7;
x
= x1 & y
= y1 by
A10,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence thesis by
A10;
end;
for p be
Point of S2, r be
positive
Real holds ex W be
open
Subset of S2 st p
in W & (f
.: W)
c=
].((f
. p)
- r), ((f
. p)
+ r).[
proof
let p be
Point of S2;
let r be
positive
Real;
p
in (
[#] S2);
then p
in
[:the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line , the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line :] by
BORSUK_1:def 2;
then
consider x,y be
object such that
A11: x
in the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line and
A12: y
in the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line and
A13: p
=
[x, y] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider x as
Element of
REAL by
A11,
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
reconsider y as
Element of
REAL by
A12,
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
A14: (f
. p)
= (x
+ y) by
A13,
A8;
set U =
].((f
. p)
- r), ((f
. p)
+ r).[;
set W =
[:
[.x, (x
+ (r
/ 2)).[,
[.y, (y
+ (r
/ 2)).[:];
A15: W
c= (
[#] S2)
proof
let z be
object;
assume z
in W;
then
consider u,v be
object such that
A16: u
in
[.x, (x
+ (r
/ 2)).[ & v
in
[.y, (y
+ (r
/ 2)).[ and
A17: z
=
[u, v] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider u, v as
Element of (
[#]
Sorgenfrey-line ) by
A16,
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
u
in (
[#]
Sorgenfrey-line ) & v
in (
[#]
Sorgenfrey-line );
then z
in
[:(
[#]
Sorgenfrey-line ), (
[#]
Sorgenfrey-line ):] by
A17,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
hence z
in (
[#] S2);
end;
reconsider W as
Subset of S2 by
A15;
reconsider X =
[.x, (x
+ (r
/ 2)).[ as
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
reconsider Y =
[.y, (y
+ (r
/ 2)).[ as
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
X is
open & Y is
open by
TOPGEN_3: 11;
then
A18: W is
open by
BORSUK_1: 6;
(r
/ 2) is
positive;
then x
< (x
+ (r
/ 2)) & y
< (y
+ (r
/ 2)) by
XREAL_1: 29;
then x
in
[.x, (x
+ (r
/ 2)).[ & y
in
[.y, (y
+ (r
/ 2)).[ by
XXREAL_1: 3;
then
A19: p
in W by
A13,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
(f
.: W)
c= U
proof
let z be
object;
assume z
in (f
.: W);
then
consider w be
object such that w
in (
dom f) and
A20: w
in W and
A21: z
= (f
. w) by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
consider x1,y1 be
object such that
A22: x1
in X & y1
in Y and
A23: w
=
[x1, y1] by
A20,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider x1 as
Element of
REAL by
A22;
reconsider y1 as
Element of
REAL by
A22;
A24: x
<= x1 & x1
< (x
+ (r
/ 2)) & y
<= y1 & y1
< (y
+ (r
/ 2)) by
A22,
XXREAL_1: 3;
A25: (x
+ y)
<= (x1
+ y1) by
XREAL_1: 7,
A24;
((x
+ y)
- r)
< (x
+ y) by
XREAL_1: 44,
XXREAL_0:def 6;
then
A26: ((x
+ y)
- r)
< (x1
+ y1) by
A25,
XXREAL_0: 2;
(x1
+ y1)
< ((x
+ (r
/ 2))
+ (y
+ (r
/ 2))) by
XREAL_1: 8,
A24;
then (x1
+ y1)
in U by
A26,
A14,
XXREAL_1: 4;
hence z
in U by
A23,
A8,
A20,
A21;
end;
hence thesis by
A19,
A18;
end;
then
A27: f is
continuous by
TOPS_4: 21;
reconsider zz =
0 as
Element of
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
reconsider k =
{zz} as
Subset of
R^1 by
TOPMETR: 17;
reconsider k1 =
[.zz, zz.] as
Subset of
R^1 by
TOPMETR: 17;
A28: k
= k1 by
XXREAL_1: 17;
L
= (f
" k)
proof
hereby
let z be
object;
assume
A29: z
in L;
then
consider x,y be
Real such that
A30: z
=
[x, y] and
A31: y
= (
- x);
reconsider x, y as
Element of
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
(f
. z)
= (x
+ y) by
A8,
A30,
A29;
then (f
. z)
in k by
TARSKI:def 1,
A31;
hence z
in (f
" k) by
FUNCT_2: 38,
A29;
end;
let z be
object;
assume z
in (f
" k);
then
A32: z
in (
[#] S2) & (f
. z)
in k by
FUNCT_2: 38;
then
A33: z
in
[:the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line , the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line :] by
BORSUK_1:def 2;
consider x,y be
object such that
A34: x
in the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line and
A35: y
in the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line and
A36: z
=
[x, y] by
A33,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
reconsider x1 = x as
Element of
REAL by
A34,
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
reconsider y1 = y as
Element of
REAL by
A35,
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
(f
. z)
= (x1
+ y1) by
A8,
A36,
A32;
then (x1
+ y1)
=
0 by
A32,
TARSKI:def 1;
then (
- x1)
= y1;
hence z
in L by
A36;
end;
hence thesis by
A28,
A27,
TREAL_1: 1;
end;
the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-line
=
REAL by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
then
Lm10: the
carrier of
Sorgenfrey-plane
=
[:
REAL ,
REAL :] by
BORSUK_1:def 2;
Lm11: for x,y be
Real st
[x, y]
in
real-anti-diagonal holds y
= (
- x)
proof
let x,y be
Real;
assume
[x, y]
in
real-anti-diagonal ;
then
consider x1,y1 be
Real such that
A1:
[x, y]
=
[x1, y1] and
A2: y1
= (
- x1);
x
= x1 & y
= y1 by
A1,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
hence y
= (
- x) by
A2;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_6:5
Th5: for A be
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-plane st A
=
real-anti-diagonal holds (
Der A) is
empty
proof
let A be
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-plane such that
A1: A
=
real-anti-diagonal ;
assume not (
Der A) is
empty;
then
consider a be
object such that
A2: a
in (
Der A) by
XBOOLE_0: 7;
a
is_an_accumulation_point_of A by
TOPGEN_1:def 3,
A2;
then
A3: a
in (
Cl (A
\
{a})) by
TOPGEN_1:def 2;
consider x,y be
object such that
A4: x
in
REAL & y
in
REAL and
A5: a
=
[x, y] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2,
Lm10,
A2;
reconsider x, y as
Real by
A4;
per cases ;
suppose
A6: y
>= (
- x);
set Gx =
[.x, (x
+ 1).[;
set Gy =
[.y, (y
+ 1).[;
reconsider Gx, Gy as
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
set G =
[:Gx, Gy:];
reconsider G as
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-plane ;
Gx is
open & Gy is
open by
TOPGEN_3: 11;
then
A7: G is
open by
BORSUK_1: 6;
x
<= x & x
< (x
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 29;
then
A8: x
in Gx by
XXREAL_1: 3;
y
<= y & y
< (y
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 29;
then y
in Gy by
XXREAL_1: 3;
then
A9: a
in G by
A5,
A8,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
now
assume (G
/\ (A
\
{a}))
<>
{} ;
then
consider z be
object such that
A10: z
in (G
/\ (A
\
{a})) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
z
in G & z
in (A
\
{a}) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4,
A10;
then
A11: z
in G & z
in A & not z
in
{a} by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
consider xz,yz be
object such that
A12: xz
in
[.x, (x
+ 1).[ & yz
in
[.y, (y
+ 1).[ and
A13: z
=
[xz, yz] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2,
A11;
reconsider xz as
Real by
A12;
reconsider yz as
Real by
A12;
A14: x
<= xz & y
<= yz by
A12,
XXREAL_1: 3;
A15: (
- x)
>= (
- xz) & y
<= (
- xz) by
A14,
Lm11,
A1,
A11,
A13,
XREAL_1: 24;
A16: (
- x)
>= y by
XXREAL_0: 2,
A15;
A17: (
- x)
= y by
A16,
A6,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then
A18: (
- x)
<= yz by
A12,
XXREAL_1: 3;
A19: (
- x)
<= (
- xz) by
Lm11,
A1,
A11,
A13,
A18;
A20: x
>= xz by
XREAL_1: 24,
A19;
A21: x
= xz by
A20,
A14,
XXREAL_0: 1;
then y
= yz by
A17,
Lm11,
A1,
A11,
A13;
hence contradiction by
A11,
TARSKI:def 1,
A13,
A5,
A21;
end;
then G
misses (A
\
{a}) by
XBOOLE_0:def 7;
hence contradiction by
A7,
A9,
A3,
PRE_TOPC:def 7;
end;
suppose
A22: y
< (
- x);
set Gx =
[.x, (x
+ (
|.(x
+ y).|
/ 2)).[;
set Gy =
[.y, (y
+ (
|.(x
+ y).|
/ 2)).[;
reconsider Gx, Gy as
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line by
TOPGEN_3:def 2;
reconsider G =
[:Gx, Gy:] as
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-plane ;
Gx is
open & Gy is
open by
TOPGEN_3: 11;
then
A23: G is
open by
BORSUK_1: 6;
A24: (y
+ x)
<
0 by
A22,
XREAL_1: 61;
A25:
|.(x
+ y).|
= (
- (x
+ y)) by
ABSVALUE:def 1,
A22,
XREAL_1: 61;
A26:
|.(x
+ y).|
>
0 by
A24,
A25,
XREAL_1: 58;
then x
< (x
+ (
|.(x
+ y).|
/ 2)) by
XREAL_1: 29,
XREAL_1: 139;
then
A27: x
in Gx by
XXREAL_1: 3;
y
< (y
+ (
|.(x
+ y).|
/ 2)) by
XREAL_1: 29,
A26,
XREAL_1: 139;
then y
in Gy by
XXREAL_1: 3;
then
A28: a
in G by
A5,
A27,
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
now
assume (G
/\ (A
\
{a}))
<>
{} ;
then
consider z be
object such that
A29: z
in (G
/\ (A
\
{a})) by
XBOOLE_0:def 1;
z
in G & z
in (A
\
{a}) by
A29,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
A30: z
in G & z
in A & not z
in
{a} by
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
consider xz,yz be
object such that
A31: xz
in
[.x, (x
+ (
|.(x
+ y).|
/ 2)).[ & yz
in
[.y, (y
+ (
|.(x
+ y).|
/ 2)).[ and
A32: z
=
[xz, yz] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2,
A30;
reconsider xz, yz as
Real by
A31;
A33: yz
= (
- xz) by
Lm11,
A1,
A30,
A32;
A34: xz
< (x
+ (
|.(x
+ y).|
/ 2)) & yz
< (y
+ (
|.(x
+ y).|
/ 2)) by
A31,
XXREAL_1: 3;
(xz
+ yz)
< ((x
+ (
|.(x
+ y).|
/ 2))
+ (y
+ (
|.(x
+ y).|
/ 2))) by
A34,
XREAL_1: 8;
hence contradiction by
A33,
A25;
end;
then G
misses (A
\
{a}) by
XBOOLE_0:def 7;
hence contradiction by
A23,
A28,
A3,
PRE_TOPC:def 7;
end;
end;
theorem ::
TOPGEN_6:6
Th6: for A be
Subset of
real-anti-diagonal holds A is
closed
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-plane
proof
reconsider B =
real-anti-diagonal as
closed
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-plane by
Th4;
let A be
Subset of
real-anti-diagonal ;
A
c= B;
then
reconsider A as
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-plane by
XBOOLE_1: 1;
(
Der A)
c= (
Der B) by
TOPGEN_1: 30;
then (
Der A)
c=
{} by
Th5;
then (
Der A)
=
{} ;
then (
Cl A)
= (A
\/
{} ) by
TOPGEN_1: 29;
hence thesis;
end;
Lm12: not
Sorgenfrey-plane is
Lindelof
proof
set S2 =
Sorgenfrey-plane ;
reconsider L =
real-anti-diagonal as
Subset of S2 by
Lm10;
reconsider T = (S2
| L) as
SubSpace of S2;
A1: for v be
Subset of T, z be
set st v
=
{z} & z
in L holds v is
open
proof
let v be
Subset of T, z be
set such that
A2: v
=
{z} and
A3: z
in L;
consider x,y be
Real such that
A4: z
=
[x, y] and
A5: y
= (
- x) by
A3;
set Ux =
[.x, (x
+ 1).[;
reconsider Ux as
open
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line by
TOPGEN_3: 11;
set Uy =
[.y, (y
+ 1).[;
reconsider Uy as
open
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-line by
TOPGEN_3: 11;
reconsider U2 =
[:Ux, Uy:] as
Subset of S2;
A6: U2
in the
topology of S2 by
BORSUK_1: 6,
PRE_TOPC:def 2;
A7: (U2
/\ L)
= v
proof
hereby
let p be
object;
assume p
in (U2
/\ L);
then
A8: p
in U2 & p
in L by
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then
consider p1,p2 be
object such that
A9: p1
in Ux & p2
in Uy and
A10: p
=
[p1, p2] by
ZFMISC_1:def 2;
consider r1,r2 be
Real such that
A11: p
=
[r1, r2] and
A12: r2
= (
- r1) by
A8;
p1
= r1 & p2
= r2 by
XTUPLE_0: 1,
A10,
A11;
then
A13: r1
>= x & r1
< (x
+ 1) & r2
>= y & r2
< (y
+ 1) by
XXREAL_1: 3,
A9;
then r1
<= x by
XREAL_1: 24,
A5,
A12;
then
A14: r1
= x by
A13,
XXREAL_0: 1;
r2
<= y by
XREAL_1: 24,
A12,
A13,
A5;
then r2
= y by
A13,
XXREAL_0: 1;
hence p
in v by
A2,
A14,
A11,
A4,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
let p be
object;
assume p
in v;
then
A15: p
= z by
A2,
TARSKI:def 1;
x
< (x
+ 1) & y
< (y
+ 1) by
XREAL_1: 29;
then x
in Ux & y
in Uy by
XXREAL_1: 3;
then p
in U2 by
ZFMISC_1:def 2,
A15,
A4;
hence p
in (U2
/\ L) by
XBOOLE_0:def 4,
A15,
A3;
end;
L
= (
[#] T) by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
hence v is
open by
A6,
A7,
PRE_TOPC:def 4;
end;
set V = {
{v} where v be
Element of S2 : v
in L };
V
c= (
bool (
[#] T))
proof
let z be
object;
reconsider zz = z as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume z
in V;
then
consider v be
Element of S2 such that
A16: z
=
{v} and
A17: v
in L;
A18: v
in (
[#] T) by
A17,
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
zz
c= (
[#] T)
proof
let y be
object;
assume y
in zz;
hence y
in (
[#] T) by
TARSKI:def 1,
A16,
A18;
end;
hence z
in (
bool (
[#] T));
end;
then
reconsider V as
Subset-Family of T;
A19: V is
open
proof
let u be
Subset of T;
assume u
in V;
then
consider z be
Element of S2 such that
A20: u
=
{z} and
A21: z
in L;
thus u is
open by
A20,
A21,
A1;
end;
A22: V is
Cover of T
proof
let z be
object;
assume z
in the
carrier of T;
then z
in (
[#] T);
then z
in L by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
then
{z}
in V & z
in
{z} by
TARSKI:def 1;
hence z
in (
union V) by
TARSKI:def 4;
end;
defpred
Pg[
object,
object] means ex x,y be
Real st $1
= x & $2
=
{
[x, y]};
A23: for r be
object st r
in
REAL holds ex v be
object st v
in V &
Pg[r, v]
proof
let r be
object;
assume r
in
REAL ;
then
reconsider r as
Real;
reconsider y = (
- r) as
Real;
set u =
[r, y];
A24: u
in L;
then
reconsider u as
Element of S2;
set v =
{u};
v
in V by
A24;
hence thesis;
end;
consider g be
Function of
REAL , V such that
A25: for r be
object st r
in
REAL holds
Pg[r, (g
. r)] from
FUNCT_2:sch 1(
A23);
reconsider x = 1 as
Element of
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
reconsider y = (
- 1) as
Element of
REAL by
XREAL_0:def 1;
set z =
[x, y];
A26: z
in L;
then
reconsider z as
Element of S2;
{z}
in V by
A26;
then
A27: (
dom g)
=
REAL by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A28: g is
one-to-one
proof
let r1,r2 be
object such that
A29: r1
in (
dom g) and
A30: r2
in (
dom g) and
A31: (g
. r1)
= (g
. r2);
consider x1,y1 be
Real such that
A32: r1
= x1 and
A33: (g
. r1)
=
{
[x1, y1]} by
A25,
A29;
consider x2,y2 be
Real such that
A34: r2
= x2 and
A35: (g
. r2)
=
{
[x2, y2]} by
A25,
A30;
[x1, y1]
=
[x2, y2] by
ZFMISC_1: 3,
A35,
A33,
A31;
hence r1
= r2 by
A32,
A34,
XTUPLE_0: 1;
end;
(
rng g)
c= V;
then
A36: (
card
REAL )
c= (
card V) by
CARD_1: 10,
A28,
A27;
A37: not (
card V)
c=
omega by
A36,
TOPGEN_3: 30,
TOPGEN_3:def 4;
A38: not ex G be
Subset-Family of T st G
c= V & G is
Cover of T & G is
countable
proof
assume ex G be
Subset-Family of T st G
c= V & G is
Cover of T & G is
countable;
then
consider G be
Subset-Family of T such that
A39: G
c= V and
A40: G is
Cover of T and
A41: G is
countable;
per cases by
A39,
XBOOLE_0:def 8;
suppose G
c< V;
then
consider u be
object such that
A42: u
in V and
A43: not u
in G by
XBOOLE_0: 6;
consider v be
Element of S2 such that
A44: u
=
{v} and
A45: v
in L by
A42;
A46: (
[#] T)
c= (
union G) by
SETFAM_1:def 11,
A40;
v
in (
[#] T) by
A45,
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
then
consider u1 be
set such that
A47: v
in u1 and
A48: u1
in G by
TARSKI:def 4,
A46;
u1
in V by
A39,
A48;
then
consider v1 be
Element of S2 such that
A49: u1
=
{v1} and v1
in L;
thus contradiction by
A43,
A44,
A49,
A48,
A47,
TARSKI:def 1;
end;
suppose G
= V;
hence contradiction by
A37,
CARD_3:def 14,
A41;
end;
end;
thus not S2 is
Lindelof by
Th4,
METRIZTS:def 2,
A19,
A22,
A38;
end;
registration
cluster
Sorgenfrey-plane -> non
Lindelof;
coherence by
Lm12;
end
registration
cluster
Sorgenfrey-line ->
regular;
coherence by
TOPGEN_5: 59;
end
registration
cluster
Sorgenfrey-line ->
normal;
coherence ;
end
Lm13: not
Sorgenfrey-plane is
normal
proof
set L =
real-anti-diagonal ;
set S2 =
Sorgenfrey-plane ;
reconsider C =
[:
RAT ,
RAT :] as
dense
Subset of
Sorgenfrey-plane by
Th2;
defpred
P[
object,
object] means ex S be
set, U,V be
open
Subset of S2 st $1
= S & $2
= (U
/\ C) & S
c= U & (L
\ S)
c= V & U
misses V;
A1: (
exp (2,
omega ))
in (
exp (2,(
exp (2,
omega )))) by
CARD_5: 14;
(
card C)
c=
omega by
CARD_3:def 14,
CARD_4: 7;
then
A2: (
exp (2,(
card C)))
c= (
exp (2,
omega )) by
CARD_2: 93;
assume
A3: for W,V be
Subset of S2 st W
<>
{} & V
<>
{} & W is
closed & V is
closed & W
misses V holds ex P,Q be
Subset of S2 st P is
open & Q is
open & W
c= P & V
c= Q & P
misses Q;
A4: for a be
object st a
in (
bool L) holds ex b be
object st
P[a, b]
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in (
bool L);
then
reconsider aa = a as
Subset of L;
reconsider a9 = (L
\ aa) as
Subset of L by
XBOOLE_1: 36;
reconsider A = aa, B = a9 as
closed
Subset of S2 by
Th6;
per cases ;
suppose
A5: a
=
{} ;
take
{} ,
{} ;
take (
{} S2), (
[#] S2);
thus thesis by
A5,
Th4,
XBOOLE_1: 65;
end;
suppose
A6: a
= L;
take ((
[#] S2)
/\ C), L;
take (
[#] S2), (
{} S2);
thus thesis by
A6,
Th4,
XBOOLE_1: 37,
XBOOLE_1: 65;
end;
suppose
A7: a
<>
{} & a
<> L;
((aa
` )
` )
= (a9
` );
then
A8: B
<> (
{} L) by
A7;
A
misses B by
XBOOLE_1: 79;
then
consider P,Q be
Subset of S2 such that
A9: P is
open and
A10: Q is
open and
A11: A
c= P and
A12: B
c= Q and
A13: P
misses Q by
A8,
A3,
A7;
take (P
/\ C);
thus thesis by
A9,
A10,
A11,
A12,
A13;
end;
end;
consider G be
Function such that
A14: (
dom G)
= (
bool L) and
A15: for a be
object st a
in (
bool L) holds
P[a, (G
. a)] from
CLASSES1:sch 1(
A4);
G is
one-to-one
proof
let x,y be
object;
assume that
A16: x
in (
dom G) and
A17: y
in (
dom G);
reconsider A = x, B = y as
Subset of L by
A16,
A17,
A14;
assume that
A18: (G
. x)
= (G
. y) and
A19: x
<> y;
consider z be
object such that
A20: not (z
in A iff z
in B) by
A19,
TARSKI: 2;
A21: z
in (A
\ B) or z
in (B
\ A) by
A20,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
P[B, (G
. B)] by
A15;
then
consider UB,VB be
open
Subset of S2 such that
A22: (G
. B)
= (UB
/\ C) and
A23: B
c= UB and
A24: (L
\ B)
c= VB and
A25: UB
misses VB;
P[A, (G
. A)] by
A15;
then
consider UA,VA be
open
Subset of S2 such that
A26: (G
. A)
= (UA
/\ C) and
A27: A
c= UA and
A28: (L
\ A)
c= VA and
A29: UA
misses VA;
(B
\ A)
= (B
/\ (A
` )) by
SUBSET_1: 13;
then
A30: (B
\ A)
c= (UB
/\ VA) by
A28,
A23,
XBOOLE_1: 27;
(A
\ B)
= (A
/\ (B
` )) by
SUBSET_1: 13;
then (A
\ B)
c= (UA
/\ VB) by
A27,
A24,
XBOOLE_1: 27;
then (ex z be
object st z
in C & z
in (UA
/\ VB)) or ex z be
object st z
in C & z
in (UB
/\ VA) by
XBOOLE_0: 3,
A30,
A21,
TOPS_1: 45;
then
consider z be
set such that
A31: z
in C and
A32: z
in (UA
/\ VB) or z
in (UB
/\ VA);
z
in UA & z
in VB or z
in UB & z
in VA by
A32,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
then z
in UA & not z
in UB or z
in UB & not z
in UA by
A29,
A25,
XBOOLE_0: 3;
then z
in (G
. A) & not z
in (G
. B) or z
in (G
. B) & not z
in (G
. A) by
A26,
A22,
A31,
XBOOLE_0:def 4;
hence thesis by
A18;
end;
then
A33: (
card (
dom G))
c= (
card (
rng G)) by
CARD_1: 10;
(
rng G)
c= (
bool C)
proof
let a be
object;
reconsider aa = a as
set by
TARSKI: 1;
assume a
in (
rng G);
then
consider b be
object such that
A34: b
in (
dom G) and
A35: a
= (G
. b) by
FUNCT_1:def 3;
P[b, a] by
A14,
A15,
A34,
A35;
then aa
c= C by
XBOOLE_1: 17;
hence thesis;
end;
then (
card (
rng G))
c= (
card (
bool C)) by
CARD_1: 11;
then (
card (
bool L))
c= (
card (
bool C)) by
A33,
A14,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
then
A36: (
exp (2,
continuum ))
c= (
card (
bool C)) by
CARD_2: 31,
Th3;
(
card (
bool C))
= (
exp (2,(
card C))) by
CARD_2: 31;
then (
exp (2,
continuum ))
c= (
exp (2,
omega )) by
A36,
A2,
XBOOLE_1: 1;
then (
exp (2,
omega ))
in (
exp (2,
omega )) by
A1,
TOPGEN_3: 29;
hence contradiction;
end;
registration
cluster
Sorgenfrey-plane -> non
normal;
coherence by
Lm13;
end