jordan24.miz
begin
reserve p1,p2 for
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2),
C for
Simple_closed_curve,
P for
Subset of (
TOP-REAL 2);
definition
let n be
Element of
NAT , A be
Subset of (
TOP-REAL n), a,b be
Point of (
TOP-REAL n);
::
JORDAN24:def1
pred a,b
realize-max-dist-in A means a
in A & b
in A & for x,y be
Point of (
TOP-REAL n) st x
in A & y
in A holds (
dist (a,b))
>= (
dist (x,y));
end
set rl = (
- 1);
set rp = 1;
set a =
|[rl,
0 ]|;
set b =
|[rp,
0 ]|;
Lm1: the TopStruct of (
TOP-REAL 2)
= (
TopSpaceMetr (
Euclid 2)) by
EUCLID:def 8;
theorem ::
JORDAN24:1
Th1: for C be non
empty
compact
Subset of (
TOP-REAL 2) holds ex p1, p2 st (p1,p2)
realize-max-dist-in C
proof
let C be non
empty
compact
Subset of (
TOP-REAL 2);
reconsider D = C as
Subset of (
TopSpaceMetr (
Euclid 2)) by
Lm1;
A1: D is
compact by
Lm1,
COMPTS_1: 23;
then
consider x1,x2 be
Point of (
Euclid 2) such that
A2: x1
in D & x2
in D and
A3: (
dist (x1,x2))
= (
max_dist_max (D,D)) by
WEIERSTR: 33;
reconsider a = x1, b = x2 as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
EUCLID: 67;
take a, b;
thus a
in C & b
in C by
A2;
let x,y be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) such that
A4: x
in C & y
in C;
reconsider x9 = x, y9 = y as
Point of (
Euclid 2) by
EUCLID: 67;
(
dist (x9,y9))
<= (
max_dist_max (D,D)) by
A1,
A4,
WEIERSTR: 34;
then (
dist (x,y))
<= (
max_dist_max (D,D)) by
TOPREAL6:def 1;
hence thesis by
A3,
TOPREAL6:def 1;
end;
definition
let M be non
empty
MetrStruct;
let f be
Function of (
TopSpaceMetr M), (
TopSpaceMetr M);
::
JORDAN24:def2
attr f is
isometric means
:
Def2: ex g be
isometric
Function of M, M st g
= f;
end
registration
let M be non
empty
MetrStruct;
cluster
onto
isometric for
Function of (
TopSpaceMetr M), (
TopSpaceMetr M);
existence
proof
set f = the
onto
isometric
Function of M, M;
reconsider f as
Function of (
TopSpaceMetr M), (
TopSpaceMetr M);
take f;
thus thesis;
end;
end
registration
let M be non
empty
MetrSpace;
cluster
isometric ->
continuous for
Function of (
TopSpaceMetr M), (
TopSpaceMetr M);
coherence
proof
let f be
Function of (
TopSpaceMetr M), (
TopSpaceMetr M);
assume f is
isometric;
then
consider g be
isometric
Function of M, M such that
A1: g
= f;
let W be
Point of (
TopSpaceMetr M);
let G be
a_neighborhood of (f
. W);
reconsider fw = (f
. W), w = W as
Point of M;
(f
. W)
in (
Int G) by
CONNSP_2:def 1;
then
consider r be
Real such that
A2: r
>
0 and
A3: (
Ball (fw,r))
c= G by
GOBOARD6: 4;
reconsider H = (
Ball (w,r)) as
a_neighborhood of W by
A2,
GOBOARD6: 91;
take H;
thus (f
.: H)
c= G
proof
let a be
object;
assume a
in (f
.: H);
then
consider b be
object such that
A4: b
in (
dom f) and
A5: b
in H and
A6: (f
. b)
= a by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
reconsider b as
Point of (
TopSpaceMetr M) by
A4;
reconsider b9 = b as
Point of M;
(
dist (b9,w))
< r by
A5,
METRIC_1: 11;
then (
dist ((g
. b9),fw))
< r by
A1,
VECTMETR:def 3;
then a
in (
Ball (fw,r)) by
A1,
A6,
METRIC_1: 11;
hence thesis by
A3;
end;
end;
end
registration
let M be non
empty
MetrSpace;
cluster
onto
isometric ->
being_homeomorphism for
Function of (
TopSpaceMetr M), (
TopSpaceMetr M);
coherence
proof
let f be
Function of (
TopSpaceMetr M), (
TopSpaceMetr M);
assume
A1: f is
onto
isometric;
then
reconsider f1 = f as
onto
isometric
Function of (
TopSpaceMetr M), (
TopSpaceMetr M);
thus (
dom f)
= (
[#] (
TopSpaceMetr M)) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
consider g be
isometric
Function of M, M such that
A2: g
= f by
A1;
g is
onto by
A1,
A2;
hence (
rng f)
= (
[#] (
TopSpaceMetr M)) by
A2;
thus f is
one-to-one by
A2;
f1 is
continuous;
hence f is
continuous;
(f
" ) is
isometric
Function of (
TopSpaceMetr M), (
TopSpaceMetr M) by
A1,
Def2;
hence thesis;
end;
end
definition
let a be
Real;
::
JORDAN24:def3
func
Rotate (a) ->
Function of (
TOP-REAL 2), (
TOP-REAL 2) means
:
Def3: for p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) holds (it
. p)
=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((p
`1 )
+ ((p
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))), (
Im (
Rotate (((p
`1 )
+ ((p
`2 )
*
<i> )),a)))]|;
existence
proof
deffunc
F(
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2)) =
|[(
Re (
Rotate ((($1
`1 )
+ (($1
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))), (
Im (
Rotate ((($1
`1 )
+ (($1
`2 )
*
<i> )),a)))]|;
consider f be
Function of (
TOP-REAL 2), (
TOP-REAL 2) such that
A1: for p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) holds (f
. p)
=
F(p) from
FUNCT_2:sch 4;
take f;
thus thesis by
A1;
end;
uniqueness
proof
let f,g be
Function of (
TOP-REAL 2), (
TOP-REAL 2) such that
A2: for p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) holds (f
. p)
=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((p
`1 )
+ ((p
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))), (
Im (
Rotate (((p
`1 )
+ ((p
`2 )
*
<i> )),a)))]| and
A3: for p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) holds (g
. p)
=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((p
`1 )
+ ((p
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))), (
Im (
Rotate (((p
`1 )
+ ((p
`2 )
*
<i> )),a)))]|;
now
let p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
thus (f
. p)
=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((p
`1 )
+ ((p
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))), (
Im (
Rotate (((p
`1 )
+ ((p
`2 )
*
<i> )),a)))]| by
A2
.= (g
. p) by
A3;
end;
hence f
= g;
end;
end
Lm2:
now
let a be
Real;
let c be
Complex;
let i be
Integer;
(
cos (a
+ (
Arg c)))
= (
cos ((a
+ (
Arg c))
+ ((2
*
PI )
* i))) by
COMPLEX2: 9;
hence (
Rotate (c,a))
= (
Rotate (c,(a
+ ((2
*
PI )
* i)))) by
COMPLEX2: 8;
end;
Lm3:
now
let a be
Real;
let i be
Integer;
thus (
Rotate a)
= (
Rotate (a
+ ((2
*
PI )
* i)))
proof
let p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
set q = ((p
`1 )
+ ((p
`2 )
*
<i> ));
A1: (
Rotate (q,a))
= (
Rotate (q,(a
+ ((2
*
PI )
* i)))) by
Lm2;
thus ((
Rotate a)
. p)
=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (q,a))), (
Im (
Rotate (q,a)))]| by
Def3
.= ((
Rotate (a
+ ((2
*
PI )
* i)))
. p) by
A1,
Def3;
end;
end;
theorem ::
JORDAN24:2
Th2: for a be
Real holds for f be
Function of (
TopSpaceMetr (
Euclid 2)), (
TopSpaceMetr (
Euclid 2)) st f
= (
Rotate a) holds f is
onto
isometric
proof
let a be
Real;
consider A be
Real such that
A1: A
= (((2
*
PI )
* (
-
[\(a
/ (2
*
PI ))/]))
+ a) and
A2:
0
<= A and
A3: A
< (2
*
PI ) by
COMPLEX2: 1;
reconsider A as
Real;
let f be
Function of (
TopSpaceMetr (
Euclid 2)), (
TopSpaceMetr (
Euclid 2)) such that
A4: f
= (
Rotate a);
reconsider g = f as
Function of (
Euclid 2), (
Euclid 2);
A5: (
Rotate A)
= (
Rotate a) by
A1,
Lm3;
g is
onto
isometric
proof
thus (
rng g)
= the
carrier of (
Euclid 2)
proof
thus (
rng g)
c= the
carrier of (
Euclid 2);
let o be
object;
assume o
in the
carrier of (
Euclid 2);
then
reconsider p = o as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
EUCLID: 67;
set pz = ((p
`1 )
+ ((p
`2 )
*
<i> ));
reconsider pz as
Element of
COMPLEX by
XCMPLX_0:def 2;
set arg = (
Arg pz);
per cases ;
suppose
A6: pz
<>
0 ;
per cases ;
suppose A
<= arg;
then
A7:
0
<= (arg
- A) by
XREAL_1: 48;
set qz = (
Rotate (pz,(
- A)));
A8:
|.(
Rotate (pz,(
- A))).|
=
|.pz.| by
COMPLEX2: 53;
(arg
- A)
<= arg & arg
< (2
*
PI ) by
A2,
COMPTRIG: 34,
XREAL_1: 43;
then
A9: ((
- A)
+ arg)
< (2
*
PI ) by
XXREAL_0: 2;
qz
<>
0 by
A6,
COMPLEX2: 52;
then (
Arg qz)
= ((
- A)
+ arg) by
A7,
A9,
A8,
COMPTRIG:def 1;
then
A10: (
Rotate (qz,A))
= pz by
A8,
COMPTRIG: 62;
set q =
|[(
Re qz), (
Im qz)]|;
A11: (
dom g)
= the
carrier of (
Euclid 2) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
(g
. q)
=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((q
`1 )
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),A))), (
Im (
Rotate (((q
`1 )
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),A)))]| by
A4,
A5,
Def3
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((
Re qz)
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),A))), (
Im (
Rotate (((q
`1 )
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),A)))]| by
EUCLID: 52
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((
Re qz)
+ ((
Im qz)
*
<i> )),A))), (
Im (
Rotate (((q
`1 )
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),A)))]| by
EUCLID: 52
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((
Re qz)
+ ((
Im qz)
*
<i> )),A))), (
Im (
Rotate (((
Re qz)
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),A)))]| by
EUCLID: 52
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((
Re qz)
+ ((
Im qz)
*
<i> )),A))), (
Im (
Rotate (((
Re qz)
+ ((
Im qz)
*
<i> )),A)))]| by
EUCLID: 52
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (qz,A))), (
Im (
Rotate (((
Re qz)
+ ((
Im qz)
*
<i> )),A)))]| by
COMPLEX1: 13
.=
|[(
Re pz), (
Im pz)]| by
A10,
COMPLEX1: 13
.=
|[(p
`1 ), (
Im pz)]| by
COMPLEX1: 12
.=
|[(p
`1 ), (p
`2 )]| by
COMPLEX1: 12
.= p by
EUCLID: 53;
hence thesis by
A11,
Lm1,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
suppose A
> arg;
then (arg
- A)
<
0 by
XREAL_1: 49;
then
A12: ((2
*
PI )
+ (arg
- A))
< (2
*
PI ) by
XREAL_1: 30;
set qz = (
Rotate (pz,(
- A)));
set q =
|[(
Re qz), (
Im qz)]|;
A13: (
dom g)
= the
carrier of (
Euclid 2) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A14:
|.(
Rotate (pz,(
- A))).|
=
|.pz.| by
COMPLEX2: 53;
then qz
= ((
|.qz.|
* (
cos (((2
*
PI )
* 1)
+ ((
- A)
+ arg))))
+ ((
|.qz.|
* (
sin ((
- A)
+ arg)))
*
<i> )) by
COMPLEX2: 9;
then
A15: qz
= ((
|.qz.|
* (
cos ((2
*
PI )
+ (arg
- A))))
+ ((
|.qz.|
* (
sin (((2
*
PI )
* 1)
+ ((
- A)
+ arg))))
*
<i> )) by
COMPLEX2: 8;
0
<= ((2
*
PI )
- A) & arg
>=
0 by
A3,
COMPTRIG: 34,
XREAL_1: 48;
then
A16:
0
<= (((2
*
PI )
- A)
+ arg);
qz
<>
0 by
A6,
COMPLEX2: 52;
then (
Arg qz)
= ((2
*
PI )
+ (arg
- A)) by
A16,
A12,
A15,
COMPTRIG:def 1;
then (
Rotate (qz,A))
= ((
|.qz.|
* (
cos arg))
+ ((
|.qz.|
* (
sin (((2
*
PI )
* 1)
+ arg)))
*
<i> )) by
COMPLEX2: 9;
then (
Rotate (qz,A))
= ((
|.qz.|
* (
cos arg))
+ ((
|.qz.|
* (
sin arg))
*
<i> )) by
COMPLEX2: 8;
then
A17: (
Rotate (qz,A))
= pz by
A14,
COMPTRIG: 62;
(g
. q)
=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((q
`1 )
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),A))), (
Im (
Rotate (((q
`1 )
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),A)))]| by
A4,
A5,
Def3
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((
Re qz)
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),A))), (
Im (
Rotate (((q
`1 )
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),A)))]| by
EUCLID: 52
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((
Re qz)
+ ((
Im qz)
*
<i> )),A))), (
Im (
Rotate (((q
`1 )
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),A)))]| by
EUCLID: 52
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((
Re qz)
+ ((
Im qz)
*
<i> )),A))), (
Im (
Rotate (((
Re qz)
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),A)))]| by
EUCLID: 52
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((
Re qz)
+ ((
Im qz)
*
<i> )),A))), (
Im (
Rotate (((
Re qz)
+ ((
Im qz)
*
<i> )),A)))]| by
EUCLID: 52
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (qz,A))), (
Im (
Rotate (((
Re qz)
+ ((
Im qz)
*
<i> )),A)))]| by
COMPLEX1: 13
.=
|[(
Re pz), (
Im pz)]| by
A17,
COMPLEX1: 13
.=
|[(p
`1 ), (
Im pz)]| by
COMPLEX1: 12
.=
|[(p
`1 ), (p
`2 )]| by
COMPLEX1: 12
.= p by
EUCLID: 53;
hence thesis by
A13,
Lm1,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
end;
suppose
A18: pz
=
0 ;
reconsider z =
0 as
Element of
COMPLEX by
XCMPLX_0:def 2;
set q =
|[
0 ,
0 ]|;
A19: (
dom g)
= the
carrier of (
Euclid 2) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A20: (p
`1 )
=
0 by
A18,
COMPLEX1: 4,
COMPLEX1: 12;
(g
. q)
=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((q
`1 )
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))), (
Im (
Rotate (((q
`1 )
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),a)))]| by
A4,
Def3
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate ((z
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))), (
Im (
Rotate (((q
`1 )
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),a)))]| by
EUCLID: 52
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate ((z
+ (z
*
<i> )),a))), (
Im (
Rotate (((q
`1 )
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),a)))]| by
EUCLID: 52
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate ((z
+ (z
*
<i> )),a))), (
Im (
Rotate ((z
+ ((q
`2 )
*
<i> )),a)))]| by
EUCLID: 52
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (z,a))), (
Im (
Rotate (z,a)))]| by
EUCLID: 52
.=
|[(
Re z), (
Im (
Rotate (z,a)))]| by
COMPLEX2: 52
.=
|[(
Re z), (
Im z)]| by
COMPLEX2: 52
.= p by
A18,
A20,
COMPLEX1: 4,
EUCLID: 53;
hence thesis by
A19,
Lm1,
FUNCT_1:def 3;
end;
end;
let X,Y be
Point of (
Euclid 2);
reconsider x = X, y = Y, gx = (g
. X), gy = (g
. Y) as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
EUCLID: 67;
A21: (
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((x
`1 )
+ ((x
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))), (
Im (
Rotate (((x
`1 )
+ ((x
`2 )
*
<i> )),a)))]|
`1 )
= (
Re (
Rotate (((x
`1 )
+ ((x
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))) & (
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((x
`1 )
+ ((x
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))), (
Im (
Rotate (((x
`1 )
+ ((x
`2 )
*
<i> )),a)))]|
`2 )
= (
Im (
Rotate (((x
`1 )
+ ((x
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))) by
EUCLID: 52;
reconsider xx = ((x
`1 )
+ ((x
`2 )
*
<i> )), yy = ((y
`1 )
+ ((y
`2 )
*
<i> )) as
Element of
COMPLEX by
XCMPLX_0:def 2;
A22: (
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((y
`1 )
+ ((y
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))), (
Im (
Rotate (((y
`1 )
+ ((y
`2 )
*
<i> )),a)))]|
`1 )
= (
Re (
Rotate (((y
`1 )
+ ((y
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))) & (
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((y
`1 )
+ ((y
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))), (
Im (
Rotate (((y
`1 )
+ ((y
`2 )
*
<i> )),a)))]|
`2 )
= (
Im (
Rotate (((y
`1 )
+ ((y
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))) by
EUCLID: 52;
A23: (
Re ((y
`1 )
+ ((y
`2 )
*
<i> )))
= (y
`1 ) & (
Im ((y
`1 )
+ ((y
`2 )
*
<i> )))
= (y
`2 ) by
COMPLEX1: 12;
A24: (((
sin a)
^2 )
+ ((
cos a)
^2 ))
= 1 by
SIN_COS: 29;
A25: (
Re ((x
`1 )
+ ((x
`2 )
*
<i> )))
= (x
`1 ) & (
Im ((x
`1 )
+ ((x
`2 )
*
<i> )))
= (x
`2 ) by
COMPLEX1: 12;
x
=
|[(x
`1 ), (x
`2 )]| & y
=
|[(y
`1 ), (y
`2 )]| by
EUCLID: 53;
hence (
dist (X,Y))
= (
sqrt ((((x
`1 )
- (y
`1 ))
^2 )
+ (((x
`2 )
- (y
`2 ))
^2 ))) by
GOBOARD6: 6
.= (
sqrt ((((((x
`1 )
* (x
`1 ))
- ((2
* (x
`1 ))
* (y
`1 )))
+ ((y
`1 )
* (y
`1 )))
* (((
sin a)
* (
sin a))
+ ((
cos a)
* (
cos a))))
+ (((((x
`2 )
* (x
`2 ))
- ((2
* (x
`2 ))
* (y
`2 )))
+ ((y
`2 )
* (y
`2 )))
* (((
sin a)
^2 )
+ ((
cos a)
^2 ))))) by
A24
.= (
sqrt ((((((x
`1 )
* (
cos a))
- ((x
`2 )
* (
sin a)))
- (((y
`1 )
* (
cos a))
- ((y
`2 )
* (
sin a))))
^2 )
+ ((((((x
`1 )
* (
sin a))
+ ((x
`2 )
* (
cos a)))
^2 )
- ((2
* (((x
`1 )
* (
sin a))
+ ((x
`2 )
* (
cos a))))
* (((y
`1 )
* (
sin a))
+ ((y
`2 )
* (
cos a)))))
+ ((((y
`1 )
* (
sin a))
+ ((y
`2 )
* (
cos a)))
^2 ))))
.= (
sqrt ((((
Re (
Rotate (xx,a)))
- (((y
`1 )
* (
cos a))
- ((y
`2 )
* (
sin a))))
^2 )
+ (((((x
`1 )
* (
sin a))
+ ((x
`2 )
* (
cos a)))
- (((y
`1 )
* (
sin a))
+ ((y
`2 )
* (
cos a))))
^2 ))) by
A25,
COMPLEX2: 56
.= (
sqrt ((((
Re (
Rotate (xx,a)))
- (((y
`1 )
* (
cos a))
- ((y
`2 )
* (
sin a))))
^2 )
+ (((
Im (
Rotate (xx,a)))
- (((y
`1 )
* (
sin a))
+ ((y
`2 )
* (
cos a))))
^2 ))) by
A25,
COMPLEX2: 56
.= (
sqrt ((((
Re (
Rotate (xx,a)))
- (
Re (
Rotate (yy,a))))
^2 )
+ (((
Im (
Rotate (xx,a)))
- (((y
`1 )
* (
sin a))
+ ((y
`2 )
* (
cos a))))
^2 ))) by
A23,
COMPLEX2: 56
.= (
sqrt ((((
Re (
Rotate (xx,a)))
- (
Re (
Rotate (yy,a))))
^2 )
+ (((
Im (
Rotate (xx,a)))
- (
Im (
Rotate (yy,a))))
^2 ))) by
A23,
COMPLEX2: 56
.= (
dist (
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((x
`1 )
+ ((x
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))), (
Im (
Rotate (((x
`1 )
+ ((x
`2 )
*
<i> )),a)))]|,
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((y
`1 )
+ ((y
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))), (
Im (
Rotate (((y
`1 )
+ ((y
`2 )
*
<i> )),a)))]|)) by
A21,
A22,
TOPREAL6: 92
.= (
dist (
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((x
`1 )
+ ((x
`2 )
*
<i> )),a))), (
Im (
Rotate (((x
`1 )
+ ((x
`2 )
*
<i> )),a)))]|,gy)) by
A4,
Def3
.= (
dist (gx,gy)) by
A4,
Def3
.= (
dist ((g
. X),(g
. Y))) by
TOPREAL6:def 1;
end;
hence thesis;
end;
theorem ::
JORDAN24:3
Th3: for A,B,D be
Real st (p1,p2)
realize-max-dist-in P holds (((
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))
. p1),((
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))
. p2))
realize-max-dist-in ((
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))
.: P)
proof
let A,B,D be
Real;
set a = p1, b = p2, C = P;
A1: (
dom (
AffineMap (A,B,A,D)))
= the
carrier of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
assume
A2: (a,b)
realize-max-dist-in C;
then a
in C;
hence ((
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))
. a)
in ((
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))
.: C) by
A1,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
b
in C by
A2;
hence ((
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))
. b)
in ((
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))
.: C) by
A1,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
let x,y be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
assume x
in ((
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))
.: C);
then
consider X be
object such that
A3: X
in (
dom (
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))) and
A4: X
in C and
A5: ((
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))
. X)
= x by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
reconsider X as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
A3;
assume y
in ((
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))
.: C);
then
consider Y be
object such that
A6: Y
in (
dom (
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))) and
A7: Y
in C and
A8: ((
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))
. Y)
= y by
FUNCT_1:def 6;
reconsider Y as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
A6;
A9: (((X
`1 )
- (Y
`1 ))
^2 )
>=
0 & (((X
`2 )
- (Y
`2 ))
^2 )
>=
0 by
XREAL_1: 63;
A10: (((a
`1 )
- (b
`1 ))
^2 )
>=
0 & (((a
`2 )
- (b
`2 ))
^2 )
>=
0 by
XREAL_1: 63;
A11: (A
^2 )
>=
0 by
XREAL_1: 63;
then
A12: (
sqrt (A
^2 ))
>=
0 by
SQUARE_1:def 2;
A13: (
dist (((
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))
. a),((
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))
. b)))
= (
dist (
|[((A
* (a
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (a
`2 ))
+ D)]|,((
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))
. b))) by
JGRAPH_2:def 2
.= (
dist (
|[((A
* (a
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (a
`2 ))
+ D)]|,
|[((A
* (b
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (b
`2 ))
+ D)]|)) by
JGRAPH_2:def 2
.= (
sqrt ((((
|[((A
* (a
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (a
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`1 )
- (
|[((A
* (b
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (b
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`1 ))
^2 )
+ (((
|[((A
* (a
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (a
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`2 )
- (
|[((A
* (b
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (b
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`2 ))
^2 ))) by
TOPREAL6: 92
.= (
sqrt (((((A
* (a
`1 ))
+ B)
- (
|[((A
* (b
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (b
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`1 ))
^2 )
+ (((
|[((A
* (a
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (a
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`2 )
- (
|[((A
* (b
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (b
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`2 ))
^2 ))) by
EUCLID: 52
.= (
sqrt (((((A
* (a
`1 ))
+ B)
- ((A
* (b
`1 ))
+ B))
^2 )
+ (((
|[((A
* (a
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (a
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`2 )
- (
|[((A
* (b
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (b
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`2 ))
^2 ))) by
EUCLID: 52
.= (
sqrt (((((A
* (a
`1 ))
+ B)
- ((A
* (b
`1 ))
+ B))
^2 )
+ ((((A
* (a
`2 ))
+ D)
- (
|[((A
* (b
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (b
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`2 ))
^2 ))) by
EUCLID: 52
.= (
sqrt (((((A
* (a
`1 ))
+ B)
- ((A
* (b
`1 ))
+ B))
^2 )
+ ((((A
* (a
`2 ))
+ D)
- ((A
* (b
`2 ))
+ D))
^2 ))) by
EUCLID: 52
.= (
sqrt ((A
^2 )
* ((((a
`1 )
- (b
`1 ))
^2 )
+ (((a
`2 )
- (b
`2 ))
^2 ))))
.= ((
sqrt (A
^2 ))
* (
sqrt ((((a
`1 )
- (b
`1 ))
^2 )
+ (((a
`2 )
- (b
`2 ))
^2 )))) by
A11,
A10,
SQUARE_1: 29
.= ((
sqrt (A
^2 ))
* (
dist (a,b))) by
TOPREAL6: 92;
A14: (
dist (x,y))
= (
dist (
|[((A
* (X
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (X
`2 ))
+ D)]|,((
AffineMap (A,B,A,D))
. Y))) by
A5,
A8,
JGRAPH_2:def 2
.= (
dist (
|[((A
* (X
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (X
`2 ))
+ D)]|,
|[((A
* (Y
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (Y
`2 ))
+ D)]|)) by
JGRAPH_2:def 2
.= (
sqrt ((((
|[((A
* (X
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (X
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`1 )
- (
|[((A
* (Y
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (Y
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`1 ))
^2 )
+ (((
|[((A
* (X
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (X
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`2 )
- (
|[((A
* (Y
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (Y
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`2 ))
^2 ))) by
TOPREAL6: 92
.= (
sqrt (((((A
* (X
`1 ))
+ B)
- (
|[((A
* (Y
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (Y
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`1 ))
^2 )
+ (((
|[((A
* (X
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (X
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`2 )
- (
|[((A
* (Y
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (Y
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`2 ))
^2 ))) by
EUCLID: 52
.= (
sqrt (((((A
* (X
`1 ))
+ B)
- ((A
* (Y
`1 ))
+ B))
^2 )
+ (((
|[((A
* (X
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (X
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`2 )
- (
|[((A
* (Y
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (Y
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`2 ))
^2 ))) by
EUCLID: 52
.= (
sqrt (((((A
* (X
`1 ))
+ B)
- ((A
* (Y
`1 ))
+ B))
^2 )
+ ((((A
* (X
`2 ))
+ D)
- (
|[((A
* (Y
`1 ))
+ B), ((A
* (Y
`2 ))
+ D)]|
`2 ))
^2 ))) by
EUCLID: 52
.= (
sqrt (((((A
* (X
`1 ))
+ B)
- ((A
* (Y
`1 ))
+ B))
^2 )
+ ((((A
* (X
`2 ))
+ D)
- ((A
* (Y
`2 ))
+ D))
^2 ))) by
EUCLID: 52
.= (
sqrt ((A
^2 )
* ((((X
`1 )
- (Y
`1 ))
^2 )
+ (((X
`2 )
- (Y
`2 ))
^2 ))))
.= ((
sqrt (A
^2 ))
* (
sqrt ((((X
`1 )
- (Y
`1 ))
^2 )
+ (((X
`2 )
- (Y
`2 ))
^2 )))) by
A11,
A9,
SQUARE_1: 29
.= ((
sqrt (A
^2 ))
* (
dist (X,Y))) by
TOPREAL6: 92;
(
dist (a,b))
>= (
dist (X,Y)) by
A2,
A4,
A7;
hence thesis by
A13,
A14,
A12,
XREAL_1: 64;
end;
theorem ::
JORDAN24:4
Th4: for A be
Real st (p1,p2)
realize-max-dist-in P holds (((
Rotate A)
. p1),((
Rotate A)
. p2))
realize-max-dist-in ((
Rotate A)
.: P)
proof
let A be
Real;
reconsider f = (
Rotate A) as
Function of (
TopSpaceMetr (
Euclid 2)), (
TopSpaceMetr (
Euclid 2)) by
Lm1;
set C = P;
A1: (
dom (
Rotate A))
= the
carrier of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
assume
A2: (p1,p2)
realize-max-dist-in C;
then p1
in C & p2
in C;
hence ((
Rotate A)
. p1)
in ((
Rotate A)
.: C) & ((
Rotate A)
. p2)
in ((
Rotate A)
.: C) by
A1,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
let x,y be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) such that
A3: x
in ((
Rotate A)
.: C) and
A4: y
in ((
Rotate A)
.: C);
f is
isometric by
Th2;
then
consider g be
isometric
Function of (
Euclid 2), (
Euclid 2) such that
A5: f
= g;
consider yy be
object such that
A6: yy
in (
dom (
Rotate A)) and
A7: yy
in C and
A8: ((
Rotate A)
. yy)
= y by
A4,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
reconsider yy as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
A6;
consider xx be
object such that
A9: xx
in (
dom (
Rotate A)) and
A10: xx
in C and
A11: ((
Rotate A)
. xx)
= x by
A3,
FUNCT_1:def 6;
reconsider xx as
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
A9;
reconsider p19 = p1, p29 = p2, xx9 = xx, yy9 = yy as
Point of (
Euclid 2) by
EUCLID: 67;
(
dist (p1,p2))
>= (
dist (xx,yy)) by
A2,
A10,
A7;
then (
dist (p19,p29))
>= (
dist (xx,yy)) by
TOPREAL6:def 1;
then (
dist (p19,p29))
>= (
dist (xx9,yy9)) by
TOPREAL6:def 1;
then (
dist ((g
. p19),(g
. p29)))
>= (
dist (xx9,yy9)) by
VECTMETR:def 3;
then (
dist ((g
. p19),(g
. p29)))
>= (
dist ((g
. xx9),(g
. yy9))) by
VECTMETR:def 3;
then (
dist (((
Rotate A)
. p1),((
Rotate A)
. p2)))
>= (
dist ((g
. xx9),(g
. yy9))) by
A5,
TOPREAL6:def 1;
hence thesis by
A11,
A8,
A5,
TOPREAL6:def 1;
end;
theorem ::
JORDAN24:5
Th5: for z be
Complex, r be
Real holds (
Rotate (z,(
- r)))
= (
Rotate (z,((2
*
PI )
- r)))
proof
let z be
Complex, r be
Real;
thus (
Rotate (z,(
- r)))
= ((
|.z.|
* (
cos (((2
*
PI )
* 1)
+ ((
- r)
+ (
Arg z)))))
+ ((
|.z.|
* (
sin ((
- r)
+ (
Arg z))))
*
<i> )) by
COMPLEX2: 9
.= (
Rotate (z,((2
*
PI )
- r))) by
COMPLEX2: 8;
end;
theorem ::
JORDAN24:6
Th6: for r be
Real holds (
Rotate (
- r))
= (
Rotate ((2
*
PI )
- r))
proof
let r be
Real;
now
let p be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2);
thus ((
Rotate ((2
*
PI )
- r))
. p)
=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((p
`1 )
+ ((p
`2 )
*
<i> )),((2
*
PI )
- r)))), (
Im (
Rotate (((p
`1 )
+ ((p
`2 )
*
<i> )),((2
*
PI )
- r))))]| by
Def3
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((p
`1 )
+ ((p
`2 )
*
<i> )),(
- r)))), (
Im (
Rotate (((p
`1 )
+ ((p
`2 )
*
<i> )),((2
*
PI )
- r))))]| by
Th5
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((p
`1 )
+ ((p
`2 )
*
<i> )),(
- r)))), (
Im (
Rotate (((p
`1 )
+ ((p
`2 )
*
<i> )),(
- r))))]| by
Th5;
end;
hence thesis by
Def3;
end;
Lm4: for T1,T2 be
TopSpace, f be
Function of T1, T2, g be
Function of the TopStruct of T1, the TopStruct of T2 st g
= f & g is
being_homeomorphism holds f is
being_homeomorphism by
PRE_TOPC: 34;
theorem ::
JORDAN24:7
ex f be
Homeomorphism of (
TOP-REAL 2) st (
|[(
- 1),
0 ]|,
|[1,
0 ]|)
realize-max-dist-in (f
.: C)
proof
reconsider z =
0 as
Element of
COMPLEX by
XCMPLX_0:def 2;
consider x,y be
Point of (
TOP-REAL 2) such that
A1: x
<> y and
A2: x
in C & y
in C by
TOPREAL2: 4;
A3: (
dist (x,y))
>
0 by
A1,
JORDAN1K: 22;
consider p1, p2 such that
A4: (p1,p2)
realize-max-dist-in C by
Th1;
reconsider g = (
AffineMap (1,(
- (p1
`1 )),1,(
- (p1
`2 )))) as
being_homeomorphism
Function of (
TOP-REAL 2), (
TOP-REAL 2) by
JGRAPH_7: 50;
set D = (g
.: C), q1 = (g
. p1), q2 = (g
. p2);
set arg = (
Arg ((q2
`1 )
+ ((q2
`2 )
*
<i> )));
reconsider qq = ((q2
`1 )
+ ((q2
`2 )
*
<i> )) as
Element of
COMPLEX by
XCMPLX_0:def 2;
set h = (
Rotate (
- arg));
A5: h
= (
Rotate ((2
*
PI )
- arg)) by
Th6;
(q1,q2)
realize-max-dist-in D by
A4,
Th3;
then
A6: (((
Rotate ((2
*
PI )
- arg))
. q1),((
Rotate ((2
*
PI )
- arg))
. q2))
realize-max-dist-in ((
Rotate ((2
*
PI )
- arg))
.: D) by
Th4;
reconsider h0 = h as
onto
isometric
Function of (
TopSpaceMetr (
Euclid 2)), (
TopSpaceMetr (
Euclid 2)) by
Lm1,
Th2;
A7: (
Rotate (z,(
- arg)))
=
0 by
COMPLEX2: 52;
h0 is
being_homeomorphism;
then
reconsider h as
being_homeomorphism
Function of (
TOP-REAL 2), (
TOP-REAL 2) by
Lm1,
Lm4;
set F = (h
.: D), s1 = (h
. q1), s2 = (h
. q2);
q1
=
|[((1
* (p1
`1 ))
+ (
- (p1
`1 ))), ((1
* (p1
`2 ))
+ (
- (p1
`2 )))]| by
JGRAPH_2:def 2
.=
|[
0 ,
0 ]|;
then
A8: s1
=
|[(
Re (
Rotate (((
|[
0 ,
0 ]|
`1 )
+ ((
|[
0 ,
0 ]|
`2 )
*
<i> )),(
- arg)))), (
Im (
Rotate (((
|[
0 ,
0 ]|
`1 )
+ ((
|[
0 ,
0 ]|
`2 )
*
<i> )),(
- arg))))]| by
Def3
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate ((
0
+ ((
|[
0 ,
0 ]|
`2 )
*
<i> )),(
- arg)))), (
Im (
Rotate (((
|[
0 ,
0 ]|
`1 )
+ ((
|[
0 ,
0 ]|
`2 )
*
<i> )),(
- arg))))]| by
EUCLID: 52
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate ((
0
+ (
0
*
<i> )),(
- arg)))), (
Im (
Rotate (((
|[
0 ,
0 ]|
`1 )
+ ((
|[
0 ,
0 ]|
`2 )
*
<i> )),(
- arg))))]| by
EUCLID: 52
.=
|[(
Re (
Rotate ((
0
+ (
0
*
<i> )),(
- arg)))), (
Im (
Rotate ((
0
+ ((
|[
0 ,
0 ]|
`2 )
*
<i> )),(
- arg))))]| by
EUCLID: 52
.=
|[
0 ,
0 ]| by
A7,
COMPLEX1: 4,
EUCLID: 52;
(
Rotate (qq,(
- arg)))
= (
|.((q2
`1 )
+ ((q2
`2 )
*
<i> )).|
+ (
0
*
<i> )) by
COMPLEX2: 55;
then
A9: s2
=
|[(
Re (
|.((q2
`1 )
+ ((q2
`2 )
*
<i> )).|
+ (
0
*
<i> ))), (
Im (
|.((q2
`1 )
+ ((q2
`2 )
*
<i> )).|
+ (
0
*
<i> )))]| by
Def3
.=
|[
|.((q2
`1 )
+ ((q2
`2 )
*
<i> )).|, (
Im (
|.((q2
`1 )
+ ((q2
`2 )
*
<i> )).|
+ (
0
*
<i> )))]| by
COMPLEX1: 12
.=
|[
|.((q2
`1 )
+ ((q2
`2 )
*
<i> )).|,
0 ]| by
COMPLEX1: 12;
then
A10: (s2
`2 )
=
0 by
EUCLID: 52;
(
dist (p1,p2))
>= (
dist (x,y)) by
A4,
A2;
then
A11: p1
<> p2 by
A3,
TOPREAL6: 93;
A12:
now
(
dom g)
= the
carrier of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A13: q1
<> q2 by
A11,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
assume
A14: (s2
`1 )
=
0 ;
(
dom h)
= the
carrier of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then s1
<> s2 by
A13,
FUNCT_1:def 4;
hence contradiction by
A8,
A9,
A14,
EUCLID: 52;
end;
(s2
`1 )
=
|.((q2
`1 )
+ ((q2
`2 )
*
<i> )).| by
A9,
EUCLID: 52;
then (s2
`1 )
>=
0 by
COMPLEX1: 46;
then
reconsider j = (
AffineMap ((2
/ (s2
`1 )),(
- 1),(2
/ (s2
`1 )),
0 )) as
being_homeomorphism
Function of (
TOP-REAL 2), (
TOP-REAL 2) by
A12,
JGRAPH_7: 50;
set E = (j
.: F), r1 = (j
. s1), r2 = (j
. s2);
A15: r2
=
|[(((2
/ (s2
`1 ))
* (s2
`1 ))
+ (
- 1)), (((2
/ (s2
`1 ))
* (s2
`2 ))
+
0 )]| by
JGRAPH_2:def 2
.=
|[(2
+ (
- 1)), (((2
/ (s2
`1 ))
* (s2
`2 ))
+
0 )]| by
A12,
XCMPLX_1: 87
.= b by
A10;
set f = (j
* (h
* g));
(h
* g) is
being_homeomorphism by
TOPS_2: 57;
then f is
being_homeomorphism by
TOPS_2: 57;
then
reconsider f as
Homeomorphism of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
TOPGRP_1:def 4;
take f;
((h
* g)
.: C)
= F by
RELAT_1: 126;
then
A16: (f
.: C)
= E by
RELAT_1: 126;
r1
=
|[(((2
/ (s2
`1 ))
* (s1
`1 ))
+ (
- 1)), (((2
/ (s2
`1 ))
* (s1
`2 ))
+
0 )]| by
JGRAPH_2:def 2
.=
|[(((2
/ (s2
`1 ))
*
0 )
+ (
- 1)), (((2
/ (s2
`1 ))
* (s1
`2 ))
+
0 )]| by
A8,
EUCLID: 52
.= a by
A8,
EUCLID: 52;
hence thesis by
A5,
A15,
A16,
A6,
Th3;
end;
definition
let T1,T2 be
TopStruct;
let f be
Function of T1, T2;
::
JORDAN24:def4
attr f is
closed means for A be
Subset of T1 st A is
closed holds (f
.: A) is
closed;
end
theorem ::
JORDAN24:8
for X,Y be non
empty
TopSpace, f be
continuous
Function of X, Y st f is
one-to-one
onto holds f is
being_homeomorphism iff f is
closed
proof
let X,Y be non
empty
TopSpace;
let f be
continuous
Function of X, Y such that
A1: f is
one-to-one
onto;
thus f is
being_homeomorphism implies f is
closed by
TOPS_2: 58;
assume
A2: for A be
Subset of X st A is
closed holds (f
.: A) is
closed;
A3: (
[#] X)
= the
carrier of X & (
[#] Y)
= the
carrier of Y;
A4: (
dom f)
= the
carrier of X by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A5:
now
let A be
Subset of X;
assume (f
.: A) is
closed;
then (f
" (f
.: A)) is
closed by
PRE_TOPC:def 6;
hence A is
closed by
A1,
A4,
FUNCT_1: 94;
end;
thus thesis by
A1,
A2,
A4,
A3,
A5,
TOPS_2: 58;
end;
theorem ::
JORDAN24:9
Th9: for X be
set, A be
Subset of X holds (A
` )
=
{} iff A
= X by
XBOOLE_1: 37;
theorem ::
JORDAN24:10
for T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace, f be
Function of T1, T2 st f is
being_homeomorphism holds for A be
Subset of T1 st A is
connected holds (f
.: A) is
connected by
TOPS_2: 61;
theorem ::
JORDAN24:11
Th11: for T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace, f be
Function of T1, T2 st f is
being_homeomorphism holds for A be
Subset of T1 st A is
a_component holds (f
.: A) is
a_component
proof
let T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace, f be
Function of T1, T2;
assume
A1: f is
being_homeomorphism;
let A be
Subset of T1;
assume that
A2: A is
connected and
A3: for B be
Subset of T1 st B is
connected holds A
c= B implies A
= B;
thus (f
.: A) is
connected by
A1,
A2,
TOPS_2: 61;
let B be
Subset of T2;
(
rng f)
= the
carrier of T2 by
A1;
then
A4: (f
.: (f
" B))
= B by
FUNCT_1: 77;
A5: (f
" (f
.: A))
= A by
A1,
FUNCT_1: 94;
assume that
A6: B is
connected and
A7: (f
.: A)
c= B;
(f
" B) is
connected by
A1,
A6,
TOPS_2: 62;
hence thesis by
A3,
A4,
A5,
A7,
RELAT_1: 143;
end;
theorem ::
JORDAN24:12
Th12: for T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace, f be
Function of T1, T2, A be
Subset of T1 holds (f
| A) is
Function of (T1
| A), (T2
| (f
.: A))
proof
let T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace, f be
Function of T1, T2, A be
Subset of T1;
A1: (
rng (f
| A))
= (f
.: A) by
RELAT_1: 115;
(
dom f)
= the
carrier of T1 by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
then
A2: (
dom (f
| A))
= A by
RELAT_1: 62;
(
[#] (T1
| A))
= A & (
[#] (T2
| (f
.: A)))
= (f
.: A) by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
hence thesis by
A2,
A1,
FUNCT_2: 2;
end;
theorem ::
JORDAN24:13
Th13: for T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace, f be
Function of T1, T2 st f is
continuous holds for A be
Subset of T1, g be
Function of (T1
| A), (T2
| (f
.: A)) st g
= (f
| A) holds g is
continuous
proof
let T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace;
let f be
Function of T1, T2;
assume
A1: f is
continuous;
let A be
Subset of T1;
let g be
Function of (T1
| A), (T2
| (f
.: A));
assume
A2: g
= (f
| A);
A3: (
dom f)
= the
carrier of T1 by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A4: (
[#] (T1
| A))
= A by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
per cases ;
suppose A is
empty;
hence thesis by
TIETZE: 4;
end;
suppose A is non
empty;
then
reconsider S1 = (T1
| A), S2 = (T2
| (f
.: A)) as non
empty
TopSpace by
A3;
(f
| A)
= (f
| (T1
| A)) by
A4,
TMAP_1:def 3;
then
A5: g is
continuous
Function of S1, T2 by
A1,
A2;
g is
Function of S1, S2;
hence thesis by
A5,
JORDAN16: 8;
end;
end;
theorem ::
JORDAN24:14
Th14: for T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace, f be
Function of T1, T2 st f is
being_homeomorphism holds for A be
Subset of T1, g be
Function of (T1
| A), (T2
| (f
.: A)) st g
= (f
| A) holds g is
being_homeomorphism
proof
let T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace;
let f be
Function of T1, T2;
assume that
A1: (
dom f)
= (
[#] T1) and
A2: (
rng f)
= (
[#] T2) and
A3: f is
one-to-one and
A4: f is
continuous and
A5: (f
" ) is
continuous;
let A be
Subset of T1;
f is
onto by
A2;
then
A6: (f qua
Function
" )
= (f
" ) by
A3,
TOPS_2:def 4;
then
A7: ((f
" )
.: (f
.: A))
= (f
" (f
.: A)) by
A3,
FUNCT_1: 85
.= A by
A1,
A3,
FUNCT_1: 94;
A8: (
dom f)
= the
carrier of T1 by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
let g be
Function of (T1
| A), (T2
| (f
.: A));
assume
A9: g
= (f
| A);
(
[#] (T1
| A))
= A & (
[#] (T2
| (f
.: A)))
= (f
.: A) by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
hence
A10: (
dom g)
= (
[#] (T1
| A)) & (
rng g)
= (
[#] (T2
| (f
.: A))) by
A9,
A8,
RELAT_1: 62,
RELAT_1: 115;
A11: g is
onto by
A10;
thus g is
one-to-one by
A3,
A9,
FUNCT_1: 52;
then
A12: (g qua
Function
" )
= (g
" ) by
A11,
TOPS_2:def 4;
thus g is
continuous by
A4,
A9,
Th13;
(g
" )
= ((f
" )
| (f
.: A)) by
A3,
A9,
A6,
A12,
RFUNCT_2: 17;
hence thesis by
A5,
A7,
Th13;
end;
theorem ::
JORDAN24:15
Th15: for T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace, f be
Function of T1, T2 st f is
being_homeomorphism holds for A,B be
Subset of T1 st A
is_a_component_of B holds (f
.: A)
is_a_component_of (f
.: B)
proof
let T1,T2 be non
empty
TopSpace, f be
Function of T1, T2 such that
A1: f is
being_homeomorphism;
let A,B be
Subset of T1;
given A1 be
Subset of (T1
| B) such that
A2: A1
= A and
A3: A1 is
a_component;
A4: (
[#] (T2
| (f
.: B)))
= (f
.: B) by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
A5: (
dom f)
= the
carrier of T1 by
FUNCT_2:def 1;
A6: (
[#] (T1
| B))
= B by
PRE_TOPC:def 5;
then
reconsider A2 = (f
.: A) as
Subset of (T2
| (f
.: B)) by
A2,
A4,
RELAT_1: 123;
per cases ;
suppose
A7: B is
empty;
then (f
.: B)
=
{} ;
then
A8: A2
=
{} by
A4,
XBOOLE_1: 3;
(
{} T2)
= (f
.: B) by
A7;
hence thesis by
A8,
JORDAN1K: 6;
end;
suppose B is non
empty;
then
reconsider S1 = (T1
| B), S2 = (T2
| (f
.: B)) as non
empty
TopSpace by
A5;
take A2;
thus A2
= (f
.: A);
reconsider fB = (f
| B) as
Function of S1, S2 by
Th12;
(fB
.: A)
= A2 by
A2,
A6,
RELAT_1: 129;
hence thesis by
A1,
A2,
A3,
Th11,
Th14;
end;
end;
theorem ::
JORDAN24:16
for S be
Subset of (
TOP-REAL 2), f be
Homeomorphism of (
TOP-REAL 2) st S is
Jordan holds (f
.: S) is
Jordan
proof
let S be
Subset of (
TOP-REAL 2), f be
Homeomorphism of (
TOP-REAL 2);
set s = the
Element of (S
` );
assume
A1: (S
` )
<>
{} ;
then s
in (S
` );
then
reconsider s as
Element of (
TOP-REAL 2);
given A1,A2 be
Subset of (
TOP-REAL 2) such that
A2: (S
` )
= (A1
\/ A2) and
A3: A1
misses A2 and
A4: ((
Cl A1)
\ A1)
= ((
Cl A2)
\ A2) and
A5: A1
is_a_component_of (S
` ) & A2
is_a_component_of (S
` );
A6: not s
in S by
A1,
XBOOLE_0:def 5;
hereby
assume ((f
.: S)
` )
=
{} ;
then (f
.: S)
= the
carrier of (
TOP-REAL 2) by
Th9;
then ex s9 be
Element of (
TOP-REAL 2) st s9
in S & (f
. s)
= (f
. s9) by
FUNCT_2: 65;
hence contradiction by
A6,
FUNCT_2: 56;
end;
take B1 = (f
.: A1), B2 = (f
.: A2);
(f
.: (A1
\/ A2))
= (B1
\/ B2) by
RELAT_1: 120;
hence ((f
.: S)
` )
= (B1
\/ B2) by
A2,
JORDAN1K: 5;
thus B1
misses B2 by
A3,
FUNCT_1: 66;
thus ((
Cl B1)
\ B1)
= ((f
.: (
Cl A1))
\ B1) by
TOPS_2: 60
.= (f
.: ((
Cl A2)
\ A2)) by
A4,
FUNCT_1: 64
.= ((f
.: (
Cl A2))
\ B2) by
FUNCT_1: 64
.= ((
Cl B2)
\ B2) by
TOPS_2: 60;
(f
.: (S
` ))
= ((f
.: S)
` ) by
JORDAN1K: 5;
hence thesis by
A5,
Th15;
end;